Reply to Faustus the Manichæan 14

sant'Agostino d'Ippona (354–430 d.C.) · Contra Faustum Manichaeum · PL 42, 207–518

14.1 Faustus abhors Moses for the awful curse he has pronounced upon Christ. Augustin expounds the Christian doctrine of the suffering Saviour by comparing Old and New Testament passages PL 42, 293

1. Faustus said: If you ask why we do not believe Moses, it is on account of our love and reverence for Christ. The most reckless man cannot regard with pleasure a person who has cursed his father. So we abhor Moses, not so much for his blasphemy of everything human and divine, as for the awful curse he has pronounced upon Christ the Son of God, who for our salvation hung on the tree. Whether Moses did this intentionally or not is your concern. Either way, he cannot be excused, or considered worthy of belief. His words are, "Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree." You tell me to believe this man, though, if he was inspired, he must have cursed Christ knowingly and intentionally; and if he did it in ignorance, he cannot have been divine. Take either alternative. Moses was no prophet, and while cursing in his usual manner, he fell ignorantly into the sin of blasphemy against God. Or he was indeed divine, and foresaw the future; and from ill-will to our salvation, he directs the venom of his malediction against Him who was to accomplish that salvation on a tree. He who thus injures the Son cannot surely have seen or known the Father. He who knew nothing of the final ascension of the Son, cannot surely have foretold His advent. Moreover, the extent of the injury inflicted by this curse is to be considered. For it denounces all the righteous men and martyrs, and sufferers of every kind, who have died in this way, as Peter and Andrew, and the rest. Such a cruel denunciation could never have come from Moses if he had been a prophet, unless he was a bitter enemy of these sufferers. For he pronounces them cursed not only of men but of God. What hope, then, of blessing remains to Christ, or his apostles, or to us if we happen to be crucified for Christ’s sake? It indicates great thoughtlessness in Moses, and the want of all divine inspiration, that he overlooked the fact that men are hung on a tree for very different reasons, some for their crimes, and others who suffer in the cause of God and of righteousness. In this thoughtless way lie heaps all together without distinction under the same curse; whereas if he had had any sense, not to say inspiration, if he wished to single out the punishment of the cross from all others as specially detestable, he would have said, Cursed is every guilty and impious person that hangeth on a tree. This would have made a distinction between the guilty and the innocent. And yet even this would have been incorrect, for Christ took the malefactor from the cross along with himself into the Paradise of his Father. What becomes of the curse on every one that hangeth on a tree? Was Barabbas, the notorious robber, who certainly was not hung on a tree, but was set free from prison at the request of the Jews, more blessed than the thief who accompanied Christ from the cross to heaven? Again, there is a curse on the man that worships the sun or the moon. Now if under a heathen monarch I am forced to worship the sun, and if from fear of this curse I refuse, shall I incur this other curse by suffering the punishment of crucifixion? Perhaps Moses was in the habit of cursing everything good. We think no more of his denunciation than of an old wife’s scolding. So we find him pronouncing a curse on all youths of both sexes, when he says: "Cursed is every one that raiseth not up a seed in Israel." This is aimed directly at Jesus, who, according to you, was born among the Jews, and raised up no seed to continue his family. It points too at his disciples, some of whom he took from the wives they had married, and some who were unmarried he forbade to take wives. We have good reason, you see, for expressing our abhorrence of the daring style in which Moses hurls his maledictions against Christ, against light, against chastity, against everything divine. You cannot make much of the distinction between hanging on a tree and being crucified, as you often try to do by way of apology; for Paul repudiates such a distinction when he says, "Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us; as it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree."

FAUSTUS dixit: Quare Moysen non accipitis? Amoris pietatisque causa, qua colimus Christum. Quis enim irreligiosus adeo est, ut eum libenter aspiciat, qui suo maledixerit patri? Quapropter et nos Moysen, quanquam humanorum nulli unquam divinorumque pepercerit blasphemando, plus tamen hinc exsecramur, quod Christum Filium Dei, qui nostrae salutis causa pependit in ligno, diro devotationis convicio lacessivit: utrum volens, an casu, tu videris. Neutro enim horum excusatus erit aut commendatus, ut debeat accipi. Ait enim maledictum esse omnem qui pendet in ligno . Hunc ergo tu vis ut accipiam, huic ut credam: cum si divinus fuit, constet eum scientem volentemque maledixisse Christo; si vero nolens nesciensque maledixerit, constet eum non fuisse divinum. Tu ergo elige utrumvis, aut Moysen prophetam non fuisse, et imprudentia peccasse, ut dum aliis ex more suo maledicit, nesciens blasphemaverit et Deum; aut fuisse quidem divinum, nec futura haec ignoravisse, sed invidentem tamen nostrae saluti, quae futura erat ex ligno, in ejus auctorem maledici oris sui venena prompsisse. Et quis ergo credat hunc vidisse aut cognovisse Patrem, qui sic laceraverit Filium: hunc adventum Filii potuisse praedicere, qui ascensionis ejus ignoraverit exitum? Huc accedit, quod illud etiam considero, quam late hoc sit sparsum convicium, quamque multa comprehendat et violet: ut omnes etiam tangat justos et martyres, quotquot similis passionis exitu defuncti sunt vita, ut Petrus, et Andreas, ac reliqui ejusdem sortis. Quos nisi Moyses aut ut non propheta, nescisset, aut ut malignus odisset, si fuit propheta, non tam crudelis devotationis contumelia lacerasset. Neque enim vulgo saltem eos maledictos dicit, id est, apud homines tantum, sed maledictos Deo. Quod si ita est, unde jam benedictionis relinquetur spes vel Christo, vel Apostolis, vel ipsis nobis, si nominis ejus causa crucifigi contingat? Quam denique imprudens erat et vacans inspiratione divina, ut cogitare nequiverit diversis ex causis homines in ligno suspendi; alios quidem ob iniquum facinus, quosdam vero justitiae causa, et propter Deum: idcircoque confuse omnes et sine discretione ulla sub idem conjecit maledictum: cum esset dicendum, si ei prudentia inesset ulla, non dicam divinatio, et si adeo crux offenderat eum, ut sola excepta abdicataque esset ex omni genere punitionum, maledictum esse sceleratum et impium omnem qui pependisset in ligno; ut esset discretio aliqua inter justos et injustos: quanquam ne sic quidem vera dixisset, cum latronem Christus de ligno secum introduxerit in paradisum Patris sui . Ubi est ergo, Maledictus omnis qui pendet in ligno? An Barabbas latro ille insignis, qui non solum in ligno suspensus minime est, sed etiam Judaeorum rogatu emissus e carcere , magis fuit benedictus, quam ille qui cum Christo de cruce ascendit in coelum? Quid denique, quod etiam eum maledictum vocat, qui solem adoraverit, aut lunam ? Si ergo sub gentili positus rege, solem adorare cogar, et cum restitero, maledictum hoc metuens jubear crucifigi, in aliud ejus incurram maledictum, quod adversus eum deprompsit qui pendet in ligno? An ipsi quidem bonis omnibus maledicere consuetum est? Nos vero tanti devotationes ejus aestimare debemus, quanti sunt stomachantium vetularum. Sic enim et Dei omnes pueros ac virgines pari devotatione prosequitur dicens, maledictum esse omnem qui non suscitaverit semen in Israel . Quod aeque convicium principaliter quidem Jesum tangit, qui ortus et ipse, ut dicitis, ex Judaeis, nullam tamen inter eos servandae posteritatis causa sobolem suscitavit. Deinde et discipulos ejus, quorum nonnullos quidem ab uxoribus sejunxit, quos copulatos invenerat: quosdam vero et conjungi vetuit, quos deprehendit intactos. Qua de re Moyseos impunitam hanc linguam, maledictorum jaculis Christum lumen, sanctimoniam, divina omnia petentem, jure nos cognoveris exsecratos. Ac ne forte multum interesse putes inter suspensum et crucifixum; nam et hoc in praesidium vobis defensionis soletis assumere; commentis hisce vestris Paulum audias praescribentem, Christus nos redemit de maledicto Legis, factus pro nobis maledictum: quia scriptum est, Maledictus omnis qui pendet in ligno .

14.2 PL 42, 296

2. Augustin replied: The pious Faustus is pained because Christ is cursed by Moses. His love for Christ makes him hate Moses. Before explaining the sacred import and the piety of the words, "Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree," I would ask these pious people why they are angry with Moses, since his curse does not affect their Christ. If Christ hung on the tree, He must have been fastened to it with nails, the marks of which He showed to His doubting disciple after His resurrection. Accordingly He must have had a vulnerable and mortal body, which the Manichæans deny. Call the wounds and the marks false, and it follows that His hanging on the tree was false. This Christ is not affected by the curse, and there is no occasion for this indignation against the person uttering the curse. If they pretend to be angry with Moses for cursing what they call the false death of Christ, what are we to think of themselves, who do not curse Christ, but, what is much worse, make Him a liar? If it is wrong to curse mortality, it is a much more heinous offense to sully the purity of truth. But let us make these heretical cavils an occasion for explaining this mystery to believers.

AUGUSTINUS respondit: Pius homo Faustus dolet Christum esse maledictum a Moyse, et ob hoc odit Moysen, quia diligit Christum. Interim, antequam aperiam in quam magno sacramento, et quam pie dictum sit, Maledictus omnis qui in ligno pependerit , istos pios homines interrogo, cur irascantur Moysi, quandoquidem maledictum ejus ad Christum istorum non pervenerit. Si enim Christus pependit in ligno, clavis utique affixus est. Unde etiam ipsas cicatrices post resurrectionem discipulo minus credulo demonstravit . Quod si ita est, utique vulnerabile atque mortale corpus habuit, quod isti nolunt fateri. Si ergo et illa vulnera, et illae cicatrices falsae erant, falsum est et quod pependit in ligno. Non itaque potuit ad eum illa maledictio pervenire, non est quod succenseant ei a cujus ore processit. Itaque si ipsi irasci se fingunt ei qui maledixerit falsae morti Christi, quod secundum ipsos dixerim; quomodo fugiendi sunt, qui non maledicunt Christum, sed quod est exsecrabilius, criminantur? Si enim non est accipiendus qui maledictum ingerit mortalitati; quomodo est detestandus qui fallaciam objicit veritati? Sed jam videamus ex occasione calumniantium haereticorum, quomodo illud sacramentum fidelibus exponatur.

14.3 PL 42, 296

3. Death comes upon man as the punishment of sin, and so is itself called sin; not that a man sins in dying, but because sin is the cause of his death. So the word tongue, which properly means the fleshy substance between the teeth and the palate, is applied in a secondary sense to the result of the tongue’s action. In this sense we speak of a Latin tongue and a Greek tongue. The word hand, too, means both the members of the body we use in working, and the writing which is done with the hand. In this sense we speak of writing as being proved to be the hand of a certain person, or of recognizing the hand of a friend. The writing is certainly not a member of the body, but the name hand is given to it because it is the hand that does it. So sin means both a bad action deserving punishment, and death the consequence of sin. Christ has no sin in the sense of deserving death, but He bore for our sakes sin in the sense of death as brought on human nature by sin. This is what hung on the tree; this is what was cursed by Moses. Thus was death condemned that its reign might cease, and cursed that it might be destroyed. By Christ’s taking our sin in this sense, its condemnation is our deliverance, while to remain in subjection to sin is to be condemned.

Mors hominis ex poena peccati est, unde et ipsa peccatum dicitur: non quia peccat homo dum moritur, sed quia ex peccato factum est ut moriatur. Sicut alio modo dicitur lingua proprie caro quae intra dentes sub palato movetur; et alio modo dicitur lingua, quod per linguam fit; secundum quem modum dicitur alia lingua graeca, alia latina: et manus alio modo dicitur ipsum proprie corporis membrum quod movemus ad operandum, et alio modo manus dicitur scriptura quae fit per manum. Dicimus enim, Prolata est manus ejus: Lecta est adversus eum manus ejus: Habeo manum tuam: Recipe manum tuam. Manus utique proprie membrum est hominis: non autem opinor illam scripturam membrum esse hominis, et tamen dicitur manus, eo quod manu facta sit. Sic et peccatum, non tantum ipsum opus malum, quod poena dignum est; sed etiam ipsa mors, quae peccato facta est, peccatum appellata est. Illud itaque peccatum, quo reus esset mortis, non commisit Christus: illud autem alterum, id est, mortem, quae peccato inflicta est humanae naturae, suscepit pro nobis. Hoc suspendit in ligno, hoc maledictum est per Moysen: ibi mors damnata est ne regnaret, et maledicta est ut periret. Quapropter per Christi tale peccatum, damnatum est et nostrum peccatum ut nos liberaremur, ne regnante peccato nos damnati remaneremus.

14.4 PL 42, 297

4. What does Faustus find strange in the curse pronounced on sin, on death, and on human mortality, which Christ had on account of man’s sin, though He Himself was sinless? Christ’s body was derived from Adam, for His mother the Virgin Mary was a child of Adam. But God said in Paradise, "On the day that ye eat, ye shall surely die." This is the curse which hung on the tree. A man may deny that Christ was cursed who denies that He died. But the man who believes that Christ died, and acknowledges that death is the fruit of sin, and is itself called sin, will understand who it is that is cursed by Moses, when he hears the apostle saying "For our old man is crucified with Him." The apostle boldly says of Christ, "He was made a curse for us;" for he could also venture to say, "He died for all." "He died," and "He was cursed," are the same. Death is the effect of the curse; and all sin is cursed, whether it means the action which merits punishment, or the punishment which follows. Christ, though guiltless, took our punishment, that He might cancel our guilt, and do away with our punishment.

Quid ergo miratur Faustus maledictum esse peccatum, maledictam esse mortem, maledictam esse mortalitatem carnis sine peccato Christi, ex peccato tamen hominis etiam in Christo factam? Ex Adam quippe corpus assumpsit, quia ex Adam virgo Maria, quae peperit Christum. Dixerat autem Deus in paradiso, Qua die tetigeritis, morte moriemini : hoc est maledictum, quod pependit in ligno. Ille neget Christum maledictum, qui negat et mortuum. Qui autem confitetur et mortuum, et negare non potest mortem de peccato esse, et ob hoc etiam ipsam peccatum vocari, audiat Apostolum dicentem, Quoniam vetus homo noster simul cum illo crucifixus est ; et intelligat quem maledictum Moyses dixerit. Ideoque securus Apostolus ait de Christo, Factus pro nobis maledictum : sicut non timuit dicere, Pro omnibus mortuus est . Hoc est enim, mortuus est, quod maledictus: quoniam mors ipsa ex maledicto est, et maledictum est omne peccatum, sive ipsum quod fit, ut sequatur supplicium, sive ipsum supplicium, quod alio modo vocatur peccatum, quia fit ex peccato. Suscepit autem Christus sine reatu supplicium nostrum, ut inde solveret reatum nostrum, et finiret etiam supplicium nostrum.

14.5 PL 42, 297

5. These things are not my conjectures, but are affirmed constantly by the apostle, with an emphasis sufficient to rouse the careless and to silence the gainsayers. "God," he says, "sent His Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, that by sin He might condemn sin in the flesh." Christ’s flesh was not sinful, because it was not born of Mary by ordinary generation; but because death is the effect of sin, this flesh, in being mortal, had the likeness of sinful flesh. This is called sin in the following words, "that by sin He might condemn sin in the flesh." Again he says: "He hath made Him to be sin for us who knew no sin, that we might be made the righteousness of God in Him." Why should not Moses call accursed what Paul calls sin? In this prediction the prophet claims a share with the apostle in the reproach of the heretics. For whoever finds fault with the word cursed in the prophet, must find fault with the word sin in the apostle; for curse and sin go together.

Ex ingenio meo ista dixerim, si non Apostolus toties hoc inculcat, ut et dormientes excitet, et calumniantes offocet. Misit, inquit, Deus Filium suum in similitudinem carnis peccati, ut de peccato damnaret peccatum in carne . Non erat ergo illa caro peccati, quia non de traduce mortalitatis in Mariam per masculum venerat: sed tamen quia de peccato est mors, illa autem caro quamvis ex virgine, tamen mortalis fuit; eo ipso quo mortalis erat, similitudinem habebat carnis peccati. Hoc appellat etiam peccatum, consequenter dicens, Ut de peccato damnaret peccatum in carne. Item alio loco, Eum, inquit, qui non noverat peccatum, peccatum pro nobis fecit, ut nos simus justitia Dei in ipso . Cur ergo timeret Moyses dicere maledictum, quod Paulus non timuit dicere peccatum? Plane hoc Propheta et praevidere debuit, et praedicere, paratus ab haereticis cum Apostolo reprehendi. Quisquis enim reprehenderit Prophetam dixisse, maledictum; cogitur reprehendere Apostolum dixisse, peccatum: nam utique maledictum comes peccati est.

14.6 PL 42, 297

6. If we read, "Cursed of God is every one that hangeth on a tree," the addition of the words "of God" creates no difficulty. For had not God hated sin and our death, He would not have sent His Son to bear and to abolish it. And there is nothing strange in God’s cursing what He hates. For His readiness to give us the immortality which will be had at the coming of Christ, is in proportion to the compassion with which He hated our death when it hung on the cross at the death of Christ. And if Moses curses every one that hangeth on a tree, it is certainly not because he did not foresee that righteous men would be crucified, but rather because He foresaw that heretics would deny the death of the Lord to be real, and would try to disprove the application of this curse to Christ, in order that they might disprove the reality of His death. For if Christ’s death was not real, nothing cursed hung on the cross when He was crucified, for the crucifixion cannot have been real. Moses cries from the distant past to these heretics: Your evasion in denying the reality of the death of Christ is useless. Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree; not this one or that, but absolutely every one. What! the Son of God? Yes, assuredly. This is the very thing you object to, and that you are so anxious to evade. You will not allow that He was cursed for us, because you will not allow that He died for us. Exemption from Adam’s curse implies exemption from his death. But as Christ endured death as man, and for man; so also, Son of God as He was, ever living in His own righteousness, but dying for our offences, He submitted as man, and for man, to bear the curse which accompanies death. And as He died in the flesh which He took in bearing our punishment, so also, while ever blessed in His own righteousness, He was cursed for our offences, in the death which He suffered in bearing our punishment. And these words "every one" are intended to check the ignorant officiousness which would deny the reference of the curse to Christ, and so, because the curse goes along with death, would lead to the denial of the true death of Christ.

Nec ideo major invidia est, quod addiderit, Deo, ut diceret, Maledictus Deo omnis qui pependerit in ligno. Nisi enim Deus odisset peccatum, et mortem nostram, non ad eam suscipiendam atque delendam Filium suum mitteret. Quid ergo mirum, si maledictum est Deo, quod odit Deus? Tanto enim libentius nobis donat immortalitatem, quae futura est Christo veniente, quanto misericordius odit mortem nostram, quae in ligno pependit Christo moriente. Quod autem additum est, omnis, ut diceretur, Maledictus omnis qui in ligno pependerit, non sane Moyses minus praevidit etiam justos in cruce futuros, sed bene praevidit haereticos veram mortem Domini negaturos, et ideo volentes ab hoc maledicto Christum sejungere, ut a mortis etiam veritate sejungerent. Si enim vera illa mors non erat, nullum maledictum Christo crucifixo pependit in ligno, quia nec vere crucifixus est. Sed contra longe futuros haereticos, quam de longe clamat Moyses, Sine causa tergiversamini, quibus displicet veritas mortis Christi, Maledictus omnis qui pendet in ligno: non ille aut ille, sed omnis omnino! Etiamne et Filius Dei? Etiam prorsus. Nam hoc est quod non vultis: inde satagitis, inde seducitis. Displicet enim vobis maledictus pro nobis, quia displicet mortuus pro nobis. Tunc enim extra maledictum illius Adam, si extra illius mortem. Cum vero ex homine et pro homine mortem suscepit, ex illo et pro illo etiam maledictum quod morti comitatur, suscipere non dedignatus est etiam ille, prorsus etiam ille Filius Dei semper vivus in sua justitia, mortuus autem propter delicta nostra , in carne suscepta ex poena nostra. Sic et semper benedictus in sua justitia, maledictus autem propter delicta nostra, in morte suscepta ex poena nostra: ac per hoc additum est, omnis, ne Christus ad veram mortem non pertinere diceretur, si a maledicto, quod morti conjunctum est, insipienti honorificentia separaretur.

14.7 PL 42, 298

7. The believer in the true doctrine of the gospel will understand that Christ is not reproached by Moses when he speaks of Him as cursed, not in His divine majesty, but as hanging on the tree as our substitute, bearing our punishment, any more than He is praised by the Manichæans when they deny that He had a mortal body, so as to suffer real death. In the curse of the prophet there is praise of Christ’s humility, while in the pretended regard of the heretics there is a charge of falsehood. If, then, you deny that Christ was cursed, you must deny that He died; and then you have to meet, not Moses, but the apostles. Confess that He died, and you may also confess that He, without taking our sin, took its punishment. Now the punishment of sin cannot be blessed, or else it would be a thing to be desired. The curse is pronounced by divine justice, and it will be well for us if we are redeemed from it. Confess then that Christ died, and you may confess that He bore the curse for us; and that when Moses said, "Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree," he said in fact, To hang on a tree is to be mortal, or actually to die. He might have said, "Cursed is every one that is mortal," or "Cursed is every one dying;" but the prophet knew that Christ would suffer on the cross, and that heretics would say that He hung on the tree only in appearance, without really dying. So he exclaims, Cursed; meaning that He really died. He knew that the death of sinful man, which Christ though sinless bore, came from that curse, "If ye touch it, ye shall surely die." Thus also, the serpent hung on the pole was intended to show that Christ did not feign death, but that the real death into which the serpent by his fatal counsel cast mankind was hung on the cross of Christ’s passion. The Manichæans turn away from the view of this real death, and so they are not healed of the poison of the serpent, as we read that in the wilderness as many as looked were healed.

Qui autem ex veritate evangelica fidelis est, intelligit tam non esse contumeliam Christi ex ore Moysi, cum eum dixit maledictum, non ex divinitate majestatis suae, sed ex conditione poenae nostrae, ex qua in ligno suspensus est; quam non est laus Christi ex ore Manichaeorum, cum eum negant carnem habuisse mortalem, in qua veram mortem pateretur: quia ex illo prophetico maledicto laus intelligitur humilitatis, ex isto haeretico quasi honore crimen objicitur falsitatis. Si ergo negas maledictum, nega mortuum: si negas mortuum, non jam contra Moysen, sed contra Apostolos dimicas. Si autem confiteris mortuum, confitere suscepisse poenam peccati nostri sine peccato nostro. Jam vero ubi audis poenam peccati, aut ex benedictione crede venientem, aut ex maledictione: si ex benedictione venit poena peccati, opta esse semper in poena peccati; si autem optas inde liberari, crede per divinae sententiae justitiam ex maledictione venisse. Confitere ergo maledictum suscepisse pro nobis, quem confiteris mortuum esse pro nobis; nec aliud significare voluisse Moysen, cum diceret, Maledictus omnis qui in ligno pependerit; nisi, Mortalis omnis et moriens omnis qui in ligno pependerit. Poterat enim dicere, Maledictus omnis mortalis; aut, Maledictus omnis moriens: sed hoc est quod asserit Propheta, quia sciebat Christi mortem in cruce pensuram, et futuros haereticos qui dicerent, Pependit quidem in ligno, sed specie quadam, non ut vere moreretur. Clamando ergo, Maledictus, nihil aliud clamavit, nisi quia vere mortuus, sciens mortem hominis peccatoris, quam sine peccato ipse suscepit, de illo maledicto venientem quo dictum est, Si tetigeritis, morte moriemini . Ad hoc pertinet et serpens ille in ligno suspensus, quo significaretur non falsam mortem Christum finxisse, sed illam veram in ligno passionis suae suspendisse, in quam serpens ille hominem male suadendo dejecit. Quam veram mortem nolunt isti conspicere: et ideo non sanantur a veneno serpentis, sicut in eremo quicumque illum attenderent sanabantur .

14.8 PL 42, 299

8. It is true, some ignorantly distinguish between hanging on a tree and being crucified. So some explain this passage as referring to Judas. But how do they know whether he hung himself from wood or from stone? Faustus is right in saying that the apostle obliges us to refer the words to Christ. Such ignorant Catholics are the prey of the Manichæans. Such they get hold of and entangle in their sophistry. Such were we when we fell into this heresy, and adhered to it. Such were we, when, not by our own strength, but by the mercy of God, we were rescued.

Itaque fatemur ab imperitis dici, aliud esse affigi ligno, aliud in ligno pendere. Sic enim quidam putant solvendam esse istam quaestionem, ut Judam dicant a Moyse maledictum qui laqueo se suspendit; quasi primo noverint utrum ex ligno an ex lapide se ille suspenderit. Sed verum est, quod et Faustus commemoravit, Apostolum non sinere aliud intelligere, quam de Christo esse praedictum. Sed talis imperitia nonnullorum Catholicorum, venatio Manichaeorum est. Tales enim solent insectari, tales suis fallaciis irretire: tales in eos cecideramus, tales haeseramus; tales, non viribus nostris, sed Dei misericordia eruti sumus.

14.9 PL 42, 299

9. What attacks on divine things does Faustus speak of when he charges Moses with sparing nothing human or divine? He makes the charge without stopping to prove it. We know, on the contrary, that Moses gave due praise to everything really divine, and in human affairs was a just ruler, considering his times and the grace of his dispensation. It will be time to prove this when we see any proof of Faustus’ charges. It may be clever to make such charges cautiously, but there is great incaution in the cleverness which ruins its possessor. It is good to be clever on the side of truth, but it is a poor thing to be clever in opposition to the truth. Faustus says that Moses spared nothing human or divine; not that he spared no god or man. If he said that Moses did not spare God, it could easily be shown in reply that Moses everywhere does honor to the true God, whom he declares to be the Maker of heaven and earth. Again, if he said that Moses spared none of the gods, he would betray himself to Christians as a worshipper of the false gods that Moses denounces; and so he would be prevented from gathering what he has not brought forth, by the brood taking refuge under the wings of the Mother Church. Faustus tries to ensnare the babes, by saying that Moses spared nothing divine, wishing not to frighten Christians with a profession of belief in the gods, which would be plainly opposed to Christianity, and at the same time appearing to take the side of the Pagans against us; for they know that Moses has said many plain and pointed things against the idols and gods of the heathen, which are devils.

Quae autem divina Moyses lacessivit, sicut Faustus criminatur dicens, quod humanorum nulli unquam divinorumque pepercerit? Dixit enim, et abiit: nihil sategit probare, nihil curavit ostendere. Nos autem scimus Moysen omnia vere divina pie laudasse, et pro sui temporis congruentia suaeque dispensationis gratia, juste humana rexisse. Exigant isti ut hoc doceam, cum et ipsi docere conati fuerint quod Faustus objicit, caute quidem, ut erat acutus, sed ob hoc incautus, quia suo acumine se perimebat. Felix enim cor acutum ad veritatem, infelix contra veritatem. Non dixit, hominum nulli unquam deorumque pepercerit, sed, humanorum, inquit, et divinorum. Si enim diceret eum Deo non pepercisse, facile convinceretur falsae criminationis; cum Moyses inveniretur ubique honorare ac praedicare Deum verum, qui fecit coelum et terram. Si autem diceret, nulli deorum pepercisse, proderet se Christianis illos deos colere, a quibus adorandis Moyses prohibet: atque ita sub alas Catholicae matris pullis fugientibus non congregaret quae non peperit. Ut ergo insidias tenderet parvulis, dixit divinorum nulli pepercisse Moysen, quo possent neque Christiani, aperto deorum cultu, fugere impietatem istorum nimis abhorrentem a religione Christiana, et Pagani eis favere adversum nos, qui Moysen scirent contra idola et contra deos Gentium, quae sunt daemonia, multa vera et digna dixisse.

14.10 PL 42, 299

10. If the Manichæans disapprove of Moses on this account, let them confess that they are worshippers of idols and devils. This, indeed, may be the case without their being aware of it. The apostle tells us that "in the last days some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and to doctrines of devils, speaking lies in hypocrisy." Whence but from devils, who are fond of falsehood, could the idea have come that Christ’s sufferings and death were unreal, and that the marks which He showed of His wounds were unreal? Are these not the doctrines of lying devils, which teach that Christ, the Truth itself, was a deceiver? Besides, the Manichæans openly teach the worship, if not of devils, still of created things, which the apostle condemns in the words, "They worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator."

Quod si istis displicet, aperte se fateantur idolorum vel daemoniorum esse cultores: quod quidem ignoranter essent, eo ipso solo quod essent haeretici. De talibus enim dixit Apostolus: Quia in novissimis temporibus recedent quidam a fide, intendentes spiritibus seductoribus, doctrinis daemoniorum in hypocrisi mendaciloquorum . Qui enim nisi daemones, quibus est amica fallacia, istis persuaderent quod Christus fallaciter passus, fallaciter mortuus sit, fallaciter cicatrices ostenderit; id est, non vere passus, nec vere mortuus sit, nec illae verae fuerint ex veris vulneribus cicatrices? Quae sunt evidentiores doctrinae mendaciloquorum daemoniorum, quam istae quibus persuadetur Filium Dei, id est ipsam veritatem, esse mendacem? Sed isti in doctrina sua habent et apertam, non quidem daemoniorum, sed tamen creaturae culturam, quam damnat Apostolus, dicens: Et coluerunt, et servierunt creaturae potius quam Creatori .

14.11 PL 42, 300

11. As there is an unconscious worship of idols and devils in the fanciful legends of the Manichæans, so they knowingly serve the creature in their worship of the sun and moon. And in what they call their service of the Creator they really serve their own fancy, and not the Creator at all. For they deny that God created those things which the apostle plainly declares to be the creatures of God, when he says of food, "Every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it is received with thanksgiving." This is sound doctrine, which you cannot bear, and so turn to fables. The apostle praises the creature of God, but forbids the worship of it; and in the same way Moses gives due praise to the sun and moon, while at the same time he states the fact of their having been made by God, and placed by Him in their courses,—the sun to rule the day, and the moon to rule the night. Probably you think Moses spared nothing divine, simply because he forbade the worship of the sun and moon, whereas you turn towards them in all directions in your worship. But the sun and moon take no pleasure in your false praises. It is the devil, the transgressor, that delights in false praises. The powers of heaven, who have not fallen by sin, wish their Creator to be praised in them; and their true praise is that which does no wrong to their Creator. He is wronged when they are said to be His members, or parts of His substance. For He is perfect and independent, underived, not divided or scattered in space, but unchangeably self-existent, self-sufficient, and blessed in Himself. In the abundance of His goodness, He by His word spoke, and they were made: He commanded, and they were created. And if earthly bodies are good, of which the apostle spoke when he said that no food is unclean, because every creature of God is good, much more the heavenly bodies, of which the sun and moon are the chief; for the apostle says again, "The glory of the terrestrial is one, and the glory of the celestial is another."

Proinde isti in phantasmatibus fabularum suarum idola et daemonia nescientes colunt: in sole autem et luna noverunt se servire creaturae; et quod putant se etiam Creatori servire, multum falluntur: phantasmati enim suo serviunt, Creatori autem nullo modo serviunt, quando ea negant Deum creasse, quae aperte Apostolus ad Dei creaturam pertinere demonstrat, dicens, cum de cibis et carnibus ageret, Omnis enim creatura Dei bona est, et nihil abjiciendum quod cum gratiarum actione percipitur . Videte quid sit sana doctrina, quam non ferentes vos ad fabulas convertistis. Quomodo Apostolus et creaturam Dei laudat, et ei tamen cultum religionis exhiberi vetat: sic et Moyses solem et lunam vera laude laudavit, cum eos factos a Deo, et in coelesti ordine ad peragenda sua opera collocatos, sicut est, ita narravit: Solem in potestatem diei, lunam in potestatem noctis . Falsis autem vestris laudibus sol et luna non gaudent. Diabolus novit falsa laude gaudere, praevaricatrix creatura. Potestates vero coelorum, quae peccato non lapsae sunt, artificem suum in se laudari volunt: quarum illa vera laus est, qua Creatori illarum non fit injuria. Fit autem cum dicitur quod partes ejus sunt, aut membra ejus, aut aliquid substantiae ipsius. Ille enim perfectus, et nullius indigens, et nusquam defluens, neque discissus, neque per loca distentus, apud se totus incommutabilis, sibique sufficiens, se ipso beatus, propter abundantiam bonitatis per Verbum suum dixit, et facta sunt; mandavit, et creata sunt . Proinde si terrestria corpora, de quibus loquebatur Apostolus cum cibum nullum immundum diceret, bona sunt, quia omnis creatura Dei bona est; quanto magis coelestia, in quibus excellunt sol et luna! cum ipse Apostolus dicat, Corpora coelestia et corpora terrestria; sed alia est coelestium gloria, alia terrestrium .

14.12 PL 42, 300

12. Moses, then, casts no reproach on the sun and moon when he prohibits their worship. He praises them as heavenly bodies; while he also praises God as the Creator of both heavenly and earthly, and will not allow of His being insulted by giving the worship due to Him to those who are praised only as dependent upon Him. Faustus prides himself on the ingenuity of his objection to the curse pronounced by Moses on the worship of the sun and moon. He says, "If under a heathen monarch I am forced to worship the sun, and if from fear of this curse I refuse, shall I incur this other curse by suffering the punishment of crucifixion?" No heathen monarch is forcing you to worship the sun: nor would the sun itself force you, if it were reigning on the earth, as neither does it now wish to be worshipped. As the Creator bears with blasphemers till the judgment, so these celestial bodies bear with their deluded worshippers till the judgment of the Creator. It should be observed that no Christian monarch could enforce the worship of the sun. Faustus instances a heathen monarch, for he knows that their worship of the sun is a heathen custom. Yet, in spite of this opposition to Christianity, the partridge takes the name of Christ, that it may gather what it has not brought forth. The answer to this objection is easy, and the force of truth will soon break the horns of this dilemma. Suppose, then, a Christian threatened by royal authority with being hung on a tree if he will not worship the sun. If I avoid, you say, the curse pronounced by the law on the worshipper of the sun, I incur the curse pronounced by the same law on him that hangs on a tree. So you will be in a difficulty; only that you worship the sun without being forced by anybody. But a true Christian, built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, distinguishes the curses, and the reasons of them. He sees that one refers to the mortal body which is hung on the tree, and the other to the mind which worships the sun. For though the body bows in worship,—which also is a heinous offence,—the belief or imagination of the object worshipped is an act of the mind. The death implied in both curses is in one case the death of the body, and in the other the death of the soul. It is better to have the curse in bodily death,—which will be removed in the resurrection,—than the curse in the death of the soul, condemning it along with the body to eternal fire. The Lord solves this difficulty in the words: "Fear not them that kill the body, but cannot kill the soul; but fear him who has power to cast both soul and body into hell-fire." In other words, fear not the curse of bodily death, which in time is removed; but fear the curse of spiritual death, which leads to the eternal torment of both soul and body. Be assured, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree is no old wife’s railing, but a prophetical utterance. Christ, by the curse, takes the curse away, as He takes away death by death, and sin by sin. In the words, "Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree," there is no more blasphemy than in the words of the apostle, "He died," or, "Our old man was crucified along with Him," or, "By sin He condemned sin," or, "He made Him to be sin for us who knew no sin," and in many similar passages. Confess, then, that when you exclaim against the curse of Christ, you exclaim against His death. If this is not an old wife’s railing on your part, it is devilish delusion, which makes you deny the death of Christ because your own souls are dead. You teach people that Christ’s death was feigned, making Christ your leader in the falsehood with which you use the name of Christian to mislead men.

Non ergo conviciatur Moyses soli et lunae, cum eos vetat adorari; sed eos laudat tanquam creaturam coelestem: Deum autem laudat tanquam creatorem coelestium et terrestrium; nec vult offendi Deum, cum illi pro illo adorantur, qui propter illum et ex illo laudantur.

At quam sibi Faustus argute reprehendere visus est, quod etiam maledictum vocat Moyses, qui solem adoraverit ac lunam. Si ergo, inquit, sub gentili positus rege, solem cogar adorare, et cum restitero, maledictum hoc metuens, jubear crucifigi, in aliud ejus incurram maledictum, quod adversus eum deprompsit, qui pendet in ligno. Vos quidem nullus rex gentilis cogit adorare solem, quod nec ipse sol cogeret, si in terra regnaret, quia nec nunc a vobis hoc vult fieri: sed sicut Creator ipse impios blasphematores suos usque ad judicium sustinet, sic et ipsa coelestia tolerant vanos adoratores suos usque ad judicium Creatoris sui. Tamen mementote Christianum regem non posse cogere ut sol adoretur. De gentili enim rege exemplum Faustus proposuit, sciens profecto ad Gentiles pertinere quod facitis, cum solem adoratis. Non est ergo hoc christianum: sed ubique jam perdix nomen Christi ponit, ut congreget quae non peperit . Videte tamen quam facile respondeat veritas, et sana doctrina quam facile disrumpat hunc vestrae quaestionis tanquam inevitabilem et bicipitem laqueum. Ecce faciamus aliquem armatum regia potestate comminari homini christiano, ut si solem adorare noluerit, suspendatur in ligno. Si declinavero, inquis, maledictum, quod Lex prompsit in solis adoratorem, incidam in illud quod eadem Lex prompsit in eum qui pependerit in ligno. Ita vero turbaberis: sed tu, imo nec tu, qui et nullo cogente adoras solem. At vero Christianus aedificatus super fundamentum Apostolorum et Prophetarum , attendit singulas causas, et singula maledicta: videt unum pertinere ad corpus mortale, quod ligno suspenditur; alterum ad animum, quo sol adoratur. Etsi enim corpus inclinatur in adorando, animus tamen aut colit quod adorat, aut fingit; utrumque autem perniciosum est. Quapropter quoniam maledictum in utroque mors meruit, sicut mors est corporis in ligno pendere, ita mors animi est solem adorare. Eligendum est igitur maledictum in corporis morte, quo maledicto et ipsum corpus in resurrectione liberabitur: devitandum autem maledictum in animae morte, ne cum suo corpore in aeterno igne damnetur. Hanc enim quaestionem nobis Dominus solvit, dicens: Nolite timere eos qui corpus occidunt, animam autem non possunt occidere: sed eum timete qui habet potestatem et animam et corpus occidere in gehennam ignis . Tanquam diceret, Nolite timere maledictum corporalis mortis, quod temporaliter solvitur: sed timete maledictum spiritualis mortis, per quod anima in aeternum cum suo corpore cruciatur. Ecce non est anicularis maledictio, sed prophetica praedictio, Maledictus omnis qui pendet in ligno. Sic enim aufert Christus de maledicto maledictum, quomodo de morte mortem, de peccato peccatum. Sic ergo non blasphemavit Moyses dicendo, Maledictus omnis qui pendet in ligno: quomodo non blasphemaverunt Apostoli dicendo, Mortuus est ; et, Vetus homo noster confixus est cruci cum illo ; et, De peccato damnavit peccatum ; et, Eum qui non noverat peccatum, peccatum pro nobis fecit ; et multa hujusmodi. Vos autem cum horretis maledictum Christum, fatemini vos horrere mortem Christi. Ubi apparet vestra, non anicularis maledictio, sed diabolica simulatio, qui mortem Christi corporis, animae vestrae morte non creditis. Quam tamen mortem Christi non veram, sed simulatam suadetis: quasi non audeatis per nomen christianum homines fallere, nisi ipsum Christum magistrum fallaciae faciatis.

14.13 PL 42, 302

13. If Faustus thinks Moses an enemy of continence or virginity because he says, "Cursed is everyone that raiseth not up seed in Israel," let them hear the words of Isaiah: "Thus saith the Lord to all eunuchs; To them who keep my precepts, and choose the things that please me, and regard my covenant, will I give in my house and within my walls a place and a name better than of sons and of daughters; I will give them an everlasting name, that shall not be cut off." Though our adversaries disagree with Moses, if they agree with Isaiah it is something gained. It is enough for us to know that the same God spoke by both Moses and Isaiah, and that every one is cursed who raiseth not up seed in Israel, both then when begetting children in marriage (for the continuation of the people was a civil duty), and now because no one spiritually born should rest content without seeking spiritual increase in the production of Christians by preaching Christ, each one according to his ability. So that the times of both Testaments are briefly described in the words, "Cursed is every one that raiseth not up seed in Israel."

————————————

Quod autem invidus continentiae vel virginitati Fausto Moyses visus est, quia dixit, Maledictus omnis qui non suscitaverit semen in Israel ; legant Isaiam clamantem, Haec dicit Dominus spadonibus omnibus: Qui observaverint praecepta mea, et elegerint quae ego volo, et custodierint testamentum meum; dabo illis in domo mea et in muro meo locum nominatum, meliorem filiorum et filiarum: nomen aeternum dabo illis, et non deerit illis . Aut si contrarium putant Isaiam Moysi, hic eis placeat, si ille displicet; non est parum adversus istos. Nobis enim sufficit scire unum Deum locutum et per Moysen et per Isaiam: et maledictum esse omnem qui non suscitaverit semen in Israel, sive tunc, cum populo secundum carnem propagando etiam carnalis prolis operatio in conjugali castitate ad officium civicum pertinebat; sive nunc, ne quisquam spiritualiter natus, putet sibi debere sufficere, nec instet dominicis lucris, quibus quisque pro modulo suo praedicando Christum, debet generare christianos. Ita illa divina sententia tempora utriusque Testamenti mira brevitate complectitur, Maledictus omnis qui non suscitaverit semen in Israel.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Salva per dopo

Inserisci la tua email: ti invieremo un link per accedere. Nessuna password. Ciò che salvi (voci, versetti, capitoli, documenti) ti segue su ogni dispositivo.