Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 17

St Augustine of Hippo (AD 354–430) · In Joannis evangelium tractatus CXXIV · PL 35, 1379–1976

17.1 Chapter IV. 1–18 PL 35, 1527

1. It ought not to be a matter of wonder that a miracle was wrought by God; the wonder would be if man had wrought it. Rather ought we to rejoice than wonder that our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ was made man, than that He performed divine works among men. It is of greater importance to our salvation what He was made for men, than what He did among men: it is more important that He healed the faults of souls, than that He healed the weaknesses of mortal bodies. But as the soul knew not Him by whom it was to be healed, and had eyes in the flesh whereby to see corporeal deeds, but had not yet sound eyes in the heart with which to recognise Him as God concealed in the flesh, He wrought what the soul was able to see, in order to heal that by which it was not able to see.

He entered a place where lay a great multitude of sick folk—of blind, lame, withered; and being the physician both of souls and bodies, and having come to heal all the souls of them that should believe, of those sick folk He chose one for healing, thereby to signify unity. If in doing this we regard Him with a commonplace mind, with the mere human understanding and wit, as regards power it was not a great matter that He performed; and also as regards goodness He performed too little. There lay so many there, and yet only one was healed, whilst He could by a word have raised them all up. What, then, must we understand but that the power and the goodness was doing what souls might, by His deeds, understand for their everlasting salvation, than what bodies might gain for temporal health? For that which is the real health of bodies, and which is looked for from the Lord, will be at the end, in the resurrection of the dead. What shall live then shall no more die; what shall be healed shall no more be sick; what shall be satisfied shall no more hunger and thirst; what shall be made new shall not grow old. But at this time, however, the eyes of the blind, that were opened by those acts of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, were again closed in death; and limbs of the paralytics that received strength were loosened again in death; and whatever was for a time made whole in mortal limbs came to nought in the end: but the soul that believed passed to eternal life. Accordingly, to the soul that should believe, whose sins He had come to forgive, to the healing of whose ailments He had humbled Himself, He gave a significant proof by the healing of this impotent man. Of the profound mystery of this thing and this proof, so far as the Lord deigns to grant us, while you are attentive and aiding our weakness by prayer, I will speak as I shall have ability. And whatever I am not able to do, that will be supplied to you by Him by whose help I do what I can.

Mirum non esse debet a Deo factum miraculum: mirum enim esset si homo fecisset. Magis gaudere quam mirari debemus, quia Dominus noster et salvator Jesus Christus homo factus est, quam quod divina inter homines Deus fecit. Plus est enim ad salutem nostram quod factus est propter homines, quam quod fecit inter homines: et plus est quod vitia sanavit animarum, quam quod sanavit languores corporum moriturorum. Sed quia ipsa anima non eum noverat a quo sananda erat, et oculos habebat in carne unde facta corporalia videret, nondum habebat sanos in corde, unde Deum latentem cognosceret; fecit quod videre poterat, ut sanaretur unde videre non poterat. Ingressus est locum ubi jacebat magna multitudo languentium, caecorum, claudorum, aridorum; et cum esset medicus et animarum et corporum, et qui venisset sanare omnes animas crediturorum, de illis languentibus unum elegit quem sanaret, ut unitatem significaret. Si mediocri corde, et quasi humano captu et ingenio consideremus facientem, et quod ad potestatem pertinet, non magnum aliquid perfecit; et quod ad benignitatem, parum fecit. Tot jacebant, et unus curatus est, cum posset uno verbo omnes erigere. Quid ergo intelligendum est, nisi quia potestas illa et bonitas illa magis agebat quid animae in factis ejus pro salute sempiterna intelligerent, quam quid pro temporali salute corpora mererentur? Corporum enim salus quae vera exspectatur a Domino, erit in fine in resurrectione mortuorum: tunc quod vivet, non morietur; tunc quod sanabitur, non aegrotabit; tunc quod satiabitur, non esuriet aut sitiet; tunc quod renovabitur, non veterascet. Nunc vero in illis factis Domini et salvatoris nostri Jesu Christi, et caecorum aperti oculi, morte clausi sunt; et paralyticorum membra constricta, morte dissoluta sunt; et quidquid sanatum est temporaliter in membris mortalibus, in fine defecit: anima vero quae credidit; ad vitam aeternam transitum fecit. Animae ergo crediturae, cujus peccata dimittere venerat, ad cujus languores sanandos se humiliaverat, de hoc languido sanato magnum signum dedit. Cujus rei et cujus signi profundum sacramentum, quantum Dominus donare dignatur, attentis vobis et orando adjuvantibus infirmitatem nostram, loquar ut potero. Quidquid autem non possum, supplebit in vobis ipse, quo adjuvante facio quod possum.

17.2 PL 35, 1528

2. Of this pool, which was surrounded with five porches, in which lay a great multitude of sick folk, I remember that I have very often treated; and most of you will with me recollect what I am about to say, rather than gain the knowledge of it for the first time. But it is by no means unprofitable to go back upon matters already known, that both they who know not may be instructed, and they who do know may be confirmed. Therefore, as being already known, these things must be touched upon briefly, not leisurely inculcated. That pool and that water seem to me to have signified the Jewish people. For that peoples are signified under the name of waters the Apocalypse of John clearly indicates to us, where, after he had been shown many waters, and he had asked what they were, was answered that they were peoples. That water, then—namely, that people—was shut in by the five books of Moses, as by five porches. But those books brought forth the sick, not healed them. For the law convicted, not acquitted sinners. Accordingly the letter, without grace, made men guilty, whom on confessing grace delivered. For this is what the apostle saith: “For if a law had been given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.” Why, then, was the law given? He goes on to say, “But the Scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.” What more evident? Have not these words expounded to us both the five porches, and also the multitude of sick folk? The five porches are the law. Why did not the five porches heal the sick folk? Because, “if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.” Why, then, did the porches contain those whom they did not heal? Because “the Scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.”

De hac piscina quae quinque porticibus cingebatur, in quibus jacebat magna multitudo languentium, assidue nos tractasse memini; et rem dicturus sum quam mecum plures recognoscant potius quam cognoscant. Verum nihil est ab re, etiam nota repetere, ut et qui non noverant instruantur; et qui noverant confirmentur. Proinde tanquam nota breviter perstringenda sunt, non otiose inculcanda. Piscina illa et aqua illa populum mihi videtur significasse Judaeorum. Significari enim populos nomine aquarum, aperte nobis indicat Apocalypsis Joannis: ubi ei cum ostenderentur aquae multae, et interrogasset quid essent, responsum accepit, populos esse . Aqua ergo illa, id est populus ille, quinque libris Moysi, tanquam quinque porticibus claudebatur. Sed illi libri prodebant languidos, non sanabant. Lex enim peccatores convincebat, non absolvebat. Ideo littera sine gratia reos faciebat, quos confitentes gratia liberabat. Nam hoc dicit Apostolus: Si enim data esset lex quae posset vivificare, omnino ex Lege esset justitia. Quare ergo data est Lex? Sequitur, et dicit: Sed conclusit Scriptura omnia sub peccato, ut promissio ex fide Jesu Christi daretur credentibus . Quid evidentius? Nonne verba haec exposuerunt nobis et quinque porticus, et languentium multitudinem? Quinque porticus Lex est. Quare quinque porticus non sanabant languentes? Quia si data esset lex quae posset vivificare, omnino ex Lege esset justitia. Quare ergo continebant quos non sanabant? Quia conclusit Scriptura omnia sub peccato, ut promissio ex fide Jesu Christi daretur credentibus.

17.3 PL 35, 1528

3. What was done, then, that they who could not be healed in the porches might be healed in that water after being troubled? For on a sudden the water was seen troubled, and that by which it was troubled was not seen. Thou mayest believe that this was wont to be done by angelic virtue, yet not without some mystery being implied. After the water was troubled, the one who was able cast himself in, and he alone was healed: whoever went in after that one, did so in vain. What, then, is meant by this, unless it be that there came one, even Christ, to the Jewish people; and by doing great things, by teaching profitable things, troubled sinners, troubled the water by His presence, and roused it towards His own death? But He was hidden that troubled. For had they known Him, they would never have crucified the Lord of glory. Wherefore, to go down into the troubled water means to believe in the Lord’s death. There only one was healed, signifying unity: whoever came thereafter was not healed, because whoever shall be outside unity cannot be healed.

Quid ergo fiebat ut in aqua illa turbata sanarentur, qui in porticibus sanari non poterant? Subito enim videbatur aqua turbata, et a quo turbabatur, non videbatur. Credas hoc angelica virtute fieri solere, non tamen sine significante aliquo sacramento. Post aquam turbatam mittebat se unus qui poterat, et sanabatur solus: post illum quisquis se mitteret, frustra faceret. Quid sibi ergo hoc vult, nisi quia venit unus Christus ad populum Judaeorum; et faciendo magna, docendo utilia, turbavit peccatores, turbavit aquam praesentia sua, et excitavit ad passionem suam? Sed latens turbavit. Si enim cognovissent, nunquam Dominum gloriae crucifixissent . Descendere ergo in aquam turbatam, hoc est humiliter credere in Domini passionem. Ibi sanabatur unus, significans unitatem; postea quisquis veniret, non sanabatur: quia quisquis praeter unitatem fuerit, sanari non poterit.

17.4 PL 35, 1528

4. Now let us see what He intended to signify in the case of that one whom He Himself, keeping the mystery of unity, as I said before, deigned to heal out of so many sick folk. He found in the number of this man’s years the number, so to speak, of infirmity: “He was thirty and eight years in infirmity.” How this number refers more to weakness than to health must be somewhat more carefully expounded. I wish you to be attentive; the Lord will aid us, so that I may fitly speak, and that you may sufficiently hear. The number forty is commended to our attention as one consecrated by a kind of perfection. This, I suppose, is well known to you, beloved. The Holy Scriptures very often testify to the fact. Fasting was consecrated by this number, as you are well aware. For Moses fasted forty days, and Elias as many; and our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ did Himself fulfill this number of fasting. By Moses is signified the law; by Elias, the prophets; by the Lord, the gospel. It was for this reason that these three appeared on that mountain, where He showed Himself to His disciples in the brightness of His countenance and vesture. For He appeared in the middle, between Moses and Elias, as the gospel had witness from the law and the prophets. Whether, therefore, in the law, or in the prophets, or in the gospel, the number forty is commended to our attention in the case of fasting. Now fasting, in its large and general sense, is to abstain from the iniquities and unlawful pleasures of the world, which is perfect fasting: “That, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we may live temperately, and righteously, and godly in this present world.” What reward does the apostle join to this fast? He goes on to say: “Looking for that blessed hope, and the appearing of the glory of the blessed God, and our Saviour Jesus Christ.” In this world, then, we celebrate, as it were, the forty days’ abstinence, when we live aright, and abstain from iniquities and from unlawful pleasures. But because this abstinence shall not be without reward, we look for “that blessed hope, and the revelation of the glory of the great God, and of our Saviour Jesus Christ.” In that hope, when the reality of the hope shall have come to pass, we shall receive our wages, a penny (denarius). For the same is the wages given to the workers laboring in the vineyard, as I presume you remember; for we are not to repeat everything, as if to persons wholly ignorant and inexperienced. A denarius, then, which takes its name from the number ten, is given, and this joined with the forty makes up fifty; whence it is that before Easter we keep the Quadragesima with labor, but after Easter we keep the Quinquagesima with joy, as having received our wages. Now to this, as if to the wholesome labor of a good work, which belongs to the number forty, there is added the denarius of rest and happiness, that it may be made the number fifty.

Videamus ergo quid voluerit significare in illo uno, quem etiam ipse servans unitatis mysterium, sicut praelocutus sum, de tot languentibus unum sanare dignatus est. Invenit in annis ejus numerum quemdam languoris: Triginta octo annos habebat in infirmitate. Hic numerus quomodo magis ad languorem pertineat, quam ad sanitatem, paulo diligentius exponendum est. Intentos vos volo; aderit Dominus, ut congrue loquar, et sufficienter audiatis. Quadragenarius numerus sacratus nobis in quadam perfectione commendatur. Notum esse arbitror Charitati vestrae: testantur saepissime divinae Scripturae. Jejunium hoc numero consecratum est: bene nostis. Nam et Moyses quadraginta diebus jejunavit , et Elias totidem , et ipse Dominus noster et salvator Jesus Christus hunc jejunii numerum implevit . Per Moysen significatur Lex, per Eliam significantur Prophetae, per Dominum significatur Evangelium. Ideo in illo monte tres apparuerunt, ubi se discipulis ostendit in claritate vultus et vestis suae. Apparuit enim medius inter Moysen et Eliam , tanquam Evangelium testimonium haberet a Lege et Prophetis . Sive ergo in Lege, sive in Prophetis, sive in Evangelio, quadragenarius numerus nobis in jejunio commendatur. Jejunium autem magnum et generale est, abstinere ab iniquitatibus et illicitis voluptatibus saeculi quod est perfectum jejunium: ut abnegantes impietatem et saeculares cupiditates, temperanter, et juste, et pie vivamus in hoc saeculo. Huic jejunio quam mercedem addit Apostolus? Sequitur, et dicit: Exspectantes illam beatam spem, et manifestationem gloriae beati Dei, et salvatoris nostri Jesu Christi . In hoc ergo saeculo quasi Quadragesimam abstinentiae celebramus, cum bene vivimus, cum ab iniquitatibus et ab illicitis voluptatibus abstinemus. Sed quia haec abstinentia sine mercede non erit, exspectamus beatam illam spem, et revelationem gloriae magni Dei, et salvatoris nostri Jesu Christi. In illa spe, cum fuerit de spe facta res, accepturi sumus mercedem denarium. Ipsa enim merces redditur operariis in vinea laborantibus secundum Evangelium , quod vos credo reminisci: neque enim omnia commemoranda sunt, tanquam rudibus et imperitis. Denarius ergo qui accepit nomen a numero decem, redditur, et conjunctus quadragenario fit quinquagenarius: unde cum labore celebramus Quadragesimam ante Pascha; cum laetitia vero, tanquam accepta mercede, Quinquagesimam post Pascha. Nam huic tanquam salutari labori boni operis, qui pertinet ad quadragenarium numerum, additur quietis et felicitatis denarius, ut quinquagenarius fiat.

17.5 PL 35, 1529

5. The Lord Jesus Himself showed this also far more openly, when He companied on earth with His disciples during forty days after His resurrection; and having on the fortieth day ascended into heaven, did at the end of ten days send the wages, the Holy Ghost. These were done in signs, and by a kind of signs were the very realities anticipated. By significant tokens are we fed, that we may be able to come to the enduring realities. We are workmen, and are still laboring in the vineyard: when the day is ended and the work finished, the wages will be paid. But what workman can hold out to the receiving of the wages, unless he be fed while he labors? Even thou thyself wilt not give thy workman only wages; wilt thou not also bestow on him that where with he may repair his strength in his labor? Surely thou feedest him to whom thou art to give wages. In like manner also doth the Lord, in those significant tokens of the Scriptures, feed us while we labor. For if that joy in understanding holy mysteries be withdrawn from us, we faint in labor, and there will be none to come to the reward.

Significavit hoc et ipse Dominus Jesus multo apertius, quando post resurrectionem quadraginta diebus conversatus est in terra cum discipulis suis ; quadragesimo autem die cum ascendisset in coelum, peractis decem diebus misit mercedem Spiritus sancti . Significata sunt ista, et quibusdam significationibus res ipsae praeventae sunt. Significationibus pascimur, ut ad res ipsas perdurantes pervenire possimus. Operarii enim sumus, et adhuc in vinea laboramus: finito die, finito opere, merces restituetur. Sed quis operarius perdurat ad accipiendam mercedem, nisi qui pascitur cum laborat? Non enim et tu operario tuo mercedem solam daturus es: non etiam afferes illi unde vires reparet in labore? Pascis utique cui mercedem daturus es. Proinde et nos Dominus in istis Scripturarum significationibus laborantes pascit. Nam si ista intelligendorum sacramentorum laetitia subtrahatur a nobis, deficimus in labore, et non erit qui perveniat ad mercedem.

17.6 PL 35, 1530

6. How, then, is work perfected in the number forty? The reason, it may be, is, because the law was given in ten precepts, and was to be preached throughout the whole world: which whole world, we are to mark, is made up of four quarters, east and west, south and north, whence the number ten, multiplied by four, comes to forty. Or, it may be, because the law is fulfilled by the gospel, which has four books: for in the gospel it is said, “I came not to destroy the law, but to fulfill it.” Whether, then, it be for this reason or for that, or for some other more probable, which is hid from us, but not from more learned men; certain it is, however, that in the number forty a certain perfection in good works is signified, which good works are most of all practised by a kind of abstinence from unlawful lusts of the world, that is, by fasting in the general sense.

Hear also the apostle when he says, “Love is the fulfilling of the law.” Whence the love? By the grace of God, by the Holy Spirit. For we could not have it from ourselves, as if making it for ourselves. It is the gift of God, and a great gift it is: for, saith he, “the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Spirit, which is given to us.” Wherefore love completes the law, and most truly it is said, “Love is the perfecting of the law.” Let us inquire as to this love, in what manner the Lord doth commend it to our consideration. Remember what I laid down: I want to explain the number thirty-eight of the years of that impotent man, why that number thirty-eight is one of weakness rather than of health. Now, as I was saying, love fulfills the law. The number forty belongs to the perfecting of the law in all works; but in love two precepts are committed to our keeping. Keep before your eyes, I beseech you, and fix in your memory, what I say; be ye not despisers of the word, that your soul may not become a trodden path, where the seed cast cannot sprout, “and the fowls of the air will come and gather it up.” Apprehend it, and lay it up in your hearts. The precepts of love, given to us by the Lord, are two: “Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind;” and, “Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.” With good reason did the widow cast “two mites,” all her substance, into the offerings of God: with good reason did the host take “two” pieces of money, for the poor man that was wounded by the robbers, for his making whole: with good reason did Jesus spent two days with the Samaritans, to establish them in love. Thus, whilst a certain good thing is generally signified by this number two, most especially is love in its twofold character set forth to us thereby. If, therefore, the number forty possesses the perfecting of the law, and the law is fulfilled only in the twin precepts of love, why dost thou wonder that he was weak and sick, who was short of forty by two?

Quomodo ergo quadragenario numero perficitur opus? Fortasse ideo, quia Lex in decem praeceptis data est, et per totum mundum praedicanda erat Lex: qui totus mundus quatuor partibus commendatur, Oriente et Occidente, Meridie et Aquilone, unde denarius per quatuor multiplicatus, ad quadragenarium pervenit. Vel quia per Evangelium quod quatuor libros habet, impletur Lex: quia in Evangelio dictum est, Non veni solvere Legem, sed adimplere . Sive ergo illa, sive ista causa, sive alia aliqua probabiliore, quae nos latet, doctiores non latet; certum est tamen quadragenario numero significari quamdam perfectionem in operibus bonis, quae maxime opera bona exercentur in abstinentia quadam ab illicitis cupiditatibus saeculi, hoc est, generali jejunio. Audi et Apostolum dicentem, Plenitudo Legis charitas . Charitas unde? Per gratiam Dei, per Spiritum sanctum. Non enim haberemus illam ex nobis, quasi facientes illam nobis. Dei donum est, et magnum donum: Quoniam charitas Dei, inquit, diffusa est in cordibus nostris per Spiritum sanctum qui datus est nobis . Charitas ergo implet Legem, et verissime dictum est, Plenitudo Legis charitas. Quaeramus hanc charitatem, quemadmodum commendatur a Domino. Mementote quid proposuerim: numerum triginta octo annorum in illo languido volo exponere, quare numerus ille trigesimus octavus languoris sit potius quam sanitatis. Ergo, ut dicebam, charitas implet Legem. Ad plenitudinem Legis in omnibus operibus pertinet quadragenarius numerus: in charitate autem duo praecepta nobis commendantur. Intuemini, obsecro, et figite memoriae quod dico; ne sitis contemptores verbi, ne fiat anima vestra via, ubi grana jacta non germinent: Et venient, inquit, volatilia coeli, et colligent ea . Percipite, et recondite in cordibus vestris. Charitatis praecepta duo sunt a Domino commendata: Diliges Dominum Deum tuum ex toto corde tuo, et ex tota anima tua, et ex tota mente tua; et, Diliges proximum tuum tanquam teipsum. In his duobus praeceptis tota Lex pendet et Prophetae . Merito et illa vidua omnes facultates suas, dua minuta misit in dona Dei : merito et pro illo languido a latronibus sauciato, stabularius duos nummos accepit unde sanaretur : merito apud Samaritanos biduum fecit Jesus, ut eos charitate firmaret . Binario ergo isto numero cum aliquid boni significatur maxime bipartita charitas commendatur. Si ergo quadragenarius numerus habet perfectionem Legis et Lex non impletur nisi in gemino praecepto charitatis; quid miraris quia languebat qui ad quadraginta, duo minus habebat?

17.7 PL 35, 1531

7. Therefore let us now see the sacred mystery whereby this impotent man is healed by the Lord. The Lord Himself came, the Teacher of love, full of love, “shortening,” as it was predicted of Him, “the word upon the earth,” and showed that the law and the prophets hang on two precepts of love. Upon these hung Moses with his number forty, upon these Elias with his; and the Lord brought in this number in His testimony. This impotent man is healed by the Lord in person; but before healing him, what does He say to him? “Wilt thou be made whole?” The man answered that he had not a man to put him into the pool. Truly he had need of a “man” to his healing, but that “man” one who is also God. “For there is one God, and one Mediator between God and man, the man Christ Jesus.” He came, then, the Man who was needed: why should the healing be delayed? “Arise,” saith He; “take up thy bed, and walk.” He said three things: “Arise, Take up thy bed, and Walk.” But that “Arise” was not a command to do a work, but the operation of healing. And the man, on being made whole, received two commands: “Take up thy bed, and Walk.” I ask you, why was it not enough to say, “Walk?” Or, at any rate, why was it not enough to say, “Arise”? For when the man had arisen whole, he would not have remained in the place. Would it not be for the purpose of going away that he would have arisen? My impression is, that He who found the man lacking two things, gave him these two precepts: for, by ordering him to do two things, it is as if He filled up that which was lacking.

Videamus proinde jam quo sacramento iste languidus curetur a Domino. Venit enim ipse Dominus, charitatis doctor, charitate plenus, brevians, sicut de illo praedictum est, verbum super terram : et ostendit in duobus praeceptis charitatis pendere Legem et Prophetas. Inde ergo pependit Moyses quadragenario suo, inde Elias cum suo, hunc numerum attulit Dominus in testimonio suo. Curatur iste languidus a praesente Domino; sed prius quid ei dicit? Vis sanus fieri? Respondit ille hominem se non habere, a quo in piscinam mittatur. Vere necessarius erat illi homo ad sanitatem, sed homo ille qui et Deus est. Unus enim Deus, unus et mediator Dei et hominum, homo Christus Jesus . Venit ergo homo qui erat necessarius: quare sanitas differretur? Surge, inquit, tolle grabatum tuum, et ambula. Tria dixit, Surge, tolle grabatum tuum, et ambula. Sed Surge, non operis imperium fuit, sed operatio sanitatis. Sano autem duo imperavit, Tolle grabatum tuum, et ambula. Rogo vos, cur non sufficeret, Ambula? aut certe cur non sufficeret, Surge? Neque enim ille cum sanus surrexisset, in loco remansisset. Nonne ad hoc surrexisset ut abiisset? Movet ergo me etiam quod duo praecepit, qui illum jacentem duobus minus invenit: tanquam enim duo quaedam jubendo, quod minus erat implevit.

17.8 PL 35, 1531

8. How, then, do we find the two precepts of love indicated in these two commands of the Lord? “Take up thy bed,” saith He, “and walk.” What the two precepts are, my brethren, recollect with me. For they ought to be thoroughly familiar to you, and not merely to come into your mind when they are recited by us, but they ought never to be blotted out from your hearts. Let it ever be your supreme thought, that you must love God and your neighbor: “God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbor as thyself.” These must always be pondered, meditated, retained, practised, and fulfilled. The love of God comes first in the order of enjoying; but in the order of doing, the love of our neighbor comes first. For He who commanded thee this love in two precepts did not charge thee to love thy neighbor first, and then God, but first God, afterwards thy neighbor. Thou however, as thou dost not yet see God dost earn to see Him by loving thy neighbor; by loving thy neighbor thou purgest thine eye for seeing God, as John evidently says, “If thou lovest not thy brother whom thou seest, how canst thou love God, whom thou dost not see?” See, thou art told, “Love God.” If thou say to me, “Show me Him, that I may love Him;” what shall I answer, but what the same John saith: “No man hath seen God at any time”? And, that you may not suppose yourself to be wholly estranged from seeing God, he saith, “God is love; and he that dwelleth in love dwelleth in God.” Therefore love thy neighbor; look at the source of thy love of thy neighbor; there thou wilt see, as thou mayest, God. Begin, then, to love thy neighbor. “Break thy bread to the hungry, and bring into thy house him that is needy without shelter; if thou seest the naked, clothe him; and despise not those of the household of thy seed.” And in doing this, what wilt thou get in consequence? “Then shall thy light break forth as the morning light.” Thy light is thy God, a “morning light” to thee, because He shall come to thee after the night of this world: for He neither rises nor sets, because He is ever abiding. He will be a morning light to thee on thy return, He who had set for thee on thy falling away from Him. Therefore, in this “Take up thy bed,” He seems to me to have said, Love thy neighbor.

Quomodo ergo inveniamus in his duobus Domini jussis, duo illa praecepta significata charitatis? Tolle, inquit, grabatum tuum, et ambula. Quae sunt illa duo praecepta, fratres, recolite mecum. Notissima enim esse debent, nec modo tantum venire in mentem cum commemorantur a nobis, sed deleri nunquam debent de cordibus vestris. Semper omnino cogitate diligendum esse Deum et proximum: Deum ex toto corde, ex tota anima, et ex tota mente; et proximum tanquam seipsum. Haec semper cogitanda, haec meditanda, haec retinenda, haec agenda, haec implenda sunt. Dei dilectio prior est ordine praecipiendi; proximi autem dilectio prior est ordine faciendi. Neque enim qui tibi praeciperet dilectionem istam in duobus praeceptis, prius tibi commendaret proximum, et postea Deum; sed prius Deum, postea proximum. Tu autem quia Deum nondum vides, diligendo proximum promereris quem videas; diligendo proximum purgas oculum ad videndum Deum, evidenter Joanne dicente, Si fratrem quem vides non diligis, Deum quem non vides quomodo diligere poteris ? Ecce dicitur tibi, Dilige Deum. Si dicas mihi, Ostende mihi quem diligam; quid respondebo, nisi quod ait ipse Joannes, Deum nemo vidit unquam ? Et ne te alienum omnino a Deo videndo esse arbitreris: Deus, inquit, charitas est; et qui manet in charitate, in Deo manet . Dilige ergo proximum: et intuere in te unde diligis proximum; ibi videbis, ut poteris, Deum. Incipe ergo diligere proximum. Frange esurienti panem tuum, et egenum sine lecto induc in domum tuam: si videris nudum, vesti, et domesticos seminis tui ne despexeris. Faciens autem ista quid consequeris? Tunc erumpet velut matutina lux tua . Lux tua Deus tuus est, tibi matutina, quia post noctem saeculi tibi veniet: nam ille nec oritur, nec occidit; quia semper manet. Erit tibi matutinus redeunti, qui tibi occasum fecerat pereunti. Ergo, Tolle grabatum tuum, mihi videtur dixisse, Dilige proximum tuum.

17.9 PL 35, 1532

9. But why the love of our neighbor is set forth by the taking up of the bed, is still shut up, and, as I suppose, needs to be expounded: unless, perhaps, it offend us that our neighbor should be indicated by means of a bed, a stolid, senseless thing. Let not my neighbor be angry if he be set forth to us by a thing without soul and without feeling. The Lord Himself, even our Saviour Jesus Christ, is called the corner-stone, to build up two in Himself. He is called also a rock, from which water flowed forth: “And that rock was Christ.” What wonder, then, if Christ is called rock, that neighbor is called wood? Yet not any kind of wood whatever; as neither that was any kind of rock soever, but one from which water flowed to the thirsty; nor any kind soever of stone, but a corner-stone, which in itself coupled two walls coming from different directions. So neither mayest thou take thy neighbor to be wood of any kind soever, but a bed. Then what is there in a bed, pray? What, but that the impotent man was borne on it; but, when made whole, he carries the bed? What does the apostle say? “Bear ye one another’s burdens, and so shall ye fulfill the law of Christ.” Now the law of Christ is love, and love is not fulfilled except we bear one another’s burdens. “Forbearing,” saith he, “one another in love, endeavoring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.” When thou wast weak thy neighbor bore thee: thou art made whole, bear thy neighbor. So wilt thou fill up, O man, that which was lacking to thee. “Take up thy bed, then.” But when thou hast taken it up, stay not in the place; “walk.” By loving thy neighbor, by caring for thy neighbor, dost thou perform thy going. Whither goest thy way, but to the Lord God, whom we ought to love with the whole heart, and with the whole soul, and with the whole mind? For we are not yet come to the Lord, but we have our neighbor with us. Bear him, then, when thou walkest, that thou mayest come to Him with whom thou desirest to abide. Therefore, “take up thy bed, and walk.”

Sed clausum est adhuc, et expositione indiget, quantum arbitror, quare in tollendo grabato dilectio proximi commendetur: nisi forte hoc nos offendit, quod per grabatum, rem quamdam stolidam et insensatam, proximus commendatur. Non irascatur proximus, si commendatur nobis per rem quae sine anima et sine sensu est. Ipse Dominus et salvator noster Jesus Christus lapis angularis dictus est, ut duos conderet in se . Dictus est et petra, unde aqua profluxit: Petra autem erat Christus . Quid ergo mirum, si Petra Christus, lignum proximus? Non tamen qualecumque lignum: quomodo nec illa qualiscumque petra, sed unde aqua profluxerat sitientibus; nec qualiscumque lapis, sed angularis, qui in semetipso copulavit duos parietes e diverso venientes. Sic nec qualecumque lignum proximum acceperis, sed grabatum. Quid ergo in grabato, obsecro te? quid, nisi quia ille languidus grabato portabatur? Sanus autem grabatum portat. Quid dictum est ab Apostolo? Invicem onera vestra portate, et sic adimplebitis legem Christi . Lex ergo Christi charitas est, nec charitas impletur nisi invicem onera nostra portemus. Sufferentes, inquit, invicem in dilectione, studentes servare unitatem spiritus in vinculo pacis . Cum esses languidus, portabat te proximus tuus; sanus factus es, porta proximum tuum: Invicem onera vestra portate, et sic adimplebitis legem Christi. Sic adimplebis, o homo, quod tibi deerat. Tolle ergo grabatum tuum. Sed cum tuleris, noli remanere, ambula. Diligendo proximum, et curam habendo de proximo tuo, iter agis. Quo iter agis, nisi ad Dominum Deum, ad eum quem diligere debemus ex toto corde, ex tota anima, ex tota mente? Ad Dominum enim nondum pervenimus, sed proximum nobiscum habemus. Porta ergo eum, cum quo ambulas; ut ad eum pervenias, cum quo manere desideras. Tolle ergo grabatum tuum, et ambula.

17.10 PL 35, 1532

10. The man did this, and the Jews were offended. For they saw a man carrying his bed on the Sabbath-day, and they did not blame the Lord for healing him on the Sabbath, that He should be able to answer them, that if any of them had a beast fallen into a well, he would surely draw it out on the Sabbath-day, and save his beast; and so, now they did not object to Him that a man was made whole on the Sabbath-day, but that the man was carrying his bed. But if the healing was not to be deferred, should a work also have been commanded? “It is not lawful for thee,” say they, to do what thou art doing, “to take up thy bed.” And he, in defence, put the author of his healing before his censors, saying, “He that made me whole, the same said unto me, Take up thy bed, and walk.” Should I not take injunction from him from whom I received healing? And they said, “Who is the man that said unto thee, Take up thy bed, and walk?”

Fecit hoc ille, et scandalizati sunt Judaei. Videbant enim hominem die sabbati portantem grabatum suum, nec calumniabantur Domino quod sanum eum fecerat sabbato, ut eis respondere posset quia si cujusquam eorum jumentum in puteum cecidisset, utique die sabbati erueret illud, et salvaret jumentum suum : non itaque jam illi objiciebant quod die sabbati sanus factus esset homo; sed quod portabat grabatum suum. Si sanitas non erat differenda, numquid et opus fuerat imperandum? Non licet tibi, inquiunt, facere quod facis, tollere grabatum tuum. Et ille auctorem sanitatis suae objiciebat calumniatoribus: Qui, inquit, me fecit sanum, ipse mihi dixit, Tolle grabatum tuum, et ambula. Non acciperem jussionem a quo receperam sanitatem? Et illi: Quis est ille homo qui tibi dixit, Tolle grabatum tuum, et ambula?

17.11 PL 35, 1533

11. “But he that was made whole knew not who it was” that had said this to him. “For Jesus,” when He had done this, and given him this order, “turned away from him in the crowd.” See how this also is fulfilled. We bear our neighbor, and walk towards God; but Him, to whom we are walking, we do not yet see: for that reason also, that man did not yet know Jesus. The mystery herein intimated to us is, that we believe on Him whom we do not yet see; and that He may not be seen, He turns aside in the crowd. It is difficult in a crowd to see Christ: a certain solitude is necessary for our mind; it is by a certain solitude of contemplation that God is seen. A crowd has noise; this seeing requires secrecy. “Take up thy bed”—being thyself borne, bear thy neighbor; “and walk,” that thou mayest come to the goal. Do not seek Christ in a crowd: He is not as one of a crowd; He excels all crowd. That great fish first ascended from the sea, and He sits in heaven making intercession for us: as the great high priest He entered alone into that within the veil; the crowd stands without. Do thou walk, bearing thy neighbor: if thou hast learned to bear, thou, who wast wont to be borne. In a word, even now as yet thou knowest not Jesus, not yet seest Jesus: what follows thereafter? Since that man desisted not from taking up his bed and walking, “Jesus seeth him afterwards in the temple.” He did not see Jesus in the crowd, he saw Him in the temple. The Lord Jesus, indeed, saw him both in the crowd and in the temple; but the impotent man does not know Jesus in the crowd, but he knows Him in the temple. The man came then to the Lord: saw Him in the temple, saw Him in a consecrated, saw Him in a holy place. And what does the Lord say to him? “Behold, thou art made whole; sin no more, lest some worse thing befall thee.”

Sed qui sanus erat factus nesciebat quis esset, a quo hoc audierat. Jesus autem, cum hoc fecisset, et jussisset, declinaverat ab eo in turba. Videte quemadmodum et hoc impleatur. Portamus proximum, et ambulamus, ad Deum; sed eum ad quem ambulamus, nondum videmus: ideo et ille nondum noverat Jesum. Sacramentum hoc commendatum est, quia in eum credimus quem nondum videmus: et ut non videatur, declinat in turba. Difficile est in turba videre Christum: solitudo quaedam necessaria est menti nostrae; quadam solitudine intentionis videtur Deus. Turba strepitum habet; visio ista secretum desiderat. Tolle grabatum tuum, porta portatus proximum tuum; et ambula, ut pervenias. Noli Jesum quaerere in turba, non est tanquam unus de turba: praevenit omnem turbam. Prior ascendit de mari piscis ille magnus, et in coelis sedet interpellans pro nobis: tanquam sacerdos magnus, unus intravit in interiora veli: turba foris stat. Ambula tu, qui portas proximum tuum; si didicisti portare, qui solebas portari. Denique modo nondum nosti Jesum, nondum vides Jesum: quid postea sequitur? Quoniam non destitit ille tollendo grabatum suum, et ambulando, Vidit eum postea Jesus in templo. In turba non eum vidit, in templo vidit. Dominus quidem Jesus et in turba eum videbat, et in templo: ille autem languidus Jesum in turba non cognoscit, in templo cognoscit. Pervenit ergo ille ad Dominum; vidit eum in templo, vidit eum in loco sacrato, in loco sancto. Et quid ab eo audit? Ecce jam sanus factus es; noli peccare, ne quid tibi deterius contingat.

17.12 PL 35, 1533

12. The man, then, after he saw Jesus, and knew Him to be the author of his healing, was not slothful in preaching Him whom he had seen: “He departed, and told the Jews that it was Jesus that had made him whole.” He brought them word, and they were mad against him; he preached his own salvation, they sought not their own salvation.

Tunc ille, posteaquam vidit Jesum, et cognovit Jesum auctorem sanitatis suae, non fuit piger in evangelizando quem viderat: Abiit, et nuntiavit Judaeis quia Jesus esset qui eum sanum fecerat. Ille annuntiabat, et illi insaniebant: ille salutem suam praedicabat, illi salutem suam non quaerebant.

17.13 PL 35, 1533

13. The Jews persecuted the Lord Jesus because He did these things on the Sabbath-day. Let us hear what answer the Lord now made to the Jews. I have told you how He is wont to answer concerning the healing of men on the Sabbath-day, that they used not on the Sabbath-day to slight their cattle, either in delivering or in feeding them. What does He answer concerning the carrying of the bed? A manifest corporal work was done before the eyes of the Jews; not a healing of the body, but a bodily work, which appeared not so necessary as the healing. Let the Lord, then, openly declare that the sacrament of the Sabbath, even the sign of keeping one day, was given to the Jews for a time, but that the fulfillment of the sacrament had come in Himself. “My Father,” saith He, “worketh hitherto, and I work.” He sent a great commotion among them: the water is troubled by the coming of the Lord, but yet He that troubles is not seen. Yet one great sick one is to be healed by the troubled water, the whole world by the death of the Lord.

Persequebantur Judaei Dominum Jesum, quia haec faciebat in sabbato. Quid ergo Dominus modo respondit Judaeis, audiamus. De sanis factis hominibus sabbato, dixi quid soleat respondere, quia jumenta sua non contemnebant sabbato, vel liberando vel alendo. De portato grabato quid respondit? Manifestum opus corporale factum erat ante oculos Judaeorum: non sanitas corporis, sed operatio corporis; quae non videbatur ita necessaria, quemadmodum sanitas. Aperte ergo Dominus dicat sacramentum sabbati, et signum observandi unius diei ad tempus datum esse Judaeis; impletionem vero ipsam sacramenti in illo venisse. Pater meus, inquit, usque modo operatur, et ego operor. Misit in eos magnum tumultum; adventu Domini turbatur aqua, sed qui turbat, latet. Tamen sanandus est turbata aqua aeger unus magnus, passo Domino totus mundus.

17.14 PL 35, 1534

14. Let us see, then, the answer made by the Truth: “My Father worketh hitherto, and I work.” Is it false, then, which the Scripture has said, that “God rested from all His works on the seventh day”? And does the Lord Jesus speak contrary to this Scripture ministered by Moses, whilst He Himself says to the Jews, “If ye believed Moses, ye would believe me; for He wrote of me”? See, then, whether Moses did not mean it to be significant of something that “God rested on the seventh day.” For God had not become wearied in doing the work of His own creation, and needed rest as a man. How can He have been wearied, who made by a word? Yet is both that true, that “God rested from His works on the seventh day;” and this also is true that Jesus saith, “My Father worketh hitherto.” But who can unfold it in words, man to men, weak to weak, unlearned to them that seek to learn; and if he chance to understand somewhat, unable to bring it forth and unfold it to men, who with difficulty, it may be, receive it, even if what is received can possibly be unfolded? Who, I say, my brethren, can unfold in words how God both works while at rest, and rests while working? I pray you to put this matter off while you are advancing on the way; for this seeing requires the temple of God, requires the holy place. Bear your neighbor, and walk. Ye shall see Him in that place where ye shall not require the words of men.

Videamus ergo responsionem Veritatis: Pater meus usque modo operatur, et ego operor. Falsum ergo dixit Scriptura quia Deus requievit ab omnibus operibus suis in die septimo ? et contra hanc Scripturam per Moysen ministratam, loquitur Dominus Jesus, cum ipse dicat Judaeis, Si crederetis Moysi, crederetis et mihi: de me enim ille scripsit ? Videte ergo ne aliquid voluit significare Moyses, quod Deus requievit in die septimo. Non enim defecerat Deus operando creaturam suam, et indigebat requie sicut homo. Quomodo defecerat qui verbo fecerat? Tamen et illud verum est, quia requievit Deus ab operibus suis in die septimo; et hoc verum est quod ait Jesus, Pater meus usque modo operatur. Sed quis explicet verbis, homo hominibus, infirmus infirmis, indoctus discere cupientibus, et forte si quid sapit, promere et explicare non valens hominibus, difficile forte capientibus, etiam si explicari possit quod capitur? Quis, inquam, fratres mei, explicet verbis quomodo Deus et quietus operetur, et operans quiescat? Obsecro vos, ut hoc vobis proficientibus differatis; visio enim ista templum Dei quaerit, sanctum locum quaerit: portate proximum et ambulate; ibi eum videbitis, ubi verba hominum non quaeratis.

17.15 PL 35, 1534

15. Perhaps we can more appropriately say this, that in the saying, “God rested on the seventh day,” he signified by a great mystery the Lord and our Saviour Jesus Christ Himself, who spoke and said, “My Father worketh hitherto, and I work.” For the Lord Jesus is, of course, God. For He is the Word of God, and you have heard that “in the begin ning was the Word;” and not any word whatsoever, but “the Word was God, and all things were made by Him.” He was perhaps signified as about to rest on the seventh day from all His works. For, read the Gospel, and see what great works Jesus wrought. He wrought our salvation on the cross, that all things foretold by the prophets might be fulfilled in Him. He was crowned with thorns; He hung on the tree; said, “I thirst,” received vinegar on a sponge, that it might be fulfilled which was said, “And in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink.” And when all His works were completed, on the sixth day of the week, He bowed His head and gave up the ghost, and on the Sabbath-day He rested in the tomb from all His works. Therefore it is as if He said to the Jews, “Why do ye expect that I should not work on the Sabbath? The Sabbath-day was ordained for you for a sign of me. You observe the works of God: I was there when they were made, by me were they all made; I know them. ‘My Father worketh hitherto.’ The Father made the light, but He spoke that there should be light; if He spoke, it was by His Word He made it: His Word I was, I am; by me was the world made in those works, by me the world is ruled in these works. My Father worked when He made the world, and hitherto now worketh while He rules the world: therefore by me He made when He made, and by me He rules while He rules.” This He said, but to whom? To men deaf, blind, lame, impotent, not acknowledging the physician, and as if in a frenzy they had lost their wits, wishing to slay Him.

Hoc forte potius dicere valemus, quia et in eo quod Deus in die septimo requievit, ipsum Dominum et salvatorem nostrum Jesum Christum, qui haec loquebatur et dicebat, Pater meus usque modo operatur, et ego operor, magno sacramento significavit. Quia et Dominus Jesus utique Deus. Ipse est enim Verbum Dei, et audistis quia in principio erat Verbum; et non qualecumque Verbum, sed Deus erat Verbum, et omnia per ipsum facta sunt : forte significatus est requieturus in die septimo ab omnibus operibus suis. Legite enim Evangelium, et videte quanta operatus sit Jesus. Operatus est salutem nostram in cruce, ut implerentur in eo omnia praedicta Prophetarum: coronatus est spinis, suspensus est ligno; dixit, Sitio, accepit acetum in spongia, ut impleretur quod dictum est, Et in siti mea potaverunt me aceto . At ubi impleta sunt omnia opera ejus, sexta sabbati inclinato capite reddidit spiritum, et in sepulcro sabbato requievit ab omnibus operibus suis . Ergo tanquam diceret Judaeis, Quid exspectatis ut non operer sabbato? Sabbati dies vobis ad significationem meam praeceptus est. Opera Dei attenditis; ego ibi eram cum fierent, per me facta sunt omnia, ego novi: Pater meus usque modo operatur. Operatus est Pater lucem; sed dixit ut fieret lux : si dixit, Verbo operatus est; Verbum ejus ego eram, ego sum: per me factus est mundus in illis operibus, per me regitur mundus in istis operibus. Pater meus et tunc operatus est cum fecit mundum, et usque nunc operatur cum regit mundum; ergo et per me fecit cum fecit, et per me regit cum regit. Dixit haec, sed quibus? Surdis, caecis, claudis, languidis, medicum non agnoscentibus, et tanquam in phrenesi mente perdita occidere volentibus.

17.16 PL 35, 1535

16. Further, what said the evangelist as he went on? “Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill Him, because He not only broke the Sabbath, but said also that God was His Father;” not in any ordinary manner, but how? “Making Himself equal with God.” For we all say to God, “Our Father which art in heaven;” we read also that the Jews said, “Seeing Thou art our Father.” Therefore it was not for this they were angry, because He said that God was His Father, but because He said it in quite another way than men do. Behold, the Jews understand what the Arians do not understand. The Arians, in fact, say that the Son is not equal with the Father, and hence it is that the heresy was driven from the Church. Lo, the very blind, the very slayers of Christ, still understood the words of Christ. They did not understand Him to be Christ, nor did they understand Him to be the Son of God: but they did nevertheless understand that in these words such a Son of God was intimated to them as should be equal with God. Who He was they knew not; still they did acknowledge such a One to be declared, in that “He said God was His Father, making Himself equal with God.” Was He not therefore equal with God? He did not make Himself equal, but the Father begat Him equal. Were He to make Himself equal, He would fall by robbery. For he who wished to make himself equal with God, whilst he was not so, fell, and of an angel became a devil, and administered to man that cup of pride by which himself was cast down. For this fallen said to man, envying his standing, “Taste, and ye shall be as gods;” that is, seize to yourselves by usurpation that which ye are not made, for I also have been cast down by robbery. He did not put forth this, but this is what he persuaded to. Christ, however, was begotten equal to the Father, not made; begotten of the substance of the Father. Whence the apostle thus declares Him: “Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God.” What means “thought it not robbery”? He usurped not equality with God, but was in that equality in which He was begotten. And how were we to come to the equal God? “He emptied Himself, taking upon Him the form of a servant.” But He emptied Himself not by losing what He was, but by taking to Him what He was not. The Jews, despising this form of a servant, could not understand the Lord Christ equal to the Father, although they had not the least doubt that He affirmed this of Himself, and therefore were they enraged: and yet He still bore with them, and sought the healing of them, while they raged against Him.

Proinde quid secutus Evangelista dixit? Hinc ergo magis quaerebant eum Judaei interficere, quia non solum solvebat sabbatum, sed et patrem suum dicebat Deum. Non quomodocumque: sed quid? Aequalem se faciens Deo. Nam omnes dicimus Deo, Pater noster qui es in coelis : legimus et Judaeos dixisse, Cum tu sis pater noster . Ergo non hinc irascebantur, quia patrem suum dicebat Deum; sed quod longe alio modo quam homines. Ecce intelligunt Judaei quod non intelligunt Ariani. Ariani quippe inaequalem Patri Filium dicunt, et inde haeresis est pulsa de Ecclesia. Ecce ipsi caeci, ipsi interfectores Christi, intellexerunt tamen verba Christi. Non eum intellexerunt esse Christum, nec eum intellexerunt Filium Dei: sed tamen intellexerunt in illis verbis, quia talis commendaretur Filius Dei, qui aequalis esset Deo. Quis erat nesciebant; talem tamen praedicari agnoscebant, quia patrem suum dicebat Deum, aequalem se faciens Deo. Non erat ergo aequalis Deo? Non ipse se faciebat aequalem, sed ille illum genuerat aequalem. Si se ipse faceret aequalem Deo, caderet per rapinam. Qui enim se voluit aequalem facere Deo cum non esset, cecidit , et ex angelo factus est diabolus: et hanc superbiam homini propinavit, unde ipse dejectus est. Nam hoc dixit homini, cui stanti lapsus invidit, Gustate, et eritis sicut dii : id est, usurpatione rapite quod facti non estis; quia et ego rapiendo dejectus sum. Non hoc prodebat, sed hoc suadebat. Christus autem aequalis Patri natus erat, non factus: natus de substantia Patris. Unde illum sic commendat Apostolus: Qui cum in forma Dei esset, non rapinam arbitratus est esse aequalis Deo. Quid est, non rapinam arbitratus est? Non usurpavit aequalitatem Dei; sed erat in illa, in qua natus erat. Et nos ad aequalem Deum quomodo perveniremus? Semetipsum exinanivit formam servi accipiens . Non ergo se exinanivit amittens quod erat, sed accipiens quod non erat. Hanc formam servi contemnentes Judaei, Dominum Christum aequalem Patri intelligere non poterant; quamvis eum hoc de se dicere minime dubitabant, et ideo saeviebant: et adhuc tamen eos ille perferebat, et sanitatem saevientium requirebat.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Save for later

Enter your email and we will send you a sign-in link. No password. What you save (articles, verses, chapters, documents) follows you to any device.