Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 8

St Augustine of Hippo (AD 354–430) · In Joannis evangelium tractatus CXXIV · PL 35, 1379–1976

8.1 Chapter II. 1–4 PL 35, 1450

1. The miracle indeed of our Lord Jesus Christ, whereby He made the water into wine, is not marvellous to those who know that it was God’s doing. For He who made wine on that day at the marriage feast, in those six water-pots, which He commanded to be filled with water, the self-same does this every year in vines. For even as that which the servants put into the water-pots was turned into wine by the doing of the Lord, so in like manner also is what the clouds pour forth changed into wine by the doing of the same Lord. But we do not wonder at the latter, because it happens every year: it has lost its marvellousness by its constant recurrence. And yet it suggests a greater consideration than that which was done in the water-pots. For who is there that considers the works of God, whereby this whole world is governed and regulated, who is not amazed and overwhelmed with miracles? If he considers the vigorous power of a single grain of any seed whatever, it is a mighty thing, it inspires him with awe. But since men, intent on a different matter, have lost the consideration of the works of God, by which they should daily praise Him as the Creator, God has, as it were, reserved to Himself the doing of certain extraordinary actions, that, by striking them with wonder, He might rouse men as from sleep to worship Him. A dead man has risen again; men marvel: so many are born daily, and none marvels. If we reflect more considerately, it is a matter of greater wonder for one to be who was not before, than for one who was to come to life again. Yet the same God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, doeth by His word all these things; and it is He who created that governs also. The former miracles He did by His Word, God with Himself; the latter miracles He did by the same Word incarnate, and for us made man. As we wonder at the things which were done by the man Jesus, so let us wonder at the things which where done by Jesus God. By Jesus God were made heaven, and earth, and the sea, all the garniture of heaven, the abounding riches of the earth, and the fruitfulness of the sea;—all these things which lie within the reach of our eyes were made by Jesus God. And we look at these things, and if His own spirit is in us they in such manner please us, that we praise Him that contrived them; not in such manner that turning ourselves to the works we turn away from the Maker, and, in a manner, turning our face to the things made and our backs to Him that made them.

Miraculum quidem Domini nostri Jesu Christi, quo de aqua vinum fecit, non est mirum eis qui noverunt quia Deus fecit. Ipse enim fecit vinum illo die in nuptiis in sex illis hydriis, quas impleri aqua praecepit , qui omni anno facit hoc in vitibus. Sicut enim quod miserunt ministri in hydrias, in vinum conversum est opere Domini; sic et quod nubes fundunt, in vinum convertitur ejusdem opere Domini. Illud autem non miramur, quia omni anno fit: assiduitate amisit admirationem. Nam et considerationem majorem invenit, quam id quod factum est in hydriis aquae. Quis est enim qui considerat opera Dei, quibus regitur et administratur totus hic mundus, et non obstupescit obruiturque miraculis? Si consideret vim unius grani, cujuslibet seminis, magna quaedam res est, horror est consideranti. Sed quia homines in aliud intenti perdiderunt considerationem operum Dei, in qua darent laudem quotidie Creatori; tanquam servavit sibi Deus inusitata quaedam quae faceret, ut tanquam dormientes homines, ad se colendum mirabilius excitaret. Mortuus resurrexit, mirati sunt homines: tot quotidie nascuntur, et nemo miratur. Si consideremus prudentius, majoris miraculi est esse qui non erat, quam reviviscere qui erat. Idem tamen Deus Pater Domini nostri Jesu Christi per Verbum suum facit omnia haec, et regit qui creavit. Priora miracula fecit per Verbum suum Deum apud se: posteriora miracula fecit per ipsum Verbum suum, incarnatum, et propter nos hominem factum. Sicut miramur quae facta sunt per hominem. Jesum, miremur quae facta sunt per Deum Jesum. Per Deum Jesum facta sunt coelum et terra, mare, et omnis ornatus coeli, opulentia terrae, fecunditas maris; omnia haec quae oculis adjacent, per Jesum Deum facta sunt. Et videmus haec, et si est in nobis Spiritus ipsius, sic nobis placent ut artifex laudetur: non ut ad opera conversi ab artifice avertamur, et faciem quodammodo ponentes ad ea quae fecit, dorsum ponamus ad eum qui fecit.

8.2 PL 35, 1451

2. And these things indeed we see; they lie before our eyes. But what of those we do not see, as angels, virtues, powers, dominions, and every inhabitant of this fabric which is above the heavens, and beyond the reach of our eyes? Yet angels, too, when necessary, often showed themselves to men. Has not God made all these too by His Word, that is, by His only Son, our Lord Jesus Christ? What of the human soul itself, which is not seen, and yet by its works shown in the flesh excites great admiration in those that duly reflect on them,—by whom was it made, unless by God? And through whom was it made, unless through the Son of God? Not to speak as yet of the soul of man: the soul of any brute whatever, see how it regulates the huge body, puts forth the senses, the eyes to see, the ears to hear, the nostrils to smell, the taste to discern flavors—the members, in short, to execute their respective functions! Is it the body, not the soul, namely the inhabitant of the body, that doeth these things? The soul is not apparent to the eyes, nevertheless it excites admiration by these its actions. Direct now thy consideration to the soul of man, on which God has bestowed understanding to know its Creator, to discern and distinguish between good and evil, that is, between right and wrong: see how many things it does through the body! Observe this whole world arranged in the same human commonwealth, with what administrations, with what orderly degrees of authority, with what conditions of citizenship, with what laws, manners, arts! The whole of this is brought about by the soul, and yet this power of the soul is not visible. When withdrawn from the body, the latter is a mere carcase: first, it in a manner preserves it from rottenness. For all flesh is corruptible, and falls off into putridity unless preserved by the soul as by a kind of seasoning. But the human soul has this quality in common with the soul of the brute; those qualities rather are to be admired which I have stated, such as belong to the mind and intellect, wherein also it is renewed after the image of its Creator, after whose image man was formed. What will this power of the soul be when this body shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality? If such is its power, acting through corruptible flesh, what shall be its power through a spiritual body, after the resurrection of the dead? Yet this soul, as I have said, of admirable nature and substance, is a thing invisible, intellectual; this soul also was made by God Jesus, for He is the Word of God. “All things were made by Him, and without Him was nothing made.”

Et haec quidem videmus, et adjacent oculis: quid illa quae non videmus, sicut sunt Angeli, Virtutes, Potestates, Dominationes, omnisque habitator fabricae hujus supercoelestis, non adjacens oculis nostris? Quanquam saepe et Angeli, quando oportuit, demonstraverunt se hominibus. Nonne Deus et per Verbum suum, id est, unicum Filium suum Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum fecit haec omnia? Quid ipsa anima humana, quae non videtur, et per opera quae exhibet in carne, magnam praebet admirationem bene considerantibus, a quo facta est, nisi a Deo? et per quem facta est, nisi per Filium Dei? Nondum dico de anima hominis. Cujusvis pecoris anima quomodo regit molem suam! sensus omnes exserit, oculos ad videndum, aures ad audiendum, nares ad percipiendum odorem, oris judicium ad sapores discernendos, membra denique ipsa ad peragenda officia sua. Numquid haec corpus, et non anima, id est, habitatrix corporis agit? Nec tamen videtur oculis, et ex his quae agit, admirationem movet. Accedat jam consideratio tua etiam ad animam humanam, cui tribuit Deus intellectum cognoscendi Creatorem suum, dignoscendi et distinguendi inter bonum et malum, hoc est inter justum et injustum: quanta agit per corpus! Attendite universum orbem terrarum ordinatum in ipsa humana republica: quibus administrationibus, quibus ordinibus potestatum, conditionibus civitatum, legibus, moribus, artibus! Hoc totum per animam geritur, et haec vis animae non videtur. Cum subtrahitur corpori, cadaver jacet: cum autem adest corpori, primo condit quodammodo putores. Corruptibilis est enim omnis caro, in putredines defluit, nisi quodam condimento animae teneatur. Sed hoc commune illi est cum pecoris anima: illa magis miranda quae dixi, quae ad mentem et intellectum pertinent; ubi etiam ad imaginem Creatoris sui renovatur, ad cujus imaginem factus est homo . Quid erit haec vis animae, cum et corpus hoc induerit incorruptionem, et mortale hoc induerit immortalitatem ? Si tanta potest per carnem corruptibilem, quid poterit per corpus spirituale post resurrectionem mortuorum? Haec tamen anima, ut dixi, admirabilis naturae atque substantiae, invisibilis res est et intelligibilis: et haec tamen per Jesum Deum facta est, quia ipse est Verbum Dei. Omnia per ipsum facta sunt, et sine ipso factum est nihil .

8.3 PL 35, 1451

3. When we see, therefore, such deeds wrought by Jesus God, why should we wonder at water being turned into wine by the man Jesus? For He was not made man in such manner that He lost His being God. Man was added to Him, God not lost to Him. This miracle was wrought by the same who made all those things. Let us not therefore wonder that God did it, but love Him because He did it in our midst, and for the purpose of our restoration. For He gives us certain intimations by the very circumstances of the case. I suppose that it was not without cause He came to the marriage. The miracle apart, there lies something mysterious and sacramental in the very fact. Let us knock, that He may open to us, and fill us with the invisible wine: for we were water, and He made us wine, made us wise; for He gave us the wisdom of His faith, whilst before we were foolish. And it appertains, it may be, to this wisdom, together with the honor of God, and with the praise of His majesty, and with the charity of His most powerful mercy, to understand what was done in this miracle.

Cum ergo tanta videamus facta per Deum Jesum, quid miramur aquam in vinum conversam per hominem Jesum? Neque enim sic factus est homo, ut perderet quod Deus erat: accessit illi homo, non amissus est Deus. Ipse ergo fecit hoc, qui illa omnia. Non itaque miremur quia Deus fecit; sed amemus quia inter nos fecit, et propter nostram reparationem fecit. Aliquid enim et in ipsis factis innuit nobis. Puto quia non sine causa venit ad nuptias. Excepto miraculo, aliquid in ipso facto mysterii et sacramenti latet. Pulsemus ut aperiat, et de vino invisibili inebriet nos: quia et nos aqua eramus, et vinum nos fecit, sapientes nos fecit; sapimus enim fidem ipsius, qui prius insipientes eramus. Et forte ad ipsam sapientiam pertinet, cum honore Dei, et cum laude majestatis ejus, et cum charitate potentissimae misericordiae ejus, intelligere quid sit gestum in hoc miraculo.

8.4 PL 35, 1452

4. The Lord, on being invited, came to the marriage. What wonder if He came to that house to a marriage, having come into this world to a marriage? For, indeed, if He came not to a marriage, He has not here a bride. But what says the apostle? “I have espoused you to one husband, to present you a chaste virgin to Christ.” Why does he fear lest the virginity of Christ’s bride should be corrupted by the subtilty of the devil? “I fear,” saith he, “lest as the serpent beguiled Eve by his subtilty, so also your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity and chastity which is in Christ.” Thus has He here a bride whom He has redeemed by His blood, and to whom He has given the Holy Spirit as a pledge. He has freed her from the bondage of the devil: He died for her sins, and is risen again for her justification. Who will make such offerings to his bride? Men may offer to a bride every sort of earthly ornament,—gold, silver, precious stones, houses, slaves, estates, farms,—but will any give his own blood? For if one should give his own blood to his bride, he would not live to take her for his wife. But the Lord, dying without fear, gave His own blood for her, whom rising again He was to have, whom He had already united to Himself in the Virgin’s womb. For the Word was the Bridegroom, and human flesh the bride; and both one, the Son of God, the same also being Son of man. The womb of the Virgin Mary, in which He became head of the Church, was His bridal chamber: thence He came forth, as a bridegroom from his chamber, as the Scripture foretold, “And rejoiced as a giant to run his way.” From His chamber He came forth as a bridegroom; and being invited, came to the marriage.

Dominus invitatus ad nuptias venit. Quid mirum si in illam domum ad nuptias venit, qui in hunc mundum ad nuptias venit? Si enim non venit ad nuptias, non hic habet sponsam. Et quid est quod ait Apostolus, Aptavi vos uni viro, virginem castam exhibere Christo? Quid est quod timet ne virginitas sponsae Christi per astutiam diaboli corrumpatur? Timeo, inquit, ne sicut serpens Evam seduxit astutia sua, sic et vestrae mentes corrumpantur a simplicitate et castitate quae est in Christo . Habet ergo hic sponsam quam redemit sanguine suo, et cui pignus dedit Spiritum sanctum . Eruit eam de mancipatu diaboli: mortuus est propter delicta ejus, resurrexit propter justificationem ejus . Quis offeret tanta sponsae suae? Offerant homines quaelibet ornamenta terrarum; aurum, argentum, lapides pretiosos, equos, mancipia, fundos, praedia: numquid aliquis offeret sanguinem suum? Si enim sanguinem suum sponsae dederit, non erit qui ducat uxorem. Dominus autem securus moriens, dedit sanguinem suum pro ea quam resurgens haberet, quam sibi jam conjunxerat in utero Virginis. Verbum enim sponsus, et sponsa caro humana; et utrumque unus Filius Dei, et idem filius hominis: ubi factus est caput Ecclesiae, ille uterus virginis Mariae thalamus ejus, inde processit tanquam sponsus de thalamo suo, sicut Scriptura praedixit, Et ipse tanquam sponsus procedens de thalamo suo, exsultavit ut gigas ad currendam viam ; de thalamo processit velut sponsus, et invitatus venit ad nuptias.

8.5 PL 35, 1452

5. It is because of an indubitable mystery that He appears not to acknowledge His mother, from whom as the Bridegroom He came forth, when He says to her, “Woman, what have I to do with thee? Mine hour is not yet come.” What is this? Did He come to the marriage for the purpose of teaching men to treat their mothers with contempt? Surely he to whose marriage He had come was taking a wife with the view of having children, and surely he wished to be honored by those children he would beget: had Jesus then come to the marriage in order to dishonor His mother, when marriages are celebrated and wives married with the view of having children, whom God commands to honor their parents? Beyond all doubt, brethren, there is some mystery lurking here. It is really a matter of such importance that some,—of whom the apostle, as we have mentioned before, has forewarned us to be on our guard, saying, “I fear, lest, as the serpent beguiled Eve by his subtilty, so also your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity and chastity which is in Christ,”—taking away from the credibility of the gospel, and asserting that Jesus was not born of the Virgin Mary, used to endeavor to draw from this place an argument in support of their error, so far as to say, How could she be His mother, to whom He said, “Woman, what have I to do with thee?” Wherefore we must answer them, and show them why the Lord said this, lest in their insanity they appear to themselves to have discovered something contrary to wholesome belief, whereby the chastity of the virgin bride may be corrupted, that is, whereby the faith of the Church may be injured. For in very deed, brethren, their faith is corrupted who prefer a lie to the truth. For these men, who appear to honor Christ in such wise as to deny that He had flesh, do nothing short of proclaiming Him a liar. Now they who build up a lie in men, what do they but drive the truth out of them? They let in the devil, they drive Christ out; they let in an adulterer, shut out the bridegroom, being evidently paranymphs, or rather, the panderers of the serpent. For it is for this object they speak, that the serpent may possess, and Christ be shut out. How doth the serpent possess? When a lie possesses. When falsehood possesses, then the serpent possesses; when truth possesses, then Christ possesses. For Himself has said, “I am the truth;” but of that other He said, “He stood not in the truth, because the truth is not him.” And Christ is the truth in such wise that thou shouldst receive the whole to be true in Him. The true Word, God equal with the Father, true soul, true flesh, true man, true God, true nativity, true passion, true death, true resurrection. If thou say that any of these is false, rottenness enters, the worms of falsehood are bred of the poison of the serpent, and nothing sound will remain.

Certi sacramenti gratia, videtur matrem de qua sponsus processit, non agnoscere, et dicere illi, Quid mihi et tibi est, mulier? nondum venit hora mea. Quid est hoc? ideone venit ad nuptias, ut doceret matres contemni? Utique ad cujus nuptias venerat, ideo ducebat uxorem, ut filios procrearet; et ab eis quos ut procrearet optabat, utique honorari cupiebat: ille ergo venerat ad nuptias, ut exhonoraret matrem, cum propter filios habendos, quibus reddere honorem parentibus imperat Deus, ipsae nuptiae celebrentur, et ducantur uxores? Procul dubio, fratres, latet ibi aliquid. Nam tanta res est, ut quidam, quos cavendos praemonuit Apostolus, sicut supra commemoravimus, dicens, Timeo ne sicut serpens Evam seduxit astutia sua, sic et vestrae mentes corrumpantur a simplicitate et castitate quae est in Christo, derogantes Evangelio, et dicentes quod Jesus non sit natus de Maria Virgine, hinc argumentum sumere conarentur erroris sui, ut dicerent, Quomodo erat mater ejus, cui dixit, Quid mihi et tibi est, mulier? Respondendum ergo est eis, et disserendum quare hoc dixerit Dominus; ne sibi aliquid adversus sanam fidem insanientes invenisse videantur, unde sponsae virginis castitas corrumpatur, id est, unde fides Ecclesiae violetur. Revera enim, fratres, corrumpitur fides eorum qui praeponunt mendacium veritati. Nam isti qui videntur sic honorare Christum, ut negent eum carnem habuisse, nihil aliud eum quam mendacem praedicant. Qui ergo mendacium aedificant in hominibus, quid ab eis expellunt, nisi veritatem? Immittunt diabolum, excludunt Christum; immittunt adulterum, excludunt sponsum: paranymphi scilicet, vel potius lenones serpentis. Ad hoc enim loquuntur ut serpens possideat, Christus excludatur. Quomodo possidet serpens? Quando possidet mendacium. Quando possidet falsitas, serpens possidet: quando possidet veritas, Christus possidet. Ipse enim dixit, Ego sum veritas : de illo autem dixit, Et in veritate non stetit, quia veritas non est in eo . Sic est autem veritas Christus, ut totum verum accipias in Christo. Verum Verbum, Deus aequalis Patri, vera anima, vera caro, verus homo, verus Deus, vera nativitas, vera passio, vera mors, vera resurrectio. Si aliquid horum dixeris falsum, intrat putredo, de veneno serpentis nascuntur vermes mendaciorum, et nihil integrum remanebit.

8.6 PL 35, 1453

6. What, then, is this, saith one, which the Lord saith, “Woman, what have I to do with thee?” Perhaps the Lord shows us in the sequel why He said this: “Mine hour,” saith He, “is not yet come.” For thus is how He saith, “Woman, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come.” And we must seek to know why this was said. But first let us therefrom withstand the heretics. What says the old serpent, of old the hissing instiller of poison? What saith he? That Jesus had not a woman for His mother. Whence provest thou that? From this, saith he, because Jesus said, “Woman, what have I to do with thee?” Who has related this, that we should believe that Jesus said it? Who has related it? None other than John the evangelist. But the same John the evangelist said, “And the mother of Jesus was there.” For this is how he has told us: “The next day there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee, and the mother of Jesus was there. And having been invited to the marriage, Jesus had come thither with His disciples.” We have here two sayings uttered by the evangelist. “The mother of Jesus was there,” said the evangelist; and it is the same evangelist that has told us what Jesus said to His mother. And see, brethren, how he has told us that Jesus answered His mother, having said first, “His mother said unto Him,” in order that you may keep the virginity of your heart secure against the tongue of the serpent. Here we are told in the same Gospel, the record of the same evangelist, “The mother of Jesus was there,” and “His mother said unto Him.” Who related this? John the evangelist. And what said Jesus in answer to His mother? “Woman, what have I to do with thee?” Who relates this? The very same Evangelist John. O most faithful and truth-speaking evangelist, thou tellest me that Jesus said, “Woman, what have I to do with thee?” why hast thou added His mother, whom He does not acknowledge? For thou hast said that “the mother of Jesus was there,” and that “His mother said unto Him;” why didst thou not rather say, Mary was there, and Mary said unto Him. Thou tellest as these two facts, “His mother said unto Him,” and “Jesus answered her, Woman, why have I to do with thee?” Why doest thou this, if it be not because both are true? Now, those men are willing to believe the evangelist in the one case, when he tells us that Jesus said to His mother, “Woman, what have I to do with thee?” and yet they will not believe him in the other, when he says, “The mother of Jesus was there,” and “His mother said unto Him.” But who is he that resisteth the serpent and holds fast the truth, whose virginity of heart is not corrupted by the subtilty of the devil? He who believes both to be true, namely, that the mother of Jesus was there, and that Jesus made that answer to His mother. But if he does not as yet understand in what manner Jesus said, “Woman, what have I to do with thee?” let him meanwhile believe that He said it, and said it, moreover, to His mother. Let him first have the piety to believe, and he will then have fruit in understanding.

Quid est ergo, inquit, quod ait Dominus, Quid mihi et tibi est, mulier? Forte in eo quod sequitur ostendit nobis Dominus quare hoc dixerit: Nondum, inquit, venit hora mea. Sic enim ait, Quid mihi et tibi est, mulier? nondum venit hora mea. Et hoc cur dictum sit, requirendum est. Prius ergo hinc resistamus haereticis. Quid dicit serpens veternosus, venenorum insibilator et inspirator antiquus? quid dicit? Non habuit matrem feminam Jesus. Unde probas? Quia dixit, inquit, Quid mihi et tibi est, mulier? Quis hoc narravit, ut credamus quia hoc dixit? quis hoc narravit? Nempe Joannes evangelista. At ipse Joannes evangelista dixit, Et erat ibi mater Jesu. Nam ita narravit: Altera die nuptiae factae sunt in Cana Galilaeae, et erat ibi mater Jesu. Venerat autem illuc invitatus ad nuptias cum discipulis suis. Tenemus duas sententias ab Evangelista prolatas. Erat ibi mater Jesu, Evangelista dixit: quid dixerit matri suae Jesus, ipse Evangelista dixit. Et quomodo dixit respondisse matri suae Jesum, ut primo diceret, Ait illi mater ejus, videte, fratres, ut adversus linguam serpentis munitam virginitatem cordis habeatis. Illic in ipso Evangelio eo ipso evangelista narrante dicitur, Erat ibi mater Jesu; et, Dixit illi mater ejus. Quis hoc narravit? Joannes evangelista. Et quid respondit matri Jesus? Quid mihi et tibi est, mulier? Quis hoc narrat? Idem ipse Joannes evangelista. O Evangelista fidelissime et veracissime, tu mihi narras dixisse Jesum, Quid mihi et tibi est, mulier? cur ei apposuisti matrem quam non agnoscit? Nam tu dixisti quia ibi erat mater Jesu, et quia dixit ei mater ejus: cur non potius dixisti, Erat ibi Maria; et, Dixit ei Maria? Utrumque tu narras, et, Dixit ei mater ejus; et, Respondit ei Jesus, Quid mihi et tibi est, mulier? Quare hoc, nisi quia utrumque verum est? Illi autem in eo volunt credere Evangelistae, quod narrat Jesum dixisse matri, Quid mihi et tibi est, mulier? et in eo nolunt credere Evangelistae quod ait, Erat ibi mater Jesu; et, Dixit ei mater ejus. Quis est autem qui resistit serpenti et tenet veritatem, cujus virginitas cordis non corrumpitur astutia diaboli? Qui utrumque verum credit; et quia erat ibi mater Jesu, et quia illud respondit matri Jesus. Sed si nondum intelligit quemadmodum dixerit Jesus, Quid mihi et tibi est, mulier? interim credat quod dixerit, et quod matri dixerit. Sit primo pietas in credente, et erit fructus in intelligente.

8.7 PL 35, 1454

7. I ask you, O faithful Christians, Was the mother of Jesus there? Answer ye, She was. Whence know you? Answer, The Gospel says it. What answer made Jesus to His mother? Answer ye, “Woman, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come.” And whence know you this? Answer, The Gospel says it. Let no man corrupt this your faith, if you desire to preserve a chaste virginity for the Bridegroom. But if it be asked of you, why He made this answer to His mother, let him declare who understands; but he who does not as yet understand, let him most firmly believe that Jesus made this answer, and made it moreover to His mother. By this piety he will learn to understand also why Jesus answered thus, if by praying he knock at the door of truth, and do not approach it with wrangling. Only this much, while he fancies himself to know, or is ashamed because he does not know, why Jesus answered thus, let him beware lest he be constrained to believe either that the evangelist lied when he said, “The mother of Jesus was there,” or that Jesus Himself suffered for our sins by a counterfeit death and for our justification showed counterfeit scars; and that He spoke falsely in saying, “If ye continue in my word, ye are my disciples indeed; and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” For if He had a false mother, false flesh, false death, false wounds in His death, false scars in His resurrection, then it will not be the truth, but rather falsehood, that shall make free those that believe on Him. Nay, on the contrary, let falsehood yield to truth, and let all be confounded who would have themselves be accounted truth-speaking, because they endeavor to prove Christ a deceiver, and will not have it said to them, We do not believe you because you lie, when they affirm that truth itself has lied. Nevertheless, if we ask them, Whence know you that Christ said, “Woman, what have I to do with thee?” they answer that they believe the Gospel. Then why do they not believe the Gospel when it says, “The mother of Jesus was there,” and, “His mother said unto Him”? Or if the Gospel lies here, how are we to believe it there, that Jesus said this, “Woman, what have I to do with thee?” Why do not those miserable men rather faithfully believe that the Lord did so answer, not to a stranger, but to His mother; and also piously seek to know why He did so answer? There is a great difference between him who says, I would know why Christ made this answer to His mother, and him who says, I know that it was not to His mother that Christ made this answer. It is one thing to be willing to understand what is shut up, another thing to be unwilling to believe what is open. He who says, I would know why Christ thus made answer to His mother, wishes the Gospel, in which he believes, opened up to him; but he who says, I know that it was not to His mother that Christ made this answer, accuses of falsehood the very Gospel, wherein he believed that Christ did so answer.

Interrogo vos, o fideles Christiani, Erat ibi mater Jesu? respondete, Erat. Unde scitis? respondete, Hoc loquitur Evangelium. Quid respondit matri Jesus? respondete, Quid mihi et tibi est, mulier? nondum venit hora mea. Et hoc unde scitis? respondete, Hoc loquitur Evangelium. Nullus vobis corrumpat hanc fidem, si vultis sponso servare castam virginitatem. Si autem quaeritur a vobis, cur hoc matri responderit; dicat qui intelligit: qui autem nondum intelligit, firmissime tamen credat, hoc respondisse, et tamen matri respondisse Jesum. Hac pietate merebitur etiam intelligere cur ita responderit, si orando pulset, et non rixando accedat ad ostium veritatis. Tantum caveat, ne dum se putat scire, aut erubescit nescire cur ita responderit, cogatur credere aut Evangelistam fuisse mentitum qui ait, Erat ibi mater Jesu: aut ipsum Christum falsa morte passum propter delicta nostra, et falsas cicatrices ostendisse propter justificationem nostram; falsumque dixisse, Si manseritis in verbo meo, vere discipuli mei estis; et cognoscetis veritatem, et veritas liberabit vos . Si enim falsa mater, falsa caro, falsa mors, falsa vulnera passionis, falsae cicatrices resurrectionis; non veritas credentes in eum, sed potius falsitas liberabit. Imo vero falsitas cedat veritati, et confundantur omnes qui propterea se volunt videri veraces, quia Christum conantur demonstrare fallacem; et nolunt sibi dici, Non vobis credimus quia mentimini; cum ipsam veritatem dicant esse mentitam. Quibus tamen si dicamus, Unde nostis dixisse Christum, Quid mihi et tibi est, mulier? Evangelio se credidisse respondent. Cur non credunt Evangelio dicenti, Erat ibi mater Jesu; et, Dixit ei mater ejus? Aut si hoc mentitur Evangelium, quomodo ei creditur quod dixerit Jesus, Quid mihi et tibi est, mulier? Cur non potius miseri, et quod ita non extraneae, sed matri Dominus responderit, fideliter credunt; et cur ita responderit, pie quaerunt? Multum enim interest inter eum qui dicit, Volo scire quare Christus hoc matri responderit; et eum qui dicit, Scio quod hoc Christus non matri responderit. Aliud est intelligere velle quod clausum est, aliud nolle credere quod apertum est. Qui dicit, Scire volo cur ita Christus matri responderit, aperiri sibi vult Evangelium cui credit: qui autem dicit, Scio quod hoc Christus non matri responderit, ipsum Evangelium arguit de mendacio, ubi credidit quod Christus ita responderit.

8.8 PL 35, 1455

8. Now then, if it seem good, brethren, those men being repulsed, and ever wandering in their own blindness, unless in humility they be healed, let us inquire why our Lord answered His mother in such a manner. He was in an extraordinary manner begotten of the Father without a mother, born of a mother without a father; without a mother He was God, without a father He was man; without a mother before all time, without a father in the end of times. What He said was said in answer to His mother, for “the mother of Jesus was there,” and “His mother said unto Him.” All this the Gospel says. It is there we learn that “the mother of Jesus was there,” just where we learn that He said unto her, “Woman, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come.” Let us believe the whole; and what we do not yet understand, let us search out. And first take care, lest perhaps, as the Manichæans found occasion for their falsehood, because the Lord said, “Woman, what have I to do with thee?” the astrologers in like manner may find occasion for their deception, in that He said, “Mine hour is not yet come.” If it was in the sense of the astrologers He said this, we have committed a sacrilege in burning their books. But if we have acted rightly, as was done in the times of the apostles, it was not according to their notion that the Lord said, “Mine hour is not yet come.” For, say those vain-talkers and deceived seducers, thou seest that Christ was under fate, as He says, “Mine hour is not yet come.” To whom then must we make answer first—to the heretics or to the astrologers? For both come of the serpent, and desire to corrupt the Church’s virginity of heart, which she holds in undefiled faith. Let us first reply to those whom we proposed, to whom, indeed, we have already replied in great measure. But lest they should think that we have not what to say of the words which the Lord uttered in answer to His mother, we prepare you further against them; for I suppose what has already been said is sufficient for their refutation.

Jam ergo si placet, fratres, illis repulsis, et in sua caecitate errantibus semper, nisi humiliter sanentur, nos quaeramus, quare Dominus noster sic matri responderit. Ille singulariter natus de Patre sine matre, de matre sine patre; sine matre Deus, sine patre homo; sine matre ante tempora, sine patre in fine temporum. Quod respondit, matri respondit: quia, Erat ibi mater Jesu; et, Dixit ei mater ejus. Hoc totum Evangelium loquitur. Illic novimus quia erat ibi mater Jesu, ubi novimus quod dixerit ei, Quid mihi et tibi est, mulier? nondum venit hora mea. Totum credamus, et quod nondum intelligimus requiramus. Et primum hoc videte, ne forte quomodo invenerunt Manichaei occasionem perfidiae suae, quia dixit Dominus, Quid mihi et tibi est, mulier? sic inveniant mathematici occasionem fallaciae suae, quia dixit, Nondum venit hora mea. Et si hoc secundum mathematicos dixit, sacrilegium fecimus incendendo codices eorum. Si autem recte fecimus, sicut Apostolorum temporibus factum est ; non secundum eos dixit Dominus, Nondum venit hora mea. Dicunt enim vaniloqui et seducti seductores, Vides quia sub fato erat Christus, qui dicit, Nondum venit hora mea. Quibus ergo prius respondendum est; haereticis, an mathematicis? Utrique enim a serpente illo veniunt, volentes corrumpere virginitatem cordis Ecclesiae, quam habet in integra fide. Primo si placet, eis quos proposueramus, quibus quidem jam ex magna parte respondimus. Sed ne arbitrentur nos non habere quid dicamus de his verbis quae Dominus matri respondit, vos magis adversus illos instruimus: nam illis refellendis, puto quod sufficiant quae jam dicta sunt.

8.9 PL 35, 1455

9. Why, then, said the Son to the mother, “Woman, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come?” Our Lord Jesus Christ was both God and man. According as He was God, He had not a mother; according as He was man, He had. She was the mother, then, of His flesh, of His humanity, of the weakness which for our sakes He took upon Him. But the miracle which He was about to do, He was about to do according to His divine nature, not according to His weakness; according to that wherein He was God not according to that wherein He was born weak. But the weakness of God is stronger than men. His mother then demanded a miracle of Him; but He, about to perform divine works, so far did not recognize a human womb; saying in effect, “That in me which works a miracle was not born of thee, thou gavest not birth to my divine nature; but because my weakness was born of thee, I will recognize thee at the time when that same weakness shall hang upon the cross.” This, indeed, is the meaning of “Mine hour is not yet come.” For then it was that He recognized, who, in truth, always did know. He knew His mother in predestination, even before He was born of her; even before, as God, He created her of whom, as man, He was to be created, He knew her as His mother: but at a certain hour in a mystery He did not recognize her; and at a certain hour which had not yet come, again in a mystery, He does recognize her. For then did He recognize her, when that to which she gave birth was a-dying. That by which Mary was made did not die, but that which was made of Mary; not the eternity of the divine nature, but the weakness of the flesh, was dying. He made that answer therefore, making a distinction in the faith of believers, between the who; and the how, He came. For while He was God and the Lord of heaven and earth, He came by a mother who was a woman. In that He was Lord of the world, Lord of heaven and earth, He was, of course, the Lord of Mary also; but in that wherein it is said, “Made of a woman, made under the law,” He was Mary’s son. The same both the Lord of Mary and the son of Mary; the same both the Creator of Mary and created from Mary. Marvel not that He was both son and Lord. For just as He is called the son of Mary, so likewise is He called the son of David; and son of David because son of Mary. Hear the apostle openly declaring, “Who was made of the seed of David according to the flesh.” Hear Him also declared the Lord of David; let David himself declare this: “The Lord said to my Lord, Sit Thou on my right hand.” And this passage Jesus Himself brought forward to the Jews, and refuted them from it. How then was He both David’s son and David’s Lord? David’s son according to the flesh, David’s Lord according to His divinity; so also Mary’s son after the flesh, and Mary’s Lord after His majesty. Now as she was not the mother of His divine nature, whilst it was by His divinity the miracle she asked for would be wrought, therefore He answered her, “Woman, what have I to do with thee?” But think not that I deny thee to be my mother: “Mine hour is not yet come;” for in that hour I will acknowledge thee, when the weakness of which thou art the mother comes to hang on the cross. Let us prove the truth of this. When the Lord suffered, the same evangelist tells us, who knew the mother of the Lord, and who has given us to know about her in this marriage feast,—the same, I say, tells us, “There was there near the cross the mother of Jesus; and Jesus saith to His mother, Woman, behold thy son! and to the disciple, Behold thy mother!” He commends His mother to the care of the disciple; commends His mother, as about to die before her, and to rise again before her death. The man commends her a human being to man’s care. This humanity had Mary given birth to. That hour had now come, the hour of which He had then said, “Mine hour is not yet come.”

Cur ergo ait matri filius, Quid mihi et tibi est, mulier? nondum venit hora mea. Dominus noster Jesus Christus, et Deus erat et homo: secundum quod Deus erat, matrem non habebat; secundum quod homo erat, habebat. Mater ergo erat carnis, mater humanitatis, mater infirmitatis quam suscepit propter nos. Miraculum autem quod facturus erat, secundum divinitatem facturus erat, non secundum infirmitatem; secundum quod Deus erat, non secundum quod infirmus natus erat. Sed infirmum Dei fortius est hominibus . Miraculum ergo exigebat mater; at ille tanquam non agnoscit viscera humana, operaturus facta divina; tanquam dicens, Quod de me facit miraculum, non tu genuisti, divinitatem meam non tu genuisti: sed quia genuisti infirmitatem meam, tunc te cognoscam, cum ipsa infirmitas pendebit in cruce: hoc est enim, Nondum venit hora mea. Tunc enim cognovit, qui utique semper noverat. Et antequam de illa natus esset, in praedestinatione noverat matrem; et antequam ipse Deus crearet, de qua ipse homo crearetur, noverat matrem: sed ad quamdam horam in mysterio non agnoscit; et ad quamdam horam quae nondum venerat, in mysterio rursus agnoscit. Tunc enim agnovit, quando illud quod peperit moriebatur. Non enim moriebatur per quod facta erat Maria, sed moriebatur quod factum erat ex Maria: non moriebatur aeternitas divinitatis, sed moriebatur infirmitas carnis. Illud ergo respondit, discernens in fide credentium, quis, qua venerit. Venit enim per matrem feminam, Deus et Dominus coeli et terrae. Secundum quod Dominus mundi, quod Dominus coeli et terrae, Dominus utique et Mariae; secundum quod creator coeli et terrae, creator et Mariae: secundum autem quod dictum est, Factum ex muliere, factum sub Lege , filius Mariae. Ipse Dominus Mariae, ipse filius Mariae: ipse creator Mariae, ipse creatus ex Maria. Noli mirari quia et filius et Dominus: sicut enim Mariae, ita et David dictus est filius; et ideo David filius, quia Mariae filius. Audi Apostolum aperte dicentem. Qui factus est ei ex semine David secundum carnem . Audi eum et Dominum David; dicat hoc ipse David: Dixit Dominus Domino meo, Sede ad dexteram meam . Et ipse Jesus hoc proposuit Judaeis, et eos inde convicit . Quomodo ergo David et filius et dominus; filius David secundum carnem, dominus David secundum divinitatem: sic Mariae filius secundum carnem, et Mariae dominus secundum majestatem. Quia ergo non erat illa mater divinitatis, et per divinitatem futurum erat miraculum quod petebat; respondit ei, Quid mihi et tibi est, mulier? sed ne putes quod te negem matrem, Nondum venit hora mea: ibi enim te agnoscam, cum pendere in cruce coeperit infirmitas cujus mater es. Probemus si verum est. Quando passus est Dominus, sicut idem evangelista dicit, qui noverat matrem Domini, et qui nobis insinuavit etiam in his nuptiis matrem Domini, ipse narrat: Erat, inquit, illic circa crucem mater Jesu, et ait Jesus matri suae, Mulier, ecce filius tuus: et ad discipulum, Ecce mater tua . Commendat matrem discipulo: commendat matrem prior matre moriturus, et ante matris mortem resurrecturus; commendat homo homini hominem. Hoc pepererat Maria. Illa hora jam venerat, de qua tunc dixerat, Nondum venit hora mea.

8.10 PL 35, 1456

10. In my opinion, brethren, we have answered the heretics. Let us now answer the astrologers. And how do they attempt to prove that Jesus was under fate? Because, say they, Himself said, “Mine hour is not yet come.” Therefore we believe Him; and if He had said, “I have no hour,” He would have excluded the astrologers: but behold, say they, He said, “Mine hour is not yet come.” If then He had said, “I have no hour,” the astrologers would have been shut out, and would have no ground for their slander; but now that He said, “Mine hour is not yet come,” how can we contradict His own words? ’Tis wonderful that the astrologers, by believing Christ’s words, endeavor to convince Christians that Christ lived under an hour of fate. Well, let them believe Christ when He saith, “I have power to lay down my life and to take it up again: no man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself, and I take it again.” Is this power then under fate? Let them show us a man who has it in his power when to die, how long to live: this they can never do. Let them, therefore, believe God when He says, “I have power to lay down my life, and to take it up again;” and let them inquire why it was said, “Mine hour is not yet come;” and let them not because of these words, be imposing fate on the Maker of heaven, the Creator and Ruler of the stars. For even if fate were from the stars, the Maker of the stars could not be subject to their destiny. Moreover, not only Christ had not what thou callest fate, but not even hast thou, or I, or he there, or any human being whatsoever.

Quantum arbitror, fratres, responsum est haereticis: mathematicis respondeamus. Et ipsi unde conantur convincere quia sub fato erat Jesus? Quia ipse ait, inquiunt, Nondum venit hora mea. Ergo illi credimus; et si dixisset, Horam non habeo, exclusisset mathematicos: sed ecce, inquiunt, ipse dixit, Nondum venit hora mea. Si ergo dixisset, Horam non habeo, exclusisset mathematicos, non esset unde calumniarentur: nunc vero quia dixit, Nondum venit hora mea, contra ipsius verba quid possumus dicere? Mirum est quod mathematici credendo verbis Christi, conantur convincere Christianos quod sub hora fatali vixerit Christus. Credant ergo Christo dicenti, Potestatem habeo ponendi animam meam, et iterum sumendi eam: nemo tollit eam a me, sed ego pono eam a meipso, et iterum sumo eam . Ergone ista potestas sub fato est? Ostendant hominem qui potestatem habeat quando moriatur, quamdiu vivat: omnino non ostendent. Credant ergo Deo dicenti, Potestatem habeo ponendi animam meam, et iterum sumendi eam: et quaerant quare sit dictum, Nondum venit hora mea, nec ideo jam sub fato ponant conditorem coeli, creatorem atque ordinatorem siderum. Quia si esset fatum de sideribus, non poterat esse sub necessitate siderum conditor siderum. Adde quia non solum Christus non habuit quod appellas fatum; sed nec tu, aut ego, aut ille, aut quisquam hominum.

8.11 PL 35, 1457

11. Nevertheless, being deceived, they deceive others, and propound fallacies to men. They lay snares to catch men, and that, too, in the open streets. They who spread nets to catch wild beasts even do it in woods and desert places: how miserably vain are men, for catching whom the net is spread in the forum! When men sell themselves to men, they receive money; but these give money in order to sell themselves to vanities. For they go in to an astrologer to buy themselves masters, such as the astrologer is pleased to give them: be it Saturn, Jupiter, Mercury, or any other named profanity. The man went in free, that having given his money he might come out a slave. Nay, rather, had he been free he would not have gone in; but he entered whither his master Error and his mistress Avarice dragged him. Whence also the truth says, “Every one that doeth sin is the slave of sin.”

Verumtamen seducti seducunt, et proponunt fallacias hominibus: tendunt ad capiendos homines, et hoc in plateis. Nam qui tendunt ad capiendas feras, vel in silvis atque in solitudine id agunt: quam infeliciter vani sunt homines, quibus capiendis in foro tenditur! Nummos accipiunt, cum se homines hominibus vendunt; dant isti nummos, ut se vanitatibus vendant. Intrant enim ad mathematicum, ut emant sibi dominos, quales mathematico dare placuerit; vel Saturnum, vel Jovem, vel Mercurium, vel si quid aliud sacrilegi nominis. Intravit liber, ut nummis datis servus exiret. Imo vero non intraret, si liber esset: sed intravit quo eum dominus error, et domina cupiditas traxit. Unde et Veritas dicit: Omnis qui facit peccatum, servus est peccati .

8.12 PL 35, 1457

12. Why then did He say, “Mine hour is not yet come?” Rather because, having it in His power when to die, He did not yet see it fit to use that power. Just as we, brethren, say, for example, “Now is the appointed hour for us to go out to celebrate the sacraments.” If we go out before it is necessary, do we not act perversely and absurdly? And because we act only at the proper time, do we therefore in this action regard fate when we so express ourselves? What means then, “Mine hour is not yet come?” When I know that it is the fitting time for me to suffer, when my suffering will be profitable, then I will willingly suffer. That hour is not yet: that thou mayest preserve both, this, “Mine hour is not yet come;” and that, “I have power to lay down my life, and power to take it again.” He had come, then, having it in His power when to die. And surely it would not have been right were He to die before He had chosen disciples. Had he been a man who had not his hour in his own power, he might have died before he had chosen disciples; and if haply he had died when his disciples were now chosen and instructed, it would be something conferred on him, not his own doing. But, on the contrary, He who had come having in His power when to go, when to return, how far to advance, and for whom the regions of the grave were open, not only when dying but when rising again; He, I say, in order to show us His Church’s hope of immortality, showed in the head what it behoved the members to expect. For He who has risen again in the head will also rise again in all His members. The hour then had not yet come, the fit time was not yet. Disciples had to be called, the kingdom of heaven to be proclaimed, the Lord’s divinity to be shown forth in miracles, and His humanity in His very sympathy with mortal men. For He who hungered because He was man, fed so many thousands with five loaves because He was God; He who slept because He was man, commanded the winds and the waves because He was God. All these things had first to be set forth, that the evangelists might have whereof to write, that there might be what should be preached to the Church. But when He had done as much as He judged to be sufficient, then His hour came, not of necessity, but of will,—not of condition, but of power.

Quare ergo dixit, Nondum venit hora mea? Magis quia in potestate habebat quando moreretur, nondum videbat esse opportunum ut illa potestate uteretur. Quomodo nos, fratres, verbi gratia, sic loquimur, Jam certa hora est, qua exeamus ut celebremus sacramenta? Si ante exeamus quam opus est, nonne perversi et praeposteri sumus? Quia ergo non facimus, nisi quando opportunum est; propterea in his agendis, cum ita loquimur, fatum consideramus? Quid est ergo, Nondum venit hora mea? Quando ego scio opportunum me pati, quando passio mea utilis erit, nondum venit ipsa hora; tunc voluntate patiar: ut utrumque serves, et, Nondum venit hora mea; et, Potestatem habeo ponendi animam meam, et iterum sumendi eam. Venerat ergo habens in potestate quando moreretur. At si ante moreretur quam discipulos elegisset, certe praeposterum esset: si esset homo qui non haberet in potestate horam suam, posset ante mori quam discipulos elegisset; et si forte moreretur jam electis eruditisque discipulis, praestaretur ei, non ipse hoc faceret. At vero qui venerat in manu habens quando iret, quando rediret, quo usque excurreret, cui paterent inferi, non tantum morienti, sed et resurgenti, ut nobis ostenderet spem immortalitatis Ecclesiae suae, in capite ostendit quod membra exspectare deberent. Resurget etiam in caeteris membris, qui resurrexit in capite. Hora ergo nondum venerat, opportunitas nondum erat. Vocandi erant discipuli, annuntiandum erat regnum coelorum, faciendae erant virtutes, commendanda erat divinitas Domini in miraculis, commendanda erat humanitas Domini in ipsa compassione mortalitatis. Ille enim qui esuriebat, quia homo erat, pavit quinque panibus tot millia, quia Deus erat: qui dormiebat, quia homo erat, ventis et fluctibus imperabat, quia Deus erat. Haec omnia commendanda erant prius, ut esset quod scriberent Evangelistae, quod praedicaretur Ecclesiae. At ubi tantum fecit, quantum sufficere judicavit; venit hora non necessitatis, sed voluntatis, non conditionis, sed potestatis.

8.13 PL 35, 1458

13. What then, brethren? Because we have replied to these and those, shall we say nothing as to what the water-pots signify? what the water turned into wine? what the master of the feast? what the bridegroom? what in mystery the mother of Jesus? what the marriage itself? We must speak of all these, but we must not burden you. I would have preached to you in Christ’s name yesterday also, when the usual sermon was due to you, my beloved, but I was hindered by certain necessities. If you please then, holy brethren, let us defer until to-morrow what pertains to the hidden meaning of this translation, and not burden both your and our own weakness. There are many of you, perhaps, who have to-day come together on account of the solemnity of the day, not to hear the sermon. Let those who come to-morrow come to hear, so that we may not defraud those who are eager to learn, nor burden those who are fastidious.

Quid ergo, fratres, quia illis et illis respondimus, nihil dicemus quid sibi velint hydriae, quid aqua in vinum conversa, quid architriclinus, quid sponsus, quid mater Jesu in mysterio, quid ipsae nuptiae! Dicenda sunt omnia, sed onerandi non estis. Volui quidem in nomine Christi et hesterno die, quo solet sermo deberi Charitati vestrae, id agere vobiscum, sed non sum permissus necessitatibus quibusdam impedientibus. Si ergo placet Sanctitati vestrae, hoc quod ad mysterium pertinet hujus facti, in crastinum differamus, et non oneremus et vestram et nostram infirmitatem. Sunt forte hodie multi qui propter solemnitatem, diei, non propter audiendum sermonem convenerunt. Crastino qui venient, veniant audituri; ut nec fraudemus studiosos, nec gravemus fastidiosos.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Save for later

Enter your email and we will send you a sign-in link. No password. What you save (articles, verses, chapters, documents) follows you to any device.