Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 7

St Augustine of Hippo (AD 354–430) · In Joannis evangelium tractatus CXXIV · PL 35, 1379–1976

7.1 Chapter I. 34–51 PL 35, 1437

1. We rejoice at your numbers, for you have come together with readiness and in greater numbers than we could have hoped. This it is that delights and consoles us in all the labors and dangers of this life, your love towards God, and pious zeal, and assured hope, and fervor of spirit. You heard when the psalm was read, “that the needy and poor man cries to God in this world.” For it is the voice, as you have often heard, and ought to remember, not of one man, and yet of one man; not of one, because the faithful are many—many grains groaning amid the chaff diffused throughout the whole world—but of one, because all are members of Christ, and thus one body. This people, then, poor and needy, does not know to rejoice with the world: its grief is within, and its joy is within, where no one sees but He who listens to him who groans, and crowns him who hopes. The rejoicing of the world is vanity. With great expectation is it hoped for and it cannot, when it comes, be held fast. For this day which is a day of rejoicing in this city to the lost, to-morrow will, of course, cease to be; nor will they themselves be the same tomorrow that they are to-day. And all things pass away, fly away, and vanish like smoke; and woe to those who love such things! For every soul follows what it loves. “All flesh is grass, and all the goodliness thereof as the flower of the field: the grass withereth, the flower fadeth; but the word of the Lord abideth forever.” Behold what thou must love if thou dost desire to abide for ever. But thou hadst this to reply: How can I apprehend the word of God? “The Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us.”

Congaudemus frequentiae vestrae, quia ultra quam sperare potuimus, alacriter convenistis. Hoc est quod nos laetificat, et consolatur in omnibus laboribus, et periculis vitae hujus, amor vester in Deum, et pium studium, et certa spes, et fervor spiritus. Audistis cum Psalmus legeretur, quia inops et pauper clamat ad Deum in hoc saeculo . Vox enim est, ut saepius audistis, et meminisse debetis, non unius hominis, et tamen unius hominis: non unius, quia fideles multi; multa grana inter paleas gementia, diffusa toto orbe terrarum: unius autem, quia membra Christi omnes; ac per hoc unum corpus. Iste ergo populus inops et pauper, non novit gaudere de saeculo: et dolor ejus intus est, et gaudium ejus intus est, ubi non videt nisi ille qui exaudit gementem, et coronat sperantem. Laetitia saeculi, vanitas. Cum magna exspectatione speratur ut veniat, et non potest teneri cum venerit. Iste enim dies qui laetus est perditis hodie in ista civitate, cras utique non erit: nec iidem ipsi cras hoc erunt quod hodie sunt. Et transeunt omnia, et evolant omnia, et sicut fumus vanescunt: et vae qui amant talia! Omnis enim anima sequitur quod amat. Omnis caro fenum, et omnis honor carnis quasi flos feni; fenum aruit, flos decidit: Verbum autem Domini manet in aeternum . Ecce quod ames, si vis manere in aeternum. Sed dicere habebas: Unde possum apprehendere Verbum Dei? Verbum caro factum est, et habitavit in nobis .

7.2 PL 35, 1438

2. Wherefore, beloved, let it belong to our neediness and poverty to grieve for those who seem to themselves to abound. For their joy is as that of madmen. But as a madman rejoices for the most part in his madness, and laughs, and grieves over him who is in his senses, so let us, beloved, if we have received the medicine coming from heaven, because we all were madmen, as if made whole, because those things which we did love we do not love,—let us, I say, groan unto God for those who are yet in madness, for He is able to save them also. And there is need that they should look upon themselves and be displeased with themselves: to behold they desire, and to behold themselves they have not known. For if they for a little turn their eyes upon themselves, they see their own confusion. But until this take place, let our pursuits be different, let the recreations of our souls be different; our grief avails more than their joy. As far as regards the number of the brethren, it is difficult to conceive that any one of the men should have been carried away by that celebration; but as regards the number of the sisters, it grieves us, and this is a greater cause for grief, that they do not rather repair to the Church, whom if not fear, modesty at all events ought to deter from the public scene. May He see to this who sees it; and may His mercy be present to heal all. Let us who have come together feed upon the feast of God, and let our joy be His word. For He has invited us to His gospel, and He is our food, than whom nothing is sweeter, if only a man have a healthy palate in his heart.

Quapropter, charissimi, ad inopiam nostram et paupertatem nostram pertineat et quod illos dolemus qui sibi abundare videntur. Gaudium enim ipsorum quasi phreneticorum est. Quomodo autem phreneticus gaudet in insania plerumque, et ridet; et plangit illum qui sanus est: sic et nos, charissimi, si recepimus medicinam de coelo venientem, quia et nos omnes phrenetici eramus, tanquam salvi facti, quia ea quae diligebamus non diligimus, gemamus ad Deum de iis qui adhuc insaniunt. Potens est enim ut et ipsos salvos faciat. Et opus est ut respiciant se, et displiceant sibi. Spectare volunt, et spectare se non noverunt. Nam si aliquantum oculos ad se convertant, vident confusionem suam. Quod donec fiat, alia sint studia nostra, alia sint avocamenta animae nostrae. Plus valet dolor noster, quam gaudium illorum. Quantum pertinet ad numerum fratrum, difficile est ut quisquam illa celebritate raptus fuerit ex viris: quantum autem ad sororum numerum, contristat nos, et hoc magis dolendum est, quia non ipsae potius ad Ecclesiam currunt, quas debuit si non timor, certe verecundia de publico revocare. Viderit hoc qui videt, et aderit misericordia ejus, ut sanet omnes. Nos autem qui convenimus, pascamur epulis Dei, et sit gaudium nostrum sermo ipsius. Invitavit enim nos ad Evangelium suum: et ipse cibus noster est, quo nihil dulcius; sed si quis habet palatum sanum in corde.

7.3 PL 35, 1438

3. But I imagine, beloved brethren, that you remember that this Gospel is read in order in suitable portions; and I think that it has not escaped you what has lately been treated of, specially the recent matters concerning John and the dove. Concerning John, namely, what new thing he learned concerning the Lord by means of the dove, although he had already known the Lord. And this was discovered by the inspiration of the Spirit of God, that John indeed already knew the Lord, but that the Lord Himself was to baptize, that the power of baptizing He would not transfer from Himself to any one, this he learned by means of the dove, because it was said to him, “On whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending as a dove, and abiding upon Him, this is He which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost.” What is “This is He”? Not another, although by means of another. But why by means of a dove? Many things were said, and I am not able, nor is there need that I should go over all;—principally, however, to denote peace, because also the trees which were baptized outside, because the dove found in them fruit, it brought to the ark, as you remember the dove sent out by Noah from the ark, which floated on the flood and was washed by baptism, was not submerged. When, then, it was sent forth, it brought an olive branch; but it had not leaves alone, it had also fruit. This, then, we ought to wish for our brethren who are baptized outside, that they may have fruit; the dove will not permit them to remain outside, but bring them back to the ark. For the whole of fruit is charity, without which a man is nothing, whatever else he have. And this, which is most fully said by the apostle, we have mentioned and recounted. For he says, “Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass or a tinkling cymbal; and though I should have all knowledge, and know all mysteries, and have all prophecy, and should have all faith” (but in what sense did he say all faith?), “so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing. And though I should distribute all my goods to the poor, and though I should give my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing.” But in no manner are they able to say that they have charity who divide unity. These things were said: let us see what follows.

Bene autem arbitror meminisse Charitatem vestram hoc Evangelium lectionibus congruis ex ordine recitari: et puto vobis non excidisse quae jam tractata sunt, maxime recentiora de Joanne et columba. De Joanne scilicet, quid novum didicerit in Domino per columbam, qui jam noverat Dominum. Et hoc inventum est inspirante Spiritu Dei, quod jam quidem Joannes noverat Dominum; sed quod ipse Dominus ita esset baptizaturus, ut baptizandi potestatem a se in neminem transfunderet, hoc didicit per columbam, quia dictum et erat, Super quem videris Spiritum descendentem velut columbam, et manentem super eum, hic est qui baptizat in Spiritu sancto . Quid est, hic est? Non alius, etsi per alium. Quare autem per columbam? Multa dicta sunt, nec possum, nec opus est omnia retexere: praecipue tamen propter pacem; quia et ligna quae baptizata sunt foris, quia fructum in eis invenit columba, ad arcam attulit: sicut meministis columbam emissam a Noe de arca, quae diluvio natabat, et baptismo abluebatur, non mergebatur. Cum ergo esset emissa, attulit ramum olivae: sed non sola folia habebat, habebat et fructum . Itaque hoc optandum est fratribus nostris qui foris baptizantur, ut habeant fructum: non illos sinet columba foris, nisi ad arcam reduxerit. Fructus autem est totus charitas, sine qua nihil est homo, quidquid aliud habuerit. Et hoc uberrime ab Apostolo dictum commemoravimus et recensuimus. Ait enim: « Si linguis hominum loquar et Angelorum, charitatem autem non habeam, factus sum velut aeramentum sonans, aut cymbalum tinniens: et si habuero omnem scientiam, et sciam omnia sacramenta, et habeam omnem prophetiam, et habuero omnem fidem, » (fidem autem quomodo dixit omnem?) « ut montes transferam, charitatem autem non habeam, nihil sum. Et si distribuero omnia mea pauperibus, et si tradidero corpus meum ut ardeam, charitatem autem non habeam, nihil mihi prodest » . Nullo modo autem possunt dicere se habere charitatem, qui dividunt unitatem. Haec dicta sunt: sequentia videamus.

7.4 PL 35, 1439

4. John bare record because he saw. What record did he bear? “That this is the Son of God.” It behoved, then, that He should baptize who is God’s only Son, not His adopted son. Adopted sons are the ministers of the only Son: the only Son has power; the adopted, the ministry. In the case that a minister baptizes who does not belong to the number of sons, because he lives evilly and acts evilly, what is our consolation? “This is He which baptizeth.”

Perhibuit Joannes testimonium, quia vidit. Quale testimonium perhibuit? Quia ipse est Filius Dei. Oportebat ergo ut ille baptizaret qui est Filius Dei unicus, non adoptatus. Adoptati filii, ministri sunt Unici: Unicus habet potestatem, adoptati ministerium. Licet baptizet minister non pertinens ad numerum filiorum, quia male vivit et male agit, quid nos consolatur? Hic est qui baptizat.

7.5 PL 35, 1439

5. “The next day, John stood, and two of his disciples; and looking upon Jesus as He walked, he saith, Behold the Lamb of God!” Assuredly, in a special sense, the Lamb; for the disciples were also called lambs: “Behold, I send you as lambs in the midst of wolves.” They were also called light: “Ye are the light of the world;” but in another sense is He called so, concerning whom it was said, “That was the true light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.” In like manner was He called the dove in a special sense, alone without stain, without sin; not one whose sins have been washed away, but One who never had stain. For what? Because John said concerning the Lord, “Behold the Lamb of God,” was not John himself a lamb? Was he not a holy man? Was he not the friend of the Bridegroom? Wherefore, with a special meaning, said John of Him, “This is the Lamb of God;” because solely by the blood of this Lamb alone could men be redeemed.

Altera die iterum stabat Joannes, et ex discipulis ejus duo, et respiciens Jesum ambulantem dicit, Ecce Agnus Dei. Utique singulariter iste Agnus: nam et discipuli dicti sunt agni, Ecce ego mitto vos sicut agnos in medio luporum . Dicti sunt et ipsi lumen, Vos estis lumen mundi : sed aliter ille de quo dictum est, Erat lumen verum, quod illuminat omnem hominem venientem in hunc mundum . Sic et Agnus singulariter, solus sine macula, sine peccato; non cujus maculae abstersae sint, sed cujus macula nulla fuerit. Quid enim? quia dicebat Joannes de Domino, Ecce Agnus Dei, ipse Joannes non erat agnus? non erat vir sanctus? non erat amicus sponsi? Ergo singulariter ille, Hic est Agnus Dei; quia singulariter hujus Agni sanguine solo homines redimi potuerunt.

7.6 PL 35, 1439

6. My brethren, if we acknowledge our price, that it is the blood of the Lamb, who are they who this day celebrate the festival of the blood of I know not what woman, and how ungrateful are they! The gold was snatched, they say, from the ear of a woman, and the blood ran, and the gold was placed on a pair of scales or on a balance, and the advantage was much on the side of the blood. If the blood of a woman was sufficiently weighty to outweigh the gold, what power to outweigh the world has the blood of the Lamb by whom the world was made? And, indeed, that spirit, I know not who, was pacified by the blood that he should depress the weight. Impure spirits knew that Jesus Christ would come, they had heard of His coming from the angels, they had heard of it from the prophets, and they expected it. For if they were not expecting it, why did they exclaim, “What have we to do with Thee? art Thou come before the time to destroy us? We know who Thou art; the Holy One of God.” They expected that He would come, but they were ignorant of the time. But what have you heard in the psalm regarding Jerusalem? “For Thy servants have taken pleasure in her stones, and will pity the dust thereof. Thou shall arise,” says he, “and have mercy upon Zion: for the time is come that Thou wilt have mercy upon her.” When the time came for God to have mercy, the Lamb came. What sort of a Lamb whom wolves fear? What sort of a Lamb is it who, when slain, slew a lion? For the devil is called a lion, going about and roaring, seeking whom he may devour. By the blood of the Lamb the lion was vanquished. Behold the spectacles of Christians. And what is more: they with the eyes of the flesh behold vanity, we with the eyes of the heart behold truth. Do not think, brethren, that our Lord God has dismissed us without spectacles; for if there are no spectacles, why have ye come together to-day? Behold, what we have said you saw, and you exclaimed; you would not have exclaimed if you had not seen. And this is a great thing to see in the whole world, the lion vanquished by the blood of the Lamb: members of Christ delivered from the teeth of the lions, and joined to the body of Christ. Therefore some spirit or other contrived the counterfeit that His image should be bought for blood, because he knew that the human race was at some time to be redeemed by the precious blood. For evil spirits counterfeit certain shadows of honor to themselves, that they may deceive those who follow Christ. So much so, my brethren, that those who seduce by means of amulets, by incantations, by the devices of the enemy, mingle the name of Christ with their incantations: because they are not now able to seduce Christians, so as to give them poison they add some honey, that by means of the sweet the bitter may be concealed, and be drunk to ruin. So much so, that I know that the priest of that Pilleatus was sometimes in the habit of saying, Pilleatus himself also is a Christian. Why so, brethren, unless that they were not able otherwise to seduce Christians?

Fratres mei, si agnoscimus pretium nostrum quia sanguis est Agni; qui sunt illi qui hodie celebrant festivitatem sanguinis, nescio cujus mulieris? et quam ingrati sunt? Raptum est aurum, dicunt, de aure mulieris, et cucurrit sanguis, et positum est aurum in trutina vel statera, et praeponderavit multum de sanguine. Si pondus ad inclinandum aurum habuit sanguis mulieris, quale pondus habet ad inclinandum mundum sanguis Agni, per quem factus est mundus? Et quidem ille spiritus nescio quis, ut premeret pondus, placatus est sanguine. Immundi spiritus noverant venturum Jesum Christum, audierant ab Angelis, audierant ex Prophetis, et sperabant eum venturum. Nam si non sperabant, unde clamaverunt, Quid nobis et tibi est? venisti ante tempus perdere nos? scimus qui sis, Sanctus Dei . Venturum sciebant, sed tempus ignorabant. Sed quid audistis in Psalmo de Jerusalem? Quoniam beneplacitum habuerunt servi tui lapides ejus, et pulveris ejus miserebuntur: tu exsurgens, inquit, misereberis Sion, quoniam venit tempus ut miserearis ejus . Quando venit tempus ut misereretur Deus, venit Agnus. Qualis Agnus quem lupi timent? qualis Agnus est qui leonem occisus occidit? Dictus est enim diabolus leo circumiens et rugiens, quaerens quem devoret : sanguine Agni victus est leo. Ecce spectacula Christianorum. Et quod est amplius, illi oculis carnis vident vanitatem, nos cordis oculis veritatem. Ne putetis, fratres, quod sine spectaculis nos dimisit Dominus Deus noster: nam si nulla sunt spectacula, cur hodie convenistis? Ecce quod diximus, vidistis, et exclamastis: non exclamaretis, nisi vidissetis. Et magnum est hoc spectare per totum orbem terrarum, victum leonem sanguine Agni, educta de dentibus leonum membra Christi, et adjuncta corpori Christi. Ergo nescio quid simile imitatus est quidam spiritus, ut sanguine simulacrum suum emi vellet, quia noverat pretioso sanguine quandocumque redimendum esse genus humanum. Fingunt enim spiritus mali umbras quasdam honoris sibimetipsis, ut sic decipiant eos qui sequuntur Christum. Usque adeo, fratres mei, ut illi ipsi qui seducunt per ligaturas, per praecantationes, per machinamenta inimici, misceant praecantationibus suis nomen Christi: quia jam non possunt seducere Christianos, ut dent venenum, addunt mellis aliquid, ut per id quod dulce est, lateat quod amarum est, et bibatur ad perniciem. Usque adeo ut ego noverim aliquo tempore illius Pilleati sacerdotem solere dicere, Et ipse Pilleatus christianus est. Ut quid hoc, fratres, nisi quia aliter non possunt seduci Christiani?

7.7 PL 35, 1440

7. Do not, then, seek Christ elsewhere than where Christ wished Himself to be preached to you; and as He wished Himself to be preached to you, in that fashion hold Him fast, in that manner write Him on your heart. It is a wall against all the assaults, and against all the snares of the enemy. Do not fear, he does not tempt unless he has been permitted; it is certain that he does nothing unless permitted or sent. He is sent as an evil angel by a power holding him in control: he is permitted when he asks anything; and this, brethren, does not take place unless that the just may be tried, the unjust punished. Why, then, dost thou fear? Walk in the Lord thy God; be thou assured, what He does not wish thee to suffer thou dost not suffer; what He permits thee to suffer is the scourge of one correcting, not the punishment of one condemning. We are being educated for an eternal inheritance, and do we spurn to be scourged? My brethren, if a boy were to refuse the punishment of cuffs or stripes from his father, would he not be called proud, incorrigible, ungrateful towards paternal discipline? And for what does an earthly father educate his son? That he may not lose the temporal things which he has acquired for him, which he has collected for him, which he does not wish him to lose, which he who leaves them cannot retain eternally. He does not teach a son with whom he is to possess, but one who is to possess after him. My brethren, if a father teaches a son who is to succeed him, and teaches him also that he will have to pass through all these things, in same way as he who is admonishing him is destined to pass through them, how do you wish that He educate us, our Father to whom we are not to succeed, but to whom we are to approach, and with whom we are to abide eternally in an inheritance which does not decay nor die, and which no storms can desolate? He is Himself both the inheritance and the Father. Shall we possess Him, and ought we not to undergo training? Let us hear the instruction of the Father. When our head aches, let us not have recourse to the superstitious intercessor, to the diviners and remedies of vanity. My brethren, shall I not mourn over you? Daily do I find these things; and what shall I do? Not yet have I persuaded Christians that their hope ought to be placed in God. Behold, if one dies to whom one of these remedies has been given (and how many have died with remedies, and how many have lived without them!), with what confidence does the spirit go forth to God? He has lost the sign of Christ, and has received the sign of the devil. Perhaps he may say that he has not lost the sign of Christ. Thou canst have, then, the sign of Christ along with the sign of the devil. Christ does not desire community of ownership, but He desires to possess alone what He has purchased. He has bought at so great a price that He may possess alone: thou makest Him the partner of that devil to whom thou didst sell thyself by thy sin. “Woe to the double-hearted,” to those who in their hearts give part to God and part to the devil. God, being angry that the devil has part there, departs, and the devil will possess the whole. Not in vain, therefore, says the apostle, “Neither give place to the devil.” Let us know the Lamb, then, brethren; let us know our price.

Ne quaeratis ergo alibi Christum, quam ubi se vobis voluit praedicari Christus; et quomodo vobis voluit praedicari, sic illum tenete, sic in corde vestro scribite. Murus est adversus omnes impetus et adversus omnes insidias inimici. Nolite timere, nec tentat ille, nisi permissus fuerit: constat illum nihil facere, nisi permissus fuerit aut missus. Mittitur tanquam angelus malus a potestate dominante; permittitur, quando aliquid petit: et hoc, fratres, non fit, nisi ut probentur justi, puniantur injusti. Quid ergo times? Ambula in Domino Deo tuo, certus esto: quod te non vult pati, non pateris; quod te permiserit pati, flagellum corrigentis est, non poena damnantis. Ad haereditatem sempiternam erudimur, et flagellari dedignamur! Fratres mei, si recusaret quisquam puer colaphis aut flagellis caedi a patre suo, quomodo diceretur superbus, desperatus, ingratus paternae disciplinae? Et utquid erudit pater homo filium hominem? Ut possit non perdere temporalia quae illi acquisivit, quae illi collegit, quae non vult eum perdere, quae ipse qui relinquit, non potuit in sempiternum tenere. Non docet filium cum quo possideat, sed qui post eum possideat. Fratres mei, si filium docet pater successorem, et quem docet et ipsum similiter per illa omnia transiturum, qua et ille qui monebat transiturus est; quomodo vultis erudiat nos Pater noster, cui non successuri, sed ad quem accessuri sumus, et cum quo in aeternum mansuri in haereditate, quae non marcescit, nec moritur, nec grandinem novit? Et ipse haereditas et ipse Pater est. Hunc possidebimus, et erudiri non debemus? Sufferamus ergo eruditionem Patris. Non quando nobis dolet caput, curramus ad praecantatores, ad sortilegos et remedia vanitatis. Fratres mei, non vos plangam? Quotidie invenio ista; et quid faciam? Nondum persuadeo Christianis in Christo spem esse ponendam? Ecce, si cui factum est remedium, moriatur, (quam multi enim cum remediis mortui sunt? et quam multi sine remediis vixerunt?) qua fronte exiit anima ad Deum? Perdidit signum Christi, accepit signum diaboli. An forte dicat: Non perdidi signum Christi? Ergo signum Christi cum signo diaboli habuisti. Non vult Christus communionem, sed solus vult possidere quod emit. Tanti emit ut solus possideat: tu facis ei consortem diabolum, cui te per peccatum vendideras. Vae duplici corde ! qui in corde suo partem faciunt Deo, partem faciunt diabolo. Iratus Deus, quia fit ibi pars diabolo, discedit, et totum diabolus possidebit. Non frustra itaque Apostolus dicit: Neque detis locum diabolo . Cognoscamus ergo Agnum, fratres, cognoscamus pretium nostrum.

7.8 PL 35, 1441

8. “John stood, and two of his disciples.” Behold two of John’s disciples: since John, the friend of the Bridegroom, was such as he was, he sought not his own glory, but bore witness to the truth. Did he wish that his disciples should remain with him and not follow the Lord? Rather he himself showed hisdisciples whom they should follow. For they accounted of him as though he were the lamb; and he said, “Why do you give heed to me? I am not the lamb; behold the Lamb of God,” of whom also he had already said, Behold the Lamb of God. And what benefit does the Lamb of God confer upon us? “Behold,” he says, “who taketh away the sin of the world.” The two who were with John followed Him when they heard this.

Stabat Joannes, et ex discipulis ejus duo. Ecce duo de discipulis Joannis: quia talis erat Joannes amicus sponsi, non quaerebat gloriam suam, sed testimonium perhibebat veritati: numquid voluit apud se remanere discipulos suos, ut non sequerentur. Dominum? Magis ipse ostendit discipulis suis quem sequerentur. Habebant enim illum tanquam Agnum: et ille, Quid me attenditis! ego non sum Agnus; Ecce Agnus Dei: de quo etiam superius dixerat, Ecce Agnus Dei. Et quid nobis prodest Agnus Dei? Ecce, ait, qui tollit peccatum mundi. Secuti sunt illum, hoc audito, duo qui erant cum Joanne.

7.9 PL 35, 1441

9. Let us see what follows: “Behold the Lamb of God.” This John said, and the two disciples heard him speak, and followed Jesus. Then Jesus turned and saw them following, and saith unto them, “What seek ye?” And they said, “Rabbi (that is to say, being interpreted, Master), where dwellest Thou?” They did not follow Him in such manner as that they should cleave to Him; for it is plain when they clave unto Him, for He called them from the ship. For one of the two was Andrew, as you have just heard, and Andrew was the brother of Peter; and we know from the Gospel that the Lord called Peter and Andrew from the ship, saying, “Come ye after me, and I will make you fishers of men.” And from that time they clave unto Him, so as not to go away. On the present occasion these two followed Him, not as those who were not again to leave Him, but to see where He dwelt, and to fulfill the Scripture: “Let thy foot wear out the threshold of His doors; arise to come to Him continually, and be instructed in His precepts.” He showed them where He dwelt: they came and remained with Him. What a blessed day they spent, what a blessed night! Who can make known to us those things which they heard from the Lord? Let us also build in our heart, and make a house into which He may come and teach us, and have converse with us.

Videamus sequentia. Ecce Agnus Dei: hoc Joannes. « Et audierunt eum duo discipuli loquentem, et secuti sunt Jesum. Conversus autem Jesus, et videns eos sequentes se, dicit eis: Quid quaeritis? Qui dixerunt: Rabbi (quod dicitur interpretatum Magister), ubi habitas? » Non sic illum sequebantur quasi jam ut inhaererent illi: nam manifestum est quando illi inhaeserunt, quia de navi eos vocavit. In his enim duobus erat Andreas, sicut modo audistis; Andreas autem frater Petri erat: et novimus in Evangelio quod Petrum et Andream Dominus de navi vocavit, dicens, Venite post me, et faciam vos piscatores hominum . Et ex illo jam inhaeserunt illi, ut non recederent. Modo ergo quod illum sequuntur isti duo, non quasi non recessuri sequuntur; sed videre voluerunt ubi habitaret, et facere quod scriptum est, Limen ostiorum ejus exterat pes tuus; surge ad illum venire assidue et erudire praeceptis ejus . Ostendit eis ille ubi maneret: venerunt et fuerunt cum illo. Quam beatum diem duxerunt, quam beatam noctem! Quis est qui nobis dicat quae audierint illi a Domino? Aedificemus et nosmetipsi in corde nostro, et faciamus domum quo veniat ille, et doceat nos; colloquatur nobis.

7.10 PL 35, 1442

10. “What seek ye?” They said unto Him, “Rabbi (which is to say, being interpreted, Master), where dwellest Thou? He says to them, Come and see. And they came and saw where He dwelt, and abode with Him that day: and it was about the tenth hour.” Do we think that it did in no wise pertain to the evangelist to tell us what hour it was? Is it possible that he wished us to give heed to nothing in that, to inquire after nothing? It was the tenth hour. That number signifies the law, because the law was given in ten commandments. But the time had come for the law to be fulfilled by love, because it could not be fulfilled by the Jews by fear. Hence the Lord says, “I am not come to destroy the law, but to fulfill.” Suitably, then, at the tenth hour did these two follow Him, at the testimony of the friend of the Bridegroom, and that He at the tenth hour heard “Rabbi (which is interpreted, Master).” If at the tenth hour the Lord heard Rabbi, and the tenth number pertains to the law, the master of the law is no other than the giver of the law. Let no one say that one gave the law, and that another teaches the law: for the same teaches it who gave it; He is the Master of His own law, and teaches it. And mercy is in His tongue, therefore mercifully teacheth He the law, as it is said regarding wisdom, “The law and mercy doth she carry in her tongue.” Do not fear that thou art not able to fulfill the law, flee to mercy. If thou canst not fulfill the law, make use of that covenant, make use of the bond, make use of the prayers which the heavenly One, skilled in the law, has ordained and composed for you.

« Quid quaeritis? Qui dixerunt ei: Rabbi, (quod interpretatum dicitur Magister), ubi habitas? Dicit eis: Venite, et videte. Et venerunt, et viderunt ubi maneret, et apud eum manserunt die illo: hora autem erat quasi decima. » Nihilne arbitramur pertinuisse ad Evangelistam, dicere nobis quota hora erat? Potest fieri ut nihil ibi nos animadvertere, nihil quaerere voluerit? Decima erat hora. Numerus iste legem significat, quia in decem praeceptis data est lex. Venerat autem tempus ut impleretur lex per dilectionem; quia a Judaeis non poterat impleri per timorem. Unde Dominus dicit: Non veni solvere legem, sed implere . Merito ergo decima hora eum secuti sunt ad testimonium amici sponsi duo isti: et decima hora audivit, Rabbi, quod interpretatur Magister. Si decima hora Rabbi Dominus audivit, et decimus numerus ad legem pertinet; magister legis non est nisi dator legis. Nemo dicat quia alius dedit legem, et alius docet legem: ipse illam docet qui illam dedit; ipse est magister legis suae, et docet illam. Et misericordia est in lingua ipsius, ideo misericorditer docet legem, sicut dictum est de sapientia, Legem autem et misericordiam in lingua portat . Noli timere, ne implere legem non possis, fuge ad misericordiam. Si multum est ad te legem implere, utere pacto illo, utere chirographo, utere precibus quas tibi constituit et composuit jurisperitus coelestis.

7.11 PL 35, 1442

11. For those who have a cause, and wish to supplicate the emperor, seek for some one skilled in the law, and trained in the schools, to compose their petition for them; lest perchance, if they ask in an unbecoming manner, they not only do not obtain what they seek, but get punishment instead of a benefit. When, therefore, the apostles sought to petition, and could not find how to approach the Emperor God, they said unto Christ, “Lord, teach us to pray;” that is to say, “O thou who art our skilled One in the law, our Assessor, yea, the Concessor of God, compose for us prayers.” And the Lord taught them from the book of the celestial law, taught them how to pray; and in that which He taught, He laid down a certain condition: “Forgive us our debts, as we also forgive our debtors.” If thou seekest not according to the law, thou becomest guilty. Dost thou not tremble before the Emperor, having become guilty? Offer the sacrifice of humility, offer the sacrifice of mercy; pray, saying, Forgive me, for I also forgive. But if thou sayest, do. For what wilt thou do? whither wilt thou go if thou hast lied in thy prayers? Not as it is said in the forum, thou shalt lose the benefit of the rescript; but thou shall not obtain a rescript. For it is the law of the forum that he who shall have lied in his petition shall derive no benefit from that which he has obtained. But this among men, because a man can be deceived: the emperor might have been deceived, when thou didst address to him thy petition; for thou saidest what thou wouldest, and he to whom thou didst speak knew not whether it was true or false; he sent thee away to thy adversary to be confuted if possible, so that if before the judge thou shouldest be convicted of falsehood (because he was not able not to grant the rescript, not knowing whether thou hadst lied), thou shouldest lose the benefit of the rescript, in the place to which thou hadst taken it. But God, who knows whether thou liest or speakest the truth, does not cause thee to lose in the judgment the benefit, but does not permit thee to obtain it, because thou hast dared to lie to the Truth.

Qui enim habent causam, et volunt supplicare imperatori, quaerunt aliquem scholasticum jurisperitum, a quo sibi preces componantur; ne forte si aliter petierint quam oportet, non solum non impetrent quod petunt, sed et poenam pro beneficio consequantur. Cum ergo quaererent supplicare Apostoli, et non invenirent quomodo adirent imperatorem Deum, dixerunt Christo, Domine, doce nos orare: hoc est, Jurisperite noster, assessor, imo consessor Dei, compone nobis preces. Et docuit Dominus de libro juris coelestis, docuit quomodo orarent: et in ipso quod docuit, posuit quamdam conditionem: Dimitte nobis debita nostra, sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris (Luc. XI 1-4). Si non secundum legem petieris, reus eris. Contremiscis imperatorem factus reus? offer sacrificium humilitatis, offer sacrificium misericordiae, dic in precibus, Dimitte mihi, quoniam et ego dimitto. Sed si dicis, fac. Quid enim facturus es, quo iturus es, si mentitus fueris in precibus? Non quomodo dicitur in foro, carebis beneficio rescripti; sed nec rescriptum impetrabis. Juris enim forensis est ut qui in precibus mentitus fuerit, non illi prosit quod impetravit. Sed hoc inter homines, quia potest falli homo; potuit falli imperator, quando preces misisti: dixisti enim quod voluisti, et cui dixisti, nescit an verum sit; dimisit te adversario tuo convincendum, ut si ante judicem convictus fueris de mendacio, quia non potuit ille nisi praestare, nesciens an fueris mentitus, ibi carebis ipso beneficio rescripti, quo perduxisti rescriptum. Deus autem qui novit utrum mentiaris, an verum dicas, non facit ut in judicio tibi non prosit; sed nec impetrare te permittit, quia ausus es mentiri veritati.

7.12 PL 35, 1443

12. What, then, wilt thou do? Tell me. To fulfill the law in every part, so as to offend in nothing, is difficult: the condition of guilt is therefore certain; wilt thou refuse to use the remedy? Behold, my brethren, what a remedy the Lord hath provided for the sicknesses of the soul! What then? When thy head aches, we praise thee if thou placest the gospel at thy head, instead of having recourse to an amulet. For so far has human weakness proceeded, and so lamentable is the estate of those who have recourse to amulets, that we rejoice when we see a man who is upon his bed, and tossed about with fevers and pains, placing his hope on nothing else than that the gospel lies at his head; not because it is done for this purpose, but because the gospel is preferred to amulets. If, then, it is placed at the head to allay the pain of the head, is it not placed at the heart to heal it from sin? Let it be done then. Let what be done? Let it be placed at the heart, let the heart be healed. It is well,—well that thou shouldest have no further care regarding the safety of the body, than to ask it from God. If He knows that it will do thee good, He will give it thee; if He give it not to thee, it would not have profited thee to have it. How many are sick in bed, and for that reason are innocent! for if they were to recover, they would go forth to commit acts of wickedness. To how many is health an injury! The robber who goes forth to the narrow path to slay a man, how much better for him would it have been to have been sick! And he who rises by night to dig through his neighbor’s wall, how much better for him to be tossed by fever! If he were ill, he would have been comparatively innocent; being well, he is guilty of wickedness. It is known, then, to God what is expedient for us: let us make this only our endeavor, that our hearts be whole from sins; and when it happens that we are scourged in the body, let us pray to Him for relief. The Apostle Paul besought Him that He would take away the thorn in his flesh, and He would not. Was he disturbed? Was he filled with sadness, and did he speak of himself as deserted? Rather did he say that he was not deserted, because that was not taken away which he desired to be taken away, to the end that infirmity might be cured. For this he found in the voice of the Physician, “My grace is sufficient for thee; for my strength is made perfect in weakness.” Whence knowest thou, then, that God does not wish to heal thee? As yet it is expedient for thee to be scourged. Whence knowest thou how diseased that is which the physician cuts, using his knife on the diseased parts? Does he not know the measure, what he is to do, and how far he is to do it? Does the shrieking of him he cuts restrain the hands of the physician cutting according to his art? The one cries, the other cuts. Is he cruel who does not listen to the man crying out, or is he not rather merciful in following the wound, that he may heal the sick man? These things have I said, my brethren, in order that no one seek any other aid than that of God, when we happen to be under the reproof of God. See that ye perish not; see that ye do not depart from the Lamb, and be devoured by the lion.

Quid ergo facturus es? dic mihi. Implere legem ex omni parte, ita ut in nullo offendas, difficile est: reatus ergo certus est; remedio uti non vis? Ecce, fratres mei, quale remedium posuit Dominus contra aegritudines animae. Quod ergo? Cum caput tibi dolet, laudamus si Evangelium ad caput tibi posueris, et non ad ligaturam cucurreris. Ad hoc enim perducta est infirmitas hominum, et ita plangendi sunt homines qui currunt ad ligaturas, ut gaudeamus quando videmus hominem in lecto suo constitutum, jactari febribus et doloribus, nec alicubi spem posuisse, nisi ut sibi Evangelium ad caput poneret: non quia ad hoc factum est, sed quia praelatum est Evangelium ligaturis. Si ergo ad caput ponitur ut quiescat dolor capitis, ad cor non ponitur ut sanetur a peccatis? Fiat ergo. Quid fiat? Ponatur ad cor, sanetur cor. Bonum est, bonum, ut de salute corporis non satagas, nisi ut a Deo illam petas. Si scit tibi prodesse, dabit illam: si non tibi dederit, non proderat habere illam. Quam multi aegrotant in lecto innocentes; et si sani fuerint, procedunt ad scelera committenda? Quam multis obest sanitas? Latro qui procedit ad faucem occidere hominem, quanto illi melius erat ut aegrotaret? Qui noctu surgit ad fodiendum parietem alienum, quanto illi melius si febribus jactaretur? Innocentius aegrotaret, scelerate sanus est. Novit ergo Deus quid nobis expediat: id agamus tantum, ut cor nostrum sanum sit a peccatis; et quando forte flagellamur in corpore, ipsum deprecemur. Rogavit eum Paulus apostolus, ut auferret stimulum carnis, et noluit auferre. Numquid perturbatus est? numquid contristatus dixit se desertum? Magis se dixit non desertum, quia non ablatum est quod volebat auferri, ut illa infirmitas sanaretur. Hoc enim invenit in voce medici: Sufficit tibi gratia mea; nam virtus in infirmitate perficitur . Unde ergo scis quod non vult te sanare Deus? Adhuc tibi expedit flagellari. Unde scis quam putre est quod secat medicus, agens ferrum per putria? Nonne novit modum, quid faciat, quo usque faciat? Numquid ululatus ejus qui secatur, retrahit manus medici artificiose secantis? Ille clamat; ille secat. Crudelis qui non audit clamantem, an potius misericors qui vulnus persequitur ut sanet aegrotum? Haec, fratres mei, ideo dixi, ne quis quaerat aliquid praeter auxilium Dei, quando forte in aliqua correptione Domini sumus. Videte ne pereatis, videte ne ab Agno recedatis, et a leone devoremini.

7.13 PL 35, 1444

13. We have declared, then, why it was at the tenth hour. Let us see what follows: “One of the two which heard John speak, and followed Him, was Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother. He findeth his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, We have found the Messias, which is, being interpreted, the Christ.” Messias, in Hebrew; Christ, in Greek; in Latin, Anointed. Χρῖσμα is anointing in Greek; Christ, therefore, is the Anointed. He is peculiarly anointed, pre-eminently anointed; wherewith all Christians are anointed, He is pre-eminently anointed. Hear how He speaks in the psalm: “Wherefore God, Thy God, hath anointed Thee with the oil of gladness above Thy fellows.” For all the holy ones are His fellows, but He in a peculiar sense is the Holy of Holies, peculiarly anointed, peculiarly Christ.

Diximus ergo quare hora decima: sequentia videamus. Erat Andreas frater Simonis Petri unus ex duobus qui audierant ab Joanne, et secuti fuerant eum. Invenit hic Simonem fratrem suum, et dicit ei, Invenimus Messiam; quod est interpretatum Christus. Messias hebraice, Christus graece est, latine Unctus. Ab unctione enim dicitur Christus. Χρῖσμα unctio est graece; ergo Christus, unctus. Ille singulariter unctus, praecipue unctus; unde omnes Christiani unguntur, ille praecipue. Quomodo in Psalmo dicit, audi: Propterea unxit te, Deus, Deus tuus oleo exsultationis, prae participibus tuis . Participes enim ejus omnes sancti; sed ille singulariter Sanctus sanctorum, singulariter unctus, singulariter Christus.

7.14 PL 35, 1444

14. “And he brought him to Jesus; and when Jesus beheld him, He said, Thou art Simon the son of Joannes: thou shall be called Cephas, which is, by interpretation, Peter.” It is not a great thing that the Lord said whose son Peter was. What is great to the Lord? He knew all the names of His own saints, whom He predestinated before the foundation of the world; and dost thou wonder that He said to one man, Thou art the son of this man, and thou shall be called this or that? Is it a great matter that He changed his name, and converted it from Simon to Peter? Peter is from petra, a rock, but the petra [rock]; is the Church; in the name of Peter, then, was the Church figured. And who is safe, unless he who builds upon the rock? And what saith the Lord Himself? “He that heareth these my words, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man building his house upon a rock” (he doth not yield to temptation). “The rain descended, the floods came, the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock. But he that heareth my words, and doeth them not” (now let each one of us fear and beware), “I will liken him to a foolish man, who built his house upon the sand: the rain descended, the floods came, the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.” What profit is it to enter the Church for him who builds upon the sand? For, by hearing and not doing, he builds indeed, but on the sand. For if he hears nothing, he builds nothing; but if he hears, he builds. But we ask, Where? For if he hears and does, he builds upon the rock; if he hears and does not, he builds upon the sand. There are two kinds of builders, those building upon the rock, and those building upon the sand. What, then, are those who do not hear? Are they safe? Does He say that they are safe because they do not build? They are naked beneath the rains, before the winds, before the floods; when these come, they carry away those persons before they overthrow the houses. It is then the only security, both to build, and to build upon the rock. If thou wilt hear and do not, thou buildest; but thou buildest a ruin: and when temptation comes it overthrows the house, and carries away thee with the ruin. But if thou dost not hear, thou art naked; thou thyself art dragged away by those temptations. Hear, then, and do; it is the only remedy. How many, perchance, on this day, by hearing and not doing, are hurried away on the stream of this festival! For, through hearing and not doing, the flood cometh, this annual festival; the torrent is filled, it will pass away and become dry, but woe to him whom it shall carry away! Know this, then, beloved, that unless a man hears and does, he builds not upon the rock, and he does not belong to that great name which the Lord so commended. For He has called thy attention. For if Simon had been called Peter before, thou wouldest not have so clearly seen the mystery of the rock, and thou wouldest have thought that he was called so by chance, not by the providence of God; therefore God willed that he should be called first something else, that by the very change of name the reality of the sacrament might be commended to our notice.

Et duxit eum ad Jesum. Intuitus autem eum, Jesus dixit, Tu es Simon filius Joannis, tu vocaberis Cephas; quod interpretatur Petrus. Non magnum quia Dominus dixit cujus filius esset iste. Quid magnum Domino? Omnia nomina sanctorum suorum sciebat, quos ante constitutionem mundi praedestinavit; et miraris quia dixit uni homini, Tu es filius illius, et tu vocaberis illud? Magnum quia mutavit ei nomen; et fecit de Simone Petrum? Petrus autem a petra, petra vero Ecclesia: ergo in Petri nomine figurata est Ecclesia. Et quis securus, nisi qui aedificat super petram? Et quid ait ipse Dominus? « Qui audit verba mea haec et facit ea, similabo eum viro prudenti, aedificanti super petram » (non cedit tentationibus): « descendit pluvia, venerunt flumina, flaverunt venti, et impegerunt in domum illam, et non cecidit; fundata enim erat super petram. Qui audit verba mea et non facit ea » (jam unusquisque nostrum timeat et caveat), « similabo eum viro stulto qui aedificavit domum suam super arenam: descendit pluvia, venerunt flumina, flaverunt venti, et impegerunt in domum illam, et cecidit; et facta est ruina ejus magna » . Quid prodest quia intrat Ecclesiam, qui vult super arenam aedificare? Audiendo enim et non faciendo, aedificat quidem, sed super arenam. Si enim nihil audit, nihil aedificat: si autem audit, aedificat. Sed quaerimus, ubi. Si enim audit et facit, super petram: si audit et non facit, super arenam. Duo sunt genera aedificantium; aut super petram, aut super arenam. Quid ergo illi qui non audiunt? securi sunt? securos eos dicit, quia nihil aedificant? Nudi sunt sub pluvia, ante ventos, ante flumina: cum venerint ista, ante illos tollunt, quam domos dejiciant. Ergo una est securitas, et aedificare, et super petram aedificare. Si audire vis et non facere, aedificas; sed ruinam aedificas: cum autem venerit tentatio, dejicit domum, et cum ipsa ruina tua te tollit. Si autem non audis, nudus es, illis tentationibus tu ipse traheris. Audi ergo, et fac; unum est remedium. Quanti forte hodie audiendo et non faciendo rapti sunt fluvio celebritatis hujus? Audiendo enim et non faciendo, venit fluvius ipsa celebritas anniversaria, impletus est torrens, transiturus est et siccaturus: sed vae illi quem tulerit! Illud ergo noverit Charitas vestra, quia nisi quis et audiat et faciat, non aedificat super petram; et non pertinet ad nomen tam magnum, quod sic commendavit Dominus. Intentum enim te fecit. Nam si hoc ante Petrus vocaretur, non ita videres mysterium petrae; et putares casu eum, sic vocari, non providentia Dei: ideo voluit eum aliud prius vocari, ut ex ipsa commutatione nominis, sacramenti vivacitas commendaretur.

7.15 PL 35, 1445

15. “And the day following He would go forth into Galilee, and finding Philip, He saith unto him, Follow me. Now he was of the city of Andrew and Peter. And Philip findeth Nathanael” (Philip who had been already called by the Lord); “and he said unto him, We have found Him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus, the son of Joseph.” He was called the son of that man to whom His mother had been espoused. For that He was conceived and born while she was still a virgin, all Christians know well from the Gospel. This Philip said to Nathanael, and he added the place, “from Nazareth.” And Nathanael said unto him, “From Nazareth something good can come.” What is the meaning, brethren? Not as some read, for it is likewise wont to be read, “Can any good thing come out of Nazareth?” For the words of Philip follow, who says, “Come and see.” But the words of Philip can suitably follow both readings, whether you read it thus, as confirming, “From Nazareth something good can come,” to which Philip replies, “Come and see;” or whether as doubting, and making the whole a question, “Can any good thing come out of Nazareth? Come and see.” Since then, whether read in this manner or in that, the words following are not incompatible, it is for us to inquire which of the two interpretations we shall adopt.

Et in crastinum voluit exire in Galilaeam, et invenit Philippum. Dicit ei: Sequere me. Erat autem de civitate Andreae et Petri. Et invenit Philippus Nathanaetem: jam vocatus a Domino Philippus. Et dixit ei: Quem scripsit Moyses in Lege, et Prophetae, invenimus Jesum filium Joseph. Ejus filius dicebatur, cui desponsata erat mater ejus. Nam quod ea intacta conceptus et natus sit, bene noverunt omnes Christiani ex Evangelio. Hoc Philippus dixit Nathanaeli; addidit et locum, a Nazareth. Et dixit ei Nathanael: A Nazareth potest aliquid boni esse. Quid intelligitur, Fratres? Non quomodo aliqui pronuntiant: nam et sic solet pronuntiari, A Nazareth potest aliquid boni esse? Sequitur enim vox Philippi, et dicit, Veni, et vide. Ambas autem pronuntiationes potest ista vox sequi, sive sic pronunties tanquam confirmans, A Nazareth potest aliquid boni esse; et ille, Veni, et vide: sive sic dubitans, et totum interrogans, A Nazareth potest aliquid boni esse? Veni, et vide. Cum ergo sive illo modo, sive isto pronuntietur, non repugnent verba sequentia; nostrum est quaerere quid potius intelligamus in his verbis.

7.16 PL 35, 1445

16. What sort of a man this Nathanael was, we prove by the words which follow. Hear what sort of a man he was; the Lord Himself bears testimony. Great is the Lord, known by the testimony of John; blessed Nathanael, known by the testimony of the truth. Because the Lord, although He had not been commended by the testimony of John, Himself to Himself bore testimony, because the truth is sufficient for its own testimony. But because men were not able to receive the truth, they sought the truth by means of a lamp, and therefore John was sent to show them the Lord. Hear the Lord bearing testimony to Nathanael: “Nathanael said unto him, Can any good thing come out of Nazareth? Philip says to him, Come and see. And Jesus sees Nathanael coming to Him, and says concerning him, Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile.” Great testimony! Not of Andrew, nor of Peter, nor of Philip was that said which was said of Nathanael, “Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile.”

Qualis fuerit Nathanael iste, in sequentibus probamus. Audite qualis fuerit: Dominus ipse perhibet testimonium. Magnus Dominus cognitus testimonio Joannis: beatus Nathanael cognitus testimonio veritatis. Quia Dominus etsi testimonio Joannis non commendaretur, ipse sibi perhibebat testimonium; quia sufficit sibi ad testimonium suum veritas. Sed quia veritatem non poterant capere homines, per lucernam quaerebant veritatem: et ideo Joannes per quem Dominus ostenderetur, missus est. Audi Dominum Nathanaeli testimonium perhibentem: Et dixit ei Nathanael: A Nazareth potest aliquid boni esse. Dicit ei Philippus: Veni, et vide. Et vidit Jesus Nathanaelem venientem ad se, et dicit de eo: Ecce vere Israelita, in quo dolus non est. Magnum testimonium! hoc nec Andreae dictum, nec Petro dictum, nec Philippo, quod dictum est de Nathanaele: Ecce vere Israelita, in quo dolus non est.

7.17 PL 35, 1445

17. What do we then, brethren? Ought this man to be the first among the apostles? Not only is Nathanael not found as first among the apostles, but he is neither the middle nor the last among the twelve, although the Son of God bore such testimony to him, saying, “Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile.” Is the reason asked for? In so far as the Lord intimates, we find a probable reason. For we ought to understand that Nathanael was learned and skilled in the law and for that reason was the Lord unwilling to place him among His disciples, because He chose unlearned persons, that He might by them confound the world. Listen to the apostle speaking these things: “For ye see,” saith he, “your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called: but God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty; and base things of the world, and things that are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, as though they were things that are, to bring to nought things that are.” If a learned man had been chosen, perhaps he would have said that he was chosen for the reason that his learning made him worthy of choice. Our Lord Jesus Christ, wishing to break the necks of the proud, did not seek the orator by means of the fisherman, but by the fisherman He gained the emperor. Great was Cyprian as an orator, but before him was Peter the fisherman, by means of whom not only the orator, but also the emperor, should believe. No noble was chosen in the first place, no learned man, because God chose the weak things of the world that He might confound the strong. This man, then, was great and without guile, and for this reason only was not chosen, lest the Lord should seem to any to have chosen the learned. And from this same learning in the law, it came that when he heard “from Nazareth,”—for he had searched the Scripture, and knew that the Saviour was to be expected thence, what the other scribes and Pharisees had difficulty in knowing,—this man, then, very learned in the law, when he heard Philip saying, “We have found Him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph;”—this man, who knew the Scriptures excellently well, when he heard the name “Nazareth,” was filled with hope, and said, “From Nazareth something good can come.”

Quid ergo facimus, fratres? Deberet iste primus esse in Apostolis? Non solum primus non invenitur in Apostolis, sed nec medius, nec ultimus inter duodecim Nathanael est, cui tantum testimonium perhibuit Filius Dei, dicens, Ecce vere Israelita, in quo dolus non est. Quaeritur causa? quantum Dominus intimat, probabiliter invenimus. Intelligere enim debemus ipsum Nathanaelem eruditum et peritum Legis fuisse: propterea noluit illum Dominus inter discipulos ponere; quia idiotas elegit, unde confunderet mundum. Audi Apostolum dicentem ista: « Videte enim, inquit, vocationem vestram, fratres, quia non multi potentes, non multi nobiles: sed infirma mundi elegit Deus, ut confundat fortia; et ignobilia mundi et contemptibilia elegit Deus, et ea quae non sunt, tanquam quae sunt, ut ea quae sunt evacuentur » . Si doctus eligeretur, fortasse ideo se diceret electum, quia doctrina ejus meruit eligi. Dominus noster Jesus Christus volens superborum frangere cervices, non quaesivit per oratorem piscatorem; sed de piscatore lucratus est imperatorem. Magnus Cyprianus orator, sed prior Petrus piscator, per quem postea crederet non tantum orator, sed et imperator. Nullus nobilis primo electus est, nullus doctus; quia infirma mundi elegit Deus, ut confunderet fortia. Erat ergo iste magnus et sine dolo: hoc solo non electus, ne cuiquam videretur Dominus doctos elegisse. Et ex ipsa doctrina Legis veniebat, quod cum audisset a Nazareth: scrutatus enim erat Scripturas, et sciebat quia inde erat expectandus Salvator, quod non facile alii Scribae et Pharisaei noverant: iste ergo doctissimus Legis, cum audisset Philippum dicentem, Invenimus Jesum, quem scripsit Moyses in Lege, et Prophetae, a Nazareth, filium Joseph; ille qui optime Scripturas noverat, audito nomine Nazareth, erectus est in spem, et dixit, A Nazareth potest aliquid boni esse.

7.18 PL 35, 1446

18. Let us now see the rest concerning this man. “Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile.” What is “in whom is no guile?” Perhaps he had no sin? Perhaps he was not sick? Perhaps he did not need a physician? God forbid. No one is born here in such fashion as not to need that Physician. What, then, is the meaning of the words, “in whom is no guile”? Let us search a little more intently—it will appear presently—in the name of the Lord. The Lord says dolus [guile]; and every one who understands Latin knows that dolus is when one thing is done and another feigned. Give heed, beloved. Dolus (guile) is not dolor (pain). I say this because many brethren, not well skilled in Latin, so speak as to say, Dolus torments him, using it for dolor. Dolus is fraud, it is deceit. When a man conceals one thing in his heart, and speaks another, it is guile, and he has, as it were, two hearts; he has, as it were, one recess of his heart where he sees the truth, and another recess where he conceives falsehood. And that you may know that this is guile, it is said in the Psalms, “Lips of guile.” What are “lips of guile”? It follows, “In a heart and in a heart have they spoken evil.” What is “in a heart and in a heart,” unless in a double heart? If, then, guile was not in Nathanael, the Physician judged him to be curable, not whole. A whole man is one thing, a curable another, an incurable a third: he who is sick, but not hopelessly sick, is called curable; he who is sick hopelessly, incurable; but he who is already whole does not need a physician. The Physician, then, who had come to cure, saw that he was curable, because there was no guile in him. How was guile not in him, if he is a sinner? He confesses that he is a sinner. For if he is a sinner, and says that he is a just man, there is guile in his mouth. Therefore in Nathanael He praised the confession of sin, He did not judge that he was not a sinner.

Jam caetera de ipso videamus, Ecce vere Israelita, in quo dolus non est. Quid est, in quo dolus non est? Forte non habebat peccatum? forte non erat aeger? forte illi medicus non erat necessarius? Absit. Nemo hic sic natus est, ut illo medico non egeret. Quid sibi ergo vult, in quo dolus non est? Aliquanto intentius quaeramus; apparebit modo in nomine Domini. Dolum dicit Dominus; et omnis qui verba latina intelligit, scit quia dolus est, cum aliud agitur et aliud fingitur. Intendat Charitas vestra. Non dolus dolor est: propterea dico, quia multi fratres imperitiores latinitatis loquuntur sic, ut dicant, Dolus illum torquet, pro eo quod est dolor. Dolus fraus est, simulatio est. Quando aliquis aliquid in corde tegit, et aliud loquitur, dolus est, et tanquam duo corda habet: unum quasi sinum cordis habet, ubi videt veritatem; et alterum sinum, ubi concipit mendacium. Et ut noveritis hunc esse dolum, dictum est in Psalmis, Labia dolosa. Quid est, Labia dolosa? Sequitur, In corde et corde locuti sunt mala . Quid est, In corde et corde; nisi duplici corde? Si ergo dolus in isto non erat, sanabilem illum medicus judicavit, non sanum. Aliud est enim sanus, aliud sanabilis, aliud insanabilis: qui aegrotat cum spe, sanabilis dicitur; qui aegrotat cum desperatione, insanabilis; qui autem jam sanus est, non eget medico. Medicus ergo qui venerat sanare, vidit istum sanabilem, quia dolus in illo non erat. Quomodo dolus in illo non erat? Si peccator est, fatetur se peccatorem. Si enim peccator est, et justum se dicit; dolus est in ore ipsius. Ergo in Nathanaele confessionem peccati laudavit, non judicavit non esse peccatorem.

7.19 PL 35, 1447

19. Wherefore, when the Pharisees, who seemed righteous to themselves, blamed the Lord, because, as physician, he mixed with the sick, and when they said, “Behold with whom he eats, with publicans and sinners,” the Physician replied to the madmen, “They that are whole need not a physician, but they that are sick: I came not to call the righteous, but sinners.” That is to say, because you call yourselves righteous when you are sinners, because you judge yourselves to be whole when you are languishing, you put away from you the medicine, and do not hold fast health. Hence that Pharisee who had asked the Lord to dinner, was whole in his own eyes; but that sick woman rushed into the house to which she had not been invited, and, made impudent by the desire of health, approached not the head of the Lord, nor the hands, but the feet; washed them with tears, wiped them with her hair, kissed them, anointed them with ointment,—made peace, sinner as she was, with the footprints of the Lord. The Pharisee who sat at meat there, as though whole himself, blamed the Physician, and said within himself, “This man, if he were a prophet, would have known what woman touched his feet.” He suspected that He knew not, because He did not repulse her to prevent His being touched with unclean hands; but He did know, He permitted Himself to be touched, that the touch itself might heal. The Lord, seeing the heart of the Pharisee, put forth a parable: “There was a certain creditor, which had two debtors; the one owed five hundred denars, and the other fifty; and when they had nothing to pay, he frankly forgave them both. Which of them loved him most?” He answered, “I suppose, Lord, he to whom he forgave most.” And turning to the woman, He said unto Simon, “Seest thou this woman? I entered into thine house, thou gavest me no water for my feet; but she hath washed my feet with tears, and wiped them with the hairs of her head: thou gavest me no kiss; she hath not ceased to kiss my feet: thou gavest me no oil; she hath anointed my feet with ointment. Wherefore, I say unto thee, to her are forgiven many sins, for she loved much; but to whom little is forgiven, the same loveth little.” That is to say, thou art more sick, but thou thinkest thyself whole; thou thinkest that little is forgiven thee when thou owest more. Well did she, because guile was not in her, deserve medicine. What means, guile was not in her? She confessed her sins. This He also praises in Nathanael, that guile was not in him; for many Pharisees who abounded in sins said that they were righteous, and brought guile with them, which made it impossible for them to be healed.

Propterea cum Pharisaei qui sibi videbantur justi, reprehenderent Dominum quia miscebatur aegrotis medicus, et dicerent, Ecce cum quibus manducat, cum publicanis et peccatoribus; respondit medicus phreneticis, Non est opus sanis medicus, sed male habentibus: non veni vocare justos, sed peccatores . Hoc est dicere, Quia vos justos dicitis, cum sitis peccatores, sanos vos judicatis, cum langueatis, medicinam repellitis, non sanitatem tenetis. Unde ille pharisaeus qui vocaverat Dominum ad prandium, sanus sibi videbatur: aegrota autem illa mulier irrupit in domum, quo non erat invitata, et desiderio salutis facta impudens, accessit, non ad caput Domini, non ad manus, sed ad pedes; lavit eos lacrymis, tersit capillis, osculata est eos, unxit unguento, pacem fecit cum vestigiis Domini peccatrix. Reprehendit ille tanquam sanus medicum, ille pharisaeus qui illic discumbebat; et ait apud se: Hic si esset propheta, sciret quae mulier illi pedes tetigisset. Ideo autem suspicatus erat eum ignorasse, quia non illam repulit, quasi ne immundis manibus tangeretur: noverat autem ille, permisit se tangi, ut tactus ipse sanaret. Dominus videns cor Pharisaei, proposuit similitudinem: « Duo debitores erant cuidam feneratori; unus ei debebat quinquaginta denarios, alter quingentos: cum non haberent unde redderent, donavit ambobus; quis eum plus dilexit? Et ille: Credo, Domine, cui plus donavit. Et conversus ad mulierem, dixit Simoni: Vides istam mulierem? Intravi in domum tuam, aquam mihi ad pedes non ardisti; illa autem lacrymis lavit pedes meos, et capulis suis tersit: osculum mihi non dedisti: illa non destitit pedes meos osculari: oleum mihi non dedisti; illa pedes meos unxit unguento. Propterea dico tibi; dimittuntur ei peccata multa, quoniam dilexit multum: cui autem modicum dimittitur, modicum diligit » . Hoc est dicere, Plus aegrotas, sed sanum te putas: modicum putas tibi dimitti, cum plus debitor sis. Bene ista, quia dolus in illa non erat, meruit medicinam. Quid est, dolus in illa non erat? Confitebatur peccata. Hoc et laudat in Nathanaele, quod dolus in illo non erat: quia multi pharisaei qui abundabant peccatis, justos se dicebant, et dolum afferebant, per quem sanari non poterant.

7.20 PL 35, 1447

20. Jesus then saw this man in whom was no guile, and said, “Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile.” Nathanael saith unto Him, “Whence knowest Thou me?” Jesus answered and said, “Before that Philip called thee, when thou wast under the fig (that is, under the fig-tree), I saw thee.” Nathanael answered and said unto Him, “Rabbi, Thou art the Son of God; Thou art the King of Israel.” Some great thing Nathanael may have understood in the saying, “When thou wast under the fig-tree, I saw thee, before that Philip called thee;” for his words, “Thou art the Son of God, Thou art the King of Israel,” were not dissimilar to those of Peter so long afterwards, when the Lord said unto him, “Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona, for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.” And there He named the rock, and praised the strength of the Church’s support in this faith. Here already Nathanael says, “Thou art the Son of God; Thou art the King of Israel.” Wherefore? Because it was said to him, “Before that Philip called thee, when thou wast under the fig-tree, I saw thee.”

Vidit ergo jam istum in quo dolus non erat, et ait: Ecce vere Israelita, in quo dolus non est. Dicit ei Nathanael: Unae me nosti? Respondit Jesus, et dixit: Priusquam te Philippus vocaret, cum esses sub ficu, vidi te; id est, sub arbore fici. Respondit ei Nathanael, et ait: Rabbi, tu es Filius Dei, tu es rex Israel. Aliquid magnum potuit Nathanael iste intelligere, in eo quod dictum est, Cum esses sub fici arbore, vidi te, priusquam te Philippus vocaret. Nam talem vocem protulit, Tu es Filius Dei, tu es rex Israel; qualem tanto post Petrus, quando ei Dominus ait, Beatus es Simon Bar Jona, quia non tibi revelavit caro et sanguis, sed Pater meus qui est in coelo . Et ibi nominavit petram, et laudavit firmamentum Ecclesiae in ista fide. Hic jam dicit, Tu es Filius Dei, tu es rex Israel. Unde? Quia dictum est ei, Antequam te Philippus vocaret, cum esses sub arbore fici, vidi te.

7.21 PL 35, 1448

21. We must inquire whether this fig-tree signifies anything. Listen, my brethren. We find the fig-tree cursed because it had leaves only, and not fruit. In the beginning of the human race, when Adam and Eve had sinned, they made themselves girdles of fig leaves. Fig leaves then signify sins. Nathanael then was under the fig-tree, as it were under the shadow of death. The Lord saw him, he concerning whom it was said, “They that sat under the shadow of death, unto them hath light arisen.” What then was said to Nathanael? Thou sayest to me, O Nathanael, “Whence knowest thou me?” Even now thou speakest to me, because Philip called thee. He whom an apostle had already called, He perceived to belong to His Church. O thou Church, O thou Israel, in whom is no guile! if thou art the people, Israel, in whom is no guile, thou hast even now known Christ by His apostles, as Nathanael knew Christ by Philip. But His compassion beheld thee before thou knewest Him, when thou wert lying under sin. For did we first seek Christ, and not He seek us? Did we come sick to the Physician, and not the Physician to the sick? Was not that sheep lost, and did not the shepherd, leaving the ninety and nine in the wilderness, seek and find it, and joyfully carry it back on his shoulders? Was not that piece of money lost, and the woman lighted the lamp, and searched in the whole house until she found it? And when she had found it, “Rejoice with me,” she said to her neighbors, “for I have found the piece of money which I lost.” In like manner were we lost as the sheep, lost as the piece of money; and our Shepherd found the sheep, but sought the sheep; the woman found the piece of money, but sought the piece of money. What is the woman? The flesh of Christ. What is the lamp? “I have prepared a lamp for my Christ.” Therefore were we sought that we might be found; having been found, we speak. Let us not be proud, for before we were found we were lost, if we had not been sought. Let them then not say to us whom we love, and whom we desire to gain to the peace of the Catholic Church, “What do you wish with us? Why seek you us if we are sinners?” We seek you for this reason that you perish not: we seek you because we were sought; we wish to find you because we have been found.

Quaerendum est, an aliquid significet ista arbor fici. Audite enim, fratres mei: Invenimus arborem fici maledictam, quia sola folia habuit, et fructum non habuit . In origine humani generis Adam et Eva cum peccassent, de foliis ficulneis succinctoria sibi fecerunt : folia ergo ficulnea intelliguntur peccata. Erat autem Nathanael sub arbore fici, tanquam sub umbra mortis. Vidit eum Dominus, de quo dictum est, Qui sedebant sub umbra mortis, lumen ortum est eis . Quid ergo dictum est Nathanaeli? Dicis mihi, o Nathanael, Unde me nosti? Modo jam loqueris mecum, quia vocavit te Philippus. Jam quem vocavit per apostolum, ad Ecclesiam suam vidit pertinere. O tu Ecclesia, o tu Israel, in quo dolus non est; si es populus Israel in quo dolus non est, modo jam cognovisti Christum per Apostolos, quomodo Nathanael cognovit Christum per Philippum. Sed misericordia sua ante te vidit, quam tu eum cognosceres, cum sub peccato jaceres. Numquid enim nos prius quaesivimus Christum, et non ille nos quaesivit? Numquid nos venimus aegroti ad medicum, et non medicus ad aegrotos? Nonne ovis illa perierat, et relictis nonaginta novem pastor quaesivit illam et invenit, quam laetus in humeris reportavit? Nonne perierat drachma illa, et accendit mulier lucernam, et quaesivit in tota domo sua donec invenit? Et cum invenisset, Collaetamini mihi, ait vicinis suis, quia inveni drachmam quam perdideram . Sic et nos sicut ovis perieramus, et sicut drachma perieramus: et pastor noster invenit ovem, sed quaesivit ovem; mulier invenit drachmam, sed quaesivit drachmam. Quae est mulier? Caro Christi. Quae est lucerna? Paravi lucernam Christo meo . Ergo quaesiti sumus, ut inveniremur; inventi loquimur. Non superbiamus, quia antequam inveniremur, perieramus, si non quaereremur. Non ergo nobis dicant quos amamus, et volumus lucrari paci Ecclesiae catholicae: Quid nos vultis? quid nos quaeritis, si peccatores sumus? Ideo vos quaerimus, ne pereatis: quaerimus, quia quaesiti sumus; invenire vos volumus, quia inventi sumus.

7.22 PL 35, 1448

22. When, then, Nathanael had said “Whence knowest Thou me?” the Lord said to him, “Before that Philip called thee, when thou wast under the fig-tree, I saw thee.” O thou Israel without guile, whosoever thou art; O people living by faith, before I called thee by my apostles, when thou wast under the shadow of death, and thou sawest not me, I saw thee. The Lord then says to him, “Because I said unto thee, I saw thee under the fig-tree, thou believest: thou shalt see a greater thing than these.” What is this, thou shalt see a greater thing than these? And He saith unto him, “Verily, verily, I say unto you, ye shall see heaven open, and angels ascending and descending upon the Son of man.” Brethren, this is something greater than “under the fig-tree I saw thee.” For it is more that the Lord justified us when called than that He saw us lying under the shadow of death. For what profit would it have been to us if we had remained where He saw us? Should we not be lying there? What is this greater thing? When have we seen angels ascending and descending upon the Son of man?

Itaque Nathanael cum dixisset, Unde me nosti? ait illi Dominus, Priusquam te vocaret Philippus, cum esses sub arbore fici, vidi te. O tu Israel sine dolo, quisquis es, o popule vivens ex fide, antequam te per Apostolos meos vocarem, cum esses sub umbra mortis, et tu me non videres, ego te vidi. Dominus deinde dicit ei: « Quia dixi tibi, Vidi te sub arbore fici, credis: majus his videbis. » Quid est hoc, « majus his videbis? Et dicit ei: Amen, amen dico vobis, videbitis coelum apertum, et Angelos ascendentes et descendentes super Filium hominis. » Fratres, nescio quid majus dixi, quam est, sub arbore fici vidi te. Plus enim est quod nos Dominus vocatos justificavit, quam quod vidit jacentes sub umbra mortis. Quid enim nobis proderat si ibi remansissemus, ubi nos vidit? Numquid non jaceremus? Quid est hoc majus? Quando vidimus Angelos ascendentes et descendentes super Filium hominis?

7.23 PL 35, 1449

23. Already on a former occasion I have spoken of these ascending and descending angels; but lest you should have forgotten, I shall speak of the latter briefly by way of recalling it to your recollection. I should use more words if I were introducing, not recalling the subject. Jacob saw a ladder in a dream; and on a ladder he saw angels ascending and descending: and he anointed the stone which he had placed at his head. You have heard that the Messias is Christ; you have heard that Christ is the Anointed. For Jacob did not place the stone, the anointed stone, that he might come and adore it: otherwise that would have been idolatry, not a pointing out of Christ. What was done was a pointing out of Christ, so far as it behoved such a pointing out to be made, and it was Christ that was pointed out. A stone was anointed, but not for an idol. A stone anointed; why a stone? “Behold, I lay in Zion a stone, elect, precious: and he that believeth on Him shall not be confounded.” Why anointed? Because Christus comes from chrisma. But what saw he then on the ladder? Ascending and descending angels. So it is the Church, brethren: the angels of God are good preachers, preaching Christ; this is the meaning of, “they ascend and descend upon the Son of man.” How do they ascend, and how do they descend? In one case we have an example; listen to the Apostle Paul. What we find in him, let us believe regarding the other preachers of the truth. Behold Paul ascending: “I know a man in Christ fourteen years ago was caught up into the third heaven (whether in the body, or whether out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth), and that he heard unspeakable words, which it is not lawful for a man to utter.” You have heard him ascending, hear him descending: “I could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal; as babes in Christ I have fed you with milk, not with meat.” Behold he descended who had ascended. Ask whether he ascended to the third heaven. Ask whether he descended to give milk to babes. Hear that he descended: “I became a babe in the midst of you, even as a nurse cherisheth her children.” For we see both nurses and mothers descend to babes, and although they be able to speak Latin, they shorten the words, shake their tongues in a certain manner, in order to frame childish endearments from a methodical language; because if they speak according to rule, the infant does not understand nor profit. And if there be a father well skilled in speaking, and such an orator that the forum resounds with his eloquence, and the judgment-seats shake, if he have a little son, on his return home he puts aside the forensic eloquence to which he had ascended, and in child’s language descends to his little one. Hear in one place the apostle himself ascending and descending in the same sentence: “For whether,” says he,“we be beside ourselves, it is to God; or whether we be sober, it is for your cause.” What is “we are beside ourselves”? That we see those things which it is not lawful for a man to speak. What is “we are sober for your cause? Have I judged myself to know anything among you, save Jesus Christ and Him crucified?” If the Lord Himself ascended and descended, it is evident that His preachers ascend by imitation, descend by preaching.

Jam aliquando de his ascendentibus et descendentibus Angelis dixeram; sed ne obliti fueritis, breviter dico tanquam commemorans: pluribus enim dicerem si non commemorarem, sed modo insinuarem. Scalas vidit Jacob per somnium, et in ipsis scalis vidit Angelos ascendentes et descendentes; et lapidem quem sibi posuerat ad caput, unxit . Audistis quia Messias Christus est, audistis quia unctus Christus est. Non enim sic posuit lapidem unctum, ut veniret et adoraret: alioquin idololatria esset, non significatio Christi. Facta est ergo significatio, quo usque oportuit fieri significationem, et significatus est Christus. Lapis unctus, sed non in idolum. Lapis unctus: lapis quare? Ecce pono in Sion lapidem electum, pretiosum, et qui crediderit in illum, non confundetur . Quare unctus? Quia Christus a chrismate. Quid autem vidit tunc in scalis? Ascendentes et descendentes Angelos. Sic est et Ecclesia, fratres: Angeli Dei, boni praedicatores, praedicantes Christum; hoc est, super Filium hominis ascendunt et descendunt. Quomodo ascendunt, et quomodo descendunt? Ex uno habemus exemplum: audi apostolum Paulum; quod in ipso invenerimus, hoc de caeteris veritatis praedicatoribus credamus. Vide Paulum ascendentem: « Scio hominem in Christo ante annos quatuordecim raptum fuisse usque in tertium coelum, sive in corpore, sive extra corpus nescio, Deus scit: et audisse ineffabilia verba quae non licet homini loqui » . Ascendentem audistis, descendentem audite. « Non potui loqui vobis quasi spiritualibus, sed quasi carnalibus: quasi parvulis in Christo lac vobis potum dedi, non escam » . Ecce descendit qui ascenderat. Quaere quo ascenderat. Usque in tertium coelum. Quaere quo descenderit. Usque ad lac parvulis dandum. Audi quia descendit: Factus sum parvulus, inquit, in medio vestrum, tanquam si nutrix foveat filios suos . Videmus enim et nutrices et matres descendere ad parvulos: et si norunt latina verba dicere, decurtant illa, et quassant quodammodo linguam suam, ut possint de lingua diserta fieri blandimenta puerilia; quia si sic dicant, non audit infans, sed nec proficit infans. Et disertus aliquis pater, si sit tantus orator ut lingua illius fora concrepent, et tribunalia concutiantur; si habeat parvulum filium, cum ad domum redierit, seponit forensem eloquentiam quo ascenderat, et lingua puerili descendit ad parvulum. Audi uno loco ipsum Apostolum ascendentem et descendentem, in una sententia: « Sive enim, inquit, mente excessimus, Deo: sive temperantes sumus, vobis » . Quid est, « mente excessimus, Deo? » Ut illa videamus « quae non licet homini loqui. » Quid est, « temperantes sumus, vobis? Numquid judicavi me aliquid scire inter vos, nisi Jesum Christum, et hunc crucifixum » ? Si ipse Dominus ascendit et descendit; manifestum est quia et praedicatores ipsius ascendunt imitatione, descendunt praedicatione.

7.24 PL 35, 1450

24. And if we have detained you somewhat longer than is our wont, the design was that the dangerous hours might pass: we imagine that those people have now brought their vanity to a close. But let us, brethren, having fed upon the feasts of salvation, do what remains, that we may in a religious manner fill up the Lord’s day with spiritual joys, and compare the joys of verity with the joys of vanity; and if we are horrified, let us grieve; if we grieve, let us pray; if we pray, may we be heard; if we are heard, we gain them also.

Et si aliquanto vos diutius tenuimus, consilii fuit ut importunae horae transirent: arbitramur jam illos peregisse vanitatem suam. Nos autem, fratres, quando pasti sumus epulis salutaribus, quae restant agamus, ut diem dominicum solemniter impleamus in gaudiis spiritualibus, et comparemus gaudia veritatis cum gaudiis vanitatis: et si horremus, doleamus; si dolemus, oremus; si oramus, exaudiamur; si exaudimur, et illos lucramur.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Save for later

Enter your email and we will send you a sign-in link. No password. What you save (articles, verses, chapters, documents) follows you to any device.