Sermons on the Song of Songs73 Sermon LXXIII. How Christ shall come to judge in human form, that he may appear delightful to the elect j and how he is less than the angels, yet loftier than they

san Bernardo di Chiaravalle († 1153) · Sermones in Cantica canticorum · 1135-1153

Sermon LXXIII. How Christ shall come to judge in human form, that he may appear delightful to the elect j and how he is less than the angels, yet loftier than they

Return, my Beloved, and be Thou like a roe or a young hart upon the mountains of Bether.'—QanX. iii. 17.

What? He is but just now gone, and you call Him back? What sudden need has arisen in so short a time? Have you forgotten anything? Yea, truly, the Bride has forgotten everything which is not He, even her own self. And though she is not devoid of reason, yet sometimes she seems for the moment 2. But I will, as far as I have received from the Lord, seek out the spirit and the life in the deep and mysterious meaning of the sacred text; this is the portion which belongs to me, as a believer in Jesus Christ. Why should I not extract the sweet and salutary nourishment of the Spirit from the barren and tasteless mass of the letter, as I separate grain from chaff, the kernel from its shell, or marrow from the bone? With this mere letter, which, when tasted, savours only of the flesh, and when swallowed, brings death, I do not desire to have anything to do, but only with that teaching from the Holy Ghost which is hidden in it. For as the Apostle declares, The Spirit speaketh in a mystery (1 Cor. xiv. 2); but Israel, in place of the mystery, which is veiled, takes the veil which covers the mystery. Why is this, except that a veil is still upon their heart? #Thus the literal meaning of the text is theirs, but its inner signification is mine; and thus there is to them a ministration of death in the letter, but to me life in the Spirit. For it is the Spirit which quickeneth (John vi. 64), inasmuch as it gives understanding; and is not understanding life? Give me understanding and I shall live, is the Psalmist's prayer to the Lord. Understanding does not remain on the surface of things, it is not superficial, it does not handle the outside with uncertain touch, like a blind man; but it penetrates to their depths, and often brings up from thence treasures of truth with eager grasp, as did the Psalmist when he said unto the Lord: rejoice at Thy word as one that findeth great spoil (Ps. cxix. 144, 162). It is thus that the kingdom of truth suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force (Matt. xi. 12). But that elder brother in the Gospel (Luke xv. 25-30) who returned from the field is the type of that ancient and earthly-minded people which has learned to labour for an earthly heritage only, and groans with careworn and furrowed brow under the heavy yoke of the Law, which it bears throughout the burden and heat of the day. This people, I say, because it has no understanding, stands without even to the present time, and will not, even when invited by the Father, enter into the house of banqueting, thus depriving himself hitherto of any share in the music, and the dancing, and the fatted calf. Unhappy that he is, he refuses to make experience how good and joyful it is for brethren to dwell together in unity. All this has been said to show the distinction between the portion of the Church and that of the synagogue;

3. Let us now examine the words of the Bride, and endeavour so to expound the chaste sentiments of her sacred love, that there may appear nothing that is contrary to reason in the sacred text, nor anything importunate or unbecoming. And if we bear in mind that hour when the Lord Jesus (for He is the Bridegroom) passed from this world unto the Father (John xiii. 1), and at the same time the state of mind in which the Church, His newly-wedded Bride, necessarily was when she saw herself deserted and left as a desolate widow, deprived of her only hope (I refer to the Apostles who had left all and followed Him, and had continued with Him in His temptations); if, I say, we consider these things, it will appear to us, I think, that it is not unreasonable nor unaccountable that the Bride should be so inconsolable for His departure, nor so urgent for His return, when she is left so solitary and in such distress. The affection that she feels for Him, and the need that she has for Him, forms, then, a twofold reason for thus appealing to Him; that since He cannot but ascend up where He was before, He will at least hasten His promised return. For that she desires and entreats that Hewould be like unto certain animals, and those the animals which are of greatest speed, is an indication of the eagerness of her desire, for which no return would be sufficiently prompt Does she not ask for this daily when she prays, Thy kingdom come (Matt vi. 10)?

4. Yet I think that she desires to point not less significantly to weakness as well as to speed, and that as well of sex in the roc as of age in the young hart. She desires, then, as it seems to me, that when returning to judgment He should appear, not in the Form of God, but in that Human Form in which He was not only born, but born as a little Child, and born only from that female sex which is the weaker of the two. Why is this? It is in order that from both the one and the other there may be a reminder to be gentle towards the weak even in the day of His wrath, and in the time of judgment to exalt mercy above judgment. For if He shall be strict to search out offences, who even of the elect shall stand in His presence {Ps. cxxx. 2)? The stars are not pure in His sight, and in His Angels He finds pravity (Job iv. 18; xxv. 5). Listen, then, to him who is elect and holy; hear what he says to God: Thou forgavest the iniquity of my sin. For this shall everyone that is godly pray unto Thee, in a time when Thou mayest be found (Ps. xxxii. 5, 6). Even the saints, therefore, need to entreat pardon for their sins, that they may be saved by the mercy of God, and must not trust in their own righteousness; for all have sinned, and all need mercy. In order, then, that when He is angry He may remember mercy, the Bride entreats of Him to appear in the garb of mercy, that is, in the Form of which the Apostle says: Being found in fashion as a man (Phil. ii. 7).

5. And, indeed, it is very necessary for us that it should be thus; for if, even with this moderating influence, so great is His equity in judgment, so awful the severity of the Judge, so lofty His majesty, and so changed the very appearance of all things, that, according to the Prophet, the day of His Coming does not bear to be thought upon (Mai. iii. 2, Douay), what would it be, do you imagine, if He who is a consuming fire (I mean the Almighty God) should come in all that immensity, and power, and purity of His Godhead, to put forth His power against a leaf (so to speak) which the wind driveth away, and to pursue the dry stubble (Job xiii. 25)? He is Man also, and who, says the Prophet, shall behold Him? Who shall stand when He appearethl (Mai. iii. 2). How much less, then, could any among men endure the sight if He should manifest Himself to us without His Humanity: as God, unapproachable in His Glory, unattainable in His loftiness, incomprehensible in the greatness of His Majesty? But now, when His wrath is kindled but a little (Ps. ii. 12), how welcome and sweet towards the children of grace shall appear a glimpse of His Humanity! How it shall be to them a confirmation of faith, a strength to their hope, an increase in their confidence, because His grace and mercy is with His saints, and He hath respect unto His chosen (Wisd. iv. 15)! In fact, God the Father Himself hath given the power of judgment unto His Son; and not because He is His Son, but because He is the Son of Man (John v. 27). O truly He is the Father of mercies! He wills that men should be judged by a Man, in order that amid fear and apprehension of evils so great confidence might be given to the elect by the resemblance of nature. Holy David had predicted this formerly, in words which were equally a prayer and a prophecy: Give the King Thy judgments, O Lord: a fid Thy righteousness unto the King's son (Ps. lxxii. 1). To the same effect is the promise made by the Angels to the Apostles when, after Jesus had been taken up into heaven, they spake to the latter thus: This same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come, in like manner as ye have seen Him go into heaven (Acts i. 11); that is to say, in that very form and substance of body.

6. It is very clear, from all these things, that the Bride had a certain access to the Divine plan, and that she was not ignorant of the mystery of God's supreme Will, which [hath chosen the weak and harmless things of the world (1 Cor. i. 27); inasmuch as she indicates, in the spirit of prophecy, and in the words of one who utters prayer, that the nature which is weaker, or rather that which is lower (for then it shall no longer be weak), shall be set on high to judge; insomuch that He who shall shake heaven and earth by His power, while girded with power against the sinful and impenitent, shall yet show Himself gentle and kind, and, as it were, harmless, towards the elect. To this it may be added that, in order to discern the one from the other, He will need not only, as it were, the agility of the roe, but the piercing sight of the hart, so as to be able to discern, in so vast a multitude, and at the moment of so great a change of condition, whom to fix upon, and whom to pass over, that He may not crush the righteous instead of the wicked, when He shall tread down the peoples in His wrath. For as to the wicked, it is necessary that the prophecy of David, or rather the word of the Lord speaking by his mouth, should be fulfilled; that will beat them small as the dust before the ivind: I will cast them out as the clay in the streets (Ps. xviii. 42, Vulg.); and also that another word, which He had spoken before by another prophet, should be accomplished, when, returning towards the Angels, He shall say [of the wicked]: I have trampled on them in My indignation, and have trodden them down in My wrath (Is. lxiii. 3, Vulg.).

7. But if anyone thinks that it would be preferable to understand the words of the Bride in this sense, that our fawn should pass over the wicked, and choose out the good in His bounds, I do not contest this, provided that discrimination is understood to be thus made between the evil and the good. For, if I remember rightly, such was also the sense which I put upon the words when I was expounding this verse in a former discourse (Sermon LIV.). But there that One is said to leap as a fawn upon some, and to pass over others, according to the dispensation of grace, and by the secret, though just, judgment of God; while here it is according to the final and varying recompense of merits. And perhaps the last words of the verse, which I had, indeed, almost forgotten, may seem to support that sense; for after having said, Be Thou, my Beloved, like a roe or a young hart, she adds, upon the mountains of Bethel Now, in 'the House of the Lord' (which is the meaning of the word Bethel) there are no mountains which are evil. Therefore the Bridegroom, leaping as a fawn upon them, does not crush and trample them, but causes them to rejoice, that the Scripture might be fulfilled which says: The mountains and the hills shall break out before God into singing. There are, indeed, mountains which, according to the Gospel, faith, though it be as a grain of mustard seed, is able to remove (Matt. xvii. 20), but these are not the mountains of Bethel: and whichsoever these latter are, faith does not at all remove them, but renders them fruitful.

8. If by the mountains of Bethel be meant the Principalities and Powers, and all other bands of the blessed Spirits, as it is of them that we are to understand what is said, Her foundations are upon the holy mountains (Ps. lxxxvii. 1), this One, who appears as a fawn upon mountains so excelling in dignity, is assuredly not of small account or to be despised, being made so much better than the Angels, as He hath by inheritance obtained a more excellent Name than they (Heb. i. 4). For what if we do read in a Psalm that He is made a little lower than the Angels (Ps. viii. 5)? That He is in a lower place does not con- 1 The word in the verse commented upon is not Bethel, ' House of God,' bat Bet her, ' House of division, or separation; but most commentators treat them as identical. The latter word is not found elsewhere in Scripture. See the discussion in Corn, a Lapide, in loc.—Ed.

2 Is. lv. 12. The reading is, before you.

9. Let this suffice in explanation of the comparison which the Bride makes of the Bridegroom to a fawn, and to show that she does thereby no injury to His dignity. Why do I say without injury to His dignity, when not even His weakness has remained without honour? He is [called a fawn, He was a little Child He is spoken of as like unto a roe, inasmuch as He was made of a woman: and yet He is upon the mountains of Bethel, yet He is made higher than the heavens (Heb. vii. 26). He does not say, 'who is* or 'who exists' in the Heavens, but he says, made higher than the heavens, that it might not be thought that this was spoken of that Nature in which He is that which He is. But where he represents Him as preferred to the Angels, he does not say that He 'remains or 'exists,' but that He is made better than they. From which it appears that not only according to that which He is from all eternity, but also according to that which He is in time, He is exalted far above all Principalities and Powers, and being the Firstborn of every creature, He is above every created being. Therefore the foolishness of God is wiser than men: and the weakness of God is stronger than men (1 Cor. i. 25). That the Apostle indeed asserts; but it seems to me that it would not be wrong to extend the assertion to the strength and the wisdom of the Angels. So, then, the present passage may conveniently be applied to the universal Church.

10. Now, as far as relates to the individual soul (for even one soul, if it love God dearly, wisely, and with passion, is the Bride), whosoever is spiritual may notice in himself what his own experience teaches upon this subject As for me, I do not fear to make known to you 1 In all the MSS. and in the earliest editions the reading here is ens; but Horst and others have martens. Thus you have ens in Sermon LXXV., n. 11, for which the editors have inserted sedens. Yet here (Sermon LXXIII. 9) is read a little farther on in the MSS., mancns vel existens.

1. Revertere; similis esto, dilecte mi, capreae hinnuloque cervorum. Quid? modo it, modo revocas? Quid subitum in tam brevi emersit? Oblitane aliquid? Etiam oblita totum quod non ille est, se quoque ipsam. Denique cum sit rationis non expers, non tamen modo, ut videtur, rationis est compos. Sed nec in sensu illi ullatenus apparet verecundia esse, quam forte habet in moribus. Amor intemperans facit hoc. Nempe is est qui omnem in se triumphans captivansque pudoris sensum, convenientiae modum, deliberationis consilium, totius modestiae et opportunitatis neglectum quemdam et quamdam incuriam parit. Nam vide nunc quomodo illum, pene adhuc incipientem ire, jam tamen redire flagitat. Etiam accelerare rogat, et quidem currere instar unius alicujus ferae silvarum velociter currentis, verbi gratia, capreae, hinnulive cervorum. Hic litterae tenor, et haec Judaeorum portio.

2. Ego vero, quemadmodum accepi a Domino, in profundo sacri eloquii gremio spiritum mihi scrutabor et vitam; et pars mea haec, qui in Christum credo. Quidni eruam dulce ac salutare epulum spiritus de sterili et insipida littera, tanquam granum de palea, de testa nucleum, de osse medullam? Nihil mihi et litterae huic, quae gustata carnem sapit, glutita mortem affert; sed enim quod in ea tectum est, de Spiritu sancto est. Spiritus autem loquitur mysteria, teste Apostolo; sed Israel pro velato mysterio ipsum mysterii velamen tenet. Quare, nisi quia adhuc velamen est positum super cor ejus? Ita quod sonat littera, illius est: quod signat [ Alias, designat], meum est; ac per hoc illi ministratio mortis in littera, mihi vita in spiritu. Nam spiritus est qui vivificat: dat quippe intellectum. An non vita intellectus? Intellectum da mihi, et vivam, ait Propheta Domino. Intellectus non remanet extra, non haeret in superficie, non instar caeci palpat forinseca; sed profunda rimatur, pretiosissimas solitus exinde veritatis exuvias tota aviditate diripere ac tollere sibi, et cum Propheta dicere Domino: Laetabor ego super eloquia tua, sicut qui invenit spolia multa. Nempe ita regnum veritatis vim patitur, et violenti rapiunt illud. Verum ille senior frater, qui de agro veniens formam tenuit populi veteris et terreni, qui pro terrena haereditate doctus diligere trituram, attrita fronte gemit anxius sub gravi jugo legis, portatque pondus diei et aestus. Is, inquam, quia intellectum non habuit, foris stat etiam nunc, et non vult nec invitatus a patre intrare domum convivii, semetipsum fraudans usque adhuc participio symphoniae, et chori, et vituli saginati. Miser qui renuit experiri, quam bonum sit et quam jucundum habitare fratres in unum. Et haec dicta sint pro distinctione partis Ecclesiae, partisque Synagogae, quo et caecitas hujus ex illius prudentia manifestior fiat, et felicitas illius ex hujus miseranda fatuitate praeemineat.

3. Nunc jam scrutemur verba sponsae, et sic conemur castos exprimere sancti amoris affectus, ut nil in sacro eloquio ratione carens, nil indecorum importunumve resedisse omnino appareat. Et si in mentem venerit hora illa, cum Dominus Jesus (is enim sponsus est) transiret ex hoc mundo ad Patrem, simulque quid tunc animi gereret sua illa domestica Ecclesia, nova utique nupta, cum se deseri cerneret quasi viduam desolatam unica spe sua: apostolos loquor, qui relictis omnibus secuti fuerant eum, atque cum ipso permanserant in tentationibus suis; si haec, inquam, cogitaverimus, non immerito neque incongrue, puto, videbitur quantum de abscessu tristis, tantum sollicita exstitisse de reditu, praesertim sic affecta, et sic relicta. Itaque diligenti et indigenti haec ipsa duplex ratio erat commonendi dilectum, ut, quandoquidem persuaderi non poterat quin iret et ascenderet ubi erat prius, saltem promissum denuo maturaret adventum. Quod enim optat et postulat similem fore feris, et ejusmodi feris, quae cursu agiliores esse videntur; cupientis animi indicium est, cui nihil satis festinatur. Nonne hoc quotidie postulat, cum dicit in oratione: Adveniat regnum tuum?

4. Ego tamen praeter agilitatem, existimo non minus signanter exprimi etiam infirmitatem, et quidem sexus in caprea, aetatis in hinnulo. Vult itaque eum, ut mihi videtur, etsi cum potestate venire, non tamen in forma Dei in judicio apparere; sed sane in ea, qua non modo natus, sed et parvulus natus est nobis, idque solo de infirmiori femineo sexu. Cur hoc? Nempe ut ex utroque admoneatur infirmo mitescere in die irae, memineritque in judicio misericordiam superexaltare judicio. Etenim si iniquitates observaverit, etiam electorum, quis sustinebit? Astra non sunt munda in conspectu ejus, et in angelis suis reperit pravitatem. Audi denique sanctum et electum quid dicat Deo: Tu, inquit, remisisti impietatem peccati mei. Pro hac orabit ad te omnis sanctus in tempore opportuno. Opus itaque habent et sancti pro peccatis exorare, ut de misericordia salvi fiant, propriae justitiae non fidentes. Omnes enim peccaverunt, et egent omnes misericordia. Ut ergo cum iratus fuerit, misericordiae recordetur, rogatur ab ista apparere in misericordiae habitu, illo, de quo Apostolus: Et habitu, inquit, inventus ut homo.

5. Necessarie quidem. Si enim cum hoc quoque temperamento tanta erit in judicio aequitas, in judice feritas, in majestate sublimitas, novitas in facie ipsa rerum, ut secundum prophetam non possit cogitari dies adventus ejus: quid, putas, foret, si ignis ille consumens (Deum loquor omnipotentem) in illa suae divinitatis magnitudine, fortitudine, puritate venisset, contra folium quod vento rapitur ostensurus potentiam suam, et stipulam siccam persecuturus? Et homo est, inquit, et quis videbit eum? Et quis stabit ad videndum eum. Quanto magis Deum nobis absque homine exhibentem nemo hominum ferret, utpote claritate inaccessibilem, celsitudine inattingibilem, incomprehensibilem majestate? Nunc vero cum exarserit in brevi ira ejus, quam grata propter filios gratiae apparebit blanda quaedam visio hominis, sane firmamentum fidei, spei robur, fiduciae augmentum: quod scilicet gratia et misericordia sit in sanctos ejus, et respectus in electos illius. Denique ipse Pater Deus dedit Filio judicii potestatem, et non quia suus, sed quia Filius hominis est. O vere Patrem misericordiarum! vult per hominem homines judicari, quo in tanta trepidatione et perturbatione malorum, electis fiduciam praestet naturae similitudo. Praedixerat hoc quondam sanctus David, orans pariter et prophetans: Deus, inquiens, judicium tuum regi da, et justitiam tuam filio regis. Sed neque huic dissonat promissio facta per angelos, qui eo assumpto ita ad apostolos loquebantur: Hic Jesus qui assumptus est a vobis in coelum, sic veniet, quemadmodum vidistis eum euntem in coelum, hoc est, in hac ipsa corporis forma atque substantia.

6. Liquet ex his omnibus sponsam in se divinum habere consilium, et mysterium supernae voluntatis minime ignorare, quae sub umbra imbellium imbecilliumque animantium naturam infirmiorem, vel potius inferiorem, quia jam infirma non erit, in judicio exhibendam, et orantis affectu, et spiritu prophetantis enuntiat; quatenus qui coelum terramque movebit in virtute sua, accinctus potentia contra insensatos, et suavis nihilominus et mitis, et quasi omnino inermis appareat propter electos. Ubi hoc quoque addi potest, quia ad discernendum alterutros a se, opus erit quodam modo illi, cum hinnuli quidem saltibus, luminibus capreae; quatenus videre et discernere in tanta multitudine et in tanta turbatione possit, in quosnam salire, et quos transilire oporteat, ne forte contingat justum pro impio conculcari, cum in ira populos confringet. Nam quantum ad impios, necesse est ut impleatur prophetia David, imo sermo Domini loquentis per os ejus, quia comminuam eos ut pulverem ante faciem venti, ut lutum platearum delebo eos; et item alius sermo, quem per alium prophetam praedixerat, impletus nihilominus tunc cognoscetur, cum ad angelos rediens dicet: Calcavi eos in furore meo, et conculcavi eos in ira mea.

7. Si cui autem magis ita intelligendum videtur, ut malos potius transilire, atque in bonos salire hinnulus noster debeat, non contendo: tantum cogitet saltus dispositum iri in discriminationem bonorum, malorumque. Nam et a me, si bene memini, ita dictum est in sermone altero, ubi capitulum idem alibi supra et ab auctore positum, et a me expositum nihilominus reperitur. Verum ibi secundum dispensationem quidem gratiae, quae in praesenti vita aliis datur, aliis non datur, justo quidem Dei judicio, sed occulto, salire, et transilire is hinnulus dictus est; hic autem, secundum ultimam ac variam retributionem meritorum. Et forte sensui huic videatur astipulari extremum capituli hujus, quod quidem pene oblitus fueram. Dicens namque: Similis esto, dilecte mi, capreae hinnuloque cervorum, addit, super montes Bethel. Nec enim in domo Dei, quod sonat Bethel, mali montes sunt. Quamobrem saliens in eos hinnulus non conculcat, sed laetificat, ut Scriptura impleatur quae dicit: Montes et colles cantabunt coram Deo laudes. Et quidem sunt montes, quos secundum Evangelium tollit fides comparata sinapi, sed non sunt montes Bethel. Etenim quicunque sunt Bethel, minime eos tollit fides, sed colit.

8. Quod si principatus et potestates, nec non et caetera nihilominus beatorum Spirituum agmina, coelorumque virtutes montes sunt Bethel, ut de his intelligamus dictum: Fundamenta ejus in montibus sanctis, non sane is binnulus vilis ac contemnendus, qui supra tam excellentes montes visus est apparere, tanto angelis melior effectus, quanto differentius prae illis nomen haereditavit. Quid enim, si in psalmo legimus minoratum ab angelis?. Neque enim ideo non melior, quia minor; nec contraria sunt locuti Apostolus et Propheta, quippe habentes eumdem Spiritum. Nam si dignationis fuit quod minoratus est, non necessitatis; nihil plane in hoc bonitati praescribitur, sed ascribitur. Denique minoratum Propheta perhibuit, non minorem, attollens gratiam, et propellens injuriam. Nam et minoritatem natura recusat, et minorationem excusat causa. Nempe minoratus est, quia ipse voluit: minoratus est sua voluntate, et nostra necessitate. Sic minorari, misereri fuit. Quaenam perditio haec? Profecto accessit pietati, quidquid majestati visum est deperiisse. Quanquam nec Apostolus tacuit hoc magnum magnae pietatis arcanum, sed ait: Eum autem qui modico quam Angeli minoratus est, videmus Jesum, propter passionem mortis gloria et honore coronatum.

9. Et haec dixerimus pro nomine et similitudine hinnuli, quatenus sponso eam, juxta sermonem sponsae, absque majestatis injuria aptaremus. Quid dico, absque majestatis injuria, quando nec infirmitas inhonorata remansit? Hinnulus est, parvulus est; capreae quoque similis perhibetur, tanquam factus ex muliere: attamen super montes Bethel, attamen excelsior caelis factus. Non dicit: Excelsior coelis ens vel existens; sed, excelsior coelis factus: ne quis putet de illa natura dictum, in qua est qui est. Sed et ubi praefertur angelis, melior nihilominus perhibetur effectus, et non dicitur manens vel existens melior. Ex quibus apparet, quod non modo in eo quod ab aeterno est, sed etiam in eo quod in tempore factus est, omnem sibi eminentiam vindicet supra omnem principatum et potestatem, supra omnem denique creaturam, utpote primogenitus omnis creaturae. Itaque quod stultum est Dei, sapientius est hominibus; et quod infirmum est Dei, fortius est hominibus. Hoc quidem Apostolus. Mihi autem non videtur errare, si quis etiam sapientiae et fortitudini angelorum praeferendum dicat identidem stultum infirmumque Dei. Ita ergo praesens locus convenienter aptabitur universali Ecclesiae.

10. Jam vero quod ad unam singulariter animam spectat (nam et una, si Deum dulciter, sapienter, vehementer amat, sponsa est), quisque spiritualis in semetipso advertere potest, quid sibi inde proprium respondeat experimentum. Ego vero quidquid illud est, quod in me de hujusmodi experiri donatum est, coram eloqui non verebor. Nam etsi vile forsitan cum fuerit auditum, et despicabile videatur, non mea refert; quia qui spiritualis est, non me despiciet; qui minus, non me intelliget. Attamen si in alium istud sermonem servavero, forte non deerunt qui aedificentur in iis, quae exoratus interim Dominus inspirabit, sponsus Ecclesiae, Jesus Christus Dominus noster, qui est super omnia Deus benedictus in saecula. Amen.

Samuel J. Eales (active by 1879; M.A., Principal of S. Boniface College, Warminster, in 1882), Life and Works of Saint Bernard, Abbot of Clairvaux, edited by Dom John Mabillon, vol. IV: Cantica Canticorum, Eighty-six Sermons on the Song of Solomon, London: John Hodges, 1896. Fonte del testo digitale: OCR of the Internet Archive scan LifeAndWorksOfSaintBernardV4, word-repaired against LifeWorksOfSBernardClairvauxV4. Testo originale: Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich) TEI of the Patrologia Latina, via the CatholicCorpus mirror. Public domain in the US and Canada: published 1889-1896; translator active by 1879, an M.A. and principal in 1882; necessarily died before 1972. Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina 182-183 (1854), public domain.

Salva per dopo

Inserisci la tua email: ti invieremo un link per accedere. Nessuna password. Ciò che salvi (voci, versetti, capitoli, documenti) ti segue su ogni dispositivo.