Selections from the Letters of St. Ambrose 41

St Ambrose of Milan (AD 339–397) · Epistolarum classis I · PL 16, 921–1196

41.0 Letter XLI: To Marcellina on the Same PL 16, 928

St. Ambrose in this letter to his sister continues the account of the matters contained in his letter to Theodosius, and of a sermon which he subsequently delivered before the Emperor, with the result that the Emperor, when St. Ambrose refused to offer the Sacrifice before receiving a promise that the objectionable order should be revoked, yielded.

The Brother to His Sister.

41.1 Letter XLI: To Marcellina on the Same PL 16, 1113

1. You were good enough to write me word that your holiness was still anxious, because I had written that I was so, so that I am surprised that you did not receive my letter in which I wrote word that satisfaction had been granted me. For when it was reported that a synagogue of the Jews and a conventicle of the Valentinians had been burnt by Christians at the instigation of the bishop, an order was made while I was at Aquileia, that the synagogue should be rebuilt, and the monks punished who had burnt the Valentinian building. Then since I gained little by frequent endeavours, I wrote and sent a letter to the Emperor, and when he went to church I delivered this discourse.

Sollicitam sanctitatem tuam esse adhuc scribere dignata es mihi, eo quod sollicitum me esse scripserim; unde miror quod litteras non acceperis meas, quibus refusam mihi scripseram securitatem. Nam cum relatum esset synagogam Judaeorum incensam a christianis, auctore episcopo, et Valentinianorum conventiculum; jussum erat, me Aquileiae posito, ut synagoga ab episcopo reaedificaretur, et in monachos vindicaretur, qui incendissent aedificium Valentinianorum. Tum ego, cum saepius agendo parum proficerem, epistolam dedi imperatori, quam simul misi; et ubi processit ad Ecclesiam, hunc sermonem habui:

41.2 PL 16, 1113

2. In the book of the prophet it is written: “Take to thyself the rod of an almond tree.” We ought to consider why the Lord said this to the prophet, for it was not written without a purpose, since in the Pentateuch too we read that the almond rod of Aaron the priest, after being long laid up, blossomed. For the Lord seems to signify by the rod that the prophetic or priestly authority ought to be straightforward, and to advise not so much what is pleasant as what is expedient.

In libro prophetico scriptum est: Sume tibi baculum nucinum ; et qua ratione hoc dixerit Dominus prophetae, debemus considerare; non otiose etenim scriptum est; quandoquidem et in Pentateucho legimus quod virga nucina Aaron sacerdotis, cum diu reposita fuisset, effloruit . Nam videtur per virgam significare quod directa esse debeat prophetia vel sacerdotalis auctoritas; ut non tam delectabilia, quam utilia persuadeat.

41.3 PL 16, 1113

3. And so the prophet is bidden to take an almond rod, because the fruit of this tree is bitter in its rind, hard in its shell, and inside it is pleasant, that after its likeness the prophet should set forth things bitter and hard, and should not fear to proclaim harsh things. Likewise also the priest; for his teaching, though for a time it may seem bitter to some, and like Aaron’s rod be long laid up in the ears of dissemblers, yet after a time, when it is thought to have dried up, it blossoms.

Ideoque nucinum baculum sumere jubetur propheta, quia memoratae pomum arboris amarum in cortice, durum in testa, intus est fructuosum; ut ad ejus similitudinem propheta quoque amara et dura praetendat, et denuntiare tristia non reformidet. Similiter etiam sacerdos, quia praeceptio ejus etsi ad tempus aliquibus amara videatur, et tamquam virga Aaron reposita diu in auribus dissimulantium; tamen aliquando cum aestimatur aruisse, florescit.

41.4 PL 16, 1114

4. Wherefore also the Apostle says: “What will ye, shall I come to you with a rod, or in love and in the spirit of gentleness?” First he made mention of the rod, and like the almond rod struck those who were wandering, that he might afterwards comfort them in the spirit of meekness. And so meekness restored him whom the rod had deprived of the heavenly sacraments. And to his disciple he gave similar injunctions, saying: “Reprove, beseech, rebuke.” Two of these are hard, one is gentle, but they are hard only that they may soften; for as to suffering from excess of gall, bitter food or drink seems sweet, and on the other hand sweet food is bitter, so where the mind is wounded it grows worse under the influence of pleasurable flattery, and again is made sound by the bitterness of correction.

Unde et Apostolus ait: Quid vultis, in virga veniam ad vos, an in charitate, spirituque mansuetudinis ? Prius enim virgam dixit, et tamquam 957 virga nucina percussit errantes, ut postea consolaretur eos spiritu mansuetndinis. Itaque quem virga sacramentis abdicavit coelestibus, eumdem mansuetudo restituit. Discipulo quoque talia praescripta dedit, dicens: Argue, obsecra, increpa . Duo dura, unum mite: sed ideo dura, ut etiam ipsa molliret; quia sicut aegris redundanti felle corporibus ciborum aut potus amaritudo dulcescit, et contra epularum suavitas amaritudini est: ita ubi animus est saucius, voluptariae fotu adulationis aegrescit, et rursum correctionis temperatur amaritudine.

41.5 PL 16, 1114

5. Let thus much be gathered from the passage of the prophet, and let us now consider what the lesson from the Gospel contains: “One of the Pharisees invited the Lord Jesus to eat with him, and He entered into the Pharisee’s house and sat down. And behold a woman, who was a sinner in the city, when she knew that Jesus sat at meat in the Pharisee’s house, brought an alabaster box of ointment, and standing behind at His feet, began to wash His feet with her tears.” And then he read as far as this place: “Thy faith hath saved thee, go in peace.” How simple, I went on to say, is this Gospel lesson in words, how deep in its counsels! And so because the words are those of the “Great Counsellor,” let us consider their depth.

Haec de prophetica lectione libata sint: Evangelii quoque lectio quid habeat consideremus: Rogavit quidam pharisaeus Dominum Jesum, ut manducaret cum illo; et ingressus domum Pharisaei, discubuit. Et ecce mulier, quae erat in civitate peccatrix, ut cognovit quod Jesus accubuit in domo Pharisaei, attulit alabastrum unguenti: et stans retro secus pedes ejus, lacrymis coepit rigare pedes ejus . Et reliqua recitavit usque ad locum: Fides tua te salvam fecit, vade in pace. Quam simplex, subjunxi, in verbis, quam profunda in consiliis Evangelii lectio! Itaque quia magni consiliarii sermo est, altitudinem ejus consideremus .

41.6 PL 16, 1114

6. Our Lord Jesus Christ judged that men could more readily be bound and led on to do the things that are right by kindness than by fear, and that love avails more than dread for correction. And so, when He came, being born of a Virgin, He sent forth His grace, that sin might be forgiven in baptism in order to make us more grateful to Himself. Then if we repay Him by services befitting men who are grateful, He has declared in this woman that there will be a reward for this grace itself to all men. For if He had forgiven only our original debt, He would have seemed more cautious than merciful, and more careful for our correction than magnificent in His rewards. It is only the cunning of a narrow mind that tries to entice, but it is fitting for God that those whom He has invited by grace He should lead on by increase of that grace. And so He first bestows on us a gift by baptism, and afterwards gives more abundantly to those who serve Him faithfully. So, then, the benefits of Christ are both incentives and rewards of virtue.

Dominus noster Jesus Christus judicavit magis homines beneficiis alligari posse, et provocari ad ea quae sunt recta facienda, quam metu: plusque charitatem proficere, quam formidinem ad correctionem. Itaque praemisit gratiam, veniens per Virginis partum; ut in baptismo peccata donaret, quo sibi faceret gratiores. Deinde si competentia gratis viris officia reponeremus, ipsius gratiae remunerationem futuram omnium in hac muliere declaravit. Nam si tantummodo prima debita nobis remisisset, videretur cautior, quam indulgentior; correctionisque providentior quam remunerationis magnificentior. Angusti animi sola astutia est, ut illiciat: Deo autem convenit, ut quos invitaverit per gratiam, eosdem gratiae ipsius incrementis provehat. Ideoque nobis et ante donat per baptismum, et post bene servientibus uberiora largitur. Ita ergo Christi beneficia et incentiva virtutis et praemia sunt.

41.7 PL 16, 1115

7. And let no one be startled at the word “creditor.” We were before under a hard creditor, who was not to be satisfied and paid to the full but by the death of the debtor. The Lord Jesus came, He saw us bound by a heavy debt. No one could pay his debt with the patrimony of his innocence. I could have nothing of my own wherewith to free myself. He gave to me a new kind of acquittance, changing my creditor because I had nothing wherewith to pay my debt. But it was sin, not nature, which had made us debtors, for we had contracted heavy debts by our sins, that we who had been free should be bound, for he is a debtor who received any of his creditor’s money. Now sin is of the devil; that wicked one has, as it were, these riches in his possession. For as the riches of Christ are virtues, so crimes are the wealth of the devil. He had reduced the human race to perpetual captivity by the heavy debt of inherited liability, which our debt-laden ancestor had transmitted to his posterity by inheritance. The Lord Jesus came, He offered His death for the death of all, He poured out His Blood for the blood of all.

Sed nemo vocabulum feneratoris horrescat. Fuimus ante sub feneratore duro, qui nisi morte debitoris expleri ac satiari nequiret . Venit Dominus Jesus, vidit gravi nos obligatos fenore. Nemo fenus suum patrimonio innocentiae suae poterat exsolvere: de meo, unde me liberarem, habere non poteram, novum genus absolutionis mihi detulit; ut creditorem mutarem, quia fenus unde solverem, non habebam. Debitores autem nos non natura, sed culpa fecerat; peccatis enim nostris aera gravia contraximus, 958 ut essemus obnoxii, qui eramus liberi; debitor enim est, qui aliquid accepit de feneratoris pecunia. Peccatum vero a diabolo est: tamquam in ejus patrimonio has habet impius opes; sicut enim Christi divitiae virtutes sunt, ita diaboli opes crimina sunt. Redegerat humanum genus in perpetuam captivitatem obnoxiae haereditatis gravi fenore, quod obaeratus auctor ad posteros de fenerata successione transmiserat. Venit Dominus Jesus, mortem suam pro morte omnium obtulit, sanguinem suum pro sanguine fudit universorum.

41.8 PL 16, 1115

8. So, then, we have changed our creditor, not escaped wholly, or rather we have escaped, for the debt remains but the interest is cancelled, for the Lord Jesus said, “To those who are in bonds, Come out, and to those who are in prison, Go forth;” so your sins are forgiven. All, then, are forgiven, nor is there any one whom He has not loosed. For thus it is written, that He has forgiven “all transgressions, doing away the handwriting of the ordinance that was against us.” Why, then, do we hold the bonds of others, and desire to exact the debts of others, while we enjoy our own remission? He who forgave all, required of all that what every one remembers to have been forgiven to himself, he also should forgive others.

Mutavimus ergo creditorem, non evasimus; immo evasimus, manet enim debitum, fenus intercidit, dicente Domino Jesu qui in vinculis sunt: Exite; et his qui in carcere sunt: Procedite; dimissa sunt ergo peccata vestra . Omnibus igitur dimisit, nec quisquam est, cui non relaxarit. Sic enim scriptum est, quia donavit omnia delicta, delens quod adversum nos erat chirographum decreti . Cur nos aliorum tenemus chirographa, et volumus exigere aliena, qui nostrorum utimur indulgentia? Qui donavit omnibus, ab omnibus exigit; ut quod unusquisque sibi dimissum meminit, alii ipse dimittat.

41.9 PL 16, 1115

9. Take care that you do not begin to be in a worse case as creditor than as debtor, like the man in the Gospel, to whom his lord forgave all his debt, and who afterwards began to exact from his fellow-servant that which he himself had not paid, for which reason his master being angry, exacted from him, with the bitterest reproaches, that which he had before forgiven him. Let us, therefore, take heed lest this happen to us, that by not forgiving that which is due to ourselves, we should incur the payment of what has been forgiven us, for thus is it written in the words of the Lord Jesus: “So shall My Father, Which is in heaven, do also unto you, if ye from your hearts forgive not every one his brother.” Let us, then, forgive few things to whom many have been forgiven, and understand that the more we forgive the more acceptable shall we be to God, for we are the more well pleasing to God, the more we have been forgiven.

Vide ne graviorem causam incipias habere fenerator, quam debitor: sicut ille in Evangelio, cui Dominus suus dimisit omne debitum, ille postea a conservo suo coepit exigere, quod ipse non solverat; unde iratus dominus ejus de ipso summis exegit injuriis, quod ei ante donaverat . Caveamus ergo ne nobis hoc accidat, ut non remittendo, quae nobis debentur, incipiamus et illa solvere quae remissa sunt nobis; ita enim scriptum est, dicente Domino Jesu: Sic et vobis faciet Pater meus, qui in coelis est, si non remiseritis unusquisque fratri suo de cordibus vestris . Dimittamus ergo pauca, quibus plura donata sunt: et intelligamus eo nos Deo acceptiores fore, quo etiam plura donamus; quia hoc gratiores Deo sumus, quo nobis dimissa sunt.

41.10 PL 16, 1115

10. And, finally, the Pharisee, when the Lord asked him, “which of them loved him most,” answered, “I suppose that he to whom he forgave most.” And the Lord replied, “Thou hast judged rightly.” The judgment of the Pharisee is praised, but his affection is blamed. He judges well concerning others, but does not himself believe that which he thinks well of in the case of others. You hear a Jew praising the discipline of the Church, extolling its true grace, honouring the priests of the Church; if you exhort him to believe he refuses, and so follows not himself that which he praises in us. His praise, then, is not full, because Christ said to him: “Thou hast rightly judged,” for Cain also offered rightly, but did not divide rightly, and therefore God said to him: “If thou offerest rightly, but dividest not rightly, thou hast sinned, be still.” So, then, this man offered rightly, for he judges that Christ ought to be more loved by Christians, because He has forgiven us many sins; but he divided not rightly, because he thought that He could be ignorant of the sins of men Who forgave the sins of men.

Denique interrogatus a Domino pharisaeus: Quis, inquit, eum plus diligit? Respondit: Aestimo quia is cui plus donavit. Cui Dominus dixit: Recte judicasti . Laudatur Pharisaei judicium, sed arguitur affectus. De aliis bene judicat: sed quod de aliis opinatur, ipse non credit. Audis laudantem Judaeum Ecclesiae disciplinam, ejusque veram gratiam praedicantem, honorantem sacerdotes Ecclesiae, hortaris ut credat, renuit; ita quod in nobis laudat, ipse non sequitur. Non ergo plena ejus laudatio est, quia audivit a Christo: Recte judicasti; nam et Cain recte obtulit, sed non recte divisit: ideoque dixit illi Deus: Si recte offeras, non recte autem dividas: peccasti, quiesce . Ergo et hic recte 959 obtulit, quia judicat Christum a christianis amplius diligendum; quia multa nobis peccata donavit: sed non recte divisit, quia putavit quod peccata hominum posset ignorare, qui hominibus peccata dimitteret.

41.11 PL 16, 1116

11. And, therefore, He said to Simon: “Thou seest this woman. I entered into thine house, and thou gavest Me no water for My feet, but she hath washed My feet with her tears.” We are all the one body of Christ, the head of which is God, and we are the members; some perchance eyes, as the prophets; others teeth, as the apostles, who have passed the food of the Gospel preached into our breasts, and rightly is it written: “His eyes shall be bright with wine, and his teeth whiter than milk.” And His hands are they who are seen to carry out good works, His belly are they who distribute the strength of nourishment on the poor. So, too, some are His feet, and would that I might be worthy to be His heel! He, then, pours water upon the feet of Christ, who forgives the very lowest their offences, and while delivering those of low estate, yet is washing the feet of Christ.

Ideoque ait Simoni: Vides hanc mulierem? Intravi in domum tuam, aquam pedibus meis non dedisti: haec autem lacrymis suis rigavit pedes meos . Omnes unum corpus Christi sumus, cui caput Deus, membra autem nos sumus : alii fortasse oculi, ut prophetae: dentes: ut apostoli, qui Evangelicae praedicationis cibum nostris infudere pectoribus; meritoque scriptum est: Oculi ejus hilares a vino, et dentes candidiores lacte . Sunt et manus ejus illi, qui videntur exsecutores bonorum operum. Sunt et venter ejus, qui vires alimoniae pauperibus largiuntur. Sunt ergo et pedes ejus aliqui: atque utinam merear ejus esse calcaneum! Aquam igitur mittit in pedes Christi, qui etiam ultimis quibusque peccata concedit; et dum plebeios liberat, Christi tamen lavat vestigium.

41.12 PL 16, 1116

12. And he pours water upon the feet of Christ, who purifies his conscience from the defilement of sin, for Christ walks in the breast of each. Take heed, then, not to have your conscience polluted, and so to begin to defile the feet of Christ. Take heed lest He encounter a thorn of wickedness in you, whereby as He walks in you His heel may be wounded. For this was why the Pharisee gave no water for the feet of Christ, that he had not a soul pure from the filth of unbelief. For how could he cleanse his conscience who had not received the water of Christ? But the Church both has this water and has tears. For faith which mourns over former sins is wont to guard against fresh ones. Therefore, Simon the Pharisee, who had no water, had also, of course, no tears. For how should he have tears who had no penitence? For since he believed not in Christ he had no tears. For if he had had them he would have washed his eyes, that he might see Christ, Whom, though he sat at meat with Him, he saw not. For had he seen Him, he would not have doubted of His power.

Mittit et ille aquam in pedes Christi, qui a peccatorum colluvione mundat conscientiam suam; ambulat enim Christus in pectoribus singulorum. Cave igitur ne pollutam habeas conscientiam, et pedes Christi incipias inquinare. Cave ne spinam in te improbitatis offendat, qua ejus in te deambulantis calcaneum saucietur . Nam ideo aquam pedibus Christi non dedit pharisaeus, quia mundum a colluvione perfidiae animum non habebat. Unde enim suam mundaret conscientiam, qui aquam non susceperat Christi? Ecclesia autem et aquam habet, et lacrymas habet: aquam baptismatis, lacrymas poenitentiae. Fides namque, quae superiora peccata deplorat, nova cavere consuevit. Ergo Simon pharisaeus, qui aquam non habebat, utique et lacrymas non habebat. Quomodo enim haberet lacrymas, qui poenitentiam non gerebat; quoniam vero non credebat in Christum, nec habebat lacrymas? Nam si habuisset, lavisset oculos suos; ut Christum videret quem adhuc, cum simul accumberet, non videbat. Nam si vidisset, non utique de ejus potestate dubitasset.

41.13 PL 16, 1117

13. The Pharisee had no hair, inasmuch as he could not recognize the Nazarite; the Church had hair, and she sought the Nazarite. Hairs are counted as amongst the superfluities of the body, but if they be anointed, they give forth a good odour, and are an ornament to the head; if they be not anointed with oil, are a burden. So, too, riches are a burden if you know not how to use them, and sprinkle them not with the odour of Christ. But if you nourish the poor, if you wash their wounds and wipe away their filth, you have indeed wiped the feet of Christ.

Non habebat capillos pharisaeus, qui Nazaraeum scire non poterat: habebat Ecclesia, quae Nazaraeum quaerebat. Capilli veluti in superfluis corporis aestimantur; iidem tamen si ungantur, bonum reddunt odorem, et ornamento sunt capiti: si non ungantur oleo, ingravant; ita et divitiae oneri sunt, si his uti nescias, si non aspergas iis Christi odorem. Si vero alas pauperes, laves eorum vulnera, illuviemque detergas; tersisti utique pedes Christi.

41.14 PL 16, 1117

14. “Thou gavest Me no kiss, but she from the time she came in hath not ceased to kiss My feet.” A kiss is the sign of love. Whence, then, can a Jew have a kiss, seeing he has not known peace, nor received peace from Christ when He said: “My peace I give you, My peace I leave you.” The Synagogue has not a kiss, but the Church has, who waited for Him, who loved Him, who said: “Let Him kiss me with the kisses of His mouth.” For by His kisses she wished gradually to quench the burning of that long desire, which had grown with looking for the coming of the Lord, and to satisfy her thirst by this gift. And so the holy prophet says: “Thou shalt open my mouth, and it shall declare Thy praise.” He, then, who praises the Lord Jesus kisses Him, he who praises Him undoubtedly believes. Finally, David himself says: “I believed, therefore have I spoken;” and before: “Let my mouth be filled with Thy praise, and let me sing of Thy glory.”

Osculum mihi non dedisti: haec autem ex quo intravi, non cessavit osculari pedes meos . Osculum utique insigne est charitatis. Unde ergo Judaeo osculum, qui pacem non recognovit, qui pacem a Christo non accepit dicente: Pacem meam do vobis, pacem meam relinquo vobis ? Non habet Synagoga osculum; habet Ecclesia, 960 quae exspectavit, quae dilexit, quae dixit: Osculetur me ab osculis oris sui ; diuturnae enim cupiditatis ardorem, quem adventus Dominici exspectatione adoleverat, osculo ejus volebat stillanter exstinguere, hoc explere sitim suam munere. Ideoque sanctus Propheta ait: Os meum aperies, et annuntiabit laudem tuam . Qui ergo laudat Dominum Jesum, osculatur eum: qui laudat, credit utique. Denique ipse David ait: Credidi, propter quod locutus sum ; et supra: Repleatur os meum laude tua, et cantem gloriam tuam .

41.15 PL 16, 1117

15. And the same Scripture teaches you concerning the infusion of special grace, that he kisses Christ who receives the Spirit, where the holy prophet says: “I opened my mouth and drew in the Spirit.” He, then, kisses Christ who confesses Him: “For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.” He, again, kisses the feet of Christ who, when reading the Gospel, recognizes the acts of the Lord Jesus, and admires them with pious affection, and so piously he kisses, as it were, the footprints of the Lord Jesus as He walks. We kiss Christ, then, with the kiss of communion: “Let him that readeth understand.”

De specialis quoque gratiae infusione eadem te Scriptura docet, quod osculetur Christum, qui accipit Spiritum, dicente propheta sancto: Os meum aperui, et attraxi Spiritum . Osculatur ergo Christum, qui confitetur illum: Corde enim creditur ad justitiam, ore autem confessio fit ad salutem . Osculatur vero pedes Christi, qui Evangelium legens, Domini Jesu gesta cognoscit et pio miratur affectu; ideoque religioso osculo velut quaedam deambulantis Domini lambit vestigia. Osculamur ergo Christum communionis osculo: Qui legit, intelligat .

41.16 PL 16, 1117

16. Whence should the Jew have this kiss? For he who believed in His coming, believed not in His Passion. For how can he believe that He has suffered Whom he believes not to have come? The Pharisee, then, had no kiss except perchance that of the traitor Judas. But neither had Judas the kiss; and so when he wished to show to the Jews that kiss which he had promised as the sign of betrayal, the Lord said to him: “Judas, betrayest thou the Son of Man with a kiss?” that is, you, who have not the love marked by the kiss, offer a kiss. You offer a kiss who know not the mystery of the kiss. It is not the kiss of the lips which is sought for, but that of the heart and soul.

Unde hoc Judaeo osculum? Qui enim non credidit in adventum ejus, nec in passionem credidit. Quomodo enim credit passum, quem venisse non credidit? Non ergo habebat osculum pharisaeus, nisi forte Judae proditoris. Sed nec Judas habebat, ideoque cum Judaeis promissum osculum, tamquam signum proditionis vellet ostendere, dicit ei Dominus: Juda, osculo Filium hominis tradis : hoc est, osculum offers, qui non habes osculi charitatem: osculum offers, qui nescis osculi sacramentum. Osculum non labiorum quaeritur, sed cordis et mentis.

41.17 PL 16, 1117

17. But you say, he kissed the Lord. Yes, he kissed Him indeed with his lips. The Jewish people has this kiss, and therefore it is said: “This people honoureth Me with their lips, but their heart is far from Me.” So, then, he who has not faith and charity has not the kiss, for by a kiss the strength of love is impressed. When love is not, faith is not, and affection is not, what sweetness can there be in kisses?

Sed dicis: Osculatus est Dominum. Verum osculatus est labiis. Hoc habet osculum populus Judaeorum, ideoque dictum est: Populus hic labiis me honorat, cor autem eorum longe est a me . Ergo non habet osculum, qui fidem et charitatem non habet; osculo enim vis amoris imprimitur. Ubi non est amor, non est fides, non est dilectio; quae potest esse suavitas osculorum?

41.18 PL 16, 1118

18. But the Church ceases not to kiss the feet of Christ, and therefore in the Song of Songs she desires not one but many kisses, and like Holy Mary she is intent upon all His sayings, and receives all His words when the Gospel or the Prophets are read, and “keeps all His sayings in her heart.” So, then, the Church alone has kisses as a bride, for a kiss is as it were a pledge of espousals and the prerogative of wedlock. Whence should the Jew have kisses, who believes not in the Bridegroom? Whence should the Jew have kisses, who knows not that the Bridegroom is come?

Ecclesia autem non cessat osculari pedes Christi; et ideo non unum, sed multa in Canticis canticorum exigit oscula , quae velut sancta Maria ad omnes ejus est intenta sermones, omnia ejus verba excipit; cum legitur Evangelium, vel propheta, et omnia ejus dicta conservat in corde suo . Sola ergo Ecclesia habet oscula quasi sponsa; osculum enim quasi pignus est nuptiarum, et praerogativa conjugii. Unde Judaeo oscula, qui non credit in Sponsum? Unde Judaeo oscula, qui Sponsum adhuc venisse non novit?

41.19 PL 16, 1118

19. And not only has he no kisses, but neither has he oil wherewith to anoint the feet of Christ, for if he had oil he would certainly, before now, soften his own neck.

Moses says: “This people is stiff-necked,” and the Lord says that the priest and the Levite passed by, and neither of them poured oil or wine into the wounds of him who had been wounded by robbers; for they had nothing to pour in, since if they had had oil they would have poured it into their own wounds. But Isaiah declares: “They cannot apply ointment nor oil nor bandage.”

Nec solum oscula non habet, sed nec oleum habet, quo ungat pedes Christi ; nam si haberet oleum, cervicem utique suam ante molliret. Denique Moyses dicit: Populus hic dura cervice est ; et Dominus ait quod levita et sacerdos praeterierunt, nec quisquam eorum 961 oleum aut vinum illius a latronibus percussi vulneribus infudit : non enim habebant quod infunderent; nam si habuissent oleum, suis quoque vulneribus infudissent. Sed clamat Esaias: Non est malagma imponere, neque oleum, neque alligaturam .

41.20 PL 16, 1118

20. But the Church has oil wherewith she dresses the wounds of her children, lest the hardness of the wound spread deeply; she has oil which she has received secretly. With this oil Asher washed his feet as it is written: “A blessed son is Asher, and he shall be acceptable to his brothers, and shall dip his feet in oil.” With this oil, then, the Church anoints the necks of her children, that they may take up the yoke of Christ; with this oil she anointed the Martyrs, that she might cleanse them from the dust of this world; with this oil she anointed the Confessors, that they might not yield to their labours, nor sink down through weariness; that they might not be overcome by the heat of this world; and she anointed them in order to refresh them with the spiritual oil.

Ecclesia autem habet oleum, quo suorum vulnera fovet; ne duritia vulneris alte serpat: habet oleum, quod accepit absconse. Hoc oleo Aser pedem suum lavit, sicut scriptum est: Benedictus filius Aser; et erit acceptus fratribus suis, et intinget in oleo pedum suum . Hoc ergo oleo ungit Ecclesia eervices suorum, ut suscipiant jugum Christi: hoc oleo unxit martyres, ut saecularem ab eis pulverem detergeret: hoc oleo confessores unxit; ne labori cederent, ne succumberent fatigati, ne aestu mundi istius vincerentur: ideo unxit eos, ut spiritali ipsos oleo refrigeraret.

41.21 PL 16, 1118

21. The Synagogue has not this oil, inasmuch as she has not the olive, and understood not that dove which brought back the olive branch after the deluge. For that Dove descended afterwards when Christ was baptized, and abode upon Him, as John testified in the Gospel, saying: “I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and He abode upon Him.” But how could he see the Dove, who saw not Him, upon Whom the Spirit descended like a dove?

Synagoga hoc oleum non habet, quae olivam non habet, quae non intellexit illam columbam, quae ramum oleae detulit post diluvium . Illa enim columba postea descendit, cum Christus baptizaretur, et mansit super eum, sicut in Evangelio testatur Joannes dicens: Quia vidi Spiritum descendentem de coelo quasi columbam, et mansit super eum . Quomodo ergo vidit columbam, qui non vidit eum, super quem Spiritus quasi columba descendit?

41.22 PL 16, 1118

22. The Church, then, both washes the feet of Christ and wipes them with her hair, and anoints them with oil, and pours ointment upon them, because not only does she care for the wounded and cherish the weary, but also sprinkles them with the sweet odour of grace; and pours forth the same grace not only on the rich and powerful, but also on men of lowly estate. She weighs all with equal balance, gathers all in the same bosom, and cherishes them in the same lap.

Ecclesia igitur et lavat pedes Christi, et capillis suis tergit, et oleo ungit, et perfundit unguento; quia non solum saucios curat, et lassos fovet; verum etiam suavi gratiae odore respergit: nec divitibus tantum ac potentioribus, sed etiam plebeiae familiae viris eamdem transfundit gratiam, aequa omnes lance examinat, omnes eodem sinu suscipit; eodem gremio fovet.

41.23 PL 16, 1119

23. Christ died once, and was buried once, and nevertheless He wills that ointment should daily be poured on His feet. What, then, are those feet of Christ on which we pour ointment? The feet of Christ are they of whom He Himself says: “What ye have done to one of the least of these ye have done to Me.” These feet that woman in the Gospel refreshes, these feet she bedews with her tears; when sin is forgiven to the lowliest, guilt is washed away, and pardon granted. These feet he kisses, who loves even the lowest of the holy people. These feet he anoints with ointment, who imparts the kindness of his gentleness even to the weaker. In these the martyrs, in these the apostles, in these the Lord Jesus Himself declares that He is honoured.

Semel mortuus Christus est, semel sepultus est: et nihilominus quotidie vult in pedes suos mitti unguentum. In quos ergo Christi pedes mittimus unguentum? Pedes Christi illi sunt, de quibus ipse dicit: Quod uni horum minimorum fecistis, mihi fecistis . Hos pedes illa mulier Evangelica refrigerat, hos lacrymis suis irrigat ; quando infimis peccatum remittitur, culpa lavatur, donatur indulgentia. Hos pedes osculatur ille, qui etiam infimos plebis sacrae diligit. Hos pedes unguento ungit ille, qui etiam tenuioribus mansuetudinis suae gratiam impertit. In his se martyres, in his apostoli, in his ipse Dominus Jesus honorari indicat.

41.24 PL 16, 1119

24. You see how ready to teach the Lord is, that He may by His own example provoke you to piety, for He is ready to teach when He rebukes. So when accusing the Jews, He says: “O My people, what have I done to thee, or wherein have I troubled thee, or wherein have I wearied thee? Answer Me. Is it because I brought thee out of the land of Egypt, and delivered thee from the house of bondage?” adding: “And I sent before thy face Moses and Aaron and Miriam.” Remember what Balaam conceived against thee, seeking the aid of magic art, but I suffered him not to hurt thee. Thou wast indeed weighed down an exile in foreign lands, thou wast oppressed with heavy burdens. I sent before thy face Moses and Aaron and Miriam, and he who spoiled the exile was first spoiled himself. Thou who hadst lost what was thine, didst obtain that which was another’s, being freed from the enemies who were hedging thee in, and safe in the midst of the waters thou sawest the destruction of thine enemies, when the same waves which surrounded and carried thee on thy way, pouring back, drowned the enemy. Did I not, when food was lacking to thee passing through the desert, supply a rain of food, and nourishment around thee, whithersoever thou wentest? Did I not, after subduing all thine enemies, bring thee into the region of Eshcol? Did I not deliver up thee Sihon, King of the Amorites (that is, the proud one, the leader of them that provoked thee)? Did I not deliver up to thee alive the King of Ai, whom after the ancient curse thou didst condemn to be fastened to the wood and raised upon the cross? Why should I speak of the troops of the five kings which were slain in endeavouring to deny thee the land given to thee? And now what is required of thee in return for all this, but to do judgment and justice, to love mercy, and to be ready to walk with the Lord thy God?

Vides quam moralis Dominus sit, ut exemplo sui te ad pietatem provocet: moralis est etiam, cum arguit. Denique accusans Judaeos ait: Popule meus, quid feci tibi, aut quid contristavi te, aut quid molestus fui tibi? Responde mihi. Quia e duxi te de terra Aegypti, et de domo servitutis liberavi te ? Et addidit: Et misi ante faciem tuam Moysen et Aaron et Mariam . In mente habeto quid cogitaverit in te Balac, hoc est, ille magicae artis opem quaerens; sed tamen eum tibi non permisi nocere. Deprimebaris utique in peregrinis exsulans terris, gravibus 962 urgebaris oneribus: misi ante faciem tuam Moysen et Aaron et Mariam, et primum ille, qui spoliaverat exsulem, spoliatus ipse est . Tu, qui amiseras tua, acquisisti aliena, liberatus ab hostibus circumvallantibus, atque inter aquas medias tutus stragem vidisti inimicorum tuorum, cum eadem unda, quae te circumfusa provexerat, hostem refusa demergeret. Nonne cum tibi per desertum venienti alimenta deessent, altricem tibi pluviam, et commeatus, quocumque pergeres, circumfluos ministravi ? Nonne te, debellatis inimicis omnibus, in regionem Botryonis induxi ? Nonne ipsum Sehon Amorrhaeorum regem , hoc est, superbum, exasperantium ducem: nonne regem Hai viventem tibi tradidi, quem suffixum ligno ac sublatum in cruce maledicto vetere condemnasti ? Quid dicam caesa quinque regum agmina, quae debitas tibi terras negare contendebant ? Et nunc pro his omnibus quid aliud a te quaeritur, homo, nisi ut facias judicium et justitiam, et diligas misericordiam, et paratus sis ire cum Domino Deo tuo ?

41.25 PL 16, 1120

25. And what was His expostulation by Nathan the prophet to King David himself, that pious and gentle man? I, He said, chose thee the youngest of thy brethren, I filled thee with the spirit of meekness, I anointed thee king by the hand of Samuel, in whom I and My Name dwelt. Having removed that former king, whom an evil spirit stirred up to persecute the priests of the Lord, I made thee triumph after exile. I set upon thy throne of thy seed one not more an heir than a colleague. I made even strangers subject to thee, that they who attacked might serve thee, and wilt thou deliver My servants into the power of My enemies, and wilt thou take away that which was My servant’s, whereby both thyself wilt be branded with sin, and My adversaries will have whereof to rejoice.

Ad ipsum regem David, illum pium atque mansuetum, qualis per Nathan prophetam expostulatio? Ego, inquit , te minorem elegi de fratribus tuis: ego te mansuetudinis replevi spiritu: ego te per Samuelem, in quo ego eram, et meum nomen, unxi in regem. Ego te, sublato illo rege superiore, quem malus spiritus exagitabat, ut persequeretur sacerdotes Domini, de exsule feci triumphatorem. Ego de semine tuo in throno tuo non prius haeredem quam consortem locavi. Ego tibi feci etiam alienigenas subditos, ut tibi serviant, qui te impugnabant: et tu servientes mihi in potestatem deduces inimicorum meorum: et tu auferes quod erat servuli mei, in quo et tibi peccatum inuritur, et habebunt de quo mei adversarii glorientur?

41.26 PL 16, 1120

26. Wherefore, O Emperor, that I may now address my words not only about you, but to you, since you observe how severely the Lord is wont to censure, see that the more glorious you are become, the more utterly you submit to your Maker. For it is written: “When the Lord thy God shall have brought thee into a strange land, and thou shalt eat the fruits of others, say not, My power and my righteousness hath given me this, for the Lord thy God hath given it to thee;” for Christ in His mercy hath conferred it on thee, and therefore, in love for His body, that is, the Church, give water for His feet, kiss His feet, so that you may not only pardon those who have been taken in sin, but also by your peaceableness restore them to concord, and give them rest. Pour ointment upon His feet that the whole house in which Christ sits may be filled with thy ointment, and all that sit with Him may rejoice in thy fragrance, that is, honour the lowest, so that the angels may rejoice in their forgiveness, as over one sinner that repenteth, the apostles may be glad, the prophets be filled with delight. For the eyes cannot say to the hand: “We have no need of thee, nor the head to the feet, Ye are not necessary to me.” So, since all are necessary, guard the whole body of the Lord Jesus, that He also by His heavenly condescension may preserve your kingdom.

Ergo imperator, ut jam non solum de te, sed etiam ad te verba convertam; quoniam advertis quam graviter Dominus convenire soleat, quo gloriosior factus es, eo amplius auctori tuo deferendum noveris. Scriptum est enim : Cum te induxerit Dominus Deus tuus in terram alienam et manducaveris fructus alienos, non dicas: Virtus mea et justitia mea hoc mihi dedit; sed Dominus donavit Deus, sed Christus misericordia sua contulit; et ideo corpus ejus, hoc est, Ecclesiam diligendo, aquam da pedibus ejus, osculare pedes ejus ; ut non solum absolvas eos, qui in peccatis deprehensi sunt, verum etiam pace tua dones concordiae, et quieti relaxes. Mitte unguentum in pedes ejus, ut tota domus in qua Christus recumbit, tuo repleatur unguento, omnes recumbentes cum eo gaudeant tuis odoribus, hoc est, sic honora ultimos, ut eorum absolutione gaudeant angeli, sicut super uno peccatore poenitentiam agente ; laetentur apostoli, delectentur prophetae. Non enim possunt dicere oculi manui: Operam tuam non desideramus; aut caput pedibus: 963 Non estis mihi necessarii . Ergo quia omnes necessarii sunt, tuere omne corpus Domini Jesu; ut ipse quoque regnum tuum coelesti sua dignatione custodiat.

41.27 PL 16, 1120

27. When I came down from the pulpit, he said to me: “You spoke about me.” I replied: “I dealt with matters intended for your benefit.” Then he said: “I had indeed decided too harshly about the repairing of the synagogue by the bishop, but that has been rectified. The monks commit many crimes.” Then Timasius the general began to be over-vehement against the monks, and I answered him: “With the Emperor I deal as is fitting, because I know that he has the fear of God, but with you, who speak so roughly, one must deal otherwise.”

Ubi descendi, ait mihi: De nobis proposuisti. Respondi: Hoc tractavi, quod ad utilitatem tuam pertineret. Tunc ait: Re vera de synagoga reparanda ab episcopo durius statueram, sed emendatum est. Monachi multa scelera faciunt. Tunc Timasius magister equitum et peditum coepit adversum monachos esse vehementior. Respondi ei: Ego cum imperatore ago, ut oportet; quia novi quod habeat Domini timorem: tecum autem aliter agendum, qui tam dura loqueris.

41.28 PL 16, 1120

28. Then, after standing for some time, I said to the Emperor: “Let me offer for you without anxiety, set my mind at ease.” As he continued sitting and nodded, but did not give an open promise, and I remained standing, he said that he would amend the edict. I went on at once to say that he must end the whole investigation, lest the Count should use the opportunity of the investigation to do any injury to the Christians. He promised that it should be so. I said to him, “I act on your promise,” and repeated, “I act on your promise.” “Act,” he said, “on my promise.” And so I went to the altar, whither I should not have gone unless he had given me a distinct promise. And indeed so great was the grace attending the offering, that I felt myself that that favour granted by the Emperor was very acceptable to our God, and that the divine presence was not wanting. And so everything was done as I wished.

Deinde cum aliquamdiu starem, dico imperatori: Fac me securum pro te offerre, absolve animum meum. Cum assideret, annueretque, non tamen aperte polliceretur, atque ego starem, dixit se emendaturum rescriptum. Statim dicere coepi, ut omnem cognitionem tolleret; ne occasione cognitionis comes aliqua christianos attereret injuria. Promisit futurum. Aio illi: Ago fide tua; et repetivi: Ago fide tua. Age, inquit, fide mea. Et ita ad altare accessi, non aliter accessurus, nisi mihi plene promisisset. Et vere tanta oblationis fuit gratia, ut sentirem etiam ipse eam Deo nostro commendatiorem fuisse gratiam, et divinam praesentiam non defuisse. Omnia itaque ex sententia gesta sunt.

Philip Schaff and Henry Wace (eds.), New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1890-1900. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Save for later

Enter your email and we will send you a sign-in link. No password. What you save (articles, verses, chapters, documents) follows you to any device.