Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 49
49.1 Chapter XI. 1–54 PL 35, 1746
1. Among all the miracles wrought by our Lord Jesus Christ, the resurrection of Lazarus holds a foremost place in preaching. But if we consider attentively who did it, our duty is to rejoice rather than to wonder. A man was raised up by Him who made man: for He is the only One of the Father, by whom, as you know, all things were made. And if all things were made by Him, what wonder is it that one was raised by Him, when so many are daily brought into the world by His power? It is a greater deed to create men than to raise them again from the dead. Yet He deigned both to create and to raise again; to create all, to resuscitate some. For though the Lord Jesus did many such acts, yet all of them are not recorded; just as this same St. John the evangelist himself testifies, that Christ the Lord both said and did many things that are not recorded; but such were chosen for record as seemed to suffice for the salvation of believers. Thou hast just heard that the Lord Jesus raised a dead man to life; and that is sufficient to let thee know that, were He so pleased, He might raise all the dead to life. And, indeed this very work has He reserved in His own hands till the end of the world. For while you have heard that by a great miracle He raised one from the tomb who had been dead four days, “the hour is coming,” as He Himself saith, “in the which all that are in the graves shall hear His voice, and shall come forth.” He raised one who was putrid, and yet in that putrid carcase there was still the form of limbs; but at the last day He will by a word reconstitute ashes into human flesh. But it was needful then to do only some such deeds, that we, receiving them as tokens of His power, may put our trust in Him, and be preparing for that resurrection which shall be to life and not to judgment. So, indeed, He saith, “The hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear His voice, and shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.”
Inter omnia miracula quae fecit Dominus noster Jesus Christus, Lazari resurrectio praecipue praedicatur. Sed si attendamus quis fecerit, delectari debemus potius quam mirari. Ille suscitavit hominem, qui fecit hominem; ipse enim est Unicus Patris, per quem, sicut nostis, facta sunt omnia. Si ergo per illum facta sunt omnia, quid mirum est si resurrexit unus per illum, cum tot quotidie nascantur per illum? Plus est homines creare quam resuscitare. Dignatus est tamen et creare et resuscitare; creare omnes, resuscitare quosdam. Nam cum multa fecisset Dominus Jesus, non omnia scripta sunt; sicut idem ipse sanctus Joannes evangelista testatur multa Dominum Christum et dixisse et fecisse quae scripta non sunt : electa sunt autem quae scriberentur, quae saluti credentium sufficere videbantur. Audisti enim quia Dominus Jesus mortuum suscitavit: sufficit tibi ut scias quia si vellet, omnes mortuos suscitaret. Et hoc quidem sibi ad finem saeculi reservavit. Nam quem audistis magno miraculo quatriduanum mortuum suscitasse de sepulcro, veniet hora, sicut ipse ait, quando omnes qui sunt in monumentis, audient vocem ejus et procedent. Resuscitavit putentem, sed tamen in cadavere putente adhuc erat forma membrorum; ille in novissimo die ad unam vocem cineres est restituturus in carnem. Sed oportebat ut modo aliqua faceret, quibus datis velut suae virtutis indiciis credamus in eum, et ad illam resurrectionem praeparemur, quae erit ad vitam, non ad judicium. Ita quippe ait: Veniet hora quando omnes qui in monumentis sunt, audient vocem ejus: et procedent qui bene fecerunt, ad resurrectionem vitae; qui male egerunt, ad resurrectionem judicii .
49.2 PL 35, 1747
2. We have, however, read in the Gospel of three dead persons who were raised to life by the Lord, and, let us hope, to some good purpose. For surely the Lord’s deeds are not merely deeds, but signs. And if they are signs, besides their wonderful character, they have some real significance: and to find out this in regard to such deeds is a somewhat harder task than to read or hear of them. We were listening with wonder, as at the sight of some mighty miracle enacted before our eyes, in the reading of the Gospel, how Lazarus was restored to life. If we turn our thoughts to the still more wonderful works of Christ, every one that believeth riseth again: if we all consider, and understand that more horrifying kind of death, every one who sinneth dies. But every man is afraid of the death of the flesh; few, of the death of the soul. In regard to the death of the flesh, which must certainly come some time, all are on their guard against its approach: this is the source of all their labor. Man, destined to die, labors to avert his dying; and yet man, destined to live for ever, labors not to cease from sinning. And when he labors to avoid dying, he labors to no purpose, for its only result will be to put off death for a while, not to escape it; but if he refrain from sinning, his toil will cease, and he shall live for ever. Oh that we could arouse men, and be ourselves aroused along with them, to be as great lovers of the life that abideth, as men are of that which passeth away! What will a man not do who is placed under the peril of death? When the sword was overhanging their heads, men have given up every means of living they had in reserve. Who is there that has not made an immediate surrender of all, to escape being slain? And, after all, he has perhaps been slain. Who is there that, to save his life, has not been willing at once to lose his means of living, and prefer a life of beggary to a speedy death? Who has had it said to him, Be off to sea if you would escape with your life, and has delayed to do so? Who has had it said to him, Set to work if you would preserve your life, and has continued a sluggard? It is but little that God requires of us, that we may live for ever: and we neglect to obey Him. God says not to thee, Lose all you have, that you may live a little time oppressed with toil; but, Give to the poor of what you have, that you may live always exempt from labor. The lovers of this temporal life, which is theirs, neither when, nor as long as they wish, are our accusers; and we accuse not ourselves in turn, so sluggish are we, so lukewarm about obtaining eternal life, which will be ours if we wish it, and will be imperishable when we have it; but this death which we fear, notwithstanding all our reluctance, will yet be ours in possession.
Tres tamen mortuos a Domino resuscitatos in Evangelio legimus, et forte non frustra. Domini quippe facta non sunt tantummodo facta, sed signa. Si ergo signa sunt, praeter id quod mira sunt, aliquid profecto significant: quorum factorum significationem invenire, aliquanto est operosius, quam ea legere vel audire. Admirantes audiebamus, tanquam magni miraculi spectaculo ante nostros oculos constituto, cum Evangelium legeretur, quemadmodum revixerit Lazarus. Si attendamus mirabiliora opera Christi, omnis qui credit, resurgit: si attendamus omnes, et intelligamus detestabiliores mortes, omnis qui peccat moritur. Sed mortem carnis omnis homo timet, mortem animae pauci. Pro morte carnis quae sine dubio quandoque ventura est, curant omnes ne veniat: inde est quod laborant. Laborat ne moriatur homo moriturus, et non laborat ne peccet homo in aeternum victurus. Et cum laborat ne moriatur, sine causa laborat; id enim agit ut multum mors differatur, non ut evadatur: si autem peccare nolit, non laborabit, et vivet in aeternum. O si possemus excitare homines, et cum ipsis pariter excitari, ut tales essemus amatores vitae permanentis, quales sunt homines amatores vitae fugientis! Quid non facit homo sub mortis periculo constitutus? Gladio impendente cervicibus, prodiderunt homines quidquid sibi, unde viverent, reservabant. Quis non continuo prodidit ne percuteretur? Et post proditionem fortasse percussus est. Quis non, ut viveret, continuo perdere voluit unde viveret, eligens vitam mendicantem quam celerem mortem? Cui dictum est, Naviga ne moriaris; et distulit? Cui dictum est, Labora ne moriaris; et piger fuit? Levia Deus jubet, ut in aeternum vivamus; et obedire negligimus. Non tibi Deus dicit, Perde quidquid habes, ut vivas exiguo tempore in labore sollicitus; sed, Da pauperi unde habes, ut vivas semper sine labore securus. Accusant nos amatores vitae temporalis, quam nec cum volunt, nec quamdiu volunt habent: et nos invicem non accusamus, tam pigri, tam tepidi ad capessendam vitam aeternam, quam si voluerimus habebimus, cum habuerimus non amittemus; hanc autem mortem quam timemus, etiamsi noluerimus, habebimus.
49.3 PL 35, 1747
3. If, then, the Lord in the greatness of His grace and mercy raiseth our souls to life, that we may not die for ever, we may well understand that those three dead persons whom He raised in the body, have some figurative significance of that resurrection of the soul which is effected by faith: He raised up the ruler of the synagogue’s daughter, while still lying in the house; He raised up the widow’s young son, while being carried outside the gates of the city; and He raised up Lazarus, when four days in the grave. Let each one give heed to his own soul: in sinning he dies: sin is the death of the soul. But sometimes sin is committed only in thought. Thou hast felt delight in what is evil, thou hast assented to its commission, thou hast sinned; that assent has slain thee: but the death is internal, because the evil thought had not yet ripened into action. The Lord intimated that He would raise such a soul to life, in raising that girl, who had not yet been carried forth to the burial, but was lying dead in the house, as if sin still lay concealed. But if thou hast not only harbored a feeling of delight in evil, but hast also done the evil thing, thou hast, so to speak, carried the dead outside the gate: thou art already without, and being carried to the tomb. Yet such an one also the Lord raised to life. and restored to his widowed mother. If thou hast sinned, repent, and the Lord will raise thee up, and restore thee to thy mother Church. The third example of death is Lazarus. A grievous kind of death it is, and is distinguished as a habit of wickedness. For it is one thing to fall into sin, another to form the habit of sinning. He who falls into sin, and straightway submits to correction, will be speedily restored to life; for he is not yet entangled in the habit, he is not yet laid in the tomb. But he who has become habituated to sin, is buried, and has it properly said of him, “he stinketh;” for his character, like some horrible smell, begins to be of the worst repute. Such are all who are habituated to crime, abandoned in morals. Thou sayest to such an one, Do not so. But when wilt thou be listened to by one on whom the earth is thus heaped, who is breeding corruption, and pressed down with the weight of habit? And yet the power of Christ was not unequal to the task of restoring such an one to life. We know, we have seen, we see every day men changing the very worst of habits, and adopting a better manner of life than that of those who blamed them. Thou detestedst such a man: look at the sister of Lazarus herself (if, indeed, it was she who anointed the Lord’s feet with ointment, and wiped with her hair what she had washed with her tears), who had a better resurrection than her brother; she was delivered from the mighty burden of a sinful character. For she was a notorious sinner; and had it said of her, “Her many sins are forgiven her, for she has loved much.” We see many such, we know many: let none despair, but let none presume in himself. Both the one and the other are sinful. Let thine unwillingness to despair take such a turn as to lead thee to make choice of Him in whom alone thou mayest well presume.
Si ergo Dominus magna sua gratia, et magna sua misericordia animas suscitat, ne moriamur in aeternum; bene intelligimus tres illos mortuos quos in corporibus suscitavit, aliquid significare et figurare de resurrectionibus animarum quae fiunt per fidem: resuscitavit filiam archisynagogi adhuc in domo jacentem ; resuscitavit juvenem filium viduae extra portas civitatis elatum (Luc. VII, 14, 15); resuscitavit Lazarum sepultum quatriduanum. Intueatur quisque animam suam: si peccat, moritur; peccatum, mors est animae. Sed aliquando in cogitatione peccatur. Delectavit quod malum est, consensisti, peccasti; consensio illa occidit te: sed intus est mors, quia cogitatum malum nondum processit in factum. Talem animam resuscitare se significans Dominus, resuscitavit illam puellam quae nondum erat foras elata, sed in domo mortua jacebat, quasi peccatum latebat. Si autem non solum malae delectationi consensisti, sed etiam ipsum malum fecisti; quasi mortuum extra portam extulisti: jam foris es, et mortuus elatus es. Tamen et ipsum Dominus resuscitavit, et reddidit viduae matri suae. Si peccasti, poeniteat te: et resuscitat te Dominus, et reddet Ecclesiae matri tuae. Tertius mortuus est Lazarus. Est genus mortis immane, mala consuetudo appellatur. Aliud est enim peccare, aliud peccandi consuetudinem facere. Qui peccat et continuo corrigitur, cito reviviscit: quia nondum est implicatus consuetudine, non est sepultus. Qui autem peccare consuevit, sepultus est, et bene de illo dicitur, fetet: incipit enim habere pessimam famam, tanquam odorem teterrimum. Tales sunt omnes assueti sceleribus, perditi moribus. Dicis ei, Noli facere. Quando te audit quem terra sic premit, et tabe corrumpitur, et mole consuetudinis praegravatur? Nec ad ipsum tamen resuscitandum minor fuit virtus Christi. Novimus, vidimus, quotidie videmus homines, pessima consuetudine permutata vivere melius, quam vivunt qui reprehendebant. Detestabaris hominem: ecce ipsa soror Lazari (si tamen ipsa est quae pedes Domini unxit unguento, et tersit capillis suis quos laverat lacrymis) melius suscitata est quam frater ejus: de magna malae consuetudinis mole est liberata. Erat enim famosa peccatrix: et de illa dictum est, Dimittuntur ei peccata multa, quoniam dilexit multum . Videmus multos, novimus multos: nemo desperet, nemo de se praesumat. Et desperare malum est, et de se praesumere. Sic noli desperare, ut eligas de quo debeas praesumere.
49.4 PL 35, 1748
4. So then the Lord also raised Lazarus to life. You have heard what type of character he represents; in other words, what is meant by the resurrection of Lazarus. Let us now, therefore, read over the passage; and as there is much in this lesson clear already, we shall not go into any detailed exposition, so as to take up more thoroughly the necessary points. “Now a certain man was sick, [named] Lazarus, of Bethany, the town of Mary and Martha, his sisters.” In the previous lesson you remember that the Lord escaped from the hands of those who sought to stone Him, and went away beyond Jordan, where John baptized. When the Lord therefore had taken up His abode there, Lazarus fell sick in Bethany, which was a town lying close to Jerusalem.
Ergo et Lazarum Dominus suscitavit. Audistis qualem, id est, quid significet Lazari resurrectio. Legamus itaque jam; et quoniam multa in hac lectione manifesta sunt, expositionem in singulis non quaeramus, ut necessaria pertractemus. Erat autem quidam languens, Lazarus a Bethania, de castello Mariae et Marthae sororum ejus. In superiore lectione meministis quod Dominus exiit de manibus eorum qui lapidare illum voluerant, et discessit trans Jordanem ubi Joannes baptizabat . Ibi ergo Domino constituto, infirmabatur in Bethania Lazarus, quod castellum erat proximum Jerosolymis.
49.5 PL 35, 1748
5. “But Mary was she who anointed the Lord with ointment, and wiped His feet with her hair, whose brother Lazarus was sick. Therefore his sisters sent unto Him, saying.” We now understand whither it was they sent, namely, where the Lord was; for He was away, as you know, beyond the Jordan. They sent messengers to the Lord to tell Him that their brother was ill. He delayed to heal, that He might be able to raise to life. But what was the message sent by his sisters? “Lord, behold, he whom Thou lovest is sick.” They did not say, Come; for the intimation was all that was needed for one who loved. They did not venture to say, Come and heal him: they ventured not to say, Command there, and it shall be done here. And why not so with them, if on these very grounds the centurion’s faith was commended? For he said, “I am not worthy that Thou shouldest enter under my roof; but speak the word only, and my servant shall be healed.” No such words said these women, but only, “Lord, behold, he whom Thou lovest is sick.” It is enough that Thou knowest; for Thou art not one that loveth and forsaketh. But says some one, How could a sinner be represented by Lazarus, and be so loved by the Lord? Let him listen to Him, when He says, “I came not to call the righteous, but sinners.” For had not God loved sinners, He would not have come down from heaven to earth.
Maria autem erat quae unxit Dominum unguento, et extersit pedes ejus capillis suis, cujus frater Lazarus infirmabatur. Miserunt ergo sorores ejus ad eum, dicentes. Jam intelligimus quo miserunt, ubi erat Dominus: quoniam absens erat, trans Jordanem scilicet. Miserunt ad Dominum, nuntiantes quod aegrotaret frater earum: ut si dignaretur veniret, et eum ab aegritudine liberaret. Ille distulit sanare, ut posset resuscitare. Quid ergo renuntiaverunt sorores ejus? Domine, ecce quem amas infirmatur. Non dixerunt, Veni: amanti enim tantummodo nuntiandum fuit. Non ausae sunt dicere, Veni, et sana: non ausae sunt dicere, Ibi jube, et hic fiet. Cur enim non et istae, si fides illius Centurionis inde laudatur? Ait enim: Non sum dignus ut intres sub tectum meum, sed tantum dic verbo, et sanabitur puer meus . Nihil horum istae, sed tantummodo, Domine, ecce quem amas infirmatur. Sufficit ut noveris; non enim amas, et deseris. Dicit aliquis: Quomodo per Lazarum peccator significabatur, et a Domino sic amabatur? Audiat eum dicentem, Non veni vocare justos, sed peccatores . Si enim peccatores Deus non amaret, de coelo ad terras non descenderet.
49.6 PL 35, 1749
6. “But when Jesus heard [that], He said, This sickness is not unto death, but for the glory of God, that the Son of God may be glorified.” Such a glorifying of Himself did not add to His dignity, but benefited us. Hence He says, “is not unto death,” because even that death itself was not unto death, but rather unto the working of a miracle whereby men might be led to faith in Christ, and so escape the real death. And mark how the Lord, as it were indirectly, called Himself God, for the sake of some who deny that the Son is God. For there are heretics who make such a denial, that the Son of God is God. Let them hearken here: “This sickness,” He says, “is not unto death, but for the glory of God.” For what glory? For the glory of what God? Hear what follows: “That the Son of God may be glorified.” “This sickness,” therefore, He says, “is not unto death, but for the glory of God, that the Son of God maybe glorified thereby.” By what? By that sickness.
Audiens autem Jesus, dixit eis: Infirmitas haec non est ad mortem, sed pro gloria Dei, ut glorificetur Filius Dei. Talis glorificatio ipsius non ipsum auxit, sed nobis profuit. Hoc ergo ait, non est ad mortem, quia et ipsa mors non erat ad mortem; sed potius ad miraculum, quo facto crederent homines in Christum, et vitarent veram mortem. Sane videte quemadmodum tanquam ex obliquo Dominus Deum se dixit, propter quosdam qui negant Filium Deum esse. Nam sunt haeretici qui hoc negant, quod Filius Dei sit Deus. Ecce audiant: Infirmitas haec, inquit, non est ad mortem, sed pro gloria Dei. Qua gloria? cujus Dei? Audi quod sequitur: Ut glorificetur Filius Dei. Infirmitas ergo haec, inquit, non est ad mortem, sed pro gloria Dei, ut glorificetur Filius Dei per eam. Per quam? Per illam infirmitatem.
49.7 PL 35, 1749
7. “Now Jesus loved Martha, and her sister Mary, and Lazarus.” The one sick, the others sad, all of them beloved: but He who loved them was both the Saviour of the sick, nay more, the Raiser of the dead and the Comforter of the sad. “When He heard therefore that he was sick, He abode then two days still in the same place.” They sent Him word: He abode where He was: and the time ran on till four days were completed. And not in vain, were it only that perhaps, nay that certainly, even the very number of days has some sacramental significance. “Then after that He saith again to His disciples, Let us go into Judea:” where He had been all but stoned, and from which He had apparently departed for the very purpose to escape being stoned. For as man He departed; but returned as if in forgetfulness of all infirmity, to show His power. “Let us go,” He said, “into Judea.”
Diligebat autem Jesus Martham, et sororem ejus Mariam, et Lazarum. Ille languens, illae tristes, omnes dilecti: sed diligebat eos et languentium salvator, imo etiam mortuorum suscitator, et tristium consolator. Ut ergo audivit quia infirmabatur, tunc quidem mansit in eodem loco duobus diebus. Nuntiaverunt ergo illi; mansit illic ille: tamdiu tempus ductum est, quousque quatriduum compleretur. Non frustra, nisi quia forte, imo quia certe et ipse numerus dierum intimat aliquod sacramentum. Deinde post haec dicit iterum discipulis suis, Eamus in Judaeam: ubi pene fuerat lapidatus, qui propterea inde discessisse videbatur, ne lapidaretur. Discessit enim ut homo; sed in redeundo quasi oblitus infirmitatem, ostendit potestatem. Eamus, inquit, in Judaeam.
49.8 PL 35, 1749
8. And now see how the disciples were terrified at His words. “The disciples say unto Him, Master, the Jews of late sought to stone Thee, and goest Thou thither again? Jesus answered, Are there not twelve hours in the day? “What means such an answer? They said to Him, “The Jews of late sought to stone Thee, and goest Thou thither again” to be stoned? And the Lord, “Are there not twelve hours in the day? if any man walk in the day, he stumbleth not, because he seeth the light of this world: but if he walk in the night, he stumbleth, because there is no light in him.” He spoke indeed of the day, but to our understanding as if it were still the night. Let us call upon the Day to chase away the night, and illuminate our hearts with the light. For what did the Lord mean? As far as I can judge, and as the height and depth of His meaning breaks into light, He wished to argue down their doubting and unbelief. For they wished by their counsel to keep the Lord from death, who had come to die, to save themselves from death. In a similar way also, in another passage, St. Peter, who loved the Lord, but did not yet fully understand the reason of His coming, was afraid of His dying, and so displeased the Life, to wit, the Lord Himself; for when He was intimating to the disciples what He was about to suffer at Jerusalem at the hands of the Jews, Peter made reply among the rest, and said, “Far be it from Thee, Lord; pity Thyself: this shall not be unto Thee.” And at once the Lord replied, “Get thee behind me, Satan: for thou savorest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.” And yet a little before, in confessing the Son of God, he had merited commendation: for he heard the words, “Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father who is in heaven.” To whom He had said, “Blessed art thou,” He now says, “Get thee behind me, Satan;” because it was not of himself that he was blessed. But of what then? “For flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father who is in heaven.” See, this is how thou art blessed, not from anything that is thine own, but from that which is mine. Not that I am the Father, but that all things which the Father hath are mine. But if his blessedness came from the Lord’s own working, from whose [working] came he to be Satan? He there tells us: for He assigned the reason of such blessedness, when He said, “Flesh and blood hath not revealed this unto thee, but my Father who is in heaven:” that is the cause of thy blessedness. But that I said, “Get thee behind me, Satan, hear also its cause. For thou savorest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.” Let no one then flatter himself: in that which is natural to himself he is Satan, in that which is of God he is blessed. For all that is of his own, whence comes it, but from his sin? Put away the sin, which is thine own. Righteousness, He saith, belongeth unto me. For what hast thou that thou didst not receive? Accordingly, when men wished to give counsel to God, disciples to their Master, servants to their Lord, patients to their Physician, He reproved them by saying, “Are there not twelve hours in the day? If any man walk in the day, he stumbleth not.” Follow me, if ye would not stumble: give not counsel to me, from whom you ought to receive it. To what, then, refer the words, “Are there not twelve hours in the day”? Just that to point Himself out as the day, He made choice of twelve disciples. If I am the day, He says, and you the hours, is it for the hours to give counsel to the day? The day is followed by the hours, not the hours by the day. If these, then, were the hours, what in such a reckoning was Judas? Was he also among the twelve hours? If he was an hour, he had light; and if he had light, how was the Day betrayed by him to death? But the Lord, in so speaking, foresaw, not Judas himself, but his successor. For Judas, when he fell, was succeeded by Matthias, and the duodenary number preserved. It was not, then, without a purpose that the Lord made choice of twelve disciples, but to indicate that He Himself is the spiritual Day. Let the hours then attend upon the Day, let them preach the Day, be made known and illuminated by the Day, and by the preaching of the hours may the world believe in the Day. And so in a summary way it was just this that He said: Follow me, if ye would not stumble.
Deinde hoc dicto, videte quemadmodum discipuli territi fuerint. Dicunt ei discipuli: Rabbi, nunc quaerebant te Judaei lapidare, et iterum vadis illuc? Respondit Jesus: Nonne duodecim sunt horae diei? Quid sibi vult ista responsio? Illi dixerunt, Modo te lapidare volebant Judaei, et iterum illuc vadis, ut te lapident? Et Dominus, Nonne duodecim horae sunt diei? Si quis ambulaverit in die, non offendit, quia lucem hujus mundi videt: si autem ambulaverit in nocte, offendit, quia lux non est in eo. De die quidem locutus est, sed in nostra intelligentia quasi adhuc nox est. Invocemus diem, ut expellat noctem, et cor lumine illustret. Quid enim Dominus dicere voluit? Quantum mihi videtur, quantum sublucet altitudo profunditasque sententiae, redarguere voluit illorum dubitationem et infidelitatem. Voluerunt enim consilium dare Domino ne moreretur, qui venerat mori, ne ipsi morerentur. Sic etiam quodam alio loco Petrus sanctus diligens Dominum, sed adhuc non plene intelligens cur venisset, timuit ne moreretur, et vitae displicuit, id est, ipsi Domino: nam cum indicaret discipulis quod esset Jerosolymis passurus a Judaeis, respondit Petrus inter caeteros, et ait, Absit a te, Domine, propitius tibi esto, non fiet istud. Et continuo Dominus, Redi post me, satanas, non enim sapis quae Dei sunt, sed quae hominum. Et paulo ante confitens Filium Dei laudem meruerat: audierat enim, Beatus es, Simon Bar Jona, quia non tibi revelavit caro et sanguis, sed Pater meus qui in coelis est . Cui dixerat, Beatus es; illi dicit, Redi retro, satanas: quia beatus a se non erat, Sed unde? Quia non tibi revelavit caro et sanguis, sed Pater meus qui in coelis est. Ecce unde beatus, non de tuo, sed de meo. Non quia Pater ego, sed quia omnia quae habet Pater, mea sunt . Si beatus de ipsius Domini; satanas de cujus? Ibi dicit: rationem quippe reddidit beatitudinis, ut diceret, Non caro et sanguis tibi revelavit hoc, sed Pater meus qui in coelis est: haec est causa beatitudinis tuae. Quod vero dixi, Redi post me, satanas, audi etiam hujus rei causam: Non enim sapis quae Dei sunt, sed quae sunt hominis. Nemo ergo se palpet; de suo satanas est, de Dei beatus est. Quid est enim de suo, nisi de peccato suo? Tolle peccatum, quod est tuum? Justitia, inquit, de meo est. Quid enim habes quod non accepisti ? Cum ergo vellent dare consilium homines Deo, discipuli magistro, servi Domino, aegroti medico; corripuit eos, et ait, Nonne duodecim horae sunt diei? Si quis ambulaverit in die, non offendit. Me sequimini, si non vultis offendere: nolite mihi consilium dare, quos a me consilium oportet accipere. Quo ergo pertinet, Nonne duodecim horae sunt diei? Quia ut diem se esse ostenderet, duodecim discipulos elegit. Si ego sum, inquit, dies, et vos horae, numquid horae diei consilium dant? Horae diem sequuntur, non dies horas. Si ergo illi horae, quid ibi Judas? Et ipse inter duodecim horas? Si hora erat, lucebat; si lucebat, quomodo diem ad mortem tradebat? Sed Dominus in hoc verbo non ipsum Judam, sed successorem ipsius praevidebat. Juda enim cadente successit Matthias, et duodenarius numerus mansit . Non ergo frustra duodecim discipulos elegit Dominus, nisi quia ipse spiritualis est dies. Sequantur ergo horae diem, praedicent horae diem, horae illustrentur a die, horae illuminentur a die, et per horarum praedicationem credat mundus in diem. Hoc ergo ait de compendio, Me sequimini, si non vultis offendere.
49.9 PL 35, 1751
9. “And after that He saith unto them, Our friend Lazarus sleepeth; but I go, that I may awake him out of sleep.” It was true what He said. To his sisters he was dead, to the Lord he was asleep. He was dead to men, who could not raise him again; but the Lord aroused him with as great ease from the tomb as one arouseth a sleeper from his bed. Hence it was in reference to His own power that He spoke of him as sleeping: for others also, who are dead, are frequently spoken of in Scripture as sleeping; as when the apostle says, “But I would not have you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning those who are asleep, that ye sorrow not, even as others who have no hope.” Therefore he also spoke of them as sleeping, because foretelling their resurrection. And so, all the dead are sleeping, both good and bad. But just as, in the case of those who sleep and waken day by day, there is a great difference as to what they severally see in their sleep: some experience pleasant dreams; others, dreams so frightful that the waking are afraid to fall asleep for fear of their recurrence: so every individual sleeps and wakens in circumstances peculiar to himself. And there is a difference as to the kind of custody one may be placed in, who is afterwards to be taken before the judge. For the kind of custody in which men are placed depends on the merits of the case: some are required to be guarded by lictors, an office humane and mild, and becoming a citizen; others are given up to subordinates; some, again, are sent to prison: and in the prison itself all are not thrust together into its lowest dungeons, but dealt with in proportion to the merits and superior gravity of the charges. As, then, there are different kinds of custody among those engaged in official life, so there are different kinds of custody for the dead, and differing merits in those who rise again. The beggar was taken into custody, so was the rich man: but the one into Abraham’s bosom; the other, where he thirsted, and found not a drop of water.
Et post hoc dicit eis: Lazarus amicus noster dormit; sed vado, ut a somno excitem eum. Verum dixit. Sororibus mortuus erat, Domino dormiebat. Hominibus mortuus erat, qui eum suscitare non poterant: nam Dominus tanta eum facilitate excitabat de sepulcro, quanta tu non excitas dormientem de lecto. Ergo secundum potentiam suam dixit dormientem: quia et alii mortui dicti sunt in Scripturis saepe dormientes, sicut Apostolus dicit, De dormientibus autem nolo vos ignorare, fratres, ut non contristemini, sicut et caeteri qui spem non habent . Ideo et ipse dormientes appellavit, quia resurrecturos praenuntiavit. Dormit ergo omnis mortuus, et bonus et malus. Sed quomodo interest in ipsis qui quotidie dormiunt et exsurgunt, quid quisque videat in somnis: alii sentiunt laeta somnia, alii torquentia, ita ut evigilans dormire timeat, ne ad ipsa iterum redeat: sic unusquisque hominum cum causa sua dormit, cum causa sua surgit. Et interest quali custodia quisque recipiatur, ad judicem postea producendus. Nam et receptiones in custodia pro meritis causarum adhibentur: alios jubentur custodire lictores, humanum et mite officium atque civile; alii traduntur optionibus; alii mittuntur in carcerem: et in ipso carcere non omnes, sed pro meritis graviorum causarum in ima carceris contruduntur. Sicut ergo diversae custodiae agentium in officio; sic diversae custodiae mortuorum, et diversa merita resurgentium. Receptus est pauper, receptus est dives: sed ille in sinum Abrahae; ille ubi sitiret, et guttam non inveniret .
49.10 PL 35, 1751
10. Therefore, to make this the occasion of instructing your Charity, all souls have, when they quit this world, their different receptions. The good have joy; the evil, torments. But when the resurrection takes place, both the joy of the good will be fuller and the torments of the wicked heavier, when they shall be tormented in the body. The holy patriarchs, prophets, apostles, martyrs, and good believers, have been received into peace; but all of them have still in the end to receive the fulfillment of the divine promises; for they have been promised also the resurrection of the flesh, the destruction of death, and eternal life with the angels. This we have all to receive together; for the rest, which is given immediately after death, every one, if worthy of it, receives when he dies. The patriarchs first received it—think only from what they rest; the prophets afterwards; more recently the apostles; still more lately the holy martyrs, and day by day the good and faithful. Thus some have now been in that rest for long, some not so long; others for fewer years, and others whose entrance therein is still less than recent. But when they shall wake from this sleep, they shall all together receive the fulfillment of the promise.
Habent ergo omnes animae, ut ex hac occasione instruam Charitatem vestram, habent omnes animae, cum de saeculo exierint, diversas receptiones suas. Habent gaudium bonae, malae tormenta. Sed cum facta fuerit resurrectio, et bonorum gaudium amplius erit, et malorum tormenta graviora; quando cum corpore torquebuntur. Recepti sunt in pace sancti Patriarchae, Prophetae, Apostoli, Martyres, boni fideles; omnes tamen adhuc in fine accepturi sunt quod promisit Deus: promissa enim est resurrectio etiam carnis, mortis consumptio, vita aeterna cum Angelis. Hoc omnes simul accepturi sumus: nam requiem quae continuo post mortem datur, si ea dignus est, tunc accipit quisque cum moritur. Priores acceperunt Patriarchae: videte ex quo requiescunt: posteriores Prophetae, recentius Apostoli, multo recentiores sancti Martyres, quotidie boni fideles. Et alii in ista requie jam diu sunt, alii non tam diu, alii paucioribus annis, alii nec recenti tempore. Cum vero ab hoc somno evigilabunt. Simul omnes quod promissum est accepturi sunt.
49.11 PL 35, 1752
11. “Our friend Lazarus sleepeth; but I go, that I may awake him out of sleep. Then said His disciples”—according to their understanding they replied—“Lord, if he sleep, he shall do well.” For the sleep of the sick is usually a sign of returning health. “Howbeit Jesus spake of his death, but they thought that He spake of the taking of rest in sleep. Then said Jesus unto them plainly,”—for He said somewhat obscurely, “He sleepeth;”—therefore He said plainly, “Lazarus is dead. And I am glad for your sakes that I was not there, to the intent ye may believe.” I even know that he is dead, and I was not there: for he had been reported not as dead, but sick. But what could remain hid from Him who had created it, and into whose hands the soul of the dying man had departed? This is why He said, “I am glad for your sakes that I was not there, to the intent ye may believe;” that they might now begin to wonder that the Lord could assert his death, which He had neither seen nor heard of. For here we ought specially to bear in mind that as yet the disciples themselves, who already believed in Him, had their faith built up by miracles: not that a faith, utterly wanting till then, might begin to exist; but that what had previously come into being might be increased; although He made use of such an expression as if only then they would begin to believe. For He said not, “I am glad for your sakes,” that your faith may be increased or confirmed; but, “that ye may believe;” which is to be understood as meaning, that your faith may be fuller and more vigorous.
Lazarus amicus noster dormit; sed vado, ut a somno excitem eum. Dixerunt ergo discipuli: quomodo intellexerunt, sic responderunt: Domine, si dormit, salvus erit. Solet enim esse somnus aegrotantium salutis indicium. Dixerat autem Jesus de morte ejus; illi autem putaverunt quod de dormitione somni diceret. Tunc ergo dixit eis Jesus manifeste. Subobscure enim dixerat, dormit: ait ergo manifeste, Lazarus mortuus est: et gaudeo propter vos, ut credatis; quia non eram ibi. Et scio quia mortuus est, et non ibi eram: aeger enim, non mortuus, fuerat nuntiatus. Sed quid lateret eum qui creaverat, et ad cujus manus anima morientis exierat? Hoc est quod ait, Gaudeo propter vos, ut credatis; quia non ibi eram: ut jam inciperent admirari, quia Dominus potuit dicere mortuum, quod nec viderat nec audierat. Ubi sane meminisse debemus quod adhuc etiam ipsorum discipulorum qui in eum jam crediderant, miraculis aedificabatur fides: non ut ea quae non erat, esse inciperet, sed ut ea quae jam esse coeperat, cresceret; quamvis tali verbo usus sit, quasi tunc credere inciperent. Non enim ait, Gaudeo propter vos, ut fides vestra augeatur, sive firmetur; sed ait, ut credatis: quod intelligendum est, ut amplius robustiusque credatis.
49.12 PL 35, 1752
12. “Nevertheless, let us go unto him. Then said Thomas, who is called Didymus, unto his fellow disciples, Let us also go, that we may die with Him. Therefore Jesus came, and found that he had [lain] in the grave four days already.” Much might be said of the four days, according to the wont of the obscure passages of Scripture, which bear as many senses as there is diversity of those who understand them. Let us express also our opinion of what is meant by one four days dead. For as in the former case of the blind man we understand in a way the human race, so in the case of this dead man many perhaps are also to be understood; for one thing may be signified by different figures. When a man is born, he is born already in a state of death; for he inherits sin from Adam. Hence the apostle says: “By one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so that passed upon all men, wherein all have sinned.” Here you have one day of death because man inherits it from the seed stock of death. Thereafter he grows, and begins to approach the years of reason that he may know the law of nature, which every one has had implanted in his heart: What thou wouldst not have done to thyself, do not to another. Is this learned from the pages of a book, and not in a measure legible in our very nature? Hast thou any desire to be robbed? Certainly not. See here, then, the law in thy heart: What thou art unwilling to suffer, be unwilling to do. This law also is transgressed by men; and here, then, we have the second day of death. The law was also divinely given through Moses, the servant of God; and therein it is said, “Thou shalt not kill; thou shalt not commit adultery; thou shalt not bear false witness; honor thy father and mother; thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s property; thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife.” Here you have the written law, and it also is despised: this is the third day of death. What remains? The gospel also comes, the kingdom of heaven is preached, Christ is everywhere published; He threatens hell, He promises eternal life; and that also is despised. Men transgress the gospel; and this is the fourth day of death. Now he deservedly stinketh. But is mercy to be denied to such? God forbid; for to raise such also from the dead, the Lord thinks it not unfitting to come.
Sed eamus ad eum. Dixit ergo Thomas, qui dicitur Didymus, ad condiscipulos: Eamus et nos, et moriamur cum illo. Venit itaque Jesus, et invenit eum quatuor dies jam in monumento habentem. De quatuor diebus multa quidem dici possunt, sicut se habent obscura Scripturarum, quae pro diversitate intelligentium, multos sensus pariunt. Dicamus et nos quid nobis videatur significare mortuus quatriduanus. Quomodo enim in illo caeco intelligimus quodammodo humanum genus, sic forte et in isto mortuo multos intellecturi sumus: diversis enim modis una res significari potest. Homo quando nascitur, jam cum morte nascitur; quia de Adam peccatum trahit. Unde dicit Apostolus: Per unum hominem peccatum intravit in mundum, et per peccatum mors; et ita in omnes homines pertransiit, in quo omnes peccaverunt . Ecce habes unum diem mortis, quod homo trahit de mortis propagine. Deinde crescit, incipit accedere ad rationales annos, ut legem sapiat naturalem, quam omnes habent in corde fixam: Quod tibi non vis fieri, alii ne feceris. Numquid hoc de paginis discitur, et non in natura ipsa quodammodo legitur? Furtum vis pati? Utique non vis. Ecce lex in corde tuo: Quod non vis pati, facere noli. Et hanc legem transgrediuntur homines: ecce alter dies mortis. Data est Lex etiam divinitus per famulum Dei Moysen: dictum est illic, Non occides; Non moechaberis; Non falsum testimonium dices; Honora patrem et matrem; Non concupisces rem proximi tui; Non concupisces uxorem proximi tui . Ecce Lex scripta est, et ipsa contemnitur: ecce tertius dies mortis. Quid restat? Venit et Evangelium, praedicatur regnum coelorum, diffamatur ubique Christus, minatur gehennam, vitam promittit aeternam, et ipsa contemnitur. Transgrediuntur homines Evangelium: ecce quartus dies mortis. Merito jam putet. Numquid et talibus est neganda misericordia? Absit: etiam ad tales Dominus excitandos non dedignatur accedere.
49.13 PL 35, 1753
13. “And many of the Jews had come to Martha and Mary, to comfort them concerning their brother. Then Martha, as soon as she heard that Jesus was coming, went and met Him; but Mary sat [still] in the house. Then said Martha unto Jesus, Lord, if Thou hadst been here, my brother had not died. But I know that even now, whatsoever Thou wilt ask of God, God will give it Thee.” She did not say, But even now I ask Thee to raise my brother to life again. For how could she know if such a resurrection would be of benefit to her brother? She only said, I know that Thou canst, and whatsoever Thou art pleased, Thou doest: for Thy doing it is dependent on Thine own judgment, not on my presumption. “But even now I know that, whatsoever Thou wilt ask of God, God will give it Thee.”
Multi autem ex Judaeis venerant ad Martham et Mariam, ut consolarentur eas de fratre suo. Martha ergo ut audivit quia Jesus venit, occurrit illi: Maria autem domi sedebat. Dixit ergo Martha ad Jesum: Domine, si fuisses hic, frater meus non fuisset mortuus; sed et nunc scio quia quaecumque poposceris a Deo, dabit tibi Deus. Non dixit, Sed et modo rogo te ut resuscites fratrem meum. Unde enim sciebat, si fratri ejus resurgere utile fuerit? Hoc tantum dixit, Scio quia potes, si vis facis: utrum enim facias, judicii tui est, non praesumptionis meae. Sed et nunc scio quia quaecumque poposceris a Deo, dabit tibi Deus.
49.14 PL 35, 1753
14. “Jesus saith unto her, Thy brother shall rise again.” This was ambiguous. For He said not, Even now I will raise thy brother; but, “Thy brother shall rise again. Martha saith unto Him, I know that he shall rise again in the resurrection, at the last day.” Of that resurrection I am sure, but uncertain about this. “Jesus saith unto her, I am the resurrection.” Thou sayest, My brother shall rise again at the last day: true; but by Him, through whom he shall rise then, can he rise even now, for “I,” He says, “am the resurrection and the life.” Give ear, brethren, give ear to what He says. Certainly the universal expectation of the bystanders was that Lazarus, one who had been dead four days, would live again; let us hear, and rise again. How many are there in this audience who are crushed down under the weighty mass of some sinful habit! Perhaps some are hearing me to whom it may be said, “Be not drunk with wine, wherein is excess;” and they say, We cannot. Some others, it may be, are hearing me, who are unclean, and stained with lusts and crimes, and to whom it is said, Refrain from such conduct, that ye perish not; and they reply, We cannot give up our habits. O Lord, raise them again. “I am,” He says, “the resurrection and the life.” The resurrection because the life.
Dicit illi Jesus: Resurget frater tuus. Hoc ambiguum fuit. Non enim ait, Modo resuscito fratrem tuum; sed, Resurget frater tuus. Dicit ei Martha: Scio quia resurget in resurrectione, in novissima die. De illa resurrectione secura sum, de hac incerta sum. Dicit ei Jesus: Ego sum resurrectio. Dicis, Resurget frater meus in novissima die: verum est; sed per quem tunc resurget, potest et modo, quia Ego sum, inquit, resurrectio et vita. Audite, fratres, audite quid dicat. Certe tota exspectatio erat circumstantium ut revivisceret Lazarus, unus mortuus quatriduanus: audiamus, et resurgamus. Quam multi sunt in hoc populo, quos premit consuetudinis moles! Forte audiunt me quidam, quibus dicitur, Nolite inebriari vino in quo est luxuria : dicunt, Non possumus. Forte audiunt me aliqui immundi, lasciviis et flagitiis inquinati, quibus dicitur, Nolite hoc facere, ne pereatis: et respondent, Non possumus tolli a consuetudine nostra. O Domine, istos resuscita. Ego sum, inquit, resurrectio et vita. Ideo resurrectio, quia vita.
49.15 PL 35, 1753
15. “He that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live: and whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die.” What meaneth this? “He that believeth in me, though he were dead,” just as Lazarus is dead, “yet shall he live;” for He is not the God of the dead, but of the living. Such was the answer He gave the Jews concerning their fathers, long ago dead, that is, concerning Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob: I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob: He is not the God of the dead, but of the living; for all live unto Him.” Believe then, and though thou wert dead, yet shalt thou live: but if thou believest not, even while thou livest thou art dead. Let us prove this likewise, that if thou believest not, though thou livest thou art dead. To one who was delaying to follow Him, and saying, “Let me first go and bury my father,” the Lord said, “Let the dead bury their dead; but come thou and follow me.” There was there a dead man requiring to be buried, there were there also dead men to bury the dead: the one was dead in the flesh, the others in soul. And how comes death on the soul? When faith is wanting. How comes death on the body? When the soul is wanting. Therefore thy soul’s soul is faith. “He that believeth in me,” says Christ, though he were dead in the flesh, yet shall he live in the spirit; till the flesh also rise again, never more to die. This is “he that believeth in me,” though he die, “yet shall he live. And whosoever liveth” in the flesh, “and believeth in me,” though he shall die in time on account of the death of the flesh, “shall never die,” because of the life of the spirit, and the immortality of the resurrection. Such is the meaning of the words, “And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this? She saith unto Him, Yea, Lord, I have believed that Thou art the Christ, the Son of God, who hast come into the world.” When I believed this, I believed that Thou art the resurrection, that Thou art the life: I believed that he that believeth in Thee, though he die, yet shall he live; and whosoever liveth and believeth in Thee, shall never die.
Qui credit in me, etiamsi mortuus fuerit, vivet: et omnis qui vivit et credit in me, non morietur in aeternum. Quid est hoc? Qui credit in me, etiamsi mortuus fuerit, sicut Lazarus mortuus est, vivet; quia non est Deus mortuorum, sed vivorum. De olim mortuis patribus, hoc est de Abraham, et Isaac, et Jacob, tale responsum Judaeis dedit: Ego sum Deus Abraham, et Deus Isaac, et Deus Jacob, non est Deus mortuorum, sed vivorum: omnes enim illi vivunt . Crede ergo; et si mortuus fueris, vives: si autem non credis; et cum vivis, mortuus es. Probemus et hoc, quia si non credis, etsi vivis, mortuus es. Cuidam Dominus differenti sequi eum, et dicenti, Eam prius sepelire patrem meum: Sine, inquit, mortuos sepelire mortuos suos; tu veni, sequere me . Erat ibi mortuus sepeliendus, erant ibi et mortui mortuum sepulturi: ille mortuus in carne, illi in anima. Unde mors in anima? Quia non est fides. Unde mors in corpore? Quia non est ibi anima. Ergo animae tuae anima fides est. Qui credit in me, inquit, etiamsi mortuus fuerit in carne, vivet in anima; donec resurgat et caro nunquam postea moritura. Hoc est, Qui credit in me, licet moriatur, vivet. Et omnis qui vivit in carne et credit in me, etsi morietur ad tempus propter mortem carnis, non morietur in aeternum propter vitam spiritus, et immortalitatem resurrectionis. Hoc est quod ait, Et omnis qui vivit et credit in me, non morietur in aeternum. Credis hoc? Ait illi: Utique, Domine, ego credidi, quia tu es Christus Filius Dei, qui in mundum venisti. Quando hoc credidi, credidi quia tu es resurrectio, credidi quia tu es vita; credidi quia qui credit in te, etsi moriatur, vivet; et qui vivit et credit in te, non morietur in aeternum.
49.16 PL 35, 1754
16. “And when she had so said, she went her way, and called Mary her sister silently, saying, The Master is come, and calleth for thee.” It is worthy of notice the way in which the whispering of her voice was denominated silence. For how could she be silent, when she said, “The Master is come, and calleth for thee”? It is also to be noticed why it is that the evangelist has not said where, or when, or how the Lord called for Mary; namely, that in order to preserve the brevity of the narrative, it may rather be understood from the words of Martha.
Et cum haec dixisset, abiit, et vocavit Mariam sororem suam silentio, dicens: Magister adest, et vocat te. Advertendum est quemadmodum suppressam vocem silentium nuncupavit. Nam quomodo siluit, quae dixit, Magister adest, et vocat te? Advertendum etiam quemadmodum Evangelista non dixerit ubi vel quando vel quomodo Mariam Dominus vocaverit, ut hoc in verbis Marthae potius intelligeretur, narrationis brevitate servata.
49.17 PL 35, 1754
17. “As soon as she heard that, she arose quickly, and came unto Him. For Jesus was not yet come into the town, but was still in that place where Martha met Him. The Jews, then, who were with her in the house, and comforted her, when they saw Mary, that she rose up hastily, and went out, followed her, saying, She goeth unto the grave, to weep there.” What cause had the evangelist to tell us this? To show us what it was that occasioned the numerous concourse of people to be there when Lazarus was raised to life. For the Jews, thinking that her reason for hastening away was to seek in weeping the solace of her grief, followed her; that the great miracle of one rising again who had been four days dead, might have the presence of many witnesses.
Illa ut audivit, surgit cito, et venit ad eum. Nondum enim venerat Jesus in castellum, sed erat adhuc in illo loco ubi occurrerat ei Martha. Judaei igitur qui erant cum illa in domo, et consolabantur eam, cum vidissent Mariam, quia cito surrexit et exiit, secuti sunt eam dicentes: quia vadit ad monumentum, ut ploret ibi. Quare pertinuit hoc ad Evangelistam narrare? Ut videamus quae occasio fecerit ut plures ibi essent quando Lazarus resuscitatus est. Putantes enim Judaei propterea illam festinare, ut doloris sui solatium lacrymis quaereret, secuti sunt eam; ut tam grande miraculum quatriduani mortui resurgentis, testes plurimos inveniret.
49.18 PL 35, 1754
18. “Then when Mary was come where Jesus was, and saw Him, she fell down at His feet, saying unto Him, Lord, if Thou hadst been here, my brother had not died. When Jesus therefore saw her weeping, and the Jews also weeping, who were with her, He groaned in the spirit, and troubled Himself, and said, Where have ye laid him?” Something there is, did we but know it, that He has suggested to us by groaning in the spirit, and troubling Himself. For who could trouble Him, save He Himself? Therefore, my brethren, first give heed here to the power that did so, and then look for the meaning. Thou art troubled against thy will; Christ was troubled because He willed. Jesus hungered, it is true, but because He willed; Jesus slept, it is true, but because He willed; He was sorrowful, it is true, but because He willed; He died, it is true, but because He willed: in His own power it lay to be thus and thus affected or not. For the Word assumed soul and flesh, fitting on Himself our whole human nature in the oneness of His person. For the soul of the apostle was illuminated by the Word; so was the soul of Peter, the soul of Paul, of the other apostles, and the holy prophets,—the souls of all were illuminated by the Word; but of none was it said, “The Word was made flesh;” of none was it said,” I and the Father are one.” The soul and flesh of Christ is one person with the Word of God, one Christ. And by this [Word] wherein resided the supreme power, was infirmity made use of at the beck of His will; and in this way “He troubled Himself.”
Maria autem cum venisset ubi erat Jesus, videns eum, cecidit ad pedes ejus, et dixit ei: Domine, si fuisses hic, frater meus non esset mortuus. Jesus ergo ut vidit eam plorantem, et Judaeos qui cum illa erant plorantes, fremuit spiritu, et turbavit semetipsum, et dixit: Ubi posuistis eum? Nescio quid nobis insinuavit fremendo spiritu, et turbando seipsum. Quis enim eum posset, nisi se ipse, turbare? Itaque, fratres mei, primo hic attendite potestatem, et sic inquirite significationem. Turbaris tu nolens; turbatus est Christus, quia voluit. Esurivit Jesus, verum est, sed quia voluit; dormivit Jesus, verum est, sed quia voluit; contristatus est Jesus, verum est, sed quia voluit; mortuus est Jesus, verum est, sed quia voluit: in illius potestate erat sic vel sic affici, vel non affici. Verbum enim animam suscepit et carnem, totius hominis sibi coaptans in personae unitate naturam. Nam et anima Apostoli Verbo illustrata est, anima Petri Verbo illustrata est, anima Pauli, aliorum Apostolorum, sanctorum Prophetarum Verbo illustratae sunt animae: sed de nulla dictum est, Verbum caro factum est ; de nulla dictum est, Ego et Pater unum sumus . Anima et caro Christi cum Verbo Dei una persona est, unus Christus est. Ac per hoc ubi summa potestas est, secundum voluntatis nutum tractatur infirmitas: hoc est, turbavit semetipsum.
49.19 PL 35, 1755
19. I have spoken of the power: look now to the meaning. It is a great criminal that is signified by that four days’ death and burial. Why is it, then, that Christ troubleth Himself, but to intimate to thee how thou oughtest to be troubled, when weighed down and crushed by so great a mass of iniquity? For here thou hast been looking to thyself, been seeing thine own guilt, been reckoning for thyself: I have done this, and God has spared me; I have committed this, and He hath borne with me; I have heard the gospel, and despised it; I have been baptized, and returned again to the same course: what am I doing? whither am I going? how shall I escape? When thou speakest thus, Christ is already groaning; for thy faith is groaning. In the voice of one who groaneth thus, there comes to light the hope of his rising again. If such faith is within, there is Christ groaning; for if there is faith in us, Christ is in us. For what else says the apostle: “That Christ may dwell in your hearts by faith.” Therefore thy faith in Christ is Christ Himself in thy heart. This is why He slept in the ship; and why, when His disciples were in danger and already on the verge of shipwreck, they came to Him and awoke Him. Christ arose, laid His commands on the winds and waves, and there ensued a great calm. So also with thee; the winds enter thy heart, that is, where thou sailest, where thou passest along this life as a stormy and dangerous sea; the winds enter, the billows rise and toss thy vessel. What are the winds? Thou hast received some insult, and art wroth: that insult is the wind; that anger, the waves. Thou art in danger, thou preparest to reply, to render cursing for cursing, and thy vessel is already nigh to shipwreck. Awake the Christ who is sleeping. For thou art in commotion, and making ready to render evil for evil, because Christ is sleeping in thy vessel. For the sleep of Christ in thy heart is the forgetfulness of faith. But if thou arousest Christ, that is, recallest thy faith, what dost thou hear said to thee by Christ, when now awake in thy heart? I [He says] have heard it said to me, “Thou hast a devil,” and I have prayed for them. The Lord hears and suffers; the servant hears and is angry! But thou wishest to be avenged. Why so? I am already avenged. When thy faith so speaks to thee, command is exercised, as it were, over the winds and waves, and there is a great calm. As, then, to awaken Christ in the vessel is just to awaken faith; so in the heart of one who is pressed down by a great mass and habit of sin, in the heart of the man who has been a transgressor even of the holy gospel and a despiser of eternal punishment, let Christ groan, let such a man betake himself to self-accusation. Hear still more: Christ wept; let man bemoan himself. For why did Christ weep, but to teach man to weep? Wherefore did He groan and trouble Himself, but to intimate that the faith of one who has just cause to be displeased with himself ought to be in a sense groaning over the accusation of wicked works, to the end that the habit of sinning may give way to the vehemence of penitential sorrow?
Dixi potestatem, attendite significationem. Magnus reus est, quem mortis quatriduum et illa significat sepultura. Quid est ergo quod turbat semetipsum Christus, nisi ut significet tibi quomodo turbari tu debeas, cum tanta mole peccati gravaris et premeris? Attendisti enim te, vidisti te reum, computasti tibi: Illud feci, et pepercit mihi Deus; illud commisi, et distulit me; Evangelium audivi, et contempsi; baptizatus sum, et iterum ad eadem revolutus sum: quid facio? quo eo? unde evado? Quando ista dicis, jam fremit Christus; quia fides fremit. In voce frementis apparet spes resurgentis. Si ipsa fides intus, ibi est Christus fremens: si fides in nobis, Christus in nobis. Quid enim aliud ait Apostolus: Habitare Christum per fidem in cordibus vestris ? Ergo fides tua de Christo, Christus est in corde tuo. Hinc est illud quod dormiebat in navi: et cum periclitarentur discipuli, jam imminente naufragio accesserunt ad eum, et excitaverunt eum: surrexit Christus, imperavit ventis et fluctibus, et facta est tranquillitas magna . Sic et tu: intrant venti cor tuum, utique ubi navigas, ubi hanc vitam tanquam procellosum et periculosum pelagus transis; intrant venti, movent fluctus, turbant navim. Qui sunt venti? Audisti convicium, irasceris; convicium ventus est, iracundia fluctus est: periclitaris, disponis respondere, disponis maledictum maledicto reddere, jam navis propinquat naufragio; excita Christum dormientem. Ideo enim fluctuas, et mala pro malis reddere praeparas, quia Christus dormit in navi. In corde enim tuo somnus Christi, oblivio fidei. Nam si excites Christum, id est recolas fidem, quid tibi dicit tanquam vigilans Christus in corde tuo? Ego audivi, Daemonium habes , et pro eis oravi: audit Dominus, et patitur; audit servus, et indignatur! Sed vindicari vis. Quid enim? ego jam sum vindicatus? Cum tibi haec loquitur fides tua, quasi imperatur ventis et fluctibus, et fit tranquillitas magna. Quomodo ergo hoc est excitare Christum in navi, excitare fidem; sic in corde hominis quem premit magna moles et consuetudo peccati, in corde hominis transgressoris etiam sancti Evangelii, contemptoris poenarum aeternarum, fremat Christus, increpet se homo. Audi adhuc: flevit Christus, fleat se homo. Quare enim flevit Christus, nisi quia flere hominem docuit? Quare fremuit et turbavit semetipsum, nisi quia fides hominis sibi merito displicentis fremere quodammodo debet in accusatione malorum operum, ut violentiae poenitendi cedat consuetudo peccandi?
49.20 PL 35, 1755
20. “And He said, Where have ye laid him?” Thou knewest that he was dead, and art Thou ignorant of the place of his burial? The meaning here is, that a man thus lost becomes, as it were, unknown to God. I have not ventured to say, Is unknown—for what is unknown to Him? but, As it were unknown. And how do we prove this? Listen to the Lord, who will yet say in the judgment, “I know you not: depart from me.” What does that mean, “I know you not”? I see you not in that light of mine—in that righteousness which I know. So here, also, as if knowing nothing of such a sinner, He said, “Where have ye laid him?” Similar in character was God’s voice in Paradise after man had sinned: “Adam, where art thou?” “They say unto Him, Lord, come and see.” What means this “see”? Have pity. For the Lord sees when He pities. Hence it is said to Him, “Look upon my humility [affliction] and my pain, and forgive all my sins.”
Et dixit: Ubi posuistis eum? Scisti quia mortuus sit, et ubi sit sepultus ignoras? Et ista significatio est, quia sic perditum hominem quasi nescit Deus. Non ausus sum dicere, Nescit: quid enim ille nescit? Sed quasi nescit. Unde hoc probamus? Dominum audi dicturum in judicio, Non novi vos; discedite a me . Quid est, Non novi vos? Non vos video in luce mea, non vos video in illa justitia quam novi. Sic et hic tanquam nesciens talem peccatorem, dixit, Ubi posuistis eum? Talis est vox Dei in paradiso posteaquam homo peccavit, Adam, ubi es ? Dicunt ei: Domine, veni, et vide. Quid est, vide? Miserere. Videt enim Dominus, quando miseretur. Unde illi dicitur, Vide humilitatem meam, et laborem meum, et dimitte omnia peccata mea .
49.21 PL 35, 1756
21. “Jesus wept. Then said the Jews, Behold how He loved him!” “Loved him,” what does that mean? “I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.” “But some of them said, Could not this man, who opened the eyes of the blind, have caused that even this man should not die?” But He, who would do nought to hinder his dying, had something greater in view in raising him from the dead.
Lacrymatus est Jesus. Dixerunt ergo Judaei: Ecce quomodo amabat eum. Quid est, amabat eum? Non veni vocare justos, sed peccatores in poenitentiam . Quidam autem ex ipsis dixerunt: Non poterat hic qui aperuit oculos caeci, facere ut et hic non moreretur? Qui noluit facere ut non moreretur, plus est quod facturus est, ut mortuus suscitetur.
49.22 PL 35, 1756
22. “Jesus therefore again groaning in Himself, cometh to the tomb.” May His groaning have thee also for its object, if thou wouldst re-enter into life! Every man who lies in that dire moral condition has it said to him, “He cometh to the tomb.” “It was a cave, and a stone had been laid upon it.” Dead under that stone, guilty under the law. For you know that the law, which was given to the Jews, was inscribed on stone. And all the guilty are under the law: the right-living are in harmony with the law. The law is not laid on a righteous man. What mean then the words, “Take ye away the stone”? Preach grace. For the Apostle Paul calleth himself a minister of the New Testament, not of the letter, but of the spirit; “for the letter,” he says, “killeth, but the spirit giveth life.” The letter that killeth is like the stone that crusheth. “Take ye away,” He saith, “the stone.” Take away the weight of the law; preach grace. “For if there had been a law given, which could have given life, verily righteousness should be by the law. But the Scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.” Therefore “take ye away the stone.”
Jesus ergo rursus fremens in semetipso, venit ad monumentum. Fremat et in te, si disponis reviviscere. Omni homini dicitur, qui premitur pessima consuetudine: Venit ad monumentum. Erat autem spelunca, et lapis superpositus erat ei. Mortuus sub lapide, reus sub lege. Scitis enim quia Lex quae data est Judaeis, in lapide scripta est . Omnes autem rei sub lege sunt: bene viventes cum lege sunt. Justo lex posita non est . Quid est ergo, Lapidem removete? Gratiam praedicate. Apostolus enim Paulus ministrum se dicit Novi Testamenti, non litterae, sed spiritus: nam littera, inquit, occidit, spiritus vivificat . Littera occidens, quasi lapis est premens. Removete, inquit, lapidem. Removete Legis pondus; gratiam praedicate. Si enim data esset lex, quae posset vivificare, omnino ex Lege esset justitia. Sed conclusit omnia Scriptura sub peccato, ut promissio ex fide Jesu Christi daretur credentibus . Ergo removete lapidem.
49.23 PL 35, 1756
23. “Martha, the sister of him that was dead, saith unto Him, Lord, by this time he stinketh: for he hath been [dead] four days. Jesus saith unto her, Have I not said unto thee, that, if thou believest, thou shalt see the glory of God?” What does He mean by this, “thou shalt see the glory of God”? That He can raise to life even one who is putrid and hath been four days [dead]. “For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; and, “Where sin abounded, grace also did superabound.”
Dicit ei Martha, soror ejus qui mortuus fuerat: Domine, jam fetet; quatriduanus enim est. Dicit ei Jesus: Nonne dixi tibi quoniam si credideris, videbis gloriam Dei? Quid est, videbis gloriam Dei? Quia et putentem et quatriduanum resuscitat. Omnes enim peccaverunt, et egent gloria Dei : et, Ubi abundavit peccatum, superabundavit et gratia .
49.24 PL 35, 1756
24. “Then they took away the stone. And Jesus lifted up His eyes, and said, Father, I thank Thee, that Thou hast heard me. And I knew that Thou hearest me always: but because of the people that stand by I said it, that they may believe that Thou hast sent me. And when He had thus spoken, He cried with a loud voice.” He groaned, He wept, He cried with a loud voice. With what difficulty does one rise who lies crushed under the heavy burden of a habit of sinning! And yet he does rise: he is quickened by hidden grace within; and after that loud voice he riseth. For what followed? “He cried with a loud voice, Lazarus, come forth. And immediately he that was dead came forth, bound hand and foot with bandages; and his face was bound about with a napkin.” Dost thou wonder how he came forth with his feet bound, and wonderest not at this, that after four days’ interment he rose from the dead? In both events it was the power of the Lord that operated, and not the strength of the dead. He came forth, and yet still was bound. Still in his burial shroud, he has already come outside the tomb. What does it mean? While thou despisest [Christ], thou liest in the arms of death; and if thy contempt reacheth the lengths I have mentioned, thou art buried as well: but when thou makest confession, thou comest forth. For what is this coming forth, but the open acknowledgment thou makest of thy state, in quitting, as it were, the old refuges of darkness? But the confession thou makest is effected by God, when He crieth with a loud voice, or in other words, calleth thee in abounding grace. Accordingly, when the dead man had come forth, still bound; confessing, yet guilty still; that his sins also might be taken away, the Lord said to His servants: “Loose him, and let him go.” What does He mean by such words? What soever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
Tulerunt ergo lapidem. Jesus autem elevatis sursum oculis, dixit: Pater, gratias ago tibi, quoniam audisti me: ego autem sciebam quia semper me audis; sed propter populum qui circumstat, dixi, ut credant quia tu me misisti. Haec cum dixisset, magna voce clamavit. Fremuit, lacrymavit, voce magna clamavit. Quam difficile surgit, quem moles malae consuetudinis premit! Sed tamen surgit: occulta gratia intus vivificatur; surgit post vocem magnam. Quid est factum? Voce magna clamavit: Lazare, veni foras. Et statim prodiit qui fuerat mortuus, ligatus manus et pedes institis; et facies illius sudario erat ligata. Quomodo processit ligatis pedibus miraris, et non miraris quia surrexit quatriduanus? In utroque potentia Domini erat, non vires mortui. Processit, et adhuc ligatus est: adhuc involutus, tamen jam foras processit. Quid significat? Quando contemnis, mortuus jaces; et si tanta quanta dixi contemnis, sepultus jaces: quando confiteris, procedis. Quid est enim procedere, nisi ab occultis velut exeundo manifestari? Sed ut confitearis, Deus facit magna voce clamando, id est, magna gratia vocando. Ideo cum processisset mortuus adhuc ligatus, confitens et adhuc reus; ut solverentur peccata ejus, ministris hoc dixit Dominus: Solvite illum, et sinite abire. Quid est, Solvite, et sinite abire? Quae solveritis in terra, soluta erunt et in coelo .
49.25 PL 35, 1757
25. “Then many of the Jews who had come to Mary, and had seen the things which Jesus did, believed on Him. But some of them went away to the Pharisees, and told them what things Jesus had done.” All of the Jews who had come to Mary did not believe, but many of them did. “But some of them,” whether of the Jews who had come, or of those who had believed, “went away to the Pharisees, and told them what things Jesus had done:” whether in the way of conveying intelligence, in order that they also might believe, or rather in the spirit of treachery, to arouse their anger. But whoever were the parties, and whatever their motive, intelligence of these events was carried to the Pharisees.
Multi ergo ex Judaeis qui venerant ad Mariam et viderant quae fecit Jesus, crediderunt in eum: quidam autem ex ipsis abierunt ad Pharisaeos, et dixerunt eis quae fecit Jesus. Non omnes ex Judaeis qui convenerant ad Mariam, crediderunt, sed tamen multi. Quidam vero ex eis, sive ex Judaeis qui convenerant, sive ex eis qui crediderant, abierunt ad Pharisaeos, et dixerunt eis quae fecit Jesus: sive annuntiando, ut et ipsi crederent; sive potius prodendo, ut saevirent. Sed quomodolibet et a quibuslibet, ad Pharisaeos ista perlata sunt.
49.26 PL 35, 1757
26. “Then gathered the chief priests and the Pharisees a council, and said, What do we?” But they did not say, Let us believe. For these abandoned men were more occupied in considering what evil they could do to effect His ruin, than in consulting for their own preservation: and yet they were afraid, and took counsel of a kind together. For “they said, What do we? for this man doeth many miracles: if we let him thus alone, all men will believe on him; and the Romans shall come, and take away both our place and nation.” They were afraid of losing their temporal possessions, and thought not of life eternal; and so they lost both. For the Romans, after our Lord’s passion and entrance into glory, took from them both their place and nation, when they took the one by storm and transported the other: and now that also pursues them, which is said elsewhere, “But the children of the kingdom shall go into outer darkness.” But this was what they feared, that if all believed on Christ, there would be none remaining to defend the city of God and the temple against the Romans; just because they had a feeling that Christ’s teaching was directed against the temple itself and their own paternal laws.
Collegerunt pontifices et Pharisaei concilium, et dicebant: Quid facimus? Nec tamen dicebant, Credamus. Plus enim perditi homines cogitabant quomodo nocerent ut perderent, quam quomodo sibi consule rent ne perirent: et tamen timebant, et quasi consulebant. Dicebant enim: Quid facimus? Quia hic homo multa signa facit: si dimittimus eum sic, omnes credent in eum; et venient Romani, et tollent nostrum locum et gentem. Temporalia perdere timuerunt, et vitam aeternam non cogitaverunt; ac sic utrumque amiserunt. Nam et Romani post Domini passionem et glorificationem, tulerunt eis et locum et gentem, expugnando et transferendo: et illud eos sequitur quod alibi dictum est, Filii autem regni hujus ibunt in tenebras exteriores . Hoc autem timuerunt, ne si omnes in Christum crederent, nemo remaneret qui adversus Romanos civitatem Dei templumque defenderet; quoniam contra ipsum templum, et contra suas paternas leges doctrinam Christi esse sentiebant.
49.27 PL 35, 1757
27. “And one of them, [named] Caiaphas, being the high priest that same year, said unto them, Ye know nothing at all, nor consider that it is expedient for us that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not. And this spake he not of himself; but being high priest that year, he prophesied.” We are here taught that the Spirit of prophecy used the agency even of wicked men to foretell what was future; which, however, the evangelist attributes to the divine sacramental fact that he was pontiff, which is to say, the high priest. It may, however, be a question in what way he is called the high priest of that year, seeing that God appointed one person to be high priest, who was to be succeeded only at his death by another. But we are to understand that ambitious schemes and contentions among the Jews led to the appointment afterwards of more than one, and to their annual turn of service. For it is said also of Zacharias: “And it came to pass that, while he executed the priest’s office before God in the order of his course, according to the custom of the priest’s office, his lot was to burn incense when he went into the temple of the Lord.” From which it is evident that there were more than one, and that each had his turn: for it was lawful for the high priest alone to place the incense on the altar. And perhaps also there were several in actual service in the same year, who were succeeded next year by several others, and that it fell by lot to one of them to burn incense. What was it, then, that Caiaphas prophesied? “That Jesus should die for the nation; and not for the nation only, but that also He should gather together in one the children of God that were scattered abroad.” This is added by the evangelist; for Caiaphas prophesied only of the Jewish nation, in which there were sheep of whom the Lord Himself had said, “I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” But the evangelist knew that there were other sheep, which were not of this fold, but which had also to be brought, that there might be one fold and one shepherd. But this was said in the way of predestination; for those who were still unbelieving were as yet neither His sheep nor the children of God.
Unus autem ex ipsis Caiphas, cum esset pontifex anni illius, dixit eis: Vos nescitis quidquam, nec cogitatis quia expedit nobis ut unus moriatur homo pro populo, et non tota gens pereat. Hoc autem a semetipso non dixit, sed cum esset pontifex anni illius, prophetavit. Hic docemur etiam per homines malos prophetiae Spiritum futura praedicere: quod tamen Evangelista divino tribuit sacramento, quia pontifex fuit, id est, summus sacerdos. Potest autem movere quomodo dicatur pontifex anni illius, cum Deus unum constituerit summum sacerdotem, cui mortuo unus succederet. Sed intelligendum est, per ambitiones et contentiones inter Judaeos postea constitutum ut plures essent, et per annos singulos vicibus ministrarent. Nam et de Zacharia hoc dicitur: Factum est autem, cum sacerdotio fungeretur in ordine vicis suae ante Deum, secundum consuetudinem sacerdotii, sorte exiit ut incensum poneret, ingressus in templum Domini . Hinc apparet plures eos fuisse, et vices suas habuisse: nam incensum non licebat ponere nisi summo sacerdoti . Et forte etiam unum annum plures administrabant, quibus alio anno alii succedebant, ex quibus sorte exibat quis, ut incensum poneret. Quid est ergo quod prophetavit Caiphas? Quia Jesus moriturus erat pro gente; et non tantum pro gente, sed ut filios Dei qui erant dispersi, congregaret in unum. Hoc Evangelista addidit: nam Caiphas de sola gente Judaeorum prophetavit, in qua erant oves de quibus ait ipse Dominus, Non sum missus nisi ad oves quae perierunt domus Israel . Sed noverat Evangelista esse alias oves, quae non erant de hoc ovili, quas oportebat adduci, ut esset unum ovile et unus pastor . Haec autem secundum praedestinationem dicta sunt: nam neque oves ejus, nec filii Dei adhuc erant, qui nondum crediderant.
49.28 PL 35, 1758
28. “Then, from that day forth, they took counsel together for to put Him to death. Jesus therefore walked no more openly among the Jews; but went thence unto a country near to the wilderness, into a city called Ephraim, and there continued with His disciples.” Not that there was any failure in His power, by which, had He only wished, He might have continued His intercourse with the Jews, and received no injury at their hands; but in His human weakness He furnished His disciples with an example of living, by which He might make it manifest that it was no sin in His believing ones, who are His members, to withdraw from the presence of their persecutors, and escape the fury of the wicked by concealment, rather than inflame it by showing themselves openly.
Ab illo ergo die cogitaverunt ut interficerent eum. Jesus ergo jam non palam ambulabat apud Judaeos, sed abiit in regionem juxta desertum, in civitatem quae dicitur Ephrem, et ibi morabatur cum discipulis suis. Non quia potentia ejus defecerat, in qua utique si vellet, et palam Judaeis conversaretur, et nihil ei facerent; sed in hominis infirmitate vivendi exemplum discipulis demonstrabat, in quo appareret non esse peccatum, si fideles ejus qui sunt membra ejus, oculis persequentium se subtraherent, et furorem sceleratorum latendo potius devitarent, quam se offerendo magis accenderent.