Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 44

sant'Agostino d'Ippona (354–430 d.C.) · In Joannis evangelium tractatus CXXIV · PL 35, 1379–1976

44.1 Chapter IX PL 35, 1713

1. We have just read the long lesson of the man born blind, whom the Lord Jesus restored to the light; but were we to attempt handling the whole of it, and considering, according to our ability, each passage in a way proportionate to its worth, the day would be insufficient. Wherefore I ask and warn your Charity not to require any words of ours on those passages whose meaning is manifest; for it would be too protracted to linger at each. I proceed, therefore, to set forth briefly the mystery of this blind man’s enlightenment. All, certainly, that was done by our Lord Jesus Christ, both works and words, are worthy of our astonishment and admiration: His works, because they are facts; His words, because they are signs. If we reflect, then, on what is signified by the deed here done, that blind man is the human race; for this blindness had place in the first man, through sin, from whom we all draw our origin, not only in respect of death, but also of unrighteousness. For if unbelief is blindness, and faith enlightenment, whom did Christ find a believer at His coming? seeing that the apostle, belonging himself to the family of the prophets, says: “And we also in times past were by nature the children of wrath, even as others.” If “children of wrath,” then children of vengeance, children of punishment, children of hell. For how is it “by nature,” save that through the first man sinning moral evil rooted itself in us as a nature? If evil has so taken root within us, every man is born mentally blind. For if he sees, he has no need of a guide. If he does need one to guide and enlighten him, then is he blind from his birth.

De homine quem Dominus Jesus illuminavit, qui caecus natus fuit, prolixa lectio recitata est: quam si universam pertractare conemur, pro sui dignitate, sicut valemus, singula considerantes, non sufficit dies. Proinde peto et admoneo Charitatem vestram, ut in iis quae aperta sunt, sermonem nostrum non requiratis: nam nimis longum erit in singulis immorari. Breviter ergo caeci hujus illuminati commendo mysterium. Ea quippe quae fecit Dominus noster Jesus Christus stupenda atque miranda, et opera et verba sunt: opera, quia facta sunt; verba, quia signa sunt. Si ergo quid significet hoc quod factum est cogitemus, genus humanum est iste caecus: haec enim caecitas contigit in primo homine per peccatum, de quo omnes originem duximus, non solum mortis, sed etiam iniquitatis. Si enim caecitas est infidelitas, et illuminatio fides; quem fidelem quando venit Christus invenit? Quandoquidem Apostolus natus in gente Prophetarum dicit: Fuimus et nos aliquando natura filii irae, sicut et caeteri . Si filii irae, filii vindictae, filii poenae, filii gehennae. Quomodo natura, nisi quia peccante primo homine, vitium pro natura inolevit? Si vitium pro natura inolevit, secundum mentem omnis homo caecus natus est. Si enim videt, non opus habet ductore; si opus habet ductore et illuminatore, caecus est ergo a nativitate.

44.2 PL 35, 1714

2. The Lord came: what did He do? He set forth a great mystery. “He spat on the ground,” He made clay of His spittle; for the Word was made flesh. “And He anointed the eyes of the blind man.” The anointing had taken place, and yet he saw not. He sent him to the pool which is called Siloam. But it was the evangelist’s concern to call our attention to the name of this pool; and he adds, “Which is interpreted, Sent.” You understand now who it is that was sent; for had He not been sent, none of us would have been set free from iniquity. Accordingly he washed his eyes in that pool which is interpreted, Sent—he was baptized in Christ. If, therefore, when He baptized him in a manner in Himself, He then enlightened him; when He anointed Him, perhaps He made him a catechumen. In many different ways indeed may the profound meaning of such a sacramental act be set forth and handled; but let this suffice your Charity. You have heard a great mystery. Ask a man, Are you a Christian? His answer to you is, I am not, if he is a pagan or a Jew. But if he says, I am; you inquire again of him, Are you a catechumen or a believer? If he reply, A catechumen; he has been anointed, but not yet washed. But how anointed? Inquire, and he will answer you. Inquire of him in whom he believes. In that very respect in which he is a catechumen he says, In Christ. See, I am speaking in a way both to the faithful and to catechumens. What have I said of the spittle and the clay? That the Word was made flesh. This even catechumens hear; but that to which they have been anointed is not all they need; let them hasten to the font if they are in search of enlightenment.

Venit Dominus: quid fecit? Magnum mysterium commendavit. Exspuit in terram, de saliva sua lutum fecit: quia Verbum caro factum est . Et inunxit oculos caeci. Inunctus erat, et nondum videbat. Misit illum ad piscinam quae vocatur Siloe. Pertinuit autem ad Evangelistam commendare nobis nomen hujus piscinae; et ait, Quod interpretatur Missus. Jam quis sit missus agnoscitis: nisi enim ille fuisset missus, nemo nostrum esset ab iniquitate dimissus. Lavit ergo oculos in ea piscina quae interpretatur Missus, baptizatus est in Christo. Si ergo quando eum in seipso quodammodo baptizavit, tunc illuminavit; quando inunxit, fortasse catechumenum fecit. Potest quidem aliter atque aliter tanti sacramenti exponi profunditas et pertractari: sed hoc sufficiat Charitati vestrae; audistis grande mysterium. Interroga hominem, Christianus es? Respondet tibi, Non sum, si Paganus est aut Judaeus. Si autem dixerit, Sum; adhuc quaeris ab eo, Catechumenus, an fidelis? Si responderit, Catechumenus; inunctus est, nondum lotus. Sed unde inunctus? Quaere, et respondet; quaere ab illo in quem credat: eo ipso quo catechumenus est, dicit, In Christum. Ecce modo loquor et fidelibus et catechumenis. Quid dixi de sputo et luto? Quia Verbum caro factum est. Hoc et catechumeni audiunt: sed non eis sufficit ad quod inuncti sunt; festinent ad lavacrum, si lumen inquirunt.

44.3 PL 35, 1714

3. And now, because of certain points in the lesson before us, let us run over the words of the Lord, and of the whole lesson itself rather than make them a theme of discourse. “As He passed out, He saw a man who was blind;” blind, not from any cause whatever, but “from his birth.” “And His disciples asked Him, Rabbi.” You know that “Rabbi” is Master. They called Him Master, because they desired to learn. The question, at all events, they proposed to the Lord as a master, “Who did sin, this man, or his parents, that he was born blind?” Jesus answered, “Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents,” that he was born blind. What is this that He has said? If no man is sinless, were the parents of this blind man without sin? Was he himself either born without original sin, or had he committed none in the course of his lifetime? Because his eyes were closed, had his lusts lost their wakefulness? How many evils are done by the blind? From what evil does an evil mind abstain, even though the eyes are closed? He could not see, but he knew how to think, and perchance to lust after something which his blindness hindered him from attaining, and so still in his heart to be judged by the searcher of hearts. If, then, both his parents had sin, and the man himself had sin, wherefore said the Lord, “Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents,” but only in respect to the point on which he was questioned, “that he was born blind”? For his parents had sin; but not by reason of the sin itself did it come about that he was born blind. If, then, it was not through the parents’ sin that he was born blind, why was he born blind? Listen to the Master as He teaches. He seeks one who believes, to give him understanding. He Himself tells us the reason why that man was born blind: “Neither hath this man sinned,” He says, “nor his parents: but that the works of God should be made manifest in him.”

Jam ergo propter quasdam in hac ipsa lectione quaestiones, verba Domini et ipsius universae lectionis percurramus potius quam tractemus. Exiens vidit hominem caecum: non utcumque caecum, sed, a nativitate. Et interrogaverunt eum discipuli ejus: Rabbi. Scitis Rabbi quia magister est. Magistrum appellabant, quia discere desiderabant: quaestionem quippe Domino proposuerunt tanquam magistro, Quis peccavit, hic, an parentes ejus, ut caecus nasceretur? Respondit Jesus: Neque hic peccavit, neque parentes ejus, ut caecus nasceretur. Quid est quod dixit? Si nullus homo sine peccato, numquid parentes hujus caeci sine peccato erant? Numquid ipse vel sine originali peccato natus erat, vel vivendo nihil addiderat? An quia oculos clausos habebat, concupiscentiae minime vigilabant? Quanta mala committunt caeci! A quo malo abstinet mens mala, etiam clausis oculis? Non poterat videre, sed noverat cogitare, et forte concupiscere aliquid quod caecus non posset implere, sed in corde judicari a cordis perscrutatore. Si ergo et parentes ejus habuerunt peccatum, et iste habuit peccatum; quare Dominus dixit, Neque hic peccavit, neque parentes ejus: nisi ad rem de qua interrogatus est, ut caecus nasceretur? Habebant enim peccatum parentes ejus, sed non ipso peccato factum est ut caecus nasceretur. Si ergo non peccato factum est parentum ut caecus nasceretur, quare caecus natus est? Audi magistrum docentem: quaerit credentem, ut faciat intelligentem. Ipse causam dicit quare ille caecus sit natus: Neque hic peccavit, inquit, neque parentes ejus: sed ut manifestentur opera Dei in illo.

44.4 PL 35, 1715

4. And then, what follows? “I must work the works of Him that sent me.” See, here is that sent one [Siloam], wherein the blind man washed his face. And see what He said: “I must work the works of Him that sent me, while it is day.” Recall to thy mind the way in which He gives universal glory to Him of whom He is: for that One has the Son who is of Him; He Himself has no One of whom He is. But wherefore, Lord, saidst Thou, “While it is day”? Hearken why He did so. “The night cometh when no man can work.” Not even Thou, Lord. Will that night have such power that not even Thou, whose work the night is, wilt be able to work therein? For I think, Lord Jesus, nay I do not think, but believe and hold it sure, that Thou wast there when God said, “Let there be light, and there was light.” For if He made it by the Word, He made it by Thee: and therefore it is said, “All things were made by Him; and without Him was nothing made.” “God divided between the light and the darkness: the light He called Day, and the darkness He called Night.”

Deinde quid sequitur? Me oportet operari opera ejus qui misit me. Ecce est ille missus in quo faciem lavit caecus. Et videte quid dixerit, Me oportet operari opera ejus qui misit me, donec dies est. Memento te quomodo universam gloriam illi dat de quo est: quia ille habet filium qui de illo sit, ipse non habet de quo sit. Sed quare dixisti, Domine, donec dies est? Audi quare. Venit nox quando nemo potest operari. Nec tu, Domine? Itane tantum valebit nox illa, ut nec tu possis in ea operari, cujus opus nox est? Puto enim, Domine Jesu, imo non puto, sed credo atque confirmo te ibi fuisse, quando dixit Deus, Fiat lux; et facta est lux . Si enim Verbo fecit, per te fecit: et ideo dictum est, Omnia per ipsum facta sunt, et sine ipso factum est nihil . Divisit Deus inter lucem et tenebras; lucem vocavit diem, et tenebras vocavit noctem .

44.5 PL 35, 1715

5. What is that night wherein, when it comes, no one shall be able to work? Hear what the day is, and then thou wilt understand what the night is. But how shall we hear what the day is? Let Himself tell us: “As long as I am in this world, I am the light of the world.” See, He Himself is the day. Let the blind man wash his eyes in the day, that he may behold the day. “As long,” He says, “as I am in the world, I am the light of the world.” Then will it be night of a kind unknown to me, when Christ will no longer be there; and so no one will be able to work. An inquiry remains, my brethren; patiently listen to me as I inquire. With you I inquire: With you shall I find Him to whom my inquiry is addressed. We are agreed; for it is expressly and definitely stated that the Lord proclaimed Himself in this place as the day, that is, the light of the world. “As long,” He says, “as I am in this world, I am the light of the world.” Therefore He Himself works. But how long is He in this world? Are we to think, brethren, that He was here then, and is here no longer? If we think so, then already, after the Lord’s ascension, did that fearful night begin, when no one can work. If that night began after the Lord’s ascension, how was it that the apostles wrought so much? Was that the night when the Holy Spirit came, and, filling all who were in one place, gave them the power of speaking in the tongues of every nation? Was it night when that lame man was made whole at the word of Peter, or rather, at the word of the Lord dwelling in Peter? Was it night when, as the disciples were passing by, the sick were laid in couches, that they might be touched at least by their shadow as they passed? Yet, when the Lord was here, there was no one made whole by His shadow as He passed; but He Himself had said to the disciples, “Greater things than these shall ye do.” Yes, the Lord had said, “Greater things than these shall ye do;” but let not flesh and blood exalt itself: let such hear Him also saying, “Without me ye can do nothing.”

Quae est illa nox, quae cum venerit, nemo poterit operari? Audi quid sit dies, et tunc intelliges quae sit nox. Unde sumus audituri quisnam sit dies iste? Ipse dicat: Quamdiu in hoc mundo sum, lux sum mundi. Ecce ipse est dies. Lavet oculos caecus in die, ut videat diem. Quamdiu, inquit, in mundo sum, lux sum mundi. Ergo nescio quae nox erit, quando ibi Christus non erit; ideo nemo poterit operari. Restat inquirere, fratres mei, patienter accipite inquirentem me: vobiscum quaero, vobiscum inveniam a quo quaero. Constat, expressum ac definitum est, diem commemorasse Dominum hoc loco seipsum, id est lumen mundi: Quamdiu, inquit, sum in hoc mundo, lux sum mundi. Ergo ipse operatur. Quamdiu est autem in hoc mundo? Putamus eum, fratres, fuisse hic tunc, et modo non hic esse? Si ergo hoc putamus, jam ergo post ascensum Domini facta est nox ista metuenda, ubi nemo possit operari: si post ascensum Domini facta est nox ista, unde Apostoli tanta operati sunt? Numquid ista nox erat, quando Spiritus sanctus veniens, et omnes qui in uno loco erant adimplens, dedit eis loqui omnium gentium linguis ? Numquid nox erat quando claudus ille ad verbum Petri salvus effectus est, imo ad verbum Domini habitantis in Petro ? Numquid nox erat quando transeuntibus discipulis aegri cum lectulis ponebantur, ut vel umbra transeuntium tangerentur ? Dominus autem cum hic esset, neminem transiens umbra sua salvum fecit: sed ipse discipulis dixerat, Majora horum facietis . Dixerat quidem Dominus, Majora horum facietis: sed non se extollat caro et sanguis; audiat dicentem, Sine me nihil potestis facere .

44.6 PL 35, 1715

6. What then? What shall we say of that night? When will it be, when no one shall be able to work? It will be that night of the wicked, that night of those to whom it shall be said in the end, “Depart into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels.” But it is here called night, not flame, nor fire. Hearken, then, why it is also night. Of a certain servant He says, “Bind ye him hand and foot, and cast him into outer darkness.” Let man, then, work while he liveth, that he may not be overtaken by that night when no man can work. It is now that faith is working by love; and if now we are working, then this is the day—Christ is here. Hear His promise, and think Him not absent. It is Himself who hath said, “Lo, I am with you.” How long? Let there be no anxiety in us who are alive; were it possible, with this very word we might place in perfect security the generations still to come. “Lo,” He says,” I am with you always, even to the end of the world.” That day, which is completed by the circuit of yonder sun, has but few hours; the day of Christ’s presence extends even to the end of the world. But after the resurrection of the living and the dead, when He shall say to those placed at His right hand, “Come, ye blessed of my Father, receive the kingdom;” and to those at His left, “Depart into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels;” then shall be the night when no man can work, but only get back what he has wrought before. There is a time for working, another for receiving; for the Lord shall render to every one according to his works. While thou livest, be doing, if thou art to be doing at all; for then shall come that appalling night, to envelope the wicked in its folds. But even now every unbeliever, when he dies, is received within that night: there is no work to be done there. In that night was the rich man burning, and asking a drop of water from the beggar’s finger; he mourned, agonized, confessed, but no relief was vouchsafed. He even endeavored to do good; for he said to Abraham, “Father Abraham, send Lazarus to my brethren, that he may tell them what is being done here, lest they also come into this place of torment.” Unhappy man! when thou wert living, then was the time for working: now thou art already in the night, in which no man can work.

Quid igitur? quid dicemus de nocte ista? Quando erit, quando nemo poterit operari? Nox ista impiorum erit: nox ista eorum erit quibus in fine dicetur, Ite in ignem aeternum, qui paratus est diabolo et angelis ejus. Sed nox dicta est, non flamma, non ignis. Audi quia et nox est. De quodam servo dicit, Ligate illi manus et pedes, et projicite eum in tenebras exteriores . Operetur ergo homo dum vivit, ne illa nocte praeveniatur, ubi nemo possit operari. Modo est ut operetur fides per dilectionem: et si modo operamur, hic est dies, hic est Christus. Audi promittentem, et ne arbitreris absentem. Ipse dixit, Ecce ego vobiscum sum. Quamdiu? Non sit in nobis sollicitudo qui vivimus: si fieri posset, de hac etiam voce posteros qui futuri sunt, securissimos faceremus. Ecce, inquit, ego vobiscum sum usque in consummationem saeculi . Dies iste qui circuitu solis hujus impletur, paucas horas habet, dies praesentiae Christi usque in consummationem saeculi extenditur. Post resurrectionem vero vivorum et mortuorum, cum positis ad dexteram dixerit, Venite, benedicti Patris mei, percipite regnum, positis autem ad sinistram dixerit, Ite in ignem aeternum, qui paratus est diabolo et angelis ejus : ibi erit nox ubi nemo potest operari, sed recipere quod operatus est. Aliud est tempus operationis, aliud receptionis: reddet enim Dominus unicuique secundum opera sua . Cum vivis, fac, si facturus es: erit enim tunc nox valida, quae involvat impios. Sed et modo omnis infidelis, quando moritur, illa nocte suscipitur: non est ut illic aliquid operetur. In illa nocte dives ardebat, et stillam aquae de digito pauperis requirebat: dolebat, angebatur, fatebatur, nec ei subveniebatur; et conatus est benefacere. Ait enim Abrahae: Pater Abraham, mitte Lazarum ad fratres meos, ut dicat illis quid hic agatur, ne et ipsi veniant in hunc locum tormentorum . O infelix! quando vivebas, tunc erat tempus operandi; modo jam in nocte es, in qua nemo possit operari.

44.7 PL 35, 1716

7. “When He had thus spoken, He spat on the ground, and made clay of the spittle, and He spread the clay upon his eyes, and said unto him, Go and wash in the pool of Siloam (which is, by interpretation, Sent). He went his way therefore, and washed, and came seeing.” As these words are clear, we may pass them over.

« Haec cum dixisset, exspuit in terram, et fecit lutum ex sputo, et linivit lutum super oculos ejus, et dixit ei: Vade, et lava in natatoria Siloe » (quod interpretatur Missus). « Abiit ergo, et lavit, et venit videns. » Haec quia manifesta sunt, transeamus.

44.8 PL 35, 1716

8. “The neighbors therefore, and those who saw him previously, for he was a beggar, said, Is not this he who sat and begged? Some said, It is he: others, No; but he is like him.” The opening of his eyes had altered his countenance. “He said, I am he.” His voice utters its gratitude, that it might not be condemned as ungrateful. “Therefore said they unto him, How were thine eyes opened? He answered, The man who is called Jesus made clay, and anointed mine eyes, and said unto me, Go to the pool of Siloam, and wash: and I went and washed, and saw.” See, he is become the herald of grace; see, he preaches the gospel; endowed with sight, he becomes a confessor. That blind man makes confession, and the heart of the wicked was troubled; for they had not in their heart what he had now in his countenance. “They said to him, Where is he who hath opened thine eyes? He said, I know not.” In these words the man’s own soul was like that of one only as yet anointed, but not yet seeing. Let us so put it, brethren, as if he had that anointing in his soul. He preaches, and knows not the Being whom he preaches.

« Itaque vicini, et qui videbant eum prius quia mendicus erat, dicebant: Nonne hic est qui sedebat, et mendicabat? Alii dicebant, Quia hic est: alii, Nequaquam, sed similis est ejus. » Aperti oculi vultum mutaverant. « Ille dicebat, Quia ego sum. » Vox grata, ne damnaretur ingrata. « Dicebant ergo ei: Quomodo aperti sunt oculi tui? Respondit: Ille homo qui dicitur Jesus, lutum fecit, et unxit oculos meos, et dixit mihi, Vade ad natatoriam Siloe, et lava. Et abii, et lavi, et vidi. » Ecce annuntiator factus est gratiae; ecce evangelizat, confitetur videns. Caecus ille confitebatur, et cor impiorum frangebatur; quia non habebant in corde, quod jam ille habebat in facie. Dixerunt ei: Ubi est ille qui tibi aperuit oculos? Ait: Nescio. In his verbis animus ipsius adhuc inuncto similis erat, nondum videnti. Sic ponamus, fratres, tanquam illam inunctionem in animo habuerit. Praedicat, et nescit quem praedicat.

44.9 PL 35, 1717

9. “They brought to the Pharisees him who had been blind. And it was the Sabbath when Jesus made the clay, and opened his eyes. Then again the Pharisees also asked how he had received his sight. And he said unto them, He put clay upon mine eyes, and I washed, and do see. Therefore said some of the Pharisees;” not all, but some; for some were already anointed. What then said those who neither saw nor were anointed? “This man is not of God, because he keepeth not the Sabbath.” He it was rather who kept it, who was without sin. For this is the spiritual Sabbath, to have no sin. In fact, brethren, it is of this that God admonishes us, when He commends the Sabbath to our notice: “Thou shalt do no servile work.” These are God’s words when commending the Sabbath, “Thou shalt do no servile work.” Now ask the former lessons, what is meant by servile work; and listen to the Lord: “Every one that committeth sin is the servant of sin.” But these men, neither seeing, as I said, nor anointed, kept the Sabbath carnally, and profaned it spiritually. “Others said, How can a man that is a sinner do such miracles?” These were the anointed ones. “And there was a division among them.” The day had divided between the light and the darkness. “They say then unto the blind man again, What sayest thou of him who hath opened thine eyes?” What is thy feeling about him? what is thine opinion? what is thy judgment? They sought how to revile the man, that he might be cast out of the synagogue, but be found by Christ. But he steadfastly expressed what he felt. For he said, “That he is a prophet.” As yet, indeed, anointed only in heart, he does not thus far confess the Son of God, and yet he speaks not untruthfully. For the Lord saith of Himself, “A prophet is not without honor, save in his own country.”

« Adducunt eum ad Pharisaeos, qui caecus fuerat. Erat autem sabbatum quando lutum fecit Jesus, et aperuit oculos ejus. Iterum ergo interrogabant eum Pharisaei quomodo vidisset. Ille autem dixit eis: Lutum posuit mihi super oculos, et lavi, et video. Dicebant ergo ex Pharisaeis quidam. » Non omnes, sed quidam: jam enim inungebantur quidam. Quid ergo dicebant, nec videntes, nec inuncti? Non est hic homo a Deo, qui sabbatum non custodit. Ipse potius custodiebat, qui sine peccato erat. Sabbatum enim spirituale hoc est, non habere peccatum. Denique, fratres, hoc admonet Deus, quando commendat sabbatum: Omne opus servile non facietis . Haec sunt verba Dei sabbatum commendantis: Omne opus servile non facietis. Jam superiores lectiones interrogate, quid sit opus servile ; et Dominum audite, Omnis qui facit peccatum, servus est peccati . Sed isti nec videntes, ut dixi, nec inuncti, sabbatum carnaliter observabant, spiritualiter violabant. Alii dicebant: Quomodo potest homo peccator haec signa facere? Ecce sunt inuncti. Et schisma erat in eis. Dies ille diviserat inter lucem et tenebras. Dicunt ergo caeco iterum: Tu quid dicis de eo qui aperuit oculos tuos? Quid de illo sentis? quid existimas? quid judicas? Quaerebant quemadmodum homini calumniarentur, ut de synagoga pelleretur, sed a Christo inveniretur. Sed ille constanter quod sentiebat expressit. Ait enim: Quia propheta est. Adhuc quidem inunctus in corde, nondum Dei Filium confitetur, nec mentitur tamen. Ipse enim Dominus de seipso ait: Non est propheta sine honore, nisi in patria sua .

44.10 PL 35, 1717

10. “Therefore the Jews did not believe concerning him, that he had been blind, and received his sight, till they called the parents of him that received his sight;” that is, who had been blind, and had come to the possession of sight. “And they asked them, saying, Is this your son, who ye say was born blind? how then doth he now see? His parents answered them, and said, We know that this is our son, and that he was born blind: but how he now seeth, we know not; or who hath opened his eyes, we know not. And they said, Ask himself; he is of age, let him speak of himself.” He is indeed our son, and we might justly be compelled to answer for him as an infant, because then he could not speak for himself: from of old he has had power of speech, only now he sees: we have been acquainted with him as blind from his birth, we know him as having speech from of old, only now do we see him endowed with sight: ask himself, that you may be instructed; why seek to calumniate us? “These words spake his parents, because they feared the Jews: for the Jews had conspired already, that if any man did confess that He was Christ, he should be put out of the synagogue.” It was no longer a bad thing to be put out of the synagogue. They cast out, but Christ received. “Therefore said his parents, He is of age, ask himself.”

« Non crediderunt ergo Judaei de illo quia caecus fuisset et vidisset, donec vocarent parentes ejus qui viderat: » id est, qui caecus fuerat, et viderat. « Et interrogaverunt eos, dicentes: Hic est filius vester, quem vos dicitis quia caecus natus est? quomodo ergo nunc videt? Responderunt eis parentes ejus, et dixerunt: Scimus quia hic est filius noster, et quia caecus natus est: quomodo autem nunc videat nescimus; aut quis ejus aperuit oculos, nos nescimus. Et dixerunt: Ipsum interrogate, aetatem habet, ipse de se loquatur. » Filius quidem noster est, sed juste cogeremur loqui pro infante, quia ipse pro se loqui non posset: olim loquitur, modo videt; caecum a nativitate novimus, loquentem olim scimus, videntem modo videmus: ipsum interrogate, ut instruamini; quid nobis calumniamini? Haec dixerunt parentes ejus, quia timebant Judaeos. Jam enim conspiraverant Judaei, ut si quis eum confiteretur Christum, extra synagogam fieret. Jam non erat malum fieri extra synagogam. Illi expellebant, sed Christus excipiebat. Propterea parentes ejus dixerunt, Quia aetatem habet, ipsum interrogate.

44.11 PL 35, 1717

11. “Then again called they the man who had been blind, and said unto him, Give God the glory.” What is that, “Give God the glory”? Deny what thou hast received. Such conduct is manifestly not to give God the glory, but rather to blaspheme Him. “Give God,” they say, “the glory: we know that this man is a sinner. Then said he, If he is a sinner, I know not: one thing I know, that whereas I was blind, now I see. Then said they to him, What did he to thee, how opened he thine eyes?” And he, indignant now at the hardness of the Jews, and as one brought from a state of blindness to sight, unable to endure the blind, “answered them, I have told you already, and ye have heard: wherefore would ye hear it again? Will ye also become his disciples?” What means, “Will ye also,” but that I am one already? “Will ye also be so?” Now I see, but see not askance.

Vocaverunt ergo rursum hominem qui fuerat caecus, et dixerunt ei: Da gloriam Deo. Quid est, Da gloriam Deo? Nega quod accepisti. Hoc plane non est gloriam Deo dare, sed Deum potius blasphemare Da, inquiunt, gloriam Deo. Nos scimus quia hic homo peccator est. Dixit ergo ille: Si peccator est, nescio; unum scio, quia caecus cum essem, modo video. Dixerunt ergo illi: Quid fecit tibi? quomodo aperuit tibi oculos? Et ille jam stomachans adversus duritiam Judaeorum, et ex caeco videns, non ferens caecos, respondit eis: Dixi jam vobis, et audistis; quid iterum vultis audire? Numquid et vos vultis discipuli ejus fieri? Quid est, Numquid et vos, nisi, quia ego jam sum? Numquid et vos vultis? Jam video, sed non invideo.

44.12 PL 35, 1718

12. “They cursed him, and said, Thou art his disciple.” Such a malediction be upon us, and upon our children! For a malediction it is, if thou layest open their heart, not if thou ponderest the words. “But we are Moses’ disciples. We know that God spake unto Moses: as for this fellow, we know not from whence he is.” Would ye had known that “God spake to Moses!” ye would have also known that God preached by Moses. For ye have the Lord saying, “Had ye believed Moses, ye would have also believed me; for he wrote of me.” Is it thus ye follow the servant, and turn your back against the Lord? But not even the servant do ye follow; for by him ye would be guided to the Lord.

Maledixerunt ei, et dixerunt: Tu discipulus ejus sis. Tale maledictum super nos, et super filios nostros. Maledictum enim est, si cor discutias, non si verba perpendas. Nos autem Moysi discipuli sumus: nos scimus quia Moysi locutus est Deus, istum autem nescimus unde sit. Utinam sciretis quia Moysi locutus est Deus; sciretis quia per Moysen praedicatus est Deus. Habetis enim Dominum dicentem, Si crederetis Moysi, crederetis et mihi; de me enim ille scripsit . Itane sequimini servum, et dorsum ponitis contra Dominum? Sed nec servum sequimini; nam per illum ad Dominum duceremini.

44.13 PL 35, 1718

13. “The man answered and said unto them, Herein is a marvellous thing, that ye know not from whence he is, and yet he hath opened mine eyes. Now we know that God heareth not sinners; but if any man is a worshipper of God, and doeth His will, him He heareth.” He speaks still as one only anointed. For God heareth even sinners. For if God heard not sinners, in vain would the publican, casting his eyes on the ground, and smiting on his breast, have said, “Lord, be merciful to me a sinner.” And that confession merited justification, as this blind man enlightenment. “Since the world began was it not heard that any man opened the eyes of one that was born blind. If this man were not of God, he could do nothing.” With frankness, constancy, and truthfulness [he spoke]. For these things that were done by the Lord, by whom were they done but by God? Or when would such things be done by disciples, were not the Lord dwelling in them?

Respondit ille homo, et dixit eis: In hoc mirabile est, quia vos nescitis unde sit, et aperuit oculos meos. Scimus autem quia peccatores Deus non audit; sed si quis Dei cultor est, et voluntatem ejus facit, hunc exaudit. Adhuc inunctus loquitur. Nam et peccatores exaudit Deus. Si enim peccatores Deus non exaudiret, frustra ille Publicanus oculos in terram demittens et pectus suum percutiens diceret, Domine, propitius esto mihi peccatori. Et ista confessio meruit justificationem, quomodo iste caecus illuminationem. A saeculo non est auditum quia aperuit quis oculos caeci nati. Nisi esset hic a Deo, non poterat facere quidquam. Libere, constanter, veraciter. Haec enim quae facta sunt a Domino, a quo fierent nisi a Deo? Aut quando a discipulis talia fierent, nisi in eis Dominus habitaret?

44.14 PL 35, 1718

14. “They answered and said unto him, Thou wast wholly born in sins.” What means this “wholly”? Even to blindness of the eyes. But He who has opened his eyes, also saves him wholly: He will grant a resurrection at His right hand, who gave enlight enment to his countenance. “Thou wast altogether born in sins, and dost thou teach us? And they cast him out.” They had made him their master; many questions had they asked for their own instruction, and they ungratefully cast forth their teacher.

Responderunt, et dixerunt ei: In peccatis natus es totus. Totus quid est? Cum oculis clausis. Sed qui aperuit oculos, salvat et totum: ipse dabit ad dexteram resurrectionem, qui in facie dedit illuminationem. In peccatis totus natus es, et tu doces nos? Et ejecerunt eum foras. Ipsi illum magistrum fecerunt, ipsi ut discerent toties interrogaverunt, et ingrati docentem projecerunt.

44.15 PL 35, 1718

15. But, as I have already said before, brethren, when they expel, the Lord receiveth; for the rather that he was expelled, was he made a Christian. “Jesus heard that they had cast him out; and when He had found him, He said unto him, Dost thou believe on the Son of God?” Now He washes the face of his heart. “He answered and said,” as one still only anointed, “Who is he, Lord, that I might believe on him? And Jesus said unto him, Thou hast both seen Him, and it is He that talketh with thee.” The One is He that is sent; the other is one washing his face in Siloam, which is interpreted, Sent. And now at last, with the face of his heart washed, and a conscience purified, acknowledging Him not only as the son of man, which he had believed before, but now as the Son of God, who had assumed our flesh, “he said, Lord, I believe.” It is but little to say, “I believe:” wouldst thou also see what he believes Him? “He fell down and worshipped Him.”

Sed quod dixi jam dudum, fratres, illi pellunt, excipit Dominus: magis enim quia expulsus est, christianus factus est. Audivit Jesus quia ejecerunt eum foras, et cum invenisset eum dixit ei: Tu credis in Filium Dei? Modo lavat faciem cordis. Respondit ille, et ait, quasi adhuc inunctus, Quis est, Domine, ut credam in eum? Et dixit ei Jesus: Et vidisti eum, et qui loquitur tecum, ipse est. Missus est ille, iste lavans faciem in Siloe, quod interpretatur Missus. Denique jam facie lota cordis et mundata conscientia, agnoscens eum non filium hominis tantum, quod ante crediderat, sed jam Filium Dei qui carnem susceperat, ait: Credo, Domine. Parum est, Credo; vis videre qualem credat? Procidens adoravit eum.

44.16 PL 35, 1719

16. “And Jesus said to him.” Now is He, the day, discerning between the light and the darkness. “For judgment am I come into this world; that they who see not might see, and they who see might be made blind.” What is this, Lord? A weighty subject of inquiry hast Thou laid on the weary; but revive our strength that we may be able to understand what Thou hast said. Thou art come “that they who see not may see:” rightly so, for Thou art the light: rightly so, for Thou art the day: rightly so, for Thou deliverest from darkness: this every soul accepts, every one understands. What is this that follows, “And those who see may be made blind?” Shall then, because Thou art come, those be made blind who saw? Hear what follows, and perhaps thou wilt understand.

Et dixit ei Jesus. Modo dies ille est, inter lucem et tenebras discernens. In judicium ego in hunc mundum veni, ut qui non vident, videant; et qui vident, caeci fiant. Quid est hoc, Domine? Magnam quaestionem fessis intulisti: sed erige vires nostras, ut possimus intelligere quod dixisti. Venisti ut qui non vident, videant: recte, quia lumen es; recte, quia dies es; recte, quia de tenebris liberas: hoc omnis anima accipit, omnis intelligit. Quid est hoc quod sequitur, Et qui vident, caeci fiant? Ergone quia venisti, caeci fient qui videbant? Audi quid sequitur, et fortassis intelliges.

44.17 PL 35, 1719

17. By these words, then, were “some of the Pharisees” disturbed, “and said unto Him, Are we blind also?” Hear now what it is that moved them, “And they who see may be made blind.” “Jesus said unto them, If ye were blind, ye should have no sin;” while blindness itself is sin. “If ye were blind,” that is, if ye considered yourselves blind, if ye called yourselves blind, ye also would have recourse to the physician: “if” then in this way “ye were blind, ye should have no sin;” for I am come to take away sin. “But now ye say, We see; [therefore] your sin remaineth.” Wherefore? Because by saying, “We see:” ye seek not the physician, ye remain in your blindness. This, then, is that which a little above we did not understand, when He said, “I am come, that they who see not may see;” for what means this, “that they who see not may see”? They who acknowledge that they do not see, and seek the physician, that they may receive sight. And “they who see may be made blind:” what means this, “they who see may be made blind”? That they who think they see, and seek not the physician, may abide in their blindness. Such discerning therefore of one from another He called judgment, when He said, “For judgment I am come into this world,” whereby He distinguishes the cause of those who believe and make confession from the proud, who think they see, and are therefore the more grievously blinded: just as the sinner, making confession, and seeking the physician, said to Him, “Judge me, O God, and discern my cause against the unholy nation,”—namely, those who say, “We see,” and their sin remaineth. But it was not that judgment He now brought into the world, whereby in the end of the world He shall judge the living and the dead. For in respect to this He had said, “I judge no man;” seeing that He came the first time, “not to judge the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.”

Commoti sunt ergo verbis istis quidam ex Pharisaeis, et dixerunt ei: Numquid et nos caeci sumus? Audi jam quid est quod movebat, Et qui vident, caeci fiant. Dixit eis Jesus: Si caeci essetis, non haberetis peccatum. Cum sit caecitas ipsa peccatum. Si caeci essetis, id est, si vos caecos adverteretis, si vos caecos diceretis, et ad medicum curreretis; si ergo ita caeci essetis, non haberetis peccatum: quia veni ego auferre peccatum. Nunc vero dicitis, Quia videmus: peccatum vestrum manet. Quare? Quia dicendo, Videmus, medicum non quaeritis, in caecitate vestra remanetis. Hoc est ergo quod paulo ante non intellexeramus quod ait, Ego veni, ut qui non vident, videant: quid est, ut qui non vident, videant? Qui se non videre confitentur, et medicum quaerunt, ut videant. Et qui vident, caeci fiant: quid est, qui vident, caeci fiant? Qui se patant videre, et medicum non quaerunt, in sua caecitate permaneant. Ergo istam discretionem vocavit judicium, cum ait, In judicium veni in hunc mundum, quo discernit causam credentium et confitentium a superbis, se videre putantibus, et ideo gravius excaecatis; tanquam dixerit ei peccator confitens et medicum quaerens, Judica me, Deus, et discerne causam meam de gente non sancta : illorum scilicet qui dicunt, Videmus, et eorum peccatum manet. Non autem illud judicium jam intulit mundo, quo de vivis et mortuis in fine saeculi judicabit. Secundum hoc enim dixerat, Ego non judico quemquam : quoniam prius venit, non ut judicet mundum, sed ut salvetur mundus per ipsum .

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Salva per dopo

Inserisci la tua email: ti invieremo un link per accedere. Nessuna password. Ciò che salvi (voci, versetti, capitoli, documenti) ti segue su ogni dispositivo.