MOLOCH

MOLOCH. – Name of a Semitic deity, from the common melekh, “king”; the Septuagint, by rendering II Reg. 23, 10.13 as ὁ Μολόχ, caused the current pronunciation, which never existed in living speech; the Masoretes vocalized Mólekh from the term bōšeth, “ignominy, infamous object”; one must adhere to the pronunciation melekh or to that of the Phoenicians, milk.

In the Old Testament M. is always associated with human sacrifices, particularly of children (Lev. 18, 21; 20, 2-5; I Reg. 11, 7; II Reg. 23, 10; Ier. 32, 35); they were slaughtered (Ez. 16, 21) and then placed upon a grate (tōpheth) to burn, according to the typical Hebrew expression: ha-ābhīr... bā'ēl lam-mōlekh (II Reg. 23, 10) or ha-ābhīr lam-mōlekh (Lev. 18, 21; Ier. 32, 35), or even without the name of the god M., which is understood (Deut. 18, 10; II Reg. 16, 3; 17, 17; 21, 6; Ier. 7, 31; 19, 5; Ez. 16, 21; 20, 26.31; 23, 37; etc.).

It is the Canaanite deity Milk, who appears in the theophoric names of the el-'Amārnah letters; human sacrifices were offered to him, as is attested by recent discoveries, especially at Gezer. Milk has been associated with Melkart (“Melek of the city”) of Tyre, and with Baal-Kammōn, a deity to whom the Phoenicians and Carthaginians, according to the classical authors, sacrificed human victims, especially children. Milk, the national god of the Ammonites, is the same name Milk with mimation.

Article illustration
(phot. Anderson) MULTIPLICATION OF THE LOAVES - Ivory panel of the cathedra of Maximian (346-36) - Ravenna, archbishopric.
The Mosaic law, with a severe prohibition, sought to preserve Israel from this horrible Canaanite worship (Lev. 18:21; 20:2; Deut. 12:31; 18:10); and the prophets (the passages cited from Jeremiah and Ezekiel) inveighed against the morbid deviation of popular religion, which in its syncretism practiced such abominations. The valley of Hinnom remained notoriously associated with this worship in Israel (v. GEHENNA).

Recently, O. Eissfeldt attempted to explain M. as a common noun, “a kind of sacrifice,” basing himself on three or four Punic inscriptions from the 3rd century A.D. (I). M. therefore would not be a divinity: in the Bible, the god to whom such a bloody sacrifice was offered is Yahweh. This attempt, exegetically untenable, was directly refuted, as regards the Old Testament, by Fr. A. Bea.

BIBL.: M.-J. Lagrange, Etudes sur les religions sémitiques, 2e ed., Paris 1905, pp. 99-109; H. Vincent, Canaan d'après l'exploration récente, there 1907, pp. 188-200; A. Lemonnier, Le culte des dieux étrangers en Israël. M., in Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques, 7 (1913), pp. 432-66; L. Desnoyers, Histoire du peuple hébreu, I, Paris 1922, pp. 183, 243 ff., 342-345; II, there 1930, p. 212 ff.; O. Eissfeldt, Molk als Opferbegriff im Punischen und Hebräischen und das Ende des Gottes M., Halle 1935; id., Molochs Glück und Ende, in Forschungen und Fortschritte, 11 (1935), p. 285 ff.; R. de Vaux, in Revue biblique, 45 (1936), pp. 278-82; A. Bea, Kinderopfer für M. oder für Jahweh?, in Biblica, 18 (1937), pp. 95-107; A. Clamer, Le Lévitique (La Ste Bible, ed. L. Pirot, 2), Paris 1940, p. 142 ff.; P. Spadafora, Ezechiele (La S. Bibbia, ed. S. Garofalo), Turin 1948, pp. 129 ff., 164 ff., 189. Francesco Spadafora
Cite this article

“MOLOCH.” Enciclopedia Cattolica, vol. VIII (1952), p. 743. Azione Romana digital edition, https://azioneromana.com/article/moloch.