Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 25
25.1 Chapter VI. 15–44 PL 35, 1596
1. Following upon yesterday’s lesson from the Gospel is that of to-day, upon which this day’s discourse is due to you. When that miracle was wrought, in which Jesus fed the five thousand with five loaves, and the multitudes marveled and said that He was a great prophet that came into the world, then follows this: “When Jesus therefore knew that they came to seize Him, and to make Him king, He escaped again unto the mountain alone.” It is therefore given to be understood that the Lord, when He sat on the mountain with His disciples, and saw the multitudes coming to Him, had descended from the mountain, and fed the multitudes on its lower parts. For how can it be that He should escape thither again, if He had not before descended from the mountain? There is something meant by the Lord’s descending from on high to feed the multitudes. He fed them, and ascended.
Hesternam ex Evangelio lectionem, ista est hodierna quae sequitur, unde hodiernus sermo debetur. Facto illo miraculo, ubi quinque millia hominum de quinque panibus pavit Jesus, cum admiratae essent turbae, et eum magnum Prophetam dicerent qui venit in mundum, sequitur hoc: Jesus ergo cum cognovisset quia venerant ut raperent eum, et facerent eum regem, fugit iterum in montem ipse solus. Datur ergo intelligi quod Dominus cum sederet in monte cum discipulis suis, et videret turbas ad se venientes, descenderat de monte, et circa inferiora loca turbas paverat. Nam quomodo fieri potest ut rursus illuc fugeret, nisi ante de monte descenderet? Significat ergo aliquid, quod Dominus de alto descendit ad pascendas turbas. Pavit, et ascendit.
25.2 PL 35, 1596
2. But why did He ascend after He knew that they wished to seize Him and make Him a king? How then; was He not a king, that He was afraid to be made a king? He was certainly not such a king as would be made by men, but such as would bestow a kingdom on men. May it not be that Jesus, whose deeds are words, does here, too, signify some thing to us? Therefore in this, that they wished to seize Him and make Him a king, and that for this He escapes to the mountain alone, is this action in His case silent; does it speak nothing, does it mean nothing? Or was this seizing of Him perhaps an intention to anticipate the time of His kingdom? For He had come now, not to reign immediately, as He is to reign in the sense in which we pray, Thy kingdom come. He ever reigns, indeed, with the Father, in that He is the Son of God, the Word of God, the Word by which all things were made. But the prophets foretold His kingdom according to that wherein He is Christ made man, and has made His faithful ones Christians. There will consequently be a kingdom of Christians, which at present is being gathered together, being prepared and purchased by the blood of Christ. His kingdom will at length be made manifest, when the glory of His saints shall be revealed, after the judgment is executed by Him, which judgment He Himself has said above is that which the Son of man shall execute. Of which kingdom also the apostle has said: “When He shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father.” In reference to which also Himself says: “Come, ye blessed of my Father, receive the kingdom which is prepared for you from the beginning of the world.” But the disciples and the multitudes that believed on Him thought that He had thus come immediately to reign; hence, they wished to seize Him and to make Him a king; they wished to anticipate the time which He hid with Himself, to make it known in due time, and in due time to declare it in the end of the world.
Quare autem ascendit, cum cognovisset quod eum vellent rapere et regem facere? Quid enim? non erat rex, qui timebat fieri rex? Erat omnino: nec talis rex qui ab hominibus fieret, sed talis qui hominibus regnum daret. Numquid forte et hic aliquid significat nobis Jesus, cujus facta verba sunt? Ergo in hoc quod voluerunt eum rapere et regem facere, et propter hoc fugit in montem ipse solus, hoc in illo factum tacet, nihil loquitur, nihil significat? An forte hoc erat rapere eum, praevenire velle tempus regni ejus? Etenim venerat modo, non jam regnare, quomodo regnaturus est in eo quod dicimus, Adveniat regnum tuum . Semper quidem ille cum Patre regnat secundum quod est Filius Dei, Verbum Dei, Verbum per quod facta sunt omnia. Praedixerunt autem Prophetae regnum ejus, etiam secundum id quod homo factus est Christus, et fecit fideles suos Christianos. Erit ergo regnum Christianorum quod modo colligitur, quod modo comparatur, quod modo emitur sanguine Christi: erit aliquando manifestum regnum ejus, quando aperta erit claritas sanctorum ejus post judicium ab eo factum; quod judicium supra ipse dixit quod filius hominis facturus sit . De quo regno etiam Apostolus dixit: Cum tradiderit regnum Deo et Patri . Unde etiam ipse ait: Venite, benedicti Patris mei, percipite regnum quod vobis paratum est ab initio mundi . Discipuli autem et turbae credentes in eum, putaverunt illum sic venisse ut jam regnaret: hoc est velle rapere et regem facere, praevenire velle tempus ejus, quod ipse apud se occultabat, ut opportune proderet, et opportune in fine saeculi declararet.
25.3 PL 35, 1597
3. That ye may know that they wished to make Him a king,—that is, to anticipate, and at once to have manifest the kingdom of Christ, whom it behoved first to be judged and then to judge,—when He was crucified, and they who hoped in Him had lost hope of His resurrection, having risen from the dead, He found two of them despairingly conversing together, and, with groaning, talking with one another of what had been done; and appearing to them as a stranger, while their eyes were held that He should not be recognized by them, He mixed with them as they held discourse: but they, narrating to Him the matter of their conversation, said that He was a prophet, mighty in deeds and in words, that had been slain by the chief priests; “And we,” say they, “did hope that it was He that should have redeemed Israel.” Rightly you hoped: a true thing you hoped for: in Him is the redemption of Israel. But why are ye in haste? Ye wish to seize it. The following, too, shows us that this was their feeling, that, when the disciples inquired of Him concerning the end, they said to Him, “Wilt Thou at this time be made manifest, and when will be the kingdom of Israel?” For they longed for it now, they wished it now; that is, they wished to seize Him, and to make Him king. But saith He to the disciples (for He had yet to ascend alone), “It is not for you to know the times or seasons which the Father hath put in His own power: but ye shall receive virtue from on high, the Holy Spirit coming upon you, and ye shall be witnesses to me in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and unto the ends of the earth.” You wish that I should manifest the kingdom now; let me first gather what I may manifest; you love elevation, and you shall obtain elevation, but follow me through humility. Thus it was also foretold of Him, “And the gathering of the peoples will surround Thee, and for this cause return Thou on high;” that is, that the gatherings of the peoples may surround Thee, that Thou mayest gather many together, return Thou on high. Thus He did; He fed men, and ascended.
Nam ut noveritis quia regem cum volebant facere, id est, antevenire, et jam habere manifestum Christi regnum, quem primo oportebat judicari, et deinde judicare: ubi crucifixus est, et illi qui in eum sperabant, spem resurrectionis ejus perdiderant, resurgens a mortuis invenit inde duos cum desperatione sibi sermocinantes, et cum gemitu quae gesta fuerant colloquentes; et apparens eis velut incognitus, cum oculi eorum tenerentur ne ab eis agnosceretur, sermonem tractantibus miscuit: at illi narrantes ei unde sermocinarentur, dixerunt quia ille magnus propheta in factis et dictis occisus esset a principibus sacerdotum; Et nos, inquiunt, sperabamus quia ipse esset redempturus Israel . Recte sperabatis, verum sperabatis: in illo est redemptio Israel. Sed quid festinatis? Rapere vultis. Illud etiam indicat nobis hunc sensum, quia cum ab eo quaererent discipuli de fine, dixerunt ei: Si hoc in tempore praesentaberis, et quando regnum Israel? Jam enim esse cupiebant, jam volebant; hoc est rapere velle, et regem facere. Sed ait discipulis, quia adhuc solus ascensurus erat: Non, inquit, est vestrum scire tempora vel momenta, quae Pater posuit in sua potestate: sed accipietis virtutem ex alto, Spiritum sanctum supervenientem in vos, et eritis mihi testes in Jerusalem, et in omni Judaea et Samaria, et usque in fines terrae . Vultis ut jam exhibeam regnum; prius colligam quod exhibeam: altitudinem amatis, et altitudinem adipiscemini; sed per humilitatem me sequimini. Sic de illo etiam praedictum est, Et congregatio populorum circumdabit te, et propter hanc in altum regredere ; id est, ut circumdet te congregatio populorum, ut multos colligas, regredere in altum. Sic fecit; pavit, et ascendit.
25.4 PL 35, 1598
4. But why is it said, He escaped? For He could not be held against His will, nor seized against His will, since He could not be recognized against His will. But that you may know that this was done mystically, not of necessity, but of express purpose, you will presently see in the following: that He appeared to the same multitudes that sought Him, said many things in speaking with them, and discoursed much about the bread of heaven; when discoursing about bread, was He not with the same people from whom He had escaped lest He should be held of them? Then, could He not have so acted at that time that He should not be seized by them, just as afterwards when He was speaking with them? Something, therefore, was meant by His escaping. What means, He escaped? His loftiness could not be understood. For of anything which thou hast not understood thou sayest, “It has escaped me.” Wherefore, “He escaped again unto the mountain alone,—the first-begotten from the dead, ascending above all heavens, and interceding for us.”
Quare autem dictum est, fugit? Neque enim vere si nollet teneretur, si nollet raperetur, qui si nollet nec agnosceretur. Nam ut noveritis hoc mystice factum, non ex necessitate, sed ex significante dispositione, modo in consequenti videbitis; quia eisdem turbis quae eum quaerebant apparuit, et cum eis loquens multa eis dixit, multa de pane coelesti disputavit: nonne cum ipsis de pane disputans erat, a quibus ne teneretur aufugerat? Non ergo et tunc poterat agere ut non ab eis comprehenderetur, quemadmodum postea quando cum eis loquebatur? Aliquid ergo significavit fugiendo. Quid est, fugit? Non potuit intelligi altitudo ejus. Quidquid enim non intellexeris, Fugit me, dicis. Ergo fugit iterum in montem ipse solus. Primogenitus a mortuis ascendens super omnes coelos, et interpellans pro nobis .
25.5 PL 35, 1598
5. Meanwhile, He, the one great High Priest being above (He who has entered into that within the veil, the people standing without; for Him that priest under the old law, who did this once a year, did signify): He then be ing above, what were the disciples enduring in the ship? For that ship prefigured the Church while He is on high. For if we do not, in the first place, understand this thing which that ship suffered respecting the Church, those incidents were not significant, but simply transient; but if we see the real meaning of those signs expressed in the Church, it is manifest that the actions of Christ are a kind of speeches. “But when it was late, saith he, His disciples went down to the sea; and when they had entered into a ship, they came over the sea to Capernaum.” He declared that as finished quickly, which was done afterwards,—“They came over the sea to Capernaum.” He returns to explain how they came; that they passed over by sailing across the lake. And whilst they were sailing to that place to which He has already said they had come, He explains by recapitulation what befell them. “It was now dark, and Jesus had not come to them.” Rightly he said “dark,” for the light had not come to them. “It was now dark, and Jesus had not come to them.” As the end of the world approaches, errors increase, terrors multiply, iniquity increases, infidelity increases; the light, in short, which, by the Evangelist John himself, is fully and clearly shown to be charity, so much so that he says, “Whoso hateth his brother is in darkness;” that light, I say, is very often extinguished; this darkness of enmity between brethren increases, daily increases, and Jesus is not yet come. How does it appear to increase? “Because iniquity will abound, and the love of many will begin to wax cold.” Darkness increases, and Jesus is not yet come. Darkness increasing, love waxing cold, iniquity abounding,—these are the waves that agitate the ship; the storms and the winds are the clamors of revilers. Thence love waxes cold; thence the waves do swell, and the ship is tossed.
Interea illo sursum posito solo sacerdote magno, : illo ergo sursum posito, discipuli in navicula quid patiebantur? Nam illo in altis constituto, navicula illa Ecclesiam praesignabat. Si non hoc primo in Ecclesia intelligimus, quod illa navicula patiebatur; non erant illa significantia, sed simpliciter transeuntia: si autem videmus exprimi in Ecclesia veritatem illarum significationum; manifestum est quia facta Christi genera sunt locutionum. Ut autem sero factum est, inquit, descenderunt discipuli ejus ad mare: et cum ascendissent naviculam, venerunt trans mare in Capharnaum. Cito dixit finitum quod postea factum est. Venerunt trans mare in Capharnaum. Et redit, ut exponat quomodo venerunt, quia per stagnum navigantes transierunt. Et dum navigarent ad eum locum quo eos venisse jam dixit, recapitulando exponit quid acciderit: Tenebrae jam factae erant, et non venerat ad eos Jesus. Merito tenebrae, quia lux non venerat: Tenebrae jam factae erant, et non venerat ad eos Jesus. Quantum accedit finis mundi, crescunt errores, crebrescunt terrores, crescit iniquitas, crescit infidelitas: lux denique quae charitas apud Joannem ipsum evangelistam satis aperteque demonstratur, ita ut diceret, Qui odit fratrem suum, in tenebris est , creberrime exstinguitur: crescunt istae tenebrae odiorum fraternorum, quotidie crescunt; et nondum venit Jesus. Unde apparet quia crescunt? Quoniam abundabit iniquitas, refrigescet charitas multorum. Crescunt tenebrae, et nondum venit Jesus. Crescentibus tenebris, refrigescente charitate, abundante iniquitate, ipsi sunt fluctus navem turbantes: tempestates et venti, clamores sunt maledicorum. Inde charitas refrigescit, inde fluctus augentur, et turbatur navis.
25.6 PL 35, 1599
6. “And a great wind blowing, the sea rose.” Darkness was increasing, discernment was diminishing, iniquity was growing. “When, therefore, they had rowed about twenty-five or thirty furlongs.” Meanwhile they struggled onward, kept advancing; nor did those winds and storms, and waves and darkness effect either that the ship should not make way, or that it should break in pieces and founder; but amid all these evils it went on. For, notwithstanding iniquity abounds, and the love of many waxes cold, and the waves do swell, the darkness grows and the wind rages, yet the ship is moving forward; “for he that perseveres to the end, the same shall be saved.” Nor is that number of furlongs to be lightly regarded. For it cannot really be that nothing is meant, when it is said that, “when they had rowed twenty-five or thirty furlongs, Jesus came to them.” It were enough to say, “twenty-five,” so likewise “thirty;” especially as it was an estimate, not an assertion of the narrator. Could the truth be aught endangered by a mere estimate, if he had said nearly thirty furlongs, or nearly twenty-five furlongs? But from twenty-five he made thirty. Let us examine the number twenty-five. Of what does it consist? of what is it made up? Of the quinary, or number five. That number five pertains to the law. The same are the five books of Moses, the same are those five porches containing the sick folk, the same are the five loaves feeding the five thousand men. Accordingly the number twenty-five signifies the law, because five by five—that is, five times five—make twenty-five, or the number five squared. But this law lacked perfection before the gospel came. Moreover, perfection is comprised in the number six. Therefore in six days God finished, or perfected, the world, and the same five are multiplied by six, that the law may be completed by the gospel, that six times five become thirty. To them that fulfill the law, therefore, Jesus comes. And how does He come? Walking upon the waves, keeping all the swellings of the world under His feet, pressing down all its heights. Thus it goes on, so long as time endures, so long as the ages roll. Tribulations increase, calamities increase, sorrows increase, all these swell and mount up: Jesus passeth on treading upon the waves.
Vento magno flante mare exsurgebat. Tenebrae crescebant, intelligentia minuebatur, iniquitas augebatur. Cum remigassent ergo quasi stadia viginti quinque aut triginta. Interea ambulabant, promovebant, nec venti illi et tempestates et fluctus et tenebrae id agebant, ut vel navis non promoveretur, vel soluta mergeretur: sed inter illa omnia mala ibat. Etenim quia abundavit iniquitas, et refrigescit charitas multorum, crescunt fluctus, augentur tenebrae, saevit ventus: sed tamen navis ambulat. Qui enim perseveraverit usque in finem, hic salvus erit . Nec ipse stadiorum numerus contemnendus est. Neque enim vere posset nihil significare quod dictum est, Cum remigassent stadia viginti quinque aut triginta, tunc ad eos venit Jesus. Sufficeret viginti quinque, sufficeret triginta, maxime quia aestimantis erat, non affirmantis. Numquid periclitaretur veritas in aestimante, si diceret stadia ferme triginta, aut stadia ferme viginti quinque? Sed ex viginti quinque fecit triginta. Quaeramus numerum vigesimum quintum. Unde constat, unde fit? De quinario. Quinarius ille numerus ad Legem pertinet. Ipsi sunt quinque libri Moysi, ipsae sunt quinque porticus illae languidos continentes, ipsi quinque panes quinque millia hominum pascentes. Ergo Legem significat numerus vigesimus quintus: quoniam quinque per quinque, id est, quinquies quini, faciunt viginti quinque, quadratum quinarium. Sed huic Legi antequam Evangelium veniret, deerat perfectio. Perfectio autem in senario numero comprehenditur. Propterea sex diebus Deus mundum perfecit , et quinque ipsa per sex multiplicantur, ut Lex per Evangelium adimpleatur, ut fiant sexies quini triginta. Ad eos ergo qui implent Legem, venit Jesus. Et venit, quomodo? Calcans fluctus; omnes tumores mundi sub pedibus habens, omnes celsitudines saeculi premens. Hoc agitur quantum additur tempori, et quantum accedit aetas saeculi. Augentur in isto mundo tribulationes, augentur mala, augentur contritiones, exaggerantur haec omnia: Jesus transit, calcans fluctus.
25.7 PL 35, 1599
7. And yet so great are the tribulations, that even they who have trusted in Jesus, and who strive to persevere unto the end, greatly fear lest they fail; while Christ is treading the waves, and trampling down the world’s ambitions and heights, the Christian is sorely afraid. Were not these things foretold him? Justly “they were afraid,” too, at seeing Jesus walking on the waves; like as Christians, though having hope in the world to come, are frequently disquieted at the crash of human affairs, when they see the loftiness of this world trampled down. They open the Gospel, they open the Scriptures, and they find all these things there foretold; that this is the Lord’s doing. He tramples down the heights of the world, that He may be glorified by the humble. Concerning whose loftiness it is foretold: “Thou shalt destroy strongest cities,” and “the spears of the enemy have come to an end, and Thou hast destroyed cities.” Why then are ye afraid, O Christians? Christ speaks: “It is I; be not afraid.” Why are ye alarmed at these things? Why are ye afraid? I have foretold these things, I do them, they must necessarily be done. “It is I; be not afraid. Therefore they would receive Him into the ship.” Recognizing Him and rejoicing, they are freed from their fears. “And immediately the ship was at the land to which they went.” There is an end made at the land; from the watery to the solid, from the agitated to the firm, from the way to the goal.
Et tamen tantae sunt tribulationes, ut etiam ipsi qui crediderunt in Jesum, et qui conantur perseverare usque in finem, expavescant ne deficiant: Christo fluctus calcante, saeculi ambitiones et altitudines deprimente, expavescit christianus. Nonne haec illi praedicta sunt? Merito et Jesu in fluctibus ambulante, timuerunt: quomodo Christiani quamvis habentes spem in futuro saeculo, quando viderint deprimi altitudinem saeculi hujus, plerumque conturbantur de contritione rerum humanarum. Aperiunt Evangelium, aperiunt Scripturas; et inveniunt ibi ista omnia praedicta; quia hoc Dominus facit. Deprimit celsitudines saeculi, ut ab humilibus glorificetur. De quorum altitudine praedictum est, Civitates firmissimas destrues; et, Inimici defecerunt frameae in finem, et civitates destruxisti . Quid ergo timetis, Christiani? Christus loquitur: Ego sum, nolite timere. Quid haec expavescitis? Quid timetis? Ego ista praedixi, ego facio, necesse est ut fiant. Ego sum, nolite timere. Voluerunt ergo eum accipere in navim, agnoscentes ac gaudentes, securi facti. Et statim fuit navis ad terram in quam ibant. Factus est finis ad terram: de humido ad solidum, de turbato ad firmum, de itinere ad finem.
25.8 PL 35, 1600
8. “On the next day the multitude that stood on the other side of the sea,” whence the disciples had come, “saw that there was none other boat there, save that one whereinto His disciples were entered, and that Jesus went not with His disciples into the boat, but that His disciples were gone away alone; but there came other boats from Tiberias, nigh unto the place where they did eat bread, giving thanks to the Lord: when, therefore, the multitudes saw that Jesus was not there, nor His disciples, they also took shipping, and came to Capernaum seeking Jesus.” Yet they got some knowledge of so great a miracle. For they saw that the disciples had gone into the ship alone, and that there was not another ship there. But there came boats also from near to that place where they did eat bread; in these the multitudes followed Him. He had not then embarked with His disciples, and there was not another ship there. How, then, was Jesus on a sudden beyond the sea, unless that He walked upon the sea to show a miracle?
Altera die turba quae stabat trans mare, unde illi venerant, vidit quia navicula non erat ibi nisi una, et quia non introisset cum discipulis suis in navem, sed soli discipuli ejus abiissent: aliae vero supervenerunt naves a Tiberiade, juxta locum ubi manducaverunt panem, gratias agentes Domino. Cum ergo vidissent turbae quia Jesus non esset ibi, neque discipuli ejus, ascenderunt in naviculas, et venerunt Capharnaum quaerentes Jesum. Insinuatum tamen est illis tam magnum miraculum. Viderunt enim quod discipuli soli ascendissent in navem, et quia alia navis non ibi erat. Venerunt autem inde et naves juxta locum illum ubi manducaverunt panem, in quibus eum turbae secutae sunt. Cum discipulis ergo non ascenderat, alia navis illic non erat: unde subito trans mare factus est Jesus, nisi quia super mare ambulavit, ut miraculum monstraret?
25.9 PL 35, 1600
9. “And when the multitudes had found Him.” Behold, He presents Himself to the people from whom He had escaped into the mountain, afraid that He should be taken of them by force. In every way He proves to us and gives us to know that all these things are said in a mystery, and done in a great sacrament (or mystery) to signify something important. Behold, that is He who had escaped the crowds unto the mountain; is He not speaking with the same crowds? Let them hold Him now; let them now make Him a king. “And when they had found Him on the other side of the sea, they said unto Him, Rabbi, when camest Thou hither?”
Et cum invenissent eum turbae. Ecce praesentat se turbis, a quibus se rapi timuerat, et in montem fugerat. Omnino confirmat et insinuat nobis in mysterio dicta esse illa omnia; et facta in magno sacramento, ut aliquid significarent. Ecce est ille qui in montem fugerat turbas: nonne cum ipsis turbis loquitur? Modo teneant, modo regem faciant. Et cum invenissent eum trans mare, dixerunt ei: Rabbi, quando huc venisti?
25.10 PL 35, 1600
10. After the sacrament of the miracle, He introduces discourse, that, if possible, they who have been fed may be further fed, that He may with discourse fill their minds, whose bellies He filled with the loaves, provided they take in. And if they do not, let that be taken up which they do not receive, that the fragments may not be lost. Wherefore let Him speak, and let us hear. “Jesus answered and said Verily, verily, I say unto you, ye seek me, not because ye saw the signs, but because ye have eaten of my loaves.” Ye seek me for the sake of the flesh not for the sake of the spirit. How many seek Jesus for no other object but that He may bestow on them a temporal benefit! One has a business on hand, he seeks the intercession of the clergy; another is oppressed by one more powerful than himself, he flies to the church. Another desires intervention in his behalf with one with whom he has little influence. One in this way, one in that, the church is daily filled with such people. Jesus is scarcely sought after for Jesus’ sake. “Ye seek me, not because ye have seen the signs, but because ye have eaten of my loaves. Labor not for the meat which perisheth, but for that which endureth unto eternal life.” Ye seek me for something else, seek me for my own sake. For He insinuates the truth, that Himself is that meat: this shines out clearly in the sequel. “Which the Son of man will give you.” Thou didst expect, I believe, again to eat bread, again to sit down, again to be gorged. But He had said, “Not the meat which perisheth, but that which endureth unto eternal life,” in the same manner as it was said to that Samaritan woman: “If thou knewest who it is that asketh of thee drink, thou wouldest perhaps have asked of Him, and He would give thee living water.” When she said, “Whence hast thou, since thou hast nothing to draw with, and the well is deep?” He answered the Samaritan woman: “If thou knewest who it is that asketh of thee drink, thou wouldst have asked of Him, and He would give thee water, whereof whoso drinketh shall thirst no more; for whoso drinketh of this water shall thirst again.” And she was glad and would receive, as if no more to suffer thirst of body, being wearied with the labor of drawing water. And so, during a conversation of this kind, He comes to spiritual drink. Entirely in this manner also here.
Ille post miraculi sacramentum, et sermonem infert, ut si fieri potest, qui pasti sunt, pascantur, et quorum satiavit panibus ventres, satiet et sermonibus mentes; sed si capiunt. Et si non capiunt, sumatur quod non capiunt, ne fragmenta pereant. Loquatur ergo, et audiamus. Respondit Jesus, et dixit: Amen, amen dico vobis, quaeritis me, non quia vidistis signa, sed quia manducastis ex panibus meis. Propter carnem me quaeritis, non propter spiritum. Quam multi non quaerunt Jesum, nisi ut illis faciat bene secundum tempus! Alius negotium habet, quaerit intercessionem clericorum; alius premitur a potentiore, fugit ad ecclesiam; alius pro se vult interveniri apud eum apud quem parum valet: ille sic, ille sic; impletur quotidie talibus ecclesia. Vix quaeritur Jesus propter Jesum. Quaeritis me, non quia vidistis signa, sed quia manducastis ex panibus meis. Operamini non cibum qui perit, sed qui permanet in vitam aeternam. Quaeritis me propter aliud, quaerite me propter me. Seipsum enim insinuat istum cibum, quod in consequentibus illucescit. Quem Filius hominis dabit vobis. Exspectabas, credo, iterum panes manducare, iterum discumbere, iterum saginari. Sed dixerat cibum non qui perit, sed qui permanet in vitam aeternam: quomodo dictum fuerat mulieri illi Samaritanae, Si scires qui petit a te bibere, tu forsitan postulasses ab eo, et daret tibi aquam vivam: cum illa diceret, Unde tibi, quandoquidem non habes hauritorium, et puteus altus est? Samaritanae respondit: Si scires qui a te petit bibere, tu petisses ab eo, et daret tibi aquam, unde qui biberit, amplius non sitiet: nam de hac aqua qui biberit, sitiet iterum. Et gavisa est illa, et voluit accipere, quasi non passura sitim corporis, quae labore hauriendi fatigabatur; et sic inter hujusmodi sermocinationes pervenit ad potum spiritualem : omnino isto modo et hic.
25.11 PL 35, 1601
11. Therefore “this meat, not that which perisheth, but that which endureth unto everlasting life, which the Son of man shall give unto you; for Him hath God the Father sealed.” Do not take this Son of man as you take other sons of men, of whom it is said, “And the sons of men will trust in the protection of Thy wings.” This Son of man is separated by a certain grace of the spirit; Son of man according to the flesh, taken out from the number of men: He is the Son of man. This Son of man is also the Son of God; this man is even God. In another place, when questioning His disciples, He saith: “Whom do men say that I, the Son of man, am? And they answered, Some John, some Elias, some Jeremias, or one of the prophets. And He said unto them, But whom say ye that I am? Peter answered, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.” He declared Himself Son of man, Peter declared Him the Son of the living God. Most fitly did He mention that which in mercy He had manifested Himself to be; most fitly did the other mention that which He continues to be in glory. The Word of God commends to our attention His own humility: the man acknowledged the glory of his Lord. And indeed, brethren, I think that this is just. He humbled Himself for us, let us glorify Him. For not for Himself is He Son of man, but for us. Therefore was He Son of man in that way, when “the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us.” For to that end “God the Father sealed Him.” What is to seal, but to put some particular mark? To seal is to impress some mark which cannot be confounded with the rest. To seal is to put a mark on a thing. When thou puttest a mark on anything, thou doest so lest it might be confused with other things, and thou shouldst not be able to recognize it. “The Father,” then, “hath sealed Him.” What is that, “hath sealed”? Bestowed on Him something peculiar, which puts Him out of comparison with all other men. For that reason it is said of Him, “God, even Thy God, hath anointed Thee with the oil of gladness above Thy fellows.” What is it then to seal, but to have Him excepted? This is the import of “above Thy fellows.” And so, do not, saith He, despise me because I am the Son of man, but seek from me, “not the meat that perisheth, but that which endureth to eternal life.” For I am the Son of man in such manner as not to be one of you: I am Son of man in such manner that God the Father sealed me. What does that mean, He “sealed me”? Gave me something peculiarly my own, that I should not be confounded with mankind, but that mankind should be delivered by me.
Hunc ergo cibum, non qui perit, sed qui permanet in vitam aeternam, quem Filius hominis dabit vobis: hunc enim Pater signavit Deus. Istum filium hominis nolite sic accipere, quasi alios filios hominum, de quibus dictum est, Filii autem hominum in protectione alarum tuarum sperabunt . Iste filius hominis sequestratus quadam gratia Spiritus, et secundum carnem filius hominis, exceptus a numero hominum; filius hominis est. Iste filius hominis et Filius Dei est, iste homo etiam Deus est. Alio loco interrogans discipulos ait: Quem me dicunt esse homines Filium hominis? Et illi: Alii Joannem, alii Eliam, alii Jeremiam, aut unum ex Prophetis. Et ille: Vos vero quem me dicitis esse? Respondit Petrus: Tu es Christus Filius Dei vivi . Ille dixit se Filium hominis, et Petrus eum dixit Filium Dei vivi. Optime ille commemorabat quod misericorditer exhibuerat: ille commemorabat quod in claritate permanebat. Verbum Dei commendat humilitatem suam, homo agnoscit claritatem Domini sui. Et revera, fratres, puto quia justum est; humiliavit se propter nos, glorificemus illum nos: non enim filius hominis propter se est, sed propter nos. Ergo erat filius hominis illo modo, cum Verbum caro factum est, et habitavit in nobis . Ideo enim hunc Deus Pater signavit. Signare quid est, nisi proprium aliquid ponere? Hoc est enim signare, imponere aliquid quod non confundatur cum caeteris. Signare, est signum rei ponere. Cuicumque rei ponis signum, ideo ponis signum, ne confusa cum aliis, a te non possit agnosci. Pater ergo eum signavit. Quid est, signavit? Proprium quiddam illi dedit, ne caeteris comparetur hominibus. Ideo de illo dictum est, Unxit te, Deus, Deus tuus oleo exsultationis, prae participibus tuis . Ergo signare quid est? Exceptum habere: hoc est, prae participibus tuis. Itaque nolite, inquit, me contemnere, quia filius sum hominis; et quaerite a me cibum non qui perit, sed qui permanet in vitam aeternam. Sic enim filius hominis sum, ut non sim unus ex vobis: sic sum filius hominis, ut Pater Deus me signaret. Quid est, signaret? Proprium aliquid mihi daret, quo non confunderer cum genere humano, sed per me liberaretur genus humanum.
25.12 PL 35, 1601
12. “They said therefore unto Him, What shall we do, that we may work the works of God?” For He had said to them, “Labor not for the meat which perisheth, but for that which endureth unto eternal life.” “What shall we do?” they ask; by observing what, shall we be able to fulfill this precept? “Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on Him whom He has sent.” This is then to eat the meat, not that which perisheth, but that which endureth unto eternal life. To what purpose dost thou make ready teeth and stomach? Believe, and thou hast eaten already. Faith is indeed distinguished from works, even as the apostle says, “that a man is justified by faith without the works of the law:” there are works which appear good, without faith in Christ; but they are not good, because they are not referred to that end in which works are good; “for Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.” For that reason, He willeth not to distinguish faith from work, but declared faith itself to be work. For it is that same faith that worketh by love. Nor did He say, This is your work; but, “This is the work of God, that ye believe on Him whom He has sent;” so that he who glories, may glory in the Lord. And because He invited them to faith, they, on the other hand, were still asking for signs by which they might believe. See if the Jews do not ask for signs. “They said therefore unto Him, What sign doest thou, that we may see and believe thee? what dost thou work?” Was it a trifle that they were fed with five loaves? They knew this indeed, but they preferred manna from heaven to this food. But the Lord Jesus declared Himself to be such an one, that He was superior to Moses. For Moses dared not say of himself that ge gave, “not the meat which perisheth, but that which endureth to eternal life.” Jesus promised something greater than Moses gave. By Moses indeed was promised a kingdom, and a land flowing with milk and honey, temporal peace, abundance of children, health of body, and all other things, temporal goods indeed, yet in figure spiritual; because in the Old Testament they were promised to the old man. They considered therefore the things promised by Moses, and they considered the things promised by Christ. The former promised a full belly on the earth, but of the meat which perisheth; the latter promised, “not the meat which perisheth, but that which endureth unto eternal life.” They gave attention to Him that promised the more, but just as if they did not yet see Him do greater things. They considered therefore what sort of works Moses had done, and they wished yet some greater works to be done by Him who promised them such great things. What, say they, doest thou, that we may believe thee? And that thou mayest know that they compared those former miracles with this and so judged these miracles which Jesus did as being less; “Our fathers,” say they, “did eat manna in the wilderness.” But what is manna? Perhaps ye despise it. “As it is written, He gave them manna to eat.” By Moses our fathers received bread from heaven, and Moses did not say to them, “Labor for the meat which perisheth not.” Thou promisest “meat which perisheth not, but which endureth to eternal life;” and yet thou workest not such works as Moses did. He gave, not barley loaves, but manna from heaven.
Dixerunt ergo ad eum: Quid faciemus ut operemur opera Dei? Dixerat enim illis, Operamini escam, non quae perit, sed quae permanet in vitam aeternam. Quid faciemus, inquiunt? quid observando, hoc praeceptum implere poterimus? Respondit Jesus, et dixit eis: Hoc est opus Dei, ut credatis in eum quem misit ille. Hoc est ergo manducare cibum non qui perit, sed qui permanet in vitam aeternam. Utquid paras dentes et ventrem? crede, et manducasti. Discernitur quidem ab operibus fides, sicut Apostolus dicit, justificari hominem per fidem sine operibus Legis : et sunt opera quae videntur bona, sine fide Christi; et non sunt bona, quia non referuntur ad eum finem ex quo sunt bona: Finis enim Legis Christus, ad justitiam omni credenti . Ideo noluit discernere ab opere fidem, sed ipsam fidem dixit esse opus. Ipsa est enim fides quae per dilectionem operatur . Nec dixit, Hoc est opus vestrum; sed, Hoc est opus Dei, ut credatis in eum quem misit ille: ut qui gloriatur, in Domino glorietur . Quia ergo invitabat eos ad fidem, illi adhuc quaerebant signa quibus crederent. Vide si non Judaei signa petunt. Dixerunt ergo ei, Quod ergo tu facis signum, ut videamus et credamus tibi? quid operaris? Parumne erat quod de quinque panibus pasti sunt? Sciebant hoc quidem, sed huic cibo manna de coelo praeferebant. Dominus autem Jesus talem se dicebat, ut Moysi praeponeret. Non enim ausus est Moyses de se dicere quod daret cibum non qui perit, sed qui permanet in vitam aeternam. Aliquid plus iste promittebat quam Moyses. Per Moysen quippe promittebatur regnum, et terra fluens lac et mel, temporalis pax, abundantia filiorum, salus corporis, et caetera omnia, temporalia quidem, in figura tamen spiritualia: quia veteri homini in Vetere Testamento promittebantur. Attendebant ergo promissa per Moysen, et attendebant promissa per Christum. Ille plenum ventrem promittebat in terra, sed cibo qui perit: iste promittebat cibum non qui perit, sed qui permanet in aeternum. Attendebant eum plus promittentem, et quasi nondum videbant majora facientem. Attendebant itaque qualia fecisset Moyses, et adhuc aliqua majora volebant fieri ab eo qui tam magna pollicebatur. Quid, inquiunt, facis, ut credamus tibi? Et ut noveris quia miracula illa huic miraculo comparabant, et ideo quasi minora ista judicabant quae faciebat Jesus: Patres, inquiunt, nostri manna manducaverunt in deserto. Sed quid est manna? Forte contemnitis. Sicut scriptum est, Dedit illis manna manducare. Per Moysen patres nostri panem de coelo acceperunt, et non eis dictum est a Moyse, Operamini cibum non qui perit. Tu promittis cibum non qui perit, sed qui permanet in vitam aeternam, et non talia opera operaris qualia Moyses. Panes hordeaceos ille non dedit, sed dedit manna de coelo.
25.13 PL 35, 1602
13. “Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, not Moses gave you bread from heaven, but my Father gave you bread from heaven. For the true bread is He that cometh down from heaven, and giveth life to the world.” The true bread then is He that giveth life to the world; and the same is the meat of which I have spoken a little before,—“Labor not for the meat which perisheth, but for that which endureth unto eternal life.” Therefore, both that manna signified this meat, and all those signs were signs of me. Ye have longed for signs of me; do ye despise Him that was signified? Not Moses then gave bread from heaven: God gives bread. But what bread? Manna, perhaps? No, but the bread which manna signified, namely, the Lord Jesus Himself. My Father giveth you the true bread. “For the bread of God is He that cometh down from heaven, and giveth life to the world. Then said they unto Him, Lord, evermore give us this bread.” Like that Samaritan woman, to whom it was said, “Whoso drinketh of this water shall never thirst.” She, immediately understanding it in reference to the body, and wishing to be rid of want, said, “Give me, O Lord, of this water;” in the same manner also these said, “O Lord, give us this bread;” which may refresh us, and yet not fail.
Dixit ergo eis Jesus: Amen, amen dico vobis, non Moyses dedit vobis panem de coelo, sed Pater meus dedit vobis panem de coelo, sed Pater meus dedit vobis panem de coelo. Verus enim panis est qui de coelo descendit, et dat vitam mundo. Verus ergo ille panis est qui dat vitam mundo; et ipse cibus est de quo paulo ante locutus sum, Operamini cibum non qui perit, sed qui permanet in vitam aeternam. Ergo et illud manna hoc significabat, et illa omnia signa mea erant. Signa mea dilexistis; qui significabatur, contemnitis? Non ergo Moyses dedit panem de coelo: Deus dat panem. Sed quem panem? forte manna? Non, sed panem quem significavit manna, ipsum scilicet Dominum Jesum. Pater meus dat vobis panem verum. Panis enim Dei est qui descendit de coelo, et dat vitam mundo. Dixerunt ergo ad eum: Domine; da nobis semper panem hunc. Quomodo mulier illa Samaritana, cui dictum est, Qui biberit de hac aqua, non sitiet unquam; continuo illa secundum corpus accipiens, sed tamen carere indigentia volens, Da mihi, inquit, Domine, de hac aqua: sic et isti, Domine, da nobis panem hunc, qui nos reficiat, nec deficiat.
25.14 PL 35, 1603
14. “And Jesus said unto them, I am the Bread of Life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.” “He that cometh to me;” this is the same thing as “He that believeth on me;” and “shall never hunger” is to be understood to mean the same thing as “shall never thirst.” For by both is signified that eternal sufficiency in which there is no want. You desire bread from heaven; you have it before you, and yet you do not eat. “But I said unto you, that ye also have seen me, and ye believed not.” But I have not on that account lost my people. “For hath your unbelief made the faith of God of none effect?” For, see thou what follows: “All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me, I will not cast out of doors.” What kind of within is that, whence there is no going out of doors? Noble interior, sweet retreat! O secret dwelling without weariness, without the bitterness of evil thoughts, without the solicitings of temptations and the interruptions of griefs! Is it not that secret dwelling whither shall enter that well-deserving servant, to whom the Lord will say, “Enter thou into the joy of thy Lord?”
Dixit autem eis Jesus: Ego sum panis vitae: qui venit ad me, non esuriet; et qui credit in me, non sitiet unquam. Qui venit ad me, hoc est quod ait, et qui credit in me; et quod dixit, non esuriet, hoc intelligendum est, non sitiet unquam. Utroque enim illa significatur aeterna satietas, ubi nulla est egestas. Panem de coelo desideratis; ante vos habetis, et non manducatis. Sed dixi vobis, quia et vidistis me, et non credidistis. Sed non ideo ego populum perdidi. Numquid enim infidelitas vestra fidem Dei evacuavit ? Vide enim quod sequitur: Omne quod dat mihi Pater, ad me veniet; et eum qui venerit ad me, non ejiciam foras. Quale est intus illud, unde non exitur foras? Magnum penetrale, et dulce secretum. O secretum sine taedio, sine amaritudine malarum cogitationum, sine interpellatione tentationum et dolorum! Nonne illud secretum est quo intrabit ille, cui dicturus est Dominus servo bene merito, Intra in gaudium Domini tui ?
25.15 PL 35, 1603
15. “And him that will come to me, I will not cast out. For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of Him that sent me.” Is it for that reason that Thou wilt not cast out him that shall come unto Thee, because Thou hast descended from heaven, not to do Thine own will, but the will of Him that sent Thee? Great mystery! I beseech you, let us knock together; something may come forth to us which may feed us, according to that which has delighted us. That great and sweet secret dwelling-place: “He that will come to me.” Give heed, give heed, and weigh the matter: “He that will come unto me, I will not cast out.” Why? “Because I came down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of Him that sent me.” Is it then the very reason why Thou castest not out him that cometh unto Thee, that Thou camest down from heaven, not to do Thy own will, but the will of Him that sent Thee? The very reason. Why do we ask whether it be the same? The same it is; Himself says it. For it would not be right in us to suspect Him to mean other than He says, “Whoso will come to me, I will not cast out.” And, as if thou askedst, wherefore? He answered, “Because I came not to do my own will, but the will of Him that sent me.” I am afraid that the reason why the soul went forth away from God is, that it was proud; nay, I do not doubt it. For it is written, “Pride is the beginning of all sin; and the beginning of man’s pride is a falling away from God.” It is written, it is firm and sure, it is true. And hence what is said of proud mortal man, clad in the tattered rags of the flesh, weighed down with the weight of a corruptible body, and withal extolling himself, and forgetting with what skin-coat he is clothed,—what, I ask, saith the Scripture to him? “Why is dust and ashes proud?” Why proud! Let the Scripture tell why. “Because in his life he put forth his inmost parts.” What is “put forth,” but “threw afar off”? This is to go forth away. For to enter within, is to long after the inmost parts; to put forth the inmost parts, is to go forth away. The proud man puts forth the inmost parts, the humble man earnestly desires the inmost parts. If we are cast out by pride, let us return by humility.
Et eum qui veniet ad me, non ejiciam foras. Quia descendi de coelo, non ut faciam voluntatem meam, sed voluntatem ejus qui misit me. Ideo ergo eum qui veniet ad te, non ejicies foras, quia descendisti de coelo, non facere voluntatem tuam, sed voluntatem ejus qui te misit? Magnum sacramentum! Obsecro vos, simul pulsemus; exeat ad nos aliquid quod nos pascat, secundum quod nos delectavit. Magnum illud et dulce secretum: Qui veniet ad me. Attende, attende, et appende: Qui veniet ad me, non ejiciam foras. Ergo, qui veniet, inquit, non ejiciam foras. Quare? Quia descendi de coelo, non ut faciam voluntatem meam, sed voluntatem ejus qui misit me. Ipsa est ergo causa quare non ejicias eum foras qui venit ad te, quia non voluntatem tuam facere descendisti de coelo, sed voluntatem ejus qui te misit? Ipsa. Quid quaerimus utrum ipsa sit? Ipsa est, ipse loquitur. Non enim nobis fas est aliud suspicari quam loquitur: Qui venerit ad me, non ejiciam foras. Et quasi quaereres, Quare? Quia non veni facere voluntatem meam, sed voluntatem ejus qui misit me. Timeo ne foras propterea exierit anima a Deo, quia superba erat; imo non dubito. Scriptum est enim, Initium omnis peccati superbia; et, Initium superbiae hominis apostatare a Deo. Scriptum est, firmum est, verum est. Deinde quid de superbo dicitur mortali, accincto pannis carnis, praegravato pondere corporis corruptibilis, et tamen extollenti se, et obliviscenti qua pelle vestitus sit, quid ei dicit Scriptura? Quid superbit terra et cinis? Quid superbit? Dicat quid superbit. Quoniam in vita sua projecit intima sua . Quid est, projecit, nisi porro jecit? Hoc est exire foras. Etenim intrare intro, appetere intima; projicere intima, foras exire est. Intima projicit superbus, intima appetit humilis. Si superbia ejicimur, humilitate regredimur.
25.16 PL 35, 1604
16. Pride is the source of all diseases, because pride is the source of all sins. When a physician removes a disorder from the body, if he merely cures the malady produced by some particular cause, but not the cause itself, he seems to heal the patient for a time, but while the cause remains, the disease will repeat itself. For example, to speak of this more expressly, some humor in the body produces a scurf or sores; there follows a high fever, and not a little pain; certain remedies are applied to repress the scurf, and to allay that heat of the sore; the remedies are applied, and they do good; thou seest the man who was full of sores and scurf healed; but because that humor was not expelled, it returns again to ulcers. The physician, perceiving this, purges away the humor, removes the cause, and there will be no more sores. Whence doth iniquity abound? From pride. Cure pride and there will be no more iniquity. Consequently, that the cause of all diseases might be cured, namely, pride, the Son of God came down and was made low. Why art thou proud, O man? God, for thee, became low. Thou wouldst perhaps be ashamed to imitate a lowly man; at any rate, imitate the lowly God. The Son of God came in the character of a man and was made low. Thou art taught to become humble, not of a man to become a brute. He, being God, became man; do thou, O man, recognize that thou art man. Thy whole humility is to know thyself. Therefore because God teaches humility, He said, “I came not to do my own will, but the will of Him that sent me.” For this is the commendation of humility. Whereas pride doeth its own will, humility doeth the will of God. Therefore, “Whoso cometh to me, I will not cast him out.” Why? “Because I came not to do my own will, but the will of Him that sent me.” I came humble, I came to teach humility, I came a master of humility: he that cometh to me is made one body with me; he that cometh to me becomes humble; he who adhereth to me will be humble, because he doeth not his own will, but the will of God; and therefore he shall not be cast out, for when he was proud he was cast out.
Caput omnium morborum superbia est, quia caput omnium peccatorum superbia. Medicus quando aegritudinem discutit, si curet quod per aliquam causam factum est, et ipsam causam qua factum est non curet, ad tempus videtur mederi, causa manente morbus repetitur. Verbi gratia, expressius hoc dicam: humor in corpore scabiem vel ulcera gignit; in corpore fit magna febris, et non parvus dolor: exhibentur quaedam medicamenta quae scabiem compescant et fervorem illum ulceris sedent; et adhibentur et proficiunt: vides hominem qui fuit ulcerosus et scabiosus, sanatum; sed quia humor ille non ejectus est, rursus ad ulcus reditur. Cognoscens hoc medicus, purgat humorem, detrahit causam, et nulla erunt ulcera. Unde abundat iniquitas? Per superbiam. Cura superbiam, et nulla erit iniquitas. Ut ergo causa omnium morborum curaretur, id est superbia, descendit et humilis factus est Filius Dei. Quid superbis, homo? Deus propter te humilis factus est. Puderet te fortasse imitari humilem hominem, saltem imitare humilem Deum. Venit Filius Dei in homine, et humilis factus est: praecipitur tibi ut sis humilis, non tibi praecipitur ut ex homine fias pecus: ille Deus factus est homo; tu, homo, cognosce quia es homo: tota humilitas tua, ut cognoscas te. Ergo quia humilitatem docet Deus, dixit, Non veni facere voluntatem meam, sed ejus voluntatem qui misit me. Haec enim commendatio humilitatis est. Superbia quippe facit voluntatem suam; humilitas facit voluntatem Dei. Ideo qui ad me venerit, non ejiciam foras. Quare? Quia non veni facere voluntatem meam, sed voluntatem ejus qui misit me. Humilis veni, humilitatem docere veni, magister humilitatis veni: qui ad me venit, incorporatur mihi; qui ad me venit, humilis fit; qui mihi adhaeret, humilis erit; quia non facit voluntatem suam, sed Dei; et ideo non ejicietur foras, quia cum superbus esset, projectus est foras.
25.17 PL 35, 1604
17. See those inner things commended to us in the psalm: “But the sons of men will put their trust in the covering of Thy wings.” See what it is to enter within; see what it is to flee for refuge to His protection; see what it is to run even under the Father’s lash, for He scourgeth every son whom He receiveth. “But the sons of men shall put their trust under the cover of Thy wings.” What is within? “They shall be filled with the plenteousness of Thy house,” when Thou shalt have sent them within, entering into the joy of their Lord; “they shall be filled with the plenteousness of Thy house; and Thou shalt give them to drink of the stream of Thy pleasure. For with Thee is the fountain of life.” Not away without Thee, but within with Thee, is the fountain of life. “And in Thy light we shall see light. Show Thy mercy upon them that know Thee, and Thy righteousness to them that are of upright heart.” They who follow the will of their Lord, not seeking their own, but the things of the Lord Jesus Christ, they are the upright in heart, their feet shall not be moved. For “God is good to Israel, to the upright in heart. But, as for me, says he, my feet were almost moved.” Why? “Because I was jealous at sinners, looking at the peace of sinners.” To whom is God good then, unless to the upright in heart? For God was displeasing to me when my heart was crooked. Why displeasing? Because He gave happiness to the wicked, and therefore my feet tottered, as if I had served God in vain. For this reason, then, my feet were almost moved, because I was not upright of heart. What then is upright in heart? Following the will of God. One man is prosperous, another man toils; the one lives wickedly and yet is prosperous, the other lives rightly and is distressed. Let not him that lives rightly and is in distress be angry; he has within what the prosperous man has not: let him therefore not be saddened, nor vex himself, nor faint. That prosperous man has gold in his own chest; this other has God in his conscience. Compare now gold and God, chest and conscience. The former has that which perishes, and has it where it will perish; the latter has God, who cannot perish, and has Him there whence He cannot be taken away: only if he is upright in heart; for then He enters within and goeth not out. For that reason, what said he? “For with Thee is the fountain of life:” not with us. We must therefore enter within, that we may live; we must not be, as it were, content to perish, nor willing to be satisfied of our own, to be dried up, but we must put our mouth to the very fountain, where the water fails not. Because Adam wished to live by his own counsel, he, too, fell through him who had fallen before through pride, who invited him to drink of the cup of his own pride. Wherefore, because “with Thee is the fountain of life, and in Thy light we shall see light,” let us drink within, let us see within. Why was there a going out thence? Hear why: “Let not the foot of pride come to me.” Therefore he, to whom the foot of pride came, went out. Show that therefore he went out. “And let not the hands of sinners move me;” because of the foot of pride. Why sayest thou this? “They are fallen, all they that work iniquity.” Where are they fallen? In their very pride. “They were driven out, and they could not stand.” If, then, pride drove them out who were not able to stand, humility sends them in who can stand for ever. For this reason, moreover, he who said, “The bones that were brought low shall rejoice,” said before, “Thou shalt give joy and gladness to my hearing.” What does he mean by, “to my hearing”? By hearing Thee I am happy; because of Thy voice I am happy; by drinking within I am happy. Therefore do I not fall; therefore “the bones that were brought low will rejoice;” therefore “the friend of the Bridegroom standeth and heareth Him;” therefore he stands, because he hears. He drinks of the fountain within, therefore he stands. They who willed not to drink of the fountain within, “there are they fallen: they were driven, they were not able to stand.”
Vide illa interiora commendari in Psalmo: Filii autem hominum in protectione alarum tuarum sperabunt. Vide quid sit ire intro, vide quid sit ad illius protectionem confugere, vide quid sit etiam sub verbera patris currere: flagellat enim omnem filium quem recipit. Filii autem hominum sub tegmine alarum tuarum sperabunt. Et quid est intus? Inebriabuntur ab ubertate domus tuae. Cum miseris intro, intrantes in gaudium Domini sui; inebriabuntur ab ubertate domus tuae, et torrente voluptatis tuae potabis eos. Quoniam apud te est fons vitae. Non foris extra te, sed intus apud te, ibi est fons vitae. Et in lumine tuo videbimus lumen. Praetende misericordiam tuam scientibus te, et justitiam tuam his qui recto sunt corde. Qui sequuntur voluntatem Domini sui, non quaerentes sua, sed quae Domini Jesu Christi, ipsi sunt recti corde, ipsis non commoventur pedes. Bonus enim Deus Israel rectis corde. Mei autem, inquit ille, pene commoti sunt pedes. Quare? Quia zelavi in peccatoribus, pacem peccatorum intuens . Ergo quibus bonus est Deus, nisi rectis corde? Nam mihi torto corde displicuit Deus. Quare displicuit? Quia dedit felicitatem malis: et ideo nutaverunt mihi pedes, quasi sine causa servissem Deo. Ideo ergo mei pene commoti sunt pedes, quia non fui rectus corde. Quid est ergo rectus corde? Sequens voluntatem Dei. Felix est ille, laborat ille: ille male vivit et felix est, ille juste vivit et laborat. Non indignetur juste vivens et laborans; intus habet quod felix ille non habet: non ergo tristetur, non maceretur, non deficiat. Felix ille habet ipse aurum in arca, iste Deum in conscientia. Compara nunc aurum et Deum, arcam et conscientiam. Ille illud habet quod perit, et ibi habet unde perit; iste Deum habet, qui perire non potest, et ibi habet unde auferri non potest: sed si sit rectus corde; tunc enim intrat, et non exit. Ideo ille quid dicebat? Quoniam apud te est fons vitae: non apud nos. Ideo intrare debemus ut vivamus, non quasi nobis sufficere ut pereamus, non quasi de nostro velle satiari ut arescamus: sed os ad ipsum fontem ponere, ubi aqua non deficit. Quia voluit suo consilio vivere Adam, et lapsus est per eum qui ante ceciderat per superbiam, qui ei calicem ipsius superbiae propinavit. Quia ergo apud te est fons vitae, et in lumine tuo videbimus lumen; intus bibamus, intus videamus. Quare enim inde exitum est? Audi quare: Non veniat mihi pes superbiae. Ergo ille exiit, cui venit pes superbiae. Ostende quia ideo exiit. Et manus peccatorum non moveant me: propter pedem superbiae. Quare hoc dicis? Ibi ceciderunt omnes qui operantur iniquitatem. Ubi ceciderunt? In ipsa superbia. Expulsi sunt, nec potuerunt stare . Si ergo superbia expulit eos qui non potuerunt stare; humilitas intromittit, qui possint in perpetuum stare. Ideo etenim ille qui dixit, Exsultabunt ossa humiliata; praedixit, Auditui meo dabis exsultationem et laetitiam . Quid est, auditui meo? Audiendo te felix sum, de voce tua felix sum; intus bibendo felix sum. Ideo non cado, ideo exsultabunt ossa humiliata: ideo amicus sponsi stat, et audit eum ; ideo stat, quia audit. De interiore fonte bibit, ideo stat. Illi qui noluerunt de interiore bibere, ibi ceciderunt; expulsi sunt, nec potuerunt stare.
25.18 PL 35, 1605
18. Thus, the teacher of humility came not to do His own will, but the will of Him that sent Him. Let us come to Him, enter in unto Him, be ingrafted into Him, that we may not be doing our own will, but the will of God: and He will not cast us out, because we are His members, because He willed to be our head by teaching us humility. Finally, hear Himself discoursing: “Come unto me, ye who labor and are heavy laden: take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly of heart:” and when ye have learned this, “ye shall find rest for your souls,” from which ye cannot be cast out; “because I am come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of Him that sent me;” I teach humility; none but the humble can come unto me. Only pride casteth out; how can he go out who keeps humility and falls not away from the truth? So much as could be said about the hidden sense has now been said, brethren: this sense is hidden enough, and I know not whether I have drawn out and shaped in suitable words for you, why it is that He casteth not out him that cometh unto Him; because He came not to do His own will, but the will of Him that sent Him.
Doctor itaque humilitatis venit non facere voluntatem suam, sed voluntatem ejus qui misit illum. Veniamus ad eum, intremus ad eum, incorporemur ei, ut nec nos faciamus voluntatem nostram, sed voluntatem Dei: et non nos ejiciet foras, quia membra ejus sumus, quia caput nostrum esse voluit docendo humilitatem. Ad extremum, ipsum audite concionantem: Venite ad me, qui laboratis et onerati estis: tollite jugum meum super vos, et discite a me quia mitis sum et humilis corde; et cum hoc didiceritis, invenietis requiem animabus vestris , unde non ejiciamini foras: quia descendi de coelo, non ut faciam voluntatem meam, sed voluntatem ejus qui misit me; humilitatem doceo, ad me venire non potest nisi humilis. Non mittit foras nisi superbia: quomodo exit foras qui servat humilitatem, et non labitur a veritate? Dicta sunt quanta dici potuerunt de abscondito sensu, fratres: satis enim hic latet sensus, et nescio utrum congruis verbis a me sit depromptus et exsculptus, quare ideo non ejiciat foras qui venit ad illum, quia non venit facere voluntatem suam, sed voluntatem ejus qui misit eum.
25.19 PL 35, 1606
19. “And this,” saith He, “is the will of the Father that sent, that of all that He hath given me I should lose nothing.” He that keeps humility was given to Him; the same He receives: he that keeps not humility is far from the Master of humility. “That of all which He hath given me, I should lose nothing.” “So it is not the will of your Father that one of these little ones should perish.” Of the proud, there may perish; but of the little ones, none perisheth; because, “if ye will not become as this little one, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.” “Of all that the Father hath given me, I should lose nothing, but I will raise it up again on the last day.” See how here He delineates that twofold resurrection. “He that cometh unto me” immediately rises again, being made humble in my members; but I will raise him up again on the last day also according to the flesh. “For this is the will of my Father that sent me, that every one who seeth the Son, and believeth on Him, may have eternal life; and I will raise him up on the last day.” He said above, “Whoso heareth my word, and believeth Him that sent me:” but now, “Whoso seeth the Son, and believeth on Him.” He has not said, seeth the Son, and believeth on the Father; for to believe on the Son is the same thing as to believe on the Father. Because, “even as the Father hath life in Himself, so hath He given also to the Son to have life in Himself. That every one who seeth the Son, and believeth on Him, may have eternal life:” by believing and by passing unto life, just as by that first resurrection. And, because that is not the only resurrection, He saith, “And I will raise him up at the last day.”
Haec est autem, inquit, voluntas ejus qui misit me Patris, ut omne quod dedit mihi, non perdam ex eo. Ipse illi datus est, qui servat humilitatem; hunc accipit: qui non servat humilitatem, longe est a magistro humilitatis. Ut omne quod dedit mihi, non perdam ex eo. Sic non est voluntas in conspectu Patris vestri, ut pereat unus de pusillis istis. De tumentibus potest perire, de pusillis nihil perit: quia nisi fueritis sicut pusillus iste, non intrabitis in regnum coelorum . Omne quod dedit mihi Pater, non perdam ex eo; sed resuscitabo illud in novissimo die. Videte quemadmodum et hic geminam illam resurrectionem delineet. Qui venit ad me, modo resurgit humilis factus in membris meis: sed et resuscitabo eum in novissimo die, secundum carnem. Haec est enim voluntas Patris mei qui misit me, ut omnis qui videt Filium, et credit in eum, habeat vitam aeternam; et ego resuscitabo eum in novissimo die. Superius dixit, Qui audit verbum meum, et credit ei qui misit me: modo autem, Qui videt Filium, et credit in eum. Non dixit, Videt Filium, et credit in Patrem: hoc est enim credere in Filium, quod et in Patrem. Quia sicut habet Pater vitam in semetipso, sic dedit et Filio vitam habere in semetipso . Ut omnis qui videt Filium, et credit in eum, habeat vitam aeternam: credendo et transeundo ad vitam, tanquam prima illa resurrectione. Et quia non est sola, et resuscitabo ego eum, inquit, in novissimo die.