Sermons on Selected Lessons of the New Testament 39

sant'Agostino d'Ippona (354–430 d.C.) · Sermones de Scripturis · PL 38, 332–799

39.0 On the words of the Gospel, Matt. xxi. 19, where Jesus dried up the fig-tree; and on the words, Luke xxiv. 28, where He made a pretence as though He would go further PL 38, 553

[LXXXIX. Ben.]

On the words of the Gospel, Matt. xxi. 19, where Jesus dried up the fig-tree; and on the words, Luke xxiv. 28, where He made a pretence as though He would go further.

39.1 On the words of the Gospel, Matt. xxi. 19, where Jesus dried up the fig-tree; and on the words, Luke xxiv. 28, where He made a pretence as though He would go further PL 38, 553

1. The lesson of the Holy Gospel which has just been read, has given us an alarming warning, lest we have leaves only, and have no fruit. That is, in few words, lest words be present and deeds be wanting. Very terrible! Who does not fear when in this lesson he sees with the eyes of the heart the withered tree, withered at that word being spoken to it, “Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever”? Let the fear work amendment, and the amendment bring forth fruit. For without doubt, the Lord Christ foresaw that a certain tree would deservedly become withered, because it would have leaves, and would have no fruit. That tree is the synagogue, not that which was called, but that which was reprobate. For out of it also was called the people of God, who in sincerity and truth waited in the Prophets for the salvation of God, Jesus Christ. And forasmuch as it waited in faith, it was thought worthy to know Him when He was present. For out of it came the Apostles, out of it came the whole multitude of those who went before the ass of the Lord, and said, “Hosanna to the Son of David, blessed is He that cometh in the Name of the Lord.” There was a great company then of believing Jews, a great company of those who believed in Christ before He shed His Blood for them. For it was not in vain that the Lord Himself had come to none “but to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” But in others, after He was crucified, and was now exalted into heaven, He found the fruit of repentance; and these He did not make to wither, but cultivated them in His field, and watered them with His word. Of this number were those four thousand Jews who believed, after that the disciples and those who were with them, filled with the Holy Ghost, spake with the tongues of all nations, and in that diversity of tongues announced in a way beforehand, that the Church should be throughout all nations. They believed at that time, and “they were the lost sheep of the house of Israel;” but because “the Son of Man had come to seek and to save that which was lost,” He found these also. But they lay hid here and there among thorns, as though wasted and dispersed by the wolves; and because they lay hid among thorns, He did not come to find them, save when torn by the thorns of His Passion; yet come He did, He found, He redeemed them. They had slain, not Him so much, as themselves. They were saved by Him who was slain for them. For, as the Apostles spake, they were pricked; they were pricked in conscience, who had pricked Him with the spear; and being pricked they sought for counsel, received it when it was given, repented, found grace, and believing drunk that Blood which in their fury they had shed. But they who have remained in this bad and barren race, even unto this day, and shall remain unto the end, were figured in that tree. You come to them at this day, and find with them all the writings of the Prophets. But these are but leaves; Christ is an hungred, and He seeketh for fruit; but findeth no fruit among them, because He doth not find Himself among them. For He hath no fruit, who hath not Christ. And he hath not Christ, who holdeth not to Christ’s unity, who hath not charity. And so by this chain he hath no fruit who hath not charity. Hear the Apostle, “Now the fruit of the Spirit is charity;” so setting forth the praise of this cluster, that is, of this fruit; “The fruit of the Spirit,” he says, “is charity, joy, peace, long-suffering.” Do not wonder at what follows, when charity leads the way.

Maledictio fici quid nos admoneat. Lectio recentissima sancti Evangelii admonuit, terruit nos, ne folia habeamus et fructum non habeamus. Hoc autem breviter exponitur: ne verba adsint, et facta desint. Magnus terror! Quis non timeat, cum in ipsa lectione oculis cordis aridam arborem videt, et sic ut ei dicatur: Nunquam ex te fructus nascatur in aeternum. Terror corrigat, correctio fructus proferat. Sine dubio enim Dominus Christus praevidebat arborem quamdam merito aridam fieri, quod haberet folia, et fructus non haberet. Ea est Synagoga, non vocata, sed reprobata. Nam et inde vocatus populus Dei, qui veraciter et sinceriter in Prophetis exspectabat salutare Dei Jesum Christum. Et quoniam fideliter exspectabat, meruit cognoscere praesentem. Inde enim Apostoli, inde tota turba praecedentium jumentum Domini et dicentium, Hosanna filio David; benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini . Turba erat magna fidelium Judaeorum, ante fusum pro se sanguinem in Christo credentium magna turba erat. Non enim frustra Dominus ipse non venerat, nisi ad oves quae perierant domus Israel . In aliis autem crucifixus, jam in coelo exaltatus, invenit poenitentiae fructum: nec aridos fecit, sed in agro excoluit, et verbo irrigavit. Inde erant illa quatuor millia Judaeorum, qui crediderunt, posteaquam sancto Spiritu impleti discipuli, et qui cum eis erant, linguis omnium gentium loquebantur, et per omnes gentes futuram Ecclesiam illa linguarum diversitate quodam modo praenuntiabant. Crediderunt tunc, et ipsae oves erant quae perierant domus Israel; sed quia venerat Filius hominis quaerere et salvare quod perierat , etiam ipsos invenit. Sed nescio ubi tanquam a lupis depraedati latebant in vepribus; et quia latebant in vepribus, ideo ad eos inveniendos non pervenit, nisi spinis passionis dilaceratus: tamen pervenit, invenit, redemit. Illi occiderant; non magis ipsum, quam se. Salvi facti sunt per occisum pro se. Loquentibus enim Apostolis compuncti sunt qui pupugerant lancea, compuncti sunt conscientia: compuncti autem consilium quaesierunt, datum receperunt, poenitentiam egerunt, gratiam invenerunt, et credentes sanguinem biberunt quem saevientes fuderunt . Qui autem remanserunt mala et sterili progenie usque in hodiernum et usque in finem, in illa arbore figurati sunt. Modo venis ad eos, et invenis apud eos omnia eloquia Prophetarum. Sed ista folia sunt: Christus esurit: fructum quaerit; sed ideo in eis fructum non invenit, quia se in eis non invenit. Non enim habet fructum, non habet Christum. Non autem habet Christum, qui Christi non tenet unitatem, qui non habet charitatem. Ergo per hanc connexionem non habet fructum qui non habet charitatem. Audi Apostolum Fructus autem spiritus, charitas: commendaturus quasi botrum, hoc est, fructum. Fructus autem, inquit, spiritus, charitas, gaudium, pax, longanimitas . Noli mirari sequentia, ubi coepit charitas.

39.2 PL 38, 554

2. Accordingly, when the disciples marvelled at the withering of the tree, He set forth to them the value of faith, and said to them, “If ye have faith, and doubt not;” that is, if in all things ye have trust in God; and do not say, “God can do this, this He cannot do;” but rely on the omnipotence of the Almighty; “ye shall not only do this, but also if ye shall say to this mountain, Be thou removed, and be thou cast into the sea, it shall be done. And all things whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, believing, ye shall receive.” Now we read that miracles were wrought by the disciples, yea rather by the Lord through the disciples; for, “without Me,” He says, “ye can do nothing.” The Lord could do many things without the disciples, but the disciples nothing without the Lord. He who could make even the disciples themselves, was not certainly assisted by them to make them. We read then of the Apostles’ miracles, but we nowhere read of a tree being withered by them, nor of a mountain removed into the sea. Let us enquire therefore where this was done. For the words of the Lord could not be without effect. If ye are thinking of “trees” and “mountains” in their ordinary and familiar sense, it has not been done. But if ye think of that tree of which He spake, and of that mountain of the Lord of which the Prophet said, “In the last days the mountain of the Lord’s house shall be manifest;” if ye think of it, and understand it thus, it has been done, and done by the Apostles. The tree is the Jewish nation, but I say again, that part of it which was reprobate, not that which was called; that tree which we have spoken of is the Jewish nation. The mountain, as the prophetic testimony hath taught us, is the Lord Himself. The withered tree is the Jewish nation reft of the honour of Christ; the sea is this world with all the nations. Now see the Apostles speaking to this tree which was about to be withered away, and casting the mountain into the sea. In the Acts of the Apostles they speak to the Jews who gainsay and resist the word of truth, that is, who have leaves and have no fruit, and they say to them, “It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you: but seeing ye have put it from you” (for ye use the words of the Prophets, yet do not acknowledge Him whom the Prophets foretold, that is, ye have leaves only), “lo, we turn to the Gentiles.” For this also was foretold by the Prophets; “Behold, I have given Thee for a light of the Gentiles, that Thou mayest be My salvation unto the end of the earth.” See then, the tree hath withered away; and Christ hath been removed unto the Gentiles, the mountain into the sea. For how should not the tree wither away which is planted in that vineyard, of which it was said, “I will command my clouds that they rain no rain upon it”?

Mons in mare missus ab Apostolis. Ideo discipulis mirantibus arboris ariditatem, commendavit fidem, et ait illis, Si habueritis fidem, et nihil discriminaveritis, id est in omnibus Deo credideritis: non dixeritis, Hoc potest Deus, hoc non potest; sed de Omnipotentis omnipotentia praesumpseritis: non solum hoc facietis, sed et monti huic si dixeritis, Tollere et mittere in mare, fiet. Et quaecumque oraveritis credentes, accipietis. Legimus miracula facta a discipulis, imo facta a Domino per discipulos: Quia sine me, inquit, nihil potestis facere . Potuit Dominus multa sine discipulis, nihil discipuli sine Domino. Qui potuit facere et ipsos discipulos, non utique est adjutus ab ipsis ut faceret ipsos. Legimus Apostolorum miracula, nusquam autem legimus arborem ab his arefactam, aut montem in mare translatum. Quaeramus ergo ubi factum sit. Non enim verba Domini vacare potuerunt. Si attendas istas usitatas et notas arbores et istos montes, non est factum. Si attendas arborem de qua dixit, et montem ipsum Domini de quo propheta dixit, Erit in novissimis diebus manifestus mons Domini : si haec attendas, si haec intelligas; et factum est, et per ipsos factum est. Arbor gens Judaea, sed iterum dico, reprobata, non vocata: arbor illa, quam commemoravimus, gens Judaea. Mons sicut docuit propheticum testimonium, ipse Dominus. Arida arbor, gens Judaea sine honore Christi: mare, saeculum hoc omnibus Gentibus. Vide jam Apostolos loquentes ad arborem arefaciendam, et mittentes montem in mare. Loquuntur in Actibus Apostolorum ad Judaeos contradicentes et verbo veritatis resistentes, hoc est, folia habentes, et fructum non habentes, et dicunt illis, Vobis primum oportebat annuntiare verbum Dei, sed quoniam repulistis illud: Prophetarum verba loquimini, et non agnoscitis quem praenuntiarunt Prophetae, hoc est, folia habentes: Ecce convertimus nos ad Gentes . Hoc enim etiam per prophetam praedicatum est: Ecce posui te in lucem Gentium, ut sis salus usque in fines terrae . Ecce aruit arbor; et Christus ad Gentes, mons translatus in mare. Quomodo enim arbor non aresceret posita in vinea, de qua dictum erat, Mandabo nubibus meis ne pluant super eam imbrem ?

39.3 PL 38, 555

3. Now that in order to convey this truth the Lord acted prophetically, I mean that, as concerning this tree, it was not His will merely to exhibit a miracle, but that by the miracle He conveyed the intimation of something to come, there are many things which teach and persuade us, yea even against our wills force us to believe. In the first place, what fault in the tree was it that it had no fruit, when even if it had no fruit at the proper season, that is, the season of its fruit, it would not assuredly be any fault in the tree; for the tree as being without sense and reason could not be to blame. But to this is added, that as we read it in the narrative of the other Evangelist who expressly mentions this, “it was not the time for that fruit.” For that was the time when the fig-tree shoots forth its tender leaves, which come, we know, before the fruit; and this we prove, because the day of the Lord’s Passion was at hand, and we know at what time He suffered; and if we did not know it, we ought of course to give credit to the Evangelist who says, “The time of figs was not yet.” So then if it was only a miracle that was to have been set forth, and not something to be prophetically figured, it would have been much more worthy of the clemency and mercy of the Lord, to have made green again any tree He might find withered; as He healed the sick, as He cleansed the lepers, as He raised the dead. But then contrariwise, as though against the ordinary rule of His clemency, He found a green tree, not yet bearing fruit out of its proper season, but still not refusing the hope of fruit to its dresser, and He withered it away; as though He would say to us, “I have no delight in the withering away of this tree, but thus I would convey to you, that I have not designed to do this without any cause for it, but only because I desired thereby to convey to you a lesson you might the more regard. It is not this tree that I have cursed, it is not on a tree without sense that I have inflicted punishment, but I have made thee fear, whosoever thou art that dost consider the matter, that thou mightest not despise Christ when He is an hungered, that thou mightest love rather to be enriched with fruit, than to be overshadowed by leaves.”

Maledictionem arboris futurum aliquid praefigurasse. Hoc ut Dominus commendaret prophetice se fecisse, de hac scilicet arbore non solum voluisse exhibere miraculum, sed futurum aliquid miraculo commendasse; multa sunt quae nos admonent nobisque persuadeant, imo ab invitis extorqueant. Primo, quid arbor peccaverat, quoniam fructus non habebat? quae si suo tempore, hoc est, illorum pomorum, fructus non haberet, nulla esset utique ligni culpa; quia lignum sine sensu non habebat culpam. Huc accedit, quia sicut in alio evangelista hoc ipsum narrante legitur, Tempus pomorum illorum non erat . Id enim tempus erat, quo ficus folia profert tenera, quae novimus nasci ante fructus: hoc ideo probamus, quia passionis Domini dies propinquabat, et scimus quo tempore passus sit; et si hoc non attenderemus, Evangelistae utique dicenti, Non erat tempus ficorum, credere deberemus. Ergo si miraculum fuerat tantummodo commendandum, et non aliquid prophetice figurandum, multo clementius Dominus, et sua misericordia dignius, si quam arborem aridam inveniret, viridem redderet; sicut languentes sanavit, sicut leprosos mundavit, sicut mortuos suscitavit. Tunc vero a contrario, quasi adversus regulam clementiae suae, invenit arborem virentem, praeter tempus nondum fructum habentem, non tamen fructum agricolae suo negantem, et aridam fecit: tanquam diceret homini. Non me ariditas hujus arboris delectavit, sed tibi volui insinuare non sine causa hoc me facere voluisse, nisi quia tibi quod plus attenderes volui commendare. Non istam arborem maledixi, non arbori non sentienti poenam inflixi; sed te terrui, si quis advertis, ut esurientem Christum non contemneres, et fructu potius opimari quam foliis obumbrari diligeres?

39.4 PL 38, 556

4. This one thing is that which the Lord intimates that He designed to signify by what He did. What else is there? He cometh to the tree being hungry, and seeketh fruit. Did He not know that it was not the time for it? What the cultivator of the tree knew, did not its Creator know? He seeketh on the tree then for fruit which it had not yet. Doth He really seek for it, or rather make a pretence of seeking it? For if He really sought it, He was mistaken. But this be far from Him, to be mistaken! He made then a pretence of seeking it. Fearing to allow this, that he maketh a pretence, thou dost confess that He was mistaken. Again, thou dost turn away from the idea of His being mistaken, and so run into that of His making a pretence. We are parched up between the two. If we are parched, let us beg for rain, that we may grow green, lest in saying anything unworthy of the Lord, we rather wither away. The Evangelist indeed says, “He came to the tree, and found no fruit on it.” “He found none,” would not be said of Him, unless He had either really sought for it, or made a pretence of seeking, though He knew that there was none there. Wherefore we do not hesitate, let us by no means say that Christ was mistaken. What then? shall we say He made a pretence? Shall we say this? How shall we get out of this difficulty? Let us say what, if the Evangelist had not said of the Lord in another place, we should not of ourselves dare to say. Let us say what the Evangelist has written, and when we have said, let us understand it. But in order that we may understand it, let us first believe. For, “unless ye believe,” says the Prophet, “ye shall not understand.” The Lord Christ after His Resurrection, was walking in the way with two of His disciples, by whom He was not yet recognised, and with whom He joined company as a third traveller. They came to the place whither they were going, and the Evangelist says, “But He made a pretence as though He would have gone further.” But they kept Him, saying, in the spirit of a courteous kindness, that it was already drawing toward evening, and praying Him to tarry there with them; being received and entertained by them, He breaketh Bread, and is known of them in blessing and breaking of the Bread. So then, let us not now fear to say, that He made a pretence of seeking, if He made a pretence of going further. But here there arises another question. Yesterday I insisted at some length on the truth which is in the Apostles; how then do we find any “pretence” in the Lord Himself? Therefore, Brethren, I must tell you, and teach you according to my poor abilities, which the Lord giveth me for your benefit, and must convey to you what ye may hold as a rule in the interpretation of all Scripture. Everything that is said or done is to be understood either in its literal signification, or else it signifies something figuratively; or at least contains both of these at once, both its own literal interpretation, and a figurative signification also. Thus I have set forth three things, examples of them must now be given; and from whence, but from the Holy Scriptures? It is said in its literal acceptation, that the Lord suffered, that He rose again, and ascended into heaven; that we shall rise again at the end of the world, that we shall reign with Him for ever, if we do not despise Him. Take all this as spoken literally, and look not out for figures; as it is expressed, so it really is. And so also with divers actions. The Apostle went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, the Apostle actually did this, it actually took place, it was an action peculiar to himself. It is a fact which he tells you; a simple fact according to its literal meaning. “The stone which the builders refused, is become the Head of the corner,” is spoken in a figure. If we take “the stone” literally, what “stone did the builders refuse, which became the Head of the corner”? If we take “the stone” literally, of what corner is this “stone” become the Head? If we admit that it was figuratively expressed, and take it figuratively, the Corner-stone is Christ: the head of the corner, is the Head of the Church. Why is the Church the Corner? Because she has called the Jews from one side, and the Gentiles from another, and these two walls as it were coming from different quarters, and meeting together in one, she has bound together by the grace of her peace. For, “He is our peace, who hath made both one.”

Regula ad Scripturas interpretandas. Hoc unum est quod Dominus commendat se aliquid significare voluisse. Quid aliud? Esuriens accedit ad arborem, et quaerit poma. Nesciebat tempus nondum esse? Quod cultor arboris sciebat, Creator arboris nesciebat? Quaerit ergo fructum in arbore, quem nondum habebat. Quaerit, an potius quaerere se fingit? Nam si vere quaesivit, erravit. Sed absit ut erraret. Ergo finxit. Timens ne fingat, confiteris errasse. Aversaris errorem, incurris in fictionem. Aestuamus in medio. Si aestuamus, optemus pluviam, ut virescamus, ne aliquid indignum dicentes de Domino, potius arescamus. Evangelista quidem, Venit, inquit, ad arborem, et fructum in ea non invenit. Utique non invenit, non diceretur de illo, nisi qui vel videre quaesiverat, vel quaerere se finxerat, quem ibi non esse noverat. Unde non dubitamus, errantem Christum nullo modo dicamus. Quid, finxisse dicimus? Anne hoc dicimus? Quomodo hinc exibimus? Dicamus, ne quid Evangelista dixerit de Domino alio loco, non auderemus dicere nos ex nobis ipsis. Quod Evangelista scripsit, dicamus; et cum dixerimus, intelligamus. Sed ut intelligamus, prius credamus. Nisi enim credideritis, non intelligetis, ait propheta . Post resurrectionem Dominus Christus ambulabat in via cum duobus discipulis suis, a quibus nondum agnoscebatur, quibus velut viator tertius comitabatur. Ventum est ad locum, quo illi tendebant, et ait Evangelista: Ipse autem finxit se longius ire. Illi autem tenebant eum more humanitatis dicentes quod jam vesperasceret, rogantes ut cum eis ibi maneret: susceptus hospitio, frangit panem, benedicto et fracto pane cognoscitur. Non ergo jam timeamus dicere, finxit quaerere, si finxit se longius ire. Sed alia quaestio oboritur. Hesterna die diu commendavimus in Apostolis veritatem; quomodo invenimus in ipso Domino fictionem? Dicendum ergo, fratres, et insinuandum vobis pro mediocribus viribus nostris, quas Dominus pro vobis donat nobis, et commendandum est vobis quod in omnibus Scripturis regulariter teneatis. Omne quod dicitur sive fit, aut per suam proprietatem cognoscitur, aut significat aliquid figurate; aut certe habet utrumque, et propriam cognitionem, et figuratam significationem. Tria proposui, exempla danda sunt, et unde nisi de sanctis Scripturis? Dictum quod proprie accipiamus, quia passus est Dominus, quia resurrexit et ascendit in coelum, quia resurrecturi sumus in fine saeculi, quia cum illo in aeternum, si eum non contemnimus, regnaturi. Hoc dictum proprie accipe, noli figuras inquirere: sicut est dictum, ita et est. Sic etiam facta. Ascendit Apostolus Jerosolymam videre Petrum, fecit hoc Apostolus, factum est, ipsius proprium est . Narrat tibi rem gestam: gestum ipsum secundum proprietatem. Per figuram dictum, Lapidem quem reprobaverunt aedificantes, hic factus est in caput anguli . Si lapidem proprie intelligamus, quem lapidem reprobaverunt aedificantes, et factus est in caput anguli? Si angulum proprie accipiamus, in cujus anguli capite factus est lapis iste? Si figurate dictum admittamus, et capias figurate; lapis angularis Christus; caput anguli, caput Ecclesiae. Quare angulus Ecclesia? Quia hinc Judaeos, hinc Gentes vocavit, et quasi duos parietes de diverso venientes et in se convenientes suae pacis gratia colligavit. Ipse est enim pax nostra qui fecit utraque unum (Ephes, II, 14).

39.5 PL 38, 557

5. Ye have heard instances of a literal expression, and a literal action, and of a figurative expression; ye are waiting for an instance of a figurative action. There are many such, but meanwhile, as is suggested by this mention of the corner-stone, when Jacob anointed the stone which he had placed at his head as he slept, and in his sleep saw a mysterious dream, ladders rising from the earth to heaven, and Angels ascending and descending, and the Lord standing upon the ladder, he understood what it was designed to figure, and took the stone for a figure of Christ, to prove to us thereby that he was no stranger to the understanding of that vision and revelation. Do not wonder then that he anointed it, for Christ received His Name from “the anointing.” Now this Jacob was said in the Scripture to be “a man without guile.” And this Jacob ye know was called Israel. Accordingly in the Gospel, when the Lord saw Nathanael, He said, “Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile.” And that Israelite not yet knowing who it was that talked with him, answered, “Whence knewest Thou me?” And the Lord said to him, “When thou wast under the fig-tree I saw thee;” as though he would say, When thou wast in the shadow of sin, I predestinated thee. And Nathanael, because he remembered that he had been under the fig-tree, where the Lord was not, acknowledged His Divinity, and answered, “Thou art the Son of God, Thou art the King of Israel.” He who had been under the fig-tree was not made a withered fig-tree; he acknowledged Christ. And the Lord said unto him, “Because I said, When thou wast under the fig-tree I saw thee, believest thou? thou shall see greater things than these.” What are these “greater things”? “Verily I say unto you” (for he “is an Israelite in whom is no guile;” remember Jacob in whom was no guile; and recollect of what he is speaking, the stone at his head, the vision in his sleep, the ladder from earth to heaven, the Angels ascending and descending; and so see what it is that the Lord would say to “the Israelite without guile”); “Verily I say unto you, Ye shall see heaven opened” (hear, thou guileless Nathanael, what guileless Jacob saw); “ye shall see heaven opened, and Angels ascending and descending” (unto whom?) “unto the Son of Man.” Therefore was He, as the Son of Man, anointed on the head; for “the head of the woman is the man, and the Head of the man is Christ.” Now observe, He did not say, “ascending from the Son of Man, and descending to the Son of Man,” as if He were only above; but “ascending and descending unto the Son of Man.” Hear the Son of Man crying out from above, “Saul, Saul.” Hear the Son of Man from below, “Why persecutest thou Me?”

Factum figuratum. Audistis dictum proprium, factum proprium, dictum figuratum: exspectatis factum figuratum. Multa sunt, sed interim quod occurrit ex admonitione lapidis angularis, quando unxit lapidem Jacob, quem ad caput posuerat cum dormiret, in quo somno magnum somnium viderat, scalas a terra in coelum surgentes et homines ascendentes et descendentes, incumbente super scalas Domino, intellexit quid debuerit figurare, unde nobis probaret ab illius visionis et revelationis intellectu se alienum non fuisse, lapidem pro Christo figuravit . Noli ergo mirari quod unxit, quia Christus ab unctione nomen accepit. Dictus autem erat Jacob iste in Scriptura homo sine dolo. Ipse Jacob, nostis, appellatus est Israel. Ideo Dominus in Evangelio quando vidit Nathanael: Ecce, inquit, vere Israelita, in quo dolus non est. Et ille Israelita nesciens adhuc qui cum illo loqueretur, respondit: Unde me nosti? Et Dominus ad eum, Cum esses sub arbore fici, vidi te: tanquam diceret, Cum esses in umbra peccati; praedestinavi te. Et ille, quia meminerat se fuisse sub arbore fici, ubi Dominus non erat, agnovit in illo divinitatem, et respondit: Tu es Filius Dei, tu es rex Israel. Ille sub arbore fici non factus est arida ficus: agnovit Christum. Et Dominus ad illum: Quia dixi, Cum esses sub arbore fici, vidi te, ideo credis; majora horum videbis. Quae sunt ista majora? Amen dico vobis (Quia Israelita ille, in quo dolus non est; respice ad Jacob in quo dolus non est; et recole, unde loquitur, lapidem ad caput, visionem in somno, scalas a terra in coelum, descendentes et ascendentes; et vide quid Dominus dicat Israelitae sine dolo), videbitis coelum apertum: Audi, Nathanael sine dolo, quid vidit Jacob sine dolo: videbitis coelum apertum, et Angelos ascendentes et descendentes; ad quem? ad Filium hominis . Ergo ille unctus erat ad caput Filius hominis: quia caput mulieris vir, caput viri Christus . Nec tamen dixit, Ascendentes a Filio hominis et descendentes ad Filium hominis, quasi tantummodo sursum esset: sed, ascendentes et descendentes ad Filium hominis. Audi sursum clamantem Filium hominis: Saule, Saule. Audi deorsum Filium hominis: Quid me persequeris ?

39.6 PL 38, 558

6. Ye have heard an instance of a literal expression, as “that we shall rise again;” of a literal action, as that, according as it is said, “Paul went up to Jerusalem to see Peter.” “The stone which the builders refused,” is a figurative expression; “the anointed stone” which was at Jacob’s head, is a figurative action. There is now due to your expectation an example made out of both together, something which is at once a literal fact, and which also signifies something else figured by it. “We know that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a free-woman;” this was literally a fact, not only a story, but a fact; are ye looking for that which was figured in it? “These are the two Testaments.” That then which is spoken figuratively, is a sort of fiction. But since it has some real event represented by it, and the very figure itself has its ground of truth, it escapes all imputation of falsehood. “The sower went out to sow his seed; and as he sowed, some fell by the way side, some fell upon stony places, some fell among thorns, and some fell upon good ground.” Who went out “to sow,” or when went he out, or upon what “thorns,” or “stones” or “way side” or in what field did he sow? If we receive this as a fictitious story, we understand it in a figurative sense; it is fictitious. For if any sower really went out, and did cast the seed in these different places, as we have heard, it were no fiction, and so no falsehood. But now though it be a fiction, yet it is no falsehood. Why? Because the fiction has some further signification, it deceives thee not. It requires only one to understand it, and does not lead any one into error. And thus Christ wishing to convey this lesson to us, sought for fruit, and hereby set forth to us a figurative, and no deceiving fiction; a fiction therefore worthy of praise, not of blame; not one by the examination of which we might run into what was false; but by the diligent investigation of which we might discover what is true.

Factum vere gestum et nihilominus figuratum. Audisti dictum proprium, quia resurrecturi sumus: factum proprium, quia sicut dictum est, ascendit Paulus Jerosolymam videre Petrum. Dictum est figuratum, Lapidem quem reprobaverunt aedificantes: factum figuratum, unctus lapis, qui fuit ad caput Jacob. Debetur exspectationi vestrae quod ex utroque sit, et proprie gestum est et significat figuratum. Novimus Abraham duos filios habuisse, unum ex ancilla, alium ex libera; proprie gestum, non solum narratum, sed et factum: figuratum ibi exspectas? Haec sunt duo Testamenta . Quod ergo figurate dicitur, quodam modo fingitur. Sed quoniam debet exitum significationis, et ipsa significatio teneret fidem veritatis, vitat crimen falsitatis. Ecce exiit seminans seminare; et seminando cecidit in via, cecidit super petrosa loca, cecidit inter spinas, cecidit in terram bonam. Quis exiit seminare, aut quando exiit, aut in quas spinas, aut in quos lapides, aut in quam viam, aut in quem agrum? Si audis fictum, intelligis significative: fictum est. Si enim vere homo seminator exiret, et semina, sicut audivimus, per haec diversa jactaret, non erat fictum, sed nec mendacium. Nondum autem fictum, sed non mendacium. Quare? Quia significat aliquid, quod fictum est, non te decipit. Quaerit intelligentem, non facit errantem. Hoc volens commendare Christus, poma quaesivit, figuratam ibi, non fallacem commendabat fictionem; ac per hoc laudabilem, non criminosam fictionem; non qua discussa ea in facultatem, sed perscrutata si invenias veritatem .

39.7 PL 38, 558

7. I see that one may say, Explain to me; what did that signify, that “He made a pretence of going further”? For if it had no further meaning, it is a deceit, a lie. We must then according to our rules of exposition, and distinctions, tell you what this “pretence of going further,” signified; “He made a pretence of going further,” and is kept back from going further. In so far then as the Lord Christ being as they supposed absent in respect of His Bodily presence, was thought to be really absent, He will as it were “go further.” But hold Him fast by faith, hold Him fast at the breaking of Bread. What shall I say more? Have ye recognised Him? If so, then have ye found Christ. I must not speak any longer on this Sacrament. They who put off the knowledge of this Sacrament, Christ goeth further from them. Let them then hold It fast, let them not let Him go; let them invite Him to their home, and so they are invited to heaven.

Idem tractatur argumentum. Video quod dicturus sit: Expone mihi hoc quod significabat, quod finxit se longius ire. Si enim significabat, fallacia est, mendacium est. Expositionibus nostris et discretissimis regulis debemus hoc dicere, quid significabat affictio quaedam longius eundi: finxit se longius ire, et tenetur, ne longius eat. Quantum igitur ad praesentiam corporalem absens putabatur Dominus Christus; absens putabatur, velut longius ibit. Tene fideliter, tene illum ad fractionem panis. Quid dicam? agnovistis? Si agnovistis, ibi Christum invenistis. Diutius de sacramento loquendum non est. Qui hoc sacramentum nosse differunt, longius ab eis Christus. Id teneant, non dimittant; invitent ad hospitium, et invitantur ad coelum.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Salva per dopo

Inserisci la tua email: ti invieremo un link per accedere. Nessuna password. Ciò che salvi (voci, versetti, capitoli, documenti) ti segue su ogni dispositivo.