Sermons on Selected Lessons of the New Testament 40

sant'Agostino d'Ippona (354–430 d.C.) · Sermones de Scripturis · PL 38, 332–799

40.0 On the words of the Gospel, Matt. xxii. 2, etc., about the marriage of the king’s son; against the Donatists, on charity. Delivered at Carthage in the Restituta PL 38, 559

[XC. Ben.]

On the words of the Gospel, Matt. xxii. 2, etc., about the marriage of the king’s son; against the Donatists, on charity. Delivered at Carthage in the Restituta.

40.1 On the words of the Gospel, Matt. xxii. 2, etc., about the marriage of the king’s son; against the Donatists, on charity. Delivered at Carthage in the Restituta PL 38, 559

1. All the faithful know the marriage of the king’s son, and his feast, and the spreading of the Lord’s Table is open to them all who will. But it is of importance to each one to see how he approaches, even when he is not forbidden to approach It. For the Holy Scriptures teach us that there are two feasts of the Lord; one to which the good and evil come, the other to which the evil come not. So then the feast, of which we have just now heard when the Gospel was being read, has both good and evil guests. All who excused themselves from this feast are evil; but not all those who entered in are good. You therefore who are the good guests at this feast do I address, who have in your minds the words, “He that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh judgment to himself.” All you who are such do I address, that ye look not for the good without, that ye bear with the evil within.

Convivium dominicum duplex: aliud hic, fidelium; aliud in coelis, beatorum. Nuptias filii regis ejusque convivium norunt omnes fideles, et apparatus mensae dominicae omnium est voluntati propositus. Interest autem quomodo quis accedat, cum accedere non vetatur. Scripturae quippe sanctae docent nos dominica duo esse convivia; unum quo veniunt boni et mali, alterum quo non accedunt mali. Ergo convivium Domini, unde modo cum Evangelium legeretur audivimus, habet utique bonos et malos. Omnes qui ab hoc convivio excusaverunt, mali sunt: sed non omnes qui intraverunt, boni sunt. Alloquor ergo vos, qui in hoc convivio boni discumbitis, quicumque attenditis quod dictum est, Qui manducat et bibit indigne, judicium sibi manducat et bibit . Omnes qui tales estis, alloquor vos, ut foris non quaeratis bonos, intus toleretis malos.

40.2 PL 38, 559

2. I do not doubt that ye wish to hear, Beloved, who they are of whom I have spoken in my address, that they should not look for the good without, and should bear with the evil within. If all within are evil, whom do I address? If all within are good, whom did I advise them to bear with being evil? Let me first then with the Lord’s assistance get out of this difficulty as best I can. If you consider good perfectly and strictly speaking, none is good but God Alone. Ye have the Lord saying most plainly, “Why callest thou Me good? there is none Good but One, that is, God.” How then can that marriage feast have good and bad guests, if “none is good but God Alone”? In the first place ye ought to know, that after a certain sort we are all evil. Yes, doubtless after a certain sort are we all evil; but after no sort are we all good. For can we compare ourselves with the Apostles, to whom the Lord Himself said, “If ye then being evil know how to give good gifts unto your children?” If we consider the Scriptures, there was but one evil one among the twelve Apostles, with reference to whom the Lord said in a certain place, “And ye are clean, but not all.” But yet in addressing them all together, He said, “If ye being evil.” Peter heard this, John heard this, Andrew heard this, all the rest of the eleven Apostles heard it. What did they hear? “If ye being evil know how to give good gifts unto your children; how much more shall your Father which is in heaven give good things to them that ask Him?” When they heard that they were evil, they were in despair; but when they heard that God in heaven was their Father, they revived. “Ye being evil;” what then is due to the evil, but punishment? “How much more shall your Father which is in heaven?” What is due to children but reward. In the name of “evil” is the dread of punishment; in the name of “children” is the hope of heirs.

Justi omnes hac in vita et mali sunt et boni. Non dubito audire velle Charitatem vestram, quinam isti sunt, de quibus alloquens disputavi, ut foris non quaerant bonos, intus tolerent malos. Si omnes mali sunt intus, quos sum allocutus? Si autem omnes boni sunt intus, quos monui ut tolerent malos? Prius ergo adjuvante Domino, de hac quaestione ut possumus, exeamus. Bonum si perfecte liquidoque perpendas, nemo bonus nisi unus Deus. Habes apertissime Dominum dicentem, Quid me interrogas de bono? Nemo bonus, nisi unus Deus . Quomodo ergo nuptiae illae habent bonos et malos, si nemo bonus nisi unus Deus? Primo scire debetis, secundum quemdam modum omnes nos esse malos. Prorsus secundum quemdam modum omnes mali sumus: secundum autem quemdam modum, non omnes boni sumus. Possumus enim nos Apostolis comparare? quibus ipse Dominus ait, Si ergo vos, cum sitis mali, nostis bona data dare filiis vestris. Si consideremus Scripturas, unus ibi erat malus inter duodecim Apostolos, propter quem Dominus ait quodam loco, Et vos mundi estis, sed non omnes . Allocutus tamen in commune omnes ait, Si vos cum sitis mali. Audivit hoc Petrus, audivit Joannes, audivit Andraeas, audierunt caeteri omnes undecim Apostoli. Quid audierunt? Vos cum sitis mali, nostis bona data dare filiis vestris: quanto magis Pater vester qui in coelis est, dabit bona petentibus se ? Audito quod mali essent, desperaverunt: audito quod Deus in coelis esset pater ipsorum, respiraverunt. Cum sitis, inquit, mali: quid ergo debetur malis, nisi supplicium? Quanto magis, inquit, Pater vester, qui in coelis est? quid debetur filiis, nisi praemium? In nomine malorum, metus poenarum: in nomine filiorum, spes haeredum.

40.3 PL 38, 560

3. According to a certain respect then they were evil, who after another respect were good. For to them to whom it is said, “Ye being evil know how to give good gifts unto your children;” is added immediately, “How much more shall your Father which is in heaven?” He is then the Father of the evil, but not of those who are to be left so; because He is the Physician of them who are to be cured. According to a certain sort then they were evil. And yet those guests of the Householder at the King’s marriage, were not I suppose of that number of whom it was said, “they invited good and bad,” that they should be reckoned among the number of the bad, who we have heard were shut out in his person who was found not to have a wedding garment. According to a certain respect, I repeat they were bad, who yet were good; and according to a certain respect they were good, who yet were bad. Hear John according to what respect they were bad: “If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.” Behold after what respect they were bad: because they had sin. According to what respect were they good? “If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” If then we should say, on the principle of this interpretation which ye have now heard me bring, as I think, out of the sacred Scriptures, viz. that the same men are both after a certain manner, good, and after a certain manner bad; if we should wish to receive according to this sense the words, “they invited good and bad,” the same persons, that is, at once good and bad; if we should wish so to receive them, we are not permitted so to do, by reason of that one who was found “not having a wedding garment,” and who was not merely “cast forth,” so as to be deprived of that feast, but so as to be condemned in the punishment of everlasting darkness.

Mali a convivio exclusi, quinam intelligendi. Secundum quid ergo mali erant iidem ipsi, qui secundum aliquid boni erant. Quibus enim dictum est, Cum sitis mali, nostis bona data dare filiis vestris; continuo subjectum, Quanto magis Pater vester qui in coelis est? Pater ergo malorum, sed non relinquendorum; quia medicus sanandorum. Secundum ergo quemdam modum mali erant. Et tamen illi convivae patrisfamilias in regis nuptiis, puto quia non erant de illo numero, de quibus dictum est, Invitaverunt bonos et malos; ut in numero malorum deputentur, quos audivimus exclusos in illo, qui inventus est non habere vestem nuptialem. Secundum quid, inquam, mali erant qui boni erant: secundum quid boni erant qui mali erant. Audi Joannem secundum quid mali erant: Si dixerimus quia non habemus peccatum, nos ipsos seducimus, et veritas in nobis non est. Ecce secundum quid mali erant: quia habebant peccatum. Secundum quid boni erant? Si confessi fuerimus peccata nostra, fidelis est et justus, qui dimittat nobis peccata, et mundet nos ab omni iniquitate . Si ergo dixerimus, secundum hanc expositionem, quam audistis me de sanctis Scripturis, ut arbitror, protulisse, eosdem homines et bonos esse secundum quemdam modum, et malos secundum quemdam modum; si secundum hunc sensum voluerimus accipere quod dictum est, Invitaverunt bonos et malos, id est eosdem ipsos et bonos et malos; si hoc voluerimus accipere, non permittimur, propter illum qui inventus est non habens vestem nuptialem, et non utcumque projectus, ut tantum illo convivio privaretur, sed ut aeterno in tenebrarum supplicio damnaretur.

40.4 PL 38, 560

4. But one will say, What of one man? what strange, what great matter is it, if one among the crowd “not having a wedding garment” crept in unperceived to the servants of the Householder? Could it be said because of that one, “they invited good and bad”? Attend therefore, my Brethren, and understand. That one man represented one class; for they were many. Here some diligent hearer may answer me, and say, “I have no wish for you to tell me your guesses; I wish to have it proved to me that that one represented many.” By the Lord’s present help, I will prove it clearly; nor will I search far, that I may be able to prove it. God will assist me in His own words in this place, and will furnish you by my ministry with a plain proof of it. “The Master of the house came in to see the guests.” See, my Brethren, the servants’ business was only to invite and bring in the good and bad; see that it is not said, that the servants took notice of the guests, and found among them a man which had not on a wedding garment, and spoke to him. This is not written. The Master of the house saw him, the Master of the house discovered, the Master of the house inspected, the Master of the house separated him out. It was not right to pass over this. But I have undertaken to establish another point, how that that one signifies many. “The Master of the house” then “came in to see the guests, and He found there a man which had not on a wedding garment. And He saith unto him, Friend, how camest thou in hither not having a wedding garment? And he was speechless.” For He who questioned him was One, to whom he could give no feigned reply. The garment that was looked for is in the heart, not on the body; for had it been put on externally, it could not have been concealed even from the servants. Where that wedding garment must be put on, hear in the words, “Let thy priests be clothed with righteousness.” Of that garment the Apostle speaks, “If so be that we shall be found clothed, and not naked.” Therefore was he discovered by the Lord, who escaped the notice of the servants. Being questioned, he is speechless: he is bound, cast out, and condemned one by many. I have said, Lord, that Thou teachest us that in this Thou dost give warning to all. Recollect then with me, my Brethren, the words which ye have heard, and ye will at once discover, at once determine, that that one was many. True it was one man whom the Lord questioned, to one He said, “Friend, how camest thou in hither?” It was one who was speechless, and of that same one was it said, “Bind him hand and foot, and cast him into outer darkness; there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.” Why? “For many are called, but few chosen.” How can any one gainsay this manifestation of the truth? “Cast him,” He saith, “into outer darkness.” “Him,” that one man assuredly, of whom the Lord saith, “for many are called, but few chosen.” So then it is the few who are not cast out. He was it is true but one man “who had not the wedding garment. Cast him out.” But why is he cast out? “For many are called, but few chosen.” Leave alone the few, cast out the many. It is true, that man was but one. Yet undoubtedly that one not only was many, but those many in numbers far surpassed the number of the good. For the good are many also; but in comparison of the bad, they are few. In the crop there is much wheat; compare it with the chaff, and the grains of corn are few. The same persons considered in themselves are many, in comparison with the bad are few. How do we prove that in themselves they are many? “Many shall come from the East and from the West.” Whither shall they come? To that feast, into which both good and bad enter. But speaking of another feast, He subjoined, “and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven.” That is the feast to which the bad shall not approach. Be that feast which now is, received worthily, that we may attain to the other. The same then are many, who are also few; in themselves many; in comparison with the bad few. Therefore what saith the Lord? He found one, and said, “Let the many be cast out, the few remain.” For to say, “many are called, but few chosen,” is nothing else than to show plainly who in this present feast are accounted to be such, as to be brought to that other feast, where no bad men shall come.

Uno excluso multos exclusos significari. Sed dicit aliquis: Quid de uno homine? quid mirum? quid magnum, si servis patrisfamilias subrepsit unus in turba non habens vestem nuptialem? Numquid propter illum poterat dici, Invitaverunt bonos et malos? Intendite ergo, et intelligite, fratres mei. Unus ille unum genus erat; nam multi erant. Respondeat hic mihi diligens auditor, et dicat: Nolo mihi narres suspiciones tuas; probari mihi volo quia unus ille multi erant. Aderit Dominus, probabo plane, nec longius requiram ut possim probare. In ipsis suis verbis Deus adjuvabit me, et quod vobis apertum sit ministrabit per me. Ecce ingressus paterfamilias, ut inspiceret discumbentes. Videte, fratres mei, quia non pertinuit ad servos, nisi invitare et adducere bonos et malos: videte quia non dictum est, Consideraverunt servi discumbentes, et ibi invenerunt hominem non habentem vestem nuptialem, et dixerunt ei. Non hoc scriptum est. Paterfamilias inspexit, paterfamilias invenit, paterfamilias distinxit, paterfamilias separavit. Hoc quidem praetereundum non fuit. Aliud autem probare suscepimus, quomodo multi essent ille unus. Intravit ergo paterfamilias inspicere discumbentes, et invenit hominem non habentem vestem nuptialem: et ait illi, Amice, quomodo huc venisti non habens vestem nuptialem? At ille obmutuit. Talis enim interrogabat, cui ille fingere nihil poterat. Vestis quippe illa in corde, non in carne inspiciebatur: quae si desuper fuisset induta, etiam servis non fuisset occultata. Ubi sit induenda vestis nuptialis, accipite, ubi loquitur, Sacerdotes tui induantur justitiam . De ea veste dicit Apostolus, Si tamen induti, et non nudi inveniamur . Ergo inventus est a Domino qui servos latebat. Interrogatus obmutescit: ligatur, projicitur, damnatur unus a multis. Domine, dixeram, quia tu admones omnes admonere. Recolite mecum verba quae addistis, et multos fuisse unum illum modo invenietis, modo judicabitis. Unum certe interrogaverat Dominus, uni dixerat, Amice, quomodo huc intrasti? Unus obmutuerat, et de ipso uno dictum fuerat, Ligate illi manus et pedes, et mittite illum in tenebras exteriores: ibi erit fletus et stridor dentium. Quare hoc? Multi enim sunt vocati, pauci vero electi. Quid huic manifestationi veritatis quispiam contradicat? Mittite, inquit, illum in tenebras exteriores. Illum certe unum, de quo dicit Dominus, Multi enim sunt vocati, pauci vero electi. Ergo pauci non mittuntur foras. Certe unus erat ille, qui non habebat vestem nuptialem. Projicite eum. Quare projicitur? Multi enim sunt vocati, pauci vero electi. Dimittite paucos, projicite multos. Certe unus erat. Unus omnino iste, non solum multi erant, sed multitudine bonorum numerum superabant. Multi enim et boni: sed in comparatione malorum pauci sunt boni. Multa frumenta nata sunt: compara paleis, et pauca grana sunt. Iidem ipsi in se ipsis multi, in comparatione malorum pauci. Quomodo probamus quia in se ipsis multi? Multi ab oriente et ab occidente venient. Quo venient? Ad illud convivium, in quod boni et mali intrant. De alio convivio locutus adjunxit, Et recumbent cum Abraham, Isaac et Jacob, in regno coelorum . Illud est convivium quo non accessuri sunt mali. Hoc quod modo est digne accipiatur, ut ad illud perveniatur. Iidem ergo multi, qui pauci: multi in se ipsis, pauci in malorum comparatione. Ergo quid ait Dominus? Invenit unum, et ait, Projiciantur multi, remaneant pauci. Dicere enim, Multi vocati, pauci vero electi, nihil est aliud, quam aperte ostendere, qui in isto convivio tales habeantur, ut ad aliud convivium perducantur, quo nullus accedet malorum.

40.5 PL 38, 561

5. What is it then? I would not that ye all who approach the Lord’s Table which is in this life, should be with the many who are to be shut out, but with the few who are to be reserved. And how shall ye be able to attain to this? Take “the wedding garment.” Ye will say, “Explain this ‘wedding garment’ to us.” Without a doubt, that is the garment which none but the good have, who are to be left at the feast, reserved unto that other feast to which no bad man approaches, who are to be brought safely thither by the grace of the Lord; these have “the wedding garment.” Let us then, my Brethren, seek for those among the faithful who have something which bad men have not, and this will be “the wedding garment.” If we speak of sacraments, ye see how that these are common to the bad and good. Is it Baptism? Without Baptism it is true no one attaineth to God; but not every one that hath Baptism attaineth to Him. I cannot therefore understand Baptism, the Sacrament itself that is, to be “the wedding garment;” for this garment I see in the good, I see in the bad. Peradventure it is the Altar, or That which is received at the Altar. But no; we see that many eat, and “eat and drink judgment to themselves.” What is it then? Is it fasting? The wicked fast also. Is it running together to the Church? The wicked run thither also. Lastly, is it miracles? Not only do the good and bad perform them, but sometimes the good perform them not. See, among the ancient people Pharaoh’s magicians wrought miracles, the Israelites did not; among the Israelites, Moses only and Aaron wrought them; the rest did not, but saw, and feared, and believed. Were the magicians of Pharaoh who did miracles, better men than the people of Israel who could not do them, and yet that people were the people of God. In the Church itself, hear the Apostle, “Are all prophets? Have all the gifts of healing? Do all speak with tongues?”

Quaenam sit vestis nuptialis. Quid ergo est? Omnes qui acceditis ad mensam dominicam, quae hic est, nolo esse cum multis separandis, sed cum paucis conservandis. Unde hoc poteritis? Accipite vestem nuptialem. Expone, inquies, nobis vestem nuptialem. Procul dubio illa vestis est, quam non habent nisi boni, in convivio relinquendi, servandi ad convivium quo nullus malus accedit, per Domini gratiam perducendi: ipsi habent vestem nuptialem. Quaeramus ergo, fratres mei, inter fideles qui sunt qui habent aliquid, quod mali non habent, et ipsa erit vestis nuptialis. Si Sacramenta dixerimus, videtis quemadmodum sint malis bonisque communia. Baptismus est? Sine Baptismo quidem nemo ad Deum pervenit: sed non omnis qui habet Baptismum ad Deum pervenit. Non ergo possum intelligere Baptismum esse vestem nuptialem, id est ipsum sacramentum; quam vestem video in bonis, video in malis. Forte altare est, vel quod accipitur de altari. Videmus quia multi manducant, et judicium sibi manducant et bibunt. Quid ergo est? Jejunatur? Jejunant et mali. Ad Ecclesiam concurritur? Concurrunt et mali. Postremo miracula fiunt? Non solum boni faciunt et mali, sed aliquando non faciunt boni. Ecce in vetere populo magi Pharaonis miracula faciebant , Israelitae non faciebant: in Israelitis solus Moyses et Aaron faciebant; caeteri non faciebant, sed videbant, timebant, credebant. Numquid meliores magi Pharaonis miracula facientes, quam populus Israel, qui miracula facere non valebat, et ad Deum tamen populus pertinebat? In ipsa Ecclesia, Apostolum audi, Numquid omnes prophetae? numquid omnes dona habent curationum? numquid omnes linguis loquuntur ?

40.6 PL 38, 562

6. What is that “wedding garment” then? This is the wedding garment: “Now the end of the commandment,” says the Apostle, “is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned.” This is “the wedding garment.” Not charity of any kind whatever; for very often they who are partakers together of an evil conscience seem to love one another. They who commit robberies together, who love the hurtful arts of sorceries, and the stage together, who join together in the shout of the chariot race, or the wild beast fight; these very often love one another; but in these there is no “charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned. The wedding garment” is such charity as this. “Though I speak with the tongues of men and of Angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, and a tinkling cymbal.” Tongues have come in alone, and it is said to them, “How came ye in hither not having a wedding garment?” “Though,” said he, “I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge, and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing.” See, these are the miracles of men who very often have not “the wedding garment.” “Though,” he says, “I have all these, and have not Christ, I am nothing.” Is then “the gift of prophecy” nothing? is then “the knowledge of mysteries” nothing? It is not that these are nothing; but “I,” if I have them, “and have not charity, am nothing.” How many good things profit nothing without this one good thing! If then I have not charity, though I bestow alms freely upon the poor, though I have come to the confession of Christ’s Name even unto blood and fire, these things may be done even through the love of glory, and so are vain. Because then they may be done even from the love of glory, and so be vain, and not through the rich charity of a godly affection, he names them all also in express terms, and do thou give ear to them; “though I distribute all my goods for the use of the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing.” This then is “the wedding garment.” Question yourselves; if ye have it, ye may be without fear in the Feast of the Lord. In one and the same man there exist two things, charity and desire. Let charity be born in thee, if it be yet unborn, and if it be born, be it nourished, fostered, increased. But as to that desire, though in this life it cannot be utterly extinguished; “for if we say that we have no sin we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us;” but in so far as desire is in us, so far we are not without sin: let charity increase, desire decrease; that the one, that is, charity, may one day be perfected, and desire be consumed. Put on “the wedding garment:” you I address, who as yet have it not. Ye are already within, already do ye approach to the Feast, and still have ye not yet the garment to do honour to the Bridegroom; “Ye are yet seeking your own things, not the things which are Jesus Christ’s.” For “the wedding garment” is taken in honour of the union, the union, that is, of the Bridegroom to the Bride. Ye know the Bridegroom; it is Christ. Ye know the Bride; it is the Church. Pay honour to the Bride, pay honour to the Bridegroom. If ye pay due honour to them both, ye will be their children. Therefore in this make progress. Love the Lord, and so learn to love yourselves; that when by loving the Lord ye shall have loved yourselves, ye may securely love your neighbour as yourselves. For when I find a man that does not love himself, how shall I commit his neighbour whom he should love as himself to him? And who is there, you will say, who does not love himself? Who is there? See, “He that loveth iniquity hateth his own soul.” Does he love himself, who loves his body, and hates his soul to his own hurt, to the hurt of both his body and soul? And who loves his own soul? He that loveth God with all his heart and with all his mind. To such an one I would at once entrust his neighbour. “Love your neighbour as yourselves.”

Vestis nuptialis charitas. Bona caetera sine charitate non prosunt. Charitas et cupiditas in homine. Quae est ergo vestis illa nuptialis? Haec est vestis nuptialis: Finis autem praecepti est, Apostolus dicit, charitas de corde puro, et conscientia bona, et fide non ficta . Haec est vestis nuptialis. Non quaecumque charitas: nam plerumque videntur se diligere etiam homines participes malae conscientiae. Qui simul latrocinia faciunt, qui simul maleficia, qui simul histriones amant, qui simul aurigis et venatoribus clamant, plerumque diligunt se: sed non est in eis charitas de corde puro, et conscientia bona, et fide non ficta. Talis charitas vestis est nuptialis. Si linguis hominum loquar et Angelorum, charitatem autem non habeam, factus sum, inquit, ut aeramentum sonans, aut cymbalum tinniens. Advenerunt linguae solae, et dicitur eis, Quid huc intrastis non habentes vestem nuptialem? Si habuero, inquit, prophetiam, et sciero omnia sacramenta, et omnem scientiam, et habuero fidem, ita ut montes transferam, charitatem autem non habeam, nihil sum. Ecce sunt illa miracula hominum plerumque non habentium vestem nuptialem. Si haec, inquit, habeam omnia, et Christum non habeam, nihil sum. Nihil, inquit, sum. Ergo prophetia nihil est? ergo scientia sacramentorum nihil est? Non illa nihil sunt: sed ego, si illa habeam, et charitatem non habeam, nihil sum. Quanta bona nihil prosunt sine uno bono? Si non habeam charitatem, si eleemosynas largior in pauperes, si ad confessionem nominis Christi usque ad sanguinem, usque ad ignes accedo, possunt ista fieri et amore gloriae, inania sunt. Quia ergo possunt fieri etiam amore gloriae inania, non charitate pinguissima pietatis, etiam ipsa commemorat, et ipsa audi: Si distribuero omnia mea in usum pauperum, et si tradidero corpus meum ut ardeam, charitatem non habeam, nihil mihi prodest . Haec est vestis nuptialis. Interrogate vos; si habetis illam, securi estis in convivio dominico. Duae sunt in homine uno, charitas et cupiditas. Charitas nascatur in te, si nondum nata est; et si nata est, alatur, nutriatur, crescat. Illa vero cupiditas, et si in hac vita exstingui penitus non potest; quia si dixerimus quod peccatum non habemus, nos ipsos seducimus, et veritas in nobis non est: in quantum autem est in nobis cupiditas, in tantum sine peccato non sumus: charitas crescat, cupiditas decrescat; ut aliquando illa perficiatur, hoc est charitas, cupiditas consumatur. Induite vos vestem nuptialem: vos alloquor, qui necdum habetis. Jam intus estis, jam ad convivium acceditis, et vestem in honorem sponsi nondum habetis: vestra adhuc quaeritis, non quae Jesu Christi. Vestis enim nuptialis in honore accipitur conjugationis, id est sponsi et sponsae. Nostis sponsum: Christus est. Nostis sponsam: Ecclesia est. Deferte nubenti, deferte ducenti. Si istis bene detuleritis qui nubent, vos filii eritis. Ergo in hoc proficite. Diligite Dominum, et ibi discite diligere vos: ut cum diligendo Dominum dilexeritis vos, securi diligatis proximos sicut vos. Quando enim non invenio se ipsum diligentem, quomodo ei permitto proximum, quem diligat sicut se ipsum? Et quis est, inquit, qui non diligat se ipsum? Ecce quis est: Qui diligit iniquitatem, odit animam suam . Numquid diligit se, qui amat carnem suam, et odit animam suam, malo suo, malo animae suae et carnis suae? Quis autem diligit animam suam? Qui diligit Deum ex toto corde suo, et ex tota mente sua. Jam tali committo proximum. Diligite proximos, tanquam vos ipsos.

40.7 PL 38, 563

7. One may say, “Who is my neighbour?” Every man is your neighbour. Had we not all the same two parents? Animals of every species are neighbours one to the other, the dove to the dove, the leopard to the leopard, the asp to the asp, the sheep to the sheep, and is not man neighbour to man? Call to mind the ordering of the creation. God spake, the waters brought forth swimming creatures, great whales, fish, birds, and such like things. Did all the birds come of one bird? Did all vultures come of one vulture? Did all doves come of one dove? Did all snakes come of one snake? or all gilt-heads of one gilt-head? or all sheep of one sheep? No, the earth assuredly brought forth all these kinds together. But when it came to man, the earth did not bring forth man. One father was made for us; not even two, father and mother: one father, I say, was made for us, not even two, father and mother; but out of the one father came the one mother; the one father came from none, but was made by God, and the one mother came out of him. Mark then the nature of our race: we flowed out of one fountain; and because that one was turned to bitterness, we all became from a good, a wild olive tree. And so grace came also. One begat us unto sin and death, yet as one race, yet as neighbours one to another, yet as not merely like, but related to each other. There came One against one; against the one who scattered, One who gathereth. Thus against the one who slayeth, is the One who maketh alive. “For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.” Now as whosoever is born of the first, dieth; so whosoever believeth in Christ is made alive. Provided, that is, that he have “the wedding garment,” and be invited as one who is to remain, and not to be cast out.

Proximus, omnis homo. Quis est, inquit, mihi proximus? Omnis homo proximus tuus est. Nonne duos parentes habuimus omnes? Proxima sunt sibi cujusque generis animalia, columbus columbo, pardus pardo, aspis aspidi, pecus pecori, et non est proximus homo homini? Recolite institutionem creaturae. Dixit Deus, protulerunt aquae; natantia, cetos magnos, pisces, alites, similiaque protulerunt. Numquid de una ave omnes aves? Numquid de uno vulture omnes vultures? Numquid de uno columbo omnes columbi? Numquid de uno colubro omnes colubri? Numquid de una aurata omnes auratae? Numquid de una ove omnes oves? Utique simul terra genera protulit omnia. Ventum est ad hominem, et non protulit terra hominem. Factus est nobis unus pater: nec saltem duo, pater et mater: factus est, inquam, nobis unus pater, nec saltem duo, pater et mater: sed de uno patre una mater; unus de nullo, sed a Deo factus est, et una de illo . Attendite genus nostrum: de uno fonte manavimus; et quia ille unus in amaritudinem versus est, omnes ex oliva oleaster facti sumus. Venit et gratia. Generavit unus ad peccatum et ad mortem, tamen unum genus, tamen proximos sibi omnes; tamen non solum similes, sed etiam cognatos. Venit unus contra unum: contra unum qui sparsit, unus qui colligit. Sic contra unum qui occidit, unus qui vivificat. Sicut enim in Adam omnes moriuntur, sic in Christo omnes vivificabuntur . Sed quomodo de illo omnis qui nascitur, moritur: sic in Christo omnis qui credit, vivificatur. Sed si habeat vestem nuptialem, si invitetur servandus, non separandus.

40.8 PL 38, 564

8. So then, my Brethren, have charity. I have explained it to be this garment, this “wedding garment.” Faith is praised, it is plain, it is praised: but what kind of faith this is, the Apostle distinguishes. For certain who boasted of faith, and had not a good conversation, the Apostle James rebukes and says, “Thou believest there is one God, thou doest well; the devils also believe and tremble.” Call to mind with me whereupon Peter was praised, whereupon called blessed. Was it because he said, “Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God”? He who pronounced Him blessed, regarded not the sound of the words, but the affection of the heart. For would ye know that Peter’s blessedness lay not in these words? The devils also said the same. “We know Thee who Thou art, the Son of God.” Peter confessed Him to be “the Son of God;” the devils confessed Him to be “the Son of God.” “Distinguish, my lord, distinguish between the two.” I do make a plain distinction. Peter spake in love, the devils from fear. And again Peter says, “I am with Thee, even unto death.” The devils say, “What have we to do with Thee?” So then thou who art come to the feast, glory not of faith only. Distinguish well the nature of this faith; and then in thee is recognised “the wedding garment.” Let the Apostle make the distinction, let him teach us; “neither circumcision availeth anything, nor uncircumcision, but faith.” Tell us, what faith? do not even the devils believe and tremble? I will tell thee, he says, and listen, I will now draw the distinction, “But faith which worketh by love.” What faith, then, and of what kind? “That which worketh by love.” “Though I have all knowledge,” he says, “and all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing.” Have faith with love; for love without faith ye cannot have. This I warn, this I exhort, this in the name of the Lord I teach you, Beloved, that ye have faith with love; for ye may possibly have faith without love. I do not exhort you to have faith, but love. For ye cannot have love without faith; the love I mean of God and your neighbour; whence can it come without faith? How doth he love God, who doth not believe on God? How doth the fool love God, “who saith in his heart, there is no God”? Possible it is that ye may believe that Christ hath come and not love Christ. But it is not possible that ye should love Christ, and yet say that Christ hath not come.

Fides non quaelibet laudatur. Habete itaque charitatem, fratres mei. Exposui vobis vestem nuptialem, exposui vobis vestem. Laudatur fides, constat, laudatur: sed quae fides, distinguit Apostolus. Nam quosdam gloriantes de fide, et non habentes bonos mores, objurgat apostolus Jacobus, et dicit: Tu credis quoniam unus est Deus, et bene facis. Et daemones credunt, et contremiscunt . Unde laudatus est Petrus, unde dictus est beatus, recolite mecum. Quia dixit, Tu es Christus Filius Dei vivi ? Ille non sonum verborum, sed affectum cordis intendit, qui beatum pronuntiavit. Nam vultis nosse beatitudinem Petri non in illis verbis fuisse? Haec dixerunt et daemones. Scimus qui sis; tu es Filius Dei . Filium Dei confessus est Petrus: Filium Dei confessi sunt daemones. Distingue, domine, distingue. Distinguo plane. Petrus dixit in amore, daemones a timore. Denique ille dicit, Tecum sum usque ad mortem . Illi dicunt, Quid nobis et tibi ? Ergo qui venisti ad convivium, noli de sola fide gloriari. Distingue et ipsam fidem, et tunc in te agnoscitur vestis nuptialis. Distinguat Apostolus, doceat nos: Neque circumcisio, inquit, aliquid valet, neque praeputium, sed fides. Dic quae: numquid non et daemones credunt et contremiscunt? Dico, inquit, audi, distinguo, modo distinguo: Sed fides, quae per dilectionem operatur . Quae ergo fides? qualis fides? Quae per dilectionem operatur. Omnem, inquit, scientiam si habeam, et omnem fidem, ita ut montes transferam, charitatem autem non habeam, nihil sum. Habete fidem cum dilectione: nam dilectionem non potestis habere sine fide. Hoc moneo, hoc exhortor, hoc in nomine Domini doceo Charitatem vestram, ut habeatis fidem cum dilectione: quia potestis habere fidem sine dilectione. Nam non vos exhortor ut habeatis fidem, sed charitatem. Non potestis enim habere charitatem sine fide; charitatem enim dico Dei et proximi: unde potest ista esse sine fide? Quomodo amat Deum, qui non credit in Deum? Quomodo amat Deum stultus, qui dicit in corde suo, Non est Deus ? Potest fieri ut credas venisse Christum, et non diligas Christum. Non potest autem fieri ut diligas Christum, et non dicas venisse Christum.

40.9 PL 38, 564

9. So then, have faith with love. This is the “wedding garment.” Ye who love Christ, love one another, love your friends, love your enemies. Let not this be hard to you. What then do ye lose thereby, when ye gain so much? What? dost thou ask of God as some great favour, that thine enemy may die? This is not “the wedding garment.” Turn thy thoughts to the Bridegroom Himself hanging upon the Cross for thee, and praying to His Father for His enemies; “Father,” saith He, “forgive them, for they know not what they do.” Thou hast seen the Bridegroom speaking thus; see too the friend of the Bridegroom, a guest “with the wedding garment.” Look at the blessed Stephen, how he rebukes the Jews as though in rage and resentment, “Ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye have resisted the Holy Ghost. Which of the Prophets have not your fathers killed?” Thou hast heard how severe he is with his tongue. And at once thou art prepared to speak against any one; and I would it were against him who offendeth God, and not who offendeth thee. One offendeth God, and thou dost not rebuke him; he offendeth thee, and thou criest out; where is that “wedding garment”? Ye have heard therefore how Stephen was severe; now hear how he loved. He offended those whom he was rebuking, and was stoned by them. And as he was being overwhelmed and bruised to death by the hands of his furious persecutors on every side, and the blows of the stones, he first said, “Lord Jesus Christ, receive my spirit.” Then after he had prayed for himself standing, he bent the knee for them who were stoning him, and said, “Lord, lay not this sin to their charge; let me die in my body, but let not these die in their souls. And when he had said this, he fell asleep.” After these words he added no more; he spake them and departed; his last prayer was for his enemies. Learn ye hereby to have “the wedding garment.” So do thou too bend the knee, and beat thy forehead against the ground, and as thou art about to approach the Table of the Lord, the Feast of the Holy Scriptures, do not say, “O that mine enemy might die! Lord, if I have deserved ought of Thee, slay mine enemy.” Because if so be that thou sayest so, dost thou not fear lest He should answer thee, “If I should choose to slay thine enemy, I should first slay thee. What! dost thou glory because thou hast now come invited hither? Think only what thou wast but a little while ago. Hast thou not blasphemed Me? hast thou not derided Me? didst thou not wish to wipe out My Name from off the earth? Yet now thou dost applaud thyself because thou hast come invited hither! If I had slain thee when thou wast Mine enemy, how could I have made thee My friend? Why, by thy wicked prayers dost thou teach Me to do, what I did not in thine own case?” Yea rather God saith to thee, “Let me teach thee to imitate Me. When I was hanging on the Cross, I said, ‘Forgive them, for they know not what they do.’ This lesson I taught My brave soldier. Be thou My recruit against the devil. In no other way wilt thou fight at all unconquerably, unless thou dost pray for thine enemies. Yet by all means ask this, yea ask this very thing, ask that thou mayest persecute thine enemy; but ask it with discernment; distinguish well what thou askest. See, a man is thine enemy; answer me, what is it in him which is at enmity with thee? Is it in this, that he is a man, that he is at enmity with thee? No. What then? That he is evil. In that he is a man, in that he is that I made him, he is not at enmity with thee.” He saith to thee, “I did not make man evil; he became evil by disobedience, who obeyed the devil rather than God. What he has made himself, is at enmity with thee; in that he is evil, he is thine enemy; not in that he is a man. For I hear the word “man,” and “evil;” the one is the name of nature, the other of sin; the sin I cure; and the nature I preserve.” And so thy God saith to thee, “See, I do avenge thee, I do slay thine enemy; I take away that which makes him evil, I preserve that which constitutes him a man: now if I shall have made him a good man, have I not slain thine enemy, and made him thy friend?” So ask on what thou art asking, not that the men may perish, but that these their enmities may perish. For if thou pray for this, that the man may die; it is the prayer of one wicked man against another; and when thou dost say, “Slay the wicked one,” God answereth thee, “Which of you?”

Charitas ad inimicos extendi debet. Oratio contra inimicos quaenam illicita, quaenam licita. Ergo habete fidem cum dilectione. Ista est vestis nuptialis. Amate invicem, qui Christum diligitis: amate amicos, amate inimicos. Non sit vobis durum. Quid ergo perditis, ubi multum acquiritis? Quid pro magno rogas Deum, ut moriatur inimicus tuus? Non est vestis ista nuptialis. Attende ipsum sponsum in cruce pro te pendentem, et pro suis inimicis Patrem rogantem: Pater, inquit, ignosce illis, quia nesciunt quid faciunt . Vidisti sponsum ista dicentem, vide et amicum sponsi cum veste nuptiali invitatum. Benedictum Stephanum attendite, quomodo increpat Judaeos, tanquam saevus, tanquam iratus: Dura cervice, et non circumcisi corde et auribus, vos restitistis Spiritui sancto. Quem Prophetarum non occiderunt patres vestri? Audisti quomodo lingua saeviat. Adhuc tu paratus es dicere in quemlibet, atque utinam in eum dicas, qui Deum offenderit, non qui te. Offendit Deum et non increpas; offendit te, clamas: ubi est vestis illa nuptialis? Audistis ergo quomodo saevierit Stephanus: audite quomodo dilexerit. Offendit eos quos increpabat, lapidatus est ab eis. Et cum undique furentium manibus, et lapidum ictibus premeretur et tunderetur, prius ait: Domine Jesu Christe, accipe spiritum meum. Deinde posteaquam pro se stans oravit, pro illis qui lapidabant eum, genu fixit, et dixit: Domine, ne statuas eis hoc delictum: ego moriar in carne, non illi in corde. Et hoc dicto obdormivit . Post haec verba nihil addidit: dixit, et abiit; novissima ejus oratio pro inimicis fuit. Discite habere vestem nuptialem. Ita et tu fige genua, et collide frontem in terra, et accessurus ad mensam Domini, ad convivium sanctarum Scripturarum, noli dicere, Si moriatur inimicus: Domine, si quid a te merui, occide inimicum meum. Quod si forte dicis, non times ne tibi respondeat: Si occidere vellem inimicum tuum, te prius occiderem? An gloriaris, quia modo invitatus venisti? Cogita, paululum ante quid fuisti. Nonne me blasphemasti? nonne me irrisisti? nonne nomen meum de terra delere voluisti? sed plaudis tibi, quia invitatus venisti. Si te occidissem inimicum, quem facerem amicum? Quid male orando doces me, quod non feci in te? Imo ego, dicit tibi Deus, doceam te, ut imiteris me. In cruce pendens dixi, Ignosce illis, quia nesciunt quid faciunt. Docui hoc militem meum. Esto tiro meus contra diabolum. Aliter invicte nullo modo pugnabis, nisi pro tuis inimicis oraveris. Dic plane, dic etiam hoc, dic ut inimicum tuum persequaris: sed scienter dic; distingue quod dicis. Ecce homo est inimicus tuus: responde mihi, quid in illo inimicetur tibi; numquid hoc quod homo est, inimicatur tibi? Non. Sed quid? Quod malus est. Quod homo est, quod ego feci, non tibi inimicatur. Dicit tibi: Ego hominem feci non malum: factus est malus per inobedientiam, qui potius zabulo obedivit, quam Deo. Quod ipse fecit, hoc tibi inimicatur: unde malus, tibi inimicus est; non unde homo est. Audio enim hominem, et malum: unum nomen est naturae, alterum culpae: sano culpam, et servo naturam. Hoc tibi dicit Deus tuus: Et ecce vindico te, occido inimicum tuum; de illo tollo quod malus est, servo quod homo est: numquid si fecero illum hominem bonum, non occidi inimicum tuum, et feci amicum tuum? Sic roga quod rogas, ut non homines pereant, sed ipsae inimicitiae pereant. Si autem hoc oras, ut homo moriatur; malus oras contra malum: et cum dicis, Occide malum; respondet tibi, Quem vestrum.

40.10 PL 38, 566

10. Extend your love then, and limit it not to your wives and children. Such love is found even in beasts and sparrows. Ye know the sparrows and the swallows how they love their mates, how together they hatch their eggs, and nourish their young together, by a sort of free and natural kindliness, and with no thought of a return. For the sparrow does not say, “I will nourish my young, that when I am grown old, they may feed me.” He has no such thought; he loves and feeds them, for the love of them; displays the affection of a parent, and looks for no return. And so, I know, I am sure, do ye love your children. “For the children ought not to lay up for the parents, but the parents for the children.” Yea upon this plea it is that many of you excuse your covetousness, that ye are getting for your children, and are laying by for them. But I say, extend your love, let this love grow; for to love wives and children, is not yet that “wedding garment.” Have faith to Godward. First love God. Extend yourselves out to God; and whomsoever ye shall be able, draw on to God. There is thine enemy: let him be drawn to God. There is a son, a wife, a servant; let them be all drawn to God. There is a stranger; let him be drawn to God. There is an enemy; let him be drawn to God. Draw, draw on thine enemy; by drawing him on he shall cease to be thine enemy. So let charity be advanced, so be it nourished, that being nourished it may be perfected; so be “the wedding garment” put on; so be the image of God, after which we were created, by this our advancing, engraven anew in us. For by sin was it bruised, and worn away. How is it bruised? how worn away? When it is rubbed against the earth? And what is, “When it is rubbed against the earth”? When it is worn by earthly lusts. For “though man walketh in this image, yet is he disquieted in vain.” Truth is looked for in God’s image, not vanity. By the love of the truth then be that image, after which we were created, engraven anew, and His Own tribute rendered to our Cæsar. For so ye have heard from the Lord’s answer, when the Jews tempted Him, as He said, “Why tempt ye Me, ye hypocrites; show Me the tribute money,” that is, the impress and superscription of the image. Show me what ye pay, what ye get ready, what is exacted of you. And “they showed Him a denarius;” and “He asked whose image and superscription it had.” They answered, “Cæsar’s.” So Cæsar looks for his own image. It is not Cæsar’s will that what he ordered to be made should be lost to him, and it is not surely God’s will that what He hath made should be lost to Him. Cæsar, my Brethren, did not make the money; the masters of the mint make it; the workmen have their orders, he issues his commands to his ministers. His image was stamped upon the money; on the money was Cæsar’s image. And yet he requires what others have stamped; he puts it in his treasures; he will not have it refused him. Christ’s coin is man. In him is Christ’s image, in him Christ’s Name, Christ’s gifts, Christ’s rules of duty.

Extendenda dilectio, ut omnes rapiat ad Deum. Extendite ergo dilectionem, non usque ad conjuges et filios vestros. Ista dilectio etiam in pecoribus et passeribus invenitur. Scitis istos passeres et hirundines quemadmodum diligant conjuges, simul ova foveant, simul pullos nutriant, grata quadam et naturali bonitate, nulla cogitata mercede. Non enim dicit passer: Nutriam filios meos, ut cum senuero, pascant me. Nihil horum cogitat: gratis amat, gratis pascit; affectum parentis exhibet, retributionem non requirit. Et nos, novi, scio, sic amatis filios vestros. Non enim debent filii parentibus thesaurizare, sed parentes filiis . Hinc etiam multi excitatis avaritiam vestram, quia filiis vestris acquiritis, eisque servatis. Sed extendite dilectionem, crescat ista dilectio: amare autem filios et conjuges, nondum vestis illa nuptialis est. Habete fidem ad Deum. Prius diligite Deum. Extendite ad Deum; et quos poteritis, rapite ad Deum. Inimicus est: rapiatur ad Deum. Filius est, uxor est, servus est: rapiatur ad Deum. Peregrinus est: rapiatur ad Deum. Inimicus est: rapiatur ad Deum. Rape, rape inimicum: rapiendo non erit inimicus. Sic proficiatur, sic charitas nutriatur, ut nutrita perficiatur: sic vestis nuptialis induatur: sic imago Dei, ad quam creati sumus, proficiendo resculpatur. Peccando enim obsolefacta erat, attrita erat. Unde attrita? unde obsolefacta? Cum fricatur ad terram. Quid est, ad terram fricatur? Terrenis cupiditatibus teritur. Quanquam enim in imagine ambulet homo, tamen vane conturbatur . Veritas quaeritur in Dei imagine, non vanitas. Amando enim veritatem imago illa, ad quam creati sumus, resculpatur, et proprius nummus Caesari nostro reddatur. Sic enim ex responsione Domini audistis, tentantibus Judaeis dicentem Dominum, Quid me tentatis, hypocritae? Ostendite mihi numisma census, id est, expressionem imaginis et superscriptionem. Ostendite mihi quid solvitis, quid paratis, quid a vobis exigitur; ostendite mihi. Ostenderunt illi denarium: et quaesivit cujus haberet imaginem et superscriptionem. Responderunt, Caesaris . Caesar iste et imaginem suam quaerit. Caesar non vult sibi perire quod jussit, et Deus non vult perire quod fecit. Caesar, fratres mei, non fecit nummum: monetarii faciunt; artificibus jubetur, suis ministris imperavit. Imago exprimebatur in nummo: in nummo est imago Caesaris. Et tamen quod alii impresserunt quaeritur: ille thesaurizat, ille non vult sibi negari. Moneta Christi homo est. Ibi imago Christi, ibi nomen Christi, munus Christi, et officia Christi.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Salva per dopo

Inserisci la tua email: ti invieremo un link per accedere. Nessuna password. Ciò che salvi (voci, versetti, capitoli, documenti) ti segue su ogni dispositivo.