Tammuz

TAMMŪZ. – Mesopotamian god (Sumerian DUMU-ZI, Akkadian Tamūzu) of vegetation, young and blossoming again in spring after the winter death (= descent into the underworld or death), dying when the summer sun dries out the earth. The cult of T. was Sumerian (DUMU-ZI = “son”), predating 5000 B.C. Its annual festival was celebrated in the fourth month, called T. (June–July). Closely associated with the cult of T. was that of Ištar, the “queen of heaven” (Akkadian Išarat šamē) mentioned in Jer. 7:18, the Assyrian Venus with whom the Phoenician Astarte was identified.

Perhaps he is connected with the legendary King Dumu-zi (who reigned for 28,880 years), a famous hunter, successor of Lugalbanda, tamer of dragons, and predecessor of Gilgameš. Like Šamaš, T. receives the title of “shepherd” (rē'ō). T.’s sister is Geštin-anna (“vine of heaven”), called Bēlit-gēri (“Lady of the countryside”). Around 1000 B.C., T. replaced the Canaanite deities, known from the Ugaritic texts, Alijan and Mōt. The principal god of many Syrians and Phoenicians was 'Adōn, “lord” (= ba'al), whence the Greco-Latin Adonis later derived (v. ADONE). The proper name concealed beneath the title 'Adōn was apparently T.; the Syro-Phoenician T. (Adonis of Byblos) was identified, at least in part, with the Egyptian Osiris, whose myth must have influenced (from the sixteenth century B.C.) the ancient Asiatic myth of T.; thus Isis came to be identified with Ištar or Astarte. Related to T. is Telipinu of the Hittite pantheon, who dies in autumn and rises again in spring.

T. had been introduced among the Israelites, even in Jerusalem itself (Is. 17:10 ff.), through contacts with the Syro-Phoenicians and through the Assyro-Babylonian conquerors. He was “the beloved of the Syrian women” (Dan. 11:37 ff.). Ez. 8:14 stigmatizes, in 590 B.C., the idolatrous “abomination” (tō'ēbhāh) of the cult of T. at the northern gate of the Temple: there sat the women who were mourning T. Whereas the Septuagint transliterates the name as Θαμυιούς, St. Jerome translates it as Adonis and then explains the myth of the death and resurrection of T.-Adonis, celebrated by the women with lamentations followed by rejoicing and songs (PL 25, 82). But the celebration of T.’s resurrection, unknown to Ez. 8:14, must be a later addition and not original. According to F. E. Brown, the pagan temple near the synagogue at Dura Europos, built between A.D. 150 and 160 and modified between 175 and 182, was dedicated to Adonis-T.; no other temple of Adonis is known, either from monuments or from texts. C. Autran repeats (1941) what H. Gunkel (1903), C. Vellay (1904), W. Frazer (1907), and H. Gressmann (1908) had imagined, and what W. Baudissin (1911) effectively refuted: that Jesus was a transposition of the myth of Adonis-T.; they cite St. Jerome (PL 22, 581)

Article illustration
TANANARIVE, APOSTOLIC VICARIATE of – The St-Pierre Seminary.
(fot. Fides)
and St. Paulinus (PL 41, 320 ff.), who instead speak of the profanations under Hadrian. T. K. Cheyne (I problemi biblici e la loro nuova soluzione, Italian trans. Piacenza 1909, pp. 107–109) sees in Jesus’ descent into the underworld the myth of T.’s descent and of Ištar’s descent, when she goes there in search of her dead husband T. According to R. Dussaud (1921), the custom of mourning every year in Gilead for Jephthah’s daughter (Iud. 11:40) would be the survival of an Amorite cult of T.! T. Meek maintained that Cant. and various psalms derived from the songs of the cult of T.; H. H. Rowley refutes this well.

BIBL.: V. ADONE; S. H. Langdon, T. and Istar, Oxford 1914; R. Dussaud, Les orig. cananien. du sacrif. israél., Paris 1921, pp. 261–64; T. Meek, Canticles of the T. cult. in Amer. journ. of sem. lang., 39 (1922), pp. 1–14; G. Furlani, La religione babilonese e asvira, I, Bologna 1928, pp. 279–85 and 295–99; A. Médebielle, Expiation, in DBs, fasc. XII (1934), cols. 11–13; M. Witzel, T. Liturgien und Verwandtes (Anal. Orient., 10), Rome 1935; H. H. Rowley, The interpret. of the Song of Songs, in Jour. of theol. studies, 38 (1937), pp. 360–62; F. E. Brown, in The excavations at Dura - Europos., Prelimin. reports of the 7th and 8th seasons of work (1933-33), New Haven 1939, pp. 135–74; G. Frank, Kultlieder aus dem Ischtar-Tamüz-Kreis, Leipzig 1939; T. H. Gaster, Ezechiel and the mysteries, in Jour. of bibl. liter., 60 (1941), pp. 289–310; C. Autran, Des orig. du christianisme, in Nouv. rev. franç., 29 (1941), pp. 800–13, effectively refuted by L.-H. Vincent, in Vivre et penser, 1 (1941), pp. 266–69; H. Otten, Die Überlieferung des Telipinu-Mythus, Leipzig 1942; E. Dhorme, Les relig. de Babyl. et d'Assyr. (Mana. I, II), Paris 1945, pp. 16–20, 115–21, 134–37; A. Moortgat, T. Der Unsterblichheitsglaube in der altoriental. Bildkunst, Berlin 1949. Texts in Ancient near eastern texts relating to the Old Test., Princeton 1950, p. 41 ff. Antonino Romeo
Cite this article

“TAMMŪZ.” Enciclopedia Cattolica, vol. XI (1953), p. 1041. Azione Romana digital edition, https://azioneromana.com/article/tammuz.