Sermons on the Song of Songs64 Sermon LXIV. Of the temptations of more mature monks) by what foxes they are infested, that is, by what temptations they are most tried. Also of the taking of heretics, who are the foxes of the Church

St Bernard of Clairvaux († 1153) · Sermones in Cantica canticorum · 1135-1153

Sermon LXIV. Of the temptations of more mature monks) by what foxes they are infested, that is, by what temptations they are most tried. Also of the taking of heretics, who are the foxes of the Church

* Take us the foxes, the little foxes that spoil the vines: for our vines have tender grapes'—Cant. ii. 15.

Iam now prepared to fulfil the promise I made. The foxes signify temptations. It is unavoidable that temptations should come. For who shall be crowned except he strive lawfully? (2 Tim. ii. 5). And what occasion is there for striving if there be no enemy to oppose? When, then, you enter into the service of God, endure constantly in fear, and prepare thy heart for temptation (Ecclus. ii. 1, 2), being assured that all who will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution (2 Tim. iii. 12). Now, temptations are diverse according to the diversity of times. At the beginning of our spiritual course, when we are as tender and newly-planted flowers, it is evident that we are attacked, as it were, by the violence of cold. Of this I have spoken in a former sermon (No. LXIII., n. 6), and shown how we are to guard against this danger. As to those who are more advanced in holy things, the powerful enemies of good do not venture openly to oppose them, but are wont to lay wait for them in secret, like foxes full of cunning, and, though vices in reality, to put on the appearance of virtues. How many, for example, have I myself known who, when they had entered upon the ways of life, when they had even attained a high degree of perfectness, when they were going on well and safely, and making progress in the ways of righteousness, were, by the devices of these foxes, overthrown with shame and disgrace, and have lamented too late over the fruits of virtues which were blighted in them!

2. I have seen a man running well on his course, and lo, a sudden hesitation and scruple arises in him. Was not that due to one of these 'little foxes'? 'To how many/ he says, 'of my brethren and relations, of my friends and acquaintances, should I be able, if I were living in my own country and neighbourhood, to communicate of that good which I enjoy here alone? They love me, and would easily follow my advice. Why is this waste made? I will go thither, and in saving many of them I shall equally save myself. There is nothing to be feared in a mere change of place. What matters it where I am as long as I am doing a good work? And, in fact, I am without doubt the better placed where I am living a more useful and fruitful life.’ Why repeat more of his reasoning? He goes whither he desires, and, unhappy man, he perishes: rather as a dog returned to his vomit than as an exile who returns to his own land He both comes to a miserable end himself and he fails to save any of his own people. Surely this was a * little fox I mean the deceptive hope which he nourished of gaining over his friends. You are able to find out for yourself other and similar ideas to this in your own mind if you examine it closely.

3. Do you wish, nevertheless, that I should point out to you one more? I will do so; and even a third and a fourth, if I shall find that it renders you watchful to take those that you may perhaps discover in your own vineyard. It happens sometimes that a man who is making good progress in virtue, and who feels that God has poured upon him an abundance of heavenly grace, conceives a desire to preach, not indeed to his relatives and connections, according to that saying, * Immediately conferred not with flesh and blood (Gal. L 16), but as if with a purer impulse, and with a design to be more powerful and more fruitful, to preach to strangers, and indeed to all. But still with great prudence. He fears to incur that malediction of the prophet upon him who shall withhold corn from the people (Prov. xi. 26), and to act against the precept of the Gospel if he should not preach to all, and, as it were, upon the housetops, what he has heard in the ear (Matt. x. 27). Now this is the temptation, so to speak, of a fox, and of one who is so much the more dangerous than the former, as he knows how to present himself secretly. But I will take him for you. First, Moses says: Thou shalt do no work with the firstling of thy bullock (Deut. xv. 19). And this is St. Paul's interpretation: Not a novice, lest, being lifted up with pride, he fall into the condemnation of the devil (1 Tim. iii. 6); and again: No man taketh this honour unto himself but he thai is called of God, as was Aaron (Heb. v. 4); and still again: Houf shall they preach except they be sent? (Rom. x. 15). And we know that the function of a rnonk is not to teach, but to mourn for sin (St. Jerome, Contr. Vigil.). Out of these and similar reasons I weave my net; I take my fox, that he may not spoil the vine. From these considerations it is certain and clear that to preach in public is not expedient for a monk, is not becoming to a novice, nor, unless he be sent, even lawful What destruction, then, to the conscience to violate at once all three of these rules! Therefore, whatever of this nature is suggested to the mind, whether it be by your own thoughts or by the prompting of an evil angel, recognise it always as the temptation of a wily fox presenting evil under the guise of good.

4. Look at another case. How many are there who, being fervent in spirit, have left their monasteries and taken upon them a solitary life, and who in the event have fallen back into lukewarmness, and by a careless, if not by an abandoned, way of living, have violated the law of the solitary? It is plain that this was the work of a fox where so extensive a devastation of the vineyard was made; that is, so deplorable an injury to the life and conscience of the man. He supposed that in a solitary life he should gather spiritual fruits with 5. What shall I say of that excessive and superstitious abstinence as practised by some among ourselves, who disturb us so often, and render themselves so troublesome to themselves and to all? All the divisions which those singularities produce, do they not break up and lay waste the conscience of those who practise them, and destroy, as far as is in their power, that great vine which the Hand of God has planted, in destroying the unanimity which ought to exist among you all? Woe to that man by whom the offence cometh! (Matt, xviii. 7). Whosoever, says the Saviour, shall offend one of these little ones (Mark ix. 42)—severe are the words which follow, but how much more severe a sentence does the person deserve who gives scandal to a community so great and so holy! Assuredly, whosoever he is, a very severe judgment shall be passed upon him. But more of this another time.

6. Let us now consider what is said by the Bridegroom with regard to those small but cunning foxes which spoil the vines. ' Little/ not because they have little malice, but because of their subtlety. This kind of creature is by nature astute, and quick to inflict injury in secret. For this reason it seems to me well suited to be the type of certain very subtle vices, which are cloaked with an appearance of virtue, such as those of which have already given some few examples. For they have, in fact, no other power to injure than that which they derive from passing themselves off as virtues, and thus deceiving by a kind of likeness which they have to the latter. They are either the vain imaginations of men, or the suggestions of evil angels, the angels of Satan, who transform themselves into the Angels of light (2 Cor. xi. 14), who prepare their arrows within the quiver (that is, in concealment) that they may privily shoot at the upright in heart (Ps. xi. 2). This is why, as I think, they are called 'little,' because, while other vices are, as it were, bulky, and show themselves openly, these are slender, subtle, and hard to be recognised, except by those who are perfect, experienced, and clear sighted, having their eyes enlightened to discern between good and evil, and especially by those advanced in the spiritual life, who are able to say with the Apostle,' We are not ignorant of the devices [of Satan]' (2 Cor. ii. n). Perhaps, too, this is the reason why the command of the Bridegroom is, not that they should be exterminated, or driven away, or slain, but that they should be taken; namely, because such little spiritual beasts (bestiolas) as these are full of craftiness, and require to be watched with the utmost vigilance and care, so that they may be taken (that is, caught in the trap of) their own craftiness. Therefore when their device is discovered, their fraud laid bare, their falseness demonstrated, then with the utmost fitness is it said that there is taken the little fox which spoiled the vine. It is thus, in fact, that we speak of a man being 7. Thus, then, the Bridegroom orders the little foxes, which spoil the grapes, to be taken—that is, to be surprised, discovered, and convicted. This kind of pest alone has it for a distinct mark that if known and recognised it has no power to harm, so that for it to be discovered is to be vanquished. For who, except a person void of understanding, would step knowingly and wilfully into a trap that is discovered to him? It is sufficient, then, for temptations of that kind to be ' taken'—that is, to be uncovered and brought into the light; to those who have become aware of them they are harmless. It is not thus with other vices. For their attack is openly made, and their powers of injury are manifest; they take captive even those who are aware of them, they overcome the reluctant, but by open force, and not by guile. Therefore against those (as it were) ferocious brutes what is needed is not to seek them out, but to overcome and render them powerless. Against these * little foxes' (who, because they are unable to hurt if discovered, have extraordinary powers of concealing themselves) it suffices that they be brought out into the light, for they have hiding-places, and taken in their own craftiness. For such reasons those foxes are described as * little/ and ordered to be taken. Or again, they may be named thus to show that vices should be diligently observed in their earlier stages, that they may be taken while they are still young and small, and not allowed to grow greater, when they will both do more injury, and be with greater difficulty mastered.

8. If we understand these words in an allegorical sense, so as to take the vines as signifying Churches, and the foxes as heresies, or rather as the heretics themselves, the simple and natural sense is that heretics should be * taken' rather than merely driven away. They should be taken, I say, not by force of arms, but by force of arguments, by which their errors are refuted, and they themselves, if possible, brought back to the true faith, and reconciled to the Catholic Church. For this is the will of Him who desires all men to be saved, and to come to the knowledge of the truth (1 Tim. ii. 4). He shows here, in fact, that He desires this, since He says, not simply Take the foxes, but Take us the foxes. He desires, then, that they should be taken for Him. and for His Bride—that is, the Church Catholic, since He says: 1 Take them for us.' Therefore the Churchman, who is skilled and learned, if he undertakes to argue with a heretic, ought to direct his endeavours to convince him that he has erred, and to convert him, bearing in mind that saying of the Apostle James: He which converteth the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soulfrom death, and shall hide a multitude of sins (James v. 20). If he is unwilling to be brought back, and is not convinced after a first and a second admonition, because he is entirely perverted, then, according to St. Paul, he is to be rejected (Titus iii. 10). In this 1 Compare Serm. in Cantic. LXVI.,;/. 12; and Ep. CCCLXV.

9. Let it not, therefore, be supposed that a man has done a small or unimportant thing who has vanquished and refuted a heretic, who has disproved his heresy, who has distinguished clearly and plainly his fair-seeming theories from the truth, who has shown by obvious and irrefragable reasoning the faultiness and erroneous nature of his dogmas; and, in short, has subjugated that haughty and perverted intellect which set itself up against the knowledge revealed by God. He who has brought about such results as these has * taken' the fox nevertheless, though not to his conversion and saving; he has taken him equally for the Bridegroom and the Bride, though after another manner. For the Church is strengthened in the faith, though that heretic be not raised up out of the mire of his errors; while the Bridegroom, without doubt, rejoices in the spiritual progress of His Bride, and the joy of the Lord is our strength (Neh. viii. 10). He who is so condescending as to associate Himself with us, regards our advantage as a matter in which He has an interest, and, therefore, bids the foxes be taken, not for Himself, but for us with Himself. Note the phrase, 'Take for us'—what can be more companionable and friendly? Does it not seem to you that He says this, as it were, like some father of a family, who possesses nothing separately for himself and his own advantage, but shares all things with wife and children and domestics? And He who thus speaks is God; yet He does not say this at all as God, but as the Bridegroom.

10. Take us the foxes. Do you see in how social and equable a manner He says this, He who has no companion or equal? He might have said, 'Take for me/ but He delights to associate others with Himself, and, therefore, preferred to say, 'Take for us.' O sweetness, O grace, O power of love! Is it possible that the Sovereign of all has become one of the mass of beings? Who has done this? It is Love; which is regardless of dignity, rich in condescension, powerful in affection, efficacious in persuasion. AVhat more forceful than love? It prevails even with God. And yet, since it is Love, is there anything that is more gentle? What strength is that, I ask, which is so forceful for victory, so gentle in the face of violence? For the Lord emptied Himself (Phil. ii. 7), so that you might know it to be the effect of His great love, that His Fulness was poured forth and expended, that His loftiness was brought down to the level of others, and His unique position associated with them. With whom is it, O admirable Bridegroom, that you have so close and intimate an alliance? 'Take for us,' you say, 4 the foxes/ For whom ' with you?' Is it for the Church gathered out of the Gentiles? That is composed of mortal and sinful beings. What she is, we know; but Thou, what art Thou, to be the devoted and eager spouse of this Ethiopian woman? (Num. xii. 1) Not another Moses, assuredly, but a greater than Moses. For Thou art He who is fairer than the children of men (Ps. xlv. 2). But in saying this I have said too little: Thou art the brightness of the Eternal Life, the Splendour and express Image of the Person of God (Heb. i. 3); and finally, Thou art above all, God blessed for ever. Amen.

Notice.

It seems to us opportune to introduce in this place the following letter, written to St. Bernard by Eberwin, Provost of Steinfeld, near Cologne, on the subject of the heretics of that time, which was the occasion of the two following sermons. I had thought with Horst and others that in these Bernard was treating of the Henricians, against whom he wrote bis Letter 240. But the subjoined letter of Eberwin shows that those heretics, whose errors are refuted in the two following sermons, were others than the Henricians, since, while the latter infested Aquitaine chiefly, the former were found in Cologne and the neighbouring districts. However, it must be allowed that each class agreed in the same errors, and perhaps they were derived from the same source. I have spoken at greater length of these men in the General Preface, n. 6. I have no doubt that this Eberwin is the same as Eberwin, or Herwin, Abbot of Steinfeld, who is praised in Book vi. of the 1 Miracles of St. Bernard/ nn. 22 and 26. He was unquestionably of the Order of Premontre which has still an abbey at Steinfeld.

Letter OF EBERWIN, PROVOST OF STEINFELD, TO ABBOT BERNARD, RESPECTING THE HERETICS OF HIS TIME.

To the Reverend lord and father Bernard, Abbot of Clairvaux: Eberwin, humble minister of the Abbey of Steinfeld, wishes that he may be made strong in the Lord, and may strengthen the Church of Christ.

I rejoice, as one that findeth great spoils, over your eloquent utterances, in which you are wont both by tongue and pen to bring to our mind the sweet and abundant graces of God: and especially in the Canticle of the love of the Bridegroom and the Bride, that is, of Christ and the Church, so that we are able to say truly to the same Bridegroom: Thou hast kept the good mine until now (John ii. 10). He has set thee among us as a cupbearer of this precious wine; do not cease to pour it forth, and do not hesitate, for it is not possible to exhaust the urns. Do not allow your bodily weakness, O holy father, to be an excuse, for in the discharge of that duty piety counts for more than bodily strength. Do not say that you are full of occupation; I know not anything that ought to be preferred to a work so necessary as this to the common good. From 1 I.e., when Mabillon wrote, circa 1690.

Letter OF EBERWIN TO ABBOT BERNARD that urn what an abundant stream you have, most holy father, already poured forth to us! From the first you have drawn to the satisfaction of all, and it has rendered those who have partaken of it wise and strong against the teaching and the force of the Scribes and Pharisees; the second has strengthened them against the arguments and the cruelties of the Gentiles; the third, against the subtle deceptions of heretics; the fourth, against false Christians; the fifth, against the heretics who shall appear towards the time of the end of the world, and of whom the Holy Spirit, by the mouth of an Apostle, speaks manifestly in these words: Jn the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of devils; speaking lies in hypocrisy... forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving (1 Tim. iv. T-3). From the sixth the faithful shall receive exaltation and joy of spirit (inebriabuntur), and be strengthened against him who in this departure from the faith shall be revealed; I mean that son of sin, the man of perdition, who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; whose coming is after the working of Satan, with all power and signs and lying wonders, and with all deceivableness of unrighteousness (2 Thess. ii. 3-10). After this, since the sons of men will be exalted in spirit with the abundance of God's House, and the river of the pleasures which He bestows, a seventh will not be needful. You have in the meantime, O good father, poured forth sufficiently to all, from the fourth urn, for their correction, their edification, and their perfecting; to all, I say, whether they be beginners, those who are making progress, or who are going on unto perfection; and to the very end of the world it will be to their benefit against the coldness and the perversity which is in false brethren. Now is the time that you should draw from the fifth, and bring forth to us the wine from thence, against the new heretics who are now stirring almost everywhere, and casting forth the mud of the abyss throughout all the Churches, as if their chief was already beginning to be threatened with dissolution, and the day of the Lord was drawing nigh. And in the marriage song of Christ and of His Church that passage which you, my father, as you have yourself informed me, are now about to treat upon, namely, Take us the foxes, the little foxes, that spoil the vines, bears perfectly upon this subject, and conducts you naturally to this fifth urn. I entreat you, then, father, to distinguish between all the parts of the heresy of those persons, which have come to your knowledge, and by opposing to them the authorities and reasons of our holy faith, to destroy them.

2. There have been lately discovered among us in the neighbourhood of Cologne certain heretics, of whom some have made amends for their fault (cum satisfaction) and returned to the Church. Two among them, namely, he who was called their bishop, and his companion, have withstood us in an open assembly of clerics and laymen, in which the lord Archbishop himself was present, and some noble- 3. This is their heresy: They say that the Church exists among them only, since they alone follow closely in the footsteps of Christ, and remain the true followers of the manner of life observed by the Apostles, inasmuch as they possess neither houses, nor fields, nor property of any kind. They declare that, as Christ did not possess any of these Himself, so He did not permit His disciples to possess them. c But you/ they say to us, 1 add house to house, and field to field, and seek the things of this world. So completely is this the case, that even those among you who are considered most perfect, such as the monks and regular canons, possess these things, if not as their private property, yet as belonging to their community.' Of themselves they say: * We are the poor of Christ; we have no settled dwelling-place; we flee from city to city, as sheep in the midst of wolves; we endure persecution, as did the Apostles and the martyrs; yet we lead a holy and austere life in fasting and abstinence, continuing day and night in labours and prayers, and seeking from these only what is necessary to sustain life. We endure all this/ they say, 4 because we are not of this world; but as for you, who are lovers of this world, you have peace with the world because you are, in fact, of it. False Apostles, adulterating the word of Christ, and seeking their own interests, have caused you and your fathers to wander far out of the right path; but we and our fathers are the descendants of the Apostles, we have remained in the grace of Christ, and shall remain until the end of the world. The distinction between us and you is to be found in those words which Christ spake: By their fruits re shall know them (Matt. vii. 16). Our fruits are the following in the footsteps of Christ.' In respect of food, they forbid every kind of milk, that which is made of milk, and whatsoever is the product of that function. It is in this particular that their manner of living 4. There are also in our country certain other heretics who differ in all respects from the former; indeed, it is by their mutual discord and contention that each kind of them is discovered to us. These latter deny that the Body of Christ is ever present (fieri) upon the Altar, because [they say that the priests of the Church are none of them validly ordained (consecrati). According to them the Apostolic dignity has been corrupted by mixing itself with the affairs of this world, and as he who sits in the chair of Peter is not engaged in warfare for God, as was Peter, he has deprived himself of the power of consecrating and ordaining which was bestowed upon Peter. That power, therefore, which it does not itself possess, the Archbishops and Bishops, who live in the Church after the manner of the world, cannot receive from it, or derive the power of ordaining anyone. This they profess to derive from the words of Christ: The 5. In the intercessions of the Saints they put no trust Tbey maintain that fasts and other mortifications of the flesh which are undergone for sins are not necessary for the just, nor even for sinners, because in the very day that a sinner has mourned over, and lamented, his sins, they are all remitted unto him; and other observances in the Church, which were established neither by Christ nor by His Apostles after Him, they call superstitions. They do not allow that there is any purgatorial fire after death, but hold that souls pass immediately on their going forth from the body either into eternal rest or eternal punishment, because of those words of Solomon: If the tree fall toivard the south, or toward the north, in the place where the tree falleth there it shall be (Eccles. xi. 3). And thus they regard as useless the prayers and oblations of the faithful for the dead.

6. Against all these forms of evil, so many and so varied, I entreat you, holy father, to let your solicitude be on the watch, and to direct the point of your sharp arrow upon these beasts of prey. Do not reply to us that that tower of David to which we fly for refuge is sufficiently strengthened with ramparts and bulwarks, that on it hang a thousand bucklers, and that it has a complete garrison of brave men. We wish, father, that this garrison should be, on account of our inexperience and backwardness, drawn together and combined by your care and zeal, that it may be more successful in finding out, and more effectual in resisting, this host of monsters. You should know also, my lord, that those who have returned to the Church have toW us that they have a very great multitude of adherents scattered almost everywhere throughout the countries, and that among these they count LETTER OF EBERWIN TO ABBOT BERNARD very many of our clerks and monks. Those who were burned said to us in their defence that this heresy has had a secret existence from the times of the martyrs even to our own day, and that it still remains in Greece and in some other countries. Such are those heretics who call themselves apostles, and have a pope of their own. Others there are who, though they do not acknowledge our Pope, yet allow that they have no other. Those emissaries (apostolici) of Satan have also among them (as they say) women vowed to continence, widows, and virgins; they have also their wives, some among the elect, others among the believers, as if to follow the example of the Apostles, to whom was conceded the power of taking about their wives with them. Farewell in the Lord.

1. Adsum promissioni meae. Capite nobis vulpes parvulas, quae demoliuntur vineas: nam vinea nostra floruit. Vulpes, tentationes sunt. Necesse est ut veniant tentationes. Quis enim coronabitur, nisi qui legitime certaverit? aut quomodo certabunt, si desit qui impugnet? Tu ergo accedens ad servitutem Dei, sta in timore, et praepara animam tuam ad tentationem, certus omnes qui pie volunt vivere in Christo, persecutionem passuros. Porro tentationes diversae sunt, pro temporum diversitate. Et initiis quidem nostris, tanquam novellarum teneris floribus plantationum, in evidenti vis algoris incumbit, cujus meminimus in sermone altero, et incipientes ab hac peste cautos reddidimus. Jam vero proficientium sanctioribus studiis minime quidem sese opponere contrariae virtutes aperte audent, sed solent in occulto insidiari, quasi quaedam fraudulentae vulpeculae; specie quidem virtutes, re autem vitia. Quantos, verbi gratia, ingressos vias vitae, progressos ad meliora, super semitas justitiae bene secureque proficiscentes et proficientes, fraude, proh pudor! vulpium harum turpiter supplantatos expertus sum, et sero in se virtutum suffocatos plangere fructus!

2. Vidi ego hominem currentem bene; et ecce cogitatio: quidni vulpecula fuit? Quantis, inquit, bonum, quo solus fruor, si essem in patria, possem utique impertiri fratribus et cognatis, notis et amicis? Amant me, et facile acquiescerent suadenti. Utquid perditio haec? Vado illuc, et salvo multos ex illis, et me pariter. Nec verendum in loci mutatione. Etenim, dum benefaciam, quid interest ubi? nisi quod illic procul dubio satius, ubi fructuosius degam. Quid plura? It, et perit miser, non tam exsul ad patriam, quam carnis reversus ad vomitum. Et se perdidit infelix, et suorum acquisivit neminem. En una vulpecula, ista videlicet frustratoria spes, quam habuit in acquisitione suorum. Potes tu quoque per te ipsum in te ipso alias atque alias similes huic invenire seu advertere, si non negligas.

3. Vis tamen ut unam adhuc ego ostendam tibi? Facio etiam et tertiam, et quartam quoque demonstrabo, si te ad capiendas eas, quas forte ex his in tua adverteris vinea, invenero vigilantem. Interdum bene proficientis cujuspiam, cum sibi profusius aliquid supernae gratiae senserit irrorari, subit animum desiderium praedicandi, non quidem ad parentes et propinquos, juxta illud: Continuo non acquievi, carni et sanguini; sed quasi purius, fructuosius, fortiusque, passim ad extraneos et ad omnes. Caute omnino. Sane timet propheticum incurrere maledictum, si quae in abscondito accepit frumenta, abscondat in populis (Prov. II, 26): et contra Evangelium facere, nisi quae in aure audivit, praedicaverit super tecta. Vulpes est, atque illa priore eo nocivior, quo occultior veniens. Sed capio tibi eam. Primus Moyses dicit: Non arabis in primogenito bovis. Hoc Paulus interpretans: Non neophytum, inquit, ne in superbiam elatus, incidat in judicium diaboli: et rursum, Nec quisquam. inquit, sumit sibi honorem, sed qui vocatur a Deo tanquam Aaron; item ipse: Quomodo praedicabunt, ait, nisi mittantur? Et scimus monachi officium esse non docere, sed lugere. Ex his similibusque collectis mihi texo rete, et capio vulpem, ne demoliatur vineam. Ex his nempe claret et certum est, quod publice praedicare nec monacho convenit, nec novitio expedit, nec non misso licet. Porro contra haec tria venire, quanta conscientiae demolitio est? Ergo quidquid tale animo suggeratur, sive sit illud tua cogitatio, sive immissio per angelum malum, dolosam agnosce vulpeculam, id est malum sub specie boni.

4. Sed aspice aliam. Quantos ex monasteriis spiritu ferventes eremi solitudo suscepit, et aut tepefactos evomuit, aut tenuit contra eremi legem, non modo remissos, sed etiam dissolutos? Sicque apparuit vulpeculam adfuisse, ubi tanta facta est vastatio vineae, id est vitae et conscientiae hominis detrimentum. Cogitabat, si solus degeret, multo se copiosiores fructus spiritus percepturum, quippe qui in communi vita tantum spiritualis gratiae fuisset expertus. Et bona visa est sua cogitatio sibi; sed rei exitus indicavit, magis eamdem illi cogitationem vulpem demolientem fuisse.

5. Quid illud quod nos quoque toties in domo ista, et tam graviter inquietat, notabilem loquor quorumdam, qui inter nos sunt, superstitiosamque abstinentiam ex qua se omnibus, sibique omnes molestos reddunt? Quomodo non haec ipsa discordia tam generalis, et suae ipsius conscientiae dissipatio est, et, quod in ipso est, et grandis vineae hujus, quam plantavit dextera Domini, vestrae scilicet omnium unanimitatis, demolitio? Vae homini per quem scandalum venit? Qui scandalizaverit, inquit, unum de his pusillis: durum est quod sequitur. Quanto duriora meretur, qui tantam, et tam sanctam multitudinem scandalizat? Judicium prorsus durissimum portabit quicunque est ille. Sed haec alias.

6. Nunc vero intendamus his, quae a Sponso dicuntur super pusillis et astutis his animalibus demolientibus vineas. Pusillis dixerim, non malitia, sed subtilitate. Astutum siquidem natura hoc genus est animantis, promptumque admodum ad nocendum in occulto: et videtur mihi congruentissime designare subtilissima quaedam vitia specie palliata virtutum, qualium utique formam praemissis ad notitiam exemplis, paucis licet, jam aliquantisper expressi. Nec enim aliter nocere queunt, nisi quod se virtutes virtutum quadam similitudine mentiuntur. Sunt autem aut cogitationes hominum vanae, aut factae immissiones per angelos malos, angelos Satanae, qui se transfigurant in angelos lucis, parantes sagittas suas in pharetra, hoc est in occulto, ut sagittent in obscuro rectos corde. Unde et pusillas eas propter hoc reor dici, quod cum caetera vitia quadam quasi corpulentia sui manifesta se praebeant, hoc genus pro sui subtilitate haud facile agnosci, et ideo nec caveri possit, nisi duntaxat a perfectis et exercitatis, et qui habeant illuminatos oculos cordis ad discretionem boni et mali, maximeque ad discretionem spiritum, qui cum Apostolo possint dicere, quia non ignoramus astutias Satanae, neque cogitationes ejus. Et vide ne forte ob hoc a sponso jubeantur, non quidem exterminari, vel abigi, vel occidi, sed capi: quod videlicet hujusmodi spirituales, dolosasque bestiolas omni vigilantia et cautela observari oporteat et examinari, et sic capi, id est comprehendi, in astutia sua. Ergo, cum proditur dolus, cum fraus aperitur, cum convincitur falsitas; rectissime tunc dicitur capta vulpes pusilla, quae demoliebatur vineam. Denique, dicimus hominem in sermone capi, sicut habes in Evangelio, quia convenerunt Pharisaei in unum, ut caperent Jesum in sermone.

7. Ita ergo sponsus capi jubet vulpes pusillas, quae demoliuntur vineas, id est deprehendi, convinci, prodi. Solum hoc malignitatis genus id proprium habet, ut agnitum jam minime noceat, ita ut agnosci, sit illi expugnari. Quis enim, nisi demens, comperta decipula sciens et prudens pedem mittit in illam? Sufficit proinde si capiantur quae ejusmodi sunt, hoc est, si prodas et deducas ad medium; quippe quibus apparere, perire est. Non sic caetera vitia. Nempe manifeste veniunt, manifeste nocent; scientes captivant, superant reluctantes, utpote vi, non dolo agentia. Ergo contra hujusmodi aperte saevientes bestias non investigatione opus est, sed refrenatione. Solas has vulpes parvulas, dissimula trices maximas, quia proditae jam non nocent, sufficit educi in lucem, et capi in calliditate sua. Nam foveas habent. Tali itaque ex causa vulpes istae et capi jubentur, et parvulae describuntur. Vel ideo parvulae, ut nascentia vitia in ipso ortu, donec utique parvula sunt, vigilanter observans illico comprehendas, ne crescentia plus noceant et difficilius capiantur.

8. Et si juxta allegoriam Ecclesias vineas, vulpes haereses, vel potius haereticos ipsos intelligamus: simplex est sensus, ut haeretici capiantur potius, quam effugentur. Capiantur, dico, non armis, sed argumentis, quibus refellantur errores eorum; ipsi vero, si fieri potest, reconcilientur catholicae, revocentur ad veram fidem. Haec est enim voluntas ejus qui vult omnes homines salvos fieri, et ad agnitionem veritatis venire. Hoc denique velle se perhibet, qui non simpliciter, capite vulpes, sed, capite, inquit, nobis vulpes. Sibi ergo et sponsae suae, id est catholicae, jubet acquiri has vulpes, cum ait, Capite eas nobis. Itaque homo de Ecclesia exercitatus et doctus, si cum haeretico homine disputare aggreditur, illo intentionem suam dirigere debet, quatenus ita errantem convincat, ut et convertat, cogitans illud apostoli Jacobi: Quia qui converti fecerit peccatorem ab errore viae suae, salvabit animam ejus a morte, et operit multitudinem peccatorum. Quod si reverti noluerit, nec convictus post primam jam et secundam admonitionem, utpote qui omnino subversus est; erit secundum Apostolum devitandus. Ex hoc jam melius, ut quidem ego arbitror, effugatur, aut etiam religatur, quam sinitur vineas demoliri.

9. Nec propterea sane nihil se egisse putet qui haereticum vicit et convicit, haereses confutavit, verisimilia a vero clare aperteque distinxit; prava dogmata, plana et irrefragabili ratione prava esse monstravit; pravum denique intellectum, extollentem se adversus scientiam Dei, in captivitatem redegit. Nempe cepit nihilominus, qui talia operatus est, vulpem, etsi non ad salutem illi; et cepit eam sponso et sponsae, quamvis aliter. Nam, etsi haereticus non surrexit de faece, Ecclesia tamen confirmatur in fide: et quidem de profectibus sponsae sponsus sine dubio gratulatur. Gaudium etenim Domini est fortitudo nostra. Denique non putat a se aliena lucra nostra, qui se nobis tam dignanter associat, dum jubet capi vulpes, non sibi, sed nobis secum. Capite, inquiens, nobis. Advertere est enim quod ait, nobis. Quid hac voce socialius? An non tibi videtur hoc dicere, quasi quidam paterfamilias, qui per se nihil habeat, sed omnia communia cum uxore et filiis atque domesticis? Et qui loquitur Deus est - minime tamen ut Deus id loquitur, sed ut sponsus.

10. Capite nobis vulpes. Vides quam socialiter loquitur, qui socium non habet? Poterat dicere: Mi hi, sed maluit, nobis, consortio delectatus. O suavitatem! o gratiam! o amoris vim! Itane summus omnium unus factus est omnium? Quis hoc fecit? Amor, dignitatis nescius, dignatione dives, affectu potens, suasu efficax. Quid violentius? Triumphat de Deo amor. Quid tamen tam non violentum? Amor est. Quae est ista vis, quaeso, tam violenta ad victoriam, tam victa ad violentiam? Denique semetipsum exinanivit, ut scias amoris fuisse, quod plenitudo effusa est, quod altitudo adaequata est, quod singularitas associata est. Cum quonam tibi, o admirande sponse, tam familiare consortium? Nobis, inquis, capite. Cui tecum? an Ecclesiae de gentibus? De mortalibus et peccatoribus collecta est. Illam scimus quae sit. Sed tu quises, Aethiopissae hujus tam devotus, tam ambitiosus amator? Sane non alter Moyses, sed plus quam Moyses. Num tu ille es speciosus forma prae filiis hominum? Parum dixi; candor es vitae aeternae, splendor et figura substantiae Dei; postremo super omnia Deus benedictus in saecula. Amen.

Samuel J. Eales (active by 1879; M.A., Principal of S. Boniface College, Warminster, in 1882), Life and Works of Saint Bernard, Abbot of Clairvaux, edited by Dom John Mabillon, vol. IV: Cantica Canticorum, Eighty-six Sermons on the Song of Solomon, London: John Hodges, 1896. Digital text: OCR of the Internet Archive scan LifeAndWorksOfSaintBernardV4, word-repaired against LifeWorksOfSBernardClairvauxV4. Original text: Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich) TEI of the Patrologia Latina, via the CatholicCorpus mirror. Public domain in the US and Canada: published 1889-1896; translator active by 1879, an M.A. and principal in 1882; necessarily died before 1972. Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina 182-183 (1854), public domain.

Save for later

Enter your email and we will send you a sign-in link. No password. What you save (articles, verses, chapters, documents) follows you to any device.