Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 15

St Augustine of Hippo (AD 354–430) · In Joannis evangelium tractatus CXXIV · PL 35, 1379–1976

15.1 Chapter IV. 1–42 PL 35, 1510

1. It is nothing new to your ears, beloved, that the Evangelist John, like an eagle, takes a loftier flight, and soars above the dark mist of earth, to gaze with steadier eyes upon the light of truth. From his Gospel much has already been treated of and discussed through our ministry, with the Lord’s help; and the passage which has been read to-day follows in due order. What I am about to say, with the Lord’s permission, many of you will hear in such wise that you will be reviewing what you know, rather than learning what you know not. Yet, for all that, your attention ought not to be slack, because it is not an acquiring, but a reviewing, of knowledge. This has been read, and we have in our hands to discourse upon this passage—that which the Lord Jesus spoke with the Samaritan woman at Jacob’s well. The things spoken there are great mysteries, and the similitudes of great things; feeding the hungry, and refreshing the weary soul.

Non rude est auribus Charitas vestrae, evangelistam Joannem velut aquilam volare altius, caliginemque terrae transcendere, et lucem veritatis firmioribus oculis intueri. Multa enim jam ex Evangelio ejus per ministerium nostrum Domino adjuvante tractata sunt: ex ordine autem sequitur haec lectio, quae hodie recitata est. Ea quae dicturus sum Domino donante multi sic audituri estis, ut magis recognoscatis quam discatis. Non ideo tamen pigra debet esse intentio, quia non est cognitio, sed recognitio. Hoc lectum est, et hanc lectionem tractandam gestamus in manibus, quod Dominus Jesus ad puteum Jacob loquebatur cum Samaritana muliere. Dicta enim ibi sunt magna mysteria, et magnarum similitudines rerum; pascentes animam esurientem, reficientes languentem.

15.2 PL 35, 1511

2. Now when the Lord knew this, “when He had heard that the Pharisees had learned that He was making more disciples than John, and baptized more (though Jesus baptized not, but His disciples), He left Judea, and departed again into Galilee.” We must not discourse of this too long, lest, by dwelling on what is manifest, we shall lack the time to investigate and lay open what is obscure. Certainly, if the Lord saw that the fact of their coming to know that He made more disciples, and baptized more, would so avail to salvation to the Pharisees in following Him, as to become themselves His disciples, and to desire to be baptized by Him; rather would He not have left Judea, but would have remained there for their sakes. But because He knew their knowledge of the fact, and at the same time knew their envy, and that they learned this, not to follow, but to persecute him, He departed thence. He could, indeed, even when present, cause that He should not be taken of them, if He would not; He had it in His power not to be put to death, if He would not, since He had the power not to be born, if He would not. But because, in everything that He did as man, He was showing an example to them who were to believe on Him (that any one servant of God sinneth not if he retire into another place, when he sees, it may be, the rage of his persecutors, or of them that seek to bring his soul into evil; but if a servant of God did this he might appear to commit sin, had not the Lord led the way in doing it), that good Master did this to teach us, not because He feared it.

Dominus enim haec « cum audisset, cognovisse Pharisaeos quod plures discipulos faceret quam Joannes, et plures baptizaret (quanquam Jesus non baptizaret, sed discipuli ejus), reliquit Judaeam terram, et abiit iterum in Galilaeam. » Hinc diutius disputandum non est, ne immorantes in manifestis, angustias temporis patiamur ad obscura scrutanda et aperienda. Utique Dominus si sciret Pharisaeos ita de se cognovisse, quod plures discipulos faceret, et quod plures baptizaret, ut hoc eis ad salutem valeret sequendi eum, ut et ipsi essent discipuli, et ipsi vellent ab eo baptizari; magis non relinqueret Judaeam terram, sed propter illos maneret ibi: quia vero cognovit eorum scientiam, simul cognovit et invidentiam, quia non hoc propterea didicerunt ut sequerentur, sed ut persequerentur; abiit inde. Poterat quidem ille et praesens ab his non teneri, si nollet; non occidi, si nollet; quia potuit et non nasci, si nollet: sed quia in omni re quam gessit ut homo, hominibus in se credituris praebebat exemplum (quia unusquisque servus Dei non peccat, si secesserit in alium locum, videns furorem forte persequentium se, aut quaerentium in malum animam suam; videretur autem sibi servus Dei peccare si faceret, nisi in faciendo Dominus praecessisset), fecit hoc ille magister bonus ut doceret, non quod timeret.

15.3 PL 35, 1511

3. It may perhaps surprise you why it is said, that “Jesus baptized more than John;” and after this was said, it is subjoined, “although Jesus baptized not, but His disciples.” What then? Was the statement made false, and then corrected by this addition? Or, are both true, viz. that Jesus both did and also did not baptize? He did in fact baptize, because it was He that cleansed; and He did not baptize, because it was not He that touched. The disciples supplied the ministry of the body; He afforded the aid of His majesty. Now, when could He cease from baptizing, so long as He ceased not from cleansing? Of Him it is said by the same John, in the person of the Baptist, who saith, “This is He that baptizeth.” Jesus, therefore, is still baptizing; and so long as we continue to be baptized, Jesus baptizeth. Let a man come without fear to the minister below; for he has a Master above.

Fortassis etiam hoc moveat, cur dictum sit, Baptizabat Jesus plures quam Joannes; et posteaquam dictum est, Baptizabat, subjectum est, Quanquam Jesus non baptizabat, sed discipuli ejus. Quid ergo? falsum dictum erat, et correctum est, cum additum est, Quanquam Jesus non baptizabat, sed discipuli ejus? An utrumque verum est, quia et Jesus baptizabat, et non baptizabat? Baptizabat enim, quia ipse mundabat; non baptizabat, quia non ipse tingebat. Praebebant discipuli ministerium corporis, praebebat ille adjutorium majestatis. Quando enim cessaret a baptizando, quamdiu non cessat a mundando? De quo dictum est ab eodem Joanne, per Joannis Baptistae personam dicentis, Hic est qui baptizat . Ergo Jesus adhuc baptizat; et quo usque baptizandi sumus, Jesus baptizat. Securus homo accedat ad inferiorem ministrum; habet enim superiorem magistrum.

15.4 PL 35, 1511

4. But it may be one saith, Christ does indeed baptize, but in spirit, not in body. As if, indeed, it were by the gift of another than He that any is imbued even with the sacrament of corporal and visible baptism. Wouldest thou know that it is He that baptizeth, not only with the Spirit, but also with water? Hear the apostle: “Even as Christ,” saith he, “loved the Church, and gave Himself for it, purifying it with the washing of water by the Word, that He might present to Himself a glorious Church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing.” Purifying it. How? “With the washing of water by the Word.” What is the baptism of Christ? The washing of water by the Word. Take away the water, it is no baptism; take away the Word, it is no baptism.

Sed forte ait aliquis: Baptizat quidem Christus in spiritu, non in corpore. Quasi vero alterius dono quam illius, quisquam etiam sacramento corporalis et visibilis Baptismatis imbuatur. Vis nosse quia ipse baptizat, non solum spiritu, sed etiam aqua? Audi Apostolum: « Sicut Christus, inquit, dilexit Ecclesiam, et seipsum tradidit pro ea, mundans eam lavacro aquae in verbo, ut exhiberet ipse sibi gloriosam Ecclesiam, non habentem maculam aut rugam, aut aliquid hujusmodi » . Mundans eam. Unde? Lavacro aquae in verbo. Quid est baptismus Christi? Lavacrum aquae in verbo. Tolle aquam, non est baptismus: tolle verbum, non est baptismus.

15.5 PL 35, 1512

5. This much, then, on the preliminary circumstances, by occasion of which He came to a conversation with that woman, let us look at the matters that remain; matters full of mysteries and pregnant with sacraments. “And He must needs pass through Samaria. He cometh then to a city of Samaria which is called Sychar, near to the parcel of ground which Jacob gave to his son Joseph. Now Jacob’s fountain was there.” It was a well; but every well is a fountain, yet not every fountain a well. For where the water flows from the earth, and offers itself for use to them that draw it, it is called a fountain; but if accessible, and on the surface, it is called only a fountain: if, however, it be deep and far down, it is called a well, but in such wise as not to lose the name of fountain.

Jam ergo his praejactis, per quae venit ad collocutionem cum illa muliere, videamus quae restant plena mysteriis, et gravida sacramentis. « Oportebat autem, inquit, eum transire per Samariam. Venit ergo in civitatem Samariae quae dicitur Sichar, juxta praedium quod dedit Jacob filio suo Joseph. Erat autem ibi fons Jacob. » Puteus erat: sed omnis puteus fons, non omnis fons puteus: Ubi enim aqua de terra manat, et usui praebetur haurientibus, fons dicitur: sed si in promptu et superficie sit, fons tantum dicitur; si autem in alto et profundo sit, ita puteus vocatur, ut fontis nomen non amittat.

15.6 PL 35, 1512

6. “Jesus therefore, being wearied with His journey, sat thus on the well. It was about the sixth hour.” Now begin the mysteries. For it is not without a purpose that Jesus is weary; not indeed without a purpose that the strength of God is weary; not without a purpose that He is weary, by whom the wearied are refreshed; not without a purpose is He weary, by whose absence we are wearied, by whose presence we are strengthened. Nevertheless Jesus is weary, and weary with His journey; and He sits down, and that, too, near a well; and it is at the sixth hour that, being wearied, He sits down. All these things hint something, are intended to intimate something, they make us eager, and encourage us to knock. May Himself open to us and to you; He who has deigned to exhort us, so as to say, “Knock, and it shall be opened to you.” It was for thee that Jesus was wearied with His journey. We find Jesus to be strength, and we find Jesus to be weak: we find a strong and a weak Jesus: strong, because “in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God: the same was in the beginning with God.” Wouldest thou see how this Son of God is strong? “All things were made by Him, and without Him was nothing made:” and without labor, too, were they made. Then what can be stronger than He, by whom all things were made without labor? Wouldest thou know Him weak? “The Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us.” The strength of Christ created thee, the weakness of Christ created thee anew. The strength of Christ caused that to be which was not: the weakness of Christ caused that what was should not perish. He fashioned us by His strength, He sought us by His weakness.

Jesus ergo fatigatus ex itinere, sedebat sic super fontem. Hora erat quasi sexta. Jam incipiunt mysteria. Non enim frustra fatigatur Jesus; non enim frustra fatigatur Virtus Dei; non enim frustra fatigatur, per quem fatigati recreantur; non enim frustra fatigatur, quo deserente fatigamur, quo praesente firmamur. Fatigatur tamen Jesus; et fatigatur ab itinere, et sedet, et juxta puteum sedet, et hora sexta fatigatus sedet. Omnia ista innuunt aliquid, indicare volunt aliquid; intentos nos faciunt, ut pulsemus hortantur. Ipse ergo aperiat et nobis et vobis, qui dignatus est ita hortari ut diceret, Pulsate, et aperietur vobis . Tibi fatigatus est ab itinere Jesus. Invenimus Virtutem Jesum, et invenimus infirmum Jesum; fortem et infirmum Jesum: fortem, quia in principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum: hoc erat in principio apud Deum. Vis videre quam iste Filius Dei fortis sit? Omnia per ipsum facta sunt, et sine ipso factum est nihil; et sine labore facta sunt. Quid ergo illo fortius, per quem sine labore facta sunt omnia? Infirmum vis nosse? Verbum caro factum est, et habitavit in nobis . Fortitudo Christi te creavit, infirmitas Christi te recreavit. Fortitudo Christi fecit ut quod non erat esset: infirmitas Christi fecit ut quod erat non periret. Condidit nos fortitudine sua, quaesivit nos infirmitate sua.

15.7 PL 35, 1512

7. As weak, then, He nourishes the weak, as a hen her chickens; for He likened Him self to a hen: “How often,” He saith to Jerusalem, “would I have gathered thy children under my wings, as a hen her chickens; but thou wouldest not!” And you see, brethren, how a hen becomes weak with her chickens. No other bird, when it is a mother, is recognized at once to be so. We see all kinds of sparrows building their nests before our eyes; we see swallows, storks, doves, every day building their nests; but we do not know them to be parents, except when we see them on their nests. But the hen is so enfeebled over her brood, that even if the chickens are not following her, if thou see not the young ones, yet thou knowest her at once to be a mother. With her wings drooping, her feathers ruffled, her note hoarse, in all her limbs she becomes so sunken and abject, that, as I have said, even though thou seest not her young, yet thou perceivest her to be a mother. In such manner was Jesus weak, wearied with His journey. His journey is the flesh assumed for us. For how can He, who is present everywhere, have a journey, He who is nowhere absent? Whither does He go, or whence, but that He could not come to us, except He had assumed the form of visible flesh? Therefore, as He deigned to come to us in such manner, that He appeared in the form of a servant by the flesh assumed, that same assumption of flesh is His journey. Thus, “wearied with His journey,” what else is it but wearied in the flesh? Jesus was weak in the flesh: but do not thou become weak; but in His weakness be strong, because what is “the weakness of God is stronger than men.”

Nutrit ergo ipse infirmus infirmos, tanquam gallina pullos suos; huic enim se similem fecit: Quoties volui, inquit ad Jerusalem, congregare filios tuos sub alas, tanquam gallina pullos suos, et noluisti ? Videtis autem, fratres, quemadmodum gallina infirmetur cum pullis suis. Nulla alia avis quod sit mater agnoscitur. Videmus nidificare passeres quoslibet ante oculos nostros; hirundines, ciconias, columbas quotidie videmus nidificare; quos nisi quando in nidis videmus, parentes esse non agnoscimus. Gallina vero sic infirmatur in pullis suis, ut etiamsi ipsi pulli non sequantur, filios non videas, matrem tamen agnoscas. Ita fit alis demissis, plumis hispida, voce rauca, omnibus membris demissa et abjecta, ut quemadmodum dixi, etiamsi filios non videas, matrem tamen intelligas. Sic ergo infirmus Jesus, fatigatus ab itinere. Iter ipsius est caro pro nobis assumpta. Quomodo enim iter habet qui ubique est, qui nusquam deest? Quo it, aut unde it, nisi quia non ad nos veniret, nisi formam visibilis carnis assumeret? Quia ergo venire ad nos eo modo dignatus est, ut in forma servi assumpta carne appareret, ipsa carnis assumptio est iter ipsius. Ideo fatigatus ab itinere quid est aliud, quam fatigatus in Carne? Infirmus in carne Jesus: sed noli tu infirmari; in illius infirmitate tu fortis esto, quia quod infirmum est Dei, fortius est hominibus .

15.8 PL 35, 1513

8. Under this image of things, Adam, who was the figure of Him that was to be, afforded us a great indication of this mystery; rather, God afforded it in him. For he was deemed worthy to receive a wife while he slept, and that wife was made for him of his own rib: since from Christ, sleeping on the cross, was the Church to come,—from His side, namely, as He slept; for it was from His side, pierced with the spear, as He hung on the cross, that the sacraments of the Church flowed forth. But why have I chosen to say this, brethren? Because it is the weakness of Christ that makes us strong. A remarkable figure of this went before in the case of Adam. God could have taken flesh from the man to make of it a woman, and it seems that this might have been the more suitable. For it was the weaker sex that was being made, and weakness ought to have been made of flesh rather than of bone; for the bones are the stronger parts in the flesh. He took not flesh to make of it a woman; but took a bone, and of the bone was the woman shaped, and flesh was filled in into the place of the bone. He could have restored bone for bone; He could have taken, not a rib, but flesh, for the making of the woman. What, then, did this signify? Woman was made, as it were, strong, from the rib; Adam was made, as it were, weak, from the flesh. It is Christ and the Church; His weakness is our strength.

Sub hac rerum imagine Adam qui erat forma futuri , praebuit nobis magnum indicium sacramenti; imo Deus in illo praebuit. Nam et dormiens meruit accipere uxorem, et de costa ejus facta est ei uxor : quoniam de Christo in cruce dormiente futura erat Ecclesia de latere ejus, de latere scilicet dormientis; quia et de latere in cruce pendentis lancea percusso Sacramenta Ecclesiae profluxerunt. Sed quare hoc dicere volui, fratres? Quia infirmitas Christi nos facit fortes. Magna ibi imago praecessit. Potuit Deus carnem detrahere homini unde faceret feminam, et magis videtur quasi congruere potuisse. Fiebat enim sexus infirmior, et magis de carne infirmitas fieri debuit quam de osse: ossa enim in carne firmiora sunt. Non detraxit carnem unde faceret mulierem; sed detraxit os, et detracto osse formata est mulier, et in locum ossis caro adimpleta est. Poterat pro osse os reddere, poterat ad faciendam mulierem non costam, sed carnem detrahere. Quid igitur significavit? Facta est mulier in costa tanquam fortis: factus est Adam in carne tanquam infirmus. Christus est et Ecclesia, illius infirmitas nostra est fortitudo.

15.9 PL 35, 1513

9. But why at the sixth hour? Because at the sixth age of the world. In the Gospel, count up as an hour each, the first age from Adam to Noah; the second, from Noah to Abraham; the third, from Abraham to David; the fourth, from David to the removing to Babylon; the fifth, from the removing to Babylon to the baptism of John: thence is the sixth being enacted. Why dost thou marvel? Jesus came, and, by humbling Himself, came to a well. He came wearied, because He carried weak flesh. At the sixth hour, because in the sixth age of the world. To a well, because to the depth of this our habitation. For which reason it is said in the psalm: “From the depth have I cried unto Thee, O Lord.” He sat, as I said, because He was humbled.

Quare ergo hora sexta? Quia aetate saeculi sexta. Computa in Evangelio tanquam unam horam, unam aetatem ab Adam usque ad Noe; secundam a Noe usque ad Abraham; tertiam ab Abraham usque ad David; quartam a David usque ad transmigrationem Babyloniae; quintam a transmigratione Babyloniae usque ad baptismum Joannis: inde sexta agitur. Quid miraris? Venit Jesus, et humiliando se venit ad puteum. Fatigatus venit, quia infirmam carnem portavit. Hora sexta, quia aetate saeculi sexta. Ad puteum, quia ad profunditatem hujus habitationis nostrae. Unde dicitur in Psalmis, De profundis clamavi ad te, Domine . Sedit, ut dixi, quia humiliatus est.

15.10 PL 35, 1513

10. “And there came a woman.” Figure of the Church not yet justified, but now about to be justified: for this is the subject of the discourse. She comes ignorant, she finds Him, and there is a dealing with her. Let us see what, and wherefore. “There cometh a woman of Samaria to draw water.” The Samaritans did not belong to the nation of the Jews: they were foreigners, though they inhabited neighboring lands. It would take a long time to relate the origin of the Samaritans; that we may not be detained by long discourse of this, and leave necessary matters unsaid, suffice to say, then, that we regard the Samaritans as aliens. And, lest you should think that I have said this with more boldness than truth, hear the Lord Jesus Himself, what He said of that Samaritan, one of the ten lepers whom He had cleansed, who alone returned to give thanks: “Were there not ten cleansed? And where are the nine? There was not another to give glory to God, save this stranger.” It is pertinent to the image of the reality, that this woman, who bore the type of the Church, comes of strangers: for the Church was to come of the Gentiles, an alien from the race of the Jews. In that woman, then, let us hear ourselves, and in her acknowledge ourselves, and in her give thanks to God for ourselves. For she was the figure, not the reality; for she both first showed forth the figure and became the reality. For she believed on Him who, of her, set the figure before us. “She cometh, then, to draw water.” Had simply come to draw water, as people are wont to do, be they men or women.

Et venit mulier. Forma Ecclesiae, non jam justificatae, sed jam justificandae; nam hoc agit sermo. Venit ignara, invenit eum, et agitur cum illa. Videamus quid, videamus quare: Venit mulier de Samaria haurire aquam. Samaritani ad Judaeorum gentem non pertinebant: alienigenae enim fuerunt, quamvis vicinas terras incolerent. Longum est originem Samaritanorum retexere, ne nos multa teneant, et necessaria non loquamur: sufficit ergo ut Samaritanos inter alienigenas deputemus. Et ne hoc audacius me arbitremini dixisse quam verius, audite ipsum Dominum Jesum, quid dixerit de illo Samaritano, uno de decem leprosis quos mundaverat, qui solus rediit ut gratias ageret: Nonne decem mundati sunt? et novem ubi sunt? non erat alius qui daret gloriam Deo, nisi alienigena iste . Pertinet ad imaginem rei, quod ab alienigenis venit ista mulier, quae typum gerebat Ecclesiae: ventura enim erat Ecclesia de Gentibus, alienigena a genere Judaeorum. Audiamus ergo in illa nos, et in illa agnoscamus nos, et in illa gratias Deo agamus pro nobis. Illa enim figura erat, non veritas; quia et ipsa praemisit figuram, et facta est veritas. Nam credidit in eum, qui de illa figuram nobis praetendebat. Venit ergo haurire aquam. Simpliciter venerat haurire aquam, sicut solent vel viri vel feminae.

15.11 PL 35, 1514

11. “Jesus saith unto her, Give me to drink. For His disciples were gone away into the city to buy meat. Then saith the Samaritan woman unto Him, How is it that thou, being a Jew, askest drink of me, who am a Samaritan woman? For the Jews have no dealings with the Samaritans.” You see that they were aliens: indeed, the Jews would not use their vessels. And as the woman brought with her a vessel with which to draw the water, it made her wonder that a Jew sought drink of her,—a thing which the Jews were not accustomed to do. But He who was asking drink was thirsting for the faith of the woman herself.

« Dicit ei Jesus: Da mihi bibere. Discipuli enim ejus abierant in civitatem, ut cibos emerent. Dicit ergo ei mulier illa Samaritana: Quomodo tu Judaeus cum sis, bibere a me poscis, quae sum mulier Samaritana? Non enim coutuntur Judaei Samaritanis. » Videtis alienigenas: omnino vasculis eorum Judaei non utebantur. Et quia ferebat secum mulier vasculum unde aquam hauriret, eo mirata est, quia Judaeus petebat ab ea bibere, quod non solebant facere Judaei. Ille autem qui bibere quaerebat, fidem ipsius mulieris sitiebat.

15.12 PL 35, 1514

12. At length, hear who it is that asketh drink: “Jesus answered and said unto her, If thou knewest the gift of God, and who it is that saith to thee, Give me to drink, thou wouldest, it may be, have asked of Him, and He would have given thee living water.” He asks to drink, and promises to give drink. He longs as one about to receive; He abounds as one about to satisfy. “If thou knewest,” saith He, “the gift of God.” The gift of God is the Holy Spirit. But as yet He speaks to the woman guardedly, and enters into her heart by degrees. It may be He is now teaching her. For what can be sweeter and kinder than that exhortation? “If thou knewest the gift of God,” etc.: thus far He keeps her in suspense. That is commonly called living water which issues from a spring: that which is collected from rain in pools and cisterns is not called living water. And it may have flowed from a spring; yet if it should stand collected in some place, not admitting to it that from which it flowed, but, with the course interrupted, separated, as it were, from the channel of the fountain, it is not called “living water:” but that is called living water which is taken as it flows. Such water there was in that fountain. Why, then, did He promise to give that which He was asking?

Denique audi quis petat bibere. Respondit Jesus, et dixit ei: Si scires donum Dei, et quis est qui dicit tibi, Da mihi bibere, tu forsitan petisses ab eo, et dedisset tibi aquam vivam. Petit bibere, et promittit bibere. Eget quasi accepturus, et affluit tanquam satiaturus. Si scires, inquit, donum Dei. Donum Dei est Spiritus sanctus. Sed adhuc mulieri tecte loquitur, et paulatim intrat in cor. Fortassis jam docet. Quid enim ista hortatione suavius et benignius? Si scires donum Dei, et scires quis est qui dicit tibi, Da mihi bibere, tu forsitan peteres, et daret tibi aquam vivam: huc usque suspendit. Viva aqua dicitur vulgo illa quae de fonte exit. Illa enim quae colligitur de pluvia in lacunas aut cisternas, aqua viva non dicitur. Et si de fonte manaverit, et in loco aliquo collecta steterit, nec ad se illud unde manabat admiserit, sed interrupto meatu. tanquam a fontis tramite separata fuerit; non dicitur aqua viva: sed illa aqua viva dicitur, quae manans excipitur. Talis aqua erat in illo fonte. Quid ergo promittebat quod petebat?

15.13 PL 35, 1514

13. The woman, however, being in suspense, saith to Him, “Lord, thou hast nothing to draw with, and the well is deep.” See how she understood the living water, simply the water which was in that fountain. “Thou wouldst give me living water, and I carry that with which to draw, and thou dost not. The living water is here; how art thou to give it me?” Understanding another thing, and taking it carnally, she does in a manner knock, that the Master may open up that which is closed. She was knocking in ignorance, not with earnest purpose; she is still an object of pity, not yet of instruction.

Tamen mulier suspensa ait: Domine, neque in quo haurias habes, et puteus altus est. Videte quomodo intellexerit aquam vivam, aquam scilicet quae erat in illo fonte. Tu mihi vis dare aquam vivam, et ego fero unde hauriam, et tu non fers. Aqua viva hic est, quomodo mihi daturus es? Aliud intelligens et carnaliter sapiens quodammodo pulsat, ut aperiat magister quod clausum est. Pulsabat ignorantia, non studio; adhuc miseranda, non dum instruenda.

15.14 PL 35, 1515

14. The Lord speaks somewhat more clearly of that living water. Now the woman had said, “Art thou greater than our father Jacob, who gave us the well, and drank of it himself, his children, and his cattle?” Thou canst not give me of the living water of this well, because thou hast nothing to draw with: perhaps thou promisest another fountain? Canst thou be better than our father, who dug this well, and used it himself, and his? Let the Lord, then, declare what He called living water. “Jesus answered and said unto her, Every one that drinketh of this water shall thirst again: but he that drinketh of the water that I shall give him, shall not thirst forever; but the water which I shall give him will become in him a fountain of water, springing up into everlasting life.” The Lord has spoken more openly: “It shall become in him a fountain of water, springing up into everlasting life. He that drinketh of this water shall not thirst forever.” What more evident than that it was not visible, but invisible water, that He was promising? What more evident than that He was speaking, not in a carnal, but in a spiritual sense?

Dicit aliquid evidentius Dominus de illa aqua viva. Dixerat enim mulier, Numquid tu major es patre nostro Jacob, qui dedit nobis puteum, et ipse ex eo bibit, et filii ejus, et pecora ejus, De hac aqua viva dare mihi non potes, quoniam hauritorium non habes: forte alium fontem promittis? Patre nostro melior potes esse, qui hunc puteum fodit, et ipse cum suis usus est eo? Dominus ergo dicat quid dixerit aquam vivam. « Respondit Jesus, et dixit ei: Omnis qui biberit ex aqua hac, sitiet iterum: qui autem biberit ex aqua quam ego dabo ei, non sitiet in aeternum; sed aqua quam ego dabo ei, fiet in eo fons aquae salientis in vitam aeternam. » Apertius locutus est Dominus, Fiet in eo fons aquae salientis in vitam aeternam. Qui biberit de aqua ista, non sitiet in aeternum. Quid evidentius, quia non aquam visibilem, sed invisibilem promittebat? quid evidentius, quia non carnaliter, sed spiritualiter loquebatur?

15.15 PL 35, 1515

15. Still, however, the woman has her mind on the flesh: she is delighted with the thought of thirsting no more, and fancies that this was promised to her by the Lord after a carnal sense; which it will be indeed, but in the resurrection of the dead. She desired this now. God had indeed granted once to His servant Elias, that during forty days he neither hungered nor thirsted. Could not He give this always, seeing He had power to give it during forty days? She, however, sighed for it, desiring to have no want, no toil. To be always coming to that fountain, to be burdened with a weight with which to supply her want, and, when that which she had drawn is spent, to be obliged to return again: this was a daily toil to her; because that want of hers was to be relieved, not extinguished. Such a gift as Jesus promised delighted her; she asks Him to give her living water.

Adhuc tamen illa mulier carnem sapit: delectata est non sitire, et putabat hoc secundum carnem promissum sibi esse a Domino. Quod quidem fiet, sed in resurrectione mortuorum. Jam hoc volebat illa. Dederat enim Deus aliquando servo suo Eliae, ut per quadraginta dies nec esuriret, nec sitiret . Qui hoc potuit dare per quadraginta dies, non potuit dare semper? Suspirabat tamen illa, nolens indigere, nolens laborare. Assidue venire ad illum fontem, onerari pondere, quo indigentia suppleretur; et finito quod hauserat, rursus redire cogebatur: et quotidianus ei fuit iste labor; quia indigentia illa reficiebatur, non exstinguebatur. Delectata ergo tali munere, rogat ut ei aquam vivam daret.

15.16 PL 35, 1515

16. Nevertheless, let us not overlook the fact that it is something spiritual that the Lord was promising. What means, “Whoso shall drink of this water shall thirst again?” It is true as to this water; it is true as to what the water signified. Since the water in the well is the pleasure of the world in its dark depth: from this men draw it with the vessel of lusts. Stooping forward, they let down the lust to reach the pleasure fetched from the depth of the well, and enjoy the pleasure and the preceding lust let down to fetch it. For he who has not despatched his lust in advance cannot get to the pleasure. Consider lust, then, as the vessel; and pleasure as the water from the depth of the well: when one has got at the pleasure of this world, it is meat to him, it is drink, it is a bath, a show, an amour; can it be that he will not thirst again? Therefore, “Whoso shall drink of this water,” saith He, “will thirst again;” but if he shall receive water of me, “he shall never thirst.” “We shall be satisfied,” it saith, “with the good things of Thy house.” Of what water, then, is He to give, but of that of which it is said, “With Thee is the fountain of life”? For how shall they thirst, who “shall be drunk with the fatness of Thy house”?

Verumtamen non praetereamus, quoniam Dominus spirituale aliquid promittebat. Quid est, Qui biberit de aqua hac, sitiet iterum? Et verum est secundum hanc aquam; et verum est secundum quod significabat illa aqua. Etenim aqua in puteo, voluptas saeculi est in profunditate tenebrosa: hinc eam hauriunt homines hydria cupiditatum. Cupiditatem quippe proni submittunt, ut ad voluptatem haustam de profundo perveniant; et fruuntur voluptate, praecedente et praemissa cupiditate. Nam qui non praemiserit cupiditatem, pervenire non potest ad voluptatem. Pone ergo hydriam, cupiditatem; et aquam de profundo, voluptatem: cum pervenerit quisque ad voluptatem saeculi hujus, cibus est, potus est, lavacrum est, spectaculum est, concubitus est; numquid non iterum sitiet? Ergo de hac aqua qui biberit, iterum, inquit, sitiet: si autem acceperit a me aquam, non sitiet in aeternum. Satiabimur, inquit, in bonis domus tuae . De qua ergo aqua daturus est, nisi de illa de qua dictum est, Apud te est fons vitae? Nam quomodo sitient qui inebriabuntur ab ubertate domus tuae ?

15.17 PL 35, 1515

17. What He was promising them was a certain feeding and abundant fullness of the Holy Spirit: but the woman did not yet understand; and not understanding, how did she answer? “The woman saith unto Him, Sir, give me this water, that I thirst not, neither come hither to draw.” Want forced her to labor, and her weakness was pleading against the toil. Would that she heard the invitation, “Come unto me, all ye that labor and are heavy laden, and I will refresh you!” This is, in fact, what Jesus was saying to her, that she might no longer labor: but she did not yet understand.

Promittebat ergo saginam quamdam et satietatem Spiritus sancti: et illa nondum intelligebat; et non intelligens, quid respondebat? Dicit ad eum mulier: Domine, da mihi hanc aquam, ut non sitiam, neque veniam huc haurire. Ad laborem indigentia cogebat, et laborem infirmitas recusabat. Utinam audiret, Venite ad me, omnes qui laboratis et onerati estis, et ego vos reficiam . Hoc enim ei dicebat Jesus, ut jam non laboraret, sed illa nondum intelligebat.

15.18 PL 35, 1516

18. At length, wishing her to understand, “Jesus saith unto her, Go, call thy husband, and come hither.” What means this, “Call thy husband”? Was it through her husband that He wished to give her that water? Or, because she did not understand, did He wish to teach her through her husband? Perhaps it was as the apostle says concerning women, “If they wish to learn anything, let them ask their husbands at home.” But this the apostle says of that where there is no Jesus present to teach. It is said, in short, to women whom the apostle was forbidding to speak in the Church. But when the Lord Himself was at hand, and in person speaking to her, what need was there that He should speak to her by her husband? Was it through her husband that he spoke to Mary, while sitting at His feet and receiving His word; while Martha, wholly occupied with much serving, murmured at the happiness of her sister? Wherefore, my brethren, let us hear and understand what it is that the Lord says to the woman, “Call thy husband.” For it may be that He is saying also to our soul, “Call thy husband.” Let us inquire also concerning the soul’s husband. Why, is not Jesus Himself already the soul’s real husband? Let the understanding be present, since what we are about to say can hardly be apprehended but by attentive hearers: therefore let the understanding be present to apprehend, and perhaps that same understanding will be found to be the husband of the soul.

Denique volens ut intelligeret, dicit ei Jesus: Vade, voca virum tuum et veni huc. Quid est, Voca virum tuum? Per virum suum ei volebat aquam illam dare? An quia non intelligebat, per virum suum eam volebat docere? Forte quomodo ait Apostolus de mulieribus, Si quid autem volunt discere, domi viros suos interrogent? Sed ibi dicitur, domi viros suos interrogent, ubi non est Jesus qui doceat: denique dicitur mulieribus quas prohibebat Apostolus loqui in Ecclesia . Cum vero ipse Dominus aderat, et praesens praesenti loquebatur? quid opus erat ut per virum ejus ei loqueretur? Numquid per virum suum loquebatur Mariae sedenti ad pedes suos, et excipienti verbum suum, quando Martha circa multum ministerium etiam de sororis suae felicitate occupatissima murmurabat? . Ergo, fratres mei, audiamus et intelligamus quod ait Dominus, Voca virum tuum, mulieri. Forte enim et animae nostrae dicit, Voca virum tuum. Quaeramus et de viro animae. Cur jam non ipse Jesus vir animae verus est? Adsit intellectus, quoniam quod dicturi sumus, vix capitur nisi ab intentis: adsit ergo intellectus ut capiatur, et ipse intellectus erit fortasse vir animae.

15.19 PL 35, 1516

19. Now Jesus, seeing that the woman did not understand, and willing her to understand, says to her, “Call thy husband.” “For the reason why thou knowest not what I say is, because thy understanding is not present: I am speaking after the Spirit, and thou art hearing after the flesh. The things which I speak relate neither to the pleasure of the ears, nor to the eyes, nor to the smell, nor to the taste, nor to the touch; by the mind alone are they received, by the understanding alone are they drawn up: that understanding is not with thee, how canst thou apprehend what I am saying? ‘Call thy husband,’ bring thy understanding forward. What is it for thee to have a soul? It is not much, for a beast has a soul. Wherein art thou better than the beast? In having understanding, which the beast has not.” Then what is “Call thy husband”? “Thou dost not apprehend me, thou dost not understand me: I am speaking to thee of the gift of God, and thy thought is of the flesh; thou wishest not to thirst in a carnal sense, I am addressing myself to the spirit: thy understanding is absent. ‘Call thy husband.’ Be not as the horse and mule, which have no understanding.” Therefore, my brethren, to have a soul, and not to have understanding, that is, not to use it, not to live according to it, is a beast’s life. For we have somewhat in common with the beasts, that by which we live in the flesh, but it must be ruled by the understanding. For the motions of the soul, which moves after the flesh, and longs to run unrestrainedly loose after carnal delights, are ruled over by the understanding. Which is to be called the husband?—that which rules, or that which is ruled? Without doubt, when the life is well ordered the understanding rules the soul, for itself belongs to the soul. For the understanding is not something other than the soul, but a thing of the soul: as the eye is not something other than the flesh, but a thing of the flesh. But whilst the eye is a thing of the flesh, yet it alone enjoys the light; and the other fleshy members may be steeped in light, but they cannot feel the light: the eye alone is both bathed in it, and enjoys it. Thus in our soul there is a something called the understanding. This something of the soul, which is called understanding and mind, is enlightened by the higher light. Now that higher light, by which the human mind is enlightened, is God; for “that was the true light which enlighteneth every man coming into this world.” Such a light was Christ, such a light was speaking with the woman: yet she was not present with the understanding, to have it enlightened with that light; not merely to have it shed upon it, but to enjoy it. Therefore the Lord said, “Call thy husband,” as if He were to say, I wish to enlighten, and yet there is not here whom I may enlighten: bring hither the understanding through which thou mayest be taught, by which thou mayest be ruled. Thus, put the soul without the understanding for the woman; and having the understanding as having the husband. But this husband does not rule the wife well, except when he is ruled by a higher. “For the head of the woman is the man, but the head of the man is Christ.” The head of the man was talking with the woman, and the man was not present. And so the Lord, as if He said, Bring hither thy head, that he may receive his head, says, “Call thy husband, and come hither;” that is, Be here, be present: for thou art as absent, while thou understandest not the voice of the Truth here present; be thou present here, but not alone; be thou here with thy husband.

Videns ergo Jesus quia mulier non intelligebat, et volens eam intelligere, Voca, inquit, virum tuum. Ideo enim nescis quod dico, quia intellectus tuus non adest: loquor ego secundum spiritum, tu audis secundum carnem. Quae loquor, nec ad voluptatem aurium pertinent, nec ad oculos, nec ad olfactum, nec ad gustum, nec ad tactum; mente sola capiuntur, intellectu solo hauriuntur: ille intellectus non tibi adest, quomodo capis quod dico? Voca virum tuum, praesenta intellectum tuum. Quid tibi est enim animam habere? Non est magnum, nam et pecus habet. Unde tu melior? Quia intellectum habes, quod pecus non habet. Quid est ergo, Voca virum tuum? Non me capis, non me intelligis: de dono Dei tibi loquor, tu autem carnem cogitas; secundum carnem sitire non vis, ego spiritum alloquor: absens est intellectus tuus, Voca virum tuum. Noli esse sicut equus et mulus, quibus non est intellectus . Ergo, fratres mei, animam habere, et intellectum non habere, hoc est, non adhibere, nec secundum eum vivere, bestialis est vita. Est enim in nobis quiddam bestiale quo in carne vivimus, sed intellectu regendum est. Motus enim animae secundum carnem se moventis, et in delicias carnales immoderate diffluere cupientis, regit desuper intellectus. Qui debet dici vir? qui regit, an qui regitur? Procul dubio cum ordinata vita est, intellectus animam regit, ad ipsam animam pertinens. Non enim aliquid aliud est quam anima, sed aliquid animae est intellectus: quomodo non aliquid aliud quam caro est oculus, sed aliquid carnis est oculus. Cum autem carnis aliquid sit oculus, solus tamen luce perfruitur: caetera autem membra carnalia luce perfundi possunt, lucem sentire non possunt; solus ea oculus et perfunditur et perfruitur. Sic in anima nostra quiddam est quod intellectus vocatur. Hoc ipsum animae quod intellectus et mens dicitur, illuminatur luce superiore. Jam superior illa lux, qua mens humana illuminatur, Deus est; Erat enim verum lumen, quod illuminat omnem hominem venientem in hunc mundum . Talis lux Christus erat, talis lux cum muliere loquebatur: et illa intellectu non aderat, qui illa luce illuminaretur, nec tantum perfunderetur, verum etiam frueretur. Ergo Dominus tanquam diceret, Illustrare volo, et non adest quem; Voca, inquit, virum tuum: adhibe intellectum per quem docearis, quo regaris. Ergo constitue animam excepto intellectu tanquam feminam: intellectum autem habere, tanquam virum. Sed iste vir non bene regit feminam suam, nisi cum a superiore regitur. Caput enim mulieris vir, caput autem viri Christus . Loquebatur caput viri cum femina, et non aderat vir. Et tanquam diceret Dominus, Adhibe caput tuum ut ille suscipiat caput suum: ergo voca virum tuum, et veni huc; id est, adesto, praesens esto: velut enim absens es, dum non intelligis praesentis vocem veritatis; praesens esto, sed noli sola; cum viro tuo adesto.

15.20 PL 35, 1517

20. And, the husband being not yet called, still she does not understand, still she minds the flesh; for the man is absent: “I have not,” saith she, “a husband.” And the Lord proceeds and utters mysteries. Thou mayest understand that woman really to have had at that time no husband; she was living with some man, not a lawful husband, rather a paramour than a husband. And the Lord said to her, “Thou hast well said, I have not a husband.” How then didst Thou say, “Call thy husband”? Now hear how the Lord knew well that she had not a husband. “He says to her,” etc. In case the woman might suppose that the Lord had said, “Thou hast well said, I have not a husband,” just because He had learned this fact of her, and not because he knew it by His own divinity, hear something which thou hast not said: “For thou hast had five husbands, and he whom thou now hast is not thy husband; this thou hast said truly.”

Et adhuc illa nondum advocato illo viro, non intelligit, adhuc carnem sapit; absens est enim vir: Non habeo, inquit, virum. Et Dominus sequitur, et mysteria loquitur. Intelligas revera istam mulierem non habuisse tunc virum; sed coutebatur nescio quo non legitimo viro, adultero magis quam viro. Et Dominus ei: Bene dixisti, Quia non habeo virum. Unde ergo tu dixisti, Voca virum tuum? Et audi quia bene novit Dominus eam non habere virum, Dicit ei, etc. Ne forte putaret mulier ideo dixisse Dominum, Bene dixisti, Quia non habeo virum, quod hoc a muliere didicerit, non quod ipse istud divinitate cognoverit, audi aliquid quod non dixisti: Quinque enim viros habuisti, et iste quem habes, non est vir tuus, hoc vere dixisti.

15.21 PL 35, 1517

21. Once more He urges us to investigate the matter somewhat more exactly concerning these five husbands. Many have in fact understood, not indeed absurdly, nor so far improbably, the five husbands of this woman to mean the five books of Moses. For the Samaritans’ made use of these books, and were under the same law: for it was from it they had circumcision. But since we are hemmed in by what follows, “And he whom thou now hast is not thy husband,” it appears to me that we can more easily take the five senses of the body to be the five former husbands of the soul. For when one is born, before he can make use of the mind and reason, he is ruled only by the senses of the flesh. In a little child, the soul seeks for or shuns what is heard, and seen, and smells, and tastes, and is perceived by the touch. It seeks for whatever soothes, and shuns whatever offends, those five senses. At first, the soul lives according to these five senses, as five husbands; because it is ruled by them. But why are they called husbands? Because they are lawful and right: made indeed by God, and are the gifts of God to the soul. The soul is still weak while ruled by these five husbands, and living under these five husbands; but when she comes to years of exercising reason, if she is taken in hand by the noble discipline and teaching of wisdom, these five men are succeeded in their rule by no other than the true and lawful husband, and one better than they, who both rules better and rules for eternity, who cultivates and instructs her for eternity. For the five senses rule us, not for eternity, but for those temporal things that are to be sought or shunned. But when the understanding, imbued by wisdom, begins to rule the soul, it knows now not only how to avoid a pit, and to walk on even ground—a thing which the eyes show to the soul even in its weakness; nor merely to be charmed with musical voices, and to repel harsh sounds; nor to delight in agreeable scents, and to refuse offensive smells; nor to be captivated by sweetness, and displeased with bitterness; nor to be soothed with what is soft, and hurt with what is rough. For all these things are necessary to the soul in its weakness. Then what rule is made use of by that understanding? Not one to discern between black and white, but between just and unjust, between good and evil, between the profitable and the unprofitable, between chastity and impurity, that it may love the one and avoid the other; between charity and hatred, to be in the one, not to be in the other.

Iterum cogit de istis quinque viris subtilius aliquid perscrutari. Multi quippe intellexerunt, non quidem absurde, nec usquequaque improbabiliter, quinque viros mulieris hujus, quinque libros Moysi. Utebantur enim eis Samaritani, et sub eadem Lege erant: nam inde illis et circumcisio inerat. Sed quoniam angustat nos quod sequitur, Et nunc quem habes, non est vir tuus; videtur mihi facilius nos posse accipere quinque viros priores animae, quinque sensus corporis esse. Quando enim quisque nascitur, antequam uti possit mente atque ratione, non regitur nisi sensibus carnis. Anima in puero parvulo, quod auditur, quod videtur, quod olet, quod sapit, quod tactu sentitur, hoc appetit aut fugit. Appetit quidquid mulcet, fugit quidquid offendit hos quinque sensus. Hos enim quinque sensus mulcet voluptas, offendit dolor. Secundum hos quinque sensus, tanquam quinque viros, prius vivit anima; quia istis regitur. Quare autem viri dicti sunt? Quia legitimi. A Deo quippe facti, et a Deo donati animae. Infirma est adhuc quae istis quinque sensibus regitur, et sub istis quinque viris agit: at ubi venerit ad annos exserendae rationis, si eam susceperit optima disciplina et doctrina sapientiae; quinque illis viris ad regendum non succedit, nisi vir verus legitimus et illis melior, et qui melius regat, et qui ad aeternitatem regat, ad aeternitatem excolat, ad aeternitatem instruat. Nam nisi quinque sensus non ad aeternitatem nos regunt, sed ad ista temporalia vel appetenda vel fugienda. Ubi vero intellectus sapientia imbutus regere coeperit animam, scit jam non solum fugere foveam, et ambulare in aequali quod oculi ostendunt animae infirmae: nec tantum canoras voces suaviter audire, dissonasque repellere; vel blandis odoribus delectari, putoresque respuere; aut dulcedine capi, et amaritudine offendi; aut lenibus mulceri, et asperis laedi. Ista enim omnia infirmae animae sunt necessaria. Quid ergo regiminis adhibetur per illum intellectum? Non alba et nigra discreturus est, sed justa et injusta, bona et mala, utilia et inutilia, castitatem et impudicitiam, hanc ut amet, istam ut vitet; charitatem et odium, in hac ut sit, in illo ut non sit.

15.22 PL 35, 1518

22. This husband had not yet succeeded to those five husbands in that woman. And where he does not succeed, error sways. For when the soul has begun to be capable of reason, it is ruled either by the wise mind or by error: but yet error does not rule but destroys. Wherefore, after these five senses was that woman still wandering, and error was tossing her to and fro. And this error was not a lawful husband, but a paramour: for that reason the Lord saith to her, “Thou hast well said, I have not a husband. For thou hast had five husbands.” The five senses of the flesh ruled thee at first; thou art come to the age of using reason, and yet thou art not come to wisdom, but art fallen into error. Therefore, after those five husbands, “this whom thou now hast is not thy husband.” And if not a husband, what was he but a paramour? And so, “Call,” not the paramour, but “thy husband,” that thou mayest receive me with the understanding, and not by error have some false notion of me. For the woman was still in error, as she was thinking of that water; whilst the Lord was now speaking of the Holy Ghost. Why was she erring, but because she had a paramour, not a husband? Put away, therefore, that paramour who corrupts thee, and “go, call thy husband.” Call, and come that thou mayest understand me.

Hic vir quinque illis viris in ista muliere non successerat. Ubi enim non succedit ille, error dominatur. Nam cum coeperit anima capax esse rationis, aut a sapiente mente regitur, aut ab errore: sed error non regit, sed perdit. Post istos ergo quinque sensus mulier illa adhuc errabat, et error eam ventilabat. Error autem iste non erat legitimus vir, sed adulter: ideo ei Dominus, ait, Bene dixisti, Quia non habeo virum. Quinque enim viros habuisti: quinque te sensus carnis primo rexerunt; venisti ad aetatem utendae rationis, nec ad sapientiam pervenisti, sed in errorem incidisti. Ergo post illos quinque viros, iste quem habes, non est tuus vir. Et quid erat, si vir non erat, nisi adulter? Voca itaque non adulterum, sed virum tuum; ut intellectu me capias, non errore de me aliquid falsum sentias. Adhuc enim errabat mulier, quae aquam illam cogitabat; cum jam Dominus de Spiritu sancto loqueretur. Quare errabat, nisi quia adulterum, non virum habebat? Tolle ergo hinc istum adulterum qui te corrumpit, et vade, voca virum tuum. Voca, et veni, ut intelligas me.

15.23 PL 35, 1518

23. “The woman saith unto Him, Sir, I see that thou art a prophet.” The husband begins to come, he is not yet fully come. She accounted the Lord a prophet, and a prophet indeed He was; for it was of Himself He said, that “a prophet is not without honor, save in his own country.” Again, of Him it was said to Moses, “A Prophet will I raise up to them of their brethren, like unto thee.” Like, namely, as to the form of the flesh, but not in the eminence of His majesty. Accordingly we find the Lord Jesus called a Prophet. Hence this woman is now not far wrong. “I see,” she saith, “that thou art a prophet.” She begins to call the husband, and to shut out the paramour; she begins to ask about a matter that is wont to disquiet her. For there was a contention between the Samaritans and the Jews, because the Jews worshipped God in the temple built by Solomon; but the Samaritans, being situated at a distance from it, did not worship there. For this reason the Jews, because they worshipped God in the temple, boasted themselves to be better than the Samaritans. “For the Jews have no dealings with the Samaritans:” because the latter said to them, How is it you boast and account yourselves to be better than we, just because you have a temple which we have not? Did our fathers, who were pleasing to God, worship in that temple? Was it not in this mountain where we are they worshipped? We then do better, say they, who pray to God in this mountain, where our fathers prayed. Both peoples contended in ignorance, because they had not the husband: they were inflated against each other, on the one side in behalf of the temple, on the other in behalf of the mountain.

Dicit ei mulier: Domine, video quia propheta es tu. Coepit venire vir, nondum plene venit. Prophetam Dominum putabat. Erat quidem et propheta: nam de seipso ait, Non est propheta sine honore, nisi in patria sua . Item de illo dictum est ad Moysen, Prophetam eis suscitabo de fratribus eorum, similem tui . Similem scilicet ad formam carnis, non ad eminentiam majestatis. Ergo invenimus Dominum Jesum dictum prophetam. Proinde jam non multum errat mulier ista. Video, inquit, quia propheta es tu. Incipit vocare virum, adulterum excludere: Video quia propheta es tu. Et incipit quaerere quod illam solet movere. Contentio quippe fuerat inter Samaritanos et Judaeos, quia Judaei in templo a Salomone fabricato adorabant Deum; Samaritani longe inde positi, non in eo adorabant. Ideo Judaei meliores se esse jactabant, quia in templo adorabat Deum. Non enim coutuntur Judaei Samaritanis: quia dicebant eis, Quomodo vos jactatis, et ideo vos meliores nobis esse perhibetis, quia templum habetis quod nos non habemus? Numquid patres nostri qui Deo placuerunt in illo templo adoraverunt? nonne in monte isto adoraverunt, ubi nos sumus? Melius ergo nos, inquiunt, in hoc monte Deum rogamus, ubi patres nostri rogaverunt. Contendebant utrique ignari, quia virum non habentes: illi pro templo, illi pro monte inflabantur adversus invicem.

15.24 PL 35, 1519

24. What, however, does the Lord teach the woman now, as one whose husband has begun to be present? “The woman saith unto Him, Sir, I perceive that thou art a prophet. Our fathers worshipped in this mountain; and ye say that in Jerusalem is the place where men ought to worship. Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me.” For the Church will come, as it is said in the Song of Songs, “will come, and will pass over from the beginning of faith.” She will come in order to pass through; and pass through she cannot, except from the beginning of faith. Rightly she now hears, the husband being present: “Woman, believe me.” For there is that in thee now which can believe, since thy husband is present. Thou hast begun to be present with the understanding when thou calledst me a prophet. Woman, believe me; for if ye believe not, ye will not understand. Therefore, “Woman, believe me, for the hour will come when ye shall neither in this mountain nor in Jerusalem worship the Father. Ye worship ye know not what: we worship what we know; for salvation is of the Jews. But the hour will come.” When? “And now is.” Well, what hour? “When the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth,” not in this mountain, not in the temple, but in spirit and in truth. “For the Father seeketh such to worship Him.” Why does the Father seek such to worship Him, not on a mountain, not in the temple, but in spirit and in truth? “God is Spirit.” If God were body, it were right that He should be worshipped on a mountain, for a mountain is corporeal; it were right He should be worshipped in the temple, for a temple is corporeal. “God is Spirit; and they that worship Him, must worship in spirit and in truth.”

Dominus tamen modo quid docet mulierem, tanquam cujus vir coeperit praesens esse? Dicit ei mulier: Domine, video quia propheta es tu. Patres nostri in monte hoc adoraverunt, et vos dicitis quia Jerosolymis est locus ubi adorare oportet. Dicit ei Jesus: Mulier, crede mihi. Veniet enim Ecclesia, sicut dictum est in Canticis canticorum, veniet et pertransiet ab initio fidei . Veniet ut pertranseat, et pertransire non potest nisi ab initio fidei. Merito jam praesente viro audit, Mulier, crede mihi. Jam enim est in te qui credat, quia praesens est vir tuus. Coepisti adesse intellectu, quando me prophetam appellasti. Mulier, crede mihi: quia nisi credideritis, non intelligetis . Ergo, Mulier, crede mihi, quia veniet hora, quando neque in monte hoc, neque in Jerosolymis adorabitis Patrem. Vos adoratis quod nescitis, nos adoramus quod scimus; quia salus ex Judaeis est. Sed veniet hora. Quando? Et nunc est. Quae ergo hora? Quando veri adoratores adorabunt Patrem in spiritu et veritate; non in monte isto, non in templo, sed in spiritu et veritate. Nam et Pater tales quaerit, qui adorent eum. Quare Pater tales quaerit qui adorent eum, non in monte, non in templo, sed in spiritu et veritate? Spiritus est Deus. Si corpus esset Deus, oportebat eum adorari in monte, quia corporeus est mons; oportebat eum adorari in templo, quia corporeum est templum. Spiritus est Deus; et eos qui adorant eum, in spiritu et veritate oportet adorare.

15.25 PL 35, 1519

25. We have heard, and it is manifest; we had gone out of doors, and we are sent inward. Would I could find, thou didst say, some high and lonely mountain! For I think that, because God is on high, He hears me the rather from a high place. Because thou art on a mountain, dost thou imagine thyself near to God, and that He will quickly hear thee, as if calling to Him from the nearest place? He dwells on high, but regards the lowly. “The Lord is near.” To whom? To the high, perhaps? “To them who are contrite of heart.” ’Tis a wonderful thing: He dwelleth on high, and yet is near to the lowly; “He hath regard to lowly things, but lofty things He knoweth from afar;” He seeth the proud afar off, and He is the less near to them the higher they appear to themselves to be. Didst thou seek a mountain, then? Come down, that thou mayest come near Him. But wouldest thou ascend? Ascend, but do not seek a mountain. “The ascents,” it saith, “are in his heart, in the valley of weeping.” The valley is humility. Therefore do all within. Even if perhaps thou seekest some lofty place, some holy place, make thyself a temple for God within time. “For the temple of God is holy, which temple are ye.” Wouldest thou pray in a temple? Pray in thyself. But be thou first a temple of God, for He in His temple heareth him that prays.

Audivimus, et manifestum est; foras ieramus, intro missi sumus. O si invenirem, dicebas, montem aliquem altum et solitarium! credo enim quia in alto est Deus, magis me exaudit ex alto. Quia in monte es, propinquum te Deo putas, et cito te exaudiri, quasi de proximo clamantem? In excelsis habitat, sed humilia respicit. Prope est Dominus. Quibus? forte altis? His qui obtriverunt cor . Mira res est: et in altis habitat, et humilibus propinquat: humilia respicit, excelsa autem a longe cognoscit ; superbos longe videt, eo illis minus propinquat, quo sibi videntur altiores. Quaerebas ergo montem? descende ut attingas. Sed ascendere vis? ascende: noli montem quaerere. Ascensiones, inquit, in corde ejus (hoc Psalmus dicit), in convalle plorationis . Convallis humilitatem habet. Ergo intus age totum. Et si forte quaeris aliquem locum altum, aliquem locum sanctum, intus exhibe te templum Deo. Templum enim Dei sanctum est, quod estis vos . In templo vis orare? in te ora. Sed prius esto templum Dei, quia ille in templo suo exaudiet orantem.

15.26 PL 35, 1520

26. “The hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth. We worship that which we know: ye worship ye know not what; for salvation is of the Jews.” A great thing has He attributed to the Jews; but do not understand Him to mean those spurious Jews. Understand that wall to which another is joined, that they may be joined together, resting on the corner-stone, which is Christ. For there is one wall from the Jews, another from the Gentiles; these walls are far apart, only until they are united in the Corner. Now the aliens were strangers and foreigners from the covenants of God. According to this, it is said, “We worship what we know.” It is said, indeed, in the person of the Jews, but not of all Jews, not of reprobate Jews, but of such as were the apostles, as were the prophets, as were all those saints who sold all their goods, and laid the price of their goods at the apostles’ feet. “For God hath not rejected His people which He foreknew.”

Venit ergo hora, et nunc est, quando veri adoratores adorabunt Patrem in spiritu et veritate. Nos adoramus quod scimus, vos adoratis quod nescitis; quoniam salus ex Judaeis est. Multum dedit Judaeis: sed noli istos reprobos accipere. Parietem illum accipe cui adjunctus est alius, ut pacati in lapide angulari, quod est Christus, copulentur. Unus enim paries a Judaeis, unus a Gentibus: longe a se isti parietes, sed donec in angulo conjungantur. Alienigenae autem hospites erant, et peregrini a testamentis Dei . Secundum hoc ergo dictum est, Nos adoramus quod scimus. Ex persona quidem Judaeorum dictum est, sed non omnium Judaeorum, non reproborum Judaeorum: sed de qualibus fuerunt Apostoli, quales fuerunt Prophetae, quales fuerunt illi omnes sancti, qui omnia sua vendiderunt, et pretia rerum suarum ad pedes Apostolorum posuerunt . Non enim repulit Deus plebem suam quam praescivit .

15.27 PL 35, 1520

27. The woman heard this, and proceeded. She had already called Him a prophet; she observes that He with whom she was speaking uttered such things as still more pertained to the prophet; and what answer did she make? See: “The woman saith unto Him, I know that Messias will come, who is called Christ: when He then is come, He will show us all things.” What is this? Just now she saith, The Jews are contending for the temple, and we for this mountain: when He has come, He will despise the mountain, and overthrow the temple; He will teach us all things, that we may know how to worship in spirit and in truth. She knew who could teach her, but she did not yet know Him that was now teaching her. But now she was worthy to receive the manifestation of Him. Now Messias is Anointed: Anointed, in Greek, is Christ; in Hebrew, Messias; whence also, in Punic, Messe means Anoint. For the Hebrew, Punic and Syriac are cognate and neighboring languages.

Audivit hoc mulier ista, et addidit. Jamdudum prophetam dixerat; vidit talia dicere eum cum quo loquebatur, quae jam plus essent ad prophetam; et quid respondit, videte: Dicit ei mulier, Scio quia Messias veniet, qui dicitur Christus: cum ergo venerit ille, omnia nobis demonstrabit. Quid est hoc? Modo, inquit, de templo contendunt Judaei, et nos de monte contendimus: cum ille venerit, et montem spernet, et templum evertet; docebit nos iste omnia, ut in spiritu et veritate noverimus adorare. Sciebat quis eam posset docere, sed jam docentem nondum agnoscebat. Jam ergo digna erat cui manifestaretur. Messias autem unctus est; unctus graece Christus est; hebraice Messias est: unde et punice, Messe dicitur unge. Cognatae quippe sunt linguae istae et vicinae, hebraica, punica, et syra.

15.28 PL 35, 1520

28. Then, “The woman saith unto Him, I know that Messias will come, who is called Christ: when He then is come, He will tell us all things. Jesus saith unto her, I that speak with thee am He.” She called her husband; he is made the head of the woman, and Christ is made the head of the man. Now is the woman constituted in faith, and ruled, as about to live rightly. After she heard this, “I that speak with thee am He,” what further could she say, when the Lord Jesus willed to manifest Himself to the woman, to whom He had said, “Believe me?”

Ergo dicit ei mulier, Scio quia Messias veniet, qui dicitur Christus: cum ergo venerit ille, nobis annuntiabit omnia. Dicit ei Jesus: Ego sum qui loquor tecum. Vocavit virum suum, factus est vir ejus caput mulieris, factus est Christus caput viri . Jam mulier ordinatur in fide, et regitur bene victura. Posteaquam audivit hoc, Ego sum qui loquor tecum, jam ultra quid diceret; quando Christus Dominus manifestare se voluit mulieri, cui dixerat, Crede mihi?

15.29 PL 35, 1520

29. “And immediately came His disciples, and marvelled that He talked with the woman.” That He was seeking her that was lost, He who came to seek that which was lost: they marvelled at this. They marvelled at a good thing, they were not suspecting an evil thing. “Yet no man said, What seekest Thou, or why talkest Thou with her?”

Et continuo venerunt discipuli ejus, et mirabantur quia cum muliere loquebatur. Quia quaerebat perditam, qui venerat quaerere quod perierat, hoc illi mirabantur. Bonum enim mirabantur, non malum suspicabantur. Nemo tamen dixit: Quid quaeris aut quid loqueris cum ea?

15.30 PL 35, 1520

30. “The woman then left her water-pot.” Having heard, “I that speak with thee am He,” and having received Christ the Lord into her heart, what could she do but now leave her water-pot, and run to preach the gospel? She cast out lust, and hastened to proclaim the truth. Let them who would preach the gospel learn; let them throw away their water-pot at the well. You remember what I said before of the water-pot: it was a vessel with which the water was drawn, called hydria, from its Greek name, because water is hydor in Greek; just as if it were called aquarium, from the Latin. She threw away her water-pot then, which was no longer of use, but a burden to her, such was her avidity to be satisfied with that water. Throwing her burden away, to make known Christ, “she ran to the city, and says to those men, Come, and see a man that told me all things that ever I did.” Step by step, lest those men should get angry and indignant, and should persecute her. “Is this Christ? Then they went out of the city, and came to Him.”

Reliquit ergo hydriam suam mulier. Audito, Ego sum qui loquor tecum, et recepto in cor Christo Domino, quid faceret, nisi jam hydriam dimitteret, et evangelizare curreret? Projecit cupiditatem, et properavit annuntiare veritatem. Discant qui volunt evangelizare, projiciant hydriam ad puteum. Recordamini quid superius dixerim de hydria: vas erat unde aqua hauriebatur, graeco nomine appellatur hydria, quoniam graece ὕδωρ aqua dicitur; tanquam si aquarium diceretur. Projecit ergo hydriam, quae jam non usui, sed oneri fuit: avida quippe desiderabat aqua illa satiari. Ut nuntiaret Christum, onere abjecto, cucurrit ad civitatem, et dicit illis hominibus: Venite, et videte hominem qui mihi dixit omnia quaecumque feci. Pedetentim, ne illi quasi irascerentur, et indignarentur, et persequerentur. Venite, et videte hominem qui dixit mihi omnia quaecumque feci: numquid ipse est Christus? Exierunt de civitate, et veniebant ad eum.

15.31 PL 35, 1521

31. “And in the meanwhile His disciples besought Him, saying, Master, eat.” For they had gone to buy meat, and had returned. “But He said, I have meat to eat which ye know not of. Therefore said the disciples one to another, Hath any man brought Him aught to eat?” What wonder if that woman did not understand about the water? See; the disciples do not yet understand the meat. But He heard their thoughts, and now as a master instructs them, not in a round-about way, as He did the woman while He still sought her husband, but openly at once: “My meat,” saith He, “is to do the will of Him that sent me.” Therefore, in the case of that woman, it was even His drink to do the will of Him that sent Him. That was the reason why He said, “I thirst, give me to drink;” namely, to work faith in her, and to drink of her faith, and to transplant her into His own body, for His body is the Church. Therefore He saith, “My meat is to do the will of Him that sent me.”

Et interea rogabant eum discipuli dicentes: Rabbi, manduca. Ierant enim emere cibos et venerant. Ille autem dixit: Ego habeo cibum manducare quem vos non scitis. Dicebant ergo discipuli ad invicem: Numquid aliquis attulit ei manducare? Quid mirum si mulier illa non intelligebat aquam? ecce discipuli nondum intelligunt escam. Audivit autem cogitationes illorum, et jam instruit ut magister; non per circuitum, sicut illam cujus adhuc virum requirebat, sed jam aperte: Meus, inquit, cibus est ut faciam voluntatem ejus qui misit me. Ergo et potus ipse erat in illa muliere, ut faceret voluntatem ejus, qui miserat eum. Ideo dicebat, Sitio, da mihi bibere; scilicet ut fidem in ea operaretur, et fidem ejus biberet, et eam in corpus suum trajiceret: corpus enim ejus Ecclesia. Ipse est ergo, inquit, cibus meus ut faciam voluntatem ejus qui me misit.

15.32 PL 35, 1521

32. “Say ye not, that there are yet four months, and then cometh harvest?” He was aglow for the work, and was arranging to send forth laborers. You count four months to the harvest; I show you another harvest, white and ready. Behold, I say unto you, “Lift up your eyes, and see that the fields are already white for the harvest.” Therefore He is going to send forth the reapers. “For in this is the saying true, that one reapeth, another soweth: that both he that soweth and he that reapeth may rejoice together. I have sent you to reap that on which ye have not labored: others have labored, and ye are entered into their labor.” What then? He sent reapers; sent He not the sowers? Whither the reapers? Where others labored already. For where labor had already been bestowed, surely there had been sowing; and what had been sown had now become ripe, and required the sickle and the threshing. Whither, then, were the reapers to be sent? Where the prophets had already preached before; for they were the sowers. For had they not been the sowers, whence had this come to the woman, “I know that Messias will come”? That woman was now ripened fruit, and the harvest fields were white, and sought the sickle. “I sent you,” then. Whither? “To reap what ye have not sown: others sowed, and ye are entered into their labors.” Who labored? Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Read their labors; in all their labors there is a prophecy of Christ, and for that reason they were sowers. Moses, and all the other patriarchs, and all the prophets, how much they suffered in that cold season when they sowed! Therefore was the harvest now ready in Judea. Justly was the corn there said to be as it were ripe, when so many thousands of men brought the price of their goods, and, laying them at the apostles’ feet, having eased their shoulders of this worldly baggage, began to follow the Lord Christ. Verily the harvest was ripe. What was made of it? Of that harvest a few grains were thrown out, and sowed the whole world; and another harvest is rising which is to be reaped in the end of the world. Of that harvest it is said, “They that sow in tears shall reap with joy.” But to that harvest not apostles, but angels, shall be sent forth. “The reapers,” saith He, “are the angels.” That harvest, then, is growing among tares, and is awaiting to be purged in the end of the world. But that harvest to which the disciples were sent first, where the prophets labored, was already ripe. But yet, brethren, observe what was said: “may rejoice together, both he that soweth and he that reapeth.” They had dissimilar labors in time, but the rejoicing they shall enjoy alike equally; they shall receive for their wages together eternal life.

Nonne vos dicitis quod adhuc quatuor menses sunt, et messis venit? In opus fervebat, et operarios mittere disponebat. Vos quatuor menses computatis usque ad messem; ego vobis aliam messem albam et paratam ostendo. Ecce dico vobis, levate oculos vestros, et videte quia jam albae sunt regiones ad messem. Ergo messores missurus est. In hoc enim est verbum verum, quia alius est qui metit, alius qui seminat: ut et qui seminat simul gaudeat et qui metit. Ego misi vos metere quod vos non laborastis: alii laboraverunt, et vos in laborem eorum introistis. Quid ergo? messores misit, non seminatores? Quo messores? Ubi jam alii laboraverunt. Nam ubi jam laboratum erat, utique seminatum erat; et quod seminatum erat, jam maturum erat factum, falcem et trituram desiderabat. Quo ergo erant messores mittendi? Ubi jam Prophetae praedicaverant; ipsi enim seminatores. Nam si ipsi non seminatores, unde ad illam mulierem pervenerat, Scio quia Messias veniet? Jam ista mulier fructus maturus erat, et erant albae messes, et falcem quaerebant. Misi vos ergo: quo? Metere quod non seminastis: alii seminaverunt, et vos in labores eorum introistis. Qui laboraverunt? Ipse Abraham, Isaac, et Jacob. Legite labores eorum: in omnibus laboribus eorum prophetia Christi; et ideo seminatores. Moyses et caeteri Patriarchae et omnes Prophetae, quanta pertulerunt in illo frigore quando seminabant? Ergo jam in Judaea messis parata erat. Merito ibi tanquam matura seges fuit, quando tot hominum millia pretia rerum suarum afferebant, et ad pedes Apostolorum ponentes, expeditis humeris a sarcinis saecularibus, Christum Dominum sequebantur: vere matura messis. Quid inde factum est? De ipsa messe ejecta sunt pauca grana, et seminaverunt orbem terrarum, et surgit alia messis quae in fine saeculi metenda est. De ista messe dicitur, Qui seminant in lacrymis, in gaudio metent . Ad istam ergo messem non Apostoli, sed Angeli mittentur: Messores, inquit, Angeli sunt . Ista ergo messis crescit inter zizania, et exspectat purgari in fine. Illa vero messis jam matura erat, quo prius missi sunt discipuli, ubi Prophetae laboraverunt. Sed tamen, fratres, videte quid dictum sit: Simul gaudeat et qui seminat et qui metit. Dispares temporis labores habuerunt: sed gaudio pariter perfruentur, mercedem simul accepturi sunt vitam aeternam.

15.33 PL 35, 1522

33. “And many Samaritans of that city believed on Him, because of the saying of the woman, who testified, He told me all that ever I did. And when the Samaritans came to Him, they besought Him that He would tarry with them; and He tarried there two days. And many more believed because of His word; and said to the woman, Now we believe, not because of thy words; for we have heard Him ourselves, and we know that this is indeed the Saviour of the world.” This also must be slightly noticed, for the lesson is come to an end. The woman first announced Him, and the Samaritans believed her testimony; and they besought Him to stay with them, and He stayed there two days, and many more believed. And when they had believed, they said to the woman, “Now we believe, not because of thy word; but we are come to know Him ourselves, and we know that this is indeed the Saviour of the world:” first by report, then by His presence. So it is to-day with them that are without, and are not yet Christians. Christ is made known to them by Christian friends; and just upon the report of that woman, that is, the Church, they come to Christ, they believe through this report. He stays with them two days, that is, gives them two precepts of charity; and many more believe, and more firmly believe, on Him, because He is in truth the Saviour of the world.

Ex civitate autem illa multi crediderunt in eum Samaritani, propter verbum mulieris testimonium perhibentis, Quia dixit mihi omnia quaecumque feci. Cum venissent autem ad eum Samaritani, rogaverunt ut apud eos maneret, et mansit ibi duos dies. Et multo plures crediderunt propter sermonem ejus: et mulieri dicebant: Quia jam non propter tuam loquelam credimus; ipsi enim nos audivimus, et scimus quia hic est vere Salvator mundi. Et hoc paululum animadvertendum est, quia lectio terminata est. Mulier primum nuntiavit, et ad mulieris testimonimum crediderunt Samaritani, et rogaverunt eum ut apud eos maneret, et mansit ibi biduo, et plures crediderunt: et cum credidissent, dicebant mulieri, Non jam propter verbum tuum credimus, sed ipsi cognovimus, et scimus quia vere hic est Salvator mundi; primo per famam, postea per praesentiam. Sic agitur hodie cum eis qui foris sunt, et nondum sunt christiani: Christus nuntiatur per christianos amicos; tanquam illa muliere, hoc est Ecclesia annuntiante, ad Christum veniunt, credunt per istam famam; manet apud eos biduo, hoc est, dat illis duo praecepta charitatis; et multo plures et firmius in eum credunt, quoniam vere ipse est Salvator mundi.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Save for later

Enter your email and we will send you a sign-in link. No password. What you save (articles, verses, chapters, documents) follows you to any device.