Lectures or Tractates on the Gospel According to St. John 9

sant'Agostino d'Ippona (354–430 d.C.) · In Joannis evangelium tractatus CXXIV · PL 35, 1379–1976

9.1 Chapter II. 1–11 PL 35, 1458

1. May the Lord our God be present, that He may grant us to render you what we promised. For yesterday, if you remember, holy brethren, when the shortness of the time prevented us from completing the sermon we had begun, we put off until to-day the unfolding, by God’s assistance, of those things which are mystically put in hidden meanings in this fact of the Gospel lesson. We need not, therefore, now stay any longer to commend the miracle of God. For He is the same God who, throughout the whole creation, worketh miracles every day, which become lightly esteemed by men, not because of the ease with which they are wrought, but by reason of their constant recurrence. Those uncommon works, however, which were done by the same Lord—that is, by the Word for us made flesh—occasioned greater astonishment to men, not because they are greater than those which He daily performs in the creation, but because these which happen every day are accomplished as it were in the course of nature; but the others appear exhibited to the eyes of men, wrought by the efficacy of a power, as it were, immediately present. We said, as you remember, one dead man rose again, people were amazed, whilst no man wonders at the birth every day of those who were not in being. In like manner, who does not wonder at water turned into wine, although God is doing this every year in vines? But since all the works which the Lord Jesus did, serve not only to rouse our hearts by their miraculous character, but also to edify our hearts in the doctrine of faith, it behoves us thoroughly to examine into the meaning and significance of those works. For the consideration of the meaning of all these things we deferred, as you remember, till today.

Adsit Dominus Deus noster, ut donet nobis reddere quod promisimus. Hesterno enim die, si meminit Sanctitas vestra, cum temporis excluderemur angustia, ne sermonem inchoatum impleremus, in hodiernum distulimus, ut ea quae in hoc facto evangelicae lectionis mystice in sacramentis posita essent, ipso adjuvante aperirentur. Non itaque opus est jam immorari diutius in commendando Dei miraculo. Ipse est enim Deus qui per universam creaturam quotidiana miracula facit, quae hominibus non facilitate, sed assiduitate viluerunt: rara autem quae facta sunt ab eodem Domino, id est a Verbo propter nos incarnato, majorem stuporem hominibus attulerunt: non quia majora erant, quam sunt ea quae quotidie in creatura facit, sed quia ista quae quotidie fiunt, tanquam naturali cursu peraguntur; illa vero efficacia potentiae tanquam praesentis exhibita videntur oculis hominum. Diximus, sicut meministis, resurrexit unus mortuus, obstupuerunt homines; cum quotidie nasci qui non erant, nemo miretur. Sic aquam in vinum conversam quis non miretur, cum hoc annis omnibus Deus in vitibus faciat? Sed quia omnia quae fecit Dominus Jesus, non solum valent ad excitanda corda nostra miraculis, sed etiam ad aedificanda in doctrina fidei; scrutari nos oportet quid sibi velint illa omnia, id est, quid significent. Horum enim omnium significationes, sicut recordamini, in hodiernum distulimus.

9.2 PL 35, 1458

2. The Lord, in that He came to the marriage to which He was invited, wished, apart from the mystical signification, to assure us that marriage was His own institution. For there were to be those of whom the apostle spoke, “forbidding to marry,” and asserting that marriage was an evil, and of the devil’s institution: notwithstanding the same Lord declares in the Gospel, on being asked whether it be lawful for a man to put away his wife for any cause, that it is not lawful save for the cause of fornication. In His answer, if you remember, He said, “What God hath joined together let not man put asunder.” And they that are well instructed in the catholic faith know that God instituted marriage; and as the union of man and wife is from God, so divorce is from the devil. But in the case of fornication it is lawful for a man to put away his wife, because she first chose to be no longer wife in not preserving conjugal fidelity to her husband. Nor are those women who vow virginity to God, although they hold a higher place of honor and sanctity in the Church, without marriage. For they too, together with the whole Church, attain to a marriage, a marriage in which Christ is the Bridegroom. And for this cause, therefore, did the Lord, on being invited, come to the marriage, to confirm conjugal chastity, and to show forth the sacrament of marriage. For the bridegroom in that marriage, to whom it was said, “Thou hast kept the good wine until now,” represented the person of the Lord. For the good wine—namely, the gospel—Christ has kept until now.

Quod Dominus invitatus venit ad nuptias, etiam excepta mystica significatione, confirmare voluit quod ipse fecit nuptias. Futuri enim erant, de quibus dixit Apostolus, prohibentes nubere , et dicentes quod malum essent nuptiae, et quod diabolus eas fecisset: cum idem Dominus dicat in Evangelio, interrogatus utrum liceat homini dimittere uxorem suam ex qualibet causa, non licere excepta causa fornicationis. In qua responsione, si meministis, hoc ait: Quod Deus conjunxit, homo non separet . Et qui bene eruditi sunt in fide catholica, noverunt quod Deus fecerit nuptias, et sicut conjunctio a Deo, ita divortium a diabolo sit. Sed propterea in causa fornicationis licet uxorem dimittere, quia ipsa esse uxor prior noluit, quae fidem conjugalem marito non servavit. Nec illae quae virginitatem Deo vovent, quanquam ampliorem gradum honoris et sanctitatis in Ecclesia teneant, sine nuptiis sunt: nam et ipsae pertinent ad nuptias cum tota Ecclesia, in quibus nuptiis sponsus est Christus. Ac per hoc ergo Dominus invitatus venit ad nuptias, ut conjugalis castitas firmaretur, et ostenderetur sacramentum nuptiarum: quia et illarum nuptiarum sponsus personam Domini figurabat, cui dictum est, Servasti vinum bonum usque adhuc. Bonum enim vinum Christus servavit usque adhuc, id est, Evangelium suum.

9.3 PL 35, 1459

3. For now let us begin to uncover the hidden meanings of the mysteries, so far as He in whose name we made you the promise may enable us. In the ancient times there was prophecy, and no times were left without the dispensation of prophecy. But the prophecy, since Christ was not understood therein, was water. For in water wine is in some manner latent. The apostle tells us what we are to understand by this water: “Even unto this day,” saith he, “whilst Moses is read, that same veil is upon their heart; that it is not unveiled because it is done away in Christ. And when thou shalt have passed over,” saith he, “to the Lord, the veil shall be taken away.” By the veil he means the covering over of prophecy, so that it was not understood. When thou hast passed over to the Lord, the veil is taken away; so likewise is tastelessness taken away when thou hast passed over to the Lord; and what was water now becomes wine to thee. Read all the prophetic books; and if Christ be not understood therein, what canst thou find so insipid and silly? Understand Christ in them, and what thou readest not only has a taste, but even inebriates thee; transporting the mind from the body, so that forgetting the things that are past, thou reachest forth to the things that are before.

Jam enim incipiamus ipsa sacramentorum operta detegere, quantum ille donat in cujus nomine vobis promisimus. Erat prophetia antiquis temporibus, et a prophetiae dispensatione nulla tempora cessaverunt: sed illa prophetia, quando in illa Christus non intelligebatur, aqua erat. In aqua enim vinum quodammodo latet. Dicit Apostolus quid intelligamus in ista aqua: « Usque ad hodiernum, inquit, diem, quamdiu legitur Moyses, idipsum velamen super cor eorum positum est; quod non revelatur, quia in Christo evacuatur. Et cum transieris, inquit, ad Dominum, auferetur velamen » . Velamen dicit adopertionem prophetiae, ut non intelligeretur. Tollitur velamen, cum transieris ad Dominum: sic tollitur insipientia, cum transieris ad Dominum, et quod aqua erat, vinum tibi fit. Lege libros omnes propheticos, non intellecto Christo, quid tam insipidum et fatuum invenies? Intellige ibi Christum, non solum sapit quod legis, sed etiam inebriat; mutans mentem a corpore, ut praeterita obliviscens, in ea quae ante sunt extendaris .

9.4 PL 35, 1459

4. Wherefore, prophecy from ancient times, even from the time when the series of human births began to run onwards, was not silent concerning Christ; but the import of the prophecy was concealed therein, for as yet it was water. Whence do we prove that in all former times, until the age in which the Lord came, prophecy did not fail concerning Him? From the Lord’s own saying. For when He had risen from the dead, He found His disciples doubting concerning Himself whom they had followed. For they saw that He was dead, and they had no hope that He would rise again; all their hope was gone. On what ground was the thief, after receiving praise, deemed worthy to be that same day in Paradise? Because when bound on the cross he confessed Christ, while the disciples doubted concerning Him. Well, He found them wavering, and in a manner reproving themselves because they had looked for redemption in Him. Yet they sorrowed for Him as cut off without fault, for they knew Him to be innocent. And this is what the disciples themselves said, after His resurrection, when He had found certain of them in the way, sorrowful, “Art thou only a stranger in Jerusalem, and hast not known the things which are come to pass there in these days? And He said unto them, What things? And they said, Concerning Jesus of Nazareth, who was a prophet mighty in deeds and words before God and all the people: how our priests and rulers delivered Him to be condemned to death, and bound Him to the cross. But we trusted that it was He who should have redeemed Israel; and to-day is now the third day since these things were done.” After one of the two whom He found in the way going to a neighboring village had spoken these and other words, Jesus answered and said, “O irrational, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken. Ought not Christ to have suffered all these things. and to enter into His glory? And beginning from Moses and all the prophets, He expounded unto them in all the Scriptures the things concerning Himself.” And likewise, in another place, when He would even have His disciples touch Him with their hands, that they might believe that He had risen in the body, He saith, “These are the words which I have spoken unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the Psalms, concerning me. Then opened He their understanding, that they might understand the Scriptures, and said unto them, Thus it is written, that Christ should suffer, and rise again from the dead the third day: and that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in His name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.”

Ergo prophetia ab antiquis temporibus, ex quo prorsus currit ordo nascentium in genere humano, de Christo non tacuit: sed occultum ibi erat; adhuc enim erat aqua. Unde probamus quod omnibus temporibus superioribus usque ad aetatem qua Dominus venit, prophetia de illo non defuit? Ipso Domino dicente. Cum enim resurrexisset a mortuis, invenit discipulos dubitantes de ipso quem secuti erant. Viderunt enim eum mortuum, et non speraverunt resurrecturum, et tota spes eorum concidit. Unde ille latro laudatus, ipso die meruit esse in paradiso? Quia in cruce fixus tunc confessus est Christum , quando de illo discipuli dubitaverunt. Ergo invenit eos nutantes, et quodammodo arguentes seipsos quod in illo redemptionem speraverant. Dolebant tamen eum sine culpa occisum, quia noverant innocentem. Et hoc ipsi post resurrectionem dixerunt, cum quosdam eorum tristes invenisset in via: « Tu solus peregrinaris in Jerusalem, et non cognovisti quae facta sunt in illa istis diebus? Ille autem dixit eis: Quae? Illi autem dixerunt: De Jesu Nazareno, qui fuit vir propheta, potens in factis et dictis in conspectu Dei et universi populi, quomodo hunc tradiderunt sacerdotes et principes nostri in damnationem mortis, et cruci eum fixerunt. Nos autem sperabamus, quia ipse erat qui redempturus esset Israel; et nunc tertius dies agitur hodie, ex quo haec facta sunt. » Haec atque alia cum dixisset unus ex duobus quos invenit in via euntes ad propinquum castellum; respondit ipse et ait: « O insensati et tardi corde ad credendum super omnia quae locuti sunt Prophetae! nonne haec omnia oportebat pati Christum, et introire in claritatem suam? Et fuit incipiens a Moyse et omnibus Prophetis, interpretans illis in omnibus Scripturis, quae de ipso erant. » Item alio loco, cum etiam palpari se manibus discipulorum voluit, ut crederent quia in corpore resurrexerat: « Hi sunt, inquit, sermones, quos locutus sum ad vos, cum adhuc essem vobiscum, quia oporteret impleri omnia quae scripta sunt in Lege Moysi, et Prophetis, et Psalmis de me. Tunc adaperuit illis sensum, ut intelligerent Scripturas, et dixit illis: Quia sic scriptum est, pati Christum, et resurgere a mortuis tertia die, et praedicari in nomine ejus poenitentiam et remissionem peccatorum in omnes gentes, incipiens ab Jerusalem. »

9.5 PL 35, 1460

5. When these words of the Gospel are understood, and they are certainly clear, all the mysteries which are latent in this miracle of the Lord will be laid open. Observe what He says, that it behoved the things to be fulfilled in Christ that were written of Him. Where were they written? “In the law,” saith He, “and in the prophets, and in the Psalms.” He omitted no part of the Old Scriptures. These were water; and hence the disciples were called irrational by the Lord, because as yet they tasted to them as water, not as wine. And how did He make of the water wine? When He opened their understanding, and expounded to them the Scriptures, beginning from Moses, through all the prophets; with which being now inebriated, they said, “Did not our hearts burn within us in the way, when He opened to us the Scriptures?” For they understood Christ in those books in which they knew Him not before. Thus our Lord Jesus Christ changed the water into wine, and that has now taste which before had not, that now inebriates which before did not. For if He had commanded the water to be poured out of the water-pots, and so Himself had put in the wine from the secret repositories of the creature, whence He made bread when He satisfied so many thousands; for five loaves were not in themselves sufficient to satisfy five thousand men, nor even to fill twelve baskets, but the omnipotence of the Lord was, as it were, a fountain of bread; so likewise He might, on the water being poured out, have poured in wine: but had He done this, He would appear to have rejected the Old Scriptures. When, however, He turns the water itself into wine, He shows us that the Old Scripture also is from Himself, for at His own command were the water-pots filled. It is from the Lord, indeed, that the Old Scripture also is; but it has no taste unless Christ is understood therein.

His ex Evangelio, quae certe manifesta sunt, intellectis, patebunt illa omnia mysteria quae in isto miraculo Domini latent. Videte quid ait, quia oportebat impleri in Christo quae de illo scripta sunt. Ubi scripta sunt? In Lege, inquit, et Prophetis, et Psalmis. Nihil Scripturarum veterum praetermisit. Illa erat aqua; et ideo dicti sunt illi a Domino insensati, quia eis adhuc aqua sapiebat, non vinum. Quomodo autem fecit de aqua vinum? Cum aperuit eis sensum, et exposuit eis Scripturas, incipiens a Moyse per omnes Prophetas. Unde jam inebriati dicebant, Nonne cor nostrum erat ardens in via, cum aperiret nobis Scripturas ? Intellexerunt enim Christum in his Libris in quibus eum non noverant. Mutavit ergo aquam in vinum Dominus noster Jesus Christus, et sapit quod non sapiebat, inebriat quod non inebriabat. Si enim jussisset inde aquam effundi, et sic ipse mitteret vinum ex occultis creaturae sinibus, unde fecit et panem quando saturavit tot millia: non enim quinque panes habebant quinque millium hominum saturitatem, aut saltem duodecim cophinos plenos , sed omnipotentia Domini quasi fons panis erat; sic posset et effusa aqua vinum infundere: quod si fecisset, videretur Scripturas veteres improbasse. Cum autem ipsam aquam convertit in vinum, ostendit nobis quod et Scriptura vetus ab ipso est: nam jussu ipsius impletae sunt hydriae. A Domino quidem et illa Scriptura; sed nihil sapit, si non ibi Christus intelligatur.

9.6 PL 35, 1461

6. But observe what Himself saith, “The things which were written in the law, and in the prophets, and in the Psalms concerning me.” And we know that the law extends from the time of which we have record, that is, from the beginning of the world: “In the beginning God made the heaven and the earth.” Thence down to the time in which we are now living are six ages, this being the sixth, as you have often heard and know. The first age is reckoned from Adam to Noah; the second, from Noah to Abraham; and, as Matthew the evangelist duly follows and distinguishes, the third, from Abraham to David; the fourth, from David to the carrying away into Babylon; the fifth, from the carrying away into Babylon to John the Baptist; the sixth, from John the Baptist to the end of the world. Moreover, God made man after His own image on the sixth day, because in this sixth age is manifested the renewing of our mind through the gospel, after the image of Him who created us; and the water is turned into wine, that we may taste of Christ, now manifested in the law and the prophets. Hence “there were there six water-pots,” which He bade be filled with water. Now the six water-pots signify the six ages, which were not without prophecy. And those six periods, divided and separated as it were by joints, would be as empty vessels unless they were filled by Christ. Why did I say, the periods which would run fruitlessly on, unless the Lord Jesus were preached in them? Prophecies are fulfilled, the water-pots are full; but that the water may be turned into wine, Christ must be understood in that whole prophecy.

Intendite autem quod ipse ait, Quae scripta sunt in Lege, et Prophetis, et Psalmis de me. Novimus autem Legem ex quibus temporibus narret, id est, ab exordio mundi: In principio fecit Deus coelum et terram . Inde usque ad hoc tempus quod nunc agimus, sexta aetas est, ut saepe audistis et nostis. Nam prima aetas computatur ab Adam usque ad Noe: secunda a Noe usque ad Abraham: et sicut Matthaeus Evangelista per ordinem sequitur et distinguit, tertia ab Abraham usque ad David: quarta a David usque ad transmigrationem in Babyloniam: quinta a transmigratione in Babyloniam usque ad Joannem Baptistam : sexta inde usque ad finem saeculi. Propterea et sexta die fecit Deus hominem ad imaginem suam : quia sexta ista aetate manifestatur per Evangelium reformatio mentis nostrae, secundum imaginem ejus qui creavit nos ; et convertitur aqua in vinum, ut jam manifestatum Christum in Lege et Prophetis sapiamus. Ideo erant ibi sex hydriae, quas jussit impleri aqua. Sex ergo illae hydriae, sex aetates significant, quibus non defuit prophetia. Illa ergo tempora sex, quasi articulis distributa atque distincta, quasi vasa essent inania, nisi a Christo implerentur. Quid dixi, tempora quae inaniter currerent, nisi in eis Dominus Jesus praedicaretur? Impletae sunt prophetiae, plenae sunt hydriae: sed ut aqua in vinum convertatur, in illa tota prophetia Christus intelligatur.

9.7 PL 35, 1461

7. But what means this: “They contained two or three metretæ apiece”? This phrase certainly conveys to us a mysterious meaning. For by “metretæ” he means certain measures, as if he should say jars, flasks, or something of that sort. Metreta is the name of a measure, and takes its name from the word “measure.” For μέτρον is the Greek word for measure, whence the word “metretæ” is derived. “They contained,” then, “two or three metretæ apiece.” What are we to say, brethren? If He had simply said “three apiece,” our mind would at once have run to the mystery of the Trinity. And, perhaps, we ought not at once to reject this application of the meaning, because He said, “two or three apiece;” for when the Father and Son are named, the Holy Spirit must necessarily be understood. For the Holy Spirit is not that of the Father only, nor of the Son only, but the Spirit of the Father and of the Son. For it is written,” If any man love the world, the Spirit of the Father is not in him.” And again, “Whoso hath not the Spirit of Christ is none of His.” The same, then, is the Spirit of the Father and of the Son. Therefore, the Father and the Son being named, the Holy Spirit also is understood, because He is the Spirit of the Father and of the Son. And when there is mention of the Father and Son, “two metretæ,” as it were, are mentioned; but since the Holy Spirit is understood in them, “three metretæ.” That is the reason why it is not said, “Some containing two metretæ apiece, others three apiece;” but the same six water-pots contained “two or three metretæ apiece.” It is as if he had said, When I say two apiece, I would have the Spirit of the Father and of the Son to be understood together with them; and when I say three apiece, I declare the same Trinity more plainly.

Quid est ergo, Capiebant metretas binas vel ternas? Mysterium nobis maxime ista locutio commendat. Metretas enim dicit mensuras quasdam, tanquam si diceret urnas, amphoras, vel si quid hujusmodi. Nomen mensurae est metreta, et a mensura accepit nomen ista mensura. Μέτρον enim mensuram dicunt Graeci: inde appellatae metretae. Capiebant ergo metretas binas vel ternas. Quid dicimus, fratres? Si ternas tantum diceret, non curreret animus noster nisi ad mysterium Trinitatis. Sed forte nec sic debemus inde cito jam sensum avertere, quia dixit binas vel ternas: quia nominato Patre et Filio, consequenter et Spiritus sanctus intelligendus est. Spiritus enim sanctus non est Patris tantummodo, aut Filii tantummodo Spiritus; sed Patris et Filii Spiritus. Scriptum est enim, Si quis dilexerit mundum, non est Spiritus Patris in illo : item scriptum est, Quisquis autem Spiritum Christi non habet, hic non est ejus . Idem autem Spiritus Patris et Filii. Nominato itaque Patre et Filio, intelligitur et Spiritus sanctus; quia Spiritus est Patris et Filii. Cum autem nominatur Pater et Filius, tanquam duae metretae nominantur. cum autem ibi intelligitur Spiritus sanctus, tres metretae. Ideo non dictum est, capientes metretas aliae binas, aliae ternas: sed ipsae sex hydriae capiebant metretas binas vel ternas. Tanquam diceret, Et quando dico binas, etiam Spiritum Patris et Filii cum his intelligi volo: et quando dico ternas, ipsam Trinitatem manifestius enuntio.

9.8 PL 35, 1462

8. Wherefore, whoso names the Father and the Son ought thereby to understand the mutual love of the Father and Son, which is the Holy Spirit. And perhaps the Scriptures on being examined (I do not say that I am able to show you this to-day, or as if another proof cannot be found),—nevertheless, the Scriptures, perhaps, on being searched, do show us that the Holy Spirit is charity. And do not count charity a thing cheap. How, indeed, can it be cheap, when all things that are said to be not cheap are called dear (chara)? Therefore, if what is not cheap is dear, what is dearer than dearness itself (charitas)? The apostle so commends charity to us that he says, “I show unto you a more excellent way. Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal. And though I know all mysteries and all knowledge, and have prophecy and all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing. And though I distribute all my goods to the poor, and give my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing.” How great, then, is charity, which, if wanting, in vain have we all things else; if present, rightly have we all things! Yet the Apostle Paul, setting forth the praise of charity with copiousness and fullness, has said less of it than did the Apostle John in brief, whose Gospel this is. For he has not hesitated to say, “God is love.” It is also written, “Because the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Spirit which is given us.” Who, then, can name the Father and the Son without thereby understanding the love of the Father and Son? Which when one begins to have, he will have the Holy Spirit; which if one has not, he will not have the Holy Spirit. And just as thy body, if it be without spirit, namely thy soul, is dead; so likewise thy soul, if it be without the Holy Spirit, that is, without charity, will be reckoned dead. Therefore “The water-pots contained two metretæ apiece,” because the Father and the Son are proclaimed in the prophecy of all the periods; but the Holy Spirit is there also, and therefore it is added, “or three apiece.” “I and the Father,” saith He, “are one.” But far be it from us to suppose that where we are told, “I and the Father are one,” the Holy Spirit is not there. Yet since he named the Father and the Son, let the water-pots contain “two metretæ apiece;” but attend to this, “or three apiece.” “Go, baptize the nations in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.” So, therefore, when it says “two apiece,” the Trinity is not expressed but understood; but when it says, “or three,” the Trinity is expressed also.

Quisquis itaque nominat Patrem et Filium, oportet ibi intelligat tanquam charitatem invicem Patris et Filii, quod est Spiritus sanctus. Fortassis enim discussae Scripturae: quod non sic dico, ut hodie docere possim, aut quasi aliud inveniri non possit: sed tamen fortasse scrutatae Scripturae indicant quod Spiritus sanctus charitas est. Et ne putetis vilem esse charitatem. Quomodo autem vilis est, quando omnia quae dicuntur non vilia, chara dicuntur? Si ergo quae non sunt vilia, chara sunt; quid est charius ipsa charitate? Sic autem commendatur charitas ab Apostolo, ut dicat: « Supereminentiorem viam vobis demonstro. Si linguis hominum loquar et Angelorum, charitatem autem non habeam, factus sum aeramentum sonans, aut cymbalum tinniens: et si sciero omnia sacramenta et omnem scientiam, et habuero prophetiam et omnem fidem, ita ut montes transferam, charitatem autem non habeam, nihil sum: et si distribuero omnia mea pauperibus, et tradidero corpus meum ut ardeam, charitatem autem non habeam, nihil mihi prodest » . Quanta est ergo charitas, quae si desit, frustra habentur caetera; si adsit, recte habentur omnia? Tamen charitatem laudans apostolus Paulus copiosissime atque uberrime, minus de illa dixit quam quod ait breviter apostolus Joannes, cujus est hoc Evangelium. Neque enim dubitavit dicere, Deus charitas est . Scriptum est etiam, Quia charitas Dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris per Spiritum sanctum qui datus est nobis . Quis ergo nominet Patrem et Filium, et non ibi intelligat charitatem Patris et Filii? Quam cum habere coeperit, Spiritum sanctum habebit: quam si non habuerit, sine Spiritu sancto erit. Et quomodo corpus tuum sine spiritu, quod est anima tua, si fuerit, mortuum est; sic anima tua sine Spiritu sancto, id est, sine charitate si fuerit, mortua deputabitur. Ergo metretas binas capiebant hydriae, quia in omnium temporum prophetia Pater et Filius praedicatur: sed ibi est et Spiritus sanctus; ideoque adjunctum est, vel ternas. Ego et Pater, inquit, unum sumus : sed absit ut desit Spiritus sanctus, ubi audimus, Ego et Pater unum sumus. Tamen quia Patrem et Filium nominavit, capiant hydriae binas metretas; sed audi, vel ternas: Ite, baptizate gentes in nomine Patris et Filii et Spiritus sancti . Itaque in eo quod dicuntur binae, non exprimitur, sed intelligitur; in eo vero quod dicuntur vel ternae, etiam exprimitur Trinitas.

9.9 PL 35, 1462

9. But there is also another meaning that must not be passed over, and which I will declare: let every man choose which he likes best. We keep not back what is suggested to us. For it is the Lord’s table, and the minister ought not to defraud the guests, especially when they hunger as you now do, so that your longing is manifest. Prophecy, which is dispensed from the ancient times, has for its object the salvation of all nations. True, Moses was sent to the people of Israel alone, and to that people alone was the law given by him; and the prophets, too, were of that people, and the very distribution of times was marked out according to the same people; whence also the water-pots are said to be “according to the purification of the Jews:” nevertheless, that the prophecy was proclaimed to all other nations also is manifest, forasmuch as Christ was concealed in him in whom all nations are blessed, as it was promised to Abraham by the Lord, saying, “In thy seed shall all nations be blessed.” But this was not as yet understood, for as yet the water was not turned into wine. The prophecy therefore was dispensed to all nations. But that this may appear more agreeably, let us, so far as our time permits, mention certain facts respecting the several ages, as represented respectively by the water-pots.

Sed est et alius intellectus non praetermittendus, et ipsum dicam: eligat quisque quod placet; nos quod suggeritur non subtrahimus. Mensa enim Domini est, et non oportet ministrum fraudare convivas, praesertim sic esurientes, ut appareat aviditas vestra. Prophetia quae ab antiquis temporibus dispensatur, ad salutem omnium gentium pertinet. Ad solum quidem populum Israel missus est Moyses, et ei soli populo per eum Lex data est, et ipsi Prophetae ex illo populo fuerunt, et ipsa distributio temporum secundum eumdem populum distincta est; unde et hydriae dicuntur secundum purificationem Judaeorum: sed tamen quod illa prophetia etiam caeteris gentibus annuntiabatur, manifestum est; quandoquidem Christus in eo occultus erat, in quo benedicuntur omnes gentes, sicut promissum est Abrahae dicente Domino, In semine tuo benedicentur omnes gentes . Nondum autem intelligebatur, quia nondum aqua conversa erat in vinum. Ergo omnibus gentibus dispensabatur prophetia. Quod ut emineat jucundius, de singulis aetatibus, tanquam de singulis hydriis, pro tempore quaedam commemoremus.

9.10 PL 35, 1463

10. In the very beginning, Adam and Eve were the parents of all nations, not of the Jews only; and whatever was represented in Adam concerning Christ, undoubtedly concerned all nations, whose salvation is in Christ. What better can I say of the water of the first water-pot than what the apostle says of Adam and Eve? For no man will say that I misunderstand the meaning when I produce, not my own, but the apostle’s. How great a mystery, then, concerning Christ does that of which the apostle makes mention contain, when he says, “And the two shall be in one flesh: this is a great mystery!” And lest any man should understand that greatness of mystery to exist in the case of the individual men that have wives, he says, “But I speak concerning Christ and the Church.” What great mystery is this, “the two shall be one flesh?” While Scripture, in the Book of Genesis, was speaking of Adam and Eve, it came to these words, “Therefore shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife; and they two shall be one flesh.” Now, if Christ cleave to the Church, so that the two should be one flesh, in what manner did He leave His Father and His mother? He left His Father in this sense, that when He was in the form of God, He thought it not robbery to be equal with God, but emptied Himself, taking to Him the form of a servant. In this sense He left His Father, not that He forsook or departed from His Father, but that He did not appear unto men in that form in which He was equal with the Father. But how did He leave His mother? By leaving the synagogue of the Jews, of which, after the flesh, He was born, and by cleaving to the Church which He has gathered out of all nations. Thus the first water-pot then held a prophecy of Christ; but so long as these things of which I speak were not preached among the peoples, the prophecy was water, it was not yet changed into wine. And since the Lord has enlightened us through the apostle, to show us what we were in search of, by this one sentence, “The two shall be one flesh; a great mystery concerning Christ and the Church;” we are now permitted to seek Christ everywhere, and to drink wine from all the water-pots. Adam sleeps, that Eve may be formed; Christ dies, that the Church may be formed. When Adam sleeps, Eve is formed from his side; when Christ is dead, the spear pierces His side, that the mysteries may flow forth whereby the Church is formed. Is it not evident to every man that in those things then done, things to come were foreshadowed, since the apostle says that Adam himself was the figure of Him that was to come? “Who is,” saith he, “the figure of Him that was to come.” All was mystically prefigured. For, in reality, God could have taken the rib from Adam when he was awake, and formed the woman. Or was it, haply, necessary for him to sleep lest he should feel pain in his side when the rib was taken away? Who is there that sleeps so soundly that his bones may be torn from him without his awaking? Or was it because it was God that tore it out, that the man did not feel it? Well, He who could take it from him without pain when he was asleep, could do it also when he was awake. But, without doubt, the first water-pot was being filled, there was a dispensation of the prophecy of that time concerning this which was to be.

In ipso exordio Adam et Eva parentes omnium gentium erant, non tantummodo Judaeorum; et quidquid figurabatur in Adam de Christo, ad omnes utique gentes pertinebat, quibus salus est in Christo. Quid ergo potissimum dicam de aqua primae hydriae, nisi quod Apostolus ait de Adam et Eva? Nemo enim me dicet prave intellexisse, quando intellectum non meum, sed Apostoli profero. Illud ergo unum quantum mysterium de Christo continet, quod commemorat Apostolus, dicens, Et erunt duo in carne una: sacramentum hoc magnum est ? Et ne quis magnitudinem istam sacramenti in singulis quibusque hominibus uxores habentibus intelligeret, Ego autem, inquit, dico in Christo et in Ecclesia. Quod est hoc sacramentum magnum, Erunt duo in carne una? Cum de Adam et Eva Scriptura Geneseos loqueretur, unde ventum est ad haec verba, Propterea relinquet homo patrem et matrem, et adhaerebit uxori suae; et erunt duo in carne una . Si ergo Christus adhaesit Ecclesiae, ut essent duo in carne una, quomodo reliquit Patrem? quomodo matrem? Reliquit Patrem, quia cum in forma Dei esset, non rapinam arbitratus est esse aequalis Deo, sed semetipsum exinanivit, formam servi accipiens . Hoc est enim, reliquit Patrem, non quia deseruit et recessit a Patre; sed quia non ea in forma apparuit hominibus in qua aequalis est Patri. Quomodo reliquit matrem? Relinquendo synagogam Judaeorum, de qua secundum carnem natus est; et inhaerendo Ecclesiae, quam ex omnibus gentibus congregavit. Ergo et prima hydria habebat prophetiam de Christo: sed quando ista quae loquor non praedicabantur in populis, adhuc aqua erat, in vinum mutata nondum erat. Et quia illuminavit nos per Apostolum Dominus, ut ostenderet nobis quid ibi quaereremus in ipsa una sententia, Erunt duo in carne una; sacramentum magnum in Christo et in Ecclesia; jam licet nobis ubique Christum quaerere, et de omnibus hydriis vinum potare. Dormit Adam ut fiat Eva: moritur Christus ut fiat Ecclesia. Dormienti Adae fit Eva de latere : mortuo Christo lancea percutitur latus , ut profluant sacramenta, quibus formetur Ecclesia. Cui non appareat quia in illis tunc factis futura figurata sunt, quandoquidem dicit Apostolus ipsum Adam formam futuri esse? Qui est, inquit, forma futuri . Praefigurabantur omnia mystice. Neque enim vere non poterat Deus vigilanti costam educere, feminamque formare. An forte ne doleret latus quando costa detracta est, propter hoc oportebat ut ille dormiret? Quis est qui sic dormiat, ut ei ossa non evigilanti evellantur? An quia Deus evellebat, propterea homo non sentiebat? Poterat ergo et vigilanti sine dolore evellere, qui potuit dormienti. Sed procul dubio hydria prima implebatur: prophetia illius temporis de futuro isto tempore dispensabatur.

9.11 PL 35, 1464

11. Christ was represented also in Noah and in that ark of the whole world. For why were all kinds of animals shut in, in the ark but to signify all nations? For God could again create every kind of animals. When as yet they were not, did He not say, “Let the earth bring forth,” and the earth brought forth? From the same source He could make anew, whence He then made; by a word He made, by a word He could make again: were it not that He was setting before us a mystery, and filling up the second water-pot of prophetical dispensation, that the world might by the wood be delivered in a figure; because the life of the world was to be nailed on wood.

Christus etiam figuratus est in Noe, et in illa arca orbis terrarum. Quare enim in arca inclusa sunt omnia animalia , nisi ut significarentur omnes gentes? Non enim deerat Deo rursus creare omne genus animalium. Quando enim omnia non erant, nonne dixit, Producat terra, et produxit terra ? Unde ergo tunc fecit, inde reficeret; verbo fecit, verbo reficeret: nisi quia mysterium commendabat, et secundam hydriam propheticae dispensationis implebat, ut per lignum liberaretur figura orbis terrarum; quia in ligno figenda erat vita orbis terrarum?

9.12 PL 35, 1464

12. Now, in the third water-pot, to Abraham, as I have mentioned before, it was said, “In thy seed shall all nations be blessed.” And who does not see whose figure Abraham’s only son was, he who bore the wood for the sacrifice of himself, to that place whither he was being led to be offered up? For the Lord bore his own cross, as the Gospel tells us. This will be enough to say concerning the third water-pot.

Jam in tertia hydria, ipsi Abrahae, quod jam commemoravi, dictum est, In semine tuo benedicentur omnes gentes. Et quis non videat cujus habebat figuram unicus ejus, qui sibi ad sacrificium, quo ipse immolandus ducebatur, ligna portabat? Portavit enim Dominus crucem suam, sicut Evangelium loquitur . Hoc de tertia hydria commemorasse suffecerit.

9.13 PL 35, 1464

13. But as to David, why do I say that his prophecy extends to all nations, when we have just heard the psalm (and it is difficult to mention a psalm in which the same is not sounded forth)? But certainly, as I have said, we have been just singing, “Arise, O God, judge the earth; for Thou shalt inherit among all nations.” And this is why the Donatists are as men cast forth from the marriage: just as the man who had not a wedding garment was invited, and came, but was cast forth from the number of the guests because he had not the garment to the glory of the bridegroom; for he who seeks his own glory, not Christ’s, has not the wedding garment: for they refuse to agree with him who was the friend of the Bridegroom, and says, “This is He that baptizeth.” And deservedly was that which he was not made, by way of rebuke, an objection to him who had not the wedding garment, “Friend, how art thou come hither?” And just as he was speechless, so also are these. For what can tongue-clatter avail when the heart is mute? For they know that inwardly, and with their own selves, they have not anything to say. Within, they are mute; without, they make a din. But whether they will or no, they hear this sung even among themselves, “Arise, O God, judge the earth; for Thou shalt inherit among the nations:” and by not communicating with all nations, what do they but acknowledge themselves to be disinherited?

De David autem, quid dicam quod ad omnes gentes pertinebat prophetia ejus; quando modo audivimus Psalmum, et difficile est ut dicatur psalmus ubi hoc non sonet? Sed certe, ut dixi, modo cantavimus, Surge, Deus, judica terram; quoniam tu haereditabis in omnibus gentibus . Et ideo Donatistae tanquam projecti de nuptiis: sicut ille homo qui non habebat vestem nuptialem, invitatus est et venit, sed projectus est de numero vocatorum, quia non habebat vestem ad sponsi gloriam; qui enim suam gloriam quaerit, non Christi, non habet vestem nuptialem: non enim volunt consonare voci illius qui amicus erat sponsi, et ait, Hic est qui baptizat . Nec immerito illi qui non habebat vestem nuptialem, hoc per increpationem objectum est, quod non erat: Amice quid huc venisti? Et sicut ille obmutuit , ita et isti. Quid enim prodest strepitus oris, muto corde? Noverunt quippe intus apud semetipsos non se habere quod dicant. Intus obmutuerunt, foris perstrepunt. Audiunt, velint nolint, etiam apud se cantari, Surge, Deus, judica terram; quoniam tu haereditabis in omnibus gentibus: et non communicando omnibus gentibus, quid aliud quam se exhaeredatos esse cognoscunt?

9.14 PL 35, 1464

14. Now what I said, brethren, that prophecy extends to all nations (for I wish to show you another meaning in the expression, “Containing two or three metretæ apiece”),—that prophecy, I say, extends to all nations, is pointed out, as we have just now reminded you, in Adam, “who is the figure of Him that was to come.” Who does not know that from him all nations are sprung; and that in the four letters of his name the four quarters of the globe, by their Greek appellations, are indicated? For if the east, west, north, and south are expressed in Greek even as Holy Scripture mentions them in various places, the initial letters of the words, thou wilt find, make the word Adam: for in Greek the four quarters of the world are called Anatole, Dysis, Arktos, Mesembria. If thou write these four words, one under the other, like four verses, the capital letters form the word Adam. The same is represented in Noah, by reason of the ark, in which were all animals, significant of all nations: the same in Abraham, to whom it was said more clearly, “In thy seed shall all nations be blessed:” the same in David, from whose psalms, to omit other expressions, we have just been singing, “Arise, O God, judge the earth; for Thou shalt inherit among all nations.” Now to what God is it said “Arise,” but to Him who slept? “Arise, O God, judge the earth.” As if it were said, Thou hast been asleep, having been judged by the earth; arise, to judge the earth. And whither does that prophecy extend, “For Thou shalt inherit among all nations”?

Quod ergo dicebam, fratres, quia ad omnes gentes pertinet prophetia: volo enim alium sensum ostendere in eo quod dictum est, Capientes metretas binas vel ternas: ad omnes, inquam, gentes pertinet prophetia; modo commemoravimus demonstratum in Adam, qui est forma futuri. Quis autem nesciat quod de illo exortae sunt omnes gentes: et in ejus vocabulo quatuor litteris, quatuor orbis terrarum partes per graecas appellationes demonstrantur? Si enim graece dicantur, Oriens, Occidens, Aquilo, Meridies, sicut eas plerisque locis sancta Scriptura commemorat; in capitibus verborum invenis Adam: dicuntur enim graece quatuor memoratae mundi partes ἀνατολὴ, δύσις, ἄρκτος, μεσημβρία. Ista quatuor nomina si tanquam versus quatuor sub invicem scribas, in eorum capitibus Adam legitur. Hoc in Noe propter arcam figuratum est, in qua erant omnia animalia, quae significabant omnes gentes: hoc in Abraham, cui apertius dictum est, In semine tuo benedicentur omnes gentes: hoc in David, de cujus Psalmis, ut alia omittam, modo cantavimus, Surge, Deus, judica terram; quoniam tu haereditabis in omnibus gentibus. Cui enim Deo dicitur, Surge, nisi ei qui dormivit? Surge, Deus, judica terram. Tanquam diceretur, Dormisti, judicatus a terra; surge, ut judices terram. Et quo pertinet illa prophetia, Quoniam tu haereditabis in omnibus gentibus?

9.15 PL 35, 1465

15. Moreover, in the fifth age, in the fifth water-pot as it were, Daniel saw a stone that had been cut from a mountain without hands, and had broken all the kingdoms of the earth; and he saw the stone grow and become a great mountain, so as to fill the whole face of the earth. What can be plainer, my brethren? The stone is cut from a mountain: the same is the stone which the builders rejected, and is become the head of the corner. From what mountain is it cut, if not from the kingdom of the Jews, of which our Lord Jesus Christ was born according to the flesh? And it is cut without hands, without human exertion; because Christ sprung from a virgin, without a husband’s embrace. The mountain from which it was cut had not filled the whole face of the earth; for the kingdom of the Jews did not possess all nations. But, on the other hand, the kingdom of Christ we see occupying the whole world.

Jam vero in quinta aetate, tanquam in quinta hydria, Daniel vidit lapidem praecisum de monte sine manibus, et fregisse omnia regna terrarum; et crevisse illum lapidem, et factum esse montem magnum, ita ut impleret universam faciem terrae . Quid apertius, fratres mei? Lapis de monte praeciditur: ipse est lapis quem reprobaverunt aedificantes, et factus est in caput anguli . De quo monte praeciditur, nisi de regno Judaeorum, unde Dominus noster Jesus Christus secundum carnem natus est? Et praeciditur sine manibus, sine opere humano; quia sine amplexu maritali de virgine exortus est. Mons ille unde praecisus est, non impleverat universam faciem terrae: non enim tenuerat regnum Judaeorum omnes gentes. At vero regnum Christi, universum orbem terrarum cernimus occupare.

9.16 PL 35, 1465

16. To the sixth age belongs John the Baptist, than whom none greater has arisen among those born of women; of whom it was said, that he was “greater than a prophet.” And how did John show that Christ was sent to all nations? When the Jews came to him to be baptized, that they might not pride themselves on the name of Abraham, he said to them, “O generation of vipers, who has proclaimed to you to flee from the wrath to come? Bring forth therefore fruit worthy of repentance;” that is, be humble; for he was speaking to proud people. But whereof were they proud? Of their descent according to the flesh, not of the fruit of imitating their father Abraham. What said he to them? “Say not, We have Abraham for our father: for God is able of these stones to raise up children to Abraham.” Meaning by stones all nations, not on account of their durable strength, as in the case of that stone which the builders rejected, but on account of their stupidity and their foolish insensibility, because they had become like the things which they were accustomed to worship: for they worshipped senseless images, themselves equally senseless. “They that make them are like them, and so are all they that trust in them.” Accordingly, when men begin to worship God, what do they hear said to them? “That ye may be the children of your Father who is in heaven; who maketh His sun to rise on the good and on the evil, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.” Wherefore, if a man becomes like that which he worships, what is meant by “God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham”? Let us ask ourselves and we shall see that it is a fact. For of those nations are we come, but we should not have come of them had not God of the stones raised up children unto Abraham. We are made children of Abraham by imitating his faith, not by being born of his flesh. For just as they by their degeneracy have been disinherited, so have we by imitating been adopted. Therefore, brethren, this prophecy also of the sixth water-pot extended to all nations; and hence it was said concerning all, “containing two or three metretæ apiece.”

Jam ad sextam aetatem pertinet Joannes Baptista, quo nemo exsurrexit major in natis mulierum: de quo dictum est, Major quam propheta . Quomodo et ipse ostendit, quia omnibus gentibus missus est Christus? Quando Judaei venerunt ad eum ut baptizarentur, et ne superbirent de nomine Abraham, Generatio, inquit, viperarum, quis ostendit vobis fugere ab ira ventura? facite ergo fructum dignum poenitentiae; id est, humiles estote: superbis enim loquebatur. Unde autem erant superbi? De genere carnis, non de fructu imitationis patris Abraham. Quid eis ait? Nolite dicere, Patrem habemus Abraham: potens est enim Deus de lapidibus istis suscitare filios Abrahae . Lapides dicens omnes gentes, non propter firmitatem, sicut lapis dictus est quem reprobaverunt aedificantes; sed propter stoliditatem et duritiam stultitiae, quia eis quos adorabant similes facti erant: adorabant enim insensata simulacra, pariter insensati. Unde insensati? Quoniam in Psalmo dicitur, Similes illis fiant qui faciunt ea, et omnes qui confidunt in eis . Ideo cum coeperint homines Deum adorare, quid audiunt? Ut sitis filii Patris vestri qui in coelis est, qui solem suum facit oriri super bonos et malos, et pluit super justos et injustos . Quapropter si ei fit homo similis quem adorat; quid est, Potens est Deus de lapidibus istis suscitare filios Abrahae? Nos ipsos interrogemus, et videmus quia factum est. Nos enim de gentibus venimus; de gentibus autem non veniremus, nisi Deus de lapidibus suscitasset filios Abrahae. Facti sumus filii Abrahae imitando fidem, non nascendo per carnem. Sicut enim illi degenerando exhaeredati; sic nos imitando adoptati. Ergo, fratres, ad omnes gentes pertinebat etiam ista sextae hydriae prophetia; et ideo de omnibus dictum est, Capientes metretas binas vel ternas.

9.17 PL 35, 1466

17. But how do we show that all nations belong to the “two or three metretæ apiece”? It was a matter of reckoning, in some measure, that he should say the same water-pots contained “two apiece,” which he had said contained “three apiece;” evidently in order to intimate to us a mystery therein. How are there “two metretæ apiece”? Circumcision and uncircumcision. Scripture mentions these two classes of people, and leaves out no kind of men, when it says, “Circumcision and uncircumcision;” in these two appellations thou hast all nations: they are the two metretæ apiece. In these two walls, meeting from different quarters, “Christ became the corner-stone, in order to make peace in Himself.” Let us show also the “three metretæ apiece” in the case of these same all nations. Noah had three sons, through whom the human race was restored. Hence the Lord says, “The kingdom of heaven is like leaven, which a woman took and hid in three measures of meal, till the whole was leavened.” What is this woman, but the flesh of the Lord? What is the leaven, but the gospel? What the three measures, but all nations, on account of the three sons of Noah? Therefore the “six water-pots containing two or three metretæ apiece” are six periods of time, containing the prophecy relating to all nations, whether as represented in two sorts of men, namely, Jews and Greeks, as the apostle often mentions them; or in three sorts, on account of the three sons of Noah. For the prophecy was represented as reaching unto all nations. And because of that reaching it is called a measure, even as the apostle says, “We have received a measure for reaching unto you.” For in preaching the gospel to the Gentiles, he says, “A measure for reaching unto you.”

Sed quomodo ostendimus omnes gentes pertinere ad binas vel ternas metretas? Aestimantis enim fuit quodammodo, ut ipsas diceret binas, quas dixerat ternas, ad commendandum scilicet sacramentum. Quomodo sunt binae metretae? Circumcisio et praeputium. Hos duos populos Scriptura commemorat, et nullum praetermittit hominum genus, quando dicit, Circumcisio et praeputium ; in duobus istis nominibus habes omnes gentes: binae metretae sunt. His duobus parietibus de diverso venientibus ad pacem in seipso faciendam, lapis angularis factus est Christus . Ostendamus et ternas metretas in eisdem ipsis omnibus gentibus. Tres erant filii Noe , per quos reparatum est genus humanum. Unde Dominus ait: Simile est regnum coelorum fermento, quod accepit mulier et abscondit in farinae mensuris tribus, quoadusque fermentaretur totum . Quae est ista mulier, nisi caro Domini? Quod est fermentum, nisi Evangelium? Quae sunt tres mensurae, nisi omnes gentes, propter tres filios Noe? Ergo sex hydriae capientes binas vel ternas metretas, sex sunt aetates temporum, capientes prophetiam pertinentem ad omnes gentes, sive in duobus generibus hominum, id est, Judaeis et Graecis, sicut saepe Apostolus commemorat ; sive in tribus, propter Noe tres filios, significatas. Figurata est enim prophetia pertingens usque ad omnes gentes. Nam in eo quod pertingit, dicta est metreta, sicut dicit Apostolus, Accepimus mensuram pertingendi usque ad vos . Gentibus enim evangelizans, hoc ait, mensuram pertingendi usque ad vos.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Salva per dopo

Inserisci la tua email: ti invieremo un link per accedere. Nessuna password. Ciò che salvi (voci, versetti, capitoli, documenti) ti segue su ogni dispositivo.