Expositions on the Book of Psalms 7

sant'Agostino d'Ippona (354–430 d.C.) · Enarrationes in Psalmos · PL 36, 67–1027

7.0 Psalm VII PL 36, 97

A psalm to David himself, which he sung to the Lord, for the words of Chusi, son of Jemini.

7.1 Psalm VII PL 36, 97

1. Now the story which gave occasion to this prophecy may be easily recognised in the second book of Kings. For there Chusi, the friend of king David, went over to the side of Abessalon, his son, who was carrying on war against his father, for the purpose of discovering and reporting the designs which he was taking against his father, at the instigation of Achitophel, who had revolted from David’s friendship, and was instructing by his counsel, to the best of his power, the son against the father. But since it is not the story itself which is to be the subject of consideration in this Psalm, from which the prophet hath taken a veil of mysteries, if we have passed over to Christ, let the veil be taken away. And first let us inquire into the signification of the very names, what it means. For there have not been wanting interpreters, who investigating these same words, not carnally according to the letter, but spiritually, declare to us that Chusi should be interpreted silence; and Gemini, right-handed; Achitophel, brother’s ruin. Among which interpretations, Judas, that traitor, again meets us, that Abessalon should bear his image, according to that interpretation of it as a father’s peace; in that his father was full of thoughts of peace toward him: although he in his guile had war in his heart, as was treated of in the third Psalm. Now as we find in the Gospels that the disciples of our Lord Jesus Christ are called sons, so in the same Gospels we find they are called brethren also. For the Lord on the resurrection saith, “Go and say to My brethren.” And the Apostle calls Him “the first begotten among many brethren.” The ruin then of that disciple, who betrayed Him, is rightly understood to be a brother’s ruin, which we said is the interpretation of Achitophel. Now as to Chusi, from the interpretation of silence, it is rightly understood that our Lord contended against that guile in silence, that is, in that most deep secret, whereby “blindness happened in part to Israel,” when they were persecuting the Lord, that the fulness of the Gentiles might enter in, and “so all Israel might be saved.” When the Apostle came to this profound secret and deep silence, he exclaimed, as if struck with a kind of awe of its very depth, “O the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are His judgments, and His ways past finding out! For who hath known the wind of the Lord, or who hath been His counsellor?” Thus that great silence he does not so much discover by explanation, as he sets forth its greatness in admiration. In this silence the Lord, hiding the sacrament of His adorable passion, turns the brother’s voluntary ruin, that is, His betrayer’s impious wickedness, into the order of His mercy and providence: that what he with perverse mind wrought for one Man’s destruction, He might by providential overruling dispose for all men’s salvation. The perfect soul then, which is already worthy to know the secret of God, sings a Psalm unto the Lord, she sings “for the words of Chusi,” because she has attained to know the words of that silence: for among unbelievers and persecutors there is that silence and secret. But among His own, to whom it is said, “Now I call you no more servants; for the servant knoweth not what his lord doeth; but I have called you friends, for all things that I have heard of My Father I have made known unto you: among His friends, I say, there is not the silence, but the words of the silence, that is, the meaning of that silence set forth and manifested. Which silence, that is, Chusi, is called the son of Gemini, that is, righthanded. For what was done for the Saints was not to be hidden from them. And yet He saith, “Let not the left hand know what the right hand doeth.” The perfect soul then, to which that secret has been made known, sings in prophecy “for the words of Chusi,” that is, for the knowledge of that same secret. Which secret God at her right hand, that is, favourable and propitious unto her, has wrought. Wherefore this silence is called the Son of the right hand, which is, “Chusi, the son of Gemini.”

[vers. 1.] Historia quidem unde occasionem ista prophetia sumpsit, in Regnorum secundo libro cognoscere facile est. Ibi enim Chusi, amicus regis David, transitum fecit in partes Abessalon filii ejus qui adversus patrem bellum gerebat, ad exploranda consilia et renuntianda quae adversus patrem ille moliebatur auctore Achitophel, qui defecerat ab amicitia David, et filium ejus adversus patrem consiliis quibus posset instruebat. Sed quoniam non ipsa historia in hoc psalmo consideranda est de qua Propheta mysteriorum velamen assumpsit, si transitum ad Christum fecimus, auferatur velamen . Et primo ipsorum nominum significationem interrogemus quid sibi velit. Non enim defuerunt interpretes qui haec ipsa non carnaliter ad litteram, sed spiritualiter investigantes, edicerent nobis quod Chusi interpretetur Silentium; Jemini autem, Dexter; Achitophel, Fratris ruina. Quibus interpretationibus rursum nobis traditor ille Judas occurrit, ut Abessalon ejus imaginem gestet, secundum quod Patris pax interpretatur; quia pacatus erga illum exstitit pater, quamvis ipse dolis suis bellum haberet in corde, sicut in psalmo tertio tractatum est. Quemadmodum autem invenitur in Evangelio filios Domini nostri Jesu Christi dictos esse discipulos , sic in eodem Evangelio invenitur etiam fratres esse appellatos; resurgens enim Dominus ait, Vade, et dic fratribus meis , et Apostolus eum dicit primogenitum in multis fratribus : discipuli ergo ejus ruina qui eum tradidit, recte intelligitur Fratris ruina, quod Achitophel interpretari diximus. Chusi autem, quod interpretatur Silentium, recte accipitur adversus illos dolos Dominum nostrum silentio dimicasse, id est altissimo secreto quo caecitas ex parte Israel facta est, cum Dominum persequebantur, ut plenitudo Gentium subintraret, et sic omnis Israel salvus fieret. Ad hoc profundum secretum altumque silentium cum venisset Apostolus, exclamavit quasi quodam ipsius altitudinis horrore perculsus: O altitudo divitiarum sapientiae et scientiae Dei, quam inscrutabilia sunt judicia ejus, et investigabiles viae ipsius! Quis enim cognovit mentem Domini, aut quis consiliarius illius fuit )? ita magnum illud silentium non expositione magis aperit, quam admiratione commendat. Hoc silentio Dominus sacramentum venerabilis passionis occultans, voluntariam ruinam fratris, id est, nefarium scelus traditoris sui, in suae misericordiae atque providentiae ordinem vertit; ut quod ille ad perniciem unius hominis perversa mente faciebat, iste ad salutem omnium hominum provida gubernatione conferret. Cantat ergo Psalmum Domino anima perfecta, quae jam digna est nosse secretum Dei; cantat pro verbis Chusi, quia meruit nosse verba illius silentii. Apud infideles enim et persecutores, silentium est illud atque secretum: apud suos autem, quibus dictum est, Jam non dico vos servos, quia servus nescit quid faciat Dominus ejus; vos autem dixi amicos, quia omnia quae audivi a Patre meo, nota feci vobis : apud amicos ergo ejus non est silentium, sed verba silentii, id est, ratio exposita et manifesta illius silentii. Quod silentium, id est Chusi, dicitur filius Jemini, id est dextri: non enim abscondendum erat sanctis quod pro illis gestum est. Et tamen Nesciat, inquit, sinistra quid faciat dextra . Canit ergo anima perfecta in prophetia, cui secretum illud innotuit, pro verbis Chusi, id est pro cognitione ejusdem secreti; quod secretum dexter Deus, id est favens atque propitius ei, operatus est: quare hoc silentium Filius dextri appellatur, quod est Chusi, filii Jemini?

7.2 PL 36, 98

2. “O Lord my God, in Thee have I hoped: save me from all them that persecute me, and deliver me” (ver. 1). As one to whom, already perfected, all the war and enmity of vice being overcome, there remaineth no enemy but the envious devil, he says, “Save me from all them that persecute me, and deliver me (ver. 2): lest at any time he tear my soul as a lion.” The Apostle says, “Your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour.” Therefore when the Psalmist said in the plural number, “Save me from all them that persecute me:” he afterwards introduced the singular, saying, “lest at any time he tear my soul as a lion.” For he does not say, lest at any time they tear: he knew what enemy and violent adversary of the perfect soul remained. “Whilst there be none to redeem, nor to save:” that is, lest he tear me, whilst Thou redeemest not, nor savest. For, if God redeem not, nor save, he tears.

[vers. 2, 3.] Domine Deus meus, in te speravi; salvum me fac ex omnibus persequentibus me, et eripe me. Tanquam cui non restat jam perfecto nisi invidus diabolus, superato omni bello atque adversitate vitiorum, dicit: Salvum me fac ex omnibus persequentibus me, et eripe me: nequando rapiat ut leo animam meam. Dicit Apostolus: Adversarius vester diabolus tanquam leo rugiens circuit, quaerens quem devoret . Itaque cum diceret per pluralem numerum, Salvum me fac ex omnibus persequentibus me, singularem postea intulit dicens, nequando rapiat ut leo animam meam: non enim ait, nequando rapiant, sciens quis restiterit inimicos, et perfectae animae vehementer adversus. Dum non est qui redimat, neque qui salvum faciat: id est, ne ille rapiat, dum tu non redimis neque salvum facis; si enim Deus non redimat neque salvum faciat, ille rapit.

7.3 PL 36, 98

3. And that it might be clear that the already perfect soul, which is to be on her guard against the most insidious snares of the devil only, says this, see what follows. “O Lord my God, if I have done this” (ver. 3). What is it that he calls “this”? Since he does not mention the sin by name, are we to understand sin generally? If this sense displease us, we may take that to be meant which follows: as if we had asked, what is this that you say, “this”? He answers, “If there be iniquity in my hands.” Now then it is clear that it is said of all sin, “If I have repaid them that recompense me evil” (ver. 4). Which none can say with truth, but the perfect. For so the Lord says, “Be ye perfect, as your Father which is in heaven; who maketh His sun to rise upon the good and the evil, and raineth on the just and the unjust.” He then who repayeth not them that recompense evil, is perfect. When therefore the perfect soul prays “for the words of Chusi, the son of Jemini,” that is, for the knowledge of that secret and silence, which the Lord, favourable to us and merciful, wrought for our salvation, so as to endure, and with all patience bear, the guiles of this betrayer: as if He should say to this perfect soul, explaining the design of this secret, For thee ungodly and a sinner, that thine iniquities might be washed away by My blood-shedding, in great silence and great patience I bore with My betrayer; wilt not thou imitate me, that thou too mayest not repay evil for evil? Considering then, and understanding what the Lord has done for him, and by His example going on to perfection, the Psalmist says, “If I have repaid them that recompense me evil:” that is, if I have not done what Thou hast taught me by Thy example: “may I therefore fall by mine enemies empty.” And he says well, not, If I have repaid them that do me evil; but, who “recompense.” For who so recompenseth, had received somewhat already. Now it is an instance of greater patience, not even to repay him evil, who after receiving benefits returns evil for good, than if without receiving any previous benefit he had had a mind to injure. If therefore he says, “I have repaid them that recompense me evil:” that is, If I have not imitated Thee in that silence, that is, in Thy patience, which Thou hast wrought for me, “may I fall by mine enemies empty.” For he is an empty boaster, who, being himself a man, desires to avenge himself on a man; and whilst he openly seeks to overcome a man, is secretly himself overcome by the devil, rendered empty by vain and proud joy, because he could not, as it were, be conquered. The Psalmist knows then where a greater victory may be obtained, and where “the Father which seeth in secret will reward.” Lest then he repay them that recompense evil, he overcomes his anger rather than another man, being instructed too by those writings, wherein it is written, “Better is he that overcometh his anger, than he that taketh a city.” “If I have repaid them that recompense me evil, may I therefore fall by my enemies empty.” He seems to swear by way of execration, which is the heaviest kind of oath, as when one says, If I have done so and so, may I suffer so and so. But swearing in a swearer’s mouth is one thing, in a prophet’s meaning another. For here he mentions what will really befall men who repay them that recompense evil; not what, as by an oath, he would imprecate on himself or any other.

[vers. 4, 5.] Et ut manifestum sit jam perfectam animam hoc dicere, cui solius diaboli fraudulentissimae insidiae cavendae sunt, vide quid sequatur: Domine Deus meus, si feci istud. Quid est quod vocat istud? an quia non dicit nomen peccati, universale peccatum intelligendum est? Qui intellectus si displicet, illud accipiamus dici quod sequitur: tanquam si interrogassemus. Quid est hoc quod dicis, istud? respondet: Si est iniquitas in manibus meis. Jam ergo manifestum est de omni peccato dici, Si reddidi retribuentibus mihi mala; quod non potest vere dicere, nisi perfectus. Ait quippe Dominus: Estote perfecti, sicut Pater vester qui est in coelis, qui solem suum oriri facit super bonos et malos, et pluit super justos et injustos ; qui ergo non reddit retribuentibus mala, perfectus est. Cum itaque oret anima perfecta pro verbis Chusi, filii Jemini, id est pro cognitione illius secreti atque silentii, quod pro salute nostra operatus est propitius nobis et misericors Dominus, ut toleraret et patientissime sustineret dolos traditoris sui: tanquam huic perfectae animae dicat, exponens rationem ipsius secreti: Ego pro te impio et peccatore, ut tuae iniquitates mei sanguinis effusione lavarentur, magno silentio et magna patientia traditorem meum pertuli, nonne imitaberis me, ut et tu non reddas mala pro malis? animadvertens igitur et intelligens quid pro illo fecerit Dominus, et ejus exemplo ad perfectionem proficiens, dicit, Si reddidi retribuentibus mihi mala, id est, si non feci quod tu faciendo docuisti, decidam ergo ab inimicis meis inanis. Et bene non ait, Si reddidi tribuentibus mihi mala, sed, retribuentibus: qui enim retribuit, jam aliquid acceperat; majoris autem patientiae est, nec ei mala rependere qui acceptis beneficiis reddit mala pro bonis, quam si nullo ante accepto beneficio nocere voluisset, Si reddidi ergo, inquit, retribuentibus mihi mala, id est, si te non imitatus sum in illo silentio, hoc est patientia tua quam pro me operatus es, decidam ab inimicis meis inanis. Inaniter enim se jactat, qui cum et ipse homo sit, cupit se de homine vindicare: et cum superare hominem palam quaerit, occulte a diabolo superatur, inanis effectus vana et superba laetitia, quod quasi vinci non potuit. Intelligit ergo iste ubi major fiat victoria, et ubi Pater reddat qui videt in occulto. Ne reddat itaque retribuentibus mala, iram potius quam hominem vincit, illis etiam litteris eruditus, in quibus scriptum est: Melior est qui vincit iram, quam qui capit civitatem . Si reddidi retribuentibus mihi mala, decidam ergo ab inimicis meis inanis. Jurare videtur per exsecrationem, quod est gravissimum jurisjurandi genus, cum homo dicit: Si illud feci, illud patiar. Sed aliud est juratio in ore jurantis, aliud in significatione prophetantis: hic enim dicit quid vere contingat hominibus qui reddunt retribuentibus mala; non quod sibi, aut alicui, quasi jurejurando imprecetur.

7.4 PL 36, 99

4. “Let the enemy” therefore “persecute my soul and take it” (ver. 5). By again naming the enemy in the singular number, he more and more clearly points out him whom he spoke of above as a lion. For he persecutes the soul, and if he has deceived it, will take it. For the limit of men’s rage is the destruction of the body; but the soul, after this visible death, they cannot keep in their power: whereas whatever souls the devil shall have taken by his persecutions, he will keep. “And let him tread my life upon the earth:” that is, by treading let him make my life earth, that is to say, his food. For he is not only called a lion, but a serpent too, to whom it was said, “Earth shalt thou eat.” And to the sinner was it said, “Earth thou art, and into earth shalt thou go.” “And let him bring down my glory to the dust.” This is that dust which “the wind casteth forth from the face of the earth,” to wit, vain and silly boasting of the proud, puffed up, not of solid weight, as a cloud of dust carried away by the wind. Justly then has he here spoken of the glory, which he would not have brought down to dust. For he would have it solidly established in conscience before God, where there is no boasting. “He that glorieth,” saith the Apostle, “let him glory in the Lord.” This solidity is brought down to the dust if one through pride despising the secrecy of conscience, where God only proves a man, desires to glory before men. Hence comes what the Psalmist elsewhere says, “God shall bruise the bones of them that please men.” Now he that has well learnt or experienced the steps in overcoming vices, knows that this vice of empty glory is either alone, or more than all, to be shunned by the perfect. For that by which the soul first fell, she overcomes the last. “For the beginning of all sin is pride:” and again, “The beginning of man’s pride is to depart from God.”

[vers. 6.] Persequatur ergo inimicus animam meam, et comprehendat. Iterum inimicum singulari numero nominans, illum magis magisque manifestat quem superius velut leonem appellavit. Ipse enim animam persequitur; et si deceperit, comprehendet. Nam homines usque ad interfectionem corporis saeviunt, animam vero post istam visibilem mortem in potestate habere non possunt; diabolus autem quas animas persecutus comprehenderit, possidebit. Et conculcet in terram vitam meam: id est conculcando, terram faciat vitam meam, cibum scilicet suum; non enim tantum leo, sed etiam serpens appellatus est, cui dictum est, Terram manducabis; et peccatori homini dictum est, Terra es, et in terram ibis . Et gloriam meam in pulverem deducat. Hic est ille pulvis, quem projicit ventus a facie terrae, superborum scilicet vana et inepta jactantia, et inflata non solidata, tanquam vento elatus pulveris globus. Recte itaque hic posuit gloriam, quam non vult in pulverem deduci. Vult enim eam solidam habere in conscientia coram Deo, ubi nulla jactantia est; Qui gloriatur, inquit, in Domino glorietur . Ista soliditas in pulverem deducitur, si per superbiam quisque contemnens secreta conscientiae, ubi solus Deus hominem probat, velit apud homines gloriari; hinc est quod alibi dicit: Deus conteret ossa placentium hominibus . Qui autem bene didicit vel expertus est vitiorum superandorum gradus, intelligit hoc vitium inanis gloriae, vel solum, vel maxime cavendum esse perfectis: quo primo enim vitio lapsa est anima, hoc ultimum vincit. Initium autem omnis peccati superbia; et, Initium superbiae hominis, apostatare a Deo .

7.5 PL 36, 100

5. “Arise, O Lord, in Thine anger” (ver. 6). Why yet does he, who we say is perfect, incite God to anger? Must we not see, whether he rather be not perfect, who, when he was being stoned, said, “O Lord, lay not this sin to their charge”? Or does the Psalmist pray thus not against men, but against the devil and his angels, whose possession sinners and the ungodly are? He then does not pray against him in wrath, but in mercy, whosoever prays that that possession may be taken from him by that Lord “who justifieth the ungodly.” For when the ungodly is justified, from ungodly he is made just, and from being the possession of the devil he passes into the temple of God. And since it is a punishment that a possession, in which one longs to have rule, should be taken away from him: this punishment, that he should cease to possess those whom he now possesses, the Psalmist calls the anger of God against the devil. “Arise, O Lord; in Thine anger.” “Arise” (he has used it as “appear”), in words, that is, human and obscure; as though God sleeps, when He is unrecognised and hidden in His secret workings. “Be exalted in the borders of mine enemies.” He means by borders the possession itself, in which he wishes that God should be exalted, that is, be honoured and glorified, rather than the devil, while the ungodly are justified and praise God. “And arise, O Lord my God, in the commandment that Thou hast given:” that is, since Thou hast enjoined humility, appear in humility; and first fulfil what Thou hast enjoined; that men by Thy example overcoming pride may not be possessed of the devil, who against Thy commandments advised to pride, saying, “Eat, and your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods.”

[vers. 7.] Exsurge, Domine, in ira tua. Quid adhuc iste quem perfectum dicimus, ad iram provocat Deum? Nonne videndum est ne potius ille perfectus sit, qui cum lapidaretur, dixit: Domine, ne statuas illis hoc peccatum ? An et iste, non adversus homines haec precatur, sed adversus diabolum et angelos ejus, quorum possessio peccatores atque impii homines sunt? Non ergo saeviens, sed misericors adversus eum orat, quisquis orat ut ei auferatur ista possessio ab illo Domino qui justificat impium : cum enim justificatur impius, ex impio fit justus, et ex possessione diaboli migrat in templum Dei; et quoniam poena est, ut cuique auferatur possessio in qua dominari desiderat, hanc poenam dicit iram Dei adversus diabolum, ut desinat possidere quos possidet. Exsurge, Domine, in ira tua: Exsurge, hic appare dixit, humanis videlicet et latentibus verbis, quasi Deus dormiat, cum in secretis suis incognitus latet. Exaltare in finibus inimicorum meorum. Fines dixit ipsam possessionem, ubi vult Deum exaltari potius, id est honorari et glorificari, quam diabolum, dum impii justificantur et laudant Deum. Et exsurge, Domine Deus meus, in praecepto quod mandasti: id est, quia humilitatem praecepisti, humilis appare; et tu prior imple quod praecepisti, ut exemplo tuo vincentes superbiam, non possideantur a diabolo, qui adversus tua praecepta superbiam persuasit, dicens: anducate, et aperientur vobis oculi, et eritis tanquam dii .

7.6 PL 36, 101

6. “And the congregation of the people shall surround Thee.” This may be understood two ways. For the congregation of the people can be taken, either of them that believe, or of them that persecute, both of which took place in the same humiliation of our Lord: in contempt of which the multitude of them that persecute surrounded Him; concerning which it is said, “Why have the heathen raged, and the people meditated vain things?” But of them that believe through His humiliation the multitude so surrounded Him, that it could be said with the greatest truth, “blindness in part is happened unto Israel, that the fulness of the Gentiles might come in:” and again, “Ask of me, and I will give Thee the Gentiles for Thine inheritance, and the boundaries of the earth for Thy possession.” “And for their sakes return Thou on high:” that is, for the sake of this congregation return Thou on high: which He is understood to have done by His resurrection and ascension into heaven. For being thus glorified He gave the Holy Ghost, which before His exaltation could not be given, as it is written in the Gospel, “for the Holy Ghost was not yet given, because that Jesus was not yet glorified.” Having then returned on high for the sake of the congregation of the people, He sent the Holy Ghost: by whom the preachers of the Gospel being filled, filled the whole world with Churches.

[vers. 8.] Et congregatio populorum circumdabit te. Duplex intellectus est. Congregatio enim populorum, sive credentium, sive persequentium potest accipi, quorum utrumque eadem Domini nostri humililate factum est: quam contemnens persequentium multitudo, circumdedit eum, de qua dictum est, Quare fremuerunt gentes, et populi meditati sunt inania ? credentium autem per ejus humilitatem multitudo ita eum circumdedit, ut verissime diceretur, Caecitas ex parte Israel facta est, ut plenitudo Gentium intraret ; et illud, Postula a me, et dabo tibi gentes haereditatem tuam, et possessionem tuam terminos terrae . Et propter hanc in altum regredere: id est, propter hanc congregationem regredere in altum; quod resurgendo et in coelum ascendendo fecisse intelligitur. Ita enim glorificatus dedit Spiritum sanctum, qui ante glorificationem ejus dari non posset, sicut in Evangelio positum est: Spiritus autem nondum erat datus, quia Jesus nondum erat clarificatus . Regressus ergo in altum propter congregationem populorum, misit Spiritum sanctum; quo impleti praedicatores Evangelii orbem terrarum Ecclesiis impleverunt.

7.7 PL 36, 101

7. It can be taken also in this sense: “Arise, O Lord, in Thine anger, and be exalted in the borders of mine enemies:” that is, arise in Thine anger, and let not mine enemies understand Thee; so that to “be exalted,” should be this, become high, that Thou mayest not be understood; which has reference to the silence spoken of above. For it is of this exaltation thus said in another Psalm, “And He ascended upon Cherubim, and flew:” and, “He made darkness His secret place.” In which exaltation, or concealment, when for their sins’ desert they shall not understand Thee, who shall crucify Thee, “the congregation” of believers “shall surround Thee.” For in His very humiliation He was exalted, that is, was not understood. So that, “And arise, O Lord my God, in the commandment that Thou hast given:” may have reference to this, that is, when Thou showest Thyself, be high or deep that mine enemies may not understand Thee. Now sinners are the enemies of the just man, and the ungodly of the godly man. “And the congregation of the people shall surround Thee:” that is, by this very circumstance, that those who crucify Thee understand Thee not, the Gentiles shall believe on Thee, and so “shall the congregation of the people surround Thee.” But what follows, if this be the true meaning, has in it more pain, that it begins already to be perceived, than joy that it is understood. For it follows, “and for their sakes return Thou on high,” that is, and for the sake of this congregation of the human race, wherewith the Churches are crowded, return Thou on high, that is, again cease to be understood. What then is, “and for their sakes,” but that this congregation too will offend Thee, so that Thou mayest most truly foretell and say, “Thinkest Thou when the Son of man shall come, He will find faith on the earth?” Again, of the false prophets, who are understood to be heretics, He says, “Because of their iniquity the love of many shall wax cold.” Since then even in the Churches, that is, in that congregation of peoples and nations, where the Christian name has most widely spread, there shall be so great abundance of sinners, which is already, in great measure, perceived; is not that famine of the word here predicted, which has been threatened by another prophet also? Is it not too for this congregation’s sake, who, by their sins, are estranging from themselves that light of truth, that God returns on high, that is, so that faith, pure and cleansed from the corruption of all perverse opinions, is held and received, either not at all, or by the very few of whom it was said, “Blessed is he that shall endure to the end, the same shall be saved”? Not without cause then is it said, “and for the sake of this” congregation “return Thou on high:” that is, again withdraw into the depth of Thy secrecy, even for the sake of this congregation of the peoples, that hath Thy name, and doeth not Thy deeds.

Potest et sic iste sensus intelligi: Exsurge, Domine, in ira tua, exaltare in finibus inimicorum meorum: id est, exsurge in ira tua, et non te intelligant inimici mei; ut hoc sit exaltare, id est, altus efficere ne intelligaris, quod refertur ad illud silentium. Sic enim de hac exaltatione in alio psalmo dicitur: Et ascendit super Cherubim, et volavit. Et posuit tenebras latibulum suum : qua exaltatione, id est occultatione, cum te merito peccatorum suorum non intellexerint qui te crucifigent, congregatio credentium circumdabit te. Ipsa enim humilitate exaltatus est, id est, non est intellectus; ut ad hoc referatur, Et exsurge, Domine Deus meus, in praecepto quod mandasti; id est, cum appares humilis, altus esto, ut non te intelligant inimici mei: justo autem sunt peccatores inimici, et pio impii. Et congregatio populorum circumdabit te: id est, per hoc ipsum quod non te intelligunt qui te crucifigunt, credent in te Gentes, atque ita congregatio populorum circumdabit te. Sed quod sequitur si vere hoc significat, plus doloris habet quia jam incipit sentiri, quam laetitiae quia intelligitur. Sequitur enim, Et propter hanc in altum regredere: id est, et propter hanc congregationem generis humani, qua Ecclesiae refertae sunt, in altum regredere, id est, rursus desine intelligi. Quid est ergo, Et propter hanc, nisi quia et ista te offensura est; ita ut verissime praenunties, dicens: Putas cum venerit Filius hominis, inveniet fidem super terram ? item dicit de pseudoprophetis, qui intelliguntur haeretici: Propter eorum iniquitatem refrigescet charitas multorum . Cum ergo et in Ecclesiis, hoc est in illa congregatione populorum atque gentium, ubi nomen christianum latissime pervagatum est, tanta erit abundantia peccatorum quae jam ex magna parte sentitur, nonne illa hic praedicitur, quae per alium quoque prophetam denuntiata est, fames verbi ? Nonne et propter hanc congregationem peccatis suis a se lumen veritatis abalienantem, Deus in altum regreditur, id est, ut aut non, aut a perpaucis, de quibus dictum est, Beatus qui perseveraverit usque in finem, hic salvus erit , teneatur et percipiatur sincera fides, et ab omnium pravarum opinionum labe purgata? Non ergo immerito dicitur, Et propter hanc congregationem in altum regredere; id est, secede rursus in altitudinem secretorum tuorum, etiam propter hanc congregationem populorum quae habet nomen tuum et facta tua non facit.

7.8 PL 36, 102

8. But whether the former exposition of this place, or this last be the more suitable, without prejudice to any one better, or equal, or as good, it follows very consistently, “the Lord judgeth the people.” For whether He returned on high, when, after the resurrection, He ascended into heaven, well does it follow, “The Lord judgeth the people:” for that He will come from thence to judge the quick and the dead. Or whether He return on high, when the understanding of the truth leaves sinful Christians, for that of His coming it has been said, “Thinkest thou the Son of Man on His coming will find faith on the earth?” “The Lord” then “judgeth the people.” What Lord, but Jesus Christ? “For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son.” Wherefore this soul which prayeth perfectly, see how she fears not the day of judgment, and with a truly secure longing says in her prayer, “Thy kingdom come: judge me,” she says, “O Lord, according to my righteousness.” In the former Psalm a weak one was entreating, imploring rather the mercy of God, than mentioning any desert of his own: since the Son of God came “to call sinners to repentance.” Therefore he had there said, “Save me, O Lord, for Thy mercy’s sake;” that is, not for my desert’s sake. But now, since being called he hath held and kept the commandments which he received, he is bold to say, “Judge me, O Lord, according to my righteousness, and according to my harmlessness, that is upon me.” This is true harmlessness, which harms not even an enemy. Accordingly, well does he require to be judged according to his harmlessness, who could say with truth, “If I have repaid them that recompense me evil.” As for what he added, “that is upon me,” it can refer not only to harmlessness, but can be understood also with reference to righteousness; that the sense should be this, Judge me, O Lord, according to my righteousness, and according to my harmlessness, which righteousness and harmlessness is upon me. By which addition he shows that this very thing, that the soul is righteous and harmless, she has not by herself, but by God who giveth brightness and light. For of this he says in another Psalm, “Thou, O Lord, wilt light my candle.” And of John it is said, that “he was not the light, but bore witness of the light.” “He was a burning and shining candle.” That light then, whence souls, as candles, are kindled, shines forth not with borrowed, but with original, brightness, which light is truth itself. It is then so said, “According to my righteousness, and according to my harmlessness, that is upon me,” as if a burning and shining candle should say, Judge me according to the flame which is upon me, that is, not that wherewith I am myself, but that whereby I shine enkindled of thee.

Sed sive superior, sive ista sit congruentior hujus loci expositio, sine praejudicio alterius alicujus melioris aut paris, convenientissime sequitur, Domiminus judicat populos. Sive enim in altum regressus est, cum post resurrectionem ascendit in coelum, bene sequitur, Dominus judicat populos; quia inde venturus est judicare vivos et mortuos: sive in altum regrediatur cum peccatores christianos deserit intelligentia veritatis; quia de ipso adventu dictum est: Putas veniens Filius hominis inveniet fidem super terram ? Dominus ergo judicat populos. Quis Dominus, nisi Jesus Christus? Pater enim non judicat quemquam, sed omne judicium dedit Filio . Quapropter haec anima quae perfecte orat, vide quemadmodum non timeat judicii diem, et vere securo desiderio dicat in oratione, Veniat regnum tuum : Judica, inquit, me, Domine, secundum justitiam meam. In superiori psalmo infirmus deprecabatur, misericordiam potius implorans Dei, quam commemorans ullum meritum suum; quoniam Filius Dei peccatores venit vocare in poenitentiam . Itaque ibi dixerat, Salvum me fac, Domine, propter misericordiam tuam, id est non propter meritum meum; nunc autem quoniam vocatus tenuit et servavit praecepta quae accepit, audet dicere: Judica me, Domine, secundum justitiam meam, et secundum innocentiam meam super me. Ista est vera innocentia, quae nec inimico nocet; itaque bene se judicari postulat secundum innocentiam suam, qui vere dicere potuit: Si reddidi retribuentibus mihi mala . Quod autem addidit, super me, non ad innocentiam tantum, sed ad justitiam quoque subaudiri potest; ut iste sit sensus: Judica me, Domine, secundum justitiam meam, et secundum innocentiam meam, quae justitia et innocentia super me est. Quo additamento demonstrat id ipsum quod anima justa est et innocens, non per se habere, sed per illustrantem et illuminantem Deum; de hac enim dicit in alio Psalmo, Tu illuminabis lucernam meam, Domine ; et de Joanne dicitur, quia non erat ille lumen, sed testimonium perhibebat de lumine . Ille erat lucerna ardens et lucens . Lumen ergo illud unde animae tanquam lucernae accenduntur, non alieno, sed proprio splendore praefulget, quod est ipsa veritas. Ita ergo dicitur, secundum justitiam meam, et secundum innocentiam meam super me, tanquam si lucerna ardens et lucens diceret: Judica me secundum flammam quae super me est, id est, non qua sum ego, sed qua fulgeo accensa de te.

7.9 PL 36, 103

9. “But let the wickedness of sinners be consummated” (ver. 9). He says, “be consummated,” be completed, according to that in the Apocalypse, “Let the righteous become more righteous, and let the filthy be filthy still.” For the wickedness of those men appears consummate, who crucified the Son of God; but greater is theirs who will not live uprightly, and hate the precepts of truth, for whom the Son of God was crucified. “Let the wickedness of sinners,” then he says, “be consummated,” that is, arrive at the height of wickedness, that just judgment may be able to come at once. But since it is not only said, “Let the filthy be filthy still;” but it is said also, “Let the righteous become more righteous;” he joins on the words, “And Thou shalt direct the righteous, O God, who searcheth the hearts and reins.” How then can the righteous be directed but in secret? when even by means of those things which, in the commencement of the Christian ages, when as yet the saints were oppressed by the persecution of the men of this world, appeared marvellous to men, now that the Christian name has begun to be in such high dignity, hypocrisy, that is pretence, has increased; of those, I mean, who by the Christian profession had rather please men than God. How then is the righteous man directed in so great confusion of pretence, save whilst God searcheth the hearts and reins; seeing all men’s thoughts, which are meant by the word heart; and their delights, which are understood by the word reins? For the delight in things temporal and earthly is rightly ascribed to the reins; for that it is both the lower part of man, and that region where the pleasure of carnal generation dwells, through which man’s nature is transferred into this life of care, and deceiving joy, by the succession of the race. God then, searching our heart, and perceiving that it is there where our treasure is, that is, in heaven; searching also the reins, and perceiving that we do not assent to flesh and blood, but delight ourselves in the Lord, directs the righteous man in his inward conscience before Him, where no man seeth, but He alone who perceiveth what each man thinketh, and what delighteth each. For delight is the end of care; because to this end does each man strive by care and thought, that he may attain to his delight. He therefore seeth our cares, who searcheth the heart. He seeth too the ends of cares, that is delights, who narrowly searcheth the reins; that when He shall find that our cares incline neither to the lust of the flesh, nor to the lust of the eyes, nor to the pride of life, all which pass away as a shadow, but that they are raised upward to the joys of things eternal, which are spoilt by no change, He may direct the righteous, even He, the God who searcheth the hearts and reins. For our works, which we do in deeds and words, may be known unto men; but with what mind they are done, and to what end we would attain by means of them, He alone knoweth, the God who searcheth the hearts and reins.

[vers. 10.] Consummetur autem nequitia peccatorum. Consummetur, inquit, perficiatur, secundum illud quod est in Apocalypsi: Justus justior fiat, et sordidus sordescat adhuc . Videtur enim consummata nequitia hominum qui crucifixerunt Filium Dei; sed eorum major est qui nolunt recte vivere, et oderunt praecepta veritatis pro quibus crucifixus est Filius Dei. Consummetur ergo, inquit, nequitia peccatorum; id est, perveniatur ad summam nequitiam, ut possit justum jam venire judicium. Sed quoniam non solum dictum est, Sordidus sordescat adhuc, sed etiam dictum est, Justus justior fiat, annectit et dicit: Et diriges justum, scrutans corda et renes Deus. Quomodo ergo justus dirigi potest, nisi in occulto; quando etiam per illa quae initio temporum christianorum, cum adhuc persecutione saecularium hominum sancti premerentur, miranda videbantur hominibus, nunc postquam in tanto culmine nomen coepit esse christianum, crevit hypocrisis, id est simulatio, eorum scilicet qui nomine christiano malunt hominibus placere quam Deo? Quomodo ergo dirigitur justus in tanta confusione simulationis, nisi dum scrutatur corda et renes Deus, videns omnium cogitationes, quae nomine cordis significatae sunt, et delectationes, quae nomine renum intelliguntur? Recte quippe temporalium et terrenarum rerum delectatio renibus tribuitur; quia et ipsa pars est inferior hominis, et ea regio est ubi carnalis generationis voluptas habitat, per quam in hanc aerumnosam et fallacis laetitiae vitam, per successionem prolis natura humana transfunditur. Scrutans ergo cor nostrum Deus, et perspiciens ibi esse ubi est thesaurus noster , id est in coelis; scrutans etiam renes, et perspiciens non nos acquiescere carni et sanguini , sed delectari in Domino, dirigit justum in ipsa conscientia coram se, ubi nullus hominum videt, sed solus ille qui perspicit quid quisque cogitet, et quid quemque delectet. Finis enim curae delectatio est; quia eo quisque curis et cogitationibus nititur, ut ad suam delectationem perveniat. Videt igitur curas nostras, qui scrutatur cor: videt autem fines curarum, id est delectationes, qui perscrutatur renes; ut cum invenerit, non ad concupiscentiam carnis, neque ad concupiscentiam oculorum, neque ad ambitionem saeculi, quae omnia transeunt tanquam umbra , inclinari curas nostras, sed ad gaudia rerum aeternarum sustolli, quae nulla commutatione violantur, dirigat justum, scrutans corda et renes Deus. Opera enim nostra, quae factis et dictis operamur, possunt esse nota hominibus; sed quo animo fiant, et quo per illa pervenire cupiamus, solus ille novit, qui scrutatur corda et renes Deus.

7.10 PL 36, 104

10. “My righteous help is from the Lord, who maketh whole the upright in heart” (ver. 10). The offices of medicine are twofold, on the curing infirmity, the other the preserving health. According to the first it was said in the preceding Psalm, “Have mercy on me, O Lord, for I am weak;” according to the second it is said in this Psalm, “If there be iniquity in my hands, if I have repaid them that recompense me evil, may I therefore fall by my enemies empty.” For there the weak prays that he may be delivered, here one already whole that he may not change for the worse. According to the one it is there said, “Make me whole for Thy mercy’s sake;” according to this other it is here said, “Judge me, O Lord, according to my righteousness.” For there he asks for a remedy to escape from disease; but here for protection from falling into disease. According to the former it is said, “Make me whole, O Lord, according to Thy mercy:” according to the latter it is said, “My righteous help is from the Lord, who maketh whole the upright in heart.” Both the one and the other maketh men whole; but the former removes them from sickness into health, the latter preserves them in this health. Therefore there the help is merciful, because the sinner hath no desert, who as yet longeth to be justified, “believing on Him who justifieth the ungodly;” but here the help is righteous, because it is given to one already righteous. Let the sinner then who said, “I am weak,” say in the first place, “Make me whole, O Lord, for Thy mercy’s sake;” and here let the righteous man, who said, “If I have repaid them that recompense me evil,” say, “My righteous help is from the Lord, who maketh whole the upright in heart.” For if he sets forth the medicine, by which we may be healed when weak, how much more that by which we may be kept in health. For if “while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us, how much more being now justified shall we be kept whole from wrath through Him.”

[vers. 11.] Justum auxilium meum a Domino, qui salvos facit rectos corde. Duo sunt officia medicinae; unum quo sanatur infirmitas, alterum quo sanitas custoditur. Juxta illud primum, dictum est in superiore psalmo, Miserere mei, Domine, quoniam infirmus sum: juxta hoc alterum, in hoc psalmo dicitur, Si est iniquitas in manibus meis, si reddidi retribuentibus mihi mala, decidam ergo ab inimicis meis inanis; ibi enim infirmus ut liberetur, hic jam sanus ne corrumpatur, orat. Juxta illud ibi dicitur, Salvum me fac propter misericordiam tuam: juxta istud hic dicitur, Judica me, Domine, secundum justitiam meam; ibi enim ut a morbo evadat, remedium, hic autem ne in morbum recidat, tuitionem petit. Juxta illud dicitur, Salvum me fac, Domine, secundum misericordiam tuam; juxta hoc dicitur, Justum auxilium meum a Domino, qui salvos facit rectos corde. Et illa enim et ista salvos facit; sed illa ex aegritudine ad salutem transfert, haec in ipsa salute conservat. Itaque ibi misericors auxilium est, quia nullum habet meritum peccator, qui adhuc justificari desiderat, credens in eum qui justificat impium ; hic autem justum auxilium est, quia jam justo tribuitur. Dicat ergo ibi peccator qui dixit, Infirmus sum, Salvum me fac, Domine, propter misericordiam tuam; et dicat hic justus, qui dixit, Si reddidi retribuentibus mihi mala, Justum auxilium meum a Domino, qui salvos facit rectos corde. Si enim medicinam exhibet, qua sanemur infirmi, quanto magis eam qua custodiamur sani? Quoniam si cum adhuc peccatores essemus, Christus pro nobis mortuus est, quanto magis nunc justificati, salvi erimus ab ira per ipsum

7.11 PL 36, 104

11. “My righteous help is from the Lord, who maketh whole the upright in heart.” God, who searcheth the hearts and reins, directeth the righteous; but with righteous help maketh He whole the upright in heart. He doth not as He searcheth the hearts and reins, so make whole the upright in heart and reins; for the thoughts are both bad in a depraved heart, and good in an upright heart; but delights which are not good belong to the reins, for they are more low and earthly; but those that are good not to the reins, but to the heart itself. Wherefore men cannot be so called upright in reins, as they are called upright in heart, since where the thought is, there at once the delight is too; which cannot be, unless when things divine and eternal are thought of. “Thou hast given,” he says, “joy in my heart,” when he had said, “The light of Thy countenance has been stamped on us, O Lord.” For although the phantoms of things temporal, which the mind falsely pictures to itself, when tossed by vain and mortal hope, to vain imagination oftentimes bring a delirious and maddened joy; yet this delight must be attributed not to the heart, but to the reins; for all these imaginations have been drawn from lower, that is, earthly and carnal things. Hence it comes, that God, who searcheth the hearts and reins, and perceiveth in the heart upright thoughts, in the reins no delights, affordeth righteous help to the upright in heart, where heavenly delights are coupled with clean thoughts. And therefore when in another Psalm he had said, “Moreover even to-night my reins have chided me;” he went on to say as touching help, “I foresaw the Lord alway in my sight, for He is on my right hand, that I should not be moved.” Where he shows that he suffered suggestions only from the reins, not delights as well; for he had suffered these, then he would of course be moved. But he said, “The Lord is on my right hand, that I should not be moved;” and then he adds, “Wherefore was my heart delighted;” that the reins should have been able to chide, not delight him. The delight accordingly was produced not in the reins, but there, where against the chiding of the reins God was foreseen to be on the right hand, that is, in the heart.

Justum auxilium meum a Domino, qui salvos facit rectos corde. Dirigit justum, scrutans corda et renes Deus: justo autem auxilio salvos facit rectos corde. Non sicut scrutatur corda et renes, ita salvos facit rectos corde et renibus: quia cogitationes et malae sunt in pravo corde, et bonae in recto corde; delectationes autem non bonae ad renes pertinent, quia inferiores atque terrenae sunt, bonae vero non ad renes, sed ad ipsum cor. Propterea non ita dici possunt recti renibus, sicut dicuntur recti corde, cum jam ubi cogitatio, ibi et delectatio est: quod fieri non potest, nisi cum divina atque aeterna cogitantur. Dedisti, inquit, laetitiam in corde meo, cum dixisset, Signatum est super nos lumen vultus tui, Domine . Nam phantasmata rerum temporalium, quae sibi animus fingit, cum spe vana mortalique jactatur, quamvis inanibus imaginationibus afferant saepe deliram insanamque laetitiam, non tamen cordi haec delectatio, sed renibus tribuenda est; quia illae omnes imaginationes de inferioribus, hoc est terrenis carnalibusque rebus, attractae sunt. Ita fit, ut scrutans corda et renes Deus, et perspiciens in corde rectas cogitationes, in renibus nullas delectationes, justum auxilium praebeat rectis corde, ubi mundis cogitationibus supernae delectationes sociantur. Et ideo in alio psalmo cum dixisset, Insuper et usque ad noctem increpaverunt me renes mei, subjecit de auxilio, dicens: Providebam Dominum in conspectu meo semper, quoniam a dextris est mihi ne commovear . Ubi ostendit suggestiones tantum se a renibus passum, non etiam delectationes, quas si pateretur, utique commoveretur. Dixit autem, A dextris est mihi Dominus, ne commovear; deinde subjungit, Propter hoc delectatum est cor meum : ut renes eum increpare potuerint, non delectare. Non itaque in renibus, sed ibi facta est delectatio, ubi adversus renum increpationem provisus est Deus a dextris esse, id est, in corde.

7.12 PL 36, 105

12. “God the righteous judge, strong (in endurance) and long-suffering” (ver. 11). What God is judge, but the Lord, who judgeth the people? He is righteous; who “shall render to every man according to his works.” He is strong (in endurance); who, being most powerful, for our salvation bore even with ungodly persecutors. He is long-suffering; who did not immediately, after His resurrection, hurry away to punishment, even those that persecuted Him, but bore with them, that they might at length turn from that ungodliness to salvation: and still He beareth with them, reserving the last penalty for the last judgment, and up to this present time inviting sinners to repentance. “Not bringing in anger every day.” Perhaps “bringing in anger” is a more significant expression than being angry (and so we find it in the Greek copies); that the anger, whereby He punisheth, should not be in Him, but in the minds of those ministers who obey the commandments of truth through whom orders are given even to the lower ministries, who are called angels of wrath, to punish sin: whom even now the punishment of men delights not for justice’ sake, in which they have no pleasure, but for malice’ sake. God then doth not “bring in anger every day,” that is, He doth not collect His ministers for vengeance every day. For now the patience of God inviteth to repentance: but in the last time, when men “through their hardness and impenitent heart shall have treasured up for themselves anger in the day of anger, and revelation of the righteous judgment of God, then He will brandish His sword.”

[vers. 12.] Deus judex justus, fortis et longanimis. Quis Deus judex, nisi Dominus, qui judicat populos? Ipse justus, qui reddet unicuique juxta opera sua . Ipse fortis, qui etiam persecutores impios, cum sit potentissimus, pro nostra salute toleravit. Ipse longanimis, qui etiam ipsos qui persecuti sunt, non statim post resurrectionem ad supplicium rapuit, sed sustinuit, ut se aliquando ad salutem ab illa impietate converterent: et adhuc sustinet, servans ultimo judicio ultimam poenam, et nunc usque invitans peccatores ad poenitentiam. Non iram adducens per singulos dies. Significantius fortasse dicitur, iram adducens, quam irascens et ita in exemplaribus graecis invenimus: ut non sit in ipso ira qua punit, sed in animis eorum ministrorum qui praeceptis veritatis obtemperant; per quos jubetur etiam inferioribus ministeriis qui vocantur angeli iracundiae, ad punienda peccata, quos jam non propter justitiam, qua non gaudent, sed propter malitiam poena humana delectat. Non ergo Deus iram adducit per singulos dies, id est, non per singulos dies ad vindictam congregat ministros suos: nunc enim patientia Dei ad poenitentiam invitat; ultimo vero tempore, cum sibi homines propter duritiam suam et cor impoenitens, thesaurizaverint iram in die irae et revelationis justi judicii Dei , gladium suum vibrabit.

7.13 PL 36, 105

13. “Unless ye be converted,” He says, “He will brandish His sword” (ver. 12). The Lord Man Himself may be taken to be God’s double-edged sword, that is, His spear, which at His first coming He will not brandish, but hideth as it were in the sheath of humiliation: but He will brandish it, when at the second coming to judge the quick and dead, in the manifest splendour of His glory, He shall flash light on His righteous ones, and terror on the ungodly. For in other copies, instead of, “He shall brandish His sword,” it has been written, “He shall make bright His spear:” by which word I think the last coming of the Lord’s glory most appropriately signified: seeing that is understood of His person, which another Psalm has, “Deliver, O Lord, my soul from the ungodly, Thy spear from the enemies of Thine hand. He hath bent His bow, and made it ready.” The tenses of the words must not be altogether overlooked, how he has spoken of “the sword” in the future, “He will brandish;” of “the bow” in the past, “He hath bent:” and these words of the past tense follow after.

[vers. 13.] Nisi convertimini, inquit, gladium suum vibrabit. Potest ipse homo Dominicus gladius Dei intelligi bis acutus, id est framea, quam non vibravit primo adventu, sed tanquam in vagina humilitatis abscondit: vibrabit autem, cum in secundo adventu veniens judicare vivos et mortuos, in manifesto splendore claritatis suae, justis suis lumen, et terrores impiis coruscabit. Nam in aliis exemplaribus, pro eo quod est gladium suum vibrabit, frameam suam splendificabit positum est: quo verbo convenientissime significari arbitror ultimum Dominicae claritatis adventum; quandoquidem ex ipsius persona intelligitur quod alius psalmus habet: Libera, Domine, ab impiis animam meam, frameam tuam ab inimicis manus tuae . Arcum suum tetendit, et paravit illum. Non passim verborum tempora praetereunda sunt, quod gladium de futuro dixit, vibrabit; arcum de praeterito, tetendit: deinde praeteriti temporis consequuntur verba.

7.14 PL 36, 106

14. “And in it He hath prepared the instruments of death: He hath wrought His arrows for the burning” (ver. 13). That bow then I would readily take to be the Holy Scripture, in which by the strength of the New Testament, as by a sort of string, the hardness of the Old has been bent and subdued. From thence the Apostles are sent forth like arrows, or divine preachings are shot. Which arrows “He has wrought for the burning,” arrows, that is, whereby being stricken they might be inflamed with heavenly love. For by what other arrows was she stricken, who saith, “Bring me into the house of wine, place me among perfumes, crowd me among honey, for I have been wounded with love”? By what other arrows is he kindled, who, desirous of returning to God, and coming back from wandering, asketh for help against crafty tongues, and to whom it is said, “What shall be given thee, or what added to thee against the crafty tongue? Sharp arrows of the mighty, with devastating coals:” that is, coals, whereby, when thou art stricken and set on fire, thou mayest burn with so great love of the kingdom of heaven, as to despise the tongues of all that resist thee, and would recall thee from thy purpose, and to deride their persecutions, saying, “Who shall separate me from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? For I am persuaded,” he says, “that neither death, nor life, nor angel, nor principality, nor things present, not things to come, nor power, nor height, nor depth, nor other creature, shall be able to separate me from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” Thus for the burning hath He wrought His arrows. For in the Greek copies it is found thus, “He hath wrought His arrows for the burning.” But most of the Latin copies have “burning arrows.” But whether the arrows themselves burn, or make others burn, which of course they cannot do unless they burn themselves, the sense is complete.

[vers. 14.] Et in ipso paravit vasa mortis: sagittas suas ardentibus operatus est. Arcum ergo istum, Scripturas sanctas libenter acceperim, ubi fortitudine Novi Testamenti, quasi nervo quodam, duritia Veteris flexa et edomita est. Hinc tanquam sagittae emittuntur Apostoli, vel divina praeconia jaculantur. Quas sagittas ardentibus operatus est, id est, quibus percussa divino amore flagrarent. Qua enim alia sagitta percussa est, quae dicit: Inducite me in domum vini, constituite me inter unguenta, constipate me inter mella; quoniam vulnerata charitate ego sum Quibus aliis sagittis accenditur, qui redire ad Deum cupiens et ab ista peregrinatione remeare, adversus dolosas linguas petit auxilium, et ei dicitur: Quid detur tibi, aut quid adjiciatur tibi adversus linguam dolosam? Sagittae potentis acutae, cum carbonibus vastetoribus : id est, quibus percussus atque inflammatus tanto amore ardeas regni coelorum, ut omnium resistentium et a proposito revocare volentium linguas contemnas, et persecutiones eorum derideas, dicens: Quis me separabit a charitate Christi? Tribulatio, an angustia, an persecutio, an fames, an nuditas, an periculum, an gladius? Certus sum enim, inquit, quia neque mors, neque vita, neque angelus, neque principatus, neque praesentia, neque futura, neque virtus, neque altitudo, neque profundum, neque creatura alia poterit nos separare a charitate Dei, quae est in Christo Jesu Domino nostro . Sic ardentibus sagittas suas operatus est: nam in graecis exemplaribus ita invenitur, Sagittas suas ardentibus operatus est; latina autem ardentes pleraque habent. Sed, sive ipsae sagittae ardeant, sive ardere faciant, quod utique non possunt nisi et ipsae ardeant, integer sensus est.

7.15 PL 36, 106

15. But since he has said that the Lord has prepared not arrows only, but “instruments of death” too, in the bow, it may be asked, what are “instruments of death”? Are they, per-adventure, heretics? For they too, out of the same bow, that is, out of the same Scriptures, light upon souls not to be inflamed with love but destroyed with poison: which does not happen but after their deserts: wherefore even this dispensation is to be assigned to the Divine Providence, not that it makes men sinners, but that it orders them after they have sinned. For through sin reaching them with an ill purpose, they are forced to understand them ill, that this should be itself the punishment of sin: by whose death, nevertheless, the sons of the Catholic Church are, as it were by certain thorns, so to say, aroused from slumber, and make progress toward the understanding of the holy Scriptures. “For there must be also heresies, that they which are approved,” he says, “may be made manifest among you:” that is, among men, seeing they are manifest to God. Or has He haply ordained the same arrows to be at once instruments of death for the destruction of unbelievers, and wrought them burning, or for the burning, for the exercising of the faithful? For that is not false that the Apostle says, “To the one we are the savour of life unto life, to the other the savour of death unto death; and who is sufficient for these things?” It is no wonder then if the same Apostles be both instruments of death in those from whom they suffered persecution, and fiery arrows to inflame the hearts of believers.

Sed quia non sagittas tantum, sed etiam vasa mortis dixit in arcu Dominum parasse, quaeri potest quae sint vasa mortis. An forte haeretici? Nam et ipsi ex eodem arcu, id est, ex eisdem Scripturis in animas non charitate inflammandas, sed venenis perimendas insiliunt, quod non contingit nisi pro meritis. Propterea divinae Providentiae etiam ista dispositio tribuenda est, non quia ipsa peccatores facit, sed quia ipsa ordinat cum peccaverint: malo enim voto per peccatum legentes, male coguntur intelligere, ut ipsa sit poena peccati; quorum tamen morte filii catholicae Ecclesiae, tanquam quibusdam spinis, a somno excitantur, et ad intelligentiam divinarum Scripturarum proficiunt. Oportet enim et haereses esse, ut probati, inquit, manifesti fiant inter vos , hoc est inter homines, cum manifesti sint Deo. An forte easdem sagittas et vasa mortis disposuit ad perniciem infidelium, et ardentes vel ardentibus operatus est ad exercitationem fidelium? Non enim falsum est quod Apostolus dicit: Aliis sumus odor vitae in vitam, aliis odor mortis in mortem, et ad haec quis idoneus Non ergo mirum si iidem Apostoli et vasa mortis sunt in eis a quibus persecutionem passi sunt, et igneae sagittae ad inflammanda corda credentium.

7.16 PL 36, 107

16. Now after this dispensation righteous judgment will come: of which the Psalmist so speaks, as that we may understand that each man’s punishment is wrought out of his own sin, and his iniquity turned into vengeance: that we may not suppose that that tranquillity and ineffable light of God brings forth from Itself the means of punishing sin; but that it so ordereth sins, that what have been delights to man in sinning, should be instruments to the Lord avenging. “Behold,” he says, “he hath travailed with injustice.” Now what had he conceived, that he should travail with injustice? “He hath conceived,” he says, “toil.” Hence then comes that, “In toil shall thou eat thy bread.” Hence too that, “Come unto Me all ye that toil and are heavy laden; for My yoke is easy, and My burden light.” For toil will never cease, except one love that which cannot be taken away against his will. For when those things are loved which we can lose against our will, we must needs toil for them most miserably; and to obtain them, amid the straitnesses of earthly cares, whilst each desires to snatch them for himself, and to be beforehand with another, or to wrest it from him, must scheme injustice. Duly then, and quite in order, hath he travailed with injustice, who has conceived toil. Now he bringeth forth what, save that with which he hath travailed, although he has not travailed with that which he conceived? For that is not born, which is not conceived; but seed is conceived, that which is formed from the seed is born. Toil is then the seed of iniquity, but sin the conception of toil, that is, that first sin, to “depart from God.” He then hath travailed with injustice, who hath conceived toil. “And he hath brought forth iniquity.” “Iniquity” is the same as “injustice:” he hath brought forth then that with which he travailed. What follows next?

[vers. 15.] Post hanc autem dispensationem justum veniet judicium: de quo ita dicit, ut intelligamus unicuique homini supplicium fieri de peccato suo, et ejus iniquitatem in poenam converti; ne putemus illam tranquillitatem, et ineffabile lumen Dei de se proferre unde peccata puniantur, sed ipsa peccata sic ordinare, ut quae fuerunt delectamenta homini peccanti, sint instrumenta Domino punienti. Ecce, inquit, parturivit injustitiam. Quid enim conceperat, ut injustitiam parturiret? Concepit, inquit, laborem . Hinc est ergo illud, In labore manducabis panem tuum; hinc etiam illud, Venite ad me, omnes qui laboratis et onerati estis. Jugum enim meum lene est, et onus meum leve . Non enim poterit labor finiri, nisi hoc quisque diligat quod invito non possit auferri. Nam cum ea diliguntur quae possumus contra voluntatem amittere, necesse est ut pro his miserrime laboremus; et ut haec adipiscamur, in angustiis terrenarum aerumnarum, cum sibi quisque illa rapere et praevenire alterum, aut extorquere alteri cupit, injustitias machinemur. Recte ergo et prorsus ex ordine parturivit injustitiam, qui concepit laborem. Parit autem quid, nisi quod parturivit, quamvis non hoc parturierit quod concepit? non enim hoc nascitur quod concipitur; sed concipitur semen, nascitur quod formatur ex semine. Labor est igitur semen iniquitatis; peccatum autem conceptio laboris, id est illud primum peccatum, apostatare a Deo : parturivit ergo injustitiam qui concepit laborem. Et peperit iniquitatem: iniquitas, hoc est quod injustitia; hoc ergo peperit quod parturivit. Quid deinde sequitur?

7.17 PL 36, 107

17. “He hath opened a ditch, and digged it” (ver. 15). To open a ditch is, in earthly matters, that is, as it were in the earth, to prepare deceit, that another fall therein, whom the unrighteous man wishes to deceive. Now this ditch is opened when consent is given to the evil suggestion of earthly lusts: but it is digged when after consent we press on to actual work of deceit. But how can it be, that iniquity should rather hurt the righteous man against whom it proceeds, than the unrighteous heart whence it proceeds? Accordingly, the stealer of money, for instance, while he desires to inflict painful harm upon another, is himself maimed by the wound of avarice. Now who, even out of his right mind, sees not how great is the difference between these men, when one suffers the loss of money, the other of innocence? “He will fall” then “into the pit which he hath made.” As it is said in another Psalm, “The Lord is known in executing judgments; the sinner is caught in the works of his own hands.”

[vers. 16.] Lacum aperuit et effodit illum. Lacum aperire, est in terrenis rebus, id est, tanquam in terra fraudem parare, quo alius cadat quem vult decipere injustus: aperitur autem hic lacus, cum consentitur malae suggestioni terrenarum cupiditatum; effoditur vero, cum post consensionem operationi fraudis instatur. Sed unde fieri potest, ut iniquitas prius laedat hominem justum in quem procedit, quam cor injustum unde procedit? Itaque fraudator pecuniae, verbi gratia, dum cupit alium damno lacerare, ipse avaritiae vulnere sauciatur: quis autem vel demens non videat quantum inter hos distet, cum ille patiatur damnum pecuniae, ille innocentiae? Incidet ergo in foveam quam fecit; quod in alio psalmo dicitur: Cognoscitur Dominus judicia faciens, in operibus manuum suarum comprehensus est peccator .

7.18 PL 36, 107

18. “His toil shall be turned on his head, and his iniquity shall descend on his pate” (ver. 16). For he had no mind to escape sin: but was brought under sin as a slave, so to say, as the Lord saith, “Whosoever sinneth is a slave.” His iniquity then will be upon him, when he is subject to his iniquity; for he could not say to the Lord, what the innocent and upright say, “My glory, and the lifter up of my head.” He then will be in such wise below, as that his iniquity may be above, and descend on him; for that it weigheth him down and burdens him, and suffers him not to fly back to the rest of the saints. This occurs, when in an ill regulated man reason is a slave, and lust hath dominion.

[vers. 17.] Convertetur labor ejus in caput ejus, et iniquitas ejus in verticem ejus descendet. Non enim voluit ipse peccatum evadere; sed factus est sub peccato tanquam servus, dicente Domino: Omnis qui peccat, servus est . Erit ergo iniquitas ejus super ipsum, cum ipse iniquitati suae subditur: quia non potuit dicere Domino, quod innocentes et recti dicunt: Gloria mea et exaltans caput meum . Ita ergo ipse inferior erit, ut ejus iniquitas sit superior, et in illum descendat; quia gravat illum, et onerat, et ad requiem sanctorum revolare non sinit. Hoc fit, cum in homine perverso servit ratio, et libido dominatur.

7.19 PL 36, 108

19. “I will confess to the Lord according to His justice” (ver. 17). This is not the sinner’s confession: for he says this, who said above most truly, “If there be iniquity in my hands:” but it is a confession of God’s justice, in which we speak thus, Verily, O Lord, Thou art just, in that Thou both so protectest the just, that Thou enlightenest them by Thyself; and so orderest sinners, that they be punished not by Thine, but by their own malice. This confession so praises the Lord, that the blasphemies of the ungodly can avail nothing, who, willing to excuse their evil deeds, are unwilling to attribute to their own fault that they sin, that is, are unwilling to attribute their fault to their fault. Accordingly they find either fortune or fate to accuse, or the devil, to whom He who made us hath willed that it should be in our power to refuse consent: or they bring in another nature, which is not of God: wretched waverers, and erring, rather than confessing to God, that He should pardon them. For it is not fit that any be pardoned, except he says, I have sinned. He, then, that sees the deserts of souls so ordered by God, that while each has his own given him, the fair beauty of the universe is in no part violated, in all things praises God: and this is not the confession of sinners, but of the righteous. For it is not the sinner’s confession when the Lord says, “I confess to Thee, O Lord of heaven and earth, because Thou hast hid these things from the wise, and revealed them to babes.” Likewise in Ecclesiasticus it is said, “Confess to the Lord in all His works: and in confession ye shall say this, All the works of the Lord are exceeding good.” Which can be seen in this Psalm, if any one with a pious mind, by the Lord’s help, distinguish between the rewards of the righteous and the penalties of the sinners, how that in these two the whole creation, which God made and rules, is adorned with a beauty wondrous and known to few. Thus then he says, “I will confess to the Lord according to His justice,” as one who saw that darkness was not made by God, but ordered nevertheless. For God said, “Let light be made, and light was made.” He did not say, Let darkness be made, and darkness was made: and yet He ordered it. And therefore it is said, “God divided between the light, and the darkness: and God called the light day, and the darkness He called night.” This is the distinction, He made the one and ordered it: but the other He made not, but yet He ordered this too. But now that sins are signified by darkness, so is it seen in the Prophet, who says, “And thy darkness shall be as the noon day:” and in the Apostle, who says, “He that hateth his brother is in darkness:” and above all that text, “Let us cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light.” Not that there is any nature of darkness. For all nature, in so far as it is nature, is compelled to be. Now being belongs to light: not being to darkness. He then that leaves Him by whom he was made, and inclines to that whence he was made, that is, to nothing, is in this sin endarkened: and yet he does not utterly perish, but he is ordered among the lowest things. Therefore after the Psalmist said, “I will confess unto the Lord:” that we might not understand it of confession of sins, he adds lastly, “And I will sing to the name of the Lord most high.” Now singing has relation to joy, but repentance of sins to sadness.

[vers. 18.) Confitebor Domino secundum justitiam ejus. Non ista confessio peccatorum est: ille enim hoc dicit, qui superius verissime dicebat, Si est iniquitas in manibus meis; sed confessio justitiae Dei, qua ita loquimur: Vere, Domine, justus es, quando et justos sic protegis, ut per te ipsum eos illumines, et peccatores sic ordinas, ut non tua, sed sua malitia puniantur. Ista confessio ita Dominum laudat, ut nihil possint impiorum valere blasphemiae, qui volentes excusare facinora sua, nolunt suae culpae tribuere quod peccant, hoc est, nolunt suae culpae tribuere culpam suam. Itaque aut fortunam, aut fatum inveniunt quod accusent; aut diabolum, cui non consentire in potestate nostra esse voluit qui nos fecit; aut aliam naturam inducunt, quae non sit ex Deo, fluctuantes miseri et errantes, potius quam confitentes Deo, ut eis ignoscat. Non enim oportet ignosci, nisi dicenti: Peccavi. Qui ergo videt merita animarum sec ordinari a Deo, ut dum sua cuique tribuuntur, pulchritudo universitatis nulla ex parte violetur, in omnibus laudat Deum: et ista est non peccatorum, sed justorum confessio. Non enim peccatorum confessio est, dum dicit Dominus: Confiteor tibi, Domine coeli et terrae, quia abscondisti haec a sapientibus, et revelasti ea parvulis . Item in Ecclesiastico dicitur: Confitemini Domino in omnibus operibus ejus. Et haec dicetis in confessione, opera Domini universa quoniam bona valde . Quod in isto psalmo intelligi potest, si quisque pia mente, Domino adjuvante, distinguat inter justorum praemia et supplicia peccatorum, quemadmodum his duobus universa creatura, quam Deus a se conditam regit, mirifica et paucis cognita pulchritudine decoratur. Ita ergo ait, Confitebor Domino secundum justitiam ejus, tanquam ille qui viderit non factas tenebras a Deo, sed ordinatas tamen. Deus enim dixit: Fiat lux, et facta est lux . Non dixit: Fiant tenebrae, et factae sunt tenebrae; et tamen ipsas ordinavit. Et ideo dicitur: Divisit Deus inter lucem et tenebras, et vocavit Deus lucem diem, et tenebras vocavit noctem . Ista distinctio: aliud fecit, et ordinavit; aliud autem non fecit, sed tamen etiam hoc ordinavit. Jam vero tenebris significari peccata, et in propheta invenitur, qui dixit, Et tenebrae tuae tanquam meridies erunt , et in apostolo dicente, Qui odit fratrem suum, in tenebris est , et illud praecipue: Abjiciamus opera tenebrarum, et induamur arma lucis . Non quod aliqua sit natura tenebrarum: omnis enim natura in quantum natura est, esse cogitur; esse autem, ad lucem pertinet; non esse, ad tenebras. Qui ergo deserit eum a quo factus est, et inclinatur in id unde factus est, id est in nihilum, in hoc peccato tenebratur; et tamen non penitus perit, sed in infimis ordinatur. Itaque postquam dixit, Confitebor Domino, ne peccatorum confessionem intelligeremus, subjicit ultimum: Et psallam nomini Domini altissimi. Psallere autem ad gaudium pertinet, poenitentia vero peccatorum, ad tristitiam.

7.20 PL 36, 109

20. This Psalm can also be taken in the person of the Lord Man: if only that which is there spoken in humiliation be referred to our weakness, which He bore.

Potest iste psalmus etiam in persona Dominici hominis intelligi; si modo ea quae ibi humiliter dicta sunt, ad nostram infirmitatem referantur, quam ille gestabat.

Philip Schaff (ed.), Buffalo/New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886-1889. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Salva per dopo

Inserisci la tua email: ti invieremo un link per accedere. Nessuna password. Ciò che salvi (voci, versetti, capitoli, documenti) ti segue su ogni dispositivo.