De Trinitate or On the Trinity 1

sant'Ilario di Poitiers (315–367 d.C.) · De Trinitate · PL 10, 25–472

1.0 Book I PL 10, 25

On the Trinity.

————————————

Book I.

1.1 Book I PL 10, 25

1. When I was seeking an employment adequate to the powers of human life and righteous in itself, whether prompted by nature or suggested by the researches of the wise, whereby I might attain to some result worthy of that Divine gift of understanding which has been given us, many things occurred to me which in general esteem were thought to render life both useful and desirable. And especially that which now, as always in the past, is regarded as most to be desired, leisure combined with wealth, came before my mind. The one without the other seemed rather a source of evil than an opportunity for good, for leisure in poverty is felt to be almost an exile from life itself, while wealth possessed amid anxiety is in itself an affliction, rendered the worse by the deeper humiliation which he must suffer who loses, after possessing, the things that most are wished and sought. And yet, though these two embrace the highest and best of the luxuries of life, they seem not far removed from the normal pleasures of the beasts which, as they roam through shady places rich in herbage, enjoy at once their safety from toil and the abundance of their food. For if this be regarded as the best and most perfect conduct of the life of man, it results that one object is common, though the range of feelings differ, to us and the whole unreasoning animal world, since all of them, in that bounteous provision and absolute leisure which nature bestows, have full scope for enjoyment without anxiety for possession.

In otio et opulentia non est nisi beluina felicitas. --Circumspicienti mihi proprium humanae vitae ac religiosum officium, quod vel a natura manans, vel a prudentum studiis profectum, dignum aliquid hoc concesso sibi ad intelligentiam divino munere obtineret, multa quidem aderant, quae opinione communi efficere utilem atque optandam vitam videbantur, maximeque ea quae et nunc et semper antea potissima inter mortales habentur, otium simul atque opulentia, quod aliud sine altero mali potius materies, quam boni esset occasio; quia et quies inops prope quoddam vitae ipsius intelligatur esse exsilium, et opulens inquietudo 2 tanto plus calamitatis afferat, quanto majore indignitate his caretur, quae maxime et optata et quaesita sunt ad utendum. Atque haec quidem quamquam in se summa atque optima vitae blandimenta contineant, tamen non multum videntur a consuetudine esse beluinae oblectationis aliena: quibus in saltuosa loca ac maxime pabulis laeta evagantibus, adsit et securitas a labore, et satietas ex pascuis. Nam si hic optimus et absolutissimus vitae humanae usus existimabitur, quiescere et abundare; necesse est hunc eumdem, secundum sui cujusque generis sensum, nobis atque universis rationis expertibus beluis esse communem: quibus omnibus, natura ipsa in summa rerum copia et securitate famulante, sine cura habendi copia redundat utendi.

1.2 PL 10, 26

2. I believe that the mass of mankind have spurned from themselves and censured in others this acquiescence in a thoughtless, animal life, for no other reason than that nature herself has taught them that it is unworthy of humanity to hold themselves born only to gratify their greed and their sloth, and ushered into life for no high aim of glorious deed or fair accomplishment, and that this very life was granted without the power of progress towards immortality; a life, indeed, which then we should confidently assert did not deserve to be regarded as a gift of God, since, racked by pain and laden with trouble, it wastes itself upon itself from the blank mind of infancy to the wanderings of age. I believe that men, prompted by nature herself, have raised themselves through teaching and practice to the virtues which we name patience and temperance and forbearance, under the conviction that right living means right action and right thought, and that Immortal God has not given life only to end in death; for none can believe that the Giver of good has bestowed the pleasant sense of life in order that it may be overcast by the gloomy fear of dying.

Ad alia natos se senserunt plerique homines. --Ac mihi plerique mortalium non ob 3 aliam quidem causam hanc ineptae ac beluinae vitae consuetudinem et respuisse a se, et coarguisse in aliis videntur, quam quod, natura ipsa auctore impulsi, indignum homine esse existimaverunt, in officium se ventris tantum et inertiae natos arbitrari; et in hanc vitam non ob aliqua praeclari facinoris aut bonae artis studia esse deductos, aut hanc ipsam vitam non ad aliquem profectum esse aeternitatis indultam quam profecto non ambigeretur munus Dei non esse reputandum, cum tantis afflictata angoribus, et tot molestiis impedita, sese ipsa atque intra se a pueritiae ignoratione usque ad senectutis deliramenta consumeret): et idcirco ad aliquas se patientiae et continentiae et placabilitatis virtutes et doctrina et opere transtulisse, quod bene agere atque intelligere, id demum bene vivere esse opinabantur: vitam autem non ad mortem tantum ab immortali Deo tribui existimandam; cum boni largitoris non esse intelligeretur, vivendi jucundissimum sensum ad tristissimum metum tribuisse moriendi.

1.3 PL 10, 27

3. And yet, though I could not tax with folly and uselessness this counsel of theirs to keep the soul free from blame, and evade by foresight or elude by skill or endure with patience the troubles of life, still I could not regard these men as guides competent to lead me to the good and happy Life. Their precepts were platitudes, on the mere level of human impulse; animal instinct could not fail to comprehend them, and he who understood but disobeyed would have fallen into an insanity baser than animal unreason. Moreover, my soul was eager not merely to do the things, neglect of which brings shame and suffering, but to know the God and Father Who had given this great gift, to Whom, it felt, it owed its whole self, Whose service was its true honour, on Whom all its hopes were fixed, in Whose lovingkindness, as in a safe home and haven, it could rest amid all the troubles of this anxious life. It was inflamed with a passionate desire to apprehend Him or to know Him.

In Dei cognitionem ardet Hilarius. --Et quamquam non ineptam hanc eorum esse sententiam atque inutilem existimarem, conscientiam ab omni culpa liberam conservare, et omnes humanae vitae molestias vel providere prudenter, vel vitare consulte, vel ferre patienter: tamen hi ipsi non satis mihi idonei ad bene beateque vivendum auctores videbantur, communia tantum et convenientia humano sensui doctrinarum praecepta statuentes: quae cum non intelligere beluinum esset, intellecta tamen non agere, ultra beluinae immanitatis esse rabiem videretur. Festinabat autem animus, non haec tantummodo agere, quae non egisse, et criminum esset plenum, et dolorum: sed hunc tanti muneris Deum parentemque cognoscere, cui se totum ipse deberet, cui famulans nobilitandum se existimabat, ad quem omnem spei suae opinionem referret, in cujus bonitate inter tantas praesentium negotiorum calamitates, tamquam tutissimo sibi portu familiarique requiesceret. Ad hunc igitur vel intelligendum, vel cognoscendum, studio flagrantissimo animus accendebatur.

1.4 PL 10, 27

4. Some of these teachers brought forward large households of dubious deities, and under the persuasion that there is a sexual activity in divine beings narrated births and lineages from god to god. Others asserted that there were gods greater and less, of distinction proportionate to their power. Some denied the existence of any gods whatever, and confined their reverence to a nature which, in their opinion, owes its being to chance-led vibrations and collisions. On the other hand, many followed the common belief in asserting the existence of a God, but proclaimed Him heedless and indifferent to the affairs of men. Again, some worshipped in the elements of earth and air the actual bodily and visible forms of created things; and, finally, some made their gods dwell within images of men or of beasts, tame or wild, of birds or of snakes, and confined the Lord of the universe and Father of infinity within these narrow prisons of metal or stone or wood. These, I was sure, could be no exponents of truth, for though they were at one in the absurdity, the foulness, the impiety of their observances, they were at variance concerning the essential articles of their senseless belief. My soul was distracted amid all these claims, yet still it pressed along that profitable road which leads inevitably to the true knowledge of God. It could not hold that neglect of a world created by Himself was worthily to be attributed to God, or that deities endowed with sex, and lines of begetters and begotten, were compatible with the pure and mighty nature of the Godhead. Nay, rather, it was sure that that which is Divine and eternal must be one without distinction of sex, for that which is self-existent cannot have left outside itself anything superior to itself. Hence omnipotence and eternity are the possession of One only, for omnipotence is incapable of degrees of strength or weakness, and eternity of priority or succession. In God we must worship absolute eternity and absolute power.

Variae antiquorum de Deo opiniones. Hilario non probantur, pro certo habenti Deum non esse nisi unum. --Namque plures eorum numerosas incertorum deorum familias introducebant: et virilem ac muliebrem sexum in divinis naturis agere existimantes, ortus ac successiones ex diis deorum asserebant. Alii majores ac minores et differentes pro potestate deos praedicabant. Nonnulli nullum omnino Deum esse affirmantes, eam tantum, 4 quae fortuitis motibus atque concursibus in aliquid exsisteret, naturam venerabantur. Plerique vero Deum quidem esse opinione publica loquebantur, sed hunc eumdem incuriosum rerum humanarum ac negligentem pronuntiabant. Aliqui autem ipsas illas creaturarum corporeas conspicabilesque formas in elementis terrenis et coelestibus adorabant. Postremo quidam in simulacris hominum, pecudum, ferarum, volucrum, serpentum, deos suos collocabant, et universitatis Dominum atque infinitatis parentem intra angustias metallorum et lapidum et stipitum coartabant. Dignumque jam non erat, auctores eos veritatis ex sistere, qui ridicula et foeda et irreligiosa sectantes, ipsis illis inanissimarum sententiarum suarum opinionibus dissiderent. Sed inter haec animus sollicitus, utili ac necessaria ad cognitionem Domini sui via nitens, cum neque incuriam Deo rerum a se conditarum dignam esse arbitraretur, neque naturae potenti atque incorruptae competere sexus deorum, et successiones satorum atque ortorum intelligeret: porro autem divinum et aeternum nihil nisi unum esse et indifferens pro certo habebat, quia id quod sibi ad id quod esset auctor esset, nihil necesse est extra se quod sui esset praestantius reliquisset: atque ita omnipotentiam aeternitatemque non nisi penes unum esse; quia neque in omnipotentia validius infirmiusque, neque in aeternitate posterius anteriusve congrueret; in Deo autem nihil nisi aeternum potensque esse venerandum.

1.5 PL 10, 28

5. While my mind was dwelling on these and on many like thoughts, I chanced upon the books which, according to the tradition of the Hebrew faith, were written by Moses and the prophets, and found in these words spoken by God the Creator testifying of Himself ‘I Am that I Am, and again, He that is hath sent me unto you.’ I confess that I was amazed to find in them an indication concerning God so exact that it expressed in the terms best adapted to human understanding an unattainable insight into the mystery of the Divine nature. For no property of God which the mind can grasp is more characteristic of Him than existence, since existence, in the absolute sense, cannot be predicated of that which shall come to an end, or of that which has had a beginning, and He who now joins continuity of being with the possession of perfect felicity could not in the past, nor can in the future, be non-existent; for whatsoever is Divine can neither be originated nor destroyed. Wherefore, since God’s eternity is inseparable from Himself, it was worthy of Him to reveal this one thing, that He is, as the assurance of His absolute eternity.

E Scripturis discit quid sit Deus; quod aeternus. --Haec igitur, multaque alia ejusmodi cum animo reputans, incidi in eos libros, quos a Moyse atque a prophetis scriptos esse Hebraeorum religio tradebat: in quibus ipso creatore Deo testante de se, haec ita continebantur: Ego sum, qui sum ; et rursum: Haec dices filiis Israel. Misit me ad vos is qui est (Ibidem). Admiratus sum plane tam absolutam de Deo significationem, quae naturae divinae incomprehensibilem cognitionem aptissimo ad intelligentiam humanam sermone loqueretur. Non enim aliud proprium magis Deo, quam esse, intelligitur; quia id ipsum quod est, neque desinentis est aliquando, neque coepti: sed id, quod cum incorruptae beatitudinis potestate perpetuum est, non potuit aut poterit aliquando non esse; quia divinum omne neque abolitioni, neque exordio obnoxium est. Et cum in nullo a se Dei desit aeternitas; digne hoc solum, quod esset, ad protestationem incorruptae suae aeternitatis ostendit. 5

1.6 PL 10, 28

6. For such an indication of God’s infinity the words ‘I Am that I Am’ were clearly adequate; but, in addition, we needed to apprehend the operation of His majesty and power. For while absolute existence is peculiar to Him Who, abiding eternally, had no beginning in a past however remote, we hear again an utterance worthy of Himself issuing from the eternal and Holy God, Who says, Who holdeth the heaven in His palm and the earth in His hand, and again, The heaven is My throne and the earth is the footstool of My feet. What house will ye build Me or what shall be the place of My rest? The whole heaven is held in the palm of God, the whole earth grasped in His hand. Now the word of God, profitable as it is to the cursory thought of a pious mind, reveals a deeper meaning to the patient student than to the momentary hearer. For this heaven which is held in the palm of God is also His throne, and the earth which is grasped in His hand is also the footstool beneath His feet. This was not written that from throne and footstool, metaphors drawn from the posture of one sitting, we should conclude that He has extension in space, as of a body, for that which is His throne and footstool is also held in hand and palm by that infinite Omnipotence. It was written that in all born and created things God might be known within them and without, overshadowing and indwelling, surrounding all and interfused through all, since palm and hand, which hold, reveal the might of His external control, while throne and footstool, by their support of a sitter, display the subservience of outward things to One within Who, Himself outside them, encloses all in His grasp, yet dwells within the external world which is His own. In this wise does God, from within and from without, control and correspond to the universe; being infinite He is present in all things, in Him Who is infinite all are included. In devout thoughts such as these my soul, engrossed in the pursuit of truth, took its delight. For it seemed that the greatness of God so far surpassed the mental powers of His handiwork, that however far the limited mind of man might strain in the hazardous effort to define Him, the gap was not lessened between the finite nature which struggled and the boundless infinity that lay beyond its ken, I had come by reverent reflection on my own part to understand this, but I found it confirmed by the words of the prophet, Whither shall I go from Thy Spirit? Or whither shall I flee from Thy face? If I ascend up into heaven, Thou art there; if I go down into hell, Thou art there also; if I have taken my wings before dawn and made my dwelling in the uttermost parts of the sea (Thou art there). For thither Thy hand shall guide me and Thy right hand shall hold me. There is no space where God is not; space does not exist apart from Him. He is in heaven, in hell, beyond the seas; dwelling in all things and enveloping all. Thus He embraces, and is embraced by, the universe, confined to no part of it but pervading all.

Deus infinitus; mente capi nequit. --Et ad hanc quidem infinitatis significationem satisfecisse sermo dicentis: Ego sum qui sum, videbatur: sed magnificentiae et virtutis suae erat a nobis opus intelligendum. Namque cum esse ei proprium esset, qui manens semper non etiam aliquando coepisset; aeterni et incorrupti Dei dignus de se hic rursum auditus est sermo: Qui tenet coelum palma, et terram pugillo ; et rursum: Coelum mihi thronus est, terra autem scabellum pedum meorum. Quam domum mihi aedificabitis, aut quis locus erit requietionis meae? Nonne manus mea fecit haec ? Universitas coeli palma Dei tenetur, et universitas terrae pugillo concluditur. Sermo autem Dei, etiamsi ad opinionem religiosae intelligentiae proficit, plus tamen significationis introspectus sensu continet, quam exceptus auditu . Nam conclusum palma coelum rursum Deo thronus est; et terra, quae pugillo continetur, eadem et scabellum pedum ejus est: ne in throno et scabello, secundum habitum considentis, protensio speciei corporeae posset intelligi, cum id, quod sibi thronus et scabellum est, rursum ipsa illa infinitas potens palma ac pugillo apprehendente concluderet; sed ut in his cunctis originibus creaturarum Deus intra extraque, et supereminens et internus, id est, circumfusus et infusus in omnia nosceretur, cum et palma pugillusque continens potestatem naturae exterioris ostenderet; ac thronus et scabellum substrata esse ut interno exteriora monstraret, cum exteriora sua interior insidens, ipse rursum exterior interna concluderet: atque ita totus ipse intra extraque se continens ( supple, cuncta), neque infinitus abesset a cunctis, neque cuncta ei qui infinitus est non inessent. His igitur religiosissimis de Deo opinionibus veri studio detentus animus delectabatur. Neque enim aliud quid dignum esse Deo arbitrabatur, quam ita eum ultra intelligentias rerum esse, ut in quantum se ad aliquem praesumptae licet opinionis modum mens infinita protenderet, in tantum omnem persequentis se naturae infinitatem infinitas immoderatae aeternitatis excederet. Quod cum a nobis pie intelligeretur, tamen a propheta haec ita 6 dicente manifeste confirmabatur: Quo abibo a spiritu tuo, aut a facie tua quo fugiam? Si adscendero in coelum, tu illic es; si descendero in infernum, et ibi ades. Si sumpsero pennas meas ante lucem, et habitavero in postremis maris: etenim illuc manus tua deducet me, et tenebit me dextera tua . Nullus sine Deo, neque ullus non in Deo locus est. In coelis est, in inferno est, ultra maria est. Inest interior, excedit exterior. Ita cum habet, atque habetur; neque in aliquo ipse, neque non in omnibus est.

1.7 PL 10, 30

7. Therefore, although my soul drew joy from the apprehension of this august and unfathomable Mind, because it could worship as its own Father and Creator so limitless an Infinity, yet with a still more eager desire it sought to know the true aspect of its infinite and eternal Lord, that it might be able to believe that that immeasurable Deity was apparelled in splendour befitting the beauty of His wisdom. Then, while the devout soul was baffled and astray through its own feebleness, it caught from the prophet’s voice this scale of comparison for God, admirably expressed, By the greatness of His works and the beauty of the things that He hath made the Creator of worlds is rightly discerned. The Creator of great things is supreme in greatness, of beautiful things in beauty. Since the work transcends our thoughts, all thought must be transcended by the Maker. Thus heaven and air and earth and seas are fair: fair also the whole universe, as the Greeks agree, who from its beautiful ordering call it κόσμος, that is, order. But if our thought can estimate this beauty of the universe by a natural instinct—an instinct such as we see in certain birds and beasts whose voice, though it fall below the level of our understanding, yet has a sense clear to them though they cannot utter it, and in which, since all speech is the expression of some thought, there lies a meaning patent to themselves—must not the Lord of this universal beauty be recognised as Himself most beautiful amid all the beauty that surrounds Him? For though the splendour of His eternal glory overtax our mind’s best powers, it cannot fail to see that He is beautiful. We must in truth confess that God is most beautiful, and that with a beauty which, though it transcend our comprehension, forces itself upon our perception.

Deus pulcherrimus. Quia caeterarum rerum speciem, si non verbo, certe sensu assequimur; Dei autem speciem neutro modo. --Quamquam igitur optimae hujus atque inexplicabilis intelligentiae sensu animus gauderet, quod hanc in parente suo et creatore immensae aeternitatis infinitatem veneraretur; tamen studio adhuc intentiore ipsam illam infiniti et aeterni Domini sui speciem quaerebat, ut incircumscriptam immensitatem in aliquo pulchrae intelligentiae esse opinaretur ornatu. In quibus cum religiosa mens intra imbecillitatis suae concluderetur errorem, hunc de Deo pulcherrimae sententiae modum propheticis vocibus apprehendit: De magnitudine enim operum, et pulchritudine creaturarum, consequenter generationum conditor conspicitur . Magnorum creator in maximis est, et pulcherrimorum conditor in pulcherrimis est. Et cum sensum ipsum egrediatur operatio, omnem tamen sensum longe necesse est excedat operator. Pulchrum itaque coelum, aether, terra, maria, et universitas omnis est, quae ex ornatu suo, ut etiam Graecis placet, digne κόσμος, id est, mundus nuncupari videtur. Sed si hanc ipsam rerum pulchritudinem ita sensus naturali metitur instinctu, ut etiam in quarumdam volucrum ac pecudum accidit specie, ut dum infra sententiam sermo est, sensus tamen id ipsum intelligens non eloquatur; quod tamen rursum, dum sermo omnis ex sensu est, sensus sibi ipse loquatur intelligens: nonne hujus ipsius pulchritudinis Dominum necesse est totius pulchritudinis esse pulcherrimum intelligi; ut cum aeterni ornatus sui species sensum intelligentiae omnis effugiat, opinionem tamen intelligentiae sensus non relinquat ornatus? Atque ita pulcherrimus Deus est confitendus: 7 ut neque intra sententiam sit intelligendi, neque extra intelligentiam sentiendi.

1.8 PL 10, 31

8. Thus my mind, full of these results which by its own reflection and the teaching of Scripture it had attained, rested with assurance, as on some peaceful watch-tower, upon that glorious conclusion, recognising that its true nature made it capable of one homage to its Creator, and of none other, whether greater or less; the homage namely of conviction that His is a greatness too vast for our comprehension but not for our faith. For a reasonable faith is akin to reason and accepts its aid, even though that same reason cannot cope with the vastness of eternal Omnipotence.

Deus intelligentiam excedens fide attingendus. --His itaque piae opinionis atque doctrinae studiis animus imbutus, in secessu quodam ac specula pulcherrimae hujus sententiae requiescebat, non sibi relictum quidquam aliud a natura sua intelligens, in quo majus officium praestare Conditori suo minusve posset, quam ut tantum eum esse intelligeret, quantus et intelligi non potest, et potest credi: dum intelligentiam et fides sibi necessariae religionis assumit, et infinitas aeternae potestatis excedit.

1.9 PL 10, 31

9. Beneath all these thoughts lay an instinctive hope, which strengthened my assertion of the faith, in some perfect blessedness hereafter to be earned by devout thoughts concerning God and upright life; the reward, as it were, that awaits the triumphant warrior. For true faith in God would pass unrewarded, if the soul be destroyed by death, and quenched in the extinction of bodily life. Even unaided reason pleaded that it was unworthy of God to usher man into an existence which has some share of His thought and wisdom, only to await the sentence of life withdrawn and of eternal death; to create him out of nothing to take his place in the World, only that when he has taken it he may perish. For, on the only rational theory of creation, its purpose was that things non-existent should come into being, not that things existing should cease to be.

In immortalitatis spem assurgit Hilarius. Hanc ratio ipsa ei suadet. --Suberat autem omnibus his naturalis adhuc sensus, ut pietatis professionem spes aliqua incorruptae beatitudinis aleret, quam sancta de Deo opinio et boni mores quodam victricis militiae stipendio mererentur. Neque enim fructus aliquis esset, bene de Deo opinari: cum omnem sensum mors perimeret, et occasus quidam naturae deficientis aboleret. Porro autem non esse hoc dignum Deo ratio ipsa suadebat, deduxisse eum in hanc participem consilii prudentiaeque vitam hominem sub defectione vivendi et aeternitate moriendi: ut in id tantum non exsistens substitueretur, ne substitutus exsisteret; cum constitutionis nostrae ea sola esse ratio intelligeretur, ut quod non esset esse coepisset, non ut quod coepisset esse non esset.

1.10 PL 10, 31

10. Yet my soul was weighed down with fear both for itself and for the body. It retained a firm conviction, and a devout loyalty to the true faith concerning God, but had come to harbour a deep anxiety concerning itself and the bodily dwelling which must, it thought, share its destruction. While in this state, in addition to its knowledge of the teaching of the Law and Prophets, it learned the truths taught by the Apostle in the Gospel;—In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him, and without Him was not anything made. That which was made in Him is life, and the life was the light of men, and the light shineth in darkness, and the darkness apprehended it not. There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. He came for witness, that he might bear witness of the light. That was the true light, which lighteneth every man that cometh into this world. He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, and the world knew Him not. He came unto His own things, and they that were His own received Him not. But to as many as received Him He gave power to become sons of God, even to them that believe on His Name; which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of man, nor of the will of the flesh, but of God. And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, glory as of the Only-begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth. Here the soul makes an advance beyond the attainment of its natural capacities, is taught more than it had dreamed concerning God. For it learns that its Creator is God of God; it hears that the Word is God and was with God in the beginning. It comes to understand that the Light of the world was abiding in the world and that the world knew Him not; that He came to His own possession and that they that were His own received Him not; but that they who do receive Him by virtue of their faith advance to be sons of God, being born not of the embrace of the flesh nor of the conception of the blood nor of bodily desire, but of God; finally, it learns that the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and that His glory was seen, which, as of the Only-begotten from the Father, is perfect through grace and truth.

Spem ac Dei notitiam auget Joannis Evangelium. --Fatigabatur autem animus, partim suo, partim corporis metu. Qui cum et constantem sententiam suam pia de Deo professione retineret, et sollicitam de se atque hoc occasuro secum, ut putabat, habitaculo suo curam recepisset, post cognitionem legis ac prophetarum istius modi quoque doctrinae evangelicae atque apostolicae instituta cognoscit: In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum. Hoc erat in principio apud Deum. Omnia per ipsum facta sunt, et sine ipso factum est nihil. Quod factum est in eo, vita est, et vita 8 erat lux hominum, et lux lucet in tenebris, et tenebrae eam non comprehenderunt. Fuit homo missus a Deo, cui nomen erat Joannes. Hic venit in testimonium, ut testimonium perhiberet de lumine. Non erat ille lux, sed ut testimonium perhiberet de lumine. Erat lux vera, quae illuminat omnem hominem venientem in hunc mundum. In mundo erat, et mundus per eum factus est, et mundus eum non cognovit. In sua venit, et sui eum non receperunt. Quotquot autem receperunt eum, dedit eis potestatem filios Dei fieri, iis qui credunt in nomine ejus: qui non ex sanguine, neque ex voluntate viri, neque ex voluntate carnis, sed ex Deo nati sunt. Et Verbum caro factum est, et habitavit in nobis: et vidimus gloriam ejus, gloriam tamquam unigeniti a Patre, plenum gratia et veritate . Proficit mens ultra naturalis sensus intelligentiam, et plus de Deo quam opinabatur edocetur. Creatorem enim suum Deum ex Deo discit: Verbum Deum, et apud Deum in principio esse audit. Mundi lumen in mundo manens, et a mundo non recognitum intelligit. Venientem quoque in sua, a suis non receptum: recipientes autem sub fidei suae merito in Dei filios profecisse cognoscit; non ex complexu carnis, neque ex conceptu sanguinis, neque ex corporum voluntate, sed ex Deo natos. Deinde ( supple, cognoscit) Verbum carnem factum, et habitasse in nobis, et gloriam conspectam ejus, quae tamquam unici a patre, sit perfecta cum gratia et veritate.

1.11 PL 10, 32

11. Herein my soul, trembling and distressed, found a hope wider than it had imagined. First came its introduction to the knowledge of God the Father. Then it learnt that the eternity and infinity and beauty which, by the light of natural reason, it had attributed to its Creator belonged also to God the Only-begotten. It did not disperse its faith among a plurality of deities, for it heard that He is God of God; nor did it fall into the error of attributing a difference of nature to this God of God, for it learnt that He is full of grace and truth. Nor yet did my soul perceive anything contrary to reason in God of God, since He was revealed as having been in the beginning God with God. It saw that there are very few who attain to the knowledge of this saving faith, though its reward be great, for even His own received Him not though they who receive Him are promoted to be sons of God by a birth, not of the flesh but of faith. It learnt also that this sonship to God is not a compulsion but a possibility, for, while the Divine gift is offered to all, it is no heredity inevitably imprinted but a prize awarded to willing choice. And lest this very truth that whosoever will may become a son of God should stagger the weakness of our faith (for most we desire, but least expect, that which from its very greatness we find it hard to hope for), God the Word became flesh, that through His Incarnation our flesh might attain to union with God the Word. And lest we should think that this incarnate Word was some other than God the Word, or that His flesh was of a body different from ours, He dwelt among us that by His dwelling He might be known as the indwelling God, and, by His dwelling among us, known as God incarnate in no other flesh than our own, and moreover, though He had condescended to take our flesh, not destitute of His own attributes; for He, the Only-begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth, is fully possessed of His own attributes and truly endowed with ours.

Filius Dei Deus. Filios Dei fieri potestas est, non necessitas. Filius Dei factus homo, ut homo fieret filius Dei. Christus verus Deus et verus homo. --Hic jam mens trepida et anxia plus spei invenit, quam exspectabat. Ac primum ad cognitionem Dei patris imbuitur. Et quod antea de Creatoris sui aeternitate, et infinitate, et specie, naturali sensu opinabatur, hic nunc proprium esse etiam unigenito Deo accipit: non in deos fidem laxans, quia ex Deo Deum audit; non ad naturae diversitatem in Deum ex Deo decedens, 9 quia plenum gratia et veritate Deum ex Deo discit; neque praeposterum ex Deo Deum sentiens, quia in principio apud Deum esse Deum comperit. Rarissimam deinde hujus salutaris cognitionis fidem esse, sed maximum praemium noscit: quia et sui non receperunt, et recipientes in filios Dei aucti sunt, non ortu carnis, sed fidei. Esse autem filios Dei, non necessitatem esse, sed potestatem: quia proposito universis Dei munere, non natura gignentium afferatur, sed voluntas praemium consequatur. Ac ne id ipsum, quod unicuique esse Dei filio fit potestas, in aliquo infirmitatem fidei trepidae impediret; quia per sui difficultatem aegerrime speretur, quod et magis optatur, et minus creditur: Verbum Deus caro factum est, ut per Deum Verbum carnem factum caro proficeret in Deum Verbum. Ac ne Verbum caro factum aut aliquid aliud esset quam Deus Verbum, aut non nostri corporis caro esset, habitavit in nobis: ut dum habitat, non aliud quam Deus maneret; dum autem habitat in nobis, non aliud quam nostrae carnis Deus caro factus esset; per dignationem assumptae carnis non inops suorum, quia tamquam unigenitus a Patre plenus gratiae et veritatis, et in suis perfectus sit, et verus in nostris.

1.12 PL 10, 33

12. This lesson in the Divine mysteries was gladly welcomed by my soul, now drawing near through the flesh to God, called to new birth through faith, entrusted with liberty and power to win the heavenly regeneration, conscious of the love of its Father and Creator, sure that He would not annihilate a creature whom He had summoned out of nothing into life. And it could estimate how high are these truths above the mental vision of man; for the reason which deals with the common objects of thought can conceive of nothing as existent beyond what it perceives within itself or can create out of itself. My soul measured the mighty workings of God, wrought on the scale of His eternal omnipotence, not by its own powers of perception but by a boundless faith; and therefore refused to disbelieve, because it could not understand, that God was in the beginning with God, and that the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, but bore in mind the truth that with the will to believe would come the power to understand.

Divina non capit nisi fides. --Hanc itaque divini sacramenti doctrinam mens laeta suscepit, in Deum proficiens per carnem, et in novam nativitatem per fidem vocata, et ad coelestem regenerationem obtinendam potestati suae permissa, curam in se parentis sui Creatorisque cognescens non in nihilum redigendam se per eum existimans, per quem in hoc ipsum quod est, ex nihilo substitisset: et haec omnia ultra intelligentiae humanae metiens sensum, quia ratio communium opinionum consilii coelestis incapax, hoc solum putet in natura rerum esse, quod aut intra se intelligat, aut praestare possit ex sese. Dei autem virtutes secundum magnificentiam aeternae potestatis, non sensu, sed fidei 10 infinitate pendebat: ut Deum in principio apud Deum esse, et Verbum carnem factum habitasse in nobis, non idcirco non crederet, quia non intelligeret; sed idcirco se meminisset intelligere posse, si crederet.

1.13 PL 10, 25

13. And lest the soul should stray and linger in some delusion of heathen philosophy, it receives this further lesson of perfect loyalty to the holy faith, taught by the Apostle in words inspired:—Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the word, and not after Christ; for in Him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily, and ye are made full in Him, Which is the Head of all principality and power; in Whom ye were also circumcised with a circumcision not made with hands, in putting off the body, of the flesh, but with the circumcision of Christ; buried with Him in Baptism, wherein also ye have risen again through faith in the working of God, Who raised Him from the dead. And you, when ye were dead in sins and in the uncircumcision of your flesh, He hath quickened with Him, having forgiven you all your sins, blotting out the bond which was against us by its ordinances, which was contrary to us; and He hath taken it out of the way, nailing it to the Cross; and having put off the flesh He made a show of powers openly, triumphing over them through confidence in Himself. Steadfast faith rejects the vain subtleties of philosophic enquiry; truth refuses to be vanquished by these treacherous devices of human folly, and enslaved by falsehood. It will not confine God within the limits which barred our common reason, nor judge after the rudiments of the world concerning Christ, in Whom dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily, and in such wise that the utmost efforts of the earthly mind to comprehend Him are baffled by that immeasurable Eternity and Omnipotence. My soul judged of Him as One Who, drawing us upward to partake of His own Divine nature, has loosened henceforth the bond of bodily observances Who, unlike the Symbolic Law, has initiated us into no rites of mutilating the flesh, but Whose purpose is that our spirit, circumcised from vice, should purify all the natural faculties of the body by abstinence from sin, that we being buried with His Death in Baptism may return to the life of eternity (since regeneration to life is death to the former life), and dying to our sins be born again to immortality, that even as He abandoned His immortality to die for us, so should we awaken from death to immortality with Him. For He took upon Him the flesh in which we have sinned that by wearing our flesh He might forgive sins; a flesh which He shares with us by wearing it, not by sinning in it. He blotted out through death the sentence of death, that by a new creation of our race in Himself He might sweep away the penalty appointed by the former Law. He let them nail Him to the cross that He might nail to the curse of the cross and abolish all the curses to which the world is condemned. He suffered as man to the utmost that He might put powers to shame. For Scripture had foretold that He Who is God should die; that the victory and triumph of them that trust in Him lay in the fact that He, Who is immortal and cannot be overcome by death, was to die that mortals might gain eternity. These deeds of God, wrought in a manner beyond our comprehension, cannot, I repeat, be understood by our natural faculties, for the work of the Infinite and Eternal can only be grasped by an infinite intelligence. Hence, just as the truths that God became man, that the Immortal died that the Eternal was buried, do not belong to the rational order but are an unique work of power, so on the other hand it is an effect not of intellect but of omnipotence that He Who is man is also God, that He Who died is immortal, that He Who was buried is eternal. We, then, are raised together by God in Christ through His death. But, since in Christ there is the fulness of the Godhead, we have herein a revelation of God the Father joining to raise us in Him Who died; and we must confess that Christ Jesus is none other than God in all the fulness of the Deity.

1.14 PL 10, 35

14. In this calm assurance of safety did my soul gladly and hopefully take its rest, and feared so little the interruption of death, that death seemed only a name for eternal life. And the life of this present body was so far from seeming a burden or affliction that it was regarded as children regard their alphabet, sick men their draught, shipwrecked sailors their swim, young men the training for their profession, future commanders their first campaign; that is, as an endurable submission to present necessities, bearing the promise of a blissful immortality. And further, I began to proclaim those truths in which my soul had a personal faith, as a duty of the episcopate which had been laid upon me, employing my office to promote the salvation of all men.

Christi fides et mortis metum et vitae tollit taedium. --In hoc ergo conscio securitatis suae otio mens spebus suis laeta requieverat: intercessionem mortis hujus usque eo non metuens, 12 ut etiam reputaret in vitam aeternitatis. Vitam autem hujus corporis sui non modo non molestam sibi aut aegram arbitrabatur, ut eam quod pueritiae litteras, quod aegris medicinam, quod naufragis natatum, quod adolescentibus disciplinam, quod militiam esse crederet imperaturis: rerum scilicet praesentium tolerantiam, ad praemium beatae immortalitatis proficientem. Quin etiam id, quod sibi credebat, tamen per ministerium impositi sacerdotii etiam caeteris praedicabat, munus suum ad officium publicae salutis extendens.

1.15 PL 10, 34

15. While I was thus engaged there came to light certain fallacies of rash and wicked men, hopeless for themselves and merciless towards others, who made their own feeble nature the measure of the might of God’s nature. They claimed, not that they had ascended to an infinite knowledge of infinite things, but that they had reduced all knowledge, undefined before, within the scope of ordinary reason, and fixed the limits of the faith. Whereas the true work of religion is a service of obedience; and these were men heedless of their own weakness, reckless of Divine realities, who undertook to improve upon the teaching of God.

Christi gesta non succumbunt naturalibus mentium sensibus. --Ac ne in aliquo saecularis prudentiae tardaretur errore, ad piae confessionis hujus absolutissimam fidem ita insuper per Apostolum divinis dictis edocetur: Videte ne quis vos spoliet per philosophiam et inanem deceptionem, secundum traditionem hominum, secundum elementa mundi, et non secundum Christum: quia in ipso inhabitat omnis plenitudo divinitatis corporaliter, et estis in illo repleti, qui est caput omnis principatus et potestatis: in quo et circumcisi estis, circumcisione non manu facta in exspoliatione corporis carnis, sed circumcisione Christi, consepulti ei in baptismate, in quo et resurrexistis per fidem operationis Dei, qui excitavit eum a mortuis. Et vos, cum essetis mortui in delictis et praeputiatione carnis vestrae, vivificavit cum illo, donatis vobis omnibus delictis, delens quod adversum nos erat chirographum in sententiis, quod erat contrarium nobis: et ipsum tulit e medio, affigens illud cruci: exutus carnem, et potestates ostentui fecit, triumphatis iis cum fiducia in semetipso . Respuit captiosas et inutiles philosophiae quaestiones fides constans, neque humanarum ineptiarum fallaciis succumbens, spolium se praebet veritas falsitati; non secundum sensum communis intelligentiae Deum retinens, neque de Christo secundum mundi elementa decernens, in quo divinitatis plenitudo corporaliter inhabitet: ut dum infinitas aeternae in eo est potestatis, omnem terrenae mentis amplexum potestas aeternae infinitatis excedat: qui nos ad divinitatis suae naturam trahens, non etiamnum corporali praeceptorum observatione distrinxerit, neque per legis umbram ad solemnia desecandae carnis ( id est, circumcisionis) imbuerit; sed ut omnem naturalem corporis necessitatem circumcisus a vitiis spiritus criminum emundatione purgaret: cujus morti consepeliremur in baptismo, ut 11 in aeternitatis vitam rediremus; dum regeneratio ad vitam mors esset ex vita, et morientes vitiis immortalitati renasceremur; ipso pro nobis ex immortalitate moriente, ut ad immortalitatem una cum eo excitaremur ex morte. Carnem enim peccati recepit, ut assumptione nostrae carnis delicta donaret, dum ejus fit particeps assumptione, non crimine; delens per mortem sententiam mortis, ut nova in se generis nostri creatione constitutionem decreti anterioris aboleret; cruci se figi permittens, ut maledicto crucis oblitterata terrenae damnationis maledicta figeret omnia: ad ultimum in homine passus, ut potestates dehonestaret; dum Deus secundum Scripturas moriturus, et in his vincentis in se fiducia triumpharet; dum immortalis ipse, neque morte vincendus, pro morientium aeternitate moreretur. Haec itaque ultra naturae humanae intelligentiam a Deo gesta non succumbunt rursum naturalibus mentium sensibus; quia infinitae aeternitatis operatio infinitam metiendi exigat opinionem: ut cum Deus homo, cum immortalis mortuus, cum aeternus sepultus est, non sit intelligentiae ratio, sed potestatis exceptio; ita rursum e contrario non sensus, sed virtutis modus sit, ut Deus ex homine, ut immortalis ex mortuo, ut aeternus sit ex sepulto. Coexcitamur ergo a Deo in Christo per mortem ejus. Sed dum in Christo plenitudo est divinitatis, habemus et significationem Dei patris nos coexcitantis in mortuo, et Christum Jesum non aliud quam Deum in divinitatis plenitudine confitendum.

1.16 PL 10, 36

16. Not to touch upon the vain enquiries of other heretics—concerning whom however, when the course of my argument gives occasion, I will not be silent—there are those who tamper with the faith of the Gospel by denying, under the cloak of loyalty to the One God, the birth of God the Only-begotten. They assert that there was an extension of God into man, not a descent; that He, Who for the season that He took our flesh was Son of Man, had not been previously, nor was then, Son of God; that there was no Divine birth in His case, but an identity of Begetter and Begotten; and (to maintain what they consider a perfect loyalty to the unity of God) that there was an unbroken continuity in the Incarnation, the Father extending Himself into the Virgin, and Himself being born as His own Son. Others, on the contrary (heretics, because there is no salvation apart from Christ, Who in the beginning was God the Word with God), deny that He was born and declare that He was merely created. Birth, they hold, would confess Him to be true God, while creation proves His Godhead unreal; and though this explanation be a fraud against the faith in the unity of God, regarded as an accurate definition, yet they think it may pass muster as figurative language. They degrade, in name and in belief, His true birth to the level of a creation, to cut Him off from the Divine unity, that, as a creature called into being, He may not claim the fulness of the Godhead, which is not His by a true birth.

Haereses duae praecipuae de Christo. Sabellii et Arii. --Nam ut de caeteris haereticorum stultissimis studiis sileam, de quibus tamen, sic ubi occasionem sermonis ratio praebebit, non tacebimus; quidam ita evangelicae fidei corrumpunt sacramentum, ut sub unius Dei pia tantum professione nativitatem unigeniti Dei abnegent; ut protensio sit potius in hominem, quam descensio: neque ut qui filius hominis secundum tempora assumptae carnis fuit, idem antea semper fuerit atque sit filius Dei: ne in eo nativitas Dei sit, sed ex eodem idem sit; ut unius Dei, ut putant, inviolabilem fidem series ex solido in carnem deducta conservet, dum usque ad virginem Pater protensus, ipse sibi natus 13 sit in filium. Alii vero (quia salus nulla sine Christo sit, qui in principio apud Deum erat Deus Verbum), nativitatem negantes, creationem solam professi sunt: ne nativitas veritatem Dei admitteret, sed creatio falsitatem doceret, quae dum ementiretur in genere Dei unius fidem, non excluderet in sacramento: sed nativitatem veram nomini ac fidei creationis subjicientes, a veritate unius Dei separabilem eum facerent, ut creatio substitutionis, perfectionem sibi divinitatis non usurparet, quam veritatis nativitas non dedisset.

1.17 PL 10, 37

17. My soul has been burning to answer these insane attacks. I call to mind that the very centre of a saving faith is the belief not merely in God, but in God as a Father; not merely in Christ, but in Christ as the Son of God; in Him, not as a creature, but as God the Creator, born of God. My prime object is by the clear assertions of prophets and evangelists to refute the insanity and ignorance of men who use the unity of God (in itself a pious and profitable confession) as a cloak for their denial either that in Christ God was born, or else that He is very God. Their purpose is to isolate a solitary God at the heart of the faith by making Christ, though mighty, only a creature; because, so they allege, a birth of God widens the believer’s faith into a trust in more gods than one. But we, divinely taught to confess neither two Gods nor yet a solitary God, will adduce the evidence of the Gospels and the prophets for our confession of God the Father and God the Son, united, not confounded, in our faith. We will not admit Their identity nor allow, as a compromise, that Christ is God in some imperfect sense; for God, born of God, cannot be the same as His Father, since He is His Son, nor yet can He be different in nature.

Fides vera contra utramque toto hoc opere stabilienda. --Horum igitur furori respondere animus exarsit: recolens hoc vel praecipue sibi salutare esse, non solum in Deum credidisse, sed etiam in Deum patrem; neque in Christo tantum sperasse, sed in Christo Dei filio; neque in creatura, sed in Deo creatore ex Deo nato. Maxime ergo properamus ex propheticis atque evangelicis praeconiis vesaniam eorum ignorantiamque confundere, qui sub unius Dei, sola sane utili ac religiosa praedicatione, aut Deum natum Christum negant, aut verum Deum non esse contendunt; ut creatio potentis creaturae intra unum Deum fidei sacramentum relinquat; quia nativitas Dei extra unius Dei fidem religionem protrahat confitentum. Sed nos edocti divinitus neque duos deos praedicare neque solum, hanc evangelici ac prophetici praeconii rationem in confessione Dei patris et Dei filii afferemus, ut unum in fide nostra sint uterque, non unus: neque eumdem utrumque, neque inter verum ac falsum aliud confitentes; quia Deo ex Deo nato, neque eumdem nativitas permittit esse, neque aliud.

1.18 PL 10, 37

18. And you, whose warmth of faith and passion for a truth unknown to the world and its philosophers shall prompt to read me, must remember to eschew the feeble and baseless conjectures of earthly minds, and in devout willingness to learn must break down the barriers of prejudice and half-knowledge. The new faculties of the regenerate intellect are needed; each must have his understanding enlightened by the heavenly gift imparted to the soul. First he must take his stand upon the sure ground [substantia = ὑποστάσει] of God, as holy Jeremiah says, that since he is to hear about that nature [substantia] he may expand his thoughts till they are worthy of the theme, not fixing some arbitrary standard for himself, but judging as of infinity. And again, though he be aware that he is partaker of the Divine nature, as the holy apostle Peter says in his second Epistle, yet he must not measure the Divine nature by the limitations of his own, but gauge God’s assertions concerning Himself by the scale of His own glorious self-revelation. For he is the best student who does not read his thoughts into the book, but lets it reveal its own; who draws from it its sense, and does not import his own into it, nor force upon its words a meaning which he had determined was the right one before he opened its pages. Since then we are to discourse of the things of God, let us assume that God has full knowledge of Himself, and bow with humble reverence to His words. For He Whom we can only know through His own utterances is the fitting witness concerning Himself.

Lectori fides necessaria. --Et vos quidem, quos fidei calor et ignoratae mundo ac sapientibus mundi veritatis studium ad legendum vocavit, meminisse oportet terrenarum mentium infirmas atque imbecillas opiniones esse abjiciendas, et omnes imperfectae sententiae angustias religiosa discendi exspectatione laxandas. Novis enim regenerati ingenii sensibus opus est, ut unumquemque conscientia sua secundum coelestis originis munus illuminet. Standum itaque per fidem ante est, ut sanctus Jeremias admonet (XXIII, 22), in substantia Dei: ut de substantia Dei auditurus, sensum suum ad 14 ea quae Dei substantiae sint digna moderetur; moderetur autem non aliquo modo intelligendi, sed infinitate. Quin etiam conscius sibi divinae se naturae participem, ut beatus apostolus Petrus in epistola sua altera ait , effectum fuisse, Dei naturam non naturae suae legibus metiatur, sed divinas professiones secundum magnificentiam divinae de se protestationis expendat. Optimus enim lector est, qui dictorum intelligentiam exspectet ex dictis potius quam imponat, et retulerit magis quam attulerit, neque cogat id videri dictis contineri, quod ante lectionem praesumpserit intelligendum. Cum itaque de rebus Dei erit sermo, concedamus cognitionem sui Deo, dictisque ejus pia veneratione famulemur. Idoneus enim sibi testis est, qui nisi per se cognitus non est.

1.19 PL 10, 38

19. If in our discussion of the nature and birth of God we adduce certain analogies, let no one suppose that such comparisons are perfect and complete. There can be no comparison between God and earthly things, yet the weakness of our understanding forces us to seek for illustrations from a lower sphere to explain our meaning about loftier themes. The course of daily life shews how our experience in ordinary matters enables us to form conclusions on unfamiliar subjects. We must therefore regard any comparison as helpful to man rather than as descriptive of God, since it suggests, rather than exhausts, the sense we seek. Nor let such a comparison be thought too bold when it sets side by side carnal and spiritual natures, things invisible and things palpable, since it avows itself a necessary aid to the weakness of the human mind, and deprecates the condemnation due to an imperfect analogy. On this principle I proceed with my task, intending to use the terms supplied by God, yet colouring my argument with illustrations drawn from human life.

Comparatio ad divina nulla est perfecta. --Si qua vero nos de natura Dei et nativitate tractantes, comparationum exempla afferemus, nemo ea existimet absolutae in se rationis perfectionem continere. Comparatio enim terrenorum ad Deum nulla est: sed infirmitas nostrae intelligentiae cogit species quasdam ex inferioribus, tamquam superiorum indices quaerere; ut rerum familiarium consuetudine admonente, ex sensus nostri conscientia ad insoliti sensus opinionem educeremur . Omnis igitur comparatio homini potius utilis habeatur, quam Deo apta, quia intelligentiam magis significet, quam expleat: neque naturis carnis et spiritus, et invisibilium ac tractabilium coaequandis praesumpta reputetur, protestans et infirmitati se humanae intelligentiae necessariam, et ab invidia esse liberam non satisfacientis exempli. Pergimus itaque de Deo locuturi Dei verbis, sensum tamen nostrum rerum nostrarum specie imbuentes.

1.20 PL 10, 39

20. And first, I have so laid out the plan of the whole work as to consult the advantage of the reader by the logical order in which its books are arranged. It has been my resolve to publish no half-finished and ill-considered treatise, lest its disorderly array should resemble the confused clamour of a mob of peasants. And since no one can scale a precipice unless there be jutting ledges to aid his progress to the summit, I have here set down in order the primary outlines of our ascent leading our difficult course of argument up the easiest path; not cutting steps in the face of the rock, but levelling it to a gentle slope, that so the traveller, almost without a sense of effort may reach the heights.

Ordo totius operis. --Ac primum ita totius operis modum temperavimus, ut aptissimus legentium profectibus connexorum sibi libellorum ordo succederet. Nihil enim incompositum indigestumque placuit afferre: ne operis inordinata congeries rusticum quemdam tumultum perturbata vociferatione praeberet. Sed quia nullus per praerupta conscensus est, nisi substratis paulatim gradibus feratur gressus ad summa; nos quoque quaedam gradiendi initia ordinantes, arduum hoc intelligentiae iter clivo quasi molliore lenivimus non 15 jam gradibus incisum, sed planitie subrepente devexum, ut prope sine scandentium sensu, euntium proficeret conscensus.

1.21 PL 10, 39

21. Thus, after the present first book, the second expounds the mystery of the Divine birth, that those who shall be baptized in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost may know the true Names, and not be perplexed about their sense but accurately informed as to fact and meaning, and so receive full assurance that in the words which are used they have the true Names, and that those Names involve the truth.

Quid contineat liber secundus. --Post hunc enim primi hujus sermonis libellum, sequens ita sacramentum edocet divinae generationis, ut baptizandi in Patre et Filio et Spiritu sancto non ignorent nominum veritatem, neque vocabulis intelligentiam confundant, sed unumquodque ita sensu concipiant, ut est ac nuncupatur; agnituri absolutissime in iis quae dicta sunt, quod neque non ipsa veritas sit nominis, neque non nomen sit veritatis.

1.22 PL 10, 39

22. After this short and simple discourse concerning the Trinity, the third book makes further progress, sure though slow. Citing the greatest instances of His power, it brings within the range of faith’s understanding that saying, in itself beyond our comprehension, I in the Father and the Father in Me, which Christ utters concerning Himself. Thus truth beyond the dull wit of man is the prize of faith equipped with reason and knowledge; for neither may we doubt God’s Word concerning Himself, nor can we suppose that the devout reason is incapable of apprehending His might.

Liber tertius. --Post hunc itaque lenem ac brevem demonstratae Trinitatis sermonem, tertius liber, etsi sensim, tamen jam proficienter incedit. Nam id, quod ultra humani sensus intelligentiam Dominus de se professus est, quantis potest potentiae exemplis ad intelligentiae fidem coaptat, dicens: Ego in Patre, et Pater in me : ut quod ab homine per naturam hebetem non capitur, id fides jam rationabilis scientiae consequatur: quia neque non credendum de se Deo est, neque opinandum est, extra rationem fidei esse intelligentiam potestatis.

1.23 PL 10, 39

23. The fourth book starts with the doctrines of the heretics, and disowns complicity in the fallacies whereby they are traducing the faith of the Church. It publishes that infidel creed which a number of them have lately promulgated, and exposes the dishonesty, and therefore the wickedness, of their arguments from the Law for what they call the unity of God. It sets out the whole evidence of Law and Prophets to demonstrate the impiety of asserting the unity of God to the exclusion of the Godhead of Christ, and the treason of alleging that if Christ be God the Only-begotten, then God is not one.

Liber quartus. --Quartus deinde liber initium sui ex haereticorum doctrinis auspicatur, se ipsum vitiis, quibus fides Ecclesiae infamatur, expurgans: ipsam illam perfidiae expositionem a multis non olim editam proferens, et subdole eos, ac per id impiissime, unum Deum ex lege defendisse convincens, omnibus legis ac prophetarum testimoniis ita demonstratis, ut sine Deo Christo unum Deum confiteri irreligiositas sit; et confesso unigenito Deo Christo, non unum Deum praedicare perfidia sit.

1.24 PL 10, 40

24. The fifth book follows in reply the sequence of heretical assertion. They had falsely declared that they followed the law in the sense which they assigned to the unity of God, and that they had proved from it that the true God is of one Person; and this in order to rob the Lord Christ of His birth by their conclusion concerning the One true God, for birth is the evidence of origin. In answer I assert, step by step, what they deny; for from the Law and the Prophets I demonstrate that there are not two gods, nor one isolated true God, neither perverting the faith in the Divine unity nor denying the birth of Christ. And since they say that the Lord Jesus Christ, created rather than born, bears the Divine Name by gift and not by right, I have proved His true Divinity from the Prophets in such a way that, He being acknowledged very God, the assurance of His inherent Godhead shall hold us fast to the certainty that God is One.

Liber quintus. --Quintus vero tenuit eum responsionis ordinem, quem haeretici instituerant professionis. Namque cum unum Deum praedicare se secundum legem ementiti essent; unum quoque Deum verum ex eadem proferre se fefellerunt: ut per exceptionem Dei et unius et veri, nativitatem Domino Christo adimerent; quia ubi nativitas est, ibi et intelligentia sit veritatis. Nos autem iisdem gradibus, quibus idipsum negabatur, docentes, nec duos deos, nec solitarium verum 16 Deum, sed Patrem verum Deum ita ex lege ac prophetis praedicavimus, ne aut unius Dei fidem corrumperemus, aut nativitatem denegaremus. Sed quia, secundum illos, creato potiusquam nato nomen Dei Domino Jesu Christo deputaretur potius quam inesset; divinitatis veritas ita ex auctoritatibus propheticis demonstrata est, ut nos, Domino Jesu Christo Deo vero praedicato, intra intelligentiam unius Dei veri nativae in eo divinitatis veritas contineret.

1.25 PL 10, 40

25. The sixth book reveals the full deceitfulness of this heretical teaching. To win credit for their assertions they denounce the impious doctrine of heretics:—of Valentinus, to wit, and Sabellius and Manichæus and Hieracas, and appropriate the godly language of the Church as a cover for their blasphemy. They reprove and alter the language of these heretics, correcting it into a vague resemblance to orthodoxy, in order to suppress the holy faith while apparently denouncing heresy. But we state clearly what is the language and what the doctrine of each of these men, and acquit the Church of any complicity or fellowship with condemned heretics. Their words which deserve condemnation we condemn, and those which claim our humble acceptance we accept. Thus that Divine Sonship of Jesus Christ, which is the object of their most strenuous denial, we prove by the witness of the Father, by Christ’s own assertion, by the preaching of Apostles, by the faith of believers, by the cries of devils, by the contradiction of Jews, in itself a confession, by the recognition of the heathen who had not known God; and all this to rescue from dispute a truth of which Christ had left us no excuse for ignorance.

Liber sextus. --Sextus vero jam liber omnem haereticae assertionis fraudulentiam pandit. Namque ut dictis suis fidem facerent, damnantes dicta et vitia haereticorum, Valentini scilicet et Sabellii et Manichaei et Hieracae, pias Ecclesiae praedicationes velamento professionis impiae furati sunt: ut correptis in melius verbis irreligiosorum, et ambigua significatione moderatis, sub impietatis damnatione doctrinam pietatis exstinguerent. Sed nos singulorum dictis et professionibus demonstratis, sanctas Ecclesiae praedicationes absolvimus, neque quidquam cum damnatis haereticis commune eis esse permisimus, ut damnanda damnantes, sola venerabiliter sectanda sequeremur, filium Dei ( supple, esse) Dominum Jesum Christum, quod maxime ab iis negabatur, per haec docentes, dum de eo testatur Pater, dum de se ipse profitetur, dum Apostoli praedicant, dum religiosi credunt, dum daemones clamant, dum Judaei negantes fatentur, dum ignorantes intelligunt gentes; ne jam ( id est, ut non) ambigendum permitteretur, quod ignorandum non relinquebatur.

1.26 PL 10, 41

26. Next the seventh book, starting from the basis of a true faith now attained, delivers its verdict in the great debate. First, armed with its sound and incontrovertible proof of the impregnable faith, it takes part in the conflict raging between Sabellius and Hebion and these opponents of the true Godhead. It joins issue with Sabellius on his denial of the pre-existence of Christ, and with his assailants on their assertion that He is a creature. Sabellius overlooked the eternity of the Son, but believed that true God worked in a human body. Our present adversaries deny that He was born, assert that He was created, and fail to see in His deeds the works of very God. What both sides dispute, we believe. Sabellius denies that it was the Son who was working, and he is wrong; but he proves his case triumphantly when he alleges that the work done was that of true God. The Church shares his victory over those who deny that in Christ was very God. But when Sabellius denies that Christ existed before the worlds, his adversaries prove to conviction that Christ’s activity is from everlasting, and we are on their side in this confutation of Sabellius, who recognises true God, but not God the Son, in this activity. And our two previous adversaries join forces to refute Hebion, the second demonstrating the eternal existence of Christ, while the first proves that His work is that of very God. Thus the heretics overthrow one another, while the Church, as against Sabellius, against those who call Christ a creature, against Hebion, bears witness that the Lord Jesus Christ is very God of very God, born before the worlds and born in after times as man.

Liber septimus. Sabellius, Hebion et Arius sese vincendo Ecclesiae vincunt. --Septimus deinceps liber, secundum perfectae fidei gradum, susceptae disputationis sermonem temperavit. Namque primum, per inviolabilis fidei sanam et incorruptam demonstrationem, inter Sabellium et Hebionem et hos non veri Dei praedicatores lite certavit, cur Sabellius subsistere ante saecula negaret, quem creatum alii confiterentur. Ignorabat enim Sabellius subsistentem Filium dum Deum verum operatum in corpore esse non ambigit. Hi autem negabant nativitatem, et affirmabant creaturam, dum opera ejus Dei veri esse opera non intelligunt. Lis eorum, fides nostra est. Nam dum filium negat (ideoque errat), in eo vincit Sabellius, 17 quod Deus verus (ut recte probat) operatus est: et Ecclesia eos, qui verum in Christo Deum negaverint, vincit. At vero cum subsistentem Christum ante saecula hi adversus eum demonstrant semper operatum, de condemnato secum Sabellio nobis triumphant, Deum quidem verum sciente, sed Dei filium nesciente. Hebion autem ab utroque ita vincitur, ut hic (Arius) ante saecula subsistentem, hic (Sabellius) verum Deum convincat operatum. Omnesque se invicem vincendo vincuntur: quia Ecclesia et contra Sabellium, et contra creaturae praedicatores, et contra Hebionem, Deum verum ex Deo vero Dominum Jesum Christum, et ante saecula natum, et postea hominem genitum esse testatur.

1.27 PL 10, 41

27. No one can doubt that we have taken the course of true reverence and of sound doctrine when, after proving from Law and Prophets first that Christ is the Son of God, and next that He is true God, and this without breach of the mysterious unity, we proceed to support the Law and the Prophets by the evidence of the Gospels, and prove from them also that He is the Son of God and Himself very God. It is the easiest of tasks, after demonstrating His right to the Name of Son, to shew that the Name truly describes His relation to the Father; though indeed universal usage regards the granting of the name of son as convincing evidence of sonship. But, to leave no loophole for the trickery and deceit of these traducers of the true birth of God the Only-begotten, we have used His true Godhead as evidence of His true Sonship; to shew that He Who (as is confessed by all) bears the Name of Son of God is actually God, we have adduced His Name, His birth, His nature, His power, His assertions. We have proved that His Name is an accurate description of Himself, that the title of Son is an evidence of birth, that in His birth He retained His Divine Nature, and with His nature His power, and that that power manifested itself in conscious and deliberate self-revelation. I have set down the Gospel proofs of each several point, shewing how His self-revelation displays His power, how His power reveals His nature, how His nature is His by birthright, and from His birth comes His title to the name of Son. Thus every whisper of blasphemy is silenced, for the Lord Jesus Christ Himself by the witness of His own mouth has taught us that He is, as His Name, His birth, His nature, His power declare, in the true sense of Deity, very God of very God.

Argumentum septimi libri. --Nemini autem dubium est, congruum id maxime pietati doctrinae fuisse, ut quia ex lege et prophetis primum Dei filium, post etiam Deum verum cum sacramento unitatis praedicassemus; rursum legem ac prophetas per Evangelia firmantes, primum ex his Dei filium, post etiam Deum verum doceremus. Competentissimum itaque fuit, post nomen filii, veritatem ejus ostendere: quamquam, secundum communem sensum, veritatis absolutionem nuncupatio filii obtineret. Sed ne quid, adversantibus unigeniti Dei veritati, occasionis ad fallendum et illudendum relinqueretur; ipsam illam ( seu, qua proprius Dei filius creditur) proprietatis fidem per divinitatis veritatem adstruximus: Deum esse eum, qui Dei filius non negaretur, his modis docentes, nomine, nativitate, natura, potestate, professione; ne (ut non) aliud esset quam nuncuparetur, neque nuncupatio non nativitatis esset, neque nativitas naturam amisisset, neque natura non retinuisset potestatem, neque potestas non etiam conscia sibi veritatis professione notesceret. Causas ergo omnes singulorum generum ita ex Evangeliis excerptas subjecimus, ut nec professio tacuerit potestatem, nec potestas non exseruerit naturam, nec natura non suae nativitatis sit, nec nativitas non sui nominis: ut per id non relinqueretur impietatis calumnia, cum Dei veri ex Deo vero divinitatem, secundum et nomen et nativitatem et naturam et potestatem, ipsa quoque Dominus Jesus Christus nativae veritatis suae protestatione docuisset.

1.28 PL 10, 42

28. While its two predecessors have been devoted to the confirmation of the faith in Christ as Son of God and true God, the eighth book is taken up with the proof of the unity of God, shewing that this unity is consistent with the birth of the Son, and that the birth involves no duality in the Godhead. First it exposes the sophistry with which these heretics have attempted to avoid, though they could not deny, the confession of the real existence of God, Father and Son; it demolishes their helpless and absurd plea that in such passages as, And the multitude of them that believed were one soul and heart, and again, He that planteth and He that watereth are one, and Neither for these only do I pray, but for them also that shall believe on Me through their word, that they may all be one, even as Thou, Father, art in Me, and I in Thee, that they also may be in Us, a unity of will and mind, not of Divinity, is expressed. From a consideration of the true sense of these texts we shew that they involve the reality of the Divine birth; and then, displaying the whole series of our Lord’s self-revelations, we exhibit, in the language of Apostles and in the very words of the Holy Spirit, the whole and perfect mystery of the glory of God as Father and as Only-begotten Son. Because there is a Father we know that there is a Son; in that Son the Father is manifested to us, and hence our certainty that He is born the Only-begotten and that He is very God.

Octavus liber. --Octavus jam vero liber, duobus superioribus 18 libris de Dei filio et Deo vero multum ad credentium fidem proficientibus, totus in unius Dei demonstratione detentus est; non auferens filio Dei nativitatem, sed neque per eam duum deorum divinitatem introducens. Ac primum quibus modis haeretici veritatem Dei patris et Dei filii, quia negare non possent, tamen eludere niterentur, edocuit; dissolvens ineptas eorum et ridiculas occasiones, quibus per id quod dictum est: Multitudinis autem credentium erat anima et cor unum ; et rursum: Qui plantat autem, et qui rigat, unum sunt ; et iterum: Non pro his autem tantum rogo, sed et pro iis qui credituri sunt per verbum eorum in me: ut omnes unum sint, sicut tu, Pater, in me, et ego in te, ut et ipsi sint in nobis : voluntatis potius et unanimitatis quam divinitatis asserunt veritatem. Sed nos haec ipsa suis virtutibus pertractantes ( hoc est, secundum vim verborum), fidem in se divinae nativitatis continere ostendimus: et omnes dictorum dominicorum professiones revolventes, totum atque perfectum, ex apostolicis praeconiis ac sancti Spiritus proprietatibus, et paternae et unigenitae majestatis sacramentum docuimus: cum et in Patre Filius intellectus, et Pater in Filio cognitus, unigeniti Dei nativitatem, et perfecti in eo Dei ostenderent veritatem.

1.29 PL 10, 42

29. In matters essential to salvation it is not enough to advance the proofs which faith supplies and finds sufficient. Arguments which we have not tested may delude us into a misapprehension of the meaning of our own words, unless we take the offensive by exposing the hollowness of the enemy’s proofs, and so establish our own faith upon the demonstrated absurdity of his. The ninth book, therefore, is employed in refuting the arguments by which the heretics attempt to invalidate the birth of God the Only-begotten;—heretics who ignore the mystery of the revelation hidden from the beginning of the world, and forget that the Gospel faith proclaims the union of God and man. For their denial that our Lord Jesus Christ is God, like unto God and equal with God as Son with Father, born of God and by right of His birth subsisting as very Spirit, they are accustomed to appeal to such words of our Lord as, Why callest thou Me good? None is good save One, even God. They argue that by His reproof of the man who called Him good, and by His assertion of the goodness of God only, He excludes Himself from the goodness of that God Who alone is good and from that true Divinity which belongs only to One. With this text their blasphemous reasoning connects another, And this is life eternal that they should know Thee the only true God, and Him Whom Thou didst send, Jesus Christ. Here, they say, He confesses that the Father is the only true God, and that He Himself is neither true nor God, since this recognition of an only true God is limited to the Possessor of the attributes assigned. And they profess to be quite clear about His meaning in this passage, since He also says, The Son can do nothing of Himself, but what He hath seen the Father doing. The fact that He can only copy is said to be evidence of the limitation of His nature. There can be no comparison between Omnipotence and One whose action is dependent upon the previous activity of Another; reason itself draws an absolute line between power and the want of power. That line is so clear that He Himself has avowed concerning God the Father, The Father is greater than I. So frank a confession silences all demur; it is blasphemy and madness to assign the dignity and nature of God to One who disclaims them. So utterly devoid is He of the qualities of true God that He actually bears witness concerning Himself, But of that day and hour knoweth no one, neither the angels in heaven nor the Son, but God only. A son who knows not his father’s secret must, from his ignorance, be alien from the father who knows; a nature limited in knowledge cannot partake of that majesty and might which alone is exempt from the tyranny of ignorance.

Liber nonus. Argumenta contra Christi divinitatem. --Parum est autem, in rebus ad salutem maxime necessariis, sola ea ad satisfactionem fidei afferre, quae propria sunt: quia plerumque blandientes sensum fallant dictorum nostrorum inexploratae assertiones, nisi etiam propositionum adversarum demonstratae inanitates, fidem nostram in eo ipso, quod ipsae ridiculae esse arguantur, affirment. Nonus itaque liber totus in repellendis iis, quae ad infirmandam unigeniti Dei nativitatem ab impiis usurpantur, intentus est: qui dispensationis occulti a saeculis mysterii immemores, evangelica fide Deum atque hominem praedicari non recordentur. Namque cum Deum esse Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum, et similem Deo esse et aequalem ut Deum filium Deo patri, natum ex Deo, et secundum nativitatis proprietatem in veritate Spiritus ( hoc est, divinitatis) subsistere negant; his niti dictorum dominicorum professionibus solent: Quid me dicis bonum? Nemo est bonus nisi unus Deus ; ut cum dici se bonum coarguat, et non nisi 19 bonum Deum unum esse testetur; et extra bonitatem Dei sit, qui bonus est, et in Dei non sit veritate, qui unus est. Quibus dictis etiam haec ad impietatis suae argumenta connectunt: Haec est autem vita aeterna, ut cognoscant te solum verum Deum, et quem misisti Jesum Christum : ut solum verum Deum confessus Patrem, nec verus ipse, nec Deus sit; quia solius Dei veri exceptio, significatae proprietatis non excedat auctorem. Non ambigue autem hoc ab eo dictum esse intelligendum, quia idem dixerit: Non potest Filius facere ab se quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem : ut cum nihil nisi de exemplo operis possit operari, naturae in eo intelligatur infirmitas; quia nequaquam sit omnipotentiae comparandum, quod alienae operationis subjectum est necessitati; et ratio intelligentiae hoc suadeat, in omnibus a se posse et non posse, differre. Differre autem eo usque, ut de patre Deo haec ita professus sit: Pater major me est et cesset in professione absoluta adversandi calumnia; quia impiae vesaniae sit honorem ac naturam Dei tribuere abnuenti. Omni autem modo in tantum eum a proprietate veri Dei abesse, ut etiam testatus haec fuerit: De die autem illa et hora nemo scit, neque Angeli in coelis, neque Filius, nisi Pater solus (Marci XIII, 32): ut cum Filius nesciat quod Pater solus sciat, longe alienus sit nesciens a sciente; quia natura ignorationi obnoxia, non sit ejus virtutis et potestatis, quae a dominatu ignorationis excepta sit.

1.30 PL 10, 44

30. We therefore expose the blasphemous misunderstanding at which they have arrived by distortion and perversion of the meaning of Christ’s words. We account for those words by stating what manner of questions He was answering, at what times He was speaking, what partial knowledge He was deigning to impart; we make the circumstances explain the words, and do not force the former into consistency with the latter. Thus each case of variance, that for instance between The Father is greater than I, and I and the Father are One, or between None is good save One, even God, and He that hath seen Me hath seen the Father also, or a difference so wide as that between Father, all things that are Mine are Thine, and Thine are Mine, and That they may know Thee, the only true God, or between I in the Father and the Father in Me, and But of the day and hour knoweth no one, neither the angels in heaven nor the Son, but the Father only, is explained by a discrimination between gradual revelation and full expression of His nature and power. Both are utterances of the same Speaker, and an exposition of the real force of each group will shew that Christ’s true Godhead is no whit impaired because, to form the mystery of the Gospel faith, the birth and Name of Christ were revealed gradually, and under conditions which He chose of occasion and time.

Argumentis respondetur. --Haec itaque, corrupto depravatoque sensu, impiissime ita intellecta esse monstrantes, omnes dictorum causas ex his ipsis vel interrogationum vel temporum vel dispensationum generibus attulimus, causis potius verba subdentes, non causas verbis deputantes: ut cum a se dissideat, Pater major me est ; et, Ego et Pater unum sumus ; neque idem sit, Nemo bonus est, nisi unus Deus (Luc. XVIII, 19); et, Qui me vidit, vidit et Patrem ; vel certe tanta a se diversitate contraria sint: Pater, omnia tua mea sunt, et mea tua ; et, Ut cognoscant te solum verum Deum (Ibidem, 3); vel illud, Ego in Patre, et Pater in me ; et, De die autem et hora nemo scit, neque angeli in coelis, neque Filius, nisi Pater solus . Intelligantur in singulis et dispensationum praedicationes, 20 et consciae potestatis naturalis professiones: et cum idem sit dicti auctor utriusque, demonstratis tamen virtutibus generum singulorum (naturarum singularum quae sunt in Christo), non pertineat ad contumeliam verae divinitatis, quod ad sacramentum fidei evangelicae sub dispensatione et causae et temporis et nativitatis et nominis praedicatur.

1.31 PL 10, 44

31. The purpose of the tenth book is one in harmony with the faith. For since, in the folly which passes with them for wisdom, the heretics have twisted some of the circumstances and utterances of the Passion into an insolent contradiction of the Divine nature and power of the Lord Jesus Christ, I am compelled to prove that this is a blasphemous misinterpretation, and that these things were put on record by the Lord Himself as evidences of His true and absolute majesty. In their parody of the faith they deceive themselves with words such as, My soul is sorrowful even unto death. He, they think, must be far removed from the blissful and passionless life of God, over Whose soul brooded this crushing fear of an impending woe, Who under the pressure of suffering even humbled Himself to pray, Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass away from Me, and assuredly bore the appearance of fearing to endure the trials from which He prayed for release; Whose whole nature was so overwhelmed by agony that in those moments on the Cross He cried, My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken Me? forced by the bitterness of His pain to complain that He was forsaken: Who, destitute of the Father’s help, gave up the ghost with the words, Father, into Thy hands I commend My Spirit. The fear, they say, which beset Him at the moment of expiring made Him entrust His Spirit to the care of God the Father: the very hopelessness of His own condition forced Him to commit His Soul to the keeping of Another.

Liber decimus. Quaedam Scripturae verba haereticis specie tenus faventia. --Decimi vero libri eadem est ratio, quae fidei. Nam quia ex passionis genere et professione quaedam per stultae intelligentiae sensum ad contumeliam divinae in Domino Jesu Christo naturae virtutisque rapuerunt; ea ipsa demonstranda fuerunt, et ab his impiissime intellecta esse, et a Domino ad protestationem verae et perfectae in se majestatis esse memorata. Namque his sibi dictis, ut religiose impii sint, blandiuntur: Tristis est anima mea usque ad mortem ; ut longe a beatitudine atque incorruptione Dei sit, in cujus animam dominans metus tristitiae imminentis inciderit: qui etiam usque ad hanc precem consternatus fuerit passionis necessitate: Pater, si possibile est, transeat calix iste a me (Ibidem, 39): et sine dubio timere videretur perpeti, quod ne pateretur oraverit; quia patiendi trepidatio causam attulerit deprecandi: in tantum vero infirmitatem ejus obtinuerit vis doloris, ut in ipso crucis tempore diceret: Deus, Deus meus, quare me dereliquisti ? qui etiam usque ad querelam desolationis suae, passionis acerbitate commotus, auxilii inops paterni, spiritum in hac voce emiserit cum dixit: Pater, commendo in manus tuas spiritum meum ; et exhalandi spiritus trepidatione turbatus tuendum hunc Deo patri commendaverit; quia commendationis necessitatem desperatio securitatis exegerit.

1.32 PL 10, 45

32. Their folly being as great as their blasphemy, they fail to mark that Christ’s words, spoken under similar circumstances, are always consistent; they cleave to the letter and ignore the purpose of His words. There is the widest difference between My soul is sorrowful even unto death, and Henceforth ye shall see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of power; so also between Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass away, from Me, and The cup which the Father hath given Me, shall I not drink it? and further between My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken Me? and Verily I say unto thee, Today shalt thou be with Me in Paradise, and between Father, into Thy hands I commend My Spirit, and Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do; and their narrow minds, unable to grasp the Divine meaning, plunge into blasphemy in the attempt at explanation. There is a broad distinction between anxiety and a mind at ease, between haste and the prayer for delay, between words of anguish and words of encouragement, between despair for self and confident entreaty for others; and the heretics display their impiety by ignoring the assertions of Deity and the Divine nature of Christ, which account for the one class of His words, while they concentrate their attention upon the deeds and words which refer only to His ministry on earth. I have therefore set out all the elements contained in the mystery of the Soul and Body of the Lord Jesus Christ; all have been sought out, none suppressed. Next, casting the calm light of reason upon the question, I have referred each of His sayings to the class to which its meaning attaches it, and so have shewn that He had also a confidence which never wavered, a will which never faltered, an assurance which never murmured, that, when He commended His own soul to the Father, in this was involved a prayer for the pardon of others. Thus a complete presentment of the teaching of the Gospel interprets and confirms all (and not some only) of the words of Christ.

Alia iis opponuntur. --Sed stultissimi atque impiissimi homines, non intelligentes nihil contrarium in rebus iisdem ab eodem dictum fuisse, verbis tantum inhaerentes, causas ipsas dictorum reliquerunt. Nam cum longe multumque diversum sit, Tristis est anima mea usque ad mortem ; et, Amodo videbitis Filium hominis sedentem a dextris virtutis (Ibidem, 64); neque idipsum sit, Pater, si possibile est, transeat calix iste a me (Ibidem, 39); et illud, Calicem quem dedit mihi Pater meus, non bibam eum ? longeque diversum sit: Deus, Deus meus, quare me dereliquisti ? 21 ab eo: Amen dico tibi, hodie meum eris in paradiso : multum quoque dissentiat: Pater, commendo in manus tuas spiritum meum ; et illud, Pater, remitte illis, quia quod faciunt nesciunt (Ibidem, 34): ad impietatem reciderunt divinorum dictorum incapaces. Et cum non conveniat trepidationi et libertati, festinationi et excusationi, querelae et adhortationi, diffidentiae et intercessioni, divinae professionis naturaeque immemores, ad argumentum impietatis suae, dispensationis gesta et dicta tenuerunt. Itaque nos demonstratis omnibus, quae in sacramento et animae et corporis Domini Jesu Christi sunt,nihil inexploratum, nihil tacitum dereliquimus: sed dictorum omnium pacificam intelligentiam singulis quibusque causarum generibus coaptantes, nec trepidare fiduciam, nec evitare voluntatem, nec conqueri securitatem, nec commendationem sui orantem, aliis veniam desiderasse monstravimus: fidem dictorum universorum absoluta evangelici mysterii praedicatione firmantes.

1.33 PL 10, 46

33. And so—for not even the glory of the Resurrection has opened the eyes of these lost men and kept them within the manifest bounds of the faith—they have forged a weapon for their blasphemy out of a pretended reverence, and even perverted the revelation of a mystery into an insult to God. From the words, I ascend unto My Father and your Father, to My God and your God, they argue that since that Father is ours as much as His, and that God also ours and His, His own confession that He shares with us in that relation to the Father and to God excludes Him from true Divinity, and subordinates Him to God the Creator Whose creature and inferior He is, as we are, although He has received the adoption of a Son. Nay more, we must not suppose that He possesses any of the characters of the Divine nature, since the Apostle says, But when He saith, all things are put in subjection, this is except Him Who did subject all things unto Him, for when all things shall have been subjected unto Him, then shall also He Himself be subjected to Him that did subject all things unto Him, that God may be all in all. For, so they say, subjection is evidence of want of power in the subject and of its possession by the sovereign. The eleventh book is employed in a reverent discussion of this argument; it proves from these very words of the Apostle not only that subjection is no evidence of want of power in Christ but that it actually is a sign of His true Divinity as God the Son; that the fact that His Father and God is also our Father and God is an infinite advantage to us and no degradation to Him, since He Who has been born as Man and suffered all the afflictions of our flesh has gone up on high to our God and Father, to receive His glory as Man our Representative.

Liber XI alia haereticorum argumenta refellit. --Igitur quia desperatissimos homines ne ipsa quidem resurrectionis gloria intra religionis intelligentiam edoctos cohibuit, sed aut per dignationis professionem, impietatis suae arma sumpserunt, aut sacramenti revelationem ad Dei contumeliam transtulerunt: ut per id quod dictum est, Adscendo ad patrem meum et ad patrem vestrum, ad Deum meum et ad Deum vestrum , dum communis nobis atque ipsi et Pater pater est, et Deus Deus est, extra exceptionem veri Dei sit in professione communi, eumque sicuti nos et creationis necessitas creatori Deo subdat, et adoptio assumat in filium; jam vero nulla in eo divinae naturae proprietas existimanda sit, secundum Apostoli dictum, Cum autem dixerit, Omnia subjecta sunt, praeter eum qui subjecit ei omnia; cum enim fuerint subjecta ei omnia, tunc et ipse subjicietur ei qui ei subjecit omnia, ut sit Deus omnia in omnibus . Quia subjectio et infirmitatem subjecti protestetur, et dominantis significet potestatem: in his quoque cum summa religionis demonstratione tractandis liber undecimus occupatur, 22 etiam ex his ipsis dictis apostolicis demonstrans, non modo non ad divinitatis infirmitatem subjectionem proficere, sed per eam ipsam ( supple, subjectionem) veritatem Dei, quia ex Deo sit natus, ostendi: et per id, quod sibi ac nobis et Pater pater est et Deus Deus est, nobis multum acquiri, et ei nihil detrahi; cum scilicet homo natus, et universis carnis nostrae passionibus functus, ad Deum et Patrem nostrum, ut homo noster in Deum glorificandus adscenderet.

1.34 PL 10, 47

34. In this treatise we have followed the course which we know is pursued in every branch of education. First come easy lessons and a familiarity, slowly attained by practice, with the groundwork of the subject; then the student may make proof, in the business of life, of the training which he has received. Thus the soldier, when he is perfect in his exercises, can go out to battle; the advocate ventures into the conflicts of the courts when he is versed in the pleadings of the school of rhetoric; the sailor who has learned to navigate his ship in the land-locked harbour of his home may be trusted amid the storms of open seas and distant climes. Such has been our proceeding in this most serious and difficult science in which the whole faith is taught. First came simple instruction for the untaught believer in the birth, the name, the Divinity, the true Divinity of Christ; since then we have quietly and steadily advanced till our readers can demolish every plea of the heretics; and now at last we have pitted them against the adversary in the present great and glorious conflict. The mind of men is powerless with the ordinary resources of unaided reason to grasp the idea of an eternal birth, but they attain by study of things Divine to the apprehension of mysteries which lie beyond the range of common thought. They can explode that paradox concerning the Lord Jesus, which derives all its strength and semblance of cogency from a purblind pagan philosophy: the paradox which asserts, There was a time when He was not, and He was not before He was born, and He was made out of nothing; as though His birth were proof that He had previously been non-existent and at a given moment came into being, and God the Only-begotten could thus be subjected to the conception of time, as if the faith itself [by conferring the title of ‘Son’] and the very nature of birth proved that there was a time when He was not. Accordingly they argue that He was born out of nothing, on the ground that birth implies the grant of being to that which previously had no being. We proclaim in answer, on the evidence of Apostles and Evangelists, that the Father is eternal and the Son eternal, and demonstrate that the Son is God of all with an absolute, not a limited, pre-existence; that these bold assaults of their blasphemous logic—He was born out of nothing, and He was not before He was born—are powerless against Him; that His eternity is consistent with sonship, and His sonship with eternity; that there was in Him no unique exemption from birth but a birth from everlasting, for, while birth implies a Father, Divinity is inseparable from eternity.

Liber XII Arianam haeresim apertius expugnat. Filium Dei ita natum esse ut semper fuerit. --Quod autem in omni genere doctrinarum observari semper meminimus, ut si qui diu tenui primum exercitatione longoque usu humilioris studii fuerint eruditi, tum jam ad rerum ipsarum, quibus imbuti sunt, experimenta mittantur; ut cum jam bene luserint bella militaturi, in militiam protrahantur; aut cum forenses lites scholaris materiae tentaverint, tunc mittantur ad tribunalium pugnas; aut cum in stagnis domesticis navim nauta intrepidus instruxerit, tunc magni et peregrini maris committatur procellis: id ipsum nos in hac maxima et gravissima totius fidei intelligentia facere curavimus. Namque cum antea a levibus initiis de nativitate, de nomine, de divinitate, de veritate fidem teneram imbuissemus, ac leni profectu etiam usque ad evellendas omnes haereticorum occasiones, legentium studia extulissemus; tum eos jam ad ipsam palaestram gloriosi certaminis magnique produximus: ut in quantum ad aeternae nativitatis complectendam intelligentiam humana mens communis sensus opinione deficitur, in tantum studiis divinis ad sentienda ea, quae ultra naturae nostrae opinionem sunt, niterentur; quaestionem hanc maxime dissolventes, quae saecularis sapientiae hebetudine invalescens, de Domino Jesu ratione se putet dicere: Erat quando non erat, et, Non fuit ante quam nasceretur, et, De non exstantibus factus est: ut quia nativitas eam videatur afferre causam, ut esset qui non erat, et cum non exsisteret nasceretur; per id quoque unigenitum Deum sensui temporum subdant: (quasi vero non fuisse eum aliquando, fides ipsa et 23 ratio nativitatis ostendat) atque ideo ex eo quod non fuit, natum esse dicant, quia nativitas praestet esse quod non fuit. Sed nos apostolicis atque evangelicis testimoniis semper Patrem, semper Filium praedicantes, non post aliqua Deum omnium, sed ante omnia esse docebimus: neque incidere in eum irreligiosae hujus intelligentiae temeritatem, ut de non exstantibus nasceretur, et non fuerit ante quam natus sit; sed ita semper fuisse, ut et natum praedicemus; ita vero natum esse, ut semper fuisse manifestemus: sitque in eo non innascibilitatis exceptio, sed nativitatis aeternitas; quia et nativitas auctorem habeat, neque careat aeternitate divinitas.

1.35 PL 10, 47

35. Ignorance of prophetic diction and unskilfulness in interpreting Scripture has led them into a perversion of the point and meaning of the passage, The Lord created Me for a beginning of His ways for His works. They labour to establish from it that Christ is created, rather than born, as God, and hence partakes the nature of created beings, though He excel them in the manner of His creation, and has no glory of Divine birth but only the powers of a transcendent creature. We in reply, without importing any new considerations or preconceived opinions, will make this very passage of Wisdom display its own true meaning and object. We will show that the fact that He was created for the beginning of the ways of God and for His works, cannot be twisted into evidence concerning the Divine and eternal birth, because creation for these purposes and birth from everlasting are two entirely different things. Where birth is meant, there birth, and nothing but birth, is spoken of; where creation is mentioned, the cause of that creation is first named. There is a Wisdom born before all things, and again there is a wisdom created for particular purposes; the Wisdom which is from everlasting is one, the wisdom which has come into existence during the lapse of time is another.

Exponuntur verba: Dominus creavit me, etc. -- Et quia dicti prophetici inscii, et coelestis doctrinae imperiti sunt; corrupto sensu ac proprietate sententiae creatum esse per id Deum potius quam natum affirmare nituntur, quia dictum est, Dominus creavit me in initium viarum suarum in opera sua ; ut sit ex communi creationum natura, licet sit praestantior in genere creationis; neque in eo sit gloria divinae nativitatis, sed virtus potentis creaturae. Verum nos nihil novum, nihil extrinsecus praesumptum afferentes, ipso illo Sapientiae testimonio veritatem dicti rationemque praestabimus, neque ad nativitatis divinae et aeternae intelligentiam trahi posse, quod in initium viarum Dei et in opera sit creatus, quia non idem sit in haec creatum esse, et ante omnia natum esse: cum ubi nativitatis significatio est, sola nativitatis professio est; ubi vero creationis est nomen, ibi causa ejusdem creationis anterior est: et cum ante omnia sit nata Sapientia, tamen quia etiam in res aliquas sit creata, non idipsum sit id quod ante omnia est, et quod coepit esse post aliqua.

1.36 PL 10, 48

36. Having thus concluded that we must reject the word ‘creation’ from our confession of faith in God the Only-begotten, we proceed to lay down the teachings of reason and of piety concerning the Holy Spirit, that the reader, whose convictions have been established by patient and earnest study of the preceding books, may be provided with a complete presentation of the faith. This end will be attained when the blasphemies of heretical teaching on this theme also have been swept away, and the mystery, pure and undefiled, of the Trinity which regenerates us has been fixed in terms of saving precision on the authority of Apostles and Evangelists. Men will no longer dare, on the strength of mere human reasoning, to rank among creatures that Divine Spirit, Whom we receive as the pledge of immortality and source of fellowship with the sinless nature of God.

Liber XII quae de Spiritu sancto confitenda sunt aperit. --Dehinc consequens visum est, creationis nomine a fide, quae nobis de unigenito Deo est, repudiato, ea quoque quae confessioni sancti Spiritus congrua ac religiosa essent, docere: ut jam confirmatis longo anteriorum libellorum diligentique tractatu, nihil de totius fidei absolutione deesset, cum amotis vitiosarum praedicationum etiam de opinione Sancti Spiritus irreligiositatibus, illaesum atque incontaminatum regenerantis Trinitatis sacramentum intra definitionem salutarem apostolica atque evangelica auctoritas contineret: neque jam per sensus humani sententiam Spiritum Dei inter creaturas quisquam auderet referre, quem ad immortalitatis pignus, et ad divinae incorruptaeque naturae consortium sumeremus. 24

1.37 PL 10, 48

37. I know, O Lord God Almighty, that I owe Thee, as the chief duty of my life, the devotion of all my words and thoughts to Thyself. The gift of speech which Thou hast bestowed can bring me no higher reward than the opportunity of service in preaching Thee and displaying Thee as Thou art, as Father and Father of God the Only-begotten, to the world in its blindness and the heretic in his rebellion. But this is the mere expression of my own desire; I must pray also for the gift of Thy help and compassion, that the breath of Thy Spirit may fill the sails of faith and confession which I have spread, and a favouring wind be sent to forward me on my voyage of instruction. We can trust the promise of Him Who said, Ask, and it shall be given you, seek, and ye shall find, knock, and it shall be opened unto you; and we in our want shall pray for the things we need. We shall bring an untiring energy to the study of Thy Prophets and Apostles, and we shall knock for entrance at every gate of hidden knowledge, but it is Thine to answer the prayer, to grant the thing we seek, to open the door on which we beat. Our minds are born with dull and clouded vision, our feeble intellect is penned within the barriers of an impassable ignorance concerning things Divine; but the study of Thy revelation elevates our soul to the comprehension of sacred truth, and submission to the faith is the path to a certainty beyond the reach of unassisted reason.

Gratia ad recte scribendum necessaria imploratur. --Ego quidem hoc vel praecipuum vitae meae officium debere me tibi, Pater omnipotens Deus, conscius sum, ut te omnis sermo meus et sensus loquatur. Neque enim ullum aliud majus praemium hic ipse usus mihi a te concessus loquendi potest referre, quam ut praedicando te tibi serviat, teque quod es, patrem, patrem scilicet unigeniti Dei, aut ignoranti saeculo, aut neganti haeretico demonstret. Et in hoc quidem tantum voluntatis meae professio est: caeterum auxilii et misericordiae tuae munus orandum est, ut extensa tibi fidei nostrae confessionisque vela flatu Spiritus tui impleas, nosque in cursum praedicationis initae propellas. Non enim nobis infidelis sponsionis istius auctor est, dicens: Petite, et dabitur vobis; quaerite, et invenietis; pulsate, et aperietur vobis . Nos quidem inopes ea quibus egemus precabimur, et in scrutandis prophetarum tuorum apostolorumque dictis studium pervicax afferemus, et omnes obseratae intelligentiae aditus pulsabimus: sed tuum est, et oratum tribuere, et quaesitum adesse, et patere pulsatum. Torpemus enim quodam naturae nostrae pigro stupore, et ad res tuas intelligendas intra ignorantiae necessitatem ingenii nostri imbecillitate cohibemur: sed doctrinae tuae studia ad sensum nos divinae cognitionis instituunt, et ultra naturalem opinionem fidei obedientia provehit.

1.38 PL 10, 49

38. And therefore we look to Thy support for the first trembling steps of this undertaking, to Thy aid that it may gain strength and prosper. We look to Thee to give us the fellowship of that Spirit Who guided the Prophets and the Apostles, that we may take their words in the sense in which they spoke and assign its right shade of meaning to every utterance. For we shall speak of things which they preached in a mystery; of Thee, O God Eternal, Father of the Eternal and Only-begotten God, Who alone art without birth, and of the One Lord Jesus Christ, born of Thee from everlasting. We may not sever Him from Thee, or make Him one of a plurality of Gods, on any plea of difference of nature. We may not say that He is not begotten of Thee, because Thou art One. We must not fail to confess Him as true God, seeing that He is born of Thee, true God, His Father. Grant us, therefore, precision of language, soundness of argument, grace of style, loyalty to truth. Enable us to utter the things that we believe, that so we may confess, as Prophets and Apostles have taught us, Thee, One God our Father, and One Lord Jesus Christ, and put to silence the gainsaying of heretics, proclaiming Thee as God, yet not solitary, and Him as God, in no unreal sense.

Exspectamus ergo ut trepidi hujus coepti exordia incites, et profectu accrescente confirmes, et ad consortium vel prophetalis vel apostolici spiritus voces: ut dicta eorum non alio quam ipsi locuti sunt sensu apprehendamus, verborumque proprietates iisdem rerum significationibus exsequamur. Locuturi enim sumus, quae ab iis in sacramento praedicata sunt, te aeternum Deum, aeterni unigeniti Dei patrem: et unum te sine nativitate, et unum Dominum Jesum Christum ex te nativitatis aeternae, non in deorum numerum veritatis diversitate referendum: neque non ex te genitum, qui Deus unus es, praedicandum; neque aliud quam Deum verum, qui ex te Deo vero patre natus est, confitendum. Tribue ergo nobis verborum significationem, intelligentiae lumen, dictorum honorem, veritatis fidem: et praesta, ut quod credimus, et loquamur; scilicet, ut contingat nobis, unum te Deum patrem et unum Dominum Jesum Christum de Prophetis atque Apostolis cognoscentibus, nunc adversum negantes haereticos, ita Deum et te celebrare, ne solum; et eum praedicare, ne falsum.

Philip Schaff and Henry Wace (eds.), New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1890-1900. Public domain: English translation first published 1885-1900 (Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series). Latin: Migne, Patrologia Latina (1844-1855), public domain; transcription from Corpus Corporum (University of Zurich).

Salva per dopo

Inserisci la tua email: ti invieremo un link per accedere. Nessuna password. Ciò che salvi (voci, versetti, capitoli, documenti) ti segue su ogni dispositivo.