On the Love of God
English translation by Marianne Caroline Patmore and Coventry Patmore (Marianne Caroline Patmore d. 1880; Coventry Patmore 1823–1896), London: Kegan Paul, 1881; second edition, London: Burns and Oates, 1884. Original text: Migne, Patrologia Latina 182, 973-1000.
The Patmores translated chapters 1-11 only; Bernard's dedicatory letter to Cardinal Haimeric and chapters 12-15 (taken from his letter to the Carthusians) are not in this translation and are omitted. The volume's other pieces (fragments of the Sermons on the Song of Songs, 'Three Rosaries of Our Lady') are not included.
Chapter 1. Why we ought to love God, and how we ought to love Him
You wish me to explain for what reason and in what measure we should love God.
I should say that God Himself is the motive of our love to Him, and that the measure of due love is to be without measure. Is this clear enough? Perhaps it may be for a person of intelligence, but I desire to answer for both the learned and unlearned; and, though I may have said enough for the former, I must remember others also. For them I will unfold my meaning, and perhaps add somewhat to it.
Two things there are that move us to love God for Himself: nothing is more reasonable; nothing is more profitable.
The question, What binds us to love God? may either mean—What is His title to our love? or, How will it profit us to love God? To both these forms of the question there is but one answer: The motive for loving God, is God. No title can be stronger than this: God gave Himself to us in spite of our unworthiness, and, being God, what could He give us of greater worth than Himself? If, then, by asking, why we are bound to love God, we mean, what is His claim, the answer is: Especially this, that He first loved us. This gives Him a right to our love in return; above all, considering who He is that loves, what His loved ones are, and in what way He loves them. For who is He that loves us, but He of whom every spirit bears witness: "Thou art my God, Thou hast no need of my goods"? and His love is it not that charity that seeks not its own interests? But on whom is fastened this unselfish love? The Apostle answers: "When we were yet enemies, we were reconciled to God." God has loved us disinterestedly, and while yet we were His enemies. But how has He loved us? St. John says to this extreme: "God so loved the world as to give His only begotten Son." St. Paul adds: "He hath not spared His only begotten Son, but hath delivered Him up for us;" and the Son says of Himself, "Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends." These are the claims which God, the Holy, the sovereignly great and Almighty, has upon the love of infinitely little, weak, and sinful man. It may be said: Yes, this is true of mankind, but it is not so of angels. I know it; for angels the same was not needful. Moreover, He who has helped man in his misery preserved the angels from falling into the like; and if God's love for men has found them a way of escape, it is by the self-same that He kept the angels from a fall like ours.
Vultis ergo a me audire, quare et quomodo diligendus sit Deus? Et ego: Causa diligendi Deum, Deus est; modus, sine modo diligere. Estne hoc satis? Fortassis utique, sed sapienti. Caeterum si et insipientibus debitor sum; ubi sat est dictum sapienti, etiam illis gerendus mos est. Itaque propter tardiores idem profusius, quam profundius repetere non gravabor. Ob duplicem ergo causam Deum dixerim propter seipsum diligendum: sive quia nihil justius, sive quia nil fructuosius diligi potest. Duplicem siquidem parit sensum, cum quaeritur de Deo, cur diligendus sit. Dubitari namque potest quid potissimum dubitetur; utrumnam, quo suo merito Deus, aut certe quo nostro sit commodo diligendus. Sane ad utrumque idem responderim; non plane aliam mihi dignam occurrere causam diligendi ipsum, praeter ipsum. Et prius de merito videamus. Multum quippe meruit de nobis, qui et immeritis dedit seipsum nobis. Quid enim melius seipso poterat dare vel ipse? Ergo si Dei meritum quaeritur, cum ipsum diligendi causa quaeritur, illud est praecipuum: quia ipse prior dilexit nos. Dignus plane qui redametur, praesertim si advertatur, quis, quos, quantumque amaverit. Quis enim? Nonne is cui omnis spritus confitetur: Deus meus es tu, quoniam bonorum meorum non eges? Et vera hujus charitas majestatis, quippe non quaerentis quae sua sunt. Quibus autem tanta puritas exhibetur? Cum adhuc, inquit, inimici essemus, reconciliati sumus Deo. Dilexit ergo Deus, et gratis, et inimicos. Sed quantum? Quantum dicit Joannes: Sic Deus dilexit mundum, ut Filium unigenitum daret: et Paulus, Qui proprio, ait, Filio non pepercit, sed pro nobis tradidit illum. Ipse quoque Filius pro se, Majorem, inquit, charitatem nemo habet quam ut animam suam ponat quis pro amicis suis. Sic meruit justus ab impiis, summus ab infimis, ab infirmis omnipotens. Sed dicit aliquis: Ita quidem ab hominibus; sed ab angelis non ita. Verum est, quia necesse non fuit. Caeterum qui hominibus subvenit in tali necessitate, servavit angelos a tali necessitate: et qui homines diligendo, tales fecit ne tales remanerent; ipse aeque diligendo dedit et angelis, ne tales fierent.
Chapter 2. That God has a right to the love of man because of His gifts to soul and body. How these should be confessed, and not turned against Him who gave them
Those who have acknowledged what I have said must surely own our obligation to love God. But if there be infidels who will not do so much, God has wherewith to confound their ingratitude in the goods beyond number with which He enriches soul and body. Is it not from Him that man receives the bread which sustains, the light which enlightens him, the air which he breathes? If I mention these first, it is not that I account them chief, for they only concern the body, but they are the most necessary. For our chief goods we must look into the soul, the superior part of our being. Those goods are—excellence, intelligence, and virtue. When I speak of excellence in man, I mean the free will which is in him, it being this which lifts him above all other living beings and places them under his dominion. Intelligence proves to him his excellence, and at the same time proves that he owes it not to himself; and, lastly, virtue makes him seek ardently, and when he has found, embrace vehemently, Him whose work he is. These three goods present each of them two aspects. Excellence is seen as the prerogative proper to human nature, and also as causing that fear which man has always produced in every other living being. Intelligence perceives the dignity of man, but at the same time owns that though in him, yet it is not of him; and, lastly, virtue in its double action provokes to an eager seeking for Him to whom we owe existence, and, when found, as eager a clinging to Him. Moreover, excellence without intelligence is worthless; and intelligence without virtue can only harm; as the following reasoning proves. No intelligence can take pride in its existence without knowing that it exists; but if, knowing that it exists, it ignores that it does so, not by itself, but by some other, and glorifies itself in itself, not in God, it should consider the words of the Apostle: "What hast thou that thou hast not received? Why dost thou glory as if thou hadst not received it?" He says not merely, "why dost thou glory?" but he adds, "as if thou hadst not received it," showing that it is not blameworthy to glory in having it, but to glory as not having received it. With good reason is such glorying termed vainglory, because it fails to rest upon the solid rock of truth. The Apostle distinguishes this from just glory by saying: "He that glorieth may glory in the Lord, that is in the truth, for God is truth."
We see then that there are two things to know: First, what we are; then, that we are not such of ourselves. If we miss either of these two, we either shall not glory at all, or the glory that we take to ourselves will be "vain." Finally, "if thou know not thyself, go forth and wander after the flocks of thy companions." This is in truth what happens; for when a man in honour knows not his own dignity, he is justly compared, by reason of such ignorance, to the animals that share with him in the corruption and perishing life of this world. Not knowing itself, the creature which reason distinguishes from the beasts confounds itself with them; because, not knowing its own glory, which is all within, it gives way to vain curiosity and occupies itself with external and sensible beauty. It sinks into the likeness of lower creatures by not knowing that it has received a greater thing than they. And this is an ignorance we must sedulously guard against. We must by no means esteem ourselves to be less than God has made us. But with still greater care we must avoid that other ignorance which makes us attribute more to ourselves than we possess; which we do when we mistakenly impute to ourselves the gifts we may be conscious of. Besides these two kinds of ignorance, there remains, to be still more detested and fled from, the presumption which would lead us knowingly to take pride in the good of which we may be conscious, without fear of robbing another of the glory due to Him for things which we well know do not come from ourselves. In the first case, we glory not at all. In the second, we glory, but not in God. In the third, we sin no longer ignorantly but deliberately by usurping that which belongs to God alone. This audacity, compared with the second fault, is greater in this: that it despises God, whereas the other did not know Him. Compared with the first, it assimilates us to devils; whereas the other made us like the beasts. Pride alone, the greatest of all evils, can make us guilty of using the gifts we have received as if they were ours by nature, and of robbing our Benefactor, for our own benefit, of the glory which is His by right. Therefore to.excellence and intelligence we must add virtue, their proper fruit. It is by virtue that we seek and attain to the generous Author of all things, Him to whom we ought in all things to render the glory which belongs to Him; otherwise we shall suffer for having known that which was right, and neglected to do it. He that does so has not used His intelligence for good, but "hath devised iniquity on his bed;" he has tried, like a wicked servant, to turn aside and appropriate the glory his good Master should have received, knowing well by the gift of intelligence that he himself had no claim to it. It is clear that excellence without intelligence is useless, and that intelligence without virtue leads to ruin. But, to the man that possesses virtue, neither intelligence nor excellence can be hurtful; he lifts up his voice and praises God eagerly, saying: "Not unto us, O Lord, not unto us, but to Thy name be the glory;" which is to say: "Lord, we lay no claim to intelligence, or excellence; we refer all to Thee, for from Thee we have all that we have."
But we are somewhat wandering, in our desire to prove that they who know not Christ, even they, are sufficiently taught by the natural law, and by the gifts they possess of body and soul, to love God for God's own sake. To repeat in few words what was said above: Where is the infidel who does not know that from Him alone who makes His sun to shine upon the just and unjust, and the rain to fall upon saints and sinners, from Him alone he has received all that is necessary for life; light, air, and food? What man, be he never so impious, refers the excellence peculiar to the human race to any other but to Him who says in Genesis, "Let us make man to Our Own image and likeness"? Who sees the author of intelligence in any but in Him who teacheth all men? From what other hand will any think to receive virtue, but from the God of virtue? God then has good title to be loved for Himself, even on the knowledge of the infidel who is ignorant of Christ; and he that loves not the Lord his God with all his heart and soul and strength is without excuse; for his innate justice and reason cry out from the depth of his soul that he is bound to love Him wholly from whom he holds all things. But it is very difficult, nay, it is impossible by natural strength or the might of free will to refer all to God, instead of keeping back some to our own praise: it is written: "All seek their own;" and elsewhere: "The imagination and thought of man's heart are prone to evil from his youth."
Quibus haec palam sunt, palam arbitror esse et cur Deus diligendus sit: hoc est, unde diligi meruerit. Quod si infideles haec latent, Deo tamen in promptu est ingratos confundere super innumeris beneficiis suis, humano nimirum et usui praestitis, et sensui manifestis. Nempe quis alius administrat cibum omni vescenti, cernenti lucem, spiranti flatum? Sed stultum est velle modo enumerare quae innumera esse non longe ante praefatus sum: satis est ad exemplum praecipua protulisse, panem, solem et aerem. Praecipua dico, non quia excellentiora, sed quia necessariora; sunt quippe corporis. Quaerat enim homo eminentiora bona sua in ea parte sui, qua praeeminet sibi, hoc est in anima quae sunt dignitas, scientia, virtus. Dignitatem in homine liberum arbitrium dico: in quo ei nimirum datum est caeteris non solum praeeminere, sed et praesidere animantibus. Scientiam vero, qua eamdem in se dignitatem agnoscat, non a se tamen. Porro virtutem, qua subinde ipsum a quo est, et inquirat non segniter, et teneat fortiter cum invenerit.
Itaque geminum unumquodque trium horum apparet. Dignitatem siquidem demonstrat humanam non solum naturae praerogativa, sed et potentia dominatus: quod terror hominis super cuncta animantia terrae imminere decernitur. Scientia quoque duplex erit, si hanc ipsam dignitatem, vel aliud quodque bonum in nobis, et nobis inesse, et a nobis non esse noverimus. Porro virtus et ipsa aeque bifaria cognoscetur, si auctorem consequenter inquirimus, inventoque inseparabiliter inhaeremus. Dignitas ergo sine scientia non prodest; illa vero etiam obest, si virtus defuerit: quod utrumque ratio declarat subjecta. Habere enim quod habere te nescias, quam gloriam habet? Porro nosse quod habeas, sed quia a te non habeas ignorare, habet gloriam, sed non apud Deum. Apud se autem glorianti dicitur ab Apostolo: Quid habes quod non accepisti? si autem accepisti, quid gloriaris quasi non acceperis? Non ait simpliciter: Quid gloriaris? sed addit, quasi non acceperis, ut asserat reprehensibilem, non qui in habitis, sed qui tanquam in non acceptis gloriatur. Merito vana gloria nuncupatur hujusmodi, veritatis nimirum solido carens fundamento. Veram enim gloriam ab hac ita discernit: Qui gloriatur, ait, in Domino glorietur, hoc est in veritate. Veritas quippe Dominus est.
Utrumque ergo scias necesse est, et quid sis, et quod a te ipso non sis: ne aut omnino videlicet non glorieris, aut inaniter glorieris. Denique si non cognoveris, inquit, te ipsam, egredere post greges sodalium tuorum. Revera ita fit. Homo factus in honore, cum honorem ipsum non intelligit, talis suae ignorantiae merito comparatur pecoribus, velut quibusdam praesentis suae corruptionis et mortalitatis consortibus. Fit igitur ut sese non agnoscendo egregia rationis munere creatura, irrationabilium gregibus aggregari incipiat, dum ignara propriae gloriae, quae ab intus est, conformanda foris rebus sensibilibus, sua ipsius curiositate abducitur: efficiturque una de caeteris, quod se prae caeteris nihil accepisse intelligat. Itaque valde cavenda haec ignorantia, qua de nobis minus nobis forte sentimus: sed non minus, imo et plus illa qua plus nobis tribuimus: quod fit, si bonum quodcunque in nobis esse et a nobis decepti putemus. At vero super utramque ignorantiam declinanda et exsecranda illa praesumptio est, qua sciens et prudens forte audeas de bonis non tuis tuam quaerere gloriam: et quod certus es a te tibi non esse, inde tamen alterius rapere non verearis honorem. Prior equidem ignorantia gloriam non habet: posterior vero habet quidem, sed non apud Deum. Caeterum hoc tertium malum quod jam scienter committitur, usurpat et contra Deum. In tantum denique ignorantia illa posteriori haec arrogantia gravior atque periculosior apparet, quo per illam quidem Deus nescitur, per istam et contemnitur: in tantum et priori deterior ac detestabilior, ut cum per illam pecoribus, per istam et daemonibus sociemur. Est quippe superbia et delictum maximum, uti datis tanquam innatis; et in acceptis beneficiis gloriam usurpare beneficii.
Quamobrem cum duabus istis, dignitate atque scientia, opus est et virtute, quae utriusque fructus est, per quam ille inquiritur ac tenetur, qui omnium auctor et dator merito glorificetur de omnibus. Alioquin sciens et non faciens digna, multis vapulabit. Quare? Utique quia noluit intelligere ut bene ageret: magis autem iniquitatem meditatus est in cubili suo, dum de bonis, quae a se non esse ex scientiae dono certissime comperit, boni Domini gloriam servus impius captare sibi, imo et raptare molitur. Liquet igitur et absque scientia dignitatem esse omnino inutilem, et scientiam absque virtute damnabilem. Verum homo virtutis, cui nec damnosa scientia, nec infructuosa dignitas manet, clamat Deo et ingenue confitetur: Non nobis, inquiens, Domine, non nobis, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. Hoc est: Nil nobis, o Domine, de scientia, nil nobis de dignitate tribuimus; sed tuo totum, a quo totum est, nomini deputamus.
Caeterum pene a proposito longe nimis digressi sumus, dum demonstrare satagimus, eos quoque qui Christum nesciunt, satis per legem naturalem ex perceptis bonis corporis animaeque moneri, quatenus Deum propter Deum et ipsi diligere debeant. Nam ut breviter, quae super hoc dicta sunt, iterentur: quis vel infidelis ignoret, suo corpori non ab alio in hac mortali vita supradicta illa necessaria ministrari, unde videlicet subsistat, unde videat, unde spiret, quam ab illo, qui dat escam omni carni; qui solem suum oriri facit super bonos et malos, et pluit super justos et injustos? Quis item vel impius putet alium ejus, quae in anima splendet, humanae dignitatis auctorem, praeter illum ipsum, qui in Genesi loquitur: Faciamus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram? Quis alium scientiae largitorem existimet, nisi aeque ipsum, qui docet hominem scientiam? Quis rursum munus sibi aliunde virtutis aut putet datum, aut speret dandum, quam de manu itidem Domini virtutum? Meretur ergo amari propter se ipsum Deus, et ab infideli: qui etsi nesciat Christum, scit tamen seipsum. Proinde inexcusabilis est omnis etiam infidelis, si non diligit Dominum Deum suum ex toto corde, tota anima, tota virtute sua. Clamat nempe intus ei innata, et non ignorata rationi justitia, quia ex toto se illum diligere debeat, cui se totum debere non ignorat. Verum difficile, imo impossibile est, suis scilicet quempiam, liberive arbitrii viribus semel accepta a Deo, ad Dei ex toto convertere voluntatem; et non magis ad propriam retorquere, eaque sibi tanquam propria retinere, sicut scriptum est, Omnes quae sua sunt quaerunt: et item, Proni sunt sensus et cogitationes hominis in malum.
Chapter 3. What motives Christians have, more than Infidels, to love God
Believers know well the need they have of Jesus crucified; but, whilst they confess and admire His love, they feel no confusion at having so little, nothing but themselves, to return for charity so condescending and so great. Their love is excited by the sense of being so much and so gratuitously loved; for he to whom little love is given, loveth little. Neither Jews nor Pagans feel the pang of love as the Church does, who says: "Stay me up with flowers, compass me about with fruits: because I languish with love." She sees Solomon wearing the diadem with which his mother crowned him. She sees the Only-begotten of the Father staggering under the weight of the cross; the God of all majesty discoloured by blows, covered with spittings; the Author of life and of glory hung upon nails, pierced with a lance and reviled, giving His dear soul for His friends. Gazing on this she feels the sword of love pierce through her heart, and cries out:
"Stay me up with flowers, compass me about with fruits, for I languish with love." The pomegranates which the Bride, led into the garden of her Beloved, delights to gather on the tree of life have the taste of the Bread of Heaven and the colour of the Blood of Christ. She sees the deathblow given to death, and its Author swelling the triumph of his Conqueror. She sees the Victor rising gloriously from hell to earth, from earth to heaven, attended by the host of the redeemed; that at "the name of Jesus every knee may bow of those that are in heaven, on earth, and under the earth." Under the ancient curse, the earth was doomed to bring forth thorns and thistles; but the Spouse calls upon it now, restored by divine benediction, to cover her with flowers; and, remembering those words, "My flesh hath flourished again, and with my will I will praise Him," she renews her strength by the fruit of the tree of the cross, and with the flowers of the Resurrection, whose divine perfume attracts the visits of the Beloved. Then he exclaims: "Behold thou art fair, my Beloved, and comely." She shows her desire for His coming, and upon what her hopes are founded; not on her own perfections, but on the sweetness of the flowers gathered in a field that the Lord hath blessed; for they are dear to the Christ who chose to be born and brought up at Nazareth. The heavenly Bridegroom, drawn by the odour, delights to come into the chamber of the heart, when He finds it decked with fruits and perfumed with flowers. He comes with eagerness, and delights to dwell in souls that He sees are devoted to meditation, carefully set on gathering in the fruit of His Passion, and the glorious flowers of His Resurrection. That precious crop which was ripening through the ages of crime and death, and in these last days is fit to be garnered, is the harvest of the fruits of His Passion; but it is in the splendour of the Resurrection that the flowers bloom of the new Springtide which grace has brought upon the earth. In the end of time, at the general resurrection, the abundance of fruit shall be without measure, "for winter is now past, the rain is over and gone, the flowers have appeared in our land." By these words the Bride would say: The summer is come back, with Him who broke up the ice of the old world to restore universal spring, saying: "Behold I make all things new." His body, sown in death, has blossomed in the resurrection, and after His likeness, our plains and valleys, which were dry and bare, or frozen, are new born to life and heat.
The freshness of these flowers, the perfection of the fruits, and the beauty of this garden exhaling such exquisite perfume, are pleasing also to the Father of Him who has made all things new; and, blessing Him, He says: "Behold the smell of my Son is as the smell of a field full of flowers, which the Lord hath blessed;" full of flowers, indeed, for it is of His fulness that we have all received. But the Bride, when she will, may come familiarly and gather flowers and fruit, to dress with them the chamber of her conscience, that the Bridegroom at His coming may find the little bed of her heart giving out the sweetest odours. And in like manner we, if we desire that Christ should come to us and abide in us, must fill our hearts full of the thoughts of His death and resurrection and of faithful recollection of the mercy and the power of which by them He has given us proof. This David meant by the words: "These two things have I heard: that power belongeth to God, and mercy to Thee, O Lord." And Christ has superabundantly proved it; for, having died to expiate our sins, He rose from the dead for our justification, and sent the Holy Spirit for our consolation. Hereafter He will return to consummate our salvation. In His death we have the proof of His mercy, in His resurrection of His power, and of the two united in the rest.
When the Bride entreats to be sustained with aromatic flowers and strengthened with sweet-smelling fruits, it is that she fears lest her love should chill or languish; but she seeks such stimulants only till received into the chamber of her Beloved. She will then feel Him covering her with the kisses she has longed for, and will exclaim: "His left hand is under my head, and His right doth embrace me." She will then feel how far the embrace of the right hand surpasses all sweetness, and that that of the left cannot be compared to it, with which He had caressed her in the first days of His coming. She will understand that "the flesh profiteth nothing; it is the Spirit that quickeneth." She will enter into the sense of His words: "My spirit is above honey, and my inheritance above honey and the honeycomb." If it be also written, "My memory is unto everlasting generations," it is to show that the elect who are not yet satisfied by the presence of the Bridegroom have at least His image for their comfort now whilst time runs on. If it be written, "They shall publish the memory of thine inexhaustible sweetness," it clearly refers to those of whom the Psalmist had before spoken: "Generation and generation shall praise Thy works." On earth there is but the memory of the Bridegroom; in heaven, His perpetual Presence. This is the glory of those who have already arrived in port; and that the consolation of those still buffeting with the waves.
Contra quod plane fideles norunt, quam omnino necessarium habeant Jesum, et hunc crucifixum: dum admirantes et amplexantes supereminentem scientiae charitatem in ipso, id vel tantillum quod sunt, in tantae dilectionis et dignationis vicem non rependere confunduntur. Facile proinde plus diligunt, qui se amplius dilectos intelligunt: cui autem minus donatum est, minus diligit. Judaeus sane, sive paganus, nequaquam talibus aculeis incitatur amoris, quales Ecclesia experitur, quae ait, Vulnerata charitate ego sum: et rursum, Fulcite me floribus, stipate me malis, quia amore langueo (Cantic. II, 4, 5). Cernit regem Salomonem in diademate, quo coronavit eum mater sua; cernit Unicum Patris, crucem sibi bajulantem; cernit caesum et consputum Dominum majestatis; cernit auctorem vitae et gloriae confixum clavis, percussum lancea, opprobriis saturatum, tandem illam dilectam animam suam ponere pro amicis suis. Cernit haec, et suam magis ipsius animam gladius amoris transverberat, et dicit: Fulcite me floribus, stipate me malis, quia amore langueo. Haec sunt quippe mala punica, quae in hortum introducta dilecti sponsa carpit ex ligno vitae, a coelesti pane proprium mutuata saporem, colorem a sanguine Christi. Videt deinde mortem mortuam, et mortis auctorem triumphatum. Videt de inferis ad terras, de terris ad superos captivam duci captivitatem, ut in nomine Jesu omne genu flectatur, coelestium, terrestrium, et infernorum. Advertit terram, quae spinas et tribulos sub antiquo maledicto produxerat, ad novae benedictionis gratiam innovatam refloruisse. Et in his omnibus, illius recordata versiculi, Et refloruit caro mea, et ex voluntate mea confitebor ei; passionis malis, quae de arbore tulerat crucis, cupit vigere et de floribus resurrectionis, quorum praesertim fragrantia sponsum ad se crebrius revisendam invitet..
Denique ait: Ecce tu pulcher es, dilecte mi et decorus; lectulus noster floridus. Quae lectulum monstrat, satis quid desideret aperit: et cum floridum nuntiat, satis indicat, unde quod desiderat obtinere praesumat. Non enim de suis meritis, sed de floribus agri, cui benedixit Deus. Delectatur floribus, Christus, qui in Nazareth et concipi voluit, et nutriri. Gaudet sponsus coelestis talibus odoramentis, et cordis thalamum frequenter libenterque ingreditur, quod istiusmodi refertum fructibus, floribusque respersum invenerit. Ubi suae videlicet aut passionis gratiam, aut resurrectionis gloriam sedula inspicit cogitatione versari, ibi profecto adest sedulus, adest libens. Monumenta siquidem Passionis, fructus agnosce quasi anni praeteriti, omnium utique retro temporum sub peccati mortisque imperio decursorum, tandem in plenitudine temporis, apparentes. Porro autem Resurrectionis insignia, novos adverte flores sequentis temporis, in novam sub gratia revirescentis aestatem, quorum fructum generalis futura resurrectio in fine parturiet sine fine mansurum. Jam, inquit, hiems transiit, imber abiit et recessit, flores apparuerunt in terra nostra: aestivum tempus advenisse cum illo significans, qui de mortis gelu in vernalem quamdam novae vitae temperiem resolutus, Ecce, ait, nova facio omnia: cujus caro seminata est in morte, refloruit in resurrectione; ad cujus mox odorem in campo convaliis nostrae revirescunt arida, recalescunt frigida, mortua reviviscunt.
Horum ergo novitate florum ac fructuum, et pulchritudine agri suavissimum spirantis odorem, ipse quoque Pater in Filio innovante omnia delectatur, ita ut dicat: Ecce odor filii mei, sicut odor agri pleni, cui benedixit Dominus. Bene pleni, de cujus plenitudine omnes accepimus. Sponsa tamen familiarius ex eo sibi, cum vult, flores legit, et carpit poma, quibus propriae aspergat intima conscientiae, et intranti sponso cordis lectulus suave redoleat. Oportet enim nos, si crebrum volumus habere hospitem Christum, corda nostra semper habere munita fidelibus testimoniis, tam de misericordia scilicet morientis, quam de potentia resurgentis; quomodo David aiebat: Duo haec audivi, quia potestas Dei est, et tibi, Domine, misericordia. Siquidem utriusque rei testimonia credibilia facta sunt nimis; Christo utique moriente propter delicta nostra, et resurgente propter justificationem nostram, et ascendente ad protectionem nostram, et mittente Spiritum ad consolationem nostram, et quandoque redituro ad consummationem nostram. Nempe in morte misericordiam, potentiam in resurrectione, utramque in singulis exhibuit reliquorum.
Haec mala, hi flores, quibus sponsa se interim stipari postulat et fulciri, credo sentiens facile vim in se amoris posse tepescere et languescere quodammodo, si non talibus jugiter foveatur incentivis, donec introducta quandoque in cubiculum, diu cupitis excipiatur amplexibus, et dicat: Laeva ejus sub capite meo, et dextera illius amplexata est me. Sentiet quippe tunc et probabit universa dilectionis testimonia, quae in priori adventu, tanquam de sinistra dilecti, acceperat, prae multitudine dulcedinis amplexantis dexterae contemnenda, et omnino jam quasi subtus habenda. Sentiet quod audierat: Caro non prodest quidquam; spiritus est qui vivificat. Probabit quod legerat: Spiritus meus super mel dulcis, et haereditas mea super mel et favum. Quod vero sequitur, Memoria mea in generatione saeculorum; hoc dicit, quia quandiu stare praesens cernitur saeculum, in quo generatio advenit, et generatio praeterit, non deerit electis consolatio de memoria, quibus nondum de praesentia plena refectio indulgetur. Unde scriptum est, Memoriam abundantiae suavitatis tuae eructabunt: haud dubium, quin hi, quos paulo superius dixerat, Generatio et generatio laudabit opera tua. Memoria ergo in generatione saeculorum, praesentia in regno coelorum. Ex ista glorificatur jam assumpta electio: de illa interim peregrinans generatio consolatur.
Chapter 4. For whom there is comfort in the thought of God; and who are fittest to feel love for Him
It is well to consider who they are that feel comforted by the thought of God. Not those, degraded, who continually vex God, and to whom it is said: "Woe, ye rich, unto you, for you have received your consolation;" but such as can say with truth: " My soul hath refused to be comforted." Well may those who have not yet the joy of the Beloved's presence fix their gaze upon the future; and they who disdain to accept of anything from the stream of passing pleasure, enjoy abundantly, in hope, those joys which shall last for ever. Such are they who seek the face of the Lord, the God of Jacob, and not themselves. The thought of God is sweet to those who sigh after Him, and with every breath recall His presence; but, far from appeasing their hunger for Him, it increases it. This He foretold in the words: "They that eat Me shall yet hunger," and, as if he spake that hungers: " I shall be satisfied when Thy glory shall appear." Yet happy are they even now who hunger and thirst after justice, for only they shall be filled. Woe to you, O perverse, wicked race; woe to you, senseless and besotted people, who do not love the thought of Him, but dread His appearing. Good right ye have to fear, because ye will not now escape from the net of the fowler; for they that will "become rich fall into the snares of the devil." In that day ye shall not fail to fall under the awful, aye and hopeless sentence: " Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire." But how sweet, how tender is that promise which we hear the Church make every day in remembrance of the Passion: " He that eateth My flesh and drinketh My blood hath everlasting life;" which implies, he that honours My death, and after My example mortifies his flesh upon earth, shall have eternal life; or, if you suffer with Me, you shall also reign with Me. Nevertheless, even to this day, many hearing those words turn and go away sorrowful, saying by their deeds, if not with their lips: " This is a hard saying, who can bear it?" They who, in place of keeping their hearts pure and being faithful to God, love better to set their affections upon uncertain treasures, cannot abide the mention of the Cross; the mere thought of the Passion seems intolerable to them. How will such endure the sentence of the Judge: " Go, ye cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels "? These words will crush, like a vast rock, those upon whom they fall. But the Saints shall be blest. Like the Apostle, they have no ambition but to ''please God while absent from Him, and still to please Him when they shall be present." They also shall hear their sentence: " Come, ye blessed of my Father, possess the kingdom prepared for you." In that day those who have not kept their hearts aright will, too late, feel how sweet and light is the yoke and burden of Christ, which they proudly refused to bear, through the hardness of their heart, as if it were a vile and crushing weight. It is impossible, poor slaves, to toil for this world's riches, and also to glory in the Cross of our Saviour Jesus Christ; at the same time to desire and labour for earthly things and to taste the sweetness of our Lord. Very fearful you will certainly find Him one day, the thought of whom has never been your joy.
But the believing soul sighs with all her heart after God, and dwells upon the thought of Him; she glories in the disgrace of the Cross, so long as she cannot see her Saviour face to face. She is as the dove of Christ, and she enjoys sleep and rest in the midst of the goods that He has bestowed on her. Her wings are white as silver through the purity and innocence which belong, O Lord Jesus, to the desire of Thine ineffable sweetness; and moreover her hope is that, in the glory reflected from Thy face, her "feathers will shine like gold," and she will overflow with joy and be inundated with light from Thy countenance in the rapture of the Saints. Good reason has she, therefore, to say now with delight: "His left hand is under my head, and His right shall embrace me." His left hand is the memory of that love whose greatness none can ever equal, by which He laid down His life for those whom He loved. His right hand is the beatific vision He has promised to His own, and the content with which He will fill and crown them when they shall enjoy His divine presence. It is written in the Psalms: "At Thy right hand there are delights even to the end." His right hand is therefore justly made the figure of that divine and deifying, that inconceivable felicity which belongs to the vision of God. In like manner the left hand is as the seat of that amazing charity of which I have spoken, of which we can never think too much, for it is upon this hand that the Bride lays her head and rests until this iniquity shall pass away. We may understand her head to mean the intention of her soul, which she leans upon the arm of her Spouse, lest through weakness she might fall away to mere earthly attractions; for the earthly and corruptible burden of the body weighs heavily upon the soul, and drags it down from thoughts to which she cannot fail to rise'if she rests upon the contemplation of mercy, to which she had so little claim, love so lavish and so amply proved, gentleness and sweetness so persevering and so exquisite, such unimagined honour. Is it possible that these should not exalt the mind that meditates upon them, detaching it from all unworthy affection, sinking deeper and deeper into it, and making it scorn all which cannot be relished without renouncing these higher enjoyments? Their sweetness, like rare scents, attracts her; she quickens her step blithely, and her heart is all aflame with love. The sense of being loved so tenderly makes her fancy herself cold, though love be her very life. What return is it for a love that comes down from so high, and is so marvellous, if a poor grain of dust be all consumed with gratitude and love? Was not the Majesty of heaven the first to love? Has it not revealed itself as wholly devoted to the work of saving her? For "God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son." This is clearly written of God the Father. And again: "He hath delivered His soul to death;" this is said of the Son. And of the Holy Spirit we read: "The Paraclete whom My Father will give you in My name, He will teach you all things, and will bring all things to your remembrance whatsoever I have said unto you." Hereby we see that God loves us, and loves us with His whole being; for the Blessed Trinity altogether loves us, if we dare so to speak of the infinite incomprehensible Being who is one and indivisible.
Sed interest, quaenam generatio ex Dei capiat recordatione solamen. Non enim generatio prava et exasperans, cui dicitur, Vae vobis, divites, qui habetis consolationem vestram; sed quae dicere veraciter potest, Renuit consolari anima mea. Huic plane et credimus, si secuta adjecerit: Memor fui Dei, et delectatus sum. Justum quippe est, ut quos praesentia non delectant, praesto eis sit memoria futurorum: et qui de rerum fluentium qualibet affluentia despiciunt consolari, recordatio illos delectet aeternitatis. Et haec est generatio quaerentium Dominum, quaerentium non quae sua sunt, sed faciem Dei Jacob. Dei ergo quarentibus et suspirantibus praesentiam, praesto interim et dulcis memoria est, non tamen qua satientur, sed qua magis esurient unde satientur. Hoc ipsum de se cibus ipse testatur, ita dicens, Qui edit me, adhuc esuriet: et qui eo cibatus est, Satiabor, inquit, cum apparuerit gloria tua. Beati tamen jam nunc qui esuriunt et sitiunt justitiam, quoniam quandoque ipsi, et non alii, saturabuntur. Vae tibi, generatio prava atque perversa! vae tibi, popule stulte et insipiens, qui et memoriam fastidis, et praesentiam expavescis! Merito quidem: nec modo enim liberari vis de laqueo venantium, siquidem qui volunt divites fieri in hoc saeculo, incidunt in laqueum diaboli; nec tunc a verbo aspero poteris liberari. O verbum asperum, o sermo durus! Ite, maledicti, in ignem aeternum. Durior plane atque asperior illo, qui quotidie nobis de memoria passionis in Ecclesia replicatur: Qui manducat meam carnem, et bibit sanguinem meum, habet vitam aeternam. Hoc est, qui recolit mortem meam, et exemplo meo mortificat membra sua quae sunt super terram, habet vitam aeternam: hoc est, si compatimini, et conregnabitis. Et tamen plerique ab hac voce resilientes et abeuntes hodieque retrorsum, respondent non verbo, sed facto: Durus est hic sermo; quis potest eum audire? Itaque generatio quae non direxit cor suum et non est creditus cum Deo spiritus ejus, sed magis sperans in incerto divitiarum, verbum modo crucis audire gravatur, ac memoriam passionis sibi judicat onerosam. Verum qualiter verbi illius pondus in praesentia sustinebit: Ite, maledicti, in ignem aeternum, qui paratus est diabolo, et angelis ejus? Super quem profecto ceciderit lapis iste, conteret eum. At vero generatio rectorum benedicetur: qui utique cum Apostolo, sive absentes, sive praesentes, contendunt placere Deo. Denique audient, Venite, benedicti, Patris mei, etc. Tunc illa quae non direxit cor suum, sero quidem experietur, quam in illius comparatione doloris jugum Christi suave, et onus leve fuerit, cui tanquam gravi et aspero duram cervicem superbe subduxit. Non potestis, o miseri servi mammonae, simul gloriari in cruce Domini nostri Jesu Christi, et sperare in pecuniae thesauris; post aurum abire, et probare quam suavis est Dominus. Proinde quem suavem in memoria non sentitis, asperum procul dubio in praesentia sentietis.
Caeterum fidelis anima et suspirat praesentiam inhianter, et in memoria requiescit suaviter; et donec idonea sit revelata facie speculari gloriam Domini, crucis ignominia gloriatur. Sic profecto, sic sponsa et columba Christi pausat sibi interim, et dormit inter medios cleros, sortita jam in praesentiarum de memoria abundantiae suavitatis tuae, Domine Jesu, pennas deargentatas, innocentiae videlicet pudicitiaeque candorem; et sperans insuper adimpleri laetitia cum vultu tuo, ubi etiam fiant posteriora dorsi ejus in pallore auri: quando in splendoribus sanctorum introducta cum gaudio, sapientiae plenius fuerit illustrata fulgoribus. Merito proinde jam nunc gloriatur, et dicit, Laeva ejus sub capite meo, et dextera illius amplexabitur me: in laeva reputans recordationem illius charitatis, qua nulla major est, quod animam suam posuit pro amicis suis; in dextera vero beatam visionem, quam promisit amicis suis, et gaudium de praesentia majestatis. Merito illa Dei et deifica visio, illa divinae praesentiae inaestimabilis delectatio in dextera deputatur, de qua et delectabiliter canitur: Delectationes dextera tua usque in finem. Merito in laeva admirabilis illa memorata et semper memoranda dilectio collocatur, quod donec transeat inquitas, super eam sponsa recumbat et requiescat.
Merito ergo laeva sponsi sub capite sponsae, super quam videlicet caput suum reclinata sustentet, hoc est mentis suae intentionem, ne inclinetur et incurvetur in carnalia et saecularia desideria: quia corpus quod corrumpitur, aggravat animam: et deprimit terrena inhabitatio sensum multa cogitantem. Quid namque aliud faciat considerata tanta et tam indebita miseratio, tam gratuita et sic probata dilectio, tam inopinata dignatio, tam invicta mansuetudo, tam stupenda dulcedo? quid, inquam, haec omnia faciant diligenter considerata, nisi ut considerantis animum, ab omni penitus pravo vindicatum amore, ad se mirabiliter rapiant, vehementer afficiant, faciantque prae se contemnere, quidquid nisi in comtemptu horum appeti non potest? Nimirum proinde in odore unguentorum horum sponsa currit alacriter, amat ardenter; et parum sibi amare sic amata videtur, etiam cum se totam in amore perstrinxerit. Nec immerito. Quid magnum enim tanto et tanti repensatur amori, si pulvis exiguus totum se ad redamandum collegerit, quem illa nimirum Majestas in amore praeveniens, tota in opus salutis ejus intenta conspicitur? Denique sic Deus dilexit mundum ut Unigenitum daret; haud dubium quin de Patre dicat. Item, Tradidit in mortem animam suam; nec dubium quod de Filio loquatur. Ait et de Spiritu sancto: Spiritus Paracletus, quem mittit Pater in nomine meo, ille vos docebit omnia, et suggeret vobis omnia quaecunque dixero vobis. Amat ergo Deus, et ex se toto amat, quia tota Trinitas amat: si tamen totum dici potest de infinito et incomprehensibili, aut certe de simplici.
Chapter 5. Of the obligation to love God, especially for Christians
All that has been said proves most clearly the duty of loving God, and His claim upon our love. How is it with the infidel? As he knows not God the Son, so is he also ignorant of the Father and the Holy Spirit; and as he gives no glory to the Son, neither does he glorify the Father who sent Him, nor the Holy Spirit, the gift of both. He knows less of God than we do, therefore it is no wonder he should love Him less. One thing, however, he does know; that to Him who created him, he owes himself entirely. But how will it be with me? for I can plead no ignorance. I know that God made me without any desert of mine, that He satisfies all my wants, comforts me with pity, and governs me with anxious care; and not only so, but I know, besides, that He is my Redeemer, the Author of my eternal salvation, my treasure and my glory. As it is written: "With Him is plentiful redemption;" "By His own blood He entered once into the Holy of Holies, having obtained eternal redemption." He keeps us safe, as it is written: "The Lord knoweth the days of the undefiled, and their inheritance shall be for ever." He enriches us, as He has said: "Good measure, pressed down and shaken together and running over, shall they give into your bosom;" and elsewhere: "The eye hath not seen, O God, what things Thou hast prepared for them that wait for Thee." He fulfils us with glory, as saith the Apostle: "We wait for the Saviour, our Lord Jesus Christ, who will transform our body, now vile and abject, and make it like unto His own, which is full of glory." And again: "The sufferings of this present time are not to be compared to the glory which shall be revealed in us;" and this present time of this world's affliction (so short, so fugitive) produces to us (if only despising the visible we fix our eyes upon things invisible) "an eternal and incomparable weight of glory."
For all of this, what shall I render to the Lord? Both reason and the law of Nature bind me fast to give myself undividedly to Him from whom I hold all that I have, and to devote my entire being to the love of Him. And faith reveals to me that I am constrained to love Him more than myself, the more I understand how I owe to His munificence not only all I am, but moreover the gift of Himself.
But let us consider that, ere yet the day of Christian faith had come, before God had put on our flesh and died upon a cross, gone down into hell and ascended to the Father, that is, before the fulness of His love for us had shone forth, long before, man had been commanded to love the Lord his God with all his heart, with all his soul, with all his strength, that is, with his whole being, with all the love of which he is capable, as a creature endowed with intelligence and will. Could it be unjust of God to claim for Himself His own work and His gifts? Why should not the work love God who made it, having also received the power to love; and why not love Him with all its powers, if it be only by God that it possesses any? Consider, too, that man has not only been called into being out of nothing, without any anterior claim, but also that he has been so called to be raised to high dignity. We shall thus see more clearly our obligation to love Him wholly, and His right to our love. Moreover, when man had sunk to the level of the beasts that perish, did God not intervene to reinstate and save him? Is not this the marvel of His goodness and His mercy? For by sin we had fallen from the dignity of our creation, to become imbruted like the ox that eateth grass and hath not the light of reason. If I owe my whole self to my Creator, what do I not owe to my Redeemer, and to such a Redeemer! It was a far less work to create, than to redeem; for God had but to speak the word and all things were made; but to repair the fall of that, which one word had created, what wonders had He not to perform, what cruelties, nay, what humiliations, had He not to suffer!
What, therefore, shall I render to the Lord for all that He hath done for me! By creating, He gave me to myself; but He restored me to myself when He gave Himself to me: first given and then restored, I doubly owe myself to Him. But, what do I owe to God for the gift of Himself? If I gave Him my whole being a thousand times over, what would that be in comparison of God?
Intuens ergo haec, credo, satis agnoscit quare Deus diligendus sit, hoc est, unde diligi mereatur. Caeterum infidelis non habens Filium, nec Patrem proinde habet, nec Spiritum sanctum. Qui enim non honorificat Filium, non honorificat Patrem qui missit illum; sed nec Spiritum sanctum quem misit ille. Is itaque mirum non est, si quem minus agnoscit, minus et diligit. Attamen et ipse totum ei sese debere non ignorat, quem sui totius non ignorat auctorem. Quid ergo ego, qui Deum meum teneo vitae meae non solum gratuitum largitorem, largissimum administratorem, pium consolatorem, sollicitum gubernatorem; sed insuper etiam copiosissimum redemptorem, aeternum conservatorem, ditatorem, glorificatorem? sicut scriptum est, Copiosa apud eum redemptio: et item, Introivit semel in Sancta, aeterna redemptione inventa: et de conservatione, Non relinquet sanctos suos; in aeternum conservabuntur: et de locupletatione, Mensuram bonam, et confertam, et coagitatam, et superefluentem dabunt in sinum vestrum: et rursum, Nec oculus vidit, nec auris audivit, nec in cor hominis ascendit, quae praeparavit Deus diligentibus se: et de glorificatione. Salvatorem exspectamus Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum, qui reformabit corpus humilitatis nostrae, configuratum corpori claritatis suae: et illud, Non sunt condignae passione hujus temporis ad futuram gloriam, quae revelabitur in nobis: et iterum, Id quod in praesenti est momentaneum et leve tribulationis nostrae, supra modum in sublimitate aeternum gloriae pondus operatur in nobis, non contemplantibus quae videntur, sed quae non videntur.
Quid retribuam Domino pro omnibus his? Illum ratio urget et justitia naturalis totum se tradere illi, a quo se totum habet, et ex se toto debere diligere. Mihi profecto fides tanto plus indicit amandum, quanto et eum me ipso pluris aestimandum intelligo: quippe qui illum non solum mei, sed sui quoque ipsius teneo largitorem. Denique nondum tempus fidei advenerat, nondum innotuerat in carne Deus, obierat in cruce, prodierat de sepulcro, redierat ad Patrem: nondum, inquam, commendaverat in nobis suam multam dilectionem, illam de qua jam multa locuti sumus, cum jam mandatum est homini diligere Dominum Deum suum ex toto corde, tota anima, tota virtute sua, id est ex omni quod est, quod scit, quod potest. Nec tamen injustus Deus, suum sibi vindicans opus et dona. Utquid enim non amaret opus artificem, cum haberet unde id posset? Et cur non quantum omnino posset, cum nihil omnino nisi ejus munere posset? Ad haec, quod de nihilo, quod gratis, quod in hac dignitate conditum est; et debitum dilectionis manifestius facit, et exactum justiorem ostendit. Caeterum quantum putamus adjectum beneficii, cum homines et jumenta salvavit, quemadmodum multiplicavit misericordiam suam Deus? Nos dico, qui mutavimus gloriam nostram in similitudinem vituli comedentis fenum, peccando comparati jumentis insipientibus. Quod si totum me debeo pro me facto, quid addam jam et pro refecto et refecto hoc modo? Nec enim tam facile refectus, quam factus: siquidem non solum de me, sed de omni quoque quod factum est, scriptum est, Dixit, et facta sunt. At vero qui me tantum et semel dicendo fecit, in reficiendo profecto et dixit multa, et gessit mira, et pertulit dura; nec tantum dura, sed et indigna. Quid ergo retribuam Domino pro omnibus quae retribuit mihi? In primo opere me mihi dedit; in secundo, se: et ubi se dedit, me mihi reddidit. Datus ergo, et redditus, me pro me debeo, et bis debeo. Quid Deo retribuam pro se? Nam etiam si me millies rependere possem, quid sum ego ad Deum?
Chapter 6. A summary of what has hitherto been said
Confess that God deserves to be greatly loved, or rather that He should be loved beyond measure. He was the first to love; He so great, we so little; He loves us to excess, just as we are, and without any claim whatsoever on our side. This is why the rightful measure of our love to God is to exceed all measure; for God, the object of our love, being infinite, how can we weigh or measure what we owe to Him in love? Moreover, our love is not a free offering; it is the payment of a debt. And, besides, as it is the I Am, eternal and immense, the Divine Love, God, whose greatness has no limits nor His wisdom bounds, who is the "Peace which passeth all understanding;" as, I say, it is such a God who loves us, is it possible for us to say we will love Him so much and no more? "I will love Thee, O Lord, my strength and my defence, my refuge and my salvation," who art to me all that my soul needs, and all that my heart desires. My God and my Help, I will love Thee with all my strength; not according to what Thou deservest, but according to my little capacity. I will love Thee more when Thou hast given me more power of loving; but never, never as Thou shouldst be loved. Thine eyes see my foolishness, my inability; but I know that Thou writest in Thy book those who do what they can, even when they cannot do what they ought. Have I not said enough to prove how God should be loved, and by what gifts He has merited our love? I merely name His gifts, because the excellence of them who can express, who can understand, who can feel?
Hic primum vide, quo modo, imo quam sine modo a nobis Deus amari meruerit; qui (ut paucis quod dictum est repetam) prior ipse dilexit nos, tantus, et tantum, et gratis tantillos, et tales. En quod in principio dixisse me memini, modum esse diligendi Deum, sine modo diligere. Denique cum dilectio quae tendit in Deum, tendat in immensum, tendat in infinitum (nam et infinitus Deus est et immensus); quisnam,, quaeso, debeat finis esse nostri, vel modus amoris? Quid quod amor ipse noster non jam gratuitus impenditur, sed rependitur debitus? Amat ergo immensitas, amat aeternitas, amat supereminens scientiae charitas; amat Deus, cujus magnitudinis non est finis, cujus sapientiae non est numerus, cujus pax exsuperat omnem intellectum: et vicem rependimus cum mensura? Diligam te, Domine, fortitudo mea, firmamentum meum, et refugium meum, et liberator meus: et meum denique quidquid optabile atque amabile dici potest. Deus meus, adjutor meus, diligam te pro dono tuo, et modo meo, minus quidem justo, sed plane non minus posse meo: qui etsi quantum dobeo non possum, non possum tamen ultra quam possum. Potero vero plus, cum plus donare dignaberis: nunquam tamen prout dignus haberis. Imperfectum meum viderunt oculi tui: sed tamen in libro tuo omnes scribentur, qui quod possunt faciunt, etsi quod debent non possunt. Satis, quantum reor, apparet, et quonam modo Deus diligendus sit, et quo merito suo. Quo, inquam, merito suo: nam quanto, cui sane appareat? quis dicat? quis sapiat?
Chapter 7. The rewards and advantage of the love of God. The heart of man is not to be satisfied by earthly things
Let us see what benefit accrues to us from loving God. Though we may see this ever so imperfectly, that is better than to be blind to it. We have spoken (though in a manner unworthy of God, yet to the best of our power) of God's right to our love; we will now speak of the recompense He has attached to our loving Him; for whilst we must love God, independently of all reward, we shall none the less be rewarded for having loved Him. True charity cannot be left without salary, although she is not mercenary and seeketh not her own. Love is a going forth of the soul, not a contract; it is not the result of a convention, and is not to be acquired by agreement; it is spontaneous in its impulses, and likens us to itself; also true love is its own satisfaction. Its recompense lies in the object of its love; for whatever be that which we seem to love, if our real object be something else, it is really that something which we love, and not that by which our heart strives to attain it. St. Paul preached not the gospel for his daily bread, but the bread which kept him alive enabled him to preach the gospel. What he loved was the gospel, not the bread. True love seeks no reward, but it merits one; it is very certain that no one proposes to pay for love, although it not only deserves its recompense, but shall surely have it. In a lower class of things, who are they that are excited by the offer of rewards? Those that are slack and unloving. Does it ever occur to any one to persuade with pay those that are burning to be allowed to serve? One does not give money to a starving man to engage him to eat, no more than to a tender mother to induce her to give suck to her child, to get a vinedresser to protect his vines, or a householder to rebuild his fallen house. Far less does he who loves God need to be urged by the promise of a recompense which is other than God Himself; otherwise it would be the reward he loved, not God.
It is natural to a reasonable being to desire that which appears to him, according to his particular mode of thinking, better than what he possesses; and never to be satisfied if a good thing wants the particular quality which he prefers. If he loves beauty he will desire what seems to him most beautiful. If he plumes himself on the possession of a very precious jewel, he will desire to possess a still more splendid one; and whatever riches he may have, his nature is to want more. Is it not a thing we see every day, the owner of immense property and wealth buying up more land, and never content but in extending his estates? Those who dwell in vast palaces, are they not for ever building new ones, always altering, making round the cornered, and the cornered round? Are not men in high position constantly aspiring to higher, constantly striving to rise, out of an ambition more and more difficult to appease? There is no limit to such restlessness, because, in all such things, it is impossible to reach a point absolutely good and high. But it is not astonishing that so long as a man can see beyond him something greater and more perfect, he should be dissatisfied with his own possession of what is less and worse. What does seem foolish beyond all expression is, always to be longing for things which cannot even lull to sleep our desires, far less satisfy them. What follows? this—that the heart, tempted by many deceitful charms, wearies itself to no purpose, is always craving, and counts for nothing what it has enjoyed, compared to what it fain would have; and is tormented, by desire of what it has not, out of all delight with what it possesses. All one cannot have; for the little it is possible to get, the price of labour must be paid; and it must be enjoyed with trembling; nay, with the miserable certainty that one day it must be lost, though the date of that day be not known.
I have described the conduct of a perverted will blindly seeking the sovereign good. It makes haste in vain, the plaything of its own vanity, deceived by iniquity. Why wear out the day in fruit less struggle this way and that, and be caught by death unsatisfied? In such toils do the profane entangle themselves who seek about, like fools, to obtain their souls' desires. They consume,their life in useless efforts and arrive at no perfect happiness; for they are in love with created things, not with the Creator, and they try them, one and then another, before they dream of trying the Lord that made them all. Yet, if they could have their hearts' desire and achieve the possession of the world, less Him who is its author, they would feel at last, by the same law which has ruled their life, that Him they must have, or never rest. They have gone from one ambition to another, coveting always some better thing; and now, masters of all in heaven and earth, they would soon find all insufficient, and discover that they were forced to seek Him who is wanting still, they must seek God Himself. Once discover that, once attain unto Him, there is peace; it is impossible to go beyond. The soul must cry out: "It is good for me to adhere to my God;" or, "What besides Thee have I in heaven, and besides Thee what do I desire upon earth?" and again: "Thou art the God of my heart, and the God that is my portion for ever." Even this way would a soul necessarily end in God if it could try in sequence all lesser things than He. But life is too short, and strength would fail for any such attempt; also the number of competitors is too great. It would be impossible to try all creatures and find them wanting. It were more easy and more advantageous to do the work in imagination than in reality. Our minds have been endowed with more activity and perspicacity than our hearts precisely for this end—that they may go first and prevent the heart from attaching itself to what the mind has not first found desirable. "Prove all things: hold fast that which is good." The first should prepare the ground for the second, so that the heart should follow the judgment of the mind. Otherwise there is no hope of "ascending into the mountain of the Lord, and dwelling in His holy place;" and it is in vain that we possess a reasoning mind, if we do as the beasts do, and only obey our senses, the reason not interfering. They who are not guided by reason, run indeed in the race, but they run without chance of winning. How should they win, seeing they care not first for the prize, but put that last of all? How should they do other than entangle themselves in a maze without beginning or end? Not so with the just. Warned by the blame addressed to those who thus err (for the way is wide and well trodden that leads to death), they choose the royal road which turns to neither right nor left, for "the path of the just is straight." They take the shortest road, guided by a word as simple as simplifying, commanding them not to heed what their eyes may see, but to sell all and give to the poor; for blessed indeed are such poor, and the kingdom of heaven is theirs. The Lord knoweth the way of the just, and commendeth it. He knoweth also the way of the sinner, in which he cannot but perish. The just are happy in their poverty, and the rich unsatisfied in their abundance; for the wise man saith: "He that loveth riches shall reap no fruit from them." But they who "hunger and thirst after justice shall be filled." Justice is their needful food. As to the things of this world, the soul is no more nourished by them than the body is by air. If we were to see a starving man inhaling with wide open mouth, drinking long draughts of wind to quench his thirst, we should say, Poor fool! So is it with those who seek to satisfy the soul with worldly goods, which do but puff it out as with wind, and no more feed it than things spiritual feed our bodies. "Bless the Lord, O my soul, who satisfieth thy desire with good things." He filleth thee out of His fulness; at once giving thee thy desire, and exciting thee to wish for more. He prevents, He sustains, He fills thee; He kindles desire in thy heart, and He Himself is the Object of all desire.
I have said that the motive of our love to God is God Himself, and it is well said, for He is both the efficient cause and the final end of our love. He is such that it is impossible to know and not to love Him; not also to hope in Him; for, if we did not hope to love Him perfectly hereafter, our present love for Him would be nothing. Our love is prepared and recompensed by His. He first loves us out of His exceeding goodness; then He claims the due return of love, and permits us in the future the most glorious hopes. He is generous to those who call upon Him, but He can give nothing better than Himself. He Himself is the end of our merits, and our reward. He is the food of holy souls, the ransom of those that are yet in captivity. If the Lord be good to the soul that seeketh Him, what is He to that soul which hath found Him? But this may seem strange, that no one can seek the Lord who hath not already found Him; for His will is to be found that He may be yet more sought; and sought, that He may be more entirely found. But, though He may be sought and found, He can never be forestalled. He is always first; and if we say: "In the morning my prayer shall prevent Thee," it is nevertheless quite certain that that prayer would be very chilly if, O God, thine inspiration did not precede it.
We have spoken of the consummation of the love of God, let us now see what are its beginnings.
Nunc quo nostro commodo diligendus sit, videamus. Sed quantum est et in hoc videre nostrum ad id quod est? Nec tamen quod videtur tacendum est, etsi non omnino videtur ut est. Superius, cum propositum esset, quare, et quomodo diligendus sit Deus, duplicem dixi parere intellectum id quod quaeritur, Quare: ut, aut quo suo merito, aut quo nostro commodo diligendus sit, utrumlibet quaeri posse perinde videatur. Dicto proinde de merito Dei, non prout dignum ei, sed prout datum est mihi; superest ut de praemio, quod item dabitur, dicam. Non enim sine praemio diligitur Deus, etsi absque praemii intuitu diligendus sit. Vacua namque vera charitas esse non potest, nec tamen mercenaria est; quippe non quaerit quae sua sunt. Affectus est, non contractus: nec acquiritur pacto, nec acquirit. Sponte afficit, et spontaneum facit. Verus amor seipso contentus est. Habet praemium, sed id quod amatur. Nam quidquid propter aliud amare videaris, id plane amas, quo amoris finis pertendit, non per quod tendit. Paulus non evangelizat ut comedat, sed comedit ut evangelizet: eo quod amet, non cibum, sed Evangelium. Verus amor praemium non requirit, sed meretur. Praemium sane necdum amanti proponitur, amanti debetur, perseveranti redditur. Denique in rebus inferioribus suadendis, invitos promissis vel praemiis invitamus, et non spontaneos. Quis enim munerandum hominem putet, ut faciat quod et sponte cupit? Nemo, verbi causa, conducit aut esurientem ut comedat, aut sitientem ut bibat, aut certe matrem ut parvulum allactet filium uteri sui. An vero quis putet prece vel pretio quempiam commonendum suam ipsius vel sepire vineam, vel arborem circumfodere, vel structuram propriae domus erigere? Quanto magis Deum amans anima, aliud praeter Deum sui amoris praemium non requirit? Aut si aliud requirit, illud pro certo, non Deum diligit.
Inest omni utenti ratione naturaliter pro sua semper aestimatione atque intentione appetere potiora, et nulla re esse contentum, cui quod deest, judicet praeferendum. Nam et qui, verbi gratia, uxorem habet speciosam, petulanti oculo vel animo respicit pulchriorem: et qui veste pretiosa indutus est, pretiosiorem affectat, et possidens multas divitias, invidet ditiori. Videas jam multis praediis et possessionibus ampliatos, adhuc tamen in dies agrum agro copulare, atque infinita cupiditate dilatare terminos suos. Videas et qui in regalibus domibus, amplisque habitant palatiis, nihilominus quotidie conjungere domum ad domum, et inquieta curiositate aedificare, diruere, mutare quadrata rotundis. Quid homines sublimatos honoribus? annon insatiabili ambitione magis ac magis totis viribus conari ad altiora videmus? Et horum omnium idcirco non est finis, quia nil in eis summum singulariter reperitur vel optimum. Et quid mirum si inferioribus et deterioribus contentus non sit, qui citra summum vel optimum quiescere non potest? Sed hoc stultum et extremae dementiae est, ea semper appetere, quae nunquam, non dico satient, sed nec temperent appetitum: dum quidquid talium habueris, nihilominus non habita concupiscas, et ad quaeque defuerint, semper inquietus anheles. Ita enim fit ut per varia et fallacia mundi oblectamenta vagabundus animus inani labore discurrens fatigetur, non satietur: dum quidquid famelicus inglutierit, parum reputet ad id quod superest devorandum, semperque non minus anxie cupiat quae desunt, quam quae adsunt laete possideat. Quis enim obtineat universa? Quanquam et modicum id quod quisque cum labore obtinuerit, cum timore possederit, certus quidem non sit quando cum dolore amittat, certus autem quod quandoque amittat. Sic directo tramite voluntas perversa contendit ad optinum, festinat ad id unde possit impleri. Imo vero his anfractibus ludit secum vanitas, mentitur iniquitas sibi. Si ita vis adimplere quod vis, hoc est, si illud apprehendere vis, quo apprehenso nil jam amplius velis, quid tentare opus est et caetera? Curris per devia, et longe ante morieris, quam hoc circuitu pervenias ad optatum.
Hoc ergo in circuitu impii ambulant, naturaliter appetentes unde finiant appetitum, et insipienter respuentes unde propinquent fini: fini dico, non consumptioni, sed consummationi. Quamobrem non beato fine consummari, sed consumi vacuo labore accelerant, qui rerum magis specie, quam auctore delectati, prius universa percurrere, et de singulis cupiunt experiri, quam ad ipsum curent universitatis Dominum pervenire. Et quidem pervenirent, si quandoque voti compotes effici possent, ut omnia scilicet, praeter omnium principium, unus aliquis obtineret. Ea namque suae cupiditatis lege, qua in rebus caeteris non habita prae habitis esurire, et pro non habitis habita fastidire solebat; mox omnibus quae in coelo, et quae in terra sunt obtentis et contemptis, tandem ad ipsum procul dubio curreret, qui solus deesset omnium Deus. Porro ibi quiesceret: quia sicut citra nulla revocat quies: sic nulla ultra jam inquietudo sollicitat. Diceret pro certo: Mihi autem adhaerere Deo bonum est. Diceret, Quid enim mihi est in coelo, et a te quid volui super terram? et item, Deus cordis mei, et pars mea Deus in aeternum. Sic ergo (ut dictum est) ad id quod optimum est, quivis cupidus perveniret, si quidem ante, quod citra cupit, assequi posset.
Verum quoniam id omnino impossibile praestruit et vita brevior, et virtus infirmior, et consors numerosior; longo profecto itinere et casso labore desudant, qui dum quaecunque desiderant, attingere volunt, ad cunctorum desiderabilium nequeunt pertingere finem. Et utinam attingere universa animo, et non experimento vellent! Hoc enim facile possent, et non incassum. Nam et animus sensu quidem carnali tanto velocior, quanto et perspicacior, ad hoc datus est, ut illum ad omnia praeveniat; nihilque audeat contingere sensus, quod animus praecurrens ante utile non probaverit. Hinc enim arbitror dictum, Omnia probate, quod bonum est tenete; ut videlicet ille huic provideat, nec is suum votum, nisi ad illius judicium consequatur. Alioquin non ascendes in montem Domini, nec stabis in loco sancto ejus, pro eo quod in vano acceperis animam tuam, hoc est animam rationalem: dum instar pecoris sensum sequeris, ratione quidem otiosa, et non resistente in aliquo. Quorum itaque ratio non praevenit gressus, currunt, sed extra viam: ac proinde Apostoli spreto consilio, non sic currunt ut apprehendant (I Cor. XI, 24). Quando etenim apprehendant, quem apprehendere nisi post omnia nolunt? Distortum iter, et circuitus infinitus, cuncta primitus attentare velle.
Justus autem non ita. Audiens nempe vituperationem multorum commorantium in circuitu (multi enim sunt viam latam pergentes, quae ducit ad mortem), ipse sibi regiam eligit viam, non declinans ad dexteram vel ad sinistram. Denique attestante propheta, Semita justi recta est, rectis callis justi ad ambulandum. Hi sunt, qui salubri compendio cauti sunt molestum hunc et infructuosum vitare circuitum, verbum abbreviatum et abbrevians eligentes, non cupere quaecunque vident, sed vendere magis quae possident, et dare pauperibus. Beati plane pauperes, quoniam ipsorum est regnum caelorum. Omnes quidem currunt; sed inter currentes discernitur. Denique novit Dominus viam justorum, et iter impiorum peribit. Ideo autem melius est modicum justo super divitias peccatorum multas, quoniam quidem, ut Sapiens loquitur et insipiens experitur, qui diligit pecuniam, non saturabitur pecunia: qui autem esuriunt et sitiunt justitiam, ipsi saturabuntur. Justitia siquidem ratione utentis spiritus cibus est vitalis et naturalis: pecunia vero sic non minuit animi famem, quomodo nec corporis ventus. Denique si famelicum hominem apertis faucibus vento, inflatis haurire buccis aerem cernas, quo quasi consulat fami, nonne credas insanire? Sic non minoris insaniae est, si spiritum rationalem rebus putes quibuscunque corporalibus non magis inflari, quam satiari. Quid namque de corporibus ad spiritus? Nec illa sane spiritualibus, nec isti e regione refici corporalibus queunt. Benedic, anima mea, Domino, qui replet in bonis desiderium tuum. Replet in bonis, excitat ad bonum, tenet in bono; praevenit, sustinet, implet. Ipse facit ut desideres; ipse est quod desideras.
Dixi supra: Causa diligendi Deum, Deus est. Verum dixi: nam et efficiens, et finalis. Ipse dat occasionem, ipse creat affectionem, desiderium ipse consummat. Ipse fecit, vel potius factus est ut amaretur: ipse speratur, amandus felicius, ne in vacuum sit amatus. Ejus amor nostrum et praeparat, et remunerat. Praecedit benignior, rependitur justior, exspectatur suavior. Dives est omnibus qui invocant eum: nec tamen habet quidquam se ipso melius. Se dedit in meritum, se servat in praemium, se apponit in refectione animarum sanctarum, se in redemptione distrahit captivarum. Bonus es, Domine, animae quaerenti te: quid ergo invenienti? Sed enim in hoc est mirum, quod nemo te quaerere valet, nisi qui prius invenerit. Vis igitur inveniri ut quaeraris, quaeri ut inveniaris. Potes quidem quaeri et inveniri, non tamen praeveniri, Nam etsi dicimus, Mane oratio mea praeveniet te; non dubium tamen quod tepida sit omnis oratio, quam non praevenerit inspiratio. Dicendum jam unde inchoet amor noster, quoniam ubi consummetur, dictum est.
Chapter 8. We begin by the love of self, this being for us the first degree of love
Love is one of the four natural affections that all the world knows, and which need not be enumerated. Now, it is but natural and right first of all to love the Author of nature; and the first commandment, which is the greatest, is: " Thou shalt love the Lord thy God." But nature is too soft and weak for such a precept; she must begin by loving herself; this is the love which is called carnal, with which man loves himself first and above all; as it is written: " That is not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural." We love first by nature, not by precept—" No man ever hated his own flesh." But if this love should increase too much; if like a river between banks it overflow and flood the lands about, it then becomes voluptuousness, and this dyke is opposed to it: «Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself." Justly may he that shares our nature share our love. Wherefore, if any one cannot so love his brethren as to think of their wants, or let us even say of their pleasures, let him deny himself in those very things, in order that he may learn. Let a man think of himself as much as ever he will, if only he take care to think equally of his neighbour. Such, O man, is the curb and just limit imposed upon thee by the law of thy being and by thy conscience, that thou be not carried away by thy selfishness to thy destruction, leaving thy nature at the mercy of the enemies of thy soul; that is, of thy passions. It is far better that thou go shares with thy neighbours than with thy enemies; and if, as the wise man advises, man renounces his passions, contents himself with food and raiment, and is willing to moderate his love for those things of the flesh which war against the spirit, he will, I think, find small difficulty in giving to his neighbour what he refuses to the enemy of his soul. His love will be contained within the bounds of justice and moderation, from the moment that he consecrates to his brethren that which he refuses to himself. Selfishness becomes benevolence by taking a wider range.
But if through imparting to our neighbour we bring ourselves to want? What is our remedy? Prayer. We have only to pray with confidence to Him who giveth all things liberally and upbraideth not; who "openeth His hand and filleth with blessing every living creature;" for we cannot doubt that He who giveth to most men more than they need, will willingly give to him who prays for what is indispensable; for it is written: "Seek first the kingdom of God, and His justice, and all these things shall be added unto you." God hereby binds Himself to provide what is essential for him that denies himself and loves his neighbour; for to put on the yoke of purity and sobriety rather than be the slave of our passions, this is to seek first the kingdom of God and to implore His help against the tyranny of sin; and it is justice to share our natural blessings with those that share our nature. But in order that love for our neighbour be entirely right, God must have His part in it; it is not possible to love our neighbour as we ought to do, except in God. Now he that loves not God can love nothing in Him. We must therefore begin by loving God, and so love our neighbour in Him. God is the author, as of all other things, so of our love for Him—and more—as He created nature, so He sustains it; for she could neither exist nor subsist without Him. That we might thoroughly know this, and not attribute anything to ourselves, God, in the depths of His wisdom and love, made us subject to tribulation. Being feeble and needy, we are forced to turn to God, and being saved by Him we render glory to His name. These are His own words: "Call upon Me in the day of trouble; I will deliver thee, and thou shalt glorify Me." In this way man, by nature animal and carnal, with no love but for himself, is brought through self-love to love God, realising that all his ability, at any rate for good, he has from God, and without Him is able to do nothing.
Amor est affectio naturalis una de quatuor. Notae sunt: non opus est nominare. Quod ergo naturale est, justum quidem foret primo omnium auctori deservire naturae. Unde et dictum est primum et maximum mandatum: Diliges Dominum Deum tuum, etc. Sed quoniam natura fragilior atque infirmior est, ipsi primum imperante necessitate compellitur inservire. Et est amor carnalis, quo ante omnia homo diligit se ipsum propter se ipsum, sicut scriptum est: Prius quod animale, deinde quod spirituale. Nec praecepto indicitur, sed naturae inseritur: quis nempe carnem suam odio habuit? At vero si coeperit amor idem, ut assolet, proclivior esse, sive profusior, et necessitatis alveo minime contentus, campos etiam voluptatis exundans latius visus fuerit occupare; statim superfluitas obviante mandato cohibetur, cum dicitur: Diliges proximum tuum sicut te ipsum. Justissime quidem, ut consors naturae non sit exsors et gratiae, illius praesertim gratiae, quae naturae insita est. Quod si gravatur homo fraternis, non dico necessitatibus subvenire, sed voluptatibus deservire; castiget ipse suas, si non vult esse transgressor. Quantum vult, sibi indulgeat; dum aeque et proximo tantumdem meminerit exhibendum. Frenum tibi temperantiae imponitur, o homo, ex lege vitae et disciplinae, ne post concupiscentias tuas eas, et pereas, ne de bonis naturae hosti servias animae, hoc est libidini. Quam justius atque honestius communicas illa consorti, id est proximo, quam hosti? Et quidem si ex Sapientis consilio a voluptatibus tuis averteris, et juxta doctrinam Apostoli victu vestituque contentus, paulisper suspendere non gravaris amorem tuum a carnalibus desideriis, quae militant adversus animam; sane quod subtrahis hosti animae tuae, consorti naturae puto non gravaberis impertiri. Tunc amor tuus et temperans erit, et justus, si quod propriis subtrahitur voluptatibus, fratris necessitatibus non negetur. Sic amor carnalis efficitur et socialis, cum in commune protrahitur.
Si autem dum communicas proximo, forte tibi defuerint etiam necessaria, quid facies? Quid enim, nisi ut cum omni fiducia postules ab eo qui dat omnibus affluenter, et non improperat; qui aperit manum suam, et implet omne animal benedictione? Dubium siquidem non est, quod adsit libenter in necessariis, qui plerisque et in superfluis non deest. Denique ait: Primum quaerite regnum Dei et justitiam ejus, et haec omnia adjicientur vobis. Sponte daturum se pollicetur necessaria, superflua restringenti, et proximum diligenti. Hoc quippe est primum quaerere regnum Dei, et adversus peccati implorare tyrannidem, pudicitiae potius ac sobrietatis subire jugum, quam regnare peccatum in tuo mortali corpore patiaris. Porro autem et hoc justitiae est, cum quo tibi est natura communis, naturae quoque cum eo munus non habere divisum.
Ut tamen perfecta justitia sit diligere proximum, Deum in causa haberi necesse est. Alioquin proximum pure diligere quomodo potest, qui in Deo non diligit? Porro in Deo diligere non potest, qui Deum non diligit. Oportet ergo Deum diligi prius, ut in Deo diligi possit et proximus. Facit ergo etiam se diligi Deus, qui et caetera bona facit. Facit autem sic. Qui naturam condidit, ipse et protegit. Nam et ita condita fuit, ut habeat jugiter necessarium protectorem, quem habuit et conditorem: ut quae nisi per ipsum non valuit esse, nec sine ipso valeat omnino subsistere. Quod ne sane de se creatura ignoret, ac proinde sibi (quod absit) superbe arroget beneficia creatoris, vult hominem idem conditor alto quidem salubrique consilio tribulationibus exerceri: ut cum defecerit homo, et subvenerit Deus, dum homo liberatur a Deo, Deus ab homine, ut dignum est, honoretur. Hoc enim dicit: Invoca me in die tribulationis, eruam te, et honorificabis me. Fit itaque hoc tali modo, ut homo animalis et carnalis, qui praeter se neminem diligere noverat, etiam Deum vel propter se amare incipiat, quod in ipso nimirum, ut saepe expertus est, omnia possit, quae posse tamen prosit; et sine ipso possit nihil.
Cited in the encyclopedia: Love (Self)
Chapter 9. Of the second and third degrees of love
First, then, man has some love for God for his own sake, not for God's. It is already something to feel the limits of his own capacity, to know what he cannot do without the help of God, and to keep right with Him who sustains his life and strength. But, let a train of disasters befall and oblige him perpetually to have recourse to God, if he still get the aid he wants, his heart must be of brass or marble not at last to be touched by the goodness of his helper, not to begin at length to love Him for Himself. Let the frequency of trials bring us often to the feet of God, surely it is impossible, but we must begin to know Him, and, knowing Him, must come to discern His sweetness. It soon follows that we are brought to love Him rightly, far more for the sweetness and beauty that we find in Him than for our own self-interest. In the words of the Samaritans to the woman: "We now believe, not for thy saying; for we ourselves have heard Him, and know that this is indeed the Saviour of the world." In like manner, we come to say to our natural self: It is not because of thee that we love the Lord, but we have tasted ourselves, and found how sweet He is. The necessities of this life are a kind of language proclaiming in transports of joy and thanksgiving the blessings of which they have taught us the value. When this has once been learnt, it is easy enough to obey the precept and love our neighbour as ourself; for, if we love God truly, we love all that is His, and it is henceforth easy to submit to the precept: "Purify your hearts in the obedience of charity, with a brotherly love." We are bound to fulfil willingly so just a command, a command, moreover, so full of profit because it is disinterested. It is a love most pure, for it is shown simply in holy deeds and truth; most just, for it returns that which it receives. Whoso loves with this love, loves as he is loved, and seeks no more his own, but the things of Jesus Christ, even as Jesus Christ has sought us. Herein we see such love as that which said, "Give praise to the Lord, for He is good." He that loves God because He is good, not to him, but in Himself, loves God indeed for God, and not as he does of whom the Scripture saith: "He will praise Thee when Thou shalt do well to him."
Amat ergo jam Deum, sed propter se interim adhuc, non propter ipsum. Est tamen quaedam prudentia scire quid ex te, quid ex Dei adjutorio possis, et ipsi servare te infensum, qui te tibi servat illaesum. At si frequens ingruerit tribulatio, ob quam et frequens ad Deum conversio fiat, et a Deo aeque frequens liberatio consequatur; nonne, etsi fuerit ferreum pectus, vel cor lapideum toties liberati, emolliri necesse est ad gratiam liberantis, quatenus Deum homo diligat, non propter se tantum, sed et propter ipsum? Ex occasione quippe frequentium necessitatum crebris necesse est interpellationibus Deum ab homine frequentari, frequentando gustari, gustando probari quam suavis est Dominus. Ita fit ut ad diligendum pure Deum plus jam ipsius gustata alliciat suavitas, quam urgeat nostra necessitas; ita ut exemplo Samaritanorum, dicentium mulieri quae adesse Dominum nuntiaverat, Jam non propter tuam loquelam credimus; ipsi enim audivimus, et scimus quia ipse est vere Salvator mundi; ita, inquam, et nos illorum exemplo carnem nostram alloquentes, dicamus merito: Jam non propter tuam necessitatem Deum diligimus; ipsi enim gustavimus et scimus quoniam suavis est Dominus. Est enim carnis quaedam loquela necessitas, et beneficia quae experiendo probat, gestiendo renuntiat. Itaque sic affecto, jam de diligendo proximo implere mandatum, non erit difficile. Amat quippe veraciter Deum, ac per hoc quae Dei sunt. Amat caste, et casto non gravatur obedire mandato, castificans magis cor suum, ut scriptum est, in obedientia charitatis. Amat juste, et mandatum justum libenter amplectitur. Amor iste merito gratus, quia gratuitus. Castus est, quia non impenditur verbo, neque lingua, sed opere et veritate. Justus est, quoniam qualis suscipitur, talis et redditur. Qui enim sic amat, haud secus profecto, quam amatus est, amat; quaerens et ipse vicissim, non quae sua sunt, sed quae Jesu Christi, quemadmodum ille nostra, vel potius nos, et non sua quaesivit. Sic amat qui dicit: Confitemini Domino quoniam bonus. Qui Domino confitetur, non quoniam sibi bonus est, sed quoniam bonus est; hic vere diligit Deum propter Deum, et non propter seipsum. Non sic amat de quo dicitur: Confitebitur tibi cum benefeceris ei. Iste est tertius amoris gradus, quo jam propter se ipsum Deus diligitur.
Chapter 10. The fourth degree of love is to love self only for God
Happy is he who can rise to the fourth degree of love, and loves himself only for God's sake. "Thy justice, O Lord, is as the high mountains." It is even so of this fourth degree of love, "a great mountain in which God is well pleased to dwell." "Who shall ascend into the mountain of the Lord?" "Who will give me wings like a dove, and I will fly thither and be at rest?" "His place is in peace, and his abode in Zion." "Woe is me that my sojourning is prolonged." When shall this flesh and blood, this dust and mire of which I am made, be able to go up there? When shall this soul of mine, entranced with love for God, look on herself as broken sherds, yearn after God, and lose herself in Him, for "He who is joined to the Lord is one spirit"? When shall she cry out: "My flesh and my heart have fainted away; Thou art the God of my heart, and the God that is my portion for ever"? Holy and happy is he who but once, for but one moment, has felt something like this in his mortal life; for this is no human happiness, it is life eternal so to lose oneself, as if one were empty of self, as if one were not. If some poor mortal attains to this, for one moment and as it were unawares, this evil time seems begrudgingly to delay and embitter his joy. This body of death drags him down, the cares and anxieties of life pull him back, the corruption of the flesh refuses its support, and his duty to his neighbour calls on him loudly to come down, and cry out: "Lord, I suffer violence, answer Thou for me;" or thus: "Unhappy man that I am, who shall deliver me from the body of this death?"
We read in Holy Scripture that God hath made all things for Himself. His creatures are therefore bound to conform themselves, at least in some measure, to the mind of their Maker. We ought to offer ourselves entirely to Him, studying only His good pleasure, not our own. We shall find happiness, much less in seeking our own advantage, than in the accomplishment of His will in us, according as we daily pray: "Thy will be done on earth as it is in Heaven." O pure and holy love! most sweet and blessed affection! O complete submission of a disinterested soul; most perfect in that there is no thought of self; most sweet and tender in that the'soul's whole feeling is divine!
To attain to this, is for the soul to be deified; as a small drop of water appears lost if mixed with wine, taking its taste and colour; and as, when plunged into a furnace, a bar of iron seems to lose its nature and assume that of fire; or as the air filled with the sun's beams seems rather to become light than to be illuminated. So it is with the natural life of the Saints; they seem to melt and pass away into the will of God. For if anything merely human remained in man, how then should God be all in all? It is not that human nature will be destroyed, but that it will attain another beauty, a higher power and glory. When shall that be? To whom shall it be given to see and know it? When shall I come and appear before the face of God? O God, my Lord, my heart hath said to Thee: "My face hath sought Thee; Thy face, O Lord, will I seek." Will it be given.to such as I to see Thy holy temple?
In this life, the heart is obliged to take some thought of the body, the mind to see that its health and powers are kept unimpaired; and I think that it is impossible, so long as our energies are thus divided, to rest wholly in God and in the contemplation of Him, impossible perfectly to obey the precept, "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, with all thy soul, and with all thy strength." We may not hope to possess the fourth degree of love, or rather to be possessed by it, until we have put on a body spiritual and immortal, pure and calm, obedient and subject in all to the spirit, which cannot be our doing, but only the work of the power of God in favour of such as please Him. Our soul will easily attain to this perfect love when neither the burden nor the temptations of this body oppress her; then she will spring untrammelled to her joy in the Lord. But are we to doubt that the souls of the holy martyrs before quitting their triumphant bodies tasted, at least in some small measure, of this happiness? This we know for certain, that immense love filled and enraptured their souls, to give them strength to lay down their lives and to endure the torments which they suffered. Still the joy of their triumph must have been thereby abated.
Felix qui meruit ad quartum usque pertingere, quatenus nec seipsum diligat homo nisi propter Deum. Justitia tua, Deus, sicut montes Dei. Amor iste mons est, et mons Dei excelsus. Revera mons coagulatus, mons pinguis. Quis ascendet in montem Domini? Quis dabit mihi pennas sicut columbae, et volabo et requiescam? Factus est in pace locus iste, et habitatio haec in Sion. Heu mihi quia incolatus meus prolongatus est! Caro et sanguis, vas luteum, terrena inhabitatio quando capit hoc? quando hujuscemodi experitur affectum, ut divino debriatus amore animus, oblitus sui, factusque sibi ipsi tanquam vas perditum, totus pergat in Deum, et adhaerens Deo unus cum eo spiritus fiat. et dicat: Defecit caro mea et cor meum, Deus cordis mei, et pars mea Deus in aeternum? Beatum dixerim et sanctum, cui tale aliquid in hac mortali vita raro interdum, aut vel semel, et hoc ipsum raptim, atque unius vix momenti spatio experiri donatum est. Te enim quodammodo perdere, tanquam qui non sis, et omnino non sentire teipsum, et a teipso exinaniri, et pene annullari, coelestis est conversationis, non humanae affectionis. Et si quidem e mortalibus quispiam ad illud raptim interdum (ut dictum est) et ad momentum admittitur, subito invidet saeculum nequam, perturbat diei malitia, corpus mortis aggravat, sollicitat carnis necessitas, defectus corruptionis non sustinet, quodque his violentius est, fraterna revocat charitas. Heu! redire in se, recidere in sua compellitur, et miserabiliter exclamare, Domine, vim patior, responde pro me: et illud, Infelix ego homo, quis me liberabit de corpore mortis hujus?
Quoniam tamen Scriptura loquitur, Deum omnia fecisse propter semetipsum; erit profecto ut factura sese quandoque conformet et concordet Auctori. Oportet proinde in eumdem nos affectum quandocunque transire: ut quomodo Deus omnia esse voluit propter semetipsum, sic nos quoque nec nosipsos, nec aliud aliquid fuisse, vel esse velimus, nisi aeque propter ipsum, ob solam videlicet ipsius voluntatem, non nostram voluptatem. Delectabit sane non tam nostra, vel sopita necessitas, vel sortita felicitas, quam quod ejus in nobis, et de nobis voluntas adimpleta videbitur: quod et quotidie postulamus in oratione cum dicimus, Fiat voluntas tua, sicut in coelo, et in terra. O amor sanctus et castus! o dulcis et suavis affectio! o pura et defaecata intentio voluntatis! eo certe defaecatior et purior, quo in ea de proprio nil jam admistum relinquitur: eo suavior et dulcior, quo totum divinum est quod sentitur. Sic affici, deificari est. Quomodo stilla aquae modica, multo infusa vino, deficere a se tota videtur, dum et saporem vini induit, et colorem; et quomodo ferrum ignitum et candens, igni simillimum fit, pristina propriaque forma exutum; et quomodo solis luce perfusus aer in eamdem transformatur luminis claritatem, adeo ut non tam illuminatus, quam ipsum lumen esse videatur: sic omnem tunc in sanctis humanam affectionem quodam ineffabili modo necesse erit a semetipsa liquescere, atque in Dei penitus transfundi voluntatem. Alioquin quomodo omnia in omnibus erit Deus, si in homine de homine quidquam supererit? Manebit quidem substantia, sed in alia forma, alia gloria, aliaque potentia. Quando hoc erit? quis hoc videbit? quis possidebit? Quando veniam, et apparebo ante faciem Dei? Domine Deus meus, tibi dixit cor meum, exquisivit te facies mea; faciem tuam, Domine, requiram. Putas, videbo templum sanctum tuum?
Ego puto non ante sane perfecte impletum iri, Diliges Dominum Deum tuum ex toto corde tuo, et ex tota anima tua, et ex tota virtute tua; quousque ipsum cor cogitare jam non cogatur de corpore, et anima eidem in hoc statu vivificando et sensificando intendere desinat, et virtus ejusdem relevata molestiis, in Dei potentia roboretur. Impossibile namque est tota haec ex toto ad Deum colligere, et divino infigere vultui, quandiu ea huic fragili et aerumnoso corpori intenta et distenta necesse est subservire. Itaque in corpore spirituali et immortali, in corpore integro, placido, placitoque, et per omnia subjecto spiritui, speret se anima quartum apprehendere amoris gradum, vel potius in ipso apprehendi: quippe quod Dei potentiae est dare cui vult, non humanae industriae assequi. Tunc, inquam, summum obtinebit facile gradum, cum in gaudium Domini sui promptissime et avidissime festinantem nulla jam retardabit carnis illecebra, nulla molestia conturbabit. Putamusne tamen hanc gratiam vel ex parte sanctos martyres assecutos, in illis victoriosis corporibus adhuc constitutos? Magna vis prorsus amoris illas animas introrsum rapuerat, qua ita sua corpora foris exponere, et tormenta contemnere valuerunt. At profecto doloris acerrimi sensus non potuit non turbare serenum, etsi non perturbare.
Chapter 11. The saints will have perfect love only after the general resurrection
What may we then believe of souls already freed from the burden of the flesh? I believe them to be altogether immersed in the fathomless depths of eternal light, and of a luminous eternity. But if, as we may not deny, they still desire and hope to rejoin the bodies they formerly inhabited, it is clear that they are not altogether changed, but that still their bodies claim some part in them, although it may be very small. And, until death be wholly swallowed up in victory, until the glory of eternity shall have pervaded every corner of the domain of night, and the clarity of celestial light shine even in our bodies, until then our souls can never cast themselves into God, and wholly give themselves to Him. Until then the chains of the body still impede them, be it only by a natural affection which they have neither the will nor the power to forsake; and, till the restitution of our bodies, our souls can never be swallowed up in God, which is their absolute perfection. If the union with Him could be consummated by the soul alone, she would no more desire the body; but when the soul leaves the body, it is gain, and greater gain when it rejoins it. Finally, "precious in the sight of the Lord is the death of His saints." If death can be so praised, how shall it be with life? that life! The soul may well think to obtain increase of glory from its body, because, though infirm and mortal, it has contributed greatly to its merits. To "them that love God all things work together unto good;" and the soul which loves God profits by its poor, weak body, whether living, dead, or risen—living, by bringing forth with her fruits of penance; dead, by resting from its labour; risen, the two together attain the consummation of all joy. It is clear then that without the body the soul is not perfected; as in every state it is essential to her good.
The body then is for the soul a faithful companion; if it be a burden, it is also a help; when it ceases to aid, it also ceases to hinder; when again it helps, it is no more a burden. The first state is laborious, but profitable; the second inactive, but in no sense tedious; and the third is glorious. Hear how the Bridegroom in the Canticles invites the soul to these three conditions: " Eat, O friends, and drink, and be inebriated, my dearly beloved." The souls whom He invites to eat are those still toiling in their bodies; those that are at rest in death, He presses to drink; those who are once more clothed upon to be inebriated; and, calling these His dearly beloved, He implies that they are filled with charity: for to the first He saith only "friends;" for they who still toil under the weight of the body are dear to Him according to the love they bear. Those who are delivered from the burden of the flesh are dearer yet, because of the freedom and fulness their love has acquired. But, compared with all these, most dearly beloved are they who, clothed again in the robe of the glorious body, are transported with the love of God in joyful liberty from everything which might draw them down or hinder their upward flight. Not till thus perfected are they so delivered, for in the first case the body wearies the spirit and keeps it back; in the second, the body is an object of hope and of personal desire, which has in it the taint of self. The faithful soul begins by eating bread, but, alas, "in the sweat of her face;" for so long as she is in the body she does but walk by faith, which should work by love, for faith without works is dead. Now these are the works which are her bread, according to the word of the Lord: " My bread is to do the will of my Father.'' When she has put off the body of death she ceases to eat the bread of sorrow, and, as at the close of a meal, she drinks long draughts of the wine of love; but this wine is not yet unmixed, for, as saith the Bridegroom in the Canticles, " I have drunk my wine with my milk," for with the wine of God's love the soul mixes milk; namely the desire of re-union with her body which she loves with the softness of natural affection. Already she feels the strength of the divine love which she drinks, but it does not yet transport her; the mingling of milk still tempers it. Inebriation troubles the spirit so that it forgets itself; but that is not the state of the soul still yearning for its body, which is yet to rise. She does not wholly lose the sense of self. But when she has regained this only thing that lacks, what hinders that she should altogether cast herself into God, losing even her own likeness, in being made like unto Him? No obstacle remaining, she can lift to her lips the cup of wisdom of which it is written: " My chalice which inebriateth me, how goodly is it; " and who can wonder that she is transported with the abundance that fills the house of God; free from all care, she drinks, in the Kingdom of the Father, long, tranquil draughts of the wine of the Son, pure and new.
It is wisdom that gives this threefold banquet, where all the food is charity. She gives bread to those who have still to labour, wine for those to drink who already enjoy rest; and inebriates those who are gone into the kingdom of heaven. When her guests have eaten, she serves to them wine. So long as we toil in this life, bearing on us a mortal body, we must eat of the bread our labour has found us, we must eat laboriously and swallow it; but, scarce have we breathed our last sigh, when we begin to drink in our spiritual life, receiving the cup, and drinking in happy restfulness. When all is accomplished, and the body is risen to life and restored to the soul, they drink to inebriation of the chalice that never fails. This is the meaning of those words: "Eat, O my friends, and drink; and be inebriated, my dearly beloved." In this life, eat; after death you shall drink; in the kingdom of the resurrection you shall be inebriated; you whom I well may call my dearly beloved. Are they not truly so who are admitted to the marriage feast of the Lamb, who sit at His table, eating and drinking in His kingdom, when "He presents to Himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle, or any such thing"? It is then He will inebriate His dearly beloved, pouring out to them a "torrent of delights;" for when the Bridegroom shall clasp the Bride in His loving and chaste embrace, a torrent of delight shall rejoice the City of God, which I hold to mean no other than the Son of God, who, "passing, will minister unto them that sit at meat." So He hath promised that the just may feast, and rejoice before God, and be delighted with gladness. From thence comes satiety which is never satisfied; ardour which is insatiable, yet most calm and peaceful; the eternal and incomparable desire to possess, which arises from no want; that inebriation without excess, which comes from the enjoyment, not of wine, but of God and His Truth. The soul hath reached for ever the fourth degree of love, when she loves only God, and loves Him supremely; when she loves for no gain, for Himself alone; so that He is her reward, the eternal recompense of those who love Him, and shall love Him for ever.
Quid autem jam solutas corporibus? Immersas ex toto credimus immenso illi pelago aeterni luminis, et luminosae aeternitatis. Sed si (quod non negatur) velint sua corpora recepisse, aut certe recipere desiderent et sperent; liquet procul dubio necdum a seipsis penitus immutatas, quibus constat necdum penitus deesse de proprio, quo vel modice intentio reflectatur. Donec ergo absorpta sit mors in victoria, et noctis undique terminos lux perennis invadat et occupet usquequaque, quatenus et in corporibus gloria coelestis effulgeat; non possunt ex toto animae seipsas exponere, et transire in Deum, nimirum ligatae corporibus etiam tunc, etsi non vita vel sensu, certe affectu naturali, ita ut absque his nec velint, nec valeant consummari. Itaque ante restaurationem corporum non erit ille defectus animorum, qui perfectus et summus est ipsorum status: nec carnis jam sane consortium spiritus requireret, si absque illa consummaretur. Enim vero absque profectu animae nec ponitur corpus, nec resumitur. Denique pretiosa in conspectu Domini mors sanctorum ejus. Quod si mors pretiosa, quid vita, et illa vita? Nec mirum, si corpus jam gloriae conferre videtur spiritui, quod et infirmum et mortale constat ipsi non mediocriter valuisse. O quam verum locutus est qui dixit, diligentibus Deum omnia cooperari in bonum. Valet Deum diligenti animae corpus suum infirmum, valet et mortuum, valet et resuscitatum: primo quidem ad fructum poenitentiae, secundo ad requiem, postremo ad consummationem. Merito sine illo perfici non vult, quod in omni statu in bonum sibi subservire persentit.
Bonus plane fidusque comes caro spiritui bono, quae ipsum aut si onerat, juvat; aut si non juvat, exonerat; aut certe juvat, et minime onerat. Primus status laboriosus, sed fructuosus: secundus otiosus, sed minime fastidiosus: tertius et gloriosus. Audi et sponsum in Canticis ad profectum hunc trimodum invitantem. Comedite, inquit, amici, et bibite; et inebriamini, charissimi. Laborantes in corpore vocat ad cibum: jam posito corpore quiescentes ad potum invitat: resumentes corpora, etiam ut inebrientur impellit: quos et vocat charissimos, nimirum charitate plenissimos. Nam et in caeteris, quos non charissimos, sed amicos appellat, differentia est: ut hi quidem qui in carne adhuc gravati gemunt, chari habeantur pro charitate quam habent: qui vero jam soluti carnis compede sunt, eo sint chariores, quo et promptiores atque expeditiores facti ad amandum. Porro prae utrisque merito nominantur et sunt charissimi, qui recepta jam secunda stola, in corporibus utique cum gloria resumptis, tanto in Dei feruntur amorem liberiores et alacriores, quanto et de proprio nil jam residuum est, quod eos aliquatenus sollicitet vel retardet. Quod quidem neuter sibi reliquorum statuum vindicat; cum et in priori corpus cum labore portetur, et in secundo quoque non sine proprietate aliqua desiderii exspectetur.
Primo ergo fidelis anima comedit panem suum, sed heu! in sudore vultus sui. In carne quippe manens adhuc ambulat per fidem, quam sane operari per dilectionem necesse est: quia si non operatur, mortua est. Porro ipsum opus cibus est, dicente Domino: Meus cibus est, ut faciam voluntatem Patris mei. Dehinc carne exuta jam pane doloris non cibatur; sed vinum amoris, tanquam post cibum, plenius haurire permittitur, non purum tamen, sed quomodo sub sponsi nomine in Canticis dictum legitur: bibi vinum meum cum lacte meo. Vino enim divini amoris etiam tunc anima suavitatem naturalis immiscet affectionis, qua resumere corpus suum, ipsumque glorificatum desiderat. Aestuat ergo jam tunc sanctae charitatis potata vino, sed plane nondum usque ad ebrietatem: quoniam temperat interim ardorem illum hujus lactis permistio. Ebrietas denique solet evertere mentes, atque omnino reddere immemores sui. At non ex toto sui oblita est, quae adhuc de proprio corpore cogitat suscitando. Caeterum hoc adepto, quod solum utique deerat, quid jam impedit a se ipsa quodammodo abire, et ire totam in Deum, eoque sibi penitus dissimillimam fieri, quo Deo simillimam effici donatur? Tum demum ad crateram admissa sapientiae, illam de qua legitur, Et calix meus inebrians quam praeclarus est! quid mirum jam si inebriatur ab ubertate domus Dei, cum nulla mordente cura de proprio, secura bibit purum et novum illud cum Christo in regno Patris ejus?
Hoc vero convivium triplex celebrat Sapientia, et ex una complet charitate, ipsa cibans laborantes, ipsa potans quiescentes, ipsa regnantes inebrians. Quomodo autem in convivio corporali ante cibus quam potus apponitur, quoniam et tali ordine natura requirit; ita et hic. Primo quidem ante mortem in carne mortali labores manuum nostrarum manducamus, cum labore quod glutiendum est masticantes: post mortem vero in vita spirituali jam bibimus, suavissima quadam facilitate quod percipitur colantes: tandem redivivis corporibus in vita immortali inebriamur, mira plenitudine exuberantes. Haec pro eo quod sponsus in Canticis dicit: Comedite, amici, et bibite; et inebriamini, charissimi. Comedite ante mortem, bibite post mortem, inebriamini post resurrectionem. Merito jam charissimi, qui charitate inebriantur: et merito inebriati, qui ad nuptias Agni introduci merentur, edentes et bibentes super mensam illius in regno suo, quando sibi jam exhibet gloriosam Ecclesiam, non habentem maculam, neque rugam, aut aliquid hujusmodi. Tunc prorsus inebriat charissimos suos, tunc torrente voluptatis suae potat: quoniam quidem in complexu illo arctissimo et castissimo sponsi et sponsae, fluminis impetus laetificat civitatem Dei. Quod non aliud esse arbitror quam Dei Filium, qui transiens ministrat, quemadmodum ipse promisit: ut ex hoc jam justi epulentur et exsultent in conspectu Dei, et delectentur in laetitia. Hinc illa satietas sine fastidio: hinc insatiabilis illa sine inquietudine curiositas: hinc aeternum illud atque inexplicabile desiderium, nesciens egestatem: hinc denique sobria illa ebrietas, vero, non mero ingurgitans, non madens vino, sed ardens Deo. Ex hoc jam quartus ille amoris gradus perpetuo possidetur, cum summe, et solus diligitur Deus: quia nec nos ipsos jam nisi propter ipsum diligimus, ut sit ipse praemium amantium se, praemium aeternum amantium in aeternum.