On Patience
1 Section 1 PL 40, 611
1. That virtue of the mind which is called Patience, is so great a gift of God, that even in Him who bestoweth the same upon us, that, whereby He waiteth for evil men that they may amend, is set forth by the name of Patience, [or long-suffering.] So, although in God there can be no suffering, and “patience” hath its name a patiendo, from suffering, yet a patient God we not only faithfully believe, but also wholesomely confess. But the patience of God, of what kind and how great it is, His, Whom we say to be impassible, yet not impatient, nay even most patient, in words to unfold this who can be able? Ineffable is therefore that patience, as is His jealousy, as His wrath, and whatever there is like to these. For if we conceive of these as they be in us, in Him are there none. We, namely, can feel none of these without molestation: but be it far from us to surmise that the impassible nature of God is liable to any molestation. But like as He is jealous without any darkening of spirit, wroth without any perturbation, pitiful without any pain, repenteth Him without any wrongness in Him to be set right; so is He patient without aught of passion. Now therefore as concerning human patience, which we are able to conceive and beholden to have, of what sort it is, I will, as God granteth and the brevity of the present discourse alloweth, essay to set forth.
Patientia Dei qualis. Virtus animi quae Patientia dicitur, tam magnum Dei donum est, ut etiam ipsius qui nobis eam largitur, qua malos ut corrigantur exspectat, patientia praedicetur. Ita quamvis Deus nihil pati possit, patientia vero a patiendo nomen acceperit, patientem tamen Deum non modo fideliter credimus, verum etiam salubriter confitemur. Sed Dei patientia qualis et quanta sit, quem nihil patientem, nec tamen impatientem, imo etiam patientissimum dicimus, verbis explicare quis possit? Ineffabilis est ergo illa patientia, sicut zelus ejus, sicut ira ejus, et si quid hujusmodi est. Nam si tanquam nostra ista cogitemus, in illo nulla sunt. Nihil enim horum nos sine molestia sentimus: absit autem ut impassibilem Dei naturam perpeti ullam molestiam suspicemur. Sicut autem zelat sine aliquo livore, irascitur sine aliqua perturbatione, miseretur sine aliquo dolore, poenitet eum sine alicujus suae pravitatis correctione: ita est patiens sine ulla passione. Nunc itaque humana patientia, quam capere possumus, et habere debemus, cujusmodi sit, quantum Dominus tribuit, et quantum patitur brevitas praesentis sermonis expediam.
2 Section 2 PL 40, 611
2. The patience of man, which is right and laudable and worthy of the name of virtue, is understood to be that by which we tolerate evil things with an even mind, that we may not with a mind uneven desert good things, through which we may arrive at better. Wherefore the impatient, while they will not suffer ills, effect not a deliverance from ills, but only the suffering of heavier ills. Whereas the patient who choose rather by not committing to bear, than by not bearing to commit, evil, both make lighter what through patience they suffer, and also escape worse ills in which through impatience they would be sunk. But those good things which are great and eternal they lose not, while to the evils which be temporal and brief they yield not: because “the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared,” as the Apostle says, “with the future glory that shall be revealed in us.” And again he says, “This our temporal and light tribulation doth in inconceivable manner work for us an eternal weight of glory.”
Patientia recta quaenam et quam utilis. Patientia hominis, quae recta est atque laudabilis et vocabulo digna virtutis, ea perhibetur qua aequo animo mala toleramus, ne animo iniquo bona deseramus, per quae ad meliora perveniamus. Quapropter impatientes dum mala pati nolunt, non efficiunt ut a malis eruantur, sed ut mala graviora patiantur. Patientes autem qui mala malunt non committendo ferre, quam non ferendo committere, et leviora faciunt quae per patientiam patiuntur, et pejora evadunt quibus per impatientiam mergerentur . Bona vero aeterna et magna non perdunt, dum malis temporalibus brevibusque non cedunt: quoniam non sunt condignae passiones hujus temporis, sicut Apostolus dicit, ad futuram gloriam quae revelabitur in nobis . Et iterum ait: Quod est temporale et leve tribulationis nostrae, in incredibilem modum aeternum gloriae pondus operatur nobis .
3 Section 3 PL 40, 612
3. Look we then, beloved, what hardships in labors and sorrows men endure, for things which they viciously love, and by how much they think to be made by them more happy, by so much more unhappily covet. How much for false riches, how much for vain honors, how much for affections of games and shows, is of exceeding peril and trouble most patiently borne! We see men hankering after money, glory, lasciviousness, how, that they may arrive at their desires, and having gotten not lose them, they endure sun, rain, icy cold, waves, and most stormy tempests, the roughnesses and uncertainties of wars, the strokes of huge blows, and dreadful wounds, not of inevitable necessity but of culpable will. But these madnesses are thought, in a manner, permitted. Thus avarice, ambition, luxury, and the delights of all sorts of games and shows, unless for them some wicked deed be committed or outrage which is prohibited by human laws, are accounted to pertain to innocence: nay moreover, the man who without wrong to any shall, whether for getting or increasing of money, whether for obtaining or keeping of honors, whether in contending in the match, or in hunting, or in exhibiting with applause some theatrical spectacle, have borne great labors and pains, it is not enough that through popular vanity he is checked by no reproofs, but he is moreover extolled with praises: “Because,” as it is written, “the sinner is praised in the desires of his soul.” For the force of desires makes endurance of labors and pains: and no man save for that which he enjoyeth, freely takes on him to bear that which annoyeth. But these lusts, as I said, for the fulfilling of which they which are on fire with them most patiently endure much hardship and bitterness, are accounted to be permitted, and allowed by laws.
Patientia iniquorum quanta. Intueamur ergo, charissimi, quanta in laboribus et doloribus homines dura sustineant, pro rebus quas vitiose diligunt, et quanto se his feliciores fieri putant, tanto infelicius concupiscunt. Quanta pro falsis divitiis, quanta pro vanis honoribus, quanta pro ludicris affectionibus periculosissima et molestissima patientissime tolerantur! Pecuniae, gloriae, lasciviae cupidos videmus, ut ad desiderata perveniant, adeptisque non careant, soles, imbres, glacies, fluctus, et procellosissimas tempestates, aspera et incerta bellorum, immanium plagarum ictus, et vulnera horrenda, non inevitabili necessitate, sed culpabili voluntate perferre. Verum hae licitae quodam modo videntur insaniae.
4 Section 4 PL 40, 613
4. Nay more; for is it not so that even for open wickednesses, not to punish but to perpetrate them, men put up with many most grievous troubles? Do not authors of secular letters tell of a certain right noble parricide of his country, that hunger, thirst, cold, all these he was able to endure, and his body was patient of lack of food and warmth and sleep to a degree surpassing belief? Why speak of highway robbers, all of whom while they lie in wait for travellers endure whole nights without sleep, and that they may catch, as they pass by, men who have no thought of harm, will, no matter how foul the weather, plant in one spot their mind and body, which are full of thoughts of harm? Nay it is said that some of them are wont to torture one another by turns, to that degree that this practice and training against pains is not a whit short of pains. For, not so much perchance are they excruciated by the Judge, that through smart of pain the truth may be got at, as they are by their own comrades, that through patience of pain truth may not be betrayed. And yet in all these the patience is rather to be wondered at than praised: nay neither wondered at nor praised, seeing it is no patience; but we must wonder at the hardness, deny the patience: for there is nothing in this rightly to be praised, nothing usefully to be imitated; and thou wilt rightly judge the mind to be all the more worthy of greater punishment, the more it yields up to vices the instruments of virtues. Patience is companion of wisdom, not handmaid of concupiscence: patience is the friend of a good conscience, not the foe of innocence.
Immanis tolerantia Catilinae ac latronum. Quid quod etiam pro apertis sceleribus, non ut ea puniant, sed ut perpetrent, multa homines gravissima perferunt? Nonne de quodam nobilissimo patriae parricida saecularium litterarum loquuntur auctores, quod famem, sitim, frigus ferre poterat, ejusque erat corpus patiens inediae, algoris, vigiliae, supra quam cuiquam credibile est ? Quid de latronibus dicam, quorum omnes cum insidiantur viatoribus, noctes perpetiuntur insomnes, atque ut transeuntes excipiant innocentes, sub qualibet coeli asperitate nocentem animum corpusque defigunt? Quidam vero eorum invicem torquere perhibentur, ita ut exercitatio contra poenas nihil distet a poenis. Non enim tantum fortassis excruciantur a judice ut a dolentibus veritas inquiratur, quantum a suis sociis ut a patientibus non prodatur. Et tamen in his omnibus miranda est potius quam laudanda patientia: imo nec miranda nec laudanda, quae nulla est; sed miranda duritia, neganda patientia: nihil autem illic jure laudandum, nihil utiliter imitandum; tantoque rectius majore supplicio dignum judicaveris animum, quanto magis vitiis subdit instrumenta virtutum. Patientia comes est sapientiae, non famula concupiscentiae: patientia amica est bonae conscientiae, non inimica innocentiae.
5 Section 5 PL 40, 613
5. When therefore thou shall see any man suffer aught patiently, do not straightway praise it as patience; for this is only shown by the cause of suffering. When it is a good cause, then is it true patience: when that is not polluted by lust, then is this distinguished from falsity. But when that is placed in crime, then is this much misplaced in name. For not just as all who know are partakers of knowledge, just so are all who suffer partakers of patience: but they which rightly use the suffering, these in verity of patience are praised, these with the prize of patience are crowned.
Patientiam veram a falsa distinguit causa patiendi. Cum ergo videris quemquam patienter aliquid pati, noli continuo laudare patientiam, quam non ostendit nisi causa patiendi. Quando illa bona est, tunc ista vera est: quando illa non polluitur cupiditate, tunc a falsitate ista distinguitur. Cum vero illa tenetur in crimine, tunc hujus multum erratur in nomine. Non enim sicut omnes qui sciunt sunt participes scientiae, ita omnes qui patiuntur sunt participes patientiae: sed qui passione recte utuntur, hi patientiae veritate laudantur, hi patientiae munere coronantur.
6 Section 6 PL 40, 613
6. But yet, seeing that for lusts’ sake, or even wickednesses, seeing, in a word, that for this temporal life and weal men do wonderfully bear the brunt of many horrible sufferings, they much admonish us how great things ought to be borne for the sake of a good life, that it may also hereafter be eternal life, and without any bound of time, without waste or loss of any advantage, in true felicity secure. The Lord saith, “In your patience ye shall possess your souls:” He saith not, your farms, your praises, your luxuries; but, “your souls.” If then the soul endures so great sufferings that it may possess that whereby it may be lost, how great ought it to bear that it may not be lost? And then, to mention a thing not culpable, if it bear so great sufferings for saving of the flesh under the hands of chirurgeons cutting or burning the same, how great ought it to bear for saving of itself under the fury of any soever enemies? Seeing that leeches, that the body may not die, do by pains consult for the body’s good; but enemies by threatening the body with pains and death, would urge us on to the slaying of soul and body in hell.
Pro aeterna salute quanta sufferre debent pii, si tanta pro temporali vita patiuntur mali. Non animae tantum, sed ipsi quoque corpori consulitur ferendo mortem et dolores. Verumtamen cum pro libidinibus, vel etiam sceleribus, cum denique pro ista temporali vita ac salute multa homines horrenda mirabiliter sufferunt; satis nos admonent quanta sufferenda sint pro vita bona, ut etiam postea possit esse aeterna, et sine ullo temporis termino, sine utilitatis ullius detrimento vera felicitate secura. Dominus ait, In vestra patientia possidebitis animas vestras : non ait, villas vestras, laudes vestras, luxurias vestras; sed, animas vestras. Si ergo tanta suffert anima ut possideat unde pereat, quanta debet sufferre ne pereat? Deinde, ut illud dicam quod culpabile non est, si tanta suffert pro salute carnis suae inter manus secantium sive urentium medicorum, quanta debet sufferre pro salute sua inter furores quorumlibet inimicorum? Cum medici, ne corpus moriatur, per poenas corpori consulant; inimici autem poenas et mortem corpori comminando, ut anima et corpus in gehenna occidatur impellant.
7 Section 7 PL 40, 614
7. Though indeed the welfare even of the body is then more providently consulted for if its temporal life and welfare be disregarded for righteousness’ sake, and its pain or death most patiently for righteousness’ sake endured. Since it is of the body’s redemption which is to be in the end, that the Apostle speaks, where he says, “Even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting the adoption of sons, the redemption of our body.” Then he subjoins, “For in hope are we saved. But hope which is seen is not hope: for what a man seeth, why doth he also hope for? But if what we see not we hope for, we do by patience wait for it.” When therefore any ills do torture us indeed, yet not extort from us ill works, not only is the soul possessed through patience; but even when through patience the body itself for a time is afflicted or lost, it is unto eternal stability and salvation resumed, and hath through grief and death an inviolable health and happy immortality laid up for itself. Whence the Lord Jesus exhorting his Martyrs to patience, hath promised of the very body a future perfect entireness, without loss, I say not of any limb, but of a single hair. “Verily I say unto you,” saith He, “a hair of your head shall not perish.” That so, because, as the Apostle says, “no man ever hated his own flesh,” a faithful man may more by patience than by impatience take vigilant care for the state of his flesh, and find amends for its present losses, how great soever they may be, in the inestimable gain of future incorruption.
Quanquam et ipsi corpori tunc providentius consulatur, si temporalis salus ejus pro justitia contemnatur, et poena vel mors ejus patientissime pro justitia sufferatur. De corporis quippe redemptione quae in fine futura est, loquitur Apostolus, ubi ait: Et ipsi in nobismetipsis ingemiscimus, adoptionem filiorum exspectantes redemptionem corporis nostri. Deinde subjunxit: Spe enim salvi facti sumus. Spes autem quae videtur, non est spes: quod enim videt quis, quid et sperat? Si autem quod non videmus speramus, per patientiam exspectamus .
8 Section 8 PL 40, 614
8. But although patience be a virtue of the mind, yet partly the mind exercises it in the mind itself, partly in the body. In itself it exercises patience, when, the body remaining unhurt and untouched, the mind is goaded by any adversities or filthinesses of things or words, to do or to say something that is not expedient or not becoming, and patiently bears all evils that it may not itself commit any evil in work or word. By this patience we bear, even while we be sound in body, that in the midst of the offenses of this world our blessedness is deferred: of which is said what I cited a little before, “If what we see not we hope for, we do by patience wait for it.” By this patience, holy David bore the revilings of a railer, and, when he might easily have avenged himself, not only did it not, but even refrained another who was vexed and moved for him; and more put forth his kingly power by prohibiting than by exercising vengeance. Nor at that time was his body afflicted with any disease or wound, but there was an acknowledging of a time of humility, and a bearing of the will of God, for the sake of which there was a drinking of the bitterness of contumely with most patient mind. This patience the Lord taught, when, the servants being moved at the mixing in of the tares and wishing to gather them up, He said that the householder answered, “Leave both to grow until the harvest.” That, namely, must be patience put up with, which must not be in haste put away. Of this patience Himself afforded and showed an example, when, before the passion of His Body, He so bore with His disciple Judas, that ere He pointed him out as the traitor, He endured him as a thief; and before experience of bonds and cross and death, did, to those lips so full of guile, not deny the kiss of peace. All these, and whatever else there be, which it were tedious to rehearse, belong to that manner of patience, by which the mind doth, not its own sins but any evils so ever from without, patiently endure in itself, while the body remains altogether unhurt. But the other manner of patience is that by which the same mind bears any troubles and grievances whatsoever in the sufferings of the body; not as do foolish or wicked men for the sake of getting vain things or perpetrating crimes; but as is defined by the Lord, “for righteousness’ sake.” In both kinds, the holy Martyrs contended. For both with scornful reproofs of the ungodly were they filled, where, the body remaining intact, the mind hath its own (as it were) blows and wounds, and bears these unbroken: and in their bodies they were bound, imprisoned, vexed with hunger and thirst, tortured, gashed, torn asunder, burned, butchered; and with piety immovable submitted unto God their mind, while they were suffering in the flesh all that exquisite cruelty could devise in its mind.
Quamvis autem patientia virtus sit animi, partim tamen ea utitur animus in se ipso, partim vero in corpore suo. In se ipso utitur patientia, quando illaeso et intacto corpore aliquid quod non expediat vel non deceat, facere aut dicere quibuslibet adversitatibus aut foeditatibus rerum seu verborum stimulis incitatur, et patienter mala omnia tolerat, ne ipse mali aliquid opere vel ore committat.
9 Section 9 PL 40, 615
9. It is indeed a greater fight of patience, when it is not a visible enemy that by persecution and rage would urge us into crime which enemy may openly and in broad day be by not consenting overcome; but the devil himself, (he who doth likewise by means of the children of infidelity, as by his vessels, persecute the children of light) doth by himself hiddenly attack us, by his rage putting us on to do or say something against God. As such had holy Job experience of him, by both temptations vexed, but in both through steadfast strength of patience and arms of piety unconquered. For first, his body being left unhurt, he lost all that he had, in order that the mind, before excruciation of the flesh, might through withdrawal of the things which men are wont to prize highly, be broken, and he might say something against God upon loss of the things for the sake of which he was thought to worship Him. He was smitten also with sudden bereavement of all his sons so that whom he had begotten one by one he should lose all at once, as though their numerousness had been not for the adorning of his felicity, but for the increasing of his calamity. But where, having endured these things, he remained immovable in his God, he cleaved to His will, Whom it was not possible to lose but by his own will; and in place of the things he had lost he held Him who took them away, in Whom he should find what should never be lost. For He that took them away was not that enemy who had will of hurting, but He who had given to that enemy the power of hurting. The enemy next attacked also the body, and now not those things which were in the man from without, but the man himself, in whatever part he could, he smote. From the head to the feet were burning pains, were crawling worms, were running sores; still in the rotting body the mind remained entire, and horrid as were the tortures of the consuming flesh, with inviolate piety and uncorrupted patience it endured them all. There stood the wife, and instead of giving her husband any help, was suggesting blasphemy against God. For we are not to think that the devil, in leaving her when he took away the sons, went to work as one unskilled in mischief: rather, how necessary she was to the tempter, he had already learned in Eve. But now he had not found a second Adam whom he might take by means of a woman. More cautious was Job in his hours of sadness, than Adam in his bowers of gladness, the one was overcome in the midst of pleasant things, the other overcame in the midst of pains; the one consented to that which seemed delightsome, this other quailed not in torments most affrightsome. There stood his friends too, not to console him in his evils, but to suspect evil in him. For while he suffered so great sorrows, they believed him not innocent, nor did their tongue forbear to say that which his conscience had not to say; that so amid ruthless tortures of the body, his mind also might be beaten with truthless reproaches. But he, bearing in his flesh his own pains, in his heart others’ errors, reproved his wife for her folly, taught his friends wisdom, preserved patience in each and all.
Majus sane patientiae certamen est, quando non visibilis inimicus persequendo atque saeviendo urget in nefas, qui palam et aperte a non consentiente vincatur; sed ipse diabolus, qui etiam per filios infidelitatis, tanquam per sua vasa, filios lucis insequitur, per se ipsum occultus impugnat, saeviendo instans ut contra Deum fiat aliquid vel dicatur.
10 Section 10 PL 40, 616
10. To this man let them look who put themselves to death when they are sought for to have life put upon them; and by bereaving themselves of the present, deny and refuse also that which is to come. Why, if people were driving them to deny Christ or to do any thing contrary to righteousness, like true Martyrs, they ought rather to bear all patiently than to dare death impatiently. If it could be right to do this for the sake of running away from evils, holy Job would have killed himself, that being in so great evils, in his estate, in his sons, in his limbs, through the devil’s cruelty, he might escape them all. But he did it not. Far be it from him, a wise man, to commit upon himself what not even that unwise woman suggested. And if she had suggested it, she would with good reason here also have had that answer which she had when suggesting blasphemy; “Thou hast spoken as one of the foolish women. If we have received good at the hand of the Lord, shall we not bear evil?” Seeing even he also would have lost patience, if either by blasphemy as she had suggested, or by killing himself which not even she had dared to speak of, he should die, and be among them of whom it is written, “Woe unto them that have lost patience!” and rather increase than escape pains, if after the death of his body he should be hurried off to punishment either of blasphemers, or of murderers, or of them which are worse even than parricides. For if a parricide be on that account more wicked than any homicide, because he kills not merely a man but a near relative; and among parricides too, the nearer the person killed, the greater criminal he is judged to be: without doubt worse still is he who kills himself, because there is none nearer to a man than himself. What then do these miserable persons mean, who, though both here they have inflicted pain upon themselves, and hereafter not only for their impiety towards God but for the very cruelty which they have exercised upon themselves will deservedly suffer pains of His inflicting, do yet seek moreover the glories of Martyrs? since, even if for the true testimony of Christ they suffered persecution, and killed themselves, that they might not suffer any thing from their persecutors, it would be rightly said to them, “Woe unto them which have lost patience!” For how hath patience her just reward, if even an impatient suffering receives the crown? or how shall that man be judged innocent, to whom is said, “Thou shall love thy neighbor as thyself,” if he commit murder upon himself which he is forbidden to commit upon his neighbor?
Impatientia Donatistarum sibi manus afferentium, quando a Catholicis quaeruntur. Hunc intueantur, qui sibi ingerunt mortem, quando quaeruntur ad vitam; et sibi auferendo praesentem, abnegant et futuram. Qui si ad Christum negandum, vel aliquid contra justitiam faciendum, sicut veri martyres, cogerentur, omnia potius patienter ferre, quam sibi impatienter mortem inferre debuerant. Quod si fugiendorum malorum causa recte fieri posset, Job sanctus se ipse perimeret, ut tanta mala in rebus suis, in filiis suis, in membris suis, diabolicae crudelitatis effugeret. Non autem fecit. Absit enim ut in se committeret ipse vir sapiens, quod nec mulier suggessit insipiens. Quia et si suggessisset, merito et hic illud audisset, quod audivit suggerendo blasphemiam: Locuta es tanquam una ex insipientibus mulieribus. Si bona suscepimus de manu Domini, mala non sustinebimus ? Et ipse quippe patientiam perdidisset, sive blasphemando, sicut illa voluerat, sive se interficiendo, quod nec illa ausa fuerat dicere, moreretur: atque esset inter illos de quibus dictum est, Vae iis qui perdiderunt patientiam ! et augeret potius quam evaderet poenas, qui post sui corporis mortem, sive ad blasphemorum, sive ad homicidarum, vel etiam plus quam parricidarum supplicia raperetur. Si enim parricida eo sceleratior est quam quilibet homicida, quia non tantum hominem, verum etiam propinquum necat; inque ipsis parricidis, quanto propinquiorem quisque peremerit, tanto judicatur immanior: sine dubio pejor est qui se occidit; quia nemo est homini se ipso propinquior. Quid ergo miseri faciunt, qui cum et hic sibimet ingestas, et postea non solum impietatis adversus Deum, sed etiam ipsius quam in se exercuerunt crudelitatis luant debitas poenas, insuper quaerunt et martyrum glorias? cum etiamsi pro vero Christi testimonio persecutionem paterentur, et se interficerent, ne aliquid a persecutoribus paterentur, recte illis diceretur, Vae iis qui perdiderunt patientiam! Quomodo enim justum praemium patientiae redditur, si et impatiens passio coronatur? Aut quomodo innocens judicabitur, cui dictum est, Diliges proximum tuum sicut te ipsum , si homicidium committit in se ipso, quod committere prohibetur in proximo?
11 Section 11 PL 40, 617
11. Let then the Saints hear from holy Scripture the precepts of patience: “My son, when thou comest to the service of God, stand thou in righteousness and fear, and prepare thy soul for temptation: bring thine heart low, and bear up; that in the last end thy life may increase. All that shall come upon thee receive thou, and in pain bear up, and in thy humility have patience. For in the fire gold and silver is proved, but acceptable men in the furnace of humiliation.” And in another place we read: “My son, faint not thou in the discipline of the Lord, neither be wearied when thou art chidden of Him. For whom the Lord loveth He chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom He receiveth.” What is here set down, “son whom He receiveth,” the same in the above mentioned testimony is, “acceptable men.” For this is just, that we who from our first felicity of Paradise for contumacious appetence of things to enjoy were dismissed, through humble patience of things that annoy may be received back: driven away for doing evil, brought back by suffering evil: there against righteousness doing ill, here for righteousness’ sake patient of ills.
Patientia bonorum. Audiant ergo sancti de Scripturis sanctis praecepta patientiae: Fili, accedens ad servitutem Dei, sta in justitia et timore, et praepara animam tuam ad tentationem: deprime cor tuum, et sustine; ut crescat in novissimis vita tua. Omne quod tibi supervenerit accipe, et in dolore sustine, et in humilitate tua patientiam habe. Quoniam in igne probatur aurum et argentum, homines vero receptibiles in camino humiliationis . Et in loco alio legitur: Fili, ne deficias in disciplina Domini, neque fatigeris cum ab illo increparis. Quem enim diligit Dominus, corripit; flagellat autem omnem filium quem recipit . Quod hic positum est, filium quem recipit; hoc in supra dicto testimonio est, homines receptibiles. Hoc enim justum est, ut qui de pristina felicitate paradisi propter contumacem deliciarum appetentiam dimissi sumus, per humilem molestiarum patientiam recipiamur: fugaces mala faciendo, reduces mala patiendo; ibi contra justitiam facientes, hic pro justitia patientes.
12 Section 12 PL 40, 617
12. But concerning true patience, worthy of the name of this virtue, whence it is to be had, must now be inquired. For there are some who attribute it to the strength of the human will, not which it hath by Divine assistance, but which it hath of free-will. Now this error is a proud one: for it is the error of them which abound, of whom it is said in the Psalm, “A scornful reproof to them which abound, and a despising to the proud.” It is not therefore that “patience of the poor” which “perisheth not forever.” For these poor receive it from that Rich One, to Whom is said, “My God art Thou, because my goods Thou needest not:” of Whom is “every good gift, and every perfect gift;” to Whom crieth the needy and the poor, and in asking, seeking, knocking, saith, “My God, deliver me from the hand of the sinner, and from the hand of the lawless and unjust: because Thou art my patience, O Lord, my hope from my youth up.” But these which abound, and disdain to be in want before God, lest they receive of Him true patience, they which glory in their own false patience, seek to “confound the counsel of the poor, because the Lord is his hope.” Nor do they regard, seeing they are men, and attribute so much to their own, that is, to the human will, that they run into that which is written, “Cursed is every one who putteth his hope in man.” Whence even if it chance them that they do bear up under any hardships or difficulties, either that they may not displease men, or that they may not suffer worse, or in self-pleasing and love of their own presumption, do with most proud will bear up under these same, it is meet that concerning patience this be said unto them, which concerning wisdom the blessed Apostle James saith, “This wisdom cometh not from above, but is earthly, animal, devilish.” For why may there not be a false patience of the proud, as there is a false wisdom of the proud? But from Whom cometh true wisdom, from Him cometh also true patience. For to Him singeth that poor in spirit, “Unto God is my soul subjected, because from Him is my patience.”
Patientia non venit ex liberi arbitrii viribus, sed ex divino adjutorio. Sed vera patientia quae hujus est nomine digna virtutis, quaerendum est unde sumatur. Sunt enim qui eam tribuant viribus voluntatis humanae, non quas habent ex divino adjutorio, sed quas ex libero arbitrio. Error autem iste superbus est: eorum est enim qui abundant, de quibus dicitur in Psalmo: Opprobrium eis qui abundant, et despectio superbis . Non ergo est ista patientia pauperum, quae non perit in aeternum . Hi enim pauperes ab illo eam divite accipiunt, cui dicitur, Deus meus es tu, quoniam bonorum meorum non eges ; a quo est omne datum optimum, et omne donum perfectum ; ad quem clamat egenus et pauper, qui laudat nomen ejus, et petendo, quaerendo, pulsando, dicit: Deus meus, eripe me de manu peccatoris, et de manu legem praetereuntis et iniqui: quoniam tu es patientia mea, Domine, spes mea a juventute mea . Isti autem qui abundant, et egere ad Deum dedignantur, ne ab illo accipiant veram patientiam, de sua falsa gloriantes, consilium inopis volunt confundere, quoniam Dominus spes ejus est . Nec attendunt cum homines sunt, et suae, id est, humanae voluntati tantum tribuunt, in illud se incurrere quod scriptum est: Maledictus omnis qui spem suam ponit in homine . Unde etiamsi eis contingat ut aliqua dura et aspera, vel ne displiceant hominibus, vel ne graviora patiantur, vel sibi placendo et amando praesumptionem suam, eadem ipsa superbissima voluntate sustineant; hoc illis dicendum est de patientia, quod de sapientia beatus Jacobus apostolus dicit: Non est ista sapientia desursum descendens; sed terrena, animalis, diabolica . Cur enim non sit superborum falsa patientia, sicut superborum est falsa sapientia? A quo est autem vera sapientia, ab illo est et vera patientia. Huic enim cantat ille spiritu pauper: Deo subjecta est anima mea, quoniam ab ipso est patientia mea .
13 Section 13 PL 40, 618
13. But they answer and speak, saying, “If the will of man without any aid of God by strength of free choice bears so many grievous and horrible distresses, whether in mind or body, that it may enjoy the delight of this mortal life and of sins, why may it not be that in the same manner the self-same will of man by the same strength of free-choice, not thereunto looking to be aided of God, but unto itself by natural possibility sufficing, doth, in all of labor or sorrow that is put upon it, for righteousness and eternal life’s sake most patiently sustain the same? Or is it so, say they, that the will of the unjust is sufficient, without aid of God, for them, yea even to exercise themselves in undergoing torture for iniquity, and before they be tortured by others; sufficient the will of them which love the respiting of this life that, without aid of God, they should in the midst of most atrocious and protracted torments persevere in a lie, lest confessing their misdeeds they be ordered to be put to death; and not sufficient the will of the just, unless strength be put into them from above, that whatever be their pains, they should, either for beauty’s sake of very righteousness or for love of eternal life, bear the same?”
Objectio: cur voluntatis vires non sufficiunt ad patiendum pro justitia, sicut pro injustitia. Sed respondent et loquuntur dicentes: Si voluntas hominis sine ullo Dei adjutorio viribus liberi arbitrii tam multa gravia et horrenda perfert, sive in animo, sive in corpore, ut mortalis vitae hujus et peccatorum delectatione perfruatur; cur non eodem modo eadem ipsa voluntas hominis eisdem viribus liberi arbitrii, non ad hoc exspectans se divinitus adjuvari, sed sibi naturali possibilitate sufficiens, quidquid laboris vel doloris ingeritur, pro justitia et vita aeterna patientissime sustinet? An vero, inquiunt, idonea est iniquorum voluntas, Deo non adjuvante, ut se ipsi in cruciatibus pro iniquitate, et antequam ab aliis crucientur, exerceant; idonea est voluntas moras vitae hujus amantium, ut Deo non adjuvante, inter atrocissima et longa tormenta in mendacio perseverent, ne sua facinora confitentes, jubeantur occidi; et non est idonea justorum voluntas, nisi eis vires desuper suggerantur, quaslibet poenas, vel ipsius decore justitiae, vel aeternae vitae amore perferre?
14 Section 14 PL 40, 618
14. They which say these things, do not understand that as well each one of the wicked is in that measure for endurance of any ills more hard, in what measure the lust of the world is mightier in him; as also that each one of the just is in that measure for endurance of any ills more brave, in what measure in him the love of God is mightier. But lust of the world hath its beginning from choice of the will, its progress from enjoyableness of pleasure, its confirmation from the chain of custom, whereas “the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts,” not verily from ourselves, but “by the Holy Spirit which is given unto us.” And therefore from Him cometh the patience of the just, by Whom is shed abroad their love (of Him). Which love (of charity) the Apostle praising and setting off, among its other good qualities, saith, that it “beareth all things.” “Charity,” saith he, “is magnanimous.” And a little after he saith, “endureth all things.” The greater then is in saints the charity (or love) of God, the more do they endure all things for Him whom they love, and the greater in sinners the lust of the world, the more do they endure all things for that which they lust after. And consequently from that same source cometh true patience of the righteous, from which there is in them the love of God; and from that same source the false patience of the unrighteous, from which is in them the lust of the world. With regard to which the Apostle John saith; “Love not the world, neither the things that be in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him: because all that is in the world, is lust of the flesh, and lust of the eyes, and pride of life; which is not of the Father, but is of the world.” This concupiscence, then, which is not of the Father, but is of the world, in what measure it shall in any man be more vehement and ardent, in that measure becometh each more patient of all troubles and sorrows for that which he lusteth after. Therefore, as we said above, this is not the patience which descendeth from above, but the patience of the godly is from above, coming down from the Father of lights. And so that is earthly, this heavenly; that animal, this spiritual; that devilish, this Godlike. Because concupiscence, whereof it cometh that persons sinning suffer all things stubbornly, is of the world; but charity, whereof cometh that persons living aright suffer all things bravely, is of God. And therefore to that false patience it is possible that, without aid of God, the human will may suffice; harder, in proportion as it is more eager of lust, and bearing ills with the more endurance the worse itself becometh: while to this, which is true patience, the human will, unless aided and inflamed from above, doth not suffice, for the very reason that the Holy Spirit is the fire thereof; by Whom unless it be kindled to love that impassible Good, it is not able to bear the ill which it suffereth.
Solutio: iniquos duritiem excupiditate, pios fortitudinem ex charitate habere. Patientiae falsae sufficit voluntas humana, non autem verae. Qui haec dicunt, non intelligunt et quemque iniquorum tanto esse ad quaecumque mala perferenda duriorem, quanto in eo major est cupiditas mundi; et quemque justorum tanto esse ad quaecumque mala perferenda fortiorem, quanto in eo est major charitas Dei. Sed cupiditas mundi initium habet ex arbitrio voluntatis, progressum ex jucunditate voluptatis, firmamentum ex vinculo consuetudinis: Charitas autem Dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris, non utique ex nobis, sed per Spiritum sanctum qui datus est nobis . Proinde ab illo est patientia justorum, per quem diffunditur charitas eorum. Quam charitatem laudans atque commendans Apostolus, inter caetera ejus bona dixit eam et cuncta sufferre. Charitas, inquit, magnanima est. Et paulo post ait: Omnia tolerat . Quanto ergo major est in sanctis charitas Dei, tanto magis pro eo quod diligitur, et quanto major est in peccatoribus cupiditas mundi, tanto magis pro eo quod concupiscitur, omnia tolerantur. Ac per hoc inde est patientia vera justorum, unde est in eis charitas Dei; et inde est patientia falsa iniquorum, unde est in eis cupiditas mundi. Propter quod dicit Joannes Apostolus: Nolite diligere mundum, nec ea quae in mundo sunt. Si quis dilexerit mundum, dilectio Patris non est in ipso: quia omne quod in mundo est, concupiscentia carnis est, et concupiscentia oculorum, et ambitio saeculi; quae non est ex Patre, sed ex mundo est . Haec igitur concupiscentia quae non est ex Patre, sed ex mundo, quanto fuerit in homine vehementior et ardentior, tanto fit quisque pro eo quod concupiscit, omnium molestiarum dolorumque patientior. Idcirco, sicut supra diximus, non est ista patientia desursum descendens: patientia vero piorum desursum est, descendens a Patre luminum. Itaque illa terrena est, ista coelestis; illa animalis, ista spiritualis; illa diabolica, ista deifica. Quoniam concupiscentia, qua fit ut peccantes omnia pertinaciter patiantur, ex mundo est; charitas autem, qua fit ut recte viventes omnia fortiter patiantur, ex Deo est. Et ideo illi falsae patientiae potest sine adjutorio Dei voluntas humana sufficere; tanto durior, quanto cupidior; et eo tolerabilius mala sustinens, quo ipsa fit pejor: huic autem, quae vera patientia est, ideo voluntas humana, nisi desuper adjuta et inflammata, non sufficit, quia Spiritus sanctus est ignis ejus; quo nisi accensa diligat impassibile bonum, ferre non potest quod patitur malum.
15 Section 15 PL 40, 619
15. For, as the Divine utterances testify, “God is love, and he that dwelleth in love dwelleth in God, and God dwelleth in him.” Whoso therefore contends that love of God may be had without aid of God, what else does he contend, but that God may be had without God? Now what Christian would say this, which no madman would venture to say? Therefore in the Apostle, true, pious, faithful patience, saith exultingly, and by the mouth of the Saints; “Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? As it is written, For Thy sake we are killed all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter. Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him that loved us:” not through ourselves, but, “through Him that loved us.” And then he goes on and adds; “For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” This is that “love of God” which “is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Spirit which is given unto us.” But the concupiscence of the bad, by reason of which there is in them a false patience, “is not of the Father,” as saith the Apostle John, but is of the world.
Ut charitas ex Deo, ita ex ipso patientia vera quae manat a charitate. Sicut enim divina testantur eloquia, Deus charitas est, et qui manet in charitate, in Deo manet, et Deus in illo manet . Quisquis ergo contendit haberi posse Dei charitatem sine Dei adjutorio, quid aliud contendit, nisi haberi Deum posse sine Deo? Quis autem hoc dicat Christianus, quod nullus dicere audeat insanus? Exsultans ergo apud Apostolum vera, pia, fidelisque patientia, dicit ore sanctorum: Quis nos separabit a charitate Christi? Tribulatio? an angustia? an persecutio? an fames? an nuditas? an periculum? an gladius? sicut scriptum est, Quia propter te mortificamur tota die, deputati sumus sicut oves victimae. Sed in his omnibus supervincimus per eum qui dilexit nos: non per nos, sed per eum qui dilexit nos. Deinde sequitur et adjungit, Certus sum enim, quia neque mors, neque vita, neque angeli, neque principatus, neque potestates, neque praesentia, neque futura, neque altitudo, neque profundum, neque creatura alia poterit nos separare a charitate Dei, quae est in Christo Jesu Domino nostro . Haec est illa charitas Dei, quae diffusa est in cordibus nostris: non ex nobis, sed per Spiritum sanctum qui datus est nobis. Malorum autem concupiscentia, propter quam in eis est falsa patientia, non est ex Patre, sicut dicit apostolus Joannes, sed ex mundo est.
16 Section 16 PL 40, 620
16. Here some man shall say; “If the concupiscence of the bad, whereby it comes that they bear all evils for that which they lust after, be of the world, how is it said to be of their will?” As if, truly, they were not themselves also of the world, when they love the world, forsaking Him by Whom the world was made. For “they serve the creature more than the Creator, Who is blessed for ever.” Whether then by the word “world,” the Apostle John signifies lovers of the world, the will, as it is of themselves, is therefore of the world: or whether under the name of the world he comprises heaven and earth, and all that is therein, that is the creature universally, it is plain that the will of the creature, not being that of the Creator, is of the world. For which cause to such the Lord saith, “Ye are from beneath, I am from above: ye are of this world, I am not of this world.” And to the Apostle He saith, “If ye were of the world, the world would love his own.” But lest they should arrogate more unto themselves than their measure craved, and when He said that they were not of the world, should imagine this to be of nature, not of grace, therefore He saith, “But because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.” It follows, that they once were of the world: for, that they might not be of the world, they were chosen out of the world.
Si cupiditas ex mundo, quomodo ex humana voluntate. Quod quis non sit ex mundo, non naturae est, sed gratiae. Hic dicet aliquis: Si ex mundo est concupiscentia malorum, per quam fit ut mala omnia pro eo quod ab illis concupiscitur perferant, quo modo ex eorum dicitur voluntate? Quasi vero non et ipsi ex mundo sint, cum ab eis diligitur mundus, deserto eo per quem factus est mundus. Serviunt enim creaturae potius quam Creatori, qui est benedictus in saecula . Sive itaque mundi vocabulo Joannes apostolus dilectores significaverit mundi, voluntas quae ex ipsis est, utique ex mundo est: sive mundi nomine coelum et terram et quaecumque in eis sunt, hoc est, universam complexus sit creaturam, voluntas procul dubio creaturae, quae non est Creatoris, ex mundo est. Propter quod talibus Dominus dicit: Vos de deorsum estis, ego de sursum sum: vos de hoc mundo estis, ego non sum de hoc mundo . Apostolis autem dicit: Si de mundo hoc essetis, mundus quod suum est diligeret. Sed ne sibi amplius arrogarent, quam eorum mensura poscebat, et hoc quod eos non esse dixit ex mundo, naturae putarent esse, non gratiae: Quia vero, inquit, de mundo non estis, sed ego elegi vos de mundo, propterea odit vos mundus . Ergo de mundo erant: nam ut de mundo non essent, electi sunt de mundo.
17 Section 17 PL 40, 620
17. Now this election the Apostle demonstrating to be, not of merits going before in good works, but election of grace, saith thus: “And in this time a remnant by election of grace is saved. But if by grace, then is it no more of works, otherwise grace is no more grace.” This is election of grace; that is, election in which through the grace of God men are elected: this, I say, is election of grace which goes before all good merits of men. For if it be to any good merits that it is given, then is it no more gratuitously given, but is paid as a debt, and consequently is not truly called grace; where “reward,” as the same Apostle saith, “is not imputed as grace, but as debt.” Whereas if, that it may be true grace, that is, gratuitous, it find nothing in man to which it is due of merit, (which thing is well understood in that saying, “Thou wilt save them for nothing,”) then assuredly itself gives the merits, not to merits is given. Consequently it goes before even faith, from which it is that all good works begin. “For the just,” as is written, “shall live by faith.” But, moreover, grace not only assists the just, but also justifies the ungodly. And therefore even when it does aid the just and seems to be rendered to his merits, not even then does it cease to be grace, because that which it aids it did itself bestow. With a view therefore to this grace, which precedes all good merits of man, not only was Christ put to death by the ungodly, but “died for the ungodly.” And ere that He died, He elected the Apostles, not of course then just, but to be justified: to whom He saith, “I have chosen you out of the world.” For to whom He said, “Ye are not of the world,” and then, lest they should account themselves never to have been of the world, presently added, “But I have chosen you out of the world;” assuredly that they should not be of the world was by His own election of them conferred upon them. Wherefore, if it had been through their own righteousness, not through His grace, that they were elected, they would not have been chosen out of the world, because they would already not be of the world if already they were just. And again, if the reason why they were elected was, that they were already just, they had already first chosen the Lord. For who can be righteous but by choosing righteousness? “But the end of the law is Christ, for righteousness is to every one that believeth. Who is made unto us wisdom of God, and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption: that, as it is written, He that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord.” He then is Himself our righteousness.
Electio gratiae praevenit omnia merita bona. Gratia dat merita, non meritis datur. Praevenit fidem. Hanc autem electionem non praecedentium in bonis operibus meritorum, sed electionem gratiae demonstrans Apostolus, sic inquit: Et in hoc tempore reliquiae per electionem gratiae salvae factae sunt. Si autem gratia, jam non ex operibus; alioquin gratia jam non est gratia . Haec est electio gratiae, id est, electio qua per Dei gratiam homines eliguntur. Haec est, inquam, electio gratiae, qua omnia bona merita praeveniuntur humana. Si enim ullis bonis meritis datur, jam non gratis datur, sed debita redditur, ac per hoc non vero nomine gratia nuncupatur; ubi merces, sicut idem dicit apostolus, non imputatur secundum gratiam, sed secundum debitum . Si autem ut vera sit gratia, id est, gratuita, nihil invenit in homine, cui merito debeatur; quod bene intelligitur et in eo quod dictum est, Pro nihilo salvos facies eos : profecto ipsa dat merita, non meritis datur. Praevenit ergo etiam fidem, ex qua omnia bona opera incipiunt. Justus enim, sicut scriptum est, ex fide vivit . Porro autem gratia non solum adjuvat justum, verum etiam justificat impium. Et ideo etiam cum adjuvat justum, et videtur ejus meritis reddi, nec sic desinit esse gratia; quoniam id adjuvat quod ipsa est largita. Propter hanc itaque gratiam, quae cuncta bona merita humana praecedit, non solum Christus ab impiis occisus est, verum etiam pro impiis mortuus est . Et antequam moreretur, non utique justos, sed justificandos elegit Apostolos, quibus ait, Ego vos de mundo elegi. Quibus enim dixit, De mundo non estis; et ne putarent se nunquam fuisse de mundo, mox addidit, sed ego vos de mundo elegi: profecto ut de mundo non essent, ipsius in eos electione collatum est. Quocirca si per suam justitiam, non per gratiam ejus eligerentur, non de mundo electi essent: quoniam de mundo jam non essent, si jam justi essent. Deinde si propterea sunt electi, quia jam justi erant; ipsi priores jam Dominum elegerant. Quis enim potest esse justus, nisi eligendo justitiam? Finis autem legis Christus, ad justitiam omni credenti . Qui factus est nobis sapientia a Deo; et justitia, et sanctificatio, et redemptio: ut, quemadmodum scriptum est, Qui gloriatur, in Domino glorietur . Ipse est ergo nostra justitia.
18 Section 18 PL 40, 621
18. Whence also the just of old, before the Incarnation of the Word, in this faith of Christ, and in this true righteousness, (which thing Christ is unto us,) were justified; believing this to come which we believe come: and they themselves by grace were saved through faith, not of themselves, but by the gift of God, not of works, lest haply they should be lifted up. For their good works did not come before God’s mercy, but followed it. For to them was it said, and by them written, long ere Christ was come in the flesh, “I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will show compassion on whom I will have compassion.” From which words of God the Apostle Paul, should so long after say; “It is not therefore of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy.” It is also their own voice, long ere Christ was come in the flesh, “My God, His mercy shall prevent me.” How indeed could they be aliens from the faith of Christ, by whose charity even Christ was fore-announced unto us; without the faith of Whom, not any of mortals either hath been, or is, or ever shall be able to be, righteous? If then, being already just, the Apostles were elected by Christ, they would have first chosen Him, that just men might be chosen, because without Him they could not be just. But it was not so: as Himself saith to them, “Not ye have chosen Me, but I have chosen you.” Of which the Apostle John speaks, “Not that we loved God, but that He loved us.”
Gratiae et fidei dono etiam antiqui ante incarnationem justificati sunt. Sine fide nullus unquam justus fuit. Unde et antiqui justi ante incarnationem Verbi, in hac fide Christi, et in hac vera justitia, quod est nobis Christus, justificati sunt; hoc credentes futurum quod nos credimus factum: et ipsi gratia salvi facti per fidem, non ex se ipsis, sed Dei dono; non ex operibus, ne forte extollerentur . Bona quippe opera eorum non praevenerunt misericordiam Dei, sed subsecuta sunt. Ipsi quippe audierunt, ipsi scripserunt longe antequam Christus venisset in carne: Miserebor cui misertus ero, et misericordiam praestabo cui misericors fuero. E quibus Dei verbis, tanto post apostolus Paulus diceret, Igitur non volentis neque currentis, sed miserentis est Dei . Ipsorum etiam vox est longe antequam Christus venisset in carne: Deus meus, misericordia ejus praeveniet me . Quomodo autem possent alieni esse a fide Christi, quorum charitate etiam nobis praenuntiatus est Christus; sine cujus fide quisquam mortalium nec fuit, nec est, nec esse aliquando poterit justus? Si ergo jam justi a Christo eligerentur Apostoli, prius illum ipsi elegissent, ut justi eligi possent; quia sine illo justi esse non possent. Sed non ita factum est: ipse quippe illis ait, Non vos me elegistis, sed ego vos elegi. Unde dicit apostolus Joannes, Non quod dilexerimus Deum, sed quia ipse prior dilexit nos .
19 Section 19 PL 40, 621
19. Since the case is so, what is man, while in this life he uses his own proper will, ere he choose and love God, but unrighteous and ungodly? “What,” I say, “is man,” a creature going astray from the Creator, unless his Creator “be mindful of him,” and choose him freely, and love him freely? Because he is himself not able to choose or love, unless being first chosen and loved he be healed, because by choosing blindness he perceiveth not, and by loving laziness is soon wearied. But perchance some man may say: In what manner is it that God first chooses and loves unjust men, that He may justify them, when it is written, “Thou hatest, Lord, all that work iniquity?” In what way, think we, but in a wonderful and ineffable manner? And yet even we are able to conceive, that the good Physician both hates and loves the sick man: hates him, because he is sick; loves him, that he may drive away his sickness.
Ante gratiae electionem injusti omnes. Quod cum ita sit, quid est homo utens in hac vita propria voluntate, antequam eligat et diligat Deum, nisi injustus et impius? Quid est, inquam, homo aberrans a Creatore creatura, nisi Creator ejus memor sit ejus , et eligat eum gratis, et diligat gratis? Quia ipse non potest eligere vel diligere, nisi prius electus dilectusque curetur, qui caecitate eligenda non cernit, et languore diligenda fastidit. Sed forte quis dicat: Quomodo Deus prius eligit et diligit iniquos, ut justificet eos, cum scriptum sit, Odisti, Domine, omnes operantes iniquitatem ? Quomodo putamus, nisi miro et ineffabili modo? Et tamen etiam nos possumus cogitare, quod medicus bonus aegrotum et odit et diligit: odit enim, quia aegrotat; diligit, ut aegritu dinem pellat.
20 Section 20 PL 40, 622
20. Let thus much have been said with regard to charity, without which in us there cannot be true patience, because in good men it is the love of God which endureth all things, as in bad men the lust of the world. But this love is in us by the Holy Spirit which was given us. Whence, of Whom cometh in us love, of Him cometh patience. But the lust of the world, when it patiently bears the burdens of any manner of calamity, boasts of the strength of its own will, like as of the stupor of disease, not robustness of health. This boasting is insane: it is not the language of patience, but of dotage. A will like this in that degree seems more patient of bitter ills, in which it is more greedy of temporal good things, because more empty of eternal.
Quomodo charitas verae patientiae, ita cupiditas fons malae patientiae. Haec propter charitatem dicta sint, sine qua in nobis non potest esse vera patientia: quia in bonis charitas Dei est, quae tolerat omnia, sicut in malis mundi cupiditas. Sed haec charitas per Spiritum sanctum est in nobis, qui datus est nobis. Unde a quo nobis est charitas, ab illo est patientia. Mundi autem cupiditas, quando patienter sustinet onera cujuslibet calamitatis, gloriatur de viribus propriae voluntatis, tanquam de stupore morbi, non de robore sanitatis. Insana est ista gloriatio; non est patientiae, sed dementiae. Voluntas ista tanto videtur patientior acerborum malorum, quanto est avidior temporalium bonorum, quia inanior aeternorum.
21 Section 21 PL 40, 622
21. But if it be goaded on and inflamed with deceitful visions and unclean incentives by the devilish spirit, associated and conspiring therewith in malignant agreement, this spirit makes the will of the man either frantic with error, or burning with appetite of some worldly delight; and hence, it seems to show a marvellous endurance of intolerable evils: but yet it does not follow from this that an evil will without instigation of another and unclean spirit, like as a good will without aid of the Holy Spirit, cannot exist. For that there may be an evil will even without any spirit either seducing or inciting, is sufficiently clear in the instance of the devil himself, who is found to have become a devil, not through some other devil, but of his own proper will. An evil will therefore, whether it be hurried on by lust, whether called back by fear, whether expanded by gladness, whether contracted by sadness, and in all these perturbations of mind enduring and making light of whatever are to others, or at another time, more grievous, this evil will may, without another spirit to goad it on, seduce itself, and in lapsing by defection from the higher to the lower, the more pleasant it shall account that thing to be which it seeks to get or fears to lose, or rejoices to have gotten, or grieves to have lost, the more tolerably for its sake bear what is less for it to suffer than that is to be enjoyed. For whatever that thing be, it is of the creature, of which one knows the pleasure. Because in some sort, the creature loved approaches itself to the creature loving in fond contact and connection, to the giving experience of its sweetness.
Voluntatem malam esse posse etiam sine spiritus mali instigatione. Quod si eam exagitat et inflammat fallacibus visis et suasionibus immundis diabolicus spiritus et maligna conspiratione sociatus, efficit hominis voluntatem, vel errore dementem, vel appetitu cujuslibet mundanae delectationis ardentem: quae cum videtur intolerabilia mirabiliter sustinere, non tamen ideo etiam voluntas mala sine instigatione alterius immundi spiritus, sicut voluntas bona sine adjutorio sancti Spiritus non potest esse. Nam esse posse voluntatem malam etiam sine aliquo spiritu vel seducente vel incitante, in ipso diabolo satis ostenditur, qui per nullum alium diabolum, sed propria voluntate factus diabolus invenitur. Voluntas itaque mala sive cupiditate rapiatur, sive timore revocetur, sive laetitia diffundatur, sive tristitia contrahatur, atque in his omnibus perturbationibus animi quaecumque sunt aliis vel alio tempore graviora contemnat et perferat; potest et sine alterius spiritus instinctu se ipsa seducere, et defectu a superioribus in inferiora lapsando, quanto jucundius aestimaverit, quod adipisci appetit, vel amittere metuit, vel adeptum gaudet, vel amissum dolet, tanto tolerabilius pro eo ferre quod sibi minus est ad patiendum, quam illud ad fruendum. Quidquid enim illud est, ex creatura est, cujus nota voluptas est. Quodam modo enim familiari contactu atque connexu ad experiendam ejus suavitatem adjacet amanti creaturae amata creatura.
22 Section 22 PL 40, 623
22. But the pleasure of the Creator, of which is written, “And from the river of Thy pleasure wilt Thou give them to drink,” is of far other kind, for it is not, like us, a creature. Unless then its love be given to us from thence there is no source whence it may be in us. And consequently, a good will, by which we love God, cannot be in man, save in whom God also worketh to will. This good will therefore, that is, a will faithfully subjected to God, a will set on fire by sanctity of that ardor which is above, a will which loves God and his neighbor for God’s sake; whether through love, of which the Apostle Peter makes answer, “Lord, Thou knowest that I love Thee;” whether through fear, of which says the Apostle Paul, “In fear and trembling work out your own salvation;” whether through joy, of which he says, “In hope rejoicing, in tribulation patient;” whether through sorrow, with which he says he had great grief for his brethren; in whatever way it endure what bitterness and hardships soever, it is the love of God which “endureth all things,” and which is not shed abroad in our hearts but by the Holy Spirit given unto us. Whereof piety makes no manner of doubt, but, as the charity of them which holily love, so the patience of them which piously endure, is the gift of God. For it cannot be that the divine Scripture deceiveth or is deceived, which not only in the Old Books hath testimonies of this thing, when it is said unto God, “My Patience art Thou,” and, “From Him is my patience;” and where another prophet saith, that we receive the spirit of fortitude; but also in the Apostolic writings we read, “Because unto you is given on behalf of Christ, not only to believe on Him, but to suffer for Him.” Therefore let not that make the mind to be as of its own merit uplifted, wherewith he is told that he is of Another’s mercy gifted.
Bona voluntas non nisi ex Deo. Voluptas autem Creatoris, de qua scriptum est, Et torrente voluptatis tuae potabis eos , longe alterius generis est: neque enim, sicut nos, creatura est. Nisi ergo amor ejus detur inde nobis, non est unde esse possit in nobis. Ac per hoc voluntas bona, qua diligitur Deus, in homine non potest esse, nisi in quo Deus operatur et velle . Haec igitur voluntas bona, id est, voluntas Deo fideliter subdita, voluntas sanctitate superni ardoris accensa, voluntas quae diligit Deum et proximum propter Deum; sive amore, de quo respondet apostolus Petrus, Domine, tu scis quia amo te ; sive timore, de quo dicit apostolus Paulus, in timore et tremore vestram ipsorum salutem operamini ; sive gaudio, de quo dicit, Spe gaudentes, in tribulatione patientes ; sive tristitia, qualem se dicit magnam habuisse pro fratribus suis : quaecumque amara et aspera sufferat, charitas Dei est, quae omnia tolerat , quae non diffunditur in cordibus nostris, nisi per Spiritum sanctum qui datus est nobis .
23 Section 23 PL 40, 623
23. But if moreover any not having charity, which pertaineth to the unity of spirit and the bond of peace whereby the Catholic Church is gathered and knit together, being involved in any schism, doth, that he may not deny Christ, suffer tribulations, straits, hunger, nakedness, persecution, perils, prisons, bonds, torments, swords, or flames, or wild beasts, or the very cross, through fear of hell and everlasting fire; in nowise is all this to be blamed, nay rather this also is a patience meet to be praised. For we cannot say that it would have been better for him that by denying Christ he should suffer none of these things, which he did suffer by confessing Him: but we must account that it will perhaps be more tolerable for him in the judgment, than if by denying Christ he should avoid all those things: so that what the Apostle saith, “If I shall give my body to be burned, but have not charity, it profiteth me nothing,” should be understood to profit nothing for obtaining the kingdom of heaven, but not for having more tolerable punishment to undergo in the last judgment.
Si quis autem non habens charitatem, quae pertinet ad unitatem spiritus et vinculum pacis, quo catholica Ecclesia congregata connectitur, in aliquo schismate constitutus, ne Christum neget, patitur tribulationes, angustias, famem, nuditatem, persecutionem, pericula, carceres, vincula, tormenta, gladium, vel flammas, vel bestias, vel ipsam crucem timore gehennarum, et ignis aeterni; nullo modo ista culpanda sunt, imo vero et haec laudanda patientia est. Non enim dicere poterimus, melius ei fuisse ut Christum negando nihil eorum pateretur, quae passus est confitendo; sed existimandum est fortasse tolerabilius ei futurum judicium, quam si Christum negando cuncta illa vitaret: ut illud quod ait Apostolus, Si tradidero corpus meum ut ardeam, charitatem autem non habeam, nihil mihi prodest ; nihil prodesse intelligatur ad regnum coelorum obtinendum, non ad extremi judicii tolerabilius supplicium subeundum.
24 Section 24 PL 40, 624
24. But it may well be asked, whether this patience likewise be the gift of God, or to be attributed to strength of the human will, by which patience, one who is separated from the Church doth, not for the error which separated him but for the truth of the Sacrament or Word which hath remained with him, for fear of pains eternal suffer pains temporal. For we must take heed lest haply, if we affirm that patience to be the gift of God, they in whom it is should be thought to belong also to the kingdom of God; but if we deny it to be the gift of God, we should be compelled to allow that without aid and gift of God there can be in the will of man somewhat of good. Because it is not to be denied that it is a good thing that a man believe he shall undergo pain of eternal punishment if he shall deny Christ, and for that faith endure and make light of any manner of punishment of man’s inflicting.
An haec eorum patientia sit Dei donum. Sed merito quaeri potest utrum et ista patientia donum Dei sit, an viribus tribuenda sit voluntatis humanae, qua quisque ab Ecclesia separatus, non pro errore qui eum separavit, sed pro veritate sacramenti seu verbi quae apud eum remansit, timore poenarum aeternarum poenas patitur temporales. Cavendum est enim ne forte, si Dei donum istam patientiam dixerimus, hi quibus inest, etiam ad regnum Dei pertinere credantur: si autem illam donum Dei esse negaverimus, cogamur fateri, sine adjutorio et munere Dei in voluntate hominis esse posse aliquid boni. Neque enim hoc non est bonum, ut credat homo aeterno supplicio se esse puniendum, si negaverit Christum, et pro ista fide qualecumque supplicium perferat et contemnat humanum.
25 Section 25 PL 40, 624
25. So then, as we are not to deny that this is the gift of God, we are thus to understand that there be some gifts of God possessed by the sons of that Jerusalem which is above, and free, and mother of us all, (for these are in some sort the hereditary possessions in which we are “heirs of God and joint-heirs with Christ:”) but some other which may be received even by the sons of concubines to whom carnal Jews and schismatics or heretics are compared. For though it be written, “Cast out the bondmaid and her son, for the son of the bondmaid shall not be heir with my son Isaac:” and though God said to Abraham, “In Isaac shall thy seed be called:” which the Apostle hath so interpreted as to say, “That is, not they which be sons of the flesh, these be the sons of God; but the sons of the promise are counted for the seed;” that we might understand the seed of Abraham in regard of Christ to pertain by reason of Christ to the sons of God, who are Christ’s body and members, that is to say, the Church of God, one, true, very-begotten, catholic, holding the godly faith; not the faith which works through elation or fear, but “which worketh by love;” nevertheless, even the sons of the concubines, when Abraham sent them away from his son Isaac, he did not omit to bestow upon them some gifts, that they might not be left in every way empty, but not that they should be held as heirs. For so we read: “And Abraham gave all his estate unto Isaac; and to the sons of his concubines gave Abraham gifts, and sent them away from his son Isaac.” If then we be sons of Jerusalem the free, let us understand that other be the gifts of them which are put out of the inheritance, other the gifts of them which be heirs. For these be the heirs, to whom is said, “Ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear, but ye have received the spirit of adoption of sons, whereby we cry, Abba, Father.”
Proinde sicut negandum non est hoc esse donum Dei, ita intelligendum est alia esse Dei dona filiorum illius Jerusalem, quae sursum libera est mater nostra.
26 Section 26 PL 40, 625
26. Cry we therefore with the spirit of charity, and until we come to the inheritance in which we are alway to remain, let us be, through love which becometh the free-born, not through fear which becometh bondmen, patient of suffering. Cry we, so long as we are poor, until we be with that inheritance made rich. Seeing how great earnest thereof we have received, in that Christ to make us rich made Himself poor; Who being exalted unto the riches which are above, there was sent One Who should breathe into our hearts holy longings, the Holy Spirit. Of these poor, as yet believing, not yet beholding; as yet hoping, not yet enjoying; as yet sighing in desire, not yet reigning in felicity; as yet hungering and thirsting, not yet satisfied: of these poor, then, “the patience shall not perish for ever:” not that there will be patience there also, where aught to endure shall not be; but “will not perish,” meaning that it will not be unfruitful. But its fruit it will have for ever, therefore it “shall not perish for ever.” For he who labors in vain, when his hope fails for which he labored, says with good cause, “I have lost so much labor:” but he who comes to the promise of his labor says, congratulating himself, I have not lost my labor. Labor then is said not to perish (or be lost), not because it lasts perpetually, but because it is not spent in vain. So also the patience of the poor of Christ (who yet are to be made rich as heirs of Christ) shall not perish for ever: not because there also we shall be commanded patiently to bear, but because for that which we have here patiently borne, we shall enjoy eternal bliss. He will put no end to everlasting felicity, Who giveth temporal patience unto the will: because both the one and the other is of Him bestowed as a gift upon charity, Whose gift that charity is also.
Patientiae pauperum Christi merces aeterna. Clamemus ergo spiritu charitatis, et donec veniamus ad haereditatem in qua semper maneamus, liberali amore simus, non servili timore patientes. Clamemus, quamdiu pauperes sumus, donec illa haereditate ditemur. Magna quippe inde pignora accepimus, quod ad nos ditandos pauper factus est Christus, quo in supernas divitias exaltato, missus est qui sancta desideria nostris cordibus inspiraret Spiritus sanctus. Horum pauperum adhuc credentium, nondum contemplantium; adhuc sperantium, nondum tenentium; adhuc desiderio suspirantium, nondum felicitate regnantium; adhuc esurientium et sitientium, nondum satiatorum: horum ergo pauperum patientia non peribit in aeternum : non quia et illic patientia erit, ubi quod toleretur non erit; sed non peribit, dictum est, quia infructuosa non erit. Fructum autem habebit aeternum, ideo non peribit in aeternum. Qui enim laborat inaniter, cum eum spes fefellerit, propter quam laborabat, merito dicit, Perdidi tantum laborem: quisquis vero ad sui laboris promissa pervenerit, gratulans dicit, Non perdidi laborem meum. Dicitur ergo labor non perisse, non quia manet perpetuus, sed quia non est inaniter fusus. Sic et patientia pauperum Christi, sed ditandorum haeredum Christi, non peribit in aeternum: non quia et illic patienter ferre jubebimur, sed quia pro iis quae hic patienter pertulimus, aeterna beatitudine perfruemur. Non dabit finem sempiternae felicitati, qui donat temporalem patientiam voluntati: quia utrumque munus donatae donatum est charitati.