Idolaters are inexcusable: and those most of all that worship for gods the works of the hands of men.
Men folowing their phantasies knew not God by his creatures, but honored the creatures for goddes. 10. Most sottishly also worshipped thinges fashioned by mens handes, as goddes.
1But all men are vain, in whom there is not the knowledge of God: and who by these good things that are seen, could not understand him that is, neither by attending to the works have acknowledged who was the workman:Or vani sono tutti gli uomini, i quali non hanno cognizione di Dio; e dalle buone cose, che veggonsi non sono giunti a conoscere colui, che è, né dalla considerazione delle opere conobber chi fosse l'artefice:BVT al men be vame, in Whom there is not the knowlege of God: and of these good thinges, which are sene they could not vnderstand him that is, neither attending to the workes haue they agnised who was the workeman:Vani autem sunt omnes homines / in quibus non subest scientia Dei; / et de his quæ videntur bona, / non potuerunt intelligere eum qui est, / neque operibus attendentes agnoverunt quis esset artifex: 2But have imagined either the fire, or the wind, or the swift air, or the circle of the stars, or the great water, or the sun and moon, to be the gods that rule the world.Ma dei, e rettori del mondo credettero essere o il fuoco, o il vento, o il mobil aere, o il coro delle stelle, o la massa delle acque, o il sole, o la luna.but either the fyre, or the wind, o• the swift ayre, or a circle of starres or exceding much water, or the sunne and the moone, they thought to be goddes rulers of the world.sed aut ignem, aut spiritum, aut citatum aërem, / aut gyrum stellarum, aut nimiam aquam, aut solem et lunam, / rectores orbis terrarum deos putaverunt. 3With whose beauty, if they, being delighted, took them to be gods: let them know how much the Lord of them is more beautiful than they: for the first author of beauty made all those things.Che se rapiti dalla bellezza di tali cose ne fecero dei, comprender debbono quanto più bello di esse sia il loro Signore, mentre tutte queste cose dall'autore della bellezza furono fatte.With whose beautie if being delighted, they thought them goddes: let them know how much the Lord of them is more beautiful then they. For the author of beautie made al those thinges.Quorum si specie delectati, deos putaverunt, / sciant quanto his dominator eorum speciosior est: / speciei enim generator hæc omnia constituit. 4Or if they admired their power, and their effects, let them understand by them, that he that made them, is mightier than they:Se poi la virtù ammirarono, e gli effetti delle medesime cose, da queste debbon intendere, che colui, il qual le creò, in virtù le sorpassa:Or if they merueled at their vertue, & operations, let them vnderstand by them, that he which made these, is stronger then they:Aut si virtutem et opera eorum mirati sunt, / intelligant ab illis quoniam qui hæc fecit fortior est illis:
5For by the greatness of the beauty, and of the creature, the creator of them may be seen, so as to be known thereby.Imperocché dalla grandezza, e bellezza della creatura potrà intelligibilmente vedersi il lor Creatore:for by the greatnes of the beautie, and of the creature the creator of them may be sene, to be knowen therby.a magnitudine enim speciei et creaturæ / cognoscibiliter poterit creator horum videri. 6But yet as to these they are less to be blamed. For they perhaps err, seeking God, and desirous to find him.Eppure meno è da dolersi di questi. Perocché errano forse in cercando Dio, e bramando di ritrovarlo.But not withstanding there is yet in these lesse complainte. For they also perhaps erre, seeking God, and desirous to finde him.Sed tamen adhuc in his minor est querela; / et hi enim fortasse errant, / Deum quærentes, et volentes invenire. 7For being conversant among his works, they search: and they are persuaded that the things are good which are seen.Conciossiaché lui cercano, investigando le opere sue, e ne rimangono presi, perché buone sono le cose, che veggonsi.For whereas they conuerse in his workes, they enquire: & they are perswaded that the thinges be good which are seene.Etenim cum in operibus illius conversentur inquirunt, / et persuasum habent quoniam bona sunt quæ videntur. 8But then again they are not to be pardoned.Contuttociò neppur a questi si dee perdonare;But againe neither ought these to be pardoned.Iterum autem nec his debet ignosci. 9For if they were able to know so much as to make a judgment of the world: how did they not more easily find out the Lord thereof?Imperocché se poteron saperne tanto da penetrare le cose del mondo, come mai il Signore di esso non iscopersero più agevolmente?For if they could know so much, that they were able to estimate the world: how did they not more easely find the Lord therof?Si enim tantum potuerunt scire / ut possent æstimare sæculum, / quomodo hujus Dominum non facilius invenerunt ? 10But unhappy are they, and their hope is among the dead, who have called gods the works of the hand of men, gold and silver, the inventions of art, and the resemblances of beasts, or an unprofitable stone the work of an ancient hand.Ma sgraziatissimi sono, e la loro speranza hanno in cose morte coloro, che danno il nome di dei alle opere delle mani degli uomini, all'oro, all'argento lavorato con arte, e alle immagini di animali, o ad un vil sasso, opera di antica mano.But they are vnhappie, & their hope is among the dead, who haue called the workes of mens handes godds, gold & siluer, the inuention of art, and the similitudes of beastes, or an vnprofitable stone the worke of an old hand.Infelices autem sunt, / et inter mortuos spes illorum est, / qui appellaverunt deos opera manuum hominum: / aurum et argentum, artis inventionem, / et similitudines animalium, aut lapidem inutilem, / opus manus antiquæ.
11Or if an artist, a carpenter, hath cut down a tree proper for his use in the wood, and skilfully taken off all the bark thereof, and with his art, diligently formeth a vessel profitable for the common uses of life,Come quando un legnaiuolo perito tronca una diritta pianta dal bosco, e con buon modo tutta ne rade la corteccia, e dell'arte sua ne forma un mobile atto a servire per le bisogne della vita,Or if an artificer a carpenter, cut streight timber out of the wood, & pare of al the barke therof cunningly, and vsing his art, diligently frameth a vessel profitable for the common vse of this life,Aut si quis artifex faber de silva lignum rectum secuerit, / et hujus docte eradat omnem corticem, / et arte sua usus / diligenter fabricet vas utile in conversationem vitæ; 12And useth the chips of his work to dress his meat:E degli avanzi di tal lavoro ne fa uso per farsi da mangiare;and vseth the chippes of that worke to dresse his meate:reliquiis autem ejus operis / ad præparationem escæ abutatur, 13And taking what was left thereof, which is good for nothing, being a crooked piece of wood, and full of knots, carveth it diligently when he hath nothing else to do, and by the skill of his art fashioneth it, and maketh it like the image of a man:E un pezzo di questi non buono a farne nulla, bischenco, e pieno di nodi, a tempo avanzato lo lavora diligentemente collo scalpello, e secondo le regole dell'arte sua gli da figura, e lo fa simile all'immagine di un uomo,and maketh that which is left therof, which is for no vses, but being a crooked peece of wood, and ful of knobes, carueth it diligently in the holownes therof, and by the skil of his art fashioneth it, and maketh it like to the image of a man,et reliquum horum quod ad nullos usus facit, / lignum curvum et vorticibus plenum / sculpat diligenter per vacuitatem suam, / et per scientiam suæ artis figuret illud, / et assimilet illud imagini hominis, 14Or the resemblance of some beast, laying it over with vermilion, and painting it red, and covering every spot that is in it:Ovver gli dà somiglianza ad alcuno animale; e lo liscia col minio, e gli dà color rosso col belletto, e lo pulisce da tutte le sue macchie,or compareth it to some beast, straking it ouer with redde, and with paynting making the colour therof ruddie, and layeth a colour ouer euerie spot that is in it:aut alicui ex animalibus illud comparet: / perliniens rubrica, et rubicundum faciens fuco colorem illius, / et omnem maculam quæ in illo est perliniens; 15And maketh a convenient dwelling place for it, and setting it in a wall, and fastening it with iron,E degna stanza a lui prepara, e lo colloca alla muraglia, dove lo assicura col ferro,and maketh a worthie habitation for it, and setting it in a wal, and fastening it with yron,et faciat ei dignam habitationem, / et in pariete ponens illud, / et confirmans ferro 16Providing for it, lest it should fall, knowing that it is unable to help itself: for it is an image, and hath need of help.Affinchè non vada per terra, usando per esso tal diligenza, perché sa, ch'ei non può da se aitarsi, perché è un simolacro, ed ha bisogno di aiuto:lest perhaps it fal, prouiding for it, knowing that it can not helpe it selfe: for it is an image, and it nedeth helpe.ne forte cadat, / prospiciens illi: / sciens quoniam non potest adjuvare se: / imago enim est, et opus est illi adjutorium.
17And then maketh prayer to it, enquiring concerning his substance, and his children, or his marriage. And he is not ashamed to speak to that which hath no life:E a lui porge voti, e lo consulta intorno alle sue facoltà, e intorno a' figliuoli, e intorno ad un matrimonio; e non si vergogna di parlare con uno, che è senz'anima:And concerning his substance, & his children, & for mariage, making a vow he seeketh to it. He is not ashamed to speake with him, that is without soule:Et de substantia sua, et de filiis suis, / et de nuptiis votum faciens inquirit: / non erubescit loqui cum illo qui sine anima est. 18And for health he maketh supplication to the weak, and for life prayeth to that which is dead, and for help calleth upon that which is unprofitable:E da un invalido chiede con suppliche la sanità, e da un morto la vita, e in suo aiuto invoca un impotente:and for health certes he besecheth the weake, and for life asketh the dead, and for helpe inuocateth him that is vnprofitable:Et pro sanitate quidem infirmum deprecatur, / et pro vita rogat mortuum, / et in adjutorium inutilem invocat. 19And for a good journey he petitioneth him that cannot walk: and for getting, and for working, and for the event of all things he asketh him that is unable to do any thing.E per fare un viaggio si raccomanda a chi non può muoversi, e per far degli acquisti, o qualche lavoro, e pel felice evento di qualsisia cosa, fa preghiere a chi non è buono a nulla.and for a iourney asketh him, that can not walke: and for getting, and for working, and for the euent of al thinges he asketh him, that in al is vnprofitable.Et pro itinere petit ab eo qui ambulare non potest; / et de acquirendo, et de operando, / et de omnium rerum eventu, / petit ab eo qui in omnibus est inutilis.
13:1
Haydock
Vain. Septuagint, "foolish by nature, who are ignorant of God." (Haydock)
Calmet
In this and the three following chapters, the miseries of idolatry are described, to shew the value of wisdom and piety. (Calmet)
St. Justin Martyr
Without the knowledge of God, all is darkness, 1 Corinthians 2:2. (St. Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho)
Worthington
Is. He who is, must be the most proper name of God, Exodus 3:14. Philosophers could perceive that all creatures had a beginning, and that there must be some first cause or God, whom some confessed, but did not honour as they ought, Romans 1:(Worthington)
Haydock
Could not. Inasmuch as they were vain. (Haydock)
13:2
Fire. The chief god of the Persians.
Wind. Zephyrus, etc.
Air. Which is perhaps the wind. Socrates was accused of adoring nothing, but heaven and the clouds, (Aristot.[Aristotle?] nub.) as the Jews were. Nil praeter nubes et Coeli numen adorant. (Juvenal 14:97.)
Stars. The zodiac, or pleiads. This species of idolatry was most ancient and general.
13:5
13:10
St. Augustine
Of men. The pagans in general took the material statue to be the residence of a god. (St. Augustine, City of God Wisdom 7:6., and 8:13.)
The more learned regarded the figures of the sun, etc., as his representations, while others supposed that Jupiter meant the heavens, Juno the air, Vulcan, fire, etc.
Calmet
Hand. This is to abuse antiquity. The idol of the Arabs was a rough stone. In more polished nations, the workmanship of Praxiteles, Phidias, etc., was more regarded. (Calmet)
Worthington
As no creature deserves to be esteemed a god, much less do the works of men's hands. (Worthington)
13:14
Pliny
Vermilion. The ancients greatly esteemed this colour, (Calmet) and painted with it the statues of their gods on festival days, and the bodies of those who had the honour of a triumph. (Pliny, [Natural History?] 33:6.)
13:15
Calmet
Iron. Baruch 6:26. ridicules the same custom, and the other prophets intimate that the pagans took these statues to be really gods, otherwise their practice was no more blameable than that of the Jews, who fastened the cherubim to the ark with gold, and carried them. But the latter did not believe that the Deity resided personally in those images; no more than we do, that Christ is attached to his image on the cross. This distinguishes the behaviour of the faithful from that of pagans. (Calmet)
13:1
1. They could not vnderstand him, that is.] Philosophers discussing the nature God is the beginning of al thinges, absolute and independing. of manie creatures, saw that euerie creature proceded of some other thing, & so there must nedes be one beginning of al, absolute of itselfe, neither proceding nor depending of an other, nor a limited substance. As the thing that is a man, is not a beast; an oxe is not a horse: &c. and telling what anie thing is, we exclude therby that it is not other thinges, but saying without addition, HE WHICH IS, we shew the beginning of al, in no sorte limited: and this is God. VVhom some Philosophers, by such discourse found, & knew, in general, & sometimes confessed, but did not honour him as God, and therefore were inexcusable, as S. Paule concludeth against them. Rom. 1.
Gods most proper name is HE WHICH 1•. Exo. 3. v. 14.
Concordance Rom. 1.
13:2
Concordance Deut. 4.
13:10
Seing no creature how excellent soeuer, is or may be estemed a god, it is more foolish to thinke, an Image, or statua, or anie thing framed by mans handes can be God.
13:11
Concordance Isa. 4.
Concordance Iere. 10.
13:1
St Cyprian of Carthage † AD 258 Exhortation to Martyrdom, Addressed to Fortunatus 1
… On account of whose beauty, if they thought this, let them know how much more beautiful is the Lord than they. Or if they admired their powers and operations, let them understand by them, that He that made these mighty things is mightier than they.”
St Cyprian of Carthage † AD 258 Three Books of Testimonies Against the Jews 3.60
… and if, on account of the beauty of these, they have thought thus, let them know how much more beautiful than these is the Lord; or if they have admired their powers and operations, let them perceive from these very things that He who has established these mighty things is stronger than they.”
St Augustine of Hippo † AD 430 The Confessions 8.1
… I had heard from the mouth of truth that “there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven’s sake;” but, saith He, “he that is able to receive it, let him receive it.” Vain, assuredly, are all men in whom the knowledge of God is not, and who could not, out of the good things which are seen, find out Him who is good.
St Augustine of Hippo † AD 430 On the Holy Trinity 15.2
… for the first Author of beauty hath created them. But if they were astonished at their power and virtue, let them understand by them how much mightier He is that made them. For by the greatness and beauty of the creatures proportionably the Maker of them is seen.”
St Augustine of Hippo † AD 430 Expositions on the Book of Psalms 66.19
… but what is he going to tell? Is it perchance how widely the earth is spread, how much the sky is extended, and how many are the stars, and what are the changes of sun and of moon? This creation fulfilleth its course: but they have very curiously sought it out, the Creator thereof have not known.
13:5
St Hilary of Poitiers † AD 367 De Trinitate or On the Trinity 1.7
… Then, while the devout soul was baffled and astray through its own feebleness, it caught from the prophet’s voice this scale of comparison for God, admirably expressed, By the greatness of His works and the beauty of the things that He hath made the Creator of worlds is rightly discerned
St Athanasius of Alexandria † AD 373 Against the Heathen (Contra Gentes) 44
… But Himself being over all, both Governor and King and organising power, He does all for the glory and knowledge of His own Father, so that almost by the very works that He brings to pass He teaches us and says, “By the greatness and beauty of the creatures proportionably the maker of them is seen
St Athanasius of Alexandria † AD 373 Against the Arians. (Orationes contra Arianos IV.) 2.18
… And as the creation contains abundant matter for the knowledge of the being of a God and a Providence (‘for by the greatness and beauty of the creatures proportionably the Maker of them is seen
St Cyril of Jerusalem † AD 386 The Catechetical Lectures of S. Cyril 9.2
2. The Divine Nature then it is impossible to see with eyes of flesh: but from the works, which are Divine, it is possible to attain to some conception of His power, according to Solomon, who says, For by the greatness and beauty of the creatures proportionably the Maker of them is seen
St Cyril of Jerusalem † AD 386 The Catechetical Lectures of S. Cyril 9.16
… having left out many, yea, ten thousand other things, and especially things incorporeal and invisible, that thou mayest abhor those who blaspheme the wise and good Artificer, and from what is spoken and read, and whatever thou canst thyself discover or conceive, from the greatness and beauty of the creatures mayest proportionably see the maker of them
St Gregory of Nyssa † AD 395 Answer to Eunomius' Second Book 1
… and especially in this, that He is God and the truth, that is to say, God in truth, ever being what He is conceived to be and what He is called, Who never at any time was not, nor ever will cease to be, Whose being, such as it is essentially, is beyond the reach of the curiosity that would try to comprehend it. But to us, as saith the word of Wisdom,
St John Chrysostom † AD 407 Three Homilies Concerning the Power of Demons 2.3
… in wisdom Thou hast made them all.” He did go through them one by one, but withdrew before the incomprehensible wisdom of God. And that he has made it thus beautiful and vast hear a certain one saying, “From the vastness and beauty of the creatures, the originator of them is proportionably seen.”
St John Chrysostom † AD 407 The Homilies on the Statues to the People of Antioch 9.4
… in order that they may guess at the Creator from His works; which, indeed, another writer has referred to; “For from the greatness and beauty of the creatures, proportionably the Maker of them is seen.”
St John of Damascus † AD 749 An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith 1.1
God, however, did not leave us in absolute ignorance. For the knowledge of God’s existence has been implanted by Him in all by nature. This creation, too, and its maintenance, and its government, proclaim the majesty of the Divine nature
13:9
St Augustine of Hippo † AD 430 The Confessions 5.3
… And as I had read and retained in memory many injunctions of the philosophers, I used to compare some teachings of theirs with those long fables of the Manichæans and the former things which they declared, who could only prevail so far as to estimate this lower world, while its lord they could by no means find out,
St Augustine of Hippo † AD 430 Letters of St. Augustin 55.7
… Such men,—and they deserve censure, as Holy Scripture teaches, because “though they had wisdom enough to measure the periods of this world, they did not much more easily come,” as by humble piety they might have done, “to the knowledge of its Lord,”
St Augustine of Hippo † AD 430 On Christian Doctrine 2.21
… And when any one is born, it is easy to observe the point at which this movement has arrived, by use of the rules discovered and laid down by those who are rebuked by Holy Writ in these terms: “For if they were able to know so much that they could weigh the world, how did they not more easily find out the Lord thereof?”
St Augustine of Hippo † AD 430 A Treatise on the Soul and its Origin 4.6
… Again, in the Book of Wisdom it is written, “For if they were able to prevail so much, that they could know and estimate the world; how is it that they did not more easily find out the Lord thereof?”
St Augustine of Hippo † AD 430 Sermons on Selected Lessons of the New Testament 18.2
2. These men does the Book of wisdom reprove, where it is said, “For if they were able to know so much as to aim at the world, how did they not sooner find out the Lord thereof?”
13:1
the truth of the faithful worshippers of God, who strive to know, worship and love God: for this is true wisdom, whereas the former is vain, indeed mere vanity and foolishness. In Greek, vain, or foolish (for μάταιος signifies both, whence the Italians matti, that is, foolish) are all men by nature, in whom there was ignorance of God. By nature, in Greek φύσει, that is, by nature, by disposition, by inclination, by corruption; likewise of themselves, spontaneously: for just as every created thing, inasmuch as it is created from nothing by God, is vain, and tends and inclines toward its own nothingness, so also man, especially after the fall of Adam, by which human nature was corrupted and made subject to death: for from this fall was born in man concupiscence, by which he is inclined toward vain, harmful and deadly things, and ignorance of God and of divine things, which lead to salvation and happiness; from which was born the multitude of idols, heresies, errors and crimes. The Syriac version: vain are men who do not know God; the Arabic: because all men in whom there is a defect of knowledge are truly vain. The word "because," or, as it is in Greek, ὅτι γὰρ, that is, inasmuch as, for indeed, gives the reason why the Canaanites fell into so many and such great crimes, and were so severely punished by God, namely because they did not know the true God, nor feared him. Understand the knowledge of God not only as speculative, but also as practical joined with the worship, fear, obedience and love of God; vain therefore and foolish were the idolaters, who, ignorant of God, worshipped and worship an idol: more vain and foolish were the philosophers, who although they knew God through natural knowledge, yet did not worship and glorify him as God with that piety and purity which was fitting, whom therefore the Apostle sharply rebukes, Rom. 1. Most vain and most foolish are the faithful, who although they know God through faith, and have from it a certain hope of eternal happiness, yet despise him and his law, that they may enjoy their illicit pleasures: for these confess God in words, but deny him in deeds, wherefore the greater knowledge of God they have, the greater malice they incur, and therefore the greater punishment they bring upon themselves: for "the servant who knew the will of his lord, and did not do it, etc., shall be beaten with many stripes," Luke XII, 47: see what is said Eccl. I, 1, to those words: "Vanity of vanities, and all things are vanity, except to love God, and to serve him alone." This is what Isaiah seeks, cap. V, 13: "Therefore my people have been led away captive, because they had not knowledge;" and Hosea, cap. IV, 6: "My people have been silent, because they had not knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will reject thee, that thou shalt not do the office of priesthood to me;" and Baruch, cap. III, 28: "And because they had not wisdom, they perished through their foolishness." To this pertains that which I have cited elsewhere, but proper to this place, and therefore to be repeated: He who knows Christ, knows enough, if he knows nothing else: He who knows not Christ, knows nothing, if he knows everything else. Such was St. Paul, who in I Corinthians II, 2 says: "For I judged not myself to know anything among you, except Jesus Christ, and him crucified;" and St. Gregory of Nazianzus, who in his Poem on Beatitude thus sings: Blessed he withdrawn from the world, who lives in the rigid desert, and lifts his mind to the stars. Blessed he who, joined with many, does not busy himself with many things, but has given his whole heart to God. Therefore, just as a wineskin or bellows empty of wine, but swollen with wind, is vain, because it contains nothing solid in itself, so a philosopher, orator, or theologian destitute of practical knowledge of God, grace and love, and puffed up with the wind of empty knowledge and pride, is vain and foolish; a bubble is swollen with wind, which soon bursts in the air; a pappus is that whose down the breeze will soon scatter; it is a vapor, it is smoke, which soon will vanish into thin air. O eternal truth, and true charity, and dear eternity! thou art my God, to thee do I sigh day and night, saith St. Augustine, lib. VII Confess. And St. Bernard, dying and appearing to William of Montpellier, said that he was ascending into the mount of Lebanon (into heaven), and added: "No knowledge here, no true cognition, above is the fullness of knowledge, above is the true knowledge of truth": thus his Life has it. Nay, and Philo, lib. De Temulentia: As the sun, saith he, from its rising hides the stars by its splendor from our small eyes, so whenever the eyes of the soul are irradiated by the clear, pure and most brilliant light of God the morning star, in sensible splendor, they can behold nothing else: for the knowledge of him who is, shining forth, illuminates all things, so that even those things which are in themselves most brilliant are darkened by this comparison. Finally, St. Justin at the beginning of his Dialogue against Trypho teaches that true philosophy and wisdom consist in the knowledge and worship of God, and that he sought it in vain among the Platonists, Stoics, Epicureans, and other philosophers, and at last found it by the admonition of a certain holy man in Holy Scripture, namely in the books of the apostles and prophets. AND OF THESE THINGS WHICH ARE SEEN, GOOD THINGS, THEY COULD NOT UNDERSTAND HIM WHO IS. — In Greek, and of visible good things they could not know τὸν ὄντα, that is, the existent one: for God in Greek is called τὸ ὂν, that is, being itself, in the neuter gender; or ὁ ὢν, that is, he who is, in the masculine gender, because God is the first, supreme, uncreated, eternal, immense being, which exists through itself, and has its being from itself, in which is the fullness and perfection of all beings and things, either formally or eminently, and finally from which all and each receive their whole being: wherefore he himself is the ocean of being, and an infinite sea of essence. Moreover he says: "From these things which are seen, good things," that is, from visible beings, which were created good by God: "for God saw all the things that he had made, and they were very good," Gen. I. For good and being are convertible, for good is a passion and property of being: wherefore as much as there is being, so much is there also good, whence God, who is supreme being, is likewise supreme good. The sense is, as if to say, Idolaters were not able from finite beings and good things to know the infinite being and good, from which they drew all their being and all their goodness; "they were not able, (because they were unwilling) for their malice blinded them," as he said cap. II, 21, because namely they loved darkness more than light: for being devoted to vanity and vain desires, they were unwilling to open their eyes to the Sun of justice, namely to God, that they might know him and worship him holily. For that they were able and ought to have known the creator from creatures, he clearly asserts in verse 5: for God is his own being and that of all others; if therefore thou knowest thy being and that of others, and wilt lift thine eyes to its author, thou wilt immediately know God also, from whom thy being and that of others depends more than from thyself, and from thy essence, for unless God continually preserved this, it would immediately fall back into its nothingness and return: wherefore if thou art asked, "Who art thou?" answer with St. John the Baptist: "I am, who am not." As God, asked by Moses: Who art thou, Lord? answered in turn: "I am who am." Note: The proper name of God is Being, or He who is, whence it was given to God by prophets, apostles and theologians, equally as by philosophers: prophets such as Moses, who asking God by what name he should be called, heard from him: "I am who am," or "I am Jehovah," that is, he who is, Exod. cap. III, and cap. VI, 3: see the things said there. Job cap. XIV, 4: "Who can make a clean thing from an unclean conceived seed: is it not thou who alone art?" David, Psalm. CI, 28: "But thou art the same thyself;" Jeremiah, cap. LI, 19: "He that made all things, he himself is, and Israel the scepter of his inheritance. The Lord of hosts is his name." St. John, Apocal. I, 8: "He who is, and who was, and who is to come." Esther, cap. XIV, 11: "Deliver not, O Lord," saith he, "thy scepter to them that are not," that is, to idols and idolaters. For God alone properly and fully is, but idols and all things rather are not than are, both because they are not from themselves, and what they are they have received from God; then because the malice of sin is in a manner below nothing, and therefore its first author the devil is called, Isai. XXVIII, 15, he who is not, and sinners are called companions of him who is not; whence Ezechiel, cap. XXVIII, 19, speaking of the proud king of Tyre, who was a type of the devil: "Thou art made nothing," saith he, "and thou shalt not be forever." Theologians, such as St. Justin at the beginning of his Dialogue against Trypho, who defines God thus: "That which always remains in the same and similar condition and state, and is the cause to all other things that they exist, that is God." St. Gregory of Nazianzus, in his 45th Oration: "What is God? He is, he says, the first being of all and the highest good. What is an angel? The first creature of God. What is a demon? One deviating from good. What is matter? The basis of forms. What is form? The adornment of matter. What is heaven? The boundary of things corruptible and incorruptible. What are the stars? Flame, holding the course of circles. What is eternity? That which flows perpetually without time. What is time? The measure of motion, which the sun makes. What is man? A noble image and likeness of God. What is life? The union of flesh and mind: what is death? The separation of both. What is mind? An interior sight having no boundary. What is will? A movement of the mind. What is reason? That which seeks the truth. What is speech? That which expresses the same thing. What is free will? To be moved to will as one pleases;" thus Gregory of Nazianzus. St. Anselm in the Proslogion, chapter XXII, philosophizes more fully and more profoundly concerning God's being and essence, whom hear: "Thou alone, O Lord, art what thou art; and thou art he who is: for whatever else is in the whole, and something else in the parts; and in which something is mutable, is not altogether what it is; and what began from non-being, and can be thought not to be, and unless it subsists through another, returns to non-being; and what has had being, which now is not, and will have being, which is not yet, that is not properly and absolutely. But thou art what thou art, because whatever thou art at any time, or in any way, this thou art wholly and always; and thou art, who properly and simply art, because thou neither hast had being, nor wilt have being, but only present being, nor canst thou be thought at any time not to be," etc. Hence Evagrius in Socrates, book IV of the Tripartite History, chapter XXI, says that God cannot be defined, because He does not have a genus, or a difference, or a species, but is the fullness of being and of all genera, species and things. Attalus the martyr in Eusebius, book VI of the History, chapter III, when asked by a tyrant "what name God had? Those who are many, he said, are distinguished by names; but he who is one, has no need of a name." Philosophers, such as Plato, who in the Timaeus calls God τὸ ὂν, that is being itself; Aristotle, in book VIII of the Physics, names God the first being, the first cause, the first mover, which moves all other things; whence the same man, when dying, is said to have invoked God thus: "Naked I came into this world, miserably I lived, doubtfully I die, whither I am to go I know not; nevertheless thou, Being of beings, cause of causes, have mercy on me." Thales of Miletus, when asked what in the nature of things was most ancient, answered: God, because He never began to be: the same man, when asked, "what was God?" answered: "That which lacks beginning and end;" or, "That which always is," according to Laertius, book I in his Life. Apuleius, in the book On the World: "What is God? That which, he says, in a trireme is the helmsman, in a chariot the driver, the leader in choirs, the commander in a city, the general in an army, this is God in the world." Alexander the Great, when in the temple of Ammon he was called by the prophet the son of Jupiter: "There is nothing, he said, wonderful in this: for Jupiter is indeed by nature the father of all, but he makes the best of them peculiarly his own." Pythagoras, according to the Philosopher, book I On the Heavens: "These three themselves, he says, are all things: but that very thing thrice is itself," or "that which is in every respect;" whence some suspect that he knew the Holy Trinity, at least through a shadow and obscurely. Orpheus called God the beginning, middle and end of the universe: the beginning, namely, as producing all things; the middle, as drawing what is produced to himself; the end, however, as perfecting those returning to himself. Trismegistus, in Dialogue V, speaking of God: "There is nothing, he says, in all nature, which he himself is not; he is indeed what things are: he is also what things are not: those things which are, he brought into light; those things which are not, he hid in himself." Hence Suidas asserts that Hermes, or Mercury, the wisest of the Egyptians, who was almost a contemporary of Moses, was called Trismegistus, because he spoke by a certain divine spirit concerning the holy Trinity, saying: "And there was intellectual light, and there was always luminous mind, and spirit containing all things. Outside this there is no God, no angel, no other substance: for he is the lord, and father, and God, and fountain, and life, and power, and light, and mind, and spirit, and all things are in him, and all things are under him;" although others wish that through these he noted only the attributes of divinity. More truly Clement of Alexandria, in book VI of the Stromata, says that Trismegistus, that is thrice greatest, was so named because he was the greatest king, philosopher and priest. NOR ATTENDING TO HIS WORKS DID THEY RECOGNIZE WHO (what kind and how great) THE CRAFTSMAN WAS. — Who, namely, created the heavens, stars, elements, and all things that are in the world from nothing, and formed them all with such artifice; who arranged those same things in such great order, and joined them together with such harmony; who continually preserves, cherishes, increases, and propagates those very things, as the Nazianzen beautifully teaches, oration 34, which is the second On Theology, who also aptly compares God to a lyre-player, skillfully playing a lyre in a house, whose melody you hear from outside, and you marvel at his skill, but you do not see his person: for thus God moves this world as it were a lyre in harmony, and produces the most sweet consonance of all things that are in it, at which all are amazed, and admire its author, but are unable to behold his person. 2. BUT THEY THOUGHT FIRE, OR SPIRIT, OR SWIFT AIR, OR THE REVOLUTION OF THE STARS, OR EXCESSIVE WATER, OR THE SUN AND MOON, TO BE THE RULERS OF THE WORLD AND GODS. — The idolatry of the ancients consisted in this, that they worshipped the sun, the heavens, and other creatures in place of the Creator; the origin and reason of which was, first, that they believed nothing existed except this visible world: wherefore they denied that God existed, who is an invisible spirit: thus Plato in the Cratylus, whom Eusebius cites, lib. III Of Preparation, cap. I: "It is manifest," he says, "that the most ancient of the Greeks thought the heavens, stars, sun and moon, which even now many of the barbarians worship, to be gods." Thus also "the Sadducees say there is no resurrection, nor angel, nor spirit," says St. Luke, Acts XXIII, 8: for they thought that nothing existed beyond those things which we perceive with our eyes, and that what is not visible does not exist in the nature of things, as even now atheists and carnal and brutish men think. The second cause was the beauty, usefulness, power and efficacy of creatures, such as the sun, heaven, stars, water, fire, earth: for these attracted rude men to worship and invoke them, because they felt themselves in need of these things, and experienced their power and aid: thus Eusebius, lib. III Of Preparation, cap. II. There was added, and the error was furthered by the mystic theology of philosophers, and the elegant fables of poets, who called fire Vulcan, ethereal spirit Jupiter, air Juno, water Tethys or Neptune, earth Ceres, sun and moon Phoebus and Diana. Thus also they gave names of gods to the stars, and assigned them dominion over the world, whence arose the error, that some placed heaven, others the sun, others air, others fire, others earth, others water, others something else as the first principle of the world and of all things, as Aristotle testifies, lib. I Physics; hence those same things were held as gods by the superstitious and rude multitude, and were adored as divine powers, as St. Augustine teaches, lib. IV Of the City of God, cap. X, and Eusebius, lib. III Of Preparation, cap. II, whom hear:
13:2
sensibly present, not only in assemblies, but also in earthly things, displaying the magnificence of His works through these, which they thought to be gods." Therefore the praises and excessive laudations, and as it were flatteries of the poets, by which they celebrated created things as if divine and as gods, impelled the rude common people to believe them to be gods and to worship them, as Lactantius teaches in book I, chapter X and XI. SPIRIT. — A more subtle air, or wind: for winds were worshipped as gods, as Seneca teaches in book IV of Natural Questions, chapter XVII; hence Aeolus is the god and ruler of the winds; finally Plato held that God is spirit and the soul of the world, whence Virgil: "Spirit within nourishes, and mind infused throughout the limbs moves the mass, and mingles itself with the great body." And another: "Jupiter is whatever you see." They worshipped therefore the sun, moon, stars, elements, as if the body and members of God: hear St. Augustine, book IV of The City of God, chapter XI: "He himself in the aether is Jupiter, he himself in the air is Juno, he himself in the sea is Neptune: in the lower regions of the sea he himself is Salacia, in the earth Pluto, in the lower earth Proserpina, in domestic hearths Vesta, in the smiths' forge Vulcan; in the stars the sun, moon and stars, in diviners Apollo, in commerce Mercury, in Janus the initiator, in Terminus the terminator; Saturn in time, Mars and Bellona in wars, Liber in vineyards, Ceres in grain, Diana in forests, Minerva in talents." OR THE SWIFT AIR. — In Greek, ταχινὸν ἀέρα, that is the swift and mobile air, which was called Juno: for from ἀὴρ, that is air, comes Ἥρα, that is Juno: whence Macrobius, book I in Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, chapter XVII: "Juno," he says, "was named aerea, because she herself was thought to be air, and the arbiter of air." The reason is that Anaximenes and many others held that the principle of all things is air, just as Thales held it to be water, Heraclitus fire, Democritus atoms, Pythagoras numbers, as Aristotle testifies in book I of the Physics. OR THE CIRCLE OF STARS. — That is, first, the stars of the zodiac, for this is the circle and orbit, and as it were the zone and girdle of heaven: thus Lyran, Hugo, Dionysius and others: for these stars, and especially the sun traversing the zodiac, produce crops, fruits, and all things on earth. Whence the zodiac is named from ζωή, that is life, because by its motion it confers life on sublunary things; hence the constellations of the zodiac are chiefly twelve, which are also called signs, because they have a certain resemblance to animals, concerning which the verse goes: "There are the ram, bull, twins, crab, lion, virgin, Balance, scorpion, archer, goat, water-bearer, fishes." Second, more plainly and fully by the circle of stars understand the constellations, which are made up of many partial stars, and thus as it were make a circle of stars, or rather a starry sphere, or starry heaven, namely the eighth heaven, that is the firmament: for this, distinguished and variegated with so many and such great stars, as if with burning coals or fires, many held to be a divinity and a god; whence in the Scriptures it is called the host of heaven, which even the Jews themselves worshipped, as appears in IV Kings XXIII, 5: thus St. Bonaventure, Osorius and others. Hence they gave names of gods to the planets, for they called the highest of the planets Saturn, the second Jupiter, the third Mars, the fourth Phoebus, the fifth Diana, the sixth Venus, the seventh Mercury; thus St. Augustine, book VII of The City of God, chapters XV and XVI: "Apollo," he says, "although they wish him to be a diviner and physician, yet in order to place him in some part of the world, they said he himself is also the sun; and Diana his sister likewise the moon, and to preside over ways; whence they wish her to be a virgin, because a way produces nothing; and therefore both have arrows, because these two stars from heaven extend rays even to the earth. They wish Vulcan to be the fire of the world, Neptune the waters of the world, Dis the father, that is Orcus, the earthly and lowest part of the world. Liber and Ceres they place over seeds, or him over masculine, her over feminine; or him over liquid, her truly over the dryness of seeds. And this certainly is all referred to the world, that is to Jupiter, who for this reason was called progenitor and progenitrix, because he sent forth all seeds from himself, and received them into himself." He adds that Minerva is the highest aether, Vesta is the lighter fire of the world, Ceres is the earth. OR EXCESSIVE WATER. — In Greek, βίαιον ὕδωρ, that is violent water, namely the sea stirred up by waves and overflowing and overwhelming all things; hence Thales held that water is the principle of all things, indeed that the heavens, birds, fishes, animals, etc., were made from waters, or from the primeval abyss, which is the opinion of many, as I have shown in Genesis I, at the beginning; hence also water is called, as it were, from which all things come. Moreover, water by the name of Tethys or Neptune, as a god, was worshipped by the Persians and Germans, but especially by the Egyptians, who worshipped their Nile, inasmuch as it irrigated and made fertile their fields by its inundation, as a god, as St. Athanasius testifies, in his Oration Against the Gentiles. Whence Claudian, epigram 6: Egypt fertile without clouds, and serene rains Alone holds, secure of the sky, not needing wind; It rejoices in the waters which it itself carries, and abounds in the Nile. OR THE SUN AND MOON. — In Greek, φωστῆρας οὐρανοῦ, that is the luminaries of heaven, of which one, namely the sun, presides over the day; the other, namely the moon, over the night, Genesis I: for their appearance and brightness, beyond that of the stars, captivated the minds of demented men, so that they thought them to be gods; hence the Persians worshipped the sun by the name of Mithras, the Egyptians by the name of Osiris, and the moon by the name of Isis; others by the names of Phoebus and Diana; others by the names of Apollo and Lucina; whence also Pliny, book II, chapter V and VII, doubting concerning God: "If, he says, there be any God, there will be no other than the sun." RULERS OF THE WORLD. — In Greek, πρυτάνεις: thus at Athens were called the first magistrates, who managed civil and sacred affairs; he calls rulers of the world therefore the gods who govern the world, to whom the gentiles attributed supreme power, providence and divinity, which are proper to the one true God alone. 3 and 4. IF THEY WERE DELIGHTED WITH THEIR BEAUTY, LET THEM UNDERSTAND HOW MUCH MORE BEAUTIFUL IS THE LORD OF THEM: FOR THE AUTHOR OF BEAUTY MADE ALL THESE THINGS. OR IF THEY ADMIRED THEIR POWER AND WORKS, LET THEM UNDERSTAND BY THEM, THAT HE THAT MADE THESE IS MIGHTIER THAN THEY. — For more beautiful, in Greek it is βελτίον, that is better; St. Cyprian, book III of Testimonies, chapter IX, more precious. For author, in Greek it is γενεσιάρχης, that is the author of generation or prince; whence you may translate it word for word, for the author of the generation of beauty created them: author of generation, that is author, or the first origin, or prince of the generation of beauty. The world in Greek is called κόσμος, that is ornament, from its appearance and beauty; whence Lactantius, book I On the Wrath of God, chapter X: "The work of the world, he says, than which nothing can be either more orderly for arrangement, or more apt for utility, or more ornate for beauty, or greater for magnitude:" see what is said in Genesis I. But the gentiles erred in this, that fixed upon the beauty of creatures they remained, and did not rise up to investigate their maker and creator: for they could have known and ought to have known that creatures could not produce and create themselves, and therefore that they were created by another, namely by God: whence St. Athanasius, in the book On the Incarnation: "It is wonderful, he says, that nothing among created things erred in understanding the divine nature, except man alone: not the sun, not the moon, not the heaven, not the stars, not water, not the aether change their order, but recognizing their maker and prince, the Reason, the Word of God, they remain in that order in which they were created. But men alone, turned away from that good station of truth, and to those things which were not, dedicated the honour of God and his knowledge to demons and to men fashioned in stone." Hence St. Dionysius, On the Divine Names, chapter I, says that God is beautiful, and beautiful throughout all things, and supremely beautiful, and always beautiful in the same manner, and has in himself before all things the principal beauty of the universe, and therefore is himself the fountain of all beauty, and the cause of all beautiful things which are in the world. And Boethius, book III of the Consolation of Philosophy, meter 9: "Thou leadest all things from the example on high, thyself most beautiful, bearing the world in thy mind, and forming it in a like image." Whence also Plato in his second letter to Dionysius the king calls God the cause of all beautiful things: Philo follows Plato in his customary manner, in the book On the Creation of the World. Wherefore St. Augustine exclaims with pathos, book X of the Confessions, chapter XXVII: "Late have I loved thee, O beauty so ancient and so new: late have I loved thee: and behold thou wast within, and I without: and I sought thee without, and deformed I rushed upon these fair things which thou hast made." The same in the Soliloquies, chapter XXXI: "I went about, he says, seeking thee everywhere, and on account of all things forsaking myself, I asked the earth if it were my God, and it said to me that it was not, and all things which are in it confessed the same. I asked the sea and the abysses and the creeping things which are in them, and they answered: We are not thy God, seek him above us. I asked the stable air, and the whole air with all its inhabitants said: Anaximenes is deceived, I am not thy God. I asked the heaven, the sun, the moon and the stars: Neither are we thy God, they say. And I said to all these things which stand about the doors of my flesh: Tell me of my God, that you are not, tell me something of him, and they all cried out with a loud voice: He made us. I asked therefore the mass of the world: Tell me if thou art my God, or not? and it answered with a strong voice: I am not, it says, but through him I am; he whom thou seekest in me, he made me; seek above me him who rules me, who made thee. The questioning of creatures is a deep consideration of them: their answer is their testimony concerning God, because all things cry out: God made us, because, as the Apostle says, Romans I, 20: The invisible things of God are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made. And after some things: Thou Lord art the beginning of all things and the end, who art before the first ages of the world, and before all the origins of the ages, thou art my God, and the Lord of all the good things which thou hast created, and with thee are the causes of all stable things, and with thee the immutable origins of all mutable things stand and remain, and the eternal reasons of all rational and irrational and temporal things live." He has the same things, book X of the Confessions, chapter VI, where also he adds: "Lord, I love thee. Thou hast struck my heart with thy word, and I loved thee; but heaven and earth and all things which are in them, behold they say to me on all sides, that I should love thee, nor do they cease to say this to all, that they may be without excuse. But thou wilt have mercy more deeply on him to whom thou hast had mercy; and thou wilt show mercy to him on whom thou hast been merciful. Otherwise heaven and earth speak thy praises to the deaf." IF THEY ADMIRED THEIR VIRTUE AND WORKS. — In Greek, εἰ δὲ δυνάμει, καὶ ἐνεργείᾳ ἐκπλαγέντες, that is, if they were struck with wonder at the power and efficacy, let them understand from these very things that he who established these is stronger, stronger than they. As if to say: If idolaters admire the wonderful power of acting in the sun, the heavens, the stars, fire, herbs, plants, winds, storms, lightning, etc., and on account of this worship them; much more should they admire and worship the omnipotence of God, who imparted these powers to creatures, but in such a way that he reserved for himself powers far greater, whence also he can create other creatures far more efficacious and stronger than those which he has created: and the powers which he has already given to created things, he recalls and takes away at his pleasure, as he took from fire the power of burning the three faithful boys in the furnace of Babylon; he took from the lions their ferocity lest they should harm Daniel, chapter VI; he took from the sun, moon and heavens their motion and course, when they stood at the command of Joshua, chapter X, 13; he took from the sea its continuity and its bed when he divided it at the command of Moses, so that the Hebrews might pass through on dry ground, Exodus XIV. Trismegistus in the Pimander, comparing God to a farmer: "Behold, he says, the farmer scattering seeds in the bosom of the earth, wheat in one place, barley in another, and seeds of another kind in yet another place. Behold the same one pruning and cutting back vines, apple trees and fig trees. In the same way God himself sows immortality in heaven, but mutation on earth, and in the whole world life and motion." Lactantius, book VII, chapter III: If God, he says, made the world, he therefore existed without the world; if he rules it, certainly as the mind rules the body; but as a master rules a house, and a pilot a ship, and a charioteer a chariot; yet they are not mixed in the things which they rule. 5. FOR FROM THE GREATNESS OF THE SPECIES, AND OF THE CREATURE, THE CREATOR OF THESE THINGS MAY BE SEEN KNOWABLY. — The Greek texts vary here; for the Vatican manuscripts have, from the greatness of the species, or beauty of creatures; the Complutensian and Royal editions, from the greatness indeed, and beauty, and creatures; St. Chrysostom, homily 14 on Genesis, from the greatness and species of creatures, the maker of the universe is fittingly considered; St. Gregory, book XXVI of the Morals, chapter XXVIII, through the greatness of the creature and species the creator can be understood intelligibly. For knowably, in Greek it is ἀναλόγως, that is analogically, or through analogy, comparison, proportion, collation, inference. The sense therefore is, as if to say, From the greatness, beauty and mass, and power of creatures, it can be known analogically, how great is the greatness, both of the beauty, and of the immensity, perfection and omnipotence of the creator himself: both because from the effect we know the cause, "and from the works the maker is known," as St. Athanasius says, book I Against the Gentiles; and because, if such is the beauty, quantity, perfection and power in angels, the sun, the heavens, and other creatures finite and limited, how much ought it to be in the creator infinite and unlimited in every way, who fills heaven and earth with his essence, presence and power, nay rather above heaven through those empty spaces extends himself in his immensity infinitely? For this is the analogy, and analogical comparison of creature with creator; hence God's greatness, majesty, power, and other attributes are absolutely infinite, so that nothing can be added to them, so much so that the whole world adds not even a whit to God, but God alone is as great as God is when joined with the world, because God is plainly immense and infinite: but nothing can be added to the infinite. Just as therefore the shadow of the sun adds nothing of light to the sun, so neither does the world add anything of goodness or perfection to God. For the world is the shadow of God. St. Justin declares the same thing by another similitude, in his Response to the Orthodox: "Just as, he says, one or unity is the principle of number, it contributes nothing to its perfection, for even when it was not the principle of number, it was perfect, and when made the principle of number, it was not increased: so God before creation was perfect, and after creation was not increased; therefore nothing of those things which are from creation increases God:" wherefore from this maxim of the Wise man, and from that of the Apostle, Rom. 1, 20: "For the invisible things of him, from the creation of the world, are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made," it is certain that by the powers of nature God can be known to be, and to be one: see the natural arguments by which Damascene proves the same thing, book I On the Faith, chapter V; Richard of St. Victor, books I and II On the Trinity; St. Thomas, book I Against the Gentiles, chapter XLIII. This is what St. Dionysius says, chapter VI On the Divine Names, that God is beheld from the most orderly disposition of all creatures: the same in the epistle to Titus: The fabric of the world, he says, is the covering of divine things, which are not seen. And Plato in the Symposium asserts that from the beauty of created things a certain admirable beauty of divinity is seen: for "the heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament showeth his handiwork," Psalm 18, 1; and "the whole earth is full of his glory," Isaiah 6, 3; whence alluding to this the Apostle, Rom. 1, 20, says: "For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, his eternal power also and divinity:" where I have noted more on this matter. See Theodoret, sermons 1 and 2 On Providence, St. Prosper, book II On the Calling of the Gentiles, chapter IV, Saints Ambrose and Basil in the Hexaemeron. See also Job, chapter XXXVIII and following, where God from the greatness of the earth, sea, clouds, rains, thunders, lightnings, Behemoth, that is elephant, and Leviathan, that is whale or bal-
13:3
The world is called in Greek κόσμος, that is, ornament, from its appearance and beauty; whence Lactantius, book I On the Wrath of God, chapter X: "The work of the world, he says, than which nothing can be more orderly for arrangement, nor more apt for utility, nor more ornate for beauty, nor greater for magnitude:" see what is said Genesis I. But the gentiles erred in that they remained fixed in this appearance of creatures, and did not rise up to investigate their maker and creator: for they were able and ought to have known that creatures could not produce and create themselves, and therefore that they were created by another, namely by God: whence St. Athanasius, book On the Incarnation: "It is wonderful, he says, that nothing among created things erred in understanding the divine nature, except man alone: not the sun, not the moon, not the heaven, not the stars, not water, not the aether change their order, but recognizing their maker and prince, the Reason, the Word of God, they remain in that manner in which they were created. But men alone, turned away from that good station of truth, and to those things which were not made, dedicated the honor of God and knowledge of him to demons and to men fashioned in stone." And again he says: "Therefore, understanding that one and sole good, you would say nothing is impossible: for he himself is all virtue; nor think him to be in something, nor again as if outside something, for he himself is he who without limit is the limit of all things, and who is comprehended by none, comprehends all things in himself. For what is the difference of bodies to incorporeal things, and of generated things to the ungenerated, and of those subject to necessity to what exists freely, or of earthly things to heavenly, and of corruptible things to eternal? not that one thing exists freely and another is subject to necessity. But those things which are below are imperfect, are corruptible." Sophocles: "One truly one is God, who ordained the heaven, and the great earth, and the pleasant wave of the sea, and the force of the winds. But most mortals, erring in heart, build for the ruin of souls images of gods fashioned from stones and wood, or wrought from gold, or from elephant figures, and preparing sacrifices and idle festivals for them, we think to worship them." Xenophon: "Therefore it is manifest that he is great and powerful and shakes and confirms all things; but what his form is, is unknown: for he does not seem to be the most bright sun, nor does he seem to permit that he himself be seen; but if anyone unwisely looks upon him, he is deprived of his eyes." Morally, learn here to rise from creatures to the creator, and in individual things to behold God: for in them God has expressed his beauty, or rather shadowed it forth, as the sun expresses itself in a parhelion: read Bellarmine On the Ascent of the Mind to God. Hence this world was to St. Anthony, St. Benedict, St. Bernard, and other anchorites a volume of divinity, in which namely they read and contemplated God and his magnificence. Most excellently St. Augustine in Psalm XXVI: "I went about, he says, and offered in his tabernacle a sacrifice of jubilation: we offer a sacrifice of jubilation, we offer a sacrifice of joy, a sacrifice of exultation, a sacrifice of thanksgiving, which cannot be explained in words. But where do we offer? In his very tabernacle, in the holy Church. What then do we offer? The most abundant and ineffable joy, in no words, in an ineffable voice. This is a sacrifice of jubilation. Whence sought, whence found? Going about, he says, I went about and offered in his tabernacle a sacrifice of jubilation. Let your mind go about through all creation, from all sides creation will cry out to you: God made me. Whatever has delighted you in art, commends the artist, and especially if you go about all things, consideration conceives praise of the artist. You see the heavens, they are great works of God. You see the earth, God made it, innumerable seeds, diversities of plants, multitude of animals. I have gone about even the heavens down to the earth, leave nothing out. From all sides all things resound to you the creator. And the very forms of creatures are certain voices of those praising the creator. But who can explain in praises all creation? who can explain it in praises? who can worthily praise heaven and earth, sea and all things that are in them?" And after some things: "Who can worthily praise the angels, thrones, dominions, principalities and powers? who can worthily praise this very thing, that in us there thrives a living body, moving limbs, exercising senses, and memory embracing so many things, intellect discerning so many things, who can worthily praise? but if in these creatures of God human speech labors so, what does it do in the Creator, except that when speech fails, only jubilation remains? I went around, and offered in his tabernacle a sacrifice of jubilation." The same, sermon 143 On the Temporal: "Ask," he says, "the beauty of the earth, ask the beauty of the sea, ask the beauty of the dilated and diffused air, ask the beauty of the sky, ask the order of the stars, ask the sun clarifying the day with its brightness, ask the moon tempering with its brightness the darkness of the following night, ask the animals which move in waters, on lands, which fly in the air, hidden souls, manifest bodies, visible things to be ruled, invisible rulers: ask these things. All things answer you: Behold, see, we are beautiful; their beauty is their confession. Who made these beautiful mutable things, except the immutable beautiful one in himself?" What therefore is the world? "the world is a book of divinity," says Trismegistus, and St. Basil, homily II on the Hexaemeron, and St. Chrysostom on Psalm CXLVIII. What is the age? "it is a mirror of divine things," says the same Trismegistus; indeed St. Paul, I Corinthians XIII, in which divine majesty shines forth. What is the world? it is a lyre or cithara producing a sweet harmony of divine providence, whose lyricist or citharaedus is God: thus St. Athanasius, oration Against Idols, and St. Augustine, book X of Confessions, chapter VI. What is the orb? it is a most beautifully variegated picture (like a field, which is as it were a tapestry variously colored with flowers and herbs), whose Apelles and painter is God: thus St. Athanasius and St. Augustine in the places already cited. What is the orb of the earth? "it is the temple of the whole world," says Trismegistus in St. Augustine, book VIII On the City of God, chapter XXIII. What is the world? it is a colossus, it is a basilica, indeed a most beautiful city, whose artificer and founder is God, Hebrews XI, 10. Wherefore St. Basil, oration On St. Julitta, says: "Let the night subject to you new arguments for praying to the divinity: when you look up to the sky, and gaze upon the beauty of the stars, ask the Lord of visible things, and venerate God, the most excellent maker of this universe." St. Paulinus, epistle 4 to Severus: "All things under the sun are vanity; therefore above the sun is truth. Thus those who consist in truth, even if they live within the world in bodily habitation, are nevertheless above the world in heavenly conversation, and flying in spirit they climb and surpass the choirs of stars, or the poles of the heavens, and act higher than the elements," etc. Blessed Lawrence Justinian, sermon On St. Martin: "He gazed with his eyes to heaven, where he knew the treasure of his heart to be laid up: for Christ the Lord is the treasure of the humble, and the riches of the poor. O Israel, how great is the house of God, and how vast the place of his possession!" Baruch III, 24. If you trample the earth and earthly things, you exchange a point for the vastest heaven; but how great is that supreme magnitude and majesty of God presiding over heaven? If you give your whole heart to him, you give all that you can, but in reality you give little. Even if you gave God a thousand hearts, even if you served him with immense souls and seraphic ardors, even if you labored for him for a thousand millions of years in sweat, what are these things to God? what to such a flood of charity and magnificence?
13:5
The meaning therefore is, as if to say: From the greatness of the beauty and mass and power of creatures, it can be known analogically how great is the magnitude, both of the beauty, and of the immensity, perfection and omnipotence of the Creator himself: both because from the effect we know the cause, "and from the works the maker is known," as St. Athanasius says, book I Against the Gentiles; and because, if such is the beauty, quantity, perfection and power in angels, the sun, the heavens, and other finite and limited creatures, how great must it be in the infinite Creator and unlimited in every direction, who fills heaven and earth with his essence, presence and power, indeed above heaven through those empty spaces he extends himself in his immensity into the infinite? For this is the analogy, and analogical comparison of creature with Creator; hence God's magnitude, majesty, power, and other attributes are absolutely infinite, so that nothing can be added to them, so much so that the whole world adds not even a jot to God, but God alone is as great as God joined with the world, because God is plainly immense and infinite: but nothing can be added to the infinite. Just as therefore the shadow of the sun adds nothing of light to the sun, so neither does the world add anything of goodness or perfection to God. For the world is the shadow of God. 8 and 9. AGAIN MOREOVER NOR SHOULD THEY BE PARDONED FOR THIS, IF THEY WERE ABLE TO KNOW SO MUCH, THAT THEY COULD ESTIMATE THE WORLD, HOW DID THEY NOT MORE EASILY FIND THE LORD OF IT? — It is a correction: for lest anyone, from the fact that he has diminished the guilt of the worshippers of idols, etc., should free them from guilt, for this reason he here reproves their error, and denies that they are worthy of pardon, as if to say: Not even by this excuse of zeal and intention of seeking God do they deserve pardon, because from the world, that is from the world, that is from the creatures of the world, they were able and ought to have ascended easily to the maker, and to know the Creator; whence they ought to have lifted the eyes of their mind to him. By a beautiful and clear reasoning and similitude Trismegistus demonstrates the same thing, Dialogue V: "For indeed when no one dares to assert that a statue and image can be made without a craftsman and painter, shall we think that the wonderful construction of this world was established without a creator? O blind little man! O too impious! O buried in the deep darkness of ignorance! Beware, beware, O my son Titus, never deprive a work of its craftsman." ESTIMATE THE WORLD. — In Greek, στοχάσασθαι, that is, first, to observe, to consider, and by your sagacity to penetrate the nature of this world; second, to conjecture and to attain by conjecture, and through effects and signs to know the world, that is the world, and natural things, which are created by God in the world; third See also Job, chapter XXXVIII and following, where God from the greatness of the earth, sea, clouds, rains, thunders, lightnings, Behemoth, that is elephant, and Leviathan, that is whale or whale- Furthermore St. Cyril in book I against Julian recites these opinions of the gentile philosophers and poets concerning the one true God; of Orpheus: "One is he, existing through himself, from one all things are made; he himself is better in them; nor has anyone of mortals beheld him, he himself sees all." And after other things again: "For he himself is established in the airy heaven, in a golden throne, and upon the earth he walks with feet, and extends his right hand to the ends of the Ocean on all sides: for great mountains tremble round about, and rivers, cities, and the deep of the pleasant sea." Of Pythagoras: "God indeed is one, and he is not, as some suspect, outside the governance of the world, but in it wholly in the whole circle, he considers all generations, being the temperament of all ages, and the light of his powers and works, the principle of all things, light in heaven, and father of all, mind and animation of all, the motion of all circles." Plato: "For to find the Father and Maker of this universe is a difficult task, and when found, to declare Him to all is impossible." Again, Plato felt "concerning one God, that no name is fitting for Him, nor can human thought comprehend Him, but the appellations which are spoken of Him are from later times, and are used of Him abusively. But if we must dare to say anything of Him at all by the names we use, the appellation of 'the One' and 'the Good' should rather be attributed to Him: for that suggests simplicity in Him, and through this sufficiency: for He needs nothing, neither parts, nor substance, nor powers, nor efficacies, but is the author of all these things. But the word 'Good' commends itself to us, because from Him all that is good comes, when others imitate, as far as they are able, His, if so it may be said, property, and through that receive salvation." Of Mercury Trismegistus, or Hermes thrice greatest: "To understand God is indeed difficult, but to speak of Him is impossible, even if it were possible to understand Him: for it is impossible to signify the incorporeal by the corporeal, and it is not possible to comprehend the perfect by the imperfect, and it is difficult to compare the eternal with the momentary: for this indeed is always, but that passes away, and this indeed is true, but that is shadowed under appearance; therefore as much as the weaker differs from the stronger, and the less from the better, so much also does the mortal differ from the divine and immortal. Wherefore if any incorporeal eye should go forth from the body to the contemplation of beauty; and should fly up and contemplate, not seeking to perceive a figure, not a body, not a form; but rather that which is able to make all things, which is quiet, which is tranquil, which is solid, which is unchangeable, which itself is all things and alone, which is one, which itself from itself, which itself in itself, which is like to itself, which is like to no other, nor unlike to itself." to conclude that passage in such a way as to say: Those who first set up images of gods for the peoples, he considers to have prudently both removed fear from their cities and added error, thinking that gods could easily be despised in the stupidity of images. But in that he does not say they handed down error, but added it, he certainly wishes it to be understood that error existed even without images." The same is testified by Plutarch in the Life of Numa Pompilius, the second king of the Romans, who succeeded Romulus: "He," he says, "forbade the Romans to think that the image of God has the form of man or beast. Nor was there among them any fashioned image of God before, but in the first hundred and seventy years, they indeed built temples and erected sacred huts, but dedicated no corporeal image: just as if it were impious to liken better things to worse, nor could God be perceived otherwise than by intelligence." The same is taught by Clement of Alexandria, book I of the Stromata, Eusebius and others. After Numa, therefore, Tarquinius Priscus, imbued at home with the vanity and folly of Greek and Etruscan superstitions, taught the Romans to set up images to the gods; whence he himself built the Capitol and dedicated it to Jupiter. Indeed the ancient pagans first made images of gods without the form of man or beast, in a rough trunk or shapeless wood, especially when they fixed them to distinguish the boundaries of fields and territories; whence Lucan, book III: "And sad images of gods lack art, and stand forth shapeless from hewn trunks." Later they gave the god Terminus the face of a man, but truncated without hands, arms, feet, etc., as one can still see in Rome in ancient images of Terminus. Finally, as art and superstition grew, they painted and carved gods in full and perfect human form, and adorned that form with colors, purple, golden crowns, a scepter, so that they might make it venerable to the rude; and then idolatry so increased that idols filled even the streets, forum, baths, stables and houses, as Tertullian testifies, book On Spectacles, chapter VIII, whence he adds: "Satan and his angels filled the whole age." 14. OR HE COMPARES IT TO SOME ANIMAL, PAINTING IT WITH RED OCHRE, AND MAKING ITS COLOR RUDDY WITH PAINT, AND COVERING OVER EVERY SPOT THAT IS IN IT. — The superstition of idolatry grew to such an extent that they fashioned idols not in the likeness of a man, but of some animal, and a vile and abject one (for this is the Greek σκωρίοι), namely a dog, cat, ape, fly, such as Beelzebub was. Painting it with red ochre, in Greek, μίλτῳ, that is with vermilion, just as the ancients marked the titles of books or chapters with red color, from which they are called rubrics. Thus ancient idols were tinged with red color, as if with purple and fiery color, for purple is the garment of kings; and fire is an index of divinity, so that they might signify that these were kings of all things, and wielded thunderbolts and fires; 15 and 16. AND HE MAKES FOR IT A WORTHY DWELLING, AND SETTING IT IN A WALL, AND FASTENING IT WITH IRON, LEST PERHAPS IT FALL, PROVIDING FOR IT; KNOWING THAT IT CANNOT HELP ITSELF: FOR IT IS AN IMAGE, AND HAS NEED OF HELP. — That is to say, then he builds for the idol as if for a deity a shrine, altar, temple, or rather a small shrine, tabernacle, or case, in which it might be enclosed, as Demetrius the silversmith did, making silver shrines of Diana, Acts XIX, 24: for at first there were no temples, for Solomon was the first to build a temple for the Hebrews, indeed Xerxes at the counsel of the magi burned temples: which, as Cicero writes, in book II of On Laws, the whole world itself is a temple, nor should gods be shut up in houses, but all things ought to be open and free to them, and therefore those about to pray would climb high mountains; they therefore placed domestic idols in the bedrooms of houses, namely in Lararia or Oratories (for all these things aim at demonstrating the baseness of idols), and there they placed them in a wall, and fastened them with nails, and strengthened them, taking care lest they fall, because they knew that these could not sustain themselves, but needed the help of another, in that an idol is nothing other than a weak image, which has need of another's aid and support. Jeremiah brings the same reproach against idols, cap. X, vers. 4: "With nails, he says, and hammers he fastened it, that it should not fall apart, etc., being carried they shall be borne, because they cannot walk;" and Baruch, cap. VI, vers. 26: "If they fall, he says, they do not rise up of themselves, nor if anyone sets it upright, will it stand of itself." Truly St. Augustine, serm. 29 On the Words of the Lord: "A god of gold, he says, and a god of wood differ in price: but to have eyes, and not to see, they are the same." 17. AND OF HIS SUBSTANCE, AND OF HIS SONS, AND
13:6
Note, that perhaps the to does not refer to errant precisely: for it is certain that they err in the worship and adoration of creatures; but to the to errant seeking God, that is to say, Perhaps these in some way from the gravity of the crime of idolatry, if not entirely, at least can be excused, in that their error was fortuitous: for when they sought God, they chanced upon these fair creatures, and when they found and beheld no other God, they held these to be gods: thus Dionysius, Jansenius, Cantacuzenus and others; whence he says: "When they are occupied in his works (that is when they occupy themselves in considering the works of God), they are persuaded," in Greek, πείθονται τῇ ὄψει, that is they are persuaded by sight, they believe their eyes, "that the things which are seen are good," in Greek, beautiful, "that is to say, deceived by the allurement of their eyes they worshipped these beautiful creatures, when they beheld nothing more beautiful, nor could they behold God, the most beautiful, with their eyes."
13:8
TO ESTIMATE THE WORLD. — In Greek, στοχάσασθαι, that is, first, to observe, to consider, and by your sagacity to penetrate the nature of this world; second, to conjecture and by conjecture to attain, and through effects and signs to know the world, that is the world, and natural things, which are created by God in the world; third in particular, they themselves could neither express, nor understand, nor grasp. Christians have nothing of such a kind, for neither in an image, even of God, do they place anything of divinity, or of spirit and life, or of bodily likeness, but a bare representation of God, and that analogical, insofar as namely a thing and a bodily image can represent a spiritual thing, which is the proper and bare reason of an image, namely to represent its prototype: and therefore rightly theologians from St. Basil and Damascene teach, that the honor of an image by its nature is referred to the prototype. Moreover images of visible men, namely of Christ and the saints, are frequent among Christians; of God however invisible few, lest the rude common people think God has a body like the image: wherefore God is not to be painted, except in that mode and form in which he himself is read in Holy Scripture to have appeared to the saints, as to Abraham, Moses and the Prophets; and it is to be explained to the rude what that form means: for God is incorporeal, and lacking all form and figure, as the Seventh Synod teaches, Act. III and seq.
13:10
AMONG THE DEAD THEIR HOPE IS. — In Greek, in the dead their hope is, that is, first, as if to say, These idolaters fix their hopes in inanimate and dead idols, and invoke gods not living but insensible; hence secondly, Vatablus translates it, their hope is dead, that is, they lack all hope, because they have fixed it in dead idols, which can neither help them nor even hear them: wherefore their hope is desperate, and therefore it is not hope but desperation. Thirdly, as if to say, They are so desperate that they seem to be numbered among the damned, who have cast away all hope of salvation; or, as if to say, Just as the dead have no hope of life, so idolaters have no hope of salvation; but just as their life, so their salvation is desperate, because they lack faith and knowledge of God, from whom alone they can be saved. Fourthly, as if to say, They do not hope, that is, they do not expect anything except death and damnation, so that they may be reckoned among the dead and damned; for this alone and nothing else awaits and expects them: on the contrary, concerning the faithful and the just he said, cap. III, vers. 4: "Their hope is full of immortality." All these senses are true and fitting, but the first seems clearer and simpler: this is what the Psalmist sings, Psalm. CXIII: "Let them that make them become like unto them, and all such as trust in them." GOLD AND SILVER (namely golden and silver images, statues made from gold and silver, statues, I say, inanimate of gods, or rather of dead men) THEY CALLED GODS. — The devil fostered and strengthened the error and superstition, who, as St. Augustine teaches from Trismegistus, lib. VII De Civit. cap. VI, and lib. VIII, cap. XIII and seq., insinuating himself into images, spoke through them, and gave responses and oracles; whence those were consulted and worshipped by the people as divine powers; but hear Augustine: "But he (Trismegistus) asserts that visible and tangible images are as it were the bodies of gods; and that there dwell in these certain spirits invited, who are able to do something, either for harming or for fulfilling some of their desires, to whom divine honors and services of worship are rendered. These invisible spirits, therefore, by a certain art he says are coupled with visible things of corporeal matter, so that they are as it were animated bodies dedicated and subject to those spirits, images, and he says this is the gods making, and that men have received this great and wonderful power of making gods." Note here that the wisest of the gentiles, such as Trismegistus was, believed idols to be bodies and members of gods, namely demons, and therefore worshipped them, just as we worship the humanity and body of Christ. Moreover, who, how great, and how ancient this Trismegistus was, the same St. Augustine declares, lib. XVIII, cap. XXXIX: "For as regards philosophy, which professes to teach something, whence men become blessed, around the times of Mercury, whom they called Trismegistus, such studies flourished in those lands, indeed far before the wise men or philosophers of Greece; but nevertheless after Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Joseph, namely also after Moses himself: for in that time when Moses was born, that great Atlas the astrologer is found to have been, brother of Prometheus, maternal grandfather of the greater Mercury, whose grandson was that Trismegistus Mercury." OF THE INVENTION OF ART, — ἐπιμελέτημα, that is, meditation, devising, fabrication, that is, a work devised and wrought by ingenious art. He refers this to gold and silver by apposition, as if to say, "Gold and silver wrought by art, etc., they called gods;" thus also St. Paul, Acts XVII, 20, calls an idol "a graven image of the art and device of man," that is, an image devised and carved artificially by man; but St. Augustine aptly calls idols phantasms of men: for in the book De Vera relig. cap. XXXVII, when he had said that some worship the sun, others the moon, others the stars, he adds: "But among these those seem to themselves to" are most religious, who regard the whole creation together, that is the entire world with all things in it, and the life by which it is breathed and animated, which some believed to be corporeal and some incorporeal. They therefore think that this whole together is one great God, of which the rest are parts: for they did not know the author and creator of all creation; hence it is that they are precipitated into idols, and from the works of God are plunged into their own works, which are nevertheless still visible: for there is another baser and inferior worship of idols, by which they worship their phantasms, and whatever they have imagined in their wandering mind with pride or arrogance, they observe in the name of religion." Wherefore the same St. Augustine fittingly says, Questions XXIX in Joshua, that mystical and greatest idols are phantasms of our heart and desire, when namely one pursues and worships honors, riches, delights, which he imagines for himself, and represents as the highest good: which he therefore asserts ought plainly to be demolished and eradicated. OR A USELESS STONE (that is to say, not only golden and silver idols, but also those formed from useless and vile stone, they called gods, as we still see in Rome the living faces of the ancient gods in marble), THE WORK OF AN ANCIENT HAND. — For veneration was increased to the idol because it was the work of an ancient and ancient craftsman: just as even now in Rome and elsewhere ancient statues of the Romans are of greater value on account of their antiquity. There was added the superstition of old women and the common people, believing that idols after a certain period of years acquire wonderful power: concerning which see William of Paris, book On Laws, XXIII, and Delrio in Magic. Moreover the first Christians from among the gentiles, in hatred of idolatry then raging, in order to testify that they had withdrawn as far as possible from the ancient idols, used no images, especially of God, in temples, whence they were called atheists by the gentiles: which calumny is refuted by St. Justin, Arnobius, Athanasius, Augustine, Tertullian and others, who wrote apologies for Christians against the gentiles. But when idolatry was abolished through Constantine, so that there would no longer be danger of relapse into it, the faithful introduced images of Christ, the Blessed Virgin, and the saints into temples, as we see in Rome the most ancient ones, both in temples and in crypts: the use of which the Church approved, and defined as holy in the Seventh General Synod, which was Nicaea II, and the Council of Trent, session XXV, at the beginning: for images are the books of the unlearned, in which they read the deeds of Christ and the saints, so that they might imitate them, and venerate them. Hitherto concerning idols fabricated from gold, silver, and stone, he now adds similar ones made from wood, which are more frequent, and demonstrates their baseness and unworthiness, therefore he says: 11 and 12. OR IF ANY CRAFTSMAN, A CARPENTER, SHALL CUT DOWN A STRAIGHT TREE FROM THE FOREST, AND SKILLFULLY STRIP ALL THE BARK FROM IT, AND BY HIS ART, DILIGENTLY FASHION A USEFUL VESSEL FOR THE CONDUCT OF LIFE, AND WITH THE REMNANTS OF HIS WORK SHALL USE THEM FOR THE PREPARATION OF FOOD. — "Or if any," repeat from the preceding verse, "called the works of the hands of men gods," namely idols, just as from gold, silver and stone, so also fabricated from wood, whose vanity and vain superstition he depicts graphically in this verse and the following, namely that a carpenter, cutting down a tree and stripping it of bark, fabricates from it a chest, table, window, or some other instrument useful for the common uses of this life: but from its remnants and rejectamenta, partly he kindles a fire by which he cooks food, partly he makes an idol, that is an effigy of a man or animal, which when polished he places in a temple, and fastens it with iron nails to the altar, lest it slip and fall. In exactly the same way Baruch depicts and mocks the fabrication of idols throughout chapter VI, Jeremiah, chapter X, and Isaiah, chapter XLIV, 9 and following, whom the Wise Man seems to imitate here: wherefore what I said there, I shall not repeat here, and therefore I shall touch briefly on what follows. CRAFTSMAN MAKER. — In Greek, ὑλοτόμος τέκτων, that is a cutter of matter, a worker in wood or a carpenter, who prepares matter for some work; but the word ὑλοτόμος is the same as one cutting down a forest: for the forest gives trees as it were matter to craftsmen for their works: for ὕλη is forest, and thence matter, for the Latins often turn the Greek aspiration into the letter S, as for ὑπέρ they say super, for ὕς they say sus, for ὕλη they say silva; whence ὕλη signifies any matter whatsoever, but especially that which is cut down. The sense is, as if to say, A mechanical and base craftsman fabricated an idol: he therefore is superior to the idol, because the maker excels his work, and one endowed with a soul excels an inanimate idol; whence it would shame the craftsman to adore an idol made by himself, because he knows the idol received all its form and beauty from himself: wherefore since he himself is not god, much less can the idol be god, since he himself cannot make gods. STRAIGHT WOOD. — In Greek, εὔτακτον φυτόν, that is a plant or tree, which easily melts away (for τήκω means I melt, soften, waste away), dissolves, rots, corrupts; others read εὔτακτον, that is easy to work, elaborated elegantly; the Vatican manuscripts read εὐκίνητον, that is easily movable, which easily obeys the hand of the craftsman, for an image is not usually cut from an oak; others read εὔγνητον, that is well-born, rightly born and formed. Our translator aptly renders it straight, because things that are straight are more easily formed, whence they are called contidora dividea, trees whose veins and fibres run straight; hence the Complutensian editors render it straight; Vatable, excellent; others, suitable, apt, tractable; Cantacuzenus explains it as suitable, straight, agile. For diligently, in Greek it is, εὐπρεπῶς, that is decently, becomingly, harmoniously, elegantly. For useful, Lyra, Hugh, and Dionysius wrongly read useless. FOR THE SERVICE OF LIFE. — In Greek, εἰς ὑπηρεσίαν ζωῆς, that is for the ministry of life. For remnants, in Greek it is, ἀπόβλημα, that is cast-offs, reject- in Greek it is, ἀπόβλημα, that is cuttings, rejection, cast-offs, residue cut from the wood. The Greek texts thus have it: cast-offs moreover of the work in preparation of food he expends, and was satisfied. He exaggerates the baseness of the matter of idols, since from the same wood an idol is made, from whose scraps or branches food is cooked, by which he is refreshed and satisfied. ABUSETH, — that is useth: thus Cicero, in the third action against Verres, and in book IX, epistle 6, says that he abused, that is used, the time and leisure which the republic granted him, for study; thus jurists say, we use things which are not consumed by use, but abuse those which are consumed by use, such as here are woods, by which fire is kindled for cooking; whence Cato, On Agriculture, chapter LXXVI, says: "Until you shall have abused all the cheese with honey," that is consumed it. Again, to abuse with Cicero and other classical authors is to use abundantly or copiously, just as we copiously use many woods for the kitchen fire, and therefore we abuse them. 13. AND THE REMAINDER THEREOF, WHICH SERVETH TO NO USE, WOOD CROOKED AND FULL OF KNOTS, LET HIM CUT DILIGENTLY BY HIS IDLENESS, AND BY THE KNOWLEDGE OF HIS ART LET HIM FASHION IT, AND MAKE IT LIKE THE IMAGE OF A MAN. — Here he depicts the carpenter sculptor carving a simulacrum, or idol, to show that it has nothing of divinity, but is merely a figment of the thought and work of the craftsman, fabricated according to his will and pleasure. Almost every word has emphasis, and denotes a particular baseness of the idol; whence he says, first: "The remainder thereof," in Greek, τὸ δὲ ἐξ αὐτῶν ἀπόβλημα, that is their cast-off, as if to say, That which is rejected from the woods, as a segment unfit for forming a vessel, and for building a fire, this he made into a simulacrum and idol. Second, "which serveth to no use," as if to say, Useless for all things. Third, "crooked," in Greek, σκολιόν, that is twisted, oblique, distorted. Fourth, "full of knots," in Greek, ὄζοις συμπεφυκός, that is born with knots, knotty, branchy, for ὄζος is a knot, and thence a branch growing forth; Our translator calls the knots vortices, or, as the Vatican has it, vertices (for vortex and vertex are the same), because they turn in upon themselves and are twisted like a rotation and dizziness, as vortices of waters do, according to that passage of Ovid, book IV of the Epistles from Pontus: The Halys twisted by frequent rotation.
13:13
For wood without knots is smooth, beautiful and easy to work; but knotty wood is rough, deformed and difficult. Fifth, that it "carves it diligently through its leisure," in Greek, ἐν ἐπιμελείᾳ ἀργίας αὐτοῦ, that is in the diligence, care and industry of its idleness. Here therefore leisure does not mean hollowed-out wood, as Lyra wishes, nor empty and vain labor, as St. Bonaventura wishes, nor empty in brain or senseless, as Dionysius wishes, but signifies idleness, as if to say: The wood of the idol is so crude that it must be carved and polished by the craftsman with great study, care and art; but he himself, occupied with other things necessary for the sustenance of his family, carves and sculpts it only through leisure, namely when he is idle from other more pressing works; therefore the idol is a work of leisure, and for this reason neglected, imperfect and of no consequence. Sixth, he adds that through the knowledge of his art he shapes it, in Greek, ἐν ἀνομοιώματι, that is in the experience of understanding, that is through experience, by which through frequent carving, he has acquired for himself the knowledge and art of skillfully carving. Therefore the idol, ignorant and lacking mind, needs the knowledge, mind and art of the man carving it, and is his work and fabrication: for he gives it his form and figure, and all its beauty; but he cannot attribute to it the divinity, which it does not have. Seventh, "let him make it like the image of a man," as if to say: The idol is so far from being God, that it is not even a living man, but only a dead image of a living man made by man. Therefore it is not a true but a fictitious and painted god; whence Horace, laughing at this, in book 1, Satires 1, satire 8: When the uncertain craftsman was making a stool for Priapus, He preferred it to be a god. Therefore most idols had the appearance of man, because it is established that all gods were men: for men distinguished by strength, power, beneficence, or benefit conferred on the state, were by the people placed among the gods: hear Tertullian, book On Idolatry, chapter XV: "Let us consider all idolatry to be the worship of men, since it is established that the gods themselves of the nations were men among their own people." The same is taught by St. Augustine throughout chapter XXVI, book VIII of The City of God, and by St. Cyprian, in the book That Idols Are Not Gods. It is established that Saturn, Jupiter, Minerva, Mercury, Ceres, Venus were men, as Tertullian teaches at length in Apology XI, where he likewise shows that these same ones were wicked. Furthermore, the Wise Man, equally with the prophets, describes so laboriously the vanity of idols and their worthlessness, because at first idolatry consisted in the adoration of gods in empty temples, without any simulacra of them, and then it was more sparing and rare; but afterwards when simulacra of the gods were made by craft, and these were elegantly carved, painted, and adorned with gold and gems, then those, being visible to the eyes, began to be worshipped everywhere by all, and thus idolatry grew greatly through idols, as Tertullian teaches in the book On Idolatry, chapter III. Whence also St. Augustine, book 19 of The City of God, chapter III, says that Cicero laughed at idols and idolaters; and in chapter XXXI, he asserts that Varro, the most learned of the Romans, thought that God is not an idol, but "a soul governing the world by motion and reason;" and soon after concerning the same he adds: "He also says that the ancient Romans worshipped gods for more than one hundred and seventy years without simulacra. If this had remained, he says, the gods would be observed more chastely. He brings as witness to this opinion among other things also the Jewish nation; nor does he doubt further that he calls this color paint, because by coating the statue of the idol with it, they covered all its blemishes, foul colors and filth, as the Wise Man adds, which was to make paint for the people: for paint is called an ointment or pigment with which women are tinged and colored, so that they conceal the pallid and lurid complexion and bodily defects: wherefore with paint they produce a red or rosy color of the face; hence the Comic poet: For those old women who continually anoint themselves with ointments, Toothless hags who conceal their bodily defects with paint. Finally, paint can be made with any color. Vatable translates this entire passage from verse 11 clearly and elegantly in this manner: or when someone, a carpenter, having cut down a tree of excellent wood, skillfully stripped all the bark around it, and from it artificially and beautifully fabricated a vessel useful for the purposes of life: having consumed the shavings of the work in preparing food and being satisfied, he took up a useless rejected log from it, knotty with branches, carved it diligently through leisure, and skillfully shaped it while idle, and so fashioned it in the likeness of a man, or formed the simulacrum of some vile animal. Then by applying red ochre and paint, he procured for it a ruddy color, and covered every blemish in it. of locusts and vile little beasts, they were indignant that through these, which, or similar ones to which, they had worshipped as gods, they were being destroyed: wherefore seeing, and feeling, that is observing, the God of the Hebrews, whom they once denied knowing, inflicting these plagues upon them, they were forced to acknowledge Him as the true God, as is evident from Judith v, 20; Jos. II, 9. But late, and unwillingly and under compulsion: wherefore it was fitting that they be punished with the final calamity, wherefore "the end of their condemnation (that is the final damnation, ruin and destruction) came upon them," namely when they were utterly abolished by Joshua and the Hebrews through wars. Others refer these things to the Egyptians, who were drowned by Moses in the Red Sea; but he dealt with the Egyptians in chapter xi, but in this chapter xii he deals with the Canaanites: thus St. Bonaventure, Dionysius and others. For patientes the Complutensian and Royal editions read impatientes: both are true, for they were patient in body but impatient in mind; hence from the Complutensian editions Jansenius thus translates clearly, for when in those things in which they suffered patiently, in those namely which they thought to be gods, when they were punished by them, they felt Him whom they once denied knowing, then they acknowledged the true God: he wishes to signify Pharaoh with his people, who first said: "I know not the Lord, and I will not let Israel go," before God had afflicted them with frogs and flies, which they worshipped as gods, not without great indignation on their part, who bore it ill to be afflicted by their gods, and by things so trivial, then at last acknowledged the Lord, so that he said: "I have sinned: the Lord is just, and I and my people are wicked. Pray ye to the Lord," etc. But I have already said that here it is properly about the Canaanites; if anyone, however, wishes with Cantacuzenus to understand these things of both Egyptians and Canaanites, I shall not object: for in what follows he speaks of both mixed together. For venit, many read veniet, namely on the day of judgment, "the end of the condemnation" of the reprobate, who shall be damned and thrust into hell; but in Greek it is ἦλθε, that is came, in the past tense: for he speaks of the past destruction of the Canaanites.
13:15
27. FOR IN THOSE THINGS WHICH THEY SUFFERED PATIENTLY THEY WERE INDIGNANT (many manuscripts add, or rather place before, in those things which they suffered, they bore ill, which words seem to be added from another version; hence the Roman edition deletes them; they say and repeat the same thing) THROUGH THESE WHOM THEY THOUGHT TO BE GODS, IN THESE VERY THINGS WHEN THEY WERE BEING DESTROYED SEEING HIM, WHOM THEY ONCE DENIED KNOWING, THEY ACKNOWLEDGED THE TRUE GOD: FOR WHICH REASON ALSO THE END OF THEIR CONDEMNATION CAME UPON THEM.
13:17
CHAPTER THIRTEEN. SYNOPSIS OF THE CHAPTER.
13:18
AND FOR A JOURNEY HE ASKS OF HIM WHO CANNOT WALK. — Vatablus: he supplicates him who cannot even take a step for making a journey, as if to say: The idolater, that he may have a prosperous journey, invokes an idol as a guide of the journey, which cannot even move a foot, according to that Psalm 113, 7: "They have feet, and shall not walk." Thus the Romans called and invoked the goddess of journeys Iterduca and Domiduca; but the weary invoked the goddess Fessonia, as St. Augustine testifies in the seventh book of the City of God, chapter III. CONCERNING ACQUIRING, AND CONCERNING WORKING, AND CONCERNING THE OUTCOME OF ALL THINGS HE ASKS OF HIM WHO IN ALL THINGS IS USELESS. — The Greek texts clearly and elegantly have, for gain, success in work, and the dexterity and prosperous success of hands, he asks of the most sluggish in hands sluggishness, facility of action, dexterity, power, and efficacy: for all these things are signified by εὐχείρωμα or, as others read, εὐδρανείαν, to which he beautifully opposes ἀδρανέστατον, that is, the most sluggish, weakest, most impotent idol. Moreover, for the acquisition of wealth and gain the gentiles invoked the god Plutus (for πλοῦτος means money), or Dis as if the rich one: thus the goddess Pecunia presided over money, Aesculanus over bronze, Argentinus over silver, why not Aurinus over gold? says St. Augustine in the fourth book of the City of God, chapter XXI, who also in the seventh book, chapter XII, says that Jupiter himself was called Pecunia: "For all things obey money:" again Arnobius, in the fourth book Against the Gentiles, calls the gods Lucrios presiding over gain: see the sayings in Ecclesiastes 10, 19. For work, moreover, and the success of work they invoked Mercury, Minerva, and Vulcan. From what has been said it is clear that Calvin errs most shamefully, who, in the first book of the Institutes, chapter XI, sections 9 and 10, asserts that the gentiles were not so stupid as to adore stones and wood: wherefore the Wise Man and the prophets, when they reprove their idols, reprove that which Christians now do, namely that they carnally venerate God in wood and stone, that is, in a wooden or stone image, is most clearly false from the whole passage, and more clearly from chapter VI of Baruch, and chapter XLIV of Isaiah, and chapter X of Jeremiah, and Psalm 113: for these prophets are extensively and laboriously occupied in removing from the rude people the opinion of the deity of the idol by the baseness of the material, the workmanship, the sculpture, etc., and persuade them that in the idol there is nothing of divinity, nothing of godhead; whence Baruch after each argument, frequently repeating, infers and concludes: "Whereby it may be known unto you that they are not gods:" from which it is most clear that the gentiles worshipped the very stone and wooden idols themselves as gods and divine beings. The same thing is most clearly taught by all the Fathers who wrote against idols, such as Tertullian, St. Justin, St. Athanasius, St. Cyprian, Athenagoras, Arnobius, Felix Minucius, St. Augustine and others, who everywhere mock the gentiles for worshipping stones and wood as gods. The same thing Hermes Trismegistus, the greatest and most ancient philosopher and theologian of the gentiles, teaches in express words, which I recited from St. Augustine in verse 10. Nor is it surprising that simple men were so stupid as to adore idols, because we know that such still exist in Japan and the Indies: for this error, strengthened by the use of so many centuries, and by the oracles which demons speaking through idols rendered, and by other their gestures and mockeries made around the idol, by which they strove to persuade the people that it was animated, indeed divine, confirmed, was handed down as it were from hand to hand to posterity, as also other no less astounding infamies of their crimes, which therefore they themselves considered lawful, as we read in Laertius, Plutarch and others. Note here that the more sagacious and learned gentiles, as Trismegistus asserts in St. Augustine, the eighth book of the City of God, chapter XXIII, believed that "certain gods, namely idols, were made by the hands of men whence also many things are and of the same God, for example Jupiter; but that these idols are the body of God: whereas God is a spirit enclosed in the idol, as it were his soul, which spirit some thought to be the soul of a dead man, to whom the idol was erected; others a demon, either invoked by idol-makers, or of its own accord inserting itself into human superstition and idols, as Trismegistus says in the place cited; others again to be the soul of the universe, or the soul of the sun, moon, earth, etc., as Eusebius relates, lib. III De Praepar. cap. III, and St. Augustine, VII De Civit. V and seq.: see more things in Giraldus De Diis gentium, syntagm. I. Furthermore, by what and how many arts and acts demons have mocked the pagans, so that they believed themselves to be the souls of idols, St. Cyprian declares, lib. De Idolol. not far from the beginning: "These spirits therefore, he says, lurk beneath statues and consecrated images: these inspire the breasts of seers by their breath, animate the entrails of victims, govern the flights of birds, direct lots, produce oracles, always mixing false things with true: for they both are deceived and deceive; they disturb life; they trouble sleep; creeping even into bodies they secretly terrify minds, distort limbs, break health, bring on diseases, so that they may compel worship of themselves, so that, fattened by the odor of altars and the burning of cattle, they may seem to have healed what they had bound fast. This is the remedy for them, when their injury ceases: nor is their study anything else than to turn men away from God, and to turn them from the understanding of true religion to their own superstition, since they themselves are penal, to seek for themselves companions in punishment, whom they have made partakers in their crime through error." You will say, the wiser among the pagans recognized the true God, and worshipped him in the idol, just as Christians worship him in an image: yet they are reproved here as idolaters; therefore so are Christians. I answer, you will scarcely find anyone who worshipped the true God in an idol, for those who recognized the true God despised and mocked idols, as Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Cicero, Lucretius; some however from fear of the people, lest they be killed, as Socrates was killed as a despiser of the gods, publicly worshipped them, not willingly, but as if forced, while privately and in secret they rejected them, and worshipped one God the creator of all. But let us grant that some worshipped the true God in an idol, they erred in this, that they thought the idol to be the body of God, as I have already said, and that God delighted in it, and enclosed and hid himself in it; or certainly that God was similar to the idol, or had similar members human, bovine, serpentine: for this reason they gave these members to the idol, and various ones to various things, and consequently attributed to the true God a body, members, and other things, which are false; and thus consequently they worshipped not the true god, who is pure spirit, but a corporeal and false one. Finally they believed the idol to be something of God, and therefore to have something of divine power, something of divinity, something of godhead, whatever that might be: for what that might be in particular they could neither express, nor understand, nor grasp. Christians have nothing of the sort, for neither in an image, even of God, do they place anything of divinity, or of spirit and life, or of corporeal likeness, but a bare representation of God, and that analogical, inasmuch as a corporeal thing and image can represent a spiritual one, which is the proper and bare reason of an image, namely to represent its prototype: and therefore rightly theologians from St. Basil and Damascene teach that the honor of an image by its nature is referred to the prototype. Moreover images of visible men, namely of Christ and the saints, are frequent among Christians; of God however invisible few, lest the rude common people believe God to have a body similar to the image: wherefore God is not to be painted, except in that mode and form in which he himself is read in Holy Scripture to have appeared to the saints, as to Abraham, Moses and the Prophets; and it is to be explained to the rude what that form means: for God is incorporeal, and lacking all form and figure, as the Seventh Synod teaches, Act. III and seq. Finally, if any of the wise worshipped the true God in an idol, as in a mere image, they are not properly censured here, nor did they sin by formal and properly so-called idolatry; but they sinned, both by the sin of scandal, in that by their example they confirmed the people in their idolatry, and by the sin of profession of false faith and idolatry: for by participating with idolaters in the common and public worship of the idol, they professed outwardly the faith and worship of the idol, even if inwardly they adored not the idol, but God in the idol, as in an image. Add that an idol is an image not of the true God, but of a false one, nor is it lawful for anyone to give to the true God an image which He Himself did not fashion for Him, but which God and the Church approve: wherefore he who worships an idol worships not the true God, but a false one, whom namely the idol-makers and idolaters have fashioned and formed for themselves, neglecting the true God, creator of heaven and earth. Whosoever therefore worships an idol worships a false god, and is an idolater; whence also most idols are so deformed and horrible that by their very form and appearance they seem to be simulacra of demons: for they are black like Ethiopians, with bovine head, fierce and threatening countenance, with enormous and glittering eyes, with bull-like brow, and sometimes horned, with a boastful nose, with thick and pig-like lips; the gape of the mouth is drawn back like a snarling dog; the mouth is open and gaping like a wolf, and likewise huge and hollow like a furnace, so that namely in it a demon might more easily form articulate voices, by which it might give forth responses and oracles: such as we see very many especially in Rome in the Vatican. Mystically adapt all these things to heresy, and to any cupidity: for to the heretic the idol is heresy, to the proud man honor, to the avaricious man gold, to the glutton the belly, to the lustful man lust, to the slothful man sleep, to the wrathful man vengeance, to the envious man envy, as St. Augustine, St. Gregory and other doctors teach, indeed St. Paul himself, Philippians III, 19, and Ephesians V, 5.
Machine translation from the Latin, not reviewed.
13:1
Sometimes the Bible deals in a practical manner with the problem of God's existence and resolves it with the principle of causality (Heb. 11:3; Rom. 1:20; Wis. 13:1-15:19; Ps. 18:2; Job 12:7 ff.; Jer. 10:11; Is. 37:16; 40:7). Usually the demonstration is based on the cosmological argument. …
… author, so that the human intellect can ascend from it to God and acquire a certain knowledge of his existence and a certain (aliqualis) knowledge of his nature (Vatican Council, Denz-U, 1785, 1806). This first manifestation of God, clearly taught in Wis. 13:1-9, presupposed by Rom. 1:18-21, Acts 14-17; 17:24-27, is often called natural R., or R. of God through nature. …
… be "something divine" (cf. Physic. I, 9, 192 a 16), in agreement with the Christian doctrine according to which in creatures there is found a "similitude" of the divinity and that man can and must from sensible things rise to the knowledge of God (Wis. 13, 1; Rom. 1, 19). The same Aristotelian doctrine of the agent intellect (νοῦς ποιητικός: De An. III, 5, 430 a 10), which was the principal scandal of medieval Augustinianism, in fact …
13:2
Preambles of the Faith (Praeambula Fidei)
… The existence of God, author of nature, can easily be known, even if in a confused manner, from the consideration of the nature of created things, from their order, etc., which postulate the existence of a creator, a supreme ordainer (Wis. 13:2-5). Therefore the Vatican Council defined (Denz-U, 1785): "that God, the beginning and end of all things, can be known with certainty by the natural light of human reason through created things". …
Douay-Rheims (Challoner) · Vulgata Clementina · original Douay-Rheims (Douay 1609-10), transcription by EEBO-TCP (CC0) · La Sacra Bibbia, tradotta dalla Volgata da Antonio Martini (1769-1781) (LaParola (laparola.net), Martini OSIS text, Public domain (LaParola's electronic edition marks it 'Dominio pubblico')). Public domain.