The beginning of worshipping idols: and the effects thereof.
Foolish men intending to saile, honour woodden idols, in regard of the profite they receiue by shippes: 6. by which some were saued in the general diluge. 8. Idols, and idolmakers are cursed. 12. They were not from the beginning, 15. but were deuised for memorie of the dead, and worshipped with diuine honour. 22. So men forgetting God, proceeded in idolatrie, with other abominable, and cruel enormities.
1Again, another designing to sail, and beginning to make his voyage through the raging waves, calleth upon a piece of wood more frail than the wood that carrieth him.Parimente un altro, che pensa di navigare, e stando per fare viaggio per mezzo ai flutti tempestosi invoca un legno più fragile, che quel, che lo porta.AGAYNE an other thinking to sayle, and begynning to make a iorney through the fierce waues, inuocateth wood more fraile then the wood that carieth him.Iterum alius navigare cogitans, / et per feros fluctus iter facere incipiens, / ligno portante se, fragilius lignum invocat. 2For this the desire of gain devised, and the workman built it by his skill.Perocché questo fu inventato dalla cupidità del guadagno, e fabbricato dall'artefice col suo sapere.For couetousnes of getting inuented it, and the craftesman by his wisdom framed it.Illud enim cupiditas acquirendi excogitavit, / et artifex sapientia fabricavit sua. 3But thy providence, O Father, governeth it: for thou hast made a way even in the sea, and a most sure path among the waves,Ma dalla tua previdenza, o Padre, egli è governato, perché tu apristi anche nel mare una strada, e passaggio fermissimo per mezzo ai flutti.But thy prouidence, ô Father, doth gouerne: because thou hast geuen a way euen in the sea, and among the waues a most sure path,Tua autem, Pater, providentia gubernat: / quoniam dedisti et in mari viam, / et inter fluctus semitam firmissimam, 4Shewing that thou art able to save out of all things, yea, though a man went to sea without art.Facendo vedere come da qualunque pericolo tu puoi salvare anche quando senz'arte uno entri nel mare.shewing that thou art able to saue out of al thinges, yea if a man goe to the sea without art.ostendens quoniam potens es ex omnibus salvare, / etiam si sine arte aliquis adeat mare. 5But that the works of thy wisdom might not be idle: therefore men also trust their lives even to a little wood, and passing over the sea by ship, are saved.Ma affinchè non restassero inutili le opere di tua sapienza, per questo ancora gli uomini affidano ad un legno le loro vite, e valicano il mare sopra una barca, e si salvano.But that thy workes might not be voyde of wisdom: for this cause also men commit their liues euen to a little wood, and passing ouer the sea are deliuered by shippe.Sed ut non essent vacua sapientiæ tuæ opera, / propter hoc etiam et exiguo ligno credunt homines animas suas, / et transeuntes mare per ratem liberati sunt. 6And from the beginning also, when the proud giants perished, the hope of the world fleeing to a vessel, which was governed by thy hand, left to the world seed of generation.E ancor da principio allorché i superbi giganti perirono, si rifugiò la speranza del mondo in una nave, la quale governata dalla tua mano rendette al secolo la semenza di suo rinascimento;But from the begynning also when the prowde giants perished, the hope of the world fleing to a shippe, rendered to the world feede of natiuitie, which was gouerned by thy hand.Sed et ab initio cum perirent superbi gigantes, / spes orbis terrarum ad ratem confugiens, / remisit sæculo semen nativitatis quæ manu tua erat gubernata.
7For blessed is the wood, by which justice comethPerocché benedetto è il legno, che serve alla giustizia.For blessed is the wood, by the which iustice is made.Benedictum est enim lignum per quod fit justitia; 8But the idol that is made by hands, is cursed, as well it, as he that made it: he because he made it; and it because being frail it is called a god.Ma il legno manofatto di un idolo, è maledetto, ed egli, e l'artefice; questi perché lo formò, e quello perché essendo cosa frale portò il nome di dio.But the idol that is made by handes, cursed is both it, and he that made it: because he in deede wrought it: and the same being fraile, was called god.per manus autem quod fit idolum, / maledictum est et ipsum, et qui fecit illud: / quia ille quidem operatus est, / illud autem cum esset fragile, deus cognominatus est. 9But to God the wicked and his wickedness are hateful alike.E Dio odia egualmente l'empio, e la sua empietà.But to God the impious and his impietie are odious alike.Similiter autem odio sunt Deo impius et impietas ejus; 10For that which is made, together with him that made it, shall suffer torments.E l'opera stessa, con chi la fece, sarà punita.For that which is made, with him that made it, shal suffer torments. For this cause also in the idol of the nationsetenim quod factum est, cum illo qui fecit tormenta patietur. 11Therefore there shall be no respect had even to the idols of the Gentiles: because the creatures of God are turned to an abomination, and a temptation to the souls of men, and a snare to the feet of the unwise.Per questo anche gli idoli delle nazioni non saran risparmiati, perché le creature di Dio furon fatte servire all'abbominazione, e tentare le anime degli uomini, e ad esser laccio a' piedi degli stolti;there shal be no respect: because the creatures of God were made to hatred, and for tentation to the soules of men, and for a snare to the feete of the vnwise.Propter hoc et in idolis nationum non erit respectus, / quoniam creaturæ Dei in odium factæ sunt, / et in tentationem animabus hominum, / et in muscipulam pedibus insipientium. 12For the beginning of fornication is the devising of idols: and the invention of them is the corruption of life.Imperocché la invenzione degli idoli è principio di fornicazione, e il loro ritrovamento fu la corruzione della vita:For the begynning of fornication is the deuising of idols: and the inuenting of them is the corruption of life.Initium enim fornicationis est exquisitio idolorum, / et adinventio illorum corruptio vitæ est:
13For neither were they from the beginning, neither shall they be for ever.Perocché questi da principio non furono, e non saranno per sempre;For neither were they from the begynning, neither shal they be for euer.neque enim erant ab initio, / neque erunt in perpetuum. 14For by the vanity of men they came into the world: and therefore they shall be found to come shortly to an end.Conciossiaché la vanità degli uomini gli introdusse nel mondo, e perciò in breve verrà il loro esterminio.For this vanitie of men came into the world: and therfore there is found a short end of them.Supervacuitas enim hominum hæc advenit in orbem terrarum, / et ideo brevis illorum finis est inventus. 15For a father being afflicted with bitter grief, made to himself the image of his son, who was quickly taken away: and him who then had died as a man, he began now to worship as a god, and appointed him rites and sacrifices among his servants.Un padre pieno di dolore si fece il ritratto di un figliuolo rapito a lui repentinamente, e quello, che allora morì come uomo, ha cominciato adesso a onorarlo qual Dio, e tra' suoi servitori gli assegna culto, e sacrifizj:For the father being sorowful with bitter moorning, made vnto himself the image of his sonne quickly taken away: and him, that then was a dead man, now he began to worshipe as god, and appointed holie thinges and sacrifices among his seruants.Acerbo enim luctu dolens pater, / cito sibi rapti filii fecit imaginem; / et illum qui tunc quasi homo mortuus fuerat, / nunc tamquam deum colere cœpit, / et constituit inter servos suos sacra et sacrificia. 16Then, in process of time, wicked custom prevailing, this error was kept as a law, and statues were worshipped by the commandment of tyrants.Indi coll'andare del tempo prese piede la prava consuetudine, e l'errore fu osservato qual legge, e per ordine de' tiranni onorati furono i simolacri.Afterward by succession of time, the wicked custom preuayling, this errour was kept as a law, and thinges grauen were worshipped by the commandement af tyrants.Deinde interveniente tempore, convalescente iniqua consuetudine, / hic error tamquam lex custoditus est, / et tyrannorum imperio colebantur figmenta. 17And those whom men could not honour in presence, because they dwelt far off, they brought their resemblance from afar, and made an express image of the king, whom they had a mind to honour: that by this their diligence, they might honour as present, him that was absent.E quelli, che gli uomini non potevano onorare personalmente, perché erano assenti, fatto venire da lungi il loro ritratto, esposero in chiara luce l'immagine del re, a cui volevan rendere onore, affine di tributargli i loro ossequi come se fosse presente.And those, whom openly men could not honour, for that they were far of, their figure being brought from a far, they made an euident image of the king, whom they would honour: that by their carefulnes they might honour as present, him that was absent.Et hos quos in palam homines honorare non poterant / propter hoc quod longe essent, / e longinquo figura eorum allata, / evidentem imaginem regis quem honorare volebant fecerunt, / ut illum qui aberat, tamquam præsentem colerent sua sollicitudine.
18And to the worshipping of these, the singular diligence also of the artificer helped to set forward the ignorant.E ad un simil culto furono spinti anche gli ignoranti dalla finissima diligenza dell'artefice.And to the worshipping of these, the excellent diligence also of the artificer, holpe them forward, that were ignorant.Provexit autem ad horum culturam / et hos qui ignorabant artificis eximia diligentia. 19For he being willing to please him that employed him, laboured with all his art to make the resemblance in the best manner.Mentre questi per piacere a chi lo adoperava, fece ogni sforzo dell'arte per fare più perfetta l'immagine.For he willing to please him, that entertained him, laboured by his art, to fashion the similitude in better sort.Ille enim, volens placere illi qui se assumpsit, / elaboravit arte sua ut similitudinem in melius figuraret. 20And the multitude of men, carried away by the beauty of the work, took him now for a god, that little before was but honoured as a man.Onde la turba rapita dalla belletta dell'opera, prende adesso per un Dio colui, che poco prima si onorava come uomo.And the multitude of men caried away by the beautie of the worke, him that a little before had bene honoured as a man, now they estemed for a god.Multitudo autem hominum, abducta per speciem operis, / eum qui ante tempus tamquam homo honoratus fuerat, / nunc deum æstimaverunt. 21And this was the occasion of deceiving human life: for men serving either their affection, or their kings, gave the incommunicable name to stones and wood.Così precipitò nell'errore la umana vita, mentre gli uomini, o per secondare il proprio affetto, o per ingrazianirsi coi regi, diedero al legno, ed ai sassi il nome incomunicabile.And this was the deceyuing of mans life: because men seruing either affection, or kinges, gaue the name that is not communicable to stones and wood.Et hæc fuit vitæ humanæ deceptio, / quoniam aut affectui aut regibus deservientes homines, / incommunicabile nomen lapidibus et lignis imposuerunt. 22And it was not enough for them to err about the knowledge of God, but whereas they lived in a great war of ignorance, they call so many and so great evils peace.Né bastò l'avere errato riguardo alla cognizione di Dio, ma vivendo gli uomini nella guerra grande della loro ignoranza a tanti mali, e sì grandi danno nome di pace.And it was not sufficient that they erred about the knowlege of God, but also liuing in a great battail of ignorance so manie and so great euils they cal peace.Et non suffecerat errasse eos circa Dei scientiam, / sed et in magno viventes inscientiæ bello, / tot et tam magna mala pacem appellant.
23For either they sacrifice their own children, or use hidden sacrifices, or keep watches full of madness,Conciossiachè or sacrificando i proprj figliuoli, or tenebrosi sacrifizj facendo, or celebrando veglie piene d'infamità;For either sacrificing their children, or making abscure sacrifices, or hauing watches ful of madnes,Aut enim filios suos sacrificantes, / aut obscura sacrificia facientes, / aut insaniæ plenas vigilias habentes, 24So that now they neither keep life, nor marriage undefiled, but one killeth another through envy, or grieveth him by adultery:Né la vita loro, né i matrimoni conservano puri; ma l'uno uccide l'altro per invidia, o lo contrista co' suoi adulterj.they now neither keepe life, nor mariage cleane, but one killeth an other by enuie, or playing the adulterer maketh him sorowful:neque vitam, neque nuptias mundas jam custodiunt: / sed alius alium per invidiam occidit, / aut adulterans contristat, 25And all things are mingled together, blood, murder, theft, and dissimulation, corruption and unfaithfulness, tumults and perjury, disquieting of the good,E dappertutto inondano le stragi, gli assassini, i furti, le fraudi, le corruttele, le infedeltà, i tumulti, gli spergiuri, la vessazione de' buoni.and al thinges are mingled together, bloud, manslaughter, theft and fiction, corruption, and infidelitie, truble, and p••iutie, disquieting of the good,et omnia commista sunt: sanguis, homicidium, / furtum et fictio, corruptio et infidelitas, / turbatio et perjurium, tumultus bonorum, 26Forgetfulness of God, defiling of souls, changing of nature, disorder in marriage, and the irregularity of adultery and uncleanness.La dimenticanza di Dio, la contaminazione delle anime, la incertezza de' parti, la incostanza de' matrimoni, la confusione degli adulterj, e della impudicizia.forgetfulnes of God, inquination of soules, immutation of natiuitie, inconstancie of mariage, disorder of adulterie, and vnchastnes.Dei immemoratio, animarum inquinatio, / nativitatis immutatio, nuptiarum inconstantia, / inordinatio mœchiæ et impudicitiæ. 27For the worship of abominable idols is the cause, and the beginning and end of all evil.Conciossiachè l'abbominevol culto degli idoli è causa, e principio, e fine di ogni male;For the worshippe of idols not to be named, is the cause of al euil, and the beginning and end.Infandorum enim idolorum cultura / omnis mali causa est, et initium et finis. 28For either they are mad when they are merry: or they prophesy lies, or they live unjustly, or easily forswear themselves.Imperocché o nelle loro feste danno in insania, o almeno falsi oracoli fingono, o vivono senza giustizia, o spergiurano con facilità.For either when they reioyce, they are madde: or certes prophecie false thinges, or liue vniustly, or quickly forsweare themselues.Aut enim dum lætantur insaniunt, / aut certe vaticinantur falsa, / aut vivunt injuste, aut pejerant cito.
29For whilst they trust in idols, which are without life, though they swear amiss, they look not to be hurt.Perché confidati ne' loro idoli, che sono senz'anima, sperano, che male non farà ad essi il giurar malamente:For whiles they trust in idols, which are without soule, swearing amisse they hope not to be hurt.Dum enim confidunt in idolis quæ sine anima sunt, / male jurantes noceri se non sperant. 30But for both these things they shall be justly punished, because they have thought not well of God, giving heed to idols, and have sworn unjustly, in guile despising justice.Ma per l'una, e pell'altra causa giustamente saran puniti, perché dediti a' loro idoli pensaron male di Dio, e fecero giuramenti ingiusti, e fraudolenti con disprezzo della giustizia.Two euil thinges therfore shal happen to them worthely, because they haue thought euil of God, attending to idols, and haue sworne vniustly, in guile contemning iustice. For it is not the powre of them, that are sworne by,Utraque ergo illis evenient digne, / quoniam male senserunt de Deo, attendentes idolis, / et juraverunt injuste, / in dolo contemnentes justitiam. 31For it is not the power of them, by whom they swear, but the just vengeance of sinners always punisheth the transgression of the unjust.Imperocché non la potenza di quelli, pe' quali essi giurano, ma la vendetta de' peccatori va sempre dietro alle prevaricazioni degli ingiusti.but the punishment of them that sinne, goeth alwayes through the trangression of the vniust.Non enim juratorum virtus, / sed peccantium pœna, / perambulat semper injustorum prævaricationem.
14:1
Worthington
Him. The folly of exposing one's life, without necessity, to such imminent danger at sea, is great; though much less than to confide in idols, (Calmet) which are commonly made of more corruptible wood than ships. (Worthington)
14:3
14:5
Calmet
Saved. Before the invention of the compass, long voyages were deemed the effects of rashness, or of great confidence in Providence. (Calmet)
14:7
Jansenius
Cometh. By which Noe[Noah] was preserved, (Cornelius a Lapide) or criminals are executed. (Jansenius)
St. Augustine
The author foretells the redemption of mankind on the cross. (Worthington) (Galatians 3:13.) (St. Augustine, City of God Wisdom 15:26; St. Ambrose, Psalm cxviii. ser. 8.)
14:12
Worthington
Fornication. Invention of idols brought people to give way to spiritual fornication, and corruption of manners. (Worthington)
Calmet
They freely practised what was sanctioned by the example of their gods. (St. Augustine, City of God 2:7., and 3 Kings 14:24., and 4 Kings 23:7, 3.) (Calmet)
14:13
Haydock
Beginning. Truth is always prior to falsehood. (Haydock)
St. Jerome
Josephus (Jewish Antiquities 1:4.) says, idolatry commenced in the 8th generation, and the Jews assert, under Enos. "Then began the name of God to be profaned," as the Chaldean, etc., translate, Genesis 4:26. (St. Jerome, q. Heb.)
The corruption of morals was the natural consequence, ver. 12.
Calmet
Ever. Christ shall destroy them. (Calmet)
14:15
Worthington
Servants. This was at first done privately, and made the way for public idolatry. Calvin attempts to refute this assertion, maintaining that Laban's idols were more ancient, and not images. But this argument is nugatory, as theraphim may be rendered either images, (Protestants, 1552.) or idols. (Protestants, 1603.) The latter version is preferable, as Laban called them his gods, and the Greek and Latin have idols. It is also certain, that Ninus set up the image of his father, Jupiter Belus, to be honoured by the people, before Abraham's time; and the fathers agree, that the making of images in memory of the dead, was the first occasion of idolatry. (St. Chrysostom, hom. 87. in Matthew; St. Jerome in Osee ii., etc.) (Worthington)
Gul. Paris. Leg
Nimrod ordered divine honours to be paid to his deceased son. (Gul. Paris. Leg.)
Grotius
Yet this fact is not certain. Diophante, the Lacedemonian, assigns the same origin to idolatry as is here given. (Grotius)
14:18
Haydock
Ignorant. The arts of sculpture and painting may be prejudicial, (Calmet) and were therefore banished by Moses from his republic, (Philo) as the Jews were so prone to idolatry, Wisdom 15:4. The case is different with us. (Haydock)
14:21
Worthington
Name. It cannot with propriety be given to any but God. (Worthington)
Calmet
The Jews explain this of the name Jehovah, which they will never pronounce. (Calmet)
14:23
Children. This was done by the Chanaanites, Hebrews, etc., Wisdom 12:23., and Isaias 57:5.
Hidden. The sacrifices of Ceres, Bacchus, etc., were performed in the dark, and horrible impurities were committed, Ephesians 5:12.
Calmet
Madness. Before they be initiated in the mysteries of Ceres, or prostitute themselves in honour of the deities of impurity, (Josephus, Jewish Antiquities 18:4.) in the very temples. Quo non prostrat femina templo? (Juvenal ix.) (Calmet)
Worthington
Many crimes proceed from idolatry. (Worthington)
14:28
Mad. Like the Bacchanalian women, running crowned with serpents, and eating raw flesh.
Lies. The delusions of the devil, or the fraud of priests.
Calmet
Easily. Those who believe not in religion, or in the power of him by whom they swear, can give no security by an oath. They fear no harm, ver. 29. Yet they are perjured if they believe Jupiter, for example, to be a god, (St. Augustine, ep. 54. ad Pub.) and if they do not, they are impious; abusing an oath, which is in itself sacred. (Calmet)
14:31
Haydock
Just. Literally, "the punishment of sinners always walketh about," etc. (Haydock)
St. Augustine
"The stone does not hear thee speaking, but God punishes the deceiver." (St. Augustine)
Juvenal
The pagans supposed that their idols sometimes punished perjury. (Juvenal, Sat. viii.)
Calmet
It is God who does it. (Calmet)
14:1
Great madnes to inuocate a wodden idol more base & commonly more corruptible then the wood of a shippe.
14:4
As the Israelites went through the redsea.
14:7
The auctor prophetically alludeth to the wood of the Crosse, on which our Sauiour redemed mankind.
14:12
From whole death procedeth mans iustification.
14:15
15. The father made vnto himself the image of his sonne.] Caluin here chargeth Caluin falsly chargeth this booke vvith ⸢e⸣r⸢r⸣or. this booke with error, in affirming that idolatrie begane by supersticiously honoring images of the dead. Against which he alleageth that Labans idoles, Gen. 31. and others more ancient, were before anie images of dead men were honoured. But he argueth vpon a false ground. For labans idols were images, as the Hebrew word Teraphim signifieth, and is so translated in the English Bibles (1552. and 1577.) but because they were images of false goddes, and for that Laban called them his goddes, a later Bible (1603.) rranslateth it better, idoles, Images of false goddes are rightly called idols. as the Latin and Greke haue idola. It is also certaine that Ninus king of Assirians long before Laban, yea before Abraham, sette vp the image of his Father Belus (otherwise called Iuppiter) to be publikly honored by the people as S. Cyril sheweth. li. 3. in Iulianum, nere the end, and S. Ambrose, or an other graue Auctor writeth the same, in cap. 1. ad Romanos. Likewise S. Cyprian li. de Idolorum vanitate. S. Chrysostom. ho. 87. in Matth. and Egesippus, apud S. Ieronym. li. de Viris Illustrib. testifie, that the making of mens images, in memorie of the dead, was the occasion, and beginning of idol•tric, according as this place repotteth, that a Father sorovving for the death of his sonne, Idolatrie begane by vvorshipping images of dead men vvith diuine honour. made an image in his memorie, & begane to worshippe him as a god, causing his seruants also to honour his dead sonne, vvith rites and sacrifices. VVhich priuate idolatrie vvas absolutely the first, that is recorded in holie Scripture, or anie other good auctor. And the first publique is counted by most auctors, that of Ninus, vvorshipping the image of his father Belus, vvith diuine honour, who also pardoned al offenders, how enormious soeuer their crimes were, that fled vnto that image. VVhich allurment together vvith so great a kinges auctotitie, Priuate idolatrie was before publique. drevv innumerable to publique idolatrie. VVherupon S. Ierom noteth (in cap. 2. Oseae) that Ninus became so great and glorious, as to make his father to be honored as a god.
Inuention of Idols brought men to spiritual fornications, & corruption of maners.
14:16
This first idolatrie was only priuatly exercised by the father and his seruants at their masters cōmandment, by which occasion publique idolatrie came into the world, wicked custom in time preuailing.
14:21
The name GOD in the proper signification, can not be geuen to anie creature.
14:24
Manie enormious crimes procede from dolatrie.
14:30
Two sort es of periurie: swearing by false goddes, and swearing vntruthes.
14:12
St Athanasius of Alexandria † AD 373 Against the Heathen (Contra Gentes) 9
… According as the wisdom of God testifies beforehand when it says, “The devising of idols was the beginning of fornication
St Athanasius of Alexandria † AD 373 Against the Heathen (Contra Gentes) 10
… and many women who had lost their husbands, all of whom nature proved to be mortal men, made representations of them and devised sacrifices, and consecrated them; while later ages, moved by the figure and the brilliancy of the artist, worshipped them as gods, thus falling into inconsistency with nature
St Athanasius of Alexandria † AD 373 Against the Heathen (Contra Gentes) 11
But of these and such like inventions of idolatrous madness, Scripture taught us beforehand long ago, when it said
14:15
St Augustine of Hippo † AD 430 Reply to Faustus the Manichæan 22.17
… This deception was favored by the folly of the human heart, especially when regret for the dead led to the making of likenesses, and so to the use of images.
14:16
St John Chrysostom † AD 407 Homilies on Ephesians 18
We will examine, if you please, whence idolatry took its rise. A certain wise man (
14:21
St Athanasius of Alexandria † AD 373 Against the Heathen (Contra Gentes) 17
… 3. And I am disposed to think that they have recounted the passions and the actions of the gods even in spite of themselves. For since they were endeavouring to invest with what Scripture calls the incommunicable name and honour of
14:1
The Gentiles attribute the invention of the ship to Jason and the Argonauts, sailing to Colchis to seize the golden fleece, as being the most ancient: thus Pliny, lib. III, cap. XXVI: Tertullian, lib. De Corona militis, cap. VIII, attributes it to Minerva; Clement of Alexandria, I Strom., to Atlas; others to Danaus, others to Neptune, others to Prometheus, who was coeval with Moses, as I said above from St. Augustine; others to the Phoenicians, others to the Cretans: for in different places different authors of the same thing could have existed. But prior to all these was the ark of Noah, Genesis VI. This therefore was, so far as we know, the first ship of the world; although it is probable that before it men navigated in rafts, in hollowed-out tree trunks, as the Indians still do, and in small boats: see Pliny, lib. VII, cap. LVI, and Polydorus Virgilius, lib. III De Invent. cap. XV. He sets forth the example of those navigating before others, because they, on account of the constant perils of life, are prone to invoke the gods: for, as the Psalmist says, Psalm CVI, 26: "They mount up to the heavens, and go down to the depths: their soul was melted away with evils. They were troubled, and moved as a drunkard, and all their wisdom was devoured. And they cried to the Lord when they were in tribulation;" whence that common saying: "He who knows not how to pray, let him go to sea:" see Jonas, cap. 1. Hence Cato, as Plutarch testifies, grieved over three things: first, that in this life so uncertain and brief, even one day had passed for him without fruit; second, that he had entrusted his secret to a woman; third, that he had made a journey by ship, which he could have made by land. Antonius in Melissa, part. I, serm. 17, attributes these same three wishes to Aristotle, and Stobaeus to Alexander the Great; but in place of the first they put that he had remained one day without making a will.
14:3
passable whenever you wish, even if someone without skill and method should approach it. Whence St. Chrysostom, homily 11 on Genesis, marvels at God's wisdom and providence, which teaches sailors and ship-masters the time, the way, and the passages in the vastest sea, so that they may know in what region of the world they are situated, what way to take, what passages they ought to pursue. Morally, learn here how great and how singular is God's providence, which governs individual ships and sailors in the midst of the sea, and in like manner governs individual men, animals, plants, and other creatures, and indeed the whole world: for the world is as it were a small ship, whose ship-master is God, as Aristotle teaches (or whoever is the author) in the book On the World. An admirable example of a certain old shipwrecked man, whose name was Valgius or Victor, who in a ship having lost his companions and the ship's cables, cast about by the waves of the sea through various regions, was preserved by the wonderful providence of God, is related by St. Paulinus in his letter to Macarius. In a similar way in other sailors crossing the vast, blind and stormy sea in so small and weak a ship, the singular care and providence of God shines forth: for sailors are scarcely three palms distant (by which the ship rises above the sea) from death; whence Juvenal, satire XIV: Go now, he says, and entrust your soul to the winds, trusting in hewn wood, distant from death by four or seven fingers, if it be the widest pine, that is, pine, from which a ship is made. And from Ovid, book II of Pontus: For near as close to death as near to water he sees. Thus also Anacharsis according to Laertius says that sailors are distant from death by four fingers, by which the ship is thick. Therefore first erred Epicurus, Heraclitus and Democritus, granting indeed God, but taking away from him providence, because they thought all things happen from the necessity of nature, as testified by Lactantius, book I On the Wrath of God, chapters IX and X. Second, Cicero erred, who took away the same from God, but from another source, namely that it would take away from God knowledge of future contingent things, thinking those to be repugnant to free human choice, as testified by St. Augustine, book V On the City of God, chapter IX. Third, others erred, who thought individual things depend on their own causes, not on God's providence: for God moves the first mover, but other things are moved by it, as Aristotle says, book XII of Metaphysics, chapter II, text 37; whence this error is attributed to Aristotle by Nazianzen, oration 1 On Theology; Clement, VIII, Stromata; Ambrose, book I On Duties, chapter XIII, and others: for it seemed to Aristotle unworthy of God to care for individual things even the smallest, such as gnats, fleas, etc. Fourth, those erred who said that God by himself cares for universal and incorruptible things; but particular and corruptible things he cares for through intermediate genii, or angels: which error Nyssenus attributes to Plato, book VIII of Philosophy, chapters III and IV. Plato however, 5. But that the works of thy wisdom might not be idle, for this reason also men trust their souls to a small piece of wood, and passing over the sea by a raft have been saved. — He gives the reason why God, who without a ship could transfer men through the waters, as he transferred the Hebrews, wished to introduce the use of ships and navigation, namely, so that islanders together with other men might have familiar commerce. First, in Greek there is an elegant paronomasia, that the works of thy Wisdom might not be ἄοκα ἔοκα, that is, idle and useless works, which you created, formed, and placed in islands and overseas regions; for this reason you inspired men with the use of ships and navigation, so that things which are in islands precious, and there as it were hidden, might be brought to us by ships, and in turn we might convey our things, which islanders lack, to them, and thus there might be mutual communication of goods and merchandise. For this end and for this reason, by a small piece of wood, that is, a vessel, men trust their souls, that is, their lives, hoping that by it, with your providence as guide, they will sail unharmed and overcome the dangers of the sea: whence by the same many crossing the sea, by a raft have been saved from these dangers, and are saved daily: thus Lyra, Holcot, Dionysius and others. Second, Osorius, Jansenius and a Castro more truly and more conformably to what follows explain it concerning the art of navigation and the making of ships, in which divine wisdom especially shines forth, as if to say: You wished, O Lord, that this be done through navigation, lest your works be idle, and men languish in idleness, but rather that they labor and apply industry in building ships, and in the science of navigation, and in the observation of stars and seas, shores, islands, and overseas regions. To this pertains that passage of Seneca in Medea, act II: Too bold, he who first with so fragile a raft broke through the treacherous straits; and seeing his own lands behind his back, entrusted his soul to light breezes; and cutting through the doubtful seas in uncertain course, was able to trust in thin wood. Between the ways of life and death, with too slender a boundary drawn. Mystically, "blessed wood, through which justice is made," and just satisfaction for the sin of Adam and the sins of the whole world, is the cross of Christ, which therefore the ark of Noah prefigured: for this cross destroyed idols and idolatry; whence it is here opposed to them, and conferred grace, justice and salvation on all who rightly believed in Christ crucified. Whence St. Chrysostom, in his oration On the Feast of the Cross, reads, bless the wood through which justice is made: St. Germanus, On the Exaltation of the Cross, reads, bless the wood through which salvation is made; Leontius, who flourished in the year of Christ 620, in his oration On the Cross of Christ: "But Solomon says, Wisdom XIV, 7: Blessed is the wood through which salvation is obtained;" An Anonymous author in Gretser, vol. II On the Cross, reads, blessed be the wood through which salvation was made in the midst of the earth: thus also St. Bonaventure, Holcot, Hugh, Dionysius here understand by wood the cross of Christ, equally as St. Augustine, book XV On the City of God, chapter XXVI, Clement of Alexandria, book VI Stromata, chapter IV, Cyril of Jerusalem, catechesis 19, and many others. Christ therefore on the cross took upon himself our curse and expiated it, and converted it into a blessing, according to that passage Galatians III, 13: "Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: because it is written: Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree: that the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Christ Jesus, that we might receive the promise of the Spirit by faith:" see the remarks there. Moreover St. Ambrose in the place already cited, acutely understands by justice mercy: Blessed, he says, is the wood through which justice is made, that is mercy: for Christ exercised this on the cross, while he washed us in his blood, and obtained pardon for us;" and he adds that mercy is called justice, because God "knowing that according to the fragility of the body corruption could affect man, as it were justly, conceded the faults of a fragile and slippery nature," especially in the posterity of Adam, who did not commit sin, but contracted it from Adam only by being born: "Upon him (Adam)," he says, "the sentence of just severity went before, because he wished to know what it was not profitable to know; but to us, who are held bound by a hereditary bond, who are in this flesh, which by the judgment of our predecessors is already worn out and accustomed to sins, could not emerge, as it were justly he indulged: for he justly forgave the heir, who labored under the prejudgment of the author. It is therefore just mercy." Finally, through the wood of the cross justice was made, that is a just sacrifice for sin, which from the equality of justice, on account of the dignity of the victim immolated, namely Christ crucified the Son of God, would satisfy the offense of God, and restore to him the honor taken away by sin, while Christ dying on the cross for this reason exhibited infinite reverence and worship to God: for as the offense of God made by the sin of Adam and of other men, on account of the person and immense majesty of God, which is offended, was infinite; so likewise infinite is the person of Christ, who offered himself as a victim to God to satisfy this offense. Add the infinite humiliation of the Word, by which he humbled himself descending into flesh and the cross, that he might expiate sins, which equally corresponded to the infinite vileness, contempt and injury, which Adam in his pride committed sin against God, indeed it far surpassed it. On the other hand an idol is wood through which the greatest injustice and injury is made to God, while divinity is taken from God and transferred to an idol; and altars, temples, religion, worship, sacrifices owed to one God are transferred to an idol. Blessed therefore is the wood of the cross, through which the greatest justice is made: but cursed is the wood of the idol, through which the greatest injury is made to God. 9. Similarly also the impious man and his impiety are hateful to God. — In Greek, for equally hateful to God are the impious man and his impiety: thus Vatablus: he gives the reason why the maker of idols, equally as the idol itself, is hateful to God, namely because the impious man is equally hateful to God as is impiety; but the maker of idols is impious, who has fabricated an idol as it were impiety, that is, the object and cause of impious idolatry. Moreover impiety is hateful to God both formally and materially; but the impious man is hateful to God formally only, namely insofar as he is impious, not however materially: for the impious man insofar as he is a creature of God and a substance, namely a man or an angel, is loved and cherished by God, because, as St. Jerome beautifully says (or whoever is the author) in epistle 6 to a sick friend, vol. IX, "God loves man as a craftsman loves his work; but he hates the evil works by which the work is driven into ruin, and forced into destruction (which is to fall into ruin and collapse), and he who hates evil works cannot love the maker of evil works, as Solomon the wisest declared, Wisdom XIV, 9: The impious man and his impiety, he says, are hateful to God:" for such is the craftsman as the work is, wherefore if the work be pious and pleasing to God, its maker will likewise be pious and pleasing to God: but if the work be impious and hateful to God, the maker likewise, and, as the Greek has it, ἔνισα, that is equally, in equal measure, will be impious and hateful to God. Most excellently St. Cyril of Alexandria, homily 12: "To impart to created things, he says, the glory of their Creator is nothing other than to refer the Creator himself into the order of created things." 11. For this reason also there shall be no regard for the idols of the nations: because the creatures of God were made for hatred, and for a stumbling-block to the souls of men, and for a snare to the feet of the foolish. — The Greek texts already have it differently, wherefore also in the simulacra of the gentiles ἐπισκοπή ἔσται, that is inspection, inquiry, visitation, punishment shall be; Vatablus, in the simulacra there shall be inquiry. Our text seems to have read the negation οὐ, that is there shall be no inspection or regard; but the sense comes to the same thing, as if to say God shall not regard the dignity of the idol, which namely is worshipped by idolaters as a deity: wherefore he shall not spare it, but shall punish it, destroy it, burn it like vile wood, and consign it to flames; or, as if to say, In the time of Christ, when the gentiles shall turn away from idols And for a stumbling-block to the souls of men (in Greek, for scandals to souls; the Syriac, for an offense, or offense of the souls of men; the Arabic, they seduced the minds of men, while idols by their beauty and precious ornament seduced the minds of the rude into superstition and idolatry), and for a snare to the feet of the foolish: — for just as foolish mice are caught in a mousetrap, when lured by the scent of cheese they enter it open, but the wood which supports it (a scandal is so called; whence the name of scandal is transferred to any stumbling-block) carelessly overturning it by touching the cheese, are shut in and crushed by the mousetrap turned back upon them: so like- Moreover God's vengeance is accustomed especially to pursue perjurers, as guilty of injury to the Godhead and the divine name: hence those who swear falsely invoking St. Anthony as witness are accustomed to be struck by him with sacred fire. Formerly in doubtful cases they sent the accused to the oratory of St. Stephen, that he might purge himself by oath of the crime charged against him; and if he perjured himself, he was immediately punished from heaven: Gregory of Tours writes the same of the Oratory of St. Martin, lib. VIII Hist. cap. XVI, where among other things he relates that a certain arsonist denying the fire committed by him, and perjuring himself in the church of St. Martin, was consumed by avenging flames from heaven. The same happened in the Oratory of SS. Processus and Martinianus, of whom St. Gregory says, hom. 32 in Evang.: "To their lifeless bodies the living sick come and are healed, perjurers come and are vexed by a demon." And in the Oratory of St. Felix of Nola, to whose Church St. Augustine, as he himself relates in epistle 137 to Hippo, sent Boniface the presbyter accused of a crime, that he might purge himself there by oath; and if he were guilty, he would reveal himself by the customary vengeance of God. And St. Augustine adds: "We know at Milan at the shrine of the saints, where demons confess miraculously and terribly, that a certain thief who had come to that place to deceive by false swearing was compelled to confess the theft, and to restore what he had taken." Such also was the Oratory of St. Apollinaris at Ravenna, where Maximus purged himself by oath of the crime of simony, as witness St. Gregory, lib. VII, epist. 7 and seq.; and above all the Basilica of St. Peter, over whose body bishops accused of crime were accustomed to purge themselves by oath, as witness St. Gregory, lib. II, epist. 23, and lib. II, epist. 8. The gentiles likewise experienced the same through their idols by swearing Three Hebrew youths, when urged by Nebuchadnezzar to adore his statue and threatened with the Babylonian furnace, generously replied, Daniel III: "It is not necessary for us to answer thee in this matter: for behold our God, whom we worship, is able to deliver us from the furnace of burning fire, and to save us out of thy hands, O king. But if he will not, be it known to thee, O king, that we will not worship thy gods, and the golden statue which thou hast set up we will not adore." They spoke and they performed; therefore in the midst of the flames, God protecting them, they remained unharmed, and sang a hymn of praise to Him. See the words there. St. Marius and his sons Audifax and Habacuc, Persians and generous martyrs, when mocking the idols, were led through the city of Rome with bound hands while a herald cried out: "Do not blaspheme the gods," they exclaimed: "These are not gods, but demons, who will destroy both you and your prince:" thus the Acts of St. Valentine have it according to Surius on the 14th of February. St. Publia, a most noble and excellent matron (whom the Greeks in the Menology assert to have been the mother of St. Chrysostom, and Theodoret insinuates), hearing that Julian the Apostate, patron of idols, was passing by that way, in order to mock him, sang with her choir of virgins: "The idols of the gentiles are silver and gold, the works of men's hands. Let them become like unto them that make them, and all such as trust in them;" and when Julian, indignant, ordered them to be silent, Publia with her companions sang the same with greater eagerness: wherefore the tyrant commanded her to be beaten and bloodied with blows. But she, considering this insult as the highest honor, returned home, and continued to wound the tyrant with spiritual songs as was her custom, as Theodoret says, book III. A trinity of martyrs and virgins under Diocletian were the holy Menodora, Metrodora, and Nymphodora, sisters, and as it were three gifts of virginity, whose triumph over idols and torments the Church celebrates on the 10th of September. Menodora, while being beaten for two hours by four lictors, with the herald crying out: "Worship the gods and sacrifice to them," answered intrepidly: "Do you not see that I have wholly sacrificed myself to my God? For what profit is my blood to me, as I descend to destruction, if I have not first sacrificed it to my spouse?" wherefore her bones were broken by rods, and the rosy cheeks of the martyr were shattered, she crying out with a loud voice: "Lord Jesus Christ, my exaltation, my love, to thee, my hope, I flee, receive my soul in peace," and gave up her purple spirit into His hands. Metrodora, mocking the idols and deriding the gods as demons, was burned for two hours with torches and crushed with iron bars, and following her sister, ascended as a martyr to her spouse. Nymphodora, ordered to sacrifice to the idols, while being torn apart with iron claws: "I," she said, "have sacrificed myself to the Lord, for whom to suffer is pleasure, and to die is gain:" wherefore, likewise broken with iron bars, she flew victorious to Christ. Blessed nymphs, who, emulating the life of angels, nay surpassing it, gained a double crown of virginity and mar- is, he will do something excellent, says Cicero; but nothing is more excellent than the administration of the world; therefore the world both was created by God and is governed by God's administration, whence at the end of the first book of On the Nature of the Gods: "If God is such," he says, "that he is held by no favor, no love of men, let him be well: since he can do nothing more propitious to man." Foolishly therefore was it said by Lucretius: Nor is he well taken according to his deserts, nor is anger touched, Lactantius, book I, chapter II: Democritus said that all things are ruled by chance and fate; the confirmer of whose opinion is Epicurus; but also before him Protagoras, who called the gods into doubt, and afterwards Diagoras, and some others, who did not think there were gods, whom nevertheless the other philosophers, and especially the Stoics, refuted, saying that neither could the world have been made without divine reason, nor could it subsist unless it were ruled by supreme reason. Euripides in his letter to Sophocles, because he had not perished in a storm, referred it to God's providence. Maro, in the sixth book of the Aeneid, sings of the Elysian fields. Phocylides says: "If you judge badly, God will judge you afterwards." Hippocrates decreed sacred rites to many gods of the nations, and instituted various supplications. Theophrastus in the Metaphysics referred all things to divine providence; he says God is a divine principle, through which all things are and endure. Ammonius, about to expound the book On Interpretation, prays that it be divinely provided for. Aristotle, in the first book of the Ethics, says that the happiness of the gods ought to be referred to as a gift received; but in the fifth book of the Ethics, he thought it should be sought by prayers, that those things which are simply good might be good also for those who desire them; that the just, which is from law, have a part in making sacrifices; whence shortly after, he decreed that divine decrees are superior to human ones: in the tenth book of the Ethics he says that a man who cultivates his mind is most friendly to God. then and praiseworthy and superexalted in all ages." And Ecclesiasticus, chapter XXXIX, verse 19: "Bless the Lord in his works, give magnificence to his name." And the Psalmist, Psalm LXXI,
14:5
Royal editions; secondly, the Vatican texts read eis ἐρεθισμόν, that is into stimulation, indeed into fury, into madness; for thus sharply and eagerly the senseless one, having seen a beautiful image, is snatched into concupiscence for it, so that he is almost maddened and rages. The sense therefore is, as if to say: Paintings and sculptures have this power, that they inspire concupiscence of idols in the rude and senseless people, and snatch him to loving, indeed to adoring these effigies of a dead image, or of an image representing a dead thing, without soul, indeed even without spirit and respiration. Cantacuzenus adds that the word senseless denotes the Egyptians, who worshipped not only effigies of men, but also of beasts as gods. Moreover, the demon renders idolaters so senseless that they, as if mad, have loved their effigies as if they were living women: thus Pygmalion king of Cyprus, as Arnobius testifies, in book VI Against the Gentiles, loved the idol of Venus as a woman, and with it, as with a woman, embraced it, exercised kisses and other lustful gestures and touches. A similar example of another is narrated by Pliny, book XXXVI, chapter V. Hence idolatry in the Scriptures is called fornication, not only mystical but also real, because near the temples of idols there were brothels and harlots, with whom strangers committed fornication: and thus Pineda explains that passage of Job XL, 46: "He sleeps in the shade," that is, under the idol, he says, the demon lies hidden, who is therefore called Baal, that is husband exciting to his shameful love; whence for loves, in Greek it is ἐρᾶται, that is desires, covets. 8. And with vain labor he fashions God from the same clay he who a little before was made from earth, and after a short time brings himself back, whence he was taken, the debt of soul which he had being repeated. — As if to say: What madness is it to consider a clay idol made by a potter from the same clay from which pans and chamber pots are formed to be God, when the potter himself is a mortal man formed and molded from similar clay and earth by God in Adam the first-formed, and soon dying is to return to that same earth, when God shall take back from him the soul which he gave: for man, such as the potter is, cannot form God, nor can the mortal form the immortal, nor can the earthly form the heavenly: for by what reason could the potter inspire divinity into statues of clay molded by himself and grant them divinity? Hugo shrewdly observes the just and fitting judgment and vengeance of God, by which it comes to pass that the potter and idolater, who made from earth and unwilling to follow the soul, that is reason, which dictated that God should be worshipped, and on account of which he was similar to God himself, listening to the baser part of himself, namely the earthly body, also adores clay, a god similar to his own body: the same thing mystically do the gluttonous, the lustful, and other sinners. For vain labor, in Greek it is κακομόχθος, which Osorius translated as laborious and impious workman; others, laboring badly; Vatable, applying effort most badly. He returns himself, — that is to say, The potter, dying shortly, will return to the earth from which his body was formed, "the debt of the soul being demanded," namely of dying, or of departing from the body: for when God demands from the soul the debt of departing from the body and returning to himself, so that it may render to God, who demands an exact accounting of debts, that is of sins committed, and especially of idolatry and of idols made by itself, an account rendered, that is to say, How vain and foolish it is to believe that the potter shapes God, who receives his being from God, and shortly returns that being to God the giver, and will render an account of it well or badly spent? Hence learn morally that the soul and life are not ours, but God's, who is their Lord and has granted us only the use of it, and has given it to us as it were on loan, so that namely we might use it for the will and praise of God; but if we abuse it to fashion for ourselves some idol of honor, pride, avarice, or luxury, he will demand from us in judgment a sharp accounting of what was given, or rather loaned, and will punish its abuse with eternal fires, according to the parable of the talents, Matt. XXV, 15; then the one abusing will hear from Christ the judge that word, Luke XII, 20: "Fool, this night do they require thy soul of thee: and the things thou hast provided, whose shall they be?" God therefore is the creditor, man the debtor, the debt is the soul and its sins; death is the debt of nature, hell is the debt of sin, wherefore he who sins bears fruit unto the second death, that is, bears fruit unto hell, says St. Ambrose in Rom. cap. VII: in like manner the earth demands from dying men the debt of the body received from itself, according to that word, Eccles. XII, 7: "And the dust return into its earth, from whence it was, and the spirit return to God, who gave it:" see the things said there. Hence St. Ambrose, lib. De Bon. mort. cap. X, proves the immortality of the soul: "Did he say, let thy soul die in thee? no: but let it be demanded of thee; what was given is demanded, or they demand it of thee: for the soul is demanded, not destroyed. What is demanded remains; what is destroyed does not remain." Wherefore Tertullian, lib. De Idol. cap. VII, asserts that Christian craftsmen, who for the sake of gain shape idols for idolaters, ought to be cast out from the Church, indeed their hands ought to be cut off: "All day long, he says, zeal for the faith will plead on this side, groaning that a Christian comes from idols into the Church, comes from an adversary's workshop into the house of God, lifts up to God the Father hands that are mothers of idols, with these hands adores what is adored outside against God, applies these hands to the body of the Lord, hands which convey bodies to demons. Nor is this enough: let it be little if they receive from other hands what they contaminate; but they themselves also hand on to others what they have contaminated. Craftsmen of idols are enrolled in the ecclesiastical order; O crime! Once the Jews laid hands on Christ, these daily assault his body; O hands to be cut off! Let them see now whether it was said by way of similitude, Matt. V, 30: If thy hand scandalize
14:7
For ashes, in Greek it is σποδός, but not simple, which is called τέφρα, but filthy, and in which extinguished coals are mixed together, and the remains of other things, namely fragments of potsherds, which in a hotter fire in the furnace often burst and break apart; in these therefore is the whole heart, that is the thought and occupation of the potter, so that he himself wholly immersed in ash and clay, appears to live a life among ashes not human and vital, but ashen and funereal. Thus Lyra: Ashes, he says, is the heart of the potter by affection, because, as St. Augustine says: You love the earth, you are earth; you love heaven, you are heaven; you love God, what shall I say? you are divine, nay you are God: for love transforms the lover into the beloved, for the soul is more where it loves than where it animates. The same St. Augustine, book II On the Sermon of the Lord on the Mount, chapter IX: "Just as," he says, "the sinner was called earth, when it was said to him: You are earth, and into earth you shall go: so the just on the contrary can be called heaven: for it is said to the just: The temple of God is holy, which you are. Wherefore if God dwells in his temple, and the saints are his temple; it is rightly said, you who are in the heavens, who his and of all good things the author and giver. For which works, in Greek it is ἐνεργοῦσαν, that is working, living, efficacious, which is not idle and empty, but is always in act and always does something, which demonstrates its vital force and vigor; which therefore Cicero, I Tusculan, calls a certain continuous and perpetual motion. For the soul is the fountain and origin of life and vital operation, which flows perpetually from life: for just as a fountain always gushing forth never rests or stops, so also the soul never rests, but always vivifies the body, quickens the members, animates the brain, and into each part of the body through vital and animal spirits, vegetation, life, sense and motion flows; of which the pulse is an index, which is in perpetual agitation and motion as long as man lives; which if it ceases, man dies. Likewise the vital spirit, that is the power of breathing, and continuous respiration through the whole of life, which ceasing man is extinguished and ceases. Wherefore wrongly some from this place have thought that there are several souls in man, namely two or three, to wit vegetative, sensitive and rational, for there is one rational soul in man, but threefold in power: for it alone performs all the duties, which in plants the vegetative soul performs, and in animals the sensitive soul, and in angels the soul, so to speak, rational. It therefore vivifies man so that he grows, it sees, hears, feels, it understands and reasons. It could also be understood through the vital spirit as the soul itself: for this is called soul, inasmuch as it animates and vivifies the body; the same is called spirit, both because it itself is spiritual and incorporeal, and because it gives to man the power of breathing, and because it produces and supplies vital and animal spirits to the head and to the whole body.
14:8
He assigns the root of the evil, namely why potters fashion idols, because namely they think that all things which are done in this life are not serious matters, on which the salvation and eternal happiness of man depends, but playful things, with which men like children with their dolls for the short time that they live, play; and therefore they fashion idols as dolls, so that with these as playful gods, they play and mock men, and their riches and purses, whether by right or by wrong they drain, while they sell these their fictions and playful idols for whatever price. For play in Greek it is παίγνιον, that is a plaything, play, mockery, and especially delights with which children play, such as are little images
14:11
which happens, it is our duty to turn to good. Synesius, book I On Providence: "Just as, he says, in a tragedy an actor, whatever role the chorus-master assigns to him in the play, is required to perform it well: so God clothes us and fortune with different kinds of life, as it were certain roles in this great drama of the world, and neither the condition of one is in any way better or worse than that of another: each one performs it as he is able; but a good man is able to conduct himself rightly in every place, whether he plays a beggar or a king. Nor is one accustomed to quarrel about the role: for in tragedy too it would be ridiculous for him to avoid this one or choose another: in the role of an old woman, if it please, he obtains garlands and praises: on the other hand, if in a royal role he conducts himself shamefully— Play, mortals, with the play not of vices, but of virtues. The miser plays with his coins, while through usuries, frauds, right and wrong he heaps them up. The ambitious man plays with his offices and honors, which he procures for himself by illicit arts. The glutton plays with his feasts, the luxurious man with his women; but this play is followed by a sad catastrophe, this applause by a mournful lamentation, while from play one goes to mourning, from jests to the fires of hell; nor does he remember the heavenly warning: "Udo, Udo, cease from play, you have played enough, Udo," except when, after the play of life is finished, after death with Udo of Magdeburg he is damned to the underworld, he becomes a plaything to the world, and a mockery of demons. Is it then for a worthless coin, a paltry honor, a base woman's mask that the die of hell is cast, that the blessed glory of heaven is squandered, that, I say, immense and boundless eternity is made sport of? O shame, O wonder, O senseless mind, O foolish heart? How much more wisely, more sanely, more pleasantly and more happily do they play, who play with humility, charity, patience, and the other offices of virtues, so that they perform them joyfully and playfully on account of the sure hope of eternal happiness? How well did St. Paul play the game of his life, saying in I Corinthians IV, 9: "We are made a spectacle to the world, to angels, and to men. We are fools for Christ," etc. How well did St. Athanasius, St. Chrysostom, St. Anthony, St. Francis, and the other saints play the same game? How well did they perform their role in this comedy and drama of life? And a manner of life arranged for gain; — in Greek τὸν βίον πανηγυρισμὸν ἐπικερδῆ, that is, life or manner of living, to be a fair prepared for gain, or gainful trading; whence the Syriac translator renders it, the sale of a merchant, that is, a market: thus Pythagoras, as Cicero testifies in Tusculan Disputations V, said that the life of men is like a fair, which was celebrated in public games with the concourse of all Greece, to which all flocked, some to buy, others to sell. The sense is, as if to say, The idol-makers think of nothing but gain; they form idols therefore so that they may sell them, and thus heap up riches: for they know no other riches that are spiritual, nor do they think of or believe in the future life. In a similar way St. Gregory of Nazianzus in the Tetrastich said that this life is a spiritual market, in which it is permitted for anyone to buy the merchandise of virtues, by which he may live in the future age: for when life is finished in death, as if the fair were finished, it is not permitted for anyone to acquire anything further; but hear Nazianzus: You should believe that this life is a fair: If you know how to trade, you will bring away gain, Exchanging transient things for eternal comforts; After that other time will not be available. deserves: thus the rude and greedy common people today, intent solely on gain, pursues it from any thing, even evil: for the avaricious place the highest good in gain, and therefore propose gain to themselves as a god. The emperor Vespasian applied himself more earnestly to the matter, and from even sordid things, such as from urine, sought tax and gain; when some objected that this tax was sordid, he replied: "Urine stinks, but gold does not stink, for from any thing the odor of gain is good and sweet;"; more honorably and cordially Chilon in Laertius book I, chapter I: "Gain, he says, obtained through crime is a loss, not a gain." More properly and strictly St. Bonaventure, Lyra and Dionysius: The enemies, they say, of the Israelites are called proud beyond measure of soul, that is more than any soul could presume and exalt itself, according to that in Isaiah XVI, 6: "His pride (of Moab), and his arrogance, and his indignation more than his strength:": for this seems to signify τὸ beyond measure of soul, although in the Greek it is beyond the souls of infants, as if to say, Presuming beyond what they are able to conceive, as foolish and unwise children do. Again Vatable understands by infants the foolish; whence he translates, more wretched than all your people are all your enemies, who press him with power, because they hold all the simulacra of the nations as gods. For all, in Greek is πάντες δέ, that is, all indeed; but these particles often—
14:12
For 'those ruling badly,' Lyra, Hugo and others read 'those reviling,' for in Greek it is καταδυναστεύοντες αὐτόν, that is, oppressing him by power and force, namely the people of God. To this pertains the prayer of Esther, chapter XIV, verses 7 and following: "And now it is not enough for them (the Persians, our enemies) that they oppress us with the harshest servitude, but attributing the strength of their hands to the power of idols, they wish to change thy promises, so that they may open the mouths of the nations and praise the strength of idols," etc. Gorionides, narrating this, makes Esther speak thus: Behold, they do not say that thou (O God) hast delivered us into their hands, but they attribute this very thing to idols and adore them, saying: You have delivered the Jews into our hands. From this passage it is clear that Solomon is not the author of this book: for in his age no nations ruled over Israel, but rather Israel through Solomon ruled over other nations, especially the neighboring ones: wherefore this book appears to have been written in the time of the Seventy Interpreters, when Ptolemy, father of Philadelphia, and the idolatrous Egyptians ruled over Judea, as I said in the Preface; hence in the following chapter he continues to attack the Egyptians. For what Lyra thinks, that the author of the book is Philo the Jew, who lived after Christ under Caius Caligula Caesar, who sent his statue throughout the whole world, because also to Jerusalem, so that it might be adored there by the Jews and other nations, and when the Jews refused to do this, he caused them many troubles, for which reason Philo, sent to him by the Jews, met with rejection: this, I say, seems scarcely probable, for who would believe that a Jewish man, with Judaism already abrogated, unfaithful and perfidious, would be the author of a canonical, holy and sacred book? — In Greek ἀργοί, that is, idle, ineffective, unfit for walking. For 'use,' as the Greek and Roman texts have it, some wrongly read 'sight,' although the sense is the same: it alludes to that passage, Psalm CXIII, 4 and Psalm CXXXIV, 18; the words are clear in themselves and evident from what has been said. St. Cyprian, book III of Testimonies, chapter LIX, for 'fingers of hands,' reads 'fingers in hands': the sense is, as if to say, the Egyptians worshipped the gods of all nations, namely idols, which have neither true fingers, nor true feet, nor true hands, but are like logs and trunks; if they themselves were to become like their makers, they would cease to be men; hence it is clear that the Egyptians, being very superstitious, worshipped not only their own gods but also those of other nations: the Romans did the same after them, so that they might have the gods of the nations propitious to them, and thus might subject all nations to themselves. Wisely St. Augustine, book I of The City of God, chapter II: "Nor did Troy perish for this reason, because it lost Minerva: for what had Minerva herself lost first, that she might perish? or perhaps her guardians? this indeed is true, for when they were killed, she could be taken away, and indeed it was not men who were guarded by the image, but the image by men. How then was she worshipped, so that she might guard the country and its citizens, she who was not able to guard her own guardians?" 16. For man made them, and he who borrowed the spirit, he fashioned them (as if to say, the idol-maker made idols from clay, and the same one who merely borrowed the spirit from God, so that he might return and restore it to him at death; hence he fashioned those clay gods; therefore they are not true gods, but made). For no man will be able to fashion a god similar to himself. — In Greek πλάσαι, that is, to form like a potter, as if to say, No idol-maker can insert into his idol a spirit similar to that which he himself received from God: wherefore he cannot fashion a god similar to himself, that is, he cannot fashion an idol which has a soul similar to his own soul, namely he cannot make an idol animated and rational, as if to say, The maker and potter of an idol cannot effect that his god, namely the idol, be a living man similar to himself; therefore much less can he effect that the idol be a god and a deity: for if he cannot insert into it the soul which he has, much less will he be able to breathe into it divinity, which he does not have. The Greek texts here vary and are corrupt, wherefore we must stand by the Vulgate, which renders the sense most excellently. sata. The sense therefore is, as if to say, Whatever senseless or irrational animals, if we compare them with those things which the Egyptians worship, we shall find these worse than them, that is, the animals worshipped by the Egyptians, when, if compared with others, are to be reckoned as irrational among rational beings, hence these are worse than them, for since all are devoid of reason, those others agree more with human mind, because they are benign and useful to man: these however are hostile to him, in that they are venomous and most dangerous to him, so that you might wonder what men worship, having forgotten their own humanity. Thus Cantacuzenus, Osorius, Emmanuel Sa, and Christopher of Castro. Again, if you take the Greek word ἄκια substantively and properly, transferring the accent from the antepenultimate to the penultimate syllable, in the dative case, which serves the Greeks in place of the Latin ablative, so that ἀκίᾳ is the same as with madness, through madness, on account of madness, madly, foolishly and senselessly, as some read in the Vulgate for insensata, thus the sense will be, as if to say: These animals most troublesome, which the Egyptians cultivate, compared with other animals by this madness, or on account of this madness by which the captive Egyptians exhibit worship to them, are worse to them, because those please God, since they serve human uses, to which they were created; but these are execrable, since they are accommodated to an improper use of usurped divinity. Hence Vatablus translates it, so that those which compared with others are worse on account of this madness, namely of the Egyptians, who worship animals so vile and deadly in preference to other beneficial animals as gods, and therefore make them worse before God, and more hateful to Him, as if usurping divinity: for it was madness to choose crocodiles and serpents compared with horses, oxen and other animals as gods, because they are worse and more hostile to man: for this is a mad and insane comparison and choice; whence some read insensately, that is, insanely compared, as I have said. Cantacuzenus adds that the Egyptians worshipped flies and worms sprung from putrid matter as gods, and therefore as it were errors and sins of nature, which God therefore did not create at the beginning of the world with the other animals, nor named them good, nor blessed them saying: "Increase and multiply:" for these are animals utterly senseless, and worse than all others; but what should be thought concerning their generation or creation, I have said in Genesis I. And they escaped the praise of God, and His blessing. — They escaped, not the Egyptians idolaters, but the animals, such as crocodiles and serpents worshipped by them as gods: for in Greek it is ἐκπέφευγε, that is, it escaped in the singular number, which elegantly agrees in Greek syntax with the neuter plural ζῷα, that is, animals, as if to say: The animals which the Egyptians worship are alien from the praise and blessing of God: for they themselves worship serpents; but God long ago cursed the serpent, because it seduced Eve, saying in Genesis III: "Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed upon the earth." The sense is first, as if to say: The Egyptians worship serpents as gods, not only deadly and horrible, but also cursed by God; what good therefore can they hope from them? for serpents are hateful to God, to men and to all animals, and therefore they flee the light, and the sight of men and animals, as well as of God, and hide themselves in darkness and hiding places: this is what τὸ escaped denotes: thus Osorius, Jansenius, Sa and others. Again, they escaped the praise of God, because they are forced by the idolaters who worship them to deny in a certain way to God the praise and blessing which all created things render to their Creator. Secondly, our Lorinus more significantly, as if to say: The animals worshipped by the Egyptians escaped, that is, they took away from themselves the praise and blessing of God, when they themselves usurped to themselves the praise of God, when it was transferred to them by those who "changed the glory of the incorruptible God into the likeness of the image, not only of corruptible man, but also of birds, and of four-footed beasts, and of creeping things," Romans I, 23. Hence St. Athanasius, in his oration Against Idols, teaches that idolatry was instituted by the desire of those who, full of adulteries and fornications, are represented in fabrications: "For the fables, comedies, and tragedies of the poets are full of these lusts of Jupiter, Mars, Venus, etc., which they sing and celebrate as if they were the deeds of gods. For this reason the worshippers of idols proposed to themselves the most shameful life of the gods as something to be imitated. St. Athanasius adds, investigating the origin of idols: 'Almost all cities abound in all lusts on account of the savagery of morals which they behold in their gods. Nor is there, in this class of gods, anyone whom you could call chaste. Once certainly the Phoenician women prostituted themselves before idols, dedicating their earnings to the deities, persuaded that they would be propitiated by harlotry, and that prosperity of affairs would arise from it;' the same was done by Babylonian, Persian, Armenian and other women, as I said on Baruch VI, 42. St. Athanasius continues: 'Men also, having cast off their sex, no longer bearing themselves as males, affected the nature of women, as if they would thus honor and make themselves pleasing to the mother of the gods; but all live in the most shameful manner, and seem to engage in a contest among themselves in depravity, and, as St. Paul said: Their women have changed the natural use. See St. Paul, Rom. I. It is well known that the priests of Isis were most impure. It is known that Paulina, a chaste matron, was sought after by Decius Mundus, and when he could not seduce her, he persuaded her through the priests of Isis that the god Anubis wished to enjoy her; and so Decius took the place of Anubis at the end; Epiphanius, Preface to the book on Heresies and at the beginning of the Panarion; Damascenus, at the beginning of book I on Heresies, and others, who assign the origin of idolatry to the age following the flood, among whom St. Cyril is foremost, books I and III Against Julian. Understand this concerning idolatry which is known from Holy Scripture or other histories, as St. Cyril and others explain it themselves: for neither Scripture nor any history clearly asserts that idolatry existed before the flood: for from signs and conjectures it is very probable to conjecture the contrary, namely that idolatry existed before the flood, indeed that it was the cause of the flood; and this Tertullian teaches expressly, in the book On Idolatry; and it is proved first, because in Genesis VI, it is said: 'All flesh had corrupted its way;' but this corruption naturally induces atheism and idolatry, as it did after the flood. Hence Serenus the abbot, in Cassian, Collation VIII, chapter XXI, teaches that the sons of God, that is the sons of Seth, when they had gone in to the daughters of men, that is the daughters of Cain, gave themselves over to sorceries, superstitions, and worshipped demons; which, since they are not visible, it is likely that they presented themselves to men in a simulacrum and idol to be seen and worshipped, as they did among the gentiles after the flood, and still do among the Indians: Serenus narrates similar things concerning Ham the son of Noah. Second, because the giants, on account of whom God brought the flood, were most impure, indeed atheists and enemies of God, as the poets narrate concerning their Titans, whom it is not doubtful were giants: for the giants, since they despised the divine power and God, and oppressed all by their strength and pride and subjected them to themselves, seem to have wished to be held and worshipped as gods, as that Mezentius did, saying in Virgil: My right hand is my god, and the missile weapon I hurl from my book. Moreover, the memory of the Creator God and the creation of the world soon and long before the flood vanished from the minds of the impious, as the things already said demonstrate. Add that the flood happened late, namely after about 1500 years from the creation of the world. Hence also the Hebrews in Bereshit Rabba, that is the Great Genesis, on chapter IV Genesis V, 17, hand down that in the time of Enos, who was the grandson of Adam through Seth his son, the men of that age abjured the faith of one God, and then idolatry began, and therefore Enos opposed himself to it, and began to call upon the name of the Lord, namely with proper and public worship: although others think differently. Moreover, God's vengeance is accustomed to pursue most especially perjurers, as being guilty of injury to the Divine Majesty and name: hence those who swear falsely by invoking St. Anthony as a witness are accustomed to be struck by him with sacred fire.
14:15
17. For since he is mortal, he fashions a dead thing with wicked hands. For he himself is better than those whom he worships, because he himself lived, whereas they never did. — That is to say, the maker of idols cannot fashion one like himself, namely a living idol or god, because since he is mortal, he cannot fashion or give to the idol an immortal soul (for the creator of this is God alone, who is immortal); wherefore he must necessarily fashion the idol as inanimate and as it were dead, for which reason he is wicked and works wickedness with wicked hands: "for he himself is better than those whom he worships," σεβασμάτων αὐτοῦ, that is his worships, namely his idols and gods, which he both fashioned and also adores and worships: for idols never had soul and life, which he, their maker, has or had: but being animated and endowed with soul, he is far better and more excellent than inanimate things. What therefore is more wicked and unjust, and equally foolish, than that the maker should exalt above himself an image made by him and inanimate, and therefore far inferior to himself while living, and make it his god, and as such should suppliantly invoke and adore it? Hence St. Cyprian in the place cited reads more plainly "better indeed" instead of "for he is better," because, as I have already said, these particles "for" and "indeed" are interchanged with each other; yet our translator renders it more profoundly with "for," because it gives the reason why he said the maker of idols makes a god with wicked hands: "for the reason is, that it is unjust that a living man should adore a dead thing far viler, weaker, and more powerless than himself, and that the maker should adore his own work, to which he himself gave being. For senseless things compared with these are worse. — Lyra, reading "of the most wretched" for what preceded, "of the most wretched," thus explains it, that is to say, senseless animals compared with these, namely men, are themselves worse than men, so as to give the reason why he said those are most wretched who worship animals, because namely senseless things are worse than men who worship them, inasmuch as they are endowed with sense and reason. Others explain it, that is to say, senseless things, namely wooden and stone idols, compared with these, namely animals, are themselves worse, that is to say, a wooden idol is worse than a brute animal; if therefore a brute is not God, much less is a wooden idol God. But these are mere trifles and at variance with the Greek: for the Greek has thus: Ἄκια γὰρ συγκρινόμενα τῶν ἄλλων, ἐστι χείρονα, that is, for dementia compared with others are worse; whence also some codices of the Vulgate have "others" instead of "these." Ἄκια in Greek is properly a noun in the singular number, signifying dementia, madness, fury; but the author of this book, who from time to time renews Greek words and takes them in a new way (as we saw above), seems to take ἄκια as an adjective in the plural and in the neuter gender, so that it is the same as ἄνοιτα, that is madness or senselessness— are regarded as foul, deformed and horrible. Who therefore would believe that those are gods who are most beautiful and most pleasant? or what comes to the same thing, that is to say, but neither, if anyone should behold any of these animals, can he perceive them as good or beautiful: for he finds none endowed with beauty such that on account of it they should be loved and worshipped; but rather he sees them as foul and horrible, and therefore to be avoided and rejected. In Greek it is, nor to such an extent that they should be desired as in the sight of animals they are good, that is, crocodiles and serpents among other animals are good, beautiful and fair, they are not good, desirable and pleasant to behold; therefore much less are they good for worship, so that they should be worshipped as it were as gods. Otherwise Cantacuzenus, that is to say, God at the beginning of the world did not create flies and worms, which the Egyptians worship; whence since God saw all things created by him to be good, Gen. I, among these good things he neither saw nor numbered flies and worms. Vatablus adds from the Greek, animals which the Egyptians worshipped, namely crocodiles, from other animals, so that they are avoided and abhorred as foul and hideous, that is to say, therefore much more should these same not be worshipped by men, but avoided and turned away from with horror, lest they appear more stupid than animals: for thus Vatablus translates it, and things which should not even appear beautiful to animals, so that they should be touched by desire for them. I say secondly, that Ninus, the first king of the Assyrians, was likewise the first to set up publicly, by the authority of the king, around the three-hundredth year after the flood, a celebrated idol of Bel his father who was dead, who was either Nemrod or his successor, and made it a sanctuary for the guilty: thus St. Ambrose in his epistle to the Romans, chapter 1, St. Cyril, book III Against Julian, not far before the end, St. Jerome in Osee, chapter II, Eusebius in his chronicle, and others throughout; and from this the ancient idols were called Bel, Baal, Baalim, Belial, Beelpheger, Beelzebub and many such things; but bel, or baal, signifies in Hebrew lord, just as we call God the Lord by way of eminence: see what is said in Genesis X, 10. Wherefore what the Greeks, as St. Cyril testifies in his book Against Julian, wish to claim, that Cecrops their first king fashioned a likeness and named it Jupiter the chief of the gods, set up altars to it, and sacrificed a bull, is either false, or is to be understood as first in Greece. Thus also what St. Jerome asserts in the Preface to the Epistle to Titus, and Didymus in his book of Exegesis, that idolatry began with Melissus the king of the Cretans, Diodorus and Eusebius say it began with the Phrygians, Lactantius in book II On False Religion with the Canaanites, because their founder Canaan, cursed by his grandfather Noah, was the first to fall away from the worship of the true God to idols: these things, I say, are either false, or are to be understood thus, that in their own places and provinces only were they the first authors of idolatry. Thus the Atlantides, peoples of Africa, falsely boasted that they first had reigned among themselves a god, οὐρανόν, that is heaven. But to the Phoenicians likewise falsely does Sanchuniation of Berytus, as cited by Eusebius in book I of the Preparation, attribute the beginning of theology and religion. Hence it is equally clear that the Hebrews err, who according to Isidore, book VIII of the Etymologies, chapter XI, hand down that the first maker of an idol was Ishmael, and that the idol itself was named Ishmael. I say thirdly, that before this celebrated and universal idol of Ninus, there were other idols, indeed both private and even public; but not so universal as that of Ninus: it is evident, for Ninus was a contemporary of Abraham, for Abraham was born in the forty-third year of Ninus: thus Eusebius, St. Jerome, Augustine, Cyril, Bede, Isidore. But that there were idols before Abraham is evident, because Thare his father and the other Chaldeans were idolaters, as the common tradition of the Hebrews holds, and it is evident from Joshua XXIV, 2. Again, Epiphanius at the beginning of book I of his work On Heresies, and from him Philo and Suidas, under the word Sarug, teach that idolatry in the worship of images or pictures began with Sarug, who was the grandfather of Thare and the seventh from Noah. From Sarug therefore idolatry of images seems to have begun, though not of statues. I say fourth, the cause and beginning of idols was the making of images of the dead: for they made idols, so that the memory of their sons, or ancestors, or kings, or inventors of arts, or benefactors and friends might be preserved; such dead men therefore were held to be gods, when they themselves were worshipped as if received into heaven, in place of whom afterwards demons substituted themselves to be worshipped on earth, and demanded that they be sacrificed to by deceived and lost men, as Augustine says in the twenty-second book Against Faustus, chapter seventeen, Cyprian at the beginning of the book On the Vanity of Idols, Herodian in book one, Tertullian in the Apology chapter eleven, Eusebius in book seven of the Preparation, chapter seven, Lactantius in book one chapter seventeen. The same doctrine concerning the man of Sarug teaches Suidas above: "This, says St. Cyprian, is so, Alexander the Great writes in a notable volume to his mother, revealed to him by fear of his own power from a priest, a secret concerning gods made of men, that the memory of ancestors and kings having been preserved, from this the rite of worshipping and sacrificing grew up;" hence also from the sepulchres of kings and famous men, Eusebius deduces the origin of temples in book two of the Preparation chapter eight, Lactantius and Clement of Alexandria in the Protrepticus: "Superstition, he says, persuaded to build temples: for what were formerly the sepulchres of men, built more magnificently, were called by the name of temples:" thus also among Christians temples were erected at the sepulchres of martyrs, and from this were called martyria, as I said on the Apocalypse chapter six verse nine. For this reason St. Augustine in book eighteen of the City of God chapter five teaches that the image of Serapis, with a finger brought to the mouth, was accustomed to indicate that Serapis should be silent, that it be understood Serapis had been a man, indeed and a penalty of death was established for those who said Serapis had been a man, although it was certainly established that he had truly been a man. The rite of the apotheosis of the Caesars, or the elevation of the Caesars into gods, Herodian has in book four at the beginning. Nor does the Wise Man mean anything else here: for he only wishes to say that idolatry took its beginning from excessive affection and grief for their own, which was done differently among various nations; among some with a father constructing an image of a son, among others a son of a father, among others a husband of a wife, among others of other dead, as the Wise Man hints in verse twenty-one; therefore the idol was fashioned by the love and ambition of the dead, advanced by the flattery and fear of princes, confirmed by the fraud of demons, the splendor of idols, the error and custom of so many ages. I say fifth, it is more obvious and inclined that a father should erect an image and idol of a son, than that a son should erect one to a father or to another; and consequently the idol of a son seems to have been either the first, or among the first: it is proved first, because the words of the Wise Man incline to this, against which nothing contrary from antiquity can be brought; and on the other hand it is altogether probable that the author of this book, a man pious, learned and grave everywhere, received this his opinion from tradition. Second, because fathers love sons, especially tender ones, more than sons love fathers; therefore the love and grief of parents more readily drove them to erect images for dead sons than the contrary: especially since parents wish through sons to be always and to live in a manner, not the reverse. It is proved third by examples: for Lactantius in book one of False Religion chapter fifteen, from Cicero teaches that Cicero himself attempted to make his daughter Tulliola, dead, a goddess by erecting an image to her, and that in imitation of the ancients; therefore this was the custom of the ancients. Again Fulgentius in book one of the Gods of the Gentiles at the beginning of the chapter on Idols, from Diophantus the Lacedaemonian has the most ancient example of an idol, which Sy- Hear St. Cyprian, at the beginning of the book On Idolatry: "The cave of Jupiter in Crete is visited, and his tomb is shown, and it is manifest that Saturn was put to flight by him; from this Latium received its name from his hiding place. He was the first to impress letters, the first to mark coins in Italy, whence the treasury of Saturn is called; and he was a cultivator of rusticity, whence he is painted bearing a sickle; Saturn, put to flight, was received by Janus as a guest, from whose name the Janiculum was called, and the month of January was instituted. He himself is depicted as two-faced, because, being placed in the middle, he seems to behold both the year beginning and departing." And when Saturn had already grown old, Jupiter reigned in Italy, to whom his son Picus succeeded, after whom Faunus, who was the father of Latinus, the father-in-law of Aeneas. From this gather how little the age of the gods was removed from the Trojan age, says Genebrardus in the Chronicle; for Aeneas fled to Italy after Troy was captured. Then therefore the principal gods flourished together at the same time, that is, men reckoned among the gods by the Greeks and Latins, who were twelve in number, whom Ennius comprised in these two verses: Juno, Vesta, Minerva, Ceres, Diana, Venus, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, Neptune, Vulcan, Apollo. Saturn and Bacchus Eusebius adds, in book IV of the Preparation. The tombs of these once stood in Greece and Latium, and especially that of Jupiter in the city of Gnossus in Crete: thus Eusebius, Clement, Lactantius, St. Cyril, and others already cited. Moreover, many of these were sons of Saturn, who is therefore called Sator of the gods: for Saturn from Rhea or Ops begot Jupiter, Ceres, Juno, Neptune, Pluto, etc., as Lactantius testifies, book I, chapter XIV from Ennius. Finally, St. Thomas, II II, Question XCIV, from this chapter gathers four causes and origins of idolatry. The first was excessive love or fear, for men excessively loving or venerating a son, father or prince, bestowed divine honor upon him. The second was the beauty of the image, by which men are naturally delighted and captivated. The third was ignorance of God: because they found no other God, hence they attributed divinity to creatures. The fourth was the fraud of demons, who, desiring to be worshipped in idols, gave responses through them, or wrought certain wonders. nophanes the Egyptian, a splendid man, erected for his dead son; and he adds that hence idol is called as it were εἶδος δλου, that is, the appearance of grief: but he was most bitter in the death of his sons. To this is added our Jerome Prado in chapter VIII of Ezekiel, near the end, where first, he asserts that this Synophanes was the first (which Holcot also asserts) idolater, and that he is the one whom the Wise Man here notes, and hence in Hebrew idols are called atsabim, aven, that is, griefs, labors; second, that the Egyptians were the authors of idolatry; third, that this son appears to be Adonis: for Σιδνοφάνης seems corrupted into the name Adonis; whence Stephanus, in the book On Cities: Amatus, he says, was a most ancient city of Cyprus, in which Adonis Osiris was worshipped, who, since he was Egyptian, the Cypriots and Phoenicians made perpetual for themselves. Fourth, Epiphanius, at the beginning of the book On Heresies, and from him Suidas, under the word Abraham, teaches that Terah, who had Serug as grandfather and Abraham as son, first before Saturn, Jupiter, Rhea, and Juno, and other gods, made statues from clay by the potter's art, that is, made idols of statues, and that he was the first, whose son, namely Aram, Scripture mentions as having died before his father, as if to indicate that this happened because Terah was the first to erect an idol for his dead son, and therefore was most gravely rebuked by his son Abraham concerning the worship of idols. And indeed if Terah first fashioned idolatrous statues for the dead, there is no doubt that he fashioned them especially for his son Aram, and for a small child dead, if he had such a one; which if true, it seems the Wise Man here notes this Terah, that he was the first to erect a statue for his dead son: for the Wise Man here seems to speak of the image of a statue. Whence verse 17, in Greek he calls γλυπτά, that is, carved; and verse 21, stones and wood. If, however, someone should refer these things to painted images of Serug, I do not object, but I would wish for an ancient author who expressly asserts that Serug was the first to erect images for his dead son: wherefore what Julius Hyginus, book I of Fables, chapter CCLXXIV, says, that Daedalus, son of Eupolamus, was the first to make simulacra of the gods, should be understood among the Greeks, or Athenians: for before him were the Chaldeans, Terah and Serug. Finally, Victor of Marseilles teaches that Nimrod set up a statue for his son for the sake of grief, whom he had lost as an only child, and made sacred rites to it, sacrificed victims, and was the author of idolatry: to this is added our Sebastian Barradius, tome IV in the Gospel, part VIII, who is of the opinion that Ninus or some other first established a public idol for his son, who was called by his grandfather Belus or Baal, and indeed the Wise Man speaks here not of a private, but of a public idol: the same opinion is held by William of Paris, book On Laws, chapter XXV. But Eusebius, St. Augustine, Cyril and others teach that Ninus first set up an idol to his father Belus, not to his son. Moreover, what Lactantius, book I of the Institutes, final chapter, says from Theophilus and Thallus, that Belus was contemporary with Saturn, who was the sower of the gods, and both flourished at the same time, others pas- are refuted: For Saturn and Jupiter were far later than Belus, Nemrod, Ninus and Abraham: for Saturn reigned in Crete, and thence was driven out by his son Jupiter, in Italy and Latium, a hundred years before the Trojan war, which occurred in the time of Samson, who was many centuries later, not only than Belus and Abraham, but also than Moses, as Eusebius testifies in his Chronicle; whence Epiphanius in the Preface to Book I Against Heresies, speaks thus: "Afterwards (after Thare and Abraham) they deified, either wretched tyrants, or sorcerers exhibiting phantoms to the world, venerating their monuments; and long afterwards, Saturn, and Jupiter, Rhea and Juno, and others in succession." It is added, that Saturn and Jupiter are Latin names; but the Latins were far later than the Babylonians, Assyrians and Hebrews, such as Nemrod and Belus, or Bel: for Jupiter is said in Latin, as it were aiding father; Saturn, as it were sated with years, as Cicero testifies in Book II of On the Nature of the Gods: indeed Lactantius himself in the place cited: "Agamemnon, he says, who waged the Trojan war, was the great-grandson of Jupiter, and Achilles and Ajax were great-grandsons, and Ulysses was nearest in the same degree." Therefore Jupiter did not live long before the Trojan war, since Belus or Bel existed many centuries before it; for the Trojan war occurred a few years before Samson. Indeed our Salianus in the Annals asserts that Troy was captured in the last year of Ahialon, judge of Israel, to whom succeeded Abdon judging Israel for eight years, then Samson; whence Eusebius in the Chronicle from the birth of Abraham, who was born in the year of Ninus (who succeeded Belus) 43, counts to the capture of Troy 825 years, but from the birth of Moses to the capture of Troy he counts 310 years. The error arose from this, that since the Latins considered their Jupiter and Saturn to be the first and most ancient of the gods, and heard that Belus was similarly such among the Assyrians, they concluded that Belus was the same, or certainly contemporary with Saturn, when Belus was far earlier, just as the Assyrians were earlier than the Latins; hence again it came to pass, that some extended the name of Jupiter to Belus, and gave him the name Jupiter Belus, and call the father of Beli Saturn; but assuredly they abuse the names, and this abuse produces confusion of gods and times. glorious deeds of tyrants, equally as trophies of the virtues of idols they brought back. 17. And these, whom men could not openly honor, because they were far away, a figure of them being brought from afar, they made an evident image of the king, whom they wished to honor, so that him who was absent, as if present, they might worship with their devotion. — In Greek, so that they might flatter him who was absent as if present with eager zeal. This is the second cause of idols and idolatry, namely flattery: for many, in order to flatter kings and other powerful men, and to seek their favor, made an evident image of them, in Greek ἐμφανῆ, that is clear, manifest, and expressed to the life, and began to worship it as a divinity. Hear St. Cyprian at the beginning of the tract On Idols: "That the gods whom the common people worship are not gods, is known from this. Kings once were, who on account of their royal memory began to be worshipped among their own people, and afterwards even in death; hence temples were instituted for them; hence to retain the faces of the dead through image, expressed likenesses were made, to which they both offered victims, and celebrated festival days by giving honors; hence to posterity were made sacred rites, which to the first had been assumed as consolations. And let us see whether this truth stands in individual cases: Melicertes and Leucothea are precipitated into the seas, and afterwards become the divinities of the sea; Castor and Pollux die alternately, so that they may live; Aesculapius, so that he may rise into a god, is struck by lightning. Hercules, so that he may put off man, is burned up in the fires of Oeta. Apollo tended the flocks of Admetus. Neptune built walls for Laomedon, nor did the unhappy builder receive the reward of his work." Hear Tertullian, at the beginning of the book On Idolatry: "The principal crime of mankind, the supreme guilt of the age, the whole cause of judgment, is idolatry." He then adds that in idolatry there is contained the crime of homicide, adultery, and fornication: "The idolater," he says, "is the same as a murderer. Do you ask whom he has killed? If it matters for the sake of rhetorical elegance, not a stranger, nor an enemy, but himself. By what snares? By the snares of his own error. By what weapon? By offense against God. By how many blows? By as many as there are idolatries. Whoever denies that the idolater has perished denies that the idolater has committed murder. Therefore you should recognize adultery and fornication in the same thing: for whoever serves false gods is without doubt an adulterer of the truth, because all falsehood is adultery, and thus he is also plunged into fornication: for who, having worked with unclean spirits, does not walk about defiled and corrupted? And indeed the holy Scriptures use the word of fornication in reproaching idolatry. The condition of fraud is this, I think, if someone steals what belongs to another, or denies to another what is owed, and certainly fraud committed against a man is called by the name of the greatest crime. But indeed idolatry commits fraud against God, denying Him His honors and conferring them on others, so that it joins contumely even to fraud." And after some other things, he teaches that other crimes are in it: "In it are the lusts of the world: for what solemnity of idolatry is without ambition of worship and adornment? In it are lasciviousness and drunkenness, since it is frequented very much for the sake of food, belly, and lust: in it is injustice, for what is more unjust than that which does not know the father of justice? In it is also vanity, since its whole account is vain: in it is falsehood, since its whole substance is false. Thus it comes about that all things are in idolatry, and idolatry is found in all things." You would say the same thing tropologically of the idol of the avaricious man, which is the phantom of gold; and of the proud man, which is the phantom of excellence; and of the lustful man, which is the phantom of a mistress; and of the gluttonous man, which is the phantom of feasts and wines: for while each one loves and worships this phantom of his as an idol, so that he might enjoy it, he rushes into all crimes. Therefore, so that you might avoid those things, tear out, crush and break this idol of yours, which you have fashioned for yourself in your mind and imagination. tempted, is the beginning and cause of all perjury and wickedness. 30. Both therefore will come upon them justly, because they thought evil of God, attending to idols, and swore unjustly, in deceit despising justice. — Both, that is, the retribution of both, namely of idolatry and perjury, a condign penalty and punishment will come upon the idolaters; in Greek it is, ἀμφότερα δὲ αὐτοὺς μετελεύσεται τὰ δίκαια, that is, both just things will come upon them, namely punishments; or, both will punish them justly: for μετελεύσομαι is sometimes the same as κολάζω, that is, I punish: thus the Lexicographer from Synesius and Thucydides; the Vatican edition translates, both moreover will pursue them, the laws: all these come down to the same thing; the sense therefore is, as if to say, Both (the just vengeance of each crime, namely of idolatry and perjury) will seize them, or will take punishment from them; both the just cause and reason of punishment will correct them, and will execute its right; both of these will be imputed to them for punishment, both that they thought evil of God, and that they swore falsely. In the Greek it is plural, both just things will comprehend them, namely punishments, or because these two crimes will subject them to penalties. For justice, in Greek it is, ὁσιότητος, that is, holiness, namely the sanctity of an oath: for this is holy and must be kept holily, and therefore it is called a sacrament. For although an idolater swears by an idol, which is not God, and therefore in the thing itself does not swear nor swear falsely, nevertheless in his mind, by which he believes the idol to be the true God, he swears and swears falsely: for the error of idolatry, by which someone thinks his idols to be true gods, brings it about that in swearing falsely he is held to be sacrilegious and unjust, says St. Augustine, epistle 154 to Publicola, and it is found in the Twenty-second Distinction, Question 1, chapter Movet... 31. Not indeed the virtue of those who swear (in Greek, δύναμις, that is, power), but the punishment of sinners always traverses the transgression of the unjust. — For those who swear, in Greek it is, ὀμνυμένων, which is of the middle voice, and can be translated both actively as those swearing, as the Complutensian and Royal editions read, and passively as those sworn by, that is idols, by which one swears, and this suits this place more aptly, as if to say: Let the idols, by which idolaters swear, have no virtue, that is no power and strength to punish their perjuries, and therefore the idolaters themselves and perjurers despise them, and know them to be weak and powerless to chastise them, nevertheless the punishment of sinners, especially of idolaters and perjurers, intended for them by God, traverses, punishing the transgression of the unjust, namely idolatry and perjury, by which those swearing both falsely and by false gods commit a twofold injury to the true God, first, because they oppose and prefer idols and false gods to the true God; second, because by those things which they believe to be the true God, they swear falsely and forswear: for they swear and forswear by them, just as if they swore by the true God, and call upon them as a false witness: by which there is a notable injury and affront to the true God. For punishment in Greek it is δίκη, that is a legal cause, by which it is tried before a judge, a suit, an action, a judgment, a right, a sentence, a punishment, also a just vengeance; whence Δίκη is feigned by the poets to be a goddess of judgments, named from this, that she justly settles disputes and punishes the guilty; hence she is said to be a virgin, because justice and vengeance ought to be pure and whole; whence Hesiod says: "Justice, he says, was born a virgin from Jupiter." This last meaning is most apt for this place, as if to say: Δίκη, that is divine vengeance against idolaters, perjurers and the wicked, traverses, so that it may seize them and strike and punish them according to their deserts, just as a praetor traverses the forum to capture thieves and hang them; hence God said to Cain the fratricide: "Nay, if thou dost well, shalt thou not receive? but if ill, sin lieth at the door," that is the avenging of sin, like a lictor will pursue and punish thee; whence Vatablus translates this place: not indeed the power of those (idols) by which oath was sworn, but the avenging justice of sinners, always exacts punishments for wicked deeds from the unjust: so also Cantacuzenus, Jansenius and others. Hence for traverses, in Greek it is, ἐπεξέρχεται, that is, as Budaeus in Comment. ling. graec. p. 99, runs through, invades, harasses, lays waste, seizes by law, judges and avenges.
14:16
SYNOPSIS OF THE CHAPTER. glorious trophies of virtue from tyrannies, equally as from idols. 17. And those whom men could not openly honor because they were far away, they brought their likeness from afar, made a clear image of the king whom they wished to honor, so that they might worship him who was absent as if present through their devotion. — In Greek, so that they might flatter him who was absent as if present with zeal. This is the second cause of idols and idolatry, namely flattery: for many, in order to flatter kings and other powerful men and to seek their favor, made a clear image of them, in Greek ἐμφανῆ, that is, bright, manifest, and expressed to the life, and began to worship it as a deity. Hear St. Cyprian at the beginning of his treatise On Idols: "That the gods whom the common people worship are not gods is known from this. Kings once existed, who on account of their royal memory began to be worshipped among their own people, and afterwards even after death; hence temples were instituted for them; hence images were fashioned to preserve the likenesses of the dead through representation, to which they also offered sacrifices and celebrated festival days by giving honors; hence sacred rites were made for posterity, which had been assumed as consolations by the first. And let us see whether this truth holds among individuals: Melicertes and Leucothea are cast into the seas, and afterwards become deities of the sea; Castor and Pollux die alternately, so that they may live; Aesculapius is struck by lightning so that he may rise to godhood. Hercules, so that he may put off his humanity, is consumed by the fires of Oeta. Apollo tended the flocks of Admetus. Neptune built walls for Laomedon, and the unhappy builder did not receive the reward of his work." 1. But thou, O God, art sweet and true, patient, and ordering all things in mercy. 2. For if we sin, we are thine, knowing thy greatness: and if we sin not, we know that we are counted with thee. 3. For to know thee is perfect justice: and to know thy justice and thy power is the root of immortality. 4. For we have not been led into error by the evil device of men's art, nor by the fruitless labor of a shadow painted, an image carved with various colors, 5. whose sight gives concupiscence to the foolish, and he loves the lifeless image of a dead thing without a soul. 6. The lovers of evils are worthy to have hope in such things, and both they that make them, and they that love them, and they that worship them. 7. And a potter also, pressing soft clay, laboriously fashions every vessel for our use, and out of the same clay fashions vessels that are clean for use, and likewise those that are for contrary uses: but the potter is the judge of the use of these vessels. 8. And with vain labor he fashions a god out of the same clay: he who a little before was made from the earth, and after a short time returns himself whence he was taken, his debt to the soul which he had being demanded back. 9. But he is careful, not because he shall labor, nor because his life is short, but he contends with goldsmiths and silversmiths: and he also imitates workers in bronze, and prefers glory, because he fashions useless things. 10. For his heart is ashes, and his hope is vain earth, and his life is more vile than clay: 11. because he knew not who fashioned him, and who inspired him with a soul that works, and who breathed into him a vital spirit. 12. And they esteemed our life to be a sport, and our conversation a business for gain, and that one ought to acquire money from every place, even from evil. 13. For this man knows that he sins above all others, who out of the matter of the earth fashions fragile vessels and graven things. 14. For all the foolish, and unhappy above measure in soul are the proud enemies of thy people, and they that rule over them: 15. for all the idols of the nations are esteemed gods, which have neither the use of eyes to see, nor nostrils to perceive the breath, nor ears to hear, nor fingers of hands to handle, and their feet also are slow to walk. 16. For man made them: and he that borrowed the spirit fashioned them. For no man can fashion a god like unto himself. 17. For when he is mortal, he fashions a dead thing with wicked hands. But he himself is better than the things he worships, because he lived, whereas they never did. 18. And they worship the most miserable animals: for compared to these, those are worse. 19. And neither can any one of these animals see any good by sight. But they have escaped the praise of God, and his blessing. Penalty in Greek is δίκη, that is, a forensic cause, by which a case is tried before a judge, a suit, an action, a judgment, a right, a penalty, and also a just vengeance; whence Δίκη is feigned by the poets to be a goddess of judgments, hence so called, because she justly settles disputes and punishes the guilty; hence she is said to be a virgin, because justice and vengeance ought to be pure and whole; whence Hesiod: "Justice, he says, was born a virgin from Jupiter." This last meaning is most apt for this place, as if to say Δίκη, that is, divine vengeance through idolaters, perjurers and wicked men walks about, so that it may seize them and strike and punish them according to their deserts, just as a praetor walks through the forum to capture thieves and hang them; hence God said to Cain the fratricide: "Nay, if thou dost well, shalt thou not receive? but if ill, shall not sin forthwith be present at the door," that is, the avenging of sin, like a lictor shall pursue and punish thee; whence Vatable translates in this place, not the power of those (idols) by which the oath was sworn, but the avenging justice of sinners, always exacts the penalties of wicked deeds from the unjust: so also Cantacuzenus, Jansenius and others. Hence for walks about, in Greek it is, ἐπιζέρχεται, that is, as Budaeus in Comment. ling. græc. p. 99, runs through, invades, harasses, lays waste, seizes by law, judges and avenges. Formerly in a doubtful case they sent defendants to the oratory of St. Stephen, so that they might purge themselves by oath of the crime objected to them; and if they perjured themselves, immediately they were chastised from heaven: Gregory of Tours writes the same of the Oratory of St. Martin, lib. VIII Hist. cap. XVI, where among other things he relates that a certain incendiary, denying the fire committed by himself and perjuring himself in the church of St. Martin, was consumed by avenging flames from heaven. The same happened in the Oratory of SS. Processus and Martinianus, of whom St. Gregory says, hom. 32 in Evang.: "To their lifeless bodies the living sick come and are healed, perjurers come and are vexed by a demon." And in the Oratory of St. Felix of Nola, to whose Church St. Augustine, as he himself relates in epist. 437 to Hippo, sent Boniface the presbyter accused of a crime, so that he might purge himself there by oath; and if he were guilty, he would betray himself by the customary vengeance of God. And St. Augustine adds: "We know at Milan near the shrine of the saints, where demons confess wonderfully and terribly, that a certain thief, who had come to that place so that by false swearing he might deceive, was compelled to confess the theft, and to return what he had taken." Such also was the Oratory of St. Apollinaris at Ravenna, where Maximus purged himself by oath of the crime of simony, as witness St. Gregory, lib. VII, epist. 7 and seq.; and above all the Basilica of St. Peter, over whose body bishops accused of crime were wont to purge themselves by oath, as witness St. Gregory, lib. II, epist. 23, and lib. II, epist. 8. tes: whence Hesiod in lib. II Ergis, vers. 39: The fifth (day of each month), he says, avoid because difficult and grave. For on the fifth they say the Furies walk about avenging the oath, which contention has at last generated perjury. And Tibullus: Ah wretch, and if anyone at first conceals perjuries, Yet great punishment comes with silent feet. Do you want examples? Take this. Cleomenes, when he had made a seven-day truce with the Argives with an oath added, on the third night invaded them and killed many, saying that he had made a pact about days, not about nights. Vengeance followed him, for he was also deprived of the city, for the sake of which he had violated the agreement, because the women, having removed the arms of the gods from the temples, avenged him. It was as if the gods themselves, whom he had despised, were taking punishment upon him. Finally, turning into madness, he himself dug into and cut his own body with a certain small sword from the ankle to the vital parts, and thus ended his life laughing with mouth agape. Agesilaus was accustomed to praise and approve barbarians who had violated the sanctity of an oath, saying that they rendered the gods hostile to themselves by nothing more than if they rashly violated the most sacred oath. Thus Aelianus, book XIV of Miscellaneous Histories. Pericles of Athens, when a friend asked him to give false testimony for him, to which an oath was attached, that is, perjury, replied: That he was indeed a friend, but only up to the altar; sensing that one ought to gratify friends to some extent, but not beyond the violation of an oath. Finally, St. Augustine, book I of The City of God, chapter XV, celebrates the most noble example of M. Attilius Regulus, who, a captive among the Carthaginians, was sent by them to Rome to negotiate with the senate about exchanging captives on both sides, after first swearing by the gods that if he did not obtain this, he would return to them. And when he did not obtain it, indeed he himself dissuaded the senate from this exchange, so that he might keep faith with his oath, he returned to the Carthaginians, even though he knew he would be tortured to death by them, as indeed happened. St. Augustine adds another example of the Saguntines in Spain, who, so that they might keep faith sworn to the Romans, preferred to be burned alive rather than surrender the city to the Carthaginians. He proceeds to attack idols and their makers, or idol-makers; therefore at the beginning he gives thanks to God, that he has kept the Israelites pure and chaste from idolatry in his faith and worship; then he refutes the vanity and deception of idols from the very makers of them. which are full of demons, and therefore they rage, and they avenge their neglect gravely, and they treat idolaters and magicians, who obey them less, most badly and punish them. Note here four attributes of God in governing: the first, benignity and gentleness; the second, truth and faithfulness; the third, longsuffering and patience; the fourth, mercy and clemency. Let kings, rulers and governors learn these from God and ask for them. governing all things. For "sweet," in Greek it is χρηστός, that is, good, benign, upright, humane, easy to gratify, suitable, clement; likewise useful, fruitful, helpful, excellent, vigorous. Such was χρηστός, that is, Christ our Lord, who was therefore called by the gentiles χρηστός, that is, Chrestus, and Christians were called chrestians, because they were benign and beneficent to all. The sense is, as if to say, Idolaters worship useless gods, indeed harmful ones. For such are demons, who, invoked by magicians, provide meager help, so that they may inflict greater harm upon them, both in body and in soul. But our God is most useful, equally benevolent and beneficent, who loads us with all good things. We therefore congratulate ourselves on such a God, greatest and best, and that he has freed us from the worst gods. Thus Cantacuzenus, who notes there is an antithesis between God and idols, which I have assigned. was; whence in turn by God he is received into favor, love, and former goodwill. Thus concerning the gentiles to be converted from gods to God through Christ, Isaiah says in chapter XLIV, 5: "This one shall say: I am the Lord's; and that one shall call in the name of Jacob; and this one shall write with his hand, To the Lord." And David, Psalm CXVIII, 94: "I am thine, he says, save me: for I have sought thy justifications." ὅ, now that is lacking in the Greek, which accordingly has it thus: we shall not sin, when we know ourselves to be esteemed by you, or to be a care and of value to you: for this especially ought to turn away any one of us from sin, that we know ourselves to be a care to God, dear, and of value, and to be predestined by God at least in the beginning, so that we may be his sons and heirs, and co-heirs of Christ. For God destined all the faithful and just to glory, and therefore predestined them at least in the beginning. Thus St. Augustine, On Faith and Works, chapter XXII, who reads in the past tense, we have not sinned, as the Louvain scholars corrected it, although the context seems to require we shall not sin, as the Greek has it: for who, thinking himself inscribed in God's friendship, family and familiarity, would dare to sin, so as to sell and squander so great a good for a vile desire? who, seriously considering himself elected by God and called to so great a grace and glory, would not strive with all his strength to live worthily of so great a calling, so as to show himself a worthy citizen of heaven and companion of the angels? "Who, worthily considering the dwelling with God, in which all are appointed by predestination, who are called according to his purpose, would not strive to live so as to be fitting for such a dwelling?" says St. Augustine in the place cited. Secondly and more genuinely, our Castro: "It seems," he says, "that Solomon speaks of the election of the people before other peoples (not of predestination), of which Moses, Deuteronomy XXXII, 8: 'When the Most High divided the nations, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the peoples according to the number of the children of Israel. But the Lord's portion is his people: Jacob the lot of his inheritance.' This knowledge therefore and persuasion, that we are of the number of God's people, and that we are inscribed in the catalogue of his faithful, chiefly contains us or ought to contain us in all modesty and fear, lest we sin, and the more so the more we are drawn into his familiarity. The Greek λελογισμέθα favors this, that is, we are inscribed in your accounts, assigned to your reckoning, counted by you: for λογίζομαι is indeed an arithmetical verb, and designates the reckoning of merchants."
14:23
are after the destruction of Babylon, cap. XVIII, 8 and seq.; and cap. XI, vers. 17; and cap. XIV, vers. 7. A counterpart to Solomon is the maxim of Jeremiah, cap. IX, vers. 23: "Let not the wise man glory in his wisdom, and let not the strong man glory in his strength, and let not the rich man glory in his riches; but in this let him glory, to know and understand me." Secondly, because in painting of great art it is a fine thing to paint shadows well: for through them the heights of things, depths, mountains and valleys, distances and intervals are represented. Indeed I have seen in Rome shadows alternated on walls, so represented to the life, that they would render anyone looking at them doubtful whether there were truly in the wall this eminence and depth, or whether it were only made and shadowed forth by painting and art; whence the painting itself is called adumbration, and to paint is to adumbrate, and σκιαγράφοι are called those who bring in outlines and shadows, by which things that are flat appear to stand out in the painting. An image carved by various colors. — For image, in Greek it is εἶδος, that is form, species, figure; whence the diminutive εἴδωλον, that is idol, as if to say a diminished figure, a meager form, a small and contracted species, a small god, a slight divinity. For carved, in Greek it is σπιλωθέν, that is spotted, that is variegated with various colors: for spots are called, both the marks by which painters are accustomed to distinguish and illuminate images and paintings; and the variegations of colors; whence Seneca, epist. 116: "The spots of great columns delight us," he says; add that the Wise Man by this word censures idols as if they were not so much depicted as spotted and defiled by colors, so that he may bring them into hatred, both because the colors themselves are in themselves sordid and spotted; and because if you regard God, surely these idols depicted and spotted with God's colors ought to be called so, for God, who is pure spirit, and therefore devoid of color, infect and spot the paintings with earthly and foul colors, and thus exhibit God not as spiritual, but as corporeal and colored. Our translator renders it more deeply, carved, both so that he may hint that ancient idols were statues skillfully carved, which were then painted with various colors; and because the coloring and painting itself is called carving by catachresis: for the painter by painting a thing with various colors, now whitening and bright, now blackening and dark, especially when he represents by them the eminences or depths of things, or mountains and valleys (whence also the Greek σπῖλος signifies not only spots, but also eminences and prominent things, such as cliffs, rocks, islands in the sea), carves out the thing itself as it were, as is seen in glasses skillfully painted; hence any idols, even if only painted, are called carved things in the Scriptures, as Exod. XX, 4: "Thou shalt not make a carved thing," that is an idol; Psalm. CV, 19: "And they adored the carved thing;"; Isai. XLII, 17: "Who trust in the carved thing," and throughout the prophets.
14:25
those dishes, but that one for forming chamber pots and other vessels for other uses, as it pleased him and seemed good to him: and yet the potter, as he adds in verse 8, in like manner from the same clay fashions an idol, and judges and chooses for this purpose that part of the clay which seems more suitable to him. Therefore an idol, if you regard the material, is plainly similar, indeed the same as the material of dishes and chamber pots, which is most vile, namely clay; but if you regard the craftsman, it is the same potter who fashions the idol and who fashions the chamber pot; therefore as vile is the potter and vile the clay, so equally vile is his work, namely the idol formed by him: wherefore rightly Arnobius, book VI Against the Gentiles, pierces and destroys idolaters with this argument as with a weapon: "What then is the reason," he says, "that if all these bodies remain untouched and uncut, they lack the force of divinity and heavenly authority, yet if they receive the forms of men, if they receive ears, noses, cheeks, lips, eyes, eyelashes, they straightway become gods, and are referred into the order of the heavenly ones and enrolled? Does some novelty in the fashioning add something to these bodies, so that by the very addition you are compelled to believe that some divinity and majesty has been conferred upon them?" etc. Among other idols of gold and bronze he mentions those of clay, both because these were very numerous and were purchased everywhere by the poor at small price; and because the material of clay is most vile, the fashioning most sordid, the craftsman most sordid; who nevertheless has full dominion and power over it, so that with wonderful ease he forms and fashions from soft clay those forms and figures which pleased him: all which things prove the supreme vileness of idols; whence he adds: Juvenal ridicules the Egyptians, because they worshipped garlic and leeks as gods, and says: O holy nations, for whom these are born as divinities in gardens! In like manner you might ridicule idol-makers, and say to them: O holy molders, who mold clay divinities! O holy palms, by which it is permitted to fashion divinities! O divine fingers, which can fashion gods! Not because he shall labor. — This labor is understood variously by various ones, first and properly, for that by which the potter labors industriously in forming the idol, and in each of its parts and members, and in preserving them lest they break or be shattered, as I have already said. Secondly, that by which he labors with sickness, which he contracts from excessive molding labor day and night; whence Peter Nannius here: "He shall labor," he says, "that is, he shall be sick: for κάμοντες are called the sick or the dead, as if to say, The potter intent on gain, and by excessive labor for glory, wastes, loses and destroys himself. Thirdly, that by which he labored in death, when the debt of his soul is demanded of him, and in hell, where he shall burn on account of his idols, which he fashioned: thus Jansenius. Contends (in Greek ἀντερείδεται, that is, he contends against an adversary or rival, strives, fights, so that by the excellence of his art he may bring back more gain and glory). He prefers glory, because he fashions superfluous things, — that is, as in Greek, he esteems glory, because he fashions κίβδηλα, that is, counterfeit things; Vatablus, he counts it glory to himself, because he fashions impostures; others, because he fashions adulteries, that is, adulterated and falsified things, namely idols, which are not divinities, but figments and portents of divinities, and therefore are adulterous and falsified gods, that is, shadowed, painted, feigned and false: for the Greek κίβδηλος signifies an adulterated, false, feigned thing, and is properly said of debased coins, when namely brass is mixed with gold, which vitiates and adulterates them: in like manner an idol is a god, not true, but false and adulterated. cut it off. What things are more to be cut off than those in which the body of the Lord is scandalized?" For this reason St. Claudius, Nicostratus, Symphorianus, Castorius and Simplicius, under the emperor Diocletian, went to glorious martyrdom, because when they were supreme sculptors, they could by no means be induced to make statues of idols; and when led to the simulacrum of the Sun, that they might venerate it, they said they would never allow themselves to adore the works of human hands: wherefore they were cast into prison, beaten with scorpions, finally enclosed alive in leaden boxes and cast into the river, they resigned their bodies to the earth, their souls to heaven, and achieved a glorious triumph over idols. The Church celebrates the day of their birth in the Octave of All Saints, and we venerate their relics in Rome in the Church of the Four Crowned Saints. in the saints; and this comparison is most fitting, so that spiritually there appears to be as much difference between the just and sinners as there is corporally between heaven and earth. For the sake of signifying this thing, when we stand for prayers, we turn toward the east, whence heaven rises: not as if God were there, and as if he had abandoned the other parts of the world, he who is present everywhere, not by the spaces of places, but by the majesty of power; but so that the mind may be admonished to turn itself toward a more excellent nature, that is toward the Lord, when the body itself, which is earthly, is turned toward a more excellent body, that is toward a heavenly body." And after some things: "So that when they have at some time come to know the dignity of the soul, even to exceed a heavenly body, they may seek him more in the soul than in the body even though heavenly."
14:28
11. Because he knew not who fashioned him, and who breathed into him a soul that worketh, and who breathed into him the vital spirit. — In Greek, because he knew not him who fashioned him, and who breathed into him a living soul, who breathed into him the vital spirit, that is to say, The potter has his whole heart in the idol which he fashions, because he is so senseless that he knows not the true God, who fashioned him, nay, created him from nothing, and who breathed into him a soul, which always works something, and breathed into him the vital spirit. He gives the reason why he said that the heart of the potter is ashes, and therefore he himself is baser earth and more abject than mud, namely because he subjects himself to mud as to his idol: for he knows not the true God, of life 12. But they esteemed our life a sport, and our conversation a life composed for gain, and that it was necessary to acquire riches from every quarter, even from evil. — Vatablus, truly these men esteem our life as a jest, and the course of an age as a lucrative trade, so that they say from every quarter, even from evil, gain must be made; the Syriac, and they reputed the dwelling of their life a laugh, and their dwelling as the time and sale of a merchant, and all his merchandise in evil; the Arabic, and they thought our age a gain for acquiring (or a gain of confusion), and because they say they are in need, hence they gain from evil.
14:31
Wisely Clement of Alexandria, book III of the Paedagogus, chapter XI: "He does not have wisdom," he says, "to whom play is held as serious business;" whence Jeremiah, chapter XV, 7: "I sat not," he says, "in the council of those that play;" and Tobias, chapter III, 17: "Never," he says, "did I mingle myself with those that play, nor with those who walk in levity together, is he rejected and hissed at; nor is he ever struck with stones." St. Chrysostom, homily 47 to the People: "The present life," he says, "is a play, or rather something worse; but the future is not a plaything: for how do we differ from children playing and building houses, we erecting splendid houses? What do we differ from those eating breakfast, we living delicately? Nothing, except that we do these things with punishment. But if we have not yet beheld the truth of things, it is no wonder: for we have not yet become men; but when we shall have become men, we shall know that these are childish things, because we also abandon those when we become men. But when we are children, we think serious the things of pottery and clay joined together, we are no less anxious in erecting walls than those building great things, yet they immediately perish and collapse: and even if they should stand anywhere, they would be useful to us no more than these splendid houses. For the heavenly city cannot admit them." He then adds that the heavenly inhabitants laugh at these games of men on earth: "Nor would he who has a heavenly homeland endure to dwell in these things, but just as we destroy these with our feet, so also he subverts them with judgment; and as we laugh at children weeping in the subversion, so also the heavenly inhabitants not only laugh at us groaning over these things, but also weep: and because their bowels are full of mercy, and hence there is much damage. Let us therefore become men. How long do we crawl on the ground alone, being wise in stones and wood? How long do we play, and would that we only played. But now we have also betrayed our own salvation; and as little children when they apply themselves to these things, neglecting letters, suffer many blows: so also we, expending all our effort in these things, while we neglect spiritual disciplines, then by works, nor shall we have any to show, we shall give the final punishment, nor shall there be anyone to rescue us, whether father or brother." He has the same in homily 24 on Matthew. The same, epistle 6: "The present life," he says, "is not unlike theatrical scenes: for as there one fills the office of emperor, here of judge, another of soldier; but when night has come, the emperor is not recognized as emperor, nor is the judge seen as judge, nor the soldier afterwards as soldier: so each one of us on that day of the age to come, not by persons, but by things and deeds, shall receive a dignity suited to him." And that one ought to acquire gain from evil everywhere, — in Greek, πορίζειν, that is to make profit, as if to say the idol-maker wholly intent on gain seizes that from evil, namely from idols, which he fashions, and which he sells as if they were gods more dearly than either the material or 13. For he knows himself to transgress above all, who from the matter of earth fashions fragile vessels and carved images. — He proves what he said, that the idol-maker "acquires gain from evil," from the fact that he himself knows he cannot form and fashion gods from clay, from which he makes bowls and dishes: wherefore beyond other idolaters and makers of idols, namely silversmiths, goldsmiths and bronzesmiths, he sins, because those often labor in ignorance, and from silver, gold, bronze fabricate idols; into which therefore the proud demon more readily insinuates himself, which can then serve also for other uses, namely for representing kings, or men excelling in virtue, or if they are broken, gold, silver and bronze can be distributed to the poor; but a clay idol is worth nothing, except that when broken it is ground under foot. The vileness therefore and fragility of earth and clay convicts the potter of deceit from his own impiety, if he will not altogether become blind and mad: for the potter knows his gods to be made of clay; he knows likewise that common saying: "The potter's wealth, earthen riches;" he knows therefore his riches to consist in earthen vessels, which therefore easily break and perish with them: which thing admonishes him, lest for so fragile a gain he commit so great a crime and fashion an idol. And Tibullus: Ah wretch, and if anyone at first conceals perjuries, Yet great punishment comes with silent feet. Do you want examples? Take them. Cleomenes, when he had made a seven-day truce with the Argives with an oath added, then on the third night invaded them and killed many, saying that he had made a pact concerning days, not nights: vengeance followed him, for he was also deprived of the city, for the sake of which he had violated the agreement, because the women, having removed the arms of the gods from the temples, avenged him: just as if the gods themselves, whom he had despised, were taking punishment upon him. Finally, turning to madness, he himself dug into and cut his own body with a certain small sword from the ankle to the vital parts, and thus ended his life laughing with mouth agape. Agesilaus was accustomed to praise and approve barbarians who had violated the sanctity of an oath, saying that they rendered the gods hostile to themselves by nothing more than if they rashly violated the most sacred oath: thus Aelianus, lib. XIV De Variis hist. Pericles of Athens, when a friend asked him to speak false testimony for him, to which an oath was attached, that is, perjury, replied: That he was indeed a friend, but only up to the altar; sensing that one ought to gratify friends to some extent, but short of violating an oath. Finally, St. Augustine, lib. I De Civit. cap. XV, celebrates the most noble example of M. Attilius Regulus, who, a captive among the Carthaginians, was sent by them to Rome, so that he might treat with the senate concerning the exchange of captives on both sides, after first taking an oath by the gods that if he did not obtain this, he would return to them. And when he did not obtain it, indeed he himself dissuaded the senate from this exchange, so that he might keep faith with his oath, he returned to the Carthaginians, even though he knew he would be tortured to death by them, as indeed happened. St. Augustine adds another example of the Saguntines in Spain, who, so that they might keep faith with the oath sworn to the Romans, preferred to be burned alive rather than surrender the city to the Carthaginians. From all these things, learn how much reverence ought to be shown to the divine name, and how truly, sparingly and circumspectly God ought to be named and invoked as a witness: for whatever is shown to the divine name is shown to God himself, whose is the name. Whence Jeremiah, cap. X, vers. 6: "There is not, he says, one like unto thee, O Lord: thou art great, and great is thy name in might. Who shall not fear thee, O king of nations?" And Daniel, cap. III, vers. 52: "Blessed art thou, O Lord God of our fathers, and worthy of praise and glorious and superexalted for ever; and blessed is the name of thy glory, holy and worthy of praise and superexalted in all ages." And Ecclesiasticus, cap. XXXIX, vers. 19: "Bless the Lord in his works, give glory to his name." And the Psalmist, Psalm. LXXI, 18: "Blessed is the Lord God of Israel, who alone doth wonderful things; and blessed be the name of his majesty for ever, and the whole earth shall be filled with his majesty, amen, amen." SYNOPSIS OF THE CHAPTER.
Machine translation from the Latin, not reviewed.
14:2
… Actus meos viderunt oculi tui» (cf. also Pss. 7, 43, 103, 146 etc.; and furthermore: Prov. 3:19; Wis. 9:2; 14:2; Jer. 11:20; 23:24; 32:19). From the New Testament it suffices to recall Rom. 11:33: «O altitudo divitiarum sapientiae et scientiae Dei». …
14:6
… believers and a sign of perdition for the "world." This spiritual sense, noted by 1 Pt. 3:20, was developed by the Fathers, who illustrated the "miserable wood" (Wis. 10:4), which became an object of blessing since in it was saved "the hope of the world" (Wis. 14:6-7), as a symbol of the Church (hence of the Madonna and of Christ himself), outside of which there is no salvation (cf. Ambrose, De Noe et arca, 6-9; PL 14, 368-74; Augustine, Contra …
Wis. 14:6 (γίγαντες) their proud
Noe (Heb. Nōah; Septuagint Nōe; cf. Old Babylonian Nuḫīja)
In biblical tradition N. was praised as "righteous" (Ex. 14:14, 20), "hope of the world," who through trust in God preserved the human race (Wis. 14:6), "renewer in the time of destruction" (Eccl. 44:17-18), model of faith (Hebr. 11:17), "herald of the righteousness" that God punishes in universal corruption (II Pt. 2:5). There is …
14:11
… Elijah (v.) is the type, "will turn the heart of the fathers toward the children" and vice versa (Mal. 4, 5 f. = Lk. 1, 16 f.; Mt. 11, 10; 17, 10-13). There is no lack of allusions to the messianic hope in Sir. 36, 6-22; 45, 22, etc.; and in Wis. 18, 4; 14, 11-14.
14:13
… And it stands out even more in the Old Testament, where the trinitarian mystery is only vaguely shadowed forth, while there is often polemic against pagan idolatry, especially in the more recent books (Wis. 14:13 ff.), but also in more ancient texts, particularly in the Letter of Jeremiah and in frequent very energetic affirmations of the great prophets (Is. 40:19, 20; 44:13-19; Jer. 10:3 ff.; …
Douay-Rheims (Challoner) · Vulgata Clementina · original Douay-Rheims (Douay 1609-10), transcription by EEBO-TCP (CC0) · La Sacra Bibbia, tradotta dalla Volgata da Antonio Martini (1769-1781) (LaParola (laparola.net), Martini OSIS text, Public domain (LaParola's electronic edition marks it 'Dominio pubblico')). Public domain.