God’s different dealings with the Egyptians and with his own people.
God plaguing the Aegyptians for idolatrie, and crueltie, deliuered the Israelites. 5. Chasticed them also, but againe shewed them mercie; 20. and fedde them with Manna.
1For these things, and by the like things to these, they were worthily punished, and were destroyed by a multitude of beasts.Per questo ancora mediante simili; cose furon quelli giustamente i tormentati, e sterminati da una turba di bestie.FOR these thinges, and by the like to these, they haue worthely suffered torments, and were destroyed by a multitude of beasts.Propter hæc et per his similia passi sunt digne tormenta, / et per multitudinem bestiarum exterminati sunt. 2Instead of which punishment, dealing well with thy people, thou gavest them their desire of delicious food, of a new taste, preparing for them quails for their meat:Ma in luogo di tali pene, tu facesti de' favori al tuo popolo concedendogli le bramate delizie di nuovo sapore, le quaglie:For the which torments thou didst wel dispose of thy people, to whom thou gauest the desire of their delectation a new taste, preparing them the quaile for meate:Pro quibus tormentis bene disposuisti populum tuum, / quibus dedisti concupiscentiam delectamenti sui novum saporem, / escam parans eis ortygometram: 3To the end, that they indeed desiring food, by means of those things that were shewn and sent among them, might loath even that which was necessary to satisfy their desire. But these, after suffering want for a short time, tasted a new meat.Talmente che quelli bramosi di cibo, a motivo di quelle bestie, che l'avevano sotto degli occhi mandate contro di loro, perdevano l'appetito del necessario, questi poi ridotti per poco tempo all'inopia gustarono nuove vivande;that they in deede coueting meate, because of those thinges which were shewed and sent them, might be turned away euen from necessarie concupiscence. But they in short time being made needie, tasted a new meate.ut illi quidem, concupiscentes escam / propter ea quæ illis ostensa et missa sunt, / etiam a necessaria concupiscentia averterentur. / Hi autem in brevi inopes facti, novam gustaverunt escam. 4For it was requisite that inevitable destruction should come upon them that exercised tyranny: but to these it should only be shewn how their enemies were destroyed.Perocché conveniva che irremediabile rovina venisse sopra di quelli, che la facevano da tiranni: a questi poi solamente si dimostrasse in qual guisa straziati fossero i loro nemici.For it behoued that without excuse destruction should come vpon them exercising tyrannie: but to these onlie to shew how their enemies were destroyed.Oportebat enim illis sine excusatione quidem / supervenire interitum exercentibus tyrannidem; / his autem tantum ostendere / quemadmodum inimici eorum exterminabantur.
5For when the fierce rage of beasts came upon these, they were destroyed by the bitings of crooked serpents.E allora quando contro di questi infierirono bestie crudeli, eglino erano messi a morte pelle morsicature di velenosi serpenti;For when the cruel wrath of beastes came vpon them, they were destroyed with the bytings of peruerse serpentsEtenim cum illis supervenit sæva bestiarum ira, / morsibus perversorum colubrorum exterminabantur. 6But thy wrath endured not for ever, but they were troubled for a short time for their correction, having a sign of salvation, to put them in remembrance of the commandment of thy law.Ma non per sempre durò il tuo sdegno, ma per poco tempo furono spaventati per loro emendazione, avendo ricevuto il segno di salute, perché si ricordassero de' comandamenti della tua legge.Howbeit thy wrath endured not for euer, but for chastisement they were trubled a short time, hauing a signe of saluation for the remembrance of the commandment of thy law.Sed non in perpetuum ira tua permansit, / sed ad correptionem in brevi turbati sunt, / signum habentes salutis ad commemorationem mandati legis tuæ. 7For he that turned to it, was not healed by that which he saw, but by thee, the Saviour of all.Al qual segno chi si rivolgeva, diventava sano, non in virtù di quel, ch'ei vedeva, ma per grazia di te Salvatore di tutti:For he that turned to it, was not healed by that which he saw, but by thee the sauiour of al:Qui enim conversus est, / non per hoc quod videbat sanabatur, / sed per te, omnium salvatorem. 8And in this thou didst shew to our enemies, that thou art he who deliverest from all evil.E con ciò facesti vedere a nostri nemici come tu se' colui, che liberi da ogni male.and in this thou didst shew to our enemies, that thou art he which deliuerest from al euil.In hoc autem ostendisti inimicis nostris / quia tu es qui liberas ab omni malo. 9For the bitings of locusts, and of flies, killed them, and there was found no remedy for their life: because they were worthy to be destroyed by such things.Perocché quelli perirono morsicati dallo locuste, e dalle mosche, nè si trovò rimedio per la loro vita, perché eran degni di essere sterminati da bestie tali:For the bitings of locusts, and flies killed them, and there was found no remedie for their life: because they were worthie to be destroyed by such thinges.Illos enim locustarum et muscarum occiderunt morsus, / et non est inventa sanitas animæ illorum, / quia digni erant ab hujuscemodi exterminari. 10But not even the teeth of venomous serpents overcame thy children: for thy mercy came and healed them.Ma i tuoi figliuoli neppur dai velenosi dragoni furono vinti, perché la tua misericordia venne a sanarli:But neither the teeth of venemous dragons ouercame thy children: for thy mercie coming healed them.Filios autem tuos nec draconum venenatorum vicerunt dentes: / misericordia enim tua adveniens sanabat illos.
11For they were examined for the remembrance of thy words, and were quickly healed, lest falling into deep forgetfulness, they might not be able to use thy help.Conciossiaché per farli ricordare de' tuoi precetti erano punti, e tosto erano salvati; affinchè non avvenisse, che perdutane affatto la memoria goder non potessero del tuo ajuto;For in memorie of thy wordes they were examined, & were quickly saued, lest falling into deepe obliuion, they might no• vse thy helpe.In memoria enim sermonum tuorum examinabantur, / et velociter salvabantur: / ne in altam incidentes oblivionem / non possent tuo uti adjutorio. 12For it was neither herb, nor mollifying plaster, that healed them, but thy word, O Lord, which healeth all things.Imperocché non fu né un'erba, né un lenitivo, che li guarì, ma la tua parola, o Signore, la quale tutto risana;For neither herbe, not pla•ster healed them, but thy word, ô Lord, which healeth al thinges.Etenim neque herba, neque malagma sanavit eos: / sed tuus, Domine, sermo, qui sanat omnia. 13For it is thou, O Lord, that hast power of life and death, and leadest down to the gates of death, and bringest back again:Perocché tu, o Signore, se' quello, che hai in tua balìa la vita, e la morte, e conduci fino alle porte di morte, e indietro richiami:For i• is thou, ô Lord, that hast powre of life and death, and bringest downe to the gates of death, and fetchest agayne:Tu es enim, Domine, qui vitæ et mortis habes potestatem, / et deducis ad portas mortis, et reducis. 14A man indeed killeth through malice, and when the spirit is gone forth, it shall not return, neither shall he call back the soul that is received:Or l'uomo ben può uccidere un altro per malvagità; ma partito, che sia lo spirito, egli non può far, che ritorni, nè richiamerà indietro l'anima altrove già ricettata.but man certes killeth by malice, and when the spirit is gone forth, it shal not returne, neither shal he cal backe the soule that is receiued:Homo autem occidit quidem per malitiam; / et cum exierit spiritus, non revertetur, / nec revocabit animam quæ recepta est. 15But it is impossible to escape thy hand:Ma di fuggire dalla tua mano non è possibile,but it is vnpossible to escape thy hand.Sed tuam manum effugere impossibile est. 16For the wicked that denied to know thee, were scourged by the strength of thy arm, being persecuted by strange waters, and hail, and rain, and consumed by fire.Quindi gli empj, che negavano di conoscerti, furon flagellati dal forte tuo braccio, perseguitati da acque nuove, e grandini, e tempeste, e consunti dal fuoco.For the impious denying to knowe thee, haue bene scourged by the strength of thine arme, suffering persecution by strange waters, and haile, and rayne, and consumed by fyre.Negantes enim te nosse impii, / per fortitudinem brachii tui flagellati sunt: / novis aquis, et grandinibus, / et pluviis persecutionem passi, / et per ignem consumpti.
17And which was wonderful, in water, which extinguisheth all things, the fire had more force: for the world fighteth for the just.E questo era il mirabile, che il fuoco attività maggiore aveva nell'acqua, la quale spegne ogni cosa, perché il mondo tutto fa le vendette de' giusti,For that which was meruelous in water, which extinquisheth al thinges, fyre more preuayled: for the world is reuenger of the iust.Quod enim mirabile erat, in aqua, quæ omnia extinguit, / plus ignis valebat: / vindex est enim orbis justorum. 18For at one time the fire was mitigated, that the beasts which were sent against the wicked might not be burnt, but that they might see, and perceive that they were persecuted by the judgment of God.Talora poi il fuoco si ammansiva, affinchè non ne fosser brugiate le bestie spedite contro degli empj, ond'eglino ciò veggendo sapessero come per giudizio divino erano straziati.For a certayne time, the fyre was mitigated, that the beasts which were sent to the impious might not be burnt, but that they seing might know that by Gods iudgement they suffer punishment.Quodam enim tempore mansuetabatur ignis, / ne comburerentur quæ ad impios missa erant animalia, / sed ut ipsi videntes scirent / quoniam Dei judicio patiuntur persecutionem. 19And at another time the fire, above its own power, burnt in the midst of water, to destroy the fruits of a wicked land.E in altro tempo il fuoco sopra la natural forza ardeva per ogni parte nell'acqua, affin di sperdere della iniqua terra le produzioni.And at a certaine time the fyre aboue his powre burnt in water on euerie side, that it might destroy the nation of a wicked land.Et quodam tempore in aqua / supra virtutem ignis exardescebat undique, / ut iniquæ terræ nationem exterminaret. 20Instead of which things, thou didst feed thy people with the food of angels, and gavest them bread from heaven, prepared without labour; having in it all that is delicious, and the sweetness of every taste.Ma all'opposto il popolo tuo nutristi col cibo degli Angeli, e dal cielo somministrasti ad essi un pane bell'e fatto senza loro fatica, contenente in se ogni delizia, ed ogni soave sapore;For the which thinges thou didst nourish thy people with the meate of Angels, and bread prepared thou gauest them from heauen without labour, hauing in it al delectation, and the sweetnes of al taste.Pro quibus angelorum esca nutrivisti populum tuum, / et paratum panem de cælo præstitisti illis sine labore, / omne delectamentum in se habentem, / et omnis saporis suavitatem.
21For thy sustenance shewed thy sweetness to thy children, and serving every man’s will, it was turned to what every man liked.Perocché quella tua sostanza dimostrava come tu se' dolce inverso i figliuoli, e adattandosi al genio di ciascheduno, ella diventava quello, che ciascuno voleva:For thy substance did shew thy sweetnes which thou hast toward thy children, and seruing euerie mans wil, it was turned to that, that euerie man would.Substantia enim tua dulcedinem tuam, / quam in filios habes, ostendebat; / et deserviens uniuscujusque voluntati, / ad quod quisque volebat convertebatur. 22But snow and ice endured the force of fire, and melted not: that they might know that the fire, burning in the hail, and flashing in the rain, destroyed the fruits of the enemies.Ma la neve, ed il ghiaccio reggevano alla forza del fuoco senza liquefarsi; affinché (i tuoi) vedessero come i frutti de' nemici erano distrutti dal fuoco ardente, che folgoreggiava in mezzo alla grandine, ed alla pioggia.Yea snow and yee susteyned the force of fyre, and melted not: that they might know that fyre burning in hayle, and lightening in rayne destroyed the fruites of the enemies.Nix autem et glacies sustinebant vim ignis, et non tabescebant: / ut scirent quoniam fructus inimicorum exterminabat / ignis ardens in grandine et pluvia coruscans; 23But this same again, that the just might be nourished, did even forget its own strength.E qui all'opposto perché i giusti avessero onde sostentarsi, si scordò egli della sua stessa virtù.And this againe, that the iust might be nourished, it forgat also his owne strength.hic autem iterum ut nutrirentur justi, / etiam suæ virtutis oblitus est. 24For the creature serving thee, the Creator, is made fierce against the unjust for their punishment: and abateth its strength for the benefit of them that trust in thee.Perocché la creatura, che serve a te suo facitore, gli ardori raddoppia e a tormentare gli ingiusti, e mite diventa in pro di quelli, che in te confidano.For the creature seruing thee the Creatour, is fierce into torment against the vniust: and is made more gentle to doe good for them, that trust in thee.Creatura enim tibi factori deserviens, / exardescit in tormentum adversus injustos, / et lenior fit ad benefaciendum pro his qui in te confidunt. 25Therefore even then it was transformed into all things, and was obedient to thy grace, that nourisheth all, according to the will of them that desired it of thee:E quindi ancora (la creatura) trasfigurandosi allora in tutte guise serviva alla tua benignità nutrice di tutti secondo i voti di quelli, che a te ricorrevano.For this cause euen then being transformed into al thinges they serued thy grace the nource of al, at their wil that desired thee:Propter hoc et tunc in omnia transfigurata, / omnium nutrici gratiæ tuæ deserviebat, / ad voluntatem eorum qui a te desiderabant:
26That thy children, O Lord, whom thou lovedst, might know that it is not the growing of fruits that nourisheth men, but thy word preserveth them that believe in thee.Affinchè i tuoi figliuoli amati da te, o Signore, riconoscessero come non i frutti rinascenti pascono gli uomini, ma la tua parola è quella che conserva chi crede in te.that thy children might know, whom thou louedst ô Lord, that not the fruites of natiuitie doe feede men, but thy word preserueth them, that beleue in thee.ut scirent filii tui quos dilexisti, Domine, / quoniam non nativitatis fructus pascunt homines, / sed sermo tuus hos qui in te crediderint conservat. 27For that which could not be destroyed by fire, being warmed with a little sunbeam, presently melted away:Perocché quello, che non poteva esser consunto dal fuoco, riscaldato a un piccol raggio del sole squagliavasi.For that which could not be destroyed by fyre, forthwith being heated with a litle beame of the sunne did melt:Quod enim ab igne non poterat exterminari, / statim ab exiguo radio solis calefactum tabescebat: 28That it might be known to all, that we ought to prevent the sun to bless thee, and adore thee at the dawning of the light.Affinché sapessero tutti, come dee prevenirsi il sole per la benedizione, e si dee alla levata del sole adorarti.that it might be knowen to al men, that we ought to preuent the sunne to blesse thee, and at the rysing of light to adore thee.ut notum omnibus esset / quoniam oportet prævenire solem ad benedictionem tuam, / et ad ortum lucis te adorare. 29For the hope of the unthankful shall melt away as the winter’s ice, and shall run off as unprofitable water.Perocché la speranza dell'ingrato, come il ghiaccio dell'inverno si scioglie, e si sperde come acqua inutile.For the fayth of the vngratful shal melt as winter yee, & shal perish as vnprofitable water.Ingrati enim spes tamquam hibernalis glacies tabescet, / et disperiet tamquam aqua supervacua.
16:1
Haydock
Things. Septuagint, "therefore by similar things they," etc. (Haydock)
16:2
Worthington
Meat. The second time, God gave them in his anger: but still he dealt favourably with his people, (Exodus 16:13., and Numbers 11:7.; Calmet) punishing them as a father, for their amendment. (Worthington)
16:3
Challoner
They indeed desiring food, etc. He means the Egyptians; who were restrained even from that food which was necessary, by the frogs and the flies that were sent amongst them, and spoiled all their meats. (Challoner)
Calmet
Exodus 8:3. (Calmet)
Challoner
These. The Israelites. (Challoner)
Menochius
New meat. Quails. (Menochius)
16:6
Calmet
Sign of salvation. The brazen serpent, an emblem of Christ our Saviour; (Challoner) and of the obedience which they should shew to God's commands. (Calmet)
Worthington
The sign could have no inherent value; but, as a token of God's favour, was the means of curing the people. (Worthington)
16:12
Calmet
Plaster, malagma. The remedy ordained by God was not naturally efficacious. (Calmet)
St. Augustine
"Every wound of the soul has its medicine in the Scriptures." (St. Augustine, Psalm xxxvi.)
16:17
Challoner
The fire had more force. Viz., When the fire and hail mingled together laid waste the land of Egypt, Exodus ix. (Challoner)
Worthington
This destroyed the useful cattle, but not such as infested the Egyptians. (Worthington)
The water seemed to nourish the flames, 3 Kings 18:39.
16:18
Calmet
Mitigated. The Egyptians could not banish the insects with fire and smoke, (Jansenius) or the storm sent by God, did not exterminate the sciniphs, which had caused the magicians to acknowledge a miracle, Exodus 8:18. The frogs and flies were already gone, Ibid.[Exodus viii.?] 11., and 31. (Calmet)
16:20
Worthington
Angels. See Exodus xvi. (Worthington)
If angels stood in need of food, they could have nothing more delicious. So water is styled honey, to denote its excellence, Psalm 77:25., Leviticus 20:24., and Joel 3:18.
Calmet
Taste. These expressions are figurative. (Calmet)
16:21
Naz. or. xlix
Sustenance. Literally, "substance," which some explain (Calmet) of God himself preparing this delicious food. (Naz. or. xlix.)
Valentia
Liked. So that if a person wished to eat an egg, etc., the manna became one, without altering its appearance, which is the case in the blessed Eucharist. (Valentia, 4 disp. 6., etc.)
St. Gregory
But this opinion supposes a continued miracle, which seems not necessary, and it is generally believed that the taste alone was changed, which St. Augustine and others restrain to God's faithful servants, otherwise the Hebrews could not have been disgusted with manna, Numbers 11:6., and 21:5. To these it was therefore simply manna. But the others found in it whatever they could desire. (St. Gregory, Mor. 6:9.)
Menochius
Yet according to others, (Haydock) both enjoyed the same privilege. (Menochius)
We cannot account for men's fancies.
16:26
Calmet
Word. Deuteronomy 8:3., and Matthew 4:4. Fruits, of themselves, could not support man. (Calmet)
16:28
Calmet
Light. Those who desire to receive any favour must seek it with diligence, as the manna was to be gathered before sun-rise. (Clarius.) (Calmet)
16:29
Haydock
Water. The ungrateful and negligent shall find their hopes frustrated, (Calmet) as well as the wicked, who expect salvation (Worthington) without a change of manners. (Haydock)
Menochius
Ingratitude stops the fountain of grace. (Menochius)
16:3
They indeed desiring food, etc.... He means the Egyptians; who were restrained even from that food which was necessary, by the frogs and the flies that were sent amongst them, and spoiled all their meats.—Ibid. But these.... Viz., the Israelites.
16:6
16:17
16:1
The Aegyptians were plagued for their idolatrie.
And that by beastes, because they worshipped beastes for goddes: and by death of their first begotten, for their crueltie against Gods people.
16:4
God punished his owne people as a father, for their amendment.
16:7
The brasen serpent not by anie vertue inherent, but as a signe of Gods fauoure, vvas the meanes of curing the people. Num. 21.
16:17
VVith the plague of haile there vvas also fire mixed. Exo. 9. v. 24. VVhich destroyed the profitable cattle.
16:18
But burnt not other beastes, that plagued the Aegyptians.
16:19
Haile did not extinguish the fire, by Gods povvre aboue nature.
16:20
See the miracles of Manna. Annoe. Exod 16.
16:27
He speaketh againe of Manna.
16:29
The vaine imagination of the vvicked that himself shal be saued vvil faile him.
16:14
St Gregory of Nyssa † AD 395 On the Holy Spirit 1
… What pitiable, what wretched madness! They understand not what they are themselves when they talk like this, and what the Holy Spirit against Whom they insolently range themselves. Who will tell these people that men are “a spirit that goeth forth and returneth not again
16:21
St Augustine of Hippo † AD 430 Letters of St. Augustin 54.4
… both miserable through sin, and both obtaining the mercy they required. We may further borrow an illustration here, from the fact that the manna given to the ancient people of God tasted in each man’s mouth as he desired that it might.
16:24
St Methodius † AD 311 From the Discourse on the Resurrection, Part I 1
… For truly, O beneficent and bountiful Lord, “the creature that serveth Thee, who art the Maker, increaseth his strength against the unrighteous for their punishment, and abateth his strength for the benefit of such as put their trust in Thee;”
St Augustine of Hippo † AD 430 On the Holy Trinity 3.1
… Therefore, even then was it altered into all fashions, and was obedient to Thy grace, that nourisheth all things according to the desire of them that longed for Thee.”
16:29
St John Chrysostom † AD 407 The Homilies of St. John Chrysostom 25
… Since neither were the Jews by anything ruined so much, as by being unthankful; those many stripes, one after another, were brought upon them by nothing else than this; or rather even before those stripes this had ruined and corrupted their soul. “For the hope of the unthankful,” saith one, “is like the winter’s hoar frost;”
16:2
the meaning is, thou hast given and prepared food for those eagerly desiring it, in place of food of a new flavor and one not yet before tasted by them, namely quail. The Hebrews sinned through gluttony and murmuring, for while manna rained from heaven, despising it as a light and thin food, they murmured against Moses and demanded solid and substantial meats; but God indulged their gluttony, and by wind drove a multitude of quail into the camp of the Hebrews, so that they might catch, cook and eat them; and this he did daily for the space of one month: which done, he punished their gluttony and murmuring with a plague, by which he killed very many. Whence the place was called the graves of lust, Numbers XIX, 34; whence tropologically St. Augustine, tract. 73 in John, teaches both wisely and elegantly that it is a sign of God's wrath if our lusts obtain their desires, but of mercy if he denies them: for thus he says: 'The apostle James says, cap. I, vers. 3: You ask and receive not, because you ask amiss, or spend it upon your lusts; therefore he who would use badly what he wishes to receive, God mercifully does not give it to him; therefore if this is asked of him whereby man would be harmed, it is more to be feared lest what he could not give in mercy, he give in anger. Did we not see the Israelites obtain to their harm what they asked with culpable lust? For they desired to eat flesh, which rained down as manna from heaven. They despised indeed what they had, and impudently asked for what they did not have: as if they would not better ask, not that food which was lacking be provided with unseemly desire, but that that which was present be taken with cured disgust: for when evil things delight us and good things do not delight us, we ought rather to ask God that good things delight us, than that evil things be granted.' A new flavor of meats, namely of quail, because manna no longer pleased the Hebrews sufficiently: again a new flavor is not only that which thou hast not yet experienced, but also that which is precious and pleasant, thus a canticle is called new, that is, beautiful and pleasant, new wine, new commandment, that we love one another: new, that is, excellent and most sweet; so our Lorinus. Add, that when God sends food to anyone, he is accustomed to send worthy, that is, not common and vulgar, but excellent and distinguished food, and therefore to impart to it a new flavor, so that it may appear far more pleasant and savory than other similar foods: thus the wine which Christ made from water at Cana of Galilee was excellent and most savory, John II, 10. A plainly similar example is found in the Life of St. Columban, cap. XXIX: For St. Columban, rebuking Theodoric king of the Franks for concubinage, was driven by him into exile, and with his companions suffered from hunger, but although food was lacking, faith remained undefiled and unshaken, which would obtain necessary things from the Lord, and when they had already suffered from three days' fasting, such a multitude of birds was offered to them as covered the camp of the Israelites with flying quail, so that birds filled that entire place. But the man of God understood that these provisions were exhibited on account of his own and his companions' necessity, namely such as would not be found except in that place where he himself dwelt; he therefore commands his followers first to give praise and thanks to the Creator, and then to take the provisions. It was truly a wonderful and amazing miracle: the birds were caught as the father commanded, nor did those furnished with winged flight withdraw themselves, but for three days that manna of birds remained. On the fourth day then a certain bishop from neighboring cities sent a supply of grain to blessed Columban by divine inspiration. Soon therefore as the grain arrived, those birds, at God's command, all flew away. Moreover from Eustachius, who at that time was under the obedience of the man of God with others, relating it we learned that there was none among them who remembered having seen such birds before that time. But the flavor of them was such that it surpassed royal provisions.' Thus far the Author of the Life. ORTYGOMETRA. Quails are called in Greek ortygai from Ortygia, an island in Greece where they were first seen, as Isidore says, book XII of the Etymologies, chapter VII; but what does the word ortygometra mean? First, Jansenius thinks metra is derived from metron, that is, measure, so that ortygometra is the measure and moderatrix of other quails in flying, when they change places; but metron is written with a short e, metra however with a long a. I say therefore that metra is derived from metra, that is, matrix, or meter, that is, mother; ortygometra therefore is the mother of quails, or a king greater and darker than other quails, who leads and conducts the flock of quails, whom the others consequently follow as their leader, just as bees follow their king: thus Pliny, book X, XXIII, and Aristotle, book VIII of the History of Animals, chapter XII, Hesychius, Gaza and others. Understand therefore under ortygometra, as under a leader, the whole army of quails, as is evident from Numbers XI, 31, where our translator renders the Hebrew selav as quails; the Septuagint however renders it ortygometra: the Wise Man follows the Septuagint in this manner here; hence the Italians call ortygometra il re delle quaglie; the French, le roi, ou mère des cailles: thus Aldrovandus in his work on the Quail. Peter Nannius adds at this place: I see, he says, that the word metra is added to certain animals when larger ones of that kind are designated, as echinometra, that is, a larger and spikier sea urchin, of which Pliny speaks, book IX, chapter XXI; leonimetra, that is, a larger lion, of which Gesner speaks in his work on the Lion: thus ortygometra is a larger and thicker quail; for it is likely that those miraculous quails sent to the Hebrews, as a work of God, were larger, fatter, more delicious, and more excellent than others. I have said more about this entire history in Exodus, chapter XVI, verse 12, and Numbers, chapter XI, verse 31. 3. THAT THEY INDEED, DESIRING FOOD ON ACCOUNT OF THOSE THINGS WHICH WERE SHOWN AND SENT TO THEM, WERE EVEN TURNED AWAY FROM NECESSARY DESIRE: BUT THESE, MADE POOR IN A SHORT TIME, TASTED NEW FOOD. He continues to show the disparity of the foods of the Egyptians and the Hebrews, as if to say: Upon the Egyptians you sent frogs, flies, locusts, etc., but to the Hebrews you gave manna and ortygometra, so that they (namely the Egyptians, when through hunger they desired food) on account of those things (namely the animals already mentioned) which were shown to them, (that is, exhibited and) sent upon them as a punishment, so that they would foul and defile their foods, nauseating at this foulness and filth, were even turned away from necessary desire, that is, from food desired and necessary, and loathed and abhorred it, and thus wasted away from hunger and want. But these, (namely the Hebrews,) made poor in a short time (in Greek, for a short time), afflicted by want, (namely having experienced hunger for a short period), tasted new food, namely ortygometra, which with a new and pleasing flavor wonderfully refreshed them, as if to say: The Egyptians, on account of the frogs, flies, gnats sent upon them, which rushed in swarms upon their tables and foods and infected them, were not only not satisfied by them, but also lost the appetite for necessary food and became nauseated by it; but the Hebrews, by the sending of new and heavenly food, namely of the most delicate quails, felt a new appetite and perceived a new sweetness of new flavor in eating: see what is said in Exodus VIII, 3: for quails are very fat and of the best flavor, and these sent by God to the Hebrews were fatter and more savory than others. For deikhtheisan, that is, shown, namely food, since God showed and exhibited to the Egyptians frogs instead of foods, the Vatican manuscript more forcefully reads sidekhtheisan, that is, the deformity hateful and detestable, namely of the frogs and foods which the frogs defiled: on account of this deformity the Egyptians were also turned away from all desire and appetite for necessary foods: for although hunger pressed upon them, yet the filthiness of foods brought such nausea upon them that they abhorred all, and therefore perished from want, thus Cantacuzenus, Lyra, Dionysius and others: wherefore less genuinely do St. Bonaventure and Hugh take the first part of this verse, not of the Egyptians, but of the Hebrews, as if to say: God gave the Hebrews new food, namely ortygometra, so that through it he would take away from them the desire for foods to which they had become accustomed in Egypt: for there is a manifest antithesis when he says, but these, namely the Hebrews, whom he opposes to the Egyptians, of whom he had already spoken.
16:4
5, 6 and 7. FOR INDEED WHEN THERE CAME UPON THEM THE FIERCE ANGER OF BEASTS, THEY WERE DESTROYED BY THE BITES OF PERVERSE SERPENTS. BUT THY ANGER DID NOT REMAIN FOR EVER, BUT THEY WERE TROUBLED FOR A SHORT TIME FOR CORRECTION, HAVING A SIGN OF SALVATION TO REMEMBER THE COMMANDMENT OF THY LAW. FOR HE THAT TURNED TO IT WAS NOT HEALED BY THAT WHICH HE SAW, BUT BY THEE THE SAVIOUR OF ALL. The fierce anger of beasts is the fury of serpents, which God sent upon the Hebrews on account of their murmuring. By another example he shows how unequal was the punishment by which God punished the Hebrews and the Egyptians: for the Egyptians he killed and destroyed inevitably by frogs, locusts, and gnats; but to the Hebrews against the serpents sent upon them he assigned a remedy. For when the Hebrews in the desert, on account of the labour of the journey, murmured against God and Moses, God sent fiery serpents upon those who murmured, which by their bite killed many; but when the others were struck by their example and repented, Moses praying, God immediately assigned a remedy against the bite, commanding Moses to raise up a brazen serpent, which those who looked upon were healed, Numbers XXI, 4 and following: see the things said there, for it is not necessary to repeat them here. God therefore did not wish to destroy the Hebrews by this plague, as he destroyed the Egyptians, but to recall them by a slight chastisement to duty and repentance, and by the punishment of a few to establish his commands and public discipline. He fittingly sent serpents upon those who murmured, because he who murmurs and detracts in secret hisses like a serpent, and breathes forth the pestilent venom of cursing with his pestilent tongue upon those who hear, according to that passage in Ecclesiasticus X, 11: 'If a serpent bite in silence, he is no better that speaketh slanderously.' See the things said there. For perverse, in Greek it is skolion, that is, tortuous. FOR CORRECTION (eis nouthesian, that is, for admonition, so that by this plague they might be warned not to murmur, but to obey God and Moses patiently and steadfastly) HAVING A SIGN (in Greek, symbolum) OF SALVATION. He notes, first, the brazen serpent raised up by Moses at God's command, to heal the bite of serpents: for this serpent is called a sign and symbol, because it itself, being brazen and inanimate, could not be the cause of health and confer it; hence it was only a sign, by which those who used it, bitten by fiery serpents, that is, burning with their bite, namely by looking upon it, were immediately healed by God: this is what he adds, 'for he that turned to it,' that is, he who turned his face to the brazen serpent, beholding it, 'was not healed by that which he saw,' that is, not by the serpent, 'but by thee the Saviour of all.' This serpent therefore was a sign of salvation, and that 'to remember the commandment of thy law,' so that namely by that the Hebrews might be made mindful, and might remember the divine mercy towards the penitent, and the vengeance towards the rebellious and disobedient to the law. Secondly, thus expound it, as if to say: Just as those obedient to the command of God bidding them look upon the brazen serpent, if they wished to obtain salvation, were healed, so from this very thing they could know and ought to know that they could not be freed from torments and from inflicted evils, unless they looked upon the law and obeyed its commandments, or unless they no longer murmured against divine precepts, but accustomed themselves to obey God's ministers: or certainly that they could not obtain health unless they looked upon the author of the law and the liberator from evils, Christ, because 'as Moses lifted up the serpent in the desert, so must the Son of Man be lifted up, that whosoever believeth in him may not perish, but may have life everlasting,' John III, 14. Allegorically, this serpent in form similar to true and living serpents, but lacking their venom, signified Christ innocent, yet esteemed noxious and wicked, crucified for us: hence it was brazen, to signify the divinity and eternity of Christ; likewise the brightness of Christ's cross, resounding like sounding brass throughout the whole world: thus St. Augustine, Theodosius, Nyssenus, indeed Christ himself, John III, 14, whose words I have already recited. Wherefore Caesarius of Arles, homily 4 On Easter: 'The remedy,' he says, 'if we wish, is even now fulfilled for us, when sin is cured by the knowledge of sin itself, and crime is abolished by the confession of crime: and if a man when he says with the Prophet, For I know my iniquities, and my sin is always before me, when he well regards his sin, he heals the bite of the serpent, through the sight of the serpent.' Moreover the true Ophites, that is, the serpentine ones (for ophis is serpent), were ancient heretics, who from the fact that, Genesis III, 1, it is said that the serpent was most cunning, and in seducing Eve gave occasion for the knowledge of good and evil, worshipped the serpent as a god. and preferred it to Christ, saying that wisdom itself became a serpent: wherefore Moses, admiring its power and majesty, made an image of it, the brazen serpent, which whoever was bitten by a serpent and looked upon it would be healed: indeed they said that Christ's serpent emulated this power and compared itself to it, saying, John III, 14: 'As Moses lifted up the serpent in the desert, so must the Son of Man be lifted up.' See Irenaeus, book I Against Heresies, chapter XXXVI; Epiphanius, Heresy 37; Tertullian, Augustine and others in Heresy of the Ophites.
16:11
INTO A DEEP (in Greek, batheian, that is, profound: thus elsewhere deep things are often called high, because they are high not upward, but downward) FORGETFULNESS (of thy promises and precepts) THEY COULD NOT USE THY HELP. In Greek, ina me aperispastoi genontai tes ses euergesians, that is, lest they become immovable, or irretractable, or rather irretrievable by thy benefit, who namely could not be drawn back by it, which Our [translator] clearly renders, they could not use thy help; perhaps also Our [translator], says Jansenius, read anyperispasta, that is, undefended, who namely would not be covered by the shield of thy beneficence, O Lord, nor would be defended from the assault of evils. The sense is, first, as if to say: By the bite of serpents, and their miraculous healing through the brazen serpent, thou didst stir up, O Lord, the Hebrews, that they might remember thee and thy law, lest falling into deep forgetfulness of it, they could not be recalled to fruitfulness either by thy past or future benefits, and thus their salvation would be despaired of, so that they could no longer use thy help; for deep forgetfulness of God's law and the divine law brings on impenitence, hardness of heart, and despair of salvation, whereby it comes to pass that God abandons such people and withdraws his help from them; hence they cannot be drawn back from sins, and death and hell, into which they are prone to rush: for 'the wicked, when he shall come into the depth of sins, contemneth,' Prov. XVIII, 3. Secondly, it could be expounded, as if to say: Lest, forgetting God, and therefore in turn being forgotten by God, as if already proscribed and lost, they could no longer experience God's aid, as is said of the dead in Psalm LXXXVII, 6: 'Like the wounded sleeping in the sepulchres, whom thou rememberest no more, and they are cast off from thy hand.' Thirdly, Cantacuzenus explains it, as if to say: Lest, being forgetful, they could not think of thy benefits, and be drawn away from thinking of them, nor be drawn by them to the thinking and remembrance of thy benefits and of thee, their benefactor. Fourthly, others [say], as if to say: Lest, forgetting thee, they could no longer use thy help, that is, the benefit by which thou didst heal them: for God did not heal those struck by serpents unless they, stirred by this goad, shook off forgetfulness and turned to God in penitence seeking aid; for the impenitent were unworthy of God's help. Fifthly, our [commentator] from Castro, fittingly and connectedly: By these words, he says, the reason for the new benefit, contained in the adverb swiftly they were saved, is given: for God was not content with that benefit which he conferred on his sons, namely that, stirred by the goad, they would come to remembrance of the transgressed commandments, nor did he delay, as he could have, healing; but he added this also more abundantly, lest healing be delayed by many and prolonged remedies applied, as men are accustomed to do, and defer the cure and healing into many days; but immediately, swiftly, by one look at the brazen serpent they were healed: and the reason for this was, lest if healing were delayed for a long time, having become forgetful of God's law, they would afterward be difficult to draw back from that forgetfulness by the benefit of healing, which would then be ascribed by them not to God, but to remedies: this exposition is favored by the reason which he subjoins. Again, physically it could thus be expounded, as if to say: They were swiftly healed from the bite of serpents, lest if they were healed slowly and tardily, the burning (for the serpents were fiery and burning) venom of the serpents would invade the brain and drive them into frenzy, madness, and fury, as those bitten by rabid dogs, unless the wound be immediately treated, are driven to madness: for driven into frenzy they would have been incurable; for the insane would not have wished to look upon the brazen serpent, nor would the sane have been able to look upon it, especially because this looking had to be done by a man free, and repenting of his murmuring, and seeking pardon and aid from God, which the frenzied could not do; hence then, falling into deep forgetfulness of their own remedy and cure, they could not have used God's help, namely the brazen serpent given to them for the remedy of their evil. From all these explanations the first seems the plainest, to which if thou add both the last ones it will become full and perfect, as if to say: 'In remembrance,' or, as the Greek has it: in memory, 'of thy words they were examined,' that is, so that the murmuring Hebrews might become mindful of thy precepts and of obedience owed to thee, O Lord, by the bites of serpents, as if by a certain examination of thine they were pricked by a goading stimulus, as the Greek has it; but also, repenting, they were swiftly healed, so that they might know and understand that this plague of serpents was sent by thee, and to the murmuring, and recalled from the penitent: for if thou hadst delayed healing longer, they would have thought that this plague of serpents was either not sent by thee, but happened by chance from the nature of the place, or was not healed by thee, but by the brazen serpent, or by the temperament of the air or some other chance; or certainly, the burning venom of the serpents suddenly penetrating the brain, driven into frenzy, they would have fallen into forgetfulness of thee and of all things, nor could they have been recalled from either, or could have used thy aid any longer and the benefit of the brazen serpent, being now bereft of reason through frenzy, delirious and insane. recalled: for if thou hadst deferred healing for a longer time, they would have thought that this plague of serpents was either not sent by thee, but happened by chance from the nature of the place, or was not healed by thee, but by the brazen serpent, or by the temperament of the air or some other chance; or certainly, the burning venom of the serpents suddenly penetrating the brain, driven into frenzy, they would have fallen into forgetfulness of thee and of all things, nor could they have been recalled from either, or could have used thy aid any longer and the benefit of the brazen serpent, being now bereft of reason through frenzy, delirious and insane.
16:12
Mystically, the word of God, especially Holy Scripture, cures the wounds and diseases of the soul: for, as St. Augustine says in Psalm XXXVI: 'Every disease of the soul has its remedy in Scripture:' the same doctrine is taught by St. Chrysostom, homily 42 on Genesis; whence St. Paula used to heal whatever passions and afflictions of her soul by turning over in her mouth and mind the sentences of Holy Scripture suited to them, as St. Jerome relates in her Epitaph. The same thing is asserted by St. Basil, epistle 1 to Gregory the Theologian, and he confirms it by examples: if anyone, he says, is tempted by lust, he has in the Scriptures Joseph, whom he may imitate as fighting even unto prison for chastity; if he is vexed by diseases, he has the patience of Job set before him as a mirror; if he is attacked by the injuries of enemies, he has David enduring the persecutions of Saul; if he is harassed by reproaches from his subjects, he has Moses, most gentle, whom he may emulate. Poultice. It is a Greek word signifying a soothing medicine, or fomentation, from malasso, that is, I soften, I mitigate, I subdue, I foment; whence Galen, book V of Simple Medicines, teaches that poultices are emollient drugs, which soften hardened concretions; these concretions and swellings, he says, occur especially around the heads of muscles and their tendons. And he adds that these drugs, so that what is hardened may be conveniently melted, and gradually dispersed by evaporation, ought to be neither too hot nor too dry: such are ammoniac, bdellium, butter. Moreover, poultices have different kinds, and are suited to different parts for multiple effects: for some digest matter, some extract it, which together are called one thing; some have an opening power, and are therefore called anoiktika; most are fitted to certain members, such as the liver, spleen, joints. There are poultices for scrofula, tumors, parotids, for dropsy, for stopping blood, and other things of this kind. Furthermore, physicians distinguish poultices from plasters in that the former are properly emollient, and therefore are made chiefly from flowers and their twigs: for poultices are fomentations of a hard thing, for example, applied to an abscess, so that they may soften it; plasters, however, are drugs which close, obstruct and seal the pores of the skin, and are therefore composed of crushed metallic substances, or of viscous and tenacious matter, such as almond oil, pompholix, ceruse, washed lime, cimolia, and the like, concerning which Galen, books IV and V of Simple Medicines. A plaster is called from emplasso, that is, I knead, I form into a mass, I smear, I stuff, I solder, I obstruct, I fill. But other writers often take poultice for any plaster, and vice versa, so it seems to be taken here. From what has been said it is gathered that God did not wish the brazen serpent to be worshipped, but only to be looked upon as a sign, so that all praise and honor of healing might be given to God: wherefore although Catharinus and Sanderus, book II On Images, chapter III, think that the Hebrews exhibited veneration to the serpent by inclination of the head and submission of the body, yet it is more true that they did not do this to the serpent, but to God before the serpent; indeed our Vasquez, III part, Question XXI, disputation 104, denies that they bowed before the serpent, but contends that they merely looked upon it; yet that some veneration could have been exhibited to it he asserts, St. Augustine, book III On the Trinity, chapter X.
16:13
death, so also there are various and different fathers: for before Christ, those dying went into the bosom of Abraham, children to limbo, sinners to hell, the just infected with venial fault to purgatory, and in each of these places there are various states, degrees, orders and places according to each one's merit or demerit. Moreover, according to the letter, death here as well as life is understood as corporeal, mystically as spiritual: for spiritually the soul lives to God through grace, and blessedly through glory; but it dies through sin, and is condemned to the second death through the punishments of hell; whence Cantacuzenus thinks that the resurrection is noted here anagogically, because he says: God is the Lord of death and life, hence he will raise up his elect in the resurrection from death to blessed and eternal life. The antistrophe to this maxim is that of Anna, the mother of Samuel, I Kings II, 6: 'The Lord killeth and maketh alive, bringeth down to hell and bringeth back;' and before that the earlier one of Moses, Deuteronomy XXXII, 39: 'See that I alone am, and there is no other God beside me: I will kill and I will make to live, I will strike and I will heal;' hence also Christ is said to have the keys of death and hell, Apocalypse I, 18: see the things said there. TO THE GATES OF DEATH, in Greek, Hadou, that is of hell, because formerly before Christ all those dying went to the infernal regions, at least to the limbo of the fathers; whence hell is called the region of the dead, or that which the dead inhabit: moreover our author from Castro takes through the gates of hell as death itself: for death is as it were a gate, through which one enters into hell; whence he thus explains that saying of Christ, Matthew XVI, 18: 'And the gates of hell shall not prevail against it,' that is to say: There is no kind of death which will be able to abolish the confession of Peter and the faith of the Church, so that there should not be in the Church a faithful and holy one who would not willingly await death to defend it. But the more genuine sense of that passage is different, and here the gates of hell, or, as our author translates it, of death, do not signify death itself, but the dangers of death and hell: for the Hebrews were not brought back from death itself, but from the dangers of death to health.
16:14
For 'will not return,' in Greek it is ouk anastrephei, which Jansenius translates actively as 'will not cause to return,' namely the slayer will not cause the soul of the slain to return to the body, so as to correspond to the Hebrew conjugation hiphil, which gives to neuter verbs an active signification. For 'nor will he recall,' Our [translation] perhaps reads, ou de anakabisei; already they read, ou de analyei; or, as the Aldine edition has it, oude analysei, which can be translated 'will not recall,' namely the slayer will not recall the soul of the slain; properly, however, many translate it 'does not dissolve,' that is, does not extinguish the soul, as if to say: The slayer by killing dissolves the body and separates it from the soul; but he cannot dissolve the soul: for the soul is simple and uncompounded, and therefore incorruptible and eternal, according to that saying of Christ, Matthew X, 28: 'Fear not them that kill the body, and are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him that can destroy both soul and body in hell.' Moreover, St. Jerome, in Daniel, chapter VII, and St. Ambrose, epistle 21, hold that the souls of all the dying, both good and evil, are received by angels; but it seems more true that the souls of the good are received by angels and led into heaven, as the soul of Lazarus was led by them into the bosom of Abraham, Luke XVI; but the souls of the evil are received by demons, so that they may snatch them away with them into the depths. St. Gregory recounts examples of Chrysaorius and others, book IV of the Dialogues.
16:16
For new waters, in Greek it is new hyetoi, that is, rains; but for rains, in Greek it is ombrois, that is, showers: for from the Greek ombros, the Latin imber is derived; he calls them new, both because in Egypt it is accustomed to rain rarely, or never: wherefore these were new and unaccustomed rains sent upon Egypt by Moses; and because they were immense and terrible, which would completely prostrate the crops and other things. Moreover hyetos, that is, rain, differs from ombros, that is, shower, in that rain is milder and more subtle and rarer; but a shower is more violent, greater and denser, whence ombros is said from omou, that is, flowing together, because in a shower waters flow together in troops and fall down. AND CONSUMED BY FIRE. For fire was mixed with the hail, which burned up all things, as is evident from Exodus IX, 24: "And the hail and fire were mingled together;"; and Psalm CIV, 32: "He gave them hail for rain, and flaming fire in their land." Philo adds, and others, that this fire was ignited lightning, which fire, that is, ignited arrows, coals, and burning embers, mixed with storms and tempests were hurled and darted upon the Egyptians: see what is said at Exodus IX, 24. 17, 18 and 19. FOR WHAT WAS WONDERFUL WAS, IN WATER, WHICH EXTINGUISHES ALL THINGS, FIRE HAD MORE POWER: FOR HE IS THE AVENGER OF THE WORLD OF THE JUST. FOR AT SOME TIME FIRE WAS MADE GENTLE, LEST THOSE ANIMALS WHICH WERE SENT AGAINST THE WICKED SHOULD BE BURNED: BUT THAT THEY THEMSELVES SEEING MIGHT KNOW, THAT BY THE JUDGMENT OF GOD THEY SUFFER PERSECUTION. AND AT SOME TIME IN WATER BEYOND THE POWER OF FIRE IT BURNED ON ALL SIDES, THAT IT MIGHT DESTROY THE NATION OF THE WICKED LAND. He now exaggerates the aforesaid plague of hail, and recounts its wonders, and as it were miracles, namely that in it things most contrary to each other, namely water and fire, were allied, and conspired against the wicked Egyptians, so much so that heaven and all the elements, namely fire, air, water and earth seemed to have conspired for their destruction; he says therefore: "For what was wonderful," (in Greek paradoxotaton, that is, most paradoxical, most new and wonderful, surpassing all opinion, as much as the force of nature) "in water, which extinguishes all things, fire had more power," that is to say, In the plague of hail, water which is accustomed to extinguish fire, so far from extinguishing it, was overcome by fire, nay rather water added strength and force to fire: for in it fire burned with greater violence, as if water were nourished like oil, according to that saying of Tragedy: "And the flames are nourished." Thus in the sacrifice of Elias, fire burst forth from the victim sprinkled with water, III Kings XVIII, 34; just as from the watered sacrifice of Nehemias, II Maccabees I, 20. Thus naturally artificial fires, which are commonly called Greek by the Greeks, are not extinguished by water, but rather nourished; nay, and lime is not quenched by water, but kindled, which as it were a miracle of nature St. Augustine wonders at, book XXI, Of the City of God, chapter IV. Moreover, that he says this is paradoxotaton, is true, for naturally all fire burns and consumes frogs, flies and other animals: wherefore although Aristotle, Pliny, and from them St. Augustine, book XXI Of the City of God, chapter IV, assert that the salamander lives in fire, yet this should be understood so that on account of its coldness and sluggishness it resists fire for some time and endures in it: for if it persists in it longer, it is finally consumed by it, as Galen expressly teaches, book III On Temperaments, chapter IV, Dioscorides, book II, chapter XVI, Albert the Great, book XXV On Animals, and others. The pyraustae, however, which are winged creatures, and very like larger flies, are accustomed naturally to live and dwell in burning furnaces, as Aristotle, Pliny and others relate, but so that they are neither generated from fire, nor nourished by it: for fire generates no animal, says Aristotle, book V History of Animals, chapter XIX. Finally all animals are bodies not simple, but mixed, and therefore composed from the mixture of four elements: wherefore they cannot be generated from one element alone. Therefore what St. Thomas writes, on virtues and vices, that the chameleon lives from air, the mole from earth, the fish from water, the salamander from fire, accepted from the common speech of the vulgar, and in strictness appears false; but it is true in this sense, that the chameleon, content with little food, lives from dew and flies flying in the air; the fish lives from water not pure, but mixed with terrestrial vapors and other things; the mole feeds itself from the roots of the earth, the salamander endures in fire for some time. A DEFENDER OF THE WORLD OF THE JUST. He now gives the reason for the wonderful or miraculous conspiracy mentioned above, namely of water and fire against the Egyptians, that is to say, the world and whatever is in it serves at the nod of God the avenger to punish the impious, who afflicted the just, namely the faithful Hebrews: see what is said in chapter V, verse 18. NOW AT A CERTAIN TIME THE FIRE WAS TAMED (in Greek eprayneto, that is, it was becoming tame, mild, was being mitigated) LEST THOSE ANIMALS WHICH WERE SENT AGAINST THE WICKED SHOULD BE BURNED. Some expound it thus: Fire sent from heaven mixed with hail upon the Egyptians burned the Egyptians, but not the animals, namely frogs, locusts, flies, which God sent upon them as a punishment through Moses; but at the time of the seventh plague, which was that of hail, the preceding plagues of frogs, locusts, and flies had already ceased at the prayers of Moses. I say therefore that the Wise One speaks of fire not from heaven, but natural fire, that is to say: When the Egyptians kindled fire everywhere, so that by setting it against themselves they might free themselves from frogs, flies, gnats and other beasts, which God sent through the works of Moses to strike them and afflict them with plagues, then the fire exerted no force upon those animals, but by divine power it restrained itself lest it burn them, so that they might obey the will of God in all things and torment the Egyptians. Moreover, this wonderful thing or miracle, although it is not written by Moses in Exodus, is nevertheless supplied and expressed here by the Wise One, just as also concerning the manna, verse 20, which had every flavor of sweetness at the pleasure of those eating it: wherefore, it is not permitted to doubt that it truly happened, thus Dionysius, Jansenius and others: for the whole discourse here is about the plagues of the Egyptians, which St. Bonaventure also accepts, but in this sense, that is to say: The animals of the Egyptians, which were in the fields, were consumed by hail and fire, but those which were at home in stables remained untouched by both. But this was not paradoxical, nor wonderful. From what has been said it is clear that Lyra receives these things less correctly, saying that the Hebrews, looking upon the brazen serpent, were not harmed by fire, that is, by fiery serpents; Holcot also goes further, who by animals understands the three companions of Daniel, who remained unharmed by fire in the Babylonian furnace, Daniel III, 24. BUT THAT THEY THEMSELVES (the Egyptians) SEEING (the flies and frogs not consumed by fire) MIGHT KNOW THAT THEY SUFFER PERSECUTION BY THE JUDGMENT OF GOD (in Greek, elaunontai, that is, they are driven, vexed, tormented by frogs, flies, locusts, etc., that is to say: God preserved the frogs and flies sent by him unharmed in the fire, so that they might infest and punish the Egyptians who rebelled against him, so that they themselves, seeing this, might recognize that this was not done by the force of nature, but by the miracle of God, and therefore might fear and worship God and let go his people, namely the Hebrews). AND AT A CERTAIN TIME IN WATER ABOVE THE POWER OF FIRE IT BURNED ON ALL SIDES, SO AS TO DESTROY THE NATION OF THE WICKED LAND, that is to say: Fire obeying God to punish the Egyptians turned itself to all parts and modes of punishing: for it spared the frogs and flies tormenting the Egyptians, as was said in the preceding verse; but truly in the seventh plague mixed with hail, fire burned above all the force of nature, so as to destroy the Egyptians and their crops. By nation some understand men and animals, struck by hail and fire: you would better understand grasses and crops growing from the earth, which hail and fire consumed in the fields, or burning hail: for in Greek it is gennemata, that is, genimina, or germs, namely herbs and crops, which hail struck, so as to afflict the Egyptians with scarcity of grain and famine: thus Jansenius, de Castro and others. Holcot receives it less correctly, understanding the fire by which Pentapolis was consumed, and the nation of the Sodomites was destroyed and burned. 20 and 21. FOR WHICH YOU NOURISHED YOUR PEOPLE WITH THE FOOD OF ANGELS, AND GAVE THEM BREAD FROM HEAVEN PREPARED WITHOUT LABOR, HAVING IN ITSELF ALL PLEASANTNESS AND THE SWEETNESS OF EVERY FLAVOR. FOR YOUR SUBSTANCE SHOWED YOUR SWEETNESS, WHICH YOU HAVE TOWARD YOUR CHILDREN: AND SERVING THE WILL OF EACH ONE, IT WAS CONVERTED TO WHAT EACH ONE WISHED. For "the sweetness of every flavor," in Greek it is "harmonious to every taste," that is, suited, or so that it would agree with every taste. He contrasts the beneficence of God toward the pious Hebrews with His malice and vengeance toward the impious Egyptians, as if to say: You, O Lord, just as You punished the Egyptians with sterility and famine, laying waste their crops through the plague of fiery hail, or hail mixed with fire: so in turn You gave to the Hebrews laboring in the desert in the want of all things, heavenly and most sweet manna; whence he calls manna the bread of angels, not of those eating it, but of those producing it from matter disposed for this purpose in the clouds by themselves, for which reason it is called bread of heaven, that is, of air and clouds, Psalm LXXVII, 24, because manna was formed in the air by angels; hence also it is called bread without labor, namely of men plowing, sowing, reaping, made by angels applying active to passive things. Note, this miraculous manna was, first, like grains of frost, or congealed dew. Second, it was round like the seed of coriander. Third, in taste it was honeyed. Fourth, in color it was white and like crystal, as the Septuagint has it. Fifth, that which was collected they beat with a mortar and mill, and ground it into flour, from which they made cakes or loaves, and cooked them in fire, just as we make from wheat flour and cook in an oven. Sixth, daily from heaven, that is, from the air, manna rained down, except on the Sabbath; whence the Hebrews on Friday collected double manna, namely what would suffice for two days, Friday and Saturday: on other days if anyone had kept manna for the next day, it would breed worms. Seventh, whoever, whether he had collected much manna or little, when returning home and measuring it, found the same measure, namely a gomor, God secretly diminishing from the manna what exceeded this measure, or adding what was lacking to this measure: wherefore God then measured out the same measure of manna to men, children and women, and children ate as much as men. Eighth, when the sun grew hot, it melted and consumed the manna, just as it absorbs and consumes dew; whence before sunrise they had to collect it: see what I have said at Exodus XVI, where I have treated at length and exactly all things pertaining to manna, and have shown that it was an expressed type of the Eucharist, especially as to the thing contained and the effect, from SS. Cyril, Gregory of Nyssa, Ambrose and others. Why indeed should I repeat what has been said here? Note, manna is called the bread of angels, because it was the work of angels, and because it was the most delicate and most excellent food: for those things which are of angels are most excellent, and so if angels were to partake of corporeal food, they would partake of manna. Allegorically manna is the food of angels in the Eucharist, because the same Christ who feeds us in the Eucharist feeds and makes blessed the angels in the beatific vision; hence angels reverently assist and minister to the priest celebrating, as I have shown with many examples in Numbers, cap. IV, at the end. It is memorable what we read of St. John, bishop of Ravenna, who was surnamed Angeloptes, that is, beholder of angels, because he was familiar with angels, namely that an angel was present to him celebrating, who, snatching the chalice of the blood of Christ from the hand of the deacon, presented it ministering, all seeing and marveling; whence he was received by angels into heaven in the year of the Lord 432: thus from the Ecclesiastical Monuments of Ravenna by Hieronymus Rubeus, Philippus Ferrarius and others. Most excellently and truly St. Gregory, IV Dialog. cap. LVIII: "Who," he says, "of the faithful could have doubt that at the very hour of immolation the heavens are opened at the voice of the priest, that in that mystery of Jesus Christ the choirs of angels are present, that the highest are joined with the lowest, that earthly things are joined with heavenly, and that one thing is made from visible and invisible things?" The same is asserted by St. Chrysostom, lib. III and VI On the Priesthood, and he brings forth examples, such as also exist in the Life of St. Chrysostom himself and St. Basil. Tropologically, manna is prayer, for by this as by heavenly bread the celestial angels enjoy it, equally as the terrestrial, namely pious and holy men: this also produces a wonderful sweetness in the soul, while it draws down from God heavenly consolations, instincts and inspirations of all virtues. Truly St. Bernard, On Consideration to Eugenius, says: "Prayer," he says, "purifies the fountain, that is the mind, from which it springs: then it regulates the affections, directs the acts, corrects excesses, composes morals, honors and adorns life:" wherefore after the sons of Israel nourished with real manna, we read that certain saints devoted to prayer and contemplation, especially anchorites, such as Gerard, who at the urging of St. Lydwina or Lydwigis withdrawing into the desert, was nourished by nothing but manna, which rained down from heaven into his cell: see the Life of St. Lydwina, further before the end; see also our Alvarez de Paz, treatise On Prayer, part I, chapter VI and following, where he extensively adapts all the properties of manna to prayer. Again manna is wisdom and Holy Scripture, especially the Psalms, which exhibit to us the sweetness of all affections: thus St. Ambrose, book I, epistle 1: "Food," he says, "and delight of heavenly nourishment is wisdom, by which those placed in paradise were nourished, which was an unfailing food of the soul, which the divine word called manna;" and St. Gregory, book XXXI of the Morals, chapter X: "Manna," he says, "is the word of God, and whatever the good will of the receiver desires, this assuredly tastes in the mouth of the eater;" and book VI, chapter IX: "Manna," he says, "had in itself all delight and all sweetness of taste, because the divine word agrees in all things, and not disagreeing with itself, condescends to the quality of those hearing." And St. Augustine, sermon 91 On the Seasons: "Now therefore let us hasten to receive heavenly manna: for this manna, as each one wishes, snatches such a taste: hear indeed the Lord himself saying to those who come to him: Be it done to thee according to thy faith. And thou therefore, if thou receivest the word of God, which is preached in the Church, with all faith and all devotion, the word itself shall become to thee whatever thou desirest. For example, if thou art troubled, it comforts thee saying: A contrite and humbled heart God will not despise; if thou art joyful, it abundantly heaps joys upon thee saying: Rejoice in the Lord and exult, ye just; if thou art angry, it soothes thee saying: The Lord healeth all thy infirmities; if thou art consumed by poverty, it comforts thee saying: The Lord lifteth up the needy from the earth, and raiseth the poor out of the dunghill. Thus therefore the manna of the word of God renders in thy mouth whatever taste thou shalt wish." Finally St. Jerome, on Psalm CXLVII: "Whatever thou shalt wish," he says, "is born from the divine word, as the Jews hand down, because when they ate manna, according to the will of each one, so it tasted in the mouth." Anagogically, manna signifies the ineffable delights of the heavenly kingdom, which the saints foretaste striving for them in this life, according to that in the Apocalypse, chapter II, verse 17: "To him that overcometh I will give the hidden manna." See the things said there. HAVING IN ITSELF ALL DELIGHT AND ALL SWEETNESS OF TASTE. Others translate it, availing for all pleasure, and suited, adapted and accommodated to all taste: for, as follows, manna exhibited to each one the taste which he himself desired and wished to taste; whence the Syriac translates it, sweeter than all sweetness, and more tasteable than all tasteable things; the Arabic, bread stronger in sweetness (that is sweeter) and before all delectable things; whence also in chapter XIX, 20, manna in Greek is called ambrosia, because by the poets it is said to be the sweetest food of the gods. THY SUBSTANCE SHOWED THY SWEETNESS, WHICH THOU HAST TOWARD THY SONS: thus it should be read with the Greeks and Romans; therefore many codices wrongly have in the accusative, thy substance and thy sweetness, which thou hast toward thy sons, thou didst show. St. Gregory of Nazianzus, oration 49, reads, my substance is my sweetness, and from this proves against the Arians that in God there is substance, and that the Son is homoousios, that is consubstantial with the Father: "For what," he says, "is the substance of God, except that which God is simple, singular, pure, mixed with no concretion, clear, good, perfect, blessed, whole, holy, all? Or dost thou think that something void and empty is God? for this is said to be blasphemy, that he be thought empty, through whom all things consist, who brought forth all things by his word, composed all things by reason, perfected all things by his power, by whose nod and command all things are governed, all things serve. And well that which is written of God in the law, Exodus III, 14: I am, who am: and there: He who is sent me to you." Nazianzenus therefore understands by the substance of God the nature which is most sweet and most pleasant, and is itself uncreated and immense sweetness and pleasantness; which therefore communicating itself to the Hebrews, exhibited to them the most sweet manna, which contained all the pleasantness of taste. This sense agrees very well with the Greek, for your hypostasis, that is your subsistence, showed your sweetness toward your children: for it gives the reason why he said prepared bread. For someone would ask, how did the Hebrews in the arid desert daily find manna, as if prepared food for continuous forty years? He answers that the cause was the hypostasis of God, namely that God, remaining the same always and consistent with himself and subsisting, daily and continuously prepared this food for the Hebrews. To this are added Victor of Utica in his book On the Catholic Faith, and St. Fulgentius Against the Arians at the fourth objection, who understand by substance the most sweet Son of God, because this manna was prepared for the Hebrews; whence also its type and figure was manna, according to that passage in John VI, 32: 'Not Moses gave you bread from heaven, but my Father giveth you the true bread from heaven,' which he explains in verses 35 and 51: 'I, he says, am the living bread, which came down from heaven. If any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread which I will give, is my flesh, for the life of the world:' thus also Optatus cited by the Gloss explains this passage of the Son of God, who is the substance of the Father, and says that he appeared as the figure and image of the heavenly bread to the people of Israel flowing down from heaven. Nevertheless interpreters in general, such as Cantacuzenus, Hugo, Jansenius, Vatablus, understand by substance the manna, and that not unfittingly, for manna is called the substance of God, because by God's command it was formed by angels and given to the Hebrews; whence a little before he called manna the food of angels, and prepared bread from heaven. The word substance denotes that manna was of solid substance, so that it did not deceive the palate of the Hebrews, as the demon deceives witches and magicians, when he exhibits to them a phantasmal banquet of all delicacies, in which they seem to themselves to eat and drink sumptuously, but after the banquet they feel themselves equally empty, and hunger and thirst equally as before, as a certain noble man in Belgium invited to a similar banquet by a magician is accustomed to relate happened to him; but manna was not a phantom, but a substance and a thing truly subsisting, which therefore truly nourished, sustained, and strengthened the Hebrews, so that they remained healthy, vigorous, and strong: wherefore its sweetness and taste were likewise real, and, so to speak, substantial, not phantasmal and fictitious; hence for your substance, in Greek it is hypostasis sou, that is your subsistence. The sense therefore is, as if to say, 'Your substance (that is manna, which was a substance and solid thing, formed by you, O Lord) showed your sweetness, which you have toward your children,' that is it testified by its sweetness, nay it represented and actually exhibited the sweetness of love and benevolence, with which you embrace your children, that is your faithful Hebrews: he adds the cause and explains the manner saying: 'And serving the will of each one, it was changed into whatsoever every one wished.' Thus Christ in the Lord's Prayer, Luke XI, 3, teaches us to ask for daily bread, in Greek epiousion, that is essential and substantial, that is necessary for the substance of man, in like manner manna is called here substance, that is substantial bread, because it nourished and sustained the Hebrews for 40 years in the desert. Finally Osorius by hypostasis, that is substance, understands the constancy of divine benevolence, goodness, and beneficence, by which he continuously nourished the Hebrews with manna for 40 years: for hypostasis is as it were a basis, and a solid and constant foundation; Pineda however in Job, chapter XXII, verse 3, in the Digression, understands by substance the power of sustaining: thus also very many others. AND SERVING THE WILL OF EACH ONE (in Greek, epithymia, that is desire, concupiscence), IT WAS CHANGED INTO WHATSOEVER EVERY ONE WISHED. For each one in Greek is prospheromenou, that is offered or offering itself, approaching, taking and eating, which our translator aptly renders, each one, namely taking and eating manna. For it was changed, in Greek it is metekirneto, that is it was tempered; the Syriac, and for the desire of each one it was mixed, just as foods are mixed and seasoned with honey, salt, sugar, and other seasonings, so that they may be more savory, and may be tempered to the palate of the eater: and just as harsh wines are mixed and sweetened with water, or with another sweeter wine: the Arabic clearly, and it ministered the perfection of his desire in whatever food they wished. From this passage some believe that manna changed not only in flavor but also in substance according to each one's pleasure, so that manna was truly converted into fish for him who wished to taste fish; into partridge for him who wished to taste partridge; into an egg for him who wished to taste an egg; and thus manna perfectly and as it were equally represented the Eucharist, in which there is transubstantiation of bread and wine into the body and blood of Christ, with only the species or accidents of bread and wine remaining: in like manner they believe that in manna the accidents of manna remained, but the internal substance was changed according to each eater's pleasure and taste: thus Claudius de Sainctes holds in De Euchar. repet. 7, cap. III; Nicholas Villagagnon, lib. III Contra Calvin., cap. LII; Thomas Bosius, lib. XII De Notis Eccles. cap. ult.; Gregory of Valencia, tom. IV, disput. 6, Quaest. III § 4. St. Augustine somewhat favors this, lib. III, De Trinit. cap. I, and St. Ambrose De iis qui initiant myst. cap. IX; but obscurely and remotely. They prove it from verse 25: "For this reason also then transformed into all things, it served the nourishment of all to thy grace according to the will of those who desired it from thee." But the contrary is far more true, namely that manna changed in flavor only, not in substance according to the pleasure of those desiring it: this is proved first, because it is said here only that manna had in itself every delight and every sweetness of flavor, and converted itself into whatever flavors those desiring it wished, according to their appetite. Second, because transubstantiation is the greatest of all miracles, and therefore proper to the Eucharist alone. Third, because thus manna would not have been similar but dissimilar to the Eucharist: for by bodily taste in the Eucharist we taste only the flavor of bread, but by mental taste we taste only the body of Christ; but in manna the Hebrews did not taste the flavor of manna alone, which was that of oiled bread and honey, but fish, partridge, egg, as each one wished. If therefore it had been continually converted into another and another substance of fish, partridge, egg, etc., according to the pleasure of those eating, it would have been dissimilar to the Eucharist, in which there is no other substance than that of the body of Christ. Fourth, these substantial transubstantiations in manna would have been very many and continuous miracles, done by God without necessity and cause: for to exhibit to each one the flavor he wished, it was not necessary to change the substance, but the accident alone sufficed; it was enough to impart to the manna that flavor which each one desired. Fifth, because the Hebrews were nauseated by the manna, longing for the onions and the fleshpots in Egypt: whence they said Num. XI, 4, and XXI, 5: "Our soul is weary over this very light food." Therefore manna was not truly changed for them into onions and flesh: for if they had had them, they would not have longed for them. You will say and turn back this argument: It is the same with flavor, for in manna they tasted onions and flesh, and yet they longed for them. I answer, they longed for them because they were carnal and gluttonous, to whom flavor alone does not suffice, but besides it they require the things themselves that are savory and solid, namely true flesh, true fish, etc. Again sixth, if manna had only the external appearance of manna, but internally was turned into fish, flesh, egg according to the pleasure of those eating, it was done in vain: for those eating saw the external appearance of manna, but not the internal substance of fish or flesh hidden under the manna: just as we in the Eucharist see the species of bread, but do not see Christ hidden under them, but believe by faith; but the carnal Jews did not have this faith in manna. If you say that manna was completely and in all respects changed into fish, flesh, etc., even as to external appearance, so that manna ceased entirely both as to substance and as to external appearance, it is contrary to Holy Scripture which everywhere asserts that the Hebrews ate, saw, and tasted manna, and that manna had every sweetness of flavor: otherwise indeed manna could not have been a type of the Eucharist, in which bread passes into the body of Christ, but the species of bread remain. Finally, just as the authors of the contrary opinion by the change of manna into the substance of fish or flesh better represent transubstantiation in the Eucharist, so we, saying that the same substance remained in manna but the accidents of flavor were varied, better demonstrate thereby that in the Eucharist the accidents of bread and wine remain and nourish man without their substance. Again, the Eucharist, one and the same, communicates every flavor and taste of all virtues and heavenly things to the one receiving it according to his desire; moreover verse 25 I shall explain presently in its proper order. Note, for "was converted," the Greek is metekirneto, that is, was tempered through, and was transfused by mixing; the Syriac, was mixed; others, was tempered; for the root kernas is the same as I mix, I taint, I temper, I pour in wine; whence physicians call eukraton a drink made from vinegar and water mixed and tempered; thus pure and unmixed wine is called akraton and akeraton, which is properly diluted and tempered. Therefore metekirnato signifies the manner of variety of flavors in the manna, in that just as wine, if water or any other wine whatsoever be mixed with it, exhibits any flavor of wine: for if you pour sharp wine, bitter wine, or wine of another flavor into sweet wine, you will bend the sweetness of the wine toward sharpness, bitterness, or another flavor: thus likewise God in the manna bent its native honeyed flavor, by pouring in another flavor toward the flavor of fish or meats, according to the desire of each one eating it. The native flavor of manna therefore remained, but tempered, diluted and bent toward the flavor of that thing which each one desired to taste: for this the Hebrews murmuring insinuate, when they say: "Our soul loathes this exceeding light food"; they therefore felt and tasted the lightness and softness of the manna, and moreover the flavor of the foods which they craved, and that lightness, softness, and sweetness of the manna moved nausea in them. Imagine yourself pouring sugar or honey over fish, meats and other foods, and you will grasp how the honeyed sweetness of the manna mixed with the flavor of fish, meats and other foods, poured in and tempered together, was done, but in such manner sparingly or abundantly, as was fitting to the palate and desire of those eating: for the manna tempered its flavor to theirs; and this seems to have been the cause of the nausea and murmuring of the Hebrews concerning the manna, namely that, although in it they tasted every flavor which they wished, yet at the same time they tasted the flavor of honey, which was native to the manna itself: for honey, sugar and other sweets if eaten for a longer time easily produce nausea and disgust. Finally the manna everywhere retained its own flavor in itself, but in the palate of those eating it produced the flavor which each one desired, and thus according to his wish was almost transformed, that is, received and put on another form and character of flavor. Wherefore it seems less true what Holcot thinks, that this variety of flavors was not in the manna itself, but in the palate of those eating it only, according to appearance and their judgment of it: for thus the flavor of the manna would have been false and phantasmal, not real and substantial, as he said in verse 21; nor would the manna have had in itself all delight and the sweetness of every flavor, nor serving the will of each one would have been converted to that which each one wished: which nevertheless he asserted in verse 21. Finally thus the manna would not have been an apt type of the Eucharist, inasmuch as it substantially exhibits to us Christ, abounding in all grace and spiritual delight, and communicating the same to those receiving it: thus the other interpreters. When therefore some Hebrew desired to eat fish, meat, egg, God gave to that manna the flavor of fish, meat, egg, which the one eating would taste, just as if he were eating fish, meat, egg. Tropologically, bread having all delight in itself, and the sweetness of every flavor is prayer and contemplation: anagogically it is heavenly glory: allegorically it is the flesh of Christ in the Eucharist; whence St. Thomas, Opuscule LVII, in the Office of the Venerable Sacrament at the Magnificat, assigns to it these verses: "Thou hast given them bread from heaven, having all delight in itself." And soon after this antiphon: "O how sweet, O Lord, is thy spirit, who to show thy sweetness to thy children, filling the hungry with the most sweet bread given from heaven, leavest the fastidious rich empty!" And in Lesson IV: "No one is able to express the sweetness of this Sacrament, through which spiritual sweetness is tasted in its source, and the memory is recalled of that which Christ showed in his passion of most excellent charity." But before the lesson he premits these verses: "He fed them with the fat of wheat, And filled them with honey out of the rock." Hence we read of certain holy ones devoutly communicating, in the sacred synaxis they tasted as it were a honeycomb. The same in the antiphon at the Magnificat in Second Vespers: "O sacred banquet, in which Christ is received, the memory of his passion is recalled, the mind is filled with grace, and a pledge of future glory is given to us!" The same in the hymn at Lauds: "He gave himself as companion being born, As food in eating, As price in dying, As reward in reigning." Do you want examples? Take them. In the Lives of the Fathers, book VI, Booklet 18 On Providence, chapter XVII: 'Abba Pastor said: It is written, Psalm XLI, 2: As the hart panteth after the fountains of water, so my soul panteth after thee, O God; since therefore stags in the wilderness swallow many serpents, and when they are inflamed by their poison, they desire to reach the waters: but drinking, they are tormented by the burning of serpentine venom: so also monks dwelling in solitudes are inflamed by the poison of malignant demons, and therefore they desire to come to the fountains of waters, that is, to the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ, that they may be cleansed from all bitterness of malignant demons.' St. Mary of Egypt, having lived an angelic life for forty-seven years in the desert, at her death receiving the sacred synaxis from St. Zosimas, extending her hands toward heaven and groaning with tears in joy, cried out: 'Now lettest thou thy servant depart, O Lord, according to thy word in peace: for mine eyes have seen thy salvation,' and thus tasting beforehand the delights of heaven, soon dying, she flew to heaven with her whole mind to drink them in: thus her life is recorded as written by the same Zosimas. We read something similar of St. Mary Magdalene in her passage to Christ. It is said that St. Monica after the sacred synaxis cried out as if drunk with delights: 'My heart and my flesh have rejoiced in the living God. What do I here? Let us fly to heaven!' St. John the hermit felt such delights in the Eucharist, as well as strength and vigor, that taking it only on the Lord's day, he ate nothing else throughout the whole week, as Palladius testifies in the Lausiac History, chapter LXI. St. Francis, as St. Bonaventure says in his Life, chapter IX, 'burned toward the Sacrament of the Lord's body with fervor in all his marrow, marveling with the greatest wonder at that most beloved condescension and most condescending charity. He communicated often, and so devoutly that he made others devout, while at the sweet tasting of the immaculate lamb, as if drunk in spirit, he was for the most part rapt into an excess of mind;' hence he desired to be totally transformed into Christ crucified through the fire of excessive love, as indeed happened to him, when through a seraph bearing the crucified one under its wings, the sacred five wounds of Christ were impressed upon his flesh, a rare gift of Christ he received. St. Catherine of Siena, as Raymond her confessor writes in her Life, 'frequently saw in the hands of the priest an infant, sometimes a somewhat larger boy, sometimes a burning furnace, and often also smelled odors of inestimable sweetness; whenever she saw or received that supreme Sacrament anew, the same ineffable joy existed in her soul, so that not rarely her heart would leap in her breast, and that with such a sound that the sisters standing around heard it most clearly: nor was that sound a usual one, but very singular and beyond the manner of nature. The holy virgin was accustomed to say to Thomas her confessor: Such great joy possesses my mind that I greatly marvel that the soul can endure in the body, and she added: I feel such great burning in my soul that material fire seems to me rather to freeze than to burn; from this burning there arises a certain renewal of purity and humility in my soul, so that I seem to myself to have returned to the age of four or five years. And such great fraternal love is kindled in me from this, that not only willingly, but also gladly for any neighbor whatsoever do I wish to undergo death.' And after some intervening remarks: 'When she received the sacred Eucharist from his hands, her face was ruddy and shining, and she received it with such great devotion that it brought the greatest wonder and devotion to her confessor himself. She herself was so absorbed in God that throughout that whole day, even after she returned to herself, she could not speak a word. She said afterward to brother Thomas her confessor, when she had received the sacred Eucharist from his hands, that she had seen something such that her mind was so drawn to it that all other things which are here, seemed to her like abominable filth, not only riches and bodily pleasures, but also spiritual consolations; and then God granted to her praying what we have said, namely a mind unmoved amid all things, which is truly an excellent and singular gift.' 22, 23 and 24. NOW SNOW AND ICE ENDURED THE FORCE OF FIRE, AND MELTED NOT: THAT THEY MIGHT KNOW THAT FIRE BURNING IN THE HAIL AND LIGHTNING FLASHING IN THE RAIN WAS DESTROYING THE FRUITS OF THE ENEMIES. BUT THIS FIRE AGAIN, THAT THE JUST MIGHT BE NOURISHED, FORGOT EVEN ITS OWN POWER. FOR CREATURE, SERVING THEE THE MAKER, IS MADE HOT FOR A TORMENT AGAINST THE UNJUST: AND IS MADE MILD TO DO GOOD TO THOSE WHO TRUST IN THEE. He returns to the seventh plague of Egypt, which was hail mixed with fire, that is, with lightning, by which God struck the crops and fruits of the Egyptians, and thus punished them with sterility and famine: for just as he said in verse 17, that in this plague fire was not extinguished by waters, that is, by hail and rains, so conversely here he says that fire did not melt snow and ice, but both, as if laying aside their natural contrariety toward each other, made a covenant and conspired for the destruction of the Egyptians; whence Philo in Book I of the Life of Moses: 'Hail,' he says, 'mixed with fires, neither did it itself melt, nor did it extinguish the lightning, but both were borne along with the same force.' And so snow and ice in this place are the same as hail: for hail appears to be nothing other than water or snow congealed; perhaps also with hail, as rain was mixed with it, so too snow, as we often see these three things come together and descend from heaven at the same time: because these three are born from water, and soon return into water; whence Symposius gives this riddle of ice: I was once a wave, which I quickly believe I shall be again: Now bound by the hard chains of rigid sky, I can neither endure to be trampled, nor to be held bare. THAT THEY MIGHT KNOW, that is, that the children of Israel might understand, to whose benefit these things are related and amplified, that the fruits of the Egyptians were consumed by fire, flashing amid the hail and rain; whence with food taken away they fell into great famine, the wretched people. FIRE BURNING IN THE HAIL, AND (repeat with Dionysius 'in') RAIN FLASHING: for this was the marvel in the plague of hail, that fire burned in it, and the same flashed and gleamed in the rain mixed with hail, although by nature the force of fire is directly opposed to hail, just as to rain, and destroys hail, or is extinguished and destroyed by it. BUT THIS. This, namely fire; in Greek it is touto, neuter, that is, this, because it refers to pyr, that is, fire, which is likewise of neuter gender in Greek: he compares and contrasts the fire by which manna was cooked with the fire mixed with hail by which Egypt was struck; and this appropriately, because manna was like congealed dew, and therefore in external appearance resembled grains of hail or sugar. The sense therefore is, as if to say, Just as in favor of the Hebrews thou didst make it, O Lord, that fire conspiring with hail would destroy the crops of the Egyptians, so conversely thou didst make it that fire conspiring with manna, which was like hail, would not melt and consume it, but would cook and solidify it, so that thou mightest feed the Hebrews with it as with bread cooked by thyself: for manna ground or pounded was formed into loaves or cakes, which they cooked with fire, as is evident from verse 27 and Numbers XI, 4. Manna therefore, dewy and congealed like hail, endured the force of fire, whether it was boiled in hot water, or fried in a pan, or baked under ashes or in an oven or furnace into bread: wherefore then fire, in order that traphosi (others less aptly read straphosi, that is, that they might be turned), that is, that the just might be nourished, namely the faithful Hebrews, 'forgot even its own power,' by which it is accustomed to melt and consume hail and ice, to which manna was similar, which nevertheless fire did not melt or consume, but it lasted and solidified. FOR CREATURE. He gives the reason why fire did not consume the hail striking the Egyptians, nor the manna feeding the Hebrews, namely because fire was the creature of God, who therefore served him as his creator in all things and obeyed: wherefore at his command it conspired with ice to torment the unjust, and in manna, as if made gentler and more lenient, it cherished and cooked it, so that the Hebrews, who believed and trusted in God, might be fed by it: thus our author from Castro. He returns, he says, to the general reason for two such contrary effects of the same fire, which harmed the Egyptians and benefited the Israelites: for creature obeying its creator exerts and remits its force to his will, and works to inflict punishment on the unjust, but to preserve and treat the just with the greatest kindness; whence from the Greek you may translate clearly word for word, creature namely serving thee its maker, is intensified, that is, is intensified for punishment against the unjust, and is remitted, that is, is remitted for benefit to those who trust in thee. 25 and 26. FOR THIS REASON AND THEN INTO ALL THINGS TRANSFORMED, TO ALL THINGS NOURISHING YOUR GRACE IT SERVED. ACCORDING TO THE WILL OF THOSE WHO DESIRED FROM YOU: THAT YOUR SONS, WHOM YOU LOVED, O LORD, MIGHT KNOW, THAT NOT THE FRUIT OF BIRTH FEEDS MEN, BUT YOUR WORD PRESERVES THOSE WHO HAVE BELIEVED IN YOU. He repeats and emphasizes what he said concerning the manna in verse 21, namely that it changed its own taste according to the desire of those eating it. Transformed, namely the creature which preceded, but there by creature he understood fire, here however by it he understands manna cooked by fire: in Greek it is metallevomene, that is transformed, changed into another thing, transfigured; St. Augustine, book III On the Trinity, chapter XI, translates it, transforming itself, as if to say: For this reason, namely that you might show your beneficence toward the faithful Hebrews, you made it so that your creature, that is the manna created by you, would transform itself and as it were transfigure itself into all things, that is into all forms of tastes, differences and kinds according to the appetite of each one eating: because the manna, equally as the other creatures, 'to all things nourishing your grace (that is your beneficence and beneficent providence) it served according to the will of those who desired from you,' so that according to the will and desire of each one it would exhibit that taste which each one wished and desired to have in the manna from God. Morally, note here that creatures are transfigured to the just, that is they exhibit another form and figure than they exhibit to the wicked: for to the just they exhibit the form and countenance serene of a friend and benefactor; but to the wicked they exhibit the form and countenance severe of an enemy and avenger: thus the Red Sea saved the Hebrews, it drowned the Egyptians: thus the flood absorbed the wicked, it saved Noah; thus fire destroying Sodom spared Lot, because creatures conform themselves to their creator, who shows himself benign to the pious, fierce to the wicked. TO ALL THINGS NOURISHING YOUR GRACE, in Greek, te pantotropho sou dorea, that is to your gift nourishing all things, for which Our translator renders grace: for dorea is a gift, grace, dowry, largesse; grace therefore here signifies the gracious will of God, providence and beneficence, or every benefit of grace proceeding from that: wherefore St. Augustine in Psalm 144, and epistle 93, teaches that there is a twofold grace, one of creation, another of salvation, or one natural, another supernatural. See Suarez volume I On Grace, Prologue III, chapter II, number 2, and chapter III, number 5, where by nourishing grace he understands the gratuitous love of God, or God's own charity itself, which is the first gift of God toward us, and most liberal proceeding from God's mercy alone. Whence the same St. Augustine On the Predestination of the Saints, chapter XV, calls grace, 'the gratuitous will of God, bestowing benefits freely;' whence some here translate, all things to your nourishing, or fostering (for almighty is said as it were nourishing, from nourishing, says Festus; whence alma Ceres, alma parent, alma earth, because it nourishes all things) your benignity served: for this entire thing is nourishment, wherefore the earth is full of God's benignity, according to that Psalm 144, 16: 'You fill every animal with blessing;' and Hosea 11, 3: 'I was like a nurse to Ephraim, I carried them in my arms, and they knew not that I healed them.' Wherefore deservedly God complains of ungrateful men, Isaiah 1, 2: 'I have nourished and brought up children; and they have rebelled against me;' and Baruch 4, 8: 'You have forgotten God who nourished you, and you have grieved Jerusalem your nurse.' ACCORDING TO THE WILL OF THOSE WHO DESIRED FROM YOU. Namely of the Hebrews hungering and desiring food: some read wrongly, those who were desired by you, that is whom you desired and loved; in Greek it is deomenon, which can be translated both of those in need and of those desiring: for need makes one desire, and desire makes one pray, that you might obtain, that is that you might relieve the need. Hear St. Jerome in Psalm 147: 'When they ate manna according to the will of each one, thus it tasted in the mouth; as if he said: If someone ate manna, if he desired apples, if fish, if grapes, if bread, if meat, according to the quality and will of the one eating, thus was the taste in the manna to him. So also in the flesh of Christ, who is the word of doctrine, that is the interpretation of holy Scripture, as we wish, thus also do we receive food. If you are holy, you find refreshment; if you are a sinner, you find torment.' By these last words St. Jerome insinuates that the just alone perceived in the manna this variety of taste at pleasure, but the unjust tasted only the native taste of manna, which was like oiled and honeyed bread: the same thing St. Augustine, book II of Retractions, chapter IX and XX, St. Gregory, book VI of Morals, chapter IX, Abulensis, Dionysius and others understand more clearly and expressly. But he hints that this grace was granted to both the wicked and the good, just as also the quails, the pillar of fire, water from the rock, etc., to each one, verse 21, which embraces both the wicked and the good: and so St. Caesarius of Arles, hom. 7 in Pascha, Hugo of St. Victor, Torniellus, Lorinus and others hold, for the reasons which I have reviewed in Exodus XVI, 31. Truly a divine power and goodness worthy of God, and unless it were openly established by sacred writings, it would be plainly incredible, that God should so accommodate himself to an innumerable multitude of men daily, indeed at every hour and moment, that in the tempering of one food he would produce a hundred disparate flavors, and from the most difficult harmonies of primary qualities so many times disparate in the palates of the Hebrews, and would generate nourishment in the stomach and all the members. THAT THY CHILDREN MAY KNOW (the faithful Hebrews) THAT IT IS NOT THE FRUITS OF GENERATION (in Greek genesis ton karpon, that is, nativity or generations of fruits, that is, fruits begotten and born, or native) THAT NOURISH MEN: BUT THY WORD (in Greek rhema sou, that is, thy word, namely thy command, thy decree) PRESERVES THOSE WHO HAVE BELIEVED IN THEE, when namely they saw themselves in the desert without bread, having lived by heavenly manna alone for 40 years, just as Christ in a similar desert fasting and devoted to prayer lived without bread for 40 days, and therefore when the devil tempting said, Matt. IV, 3: 'Command that these stones be made bread,' he answered: 'It is written (Deut. VIII, 3): Man liveth not by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth from the mouth of God,' that is, by every thing which God has commanded and ordained, just as he commanded the Hebrews to be nourished by manna: for Moses speaks of manna in Deut. VIII, 3. Finally, to one not thinking of another flavor and food, manna exhibited the flavor of oiled bread or honeyed flour: but to one thinking and desiring any other flavor whatsoever, it exhibited that very one: wherefore the good, when from the native honeyed flavor of manna they felt nausea creeping upon them, and from this murmuring, they resisted it by thinking that they could taste anything in the manna if they conceived the desire for it; but the wicked and ungrateful yielded to the nausea and murmured against it: see the sayings in Exodus XVI, 43.
16:27
28 and 29. THAT IT MIGHT BE KNOWN TO ALL, THAT THOU MUST PREVENT THE SUN TO BLESS THEE, AND MUST ADORE THEE AT THE RISING OF THE LIGHT. FOR THE HOPE OF THE UNGRATEFUL SHALL MELT AWAY AS WINTER'S ICE, AND SHALL PERISH AS SUPERFLUOUS WATER; that is to say, Because the manna melted when the sun grew hot, therefore before sunrise, or at the rising of the sun it was necessary to gather it; by which God signified that it is necessary for us to prevent the sun to receive the blessing of God, and in turn to render it back to Him through thanksgiving, and at early morning at the rising of the light to praise, adore and invoke God: for he who is sluggish and ungrateful to this divine offering, by which God offers grace in the morning to those who pray, just as He offered manna in the morning to the Hebrews, hopes after sleep and sluggishness to find God's grace when it shall please him, is deceived, just as the Hebrews snoring were deceived, when after the rising of the sun they sought manna, for they found it melted and dissolved by the sun's rays: for it was melted, just as ice in winter melts and wastes away when the sun grows hot, that is, it goes into vapor and vanishes: in like manner the hope of the ungrateful shall perish as superfluous water, that is, as the Greek has it, like useless water it shall flow away. TO BLESS THEE. Blessing here is taken reciprocally, namely both God's own beneficence, by which He gave manna in the morning to the Hebrews, and gives grace in the morning to those who pray, and that of the Hebrews and ours, namely thanksgiving, by which on account of the manna and every grace, thanks must be given to God: thus Luke of Bruges in his Notes here, Vatable, Jansenius, Clarius and others; whence in Greek it is epi eucharistian sou; eucharistia moreover signifies both grace and thanksgiving; hence the Venerable Sacrament is called the Eucharist, because it contains the highest grace, namely Christ the fountain of all grace, and therefore requires the highest thanksgiving from the good; whence by antithesis he adds: For the hope of the ungrateful, etc., where manifestly he opposes euchariston, that is, grateful, to acharisto, that is, ungrateful. Furthermore by this word eucharistia, he alludes and hints at the mystical manna of the new law, namely at the body of Christ in the Eucharist. AND MUST ADORE THEE AT THE RISING OF THE LIGHT; in Greek it is, entynchanein, that is, to meet (namely God), to intercede, to pray, to intercede for both private and public matters; that is to say, If God is so diligent as to offer us manna and His grace in the early morning, surely it is fitting for us with like diligence to meet God, so that we may gratefully receive His grace. Rising here does not signify the position of heaven, namely the east and the eastern region of the sky: for the Hebrews prayed not turned toward the east, as Christians do, but facing toward the Holy of Holies, which was to the west, as St. Jerome teaches in Ezekiel chapter VIII; rising therefore here signifies the beginning of the sun and of light, namely morning and dawn, for then it was necessary to gather the manna, for after the rising of the sun it was melted by its rays, so that the Hebrews might learn not to sleep, but to rise in the morning to prayer and to prepare food: for God comes to meet and helps those who are diligent. For God rightly wills to be preferred before all other cares and things, and the first fruits of the day to be dedicated to Him, so that from Him we may obtain a happy course of the whole day; whence St. Athanasius in Psalm V: It is, he says, a great glory of the contest, from bed itself to present oneself to God, and to prevent the sun in thanksgiving; and St. Chrysostom in Psalm V, at those words: In the morning thou shalt hear my voice, thus speaks: From the beginning of the day David gave to God the first fruits. It is necessary, he says, to prevent the sun in giving thanks to thee, and to intercede with thee before the rising of the light. But thou in an emperor indeed wouldst not at all suffer him who is inferior to adore before thee: now however when the sun rises thou thyself sleepest, and yieldest the first place to a creature, nor dost thou prevent every creature, which was made for thee, nor dost thou give thanks to it, but when thou risest, thou washest thy hands and face, but neglectest thy soul unclean, etc. Moses likewise ordained this, Deuteronomy VI, 7: Thou shalt meditate upon them, etc., sleeping and rising, where I have collected many things on this matter. Be thou therefore, O Christian, O priest, O religious, a nightingale of the dawn, nay, be thou a cicada of the night, as St. Jerome writes and prescribes to Eustachium: for just as birds sing at daybreak, the nightingale with its melody prevents the sun, and greets it as it were coming and salutes it, so likewise the faithful ought in the morning to greet the sun of justice with their hymns and prayers: this the Essenes and the first Christians did, who according to Pliny sang hymns to Christ before dawn: nay, the Jews daily in the morning offered the perpetual sacrifice, just as even now the faithful in the morning say or hear the sacrifice of the Mass. Moreover, for this reason Christians pray, not only in the morning at dawn at the rising of the sun, but also turned toward it, that is, toward the eastern part of the world, and they do this from apostolic tradition, as St. Basil says in On the Holy Spirit, chapter XXVII; Athanasius, or rather Anastasius of Nicaea in Questions on Holy Scripture, Question XVIII, and others. First, so that they may acknowledge the benefit of the sun, which by rising brings light, gladness, warmth, life and fruitfulness to men and to the whole world, and may give thanks to God. Second, because the east is the nobler part of the world: for from the east arise light and the sun, which is a symbol and hieroglyph of God; whence also the east is taken for light: St. Justin gives this reason, book of Questions, Question CXVIII, St. Dionysius in On the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy, part II, chapter II, and St. Cyril, Catechesis I Mystagogica. Therefore, because the east was held as it were a certain light, and the west was a hieroglyph of darkness, from this there was also an ancient observance in the Church, that one to be initiated by baptism, about to renounce the devil first, should be placed facing the west, and thus positioned, should utter those words of renunciation a third time, and the same person afterwards, about to confess Christ the Lord, turned toward the east, should do so the same number of times. And this not only St. Dionysius testifies, but also Cyril. Third, because paradise, from which we were cast out in Adam and toward which we long, was situated toward the east: thus the Damascene, book IV On the Faith, chapter XIII, and St. Cyril in the place already cited, and St. Basil and Nyssenus in Moses Barcepha, book On Paradise, part I, chapter XIV. Fourth, because Christ crucified faced the west, for he turned his back to Jerusalem and to the east, but turned his face toward the west, namely toward Rome and Europe: therefore when we pray turned toward the east, we look upon Christ crucified and meet him. Again, Christ ascending into heaven was borne toward the rising, and there he was adored by the disciples, and thus from there he will come to judgment, as the apostles saw him ascending into heaven there, according to that passage in Zechariah XIV, 4: 'His feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is over against Jerusalem on the east.' And that passage in Psalm CXXXI, 7: 'We will adore in the place where his feet have stood;' hence also Christ himself is called the East, Zechariah VI, 12. St. Athanasius brings all these reasons in Questions to Antiochus, Question XXXVII, but especially the first: 'We adore toward the east,' he says, 'because God is the true light, and for this reason, turned toward this created light, we do not adore that light which is not created, but the creator of that light, and from the element most splendid of all, we venerate God the creator of all elements most splendid.' Note, however, that these questions are not those of St. Athanasius of Alexandria: for in Question XXIII, the author cites St. Athanasius of Alexandria, and in Question CXXIX, St. Gregory of Nazianzus, who was later than St. Athanasius, indeed in these same questions St. Chrysostom, the Ladder of John Climacus, Maximus, Nicephorus are cited; whence it is clear that the author was of a much later age, as Bellarmine, Sixtus of Siena, Possevinus and other ecclesiastical writers rightly noted. Moreover, from this rite of praying toward the east it came about that some rude Christians and Priscillianist heretics adored the rising sun, whom St. Leo, rebuking in sermon 7 On the Nativity, says: 'From such institutions (namely of the Priscillianists) that impiety also is generated, that the sun rising at the beginning of the day's light is adored by some more foolish persons from prominent places. Which some Christians also think they do so religiously, that before they reach the Basilica of the Blessed Apostle Peter, which is dedicated to the one true and living God, having overcome the steps by which one ascends to the platform of the upper area, turning their body toward the rising sun they bow down, and with bent necks they incline themselves in honor of the splendid orb; which we greatly lament and grieve happens partly from the vice of ignorance, partly from a pagan spirit: because even if some perhaps venerate the creator of the beautiful light rather than the light itself, which is a creature, nevertheless such a form of worship must be abstained from.' He says this for this reason, lest the faithful have anything in common with the Priscillianists and the pagans: see Baronius, volume I, year of Christ 58, number 86. Moreover, the pagans were accustomed to announce the first hour to the gods, as if morning and first greetings were most pleasing to them. The same people used to besiege the doors of princes in the morning, so that they might go out to meet those departing and beg their greeting, as our Pineda shows with many examples in Job, chapter XXXI, verse 36, number 9. FOR THE HOPE OF THE UNGRATEFUL SHALL MELT AWAY LIKE WINTER ICE. St. Thomas, II II, Question CVII, article 4, notes that by this maxim is signified what the ungrateful deserve to suffer, and what often befalls him by the just judgment of God, namely that on account of ingratitude for a prior benefit, he is deprived of a subsequent benefit which he hopes for, and his hope is frustrated: for otherwise, he says, it is the part of a faithful and generous man to do good even to the ungrateful, unless by benefits he should become worse and more ungrateful: then indeed, to avoid this evil, one must cease from doing good. He proves this by the example of God, who does good to the ungrateful continually, 'while he maketh his sun to rise upon the good and bad, and raineth upon the just and unjust,' Luke VI, and Matthew VI. He confirms it also by reason, because, he says, the faithful man ought to strive to make the ungrateful man grateful: if he cannot do this by the first benefit, perhaps he will do it by the second, third, or fourth; and he cites Seneca, book On Benefits, chapter VII, who also in chapter V assigns the cause of ingratitude, which the Wise Man touches upon here, saying: 'He who places great hope in the future gives least thought to memory,' that is to say, The ungrateful are forgetful of past benefits because they are wholly filled with hope for the future: because they are entirely yearning and gaping for new gifts, which they hunt for and hope for, hence they forget what is past.
Machine translation from the Latin, not reviewed.
16:6
… Hung on the pole, the serpent was as it were rendered harmless; the sight of the image recalled the punishment deserved; the act of trust, which the gaze was meant to provoke and signify, merited healing from God (Wis. 16:6-8). The object was preserved: but in Israelite popular tradition a cult became attached to it: it is found again under the name of Nehushtan (Nebulsilin) among the idolatrous objects …
The Flood is recalled in the Old and New Testaments: Wis. 10, 4; 16, 6 ff.; Sir. 16, 7; 44, 17-19; Is. 54, 9; Mt. 24, 37-39; Lk. 17, 26 ff.; I Pt. 3, 20 ff.; II Pt. 2, 5; Heb. 11, 7. These passages affirm the historicity not only of the fact, but also of …
16:10
… LEVIATHAN), 2 times náhás ("serpent"), and the other times wrongly tan "jackal" (also in Lam. 4:3, Vulg. lamiae), kēphír "young lion," péthen "viper," 'attúr "he-goat." The Septuagint uses δράκων another 8 times: Esth. 1:1 and 10:3 c (Vulg. 11:6; 10:7); Wis. 16:10; Eccl. 25:16 (Vulg. 23); Dan. (Bel et draco, Vulg.) 14:22-27, where it concerns the serpent cult at Babel.
16:13
I. TRUTH OF THE RESURRECTION OF THE DEAD. - I. Scripture. - In the Old Testament the revelation of this truth was progressive, in harmony with slow divine preparations (Yahweh, God of life: Gen. 5:24; Deut. 32:39; I Kings 17; II Kings 2:3, 11-12; 4:33-36; 13:21; Ps. 9:2; Wis. 2:24; 16:13) and with deep aspirations of the human heart (permanent familiarity with God: Gen. 3:8; Is. 38:18; Ps. 6:5-6; 73:25; otherworldly justice as the work of Yahweh: Jer. 31:29; …
… All the dead are under the dominion of the f. (Os. 13:14; Ps. 15:10; 48:16; 88:49; Prov. 5:5; 23:14), which lies beneath the ocean (Job 26:5) and swallows all without distinction (Ps. 88:49). The "gates of the f." (Is. 38:10; Job 38:17; Ecclus. 51:9; Sap. 16:13; Ps. Sal. 16:2; III Mach. 5:51; cf.: God has "the keys" of it, Apoc. 1:18) express the invisible power of the empire of death (Mt. 16:18: portae inferi has a moral tinge). …
16:16
… Pharaoh himself was deeply struck by it. The seventh plague is poetically described in Wis. 16:16-19, where among other things it is said that rain and hail were accompanied by a fire that preserved, even in the midst of the water, its devastating energy and consumed the produce …
Douay-Rheims (Challoner) · Vulgata Clementina · original Douay-Rheims (Douay 1609-10), transcription by EEBO-TCP (CC0) · La Sacra Bibbia, tradotta dalla Volgata da Antonio Martini (1769-1781) (LaParola (laparola.net), Martini OSIS text, Public domain (LaParola's electronic edition marks it 'Dominio pubblico')). Public domain.