True wisdom is to observe God’s commandments. The ways of God are unsearchable.
A signe of true wisdom appereth in obseruing Gods commandments, 6. in this shorte time of meriting eternal reward. 9. Rule of others, 11. and want of feare hurt manie. 14. Why God suffereth the wicked to prosper, and the iust to be afflicted in this life, no mortal man can know.
1The wisdom of a man shineth in his countenance, and the most mighty will change his face.La sapienza dell'uomo sulla faccia di lui risplende: e colui che può il tutto gli cangia il volto.THE wisdom of a man shineth in his countenance, and the most mightie wil change his face,Sapientia hominis lucet in vultu ejus, / et potentissimus faciem illius commutabit. 2I observe the mouth of the king, and the commandments of the oath of God.Io sto intento alle parole, e ai precetti del Re Iddio, confermati con giuramento.I obserue the mouth of the king, and the precepts of the oath of God.Ego os regis observo, / et præcepta juramenti Dei. 3Be not hasty to depart from his face, and do not continue in an evil work: for he will do all that pleaseth him:Non ti allontanar di leggeri dalla sua faccia, e non perseverare nella mala opera: perocché egli fa tutto quello che vuole:Hasten not to depart from his face, nor continew thou in an euil worke: because al that he pleaseth, he wil doe,Ne festines recedere a facie ejus, / neque permaneas in opere malo: / quia omne quod voluerit faciet. 4And his word is full of power: neither can any man say to him: Why dost thou so?E la sua parola è sommamente potente, e, nessuno può dire a lui: Perché fai tu così?and his word is ful of powre: neither can anie man say to him. Why dost thou so?Et sermo illius potestate plenus est, / nec dicere ei quisquam potest: Quare ita facis ? 5He that keepeth the commandment, shall find no evil. The heart of a wise man understandeth time and answer.Chi osserva i precetti non sentirà verun male: il cuore del saggio conosce il tempo, e la maniera di rispondere.He that kepeth the precept, shal finde no euil. The hart of a wiseman vnderstandeth time and answer.Qui custodit præceptum non experietur quidquam mali. / Tempus et responsionem cor sapientis intelligit. 6There is a time and opportunity for every business, and great affliction for man:Per ogni cosa v'ha il suo tempo opportuno: ma è di grande afflizione per l'uomo.There is a time for al busines, and opportunitie, and much affliction of man:Omni negotio tempus est, et opportunitas: / et multa hominis afflictio, 7Because he is ignorant of things past, and things to come he cannot know by any messenger.Il non sapere il passato, e il non potere aver novella del futuro.because he is ignorant of thinges past, and thinges to come he can know by no messenger.quia ignorat præterita, / et futura nullo scire potest nuntio. 8It is not in man’s power to stop the spirit, neither hath he power in the day of death, neither is he suffered to rest when war is at hand, neither shall wickedness save the wicked.Non è in potere dell'uomo il rattenere lo spirito, né egli ha autorità sopra il giorno di sua morte, né gli è permesso di starsi in pace, venuta che è la guerra; e l'empietà non salverà l'empio.It is not in mans powre to prohibite the spirite, neither hath he powre in the day of death, neither is he suffered to rest when warre is at hand, neither shal impietie saue the impious.Non est in hominis potestate prohibere spiritum, / nec habet potestatem in die mortis: / nec sinitur quiescere ingruente bello, / neque salvabit impietas impium.
9All these things I have considered, and applied my heart to all the works that are done under the sun. Sometimes one man ruleth over another to his own hurt.Io considerai tutte queste cose, e applicai il mio cuore a tutte le cose, che si fanno sotto del sole. Talora un uomo ha impero sopra un altro uomo per sua sciagura.Al these thinges I haue considered, and gaue my hart on al the workes, that are done vnder the sunne. Sometime man ruleth ouer man to his owne hurt.Omnia hæc consideravi, / et dedi cor meum in cunctis operibus quæ fiunt sub sole. / Interdum dominatur homo homini in malum suum. 10I saw the wicked buried: who also when they were yet living were in the holy place, and were praised in the city as men of just works: but this also is vanity.Vidi degli empj portati alla sepoltura, i quali mentre tuttor viveano, stavano nel luogo santo, ed erano celebrati nella città, come persone date al bene: ma questo pure è vanità;I saw the impious buried: who also when they yet liued, were in holie place, and were praised in the citie as men of iust workes. But this also is vanitie.Vidi impios sepultos, / qui etiam cum adhuc viverent / in loco sancto erant, / et laudabantur in civitate / quasi justorum operum. / Sed et hoc vanitas est. 11For because sentence is not speedily pronounced against the evil, the children of men commit evils without any fear.Perocché a motivo, che non così subito è proferita la sentenza contro i cattivi, per questo i figliuoli degli uomini fanno il male senza paura.Because sentence is not speedely pronounced against the euil, the children of men committe euils without anie feare.Etenim quia non profertur cito contra malos sententia, / absque timore ullo / filii hominum perpetrant mala. 12But though a sinner do evil a hundred times, and by patience be borne withal, I know from thence that it shall be well with them that fear God, who dread his face.Ma dall'essere tollerato con pazienza il peccatore quando cento volte ha peccato, io ho compreso, che saran felici quelli che temono Dio, e stanno con timore dinanzi a lui.But yet a sinner by this that he doth euil an hundred times, & by patience is borne withal, I know that it shal be good to them that feare God, which dread his face.Attamen peccator ex eo quod centies facit malum, / et per patientiam sustentatur; / ego cognovi quod erit bonum timentibus Deum, / qui verentur faciem ejus. 13But let it not be well with the wicked, neither let his days be prolonged, but as a shadow let them pass away that fear not the face of the Lord.Non abbia bene l'empio, e non siano lunghi i suoi giorni, ma passino com'ombra quelli, che non temono la faccia del Signore.Let there be no good to the impious, neither let his dayes be prolonged, but as a shadow let them passe, that feare not the face of our Lord.Non sit bonum impio, / nec prolongentur dies ejus, / sed quasi umbra transeant qui non timent faciem Domini.
14There is also another vanity, which is done upon the earth. There are just men to whom evils happen, as though they had done the works of the wicked: and there are wicked men, who are as secure as though they had the deeds of the just: but this also I judge most vain.V'ha pure un'altra vanità, che avviene sopra la terra: Vi sono de' giusti, che soffrono calamità come se avessero operato da empi, e vi sono degli empj tanto tranquilli, come se avessero operato da giusti: ma questa pure io la credo cosa vanissima.There is also an other vanitie, which is done vpon the earth. There are iust men, to whom euils happen, as though they had done the workes of the impious: and there are impious men, which are so secure, as though they had the dedes of the iust. But this also I iudge most vaine.Est et alia vanitas quæ fit super terram: / sunt justi quibus mala proveniunt / quasi opera egerint impiorum: / et sunt impii qui ita securi sunt / quasi justorum facta habeant. / Sed et hoc vanissimum judico. 15Therefore I commended mirth, because there was no good for a man under the sun, but to eat, and drink, and be merry, and that he should take nothing else with him of his labour in the days of his life, which God hath given him under the sun.Quindi io lodai il viver lieto, perché altro bene non abbia l'uomo sotto del sole, se non mangiare, e bere e questo solo egli ritragga dalle sue fatiche nel tempo, di vita conceduto a lui quaggiù da Dio.I therfore haue praised mirth that there was no good thing for a man vnder the sunne, but that he should eate, and drinke, and be glad: and this only he should take away with him of his labour in the dayes of his life, which God hath geuen him vnder the sunne.Laudavi igitur lætitiam; / quod non esset homini bonum sub sole, / nisi quod comederet, et biberet, atque gauderet, / et hoc solum secum auferret de labore suo, / in diebus vitæ suæ quos dedit ei Deus sub sole. 16And I applied my heart to know wisdom, and to understand the distraction that is upon earth: for there are some that day and night take no sleep with their eyes.Or io applicai il mio cuore ad apprendere la sapienza, e ad osservare le distrazioni, che occupano la terra: V'ha taluno, che non chiude occhio per dormire né di giorno né di notte.And I haue set my hart to know wisdom, and to vnderstand the distraction that is in the earth: There is a man that dayes and nightes taketh no slepe with his eyes.Et apposui cor meum ut scirem sapientiam, / et intelligerem distentionem quæ versatur in terra. / Est homo qui diebus et noctibus somnum non capit oculis. 17And I understood that man can find no reason of all those works of God that are done under the sun: and the more he shall labour to seek, so much the less shall he find: yea, though the wise man shall say, that he knoweth it, he shall not be able to find it.E conobbi come di tutte le opere di Dio di quelle, che si fanno sotto del sole, nessun uomo trovar può la ragione; e quanto più si affatica in tal ricerca, tanto meno troverà: e quand'anche il saggio dicesse di saperla, non potrà rintracciarla.And I vnderstood that man can sinde no reason of al those workes of God, that are done vnder the sunne: and the more he shal labour to seke, so much the lesse he can finde: yea if the wisman shal say, that he knoweth, he is not able to finde it.Et intellexi quod omnium operum Dei / nullam possit homo invenire rationem / eorum quæ fiunt sub sole; / et quanto plus laboraverit ad quærendum, / tanto minus inveniat: / etiam si dixerit sapiens se nosse, non poterit reperire.
8:1
Calmet
Most. Septuagint, "he whose face is impudent, shall be hated." The truly wise and virtuous man is always polite and affable. (Calmet)
As we may form a probable conjecture of a person's disposition from his countenance, so we may judge of men's virtue by their actions. They are right and meritorious when the intention is good, (Worthington) and the works themselves blameless.
8:2
Solomon proposes his own example, or speaks in the name of the just.
God. The law of Moses, confirmed with an oath, or the engagement to be faithful to the king, 2 Kings 6:3., and 1 Paralipomenon 29:24.
8:3
Face. This courtiers observe, while many Christians neglect God.
Work. Defend not what has been said or done amiss.
8:4
So? The eastern kings rule with absolute sway, Proverbs 16:14.
8:5
8:6
Calmet
Man. Solomon often reminds him of his misery. Septuagint and Theodotion, "man is possessed of much knowledge," as they read dahth for rahth. (Calmet)
8:7
Haydock
Past. Protestants and Septuagint, "that shall be." (Haydock)
8:8
Spirit from leaving the body, or the wind from blowing. There is no quarter given by death; so the wicked cannot escape vengeance.
8:9
Hurt. Those who are despised in elevated situations, might have been happy in obscurity.
8:10
Works. In life and death hypocrites are mixed with the unjust; and this excites indignation.
8:11
Fear. Thus they abuse the patience of God, and grow worse, because he is good. His time will come, Apocalypse 16:15., Ecclesiasticus 5:4., and 2 Peter 3:10.
8:12
Calmet
Face. If God shew such clemency to the wicked, will he disregard his servants? Greek interpreters have read in a different meaning. (Calmet)
8:13
Haydock
Let. Or, Hebrew, "it shall not," etc. (Protestants) (Haydock)
Faith evinces that the wicked will be punished.
But. Hebrew, "like a shadow." Septuagint, "under the shade," in prosperity.
8:14
Calmet
Vain, or afflicting. Hence some have denied Providence, Jeremias 12:1. (Calmet)
8:15
Calmet
No good for a man, etc. Some commentators think the wise man here speaks in the person of the libertine, representing the objections of these men against divine Providence, and the inferences they draw from thence, which he takes care afterwards to refute. But it may also be said, that his meaning is to commend the moderate use of the goods of this world, preferably to the cares and solicitudes of worldlings, their attachment to vanity and curiosity, and presumptuously diving into the unsearchable ways of divine providence. (Challoner) (Chap. 2:24., and 3:12., and Ecclesiasticus xv.) (Calmet)
Worthington
Felicity is not attached to temporal prosperity, nor are the afflicted always miserable. (Worthington)
8:16
Distraction of politicians, (Grotius) and of all human affairs.
8:17
Calmet
Reason. We know in general that God does all for his own glory, and for the welfare of his elect. But we cannot account for his treatment of mankind in particular cases, Romans 11:33. (St. Jerome) (Calmet)
Haydock
Say. Septuagint, "speak what thing soever, that he may know he," etc. (Haydock)
8:15
No good for a man, etc.... Some commentators think the wise man here speaks in the person of the libertine: representing the objections of these men against divine providence, and the inferences they draw from thence, which he takes care afterwards to refute. But it may also be said, that his meaning is to commend the moderate use of the goods of this world, preferably to the cares and solicitudes of worldlings, their attachment to vanity and curiosity, and presumptuously diving into the unsearchable ways of divine providence.
8:1
As probable coniecture of a mans inward disposition is made by his exteriour countenance: so his good workes shining before men are good signe of internal vertues, which in dede are right and meritorious, when the intention is sincere, referring al to Gods glorie, & edification of others, without desire of vaine praise in the world.
8:14
By this terme vanitie is ful vnderstood that fell- citie is not in prosperous thinges of this world: neither are al men miserable, that suffer aduersitie.
8:16
〈◊〉 〈…〉ing
8:1
St Athanasius of Alexandria † AD 373 Against the Arians. (Orationes contra Arianos IV.) 2.22
… for ‘a wise man feareth and departeth from evil ;’ and ‘through wisdom is a house builded ;’ and the Preacher says, ‘A man’s wisdom maketh his face to shine;’ and he blames those who are headstrong thus, ‘Say not thou, what is the cause that the former days were better than these? for thou dost not inquire in wisdom concerning this
St John Chrysostom † AD 407 Instructions to Catechumens 2.4
… These are the tints of virtue. By means of these thou wilt attract angels not human beings to be thy lovers. By means of these thou hast God to commend thee, and when God receives thee, he will certainly win over thy husband for thee. For if the wisdom of a man illuminates his countenance,
8:11
Origen † AD 254 Origen Against Celsus 8.52
… and let them rest assured that punishment shall be inflicted on the wicked, and rewards shall be bestowed upon the righteous, by Him who deals with every one as he deserves, and who will proportion His rewards to the good that each has done, and to the account of himself that he is able to give.
St Ephrem the Syrian † AD 373 Ephraim Syrus: The Pearl. Seven Hymns on the Faith 1.3
“At these uproars the fish in the sea were moved, and Leviathan also. Have ye then a heart of stone that ye read these things and run into these errors? O great fear that justice also should be so long silent!”
John Cassian † AD 435 The Conferences of John Cassian 7.8
… It follows then that no one can be deceived by the devil but one who has chosen to yield to him the consent of his own will: as Ecclesiastes clearly puts it in these words: “For since there is no gainsaying by those who do evil speedily, therefore the heart of the children of men is filled within them to do evil.”
8:14
St Augustine of Hippo † AD 430 City of God 20.3
… “There is a vanity which is done upon the earth; that there be just men unto whom it happeneth according to the work of the wicked: again, there be wicked men, to whom it happeneth according to the work of the righteous. I said, that this also is vanity.”
8:1
1. THE WISDOM OF A MAN SHALL SHINE IN HIS FACE. — Vatablus explains this of the serenity and cheerfulness of the countenance; Cajetan of majesty and authority; Clarius of grace, from which a face is wont to be called gracious and festive; Olympiodorus understands the face of the soul, not of the body, that is to say, the wise man has the face of his soul conspicuous with great light, namely illuminated by the splendor of divine wisdom: but this is mystical. St. Jerome, connecting this saying with the final words of the preceding chapter, reads it thus, and expounds it plainly and clearly: "Who is like the wise man? and who knoweth the interpretation of a word? The wisdom of a man shall illuminate his face, and the strength of a man shall change his face, etc. Above he had taught that it is difficult to find a good man, and he had raised a question against one coming forward: that God created good men, but they fell into sin of their own accord. Now what good God has given to a good man, he enumerates as if about to glory in it, namely wisdom and reason, to know the hidden mysteries of God and to enter into the secret senses of His heart. But he speaks obliquely of himself, that no one was so wise as he, and no one made solutions of problems thus, and his wisdom was praised by all the people, which not only lay hidden within but also shone forth on the surface of the body and in the mirror of the face, and beyond all men he painted the prudence of his mind on his face." Furthermore, wisdom shines in the face in three ways: first, because, as St. Jerome and Albinus say, the soul imprints itself and its passions and affections upon the body, especially the face, by a natural sympathy, by which form adapts and accommodates matter, namely the soul the body to itself. The wise mind therefore reveals wisdom, indeed fashions and paints it on the face, just as a seal fashions and paints its figure in wax. This is evident from physiognomy. Whence Aristotle in his Physiognomics recounts the physiognomic signs of wisdom and folly, of virtues and vices, which shine forth in the face and the whole body. Wherefore Thuanus translates: Indeed there gleams a rosy radiance on the wise man's brow, and from his face fierceness and wrinkles depart. The face therefore is a living image, indeed a mirror and likeness of the soul, as is the common opinion of the wise. Understand this to happen commonly, but not always; for, as the Comic poet says: "Many mortals have an ingenuous face, yet within the mind is found illiberal." Secondly and rather, because wisdom, that is prudence and virtue, composes and forms not only the mind but also the body, especially the face to all honesty and comeliness, and causes gravity, modesty, courtesy, probity, piety to shine forth in it, namely serenity in the brow, shame in the cheeks, candor in the eyes, prudence and grace in the mouth, cheerfulness and joy in the whole face, mixed with prudent and holy maturity. Whence in Hebrew it is, the wisdom of a man shall illuminate his face; the Chaldean, the wisdom of a wise man illuminates the splendor of his face among the just. So also the Septuagint, the Syriac, the Arabic and the others. Arias: Wisdom suffuses the face of a man with light, and changes anger and the proud countenance, and removes the eyebrow, and renders it modest. And another: For the grave face is the image of the wise man's soul: if namely it be mature, courteous, calm and equable. For companions of wisdom are humanity and modesty. Again wisdom shines in the face of the wise man, because it makes him lovable to all, according to that in Job xxix, 24: "The light of my countenance fell not to the ground." For light is a symbol of majesty and a cause of veneration. Thus Esther says to Ahasuerus, chapter xv, verse 16: "I saw thee, my lord, as an angel of God, and my heart was troubled with fear of thy glory. For thou art very wonderful, my lord, and thy face is full of graces." Moreover, "he sat upon the throne of his kingdom, clothed with royal garments, and shining with gold and precious stones, and was terrible to behold," in the same verse 9. Thus the Jews saw the face of St. Stephen as of an angel, Acts vi, 15. Wisdom therefore is joined to holiness, as the sun diffusing its radiance upon the face; whence "its light is inexhaustible," Wisdom vii, 10. Thirdly, because the Holy Spirit dwelling in and illuminating the soul through grace diffuses his light, indeed his own light, into the face and body, just as the light of a lamp shines through glass and horn; and just as the light of glory makes not only the minds but also the bodies of the blessed radiant and glorious. Add to this: the Holy Spirit often breathes a special clarity and splendor of countenance upon outstanding men in whose minds, as in narrow temples, he dwells: thus in the face of Christ shone the splendor of divinity, as St. Jerome testifies, whose rays he breathed upon St. Peter, St. James and St. John in the transfiguration; in the face of St. Anthony shone the splendor of holiness, as St. Athanasius testifies. Thus Blessed Philip Neri, founder of the Oratory, and other wise and holy men asserted that they saw the face of St. Ignatius, founder of the Society of Jesus, radiant and splendid. Thus God, speaking with Moses on Sinai, affixed to him horns, that is, rays of light, Exodus xxxiv, 30. Thus the face of the Blessed Virgin was an image of virtue, a norm and form of virtue, as St. Ambrose testifies. Whence it follows: "And (that is, because) the Almighty shall change his countenance." And Psalm lxvi, 2: "May God illuminate his countenance upon us." For just as the sun illuminates creatures, so God illuminates holy men with his light. See what is said at Proverbs xvii, 24, on those words: "In the face of the prudent wisdom shines." And Proverbs xxvii, 19, on those words: "As in waters faces answer to faces, so the hearts of men are revealed to the prudent." AND THE ALMIGHTY SHALL CHANGE HIS COUNTENANCE. First, as if to say: A prince or tyrant, or any other powerful man, will bend the constancy of the wise and holy man by threats or rewards, and his countenance, so that he may turn from wisdom and virtue to folly and vice. Again, if the wise man serves a prince and depends upon his face and nod, it is necessary that he often change his countenance with him, just as a shadow changes and varies its form when the body is changed; wherefore if he is wise, he will not enslave himself to an earthly prince, but to a heavenly one, with whom there is no shadow of change, James cap. 1, vers. 17; which Wisdom admonishes when it adds: "I keep the mouth of the king." Secondly and properly, by the Almighty understand God. He gives the reason why wisdom shines in the face of the wise: namely, because God changes it, and breathes his own wisdom and light into it, especially in prayer and conversation with God the Father of lights, just as he breathed his rays into the face of Moses. Thus the face of St. Dominic from prolonged prayer breathed forth love; that of St. Francis, contempt of the world and the crucified Christ; that of St. Catherine of Siena, devotion and compunction, so that those beholding her by her countenance alone were moved to compunction and inflamed with love of God and piety. The sense therefore is, as if to say: God the Almighty is accustomed to change the face of the wise, so that impudicity, obstinacy, sadness, wildness, ferocity, and if any other depraved affection was previously in it, may be changed into a good one, namely into modesty, temperance, chastity, joy, piety, etc.; so that he who by nature, or by practice and vice, previously had a gloomy, stern, threatening, wandering, wanton countenance, now by the gift of wisdom has the same cheerful, serene, placid, stable, chaste, holy. Thus God after prayer changed the sad face of Anna, mother of Samuel, so that thereafter she always remained with an even, joyful and cheerful countenance, I Kings 1, 18; and the face of Esther, pale from fear of Ahasuerus, Esther xv, 10; and that of Daniel, cap. vii, vers. 28. Moreover St. Bonaventure teaches that God changes the external face by changing the internal, that is, the superior part of the soul or reason capable of God. Otherwise Emmanuel Sa, as if to say: God sometimes so changes and casts down the wise man that he does not appear to be wise. Morally, Cardinal Hugo: God, he says, changes him who is evil so that he becomes good; who is ugly, so that he becomes beautiful; who is weak, so that he becomes strong; who is a wayfarer through grace, so that he becomes a comprehensor through glory, according to the fourfold state of beginners, proficients, the perfect, and those arriving. Dionysius, however, as if to say: The wise man by God's gift will change his countenance to his subjects, and according to the need of the subjects and circumstances will now put on an angry face, now a mild one, now a sad one, as Christ did, when he cast out those buying from the temple, when he appeared to Magdalene as a gardener, and to the disciples going to Emmaus as a stranger. Anagogically, Lyra: God, he says, will change the mortal face in the resurrection into an immortal and glorious one. Our Interpreter reads עז az, that is, powerful, by antonomasia, that is, the Almighty, namely God; already by another pointing they read עז oz, that is, power, strength, vigor, hardness, impudence: for he who is hard of face or brow is called impudent by the Hebrews. Whence First, Cajetan translates it, and the boldness of his countenance shall be changed, which he expounds thus, that is to say, No ruler is so wise that he does not sometimes act foolishly, so as to allow himself to be corrupted by gifts, prayers or something else, so that he may afflict his subjects, etc.; and thus his countenance also, that is his authority, is changed and lost among them. Whence the Chaldean translates, and shameless in face, his ways are changed from good to evil. Thus Catiline breathed forth shamelessness and cruelty in his countenance, even after he was slain. "Even when dead," says Sallust, "Catiline retained the face which he had when alive." Second, Clarius translates, and the shamelessness (Vatablus, hardness) of his countenance shall be changed, because when wisdom has possessed a man, it drives shamelessness from his mind and brow. And Titelmann thus translates and explains, the wisdom of a man shall make his countenance shine, and shall change the boldness, that is the shamelessness or cruelty, the wildness and barbarism of his countenance; Campensis, he drives away cruelty. Third, Vatablus, that is to say, Wisdom shall change the boldness and arrogance and shamelessness of a man's countenance, because it will cause him to appear to himself vile, abject, despised, although he be held in high regard by others. Fourth, the Septuagint reading ישנא iescunne through sin, that is, shall be hated, not ישנא iescunne through shin, that is, shall be changed, translate ἀναιδής, that is shameless (the Vatican copies read, imprudent, and shamelessness is imprudence, namely stupidity) in countenance shall be hated; the Syriac, whose face is bold, shall become hateful; the Arabic, he who has no shame, brings disgrace upon his own face, that is to say, In the countenance of the wise shine modesty and wisdom, in the countenance of the shameless, foolishness, and therefore the former shall be loved and honored, the latter hated and despised. Whence, as Olympiodorus explains, he shall be punished by his own face, when namely the shameless man, exalting himself with contentious speeches and sophistical quibbles, being refuted, shall pay the penalty of his shamelessness. Thaumaturgus, the mark of wisdom appears from a man's countenance, just as also shameless bruising, as soon as someone is seen, will reveal that he is worthy to have it dwell in him. St. Jerome in his Commentary, the wicked man shall be hated for his countenance: wickedness is boldness and shamelessness.
8:2
2. I KEEP THE MOUTH OF THE KING, AND THE PRECEPTS OF THE OATH OF GOD. — The Septuagint, the Syriac and the Arabic translate in the imperative, keep the mouth of the king, because for שמר scomer, that is I keep, they read with another pointing שמר scemor, that is keep. Whence from the Hebrew thus to be translated they judged, I, namely I admonish or command, keep the mouth of the king. This verse depends on the preceding one, and is as it were a practical conclusion drawn, as if he should say: Because God is most powerful and changes the face of the wise man, his mouth and face by the light of his face, and inspires in him his wisdom, virtue and splendor, for this reason: I wisdom, or I the wise man keep the mouth and face of God my king, both that I may conform my mouth and face to his, illuminated by the light of his mouth and face; whence frequently in the Psalms David prays that God may "enlighten his countenance upon us," because "in thy light we shall see light:" for as he who walks in the sun is illuminated by the light of the sun: so he who converses with God is suffused with divine light; and also that from his divine mouth I may receive the commands and precepts of wisdom, by which I may imbue, illuminate, sanctify my mind and countenance, and bring them into practice, that I may follow my God here by grace laboring, and in heaven by glory comprehending attain to him. Furthermore τὸ ego refers to wisdom, concerning which the whole discourse is, or to Solomon, who in himself here expresses a type of wisdom and the wise man, which comes to the same thing, as is clear from the words of St. Jerome cited at the beginning of verse 1. For often Solomon, equally as Sirach, introduces by prosopopoeia wisdom itself speaking, for the sake of elegance and force. Therefore first and properly, by the king understand God, who is King of kings. For Solomon had no superior king on earth, whose mouth and commands he would keep. The sense therefore is, as if to say: I wisdom walk carefully with God my king and studiously keep; and I command my studious ones, namely the wise and holy, to keep exactly his mouth, that is the law flowing from the mouth of God, and the precepts of the oath of God, which namely he himself confirmed by oath, to testify that this is his intimate will, namely that men should keep these his precepts most diligently, and which we in turn by solemn profession, as it were by oath, have promised to keep in circumcision or baptism, and as it were have sworn. Note: Observo signifies sedulous and exact study of the divine will, and of searching out and fulfilling the law, so that what, how much, in what manner, in what circumstances God commands this or that to be done, we may trace minutely, and fulfill all and each things exactly. Thus servants keep the mouth of the king, that is his individual commands and words, nay his individual gestures and nods and winks of the eyes, and when they have perceived what he wishes, immediately they go not so much as run and fly to accomplish it. Mystically St. Bonaventure: The mouth, he says, of the Father is Christ (just as the mouth of Christ is the doctor and preacher), whose least sayings, nay gestures and nods we ought studiously to hear, to lay up in mind, to meditate on and to fulfill in deed. For, as Christ says: "Blessed are they who hear the word of God and keep it." Thus the Blessed Virgin "kept all these words, pondering them in her heart," Luke ii, 19. Thus each one ought to keep the mouth of the Lord, so that at the least indication of the divine will he would shape and compose himself entirely. This is "to walk carefully with God," which God alone requires of us, as Micah teaches in vi, 8; and therefore it is fitting to say continually with Samuel: "Speak, Lord, for thy servant heareth;" and with Paul: "Lord, what wilt thou have me to do?" and with the Psalmist: "My heart is ready, O God, my heart is ready." Secondly, by king, with Olympiodorus and others, any king, prince and magistrate can be understood, who has received from God the office, right and authority of ruling, as if to say: I wisdom observe, and teach my own to observe the mouth, that is the laws and commands of kings and magistrates, who as vicars of God rule the commonwealth. For in their inauguration the subjects promised to obey them and swore an oath. Therefore it is fitting that they obey and comply with them according to the oaths given, according to that in Proverbs xxiv, 21: "Fear the Lord, my son, and the king," because the Lord commanded that you obey the king. Whence the Septuagint and Arabic translate, keep the mouth of the king; the Syriac, preserve; the Chaldean, keep your mouth concerning the sentence of the king; the Zurich Bible, indeed I admonish that you observe the mouth of the king, especially on account of the oath of God; because, as Vatablus says, we have pledged faith by oath to the king. Others say, it is mine to observe the command of the king. Moreover some separate the first hemistich from the latter adversatively, as if to say: Observe the mouth, that is the precepts of the king, but rather observe the oaths by which you are bound to God; so that, if the king command anything contrary to God, you say: "We ought to obey God rather than men." Whence Campensis, let him observe what the king commanded, and perform if he has called God to witness by oath. And Thaumaturgus, the words of the king must be attended to with great diligence, but an oath by the name of God must be avoided in all ways. Thirdly, some restrict this maxim and attribute it to the familiars and counselors of kings and princes, as if Solomon here indicates to them fidelity and silence, lest they divulge their secret counsels, as they promised by oath, as if each of them is here introduced speaking and saying: I the mouth, that is the secrets which I heard from the mouth of my king, I keep secret. Whence St. Jerome thinks that Solomon here speaks in the person of any wise man who obeys laws and kings. For this is the knot and sinew of ruling and of conducting affairs well, if counsels are kept secret. The Persians know this, of whom Ammianus writes, lib. xxi: "No one," he says, "is aware of counsels except the taciturn and faithful nobles, among whom even the divinity of silence is cultivated," as if to say, they observe and cultivate silence so religiously, as if it were their only divinity, hence they were called silentiaries, and truly were. To this pertains that of Raphael, Tob. xii, 7: "It is good to hide the secret of the king." To this also pertains the exposition of Olympiodorus: "It is," he says, "to keep the mouth of the king, to conceal divine mysteries in silence, and not to explain them to unworthy and profane hearers." The same he expounds tropologically thus: It is good that we do not strive to walk outside the mouth and face of God, but perform all our works so that we fear God, as a present judge and inspector. AND THE PRECEPTS (In Hebrew, word; St. Jerome, speech) OF THE OATH OF GOD: observe, I keep. Otherwise St. Jerome in the Commentary, and Symmachus, who connect these with what follows, do not hasten. Whence the Arabic: Do not hasten, he says, in the oath in the memory of God; Symmachus, to transgress the oath of God, as if to say: Do not hasten and be rash in the oath, because the oath is inscribed in God's memory as well as yours, and as if engraved is kept, so that if you transgress it, you will experience God as avenger. Our version, the Septuagint and Arabic call words or precepts the oath of God, namely those by which God as if by oath has bound you, that is has bound you most strictly and severely, threatening eternal punishments and promising the heavenly kingdom, and also with the covenant and blood of the pact, Exodus xxiv, 8; and which you promised to keep, when you came to his religion and Church, and as if swore. Hence the Fathers call the profession of faith, which is made in baptism, a sponsion, an oath, a vow, and they earnestly urge the faithful to keep the precepts of God. It is a catachresis similar to that in Psalm cxviii, 106: "I have sworn (that is firmly determined, resolved, promised; whence follows), and I am determined to keep the judgments of your justice." Hear St. Chrysostom, homily on that passage of Wisdom: The souls of the just are in the hand of God: "Whence art thou, Christian, a delicate soldier, if thou thinkest thou canst conquer without battle, triumph without contest. Exert thy strength, fight bravely, contend fiercely in battle. Consider the covenant, attend to the condition, know the warfare; the covenant which thou hast promised, the condition by which thou hast come, the warfare to which thou hast given thy name," by military sacrament, namely by baptism, and by profession of the Christian life in the Church militant, to which thou art enrolled as it were a soldier and athlete of Christ. Tertullian, in the book On the Crown of the Soldier, chapter iii: "In the Church, he says, under the hand of the bishop we make a solemn declaration that we renounce the devil and his pomp and his angels," that is to say, by military sacrament in baptism we have renounced the devil, and have bound ourselves to Christ, as it were his soldiers under contract. St. Basil, Exhortation to Baptism: "Soldiers receive a token from those under whom they serve, etc.: unless the angel recognize the character in thee, how will he fight for thee, or defend thee from enemies?" Augustine, book iv On the Creed to the Catechumen, chapter 1: "To him (the devil), he says, ye have professed to renounce, in which profession not to men, but to God and his angels bearing witness have ye said: I renounce. To renounce not only in words, but also in deeds; not merely in the sound of the tongue, but also in the act of life; nor merely in sounding lips, but in works that declare it! Know that ye have undertaken battle with a cunning, ancient and sluggish enemy; let him not find his works in you after your renunciation, let him not justly draw you into his servitude. For thou shalt be caught and exposed, Christian, when thou doest one thing and professest another; faithful in name, thou showest something else in deed, not keeping the faith of thy promise: now entering the Church to pour forth prayers, shortly after in spectacles with actors to cry out shamelessly. What hast thou to do with the pomps of the devil which thou hast renounced?" Victor of Utica relates, in book iii of the Vandal History, that two Christian brothers were hanged by the Arian Vandals, with bundles of stones fastened to their feet; and when one of them asked to be taken down and given a respite, the other, fearing lest he deny the faith, exclaimed: "Nay, nay, brother, we swore not thus to Christ. I will accuse thee when we come before his terrible throne, because upon his body and blood we swore that we would suffer for him in turn." Whence the former, strengthened, said constantly: "Torture us with whatever torments ye will, and press Christians with cruel punishments. What my brother shall do, this also will I do."
8:3
3. DO NOT HASTEN TO DEPART FROM HIS FACE, NEITHER REMAIN IN AN EVIL WORK: BECAUSE HE WILL DO ALL THAT HE WILLETH. — The do not hasten the Arabic, Olympiodorus and others connect with the preceding, that is to say, Do not hasten in the oath of God, that is, be not rash in swearing; for thus thou exposest thyself to the danger of perjury. Better our Septuagint, Syriac and others in various places connect with the following, that is to say, Keep the oaths, that is the precepts of God, by which in solemn profession in circumcision or baptism, as it were by oath, with the highest piety thou hast bound thyself to God to keep them: wherefore, if any temptation, adversity, persecution should arise, do not hasten, in Hebrew אתבהל al tebahel, that is do not tremble, do not be dismayed, do not precipitously depart from his face, as though thou couldst flee from his sight, as Campensis says, as Cain fled from him, Genesis iv, 16, but did not escape, neither remain; Campensis, do not stubbornly persist in an evil work, as if against the law of God in some crime, to which concupiscence, companions or enemies impel thee by enticements or threats, thou shouldst persist, casting off fear of the divine power and God's vengeance; because even if he defer it for a time, yet in his own time he will do all that he willeth, and will punish those who rebel against him and are guilty, and will fine them with present and eternal death. For in an evil work, the Hebrew, Septuagint, Syriac and Arabic have, in an evil word, which can properly be understood of sins of the mouth and tongue, such as murmuring, detraction, contradiction. Whence the Wonderworker understands it of blasphemy; for thus he translates, against the words of God, although it is a troublesome thing that obedience is fitting for those who command, and that one beware of all blasphemy against God. For although he inflict something upon thee, yet it shall not be thy part to reprove, nor to contradict the decrees of a monarch or king. Furthermore the Chaldean translates, and in the time of the anger of man do not cease to pray before him, but quickly go into his sight and pray, and seek mercy from him that not in an evil word: because the Lord of all the age did whatsoever he willed, that is, as Costus translates more clearly, that nothing sorrowful may happen: for he himself, the Lord of the whole world, is able to do all things according to the purpose of his mind. Secondly, all these things from verse 2 to verse 9 can be understood not only of God, but also of a king or magistrate, that is to say: Do not oppose yourself to the king and his decrees, so as to speak against them or resist them, because the king is powerful, and whatever he wishes he will do, so that he may punish you as his adversary or deprive you of goods, or city, or liberty, or life. Thus Vatablus, Campensis, Cajetan and others. Moreover, Cajetan explains "do not hasten," that is to say: Do not go too quickly into the presence of the king, or depart from him lightly, lest by this levity and impropriety you offend the king; but even if you have said something against him, do not persist in his dominion, but quickly tear yourself away from it, lest he seize and punish you. David of Pomis, however, says: Do not hasten to approach the king, or to depart from him; nor stand before his face too frequently, nor too rarely. For, as Plutarch says: "One must deal with a king as with fire," so that you neither approach him too closely, lest you be burned; nor too far away, lest you do not feel warmth from him, that is, do not experience his love, favor and benefits. Sidonius Apollinaris also, in book iii of his Letters, compares kings to flames; "which," he says, "just as when removed a little from themselves they illuminate, so when brought sufficiently close they burn." For thus Alexander killed Clitus, who was too familiar, Tiberius killed Sejanus, Nero killed Seneca. Moreover, Vatablus thus explains it: If you have withdrawn from the king, immediately return into his favor, lest you be forced to remain in an evil work, since the king can do whatever he wishes. Others explain it thus: Do not depart from the king in a fastidious manner, and with arrogant and philosophical superciliousness, being unwilling to approach him even when summoned by him, as if you were superior to him and wiser and more exalted than the king and the whole world, as Diogenes spurned Alexander the Great. Seneca, epistle 103: "For many," he says, "philosophy insolently displayed and contumaciously has been a cause of danger. Let it remove vices from you, not reproach others, not shrink from public customs, nor act in such a way that whatever it does not do, it seems to condemn; it is possible to be wise without ostentation, without envy." See Plutarch, in the book entitled: How a Philosopher Should Converse with Princes. Finally, our Pineda thinks these apply to the familiars and counselors of kings and princes, so that Solomon here suggests to them two salutary admonitions: first, that in giving counsel to the king they do not precipitate their opinion; but, after deliberation has been premised, let them pronounce it maturely. For, as Livy says, book xxii: "All things are clear and certain to one who does not hurry; hasty action is improvident and blind;" and book xxxi: "Nothing is so inimical to counsels of great importance as speed." Secondly, that in their opinion they be not stubborn, nor self-willed, but if they see sounder counsels given by others, let them approve of them and change their opinion. For thus they will show themselves to be devoted not to themselves, but to the king's and the commonwealth's advantage, which is the proper praise of a senator and counselor.
8:4
4. AND HIS WORD IS FULL OF POWER: NOR CAN ANY ONE SAY TO HIM: WHY DOST THOU SO? — In Hebrew, in which the word of the king, in it is power, that is to say, The word of the king and command is armed with power, and so is itself power, that like lightning it immediately executes what it has commanded, and his word is deed: hence Seleucus was surnamed Ceraunius, that is, the Thunderer. Whence Thaumaturgus: For if he shall have commanded, the bidder's Or by his word, more swiftly, his voice forthwith deeds shall follow. Others translate, according to the word of the king is power, that is to say, The measure of the word or command of the king is power: he can do as much as he has said and commanded; he is worth as much as he wills. Hear Esdras, book iii, chapter iv, 3: "The king surpasseth all things, and is lord of them: and whatsoever he commandeth them, they do. And if he send them to war, they go, and demolish mountains, and walls, and towers. They slay and are slain, and the words of the king pass not by: and he himself alone if he shall say: Kill, they kill," etc. And Plutarch to an unlearned prince: "Wickedness, he says, having seized upon power, in swift course expels all motions of the mind into deeds. But as lightning bursts forth after thunder, yet is seen first, so in empires punishments outrun accusations, unless reason, hindered by gravity, restrains and represses power." Do you wish examples of the ambitious power of kings? Take this: Cyrus, crossing the river Gyndes with a ship, because one of his horses had perished, burning with anger against the river, divided it into 360 channels to destroy it, as Seneca relates at length, book iii On Anger, chapter xxi. More unrestrained was Xerxes, who, because a storm had scattered his bridges over the Hellespont, heaped insults upon it, ordered three hundred blows to be inflicted upon it, and even chains to be fastened to it, as Herodotus testifies, book vii. More modest and wiser was Canute, king of England, who, sitting on the shore of the sea, commanding the sea: "Wave, he said, I command you not to touch my feet," but when it did not obey and he was soaked, he taught his English that not he, but Christ alone is king, to whom winds and sea obey. Wherefore at Winchester in the Basilica of St. Peter and Paul he placed his royal crown upon the crucifix of Christ, nor did he afterwards allow himself to be crowned, as Polydore Vergil testifies, book vii of the History, near the end. More foolish was Pharao, saying: "The river (Nile) is mine, and I have made myself," Ezech. xxix, 3; and the king of Tyre, saying: "I am God, and I sit in the seat of God in the heart of the sea," Ezech. xxviii, 2; and the king of Babylon, saying: "I will ascend into heaven, above the stars of God I will set my throne, etc., I will be like the Most High," Isaiah xiv, 13. Are not these voices of kings, subjecting even the elements and the heavens to their own power, insane?
8:5
5. HE THAT KEEPETH THE COMMANDMENT SHALL NOT EXPERIENCE ANY EVIL. — The Hebrew: shall not know, namely by experience and sense, the word evil, that is, an evil thing, such as the wrath of the king and the penalty of the law; the Arabic: an unclean word. Otherwise Olympiodorus and St. Ambrose in Psalm xli, as if to say, The just man does not "know evil," namely of guilt, so as to do it, approve it, or receive it with any consent, or transfer it to himself in any association. Hence learn the power and fruit of obedience, namely that it renders the obedient immune from all evil, and as it were inviolable, so that even if a king or superior, being hostile to him, wishes to constrain him with rigid and strict precepts, the obedient one, nevertheless, undertaking all things, overcomes and transcends by great virtue of spirit, with praise and merit; and therefore God makes all things easy, useful and honorable for him, even those things which seem to have been devised to depress him; for to the obedient, as to "those who love God, all things work together unto good," Rom. viii. St. Ephrem teaches this excellently, volume ii, paraenesis 16 On the Prefect and Obedience; and St. Chrysostom, homily 84 on John; and Dorotheus, doctrine 5. Therefore, although he may suffer either common or private and personal troubles of life, nevertheless he does not regard those as punishments, but as exercises of virtue, increases of merit, and examples for those observing or for posterity: wherefore, with Paul, he is pleased with himself, indeed glories in infirmities and tribulations, Rom. viii, 28; II Corinth. xii, 5. Therefore the obedient and just man regards God scourging as a father; correcting as a friend; chastising as a teacher; offering bitter things as a physician, and says with St. Augustine: "Here burn, here cut, that in the future thou mayest spare." THE WISE MAN'S HEART UNDERSTANDETH TIME AND RESPONSE. The Hebrew: time and judgment, that is, as the Septuagint and Arabic explain through hendiadys, the time of judgment. Judgment in Scripture signifies many things: for in the judgment of judges many things are done, which now all together, now one of all separately through synecdoche the word judgment signifies; hence now it signifies interrogation and accusation, defense and response; now the sentence of judgment, now the penalty inflicted by it. Again, because forensic judgment is fixed, determined, certain and established, hence judgment through catachresis signifies a fixed and certain thing, likewise custom, law, usage, norm, rule, state, condition, office, function, ministry. Now First, Thaumaturgus expounds it of the day of judgment, which the wise man proposes to his mind in all actions. Hence he translates: indeed the wise man always has before his eyes the just judgment to come in its time, and foreknows that all the works of human life await retribution from on high. It is related of St. Jerome that he said: "Whether I eat, or drink, or watch, or sleep, or do anything else, always that trumpet sounds in my ears: Arise, ye dead, come to judgment." Certainly he who is wise does the same thing, and therefore "arranges his words (and all actions) in judgment," that is, justly, lawfully and exactly with mature judgment, so that on the day of judgment he may have something to answer to the Judge on his behalf. Thus also Olympiodorus, Hugo, Lyra, Titelmanus and others. Secondly, others refer these things to the king's counselor, as if to say, If the king commands something unlawful, the wise man knows what he ought prudently to answer to the king, lest he either commit something unlawful or incur the king's wrath, as the three youths did when commanded to adore the golden statue, Dan. iii; and Daniel himself, cap. vi, when a law was passed that no one should adore God for 30 days except the king. Cajetan on the other hand refers these things to the king, whom the wise man knows to be seeking time and judgment, that is, the occasion of judging against him whom he intends to punish, as Solomon sought the time of punishing Semei and Adonias, III Reg. cap. ii, 22 and 42. But this sense is discordant with the Vulgate, which translates "response." Thirdly and genuinely, that is to say, the wise man obeys the precept of God, the king, and the magistrate so exactly, observing all its circumstances of place, time, manner, persons, etc., that there is nothing in him that can be found fault with; but if anyone is blamed in a matter by someone, he immediately has something by which he can justly respond, and by which he can defend and demonstrate his obedience, so that if he is called into judgment, he can render a just account of his deed before judges. Hence our author shrewdly translates "judgment" as "response." Thus St. Jerome: "The precept," he says, "the command of the king, that is of Christ, must be kept, and we must know what, and why, and at what time he commands," so that namely we observe all the circumstances, articles, and nods of the one commanding with exact judgment, lest even the smallest occasion slip away by which we do not fully carry out his will, but to the one calling, or even hinting, we immediately present ourselves and respond with Samuel: "Behold, I am here;" and with St. Augustine: "Give what you command, and command what you will." Therefore the "wise man" understands and observes "time and judgment," because when called, questioned, or commanded by God or a king to respond, say, or do something, he responds, speaks, and acts in his own time, and with mature judgment, that is with great reason, prudence, and circumspection. Or more plainly, which however comes to the same thing, the wise man observes time and judgment, that is the time of judgment, as the Septuagint translates it, that is the just, fitting, apt, opportune time for responding, speaking, or acting. Whence our author translates the Hebrew misphat, that is judgment, which he here translates as response, in the following verse he translates as opportunity. These three things therefore, namely judgment, response, and opportunity, signify the same thing in this place, namely the just and opportune time for responding. Finally, our Pineda holds that here is noted the form and idea of the perfect obedient one, so that to understand judgment is the same as to hasten with the wish, readiness, and consideration of a zealous mind, so that it may anticipate the time of precept and obedience, and so that he may eagerly await it, and as far as in him lies, call it forth, hasten it, bring it about, and finally before he receives commands, he may silently think with himself, if this or that grave and difficult thing be commanded, with what countenance, with what mind, with what response he will receive it, and often fashion that response in his mind, and have it most ready: "Behold, I am here, send me;" for, as St. Bernard says: "The true obedient one prepares his ears for hearing, his tongue for the voice, his hands for the work, his feet for the journey; and thus he gathers himself wholly within himself, so that he may carry out the command of the one commanding." Thus he himself, in the sermon On Obedience. Morally, St. Bonaventure: The wise man, he says, observes the time of acting well, so that he may respond aptly to the one questioning and ignorant, as Hugo notes, either by teaching, or by counseling, or by obeying, or by patiently receiving the scourges of God, and correcting morals, or by humbly confessing accusations and criminations, or by giving thanks to God for benefits, or by cooperating with the inspiration of God, and making progress for the better. Again and properly learn here that the wise man observes time, that is the opportunity of acting well, and fulfilling what has been commanded, and therefore a great part of wisdom and prudence consists in seizing the opportunity of doing a thing well; for while that opportunity offers itself, the thing is easily and happily accomplished: but while that is absent, the thing is attempted with great difficulty in vain, and nothing is advanced, but all things turn out unhappily. Hence it follows that great account must be taken of the time of this life, as being short, and once elapsed irrevocable, and on which depends the whole eternity of each one, and that either most blessed or most miserable. Ludovicus Blosius relates, in book iv of Spiritual Grace, chapter iv, concerning St. Mechtilde, that she heard from Saints appearing to her: "Ah, how blessed you are who still live on earth, and how much you are able to merit! for if a man knew how much he could merit in one day, as soon as he awoke from sleep, his heart would be so dilated with joy because that day had dawned, in which he could live for God and from God's grace increase his merit to God's praise, that throughout the whole day he would be made more eager and stronger for all things which he ought to do or suffer. For he who sows sparingly, shall also reap sparingly; and he who sows in blessings, shall also reap of blessings. For their works follow them." St. Bernard to Scholars: "No one of you, he says, should make light of the time which is consumed in idle words. The word flies away irrevocably, time flies away irretrievably, and the foolish man does not notice what he loses; it is permitted to speak fables, they say, until the hour passes. O until the hour passes, which the mercy of the Creator grants to you for doing penance, for obtaining pardon, for acquiring grace, for earning glory! until that time passes in which you ought to have appeased the divine mercy, hastened to the society of angels, sighed for the lost inheritance, stirred up your sluggish will, wept for your committed iniquity." And again: "Nothing is more precious than time, and alas! today nothing is found more worthless. The day of salvation has passed, and no one reflects: no one blames himself for losing a day that will never return; but just as a hair from the head, so not even a moment will perish from time." Do you wish for the sentiments and maxims of the gentiles concerning the value and brevity of time? Take Virgil, Georgics iii: And meanwhile it flees, it flees, irrevocable time. The same, Aeneid x: To each his day is fixed, brief and irreparable is the time of life for all. Ovid, Metamorphoses x: It glides away secretly, and fleeting age deceives. And: Nothing is swifter than the years. And again: The years go like flowing water: one must use one's age, time glides away with swift foot. Seneca in Hippolytus: The hour flies on ambiguous wings. Seneca, book i, epistle 1: "The greatest part of life, he says, escapes those who act badly, a great part those who do nothing, the whole life of those who do something else. Who will you give me who sets any value on time? who esteems a day? who understands that he dies daily? Do therefore, my Lucilius, as you write that you do, embrace all hours. All things are another's, time alone is ours. Into the possession of this one fleeting and slippery thing nature has sent us, from which whoever wishes is expelled; and so great is the folly of mortals, that things which are smallest and most worthless, certainly reparable, they suffer to be reckoned to them when they have obtained them; no one judges himself to owe anything who has received time; whereas this alone is that which not even a grateful man can repay." M. Varro held that there was no loss more serious, especially for one who knows, than that of time. Bias, according to Laertius, book i, chapter vi, was accustomed to say that the time of life should be feared as if we were both to live long and to live little, according to that saying of St. Jerome: "Live as if you were always about to die; study as if you were always about to live." Democritus said that time was the most precious expenditure. Zeno said that nothing is more lacking to men than time, says Laertius, book vii, chapter 1; and yet many squander it in dice, games, and jests, as if they had abundance of it. Theophrastus always had on his lips: "There is no expense more precious than time." Simonides, when asked how long he had lived: "Time indeed was short, he said, but the years were many," says Stobaeus, sermon. Thus Barlaam according to Damascene, in History chapter xviii, when asked by the son of King Josaphat how many years of life he had, answered, 45; for although I am 70 years old, yet only 45 of them have I served God in monastic life; that alone I count as life: for what is spent in vanity and idleness is time of death, not of life. Another: "As a river cannot be stopped, so neither can time. As one wave perpetually drives another, so one day drives another." As no one perceives the storks arriving, but having arrived; no one perceives them departing, but having departed, because they do both by night and secretly: so no one perceives youth departing, but having departed, and we do not perceive old age arriving, but having arrived: just as those who are carried in a ship, they progress gradually without perceiving it. An old saying is: Know the time. And: "When it rains, grind." Opportunity has hair in front, bald behind. The Egyptians painted a serpent for the annual circuit: because it, as St. Cyril says, extends itself in length, and is coiled in many spirals, which are many series of days and years, and creeps silently with no sound made. The serpent suppressed its tail, because all times are uncertain to us. For the present, since it is unstable and passes most swiftly, is scarcely perceived; the past we cannot behold; the future much less, because it is not yet, and its end is altogether unknown. Thus Pierius, book xiv, page 130. Nemesianus, eclogue 3: ... we grow old, age escapes. "All time departs, time seizes, use is in straits." I have said more concerning the value and care of time in III, 1, and Ephesians v, 16.
8:6
6. TO EVERY BUSINESS (in Hebrew, to the will, that is to the thing willed) THERE IS A TIME AND AN OPPORTUNITY (Symmachus, a time of convenience and a manner; the Hebrew, Syriac, Arabic and Septuagint, time and judgment); AND MUCH AFFLICTION OF MAN. — He gives the reason why the heart of the wise man understands and observes the time, namely because he knows that each thing has its own time and opportunity; and thus he seizes it at its opportune time. St. Jerome, however, holds that here it is taught that the wise man or the just man knows that God disposes all things for his own utility and that of others, even if he cannot know what will befall him; wherefore whatever happens to the just man, he receives it with an even, indeed willing mind, as ordained by God and sent to him. Therefore he embraces the judgments of God, and from all things seizes the occasion of acting well and of deserving well of God. AND MUCH AFFLICTION OF MAN. Theodotion and the Arabic, reading דעת daath, that is knowledge, instead of רעת raath, that is affliction, translate it, because the knowledge of man is much upon him; which Olympiodorus refers to the multitude of things to be known: "Since," he says, "wisdom itself is immense, it presses upon and overwhelms man. For if he should wish to know all things, rushing upon him in a vast mass, it troubles his mind and suffocates it." He then explains the same concerning ignorance of the time, place and manner, namely when, where and how the final judgment should be carried out. But the Septuagint, Syriac, Arabic, Chaldean and others with our text read raath, that is affliction; Vatable, misfortune; Clarius, various and most dangerous evils, not so much of guilt, as Cajetan wishes, but of hardship and punishment. It signifies that to each time, just as to a sublunary thing, there belongs its own vanity and affliction: for he strives to prove this throughout the whole book. Moreover, the vanity and affliction proper to time is that which he subjoins: "Because he knows not things past and future," as if to say, In all things, places and times there is great affliction, especially in handling and dispatching difficult matters; but nevertheless the wise man foresees it by his wisdom, and avoids or overcomes it. Properly and precisely Hugo of St. Victor explains affliction as the difficulty of finding a suitable response by which an angry king may be appeased, whose will, whether just or unjust, the wise counselor has opposed. Others explain affliction as the torment of fear and punishment which seizes the disobedient one, who has transgressed the precepts of God or the king. The Chaldean refers it to the day of judgment; for thus it has from the version of Costus, the vicissitude of whatever thing is good and bad, and indeed by a just sentence the whole world will be judged, at which time vindication will be from the Lord at the time appointed to be throughout the whole earth on account of the various sins of men who wonderfully please themselves in their misdeeds. Clarius Campensis holds that God has appointed a time according to his will, at which he will judge all things, and before that time arrives, we are exposed to various and dangerous evils. This sense is very apt, both because the Hebrew is משפט mispath, that is judgment; and because in this sense all things are most excellently connected, and all flow from that verse 2, according to the Septuagint, observe the mouth of the king, etc. Because whatever he shall will he will do, and his word is full of power, as if to say, Observe the precepts of God, because he himself on the day of judgment will exact a strict account of them from you; because he is most powerful, he will punish you sharply, indeed he will condemn you to hell, and he will do this when it pleases him: for he alone is lord of life and death: wherefore when he wills, he will hasten death to you, that he may judge and condemn you: on this account mention of power over death is introduced in verse 8.
8:7
7. BECAUSE HE KNOWETH NOT THINGS PAST, AND THINGS TO COME HE CAN KNOW BY NO MESSENGER. — "A great affliction (says St. Jerome) to the human race, as the Poet says: The mind of men knows not fate and the lot to come. One thing he hopes for, another comes to pass; he expects the enemy from one place, and is wounded by the javelin of another." Any things past and future can be understood here; yet properly those are signified which pertain to giving a fitting response to God or to a king, of which I spoke in verse 5, and to the affairs which ought to be prudently dispatched to a man at an opportune time: for although man may know some things past, yet those are few, and often not pertaining to the matter, because far more are those which he ignores, especially those which pertain to his affair. Dionysius understands by things past the patience of the holy fathers, and likewise the punishments taken upon the impious. For things past the Hebrew is things to come, and thus the Septuagint translates: Because, they say, there is no one who knows what shall be: for as it shall be, who shall tell them? The Arabic: because there is not found one who knows what is to be avoided; for who shall remind him of the matter as yesterday? The Chaldean of Costas: no one was ever able to know what end shall follow him. For since it seemed good to the Lord to demand him for punishment, who shall make him certain? But the Syriac translates in the past tense: because there is no one who knows for what he was made, and who shall show him what shall be after him? Wherefore the Syriac as well as our text seems to have read שהיה scehaia, that is what was, or what was done and is past, for שיהיה sceiia, that is what shall be; or rather from the text and connection of the sentence sagaciously conjectured that the former is opposed to the latter, and therefore the former is to be translated by the past tense (as if the vau included the conversive vau, which turns the future into the past), the latter properly by the future. Thus therefore you shall translate word for word from the Hebrew: for not knowing what was done, because who shall tell him what shall be? And thus the sense rightly coheres, as if to say: A great affliction lies upon the wise man, that he may give a fitting response to God, or to a king questioning or examining him, and that he may perform all actions and things fittingly and opportunely, and may prudently dispatch the affairs which lie upon him in their proper time, because he knows not things past which could teach him what ought to be done, as well as things to come, namely what shall be the outcome of his action or counsel. For prudence consists in the memory of things past, the consideration of things present, and the foresight of things to come: and therefore the heart of the wise man can understand the time, that is the distinctions of time, namely what is past, what is to come.
8:8
8. THERE IS NOT IN THE POWER OF MAN TO PROHIBIT THE SPIRIT, NOR HAS HE POWER IN THE DAY OF DEATH, NOR IS HE PERMITTED TO REST WHEN WAR PRESSES IN, NOR SHALL IMPIETY SAVE THE IMPIOUS. — The Hebrew and Septuagint: man does not have power over the spirit, so as to prohibit the spirit, and there is no power in the day of death, and there is no dismissal in the day of war, and impiety shall not save its master; the Septuagint, him who from it, supply is and is called impious; the Arabic, him who shares in it; the Zurich Bible, his associates. It is easy to connect this saying with the preceding ones: for it can be referred to the great affliction. For the greatest affliction of man is death, which is here described; or to the future: for the future place, day, and manner of death are unknown, thus the Wonderworker; or to every matter there is a time and judgment, as the Hebrew has it, that is to say, Just as a time of judgment is determined by God, in which He Himself will demand an account of deeds from anyone, so also is the time of death determined, which no one can stop or prolong; or to observe the mouth of the king, verse 1, as the Septuagint has it, that is to say, Observe the precepts of God and of the king or prince; because he himself, if you violate them, has over you the right of death and life which you cannot resist: wherefore strive to please him in all things, and whatever you can do, do it, so that in the hour of death, called forth by God, you may depart to Him joyfully and confidently. Somewhat differently St. Jerome, that is to say, "We should not mourn if we cannot know the future, and are often oppressed by wicked and more powerful men, since death ends all things, and the proud and powerful man who has laid waste everything cannot retain his own soul, when it is snatched away." Also differently Cajetan, who thinks that here by a threefold similitude it is shown how useless his impiety is to man, that is to say, Just as no one can restrain the breath of wind, nor avoid the day of death, nor in battle while actually fighting substitute another in his place: so neither does impiety avail to free the impious. TO PROHIBIT THE SPIRIT. You will ask, what is the spirit here? First, Olympiodorus and Cajetan understand by spirit the wind, that is to say, Just as no one can restrain the wind, so neither can one prohibit or ward off death, as follows. For death is compared with wind in efficacy, in that no one can resist either. Second, the Wonderworker understands an angel, namely the one presiding over death, who is accustomed to wrest the soul from the dying man: "Nor anyone," he says, "so strong that he can prohibit the angel wrenching his soul and about to separate it from the body." This angel presiding over death is called in Hebrew אבדון, in Greek Apollyon, in Latin the Destroyer, Apocalypse chapter ix, verse 11. Third, Dionysius understands the soul and the movements and impulses of the soul, which man cannot repress in others especially the more powerful, indeed often not even in himself. For who can moderate all the wanderings of the mind, desires, fluctuations, impulses, heats especially the more stirred up and ardent, such as those of anger and indignation, or restrain and compress them? Whence Campensis translates, no one is so powerful as to contain his own spirit, according to that in Proverbs xxvii, verse 4: "And who can bear the impetuosity of one provoked?" Fourth, Olympiodorus understands the gifts and impulses of the Holy Spirit; for although we can prohibit those from going into act, according to that: "The spirits of prophets are subject to prophets," I Corinthians xiv, verse 32: yet we cannot prevent those from being sent to us, so that we feel them, even if we do not consent to them. Add that the impulses of the Holy Spirit are so abundant and powerful, that to resist them and not to consent is very difficult and almost impossible, such as were sent to St. Paul in his conversion, to St. Mary Magdalene, and to St. Matthew, and similar ones. Hence Idacius against Varimachus understands the Holy Spirit, whom no one can prohibit from working what He has destined. Whence St. Jerome: "The Spirit," he says, "who dispenses all things, cannot be prohibited by any man, and receive laws of breathing." Fifth and more appropriately, by Spirit you understand the soul and the vital breath, which no one in man can restrain and shut off, lest it depart from the body and man die, whence explaining this he adds: "Nor has he power in the day of death." Thus St. Jerome: "It is not, he says, in the power of our soul that it be not taken from us, and to prohibit the spirit departing at the command of the Lord. It profits nothing to close the mouth and retain fleeing life; and when destruction, the enemy of our life and adversary, has come, we cannot obtain a truce. Nor could kings once in the world and all things laid waste by our impiety, be able to bring hands against death: but they will be dissolved into ashes and earth." And the Chaldean: There is no lord who rules over the spirit of breath (the vital spirit by which we breathe), so as to prohibit the breath of life from departing from the human body; nor is there dominion in the day of death, so as to free a man his neighbor, nor does it help in war, nor does impiety free him who has it in the day of great judgment: for God alone is he who has power over body and soul, and the right of death and life, according to that: "The Lord killeth, and maketh alive, bringeth down to hell, and bringeth back," 1 Kings ii, 6; and therefore he has "the keys of death and hell," Apoc. i, 18. Whence Daniel prophesying from God to King Balthassar death, cap. v: "God, he says, who hath thy breath in his hand, and all thy ways, thou hast not glorified;" for God at his pleasure "taketh away the spirit of princes," Psal. lxxv, 13. NOR HAS HE POWER IN THE DAY OF DEATH. In Hebrew, there is no power in the day of death; St. Jerome, in the Commentary, he is not powerful, that is having power, as Our [translator] renders it; which you may explain in two ways: First, as if to say, There is no dynast, prince, or magistrate who commands death. Thus the Chaldean: There is no emperor, he says, in the day of death, so that anyone might snatch away his servant. For a magistrate commands his subjects what he wishes; but there is no magistrate who can command death, that it touch this one or that one. Second, as if to say, "He is not powerful, that is a king or prince, who can free himself from death." Thus St. Jerome: "Nor could kings, he says, once in the world and all things laid waste by our impiety, be able to bring hands against death." Moreover the Thaumaturgus by power understands not strength, but arts: "Nor, he says, is any art and cunning found which repels the time of death, and as it were removes it by exception." NOR IS HE ALLOWED TO REST WHEN WAR PRESSES IN. In Hebrew and Greek, nor is there (in Hebrew משלחת mislachat, in Greek ἀποστολή, mission, sending, submission, or dismissal) in battle, which various ones explain variously. First, Cajetan, as if to say, In the line of battle while it is being fought, no one can send another in his place and substitute him, so that he himself might escape unharmed: thus neither in the hour of death is it permitted to substitute a servant or son for oneself, so that he himself might escape unharmed; but he himself is compelled to undergo the agony of death. Second, the Chaldean translates, nor do vessels of arms help in battle; Symmachus, there is no drawing up a line in battle; the Zurich [Bible], nor has it the sending of missiles in war; Olympiodorus, with whom Pollux and Budaeus agree, translates the Greek ἀποστολήν, there is no navigation, or fleet in the day of war, as if to say, To the dying no soldiers are present, no fleets, no missiles are supplied, by which he might ward off and repel death advancing like an enemy. Third, the Syrian, there is no liberation in the day of war; another, there is no manumission in war; the Thaumaturgus, in the midst, he says, of war those captured see all flight cut off; but it is necessary to fall and die. Fourth, the Arabic, nor will he find a letter in the day of war, as if to say, No one will receive letters of dismissal, which would make him immune from death, so that death seeing them would release him from itself. For the Arabic in its manner following the Septuagint, took ἀποστολή for letters of dismissal, as Jurists accept them, concerning which Alciates, On the Signification of Things and Words, unless you say the Arabic read ἐπιστολή for ἀποστολή, i.e. letter. All these tend to the same thing, namely grammatically in the bark of the letter it is signified that subjects, when called by the king to war, cannot escape it, but ought to fight in battle and offer themselves to the danger of death, indeed often fall and die, because there is no place of escape. But parabolically (for this is a parable) by this is signified that no one can avoid the struggle of death, or substitute another in his place, for example a servant or a son, and offer him as a pledge or prey to death in his stead, but must undergo this pledge himself. Whence Campensis translates it, neither is there any hope of escaping from that battle which we must join with death. For this is a fierce battle which each must undergo at his appointed time, because in it one must contend not only with death, but also with the devil, indeed with all demons: for then the whole matter is at stake, and the contest is over eternity, over heaven and hell; whence on both sides the conflict is waged most bitterly. To this alluded the Wonderworker when he translated the spirit as the angel of death presiding. Hear St. Chrysostom, homily 54, on chapter 5 of Matthew: "What shall we do," he says, "when threatening angels, and powers and authorities that sever the soul from the body shall attack us?" And St. Ephrem, sermon On the Vanity of the World, vol. iii: "When," he says, "the forces and attendants of the Lord shall come, when the admirable armies shall invade and seize, when the divine messengers and emissaries shall command the soul to depart from the body," etc. Similar things are found in St. Gregory, homily 39 on the Gospel; St. Basil, on Psalm 33; Cyril of Alexandria, oration On the Departure of the Soul, and others. An illustrious example of this war, indeed duel with demons in the struggle of death, is presented in Chrysaorius by St. Gregory, IV Dialogues, chapter 38. Whence St. Martin, dying and seeing the devil: "Why," he said, "do you stand here, bloody beast? You will find nothing deadly in me." NEITHER SHALL IMPIETY SAVE THE IMPIOUS. Vatable, by perversity, that is, bold and petulant resistance; Aben-Ezra, agitation, as if to say, The bold sometimes by their perversity here overturn judgment and the sentence of death, but before God they will be able to do nothing of the sort. He himself will crush and destroy all perversity. The impious man therefore may agitate himself as he wishes, turn himself in every direction, yet he will not escape death. Vatable, impious cunning avails nothing against the Lord. Lyran understands magical arts and superstitions, by which the impious desire to avert death, or at least to prolong life, but in vain. St. Bonaventure understands by impiety hypocrisy; Morinus, tyranny, pride and arrogance, which so far from warding off death, rather invite it and bring it upon tyrants and the proud: for those who torture and kill others are hated by all, and are tortured and killed by those whom they have harmed. Osorius understands wickedness established in riches, by which the impious think they can escape death, but in vain. Therefore all these things signify death, which God inflicts upon the disobedient and those who transgress His precepts, or that a king and prince has broad power and dominion over men, from which no one by any force, obstinacy, art, deceit, prayer, or price can exempt and withdraw himself. Death therefore is as it were an invincible king and monarch of the world, conquering all things and subjugating them to itself, according to that in Job 18:14: "He shall tread upon him as a king, destruction;" and Apocalypse 6:8: "And behold a pale horse: and he that sat upon him, his name was Death, and hell followed him, and power was given to him over the four parts of the earth, to kill with sword, with hunger and with death." From these things Solomon leaves it to be concluded that which he proposed at the beginning, verse 2, according to the Septuagint: "Observe the mouth of the king, and the precepts of the oath of God, etc.: because whatsoever he will, he shall do, and his word is full of power." There is therefore no other power over death except that of God and the king. From this the following things are drawn and depend up to this point. Furthermore, impiety taken generally is any great iniquity; properly, however, it is infidelity and violation of the divine nature. Whence St. Gregory, 25 Morals, chapter 10: "The impious," he says, "Scripture properly calls infidels. For by this distinction sinners are distinguished from the impious, because although every impious person is a sinner, not every sinner is impious. For even one who is pious in faith can be called a sinner. Whence John says: If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves. But the impious is properly called one who is separated from the piety of religion. For concerning such the Prophet says: The impious shall not rise again in judgment."
8:9
9. I HAVE CONSIDERED ALL THINGS, AND HAVE GIVEN MY HEART TO ALL THE WORKS THAT ARE DONE UNDER THE SUN. SOMETIMES A MAN HATH POWER OVER A MAN TO HIS HURT. — Solomon repeatedly says that he has considered all things under the sun, and has searched out, in order to uncover the vanity and affliction of all things, and to indicate to all, and especially to the pious, especially to princes, the vanity of princes, as if to say: I saw impious princes buried with great pomp of funeral and mausoleum, who, while they lived, partly on account of royal splendor and power, partly on account of the pretense of sanctity, because they moved about in Jerusalem the holy city, and in a holy place, namely in the temple and in the assembly of priests, scribes, doctors of the law and religious men; partly on account of the assent of friends and flatterers, by the rude and ignorant people, who are captivated by these external signs, were held and worshipped as good and holy men, not only in life, but also after death; but this too is vanity: for what does it profit a king or prince to be worshipped by the people, if he be hateful to God on account of his wickedness? What does it avail the body to be buried in a golden mausoleum, if the soul burn in the flames of hell? What does it contribute to be praised by men on earth, if he be condemned by all the angels and saints in heaven, and be afflicted with all reproaches by demons in hell? Truly does he say: "Alexander is praised where he is not, but is tormented where he is." The name of the rich glutton was celebrated by his brothers in the palace, but his soul was burned by demons in Tartarus; what therefore does praise avail him, except that it increases his torment? Hence the Chaldean translator renders it, and in truth I saw sinners, who are buried and destroyed from the world, from the holy place, where the just dwell, and they went away to be burned in hell, and were given over to oblivion among the inhabitants of the city; and behold, as they did, so it was done to them. This too is vanity. Add to this: Time at length uncovers the hypocrisy of the impious, and then that most vain shadow and mask of sanctity vanishes, and the truth is seen and the true fiction of their simulation, and their true iniquity and impiety, which brings upon them greater, indeed eternal, disgrace and infamy; those therefore who previously praised and worshipped them, either through error, or fear, or flattery, afterwards, when the hypocrisy is detected, pursue and curse them more bitterly. Moreover, the Hebrew Codices vary here on account of the affinity of the letters ח and כ: for some read ישתבחו iistabbechu, that is, they were praised or praised themselves, and took care to be praised by flatterers. Others read ישתכחו iistakchechu, that is, they were given over to oblivion. In the former way read Our Vulgate, the Septuagint, the Arabic, and St. Gregory, XXXII Moral. x or xi. In the latter way read the Chaldean, the Syriac, the Zurich, Clarius, Cajetan, Pagninus and the more recent, partly Hebrew, partly Latin. Hence some, such as Clarius, Cajetan, Campensis, Vatable, think there is an antithesis here; for they hold that the former verse pertains to the impious, the latter to the pious, as if to say: I saw the impious glorious in life, and after death honorably buried, and praised by posterity as holy men; conversely I saw given over to oblivion those who acted rightly and holily. SOMETIMES A MAN HATH POWER OVER A MAN TO HIS HURT. — "His" understand either reciprocally of the one who rules himself, or absolutely, namely of the man over whom the ruler rules to do him harm, say the Complutensian editors; to his destruction, says the Zurich; so as to afflict him with loss and trouble, says Olympiodorus. So also the Wonderworker, the Chaldean and St. Jerome, as if to say: Sometimes those who preside are tyrants or excessively harsh, who afflict their subjects, impoverish them and vex them in a thousand ways, and therefore in turn are afflicted, vexed by them or by others, indeed even by God Himself, and not rarely are deposed or killed, as happened to Pharaoh, Sennacherib, Antiochus, Herod, Holofernes, Rehoboam and many others. And in this way he demonstrates what he said in the preceding verse: "Neither shall wickedness save the wicked," because tyranny does not save, but destroys tyrants. This maxim depends on τὸ I considered and I saw, namely among the other vanities of the world also this, namely that "sometimes a man hath power over a man to his hurt." This is evident from the Hebrew, Chaldean, Aquila, Septuagint, Syriac, Arabic, Vatablus, Pagninus and others. Aquila and the Syriac translator render it, I considered the time in which man had dominion over man. Pagninus and others clearly, all this I saw, turning my heart to every work that was done under the sun at that time when man exercises dominion over man to his own harm: for indeed in verse 2 he said, "I keep the word of the king," and having exalted the king, now he shows that in the kingdom also there is great vanity, hardships and dangers. Whence the Thaumaturgus renders it, I am amazed therefore whenever I behold how many and how great damages men devise against their neighbor. The dominion of Adam over men and animals before sin was full, pleasant, useful both to the one commanding and to those commanded: but after sin, concupiscence having entered into both, it began to be troublesome to both, difficult and abounding in a thousand cares and dangers. This is a just punishment of man's sin, that he who was unwilling to obey God, should also feel those subject to him to be troublesome, difficult, rebellious; especially while he himself is imperious and cruel or severe toward them. Truly the Tragedian: He who rules the scepter with harsh tyranny, fears those who fear: fear returns to its author. And Claudian thus depicts the tyrant: He wearies the living with terror, becomes heir to the dying. Ravisher of maidens, obscene adulterer in chambers. No rest: when prey ceases, lust arises, etc.
8:10
10. I SAW THE IMPIOUS BURIED: WHO EVEN WHILE THEY STILL LIVED, WERE IN A HOLY PLACE, AND WERE PRAISED IN THE CITY AS IF THEY WERE JUST IN THEIR WORKS; BUT THIS ALSO IS VANITY. — He continues to describe the vanity of impiety and of the impious, especially of princes, as if to say, I saw impious princes buried with great pomp of funeral and mausoleum... they worked; but this also is vanity, because to the impious the vain and false praise of men profits nothing, nor does the forgetfulness of men harm the pious: for "the just shall be in everlasting memory" (and likewise in glory) with God and all the heavenly ones. Whence Pagninus renders it, and then I saw the impious buried, and those who came after them, and walked in the holy place, shall be delivered to oblivion in the city in which they did right; but this also is vanity. But that the whole saying pertains to the impious alone is clear from the Septuagint, Syriac, Chaldean and Arabic; especially since the more recent interpreters, who understand it of both the pious and impious, do not agree among themselves, but each one forges different versions from the others, which our Lorinus here laboriously reviews. The whole saying therefore signifies the vanity of the fiction and hypocrisy of the impious. Furthermore, this saying is general and pertains indeed to all hypocrites and the impious, but more especially to the powerful and princes, whether secular or ecclesiastical, namely Bishops and Prelates, to whom St. Jerome refers it: "For no one dares, he says, to accuse a superior, and therefore as if holy and blessed, and walking in the precepts of the Lord, they add sins to sins. Accusation against a Bishop is difficult: for if he has sinned, he is not believed; if he is convicted, he is not punished." Whence he says, "They were in a holy place," that is, they occupied a sacred rank or holy office, for example they were priests, religious, Bishops, etc. Alluding to this, Isaiah, chapter twenty-six, verse ten: "In the land of the saints, he says, she wrought iniquity, and (therefore) shall not see the glory of the Lord." See the sayings there and Olympiodorus whom hear: Because often men are scandalized, and think it an unjust thing that the same men are impious who are also powerful and fortunate, therefore, he says, I have contemplated more deeply on this matter, and I finally saw the ultimate ruin of the impious, when namely they die not only in body but also in soul. For what he says in this place, brought into sepulchers, he understands in punishments and torments. But to those into whose sepulchers these things are brought, their power profited nothing, nothing that they were once held to be just and holy, nothing that they performed sacred ministries and duties in the temple of God. Ecclesiastes therefore teaches us not to be scandalized at all, because we see in human life an enormous dissidence of states and conditions, when on the contrary we ought rather to look to that retribution which is in the future age. This is what the Psalmist says in Psalm ten, verse three: "The sinner is praised in the desires of his soul: and the unjust man is blessed." And Zechariah eleven, seventeen: "O shepherd, and idol." This finally is the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place, Matthew twenty-four, fifteen. Thus Hugo. Sulpitius writes in the Life of St. Martin, chapter eight, that he himself, when he saw a certain deceased person honored by the people at the altar as a martyr, whose name, life, and certain memory did not exist, prayed to God that he would show who he was, or of what merit he was buried. "Then turning, he says, to the left, he saw near at hand a foul, grim shade; he commands that it speak its name and merit; it declares its name, confesses its crime, says it was a robber struck down for its wickedness, celebrated by the error of the common people, having nothing in common with the martyrs, since glory held them, but punishment held it." What did this vain and erroneous worship of the people profit him, except that with his crime exposed, public infamy was created for him, and the honor of a martyr was turned into the disgrace of a robber?
8:11
11. FOR INDEED BECAUSE SENTENCE IS NOT QUICKLY PRONOUNCED AGAINST THE WICKED, WITHOUT ANY FEAR THE CHILDREN OF MEN COMMIT EVILS. — The Hebrew, Chaldean, and Septuagint versions: therefore the heart of the children of men is full, or filled in them to do evils; Aquila, they dare; the Zurich Bible, the heart of men is full of boldness; Symmachus, with fearless heart the children of men do evil. For sentence the Hebrew word is pithegam, which the Septuagint translates as contradiction; the Arabic, insult; the Syriac, vengeance; Thaumaturgus renders this verse and the following thus: because indeed divine providence does not quickly punish all, by the equanimity with which it tolerates the wicked, and does not immediately avenge transgressions, therefore the impious man thinks it matters not if he frequently and gravely sin, trusting that he will escape unpunished; but he does not understand that even after much time evil will not remain unpunished. It is therefore the greatest good to worship God piously. Olympiodorus: because there are not those who diligently and vehemently contradict, and with sharp reproof restrain those doing evil, etc. This sentence and contradiction can therefore be understood not only of God, but also of men, especially of judges and magistrates, who often dissemble sins and do not punish them. Olympiodorus and others connect this maxim, omitting the "for indeed" which is not clearly in the Hebrew, with what preceded, "and this is vanity," as if to say: This also which I add is vanity, namely, that through long impunity men boldly commit evils; because by this increasing sins, they increase punishments for themselves, and abusing the long-suffering of God, they more sharply provoke His anger and vengeance, and stir up a more burning one against themselves. But our author punctuates more aptly, and adds the "for indeed." For this maxim gives the reason why the impious dominate in their impiety, are praised and celebrated: namely, because God permits them unpunished for a time, by which it comes to pass that neither fearing God nor men, they act with impunity and boldness as they please, rage against the pious, accumulate riches, indulge Venus and the belly: hence it comes to pass that by men they are praised and honored as if happy and blessed. And this is one mode among many by which God is said to blind and harden sinners, just as an overly indulgent mother to her son, and not punishing him when he sins, is the occasion that the son commits worse deeds, and finally commits a crime for which he is punished by death or hanged. Thus the sun hardens mud by its heat. So teaches St. Augustine, sermon 58 On the Seasons, and St. Basil, oration That God is not the Author of Evils. Furthermore, how unjust and foolish it is to abuse God's patience for sinning, St. Leo teaches forcefully, sermon 4 of Lent: "Some abuse," he says, "the patience of God, and those who are not free in conscience become secure from long impunity, although vengeance is delayed so that time might have correction," not so that there might be freer license for sinning. "Therefore let no one so delay embracing the mercy of our God, because he does not receive what he deserved: for not everything that is delayed is taken away; nor has he escaped condemnation who has not sought indulgence;" and Tertullian, book On Penance, chapter vii: "God forbid," he says, "that anyone interpret it thus, as if the way to transgress is now open to him because the way to repent is open, and from the abundance of heavenly clemency make a license of human rashness. Let no one be worse because God is better, sinning as often as he is forgiven. For what is more unworthy than to draw from divine mercy an argument to provoke divine justice? and because God willingly receives the penitent, to deliberately wish to become sinners?" And St. Ambrose, book II On Penance, chapter ix: "Having proposed," he says, "the hope of doing penance, they think license to transgress is extended to them. Let penance be a remedy for sin, not an incentive to the sinner. For a wound needs medicine, not a wound for medicine: because medicine is sought on account of the wound, not the wound desired on account of medicine," as if to say: Who ever inflicted a deep wound on his own head to test the virtue of balsam? Who ever fearlessly drank poison to test the power of an antidote? He would be mad who did this. So plainly should he be judged mad who sins in order to flee to divine mercy, or who is induced to sin by the abundance of divine mercy. The same thing concerning the harm and injury of impunity and delayed vengeance, Plato and the other philosophers learned and felt from Solomon. Plato in his book On the Republic teaches throughout that the government of the state is maintained by punishment and reward, which if you remove and grant impunity, all laws and rights are violated and the state is overthrown. Aristotle teaches the same thing, X Ethic. final chapter, and in the Politics. Plutarch, in On the Delayed Vengeance of the Deity: "From the impunity of the wicked," he says, "faith in divine providence is diminished." Cicero, in the Pro Sestio: "Unbridled fury," he says, "is nourished by prolonged impunity." And in the Pro Milone: "Who does not know that the greatest enticement to sin is the hope of impunity?" And in book III of the Offices: "How few can be found who, with impunity and the ignorance of all men proposed to them, can refrain from injury?" For the common mass of men is moved more by punishment and reward than by love of virtue, so that if those cease, this grows weak. Polybius, book I, near the end: "If you grant pardon," he says, "or impunity, if you have won over the wicked man by kindness, counting all that as deceit and fraud, he will become far more unfaithful toward his benefactor." Cato felt that nothing was more dangerous than impunity, which always invites toward worse things: for unpunished injuries threaten injury to all by example. For if it were permitted to harm with impunity, no one would be safe from the violence of the wicked; wherefore magistrates who grant malefactors impunity, he teaches, ought to be buried under stones, as being most harmful to the state. Thus Plutarch in the Apophthegms. Fronto the consul under the Emperor Nerva used to say that he ruled badly who conceded nothing to anyone, but far worse is he under whom there is the greatest license for anyone to do anything. For it is inhumanity if a prince indulges his friends in nothing, but it is most pernicious if they are permitted to do whatever they wish. Thus Dio Cassius in Nerva. Moreover, God defers the vengeance of sinners in order to show His longsuffering and clemency, by which He invites sinners to repentance, so that some, recognizing it, do in fact repent and change their life: but the others, abusing God's patience, "treasure up to themselves wrath in the day of wrath, and revelation of the just judgment of God," as the Apostle says, Rom. ii, 5; and Job cap. xxiv, 23: "God gave him," he says, "a place for repentance, and he abused it unto pride." He who does this is wicked, and often reprobate and a son of perdition and of hell; and therefore when he has come into the depths of sins, he denies God's providence and the vengeance of the deity; and if any evil is afterward inflicted upon him, he esteems it a chance occurrence, not vengeance for sin sent by God. See Plutarch, book On the Delayed Vengeance of the Deity. Morally, learn here that the wicked are punished, which is a great good and a good for the state; but not to be punished is a great evil: wherefore magistrates, to whom the care of the state falls, ought by their duty to punish them. But God, who is bound to no one, but has higher reasons for His providence, for just causes often defers punishment, and compensates the slowness of penalty by its severity, according to that in Eccli. v, 2 and seq.: "Follow not in the strength of thy youth thy concupiscences, and say not: How powerful am I? or who shall bring me under for my deeds? For God is a judge that is strong and patient. Say not: I have sinned, and what evil hath befallen me? For the Highest is a patient rewarder. Be not without fear about forgiven sin (although thou hast not yet paid the penalties), neither add sin upon sin." Hence St. Peter, II epistle, cap. iii, 2, calls such men "mockers, walking after their own concupiscences, saying: Where is the promise or the coming of him?" To whom he himself responds verse 9: "The Lord delayeth not his promise, as some imagine, but dealeth patiently for your sake, not willing that any should perish, but that all should return to penance. But the day of the Lord shall come as a thief," etc. And Malach. cap. ii, 3, he brings forward the wicked saying: "Every one that doth evil is good in the sight of the Lord, and such please him: or where is the God of judgment?" To whom you may answer that God awaits the opportune time and the state of vengeance, the time at which according to the measure of the offense he will inflict the weight of punishment, either in this life, or certainly in the day of judgment, according to that in Apocal. xiv, 15 and following: "Thrust in thy sickle and reap, because the hour to reap is come, for the harvest of the earth is ripe; and (without delay) he thrust his sickle into the earth, and the earth was reaped." And again: "Thrust in thy sharp sickle and gather the clusters of the vineyard of the earth: for her grapes are ripe. And (immediately) the angel thrust his sharp sickle into the earth, and gathered the vineyard of the earth, and cast it into the great winepress of the wrath of God." A notable example is in St. Ephrem, in the sermon entitled: Confession and Reproof of Himself, where he recounts of himself that, when as a younger man from the licentiousness and impunity of the impious he doubted concerning God's providence, he was instructed by a wonderful vision and experience, and finally heard an angel saying: "Do penance for iniquity, and know for certain that there is one eye passing through all things." I have narrated the whole matter more fully in Genesis xlii, 21.
8:12
12. YET A SINNER, FROM THE FACT THAT HE DOETH EVIL A HUNDRED TIMES, AND BY PATIENCE IS BORNE WITH, I HAVE KNOWN THAT IT SHALL BE WELL WITH THEM THAT FEAR GOD, WHO FEAR HIS FACE. — This is a Hebrew hysteron proteron; for thus the words must be transposed and arranged: Yet from the fact that a sinner doeth evil a hundred times, and by patience is borne with, I have known that it shall be well with them that fear God, who fear His face. — Campensis, who fear God, that is to say: If God is so patient and benign toward sinners, that He long tolerates them and waits for their repentance, how much more clement and benign will He be toward those who fear Him or are innocent, who have not sinned grievously; or toward the penitent, who grieve over their committed crimes, and carefully avoid committing them! This is one among many the end and fruit of divine forbearance and long-suffering toward the wicked, namely that from that the pious may measure how much clemency and beneficence they ought to hope for and expect from Him. Thus St. Jerome, Albinus, Lyra, Bonaventure, Hugh and others. Solomon borrowed this from his father David, saying in Psalm xxx, 20: "How great is the multitude of Thy sweetness, O Lord, which Thou hast hidden for them that fear Thee." Secondly and more precisely, our Pineda expounds it, that is to say: God dissembles the sins of the impious, but immediately chastises those of the pious; yet lest thou infer from this that the lot of the impious is better than that of the pious, both because it is a great benefit of God to chastise the light faults of the pious, lest they slip into graver ones; and because the pious, like noble horses turned aside from the path, tremble at a light stroke of God's rod and return to the way of virtue, whereas the impious, like stubborn mules, kick against the rod: and therefore God will reward this docility, reverence and obedience of the pious with great gifts of grace. Hear the Author, II Maccabees vi, 13: "For it is a sign of great kindness when the wicked are not suffered to do as they list for a long time, but are presently punished. For not as with other nations, whom the Lord patiently beareth with, until He punish them when the day of judgment cometh: so hath He determined concerning us, that our sins being come to their height, then He should punish us. And therefore He never withdraweth His mercy from us: but though He correcteth us with adversity, yet He forsaketh not His people." Finally our Mendoza, in I Kings cap. iv, vers. 3, thinks that τὸ yet marks an antithesis of the pious and impious, so that as in the preceding verse the impious are said to abuse God's long-suffering patience, and to rush into sin, so in this verse the pious are said to use it rightly, and to be recalled from sinning, that is to say: The sons of men, that is sinners, perpetrate evils without fear, because sentence is not quickly pronounced against them. Yet I have known that it shall be well with them that fear God, who fear His face, from the fact that a sinner doeth evil a hundred times and by patience is borne with, as though by a certain special study and benevolence they are crowned by God; those who worship Him, fear and reverence Him, not because He is lord, judge and avenger, but because He is patient, long-suffering and merciful, and seeing human wickedness yet do not experience divine punishments. This is the character of the good, that from this long-suffering of God, by which He waits for sinners to repent, and dissembles the sins of men on account of repentance, they are much more stirred up to love and fear God. A HUNDRED TIMES, — that is very often; for a definite number is put for an indefinite one. The Interpreter rightly translated it with the Syriac: for the Hebrews have מאת meath, that is a hundred times. The Septuagint read מעת meeth, that is from a time, whence they translate, he who sinned, doeth evil from then, that is from his youth, as Olympiodorus says; and the Arabic, he who had sinned had already done evil from that time. Aquila, Symmachus and Theodoret read מת meth, that is he is dead: for the א in the middle of מאת meath, since it is a quiescent letter, is often omitted; whence they translate, the sinner being evil is dead, a long life being granted to him, that is to say: The sinner is dead in the habit of sin, strengthened by long use with age; for he who repeats sins, through a long life does not become better, but worse, and contracts a callus of sin, and thus almost brings upon himself a necessity of sinning, so that he dies in many sins, and is condemned to great torments in hell. BY PATIENCE IT IS SUSTAINED. — In Hebrew מאריך לו maarich lo, that is, he prolongeth to him, namely God prolongeth his patience to him: whence Symmachus translated it, by long-suffering bestowed upon him; and also the life, age and space for repentance of the sinner; or he removeth from him, namely vengeance, while he defereth and postponeth it for a long time. "The patience of God is proclaimed, not in this that he suffereth some evil, but that he waiteth for the wicked, that they may be converted," saith St. Augustine, in the book On Patience. Meanwhile their malice serveth, so that through it God may chastise and purge the light sins of the pious, and exercise their patience, and increase their merits and crown. The Septuagint translate it, from that time and from the length of them, as if to say, The sinner already then, that is from of old, namely from childhood, soon from birth, when he began to use reason, began to sin, and from thence by long custom turned sins as it were into nature; for, as St. Gregory saith: "Sin which is not blotted out by repentance, draweth by its weight to another." Therefore, as much as God prolongeth his patience and the sinner's life, so much doth he himself prolong his guilt and impenitence. IT SHALL BE GOOD TO THEM THAT FEAR, — both in this life and rather in the future life. Whence the Chaldean translated it, and in the time when the sinner worketh evil a hundred years before the face of the Lord, time is given to him that he may be converted. It is manifest to me in the Holy Ghost, and I know that it shall be good in the world to come to them that fear God, who fear before his face, and do his will. Moreover Olympiodorus by good understandeth good thoughts and works, which God inspireth to them that fear him: "For when," saith he, "they live in the sight of God, and take heed to themselves in all their action and thought, as to God the judge beholding all things, God is the cause of all good works and conceptions to them." Thaumaturgus interpreteth it of the fear of God itself: "That," saith he, "most excellent good, to be endowed with pious fear of God." More simply thou mayest take good for happy and pleasant, as if to say, Although God chastiseth the light errors of the pious, yet soon he shall console them with a far happier and more pleasant lot, either on earth or in heaven, according to that in Ecclesiasticus i, 29: "The patient man shall bear for a time, and afterwards joy shall be restored to him." When therefore thou art chastised and afflicted by God, receive this affliction as a pledge and earnest of impending joy, and consolation near at hand to thee. For whom God chastiseth, he soon solveth and sootheth, as a mother coaxeth a child after chastisement; yea and Christ "tasted honeycomb after gall," saith Tertullian; namely after winter cometh summer, after night day, after war peace, after battle victory, after clouds Phoebus, after tempest serenity. This is what Isaiah promiseth to the just, cap. iii, 10, saying: "Say ye to the just man that it is well, for he shall eat the fruit of his doings. Woe to the wicked unto evil: for the reward of his hands shall be given him." Whence concerning the same Solomon subjoins:
8:13
13. LET IT NOT BE GOOD TO THE WICKED, AND LET NOT HIS DAYS BE PROLONGED, BUT LET THEM PASS AWAY AS A SHADOW WHO FEAR NOT THE FACE OF THE LORD. — Present and beholding all things, so that they walk before it with great reverence, fear and trembling, says Olympiodorus; in Hebrew, it will not be good; but the Hebrews often use the future for the imperative, or optative, whence Our translator aptly renders it, let it not be good, namely that he be sustained by God and expected to repentance, says Hugo, because the patience of God is not used for repentance, but is abused for greater iniquity and guilt. GOOD. — Understand, both the prolongation of life, thus St. Jerome and Cajetan; both the goods of the body such as health, strength, riches, prosperity, children, a numerous family, thus Lyra and Dionysius; both the goods of the soul, such as the manifold grace of God in this life, and glory in the future: thus the Wonderworker, Bonaventure, Hugo. In sum, good signifies here whatever is joyful, pleasant and prosperous. This punishment of the wicked is fitting, namely that they be deprived of all good, who from the supreme good and fountain of all good, namely from God, have willfully and impiously turned themselves away; just as he who alone closes the window deserves to be deprived of its light and to dwell in darkness. You will ask, how does the wise man here pray ill, and as it were curse the wicked, when this seems to be against or beyond charity? I have spoken at length on this matter in the Prophets; now briefly. It is answered first, that these curses are not so much imprecations as predictions and announcements of future punishments decreed to the wicked by God. "Let it not be" therefore, that is, it will not be good to the wicked, as the Hebrew, Chaldean, Syriac, Arabic and other texts have it. Thus St. Jerome, the Wonderworker and Olympiodorus, and by this reasoning this maxim is rightly connected to the preceding one, as if to say: I knew that great goods befall those who fear God; but to those who do not fear him, evils. Second, to imprecate to the wicked the privation of temporal goods, so that by it they may return to their senses and change their life, or certainly sin less, since with the goods of which they are deprived they can no longer abuse themselves to luxury, pride, gluttony, lust, is not beyond but according to charity. For thus the Psalmist imprecates to the wicked: "Fill their faces with shame: and they shall seek thy name, O Lord," Psalm lxxxii, 17. Thus today we see many converted to God through poverty, diseases, adversities, who were growing insolent with riches, health, and prosperous things and abusing them for every crime. To imprecate disease or want to such persons is therefore good and salutary. Third, properly the Prophets and Apostles from zeal for justice and divine honor pray ill to the wicked persevering in impiety and dying, that is, they wish them as guilty of injured Divine Majesty to be punished with pains, both temporal and eternal, so that by this reason justice may be satisfied, and the guilty be punished, and so that they may restore by suffering deserved torments the honor which by sinning they took from God. For the Saints conform themselves in all things to the divine will already certain and fixed concerning the punishment of the wicked. When therefore God wills, and has fixedly decreed to punish and damn the wicked, the Saints also will the same, especially while they themselves are heralds and ministers, indeed the mouth of God, through whom namely God promulgates his laws, and threatens to transgressors present and eternal punishments, such as were the Prophets and Solomon here, who when he had said that the wicked abuse the longsuffering of God, so that they sin longer and more gravely, indignant with holy zeal for justice at this abuse of theirs, prays and wishes saying: "Let it not be good to the wicked, and let not his days be prolonged," inasmuch as he abuses them for sinning, and to offend God more, who prolongs his days to him for repentance. Thus the Saints, sitting in judgment with Christ on the day of judgment, will hurl the sentence of damnation upon the wicked, Matthew cap. xxiv, vers. 31 and seq. AND LET NOT HIS DAYS BE PROLONGED, — so that he sin less, and offend God less, and so that immediately withdrawn by death, he may receive the torments which he deserves, says St. Jerome; because he will be sent to eternal punishments, says Olympiodorus. Moreover the Chaldean: Neither shall there be, he says, length to him in the world to come, and in this present world the days of his life shall be cut short, they shall flee and be cut down like a shadow. BUT AS A SHADOW LET THEM PASS AWAY. — In Hebrew, he will not prolong his days, just as a shadow does not prolong its days, but before evening it passes away. The Septuagint, reading ב, that is, in, instead of כ, that is, as, renders it in a shadow; the sense is, first, just as a shadow, when the day and sun depart, vanishes toward evening; so also let the impious quickly pass away and vanish, lest they reach the evening of life, namely old age. Second, just as a shadow departs when the body, of which it is the shadow, departs: so also they themselves, when life and time depart—which is the shadow of eternity and blessed life—depart together with it. Third, just as nothing is more tenuous than a shadow, nothing more vain, nothing more fleeting: so also is life, especially that of the impious. I have said more on this matter above, and in Isaiah chapter thirty-eight, verses eight and following, where I treated of the shadow of Hezekiah increasing by miracle on the dial of Ahaz. Olympiodorus gives an apt reason: "The sinner," he says, "will not be long in life, because he did not reckon the whole time of his life, however long it may be, to be a shadow, but strove with anxious effort to acquire for himself things that are fleeting and temporal, as if they were to endure perpetually. Or understand it otherwise thus: although the sinner in the present life is protected and defended in a certain way by the patience of God (as by a shadow) rather than punished, yet shortly thereafter he will be consigned to eternal torments." But this latter interpretation is mystical. Cajetan adds: Just as a shadow is not a body, but a thin semblance of a body: so the impious man is not so much a man as an empty semblance and shadow of a man, because he has only the empty appearance of a man, not the reality, in that he does not live as a man endowed with reason, but as a beast lacking reason. But this is more subtle than solid. Holy Scripture often compares the present life to a shadow, because it truly is such if compared to true and eternal life, toward which therefore the bride sighing in the Canticle, chapter two, verse sixteen, says: "My beloved is mine, and I am his, who feedeth among the lilies until the day break and the shadows decline." To this pertains that saying of Ausonius in his Epitaphs of Heroes, number seventeen: "We are dust and shadow;" and that of Pindar in the Pythian Odes, hymn eight: "Men are the dream of a shadow." Finally, hear St. Jerome expounding the version of the Septuagint: "He will not prolong his days in a shadow, that is, the days of his life, which are as a shadow to the living; for those who live for a long time do not prolong their days, but those do who make them great by the magnitude of good works. Whence also Jacob, as it were confessing himself a sinner, says: Few and evil have been the days of my life; as also in the Psalm confessing: My days, he says, have declined like a shadow, and I am withered like grass. Not that he sought a long life in the present (in which all that we live is brief, and is a shadow and an image, for in the image man walks about), but that he feared concerning the future, lest the length of his life, where true life is, should be shortened."
8:14
14. THERE IS ALSO ANOTHER VANITY WHICH IS DONE UPON THE EARTH; THERE ARE JUST MEN TO WHOM EVILS HAPPEN, AS THOUGH THEY HAD DONE THE WORKS OF THE WICKED: AND THERE ARE WICKED MEN, WHO ARE SO SECURE, AS THOUGH THEY HAD THE DEEDS OF THE JUST; BUT I JUDGE THIS ALSO TO BE MOST VAIN. — The word "this" refers either to the security of the wicked alone: for this is most vain and most deceptive; or to the alternation of the lot of the just and the wicked, namely that to the just there befall things due to the wicked, and to the wicked things due to the just. The word "another" is not in the Hebrew, Septuagint, Syriac, or Arabic, but is understood. For Ecclesiastes here reviews vanities one after another in succession. Moreover this vanity is similar to that in verse 10. It is nevertheless another, different from that one, because there he said only that the wicked are praised as the just; here however he adds that to the wicked there befall any goods and prosperity whatsoever, but to the just evils and adversities. Whence he says: "There are just men to whom evils happen, as though they had done the works of the wicked." Hebrew, there are just men to whom it has touched them as the work of the wicked; and there are wicked men to whom it has touched them, as the work of the just, that is to say, There are just men whom touches, or to whom reaches the lot of adversity, by which the wicked are worthy; and there are wicked men whom touches the lot of prosperity, which they deserve and by which the just are worthy. The Septuagint: there is a vanity which has been done upon the earth, because there are just men, because there comes upon them as the deed of the wicked: and there are wicked men, because there comes to them as the deed of the just. Campensis: evils befall the just, which it was fitting for the wicked to bear. Moreover some think these things are said in the person not of Solomon, but of the ignorant and wicked. Thus the Thaumaturgus, Lyra, and Olympiodorus, whom hear: "Now Ecclesiastes introduces the person of one who falls from scandal into error, and says: I saw the just in this life corrected by those evils which ought rather to have been due to the wicked, such as disease, poverty, or some other difficult circumstance befalling. On the other hand, he says, I saw what ought to have been due to the just come to the wicked: therefore such a foolish man, made as it were a despiser of divine providence, and this, he says, is vanity. But the wise man, foreseeing the outcome of things, and knowing plainly what is rendered to each according to their desert, understands that God does not permit these things to happen by chance, but so that the just may be crowned with greater reward, and the wicked may be tormented with graver punishment. Notably moreover he says here that he saw vanity above the earth, for in heaven indeed there is nothing vain." But truly others judge better that these things, as also the rest, are said in the person of the wise man, as the words themselves show. You ask, in what manner is it vanity that evils befall the pious and goods befall the impious? First, Symmachus for vanity renders ἄπορον, that is, difficult to know; St. Jerome properly, doubtful perplexed, controversial, according to that saying of David: "Labour is before me: until I understand in their last things," Psalm lxxii, 16, as if to say: It is vain to wish to scrutinize God's judgments by which He afflicts the pious and prospers the impious, because these judgments are difficult to know, indeed inscrutable. Second, Thaumaturgus expounds vanity as a grave and pernicious error, in that the impious is held to be pious, and the pious impious: whence indeed the rude take occasion either of accusing God's providence, or of abandoning probity and embracing impiety. Thus we call supreme vanity a lying error and a deceptive one. Third, Hugh by vanity understands partly unhappiness, because, he says, nothing is more unhappy than the happiness of sinners; partly chance, because as if by chance happening goods befall the impious, evils the pious. Fourth, others by vain understand troublesome and harsh: whence Campensis renders it, certainly this is exceedingly troublesome. Lyra adds: It is vain, he says, because irrational. Fifth, St. Jerome by vanity understands the inconstancy of human things: for they are vanities which are borne along by various outcome. Sixth, St. Bonaventure says it is vain when evils befall both good and bad, because unworthy on account of the bad: more vain when goods befall both good and bad, because unjust equally and unworthy; therefore Habacuc bore this so indignantly that he seemed to accuse God, when he said: "Why dost thou look upon them that do unjust things, and holdest thy peace when the wicked devoureth one more just than himself?" Habacuc 1, 3 and 13. Seventh, Pineda: This is vain, he says, because in such events nothing perpetual, nothing solid exists to which we can fix our soul: wherefore each one must strive toward goods stable and eternal. All these things are true and fitting to this place: yet most of all vanity here is the iniquity of the thing, and the unjust lot of distribution. For it seems unjust that evils are given to the pious, goods to the impious, when the pious deserve goods, the impious evils, if you regard the matter in itself, and in the sense of the unskilled and rude, who by this are often impelled so that they cultivate, pursue, and embrace impiety before piety: but if you regard God's providence, this is not unjust but prudent and holy, on account of the most just reasons which He Himself has, and especially two. The first is, that the impious on account of small things which they do well receive goods of this life in place of reward, otherwise about to give the gravest punishments of evildoers in hell: the pious truly on account of small things which they do badly are chastened and purged by the hardships of this life, so that purified, on account of many good works which they have done, they may be blessed in heaven; or if they are altogether pure, exercised by adversities they may receive a more splendid crown of patience in heaven, as happened to St. Job. Concerning which matter see St. Augustine, lib. V of the City of God, cap. xv and xvi, where he compares heavenly happiness of the blessed, and prefers it to the earthly happiness of the Romans. The second is, that God may teach us that all things which are in this world, whether adverse or prosperous, are vain, that is empty and false, since adverse things befall the pious, prosperous things the impious, that is the unworthy; but true goods are not except in heaven, and true evils not except in hell, according to that saying of the Wise Man: "No good except the eternal, no evil except the eternal." Thus blessed Dionysia the martyr, amid the blows of rods and blood flowing over her whole body, her only little son trembling, animated him to the fellowship of martyrdom with this voice: "That punishment is to be feared which never ends; that life is to be desired which is always possessed." By which he, strengthened, underwent martyrdom bravely, as Victor of Utica relates, lib. III of the Vandals. Hence Ecclesiastes leaves it to be concluded tacitly that to the wise both the prosperous and adverse things of this life are to be despised; but the heavenly goods are to be sought, and the evils of hell are to be most carefully avoided. Whence it is not to be wondered at if prosperity befalls the impious and adversity the pious, because God does this to show how vain both are, that is, small, exiled, brief and perishable: wherefore the pious ought not to grieve on this account, but rather to rejoice, because from this as it were a certain sign of divine predestination, they know that a most happy lot is prepared for them in heaven. Thus the Chaldean: "I saw," he says, "in the Holy Spirit, that the evil which befalls the just in this world is not on account of their sins, but to remove from them a light fault, so that their reward may be complete in the world to come; and what happens to sinners is not on account of their merit, but to repay them the reward of a light merit which they have done, so that they may eat their reward in this world, and lose their portion in the world to come." And the Midrash, or Gloss of the Hebrews here: "Happy are the just," it says, "to whom happens what ought to happen according to the deeds of the impious, because a most ample reward and glory is laid up for them. On the contrary, woe to the impious to whom happens what ought to happen according to the deeds of the pious, because they are exalted, that they may fall more heavily." And St. Jerome: "Among the other vanities," he says, "which are borne about in the world by various fortune, this also is observed, that just men frequently experience what ought to happen to the impious; and the impious live so happily in this world, that you would think them most just. The evangelical example of the rich man clothed in purple and the poor man Lazarus teaches this." St. Jerome adds: "The Hebrews interpret the just to whom evils happen, and the impious to whom the works of the just befall, as the sons of Aaron and Manasseh, because those offering sacrifice perished, and he himself after so many evils and captivity was restored to his kingdom." But the Hebrews err: for the sons of Aaron acted unjustly, when being drunk they offered to God incense of strange fire against the commandment of the Lord, Leviticus x. Manasseh also, doing penance in prison, merited the grace of God, and accordingly being justified was restored to his kingdom. Philo wisely, in the book On the Confusion of Tongues: "A notable," he says, "punishment and vengeance of impiety is for God to connive at, and even to indulge sinners, and to grant them not only impunity, but great and lasting prosperity." For this makes them as it were drunk and mad, so that they rush of their own accord into their own ruin, and bring their own destruction upon themselves. On the other hand the pious and wise man is the same in adversities as in prosperities, sober, modest, tranquil, and therefore great. "As a dwarf," says Seneca, "even if he stands on a mountain, is small; a colossus even in a pit is great: so the wise man, in whatever fortune, is great by his own goods, the fool even in the highest fortune is humble. As the apparatus of the stage, because it is given on loan, is immediately returned, and without complaint: so whatever magnificent thing happened in life, whether soon or later is demanded back by fortune, we shall return with equanimity, if we use these things as borrowed." The same: "As hail striking roofs bounces off with great noise indeed, but with no harm: so the assault of fortune can do nothing against the wise man." AND THE IMPIOUS ARE SUCH AS ARE THUS SECURE. — "Secure," that is, prosperous, abounding in all things and happy, as St. Jerome explains: for happiness makes men secure; for a great part of happiness is to be secure about the good by which you think yourself blessed; whence security is opposed to care and solicitude, and secure is said of him who is without care, as it were separated or set apart from care. For he opposes the pious to the impious, in that to the former happen unhappy and adverse things, to the latter happy and prosperous things. This is clear from the Hebrew, Septuagint, Syriac and others. But this happiness and security is false and feigned; for "when they shall say, Peace, and security; then shall sudden destruction come upon them," 1 Thessalonians v, 3. Most excellently St. Gregory, book IX of the Morals, chapter xxvii: "The saints," he says, "are so uncertain that they trust; and so trust that yet from security they are not torpid." Their hope therefore is mixed with fear; hope makes them magnanimous and cheerful, fear humble and solicitous. See the same St. Gregory, book XXIV of the Morals, chapter xii, 7, and book VI, epistle 92 to Gregoria, chamberlain of the Empress, who retained the revelation that her sins had been forgiven her; to whom St. Gregory responds that this vow is useless and harmful, because the uncertainty of remission keeps in us the study of penance and good works. See also St. Augustine, On Correction and Grace, chapter xiii, and in Psalm cxlvii: "Terror," he says, "begets security; for as perverse security drives into terrors, so ordered solicitude begets security. BUT THIS ALSO I JUDGE MOST VAIN. — Hebrew, and this also is vanity, namely by antonomasia, that is, vanity of vanities, that is, the greatest and utmost, for the reasons which I gave a little before. Morally, learn here how vain and how harmful prosperity is to the impious. Hear Eusebius of Emesa, homily On the Holy Epiphodius and Alexander: "In this world, with malice prevailing, with iniquity ruling, the poor man is afflicted, the rich man multiplies. Do you call this man powerful, who is strong unto his own death, to whom the deceptive shadow of present gains gathers causes of eternal evils? Who would call blessed a strong right hand turned against his own throat? Who reasonably praises one swift in hastening to steep precipices? Who would admire the ascent of one whom he sees from on high about to fall? It is just as if you were to admire someone working through impieties and iniquities, through riches and wealth, as if you were to see someone mixing poisons for himself in a cup gilded and set with gems." He then adds: "Do you call him happy, who is unfaithful, obscene, greedy and bloodthirsty, because he spurns the ways of the Lord and is permitted to go his own ways, offended by the straits of the right hand and delighted by the breadth of the left, involved in shameful deeds, stained by crimes, defiled by spoils, and amid all this thinks himself most blessed; unhappy even in this, that he does not understand himself to be unhappy. What can the medicine of heavenly commandments do for these, which heals only the willing? Sluggish therefore toward the care of salvation, eager for the warfare of death and captivity, as has been said; they exult in the worst things, and rejoice in their own perdition: like those who, by chance taking deadly draughts of herbs, are said to perish with laughter." Seneca, epistle 39: "It is the mark of a great soul," he says, "to despise great things and to prefer moderate things to excessive ones: for those are useful and vital; but these, because they are superfluous, harm. Thus excessive fertility destroys the crop; thus branches are broken by weight; thus excessive fruitfulness does not reach maturity. The same happens also to minds, which immoderate happiness breaks, and which turn not only to the injury of others, but also to their own." Pliny, book XVI, chapter 35: "Ivy," he says, "kills trees by its embrace, so does prosperous fortune, while it flatters, strangle and destroy." The Adagiographer: "Trees," he says, "are wont to die forthwith, if ever they become fruitful beyond the usual: so fortune, beyond the usual, bland and favoring, often signifies impending ruin. Just as it often happens that from a most serene sky a fierce rain suddenly arises, so in the most prosperous and joyful circumstances there often falls the gravest disturbance of affairs."
8:15
15. I PRAISED THEREFORE JOY, BECAUSE THERE WAS NO GOOD FOR A MAN UNDER THE SUN, BUT TO EAT, AND DRINK, AND TO REJOICE: AND THAT HE SHOULD TAKE NOTHING ELSE OF HIS LABOUR IN THE DAYS OF HIS LIFE, WHICH GOD HATH GIVEN HIM UNDER THE SUN. — Many think these things are said from the person not of a wise man, but of a foolish voluptuary, who, wearied of the confusion of human affairs, because good things befall the impious and evil things the pious, has given himself over to pleasure, as Solomon finally did. Thus Lyra, Hugo, Titelmann, Cajetan, and even the Thaumaturgus, whom hear, embracing all things from this verse to the end of the chapter in a few words: "I thought at some time that the highest good was situated in food and drink, and that it was more pleasing to God, who throughout his whole life enjoyed these things as much as possible and was refreshed by them; and I alone admired that joy, and so thought of nothing else, that neither night nor day would I be drawn away from that matter, invented for the luxury of men. Finally from these I discovered one thing, that no one of this sort, however much he labors, will in any way reach the good which is truly good." But more truly St. Jerome, whom the Chaldean, Olympiodorus, the Gloss, the Hebrew, Hugo and others follow, think that Solomon continues to speak here from his own sense. For he says the same thing here that he said in chapter ii, verse 12, and chapter v, 17. Namely, he praises here the use of riches and delights, but moderate, frugal and honest. Hear the Chaldean: "And I praised the joy of the law, because there is no good for a man in this age under the sun, except only to eat, and to drink, and to rejoice in his labor, and in his portion, which is given to him from heaven; and not to stretch out his hand in rapine and violence; and this will lead him in peace to the age to come, and he will receive perfect reward for his labor, which he labored in integrity all the days of his life, which the Lord gave him in the age under the sun." AND THIS ONLY HE SHOULD TAKE WITH HIM. — The word "take" signifies that we are not properly and fully masters of the goods of this life, but usufructuaries, so that we use them as if they were alien and lent to us for life, in death to resign them to others and to God himself, who is the true master. The Hebrew, and this alone adheres to him; the Septuagint, and he will hate it together with him; Campensis, for man will receive this as his own; the Arabic, and this will depart with him. Otherwise the Syriac: And he himself, it says, grows weary for himself in his labor. It seems he read ילאנו (iilennu), that is, will labor or grow weary for himself, from the root לאה (laa), that is, labored, instead of ילוננו (illuennu), that is, will adhere or be joined to him.
8:16
16. AND I APPLIED MY HEART TO KNOW WISDOM, AND TO UNDERSTAND THE DISTRACTION WHICH IS CONVERSANT ON THE EARTH: THERE IS A MAN WHO TAKETH NOT SLEEP IN HIS EYES DAY AND NIGHT. — By wisdom the Chaldean understands the study of the law; Thaumaturgus, the study of seeking and obtaining many new pleasures; Olympiodorus, the study of natural sciences; St. Jerome, the study of scrutinizing divine judgments, for example why God afflicts the just and prospers the wicked: why He chooses this one and neglects that one. More broadly, by wisdom you should understand the study of scrutinizing all things created by God: for Solomon scrutinized these, both to know the nature, gifts, and causes of individual things; and also to perceive whether any thing could tranquilize, satisfy and make blessed the mind of man. Whence, explaining this, he adds: "And I understood that man could find no reason for any of the works of God." All these things are explained at the end of this chapter in chapter i, verse 17, chapter ii, verses 7 and 12. For Solomon repeats the alternating movements and agitations of his mind, by which he scrutinized all things, so that he might find rest and satisfaction of mind; and when he found it in none, but mere vanity in each, hence wearied of one he transferred himself to another and another, and especially from joy and delights to the study of wisdom, as more honorable and sublime; but immediately in this too he testifies that he found the stings and thorns of vanity and troubles. DISTRACTION. — Some read dissension, and explain this of the various opinions of the wise conflicting with one another. Others, as Lyran, Hugh and the Interlinear Gloss, read distinction, and explain this of the difference between good and evil, wise and foolish, the prosperity of the wicked and the adversity of the just, and of the diverse ranks, conditions, and customs of men. But it should be read with the Romans as distraction; for in Hebrew it is ענין inian, that is, occupation, distraction, solicitude, affliction, of which I spoke in chapter i, verse 13: "This most troublesome occupation (that is, most vexing) God has given to the sons of men that they might be occupied in it," while some are constantly devoted to gathering wealth, others to cultivating lands, others to erecting buildings, others to pursuing honors, others to vain sciences, etc., so much so that neither by day nor by night do they rest, or take sleep. Whence he adds: THERE IS A MAN WHO TAKETH NOT SLEEP IN HIS EYES DAY AND NIGHT, — that is, he takes very little and as it were none. It is a hyperbole; for men cannot live without sleep, as if to say, He sleeps little, indeed he is always anxious, because he is wholly intent upon his occupation, for instance his gain, his honor, his science, his art, his office, etc. Hence Demosthenes used to say that he consumed more oil in nocturnal studies than wine by day. Aristotle while sleeping held a bronze ball in his hand, so that when it slipped from the hand of the sleeper and fell into the vessel placed beneath, the sound would awaken him, and thus he would return vigilant to nocturnal studies. Thus his Life relates. The same did some Christians and religious. Famous in the East was the monastery of the Acoemeti, that is, the sleepless, and those who kept vigil at night in prayer and meditation, and sang psalms continuously day and night, in a threefold order and time, with the monks divided into three choirs, and succeeding one another in turn in a threefold order. First, this monastery of the Acoemeti was erected in Constantinople, under Pope Leo I, in the year of the Lord 459; they were called the same Studites, from Studio, a man of consular rank, who erected such a monastery, as Nicephorus testifies, book xv, chapter xxiii. Among them St. John Calybita lived the monastic life. Thus Baronius, in the year of the Lord 459. Similar to the monastery of the Acoemeti were those of St. Columban and St. Gall, and many others in Germany, Gaul, and Ireland: namely, these are not vain, but holy vigils of religious, indeed heavenly watches of angels on earth singing psalms to God and serving Him.
8:17
17. AND I UNDERSTOOD THAT MAN COULD FIND NO REASON FOR ALL THE WORKS OF GOD, OF THOSE THINGS WHICH ARE DONE UNDER THE SUN: AND THE MORE HE SHALL HAVE LABOURED TO SEEK, THE LESS HE SHALL FIND: YEA THOUGH THE WISE MAN SHALL SAY THAT HE KNOWETH IT, HE SHALL NOT BE ABLE TO FIND IT. — By the works of God understand both of His omnipotence and magnificence, as the Chaldean translator renders it; but rather of His providence concerning men, as I said at the beginning of the preceding verse from St. Jerome, whom Albinus, Lyra, Hugo and others follow. YEA THOUGH THE WISE MAN SHALL SAY THAT HE KNOWETH IT, HE SHALL NOT BE ABLE TO FIND IT. — It can be translated more clearly from the Hebrew, if it be said (that is, if even the wisest man should determine with himself to give himself to knowing, he will not be able to find it. Thus Vatable and Campensis: And even the wise man himself, he says, if he should try to know, will labour in vain. We have already heard this aphorism in chapter iii, verse 11; wherefore I shall not repeat what was said there. To this pertains the ancient fable which our Pontanus recounts in volume III of his Progymnasmata, part 1, chapter xl: A dog was railing against his tail, because it was idle and lazy, and allowed itself to be dragged by the rest of the body, and did not show the way like the eyes, nor receive commands like the ears, nor pursue the enemy like the feet, nor fight like the teeth, but was as it were a useless appendage to the hind part of the body. The tail replied: And yet I, useless as you slander me, drive away flies, flatter the master, cover shameful parts, and am an ornament to the whole body. The moral: nothing is made by God except wisely and providentially, although men do not see this in many things. A rare example of this sentence is in the squaring of the circle, in which so many generations of mathematicians have tormented themselves and have not wrested the truth, so much so that this seems to them a fixed cross. For the squaring of the circle mechanically, that is, the method of practically effecting a square which shall be equal to a circle, or whose capacity shall be equal to the capacity of any circle, Archimedes found and handed down in his book On the Measurement of the Circle, theorem 1, page 128, in the Paris edition. And it is this: Take the perimeter, or circumference of the circle, and extend it from curved to straight, or make a straight line equal to the circumference of the circle, and to its end attach a straight line, which shall be equal to the semi-diameter of the circle, at right angles, and finally connect the extremity of each of the aforesaid lines with a transverse straight line, and you will have a triangle which shall be equal to the circle. But that a square equal to any triangle can be described mathematically is certain, and Euclid demonstrates the method of doing this in book I, proposition 42, and book II, proposition 14, and book IX, proposition 33. See Clavius there: wherefore thus a square equal to the circle is made. Hence mechanics easily from this practice by measuring a straight line with the circumference of the circle, construct triangles and squares which are equal to the circle. But to demonstrate this mathematically, as Euclid demonstrates his propositions, that is, to bring forth a mathematical reason which demonstrates the method of finding a line which shall be equal to the circumference of the circle, neither Archimedes, nor Euclid, nor anyone else has found up to now, although very many have sweated over it for many years. The squaring of the circle therefore is known practically and mechanically; but its reason and mathematical demonstration is unknown.
Machine translation from the Latin, not reviewed.
Douay-Rheims (Challoner) · Vulgata Clementina · original Douay-Rheims (Douay 1609-10), transcription by EEBO-TCP (CC0) · La Sacra Bibbia, tradotta dalla Volgata da Antonio Martini (1769-1781) (LaParola (laparola.net), Martini OSIS text, Public domain (LaParola's electronic edition marks it 'Dominio pubblico')). Public domain.