The wise man thinketh humbly of himself. His prayer and sentiments upon certain virtues and vices.
Aright wiseman thinketh humbly of himself. 4. knowing that Gods workes are inscrutable, and perfect: 8. desireth truth in al thinges, & mediocritie in riches. 11. Abhorreth certaine sortes of men, 1. 5. & certaine execrable thinges 18. noteth certaine thinges hard to be knowen: 21. other thinges intolerable: 24. others admirable. 32. the tongue dangerous.
1The words of Gatherer the son of Vomiter. The vision which the man spoke, with whom God is, and who being strengthened by God, abiding with him, said:Parole di colui, che aduna, figliuolo di lui, che messe fuora la sapienza. Visione raccontata da un personaggio, col quale sta Dio, e il quale avendo Dio abitante in se, che lo fortifica, ha detto:THE wordes of the Gatherer the sonne of Vomiter. The vision, that the man spake, with whom God is, and who being strengthened by God abiding with him, sayd:Verba Congregantis, filii Vomentis. Visio quam locutus est vir cum quo est Deus, et qui Deo secum morante confortatus, ait: 2I am the most foolish of men, and the wisdom of men is not with me.Io sono il più ignorante tra gli uomini, e la sapienza degli uomini non sta meco.I am most foolish of men, & the wisedom of men is not with me.Stultissimus sum virorum, / et sapientia hominum non est mecum. 3I have not learned wisdom, and have not known the science of saints.Io non ho apparata la sapienza, e non so nulla della scienza de' santi.I haue not learned wisedom, and haue not knowen the science of saints.Non didici sapientiam, / et non novi scientiam sanctorum. 4Who hath ascended up into heaven, and descended? who hath held the wind in his hands? who hath bound up the waters together as in a garment? who hath raised up all the borders of the earth? what is his name, and what is the name of his son, if thou knowest?Chi è che sia salito al cielo, e ne sia disceso? chi nelle sue mani contenne il vento? chi le acque ha ristrette come in un involto? chi ha data stabilità a tutte le parti della terra? qual è il nome di lui, e quale il nome del figliuolo di lui, se tu lo sai?Who hath ascended into heauen and descended? who hath conteyned the spirit in his handes? who hath bound the waters together as in a garment? who hath raysed vp al the borders of the earth? what is his name, and what is the name of his sonne, if thou know?Quis ascendit in cælum, atque descendit ? / quis continuit spiritum in manibus suis ? / quis colligavit aquas quasi in vestimento ? / quis suscitavit omnes terminos terræ ? / quod nomen est ejus, et quod nomen filii ejus, si nosti ? 5Every word of God is fire tried: he is a buckler to them that hope in him.La parola di Dio o tutta purgata col fuoco: egli è scudo per quelli, che sperano in lui.Enerie word of God tryed by fyre, is a buckler to them that hope in him:Omnis sermo Dei ignitus: / clypeus est sperantibus in se. 6Add not any thing to his words, lest thou be reproved and found a liar:Non aggiungere un jota alle sue parole, affin di non essere accusato, e convinto di menzogna.Adde not any thing to his wordes, and so thou be reproued and found a lyer:Ne addas quidquam verbis illius, / et arguaris, inveniarisque mendax.
7Two things I have asked of thee, deny them not to me before I die.Due cose io ti ho domandato (o Signore) non negarle a me per quel, che mi resta di vita.Two thinges I haue asked thee, denie them not to me before I dye.Duo rogavi te: / ne deneges mihi antequam moriar: 8Remove far from me vanity, and lying words. Give me neither beggary, nor riches: give me only the necessaries of life:Allontana da me la vanità, e le parole di menzogna: Non darmi mendicità, né ricchezze, ma concedimi quel, che è necessario al mio vivere:Vanitie, and lying wordes make far from me. Beggerie, and riches geue me not: geue only things necessarie for my sustenance:vanitatem et verba mendacia longe fac a me; / mendicitatem et divitias ne dederis mihi: / tribue tantum victui meo necessaria, 9Lest perhaps being filled, I should be tempted to deny, and say: Who is the Lord? or being compelled by poverty, I should steal, and forswear the name of my God.Affinchè per disgrazia quand'io sia satollo non sia tentato a rinnegare, e dire: Chi o il Signore? ovvero spinto dalla necessità io non mi metta a rubare, e prenda invano il nome del mio Dio.lest perhaps being filled I be allured to denie, and may say: Who is the Lord? or being compelled by pouertie I may steale, and forsweare the name of my God.ne forte satiatus illiciar ad negandum, / et dicam: Quis est Dominus ? / aut egestate compulsus, furer, / et perjurem nomen Dei mei. 10Accuse not a servant to his master, lest he curse thee, and thou fall.Non accusare il servo dinanzi al suo padrone, affinchè egli forse non ti maledica, onde tu vada in perdizione!Accuse not a seruant to his master, lest perhaps he curse thee, and thou fal.Ne accuses servum ad dominum suum, / ne forte maledicat tibi, et corruas. 11There is a generation that curseth their father, and doth not bless their mother.Havvi una razza di uomini, che maledice suo padre, e non benedice sua madre.There is a generation that curseth their father, and that blesseth not their mother.Generatio quæ patri suo maledicit, / et quæ matri suæ non benedicit; 12A generation that are pure in their own eyes, and yet are not washed from their filthiness.Havvi una razza di uomini, che mondi sembrano a loro stessi; ma non sono però lavati dalle sozzure.A generation, that semeth to itself cleane, & yet is not washed from their filthines.generatio quæ sibi munda videtur, / et tamen non est lota a sordibus suis; 13A generation, whose eyes are lofty, and their eyelids lifted up on high.Havvi una razza di uomini, che portano alti gli occhi, e le loro pupille altiere, e superbe.A generation, whose eies are loftie, and the eielids therof set vp on high.generatio cujus excelsi sunt oculi, / et palpebræ ejus in alta surrectæ;
14A generation that for teeth hath swords, and grindeth with their jaw teeth, to devour the needy from off the earth, and the poor from among men.Havvi una generazione, la quale ha coltelli in cambio di denti, e lacera con sue mascelle, e divora i mendichi della terra, e i poveri tra gli uomini.A generation, that for teeth hath swordes, and chaweth with theyr grinding teeth, that they may eate the needie out of the earth, and the poore from among men.generatio quæ pro dentibus gladios habet, / et commandit molaribus suis, / ut comedat inopes de terra, / et pauperes ex hominibus. 15The horseleech hath two daughters that say: Bring, bring. There are three things that never are satisfied, and the fourth never saith: It is enough.La mignatta ha due figlie, che dicono: Dammi, dammi. Tre cose sono insaziabili, e la quarta, che non dice mai: Basta.The horseleach hath two daughters that say: Bring, bring. Three things are vnsatiable, the fourth neuer sayth it sufficeth.Sanguisugæ duæ sunt filiæ, / dicentes: Affer, affer. / Tria sunt insaturabilia, / et quartum quod numquam dicit: Sufficit. 16Hell and the mouth of the womb, and the earth which is not satisfied with water: and the fire never saith: It is enough.L'inferno, e la matrice, e la terra, che non si sazia di bere l'acqua: il fuoco poi non dice mai: Basta.Hel, and the mouth of the matrice, & the earth which is not satisfied with water: but the fyre neuer sayth it sufficeth.Infernus, et os vulvæ, / et terra quæ non satiatur aqua: / ignis vero numquam dicit: Sufficit. 17The eye that mocketh at his father, and that despiseth the labour of his mother in bearing him, let the ravens of the brooks pick it out, and the young eagles eat it.A colui che schernisce il proprio padre, e disprezza i dolori della madre nel partorirlo, gli cavin l'occhio i corvi, che stan lungo i torrenti, e sei divorino i figliuoli dell'aquila.The eie, that scorneth his father, & that despiseth the trauail of his mother, in bearing him, let the rauens of the torrents pick it out, and the young of the eagle eate it.Oculum qui subsannat patrem, / et qui despicit partum matris suæ, / effodiant eum corvi de torrentibus, / et comedant eum filii aquilæ ! 18Three things are hard to me, and the fourth I am utterly ignorant of.Tre cose sono per me difficili ad intendersi, e una quarta mi è affatto ignota:Three thinges are hard to me, and of the fourth I am vtterly ignorant.Tria sunt difficilia mihi, / et quartum penitus ignoro: 19The way of an eagle in the air, the way of a serpent upon a rock, the way of a ship in the midst of the sea, and the way of a man in youth.La traccia dell'aquila nell'aria, la traccia di un serpente sulla pietra, la traccia di una nave in mezzo al mare, e la traccia dell'uomo nella adolescenza.The way of an eagle in the ayre, the way of a serpent vpon a rocke, the way of a shippe in the middes of 〈…〉 and the way of a man in youth.viam aquilæ in cælo, / viam colubri super petram, / viam navis in medio mari, / et viam viri in adolescentia.
20Such also is the way of an adulterous woman, who eateth and wipeth her mouth, and saith: I have done no evil.Tale è parimente la via della donna adultera, la quale mangia, e si ripulisce la bocca, e dice: Non ho fatto verun male.Such is also the way of an adulterous woman, which eateth, and wyping her mouth sayth: I haue done no euil.Talis est et via mulieris adulteræ, / quæ comedit, et tergens os suum / dicit: Non sum operata malum. 21By three things the earth is disturbed, and the fourth it cannot bear.Per tre cose è messa in commozione la terra, e alla quarta non può ella, reggere:By three thinges the earth is moued, and the fourth it can not susteyne.Per tria movetur terra, / et quartum non potest sustinere: 22By a slave when he reigneth: by a fool when he is filled with meat:(E messa in commozione) da uno schiavo, che arrivi a regnare, da uno stolto, quando è pieno di cibo:By a seruant when he shal reigne: by a foole when he shal be filled with meate:per servum, cum regnaverit; / per stultum, cum saturatus fuerit cibo; 23By an odious woman when she is married: and by a bondwoman when she is heir to her mistress.Da una donna odiosa, quando uno la ha sposata; e da una serva divenuta erede di sua padrona.by an odious woman when she shal be taken in matrimonie: & by a bondwoman when she shal be heyre to her mistresse.per odiosam mulierem, cum in matrimonio fuerit assumpta; / et per ancillam, cum fuerit hæres dominæ suæ. 24There are four very little things of the earth, and they are wiser than the wise.Quattro cose delle più piccole sono sulla terra, e queste superano in saggezza i sapienti.There are foure the least thinges of the earth, and they are wiser then the wise.Quatuor sunt minima terræ, / et ipsa sunt sapientiora sapientibus: 25The ants, a feeble people, which provide themselves food in the harvest:Le formiche, popolo debolissimo, il quale al tempo della messe si prepara il suo vitto:The antes,formicæ, populus infirmus, / qui præparat in messe cibum sibi; 26The rabbit, a weak people, which maketh its bed in the rock:I conigli, razza paurosa, la quale pianta il suo covile nei massi:a weake people, which prepareth in the haruest meate for themselues: The leueret, a people not strong, which placeth his bed in the rocke:lepusculus, plebs invalida, / qui collocat in petra cubile suum; 27The locust hath no king, yet they all go out by their bands:Le cavallette non hanno re, e si muovono tutte divise in isquadroni:The locust hath no king, and they go our al by their troopes:regem locusta non habet, / et egreditur universa per turmas suas; 28The stellio supporteth itself on hands, and dwelleth in kings’ houses.Lo stellione, che si regge sulle sue mani, e abita nelle case dei re.The stellion stayeth on his handes, &〈…〉 in kings houses.stellio manibus nititur, / et moratur in ædibus regis.
29There are three things, which go well, and the fourth that walketh happily:Tre cose vi sono, che hanno bella andatura, e una quarta, che cammina magnificamente;There are three thinges which 〈…〉l, and the fourth that goeth happely.Tria sunt quæ bene gradiuntur, / et quartum quod incedit feliciter: 30A lion, the strongest of beasts, who hath no fear of any thing he meeteth:Il lione, forte sopra tutti gli animali, non teme l'incontro di chicchessia;The lyon, the strongest of beastes shal feare at the meeting of none:leo, fortissimus bestiarum, / ad nullius pavebit occursum; 31A cock girded about the loins: and a ram: and a king, whom none can resist.Il Gallo dai fianchi serrati, e l'ariete, e il re, a cui nissuno resiste.the cocke gyrded about the loines, and the ramme: also the king, against whom none can resist.gallus succinctus lumbos; / et aries; nec est rex, qui resistat ei. 32There is that hath appeared a fool after he was lifted up on high: for if he had understood, he would have laid his hand upon his mouth.V'ha chi è stato riconosciuto per istolto dopo che fu innalzato a posto sublime: perocché se avesse avuto intelletto si sarebbe messa la mano alla bocca.There is that hath appeared a foole after that he was listed vp on high: for if he had vnderstood, he would haue layd his hand vpon his mouth.Est qui stultus apparuit postquam elevatus est in sublime; / si enim intellexisset, ori suo imposuisset manum. 33And he that strongly squeezeth the paps to bring out milk, straineth out butter: and he that violently bloweth his nose, bringeth out blood: and he that provoketh wrath, bringeth forth strife.Chi stringe con forza le poppe per trarne il latte, ne spreme il burro, e chi si soffia il naso con veemenza, ne cava il sangue; e chi provoca lo sdegno accende discordie.And he that strongly presseth the pappes to wring out milke, strayneth out butter, and he that violently cleanceth his nose, wringeth out bloud: & he that prouoketh angers, bringeth forth discordes.Qui autem fortiter premit ubera ad eliciendum lac exprimit butyrum; / et qui vehementer emungit elicit sanguinem; / et qui provocat iras producit discordias.
30:1
Challoner
Gatherer, etc., or, as it is in the Latin, Congregans, the son of Vomens. The Latin interpreter has given us in this place the signification of the Hebrew names, instead of the names themselves, which are in the Hebrew, Agur, the son of Jakeh. But whether this Agur be the same person as Solomon, as many think, or a different person, whose doctrine was adopted by Solomon, and inserted among his parables or proverbs, is uncertain. (Challoner)
Calmet
Vomiter may denote David, who delivered many excellent canticles; Eructavit cor, Psalm xliv. De Dieu translates, "The words of him who is recollected the son of obedience." The author styles himself foolish, and asks for neither beggary nor riches, (ver. 2, 8.) which seems not to agree with Solomon; though there can be no doubt but this chapter is inspired. (Calmet)
In effect, that great king might form this petition, being mindful of the instability of human greatness, and confess that of himself he was foolish.
Vision. Hebrew massa (Haydock) generally implies something disagreeable, but here it is put for a collection of moral sentences.
Worthington
With, etc. Hebrew also, "to Ithiel, even unto Ithiel and Ucal," (Protestants; Haydock) friends of Agur, (Calmet) or his children, (Menochius) or rather Solomon speaks to all the faithful. We never find Agur mentioned as a canonical writer; and if he were, he would have been placed after Solomon. (Worthington)
30:2
Calmet
With me. He speaks of what he could claim of his own, abstracting from the prophetic light. (Calmet)
Worthington
In his humility, he supposeth that others are more perfect. The wisest know best their own defects. (Worthington)
30:4
Calmet
Descended. How then could I acquire such a sublime science? (Deuteronomy 30:11.) (Calmet)
Worthington
Christ alone could impart it, (John 3:13.; Haydock) who is the perfect wisdom. (Worthington)
Haydock
Hands. Septuagint, "breast." (Haydock)
It is no less difficult to fathom the designs of Providence. Some understand the "spirit" of prophecy to be here meant.
Calmet
Son. Septuagint, "children." But many Greek copies, and all the interpreters, have Son, which the Fathers explain of the second person of the blessed Trinity, specified [in] Proverbs 8:22. (Calmet)
30:5
Is fire-tried; that is, most pure, like gold purified by fire. (Challoner) (Psalm 17:31., and Jeremias 23:29.)
It cannot deceive.
30:6
And not any thing contrary, Deuteronomy 4:2., and 12:32.
30:8
Words, which are so opposite to thine, ver. 5.
Riches. The former often prompts men to deceive, the latter to grow proud and forget God.
30:10
Rabbins
Accuse. Septuagint, "deliver not" to an idolater, Deuteronomy 23:15. (Rabbins)
Worthington
Servant. Add not to his affliction. (Worthington)
Lyranus
We must suppose that the accusation is frivolous or false. (Lyranus)
A servant may do a person much injury: but this ought not to deter the other from performing what justice and charity require.
30:15
Challoner
The horse-leech: concupiscence, which hath two daughters that are never satisfied, viz., lust and avarice. (Challoner)
30:16
Womb. Septuagint, "the love of a woman," (Haydock) a harlot, or rather Hebrew, "a barren woman."
Worthington
Enough. The more fuel, the brighter the flame. These four similitudes may denote cruelty, lust, avarice, and prodigality; (Calmet) or the first and last may be understood (Haydock) of envy and ambition. (Worthington)
30:17
Labour. Septuagint, etc., "old age." Hebrew, "the obedience or admonition." Those who cursed their parents, were sentenced to death, Leviticus 20:6.
30:19
Haydock
Youth. Hebrew, "a virgin." The "conception of a mighty man (the Messias; Haydock) in a virgin," is fitly compared to the flight of an eagle in the air, which leaves no trace behind, and is the most difficult to comprehend. See Jeremias 31:22.; Univ. Hist. 3:p. 144, note. Isaiah 7:14.; Parkhurst in alm. (Haydock)
Cornelius a Lapide
Some of the Jews have admitted this explanation. (Cornelius a Lapide)
Calmet
Others understand that the marks of virginity are equivocal; (Bossuet, etc.) or, if we stick to the Vulgate and Septuagint, the difference betwixt a child and a young man is extremely great, and almost incomprehensible. (Calmet)
Worthington
Young people who follow their carnal appetite, can no more give an account of their actions than of the course of an eagle, etc. (Worthington)
His wanderings are manifold. The Hebrew seems to contain a prophecy of Christ's conception.
30:23
Calmet
Mistress, and is married to her master. She will generally prove insolent; like slaves on the throne, Regnabit sanguine multo ad regnum quisquis venit ab exilio. (Suetonius, Tib. 59.) (Calmet)
30:27
Calmet
Bands, like an army. When one rises or falls, all do the like. They are so numerous in the East, as to darken the sun and spread destruction, Joel i., and 2:(Calmet)
30:28
Challoner
The stellio. A kind of house lizard, marked with spots like stars, from whence it has its name. (Challoner)
Haydock
Hebrew semamith. (Haydock)
Calmet
It probably provides food against the stormy season, like ants. (Bochart) (Calmet)
Vatable
Others understand "the spider," (Kimchi) or "monkey." (Vatable, etc.)
30:30
Pliny
Meeteth. If he retreat, he looks back with disdain, till the woods conceal the turpitude of his flight. (Pliny, [Natural History?] 8:16.)
30:31
Loins. It rules, and is even terrible to lions. (Pliny 10:21.)
Calmet
The terms of the original are found nowhere else, and some understand the horse, the bee, and a soldier in arms. (Calmet)
Montanus
Whom. Hebrew, "and Alkum with him." (Montanus)
But we know no animal or king of this name; and it may imply, "in the midst of his court," or "assembly." (Chaldean) Some Latin copies read, Et Rex, nec est qui resistat ei, (Sixtus V.) which is more conformable to the Hebrew, (Calmet) and is here translated, though the Vulgate read, Nec est rex qui, etc. These four emblems (Haydock) denote fortitude, chastity, order, and justice.
30:32
Worthington
Mouth. Fools ought not to govern. (Worthington)
Calmet
Many might have been deemed wise, if they had continued in a lower station. (Calmet)
Haydock
Hebrew, "If thou hast acted foolishly in raising thyself, and if thou hast entertained evil thoughts, put thy hand to thy mouth." (Haydock)
Calmet
Chaldean, "put not thy," etc. Give not way to pride, or to insolent language. (Calmet)
30:33
Calmet
And. Hebrew, "For he who presseth milk." (Calmet)
Haydock
Protestants, "Surely the churning of milk bringeth forth butter," etc. (Haydock)
Worthington
Strife. Moderation is necessary, (Calmet) in all actions. (Worthington)
30:1
Gatherer, etc.... Or, as it is in the Latin, Congregans the son of Vomens. The Latin interpreter has given us in this place the signification of the Hebrew names, instead of the names themselves, which are in the Hebrew, Agur the son of Jakeh. But whether this Agur be the same person as Solomon, as many think, or a different person, whose doctrine was adopted by Solomon, and inserted among his parables or proverbs, is uncertain.
30:5
Is fire tried.... That is, most pure, like gold purified by fire.
30:15
The horseleech.... Concupiscence, which hath two daughters that are never satisfied, viz., lust and avarice.
30:28
The stellio.... A kind of house lizard marked with spots like stars, from whence it has its name.
30:1
1. The vvordes of the Gatherer.] Some Interpreters take these foure Hebrew Some suppose one Agur to be auctor of this chapter. wordes, Agur, Iache, Ithiel, and Vcal, conteined in this first verse, to be proper names of men, supposing that a certaine wiseman named Agur, the sonne of Iache, spake the sentences folowing in this chapter, to his sonnes or scholars, called Ithiel & Vcal. And so this supposed Agur, not Salomon, should be the auctor of this chapter. But the old Interpreter, whom S. Ierom approueth and foloweth, translated the same wordes as noones appellatiues. Neither But it semeth more probable that only Salomon is auctor of this whole booke. doth anie ancient Father account this Agur, amongst the writers of holie Scriptures. And if there were a peculiar auctor of this chapter, it is like the same should haue bene placed last, and not before that which now foloweth, and is by al men confessed to be Salomons. And therfore we thinke it more probable, with S. Beda, and the common opinion, that there vvas no other auctor of anie part of this booke, besides King Salomon VVho is here called CONGREGANS, the Gatherer, because he gathered these excellent Parables, VVhy he is called Gatherer. and Prouerbes; as the sonne of the Holie Ghost, signified by the word IACHE, povvring forth diuine sentences, for instruction of ITHIEL & VCAL, that is, of al those vvith vvhom God is by his grace; and vvho are streingthened by God abiding vvith them.
30:2
The wisest man best knoweth that he wanteth much of perfect wisdom yet in his humilitie supposeth, that others haue attained some what more then himself.
30:4
Christ the Sonne of God is wisdom it self and as the Sonne of man hath perfect wisdom.
30:10
Bondslades are to be pittied, and not affliction added to the afflicted.
30:11
Foure execrable vices. Ingratitude. Hypocrisie: Insolencie: Oppression of the poore. Cōcupiscence of the flesh, & of the eyes.
30:16
••u•e, Luxurie, Auarice, & Ambition.
Dishonour of parents shal be senerely punished.
30:17
Youngmen folowing carnal appetite, can no more geue account of their actiōs, then of the vvayes vvhich an eagle, a serpent, and a shippe haue passed.
30:19
By these examples are commended foure vertues, Industrie, Prudence, Concord, and Humilitie.
30:23
23. A bond vvoman vvhen she shal be heyre.] Of al thinges in this world, it semeth VVhy God suffereth heresie to reigne. most absurde, that heresie doth dominiere ouer Catholique religion: vvhich God some times, and in some places suffereth, for the greater merite of his elect.
30:24
Other foure Fortitude, Chastitie, Order, and Iustice
30:29
Fooles ought not to gouerne.
30:32
Moderation is necessarie in al actions.
30:3
St Gregory of Nyssa † AD 395 Against Eunomius 3.2
… Now, since it is not mere human wisdom that is claimed for himself by Solomon, who says, “God hath taught me wisdom
St Augustine of Hippo † AD 430 Letters of St. Augustin 102.29
… Again, in another place in the book of Proverbs, he says: “God hath taught me wisdom, and I have learned the knowledge of the holy. Who hath ascended up into heaven and descended? who hath gathered the winds in His fists? who hath bound the waters in a garment? who hath established all the ends of the earth? What is His name, and what is His Son’s name?”
30:4
St Ignatius of Antioch † AD 108 Epistle to the Philippians 2
… Have we not all one Father? And there is also one Son, God the Word. For “the only-begotten Son,” saith [the Scripture], “who is in the bosom of the Father.” And again, “One Lord Jesus Christ.” And in another place, “What is His name, or what His Son’s name, that we may know?”
30:6
Origen † AD 254 Origen's Commentary on the Gospel of John 2.8
… For he says that the æon (age), and the things in it, were not made by the Logos; he considers them to have come into existence before the Logos. He deals with the statement, “Without Him was nothing made,” with some degree of audacity, nor is he afraid of the warning:
30:8
St Athanasius of Alexandria † AD 373 Apology to the Emperor. (Apologia Ad Constantium.) 20
… You, like Solomon, have required of the Lord (and you ought to believe yourself to have obtained your desire), that it would seem good unto Him to remove far from you vain and lying words
St John Chrysostom † AD 407 Homilies on First Thessalonians 3
… Grudging and envy. What those in the time of Noah? Fleshly pleasures, and the evils issuing from them. What his son? Insolence and irreverence. What the Sodomites? Insolence, wantonness; and fullness of bread. But often even poverty has this effect. On this account a certain wise man said, “Give me neither poverty nor riches.” (
St John Chrysostom † AD 407 The Homilies of St. John Chrysostom on the Epistle to the Hebrews 18
But, one says, “the wisdom of the poor man is despised.” ( Eccles. ix. 16 .) And again another says, “Give me neither riches nor poverty” (
St Augustine of Hippo † AD 430 Letters of St. Augustin 130.12
… for if his desires go beyond it, he is not desiring it, and therefore his desire is improper. This was desired, and was prayed for by him who said: “Give me neither poverty nor riches: feed me with food convenient for me: lest I be full, and deny Thee, and say, Who is the Lord? or lest I be poor, and steal, and take the name of my God in vain.”
St Augustine of Hippo † AD 430 Letters of St. Augustin 130.22
… When one says: “Order my steps in Thy word, and let not any iniquity have dominion over me,” what else is he saying than, “Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven”? When one says: “Give me neither poverty nor riches,”
30:11
St Athanasius of Alexandria † AD 373 History of the Councils 14
… And let them go on to accuse their own unfortunate birth, and say, ‘We are sprung not of religious men but of heretics.’ For such language, as I said before, is consistent in those who barter their Fathers’ fame and their own salvation for Arianism, and fear not the words of the divine proverb, ‘There is a generation that curseth their father’ (
30:12
St Augustine of Hippo † AD 430 Letters of St. Augustin 93.37
… And thus you have no excuse by which you can wash away the guilt of the schism whereby you have gone forth from the unity of the Church; and in you is fulfilled that saying of Holy Writ: “There is a generation that esteem themselves right, and have not cleansed themselves from the guilt of their going forth.”
30:14
St Jerome † AD 420 Jerome's Apology for Himself Against the Books of Rufinus 3.43
… The stone is heavy, and the sand hard to be borne; but the anger of a fool is heavier than either; indignation is cruel, anger is sharp, and envy is impatient. The impious man speaketh against the poor; and he that trusteth in the audacity of his heart is most foolish. The unwise man putteth forth all his anger, but the wise dealeth it out in parts.
30:15
St Hippolytus † AD 235 On Proverbs 1
… And as Tartarus, which is situated in a doleful and dark locality, is not touched by a ray of light, so is every one who is the slave of sin in all the passions of the flesh. Like the earth not filled with water he is never able to come to confession, and to the laver of regeneration, and like water and fire, never says, “It is enough.”
St Athanasius of Alexandria † AD 373 Defence of His Flight. (Apologia de Fuga.) 4
Are they then satisfied with all this, and content to be quiet for the future? By no means; they have not given over yet, but like the horseleach
St Athanasius of Alexandria † AD 373 Persecution in Egypt 1
The crimes these men have committed cannot adequately be described. I would only say, that as I write and wish to enumerate all their deeds of iniquity, the thought enters my mind, whether this heresy be not the fourth daughter of the horse-leach
St Gregory of Nazianzus † AD 389 Select Orations of Saint Gregory Nazianzen 16.19
… Who give heed to the brilliance of costly stones, and soft flowing garments, the prey of moths, and the plunder of robbers and tyrants and thieves; who are proud of their multitude of slaves and animals, and spread themselves over plains and mountains, with their possessions and gains and schemes, like Solomon’s horseleach
St Gregory of Nazianzus † AD 389 Select Orations of Saint Gregory Nazianzen 18.21
… but he intrusted the greater part of this bounty to her hand, as being a most excellent and trusty steward of such matters. What a woman she is? Not even the Atlantic Ocean, or if there be a greater one, could meet her drafts upon it. So great and so boundless is her love of liberality. In the contrary sense she has rivalled the horse-leech
St Gregory of Nyssa † AD 395 Against Eunomius 4.8
… war stands to peace, and life to death, does he also perceive in the essences the conflict which so exists among all such things, so that they cannot unite one with another, because the mixture of contraries exerts upon the things mingled a consuming force, as the wisdom of the Proverbs saith of such a doctrine, that water and fire never say “It is enough
St Jerome † AD 420 Against Jovinianus 1.28
… Hence the same Solomon previously commands: “My son flows forth beyond.” And the Apostle, writing to the Hebrews, says “Therefore we ought to give the more earnest heed to the things spoken, lest haply we flow forth beyond.” But who can hide from himself what is thus enigmatically expressed?
St Augustine of Hippo † AD 430 On the Holy Trinity 15.9
… for they who sleep, sleep in the night; and they who are drunken, are drunken in the night: but let us who are of the day, be sober.” But this allegory is not an enigma. For here the meaning is patent to all but the very dull; but an enigma is, to explain it briefly, an obscure allegory, as, e.g. , “The horseleech had three daughters,”
30:17
St Hippolytus † AD 235 On Proverbs 1
… and may the young eagles devour him: and such shall be trodden under the feet of the saints.
30:18
St Hippolytus † AD 235 On Proverbs 1
… “and the ways of a ship crossing the sea,” i.e., the ways of the Church, which is in this life as in a sea, and which is directed by her hope in Christ through the cross; “and the ways of a man in youth,” —the ways of Him, namely, who is born of the Holy Spirit and the Virgin. For behold, says the Scripture, a man whose name is the Rising.
St Ambrose of Milan † AD 397 Exposition of the Christian Faith 5.3
… We have this set forth in the books of Solomon, in that passage in which he said: “There are three things impossible to understand, yea, a fourth which I know not, the track of an eagle in the air, the way of a serpent upon a rock, the path of a ship in the sea, and the way of a man in his youth.”
30:19
St Hippolytus † AD 235 On Proverbs 1
… And Jesus was then beginning to be about thirty years of age. This, then, was the youthful and blooming period of the age of Him who, in journeying among the cities and districts, healed the diseases and infirmities of men.
Origen † AD 254 Origen's Commentary on the Gospel of John 1.26
… For this road is itself sufficient for all the supplies of our journey; and every one who walks on it wants nothing. He is clad with a garment which is fit for one who is setting out in response to an invitation to a wedding; and on this road he cannot meet anything that can annoy him. “No one,” Solomon says,
Theodoret of Cyrus † AD 458 The Ecclesiastical History of Theodoret 1.3
… that the power of God can be united with weakness? that reason itself can be dimmed by unreasonableness, or that darkness can be mixed with the true light? Does not the Apostle say, ‘ What communion hath light with darkness? and what concord hath Christ with Belial ?’ and Solomon, that ‘ the way of a serpent upon a rock
30:20
St Hippolytus † AD 235 On Proverbs 1
… woman, who, when she has done the deed of sin, wipeth herself, and will say that no wickedness has been done.” Such is the conduct of the Church that believes on Christ, when, after committing fornication with idols, she renounces these and the devil, and is cleansed of her sins and receives forgiveness, and then asserts that she has done no wickedness.
30:21
St Hippolytus † AD 235 On Proverbs 1
… “And a fool when he is filled with meat:” i.e., getting the land in possession readily, and eating its fruit, and being filled, it (the people) kicked. “And a handmaid when she casts out her mistress:” i.e., the synagogue which took the life of the Lord, and crucified the flesh of Christ.
St Cyril of Jerusalem † AD 386 The Catechetical Lectures of S. Cyril 6.25
… He committed blasphemy therefore by saying that he was the Holy Ghost: let him that communicates with those heretics see with whom he is enrolling himself. The slave shook the world, since by three things the earth is shaken, and the fourth it cannot bear,—if a slave became a king
30:24
St Hippolytus † AD 235 On Proverbs 1
… “The spider, that supports itself upon its hands, and is easily caught, dwells in the strongholds of kings.” That is, the thief with his hands extended (on the cross), rests on the cross of Christ and dwells in Paradise, the stronghold of the three Kings—Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.
Origen † AD 254 Origen Against Celsus 4.87
… The ants are a people not strong, yet they prepare their meat in the summer; the conies are but a feeble folk, yet make they their houses in the rocks; the locusts have no king, yet go they forth in order at one command; and the spotted lizard, though leaning upon its hands, and being easily captured, dwelleth in kings’ fortresses.”
30:26
John Cassian † AD 435 The Conferences of John Cassian 10.11
… And of these spiritual hedgehogs we read in Proverbs as follows: “And the hedgehogs are a feeble folk, who have made their homes in the rocks.”
30:29
St Hippolytus † AD 235 On Proverbs 1
… And the fourth, viz. God, the Word Incarnate, passed in honour through the Virgin’s womb; and creating our Adam anew, he passed through the gates of heaven, and became the first-fruits of the resurrection and of the ascension for all.
St Gregory of Nazianzus † AD 389 Select Orations of Saint Gregory Nazianzen 32
… But since you hold so very close to the letter (although you are contending against the letter), pray take your demonstrations from this source. There are in the Book of Proverbs three things which go well, a lion, a goat, and a cock; and to these is added a fourth;—a King making a speech before the people,
30:30
St Augustine of Hippo † AD 430 Reply to Faustus the Manichæan 12.42
… We see Him worshipped by the sons of Jacob, the remnant saved according to the election of grace. Christ, who was born as an infant, is the lion’s whelp, as it is added, My son and offspring, to show why this whelp, in whose praise it is said, "The lion’s whelp is stronger than the herd,"
30:33
St Gregory of Nazianzus † AD 389 Select Orations of Saint Gregory Nazianzen 37
… and, let the colt of thy favours and the stag of thy love company with thee; do thou then take care not to be a strange river, nor to please others better than thine own wife. But if thou be carried elsewhere, then thou makest a law of lewdness for thy partner also. Thus saith the Saviour.
30:1
1. THE WORDS OF HIM THAT GATHERETH, THE SON OF HIM THAT VOMITETH. A VISION WHICH A MAN SPOKE, WITH WHOM IS GOD, AND WHO, BEING STRENGTHENED WITH GOD DWELLING WITH HIM, SAITH. — Many take τὸ congregantis, vomentis, etc., as not appellative names, but proper names, whence also in the Roman Bibles they are written with capital letters C and V; wherefore from the Hebrew they thus translate, the words of Agur the son of Jake; he spoke a prophecy, a man to Ithiel and Uchal. Thus the Chaldean; thus also nearly the Syriac, the words of Agur, he says, son of Jake, who receives prophecy, and was strengthened, and said to Ithiel; Aquila, to Ethel, and perfect; Theodotion, to Ethel, and I shall be able, etc. Thus also Vatablus, Pagninus, Baynus, Jansenius, and Aben-Ezra, who therefore hold that these words are not Solomon's, but Agur's, who flourished in the time of Solomon in wisdom, probity, and authority, and delivered this his doctrine to Ithiel and Uchal, two of his disciples or companions, and therefore Solomon wisely inserted these wise sayings into his book, or they were added to Solomon's book by someone else. They make their opinion probable, both because three names are accurately expressed here—of the father, the son, and the disciples—which can scarcely be taken appellatively; and because this style and discourse is so dissimilar from the rest of the style and discourse of Proverbs; and finally because it is called a prophecy and a vision, whereas Solomon in this book did not act as a Prophet, but as an instructor of youths. Others on the contrary contend that all these things, equally as the preceding, are not Agur's, but Solomon's himself, and therefore the names Agur, Jake, Ithiel and Uchal, which appear to be proper, are to be taken appellatively, so as to signify properties and gifts befitting Solomon, as both Our author and the Septuagint took and expounded them appellatively. For the Church and the Fathers attribute these, equally as the preceding, to Solomon, and cite them in the name of Solomon, not of Agur; thus Bede, Lyra, Hugo, Arboreus, Dionysius, Peltanus and others. I myself walk between both opinions, and reduce both to harmony. I say therefore, as in the parables of the Gospel of Our Lord Jesus Christ and of others, there is a twofold sense: the former is grammatical, or of the bark of the letter or parable; the latter is parabolical and principal, which is signified through the grammatical or bark of the letter parabolically, and is represented through the parable, as through an image and idea similar to itself. Thus likewise this happens here: for this is a parable or riddle of Solomon, in which grammatical sense, or in the bark of the parable, he alludes to a man distinguished in his age by wisdom, namely to Agur, as if he here instructs his disciples or familiars, Ithiel and Uchal, in this; and teaches his wisdom. Indeed Solomon introduces Agur in this chapter, and in the following chapter Lemuel, as interlocutors; as Plato in his Dialogues, and Plutarch in his Symposia (for this too is a symposium, or banquet of Solomon's wisdom) introduce various interlocutors, such as Socrates, Protagoras, Menon, etc. In the person of Agur therefore and Lemuel does Solomon speak here: for he assumes their name and person, so that he attributes the significances of their names to himself. And it is probable that the riddles and enigmas of this chapter were uttered by Agur, but Solomon makes them his own and transcribes them into himself, indeed he confirms them, and gives them his assent and authority. Under this grammatical sense therefore and bark of the proper names of Agur, Jake, Ithiel and Uchal, he signifies arcane things parabolically, while he interprets these proper names, and ascribes their significances to himself, as if to say: The words of Agur, that is of Solomon, who was Agur, that is, gathering; and the son of Jake, that is of him that vomiteth, because he himself gathered his wisdom here, and contracted it into a few quatrains, and collected his mind and senses in God, so that he might abundantly draw his divine lights and, being full of them, might then eruct them to others with such abundance that he seemed to vomit them forth; just as a furnace is not absurdly, but elegantly said to vomit sparks and fires, because it ejects them copiously; and Virgil says: "The golden boss vomits fires," and: "He vomits forth the purple life," Aeneid IX; and Ovid, epistle 18: "The wave vomits forth and resorbs Scylla," and book I of the Fasti: "Cacus vomits flames from his mouth." Just as therefore gulfs and fountains egurgitate and vomit forth a copious supply of waters with force, so Solomon vomits here the waters of wisdom like an overflowing fountain. Therefore τὸ son of vomiting signifies, that is, abounding in vomit (just as the son of iniquity is said to abound in iniquity), that Solomon's mind was so illuminated and filled with divine revelations, that like one abounding, he was compelled by vomit to eructate, and to pour forth to the whole world these salutary doctrines, which with collected spirit as if full of new wine he had learned and drawn from God; just as the Apostles, having received the Holy Spirit at Pentecost, as if full of new wine eructated the mighty works of God, so that they seemed to vomit them forth and to be drunk. Hence he calls this doctrine prophecy, because received by heavenly light, and he says leithiel, that is, through Ithiel, that is, through this that God is with me (for אתי itti signifies with me, אל el, that is, God); and Ithiel, that is, God being with me and dwelling with me; Uchal, that is, I shall be able, as if to say, Strengthened by God I shall be able to bring forth and utter this lofty wisdom, just as in fact I do bring it forth and utter it. Whence Cajetan thus translates word for word from the Hebrew aptly to our version: The words of the gathered son of vomiting. Prophecy, the saying of the man through God with me (that is, God), God with me, I shall be able. Thus Solomon, Ecclesiastes I, 1, calls himself the Preacher, that is, one who preaches, convokes and gathers, and teaches the Church, or the assembly of the faithful. You may explain leithiel more clearly, whose name is Ithiel, that is, God is with me, that is, as our translator renders it, with whom God is; for the initial lamed is the article of the dative case; and Ithiel is the same as God with me. Beneath this second parabolic sense, which is the genuine and literal one, lies a third symbolic sense, higher and more sublime, whereby Solomon rises to God and to Christ, the antitype of Solomon, whom he therefore calls Ithiel, that is, God with me. For with Christ as man was the divinity and the person of the Word; whence Christ is called by Isaiah, chapter IX, Emmanuel, that is, God with us: therefore Solomon here foreshadows, and through the shadow of these names obscurely represents the mystery of the Holy Trinity. For Agur, that is, gathering, is God the Father, in whom is formally and radically all the gathering of wisdom, and the whole gathering of divinity and the Holy Trinity; whence he is called the son of vomiting, that is, from the abundance of majesty and glory eructating, and as if vomiting, that is, pouring forth and begetting Ithiel, that is, the Son: for he says Ithiel, that is, God is with me, because in Christ dwells "all the fullness of the divinity bodily," Colossians II, 9. He also pours forth and breathes Uchal, that is, the Holy Spirit: for his name and voice is Uchal, that is, I shall be able, because this Spirit is most mighty and most powerful, so that no one is able to resist his force and efficacy. And τὸ Ithiel is repeated and doubled, on account of the twofold nature in Christ, divine and human. This therefore is the enigma of the Holy Trinity; for Solomon wished prudently to foreshadow, indeed to conceal and hide, this mystery to the rude and gross Jews, not openly, but through the veil of this obscure enigma, lest, if he should enunciate it clearly, it would not be grasped by them, but would be mocked, rejected and perhaps blasphemed. That this is so is evident from the following verses 4 and 5, where he clearly expresses the omnipotence of the Godhead, and the Holy Trinity, and namely the generation of the Son, saying: "What is his name, and what is the name of his son, if thou knowest?" In which he followed his father David, saying in Psalm CIX: "The Lord said to my Lord (namely God the Father to God the Son): Sit thou at my right hand;" whence from this place Christ convicted the Pharisees. Now let us weigh the words one by one in order. The Words of the Gatherer. — Agur, if you regard the etymology, is pual or the passive participle of the qal conjugation, signifying gathered, collected, contracted; it can however be taken actively for gathering, collecting, contracting, especially when it is a name. Some translate Agur as a stranger, a sojourner: for גור gur signifies to sojourn: so that aleph is a servile and added letter; yet this etymology fits this place less aptly. But why is Solomon called Agur, that is, gathering, or gathered and collected? Cajetan answers first, that he is called collected because he gathered his mind and strength and all his senses, and withdrew them to God, so that he might receive the seeds of divine wisdom, which he would pour forth abundantly to others, and as if full of divine wine would vomit forth: for אגר agar signifies to gather grain winnowed from chaff and pure into barns, and to store new wine in vessels. Secondly, Lyra holds that Solomon is called a gatherer because he gathered together and united the Israelites subject to him into one kingdom and one synagogue by his wisdom, so that no sedition or rebellion shook his kingdom: for, as Agapetus the Deacon says in his Admonitions to the Emperor Justinian, "the study and care of a king and a farmer is one: the care is to gather. The one sows grain and gathers the grain; the other sows benefits and draws together citizens." Thirdly, Hugo holds that gatherer means the same as Ecclesiastes, namely one who calls the people to an assembly and speaks words to them; but these interpretations seem more alien and remote from Solomon's mind and from the purpose of this passage. Fourthly and more aptly, the Hebrew agar signifies to gather grain; whence Agur is called a collector of public grain supplies; hence the Arabs even now call such collectors Agori. Solomon was a similar gatherer and collector of spiritual provisions, namely of doctrine and wisdom, so that he might distribute them to the peoples, as he does in this book, according to that saying of Christ concerning the faithful servant, "whom the Lord hath appointed over his family, to give them their measure of wheat in due season," Luke XII, 42. To this applies that saying of Plato in the Protagoras: "Doctrine, like grain, has increases," that is to say, Just as grain, whenever it comes to the measure and is measured, is found to be greater and more abundant (as is evident from experience) until it acquires its just and fixed limit, so he who pours forth doctrine to others increases and multiplies it. To this are added others, who explain the gathering of the gatherer as the fruit of hearers, with an allusion to the harvest of harvesters, that is to say, Just as harvesters gather an abundant harvest, so I Solomon, by sowing and teaching these doctrines of mine, have gathered an abundant fruit of hearers. Fifthly and genuinely, Solomon is called a gatherer, that is a collector and compiler, because he gathered into this volume grave, elegant, certain, and excellent sentences, composed not by another but by himself, like grains separated from chaff, winnowed and pure, into a storehouse. Properly indeed he is called a gatherer with respect to the sentences of this chapter and the following, because those are selected and illustrious beyond the rest, and because he has brought them together and compressed them into brief groups of four, so that in few words he might signify many mysteries and sublime things, just as many ears of grain, by threshing separated from chaff and straw, are reduced to few grains, which compressed are brought into a storehouse; and just as many grains ground, with the husks or bran separated by the sieve, are contracted into little flour or meal; or just as grapes pressed in the winepress, with the stems, seeds and skins rejected, yield little of excellent liquid, namely wine, which collected and compressed is gathered into casks. For the root agar alludes to גרה gera, that is, he drew together, contracted, whence it signifies a gathering, by which many things are contracted and compressed into few; hence אגרת iggeret is called an epistle, because in it many things are written and contracted in few words, so that they may be carried to friends. Whence Aben-Ezra notes that Agur, that is Solomon, here compiles and condenses illustrious sentences, each of which is four-membered; in that they are composed and consist of four things, except one verse 7, which is two-membered, and is composed of only two things, although if you consider it rightly, you will find in it a four-membered structure, namely that it consists of four things like the others: for even the first sentence, which is completed in the first six verses, contains four things, namely four elements: to wit the heavens, by the name of which fire is understood (which comes nearest to the heavens, indeed the ancients held the sun to be fire, as I said on Ecclesiastes XLIII, 3), wind or air, water and earth. Solomon therefore is called here Agur, that is a gatherer, one who contracts, one who compresses: because he has compressed and contracted all these sentences into brief and few groups of four things, whether similar or dissimilar. Finally, gatherer can be taken for one who binds together; for harvests are gathered when they are bound together into sheaves and bundles; and one who binds together is the same as one who wraps sentences in the coverings of parables and riddles, binds them and hides them, and does not explain and unfold them in plain narrative, according to that saying of Isaiah VIII, 16: "Bind up the testimony, seal the law," that is to say, Do not declare my decrees plainly to the Jews, but wrap and cover them in parables. Thus gatherer, that is one who binds together, denotes that the following parables are riddles and enigmas. SON OF VOMITING,—that is, full of vomit, so filled with delicacies and wines that he belches them forth and vomits them out. For just as if someone were to eat abundantly of things of much juice and much substance, but compressed and contracted into a small quantity, such as pottages, chicken broth or mutton juice crushed, distilled, and contracted into a small liquid (which is commonly called pist or sublimated, or the fifth essence), generous wines, etc., a small quantity of these so stuffs and fills the stomach that, while the stomach resolves, clarifies and digests each thing, it is distended and inflamed, and cannot contain them, but is forced to vomit: so likewise the mind of Solomon, full, swollen and crammed with these sentences, dense and signifying much, does not so much speak them as belch and vomit them forth, on account of their abundance, density, excellence and force, as much as the ardor and impulse of his spirit, so as to pour them forth and impress them upon others. Furthermore, Pliny, book XI, chapter XXXVII, teaches that only those animals vomit which have a narrow lower belly, such as man and dog: "There is, he says, a belly beneath for those having a stomach; for others it is simple; for ruminants it is double; for those lacking blood it is none: for in some the intestine beginning from the mouth is bent back by a certain path to the same place, as in the cuttlefish and octopus. In man it is attached to the lowest stomach similar to the dog's; in these alone of animals is the lower part narrower; and therefore they alone vomit, because when filled, the food is suppressed by the narrowness, which cannot happen to those whose spacious laxity transmits it to the lower parts." So likewise in Solomon the lower belly of the mind, which contemplates human things, was narrower, especially by the zeal and ardor of the higher, in the mind, so to speak, belly constraining him and urging him to contemplate divine and heavenly things: wherefore these straits forced him to belch forth these, and as it were to vomit them for the good and salvation of his subjects and all men. Some, such as Aben-Ezra and Osorius, for son of vomiting translate son of the obedient, or of obedience. For this is what the Hebrew בן יקה bin iake signifies, if you derive it from יקה iaka, that is, to hear, to obey. Whence Aben-Ezra: Solomon, he says, is called son of iake, that is of David, to whom the people listened and obeyed, or rather who listened and obeyed God in all things. Whence he is called by God, a man after God's own heart. But our author and others everywhere derive iake from קא ko, that is vomited, so that iod is heemantic, not radical. It should therefore be translated, son of vomiting. Therefore the vomiting signifies the redundance of wisdom and spirit in Solomon, so that being unable to contain it, he was forced to pour it forth with full mouth and throat and as it were to vomit it, just as David saying, Psalm XLIV: "My heart hath eructated a good word," that is to say, On account of the abundance and excellence of divine wisdom which I have drawn from heaven, I cannot restrain it, but must belch it forth and speak it with force. He alludes to the must of generous wine, which, seething and boiling, sends forth fiery vapors, breaths and bubbles through its opening, so that if you close this opening, the wine by its own heat bursts the very vessels; for the spirit of seething wine cannot be contained in a vessel: such was the spirit of David and Solomon, and such is that of any Apostolic and zealous man. To this pertains that saying of Rhodiginus, book XXI, chapter VIII, those formerly called vomiting, who would speak something not with premeditated oration, but extemporaneously: "Today, he says, you propose, but tomorrow you hear, for I am not of the vomiting, but of those who speak carefully." But the Prophets, such as David and Solomon were, because by the breathing of the Holy Spirit they spoke forth their doctrines extemporaneously, could be reckoned among the vomiting. The same Rhodiginus, book XXI, chapter XLIV: Palaton, he says, the painter painted Homer vomiting, and the other Poets standing around and absorbing what he poured forth from his mouth and breast: whom also Ovid in elegy 8 of the Amores describes in the same way, as it were perpetually gushing forth, and the other Poets drinking from him as from that "fountain of talents," as Pliny calls him in book XVII, chapter V, whose "mouths of Bards are watered by Pierian waters." Let us add here the expositions of others who think differently. First, R. Levi: Solomon, he says, is called the gatherer, son of vomiting, because he had collected within himself contrary thoughts in the most serious questions, and wished to vomit forth the burdensome and useless weight of thoughts which were not examined according to the norm of truth, so that he might keep for himself those which were useful and would agree with truth, that is to say, Solomon vomited forth vain thoughts and desires of concupiscence, so that in an empty heart he might gather and heap up holy thoughts and heavenly desires. Secondly, Hugo: Solomon, he says, is the son of him who vomits, that is, the son of David by Bathsheba: for Bathsheba, or as the Hebrews pronounce it, Bat-sheba, is the same as daughter of satiety; therefore the son of him who vomits is the same as the son of one sated and full, because namely Solomon glutted himself with delights even to nausea and vomiting, as if to say. Fittingly therefore Solomon's mother was called Bathsheba, that is, daughter of satiety, because she herself was about to bear a son who would glut himself with all the pleasures of the world even to nausea and vomiting: this omen the name Bathsheba had. Thirdly, the same Hugo: Solomon, he says, is called the son of him who vomits, that is, of David who, in order to escape the danger of his head, vomiting saliva feigned madness before King Achish, I Kings XXI. Whence fittingly it is added: "I am the foolishest of all men," as if to say. Fittingly I Solomon was born of David who feigned madness, as if a fool from a fool, so that the feigned folly of the father would be an omen and presage of the true folly of the son, when he himself worshipped idols. Fourthly, a learned man thinks that "of him who vomits" alludes to the custom of the ancients, by which in banquets, when they were about to speak a saying and to draw forth their wisdom, in order to do so more calmly, they first lightened the stomach and head burdened with food and wine by vomiting. Whence Plutarch in the Symposium, teaching that one should philosophize at a banquet, recommends vomiting to him who wishes to speak aptly and learnedly, when he feels his head burdened with wine. Agur therefore, that is, Solomon, is called the son of him who vomits, because with his head lightened by vomiting and his senses freed, he had rushed forth to teach: but this opinion seems more worthy of Epicurus than of Solomon. Fifthly, others think that by vomiting is noted the severity and acrimony of these proverbs, in that they are satirical and more sharply censure vices and the vicious: for we commonly call this "vomiting forth" something against someone. Thus Cicero, Philippic V: "Against me absent," he says, "he vomited forth an oration," that is, he had an invective against me. Whence the Septuagint paraphrastically translates: "My words, my son, fear, and receiving them do penance." For these words are not rightly omitted by the Complutensian and Royal editions; the Vatican codices have them, chapter XXIV, with all this remaining chapter, to which no others correspond than these: "The words of him who gathers, the son of him who vomits," as is evident to one comparing the Hebrew, Greek and Latin text. The sense therefore is, as if to say. When you have received my words, O son, let the fear of God bind and gather your mind to itself and to God, so that you may do penance for past sins, and thus vomit them forth and expel them, as if to say. My words are catapults or cathartic medicines, which move and pierce the stomach of the mind with holy fear; and thus they elicit and provoke the vomiting of sins through penance. Sixthly, others think that by vomiting is noted the penance of Solomon, as if to say. I Solomon gathered for myself riches, delights and pleasures of the whole world; but having experienced the vanity of all things, I was weary of them, and nauseated I rejected them and as if vomited them forth, and doing penance I condemned my past life, and said: "I am the foolishest of all men." Thus R. Solomon, R. Levi, Arboreus, and our Pineda, book VIII On the Affairs of Solomon, chapter I, section 6. Hence just as the force of vomiting stirs up tears (see what Pliny says, that vomiting relieves the stomach, but harms the eyes; thus penance stirs up tears in Solomon). Wherefore in the plates of Elvira recently discovered, inscribed in the Mozarabic language, it is read concerning Solomon: "And he wept for his sin with vehement weeping, and it was forgiven him," as Pineda cites it, although others doubt the reliability of those plates. They add that the same Solomon, lost through sins, received back the spirit of prophecy through penance, and therefore he subjoins: "The vision which the man spoke, with whom is God." These things they do not improbably, but uncertainly: for concerning Solomon's penance and salvation nothing certain can be established, for whatever things are brought forth by many to establish either one, are either ambiguous or uncertain. God therefore wished both to be uncertain to men, so that he might instill in them holy fear, and by the pious fear of the terrible example of Solomon might always keep them suspended in doubt. Allegorically, the son of him who vomits, namely Solomon, was Christ the Lord, the true Solomon, who like him taught the Gospel, nay rather eructated parables, nor did he speak to the crowds except in parables, "that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet David, Psalm LXXVII, 2, saying: I will open my mouth in parables, I will eructate things hidden from the foundation of the world," Matthew XIII, 35. THE VISION WHICH THE MAN SPOKE WITH WHOM GOD IS. — In Hebrew, the burden spoken by the man to Ithiel: burden, in Hebrew משא massa, is called a threatening and burdensome prophecy, which is imposed by God like a heavy burden upon the shoulders of peoples, as I said on Isaiah XIII, 1; from this it extends to any prophecy, even favorable and joyful. For this is called a burden, because, as St. Augustine says, book XVII of The City of God, chapter XX, he expressly asserts "that Solomon prophesied in his three books." So also Theophylactus, book II On Faith, and Psellus, Preface to the Song of Songs. Finally the Chaldean Paraphrast thus begins Ecclesiastes: The words of the prophecy which Ecclesiastes prophesied. He is Solomon the son of David. Again they are called a burden, because they set forth the correction of concupiscence through the law and discipline of God, which indeed is a great burden to man in corrupted nature, especially because to those violating it it threatens grave punishments, both in this life and in hell. Hence for "which he spoke," in Hebrew it is נאם neum, that is a certain and undoubted saying, and to be believed with sure faith like a prophecy revealed by God, which St. Paul, I Timothy I, 15, translates and calls πιστὸς ὁ λόγος, that is faithful, or sure and certain speech. Whence just as the prophets and Paul, so also Solomon here about to speak certain and undoubted things, indeed oracles of God, prefixes τὸ neum, as if to say: What I am about to speak is most certain, and worthy of all faith, because it is an oracle of God. WITH WHOM GOD IS, AND WHO WITH GOD DWELLING WITH HIM. — Hebrew לאיתיאל לאיתיאל leithiel leithiel, that is with me God, with me God, by which doubling Solomon signifies that he has received abundant illumination from God, so that full of God and most powerfully inspired by God he might utter and as it were vomit forth these oracles of God. Again, that they have been revealed to him not once, but again and again by God, at the same time impelling him to bring them forth and utter them. The Septuagint paraphrastically translates: thus says the man believing in God, and I rest; and the Arabic: the man speaks these words to those who are with God.
30:2
2. I AM MORE BRUTISH THAN ANY MAN, AND I HAVE NOT THE UNDERSTANDING OF A MAN. — For "more brutish" in Hebrew בער baar, that is, slow, stupid, dull, beastlike, one who like a beast wanders hither and thither, and cannot govern himself by his own reason, but has need of a leader and guide. For baar is derived from בעיר beir, that is, beast, animal, brute, so called from grazing; therefore baar is one who resembles a beast, who lives a bestial life, who exhibits the manners of a brute. Therefore the Hebrews literally have: Because slow am I compared to a man (any man, that is, compared to all men), and the understanding of men is not with me; the Septuagint, For I am the most foolish of all men, and the prudence of men is not in me; the Syriac, Because I am most destitute of thoughts; Vatable, I am indeed more stupid than anyone else; Baynus, Since I am more foolish than any, and there is not the understanding of man with me. The Hebrews begin with כי ki, that is, because, for, indeed, as the Septuagint translates it, as if to say, Therefore I here speak not in my own person, but in the person of Agur, and I introduce him speaking as comforted by God, because I, when I consider myself thoroughly, see that I am brutish, senseless, an infant and inarticulate: Our translator however omitted the "because," because the Hebrew ki often abounds through pleonasm, and merely gives the beginning to the discourse, as if to say, Indeed I am brutish, and I acknowledge myself stupid compared to other men. First, The Rabbis according to Lyra, Arboreus, Pineda and others cited in verse 1, think that these are the words of Solomon grieving and repenting of his luxury and idolatry, as if he himself here accuses himself, that, although he had been endowed by God with the highest wisdom, yet he cast himself down to such foolishness, that among his concubines like a pig wallowing, in his eagerness to please them he worshipped their gods, that is, stone and golden statues, as if to say, I accuse myself that, although I ought to have been wiser than others, I was more foolish than all, and I who ought to have worshipped one God, worshipped idols, indeed I became the leader and teacher of idolatry to the whole people. But it might seem strange to someone, if Solomon here repents, why he does not here name the sin of idolatry, which is public and scandalous, of which he repents, and specifically retract and condemn it, so that he might remove and take away the scandal which he had given to the people: for true repentance demands and requires this. Whence Lyra refutes this opinion of the Rabbis, who, with Abulensis and others, thinks that Solomon died in idolatry unrepentant, and was damned. Because, they say, if he had repented, he ought to have destroyed the temples of idols built by him; but he did not do this, because they stood until Josiah, who overthrew them, IV Kings XXIII: but more on this elsewhere. Secondly, R. Solomon thinks that Solomon calls himself foolish, because, trusting in his own wisdom, contrary to the precept of God saying, Deut. IV, 2: "Thou shalt not add to the word that I speak to thee, nor take away from it," which Solomon cites here, verse 6, he added many things to or took away from the words of Moses. But in this matter thou art more foolish and dull than Solomon, R. Solomon: for it is established that Solomon spoke these parables from the instinct of God, nor did he add to them anything contrary, or take away anything necessary from the law of Moses, but rather explained and inculcated it. Thirdly, R. Levi thinks that Solomon calls himself unwise, because he did not have knowledge of the celestial spheres, and therefore in explaining he adds: "Who hath ascended into heaven and descended?" Hence he says the same of Ecclesiastes, that is, of himself, cap. XII, 10: "He sought out useful words," so that namely a voice fallen from heaven might answer him, which however he did not obtain. Again Solomon sought to be equal to the greatest Prophets in performing miracles, so that he might have dominion over all the elements. But it was impious for this to be demanded of him, which however was permitted to others, such as to Moses who ascended into the heavens and descended; to Aaron who restrained the spirit, according to that: "And standing between the dead and the living, he prayed for the people, and the plague ceased" in the sedition of Core, whom the earth swallowed alive, and the plague raged no further against the rest of the people, Num. XVI, 48; to Elias, who restrained the waters with his garments, IV Kings II, 14; to Joshua, who fixed the boundaries of the earth, when the sun stood fixed in Gabaon, Joshua X, 13. But these, equally as those of R. Solomon, are dull and stupid. Fourthly, The Author of the Greek Catena from the Septuagint thus translates, now I make an end: For I am the most foolish of all mortals, and no human prudence exists in me, and thus explains it, as if to say, Henceforth I shall cease to hand down to you the doctrine of morals, and to exhort you further to it, because I am the most foolish of mortals, that is, God illuminating me with divine wisdom, I have made a loss of all human prudence, and true wisdom infused into me by God has taken from me all false knowledge. To this is added the exposition of St. Gregory of Nazianzus, oration 29, after the beginning: "I am the most foolish of men: Solomon signifies, he says, that he has no wisdom of his own, but is inspired by divine and more perfect wisdom. For indeed, Paul also when he said, Galatians II: And I live, now not I; but Christ liveth in me; was not speaking of himself as if dead, but as one who lived a life more excellent than the common dead, inasmuch as he was a partaker of true life, circumscribed by no end of death." Fifthly and genuinely, Solomon, although the wisest of mortals, nevertheless calls himself the most foolish out of modesty and the pursuit of humility, because, thinking humbly of himself, he acknowledged himself to be such from himself, and rightly ascribed all his wisdom not to himself but to God from whom he had received it infused, and whose it was. In a similar sense St. Paul (as also St. Francis), although most holy, calls himself the first of sinners, I Timothy I, verse 15. For a humble sense of oneself esteems its own things as small, and others' things as great. The sense therefore is: "I am the most foolish of men," that is, I appear to myself to be so, namely when I regard myself and those things which I have from myself, setting aside God's illumination; when I intimately penetrate and understand the smallness of my wisdom, and compare it both with my ignorance and with divine wisdom; I appear to myself to be most ignorant, and indeed an abyss of ignorance and foolishness, and that others, whose ignorance is not thus apparent to me, are far wiser than I, especially in practical wisdom and in the knowledge of themselves and God. Whence the Hebrews think that Solomon, conscious of his idolatry and sins, said these things in repentance, although Lyra refutes them. In sum, by these words Solomon wishes to teach us that true wisdom is situated especially in the knowledge of oneself and one's misery and foolishness, and in a humble sense and estimation of oneself. Thus Socrates, when asked what he knew, answered: "I know this one thing, that I know nothing." Indeed another, when asked the same, answered and added that he did not even know this, namely that he knew nothing. Thus St. Augustine said: "Lord, may I know Thee, may I know myself;" for in these two things the sum of practical wisdom consists. And St. Francis: "Lord," he says, "who art Thou? who am I? Thou art an abyss of wisdom, of being, and of all good; I am an abyss of foolishness, of nothingness, of sins, and of all evil." That this is the sense is clear from the fact that immediately he subjoins the immense wisdom and power of God in the creation and governance of all things, before which, being amazed, he adds: "Who hath ascended into heaven, etc.; what is his name, and what is the name of his son, if thou knowest?"
30:3
3. I HAVE NOT LEARNED WISDOM, AND I HAVE NOT KNOWN THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE SAINTS. — The Hebrew texts appear to say the contrary: for they have: And I have known the knowledge of the Saints, and so some Latin codices read, and Bede, who explains it thus, that is to say, I am strong in wisdom not human and acquired by study, but divine infused to me from heaven; and, as Vatablus says, "I am without human arts, but I am knowledgeable in divine things." Whence the Septuagint translates, God taught me wisdom, and I knew the knowledge of the Saints. So also the Arabic. But the negative τὸ non must be repeated from the former hemistich, and read with the Romans negatively: And I have not known the knowledge of the Saints; for the first negation is extended to all the following parts of the sentence, often among the Hebrews by zeugma, as Psalm CXLII, 7: "Turn not thy face away from me, and (not) I shall be (be) like them that go down into the pit," that is, turn not thy face from me, nor make me like the dead. Psalm XLIII, 19: "Our heart hath not gone back, and (not) thou hast turned aside our steps from thy way." Psalm I, 5; Psalm IX, 19; Proverbs XXIV, 28, in the Hebrew, and often elsewhere. Now some explain it thus, that is to say, When I consider the difficulty of those things which I am about to say, I am perplexed and as it were stupefied; for I see my ignorance, and my unfitness for declaring them, and I recognize myself as most foolish, because I lack human wisdom, which is acquired by teaching and learning; I lack also divine knowledge, which God infuses into the Saints: for neither have I learned wisdom by my own effort, nor acquired it by study, nor have I drawn so much from heaven, as is required for those things which remain to be uttered: but I profess that wisdom of the Saints, such and so great as namely the holy Prophets had, far inferior and unequal. But you would explain it more plainly in the manner in which I said verse 2, that is to say, As far as concerns me, I seem to myself from myself and from the powers of my own genius and nature to be the most foolish of mortals: for although from wisdom infused to me from heaven I am the wisest of all, yet this whole thing is the gift of God: wherefore I do not arrogate this to myself, nor do I think it to be mine, but I return and refer it wholly to God the author, to whom it belongs entirely. It remains therefore that from myself I seem to myself the most foolish of two-footed men. Mystically St. Jerome, book II Against Pelagius, and St. Augustine, epistle 49, hold that Solomon here speaks in the person of Christ; Christ therefore calls himself most foolish, both because he took upon himself our foolishnesses, desires and crimes to be expiated and atoned for; and because the wisdom of Christ appears to the world to be foolishness: for Christ taught by word and example that the poor are blessed, those who mourn, those who hunger, those who suffer persecution, etc., which all things appear to the worldly to be foolish. Whence Christ says, Psalm LXVIII, 6: "God, thou knowest my foolishness;" and Paul, I Corinthians I, 23: "But we, he says, preach Christ crucified, to the Jews indeed a stumbling block, and to the Gentiles foolishness, but to them that are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God; because that which is foolish in God is wiser than men." This is what Solomon says here: "And the wisdom of men is not with me."
30:4
4. WHO ASCENDED INTO HEAVEN AND DESCENDED? WHO HELD THE SPIRIT IN HIS HANDS? WHO BOUND UP THE WATERS AS IN A GARMENT? WHO RAISED UP ALL THE ENDS OF THE EARTH? WHAT IS HIS NAME, AND WHAT IS THE NAME OF HIS SON, IF THOU KNOWEST? — The Syriac version prefixes: Tell me who ascended, etc. WHO HELD THE SPIRIT IN HIS HANDS? — In Hebrew, who gathered the spirit in his fists? Pagninus, in his sails; the Septuagint, in his bosom; the Chaldean, who held the wind in his fists? Aquila, who gathered the spirit in his palms? Symmachus, who gathered the winds in his fists? WHO BOUND UP THE WATERS AS IN A GARMENT? — The Chaldean, as in a cloak; the Syriac, in a napkin; the Septuagint, who turned the waters into a garment? or, as the Author of the Greek Catena reads it, who gathered all the water, as if enclosed within a garment, into one? WHO RAISED UP ALL THE ENDS OF THE EARTH? — In Hebrew, who established all the borders of the earth? The Septuagint, who held all the extremities of the earth? The Chaldean, who established the borders of the earth? The Syriac, who constituted the mighty ones of the earth? The Author of the Greek Catena, who obtained dominion over all the heights of the earth? First, the Rabbis according to Lyra expound all these things of Moses: "Who ascended into heaven and descended?" that is to say, Who was equal or similar to Moses, who ascended the mount of Sinai, near to heaven, and there conversing with God brought down his law to us? "Who held the spirit in his hands?" who had the air and winds subject to him, so that like Moses striking them with his rod, he drew forth gnats and flies, which filled all Egypt? "Who bound up the waters as in a garment?" as Moses did, dividing the waters of the Red Sea, so that the people of Israel passed through, and the waters were to them as a wall on the right hand and on the left, according to Exodus chapter XIV. "Who raised up all the ends of the earth?" as Moses did, who in the erection of the tabernacle by his merits cast terror upon all the nations of Chanaan, so that he might place the Hebrews in it through Josue, and they might firmly possess all its regions, according to that in Deuteronomy II, 25: "This day I will begin to send thy fear and dread upon the nations." "What is his name?" that is to say, If it be said that another existed who by his art was like Moses and wrought similar wonders, let it be declared who that one was and what his name was. And if it be answered that he is dead and his name given to oblivion, let it be declared "what is the name of his son?" namely, what was his genealogy and the succession of his sons and grandsons, through which his fame was transmitted to us; and since no such one can be found or named, it remains that we conclude that no one existed equal or similar to Moses; and therefore, since Moses from the mouth of God in Deuteronomy chapter XVII, 16 and following, forbade the king of Israel to multiply horses, gold, silver, wives, etc., and yet I Solomon did the contrary; hence it is clear that I was the most foolish of men, as I said. Thus the Rabbis. But Lyra rightly refutes all these things. For no mention is made of Moses here, nor did Moses ascend into heaven and descend from it, nor did he deliver all the ends of the earth, but only a small portion of the earth, namely Chanaan, to the Hebrews, etc. Therefore all these things and the rest belong to God alone, as will be evident from similar sentences of Scripture, which I shall presently cite. I say therefore that Solomon, from his own lack of wisdom and weakness, rises up and marvels at the immense power and wisdom of God, so as to show that he compared to God is most unwise and most foolish, and that in these two things consists true wisdom, namely that thou knowest who thou art and who God is, and that thou sayest with St. Augustine: "Lord, may I know thee, may I know myself;" namely, may I know myself to be most unwise, most weak, most miserable, who have nothing of knowledge, being, or virtue from myself; but whatever I have, all is from the gift of God. May I then know thee to be most wise, most powerful, most good, and thus the Being of beings, namely that thou art an immense and uncreated sea of being, in which there is infinite amplitude of any being whatsoever, from which all created beings beg and draw their meager being, according to that: "I am who am," Exodus III, 14. See the things said there. Moreover Solomon proposes these things interrogatively: "Who hath ascended?" etc., both because he here brings forth his riddles and enigmas, which are wont to be proposed by interrogation; and because Scripture is accustomed not to narrate affirmatively the infinite wisdom and power of God, which is incomprehensible and inexplicable, but to contemplate and admire it by interrogating: thus Isaiah interrogates concerning it, cap. XL, 12: "Who hath measured the waters in the hollow of his hand, and weighed the heavens with his palm? who hath poised the earth with three fingers, and weighed the mountains in a balance, and the hills in a scale? Who hath assisted the spirit of the Lord? or who hath been his counsellor, and taught him? Behold the nations are as a drop of a bucket, and are counted as the smallest grain of a balance." Thus Ecclesiasticus, cap. I, 2, interrogates: "The sand of the sea, and the drops of rain, and the days of eternity, who shall number them? The height of heaven, and the breadth of the earth, and the depth of the abyss, who shall measure them? The wisdom of God which precedeth all things, who hath searched it out? and her prudent counsels, who hath known them?" By these maxims man is admonished, that by comparison with God he may know both his own foolishness and his weakness, and may attribute all wisdom to God alone, who alone can do all things and knows all things perfectly. So also Job, cap. XXVIII, 20: "Whence therefore, he says, cometh wisdom? and where is the place of understanding? It is hid from the eyes of all living things, and the fowls of the air are ignorant of it. Destruction and death have said: We have heard the fame thereof with our ears. God understandeth the way thereof, and he knoweth the place thereof: for he seeth the ends of the world, and beholdeth all things that are under heaven. He who made the winds to have weight, and weigheth the waters by measure." Therefore Solomon here in brief touches upon the whole work of creation and governance of the universe, that from it he may show forth the incomprehensible wisdom and power of God, which shines forth wonderfully therein, so that from it we may gradually ascend to contemplating and admiring the abyss far greater of wisdom and power, which lies hidden concealed in God himself. For he celebrates here the work of creation of the heavens and elements, under which he understands the other mixed bodies which are compounded from elements; for under the heavens he comprehends fire, under spirit the air, under water and earth each element. The sense therefore is, as if to say: I have professed myself to be most foolish and void of wisdom, when I compare my ignorance with the immense wisdom of God. For considering this, I do not see why I or any other should esteem himself wise, or arrogate to himself any wisdom. For is there anyone who hath ascended into heaven, that he might there orderly arrange the orders of the heavens, their motions, the stars, and then descended to the earth that he might narrate these same things to men? Is there anyone who "hath held the spirit," that is the air and the many and most mighty winds, which sweep through the seas and lands, and cast down and level trees, ships, towers, fortresses and cities? Is there anyone who hath bound the waters, both those which are in the sea and those which are in the air, in their channels and clouds as in a garment? Is there anyone who "hath raised up," that is erected, established and made firm "all the borders of the earth," that is the whole world? Is it not God alone, who can do all these things, and hath made them? For he himself ascended into heaven, surpassing all things, surveying all things, however high, as Amos says: "He that buildeth his ascension in heaven," Amos IX; and the Psalmist: "Who ascendeth above the heaven of heavens toward the east," Ps. LXVII. He it is who descended, because as Job says: "He seeth the ends of the world, and beholdeth all things that are under heaven." He it is who containeth the wind in his hands; and whose course and force no one, however powerful or ingenious, can restrain by any machines and obstacles, he restrains and holds in the hand of his omnipotence, sending forth, when he wills, winds from his treasures, which, as Job hath it: "He made the winds to have weight," he it is who hath bound the "waters as in a garment." Because, as the Psalmist says: "Gathering together the waters of the sea as in a bottle," Ps. XXXII. Therefore God alone is the lord, maker, creator and governor of the heavens, winds, waters and earth, invisible and immense, who dwelleth in light inaccessible. Whence interrogating after his manner he subjoins: "What is his name, and what is the name of his son, if thou knowest?" The proper name of God is a mystery, incomprehensible and ineffable, much more a mystery is the name of his son. He alludes to the name Jehova, which is ineffable, according to that of Exodus VI, 3: "My name Adonai (in Hebrew, Jehova) I did not reveal to them." See the things said there. Presently I shall weigh out each thing thoroughly. Allegorically, St. Augustine, in epistle 49 to Deogratias, in response to his fifth question, teaches that Solomon here instructs against the modern Jews that God is not one in person, as He is one in essence, but in one essence has two, indeed three persons; and then concerning the Son of God, namely Christ incarnate, he expounds this entire passage thus mystically: "In a certain place of Proverbs," he says, "it is said: Who ascended into heaven and descended? Who gathered the winds in his bosom? etc. Of these two things which I mentioned at the end, he referred one to the Father: What is his name? For which reason he had said: God taught me wisdom; and the other evidently to the Son, when he says: What is the name of his son? on account of the other things which are more understood of the Son, that is: Who ascended into heaven and descended? which Paul thus mentions: He that descended, the same also is he that ascended above all the heavens. He then proceeds to adapt the rest to the same: Who gathered the winds in his bosom? that is, the souls of believers in secret and hidden things, to whom it will be said: For you are dead, and your life is hidden with Christ in God. Who turned water into clothing, so that it could be said: As many of you as have been baptized in Christ, have put on Christ? Who held the ends of the earth? who said to his disciples: You shall be witnesses unto me in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and even to the uttermost part of the earth." Who ascended into heaven and descended? — Cajetan translates it, who like one ascending and descending twists the celestial spheres? For since these, he says, from the East to the South are seen to be borne upward and to ascend, but from the South to the West to set and as it were to descend, God also their mover, together with them seems to ascend and descend. But this sense appears more narrow and more foreign. More aptly and more fully Lyra and others through this ascent and descent of God understand to be signified the complete governance of God, by which He rules and governs both things above and things below, as if to say: God alone is all-knowing and all-powerful, who not by change of place (for He is everywhere and immense), but by His wisdom and operation, as it were ascends into heaven and descends, while in celestial and sublunary creatures, in the highest as well as in the lowest He operates: namely while above most wisely He established the heavens, ordered them, adorned them with stars, moved, ruled, governed them, and below in the air, earth and sea, all animate as well as inanimate things He creates, nourishes, preserves, makes fruitful, etc. He alludes to Deuteronomy XXXIII, 26: "The ascender of the heaven is thy helper; his magnificence runneth through the clouds: his dwelling is above, and beneath are the everlasting arms;" and to that passage Amos IX, 6: "He that buildeth his ascension in heaven." See the remarks in both places. And allegorically indeed, properly Christ descended from heaven, when through the incarnation He lowered Himself into the womb of the Virgin and to the earth; and thence He ascended, when after the resurrection glorious before the Apostles He ascended into heaven, according to that saying of Christ, John III, 13: "No one ascended into heaven, but he that descended from heaven, the Son of Man who is in heaven;" and that of Paul, Ephesians IV, 9: "Now that he ascended, what is it, but because he also descended first into the lower parts of the earth (into hell)? He that descended, the same also is he that ascended above all the heavens, that he might fill all things." WHO HELD THE SPIRIT IN HIS HANDS? — Bede understands spirit to mean any spirit whatsoever, namely angels, demons, souls, as if to say: God alone is He who holds all these spirits in His hand, that is, in His power, namely restrains, governs, moderates them, so that they do nothing except what He Himself wills, that is, has decreed or permitted. Better do others understand by spirit the wind, as the Septuagint and Symmachus translate it. For marvelous is the agility of winds, their subtlety, their contrariness, their force and impetus, so much so that they shake mountains and cities. Whence Scripture is accustomed to commend God's wisdom and power from the fact that He walks upon the wings of the winds, that is, governs them, indeed dominates them as if riding upon them, and presides over them as a charioteer. Hence also the Poets fable that Aeolus presides over the winds and restrains them, and shuts them up in caves and caverns as if in prisons. Therefore the Septuagint translates: who gathers the winds in His bosom? In Hebrew, in His fists, as if to say: God shuts up and encloses the winds, so agile, subtle and fleeting, and equally impetuous and roaring, that no one can resist them, in His fist, so that at His nod He may release them with open hand wherever He wishes, and with closed hand compress and calm them. Τὸ in sinu signifies the winds to be in God's secrets. For why does the South wind blow from the South, the North wind from the North, the East wind from the East, the West wind from the West? Why does the Typhon turn things in a circle, why is the Prester fiery, so as to move houses from their place and transfer them elsewhere? etc. Natural philosophers cannot give plain and adequate natural causes which satisfy the mind: but this pertains to God's secrets, who, the Lord of the winds, moves, bends, turns, changes, restrains and calms them at His pleasure. Just as therefore we store secrets in our bosom, so God stores the winds as if in His bosom, that is, reserves and contains them in the arcanum of His power and wisdom. Mystically, Christ the Lord held the wind in His hands, and gathered the waters, as it were in a garment, when He commanded the winds and the sea, and there was a great calm, Matt. VIII, and when treading upon the waves of the sea He walked upon them, Matt. XIV. WHO RAISED UP ALL THE BORDERS OF THE EARTH? — First, Bede understands by the borders of the earth animals, plants, nations, and all things which are enclosed within the borders of the earth, as if to say: Who preserves, cherishes, makes fruitful all animate things, equally as inanimate things, so that as these dry up and die, others in continuous succession are born and succeed them? Surely none other than God. Second, better do others understand by the borders of the earth the borders by which the earth restrains the waves and billows of the sea, so that it itself rises above them, according to that Gen. I, 9: "Let the waters be gathered together into one place, and let the dry land appear." Third and most rightly do you understand these things of the immobility of the earth: for this is what the Hebrew הקים hekim signifies, that is, He established, made to stand, as if to say: Who so stabilized the earth hanging as it were in the air, that by no force of winds, inundations, or other things can it be moved from its place, but it itself remains immobile, indeed is the center of the whole universe, which affords to all their state and their immobility? Surely none other than God accomplishes this. He alludes to that Job XXXVIII, 4: "Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? etc. Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it? Upon what are its bases grounded? or who laid the corner stone thereof?" And to that Psalm. CIV, 5: "Who hast founded the earth upon its stability; it shall not be moved for ever and ever." For God established the earth in the center of the universe, so that in it all the orbs of the elements and heavens which surround it might terminate and firmly consist. Again God Himself established borders for the earth, namely so that it might be bounded on the East by the Eastern sea and India; on the West by the Western sea and Italy, Gaul, Germany; on the North by the Glacial sea and Norway; on the South by the Southern sea and Africa, etc. WHAT IS HIS NAME, AND WHAT IS THE NAME OF HIS SON, IF THOU KNOWEST? — And a riddle or enigma, as if to say: Tell me thou, who esteemest thyself wise and arrogate wisdom to thyself, what is the name of Him who, as I have said, created the heavens, the spirit, the waters and the earth, and orderly constitutes them in their place, moderates and governs them? Thou wilt say His name is God. But what does this name God mean to thee? What does it signify of His essence? What, of what kind, and how great is this essence of His? Surely thou canst not comprehend it. Confess therefore that thou dost not comprehend the very name of God, much less the name of His Son: whence He says: "If thou knowest?" as if to say: Thou knowest it imperfectly, thou knowest it not perfectly. He alludes to the name of the tetragrammaton, which was unknown to the Hebrews because it was ineffable. For they saw it written in the Scriptures with four consonant letters, namely יהוה, and they did not know by which vowels and in what sound it ought to be pronounced, whether Jehova, or Jeheve, or Jehu, or Jaho, or in some other way; but those who knew this, such as the initiates and those conscious of the mysteries, such as the high priests and the learned in the law, did not pronounce it out of reverence, nor did they teach others in what manner it ought to be pronounced; and therefore the Jews, whenever יהוה occurred, read Adonai in its place, that is, Lord. Wherefore God signified not only that the highest reverence is owed to His name, and that it ought to be venerated in chaste and mystical silence, but also that the thing signified by the name, namely the essence of God, is incomprehensible, as I said at Exodus VI, 3. Therefore we know the name of God imperfectly and as it were through a shadow, but we do not know it fully and properly. For we know God only through relation and respect to creatures, for example, that God is He who created, preserves, rules and governs heaven, earth and all things in them; and just as we do not know creatures perfectly, so much less do we know God the creator, much less still what God is in Himself, namely what His essence is and how great His majesty in Himself; least of all do we know the Holy Trinity, and the plurality of persons in Him, namely that God is not only God, but also Father generating the Son, and with Him spirating the Holy Spirit. Whence St. Thomas, I part. Quest. XIII, art. 1 et seq., citing this place from Proverbs, teaches that there is no name which perfectly signifies and represents the nature of God. Likewise Francis Suarez and Gabriel Vasquez in that place: There is, they say, no name which adequately explains the nature of God, much less the nature and property of the Son of God: "For who shall declare His generation?" Isaiah LIII, 8. The reason of St. Thomas is that we cannot see and know God in Himself, but only by ascending in gradual steps from creatures to their author, God the creator, in our mind. But creatures are infinitely distant from God, and represent Him much more imperfectly than a shadow represents the sun. Wherefore all names, given to God from creatures, signify and represent the nature of God only imperfectly and thinly; but the Holy Trinity most thinly of all. Hence St. Dionysius, cap. I On the Divine Names: "God," he says, "has neither name nor opinion," which St. Thomas, explaining in the cited Quest. ad 1: "God," he says, "is said not to have a name, and to be above naming, because His essence is above that which we understand of God and signify by voice:" hence Cicero, Tusculan Disputations I, and from him St. Augustine, XXII City of God XX, defines God thus: "God is a certain mind, free and unbound, separate from all mixture with mortal substance, perceiving and moving all things, and itself endowed with eternal motion." But hear St. Dionysius: "When the theologians understood this, they praise it (the divinity) both as lacking a name and as beyond every name: as lacking a name indeed, just as when they say that the divinity itself in one of the mystical visions of the symbolic divine manifestations rebuked him who had asked: What is Thy name? and as it were drawing him away from all knowledge of God's name said: Why dost thou seek My name, which is wonderful? Is not this name truly and plainly wonderful, which surpasses every name, which lacks a name, which stands out above every name that is named either in this age or in the future, as if placed on a foundation?" Thus also Trismegistus, speaking of the ineffable majesty of God, said that God is ἀνώνυμον, that is, without a name and unnameable. Did not Solomon therefore, rightly considering himself before God and in the sight of God, say: "I am the foolishest of men, and the wisdom of men is not with me?" Tertullian indeed, in book III Against Marcion, about the middle, says "the name of God is as it were natural to divinity;" because, as St. Justin says in his Exposition of the Faith: "If you wish to understand the divine essence, you will express it by the name of God." But nevertheless St. Augustine in Psalm LXXXV: "You ask, he says, what God is? which eye has not seen, nor has it entered into the heart of man: why do you ask that it ascend into the tongue, which has not ascended into the heart?" Indeed, Plato also, from Trismegistus, as St. Cyril testifies in book I Against Julian, and Nazianzus in oration 2 On Theology, says: "God, he says, is difficult indeed to understand, but impossible to speak of." And St. Athanasius in his letter On the Decrees of the Nicene Synod, after the middle: "When we hear, he says, the word God, we understand nothing other than the very incomprehensible substance of God to be signified:" for, as St. Augustine says, sermon 1 On the Words of the Apostles: "God surpasses all things: if you ask about magnitude, he is greater; if about beauty, more beautiful; if about sweetness, sweeter; if about splendor, more brilliant; if about justice, more just; if about strength, stronger; if about mercy, more merciful." And the Nyssene, in the book to Ablabius: "What is altogether infinite is defined by nothing: but infinity escapes every rational definition." Wherefore Evagrius, hearing some disputing curiously about God and the Holy Trinity, answered "that divinity is by no means to be defined; and therefore what is ineffable is to be prayed for only in the prayer of silence." Thus Socrates, book VI of the Tripartite History, chapter XXX: and Attalus, a martyr, when asked by a tyrant "what name God had," answered: "Those who are many are distinguished by names; but he who is one does not need a name." Thus Eusebius, book VI of the History, chapter III. God therefore can be thought upon, but plainly cannot be named. For, as Sixtus the Pythagorean says in his Sentences, number 45: "Every moment in which you do not think of God, consider that you have lost." The same thing St. Dominic said, and from his teaching St. Thomas, the Angelic Doctor. WHO HATH GATHERED TOGETHER THE WATERS AS IN A GARMENT? — First, Cajetan understands by waters rains, fountains and rivers: for rains seem to drip from the sky, just as a wet cloth drips drops. The same thing some think, as Aristotle testifies, concerning fountains and rivers, namely that, just as a cloth placed upon a pitcher draws out the liquid of the pitcher, so that it becomes moist, and then lifts it up, and afterwards emits the same outside the pitcher by drops; so likewise the earth, although it is higher than the sea, yet because it is spongy and porous, draws out and attracts waters from the sea, and by absorbing them lifts them up, which it then distills and emits through fountains and rivers in certain places. Second, others more rightly understand by waters the upper waters, which in dark clouds are gathered together as in a black garment, so much so that they hide the sun, stars and moon from us; but when this garment of clouds is opened by God and as it were torn, the waters burst forth through rains and showers. This is what Job says in chapter XXVI, 8: "Who bindeth up the waters in his clouds, that they break not out and fall down at once." Third and best, understand by waters the waters of the sea, of pools and rivers, of which the Psalmist sings, Psalm XXXII, 7: "Gathering together as in a bottle the waters of the sea," because namely he gathered them in one place, so that the dry land might appear, setting a boundary to them, lest they should pass it, nor turn back to cover the earth." Whence also the Lord, commending his wisdom and power to humble Job among other things, says, Job XXXVIII, 8: "Who shut up the sea with doors, when it burst forth as issuing out of the womb; when I made the cloud its garment, and wrapped it in a mist as in swaddling clothes? I set my bounds around it, and made bars and doors, and I said: Hitherto thou shalt come, and thou shalt go no further, and here thou shalt break thy swelling waves." Whence the Author of the Greek Catena thus explains it, as if to say: Who by his wisdom and power gave stability and constancy to the fluid and inconstant nature and condition of things? surely God alone. See St. Augustine, book On the Knowledge of the True Life, chapter XVIII, and sermon 38 On the Words of the Lord, and book XV On the Trinity, chapter II, where among other things he says: "The supereminence of the Godhead exceeds not only our customary speech, but also the faculty of understanding; for God is thought of more truly than He is spoken of, and He is more truly than He is thought of. But it is no small part of knowledge, if before we are able to know what God is, we are able to know what He is not." Hear Arnobius, book III Against the Gentiles: "Whatever you shall say of God, whatever you shall conceive in the silent thought of your mind, passes into human sense and is corrupted; nor does that which is expressed in our words and composed for human affairs have the mark of its proper signification. The one most certain understanding of man concerning the nature of God is this, if you know and feel that nothing of it can be drawn forth in mortal speech." The same author, book VIII: "I shall speak, he says, as I feel; whoever thinks he knows the magnitude of God, diminishes it; whoever does not wish to diminish it, does not know it." Wherefore the Egyptians in their Hieroglyphics painted a crocodile and a stork lacking a tongue, to signify that God is ineffable. Simonides, when asked by Hiero what God was, requested a space of one day to answer, then two days, soon four, and thereafter always asked for double the time, denying that any amount was sufficient: "For the longer I consider, he says, the more obscure the matter appears," as Cicero relates, book I On the Nature of the Gods.
And What Is the Name of His Son? Hence against the Jews it is established from Solomon that God has a Son, and therefore there are several persons in God, namely the Father and the Son: thus St. Augustine, epistle 49, Question V. For although the Rabbis attempt to evade this, saying that Solomon speaks not of God the maker of things, but of a wise man, or of Moses, who fully knew this work of God, as if to say: What man is so wise or was so wise as to have fully known these things which I have said concerning the heavens and elements created by God? "and what is his name?" If you say he has departed from life, "what is the name of his son?" These things are certainly frivolous, and mere trifles contrived to evade this argument. For it is clear that Solomon speaks not of a wise man, but of God creating all things most powerfully and governing them most wisely, and therefore he asks of him: "What is his name, and what is the name of his son?" as if to say: You know, O rude Jews, God the creator in some measure, but that God is a father and has a Son you do not know. For very few of the Rabbis and wise men in the time of Solomon fully and distinctly knew the mystery of the Holy Trinity: whence the modern Jews and Rabbis, equally as the Turks and Gentiles, altogether deny the same. Much less did they know the name, that is, the thing named and the dignity of the Son, namely that he himself is homoousios and consubstantial with the Father, and therefore produced by him coeval by eternal generation, equal and the same; that he himself is the image of the Father; that he is "the brightness of his glory and the figure of his substance, upholding all things by the word of his power, making purgation of sins, sits on the right hand of the majesty on high; being made so much better than the angels, as he hath inherited a more excellent name than they. For to which of the angels said he at any time: Thou art my son, this day have I begotten thee?" Hebrews 1, 3. Our Salazar understands by name a person: for by name one person is distinguished and known from another, as if to say: "What is the name," that is, what is the person of God the Father, "and what is the name," that is, what is the person "of the Son," by which namely the Son is distinguished from the Father? for the essence and all other things are indistinct, and the same in the Father and the Son. More subtly and precisely Bartholomaeus Torres, and from him our Molina, I part. Question XI, article 2, disputation 2, member 3, at the beginning, answers that there are two names relative and proper to the Son of God, one the name of Son, the other the name of Word; and this second was more hidden in the Old Testament, and the Wise Man inquires concerning it as concerning something hidden, which was afterwards most clearly made manifest through St. John in the New Testament, when he said: "In the beginning was the Word; and the Word was made flesh." Whence St. Ignatius, epistle 8 to the Philippians: "One," he says, "is the Son, the Word, God: what is his name, and what is the name of his son, that we may know." For which Our [author] translates, if you know. Furthermore the Septuagint for son render sons in the plural, because they wished to hide the mystery of the Holy Trinity from the unbelieving Jews; or certainly for sons should be read son in the singular, for thus the Hebrew, Chaldean, Vulgate, Aquila, Symmachus, Theodotion and others read consistently, and one codex of the Septuagint cited by Caraffa in the notes to the Vatican Septuagint, and indeed St. Augustine, epistle 49. He mentions the Son alone, not the Holy Spirit, both lest the multitude of so many persons in the Holy Trinity should stupefy and offend the rude Jews; and because here the matter concerns the wisdom of God: and this is appropriated to the Son; and because through the Word God created heaven and all things: "For by the word of the Lord the heavens were established," Psalm 32, 6; and the Son is the notional and personal Word of God the Father; and finally because the Son was promised to the Jews, as the coming Messiah and redeemer. Hence he notes a twofold generation of the Son, divine and human, and a twofold name of his: as God indeed, he is called the Word; as man, he is called Jesus Christ, as if to say: Do you know what the Word is, and who is Jesus Christ, nay, that the Word is Jesus Christ? Hence his incarnation, passion, ascension he tacitly adumbrates through the symbols of the eagle, the serpent, the ship, the virgin, verse 19, as we shall see there. Add that the Holy Spirit is symbolically noted here, when he says: "Who hath held the wind in his hand?" For the Spirit, namely the wind, is a symbol of the Holy Spirit, who in the form of a mighty wind and of fiery tongues descended upon the Apostles at Pentecost, Acts II. Whence it was said of him Genesis 1, 2: "And the Spirit of God moved over the waters." For the Holy Spirit is the Spirit of the Father and the Son, undivided, and therefore cannot be separated from the Father and the Son neither in essence, nor in operation, nor in any other way. "The same," says St. Augustine, book I On Christian Doctrine, chapter V, "is the eternity of the three, the same immutability, the same majesty, the same power. From the Father unity, in the Son equality, in the Holy Spirit the concord of unity and equality. And these three are all one because of the Father, all equal because of the Son, all connected because of the Holy Spirit."
30:5
For "tried" in Hebrew is צרופה tserupha, which properly signifies melted, and melted by being smelted, refined and purified, just as gold is melted in a furnace by fire, so that with impurities and dross removed, it comes out pure, bright and splendid. The Septuagint: all the words of God are tried; and he protects those who revere him; the Chaldean: all the words of God are melted (the Syriac, chosen), and he helps those who trust in him. You will ask first, how do these verses cohere with the preceding ones? It is answered that Solomon made mention of the Son of God, namely the eternal Word; hence he attached to it how the Word which was from eternity with God, in time emanated to men through the words of Holy Scripture, of the Law and the Prophets, so that he might announce to us the will of God the Father and the way to happiness. For these words proceed from the Word of God, just as a ray from the sun, water from a fountain, heat from fire. Again, because he celebrated the wisdom of God shining in the heavens and elements; now he celebrates the same wisdom insofar as it communicated itself to men through fiery speech, by which it protects those who hope in it: for on account of man he created heaven and all other things. In a similar way Solomon, cap. VIII, vers. 27, when he had said that the wisdom of God established the heavens, made firm the ether above, balanced the fountains of waters, hung the foundations of the earth, immediately concerning the same wisdom descending to men he adds, vers. 31: "And my delights were to be with the children of men, now therefore, children, hear me." Thus also Baruch, cap. III, when long seeking the origin and place of wisdom, at length, vers. 32, he assigned it, saying: "He that knoweth all things, knoweth her, and hath found her out by his prudence, he that prepared the earth for ever, and filled it with cattle and beasts, who sendeth forth the light, and it goeth;" he adds vers. 37: "He found out all the way of knowledge, and gave it to Jacob his servant, and to Israel his beloved. After this she was seen upon earth, and conversed with men." Similarly Job, cap. XXVIII, after the words cited above, by which he asserts wisdom to be natural and proper to God, he adds vers. 26: "When he made a law for the rain, and a way for the sounding storms, then he saw her, and declared her, and prepared her, and searched her out. And he said to man: Behold the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom, and to depart from evil is understanding." Similarly he does in Ecclesiasticus XXIV; for when, vers. 5, Wisdom said: "I came out of the mouth of the Most High, the firstborn before all creatures; I made in the heavens that an unfailing light should rise," etc.; he adds vers. 12: "Then the Creator of all things commanded and said to me, etc. Dwell in Jacob, and take thy inheritance in Israel, and in my chosen put down thy roots." By all which things God signifies that he chose Wisdom for the end and purpose, indeed for a house and temple, men, namely the faithful and holy, so that he might fill them with the knowledge, fear and love of God, and thus lead them to salvation and glory: and for this reason he created the heavens, elements, and other things, so that from these man might know, love, worship God and his wisdom, power and goodness, and serve and obey him in all things, and thus be gifted by him with the reward of eternal happiness. Solomon does the same here. You will ask secondly, why is the word of God said to be tried? I answer: Tried, that is melted, refined and pure; for this is what the Hebrew tserupha and the Greek πεπυρωμένον signify. Whence Symmachus and St. Jerome, Ps. XVII, 31, translate, the word of God proved. For it alludes to chemical vessels, by which through fire gold and silver are smelted from dross, so that they become pure and bright. For this is what tserupha signifies. Whence Sarepta was called a city of the Sidonians, because in it there were frequent smelting workshops for smelting metals. The sense therefore is, as if to say, The words of God, namely both the precepts and promises of God, are so true, pure, sincere, certain, just as if they were gold liquefied by fire, melted, and purged of all dross. For in a similar way, indeed far more, the words of God are refined, and pure from all contamination not only of falsehood, fraud and simulation, but also of vanity and superfluity, so that there is nothing that is lacking or excessive in divine utterances, nothing that can be reproved, and therefore it follows: "Add not anything to his words, and thou be reproved." Whence also the law of God is called "immaculate," in Greek ἀμῶμος, that is irreproachable; in Hebrew תמימה temima, that is whole, blameless, perfect, Psal. XVIII, 8. Wherefore God (for this pertains to God, not to the word, since the word in Hebrew is of the feminine gender, but in itself of the masculine) "is a shield to them that hope in him," because namely he truly, fully, certainly and safely bestows upon those who keep his precepts and hope in him the love, aid and protection promised by him, nor does he suffer those who hope in him to be frustrated in their hope, just as he truly bestowed upon David, who hoped in him, a wonderful deliverance from the persecution of Saul, and likewise the kingdom and the perpetual propagation of the kingdom to his descendants, promised by him. That this is the meaning is evident from Psalm XVII, 31, where the same words in Hebrew are found as here. There, however, the Septuagint translates: "The words of the Lord tried by fire, he is a protector of all that hope in him"; Symmachus: "The word of the Lord approved." Thus also St. Jerome, where St. Basil: "The words, he says, tried by fire he calls approved, true and free from falsehood." Thus also Theodoret, Euthymius, and others there. And more clearly Psalm XI, 7: "The words, they say, of the Lord, the words of the Lord are pure, (as) silver tried by fire, proved upon earth, purified sevenfold." For shield in Hebrew is מגן magen, that is, a shield, buckler; the Septuagint translates ὑπερασπίζει, that is, he will protect, he will defend, he will stoutly defend: whence ὑπερασπίζων, protecting another's side with a shield, an armor-bearer, a protector, an auxiliary, a defender. Such is God to the faithful one hoping in him and calling upon him, because by his power and faith, as it were with an outstretched shield, he keeps, guards and defends his suppliant. This meaning is most proper and genuine. Secondly, however, St. Ambrose in Psalm CXVIII, 140, to those words: "Thy word is exceedingly inflamed:" "Inflamed, he says, because by the fire of zeal and charity it inflames the hearers. What fire, therefore, did the Lord scatter in the New Testament? That which would inflame the secret affections of the mind with the divine ardor of knowledge, which would kindle the vapor of faith and devotion, which would set on fire the desire of virtue." And in a brief interval: "Good, he says, is the fire which knows how to warm, does not know how to burn except sins alone. By this fire that apostolic gold is proved; by this fire that silver of morals or works is examined; by this fire those precious stones are illuminated, but hay and stubble are consumed. Therefore this fire cleanses the soul, consumes error." And again below: "By this fire the bush was burning, and was not consumed; for the divine word burns in order to correct the conscience of the sinner; it does not burn in order to destroy." See the following, where he teaches that this fire powerfully effects three things, namely to purify, to illuminate, to inflame. Cassiodorus adds in Psalm XVII, 31: "The words, he says, of the Lord tried by fire, as if to say: The flame of faith the supreme law is examined, when by the desire of knowing divine words are sought out. Thus also the Prophet Jeremiah concluded the words of the Lord with a wonderful definition, saying in chapter XXIII, 29: Are not my words as a fire, saith the Lord, and as an axe cutting the stone?" Our translator renders for axe, hammer. Thirdly, St. Jerome in Psalm XVII, verse 31, thinks that the words of God are said to be inflamed, "not because they, he says, are in themselves examined by fire, or because they had been defiled; but because he who receives them makes them so that they make him pure gold purified by fire. For what have the chaff to do with the wheat?" Jeremiah XXIII, 28. "What have the dross to do with the silver?" says St. Augustine in the Conference of the third day against the Donatists. Therefore the words of God in this sense are said to be inflamed, because like fire they chastise, refine and wipe away from the soul the dross, that is, desires and vices: hence they are called arrows, because they strike the heart, torment and wound it. Whence Origen in Psalm XXXVII, to those words: "For thy arrows are fastened in me:" "He who, therefore, he says, speaks the words of the Lord, hurls arrows, and when he speaks correcting and chastising, the arrow of correction penetrates the heart of the hearer." More vigorously and elegantly St. Augustine in Psalm VII, to those words: "The arrows of the mighty are sharp with coals," etc., thus says: "The arrows of the mighty are sharp, the words of God are. Behold they are hurled and pierce hearts; but when hearts have been pierced by the arrows of the word of God, love is stirred up, not destruction is brought about; the Lord knows how to shoot at love, and no one shoots more beautifully at love than he who shoots with the word," etc. Finally, whatever fire effects, that the word of God effects. Consider therefore the gifts and properties of fire, especially in melting and purifying metals, such as gold and silver, and attribute these mystically to the word of God, namely to Holy Scripture, to the law, to the inspiration and promises of God. Whence Didymus in Psalm XVII, 31: "The utterances of God," he says, "are called fiery, because they so kindle the mind that they consume the chaff of earthly things and thoughts." But the author of the Greek Catena here: "All," he says, "the words of God are fiery; for they consume all that is thorny and brushy by their fire, and they make manifest what is clean and purified, and they are sufficient for obtaining salvation." Again, fire denotes the efficacy and subtlety of the word of God, which penetrates the innermost parts of the soul, breathes upon it, purifies it, illuminates it and sets it on fire, according to that saying of Paul: "For the word of God is living and effectual, and more piercing than any two-edged sword, and reaching unto the division of the soul and the spirit, of the joints also and the marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart," Hebrews, chapter IV, 12. Similar are the preachers of the word of God burning with zeal, who, kindled by the word of God, like fiery beings breathe nothing but heavenly fires, by which they illuminate, purify, set on fire and inflame their hearers. Moreover, just as fire refining gold and silver renders it most excellent and most precious: so also the word of God refining the affections of the mind renders them most distinguished and of the highest value before God and men, namely heavenly and divine, according to that which was promised concerning Christ, Malachi III, 2: "For he shall be as a refiner's fire, and as the fuller's herb; and he shall sit refining and cleansing the silver, and he shall purify the sons of Levi, and shall refine them as gold, and as silver, and they shall offer to the Lord sacrifices in justice." Where I have said more on this matter.
A Shield to All That Trust in Him Namely God himself, as I have said. He alludes to Genesis XV, 1, where God says to Abraham: "Fear not, Abram, I am thy protector (in Hebrew, I am thy shield), and thy reward exceeding great." It could however also be referred to the word of God: for this is the shield of man against all temptations, both because the promise of God, especially of eternal life and glory, animates the faithful to repel all temptations of the world, flesh and devil with strength; and because the precepts of God instil fear of him in minds, which dispels all assaults of enemies. Thus Christ, tempted by the devil, opposed to him the shield of the words of God, saying: "It is written: Not in bread alone doth man live, but in every word that proceedeth from the mouth of God," Matthew IV. St. Paula did the same, as St. Jerome testifies in her Life, and other Saints likewise.
Add Thou Nothing to His Words "Add thou nothing to his words," that is to say, Divine words must be adhered to, because whoever turns away from them goes astray into falsehoods; because they themselves are pure, true, finished and perfect, so that nothing can be added to or taken from them. "The words of God," says Procopius, "since they are full and perfect, admit no addition." Understand that nothing can be added which is repugnant to them or detracts from them; for thus Solomon explains himself, when he adds: "Lest thou be reproved and found a liar." For since the word of God is most true, whoever adds to it something repugnant, must necessarily speak what is false and lie. Again, nothing can be added to them as if spoken by God, so that you might sell your word as the word of God, as the Scribes and Pharisees once did, selling their useless traditions, contrary to the law of God, as the word of God; and as heretics now do, who vitiate and corrupt the words of God by heretical exposition, while they thrust their dreams and ravings upon us as the word of God; who therefore, as it were, falsifiers of Holy Scripture, shall be judged and condemned by God. For, as St. Chrysostom says, homily 20 in Matthew: "Add nothing to the words of God, etc.; but whoever dares to do this thinks himself wiser than God, and begins to be a false witness, because he says that which neither ear hath heard, nor eye hath seen." Since therefore certain things have been said, written and preached to God's people by posterity, by the Apostles, and by the Church, which were not expressed in the earlier words of God, nothing has been added to the words of God, because those things which were added are also words of God. When interpreters explain the words of God, they add nothing to the words of God, since they do not wish their explanations to be received as the word of God, except insofar as they are consonant and agreeable with the word of God; nor do they add their own, as if the words of God were not sufficient, but because they are not understood by all. Thus Jansenius. I have said more on this maxim in Deuteronomy IV, 2; Apocalypse XXII, 18; Galatians I, 8.
30:7
"Two things I have asked of thee" not as if he merely seeks to obtain these two things before the death of these two, or before death to repent of past luxuries and idolatry (whence some from this place contend that Solomon did penance for his crimes before death); but that throughout all the remaining life until death he desires these two things to be granted to him, that is to say, By continuous prayers I beseech thee that the two things which I shall set forth, thou dost not deny me, but grant them, so that "before I die," that is, as long as I shall survive, as long as I do not die, but live, these two things may always be present to me and never be lacking: for, as to whether they be lacking to me in death and after death, I care little. Whence the Hebrew texts have: Two things I have asked of thee, do not prohibit them from me before I die; the Septuagint: Do not take away from me this grace before I die, as if they say: Do not take away from me this twofold grace which I ask for as long as I live, but graciously and benevolently grant me both always.
30:8
"that is to say, says Bede, lest by abundance or scarcity of transient things I fall into forgetfulness of eternal things." He passes from the intellect to the affection. He said how great wisdom operates in heaven and in the whole world, and from whom it should be sought, namely from the Word of God; now he shows its use and practice, that is, what should be sought ordinarily after obtaining wisdom for living life rightly, for which wisdom is sought, and to which the Word of God has been handed down. He demonstrates this by his own example, saying: "Two things I have asked of thee," etc. Some think these two things are, first: Thus Lyra, whom hear: "Two things I have asked of thee, O Lord: vanity, which is annexed to prosperous fortune; and lying words, which are frequently attached to adversity, remove far from me; and he repeats the same by other words: Give me neither beggary nor riches, etc. And so under the example of riches and poverty Solomon here prays, and admonishes us to pray, that we be neither exalted by prosperity and led into the vanity of pride and neglect of God with the worship of idols; nor be depressed by adversity into dishonest things and lies, among which the greatest is to swear falsely by the name of God, that is, to make God a witness of falsehood. "Remove vanity and lying words far from me;" secondly: "Give me neither beggary nor riches." By vanity, however, Pagninus understands a vain, that is, an idle word; the Author of the Catena of the Greeks, a foolish word, namely foolish speech; the Chaldean, detraction, because the detractor is like a cenotaph, that is, an empty tomb, which outwardly represents the burial of someone, but inwardly lacks the buried body, and is empty and void. For thus the detractor feigns and says many things which outwardly harm another's reputation, but inwardly in fact, namely in truth, are lacking, and are empty, vain and false. Others by vanity understand vain opinions, errors and heresies, as if the Wise one wishes to be preserved from them; for two things are to be desired: first, that we think rightly about God; secondly, that we use rightly riches and poverty, lest in either we offend God. Again our Salazar by vanity, or vain word, thinks that a violated promise is noted, that is to say, the violation of a word given or offered faith, and remove falsehood far from me; for both are crimes unworthy of a prince, and so ought to be far from him, so that not even the remotest suspicion of it should fall upon him. Hence Cassiodorus in the Variae: "The majesty of a king," he says, "ought to possess the authority of divinity, and his voice ought to have the place of an oracle; for if he lie even once and break faith, no one will thereafter have faith in him. To this pertains the proverb of the Syrians and Arabs, Cent. 2, num. 49: 'He who is known for truthfulness, his lie is received; and he who is known for mendacity, his truth is not received,' that is to say, Opinion has such force that we believe even the lie of one who is accustomed to speak truth; but to one who often lies, even when he speaks truth, faith is not given. This is what liars, traitors and perjurers gain, that they lose reputation and faith, nor is credence given to them even when they speak truth and swear; ' and num. 48: 'Abandon falsehood where you see that it will profit you, for it will harm you. And it is yours to cleave to truth where you see that it will harm you, because it will profit you;' and Cent. 2, num. 72: 'Truth is magnificence (that is, magnificent), but falsehood is baseness. Truth is health, falsehood infirmity,' that is, weak and infirm, because it vanishes before the light of truth. Hence some translate the Hebrew שאו scau, that is, vanity, as irruption, impetuosity, rashness, precipitancy (for the root שאה signifies to irrupt with impetuosity and precipitate), by which, namely, insolent and swollen with riches I irrupt into the throne of God, and arrogantly with Lucifer say: Who is the Lord? who shall rule over me? I am like the Most High, nay I am God in my kingdom, as Pharao said, Exodus v, 2; and the king of Tyre, Ezekiel xxviii, 2: "I am," he says, "God, and I sit in the seat of God in the heart of the sea." Thus St. Basil explains this passage in the Rules more fully disputed, question 20: "Solomon," he says, "here defined riches and satiety; but extreme poverty as the lack of things necessary for life, namely from this that he says necessary, declaring a middle thing between poverty and abundance of things necessary for use." And St. Ambrose in Psalm 118, octon. 8: "For he says, these two greatest temptations St. Solomon declared by his prayer and begged that he might be able to exclude them, saying: But riches and poverty give not to me, but ordain for me what is necessary, and what may abound, lest being filled I become a liar, and say: Who sees me? or being poor I steal and perjure the name of God. Can you therefore despise these temptations which Solomon feared, who sought wisdom and deserved it? He was rich, he feared to be exalted; he feared to become poor, lest by the necessity of poverty he should not retain the grace of abstinence." He proves this by examples: "How many who seemed to be holy have fallen from the height of their heart? How many cast down by some necessity, could not be content in injury, who had been strengthened by the exercise of virtues? Rare is Job found on earth, who both lost riches and sons, and was scarred with stripes on his body, while worms flowed over his whole body; yet he could not be separated from the love of God." And St. Bernard, serm. 2 in Domin. Palm.: "Although," he says, "adversity kills many, yet prosperity exalts far more, as it is written: A thousand shall fall at thy side, namely on the left, by which adversity is signified; and ten thousand, that is far more, on thy right hand, in which prosperity is designated. Namely by saying: "Who is the Lord?" that is, lest perhaps I abandon God and turn to idols; for these are "vanity," that is plainly empty and vain things; apostasy itself also is vanity, that is vain pride and arrogance by which one despises God. Finally, because there is danger on both sides, the Wise man prays and says: Give me neither riches nor poverty, lest perhaps riches should exalt me into pride, or poverty cast me down into impatience." Similar was the vow of Catherine, queen of England, wife of Henry VIII, who was then unjustly repudiated by him and lived a life very like that of a martyr, of whom Sander thus writes, lib. I De Schismate Anglicano: Catherine was accustomed very often to say among her people that she would not choose fortune, if the choice were given, either most harsh or most mild, since each has its own temptations and dangers; but rather a middle and temperate one: if however one or the other had to be chosen, she would prefer the most sorrowful rather than the most pleasant; for the unhappy rarely lack consolation, but the most fortunate almost always lack peace of mind. From Solomon this opinion was learned and received by Plato and the Philosophers; for Plato, lib. III De Legibus: "In whatever," he says, "gathering of men there is neither want nor riches, to this the most just morals will adhere; for neither contumely nor injury has place there." An example is in Sparta, from which Lycurgus removed wealth and want, and therefore had the best and most just citizens. St. Basil, tract. De Legendis libris Gentilium, cites the saying of Theognis saying: I do not desire riches, I do not seek great things; but let small things be present, / Provided that I live happy and free from evils. Similar is the vow of Socrates in Plato at the end of the Phaedrus: "O friend Pan," he says, "and all you gods who inhabit this place, grant me that I may become beautiful within, and whatever I have externally, may be friendly within; but let me esteem the rich man only as wise. Let me have only so much gold as neither to carry nor to bear except a man of temperance." For, as St. Ambrose says in lib. VI Hexaem. cap. viii, citing this saying of Solomon: "The temptations of the world are to be fled and guarded against, lest the poor man despair, lest the rich man become insolent." Maximus, lib. XIII, cites St. Chrysostom saying: "He is rich not who possesses much, but who needs not much;" and Philo: "A good man and one needing few things is in a certain borderland of death and immortal nature. For he needs indeed on account of the mortal body, but not much on account of the immortal soul seeking immortality." Democritus: "Fortune sets forth a sumptuous table; temperance provides what is enough." Finally the Apostle, I Tim. vi, 6: "There is," he says, "great gain in godliness with sufficiency," that is with a mind sufficient to itself, and content with its own things however modest. Where I have said more on this matter. You will say: Solomon was a most wealthy king; but a king need not fear poverty, since it is necessary for a king to abound in riches. Some answer with Jansenius that these are the words of Agur, not of Solomon; but I have refuted this at verse 1. Others better judge that Solomon here assumes the person of any private and common man, so that he may teach him the manner of praying, namely to ask for necessary food, so that he may be free both from abundance and from want. For this seems more consonant and temperate to the greater part of men and to their common life which is less perfect. For few perfect men fear neither riches nor poverty, but say with Paul: "I know both how to be abased, and how to abound (everywhere and in all things I am instructed), both to be full and to be hungry, and to abound and to suffer need," Philip. iv, 12; and with the Psalmist: "Prove me, O Lord (in want and affliction), and try me: burn my reins and my heart," Psalm. xxv, 2. This is true; whence St. Chrysostom, hom. 18 in epist. ad Hebr., and St. Ambrose in Psalm. cxviii, octon. 8, say that these words of Solomon are fitting for men of the Old Testament, because they were imperfect. However, this maxim can be understood as spoken in the person of King Solomon, both because a king can fall from his throne and kingdom and become a private person, as happened to Mithridates, Tigranes, Antiochus, Deiotarus, Perseus, Ptolemy, Cleopatra and other kings conquered by the Romans; and because a king is often poorer than a private person, because although he may have many riches, yet he has more expenses of officials, cities, buildings, wars, so that those royal riches do not suffice for them, as we see with our own eyes in some kingdoms today: for those riches ought to be estimated which are free from the burden of expenses. Wherefore a merchant having one hundred thousand free gold pieces is often richer than a king who collects annually fifteen million, but all obligated to pay debts, war expenses, and other kingdom costs. Hence sometimes want compels kings to steal and plunder, not florins or gold pieces, but whole cities, provinces and kingdoms, while they either invade others' lands, or plunder their own through tributes or governors and soldiers. You will say secondly: Solomon here seems to censure and condemn the poverty of Religious and the Orders of mendicants. I answer: Not at all, but he prescribes a manner of living suited to his age, which namely was fitting for the Jews, and indeed for the greater part of Christians, which is to live moderately, so that necessities are supplied and superfluities are absent; for this manner is suited to the common human race and is salutary. But Christ joined to this a more perfect manner of life, when he persuaded evangelical poverty both by example and by word. Whence he himself says: "But I am a beggar and poor," Psalm. xxxix, 15. And: "The foxes have holes, and the birds of the air have nests; but the Son of man hath not where to lay his head," Matth. viii, 20. Furthermore, this poverty of Christ is far different from the poverty which Solomon deprecates: for this is involuntary and forced, such as that of beggars; but Christ's is voluntary and free, which namely the Apostles and Religious freely assume following the example of Christ, both from the study of humility, and so that they may turn their affection away from riches and earthly things, and transfer it wholly to God and divine things. Thus St. Thomas answers, III part., Quaest. XL, art. 3, ad 1. Wherefore Christ says Matth. v: "Blessed are the poor in spirit; for theirs is the kingdom of heaven." See Jerome Platus, lib. I De Bono status Relig. cap. ix, and lib. II, cap. viii. Bellarmine adds, lib. II De Monachis, cap. xiv, that Solomon speaks of mendicancy which is exposed to danger; but such is not that of Religious, who know for certain that nothing will be lacking to them, because Christ promised them a hundredfold in this life, Matth. xix. Indeed Religious seem, he says, to ask literally what the Wise man asks: for they do not wish for riches, and therefore they leave them; nor yet do they wish for dangerous mendicancy, by which they would die of hunger; and therefore they say: "Grant only the necessaries for my food."
Grant to My Victory Only What Is Necessary The Hebrew word is טרף taraph, that is, to prey, to seize, to pluck, to feed. Whence you may translate it word for word thus: make me pluck the bread of my statute, or bread measured out to me, that is, sufficient to my necessity and proportioned to it, according to that which Christ taught us to pray, Matthew vi, verse 11: "Give us this day our daily bread." In Greek it is bread ἐπιούσιον, that is, substantial or substantive, that is, pertaining to our substance, namely, necessary daily that we may subsist in life, which others call sustenance. Thus St. Chrysostom, St. Basil, Theophylactus, Euthymius and others in Matthew chapter vi. Whence the Syriac translator renders it, the bread of our need. The word therefore to pluck signifies that this bread ought to be sought and plucked daily in parts frugally and sparingly, just as oxen, sheep and beasts daily pluck pure grasses, and from these sustain themselves. Others say, feed me with food suited to me; Aquila, establish for me sufficient sustenance; the Chaldean, nourish me with bread sufficient for me; the Septuagint, establish for me what is necessary and sufficient. St. Ambrose in Psalm cxviii, octon. 8: "But ordain for me what is needful, and let them abound," that is, establish for me the necessities of life not narrowly and sparingly, but liberally and abundantly, although others think it should be read, "nor let them abound:" for this seems to be required by the antithesis, for he seeks sufficiency, he deprecates superfluity: sufficiency, I say, of nature, not of avarice; for avarice nothing can suffice, even if it possessed the whole world, so luxurious is it. Most excellently St. Augustine, sermon 15 On Diverse Matters, chapter xv: "These," he says, "are called unjust riches, not because it is unjust that gold and silver exist; but because it is unjust to think those riches which do not remove want. For each person will burn with want in proportion as he loves them more and has greater amounts of them. How therefore are they riches, which as they increase, want increases, which to their lovers, however much they may be enlarged, do not bring satiety, but inflame cupidity? Do you think him rich who would need less if he had less?" He proves this by examples: "For we have seen some who, when they had small money, were content with small gains; but after it began to abound for them—truly indeed a body of gold and silver, but nevertheless false riches—when you offer something small, they already refuse it: do you believe them now to be satisfied; but it is false. For greater money does not close the throat of avarice, but extends it; it does not irrigate, but inflames; they spurn the cup, because they thirst for the river." Cajetan notes in III part., Question XL, article 3, that Solomon here places necessities as a middle thing between riches and poverty, so that he who has only necessities, is to be considered neither rich nor poor, but middle between both: and therefore a Religious, who is poor and professes poverty, ought to lack not only superfluities, but also sometimes necessities: for he who is truly poor often lacks these. The same thing which Solomon here prays for, St. Francis also imprecated and obtained for his host in the village of Tyfi, five miles from Mount Alverno. For when he had been received by him with kind hospitality, he blessed his house, and foretold that to his progeny from generation to generation, God would give neither riches nor poverty, but what would be necessary for comfortable life and sustenance. The memory of this ancient prophecy is still fresh in the said place: that house is called St. Francis's, and it lies open to all Franciscans passing through for hospitality, and it is hospitable and liberal, as Luke Wadding relates in the Annals of the Minors, in the year of Christ 1215, number 11.
30:9
In Hebrew, lest I be satisfied and deny, or lie, and say; the Septuagint, lest being satisfied I become a liar, and say: Who sees me? For perjure in Hebrew is, I shall seize the name of the Lord, namely that, having seized it as it were as a shield, I may protect my lie, by which I deny the theft committed by me, and elude those accusing me of it. Pagninus, and I shall take the name of the Lord in vain; the Chaldean, I shall violate the name of my God; the Septuagint, I shall perjure myself. He gives the reason why he deprecates riches, namely that they produce an abundance of things, gluttony and satiety which begets pride, which gradually swelling grows so much that it denies God and every divine power, and says: Who is the Lord who may take away my riches from me? or who forbids me to use and enjoy them at my pleasure for every gluttony and luxury? For this is the reason why the rich and the voluptuous deny God, because namely they wish to indulge freely without fear of punishment and vengeance in their desires and lusts; and because they know God forbids these things and threatens them with the gravest punishments in hell, hence in order to shake off fear of Him, and to feast and luxuriate freely, they say: There is no God, there is no divine power, there is no providence that sees me, judges me, condemns me, punishes me. For this is the cause of atheism, why namely the voluptuous become atheists, according to that in Psalm xiii, 1: "The fool hath said in his heart: There is no God." He adds the reason: "They are corrupted, and become abominable in their devices," as if to say: Because they have corrupted their devices, that is their thoughts, actions and morals, therefore they denied God, lest they should fear His vengeance. Another reason is that the avaricious and those desirous of riches love and worship their wealth as an idol; for they are always thinking about acquiring, preserving, and increasing it, and they expend all their affections, pursuits and labors upon it, they obey the desire for it in all things, and place in it all good and their ultimate end: wherefore for the sake of it they neglect the worship of God, violate His precepts, and finally deny His providence. Whence avarice is called by the Apostle "the service of idols," Ephesians v, 5. See there St. Chrysostom, homily 18, and homily 6 on the epistle to the Romans, where he teaches that the avaricious are truly idolaters, because they have fashioned for themselves an idol of gold in their mind, and to it they sacrifice both body and soul. A third reason is that one crime leads to another, and the lesser impels to the greater, so that it happens that a rich man growing in pride, avarice, gluttony, injustice, and every crime, finally falls into heresy, atheism, idolatry, as Solomon fell, and in this age we have seen many fallen thus. For this is God's just vengeance, by which He punishes one crime by another, and finally allows the wicked to fall into atheism or idolatry; for the wicked know that idols are of stone and wood, and have no power to avenge themselves and punish the wicked: wherefore they prefer to serve them, that they may be unpunished, rather than the true God; who is the most severe avenger of crimes. This is what Ephraim says in Hosea chapter xii, 8: "I am become rich: I have found an idol for myself: all my labors shall not find me the iniquity which I have sinned," as if to say: I have fashioned for myself an idol, which in all my work and labor will bind me by no laws, and therefore will accuse me of no crime, will punish me with no penalties. Hence St. Ambrose, book II of the Duties, chapter vii: "Avarice," he says, "is near to perfidy;"; and St. Augustine, book V of the City of God, teaches that formerly men were converted from idols to the worship of God by poverty, and grew in it by poverty, but through riches they relapse from faith into perfidy. An example is in the Hebrews, who feasting and satisfied turned away from God, and made for themselves an idol of a golden calf, according to that in Exodus xxxii, 4 and 6: "The people sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to play, saying: These are thy gods, O Israel, that have brought thee out of the land of Egypt;"; and that in Deuteronomy xxxii, 15: "The beloved grew fat and kicked: he grew fat, and thick, and gross, and forsook God who made him, and departed from God his saviour. He provoked him to anger with strange gods." Similarly the glutton and the luxurious man has his gluttony and luxury as an idol, according to that in Philippians iii, 19: "Whose end is destruction, whose God is their belly." For, as Tertullian says elegantly in Against the Psychics: "Their God is their belly, and their lungs are a temple, a little stream is an altar, a cook is a priest, whose whole charity ferments in pots, whose whole faith grows hot in kitchens, whose whole hope lies in dishes." Morally, learn here that riches, although in themselves neither good nor evil, but indifferent, are nevertheless for many an occasion and enticement to pride, gluttony, luxury, injustice and impiety, and this on account of the desire for these things innate in man. Whence Antonius in the Melissa, Part I, chapter xxxi, cites from the sayings of the Fathers and wise men. Of St. Chrysostom: "The poor man does not so much desire necessities as the rich man desires superfluities; nor again does the poor man have so much power or ability to exercise wickedness as the rich man. If anyone is overcome by cupidity, he is conquered by money; nor does he often overcome cupidity, but he has received from nature that this is scarcely troublesome to him: for not all are similarly luxurious. The root of all evils is the love of money: for the desire of riches is perjury, theft, robbery, fornication, envy, murder, hatred of brothers, war, avarice, simulation, flattery." Of St. Gregory of Nyssa: "To possess honestly a few things is far better than to possess many things dishonestly. No satiety of gain ever arises, but what is received in turn becomes the matter and fuel of greater desire." Of Clement: "The best riches are the poverty of desires." Of Philo: "The glory of riches is not situated in purses, but in providing aid to the needy." Of Nilus: "Do not wish to become rich for the reason that you may be generous to the poor: for God commands the just to have mercy from what they have." Of Plutarch: "As long robes hinder bodies, so immoderate riches hinder souls. A noble horse is not judged from costly trappings, but from what it is by nature; nor is an honest man judged from possessing riches of great price, but from having a noble spirit." Of Democritus: "Constant in all men is the cupidity of riches: for what is not acquired torments, what is acquired fatigues with cares, what is lost finally destroys with sadness. Natural riches consist of bread and water, and clothing easily obtained for the body; but superfluous riches have infinite vexation of cupidity in the mind." Of Eusebius: "Riches for many evils are like a veil placed before them." Of Chilon: "What is opulence? A treasure of evils, a provision for calamity, a supply for wickedness." Of Christ himself: "It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of heaven," Matthew xix, 24; of St. Paul: "The root of all evils is cupidity," in Greek φιλαργυρία, that is, the love of money, I Timothy vi, 10. Maximus indeed, sermon 12, among very many others cites the saying of Lucian: I was brought forth into the light naked, naked I shall depart: / Why do I toil in vain, seeing naked funerals? And he adds: Aristides surnamed the Just, when a certain rich man reproached him with poverty, said: "To me, poverty will present nothing evil to be seen, but to you riches present not a few troubles." Hiero, when he was blamed because, although he had taught many to practice rhetoric, he himself was in need, said: "Yet I did not teach them to become rich, nor to love money." Musonius: "We shall indeed condemn the treasures of Croesus and Cyrus as subject to extreme poverty; but we believe one alone to be rich and wise, namely he who can find everywhere as much as need demands." Xenophon the philosopher: "He said that poverty was philosophy taught by word: for what this persuades by word, that compels by deed. Opulence is the covering of many evils." The same man "said that a rich and uneducated man was tarnished silver. Even if you were lord of ten thousand cubits of earth, when dead you will occupy three or four: there are some who do not live in this present life, but with great effort prepare, as if they were about to live another life, not this present one." Again Antonius in the Melissa, chapters xxxiii and xxxiv, cites that saying of St. Basil: "Rejoice, O man, in want, because the goods of Lazarus will follow you. Gold is a snare of souls, a hook of death, bait of sin. Poor is he who lacks many things; but insatiable cupidity makes many things lacking. Just as to drunkards the wine already drunk provides ever greater occasion for drinking; so also men recently enriched, although they possess much, desire more, fostering disease from the very increase of things, and their study is turned to the contrary. Whatever you see, whatever you imagine, is gold. This is to you a dream in sleep, and a thought when awake: for just as those who rave through madness do not see the things themselves, but imagine what their affection suggests to them; so your mind held by avarice sees nothing but gold and silver, and indeed gold appears sweeter to you than the sun offers itself to your sight. Finally Secundus the philosopher, when asked by the Emperor Hadrian: "What are riches?" answered: "The weight of gold, a minister of cares, insatiable envy, an inexhaustible desire, a hateful concupiscence. What is poverty? A hateful gift, the mother of health, a removal of cares, an inventor of wisdom, happiness without anxiety." Solomon adds the reason why he begs to be spared from poverty, saying: "Lest being compelled by want I steal, and forswear the name of my God:" for poverty, in order to enrich itself, is prone to theft, which to conceal it lies about, and to make the lie believed adds an oath, and perjures itself. Hence we see that the poor and beggars are thievish, and swear at every third word and often perjure themselves. To this pertain the maxims of the wise men which Maximus recites, sermon 12 of Craton: "There is no greater calamity in life than poverty." And of Simonides, who when asked whether riches or wisdom were more to be desired: "I know not," he said; "yet I see that wise men frequent the doors of the rich." And of Theognis: "Not in vain do all men, O Plutus, cultivate and revere you: / For it is easy for you, not hard to bear evil." And of Euripides in Danae: "O gold! most beautiful happiness to men." Of Aristotle: "Poverty lacks much, insatiable desire lacks all things." Of Democrates: "If you do not desire many things, even few things will seem many to you: for small appetite makes poverty equal to wealth."
30:10
In Hebrew, do not accuse with the tongue, or bring a charge against a servant before his master, lest perhaps he curse you, and you offend; the Chaldean, lest he curse you, and you be found guilty; the Septuagint, do not deliver a servant into the hands of his master, lest he curse you, and you be destroyed. But that final part, lest you be destroyed, Aquila, Symmachus and Theodotion translate thus: lest you sin, lest you offend. The Hebrew אשם ascam signifies, first, to offend, to sin; second, to be found guilty of sin; third, to be punished and desolated on account of sin: for it alludes, both in letters and sound, and in meaning, to שמם scamam, that is, to be desolated. Some translate it, lest you be blown upon, or hissed at, because ascam, they say, signifies to be blown upon and hissed at on account of fault or punishment, so that with a certain blast it becomes an abomination and horror to those looking on. First, the Rabbis, and among them Baynus, limit this maxim to a servant of the Gentiles, who took refuge with the sons of Israel, so that converted from paganism to Judaism he might become a proselyte; whom therefore they think should not be returned to a gentile master, but should be granted freedom among the Jews; and they take that saying from Deuteronomy chapter 23, 15: "You shall not deliver a servant to his master, who has fled to you; he shall dwell with you in the place that shall please him, and in one of your cities he shall rest: do not afflict him." Second, better and more fully Lyran, Hugo, Jansenius, Arboreus and others understand this of any servant, whom he forbids to be accused before his master rashly and without grave cause, especially from mockery or hatred, so that you might harm him and afflict him through his master. For this is cruelty, and this is what the Hebrew אלטון talscen signifies, that is, he slandered, he carried tales with his tongue, from the root לשון lascon, that is, tongue: and thus we commonly say that talkative and slanderous people have a longer tongue than is fitting. For otherwise the law commands, Deuteronomy 22, that a straying ox or sheep be brought back to its master, how much more a servant? For who would not wish this done to himself? Who would not wish to know the faults of his servants? It concerns the advantage of both, if a servant offends, that the master should know. He gives the reason for this precept: "Lest perhaps he curse you, and you fall or offend." Lest he curse, that is, lest he pray evil upon you, lest he execrate you, as if to say: The curse of a poor man and one without power unjustly injured is no less to be feared than the strength and wealth of the rich: for the powerless have God as their avenger, and widows, and orphans, and others who are destitute of human aid, especially when they cry out to him, and commend their injury to him with a heart gravely wounded: whereby it will come to pass that God, hearing them, will allow you, who have unjustly accused them, to fall into a like evil, and to be afflicted similarly. Whence Solomon, following his custom, Ecclesiasticus, chapter 4, 3: "Do not afflict," he says, "the heart of the needy, and do not delay to give to those who beg: do not grieve the sorrowful, nor refuse to him that is in need. Do not turn away your face from the poor, and there shall be no face turned from you. As you would not that a man should despise you when you are in need, so neither despise you any one when he is in need and in misery. Do not grieve the heart of the poor, and defer not to give to him that is in distress. Do not reject the supplication of the afflicted, nor turn away your face from the needy. Do not turn away your eyes from the poor for fear of anger: and do not give any one occasion to curse you: for if he curse you in the bitterness of his soul, his curse shall be heard by him that made him." For "lest you fall," very aptly with the Chaldean you may translate, "lest you be found guilty," as if to say: Do not rashly accuse a servant before his master, lest the servant accused by you curse you, that is, speak evil of you, and likewise accuse you, and reveal some hidden deed, on account of which you be found guilty, condemned and punished: for such is the nature of servants. This sense is very apt. By the same reasoning you may say the same of any subject or inferior. Do not rashly accuse a subject before a superior, lest he likewise speak evil of you, accuse you and find you guilty: whence also Vatablus translates, "lest perhaps he curse you, and you sin," as if to say: "Lest after you have sinned, it befall you to be cursed," so that it be a reversal of the natural order. This maxim teaches that no one, however vile, should be despised or injured, for there is no one so vile who cannot avenge himself and injure in turn the one who has injured him. Whence that saying: "A dog in his own dunghill, and a beggar in his own place can do much." How many masters have been beaten by servants, how many princes by tradesmen!
Verses 11, 12, 13 and 14: Four Perverse Generations Solomon here adds other vices especially to be avoided, teaching much and philosophizing chiefly through quaternaries of six. And first indeed he sets forth four generations, that is, kinds of men, which he indicates are especially to be detested on account of singularly evil vices, as Jansenius says. Whoever therefore strives to attach this gnome to the preceding one seeks a knot in a bulrush, and obscures and darkens it rather than illustrates it. This gnome therefore, like the others, is illustrious and stands by itself alone. For from here begin six riddles and enigmas, each of which is four-membered and concluded by a quaternary. The Hebrew דור dor, that is, generation, signifies three things: first, the age of man; second, an age or era; third, a kind of men. Hence this gnome is expounded in three ways. First, concerning four ages of man, namely childhood, adolescence, youth and manhood: for to childhood the first gnome is suited, because children are accustomed to be obstreperous toward their parents; to adolescence the second is suited, because adolescents appear candid and pure, and yet on account of boiling blood are prone to angers, quarrels, lusts; to youth the third is suited, because young men are spirited and courageous, and therefore seek lofty things, and sometimes things beyond their strength; to manhood the fourth is suited, because men, like women, in order to nourish wife and children and family, not rarely plunder others, especially the needy and poor. They think therefore this is a symbol of the four ages of human life. But this sense appears far-fetched and alien. Second, others take dor to mean an age or era, as if he here notes four ages of the world, in which four principal crimes flourished. For in the first age before Abraham idolatry flourished; in the second after Abraham until Christ Judaism flourished, and the hypocrisy of the Jews; in the third after Christ heresy flourished until the times of St. Gregory; in the fourth after St. Gregory the wickedness, oppressions and tyrannies of Christians flourished and flourish. The first generation therefore denotes idolaters: for these curse their father, that is, God, and their mother, that is, the Church, with maledictions; the second generation denotes Jews, who because they wash their flesh outwardly with certain external washings and baptisms, arrogate to themselves cleanliness, when nevertheless they do not put away the filth of the soul: the third generation adumbrates heretics, whom pride, arrogance and haughtiness of mind, failing from the true faith, compelled into such dissimilar sects; the fourth generation hints at wicked Christians, who, alien from all mercy and gentleness, put on hearts of iron, and exercise cruelty toward their neighbors. But this exposition is more mystical than literal; yet as mystical it is not unsuitable, indeed it is fitting. Third and genuinely, dor here, as also elsewhere, signifies the kind and condition of various men, whose principal four vices are here described, namely first, ingratitude and impiety toward parents; second, hypocrisy and feigned sanctity; third, pride and arrogance; fourth, injury, violence and oppression of the poor: for these four especially agitate and disturb the whole world, and are hated by God before others, and therefore Solomon here proposes them to each one, that they may guard themselves from them. A generation therefore, namely perverse and wicked and impious, is fourfold. Hence the Septuagint clearly translates, a wicked son, or, as the Author of the Catena of the Greeks: "A wicked offspring and progeny curses its father, and does not bless its mother. A wicked offspring and progeny judges itself just; nor yet does it wash away the filth of its origin. A wicked offspring carries lofty eyes before itself, and lifts itself up with its own eyelids. A wicked offspring has teeth like swords, and molars like pincers (or a two-edged axe, a double-bladed axe, axes; for the word τομίς signifies all these things) cutting, so that it may devour, and from the earth consume the weak and humble, and take away their poor from among men." The first generation therefore, that is, kind, as Jansenius says, is of those who sin through supreme ingratitude toward those to whom the greatest gratitude is owed. Generation, he says, understand it to be, that is, it is a certain kind of men, and there are some who even curse their own father or speak ill of him; and similarly they do not bless their mother, as they ought, but on the contrary curse her. The second kind is of those who falsely claim sanctity for themselves: "A generation," he says, "which seems clean to itself, when it is not washed from its filth," that is, there are those who think themselves clean, when nevertheless they have not washed away their uncleanness: which happens either because they are ignorant of their uncleanness and vices, or because they do not care about them. The third kind is of those who are so puffed up with pride that they plainly display it even in their outward countenance and gesture, nor are they able to conceal it in their mind: "A generation," he says, "whose eyes are lofty, and whose eyelids are lifted up," declaring by the very bearing of their eyes that they seek high things, and despise all others before them. The fourth kind is of those who are of such cruelty that they imitate wild beasts, and as it were eat human flesh with their teeth, whom he expresses, saying: "A generation, which hath swords for teeth," that is, whose teeth are as swords; by which nothing else is signified than that some rage so cruelly against others, to destroy them either by deed or by word, or to plunder their goods and flay them, that they seem to tear them apart and chew them after the manner of beasts with their teeth, and to break them with their molars. Our author reads in the Hebrew מאכלות meachelot, that is, devouring, or chewing with molars, that is, he chews with his molars: already others read with different points, מאכלות maachalot, that is, knives, whence they translate, he hath knives for molars, that is, he hath sharp molars, so that they seem to be not so much teeth as most sharp knives. It is a metaphor, as if to say: They devour and plunder the poor so cruelly, as if like beasts they tore them apart and cut them with teeth like knives. This fourth kind is worse than the other three, and so the worst and most savage of all, and therefore is placed in the fourth and last place as the summit and apex of malice. Thus in the following quaternaries, what is placed in the fourth place is the highest in them. That this is the meaning is clear both from the very words of each sentence in this quaternary, and from what follows; for he explains the fourth generation of the avaricious and rapacious, when he immediately adds: "The leech hath two daughters, saying: Bring, bring." But he pursues the first generation, namely of the impious toward their parents, when immediately after the leech, as if returning to the head of the four generations, he subjoins in verse 17: "The eye that mocketh his father, and that despiseth the labour of his mother in bearing him, let the ravens of the brook pick it out." Then he pursues the second generation of hypocrites in verses 18, 19, 20, especially when he names: "The way of a man in his youth;" and he adds: "Such is also the way of an adulterous woman, who eateth, and wipeth her mouth, and saith: I have done no evil." Finally he completed the third generation, sublime in pride, in verses 21 and 22, giving examples of the same: "By three, he says, the earth is disturbed, and the fourth it cannot bear: by a servant when he reigneth: by a fool when he is filled with bread: by an odious woman when she is married: and by a handmaid when she is heir to her mistress." By a similar scheme of the individual generations, or states, St. Augustine elegantly arranged the abuses and vices of the same through their antitheses, or whoever is the author (for others ascribe it to St. Cyprian, others to Climacus, others to others) in the tract On the Twelve Abuses, vol. IX: "The first," he says, "degree of abuse is, if one be wise and a preacher without good works, who neglects to fulfill in deeds what he teaches in word; the second, if an old man be found without religion; the third, if a young man be caught without obedience; the fourth is, a rich man without almsgiving; the fifth is, a woman without chastity; the sixth is, a master without virtue; the seventh is, a contentious Christian; the eighth is, a proud pauper; the ninth is, an unjust king; the tenth is, a negligent Bishop; the eleventh is, a people without discipline; the twelfth is, a people without law." Which he then pursues at length individually. Note verse 12: "Not washed from her filthiness." Our author with the Hebrew reads מצאתו mittsoato, that is, from her filthiness; but the Septuagint read with another pointing, מצאתו mitseato, that is, from her issue: whence they translate, she did not wash her issue, or, as the Author of the Catena of the Greeks, she did not wash away the filth of her birth. He alludes to the afterbirth and filth with which children are wrapped when they are born, when they come forth from the womb of their mother into the light, from which immediately the midwives wash them, according to that in Ezekiel xvi, 4: "In the day thou wast born thy navel was not cut, neither wast thou washed in water for thy health, nor salted with salt." By filthiness of issue understand the concupiscence innate and proper to each. For some draw from their parents a choleric temperament, and are prone to anger; others a sanguine temperament, and are prone to lust; others a phlegmatic temperament, and are prone to sloth; others a melancholic temperament, and are prone to sadness. Moreover, it is difficult for each to overcome this temperament of his own, and the concupiscence residing in it, because it is as it were inborn and connatural to each; whence very few are even holy men who mortify it so that it does not sprout again, according to that saying: Though you drive out nature with a pitchfork, yet it will always return. Hence it is held as a great thing, and almost as a miracle, what we read in the Life of St. Ignatius, founder of the Society of Jesus, namely that he, although by nature choleric, so thoroughly subdued his nature and choler, that he appeared slow and phlegmatic. Others refer this part to bastards; for to them lust, levity and the vices of parents so often cling, that from this alone you can recognize them to be bastards. The reason is, because the intemperance and lust of parents infects the seed, from which the children born contract the vices innate to those parents: and even if sometimes for a time they correct them, yet given occasion or temptation they relapse into them. Whence the Septuagint translates, "and did not wash his issue," that is to say, Even if a bastard at times lives rightly, yet he cannot wash away the paternal stain and vice ingrained, which he contracted from his father at his birth, without relapsing into it. Whence Baldus in the final chapter On the Translation of Bishops, about the middle: "A bastard, he says, legitimated, or ennobled in some way, is like a sick man cured of a wound, of which some scar always remains." And clearly the Wise Man, chapter iv, 6: "For from wicked dreams, he says, are born children who are witnesses of wickedness against their parents in their examination." Philosophers learned the same thing from Solomon. Whence Plutarch, in the treatise On Nobility: "Absurd is, he says, the calumny of the sophists against nobility, who do not consider even common and most well-known things, namely that for the sake of generating offspring noble horses and dogs are bred; likewise the best seeds of vines, olives, and other trees: but for man they think nothing contributes to the future succession of the nobility of the race, but only whether the origin be barbarous or Greek. Nor do they believe that certain latent principles and seeds of virtue are communicated to children in generation, as to Telemachus son of Ulysses, of whom Homer, using the clearest word, said: The virtue of your father has been instilled into you, as if he were asserting that to a few drops of seed the good things of paternal virtue flow together." Xenophon concerning the writings of Theognis: "He indicated, he says, that no man, nor anything else good would come to be, except one born from good parents. Rams, asses and horses, O Cyrnus, we seek noble, and each one wishes to procure these animals for himself from a good stock." Aristotle, book III of the Politics, chapter vi, teaches that the state should be constituted from noble and well-born men, and gives the reason, that from them proceed noble men, who illustrate the state. "Moreover, he says, it is fitting that those born from better men be better; for the virtue of the race is nobility." Finally, the third generation of those who walk with lofty brows, some attribute to worldly nobility and the noble, who with haughty eyes, puffed up with pride, despise the plebeians, as the Brahmins do among the Indians, who to this day are so inflated with their race, that they deign neither to speak, nor to eat, nor to dwell with plebeians. And the Nairs among Calicut, who as nobles do not allow themselves to be touched by a plebeian, but if by chance they are touched by one, they punish him with a club or sword, as Osorio testifies, book I On the Deeds of Emmanuel. Sallust in the Jugurtha: "Metellus, he says, although virtue, glory and other desirable things surpassed good men, yet there was in him a contemptuous spirit and pride, a common vice of nobility." Cicero, oration 7 against Verres: "Of noble men, he says, scarcely anyone favors our industry; we cannot attract their goodwill by any of our services: as if they were separated by nature and birth, so they differ from us in mind and will, just as they do in blood." Plutarch in the Moralia declares this by the likeness of two birds, namely the thorn-finch and the acanthis: "Among the agathallos and acantides (thus he calls such little birds), there is such hatred, that if their blood is mixed by force, it immediately separates itself and bursts apart: so among patricians and plebeians, if ever for the sake of affairs they are joined together and conspire, yet the natural hatred endures all the while." But this pride is not the nature of true nobility, but a vice. For true nobility is modesty and humility of spirit. Whence Diogenes, when asked: "Who among men would be the most noble?" answered: "Those who despise riches, glory, pleasure, and finally life itself, and overcome their opposites, poverty, infamy, pain and death." Demosthenes: "It is fitting, he says, that the noble and honorable above all should persevere in having beauty in countenance, temperance in soul, in both fortitude, and grace in speech." Thus Stobaeus, sermon 89. Aristotle, in the Politics, book VI, chapter v: "It is the part, he says, of those who are gracious and of noble mind to take up the poor, and providing opportunity to convert them to the doing of deeds." More sublimely St. Basil in the work of Maximus, sermon 63: "We cannot, he says, call fathers and ancestors noble; for the law of truth requires the praises of each: for a horse is not swift because it is born of the swiftest; but just as in other animals each is judged by itself, so the praises of men are testified by the illustrious deeds of each." And St. Gregory of Nazianzus in the same place: Let foul fame shame you: let not evil lineage / Move you: your lineage long ago has rotted away. / Lineage, either begin it, or bring it to an end, / So that you be either good, or born of the good.
Verses 15 and 16: The Leech and Four Insatiable Things The Septuagint repeats and doubles τὸ and water; for thus they have it: And the earth which is not satisfied with water, and water and fire do not say: It is enough. Thus the Vatican and Complutensian texts, although the Author of the Catena of the Greeks deletes τὸ and water, as do the Hebrew, Chaldean, Vulgate and others. For "mouth of the womb" in Hebrew it is "closing of the womb," namely the same narrow opening thereof, says Vatablus. Others understand a barren woman, whose womb the Lord closed, and yet she ardently desires to have offspring, such as was Anna the mother of Samuel. Some distinguish verse 15 from the two following, and consequently think there is a twofold riddle here, one of the leech, another of three or four insatiable things; others however connect these three verses, so that they propose one and the same riddle. That this may be made clearer, it is asked first what the Hebrew עלוקה aluka signifies, which Our author translates as leech? First, Aben-Ezra takes the Hebrew aluka, that is leech, by metathesis for מקולה akula, that is depravity, crookedness, perversity: for the root עקל akal signifies to be depraved, crooked, perverse; whence some think that by this word the crocodile is denoted, which is crooked, savage and perverse, and therefore says: Bring, bring, because one devours and swallows with a single bite, another chews gradually and crushes with its teeth. Now the crocodile is a symbol of death, because death like a crocodile rages against all, and some it consumes by swift death, others by slow disease and wasting. Second, R. Saadia and others in Pagninus's Lexicon translate aluka as privation, that is to say "Two daughters of Privation are, Bring, Bring." That is, death deprives some of life in the mother's womb, others after birth from the womb. Third, others in R. Solomon think aluka to be synonymous with שאול sheol, that is hell and descent: its two daughters are Gehenna and the garden of delights, of which the one with constant voices demands the wicked to itself, the other however the just. For in the time of Solomon all, even the just, after death descended to the infernal regions, awaiting Christ, who by the price of his death would open heaven to them; to the just therefore the limbo of the fathers was as it were a garden of delights. But all these are Rabbinic fictions. Fourth indeed, the Septuagint, the Chaldean, Our author, Symmachus and others consistently translate aluka as a leech, or hirudo. Whence also the Arabs (whose language is akin to Hebrew) call the leech aleka, and the Germans, English, Belgians echel. It is asked second, what is this leech or hirudo, and what are its daughters? I suppose that by two daughters is alluded to the two mouths of the leech, with which on account of its great avidity for sucking it is endowed, so that it may suck more and satisfy its avidity. Whence Pliny, lib. XXXII, cap. x: "Therefore," he says, "they cut off the sucking mouths with pincers." Indeed Berchorius from St. Isidore says the mouth of the hirudo is distinguished by three angles as it were, so that with three parts it cuts the flesh and sucks the blood. Two daughters therefore are here called metaphorically a twofold mouth, and a twofold avidity for sucking. For properly a hirudo does not generate, nor has daughters, but is born from muddy water equally as slugs; although Aldrovandus doubts whether it does not sometimes emit eggs, from which it excludes daughters. The twofold mouth of the hirudo is a sign that it has a twofold taste, from the fact that blood tastes most sweetly to it: for thus Aristotle from the fact that serpents have a bifid tongue, concludes that they have a twofold taste. Indeed Andreas Vesalius, a distinguished Anatomist, asserts that the hirudo has a fistula in its mouth, by which it bores through the skin, so that it may draw the blood which it thirsts for. Others give the hirudo a bifid and fistulated tongue, which it drives completely into the flesh. Aldrovandus, tom. De Insectis, cap. De hirudine, says it has a mouth like a sting, and indeed trisulcate, by which it inflicts a trisulcate wound on the flesh. Now first Bede, Hugh, Lyran and Salonius understand by the leech the devil, who, they say, "is always inflamed with thirst for sin and for persuading sins." Hence his two daughters are two special allurements of the human race, namely lust and avarice. For just as the hirudo sucks not good but corrupted blood: so the devil thirsts for nothing but these evil desires, so that he may excite the same in man. Others understand by the leech avarice, others concupiscence. But all these are mystical. Secondly, physically some understand by these leeches, or four insatiable things, the generation of things: for hell or the state of the dead represents the corruption and death of things; the mouth of the womb represents their generation and origin, both of which last and will last until the end of the world, nor are they ever satisfied. The remaining two elements, namely earth and fire, represent things through which generation and corruption occur, that is through earth, while it continually receives moisture and water into itself, and through fire, which heats all things, always acts, and stirs, makes fertile, and changes all things in the earth. But these are symbols of physical, not ethical, matter, which Solomon here chiefly regards. I say therefore that these three verses regard the same thing, and therefore are not two, but one and the same riddle of the leech and the four insatiable things, and accordingly the leech denotes the four insatiable things, so that leech is the same as insatiability, or insatiable greed: for the leech is the idea and symbol of this, according to that saying of Horace: The leech will not let go of the skin unless full of blood. That this is so is clear first, because both the Hebrew and Roman versions in the same verse 15 comprehend both the daughters of the leech and three, indeed four insatiable things; secondly, because the Hebrew signifies this, and the Septuagint plainly proves it: for thus they translate, The leech had three beloved daughters, and those three did not satisfy her, and the fourth could not say: It is enough. This is the riddle; now they subjoin its solution with the same number of things, saying: "Three things are insatiable, and a fourth never says: It is enough: Hell, the love of a woman, and earth not saturated with water, but fire also and water never say: It is enough." And clearly the Arabic: "The leech has three beloved daughters, loving them with the greatest love, and these three did not satisfy her, and to the fourth she did not give sufficiency to say: It is enough for me; and they are: Hell, and the love of a woman, and hard earth which is not satisfied with rain; and water and fire never said: It is enough." The sense will be the same in the Latin Vulgate, if you count the leech by number: for she herself with two daughters will be the third, and thus three leeches precisely correspond to three insatiable things, and with them are the same in reality. From all which it is altogether clear that the four insatiable things are the same as the two daughters of the leech: for those four are first designated by the binary number, then by the ternary, and finally by the quaternary, as if to say: Two are insatiable, and which never say: It is enough, but say: Bring, bring; nay three are insatiable, nay four. For there is here and in the following quaternaries a gradation, and such a manner of speaking as is found in Amos, who used similar quaternaries in describing the crimes of many nations, when he says: "Upon three crimes, and upon four," Amos, cap. 1, for the reason that: Three are crimes, nay four, on account of which I will not turn away or will not spare. So also in Prov. vi, where we have: "Six are the things which the Lord hateth, and the seventh his soul detesteth;" in Hebrew it is not seventh, but seven, as if to say: Six are, nay seven, which the Lord hateth, and his soul detesteth. Whence for what we have, "and a fourth never says: It is enough," in Hebrew it is, and (Vatablus, nay) four never say: It is enough. The two daughters of the leech therefore saying: "Bring, bring;" or, as it is in Hebrew, give, give, are the first two insatiable things, namely hell and the mouth of the womb: these two are called two daughters of the leech, because just as the leech has two mouths which cannot be satisfied with blood, so also hell and the mouth of the womb are as it were two mouths which are never satisfied, according to that saying: Hell insatiably opens its gaping throat. Hence hell in Hebrew is called שאול sheol, which always demands: שאל shaal for it is to demand; among the Latins it is called Orcus, because it urges all to death, says Festus, so that after death it may swallow them. Therefore hell, that is death, perdition and the state of the dead, says Jansenius (I cite his words because they are clear, concise, solid), is as it were a mouth devouring all, and is never satisfied, so that it always really says: Bring, and its name can rightly be said אנהב an hab, as it is in Hebrew, that is give. Similarly also the mouth of the womb, because the concupiscence of woman always desires the congress of man, so that it really says: "Bring," and its name can also be said hab, that is give. For insatiable is the lust of woman, according to that saying of the Poet: Wearied indeed, but not satisfied, she departed. The Hebrews do not have "mouth of the vulva," but "closure of the vulva" or of the womb, that is, the matrix impeded, contracted and sterile, so that the insatiable desire of a sterile woman may be signified, whose Lord has closed the womb so that she may not bear: for such a woman is more eager for intercourse than others, both on account of the desire of having offspring, and because fertile and pregnant women naturally do not desire intercourse since their womb is as it were a stomach full, as physicians teach; but the matrix of sterile women is not dilated by conception, and remains empty. Therefore the two aforesaid daughters of the leech are among the number of four insatiable things. The third insatiable thing is the earth, which is not easily saturated with water, which it always drinks in, especially if sandy. The fourth is fire, which by the addition of wood is not extinguished, but is ever more and more kindled, and ever more and more consumes and devours. But under this physical and literal sense, and under this bark of the letter, a notable ethical symbol lies hidden, which must now be investigated. It is asked therefore thirdly, what ethically and symbolically the leech with two daughters signifies, or the four insatiable things, namely hell, the mouth of the vulva, the earth which is not saturated with water, and fire? I answer first: The leech ethically signifies concupiscence, whose two, nay three and four daughters insatiable, are four primary vices, or vicious desires, namely anger, lust, avarice and ambition, from which four as from roots other desires and vices arise. Whence St. Augustine, On the City of God, book XIV, chapter xv: "Lust," he says, "is a general term for all desire. For there is lust of avenging, which is called anger; there is lust of possessing, which is named avarice; there is lust or appetite for pleasures, which is called luxury; there is lust of glorying and ruling, which is called boasting or ambition." The first therefore is anger and envy, or the desire of vengeance and harm, which is rightly signified by hell, horrible and dark, which desires death; nor can it be satisfied even by death itself, but is ever stirred up to the harm and ruin of another, gnawing all things, destroying all things. The second is the concupiscence of the flesh rightly designated by the mouth of the vulva, because it chiefly flourishes in it, as has been said: for lust in both sexes is not extinguished, nor is it satisfied by use itself, but its desire is more excited by use. The third is "the concupiscence of the eyes," as John calls it, I John ii, or as Paul calls it φιλαργυρία (Colossians iii), namely avarice, which is compared to the earth, because it is altogether earthly, adhering only to earthly things, and to the likeness of which it is never satisfied with riches, just as that earth, especially sandy, although it has received much water into itself, is always ready to receive more. Whence also the avaricious man is compared to one with dropsy, and to him is accommodated that saying: The more waters are drunk, the more waters are thirsted for. The fourth is the desire of glory, which is pride, and is rightly likened to fire, because, just as fire always seeks high things, so also does pride; and just as fire devours all things, so pride desires to subject all things to itself, nor is it satisfied with all things even subjected to it, always seeking further things: as appeared in Alexander, who, when he heard that philosophers were disputing about other worlds in the world subjected to him, is said to have groaned, as if grieving that only one world was subjected to him. To this Anastasius of Nicaea adds in Questions on Holy Scripture, Question XLI, who follows the Septuagint: "The leech," he says, "that is, sin, has three beloved daughters, fornication, envy, idolatry." To this pertains that passage of St. Augustine (or whoever is the author: for the style argues that it is not St. Augustine of Hippo the Bishop), Book On Saving Doctrine, chapter XLIX: "There are three things in this world worse than all evil: the soul of a sinner persisting in sin, which is blacker than a raven, and the evil angels who seize it, and hell into which it is led. For there are not worse things than these three. For that same soul, trembling with fear of the future judgment, and beholding its own putrefaction, says: My scars have rotted and become corrupt from the face of my foolishness. Again, there are three things than which there are not better things in this world: the soul of a saint persisting in good works, which is more beautiful than the sun, and the holy Angels who receive it, and paradise into which it is led, and the expectation of the kingdom of heaven. There are not better things than these three in this world. For the holy Angels delight the mind with spiritual song, as the Psalmist says: Blessed is he whom thou hast chosen and taken up, O Lord, he shall dwell in thy tabernacles. We shall be filled with the good things of thy house: thy holy temple is wonderful in justice. Let us meditate on these things, dearest brother." Hence a leech has been set as a symbol of concupiscence: first, because just as this creature wallows in muddy water and thirsts intensely for blood, so also concupiscence is wholly carnal and earthly, and wallows in flesh and blood, nor does it desire anything but carnal things. Second, both are insatiable, and neither permits its appetites to be retarded, but fulfills them as swiftly and frequently as possible. Third, both are soft and delicate. Fourth, a leech does not touch pure blood, but tainted and corrupted blood, and delights in it; so also concupiscence rejoices in nothing but depraved desires, thoughts, and deeds, for example, an angry man thinks of nothing but injuries done to him: he also interprets all things done rightly in a sinister way, as if done from hatred; he seeks ways of revenge, etc.; a glutton thinks of nothing but his belly and filth, a lustful man of nothing but foul lust, etc. Fifth, leeches by sucking blood finally exhaust and kill a man. There is a kind of leech which the Germans call from the horse rossegel, because nine of them kill a horse; so concupiscence exhausts the powers of body and mind, and is the cause of death present and eternal to man. Sixth, a leech adheres tenaciously to the body, whence it is said to be called hirudo from haerendo (although the quantity differs; for hirudo has a short first syllable, haereo a long one), as Pontanus says: so concupiscence adheres most tenaciously to the soul, so that you would more easily knock a tooth from the mouth than concupiscence from the soul. Seventh, a leech is venomous, whence surgeons are accustomed first to soak it in fresh water, so that it may put its venom in it, as Galen testifies, vol. V, class 6, cap. 1: so concupiscence is a poison to the soul, infecting it, corrupting it and destroying it. Eighth, a leech has a fistula in its mouth, by which it pierces the skin: so concupiscence has a sting, by which it wounds the conscience. Ninth, a leech is generated in spring by the warmth of air and water, and this by the provident counsel of God and nature, so that it may meet the blood abundant and boiling at the same time and for the same reason, and by sucking it may diminish it, lest it cause inflammations, fevers and diseases: so in spring, on account of fervent blood, concupiscence of anger, gluttony, lust, pride, etc., bursts forth. Tenth, the leech moves by creeping, as a reptile, namely now extending, now contracting its tail toward its head: concupiscence creeps on the ground, while it seeks earthly things, and about them now extends itself, now contracts and entwines itself. Eleventh, when leeches adhere to flesh, the more they are pulled, the more strongly they hold on until they burst; moreover they drink corrupted blood, and thus in healing others they kill themselves, as Aldrovandus says. Concupiscence does the same, especially envy and anger, which while biting others, heals them from vices, and consumes itself with envy and wasting away. Twelfth, a leech is impatient of smoke, whence to remove it they apply smoke, which when it senses, it departs of its own accord, as Aldrovandus says: so concupiscence is restrained by the smoke of God's wrath and of hell, where the fire and smoke of torments ascends for ever and ever, as Isaiah testifies, cap. xxx, vers. 33, and St. John, Apocalypse xiv, 11. For when one seriously meditates on these things, he restrains concupiscence: for he says to himself: "Beware of that which delights for a little, that you may avoid that which torments eternally." Thirteenth, the leeches are two daughters saying: Bring, bring, that is two mouths ever sucking: so concupiscences have two offices, namely to indulge themselves, and to harm others; to love themselves, and to hate others; to retain their own, and to seize what belongs to others; to satisfy themselves, and to injure and exhaust others. Fourteenth, St. Isidore, lib. XII Origin. cap. v: "The leech," he says, "wherever it has adhered, draws blood, and when it has become wet with excessive gore, it vomits what it has drawn, so that it may suck fresh blood again:" so cupidity, where it has obtained what it coveted, spits it out to the point of nausea, and seeks new delights, just as when gluttons vomit delicacies and wines, so that they may gorge themselves with new ones. Fifteenth, Galen in the place cited teaches that leeches, baited with the delights of blood, when they adhere more tenaciously, are torn away by salt or ash sprinkled on them, for then they fall off of their own accord: so right reason and wisdom, whose symbol is salt, and the memory of ash (that is, of death) extinguish the thirst of cupidity. All these things which I have said of concupiscence in general, apply to each particular cupidity, for example anger, gluttony, lust, avarice, pride, etc., and adapt them with the name changed. Finally, the leech has a mouth like a triangle, which inflicts a triangular wound, as is evident to the eye: so concupiscence inflicts three wounds, namely to the body, the soul and the mind. Moreover, opposed to cupidity or concupiscence is charity, namely to the love of the flesh, the love of God, which is far more insatiable, because it is satisfied by no limits, no merits, no progress, no labors, no dangers, no torments, but always desires to suffer and to do greater things for God, most beloved, and to accomplish them. Charity therefore is a leech, which always says: Bring, bring labors and sorrows, virtues and merits, souls and peoples, whom I may lead to the worship and salvation of God. It is equally more capacious than hell, more fertile than the mouth of the womb, more thirsty than sandy earth, more ardent than fire, according to that passage in the Song of Songs viii, 6: "Strong is love as death, hard as hell is jealousy; her lamps are lamps of fire and of flames. Many waters cannot quench charity, neither shall floods drown it; if a man should give all the substance of his house for love, he shall despise it as nothing." Such was the insatiable charity of St. Paul, concerning which I have said more in the Preface to his Epistles, and in the Preface to the Acts of the Apostles. Such likewise was the charity of St. Dominic, St. Francis, St. Ignatius, St. Xavier. Therefore the first leech is anger, both on account of the analogies already recounted; and because it draws blood inwardly to itself from all parts, and inflames it: whence the outer parts of the angry grow pale. "For in those who pant for vengeance, the blood thus boils around the heart, as if by the force of fire it bubbles and rages," says St. Basil, homily On Anger; and because "anger is the mother of murder, and drinker of murder," says St. Chrysostom in chapter vi of Matthew. Again, anger is rightly compared in four insatiable things to hell, both because it is the cause of injuries and slaughters, which men send to the grave and to hell, according to that saying of Christ: "Whosoever shall say to his brother, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire," Matthew v, 22; and because anger is similar to the fire of hell, so that an angry man appears to be an infernal demon burning with fury, as the Nazianzen says in his poem On Anger, and St. Basil, homily On Anger: "Just as," he says, "he who has charity has God in himself: so he who has hatred and anger contains a demon in himself." Hear also Seneca, book II On Anger: "What monsters," he says, "have the poets imagined in the infernal regions, girt about with serpents and fiery breath; what most terrible furies go forth from hell to stir up wars and tear apart peace; what three-headed Cerberus, vomiting flames—such let us imagine anger to be." Furthermore, just as the fire of hell burns, but does not shine, and is therefore most ardent, but most dark, as St. Basil testifies in Psalm xxviii: so anger inflames the mind, but darkens reason, so that man does not see what he does. Moreover, some understand by hell the belly, because this, first, is insatiable as hell; second, it wastes away bodies, makes them putrid and consumes them, like a sepulcher and hell: whence the Nazianzen in his Poem On Different Kinds of Life: "Not a banquet," he says, "so that I return home late, and carry about alive a belly like a sepulcher." See St. Chrysostom, homily 26 in Matthew. Second, lust is a leech, because it consumes the best blood (for such is seed) and the most noble spirits, and makes man pale, livid, bloodless. Whence Theocritus, Idyll 2: Alas! cruel love, to satiate yourself with our blood, / Clinging to the highest skin as if this leech had sucked it. Again, lust is denoted by the mouth of the womb, especially of a harlot, which she insatiably desires, as Bede, Hugh, Arboreus, Cajetan, Jansenius and others note. Hence the Septuagint for mouth of the womb translates, love of women. Whence also St. Jerome, Against Jovinian, reading from the Septuagint, love of women, thus says: "This is not said of a harlot, not of an adulteress; but the love of women is generally accused, which is always insatiable, which when extinguished is kindled, and after satisfaction is again in want, and emasculates the manly spirit, and except for the passion which it sustains, allows nothing else to be thought of, nor is it extinguished even by use itself, but is inflamed more immoderately and vehemently." Third, by leech understand avarice; for this is the third daughter, as the Septuagint translates, of the leech, that is of cupidity; for a leech does not cease to suck until it fills itself completely with blood; then indeed it ceases to suck and falls off. Whence Pliny: "They fall off from satiety, drawn down by the weight of the blood itself." But the cupidity of the avaricious is satisfied by no riches; but the more he has, the more he desires, according to that saying: The more waters are drunk, the more they are thirsted for. Again, the avaricious man among four insatiable things is like the earth, especially dry and sandy earth, which is not satisfied with water, but immediately drinks in and absorbs even abundant rain, so that it at once dries up and thirsts for new showers: for thus the avaricious man, even if he acquires vast riches, like sand drinks them in, and thirsts for greater ones. And just as sand, though watered, bears no fruit, so neither does the avaricious man, though abounding in riches which he stores in a chest, distributes them to the needy. Therefore riches perish in him and with him, just as water perishes watering sand. Whence St. Chrysostom compares the avaricious man to a dropsical person, homily 15 on the First Epistle to the Corinthians: "Rightly," he says, "someone said that the avaricious are dropsical: for just as those carrying much water in their body thirst more, so also the avaricious carrying much money about them desire more. But the cause is: neither do those in whom it is fitting have water in their places, nor do these have riches in their affections and thoughts as is fitting." St. Chrysostom asserts that dropsical persons use water, because namely in them the water which would cool the stomach and vital organs is drawn to the extremities, so that it remains between the flesh and skin, whereby the vital organs deprived of the cooling of water burn with heat and thirst continually: so also avarice, the greater riches it has, the greater it desires, and as it were burning thirsts. Whence St. Chrysostom, in the homily on Lazarus, says the avaricious man burns and thirsts more than the rich man Epulo in hell, who asked for a drop of water to cool his flaming tongue, Luke xvi. The same, homily 28 on Matthew, compares the cupidity of the avaricious with the burning and thirst of those with fever. Wherefore Cyril assigns the reason a priori of this opinion drawn from the same dropsy, through the apologue of the dropsical fox and the physician weasel, physically and elegantly, book III of Moral Apologues, chapter viii, which has the title: On the Cause and Cure of Insatiable Avarice: A fox, he says, languishing squalid under the burden of dropsy, sought medicine and a physician for restoring health. But when she had met the weasel, knowing her diligence, she at once proposed to her the querulous question of her illness: I remember, she said, how once by your tooth I received life from the snare of death, as if newly born; why now, oppressed by the dangers of a grave lethal disease, trusting in your former benefits, do I resort to the counsel of your sagacity. To whom the weasel replied not ungraciously: If I have profited in any way, I know not; but if I have received a benefit, I always remember this. Explain therefore the disease: because, if I shall know it, I willingly shall apply an equal mode of cure. Then the fox, giving thanks, said: A languor, my sister, of unquenchable thirst I suffer, in which I especially marvel at these two things: one is, that when I drink, I thirst more; the other is, that with the vital organs wasted away, only the skin has swollen on the outside. To whom the teacher replied: I certainly thought you, sister, somewhat learned in medicinal matters by such art of cleverness; but I see you to be entirely ignorant of Hippocratic discipline. She then assigns the true cause of dropsy from the principles of Physics and Medicine, and its cure: "For your languor is not, as you suppose, thirst, but hunger of the members; because in you the flame of temperate heat diminished below its proper measure, the digestion of the liver becomes less, and then it generates water in place of blood, and your members are deprived of their increase, and the dried vital members, hungering, desire blood as food. But you, erring in such judgment, thinking the hunger of appetite to be bodily thirst, while you give liquid in place of food, you thereby weaken the digestive faculty all the more. For this reason, dearest, even if you drank the Danube, you would by no means extinguish this thirst, but rather would increase it, since according to the opinion of Galen, liquid does not substantially moisten the organs of flesh." Then he adapts all these things to avarice, which is spiritual, but a true and mere dropsy: "For," he says, "when in the soul of the avaricious man through the excessive burning of cupidity the proportion of charity is corrupted, and the digestive power of choice goes astray; with the loss of the substantial humor of blood, a thirsty dryness is immediately derived into the mind. But when the blinded appetite of the mind, wandering after temporal goods, desires them as a drink instead of food, and perverse care of money furnishes the cup instead of substantial and eternal goods, a great thirst of cupidity is kindled. Since worldly riches do not diminish but increase the dryness of spirit. For they inflame the affection with all the graver avidity, the more they deceive by the appearance of good; because when solid good is sought for, and what appears is given, the solid substance of goodness being not at all found, the affection is more vehemently inflamed. For nature provokes desires that lie about what is desired. Therefore if the world were the possession of the growing cupidity of the avaricious man, rapacious avarice would thirst more, and with the substance of the mind wasting away, only the empty skin of outward glory would swell. As therefore the avaricious man, if he extinguish cupidity by the largesse of charity, is satisfied: so the dropsical man, strengthened by natural heat, if he quickly bedew his dry members, is soon cured." Finally, as the leech by the rapine of the noxious blood which it sucks, bursts and destroys itself: so also the avaricious man often vomits forth the riches which he has seized, together with his soul, as I have shown from the same Cyril at chapter 1, 22. Fourthly, the leech, or the daughter of the leech, is ambition, because it itself, like a bloodsucker, sucks and draws to itself all the senses, blood, spirits and powers both of soul and body; for it calls all to itself, that it may devise and execute the means and methods by which it may obtain the honors which it seeks. This therefore, more than the other three, is insatiable; whence concerning it more than the other three it is said: "And the fourth which never says: It is enough." For "it is enough" in Hebrew is הון hon, that is, it is sufficient, also substance, riches, wealth, as Cajetan and Aben-Ezra translate it, meaning: Fire by burning acquires no riches, but rather loses all, and annihilates all substance. Such is ambition, which is satisfied by no honor, because honor has no subject and substance, but immediately passes and vanishes into nothing. The Septuagint translates hon in this place, as our version does, "it is enough"; but elsewhere they translate it "glory," "possession," "substance," "rest" (which suits this place, because neither fire nor the ambitious man has any rest), "power," "abundance," "price," because all these belong not to fire, nor to any other created thing, but to God alone. God therefore is to us hon, that is, sufficiency, substance, abundance and fullness of all good, and is therefore called Shaddai, the horn of plenty. Again, the leech, when it draws its tail to its mouth, swells; but when it pushes its mouth further forward, it becomes thin and slender: so the ambitious man, having obtained honor, swells; but when he aspires to a greater, he becomes humble, vile and suppliant. Hence again ambition is aptly compared among the four insatiable things to fire, on account of its fiery force: because fire, like it, first, strives upward, that it may climb the high peaks of honors; secondly, the more honors and magistracies it has obtained, the more fiercely it is inflamed, that it may seek more and greater, and climb higher; thirdly, as fire enclosed in the earth shakes it, and causes an earthquake: so the ambitious man, who lies low, moves all things, disturbs all men, shakes all things, that he may obtain the dignities he covets; fourthly, as fire by its subtlety and efficacy insinuating itself into all things, consumes them: so also ambition subtly inserting itself into all actions, incorporates them to itself, unites and ignites them. Whence Climacus in his account of Anthony in the Melissa, part II, chapter 74: "Fasting," he says, "I am desirous of vain glory; I hide myself that I may be unknown, as if prudent I again seek glory; clothed splendidly, I am overcome by it; covered in vile garments I again desire glory; speaking I am overcome, silent I am again defeated: however you cast out this thistle, the prickle stands upright." Wherefore Theopompus of Pylos wisely rejected the highest honors offered to him, saying: "Moderate honors time itself increases, immoderate honors it abolishes," teaching that it is the mark of a lofty mind to despise the highest things, and that in all matters moderation is best. Indeed he also acutely perceived that things which grow suddenly to a great height are not lasting, which is the nature of beets and gourds; but things which increase gradually, these endure through time, as the oak and the box. Thus Plutarch in the Laconian account. The ambitious therefore are lifted on high, that they may fall with a heavier crash, says Philistion. Moreover, Solomon set before our eyes the great evil of these four capital desires, namely their insatiable greediness, in order to deter us from them and to teach that they must be mortified and cut off: for why should we strive for vengeance, lust, avarice, ambition, which do not satisfy, but ever more sharply irritate, lacerate and torment the soul? Let us therefore cast them off from ourselves, and we shall obtain a wonderful peace, satiety and joy in our God, and we shall say with the Psalmist: "In peace in the selfsame I will sleep and rest." Secondly, specifically and adequately you should understand avarice by the bloodsucker with two, indeed three and four insatiable daughters, concerning which mention was made recently in the fourth wicked generation, verse 14, so that by these four insatiable ones the inexhaustible condition, nature and character of the avaricious and rapacious may be declared. Whence in a similar manner in the following verses Solomon continues the three former wicked generations, and specifically the first of sons cursing their parents in the next verse, saying: "The eye that mocketh his father, etc., let the ravens pluck it out." Thus Cajetan: Avarice, he says, is a bloodsucker, because this one sucks blood, that one sucks wealth and then the blood of the poor. It has two mouths, namely force and fraud: for what breaks through skin and flesh with pain is force; but what sucks out blood not copiously, but thinly and gradually, and leaves no trace of the wound, is great fraud. Similarly, two mouths, or two daughters of avarice are, to retain one's own, and to seize another's; or to sell justice, and to sell grace, says Cajetan, as avaricious judges, prefects, and provincial procurators do, whom for this reason the common people call bloodsuckers, and they satisfy them with gifts, so that filled with these they do not squeeze out money by evil arts. Wherefore the Emperor Tiberius, when he considered them not easily to be changed, nor successors to be given except when they were dead, used an apology of this kind, as Josephus testifies, lib. XVIII Antiq. Judaic. cap. viii: Flies, flying in swarms, had covered the wounds of a certain wounded man. A certain person passing by, taking pity on him, offered him his service in driving away the flies; for he thought that on account of the weakness of his strength he could not drive them away himself. The wounded man begs that he leave him thus. The other wondering what it was that he did not wish to be freed from this trouble, he replied: "Indeed, if these are driven away, I shall be afflicted with greater trouble and torment; for other fresh and hungry flies will succeed these, which will utterly destroy me already in bad condition; but these which now sit upon me already suck the blood somewhat more gently, inasmuch as they are already somewhat satiated. Thus therefore, says Tiberius, I too wish to consult the welfare of the provincials, lest they be too much vexed and flayed by the rapines of many governors; which would happen entirely if those were frequently changed, with the fear of quickly departing being added to their innate greed: I prefer therefore to leave them enriched by rapines, rather than to substitute new ones." Tiberius borrowed this apology from Aesop. For he, when he was giving patronage to a certain tribune of the plebs who was being prosecuted for embezzlement, brought a similar apology in his defense about a fox fallen into a chasm, and a hedgehog forbidding it not to drive away the dog flies by which it was besieged, as Aristotle is the author, lib. II Rhetor. xx. The apology will be more elegant and more forceful if you substitute bloodsucking leeches for flies. Again, avarice is aptly compared to four insatiable things, namely hell, the mouth of the womb, the earth which is not satisfied with water (the Septuagint adds, and water; they double the water, so as to denote the inexhaustible thirst for riches in the avaricious man), and fire. To hell, for the reasons which I recited a little before from St. Chrysostom; but to the mouth of the womb, because the desire for gold is as great as that for sexual pleasure. St. Bernard adds, in his work On Conversion to Clerics, chapter fourteen: "The hearts of men," he says, "will not be satisfied with gold any sooner than the air will satisfy bodies." Why the avaricious man is compared to the earth, which is not satisfied with water, I said a little before. The same comparison is made to fire. For, as St. Basil says, homily 21 on various passages of Scripture: "The evil of avarice knows not how to stand still, but is like fire in nature. For fire, after it has caught hold of fuel, hastens to consume all the material, nor can it cease before the material fails. But what can restrain the avaricious man? He is more violent than fire: he continually seizes all things within his boundaries, he takes away those things which belong to his neighbor. Soon, when he obtains another neighbor, he snatches away his possessions as well. He does not rejoice in what he possesses, but is tormented by what he lacks, nor does he enjoy what he has gathered together, but torments himself more by the desire of acquiring more. He uses the same comparison in homilies 6 and 7 on the Rich and Avaricious, and in oration 15 On Avarice. Therefore, just as fire, the more fuel it has, the more strength it acquires, so that it rages more violently; and the more it devours, the more insatiably it gluts itself: so also the avaricious man, the more riches he heaps together, the more eagerly he applies himself to heaping together more. Thirdly, St. Chrysostom, in homily 49 On Detraction: Detraction, he says, is a leech, which eagerly drinks the corrupt humor, that is, the vicious habits of one's neighbor, and offers them to others to be drawn in: this leech has two daughters, namely detraction and insult. All, says Chrysostom, turn away from the detractor, as from one who smells of mud, as from a leech, which feeds on foul blood; and from a beetle, which feeds on dung, that is, on the evils of others." Pliny adds, in book XXXII, chapter ten: "Sometimes leeches, when attached by their bite, leave their mouths behind, which causes incurable wounds, as happened to Messalina from the consular patricians, when she had admitted them to her knees." Some adapt this to the above, when they correct more sharply the defects of their subjects: for these indeed fix wounds deep in the minds of their subjects, and therefore make them incurable, as being lodged deep in the mind. Wherefore, just as physicians temper and dilute the poison of leeches with sweet waters, and then apply them to the body: so superiors should mitigate and sweeten the harshness of correction with the tender bowels of charity, and with gentle words. Fourthly, St. Bernard in his Declamation, on those words: "Behold, we have left all things," at the beginning: The leech, he says, is one's own will, its daughters are avarice and ambition: "Avarice," he says, "and the appetite for praise are opposed to each other; for what the one gathers, the other scatters: but these two such dissimilar evils have sprung from one root, namely from one's own will; for this leech has two insatiable daughters, crying out: Bring, bring; since neither is the mind satisfied with vanity, nor the body with pleasure, as it is written: The eye is not satisfied with seeing, nor the ear with hearing. Flee this leech, and thou hast left all things." Nay, rather, one's own will even infects, vitiates and corrupts the good works to which it clings. Whence St. Bernard, sermon 71 in the Canticles, pondering those words of Isaiah, chapter fifty-eight: "Behold, in the day of your fast your own will is found," exclaims: "Great is the evil of one's own will, by which it comes to pass that thy good things are not good to thee." You will ask fourthly, how the Rabbis, Cabalists and the like explain the daughters of the leech, or the four insatiable things, namely hell, the mouth of the womb, the earth which is not satisfied with water, and fire? I answer first, Aben-Ezra, whom Baynus follows, refers these four things to the four wicked generations mentioned a little before, as if the punishment of each is assigned here. For the first generation of children cursing their parents is condemned to hell, that is, to death and the grave; that is, it is punished with the penalty of a shorter life: for he who neglects those by whom he was given life, on account of his contempt for this benefit, ought to be deprived of life itself. To the second generation, the unclean, that is, to spurious and illegitimate children, "constriction of the womb," that is, sterility, is threatened. For thus it is fitting, that degenerate offspring should wither away in sterility and infecundity, according to that passage in Wisdom, chapter four, verse three: "Bastard slips shall not take deep root." The third generation indeed of sons, who grow insolent from the glory of their birth, is chastised by poverty. This is noted by the voice and the earth which is not satisfied with water, namely dry and thirsty earth, and thus bearing no fruit. Therefore these are punished by scarcity of grain, that is, by poverty: for poverty depresses the arrogance and haughtiness of the proud. The fourth generation of the avaricious, devouring the poor and humble, is given over to fire, namely to hell, so that those to whom the needy become food, they themselves also become food and fuel of eternal fire. But these seem far-fetched and foreign. Secondly, others refer these four to the four elements, which are filled and satisfied by no action, conversion, or mixture. But air is lacking here: for neither the infernal region, which is in the earth, nor the mouth of the womb, which is likewise earthly, can represent it. Again, others think that by these four are noted the four complexions of humours in the body. For some are choleric, the infernal region represents these; others are phlegmatic, the mouth of the womb represents these, both because woman is phlegmatic, and because her seed is watery; others are sanguine, who are red like fire; others are melancholic, who are dark like earth: for melancholy is above all else an earthy affection weighing down the soul and pressing it downward. Therefore just as dry earth drinks in rains, so also sadness is nourished and fostered by tears. Likewise, just as earth once soaked with waters dries again, and thirsts for waters repeatedly: so also graver sadness is never satisfied by tears, but drinking in the former ones, it thirsts impatiently for others after others. Thirdly, some divide these four into pairs, and combine them in this way. The infernal region and the mouth of the womb represent the birth and death of men: for the mouth of the womb signifies birth, the infernal region death, as if to say: Every man who is born of woman goes down and departs to the infernal regions; the earth which is not satisfied with water signifies the trees, herbs, plants which it produces: all of which finally dry up and become fuel for fire. So that by these four he notes the vanity of all things, namely that all things after they are born perish and become fuel either of hell or of fire, as at the end of the world all things will be burned up by the fire of conflagration. This is what he says in Ecclesiastes, chapter 33, verse 15: "Good is set against evil, and life against death: so also is a just man against a sinner. And so consider in all the works of the Most High, two and two, and one against one." To this physical sense the ethical sense aptly applies, as if to say: The mouth of the womb, that is, lust, leads men to hell; the earth which is not satisfied with water, that is, avarice, leads men likewise to the fire of hell. Wherefore St. Chrysostom compares fornication and the harlot to hell: for thus he says, tract. 86 in John: "The female sex is rash, and like hell, and cupidity is likened to hell: then it ceases, when it has stripped the lover of all things; nay, not even then, but rather it reviles and insults him as he lies there." So both the harlot and hell never say: "It is enough." Whence St. Augustine, tract. 107 On Time: "Hell, he says, and the love of woman Scripture rightly joins together. The fire of hell will hold the house of the harlot. The house of the harlot is put in place of hell, because it repels no one, it draws every one entering to itself." And St. Jerome exclaims: "O infernal fire of lust, whose matter is gluttony, whose flame is pride, whose spark is wicked conversation, whose smoke is infamy, whose end is hell!" Similarly, according to the second combination of earth with fire, the same Chrysostom compares the avaricious to the fire of hell, homily 29 in Matthew: "The avaricious man, he says, leaping upon all like death, swallowing all like hell, the common enemy of mankind, since he would have no other man to exist, so that he might possess all things." Hence St. Luke, chapter 16, narrating the torment of the rich Epulon and the avaricious man, says: "Lifting up his eyes, when he was in torments, he saw Lazarus, etc. He was in torments (says Chrysostom) and had only his eyes free, so that he could behold the riches of another; for this reason the eyes are left free, so that he might be tormented more, because he did not have what another held: the riches of others, of those who are in poverty, are torments." Fourthly, others think that these four combined note both the struggle of vices among themselves and the rivalry and envy of the vicious; for the infernal region, that is, wrath, often resists the mouth of the womb, that is, lust and love of women; the earth without water, that is, avarice, resists fire, that is, ambition, because it is unwilling to spend gifts and riches, so as to attain the honours which ambition suggests. Again, while someone like fire seeks some opulent dignity, immediately earth arises, that is, some avaricious person, and not one, but ten, who seeks the same, nay, buys and purchases it.
30:17
For "mocketh" in Hebrew is the word לעג laag, that is, he derideth, stammers, mocketh, either by stammering with mouth and tongue, or by extending the tongue, or by winking with the eyes, or by some other manner and gesture. For the eyes are the indices of all affections, and therefore contempt and mockery are perceived chiefly in the eyes, as if to say: The son who, seeing and recognizing his parents, with open, twisted and proud eyes shamefully despiseth them, nay mocketh and insulteth them, deserveth to be torn and blinded by ravens. He nameth the eye, to indicate that it is wicked even to look upon parents with twisted eyes, so that from this he may leave it to be gathered how great a crime it is to lay violent hands upon them. For "old age" in Hebrew is יקהת iikkehot, that is, obedience; others say, doctrine; others, expectation; Aben-Ezra translateth it, companionship, as if to say: He who despiseth the companionship and fellowship of his mother; R. Solomon and Cajetan translate it, wrinkles; the Septuagint and the Syriac, old age. It is Hebrew, ravens of the torrent, or valley. Vahat signifieth a torrent and the bed of a torrent, through which in rainy season the torrent is carried away, which however at other times is dry, and then it is established that it denoteth any valley whatsoever. By "old age" some understand a brother born of the same mother, as if to say: As it is a crime to despise the mother, so also the brother, because the brother is the offspring of the same mother; and therefore he who despiseth the brother, despiseth also the mother, who bore and brought him forth with her: for the son is the image of the mother, and representeth her as it were as an idea and mirror. What therefore is more unjust than to despise the brother, that is, to despise the mother? THE RAVENS OF THE TORRENT SHALL PLUCK OUT HIS EYES. — For ravens are wont, being dry, hot and thirsty, to dwell near torrents, that they may frequently wash themselves in the waters, moisten themselves, drink, and cool themselves. The sense is, as if to say: The son who mocketh his parents is worthy to be hanged, to go to the gallows, to be affixed to the gibbet, that there he may be blinded and devoured by ravens, according to that saying of Horace: "Thou shalt not feed the ravens on the cross." Hence it is commonly said: "Go to the ravens," that is, to the gallows, where thou mayest feed the ravens; for he who is impious and cruel to his parents will be far more impious and savage to strangers; whence we see that sons impious to their parents become thieves, murderers, traitors, robbers, etc. Wherefore the eye impious and savage toward parents deserveth to be plucked out and devoured by impious and savage ravens. Thou wilt ask, why doth he name ravens and eagles before other birds and beasts? I answer first, because ravens attack the eyes, and tear with their beak, whether because these are to them the most delicious food, or from malignity, or from the imagination, namely that their savagery may not be seen, they pluck out the eyes, so that they may then freely prey upon the blinded and blind bodies. Both natural philosophers teach this concerning the raven, such as Aelian, lib. II De Animal. cap. 11; and experience itself. Whence Catullus: "Let the raven devour the plucked-out eyes with dark throat, the dogs the intestines, the wolves the rest of the limbs." Nay, the raven fighting with the ass and the bull, which it hath as enemies stronger than itself, useth cunning to overcome them; for beating them with its wings it attacks their eyes, and thus easily overcometh them when blinded and blind. Hear Aristotle, lib. IX Histor. animal. cap. 1: "The raven is an adversary to the bull and the ass, inasmuch as flying at them it striketh and teareth their eyes." Isidore also, lib. XII Origin. cap. VII, teacheth that ravens first pluck out the eyes in corpses. Hence also that saying of Aristophanes in the Birds: "The raven coming to the perjurer, flying secretly, will cast out his eye by striking." Some give the reason, that ravens, seeing their own image in the eyes or pupils, as in a mirror, are inflamed with envy and anger, just as if they perceived others as adversaries to themselves; and from this it is said in Greek that ravens are called coraces from fixing upon the pupils: κόραξ for it is said from κόρα, that is, the pupil. Thus they themselves. Secondly, because ravens and eagles on account of their dryness, heat, sinews and strength are longer-lived than other birds, as Pliny testifieth, lib. VII, cap. VIII, Aristotle and others. Justly therefore the impious son is given to long-lived ravens to be destroyed, that they may take away his long life from him, and destroy him with swift death as unworthy of life. Albert the Great and from him Aldrovandus relate that the raven liveth one hundred and eight years. Thirdly, because ravens are cruel to their young, just as the young are to their parents: therefore the impious sons are fittingly torturers and executioners. Hear St. Gregory, book XXX of the Morals, chapter VIII: "The raven, it is said, when it has brought forth its young, plainly withholds food from them until, by growing feathers and becoming black, its own likeness appears in them, and allows them to be afflicted by hunger." The same thing is asserted by St. Augustine and other Fathers regarding those words of Psalm CXLVI: "Who giveth to beasts their food, and to the young ravens that call upon him." Some add that the young ravens feed on flies and gnats flying past, Cassiodorus, and also on heavenly dew. Furthermore, Aristotle adds, book VI of the History of Animals, chapter VI: "The raven," he says, "drives its young from the nest;" for it compels them, scarcely able to fly, to go out and seek food for themselves, lest it be forced to feed them; indeed it does not permit them to remain in its own region, if it be narrow, lest they snatch away food from it, as the same Aristotle plainly teaches, book IX of the History of Animals, chapter XXXI. Whence Aelian and Pliny say this is a sign of the fertility of fields, when a multitude of ravens flies about in them: for where there is an abundance of grain, ravens permit more ravens to dwell there. This applies to the fable of Aesop: "A raven," he says, "being sick said to his mother: Mother, pray to God, and do not lament. To whom the mother said: And who indeed, O my son, will have pity on you? whose flesh have you not eaten?" The fable signifies those who in life have many enemies, and find no friend in time of need. Fourthly, because young ravens are cruel to their own parents, they beget young similar to themselves, whom they experience to be equally cruel and savage toward them: in like manner impious sons toward their parents beget sons similar to themselves, whom therefore partly from wicked education and wicked example, partly by the just vengeance of God, they experience to be equally impious and cruel toward them, especially in old age, according to that saying: "Evil ravens, evil egg." Nay more, young ravens on account of their voracity and cruelty, when food fails, attack their parent ravens, tear them to pieces and devour them. Whence that passage from Philes, On the Gifts of Animals: "But the evil raven, nourishing evil offspring, which he himself (hatching the eggs) brought forth for the sake of his kind, when either a brief time of hunger presses, offers himself as food to his offspring in place of nourishment." Aelian also, book II, chapter XXIX, teaches that ravens are abandoned by their young in old age and perish of hunger, because they themselves abandoned their young in the nest. The same author, book III, chapter XIV, says that young ravens on account of their voracity and gluttony do not even spare their parents, but kill and devour them; wherefore they deserve to be sewn in a sack as guilty of the gravest parricide, says Aldrovandus in his work on the Raven. Our Nicolaus Causinus, book VI of Parabolic History, chapter XLIX: "Ravens," he says, "remember that when they were young they were abandoned by their parents and exposed to hunger, thus they devour their parents worn out by old age." Young ravens therefore signify others as avengers of parental neglect. Thus Solomon tacitly admonishes parents to educate their sons piously, if they wish to experience them pious toward themselves; for if they educate them impiously and like ravens, they will experience them impious and raven-like toward them, so as to avenge the impiety of their parents and punish them by retaliation. Fifthly, because the raven is a foul, thieving, black, most rapacious, ill-omened bird; whence by St. Jerome it is called the most dreadful bird: by this very fact therefore that the impious are compared to their parents, nay delivered over to the raven, it is signified that nothing is more abominable, nothing more contemptible, nothing more impious. Hence the raven in Greek is called κόραξ from κορός, that is black; or from κάρα, that is head, because it has a large head; or from κόρα, that is pupil, because it attacks the eyes; or, as Rhodiginus, book VII, chapter V: παρὰ τοῦ κινεῖν κόρας, that is from the constant motion of the pupil. Suidas derives it from κρώζειν, that is to croak or caw, because their voice is a croaking; for they repeat to coras or cras. Thus also Varro teaches that the Latin corvus is related to the word crocio; Isidore, however, book XII of the Origins, chapter VII, thinks corvus is said from the voice of the heart, namely because they produce their voice from the breast, and croaking as they expel it, they are betrayed by their own voice and seized. Others derive the Latin corvus and the Greek κόραξ from the Hebrew ערב oreb, or goreb, which, like sack, horn and certain other names, appears to have been transferred from the Hebrew language to most other languages. The raven is called goreb because it has a mixed color between bright and black; or because it reflects the darkness of evening, and flies in the evening: for ערב ereb, or gereb is evening; or, as others say, oreb is said from ערב Arab, that is Arabia, and ערבי Arabi, that is Arabs, because like the Arabs it plunders and commits robbery. Indeed some derive from oreb by aphaeresis the verb rapio (to seize); whence in German the raven is called raab, in Flemish rave. Hence the raven is fittingly a symbol of demons, who are likewise black, malignant, rapacious, impious, and who gouge out and blind man; whence also demons have often appeared, and still appear, in the form of ravens. Thus Bede here understands by ravens demons, as if to say: Impious sons shall be invaded by demons against their parents, who will seize them and carry them to Tartarus, where the demons, like fierce ravens with their beaks, will pierce and lacerate their eyes, by which they mocked their parents. Mystically, St. Gregory, book XVIII of the Morals, chapter XIX: "The eye that mocks, etc. For the perverse, he says, while they reprove the divine judgments, mock their father. And any heretics, while they despise the preaching of the holy Church, despise the offspring of their mother. But ravens come from the torrents, when true preachers proceed to the defense of the holy Church from the flowing streams of sacred books, who are also rightly called ravens, because they do not boast at all in the light of justice, but through the grace of humility confess in themselves the blackness of sins; which ravens indeed gouge out the eye of the mocker, because they overcome the intention of wicked and stubborn men. Tropologically our Alvarez de Paz, book V, part III, chapter VI On the Extermination of Evil: Who, he says, mocks his father? He who, swollen with pride, does not obey his superior; and who despises the offspring, that is, the labor or travail of his mother? He who, to satisfy his own will, by not obeying, subverts religious discipline. This one is worthy to be led to the cross, indeed to be destined for eternal torments, where demons, similar to ravens in the blackness of sin and to eagles in rapacity, gouge out his eyes, so that he may not see the sun of justice, and tear apart all his goods like flesh. Is not a thief, if he steals something of great value, led to the cross or hanged by the gallows according to the laws? But he is a thief, and a usurper of something of great value, namely of a will consecrated to God, who does not obey his superiors. And therefore St. Bonaventure says: "You gave yourself to your superior for the sake of the Lord and for the sake of the kingdom of heaven, and now you are not your own, but his to whom you sold yourself; and therefore nothing is permitted to you to do concerning yourself without his will." For he himself is the lord of your will, and the handling of another's property against the will of the master is theft; but a thief does not belong to heaven." These words are from St. Bonaventure, tract. On the Interior Man, chapter II. Solomon adds: "And the sons of the eagle shall eat him." Rabbi Solomon and Aben-Ezra think that eagles are dutiful toward their young and toward their parents, and therefore justly here the impious sons are delivered to them to be devoured, so that dutiful birds may avenge impiety. Moreover, there are also some eagles that are inhuman and cruel toward their young and parents; whence that passage about the eagle in Aristotle, book I of the History of Animals, chapter XXXI: "She bears three, and ejects two from the nest, rears one;" and book IX, chapter XXXII: "Eagles, he says, nourish their young until they are able to fly, then they expel them from the nest; afterwards they entirely exterminate them from the region which the parents themselves inhabit." Wherefore for the same reasons I have already stated that impious sons are delivered to ravens, for the same reasons they are also delivered to eagles. An apt example of this maxim is recounted by Gregory of Tours, an eyewitness, concerning Meroveus, who, being desirous of novelties and greedy for the kingdom, disagreed with his father King Chilperic of the Franks, and was shorn by him and shut up in a monastery: fleeing from there and coming to Tours to the temple of St. Martin, he was kindly received by Gregory of Tours, and there received this omen like a thunderbolt, which Gregory himself relates in these words, book V of the History of the Franks, chapter XIV: "But Meroveus spoke many crimes against his father and stepmother; which, since they were in part true, I believe it was not acceptable to God that these be made public by a son, as I learned in what follows. For on a certain day, being summoned to his banquet, while we sat together, he humbly asked that something be read for the instruction of his soul. I indeed, opening the book of Solomon, seized upon the verse which first occurred, which contained these words: The eye that mocketh at his father, let the ravens of the valley pluck it out. And he not understanding it, I considered this verse to have been prepared by the Lord," and according to it the end of the unhappy Meroveus was. For by his father Chilperic, like raven by raven, he was deprived of the light of his eyes and of life, as Paul Æmilius testifies in the Life of Chilperic; where he also adds that Chilperic received like for like, when he was slain by his wife Fredegonde in a raven-like manner.
30:18
The Arabian, the footsteps of an eagle flying, and the track of a serpent upon a polished stone, and the path of a ship sailing through the sea, and the ways of a man in his youth. This is the third riddle and the third most obscure enigma, equally elegant and most divine. There is here a twofold reading: for the ancient codices and the Vatican, together with Bede and many others, read, in his youth; and the Septuagint, in youth; the Syriac, in youth; and thus read St. Ambrose, Anastasius of Nicaea, Isidore of Pelusium and others to be cited presently. The other reading is: And the way of a man in a young maiden; thus read the manuscript codices, Hugo, Isidore Clarius, Jansenius and others, whom Francis Lucas cites in the Notes here: for in Hebrew it is בעלמה bealma, that is, in a virgin, and thus Pagninus translated it; for alma signifies a young maiden hidden (for על alam means to hide) and unknown to a man, such as the Virgin, as I showed at Isaiah VII, 14, to those words: "Behold a virgin (in Hebrew, alma) shall conceive;" and thus St. Matthew translated it, cap. I, 23: whence also the Chaldean here translated, and the way of a man in a virgin; and Symmachus, ἐν νεάνιδι, that is, in a young maiden. Francis Lucas suspects in the Notes here that the Septuagint originally translated, ἐν νεάνιδι, that is, in a young maiden, which was afterwards corrupted into ἐν νεότητι, that is, in youth, and from thence perhaps derived τὸ in his youth, which many codices of the Vulgate have. For this change and error, as it is more proximate, so it is easier and more ready, than from עלמה alma, that is, a young maiden, into על מות almut, that is, youth. And this reading contains a sublime sense, and one difficult to perceive, indeed impossible, namely the incarnation of the Word in a virgin, so that Solomon, otherwise most wise, rightly said of it: "And the fourth I am utterly ignorant of," since "the ways of a man in his youth," from daily use and experience, knowledge seems to be easy, certainly not so difficult. Both readings therefore are supported by grave authorities, and therefore both ought to be explained. The prior reading: "And the way of a man in his youth," first suggests this plain and plausible sense, concerning the mobility of youth, and the wandering instability of young men, on account of the fervor of age and blood, as if to say: Just as the way of an eagle, a serpent and a ship are oblique and tortuous, and are with difficulty found, because no trace of them remains: so also the way, that is, the manner of life which anyone follows in his youth, is with difficulty understood; so unstable is the way of a man in his youth, so does the young man turn himself in all hours to different things, and now hither, now thither is he carried away, that it is difficult to comprehend it, and to observe whither he tends, and in what things he has been occupied. Moreover, the way of the eagle in the sky is unstable, the way of the serpent upon the rock and earth is wandering and slippery, the way of the ship in the sea is fluid and fluctuating; wherefore by these three things and elements is graphically depicted, and as it were represented in an image, the wandering way of an unstable mind, which now wanders in the desire of worldly glory, now in the desire of earthly things, now in the desire of lusts and venereal things, in which as in waters men roll and are immersed. Again, here the eagle, serpent and ship signify wisdom, counsel and every more sublime doctrine and thought, which is like the eagle, to fly through adolescents and adolescence as through a mobile air, so that it leaves no trace of itself; prudence, which the serpent represents by its cunning, to creep and slip through the same age as through a rock, so that it leaves no signs behind it; guardianship, constancy, good purposes, and every virtue to pass through the same, like a ship cutting through the sea, which leaves no mark upon the sea. So that all these things signify that nothing firmly adheres in adolescence in the manner of a habit, but all things pass through it and slip away, so that from the fact that you see an adolescent today to be upright, modest, sober, etc., you cannot determine whether he will be such the next day; you likewise know not what he conceals in his mind, what affections, loves, or hatreds he hides in his soul; just as an adulteress carefully conceals her adulterous loves. Whence concerning her it is added: "Such is the way of an adulteress," etc. Wherefore St. Chrysostom, homily 84 on Matthew, asserts that our life is unstable and fluctuates more than the Ocean and Charybdis: "The waves of adolescents, he says, succeed childhood, which are agitated more vehemently like the Aegean sea by the winds of concupiscence, which age is especially destitute of correction, not only because it is beaten by greater waves of disturbance, but also because the pedagogue and teacher are then withdrawn." See Aristotle, book VIII of the Ethics, chapter III, where he describes this mobility of adolescence; from which he concludes that no certain argument concerning the ingenuity, disposition, and morals of the following life can be drawn from it. For, as Homer says, Iliad III: "The minds of the young always hang in suspense." To this Pineda adds, book III On the Affairs of Solomon, chapter II: These four things, he says, are very similar to each other, and represent the image of the last, that is the fourth. For the ways and processes of the first three, namely the eagle, the serpent and the ship, are tortuous and oblique, and are now twisted this way, now that way by moments: the ship especially in the midst of the sea, driven by contrary winds, impelled by swift waves, which either impede the straight course, or submerge the ship, that is adolescence, into destruction. For that signifies among some τὸ in medio maris. But if wisdom should befall the adolescent, it will be like a rudder for directing the course and overcoming the waves, since wisdom itself is said to have been to Solomon like a shore, against which the most proud surges of the sea, that is the disturbances of adolescence and the impulses of most swift desires, are dashed and broken. Hear Scripture: "God gave Solomon wisdom and understanding exceeding much, and largeness of heart, as the sand that is on the sea shore," III Kings IV, 29. For Solomon began to reign in adolescence after the death of his father David, at the age of 18 years, as Pineda teaches in that same place, and at the beginning of his reign he asked and obtained from God wisdom, III Kings III, 11. Secondly, others on the contrary through these three, or rather four things, think there is noted the wonderful virtue of adolescence and of a well-instructed adolescent, prudent and vigorous like a man (for this is what the Hebrew word גבר gaber signifies), strength and vigor, as if to say: It is a thing worthy of admiration that an eagle, heavy in bulk of body, bears itself through the air by wings alone, and flies on high; that a serpent, lacking feet, glides and runs most swiftly over rocks and stones, and indeed suddenly climbs high cliffs, trees, houses without ladders or keys; that a ship laden with great cargo swims in the sea like a fish, and turns itself hither and thither at the pleasure of the shipmaster, and moreover by ploughing through winds, storms and waves, struggles against them and subdues them by treading upon them: but far more admirable is the way of gaber, that is of a man, namely the mature and upright conduct of a manly and noble adolescent, who in adolescence by precocious virtue overcomes his years and outstrips his age. For this one is similar to, or rather transcends the generosity of the eagle, serpent, ship and shipmaster: for a young man living in the flesh and ruling the flesh, while he meditates on things above and has his conversation in heaven, is an eagle despising the earth and flying on high. The same one, conducting himself prudently and circumspectly in all things, although he has not yet learned prudence through experience, is as it were an astute serpent, which smooth and lacking feet, by natural agility inherent in it, skillfully fleeing crosses rocks and climbs cliffs. The same one, cautiously avoiding or manfully overcoming the temptations of the flesh and the world, is like a ship guided by a skilled shipmaster, which overcomes storms and waves either by ploughing through or by struggling against them, and is borne directly into port. Thirdly, our Salazar thinks that by these four things is designated the swift course of adolescence and its pleasures, as if to say: An eagle is borne most swiftly through the lightest region of the air, a serpent glides most lightly over the earth, a ship rushes most softly and at the same time most swiftly through the waters of the sea; but nevertheless far more swiftly and lightly does a man pass from adolescence to other ages, glide, rush: because a young man does not sufficiently attend to what time is passing from him, and so youth flees from him unaware and as if he were doing something else. By a similar scheme the Wise Man, chapter V, verse 10, compares the swift passage of human age to a ship passing through water, and to a bird cutting through the air, equally as Job chapter IX, verse 26, and others compare it to a serpent fleeing over rocks. Whence the Chaldeans represented by a serpent coiled into a circle and devouring its own tail, the year always fleeing, circling and returning into a circle; as Horus Apollo testifies in his work on the Serpent. Again, just as it is difficult, or rather impossible, for an eagle, serpent, ship to go back and return by the very same path: so it is very difficult that an adolescent should abandon the path of pleasures which he has entered, should take up the path of virtue, and should turn himself to good conduct. For what else is a young man lifted up by desire for glory, but an eagle flying on high? What is an adolescent eagerly desiring earthly and perishable goods, but a serpent creeping over the earth? What finally is a young man dissolving in delights and pleasures, but a ship rushing through the waters? Mystically Isidore of Pelusium, book I, epistle 416: "There are three things," he says, "which I cannot grasp by understanding, and a fourth I am wholly ignorant of, says Solomon: the way of an eagle flying; but this is the divine nature of the Son, which cannot be comprehended by any human intellect. And thy footsteps shall not be known, says the divine Spirit in the Psalms. And Moses himself also saw this eagle, covering the people with its wings in the desert. And the way of a serpent on a rock. The oblique and winding ways of that serpent are, which whispered to us the transgression of the commandment, which indeed are sins, and found no way on the rock; but the rock is Christ, who when he put on flesh, remained free from all change. For he did not commit sin, neither was guile found in his mouth. The way of a ship in the midst of the sea, that is, of the divine Incarnation bringing salvation to all; which, like a ship, traversed the abyss of death, and indeed called back our race from it, but the path of death itself was in no way found in hell. The way of a man in adolescence. By youth in this place he understands resurrection from the dead, when namely corruption shall be changed, and nature shall grow young to a state alien from all corruption and destruction. Seek thou this state." Isidore applies these four things less aptly in that same place to the devil and his temptations. The Author of the Greek Catena applies them more aptly: "By the eagle," he says, "understand Christ; by the eagle's footsteps, his incomprehensible descent from the heavens and his ascent again to the same place; by the paths of the ship, his wonderful birth from the Virgin Mother; by the way of the serpent, finally, the diabolical forces and operations of temptations." The later reading: "And the way of a man in a young woman," namely a blessed one, that is a virgin, as the Hebrew and Chaldean texts have it, is first explained thus by our Gaspar Sanchez in chapter VII of Isaiah, verse 14, as if to say: You will more easily find the way of an eagle in the air, and the way of a serpent in the rocks, and the way of a ship in the sea, than the way of men to the door of that virgin who never offers herself to be seen by men, but rather turns away from them and flees; and therefore she is blessed, that is hidden. Again, just as after the passage of the eagle, serpent and ship, no trace of passage remains in the air, rock and sea: so in the virgin, whose mind is undefiled and pure in thought, the affection or memory of a man leaves no trace of itself; but all these things immediately dissolve and flow away. By which is signified that the best guardianship of virginity is, first, her firm and constant zeal for it; second, the avoidance of men, so that she hides and conceals herself at home: for the wanton youths will not be able to deceive her, she who shuns and dreads the sight and conversation of all as if they were serpents. Second, conversely Jansenius thinks these words correspond to that generation mentioned second, of which he said in verse 12: "A generation that seemeth clean to itself, and is not washed from its filthiness." Namely, there is a certain generation which, although impure and immodest, nevertheless presents itself as chaste and possessing an undefiled purity; this however is a virgin who has been corrupted and grants access to herself, and a married woman who admits an adulterer: for each strives to conceal and dissemble her deed. And so he says: Just as in air, rock and water the eagle, serpent and ship leave no expressed marks of their passage: so also the entrance of a man to a virgin is wont to leave no trace, on account of the excessive care in hiding that which cannot be divulged without peril to one's head. And so according to this Hebrew sense, blessed does not signify an uncorrupted young woman, but a virgin, namely not one who is already a virgin, but one who was a virgin before intercourse, or indeed was found to be a virgin in the very act of intercourse. Third, others explain it thus, so that Solomon advises parents to keep a watchful and exact guard over their virgin daughters, because, just as eagles, serpents and ships have the softest and gentlest passage through air, rocks and sea, so much so that it is not felt: so likewise the entrance of a man to a virgin is most gentle and most secret, so that it deceives all parents as well. Again, just as the access of a man to a virgin is hidden, so also is the departure: for it leaves no trace of itself in the man; in the virgin however, even if some think there remains a trace of the membrane ruptured, which before intercourse covered the virgin secret and was the seal of virginity, yet others deny this very thing, such as Francis Vallesius the physician, as I showed in Deuteronomy XXII, 17 and 18. Beneath this humble and abject letter-covering and its grammatical sense, Solomon looked to something deeper, namely the incarnation and nativity of the divine Word in the Blessed Virgin; for this is what the Hebrew alma signifies, into whom entered gaber, that is, the man Christ, as announced by the Archangel Gabriel, so named because he announced gaber el, that is, the man God, namely the incarnate Word. For this was a marvelous, difficult and incomprehensible mystery, or rather the mighty work of all ages, according to that passage in Jeremiah XXXI, 22: "The Lord hath created a new thing upon the earth: a woman shall compass a man;" and Isaiah cap. VII, 14, exhibits to King Achaz this sign of signs most great, saying: "Behold a virgin shall conceive and bear a son;" and cap. LIII, 8: "Who shall declare his generation?" Therefore, the Blessed Virgin, fulfilling this prophecy of her ancestor Solomon, having received the message from Gabriel, marveling said: "How shall this be done, because I know not man?" and the Angel answered her that this work would be not of man, but of the Holy Ghost: "The Holy Ghost, said he, shall come upon thee, and the power of the Most High shall overshadow thee:" the same thing precisely does Solomon here prophesy first, and, being amazed at so sublime a mystery, he confesses that he is utterly ignorant of its manner: whence he is called by the Fathers a prophet, nay, he himself called himself a prophet in this chapter, verse 1, when he called this his utterance a vision, that is, an oracle and prophecy. For the Hebrew word gaber, that is, a strong man, belongs properly to no boy or adolescent, but to Christ alone being born, both on account of the strength of his divinity, and because from the very instant of his conception, according to his soul, he was altogether perfect: nor does it seem to lack mystery that it was not said: The way of a youth or young man in a young maiden, as according to that former literal sense it seemed it should be said, but the way of a man. Certainly in no other can this be more truly applied than in Christ and his virgin mother. According to which sense the other three ways are rightly understood to be adduced, so that by the example of those, that fourth way, and more marvelous than the others, might be better understood and observed, namely that, just as a bird flies in the air, a serpent creeps upon a rock, a ship passes through the sea without any corruption of air, or rock, or water, or any sign of division being left behind: so also that way of the man happens without injury and corruption of the virgin. Thus did the ancient Rabbis explain this passage concerning Christ incarnate in the Virgin, and among them R. Haccados, that is, the Holy One, in Galatinus, lib. VII De Arcanis fidei, cap. XV, Lyra, Jansenius, Francis Suarez, III part. Quæst. XXVIII, art. 1, disp. 5, sect. 1, and others. Therefore Solomon here adumbrates "the way of a man in a virgin," that is, the incarnation of the Word in her, by three similar but enigmatic comparisons, namely by the way of an eagle in the sky, by the way of a serpent on a rock, by the way of a ship in the sea: whence you may gather that Christ is the eagle, the serpent, the ship; the Blessed Virgin is the sky, the rock, the sea. That Christ is the eagle, which is the queen of birds, is evident from the analogies of both. Hear St. Ambrose, tract. in cap. XXX Prov., near the end: "Christ is understood to be the eagle, who by his flight descended to the earth; which kind of animal is not nourished unless first the chastity of the mother be proven, so that with open eyes without blinking it may behold the whole sun: for this animal is compared to the Saviour, because when it wishes to seize something, it does not walk the earth by footsteps, but chooses an exalted place: thus also Christ, suspended on the high cross, with thundering noise and terrible flight made an assault upon the infernal regions, and snatching the saints carried them back to the heavens." That Christ is likewise the serpent, who indeed took on the form of a sinner, but lacked the venom of sin, nay rather expiated it by his blood, is evident from that passage in John, cap. III, 14: "As Moses lifted up the serpent in the desert, so must the Son of man be lifted up, that whosoever believeth in him, may not perish, but may have life everlasting." That Christ is the ship of heavenly merchandise, which carries all the faithful and saints through the sea of this world to the port of eternal salvation, St. Ambrose teaches in the same place: "Christ," he says, "is the ship in which the souls of all believers ascend, which in order that it may be borne more firmly among the waves, is fashioned of wood and fastened with iron: but this is Christ on the cross; yet he calls it a ship without a trace, because the Word of God, true and efficacious, penetrates through the ear to the inmost parts without injury, and the Word assumed in man is born among men without diminishment of himself, and Mary the virgin gives birth without corruption. Therefore the ship passes through the sea, and no traces remain in the waves, because Christ comes from heaven, is conceived through the ear, is borne in the womb, and such Mary the virgin remained after she gave birth as she was before the Word was conceived through the ear and borne in the womb." That the Blessed Virgin is the sky is evident, because in her, as in a heavenly throne adorned with all beauty and grace, God, namely the divine Word, sat for nine months (for where God is, there is heaven: where the Pope is, there is Rome, as the Canonists say), which as an eagle most swiftly and sublimely flew into her, when she said: "Behold the handmaid of the Lord, be it done to me according to thy word," at that same instant descended into her from the bosom of the Father, assumed flesh from her flesh, and embodied himself. That the Blessed Virgin is the clear rock of purity, and strength, and constancy, is manifest. That she is the same sea of wisdom and virtues the Fathers teach. Whence also Mary, or, as the Hebrews pronounce it, Miram, or Mariam, is the same as the height of the sea, as some wish; although there are other and truer etymologies of her name. Here I open to you, O reader, a broad field, both for running forth in praises of the Blessed Virgin, and for contemplating and admiring the manner of the incarnation of the Word in the Virgin. For consider hence the qualities of the eagle, the serpent and the ship, and attribute them to Christ; thence weigh the qualities of the sky, of the rock or cliff, and of the sea, and attribute them to the Blessed Virgin, and you will truly perceive that an abyss of wisdom lies hidden in this enigma. Mystically, Lyra understands by the way of the eagle in the sky the signified ascension of Christ into the heavens; by the way of the serpent upon the rock, his resurrection: who, as a serpent hung upon the cross, in the resurrection rose from the sealed sepulchre, so that in the sealed stone placed over it no trace of the resurrection appeared; by the way of the ship in the midst of the sea, his conversation in this stormy and turbulent world, in which he was exposed among the Jews to various tempests, always wandering unstably from one place to another. For all these ways, as also the way of his conception and nativity, exceed the grasp of man. Otherwise Anastasius of Nicæa adapts these things to Christ in Quæst. S. Script. Quæst. XLIII; for thus he says: Who shall understand and comprehend with his mind "the way of the eagle flying in the sky," that is, the ascension of Christ; "the way of the serpent upon the earth," namely the trace of sin in the body of Christ; "and the paths of the ship through the sea," namely of the Church, inasmuch as in this life as in a sea, it is governed by hope in Christ through the cross; "and the ways of a man in youth," namely of him who was born of the Holy Ghost and the Virgin? "For behold a man, his name is the Orient," Zach. VI, 12. The third emblem of the way of a ship he thus ascribes to Christ: "We ought to understand the ship and likewise the Church as constituted in the sea of this world, which is wearied by the frequent blasts of winds, that is by the blows and scourges of temptations; which turbid waves, that is the power of this age, strive to lead to the rocks; which although often vexed by the fluctuations of waves, can never sustain shipwreck, because on its tree, that is on the cross, Christ is raised up; in the stern the Father sits as helmsman; the prow the Paraclete Spirit guards. Twelve rowers lead this through the narrow straits of this world into port, that is the twelve Apostles and a like number of Prophets." He then adds that this ship overcomes all rocks, storms, pirates and blasts of winds: "But what he says about the ways of a ship sailing, properly signifies that in the time of persecution it cannot be comprehended in a wonderful manner at all; because namely it becomes living through destruction, and rich through losses, which on this account is compared in many places to the sun or moon, which although beaten, is not moved, or if it is moved, it rises again;" namely the moon receding from the sun, its light and orb are diminished; approaching then, it is again increased, and as it were rises again. Then the fourth emblem of a man in adolescence he thus continues concerning Christ: "This man is Christ our Lord; this is the man whose ways cannot be known in youth. For who can estimate in mind how great works he performed, when according to man he dwelt on earth, what paths of virtues he took, what ways of benefits he entered upon concerning the human race?" More elegantly, more fully and more extensively St. Ambrose treats this entire riddle concerning Christ, in his tract on chapter XXX of Proverbs, or concerning Solomon, which is found at the end of vol. II, where by the way of the eagle in heaven, he understands Christ's descent to earth and into the Virgin's womb, and again his ascent into heaven; by the way of the serpent on the rock, the immunity of Christ (for he is the rock) from sin and the slavery of the devil; by the way of the ship in the sea, Christ's incarnation, his cross, and the Church; by the way of a man in adolescence, Christ's life and conversation in this world. But hear him himself resounding: The first emblem of the eagle thus attributed to Christ: "As if it were easy for the eagle suspended on high by the swift beating of its wings to make manifest the traces of its flight and fall, or to mark a way in the void, and to fix the line of its flight in the liquid. We ought to understand the eagle in this place as the Lord. For although after his passion and resurrection our Lord ascended into heaven in the presence of the Apostles, yet whose man has such lofty sense or so great, that it can be explained how that so great majesty deigned to come from heaven or to return? since it is permitted to us only to know that he either came or returned. For who can know in what manner the Word came into the Virgin, so that she suddenly conceived, so that she brought forth so blessed a fruit by virginal birth, so that God put on man, whom the whole world can neither bear nor contain? that is, what Solomon says, the traces of the flying eagle, that is of Christ the Lord coming to earth and returning to the heavens, traces cannot be comprehended and recounted." According to the emblem of the serpent on the rock, he adapts it to Christ thus: "We ought not to doubt that this rock is Christ our Lord; but the serpent, from the very name itself, in that it is more cunning than all the beasts that are upon the earth, it appears that it is the devil; who is therefore called a serpent, because it creeps in secret and, stealing in subtly, it attempts to test the senses of man. This one, therefore, in the body of man, which the Almighty Lord had assumed, was able to imprint no traces of his malice, although he dared to tempt it often." And in the appendix he teaches that the serpent seduced Adam and Eve, because they were made from dust and were dusty and earthly; but not Christ, because he himself was from the rock and was rocky. "He was able, he says, to approach to tempt him also; but Christ did not obey, and he despised the words of the devil: therefore the serpent made no trace on the rock." Tropologically, by this fourfold way you may understand the four-horse chariot of virtues, by which we go, or rather are drawn, to eternal happiness. Namely, by the way of the eagle in heaven is signified prudence: for the eagle is its symbol, as being endowed with wonderful keenness of sight for seeing and foreseeing, just as it is the part of prudence to foresee and look ahead at all things suitable or harmful to action. By the way of the ship on the sea is signified fortitude, by which we proceed strongly against the waves and storms of the temptations of this world. By the way of the man in youth is signified temperance, by which we moderate the heat and desires of youth. By the way of the serpent on the rock is signified justice, which gives to each his own: just as the serpent creeping over the rock takes nothing from it, but leaves all things to it. Do you wish to go to heaven? Take the way of virtue: by this way all the Saints went, the Apostles, Martyrs, Virgins, Confessors. But come, let us inquire of the saints concerning the straight way. Tell us, Abraham, tell us, Isaac, tell us, Jacob, by what shortcut did you escape to heaven? "By faith we dwelt in the land as in a strange country, dwelling in tents, confessing that we are pilgrims and strangers upon the earth: for we looked for a city that hath foundations, whose builder and maker is God," Heb. XI. Tell us, Moses, tell us, Prophets, Hermits, tell us, eagles, or rather earthly angels: "We went about in sheepskins, in goatskins, needy, distressed, afflicted; wandering in deserts, on mountains, in caves and in the holes of the earth. We chose to be afflicted with the people of God, rather than to have the temporary enjoyment of sin: esteeming the reproach of Christ greater riches than the treasures of Egypt; for we looked unto the reward." Ibid. Tell us, St. Paul, what way did you enter when caught up to heaven? "Brethren, you are no more strangers and foreigners; but you are fellow citizens with the saints, and the domestics of God," Ephes. II. "I desire to be dissolved and to be with Christ," Philip. I. "Our conversation is in heaven. The sufferings of this time are not worthy to be compared with the glory to come, that shall be revealed in us," Rom. VIII, 18; "for that which is momentary and light of our tribulation, worketh for us above measure exceedingly an eternal weight of glory," II Cor. IV. Tell us, St. Sebastian: "He hath set me as a mark to the arrow, he hath bent his bow against me," Lam. III: the arrows of heaven have pierced me more deeply than the arrows of men. Tell us, St. Francis: "Brethren, we have promised great things, greater things have been promised to us: let us keep these, let us aspire to those. Brief pleasure, eternal punishment; slight suffering, infinite glory; many called, few chosen, recompense for all." So great is the glory which I await, that every punishment delights me, every poverty, every leanness, every labor, every infirmity, every temptation, every cross. Tell us, St. Lawrence, what way led you to the city? "Thou hast proved me by fire, and iniquity hath not been found in me," Psal. XVI, 3. Thus my heart, fixed in God, in heaven, so that examined by fire, roasted, burned, I would sooner give up my soul than heaven. Tell us, St. Agnes: "The filthiness of the flesh and the threats of the tyrant I passed by on an immaculate and unyielding path: and behold I come to thee, whom I have loved, whom I have sought, whom I have always desired. I am joined to him in heaven, whom, placed on earth, I loved with all devotion." St. Ambrose, serm. 90. Tell us, Maccabees, ancient and unconquered band of brothers and Martyrs: "You indeed, most wicked one, destroy us in the present life; but the king of the world will raise us up, who die for his laws, in the resurrection of eternal life. I possess these things from heaven, but now on account of the laws of God I despise these very things, because I hope to receive them from him," II Mach. VII. Tell us, mother, tell us, woman of valor: "I know not how you were formed in my womb: but the Creator of the world, who formed the nativity of man, and who found out the origin of all things, will also give back to you your spirit and your life with mercy, as you now despise yourselves for the sake of his laws." My son, have mercy on me, who carried thee nine months in my womb, gave thee milk for three years, nourished thee, and brought thee to this age. I beseech thee, my son, that thou look upon heaven, that thou fear not this executioner; but being made worthy of thy brethren, a partaker, who, having endured a little pain, under the testament of eternal life have been made, receive death, that in that mercy with thy brethren I may receive thee," ibid. Let us follow these, let us imitate these, let us arm ourselves with these, if war, if temptation, if infirmity, if melancholy press upon us, that in the suburbs of heaven, in the courts of our God we may dwell continually. Begin to be, O soul, what thou art to be; thou art destined to be the companion of Angels, live angelically; thy guardian angel most eagerly, all the Saints, so great a number of the dear ones await thee; run, hasten, make speed; the Blessed Virgin, thy mother, awaits thee; Christ the Lord, thy delight, awaits thee; God the Father awaits thee, that as a daughter predestined to him from eternity, he may endow thee with his inheritance; God the Son awaits thee, that upon thy breast as upon the sweetest bride he may rush with embraces and kisses; the Holy Spirit awaits thee as a most pleasing friend, that with all glory, all grace, all beauty he may clothe and adorn thee. Why dost thou delay? From the salt and soil, from this mud fly up to heaven. Go forth, O soul, from the tent of thy body, that standing at the door thou mayest see the glory of the Lord pass by: from this prison flying up to heaven the Blessed Virgin, mother of the Lord, shall meet thee accompanied by choirs of virgins, shall embrace thee, shall receive thee into her own, shall applaud thee with all hers; when all the Angels admiring thy glory shall cry out: "Who is this that cometh up from the desert, flowing with delights, leaning upon her beloved?" Cant. VIII, 5; when most joyfully all the daughters of Sion shall behold thee, shall greet thee, and shall proclaim thee most blessed; when all the sons of God shall rejoice; when those 144 thousand in the sight of the throne and the elders, holding harps, shall sing a new canticle, and thou as a triumphant one shalt sing: "Let us sing to the Lord, for he is gloriously magnified: the horse and the rider he hath cast into the sea," Exod. XV; when the bridegroom himself with myriads of Saints shall come to meet thee: "Arise, come, make haste, my love, my fair one, my dove. For winter is now past, the rain is over and gone. Come from Libanus; come, thou shalt be crowned," Cant. II, 10. Then shall he wipe away every tear from thy eyes; then labour and pain, temptation, tribulation, humiliation, penance, bile, phlegm, melancholy shall be no more. Then instead of a crown of thorns upon thy head he shall place one shining with gold and gems; then shall he kiss thee with the kiss of his mouth; then shall he give thee "a crown for ashes, the oil of joy for mourning, a garment of praise for the spirit of heaviness," Isaiæ LXI, 3. Then secure and exulting thou shalt fly into the embraces of the bridegroom, and with jubilation thou shalt say: "I found him whom my soul loveth, I held him, nor will I let him go. I will rejoice and be exceeding glad in the Lord, because he hath clothed me with the garments of salvation, and with the robe of justice he hath covered me, and as a bride adorned with a crown," ibid. vers. 10. Let us meditate upon these things most frequently, let us dwell here continually with the Saints, with the Angels; let our heart be here, let our tongue be here, let all our ways and vows be here, that after this brief and vain life, after a few years, would that after a few days and hours, would that on this very day and hour, we may be received into the society of all the Saints in heaven, and may enjoy him who is our love, our end and desire, our blessed God for ever and ever. Amen.
30:20
This maxim can either be connected with the preceding verses, being similar to them in the manner I have already explained; or it can be separated from them and stand alone by itself. For, as Jansenius rightly observes, the word 'such' can be referred not to what precedes, but to what follows, as if to say, 'Such is the way,' that is, this is the manner of acting of an adulteress, which I am about to describe, namely, 'she eateth and wipeth her mouth,' etc. For in the Hebrew there is not 'she who eateth,' but simply 'eateth.' And thus the mystery of the nativity of Christ in the preceding verse is most excellently preserved. The sense therefore is, as if to say, This is the character, this is the nature, this is the custom and practice of an adulteress, namely, like some gluttonous woman who secretly eats a forbidden thing, wipes her mouth, so that no trace of eating appears, and puts on an air of continence, and says: I have not eaten a stolen thing, 'I have not wrought evil,' that is, I have not committed adultery. For she decently signifies the pleasure of adulterous intercourse by the metaphor of eating a stolen thing (a similar metaphor and catachresis is found in cap. V, vers. 15, and cap. IX, 17), because an adulteress commits theft, both because she delivers her body, which is bound to her husband, to an adulterer, and because she steals the body of the adulterer, which is alien and forbidden to her. Add that adulteresses are accustomed to feast with adulterers, and thus incite themselves to adultery: for gluttony paves the way to lust, and a belly seething with wine foams forth into lusts, as St. Jerome says. Moreover, adulteresses, in order to conceal their gluttony and adulterous loves, are accustomed to hide their feasts with adulterers, and to wipe their mouth, and to say: I have not feasted with an adulterer. Mystically, Anastasius of Nicaea, Question XLIII, already cited, understands by the adulteress the Church gathered from idolatrous gentiles: 'Such,' he says, 'is the conduct of the Church believing in Christ; which, having committed fornication in idols, renouncing them and the devil, when she has washed away her sins and received remission, says that she has done nothing evil.' So also Isidore of Pelusium, lib. I, epist. 417.
30:21
In Hebrew, under three the earth trembles, and under four it cannot bear; the Septuagint, through three the earth is shaken, but the fourth it cannot bear; Symmachus, but four it cannot bear. The Septuagint transposes the last two, and places the hateful woman in the fourth and last place, as if the worst compared to the three others; for thus they have it: If a servant reign, and a fool be filled with meat, if a handmaid thrust out her mistress, and a hateful woman obtain a good husband. The Septuagint follows the Syriac in its manner. This is the fourth riddle, or as it were the fourth enigma of four intolerable things. By a hateful woman understand one who is morose, wrathful, quarrelsome, headstrong, proud, incontinent, who by her arrogance, anger, impatience, and evil habits makes herself hateful, so that she is an object of hatred and horror to her husband and the whole household; whereas on the other hand a good wife ought to be lovable, and by her modesty and grace to win the love of all. For "is moved" in Hebrew is nirgeza, that is, is moved, trembles, rages: for ragaz both in letters and in meaning alludes to ragas and raas, that is, to tremble, to quake, to be disturbed, to fear, to be angry, and is said both of animate and inanimate things. Whence the Septuagint translates nirgeza and ragaz now as being incited to anger, now as being exacerbated, now as being irritated, now as being disturbed and troubled, now as fearing, now as being saddened, now as being wearied, now as being anxious, now as being shaken, now as being astounded. Vatablus in this place translates it, the earth is indignant; the Chaldean, is moved; the Syriac, under three the earth wavers. It alludes to the motion of the earth, by which the earth is shaken, rages and trembles on account of air and winds enclosed, which conflicting with each other beneath the earth, shake it, which is otherwise immobile, so as to overthrow houses, towers, temples, and then seem to wrench the earth from its center, which in truth some Philosophers believe happens in an earthquake, as I shall show in Ecclesiastes I, 4. It is similar in a house and republic of the earth, that is, of the inhabitants of the earth, for from the motion and disturbance of men and household members, not so much of bodies as of souls, when a servant rules over his master, a fool over a wise man, a wife over her husband, a handmaid over her mistress: for these, puffed up with pride, gaping with greed, blind with imprudence, exalted by their new lot and dignity, not containing themselves, become insolent, overturn all things, pervert them, and mix them topsy-turvy; wherefore they stir up motions, seditions, tumults in the house or republic, so that it itself seems to be shaken from its foundations and as it were thrown out of its center: for all, indignant at the rule of the impotent, unjust, tyrannical, arrogant one over them, rage and gnash their teeth, and as if kindled against furies with torches of fury, rage and rave: hence also ragez means the same as commotion, terror, tremor, anger, fury. Concupiscence, which when armed with power and dominion, rages upon all equally and imperiously: wherefore then a house or kingdom is not ruled by equal reason, but by impotent and unbridled concupiscence: for this governs the servant, who governs the house or kingdom; but all subjects, because they are rational men, wish to be ruled by human reason, not by passion: for this is the human manner of ruling men; if it be otherwise, not reason but greed rules the house or republic, and therefore it is not principate but tyranny, which all hate, and on account of which they are angry and tumultuous, so as to vindicate themselves into liberty. The reason is first, that it seems unworthy and contrary to nature for masters to be subject to servants; for the wise man, whose it was to rule, to be ruled by a fool; for a husband to serve a wife, a mistress a handmaid: for it is proper to servants on account of their nature and servile habits to serve, but to masters and mistresses to rule, as Aristotle teaches, book I of the Politics, chapter IV; wherefore if it be otherwise, nature seems to be inverted and the world to be inverted. Second, that servants, fools, women and handmaids ruling do not contain themselves and their lot and fortune; but as if moved in mind they leap out, transgress all bounds, and as if mad revel, and therefore commit many unworthy things and injuries to others, by which all are stirred up against them, according to that saying: Nothing is harsher than the humble when he rises on high. Whence Plato, book VI of the Laws: "Against this also it is said," he says, "that nothing in a servile mind is whole, nor is there anything of the servile race to be tamed, which the wisest of Poets (Homer) also testifies to us, when he speaks thus of Jupiter: Jupiter takes away half the mind from those who are subjected to the lot of servitude." Similarly a fool if he be filled with food, that is with delicacies and wines, is intolerable, both because he is a fool, and because satiety and wine sharpen his foolishness. "For petulance is the natural offspring of satiety," says Philo: as we see in well-fed calves, whose leaping and gestures of petulance the foolish and drunken imitate; under satiety is understood wealth and riches, which it is absurd for a fool to possess, since they do not befit him who cannot use them rightly, but ought to belong to the wise man who knows their right use. For, as was said above, "what doth it profit a fool to have riches, when he cannot buy wisdom?" Nor is this matter merely absurd in itself, but from it great disturbance arises on earth, because fools abusing riches commit many things insolently, despising others and injuring them, and through these things stirring others to indignation and zeal. An example is Nabal the husband of Abigail, whose name is set down in this place for a fool: for nabal in Hebrew signifies a fool. Thirdly, that servants, fools, women and handmaids ruling do not act by reason, but by passion and are in tumult, so as to vindicate themselves into liberty. Hear St. Augustine, book IV of the City of God, chapter III: "Therefore the just man, even if he serve, is free; but the wicked man, even if he reign, is a slave: and not of one master, but, which is more serious, of as many masters as he has vices, concerning which vices when divine Scripture was speaking, it said: By whom a man is overcome, to him also he is enslaved." Finally, the Author of the Greek Catena says that servants bring nothing suitable for administering a kingdom, such as humility, knowledge, experience and other things of this kind. Jeroboam indeed reigned as a servant, but he perpetrated such great evils as no one before or after him, as the outcome of events demonstrated. A similar example was in Eutropius a servant, who under the Emperor Arcadius in luxury administered the empire under him with such arrogance and insolence, that pursued by the raging people to death, fleeing to the asylum of the temple, he was scarcely saved there by the oration of St. Chrysostom, as I have related above from Baronius and others. Moreover it is plainly intolerable, which the Septuagint translates, that a handmaid cast out her mistress, so that namely the handmaid of the mistress cast out by her should seize her bed, throne, right, wealth and kingdom, as Hagar despised her mistress Sarah and invaded her place, and therefore by the command of God was cast out of the house by Abraham, Genesis XVI. Therefore this parable teaches that all these things are thrown into confusion in the world, because those who ought to be subject and ruled, and who ought to be pressed by poverty and despised, obtain empire, dominion, abundance of things and honor. Which also happens in ourselves: for the earth of our heart is moved on account of this, because carnal affection, which ought to serve the spirit, commands reason; because the foolish and brutal part is indulged too much in satiety; because hateful flesh is held in too much honor, and she who ought to be a handmaid wishes to rule. Thus Jansenius, Baynus and others. Allegorically the Author of the Greek Catena understands by these four things sin, or the guilt of four centuries succeeding one another in order, namely the Noetic flood, the Sodomites, the Egyptians and the Jews. Therefore guilt, he says, which is servile by nature and makes one a servant, once reigned in the mortal body of men, once indeed at the time of the universal flood, then moreover in the age of the Sodomites who could not bear the fertility of their own land modestly, nor refrained from doing violence to foreign and strange men out of mere petulance. Hence again under hateful Egypt, for she having obtained a good man, namely Joseph, proved ungrateful. For Joseph, lest they perish from hunger, distributed to all a measure of grain, and strove to deserve well of all: but drunken pride, the children of Israel having merited nothing of the sort, most miserably harassed and oppressed them with the utmost injury and contumely. But truly the handmaid who cast out her mistress is earthly Jerusalem, on account of the frequent captivities which she suffered among the nations, called the servant or handmaid of all; she moreover cast out her mistress, namely the sacred flesh of Christ God, becoming deicide and slayer of the Lord.
30:24
FOUR ARE THE LEAST THINGS OF THE EARTH. — In Hebrew, four themselves the least things of the earth, and themselves wisdom wisely taught: Pagninus, and themselves equally know, as if they were taught wisdom; Arabic, four are the contemptible things of the earth, and they are most wise before the wise; Vulgate, the ant a weak people, etc. Hebrew, ants a people not strong, and they prepared in summer their bread; Septuagint, the ant to which there is no strength, and let them prepare by force their food. For ant here is a noun of plural number, as is evident from the Hebrew: for it signifies a gathering of ants, which is a type of a weak people. For the little hare in Hebrew is שפן saphan, that is, hidden, or hiding itself, which word signifies three things: first, a rock badger, as the Septuagint translates here; second, a hedgehog or porcupine, or a spiny little pig, which with its spines pierces apples and loads itself with them; third, a little hare or rabbit, as the Syriac translates: for this is a small hare. See the things said in Leviticus, chapter XI, verse 5. Furthermore hares and rabbits are wise, that is, clever so as to flee dogs, and hide themselves in their dens. Whence Aristotle, book I of the History of Animals, chapter 1: "Some animals," he says, "are ingenious and timid, such as deer, hares, rabbits;" for fear makes them cautious, clever, provident, so that they escape the evil which they fear. Hence also from the four coldest months they hide, and during that time eat nothing, says the same author, book VIII, chapter XV. Hence also the hare, as Pliny says, the hairiest of animals, has the largest heart, as also other timid creatures, sleeps with open eyes, since eating it makes one sleepy and fearful. Hare in Greek is called λαγώς from λάγνος, that is, lustful, licentious, fertile: for such is the hare; whence it is at once male and female, and produces very many offspring, and that frequently. In Hebrew it is called ארנבת arnebet from ארב arab, that is, to lie in wait, and רנה rana, that is, to make noise, because hunters and those lying in wait pursue it with shouting and noise, and the howling of crowds and dogs, according to that saying of Horace, II Satires, satire 4: The wise man will pursue the loins of the fertile hare; for its loins and flesh are exceedingly delicate. In Latin it is called lepus, whose etymology Varro gives, book III On Agriculture, chapter XII: "Lucius Ælius," he says, "thought the hare was called from swiftness, because it was light-footed; I think it is from an ancient Greek word, which the Æolians and Bœotians called it λέποριν." Thus also Gellius, book I, chapter XVIII. THE LOCUST HAS NO KING. — In Hebrew, the locust has no king, and it goes forth dividing all itself, that is, dividing all its swarms and armies, that is, all distributed into its cohorts and phalanxes; Pagninus, and it goes forth all gathered together; Chaldean, and they all gather into one; Syriac, they all gather as one; Septuagint, without order; Symmachus, and like a stone all, that is, it goes forth in order, as stones are arranged in order in calculation; Aben-Ezra, the locust goes forth in a ball, and collected in a column; others, it goes forth armed with stings; Arabic, in its army its command. THE STELLIO SUPPORTS ITSELF WITH ITS HANDS. — In Hebrew it is שממית scemamith, which first, the Arabic, R. Solomon, R. Levi, Mercier and others translate as spider: for this indeed weaves a web with its hands as it were; whence it is a symbol of labor, and it also dwells in the houses of kings. Whence the Chaldean translates, the spider makes coverings with its hands, and being easily caught dwells in the fortifications of kings; Aquila, seizing or handling with hands; others, grasping on both sides with hands; Vatable, the spider will grasp either side with hands; R. Levi and R. David, the spider walks with its feet, as wool and threads are walked when they are combed, and by combing they are cleansed from filth. Second, Aben-Ezra, Pagninus, Jansenius and others translate it as monkey. For this indeed agrees in voice and meaning with the word scemamith: the monkey also uses its feet as hands, and sometimes walks on two feet like a man gracefully and elegantly, and decorously imitates the manners and gestures of man: and therefore on account of the dexterity of its wit and imitation of human prudence it is for the recreation of kings and in their delights. Third, Our author translates it as stellio. So also the Septuagint, which translates καλαβώτης (erroneously in the Complutensian and Royal editions is read σαλαβώτης), or ἀσκαλαβώτης, from ἀσκαλός, that is circle, because namely it is marked and varied with certain golden circles, as with stars; whence also it is called stellio; or, as others say, because it moves in a circle and progresses circularly. It is a small animal similar to a lizard, concerning which I have spoken at Leviticus XI, 30. See also Pliny, book XXX, chapter X, and Aristotle in the History of Animals. In Hebrew it is called scemamith from שמם scamam, that is to wonder, to be astonished, because when it sees men it stops, and as if wondering remains still, or because it captivates men with its stars and gestures into wonder. The fifth is here a riddle, or enigma of four smallest creatures: "Four, he says, are the smallest of the earth," that is among the smaller animals of the earth, which nevertheless "are wiser than the wise," that is, which from the instinct of nature exercise certain works of wisdom, more than those who profess the name of wise, or than men who are truly capable of wisdom: because they thus provide for themselves as if they were operating from some wisdom, and because they teach us wisdom: whence also on this account they can be said to be "wiser than the wise," because by their singular action they teach the wise wisdom, and are not taught by them. Again, because they are wiser than other animals, that is, more sagacious and more clever. Thus Jansenius, Baynus and others. Solomon therefore teaches here to imitate the wisdom of four smallest creatures: by which he signifies first, that wisdom does not consist in the bulk of the body, nor in strength, nor in beauty, nor in any other thing, but in cleverness and clever action, by which each one provides for himself in necessary things, which is to be seen in these four smallest creatures. Second, he teaches us to admire the wisdom and power of God in the smallest things; for, as St. Augustine says, the wisdom of God shines forth more in a tiny bee, ant, gnat, fly, than in the heavens: not only because those are animate, the heavens inanimate; but also because in a gnat, for example, there are eyes, heart, stomach, and other members, which are in other animals, and yet the eye cannot distinguish these by sight, which God and nature have in fact distinguished. Whence the Poet: In the smallest things the greatest God himself shines forth. Third, he teaches that nothing should be despised on account of smallness or weakness, since the small often prevail in wit, wisdom, acuteness, spirit, virtue over the great. "Nature is nowhere more than in the smallest things," says Pliny, book XI, chapter II. So also virtue is nowhere more shown than in the smallest things. And Aristotle, book IX of the History of Animals, chapter VII: "Altogether, he says, the reason of brutes bears great resemblance to human life, and you will see the reasons of intelligence more in the smaller kind than in the larger." Tertullian, book I Against Marcion, chapter XIV: "The smaller animals, he says, the greatest artificer has of purpose enlarged with ingenuities or virtues, thus teaching that greatness is to be approved in mediocrity, as virtue in weakness according to the Apostle. Imitate (if you can) the buildings of the bee, the stables of the ant, the nets of the spider, the threads of the silkworm." And St. Jerome to these words of the divine Psalmist: "The earth is filled with thy possession," Psalm CIV, verse 24, thus has it: "And truly all the works of the Lord are full of wisdom; for when do we see the ant know when winter comes, and lay up food for itself; and again the gnat so tiny having eyes, belly and all members as we have, etc., are not these worthy of admiration and full of wisdom, namely when the nature of things is nowhere more wonderful than in the smallest things? Whence Solomon also, the wisest of kings, was especially astonished at this kind of smallest creatures: Four, he says, are the smallest of the earth, and they themselves are wiser than the wise, the people of the ant weak." This wisdom shines forth, first, in that there is no king among ants, as there is among bees, and therefore they do not have a leader, but each acts by its own instinct and motion. Bees therefore have a monarchy, ants a democracy and a commonwealth. Second, this commonwealth is as it were military. Whence ants build cities for themselves as it were under the earth in the manner of camps, with such diligence, proportion, measure, and distribution, that Simon Majolus, Bishop of Vulturnum, when he beheld them, as he himself writes in his Days of the Dog-star, colloquy 7, marveled at them more than at the construction of Naples or any other most beautiful city. Third, ants divide their cities into three as it were dwellings, in one of which they spend their life and eat in common, in another they store their food as it were in a granary or storehouse, in the third they bury their dead, as Plutarch says, which is indeed a remarkable sign of love, benevolence and goodness. Aelian, book VI On Animals, chapter XLIII, adds a fourth, namely a gynæceum, where the females give birth. Fourth, ants proceed in troops, but in wonderful order, cunning and peace; for the empty ones do not plunder the laden ones, nor do they steal anything from them, but each gathers for itself. "Some," says Aelian, book II, chapter XXV, "go to gather grain, others return bearing a burden, and with the greatest honor and modesty (let the faithful and Religious imitate this), some give way to others on the path," especially indeed the unloaded to those bearing a burden. And elsewhere again: "Ants, especially sedulous and industrious animals, are held by such great zeal for labor, and that without any excuse and pretext, which the idle are wont to use, that they do not even cease from their work at night, provided the moon is full; nor indeed, as men do, do they put forward excuses for idleness and flight from labor," etc. But depicting more exactly the work of each, when he had described the art and use of those caverns, he adds: "They devote a third to heaps of grain," although they learned nothing of the sort from Ischomachos and Socrates, who were skilled in household management. But when they set out as it were to forage, the older ones similarly lead them as military commanders lead an army; when they have reached the grain fields, the younger ones stand under the stubble, but the commanders ascend, and cast down the cut ears to those below; these in turn standing around pull them apart together and from their husks and sheaths draw out the enclosed grain; nor do they need any instrument for threshing, nor men for winnowing, nor winds for cleansing the grain from filth, from the wheat which men plow and sow, preparing food for themselves, they enjoy the fruits of human labors. This is what Virgil, admiring, sings of them in the fourth Aeneid thus: A black column goes through the fields, and they convey their prey through the grass along a narrow path: some thrust great grains forward, straining with their shoulders, some drive the columns, and check delays: all the path seethes with work. Fifth, ants have a certain knowledge of heavenly things, and often look up to the sky, and have a presentiment of winds and rains; whence then they keep themselves at home. Wherefore Aelian, book I, chapter XXII, asserts that they are skilled in astrology; Pliny, book XI, XXX, attributes to them prophetic foreknowledge. Sixth, ants, when they grow old and succumb to burden (for then they put forth wings, as man puts forth gray hairs), depart from the administration of the commonwealth, and fly to an elevated place, according to the testimony of Albert the Great, book XXVI, as it were disdaining earthly things, to heavenly ones. I have said more about the industry of ants in chapter VI, verse 8. Again, the greatest animals fear and dread the smallest, as the elephant fears the mouse, the lion fears the rooster, the crocodile fears the ichneumon, the ass fears the acanthis bird, as Aldrovandus says, book V of Ornithology. Solomon therefore indicates that the small and weak ought not to be despised, nor should they themselves abase themselves and abandon hope of a better lot; because if anyone should be endowed with prudence and wisdom it can happen, and often does happen, that a poor man prepares abundantly the necessities for living, and a vagrant or stranger builds for himself a house and comfortable dwelling, and an unwarlike man follows camps and military service, and finally a plebeian and base-born man undertakes the most honorable duties of the commonwealth, and holds a place among courtiers and the princes of the kingdom. Solomon therefore proves by the example of four animals that these things are not difficult. Wherefore wisely R. Ben-Azai in Pirke Avoth, chapter IV: "Never," he says, "despise any man, or make light of any thing, however much it may seem to you to be of no weight; for each thing has its own place and use, just as each man has his own time." Now let us examine this emblem more closely and in detail. I say therefore that it is threefold, namely ethical, economic, and political, and represents a threefold wisdom, namely ethical, economic, and political, so as to instruct men of every state and order. Ethics, because it teaches any private individual prudence for rightly ordering his life, so that he may become an honest and upright man; economics, because it instructs a husband or master in properly governing his household, so that he may become a good father of a family; politics, because it educates both citizens, how they ought to live politically, and magistrates, how they ought to govern the commonwealth politically, so that they may become good citizens and governors. Let us consider each individually. Cajetan, Baynus, and Jansenius understand this ethically. They say that Solomon teaches us here to imitate the diligence and labors of the ant, so that by these we may procure sustenance for body and soul; for this is the first concern of prudence. Yet no animal does this either more seasonably, or more wisely, or more diligently than the ant. Whence Solomon sent his lazy ones to it, cap. VI, vers. 6, saying: "Go to the ant, O sluggard." But here besides diligence, he also mentions weakness, saying: "A weak people," so that no one may rashly pretend bodily infirmity as an excuse, as if by it he could not provide for the necessities of life, signifying that hard labor overcomes all things, if it be undertaken at the opportune time, as the ant "prepares in harvest, or in summer food for itself." The second part of wisdom is that we provide for ourselves a suitable dwelling. He teaches it by the second little animal, "the hare, a weak people." For the hare, or rabbit, chooses for itself a burrow and dwelling in a rock or rocky caverns, namely in a safer and less accessible place, so that he who cannot trust in his own strength may be secure in that place; for hunters everywhere lie in wait for it, because it itself is the glory of tables and the delight of those feasting. Whence Martial, lib. XIV, painting the luxury of tables thus sings: Among birds the thrush, if anyone should contend with me as judge, Among four-footed beasts the hare holds first glory. And, as St. Fulgentius says, serm. 1 De Epiphan.: "Who is this king of the Jews? poor and rich, humble and sublime, who is carried as a little child, adored as God; a little child in the manger, immense in heaven; vile in rags, precious in stars." "Grace is the companion of the small," says St. Gregory Nazianzen. The author of the Hilaria sings of the small: It is the nature of little ones, that their spirit in body Be greater than them ten feet. For the small are keen and magnanimous, nor does their slender body contain their spirits. Claudian concerning the Alanic people: To whom nature had fashioned narrow limbs with great spirits, And had stained their eyes with immense anger. No part is vacant from wounds, and the glory Of the defiled face shines more boastfully cut off from all. And Statius, Thebaid. I: But neither does the spirit bear Tydeus below in strength, and poured throughout all limbs Greater virtue reigned in a small body. Concerning the same from Homer Virgil: Fierce in genius, small in body he was. Xanthippus the Lacedaemonian, of short stature, is thus praised by Silius Italicus: In small limbs vigor, admirable, Lively, and one who would overcome great limbs by effort. What is more minute than carbuncles? what shorter than diamond? what more diminutive than hyacinth? And yet nothing more noble or precious is found than these. Finally, look around the world, and you will perceive that almost all things of the world are esteemed more by virtue than by magnitude. Edgar, king of Britain, when he was despised by Kinald, king of the Scots, on account of the smallness of his body, challenged him to a duel and forced him to ask pardon, as Fulgosus relates, lib. III De sui ipsius contemptu. Persius, the smaller he is, the more elegant; the less weight he has, the more authority he obtains. Whence Martial says of him: Persius is remembered more often in one book, Than light Marsus in all the Amazon. Three very great men were small in body: Philip of Macedon, Xanthippus the Laconian, Ulysses, Agesilaus, strong in spirit and body; but above all St. Paul. On the contrary, the Satirist mocks "the long neck of the weak." See what I said about the small Eccli. XI, 3, and Zachar. IV, 10, and Prolegomena in the Minor Prophets. Finally, a famous riddle is: "What is the greatest in the smallest? It is the Word shortened, as Isaiah says, cap. X, and incarnate, namely the Word as an infant, a wise child, God nursing, lying in a manger, as a hare, as an ant, a locust, a lizard in a cave, where the great Lord and exceedingly praiseworthy became a little child and exceedingly lovable." Let him learn from the rabbit to conceive and rear offspring. For the rabbit is most fertile, and brings forth a multitude of young every single month, so that the female is always pregnant. But from her offspring she rejects none, but nurses and nourishes all of them; hence from love of them she exhausts and wears out herself, and greatly shortens her life. Moreover for the sake of her young she digs out houses and rocks, so that she may excavate deep caves, impassable to other animals, in which she may place them safely and conveniently. Finally in all things she provides for them, cherishes them, protects them as a benevolent and pious mother. The rabbit therefore is a type of household management, and of a good father and mother of a family, who educates her offspring with care, and procures and supplies nourishment and comforts for both body and soul. Let him learn from the locust to cultivate peace with those of his household and neighbors, indeed to bring it about, so that there be no quarrel among them, no enmity, no hatred, but all may strive for the good of the family, and flock together like locusts to it and work together: thus he will make both his house and the commonwealth invincible and unconquerable. Let him learn from the lizard to approach the palaces of kings, and seeking their favor, to show deference to princes and magistrates and to offer his services, and to win their favor for himself; thus he will both support the magistrate and prince, and in turn be supported and advanced by him. Therefore by the example of the lizard he exhorts men of base and lowest condition not to lose heart, nor to cease from aspiring to the highest honors, as though it were altogether impossible. Politically these things pertain to the commonwealth and its prince: for this reason therefore the army of ants, rabbits and locusts is set forth, in the manner of a people or nation, not however a single animal. The commonwealth is therefore taught that it must take care that all in the city be diligent and industrious; next that it choose for itself a suitable place, and fortify it so that it may dwell there securely; then that it maintain concord among the citizens, by which it may be strong and fortified against all enemies. Finally, that it itself be in good accord with its head and prince, and in turn the prince be diligent and watchful, which the spider teaches well, weaving her web, which therefore can be said to be in the houses of kings to teach kings diligence. The lizard teaches the same thing, laboring with its hands continually and creeping about. Hence our Salazar appropriately through these four animals understands four kinds of men, which form, foster and advance the commonwealth, namely through ants gathering grain, he understands farmers, who prepare fruits and food for the commonwealth. Whence Plato in the Phaedo, establishing the Pythagorean metempsychosis, or the transmigration of souls after death into other bodies and animals, whose customs they imitated in life, asserts that the souls of farmers migrate into ants, because they imitated their labor while they lived, by tilling the fields. Economically these four signify as many duties of a father of a family, of which the first is to care for and increase the family property diligently; the second, to conceive and educate offspring properly; the third, both to bring about peace among the household and to make and cultivate the same with neighbors; the fourth, to show the honor and obedience due to magistrates. Let the father of a family therefore learn from ants to provide for his family, and therefore let him occupy all who are in it with useful labor, nor permit anyone to live idle in idleness, as ants force all their household members to labor. Through the rabbit he understands citizens in cities, as it were dwelling in their dens, and caring for the city and civic duties and crafts; through locusts he understands soldiers, who defend the city and commonwealth from enemies: for the army, ranks, battle lines and phalanxes of locusts carry with them a certain military character, indeed their very form resembles helmeted soldiers. Hence locusts wage war with serpents and kill them. "The serpent," says Pliny, book XI, chapter LXXXIX, "when it pleases them they kill singly, seizing its jaws with a bite." Through the lizard he understands courtiers; for the lizard dwells about the doors of courts and the hinges of gates. From the lizard therefore let courtiers learn the grace of acting and conversing, so that they may win the favor of all for themselves; likewise let them imitate its ingenuity and cunning, so that they may guard themselves against rivals and dangers. Moreover let them employ its power and efficacy; for, as Galen says, in the book On Theriac to Piso, chapter IX: "There are many things which show their power by being looked upon alone, as the lizard; which if scorpions behold, they become immobile, and finally are rendered dead." And Philes: "And the lizard the destroyer, the thief scorpion," understands fears or hates. Aristotle relates in Book IX of his History of Animals, chapter I, and Pliny in Book XI, chapter XXVI, that there is war between the spider and the lizard, and that spiders are devoured by the lizard, who also adds that lizards in some way have the nature of the chameleon, so that they live on dew alone, except for spiders. Aristotle adds that the lizard feeds on spiders and catches them with wonderful cunning; for it creeps up to their webs, plucks at them and disturbs them; then the spiders, excited by the motion, fly at them as if to catch flies, and thus are attacked and devoured by the lurking lizards: in a similar way, prudent courtiers ought to oppose with caution and strength the spiders and scorpions, that is, the venomous words, machinations, counsels, and deeds of factious men, and scatter and confound them. But let them beware of the lizard's envy, by which it devours the skin it has shed, so as to snatch away from man a present remedy for the comitial disease, as Pliny testifies in Book XXX, chapter X; let them beware of its deceits and frauds: for from the lizard deceit and fraud are called the crime of stellionage. For in courts envy, deceit and fraud flourish, when he who is more powerful undermines the weaker, and by wonderful arts digs up and overturns his counsels and petitions; and he alone snatches up offices, and if he is honored with new and greater honors, he does not yield the old ones to others, but usurps and devours all things like a lizard, so that he becomes a gulf and abyss of benefits and offices. Ants therefore and locusts are a type of the commonwealth, or of democracy and popular rule, which consists chiefly in equality and mutual union; whence the seven Wise Men of Greece judged thus concerning it, according to Plutarch in their Symposium. "First Solon: It seems to me, he says, that a city will be most blessed and will preserve the popular state, in which the author of any injury is dragged to justice and punished no less by the unharmed than by the harmed. Second, Bias said that the popular state of the commonwealth is best, in which all fear the law as a tyrant. Thales, where neither the rich nor the poor are excessively numerous among the citizens. Anacharsis: That in which, while all other things are held equal, virtue nevertheless receives a better condition, vice a worse. Fifth, Cleobulus pronounced that the people will most do their duty, if citizens fear reproof more than the law. Sixth, Pittacus: Where it is not permitted for the wicked to hold office, it is permitted for the good. Then Chilo, turning to address them: That, he says, is the best commonwealth, in which laws are heard most, orators least. Again, finally Periander, concerning the sayings of these men, thus judged it to appear to him that, with all these pronouncements, that form of popular commonwealth is commended, which is most similar to the rule of the optimates in the city." Mystically, Hugo says that these four animals denote four species of men, in whom wisdom excels, namely that by ants are signified monks, by hares doctors, by locusts anchorites, by the lizard simple Christians, and then he adapts each to each. But St. Gregory, in Book XXI of the Morals, chapter XII, adapts the emblem of the locust to the Gentiles: "The locust has no king: Because namely, he says, the Gentile world, long abandoned, has been removed from divine rule, yet afterwards ordered against the spirits that oppose, it proceeded to the war of faith." The same, in Book VI, chapter V, speaks thus concerning the lizard: "The lizard supports itself on its hands, etc., for birds which the wing lifts up for flying usually rest in brambles; and the lizard, which does not have wings for flying, supporting itself on its hands, holds the king's building. Because indeed often the ingenious, while sluggish in negligence, remain in depraved actions, and the simple, whom the wing of ingenuity does not aid, are lifted up by the virtue of action to obtain the duties of the eternal kingdom. The lizard therefore, which supports itself on its hands, dwells in the royal buildings: because that simple one through the intention of right action arrives where the ingenious does not ascend." O how great and how beautiful and how mighty are the animals that inhabit the caverns of the earth, and lurk in horrible caves, and do not care to approach the royal houses! but the lizard, a vile creature, because it supports itself on its hands, because namely it takes care to climb up to high things, has received a place of rest in the royal house. Thus many grave men, renowned for outstanding learning, eloquence and skill in governance, lie in the depths, and through their own sluggishness in a certain obscurity of life, and dwell in a certain abyss of imperfections; yet the lizard, that is, a man ignorant and contemptible, who despises the world according to the flesh, and diligently applies himself to every virtue, obtains the citadel of the Lord, that is, perfection. He who has dexterity in handling worldly affairs neglects this business of his salvation, on which depends that he be an inhabitant of the king's house, that is, of the heavenly fatherland, and of a life of purity. Cassian, Conference X, chapter X, reading from the Septuagint a hedgehog instead of a little hare, understands by it Christians and Religious striving for perfection, who dwell in the rock, that is in Christ and his passion by meditating. Concerning whom it is said in Psalm CIV: "The high mountains are a refuge for the stags, the rock a refuge for the hedgehogs." Because, he says, whoever persevering in simplicity and innocence is harmful or troublesome to no one, but content with his own simplicity alone, seeks only to be protected from the prey of those lying in wait, as a spiritual hedgehog, by the constant covering of that Evangelical rock, that is by the memory of the Lord's passion, and fortified by the unceasing meditation of the aforesaid verse, he may avoid the snares of harassing enemies. Concerning these spiritual hedgehogs it is also said in Proverbs thus: "And the hedgehog is a weak nation, which made their houses in the rocks." And truly what is weaker than a Christian? what more infirm than a monk, to whom not only is no vengeance for injuries afforded, but not even a light and silent disturbance is permitted to spring up at least inwardly?" Tropologically, the smallest obtain wisdom, that is the truly humble; for true wisdom consists in humility. Whence four species of each are here enumerated, which our Alvarez de Paz pursues thus from Bede, book IV, part I, chapter VII On Humility: "Ants," he says, "are small in body, great in strength, which carry burdens twice greater than themselves, and are called a weak people, because compared to larger animals they appear feeble. These love hiding places, and go out only for some necessity. In summer they prepare food, and store it in storerooms made by themselves; they cut it with their teeth lest it grow again; when wet, in clear sky they bring it out to the middle lest it rot; they labor night and day, and help one another mutually, so that by mutual aid they become richer. O great wisdom of tiny creatures, which the humble one has drawn not from ants, but from God himself the teacher of the humble; he is small in external appearance: for he does not resist evil, but rather if someone strikes him on the right cheek, he offers him the other also: he does not wish to be praised by men; but he is great in virtue, who trusting in God undertakes difficult and hard things, if called to them, without any hesitation. He willingly remains hidden, but if the glory of God and the utility of neighbors demand it, he does not fear to come forth in public and to speak among the great of this world. While life, which is granted to him as his summer, is his companion, because he considers himself poor, he prepares merits by which he may become rich in the winter of death. From his merits he cuts away everything superfluous and serving vain ostentation, lest the seed of vain glory spring up. If the works which he has done have some imperfections, he presents them to justice alone to be consumed. He always labors, because he never considers himself sufficiently perfect. And he does not shrink from being helped by others, because he seeks no honor for himself in rightly done deeds. Does not this one seem to you wiser than the wise of the world, to whom such industry in gathering merits has accrued? The second species is higher, that of little hares or rabbits, which are namely so humble that, wholly distrusting their own strength, they flee to the rock, that is, they fix all their hopes in Christ, and in him they become strong and magnanimous. Such was David saying, II Kings XXII, 2: "The Lord is my rock, and my strength, and my savior; my strong God, I will hope in him." Every humble person proclaims this same thing: To me fleeing, thou, O Lord, art a rock, in which I stand; to me trembling thou art a most fortified stronghold, by the walls of this protection I am girt about and defended; to me imploring aid thou art a liberator, by whose unconquerable power I am snatched from the claws of lions pursuing me. If I am weak and powerless, I care nothing, because thou art my strength; if I am left alone, it matters not, because thou art my hope; if enemies hurl fiery darts at me, I am cheerful and secure, because thou art my shield; if they make an assault upon me and rush in, I easily turn them to flight, because thou art in my hand in place of sword and spear." The third species is locusts proceeding in swarms, orderly, quietly and in concord. Such is the congregation of the humble, each of whom, since he does not regard himself as sufficient unto himself, seeks the help of his brother brethren, and strives to be united with them by the bond of charity. It is as if they have no king, because, taught not by fear of a Superior but by love of the brethren and knowledge of his own necessity, he keeps peace with others, and departs from all discord and singularity. The humble go forth in swarms, because although they are not equal in spiritual studies, but rather one excels more, another less in the gift of divine familiarity, yet in bodily labor and external observance of discipline no one withdraws himself, but all live together as if they were equal in merits. Hence also St. Augustine in Psalm CXLVIII, exposition 2, understands by locusts the just, either on account of their multitude, or because they have passed from place to place. The humble are therefore like locusts in this, that they are clean animals, in this that they leap from earthly things to heavenly desires, in this that, not oppressed by fear of some superior, but incited by knowledge of their own weakness, they proceed not solitary, but gathered with others. The fourth species is the stellion, which is a vile reptile, similar to a lizard. This is the humble man, who from a vile estimation of himself sits in the lowest place, but shines with his virtues as if with certain little stars. This man, therefore, although he avails little, although he knows nothing, has nevertheless learned this: to laugh at the world, to flee its honors and dignities, and to regard the highest honor (as it truly is) the friendship and familiarity of God. To obtain this he strives with his hands and with utmost efforts and desires to obtain this true honor, this true glory. From these things it is clear that true humility is wisdom, since it teaches to gain heavenly riches in the safest dwelling, namely to dwell in the protection of God, to love brotherhood and to distinguish true honor from false. The humble are truly the least of the earth, because they do not wish to be great on earth, that they may have greatness in heaven; but they are wiser than the wise, because they know that which is the summit of virtue, and aspire to it, which vain wise men ignore. Humility finally is not only true, but the only wisdom, which He Himself (as we have already said) coming into the world taught His faithful, saying: "Come to me, and learn of me, because I am meek and humble of heart," Matt. XI, 28. Such a stellion was Paul the Simple, St. Francis, St. Bonaventure and the like. For the stellion is simple and humble, but industrious and laborious, who will precede the learned idle and vain man in heaven. Finally, all these things belong before all others to Christ alone: for Christ is the ant through diligence, prudence and providence, by which He provides for His faithful and the Church in all things profitable to salvation. He is the hare or rabbit through fecundity, by which He regenerates all nations through His blood in baptism, and places them in the high clefts of the rock, that is in the sacred wounds of His passion, that they may be safe and secure from all assault of enemies. He is the locust through concord and order, by which He orderly associates peoples contrary to Him in one Church as if brothers, indeed really unites and incorporates them in the Eucharist. He is the stellion through grace, by which He reconciles and subjects to Himself the minds of all. Whence some think the stellion represents Christ in infancy as a little child: for just as the stellion strives with his hands, so little children strive and crawl with hands and feet; and just as the stellion dwells in the halls of kings, so Christ dwells in the hall of the Holy Trinity, as it were "the only begotten who is in the bosom of the Father," John I; indeed, as man exalted by merit of His humility and passion, He ascended into heaven, and sits at the right hand of God.
30:29
THREE THINGS WHICH GO WELL, etc. — In Hebrew, three things which make a good gait, and four which make a good journey; the Septuagint, three things which go forward prosperously, and a fourth which goes well; Aquila, Symmachus and Theodotion, three things which make a good step. A LION THE MIGHTIEST OF BEASTS, etc. — In Hebrew, a lion strong or mighty among animals, and shall not return from the face of all; the Septuagint, a whelp of a lion stronger than beasts, which is not turned away nor fears a beast; Aquila, Symmachus and Theodotion, which does not fear from the face of anyone; Vatablus: these three go well, indeed four go well: a lion who is a hero among beasts, and does not flee from anyone's sight; a hunting dog, a ram, and a king with an elk. Thus also Pagninus: Three things, he says, are of the best gait, and four of the best going: a lion strong among animals, and shall not return from the face of all; a hound girt about the loins, or a ram, and a king with an elk; the Syriac, a whelp of a lion neither flees nor is turned away by anyone; a cock which walks among hens; a ram which goes first before the flocks, and a king who speaks among peoples. For cock girt about the loins in Hebrew is זרזיר zarzir motnaim, that is zarzir of the shoulders, that is girt about the loins. By which some understand an animal which tightens the loins, drawing them tight and as it were girding them, such as a bee and a wasp; likewise an ant. Others understand an animal which has slender loins, and therefore is agile, such as a lelaps, or hunting dog and hare-hound, which is called zarzir, that is a tearer, from the root זרר bazer, that is he tore, he rent, which by its strength tears and rends the animals which it hunts so as to devour them. But our translator renders it most excellently as cock: for this indeed stands out among birds in gait; for it walks erect, composed, generously, royally, as it were with loins girt for a journey, indeed for battle. Whence also the Chaldean renders it, and a cock among hens girt; the Septuagint, and a cock mounting hens briskly; Aquila and Theodotion, and a cock girt about the back; Symmachus, and a cock girt about the loins. For ram in Hebrew is תיש thais, that is a he-goat, or a ram: for each indeed goes excellently, and leads and conducts the flock, according to that: "The leader of the flock is the goat himself." Whence the Arabic, and a ram which leads the flock. NOR IS THERE A KING (some wrongly read, a thing which) WHO RESISTS HIM. — In Hebrew, and a king with an elk. Whence Vatablus and Pagninus understand elk as the proper name of a king illustrious at that time; indeed some believe that Solomon called himself Alkum, because he surpassed all kings of all ages in wealth, strength, felicity, and glory, so that no one could stand before him, that is equal him or resist him. Marinus in the Lexicon suspects that alkum is the name of some animal, so called from the strength of its body against which no other animal dares to rise up: which also for this reason is adorned with the name of king, and perhaps, he says, it is a description of a lion, but of another species different from the common one. Others translate alkum as elk, which is commonly called a great beast, whose hoof is a remedy for the falling sickness. The rest understand alkum as an appellative, compounded from al kum, that is not to stand, or not to rise: whence they translate, and not to rise up with him, that is a strong king, against whom no one dares to rise up. The Chaldean, a king who stands and speaks in the house of his people; the Septuagint, and a king who addresses the nation. They read עמו ammo, that is in the nation, or people: now they read עמו immo, that is with him; the Arabic, and a king who leads peoples after him, or who espouses, that is joins, peoples to himself. Hence it is clear that the fourth thing which walks well is a king. Wherefore Lyra, Dionysius, Clarius, Jansenius and others think that a fault has crept into the Vulgate, and thus the words should be transposed: "And a king, nor is there one who resists him." But most of the ancient codices, and especially those corrected at Rome, consistently have, nor is there a king who resists him. Which words, so that they may conform to the Hebrew, Septuagint, Chaldean and other Interpreters, are to be explained thus, that is to say, Nor is there a king, namely having someone, who resists him, that is to him: for the king is the fourth which walks magnificently and royally before the other three, so that no one wishes or is able to resist him. Or with Francis Lucas in the notes here, the king as an absolute case (as the Hebrews use their nouns) is placed by antiptosis for the dative to the king, that is to say, Nor is there to the king who resists him, that is, nor is there one who resists the king: for the "him" is redundant in the Hebrew; which is the same as if you should say, and a king, nor is there one who resists him; or, as the Hebrew, Chaldean, and Septuagint have it, and a king, nor is there one who stands or rises before him, that is against him. Otherwise indeed it would be said ineptly of a ram or a cock: "Nor is there a king who resists him;" for who is a king so unwarlike that he cannot resist a ram or a cock? Therefore this particle stands by itself, and assigns the fourth walking well, namely a king, who for this reason is joined to the other three walking well, namely to the lion, the cock, the ram, so that he may propose to himself the remarkable gifts which are seen in those animals as things to be imitated. Now let us trace the meanings and sense of these four. For this is the sixth riddle of those walking well. First, the Hebrews think that by these four things walking happily are hieroglyphically signified the four monarchies, and their happiness and magnificence, namely by the lion is noted the monarchy of the Assyrians and Chaldeans, which Jeremiah compared to a lion, chapter IV, 7, saying: "The lion is come up from his den, and the robber of the nations is risen up." For Nebuchadnezzar, heaping victories upon victories, nations upon nations, walked as a lion, whom no one could resist. By the cock, or, as the Hebrews translate it, the hunting dog, they understand the monarchy of the Persians; for this began from Cyrus, who as an infant exposed by his grandfather Astyages is said to have been nursed by a dog, and devoted himself intensely to the hunting of wild beasts by means of dogs, as Xenophon testifies: for hunting in Greek is called κύρα, whence Cyrus. By the ram or he-goat they understand the monarchy of the Greeks, because this began from Alexander the Great, whom Daniel, chapter VIII, 21, compares to a he-goat, saying: "And the he-goat is the king of the Greeks." I have assigned the reasons there. Finally, by "a king not rising up with him," as they translate from the Hebrew, they understand the empire of the Romans, who, after Tarquinius Superbus the last king was expelled, administered the Republic through consuls and senate with such happiness that it ascended to the highest pinnacle of empire. But these things, although they are not said ineptly, nevertheless appear to be far-fetched: especially since at the time of Solomon, who wrote these things, the monarchy of the Chaldeans did not exist, much less that of the Persians, Greeks and Romans; for he himself preceded all these ages. Indeed, then Rome did not yet exist in the nature of things: for it was founded under Joatham king of Judah, 228 years after Solomon. To this belongs the exposition of R. Solomon, who explains these five emblems or quaternaries, which have been proposed from verse 15 up to this point, concerning the same four monarchies. Hear him: Allegorically, he says, these five parts, each consisting of four things, are explained of the four kingdoms, for the reason that their dominion was established over the Israelites on account of their crimes, by which they violated the divine law comprehended in five books, so that therefore their deeds were mentioned five times. "Hell:" the Babylonian kingdom is signified by hell, according to that which is used of Nebuchadnezzar: "He that hath enlarged his soul like hell," Habakkuk II, 7. "The mouth of the womb," the constriction of the womb, that is the empire of the Medes, since during that storm the Israelites could not conceive offspring, as those words testify: "Letters were sent by the king's messengers, that they should kill and destroy all the Jews," Esther III, 13. "The earth which is not satisfied with water," that is the kingdom of the Greeks, to which it was never enough to establish laws and its edicts of destruction against the Israelites. "Fire," that is the kingdom of Esau, which inflamed with wrath produced conflagrations of the Israelite nation, so that on the same day it ordered women together with their infants to be taken away from their midst. "The way of the eagle in heaven," this is Babylon, a great eagle, spreading itself far with wings. "The way of the serpent," this is the Mede. "The way of a ship in the midst of the sea:" these pertain to the Greeks, who were most swift in enacting laws. "The way of a man in his youth:" these are the Persians or Romans, who affirmed that their empire would never have any end. "Such is the way of an adulterous woman:" this is the calamity, of which the Israelite nation made itself the author, departing from God and embracing the superstitious worship of idols, from which it experienced these punishments coming upon itself; for it boasted this: "I am bound by no crime;" from which in turn this response came from God: "Therefore thou art subject to my judgment, because thou affirmest thyself to be free from crime." "The earth is moved," that is, the Israelite, "by a servant." This pertains to Nebuchadnezzar, who was a servant of Merodach Baladan, and served him in his letters. "By a fool when he is filled:" this is Ahasuerus, who for the space of 180 days exhibited royal feasts. "By an odious woman:" this is to be referred to the Greeks. "By a handmaid when she shall be heir to her mistress:" this is to be referred to the posterity of Esau, whom it was right for Jacob to serve, yet the matter turned out otherwise. "The ants a feeble people," that is, Zerubbabel, as those words testify: "Behold the land of the Chaldeans, such a people was not." Isaiah XXIII, 13. "She prepareth her meat in the harvest," Nebuchadnezzar at some time received honor as a god through the age of Merodach Baladan, who writing letters to Hezekiah, says: "Health to Hezekiah, health to the city of Jerusalem, health to the great God Nebuchadnezzar." Therefore he who was his secretary was perhaps absent on that day, and when he returned, having been made aware of what had been done, he said: "Do you call him a great god and assign him last?" Therefore running after the messenger, he brought him back. Wherefore on account of such a course he was elevated to the kingdom. He therefore prepared food for himself in the time of harvest, imitating the ant. "The hare a feeble people:" these are the Medes and Persians, who indeed placed their dwelling in the rock, because they built the temple of Jerusalem. "The lizard with hands:" the Romans, the posterity of Esau, are signified, according to that: "But the hands of Esau," Genesis XXVII. "Dwelleth in the houses of the king:" for the Romans entered the temple of Jerusalem and utterly destroyed it. "The lion strong:" this is Nebuchadnezzar, according to that: "The lion is come up from his den," Jeremiah IV. "The cock girded about the loins:" these are the Medes and Persians, who conspiring together and girding up their loins slew Belshazzar, and took the kingdom from him. "The ram:" these are the Greeks, who are called by this name, according to that: "Moreover the he-goat is the king of the Greeks," Daniel VIII, 21. "And there is no king:" these things pertain to the Persians, who usurped this of themselves: "I am, and there is none besides me," Isaiah XLVII, 8 and 10; for no one dared to set his strength against them; as alkum signifies, "no one could resist him." Hitherto according to the word of R. Solomon. But these things are partly foreign, partly false, as that he takes the Romans through Esau and the Idumeans, as if Julius Caesar and the Romans were descended from the Idumeans, which is great ignorance and calumny of history; partly uncertain and fabulous, as that he says Nebuchadnezzar was a servant of Baladan Merodach, when more than a hundred years intervened between the two; for Baladan reigned under Hezekiah king of Judah, but Nebuchadnezzar under Joakim, who was the fifth king after Hezekiah. Secondly, others through these four things proceeding happily, that is, prosperously as to human happiness, but wrongly and perversely as to future and divine happiness, think that four vices of kings are noted, namely through the lion is indicated the pride of kings, their anger and cruelty, according to that passage in chapter XX, 2: "As the roaring of a lion, so also is the terror of a king." Through the rooster is noted the lust of kings: for the rooster is indeed a lustful animal. Whence the Septuagint translates, the rooster mounting the hens eagerly; or, as Salazar holds, the rooster denotes forgetfulness and defect of memory, which ought to be reckoned among the principal vices of kings. For nothing, he says, is more customary for princes and kings than to forget the duties and merits of their subjects; thus indeed the proud manners of kings carry it, that they think all things are owed to them, and believe themselves bound by no duties: hence forgetfulness and defect of memory, which the rooster denotes. For they say that he is more forgetful than other animals; from this arose that common proverb among our people: "Memory of a rooster;" and the Physiognomists hand down that those whose heads are compressed at the temples imitating roosters are of very unstable memory. Through the ram is insinuated the imprudence, stubbornness and stupidity of kings: for nothing is more stupid than a sheep and a ram. Finally, their injustice and tyranny are understood when it is said: "Nor is there one that resisteth him," that is to say, the king acts all things according to his pleasure, whatever pleases him is likewise permitted, there is no one who opposes him. Thirdly and genuinely: Just as Solomon in verse 11 and thereafter proposed five emblems or quaternaries, first, of four perverse generations; secondly, of four insatiable things; thirdly, of four difficult to know; fourthly, of four intolerable things; fifthly, of four smallest most wise, through which as it were physical symbols he represents something ethical and moral: so also here he proposes the sixth emblem of those proceeding well, through which he physically signifies these four things, namely the lion, the rooster, the ram and the king proceeding well and happily, that is, honestly, composedly, fittingly, decorously, firmly and equally prudently, expeditiously, courageously, powerfully, efficaciously and happily; so that to each of them nothing of the same or similar kind dares to be compared, or to oppose or resist itself; for good and happy proceeding in walking denotes both honesty and composure, both decorum and elegance, both providence, both agility, both firmness, both strength and efficacy, both success and happiness of proceeding. For the lion proceeds with erect neck, with mane generously displayed, vibrating his tail like a lance, with magnificent gait as a king of beasts, so that the other beasts do not sustain to look upon him proceeding with adverse eyes, but immediately flee and hide themselves in lairs. The rooster likewise proceeds with high neck, and with crests erect; he contends with roosters in pursuit of glory, he sings in victory, showing himself a prince; he awakens men from bed with his song, and announces that light is at hand; he is present to the hens with marital affection, defending them. But the rooster is said to be girded about the loins, because he is prepared for entering and battle, namely because through the strength of his loins he is prompt for combat and procreation. Finally, the rooster in his yard rules over the hens and chicks, nor does he suffer a rival, but alone in his yard and dunghill, as is commonly said, he reigns. The ram similarly, larger than the whole flock, armed with horns, proceeds composedly and courageously, indeed he precedes and leads the whole flock, so that all the sheep follow him as a prince eagerly, especially because they love his modesty and clemency. Finally, the king in royal garb and gait, crowned with scepter, purple and diadem, proceeds royally attended by an illustrious array of courtiers, guards, soldiers, and caparisoned horses, gilded chariots and carriages in formation and pomp, so that no one dares to compare himself to him or oppose him. These things physically. Under this physical scheme Solomon represents ethically and morally what kind the king ought to be, and his manner of proceeding and conducting himself, while he compares him to the gait of the lion, rooster and ram, namely that the king ought to imitate the strength of the lion, so that no one can resist him; now by antithesis he adds that certain foolish and stupid men, when they are elevated to the kingdom or otherwise to dignities, foolishly reveal their stupidity by speaking, acting or commanding foolishly: wherefore they foolishly accepted the kingdom or dignity, to which on account of their stupidity or imprudence, or inexperience and lack of skill they knew themselves unfit and unsuitable; for in the exercise of rule they revealed their stupidity previously hidden and unknown to others, foolishly commanding, and made it public; wherefore from the kingdom or dignity they brought upon themselves nothing but disgrace and infamy.
The Lion, Most Mighty of Beasts First, Aristotle in the place cited: "The lion, he says, walks slowly and majestically, and moves himself in his shoulders when he walks:" thus a king and Prelate in his gait should not be light and hasty, but grave, slow, majestic. Second, the lion fears the encounter with no bear, leopard, tiger, wolf or other beast, but makes all fearful and strikes them with terror: thus a king by his wisdom and strength should make himself fearless and steadfast, so that he may strike fear and dread into all his subjects. Whence Aben-Ezra thus expounds "there is no king who resisteth him," as if to say, Then the king proceeds with happy step, when no one rises up to wage war, and things succeed happily, because, adhering to the path of justice, he has no adversary or enemy, just as Solomon had none in his kingdom, whom some think is indicated here by the name alkum, as it were by an enigma, as I have said. Third, Aristotle, book IX of the History of Animals, chapter XLV: "The lion, he says, when he is seen, never flees; but if he is forced to yield to a multitude of hunters, he departs slowly and step by step, frequently stopping and looking back. But when he reaches shaded places, he withdraws himself with flight as swift as possible, until he comes into open ground, then again he walks slowly." Thus a king, if ever pressed and oppressed by wars or adversities and forced to yield, should do so honorably, steadfastly and decorously, lest a shameful flight imprint upon royal majesty a mark of timidity and faint-heartedness, as Agapetus the Deacon admonishes Justinian: "For just as, he says, when the lion stands firm and looks back the hunters sit still: so also when the prince acts steadfastly, the assault of those forced to attack is broken." Fourth, Aristotle, book II of the History of Animals, chapter I: "Lions walk, he says, step by step, namely the left foot and paw does not pass the right, but follows after the manner of camels:" thus a king should postpone the left to the right, that is, base things to honorable things, improvident things to prudent things, doubtful things to certain things, transitory things to eternal things, human things to divine things; and should prefer the right, that is the wiser and better ones in governing, to the left, that is to those less good and less wise. Fifth, St. Gregory of Nazianzus in his Poem On Human Virtue asserts that the lion sweeps away and obliterates the footprints of his feet with his tail, lest they be seen by hunters, so that they might pursue him: thus a king should conceal and hide his counsels, lest they be discovered and overturned by adversaries. For secrecy is of great value in governance. Sixth, Pliny, book VIII, chapter XVI, gives to the lion these praises of nobility: "Nobility is most evident in dangers: not only in this, that scorning weapons it long protects itself by terror alone, and as it were testifies that it is forced; and it rises up not as if compelled by danger, but as if angered by madness. That is a nobler indication of spirit, that however great the force of dogs and hunters pressing upon it, it yields with contempt, springing back in the fields, and where it can be seen." Thus a king in dangers should be intrepid, and his spirit should be sharpened by them, so that he may also sharpen others to strength; for "virtue agitated by adversities grows," namely that which is true and heroic. Elegantly and wisely Rabbi Judah in Pirke Avoth, that is in the Apophthegms of the Fathers: "You ought to be bold, he says, as a leopard, quick and swift of foot as a gazelle; like an eagle, the royal and solar bird, penetrating all things by the agility of body; finally, like a lion, strenuous and warlike, strong and magnanimous in executing the will of God and your father."
The Cock with Loins Girded Appositely, as it were by gradation, he ascends from the lion to the cock, because this creature is a terror to the lion, as I shall presently show. The cock walks pompously; for in his gait he raises his legs high, so that he may plant his feet with greater force: hence he is called by the Poet high-stepping. Again, "when he enters a threshold," says Ælian, "although it be very high, he inclines his crest lest his crest strike anything;" for his crest is to him as a diadem, wherefore he carefully keeps it unharmed, so that he may avoid obstacles and dangers even from afar. Thus let a prudent king be, so that he may foresee, avert and dispel not only near and certain, but also remote and doubtful dangers and perils of enemies and adversities from a distance. Again, the cock, exulting in his song, strikes terror into the lion, the most ferocious of all animals by his very aspect, exercises his kingdom in whatever house he is in, distinguishes three hours, as if knowing the stars, says Aldrovandus at the beginning of book XIV of his Ornithology. Now let us arrange each of these things and many others in detail, and apply them to the king and Prelate. First, in the cock there is a wonderful love toward hens and chicks, a wonderful care for them, so that he contends for them even unto death: let the king have a similar care for his kingdom and subjects, so that he may spend his life for them if need be. Hear Aldrovandus, book XIV of his Ornithology: "The cock," he says, "is an example of the best father of a family: for he shows himself not only a vigilant guardian of himself and his own, and in the morning when it is time, he invites them to daily labor; but he himself is the first to leap forth, showing not so much by voice as in deed what must be done; he himself sweeps all, explores all, inspects all, and as soon as he has obtained some food, he calls the hens and chicks to feed; meanwhile, like a certain father and lofty master of the feast, he stands by, and invites them to eat, always having this one care, that his own have something to eat. Meanwhile he himself inquires whether he might find anything nearby, and having found it, he again calls his family with a loud voice. They come at once. He, bearing himself in a lofty manner, and looking about on all sides whether anything hostile appear anywhere, goes around the whole cohort, and now and then takes a single grain for himself, not without inviting his own to follow him. Moreover, the jealousy and love of the cock toward the hens subject to him, says Rhodiginus, excites the cock so many times at night, and therefore he sings, so that by his song he may testify that he is present: by a similar reasoning, zeal and love for the kingdom should make a good king and prince ever watchful. Second, the cock excels in a wonderful and, so to speak, prescient genius, industry and cleverness. Let the king imitate this. Hear Pliny, book X, chapter XXI: "Cocks," he says, "are next to glory, and these our night-watchers, whom nature created to rouse mortals to work and to break sleep, know the stars, and distinguish three hours in the daytime by their song. They go to bed with the sun, and at the fourth watch of the camp they recall us to cares and labor. Nor do they allow the rising of the sun to creep upon the unwary, and they announce the coming day by song, and the song itself by the beating of their wings. They command their own kind, and exercise their kingdom in whatever house they are in. This too is determined among them by combat, as if they understood that weapons were born with their legs." Ælian also writes that roosters rejoice not only at the rising of the sun but also at the rising of the moon, where he says: "The rooster, as the moon rises, is said to rage and exult as if afflicted by some divine spirit. But the rising sun never deceives it: then, striving with the most vehement voice, it tries to overcome itself more and more by singing." Thus Ælian, book IV, chapter XXIX. Hence that passage from Job, chapter XXXVIII, verse 36: "Who gave the cock understanding?" For the cock's song wisely distinguishes day and night, just as if it were endowed with intellect. Third, the magnanimity of the rooster is remarkable, especially in combat and battle: let the king put on this virtue. Hear Aldrovandus in the place cited: "The greatest praise of the rooster," he says, "is in a spirit more than royal, so much so that Oppianus did not hesitate to call it the most combative of all birds: whose spirit is indeed so lofty, such constancy of mind, that it not only undergoes dangers to life, which is most dear to all animals, but prefers to lose it rather than to suffer the dominion and yoke of another, even for a single moment of time. Themistocles knew this, our ancestors knew it, who by instituting annual and solemn combats of roosters with solemn rite, wished us to be perpetual imitators of roosters. They say indeed that not only the lion trembles at their song, but also the basilisk; whether this is true matters little, but it is certain that no animal bears its crested head and erect and curved tail with greater spirit and excellence, or enters into combat, in which it frequently dies before yielding to its adversary. Wherefore by right and merit it was held sacred to Mars, the god of wars and battles, and is called proverbially ἄρεως νεοττός, that is, the chick of Mars, as if greatly inclined to wars and battles. Moreover, in combat roosters employ remarkable art and gestures: for while they fight, led by nature they strike the ground, and raise their feathers around the neck, and vibrate their tail feathers up and down as much as they can, leaping meanwhile, so that they may strike their enemy more with their spurs, which on account of this are recognized as weapons born in the legs, according to Pliny's testimony. From such a contest there exists a common saying: "The rooster leaps in," concerning one who, once defeated, renews the contest, which is indeed most fierce in the rooster. Whence St. Augustine said: "When behold before the doors we notice roosters entering into a very fierce battle." And shortly after he describes the battle thus: "So that in the roosters themselves it was possible to see intently projected heads, puffed-up crests, vehement blows, most cautious evasions, and in all the movement of animals lacking reason nothing not becoming: for another reason moderating all things from above; finally the law itself to the victor a proud song, and limbs collected into one circle as it were, as if into the pride of dominion." But most learnedly the same contest Angelo Poliziano embraced in these verses, how briefly, in the Rusticus: And they prepare a kingdom for themselves by Mars, for indeed with beaks opposed Beaks they bear, and with frequent assaults they sharpen their angers. They burn in their spirits, and spur repels spur With hostile force, and with body they strike the opposing breast. The victor exulting testifies the palm by song, and to the enemy Insulting the conquered, he treads him with an unjust foot: He is silent, and seeks hiding places, and the proud master Groans to bear: the rest of the people rightly follow the king. Aelian, book IV, chapter XXIX: "If," he says, "the palm falls to them, immediately they sing in victory, and they themselves testify themselves as princes, etc. And the sky alone of birds does it behold, frequently raising its curved tail also on high." And Pliny: "If it carries off victory from the contest, then by the prominence of the eyes, then by the erect neck, at the same time and by the contention of song it is insolently exalted, and triumphs; it is similar." Wherefore Miltiades sharpened the Athenians against the Persians for battle by the spectacle of dueling roosters. "For," says Philo, "having observed in brutes patience, and persistent contention even unto death fighting, seized with unconquered breast they took up arms for that expedition, as if about to wage war with great slaughter of the enemy, despising deaths and wounds, so that at least they might lie unburied in the free soil of their country. For nothing excites more to the serious conduct of affairs, and the victory of the inferior than could be hoped for." Diogenes Laertius also relates that Socrates added courage to the general Iphicrates, when he showed him roosters of the barber Midas fighting against those of Callias with feathers and beak. This is related to the symbol of Pythagoras: "Nourish a rooster, but do not sacrifice it," that is, maintain soldiers as wings for the protection of the city, but do not employ them in sacred rites. Fourth, the rooster is a terror to the lion; indeed Pliny, book XXIX, chapter XIV, relates that those who are rightly anointed with rooster are not touched by lions and panthers, especially if garlic is mixed with it. Again the rooster is feared by the asp, the ape, the basilisk: thus let the king be formidable to evildoers. Fifth, the rooster is a solar animal, and has a remarkable sympathy with the sun: for it, hastening to all corners of the world, rising, setting and meridian, with a very vocal voice, and by the clapping of wings in the manner of one congratulating, frequently greets and returns the greeting.
And the Ram The ram, which leads the flock and conducts it in the morning to pasture, and brings it back to the fold in the evening. Whence Varro: "The ram," he says, "is the eye of the whole flock:" hence the ram is a symbol of prudence and providence. Whence Pausanias in his account of Corinth relates that at Corinth there was a bronze image of Mercury, to which a ram stood opposite, so that it might be signified, he says, that prudence ought to be joined to eloquence, of which Mercury was the presiding deity. Again, the ram, although he is gentle and tame toward the sheep which he leads, is nevertheless fierce and combative toward the he-goats and rival rams. Wherefore Pierius, in his Hieroglyphics, book 10, chapter XXIX: "As much gentleness," he says, "as we experience in the lamb, so much ferocity do we experience in the ram. For as soon as horns have grown, they become most combative, and not only do they provoke one another in their own kind, and butt against each other; but they also attack men and provoke them to war. Hence the ram is dedicated to Mars the heavenly. The Romans also, when about to declare war on someone, would send a ram ahead through the herald, which he would drive into the enemy's territory. In like manner, let a king be benign toward his own, but formidable to his enemies, according to that saying of Virgil concerning Marcellus, whose art of command he comprehends in these two things, in the Aeneid, book VI: To spare the conquered, and to war down the proud. Let us add here other qualities of the ram to be imitated by the king. First, Plutarch relates in book II of his Symposium, Question VII, that when a raging elephant beholds a ram, its madness is dissolved and it becomes tame. Aelian adds that the elephant dreads the ram's horns, and for this reason the Romans put to flight the elephants of Pyrrhus, king of the Epirotes, by setting rams against them. Aldrovandus teaches this in more detail in his work on the Elephant: thus does a king calm the angers and tumults of his subjects by his own gentleness and cheerful countenance. In this matter let him imitate God; for, as St. Bernard says, "God tranquil tranquilizes all things, and to behold the quiet is to be at rest." Second, Albert the Great writes that if the horns of a ram are buried at the root of a fig tree, the fruit thereon matures more quickly. And Antonius Mizaldus commands that a fig tree, lest it lose its fruit, be surrounded with ram's horns buried about its roots, as attested by Aldrovandus in his treatise On the Sheep: thus does a good king, by his strength mingled with clemency, make his subjects fruitful and enriches them. Third, the antipathy, hatred and war between the ram and the wolf is well known, which endures even after death, especially in the hide, wool and cords. Whence Pythagoras is the author of the statement that if the hide of a ram is placed next to that of a wolf, the wool of the ram will fall out; cords made from the sinews of rams mixed with cords made from the sinews of wolves produce no sound. Oppianus writes that if you make a drum from a wolf's hide, it alone will resound when struck, while the ram-skin drums and other previously sonorous ones remain silent. Albert writes, in book I of his History of Animals, chapter XXXVIII, that if you bury a cord made from a wolf's intestine in the earth, you will prevent the sheep of the flock from crossing over it, even if driven by a rod. That saying of Alciati is well known: Other things fall silent, and the sheep's hide will be mute, If drums made from a wolf's skin sound forth. Let the king imitate this antipathy toward heretics, whom Christ compares to ravenous wolves, and similar pests of the commonwealth, so that he may pursue and exterminate them everywhere. Fourth, the Egyptians depicted the horns of a ram on Jupiter Ammon. Whence, in imitation of him, the ancient Gentiles inscribed the same horns in tombs: for the Egyptians venerated Ammon as a health-giving god and god of salvation with great reverence. Indeed, the ancients, covered with the hide of a ram and sleeping in it, sought oracles from dreams, as Aldrovandus teaches from Pausanias and Virgil in his work On the Sheep: for the ram is a symbol of divine mercy, gentleness, benevolence and beneficence. Let the king imitate this. Fifth, the ram was a symbol of heroes. Ammianus celebrates the ram-head as the insignia of King Sapor, elaborated in a golden figment of a ram's head. And this, as both a military emblem and as it were of a certain fellowship of his own, in very recent memory (says Pierius Valerianus, Hieroglyphics, book 10, chapter XXVI) Charles the most mighty Duke of Burgundy, grandfather of the Emperor Charles V, adopted, imposing a golden ram's head as an insignia for each member, and calling the fellowship by the name of the ram's head: they commonly called it the Golden Fleece (l'ordine del Tosone), because that expression designated a ram's head in the native tongue. One can find a coin of the Emperor Gallienus, on which a ram is seen expressed with the inscription added to Jupiter cons. Aug. Sebastian Eritius depicts another coin of Antinous, a large Greek bronze, and made by an excellent sculptor, with letters of this kind ΑΝΤΙΝΟΟΣ ΗΡΩΣ, that is, Antinous the hero: he shows on the other side a ram most beautifully expressed with certain letters, which however, on account of the injury of time, cannot be read. This coin, he says, was struck by the Greeks for the sake of honor and memory after the death of Antinous, and perhaps to please the Emperor Hadrian, to whom he was a favorite, who erected statues to him everywhere throughout the world. Let the king emulate these heroes, so that he himself may be the ram of rams, and the hero of heroes, namely the leader and guide of heroes to the generous undertaking of heroic deeds. Sixth, the sheep and the ram are a symbol of patience and martyrdom, inasmuch as they harm no one and tolerate those who harm them, according to that saying of the Christian poet: This one aim will be for all to benefit, To harm none, and to love the good, and to tolerate the wicked.
30:32
Some read "and" instead of "for", and connect this verse to the preceding one, as if a fourth happy beginning were assigned here, namely a fool elevated to the heights, by whom St. Gregory, XXX Moral. cap. III, understood Antichrist, who will be elevated by the demon and will become the monarch of the world. But "for" should be read, as the Vatican codices and other corrected ones read it. In Hebrew it is, if thou hast foolishly acted in exalting thyself, and if thou hast thought, put thy hand to thy mouth, that is, place it and be silent: where previously אם im, that is "if", from the Hebrew phrase is of negation, signifying "lest", "not". Whence the Chaldean translator rendered it, lest thou exalt thyself, lest thou be unwise, or, lest thou, exalted on high, act or speak freely and foolishly, as fools are wont to do; which Our translator clearly rendered, he is who appeared foolish after he was exalted to the heights. The Hebrew נבל nabal signifies to become foolish, likewise to fall, to flow away and to wither; and it is said of herbs and flowers, so that as in letters and voice, so also in meaning it agrees with נפל naphal, that is to fall, to drop. Whence Pagninus rendered it, if thou hast fallen when thou didst exalt thyself; if thou hast thought, put thy hand to thy mouth; others: Thou hast been silent after thou wast exalted, etc. The Septuagint: if thou hast flowed forth, or hast poured thyself out into joy, and hast stretched forth thy hand in battle, thou shalt be dishonored; R. David thus rendered it, if thou hast fallen, or hast become foolish, it was in exalting thyself: if thou hast been wise, it was because thou didst put thy hand to thy mouth. The discourse of Agur is directed to the disciples Ithiel and Uchal, says Aben-Ezra, as is evident from what is said in verse 1. But under these take any reader or hearer, as if to say: If thou hast incurred the reputation and mark of foolishness, the cause was thy pride, in that thou didst exalt thyself above others and make a show of thyself: for pride is the companion of foolishness equally as of infamy; but if on the other hand thou hast acquired the name and honor of wisdom, the cause was thy modesty, humility and silence, by which thou didst put thy hand to thy mouth, lest thou shouldst utter anything insipid: "For if a fool hold his peace, he shall be counted wise," as Solomon says, Prov. XVII, 28. Again, the same R. David thus explains it, as if to say: If thou hast fallen from thy station, rank, honor, and hast been cast down into the lowest vileness and poverty, do not despair; but think and act wisely, so that thou mayest put thy hand to thy mouth, that is, so that thou mayest labor with thy hands, and by this labor prepare for thyself food, which thou mayest bring to thy mouth. Secondly, Vatablus renders it, if thou hast done anything foolishly in exalting thyself, or if thou hast thought anything wicked among thee (for this is זמות zamotha), put thy hand upon thy mouth, that is, at least immediately restrain thy mouth, lest wickedness burst forth, and create danger to thee of life, or of wealth and reputation. To this is added R. Levi: If thou art wise, he says, put thy hand upon thy mouth, that is, keep silent and conceal what is committed to thee in secret; for many have destroyed themselves and others through the revelation of a secret. Or put thy hand upon thy mouth, that is, think silently and wisely in what manner thou mayest amend, correct and restore what thou hast foolishly done or said. Thirdly, the Syriac translator renders it, do not indulge thy desires (as fools do), lest thou be afflicted with reproaches, nor put thy hand unjustly to thy mouth, so as to revile someone, to slander, to accuse falsely, and to thy mouth thy hand, that is to add harder blows to harsh words. Many other interpretations of the Hebrew interpreters are to be read in R. Solomon and Aben-Ezra, which, because they seem little probable and fitting, I purposely omit. Fourthly, Cajetan, thou hast been silent when thou wast exalted, and if thou hast considered thy hand to thy mouth, as if it were an oracle concerning the future which he himself thus explains after his manner: It is an apostrophe, he says, to the Roman Republic, with battle, thou shalt be dishonored. By which some think he predicts the future, so that then especially when it had been exalted, it would fall more basely and collapse, and would fall back into ancient humility under kings, when the Caesars would seize the empire and usurp perpetual dictatorship for themselves. And this is what he means by that: If thou hast considered thy hand to thy mouth: for the hand to the mouth is the execution of the command of the mouth, by which words the office of the dictator is hinted at, whose authority over the Republic was so great that whatever he said would be immediately executed, as if to say: It will come to pass at some time that with the Republic and the Senate of the Romans falling, the hands of all will be moved to the mouth of one, that is to the command of Caesar; or so that their hands, that is their armies, may be directed to the mouth and knowledge of one Emperor. But this version and interpretation is new, foreign and forced. If thou hast been so foolish as to wish to exalt thyself, and hast thought to let loose the reins of anger, put thy hand to thy mouth, that is, impose it, restrain thyself. Vers. 33. For as the pressing of milk in a skin produces butter, and the pressing of the nose brings forth blood, when the nose is compressed and blown more forcefully blood is drawn forth, and thus the pressing of the nostrils, that is of anger, brings forth strife. The pressing of anger here is not the restraining of it lest it burst forth, but the stirring up of it, the likeness being taken from one who presses something in which there is juice, so that juice may come out. It signifies those who stir up another's patience to anger by injuries or stinging words. But you will more easily draw the version of the Septuagint to the Vulgate, and accommodate yourself to it. For it is a single maxim of one member, not of two members; otherwise indeed τὸ if would be repeated. The sense therefore is, as if to say, If, O prince, lifted up to the heights you have poured yourself out, after the manner of fools with your subjects, joking lightly with them, censuring them, plucking at them, beating them, and as if fighting in jest, you will be dishonored: that is, if you have vexed your subjects wantonly with words or blows, they will dishonor you and despise you, and will return like treatment to you, and will attack you similarly with words and blows. The sense of the Vulgate is the same. Whence it follows: Fifth, others more plausibly thus, as if to say, If perchance when you were foolish and ignorant of affairs, you were lifted up to dignities or rule, do not suddenly rush into new things, and new edicts and undertakings; but think maturely by placing your hand upon your mouth, that is by being silent and deliberating with yourself what ought to be done; for from mature deliberation follows mature execution and governance. But all these things are far removed from the Vulgate version. Sixth therefore, according to the Vulgate, the sense here is plain and genuine. Solomon had said in the preceding verse that a wise king is like a lion, a cock and a ram, so that no one can resist him; now by antithesis he adds that certain foolish and stupid men, when they are elevated to a kingdom or other dignities, reveal their foolishness by speaking, acting or commanding foolishly: wherefore they have foolishly accepted the kingdom or dignity, to which they knew themselves unfit and unsuitable on account of their foolishness or imprudence, or inexperience and lack of skill; for in ruling they have foolishly revealed their foolishness previously hidden and unknown to others, and made it public; wherefore from the kingdom or dignity they have brought upon themselves nothing but disgrace and infamy. "For if he had understood," that is if he had been intelligent and wise, "he would have put his hand upon his mouth," that is he would not have consented to the kingdom or dignity to which he was chosen, or was requested, nor would he have accepted it, as being conscious of his unfitness and foolishness. Again, having accepted the kingdom he would have been silent, that is he would have proceeded silently, quietly and modestly, lest by acting, speaking or commanding rashly and foolishly, he reveal his foolishness.
30:33
For he who presses strongly, wrings out, provokes—in Hebrew it is the same word מיץ mits, that is, one who wrings out, one who extracts, one who expresses; or, as others say, wringing out, extraction, expression. The Hebrews therefore have it thus, because he who wrings out milk draws forth butter, he who wrings out the nose brings forth blood, and he who wrings out angers produces strife; the Septuagint: milk the milk, and there will be butter; but if thou shouldest wring out the nostrils, blood will come forth; but if thou shouldest draw out words, there will come forth strifes and quarrels; the Chaldean: because he who expresses milk draws forth butter, and from the expression of anger comes forth blood, and from the nostrils of the face comes forth contention. Aquila also translated for nose anger, because here it is chiefly seen in the flaming nose. The Syriac: from the fatness of milk comes forth butter; and if thou shouldest press thy hand upon itching, blood comes forth: thus from the contention of faces proceed strifes; clearly Vatable, certainly as frequent shaking of milk expresses butter, and violent wringing of the nose expresses blood: thus also violent irritation of anger stirs up contention. Hence it is clear first, that Bede, Lyran, Hugh and others less correctly refer both the former hemistichs to the udders, as if to say, "He who presses the udders strongly expresses butter; and he who wrings them out vehemently draws forth blood." For it is established from the Hebrew and Septuagint that the former wringing out refers to the udders, the latter to the nostrils; for he who wrings out mucus from the nostrils too much, at length instead of mucus wrings out blood. Also Baynus wrongly reads a skin for udders, on the ground that butter is not milked from udders, but butter is drawn forth from milk in a skin beaten about. For all the Latin codices have udders. For from the udders butter is milked together with milk; for butter is mixed with milk, and is as it were the fat and fatness of it, which in a wooden skin by frequent shaking is separated from the milk, thickened, and becomes butter. Finally Lyran wrongly understands by butter fat, as if to say, He who milks and presses the udders too strongly, at length instead of milk which fails, wrings out the very fat and fatness of the udder itself; although indeed this is true and fitting, nevertheless butter does not signify fat. Now First, Cajetan understands by wringing out and extraction dictatorship, which he explained also in the preceding verse, which was the ruin of Roman liberty, when Julius Caesar usurped for himself perpetual dictatorship, that is, the empire of the city and the world. For the word because, he says, gives the reason of the preceding verse. The reason indeed why Rome both declined and fell from liberty was dictatorship; and because dictatorship sometimes had good effects, and sometimes evil, therefore one and the same action is brought forward producing sometimes good, and sometimes evil: wringing out of milk is indeed found producing good, namely butter: for from wrung out milk results butter; again wringing out is found to be the producer of evil: for wringing out of the nose brings forth blood. And hence in the third place he applies it to the matter at hand by saying that wringing out of angers brings forth strife. For literally the wringing out of the angers of Caesar and Pompey brought forth the strife, which had to be settled by war with the loss of Roman liberty. But this explanation, as I said in the preceding verse, seems alien and forced. Second, others understand this wringing out and extraction of a man in himself, as if to say, He who presses the udders too strongly to draw forth milk expresses butter, that is, he who too vehemently urges and stimulates his own talent, disposition, nature, whether toward knowledge and study, whether toward fastings, penances, vigils, etc., or toward anything else by doing violence to his constitution, he expresses butter, that is, he sucks out all the vigor, strength and forces of nature, so that from lively it becomes exhausted, from cheerful gloomy, from benign wrathful and contentious. But this sense seems more alien from the scope of Solomon. Third, others more aptly refer the wringing out of milk to those who are of easy and benign nature; but the wringing out of nostrils to those who are of harsh and choleric disposition, as if to say, Just as he who presses the udders too much expresses butter together with milk, that is all the fatness and fat: so he who presses the benign and meek too much and urges them more sharply or rebukes them, he expresses from them all strength, all spirit and forces, and makes them become faint-hearted and despair. But he who urges and rebukes the harsh and choleric too much, he draws forth blood, that is he provokes their anger and cruelty. Fourth, others refer milk to friends, blood to enemies, as if to say, Just as he who presses and shakes milk expresses butter: so he who is importunate and urges friends with excessive requests or complaints, he expresses from them all favor, so that he becomes hateful and odious to them; but he who pursues enemies more sharply and accuses them, he stirs up their anger and fury against himself. Fifth, Jansenius refers both milk and butter and nostrils and blood to the same thing, namely to anger and contention. The Wise Man speaks, he says, of a twofold vigorous extraction, one of milk from the udders, the other of mucus from the nostrils. And he compares a third to these, because the expression of angers produces discords, as if to say: Just as by the extraction of milk butter is at the same time drawn out, and just as by the blowing of the nostrils, if it is vigorous, blood is often drawn out: so if anyone does not restrain his thoughts and conceived anger, but by his foolishness expresses it and pours it out in angry and threatening words, always wishing to pursue his own right; or rather he who provokes the angers of others by importunate words, will at the same time produce and stir up for himself discords and contentions against others. Therefore this parable admonishes that anger is to be suppressed, and the hand is to be placed upon the mouth, when anyone is agitated by evil or proud thoughts. To this the Hebraists add, who take milk not in the udder, but shaken in a skin so that butter is expressed, as if to say: Just as liquid and soft milk, shaken long and vigorously in a skin, finally hardens and congeals into butter: so also the meek and kind, if they are shaken more vigorously by a Superior or anyone else, corrected or beaten, harden, become indignant and are exasperated. This exposition corresponds very well with the Hebrew. Sixth, our Salazar refers both milk and blood to excessively harsh correction, and to excessive exaction of taxes and tributes, as if to say: Just as he who compresses the same udders more vigorously, after the milk is exhausted, forces out blood: so also a prince, who restrains his subjects with excessive severity, and presses them with laws more than is sufficient, certainly does not persuade them to good morals and a just manner of living, but stirs up their anger and fury against himself, and sharpens impatient minds to think of wars and seditions. In a similar manner this maxim admonishes that tributes are to be exacted from subjects very sparingly; subjects are to be milked like udders, not blown upon and exhausted: for when they see themselves exhausted, they think of seditions. To this pertains the answer of Alexander the Great in Plutarch's Apophthegms, who, when someone suggested to him that he impose greater tributes on his people, said: "I hate the gardener who cuts up vegetables by the roots." And of Tiberius Caesar in Maximus, sermon 13: "It is the mark of a good shepherd to shear the flock, not to flay it." Thus he himself, in his usual elegant and ingenious manner: except that here the expression of fat, that is of fortunes from subjects, is not sufficiently aptly understood through the expression of butter: for butter is one thing, fat is another. Again, the good of milk and its excellent fruit is that when mixed it gives butter. For butter is the flower, juice and fatness of milk: wherefore butter is the symbol and omen not of an evil, but of a good thing and name. Seventh therefore, plainly and genuinely, milk pertains to the virtue of modesty and gentleness, blood to the vice of pride and harshness. For the Hebrew כי ki, that is because, indicates here that a reason is given for what I said in the preceding verse, that a fool exalted on high reveals his foolishness, speaking, acting, commanding foolishly and proudly. Whence Solomon does not apply the former parable of milk and butter, but leaves it as it were obvious and easy for the reader to apply; but he applies the latter of the nose and blood, because it serves his purpose, namely to prove the foolishness of the exalted fool. The sense therefore is, as if to say: Just as he who draws the udders strongly milks milk, and from it strongly shaken draws out butter: so he who speaks modestly, sweetly and gently, and persists strongly and constantly in this gentle manner of speaking, especially if he be a king and prince, when he commands or requests something more serious, he conciliates the listeners and subjects to himself, and feeds and refreshes them as it were with mild and sweet butter, and in turn from them draws out and obtains butter, that is fatness, grace, sweetness, love, services, tributes. On the other hand, just as he who blows the nostrils more sharply, having drawn out filth and mucus, produces blood: for when nature has no more phlegm to suggest to the one blowing, exhausted it suggests to the one pressing the blood that remains to it: so likewise he who speaks filthy things, namely proud, angry, threatening, insulting things, produces contentions, lawsuits and quarrels, and especially a king and prince, who vexes and goads the people with harsh commands, burdens, threats and punishments, he stirs him up to rebellion, sedition and slaughter, so that indignant at last he may rage against the very family of the prince, and devastate and lay waste everything with blood and flames. Therefore this maxim admonishes kings and any others whatsoever to win for themselves the goodwill of their subjects, servants and all others by commanding, acting and speaking modestly, gently and pleasantly; but let them avoid their ill-will, inasmuch as it brings dissension, quarreling and utter ruin to both parties. Wherefore a king, and anyone else who is harsh and cruel toward his subjects and others, is foolish and lacks wisdom; but he who is courteous and kind toward them, he is wise both for himself and for the whole people. That this is the meaning is clear, first, from the Septuagint when they translate, "Churn milk, and it will become butter: but if thou pressest the nose, it will bring forth blood." Which words sufficiently signify that milk and butter pertain to one thing, namely to modesty and pleasantness of speech, while the nose and blood pertain to another, namely to harshness and cruelty of speaking, acting and commanding. The same therefore is said here as in chapter XV, 1: "A soft answer breaketh wrath, but a grievous word stirreth up fury." Second, the same is clear from the Hebrew, where in the third member, namely in the application of the parable, appaim, that is, angers, both in name and in meaning corresponds to aph, that is, nose, from which blood is drawn, of which it was said in the second member: but it plainly differs from chema, that is, butter, which was named in the first member. Third, because thus both St. Gregory the Great and St. Gregory of Nazianzus, Bede, the Author of the Greek Catena, the Gloss, Jansenius, Baynus and others distinguish and oppose these. Wherefore, adhering to this exposition, St. Gregory, in the second book of the Morals, chapter 1, expounds it mystically thus: "He who forcefully presses the udders to draw out milk, expresses butter, etc. For we forcefully press the udders when we weigh the words of sacred eloquence with subtle understanding, and by this pressing, while we seek milk, we find butter, because while we seek to be nourished by light understanding, we are anointed with the abundance of inner richness, which however ought not to be done too much or always, lest, while milk is sought from the udders, blood should follow. For often indeed, when certain words of sacred eloquence are discussed more than they ought, they fall into carnal understanding. He draws forth blood who forcefully wrings out, because that becomes carnal which is perceived from excessive discussion of the spirit." To this pertains that saying of St. Gregory of Nazianzus, in oration 1: "Churn milk, says he, and it will become butter, that is, seek diligently, and perhaps thou wilt find something more succulent in these things." Furthermore, this maxim is general, wherefore it can be adapted to various cases, as to plagiarizing teachers raging against their disciples and punishing errors with bloody blows; to confessors who constrain penitents with excessive penances and precepts; to rectors who strangle their subjects with excessive laws, rebukes, and overly rigid discipline, to whom this applies: "If thou straitest, it will burst forth;" for these indeed drive their subjects either into desperation or into fury and rebellion, and are the cause or occasion of many crimes, such as murmurings, detraction, disobedience, conspiracies, etc. To prefects who are too severe toward soldiers; to tax collectors who exact and wring out excessive tribute; to magistrates who rage against citizens, etc. Whence Dionysius: "By these things, says he, it is taught that we ought not to demand something from another too importunately, nor to trouble him who is of good will immoderately, or to rebuke him too sharply, lest he be exasperated and deny entirely what was asked, and thus the bowels of mercy be extracted from him, which we express by the name of butter, and he lose the life of the soul (which is the grace of God)." Hence Seneca speaks: Ask nothing which thou wilt deny; deny nothing which thou wilt ask. And likewise: Fury is made by patience often injured. And: Again a good mind injured, is angered much more gravely. Whence St. Gregory in his letter to Augustine, Bishop of the English, as it is found in distinction IV, chapter final, prescribing to the clergy that they begin the fast of Lent from the Sunday of Quinquagesima, makes an exception for laypeople and seculars, who on that Sunday and the two following days are accustomed to celebrate Bacchanalia and to gorge themselves with wine and meat: "Nor can they be turned away from such a custom, and therefore they ought to be left to their own nature with pardon, lest perhaps they become worse if they are prohibited from such a custom; for as Solomon says: He that much wrings out, draweth forth blood." Thus St. Gregory. Finally, examples of this opinion are found in Julius Caesar, who, with excessive arrogance, mocking the senate and not rising for the senators who greeted him, and arrogating to himself perpetual dictatorship, the name of Emperor, the cognomen of Father of his Country, royal power, a statue among kings, a seat in the orchestra, indeed a golden throne in the senate house, temples, altars, statues, a pulvinar, a flamen, etc., brought upon himself the anger and envy of all, with the result that when sixty senators conspired for his death, he was stabbed with twenty-three wounds in the senate house, slain as a tyrant and oppressor of his country, as Suetonius narrates at length in his Life, cap. LXXVI and seq. And in C. Caligula, who, when he raged against anyone, proceeded at will with lust, robberies, extortions, and murders, and being warned by his grandmother Antonia to conduct himself more modestly, as though it were not enough to disobey: "Remember," said he, "that all things are permitted to me and against all; let them hate, provided they fear." Angered at the crowd opposing him, he exclaimed: "Would that the Roman people had but one neck," so that he might cut it off with a single blow. Smiling at Cassius Chærea, a tribune and his intimate, when asked the reason, he said: "I smile," said he, "because your head is in my hand, so that I may take it from you at will;" wherefore, being forestalled by the same man, he was struck down with a sword and slain.
Machine translation from the Latin, not reviewed.
30:8
… easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven (Mt. 19-22). The heartfelt warning against the dangers of wealth does not therefore by that very fact mean an exaltation of poverty as such (cf. Prov. 30:8-9).
30:10
… In this sense speak Sacred Scripture (cf., for example, Ps. 14:3; 33:14; Prov. 20:19; 30:10; Wis. 1:11 agg.; I Tim. 3:2; Rom. 1:30; II Cor. 12:20; Inc. 4:11, etc.) and patristic tradition (especially the Fathers' commentaries on the cited biblical passages).
30:15
… sheol, an immense cavern, as large as a region (Job 10, 21-22; Ps. 88, 13), divided into sectors of varying depth (Is. 14, 15; Ez. 32, 23), poetically conceived as a deep abyss, almost an insatiable monster (Ps. 144, 7; Prov. 1, 12; 27, 20; 30, 15), which no longer gives back its prey (Job 7, 9; 14, 12; 16, 22; 17, 13-16). A dark place, where "nullus ordo sed sempiternus horror inhabitat" (Job 10, 21), it is described as …
… Lagrange, La parabole en dehors de l'Évangile, in Revue biblique, 17 (1908), pp. 198-212, 342-67; D. Buzy, Introduction aux paraboles évangéliques (Études bibliques), Parigi 1912, pp. 52-112; id., Les maschals numériques de la sangane et de l'almah. Prov. 30, 15 sg., 18 sgg., in Revue biblique, 42 (1933), pp. 5-13; O. Eissfeldt, Der Maschal im Alt. Test. …
30:16
Is. 14, 9; Ez. 31, 15. Others prefer to give the root ἐδ'ῶ the meaning popascit, which would indicate an insatiable abyss that devours men, or even a place of interrogation, as it were the dwelling of the spirits that were consulted (cf. Prov. 27, 20; 30, 16; Is. 5, 14; Ps. 6, 6; 89, 49).
… the depths" to God to be delivered (Ps. 129:1; Ecclus. 51:9). The f. personified like death (Job 28:22; Is. 5:14; Ecclus. 14:12-19), is poetically depicted as an insatiable monster with enormous jaws (Is. 5:14; Hab. 2:5; Ps. 141:7; Prov. 1:12; 27:20; 30:16), with a vast belly (Ios. 2:3; Ecclus. 51:5). The fruit of the power of the f.-death is destruction (Os. 13:14 = I Cor. 15:54): v. ABADDON. …
30:18
… The usage of the Hebrew Bible (Gen. 24, 43; Ex. 2, 8; Cant. 1, 2 and 6, 7; Ps. 68 [67], 26; Prov. 30, 18-19) gives the noun 'almāh the sense of a young unmarried woman, who must be supposed intact, as the Septuagint understood, before any interested polemic with Christians, translating it ἡ πάρθενος. …
Douay-Rheims (Challoner) · Vulgata Clementina · original Douay-Rheims (Douay 1609-10), transcription by EEBO-TCP (CC0) · La Sacra Bibbia, tradotta dalla Volgata da Antonio Martini (1769-1781) (LaParola (laparola.net), Martini OSIS text, Public domain (LaParola's electronic edition marks it 'Dominio pubblico')). Public domain.